35001|34984|2018-04-12 11:40:55|mountain man|Re: Isizu C221| Matt, The same thing happened to me on the Wylo 2 group Martin De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 12 avril 2018 11:19:43 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : Re: [origamiboats] Re: Isizu C221     Test...  I responded 3 times over the last few days where the list did not send my response out over the mailing list or store it on the Yahoo Groups.  I am trying to diagnose the problem. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Gordon Schnell gschnell@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 9:46 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Isizu C221     58 HP is ample! On Apr 11, 2018, at 8:42 AM, rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] wrote: Forgot to mention. Mechanic said it was 58 horse power. | 35002|34984|2018-04-12 14:26:30|Darren Bos|Re: Isizu C221| Like all boat things it is a tradeoff.  I was hoping with someone with more diesel experience than me would comment on how oversized you can go before you run into problems with the engine (extra weight aside).  My understanding is that one of the common demises of marine diesel engines is carbon buildup on the piston rings which fouls them, causes a loss of compression and blow-by into the crankcase.  I know enough to know that charging your batteries with the main engine while at anchor doesn't put enough load on the engine and creates this type of fouling.  At some point an engine must be enough oversized that you run into the same problem motoring around at 5 or 6 knots, unless you add extra loads to the engine. It would seem like an oversized engine like this would be a natural match for something like the new Firefly carbon tech lead acid batteries or LiPO4 batteries that could accept really high charge rates from a massive alternator(s). On 18-04-12 08:24 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   First, I did look up the engine horsepower, and the first link I found said 73 hp, and I posted based on that a few days ago -- that went through.   After the feedback on HP from everyone, I looked it up again, and all other references agree -- 58 hp.   So Shane had it right from the start, but my post of that did not go through. Secondly, I entirely forgot about other uses of horsepower other than speed and electricity....  Darren had a really good post that I answered... it never came through.   I am reposting as a test: Darren has a good point with towing -- double the engine and prop can pull two boats of the same size at hull speed, that is really useful.   Then there is motoring into a very strong wind. Then there is motoring into a wind while towing. Then there is rapidly recovering speed between waves when motoring into waves strong enough to stop forward motion of the boat over ground for a moment - the bigger prop will result in a higher acceleration and higher average speed over ground -- sort of like accelerating sharply between stop signs with a car -- it is the fastest way through a series of stop signs.   With a boat though, one can actually, net, be swept backwards if one does not have enough horsepower to accelerate between waves.   This might make the difference getting out of surf, or maintaining more control (water speed over the rudder) when crossing the bar into or out of a channel in heavier waves. Thanks Darren. It would also help in setting larger anchors. It would also help in the docking or dock departure maneuvers that involve vectoring the prop wash with the rudder to result in lateral forces at the stern to hold against or push away from the dock in an unfavourable wind situation. Thinking about what Darren said I am convinced that yes, a bigger engine and prop might come in very handy.   I would still put a truck alternator on it, and a bigger diesel tank and have happier passengers with capacity for greater hotel loads. Come to think about it, incredible high power lighting like a set of halogen car headlights pointed all around from the mast head, might also be something I might add, on an auxiliary switch, so that everyone in 20 miles knows where I am -- for crossing shipping lanes when they are not paying attention. Matt | 35003|34984|2018-04-12 18:01:03|opuspaul|Re: Isizu C221|FWIW, I have had a post not make it through over the last few days.The problem of having a large engine is you need a large prop or you are just wasting horsepower.  A large prop creates a huge amount of drag under sail unless you go to a fully feathering prop.   These are extremely expensive and can be troublesome.   I had a Gori folding prop and ended up getting rid of it.   Maxprops are good but extremely expensive.   I wouldn't want to hit a log with one.   I have motored into large wind and waves many times with my 35 hp Isuzu 3KR1 which is about 1.4 liter displacement.  I turn a small 14 x 10 2 blade prop with a 2 to 1 gearbox.  The small prop and ratio isn't ideal for motoring but it gets me there with little drag under sail.  I think a smaller engine like the smaller Isuzu 23 hp (2KR1) may not do what I want into a headsea without a struggle but the 35hp is enough, even when charging with a large alternator which can draw off 3 or 4 hp.   Larger diesels are very heavy and take up a lot of room so can really screw up an interior.    It is just my opinion but there is no way I would have a 58 or 70 hp diesel in a 36 foot boat unless it was a very good deal and I motored most of the time.    As an aside, Vic Klassen (long gone now but who started Klassen Diesel) told me to ignore hp ratings and just go by displacement.  This has always made sense to me since some of the manufacturers play with their numbers giving hp ratings at rpms the motors will never run.   Diesels are often given hp ratings at a high rpm and then derated.   Yanmar is great at this.   You need to look at the torque curve and hp at the rpm you are going to be using and then compare engines for your application.  Click the link below and you will see that the hp rating vary widely depending on their use.  Nobody will run a boat diesel at 3500 rpm or higher so who cares what the hp is there?  The max I have ever run my engine is about 2500 rpm.   With my small prop and 2 to 1 gearbox, I normally cruise at about 2100.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Isuzu_enginesIsuzu 3KR1 is 1.4 liter and rated at about 30 hp at 2800 rpm when used in a boat.  150kg.Isuzu C240 is 2.4 liter and rated at about 50 hp at 3000 rpm but it varies.  220kg.  Isuzu C221 is about the same size as the C249 but puts out more HP. Older?There were heaps of C240s put in boats.  I believe it used Bosch fuel injection and the fishermen on the west coast loved them.   I have never heard of C221s in boats but I am certainly no expert.  I would talk to Klassen Diesel and see what they think before buying anything.| 35004|34984|2018-04-12 18:01:14|opuspaul|Re: Isizu C221|You are right.  You need to load diesels up and really make them work.  A lot of people screw up their engines by using them to charge batteries only.  I know of one couple who totally screwed their engine by running it for hour after hour just so they could play video games.  It blew black smoke everywhere and had no get up and go.  Just crazy.....---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Like all boat things it is a tradeoff.  I was hoping with someone with more diesel experience than me would comment on how oversized you can go before you run into problems with the engine (extra weight aside).  My understanding is that one of the common demises of marine diesel engines is carbon buildup on the piston rings which fouls them, causes a loss of compression and blow-by into the crankcase. | 35005|34984|2018-04-12 18:27:05|brentswain38|Re: Isizu C221|You could drag most anchors for  boat that size with that kind off HP, even if it has set properly.I remember heading into Dodd  narrows one dark night, and encountering a fishboat coming thru,  heading my way, with a super bright halogen flood light pointing  right at my eyeballs, blinding me. I gave a  blast of  2 million candle power spotlight at their eyeballs,  and they got the message.| 35006|34984|2018-04-12 18:27:13|rockrothwell|Re: Isizu C221|Answered ass this yesterday but it seems the system dumped it..?Anyway, its a 58 hp naturally aspirated isuzu c221 with a borg warner velvet drive 2.9:1 reduction. Its 2.2 litresSort of flying by the seat of me pants and just bought it and brought it to the isuzu geek  in Duncan.Really solid unit with mounts for the gearbox as well. Gearbox casing is cast iron. The wheel that it came with and it was set up for is 21 x 17 = huge.It is however rather older than i thought. Solid as can be but will not have all info for about a week. At this point biggest concern, altho it runs beaut, is the injectn pump. We will see.Also, Does anyone know a good transmission/gearbox mechanic I can get to give the gearbox a thourough going over.. Mid island area?| 35007|34984|2018-04-12 18:45:42|brentswain38|Re: Isizu C221|A diver I know, had problem starting hookah engine. A mechanic found he was running it on low speed, then shutting it down ,never reving it up.The mechanic said "When you have been running it for  along time on low speed ,give it a blast of high speed, no load, until the exhaust smoke clears,  before shutting it down." He started doing that, and had no further problems. I do that all the time.Tom Norhtcott, at a diesel course, was warned about not running his fishboat engine on low speed for  too long. The teacher said "On a dark windy night with no one around rev her up,  full speed, until the smoke clears. When he went back,  fired it up and reved it all the way up,  the marina was filled with smoke,  until it cleared ,and she ran clean  after that .| 35008|34984|2018-04-12 19:08:23|Matt Malone|Re: Isizu C221| Depends on the anchor whether you want to give only one good tug, or purposely pull it 5 feet so it really burrows in and buries itself.  I was getting at, with extra horsepower, one has the tools to do it the best way for the anchor you choose, not to pull until the boat stops moving. Yes, really bright lights can be ignorant, that is why they would be on a switch -- there when you need them.   I was out once and I heard a big speed boat coming at me at night, with no lights.   I had proper lighting but I was close to shore, so, I was concerned the lights of houses, cottages and businesses might be confusing them.   The boat stopped some distance away from me, maybe half a mile, and I lost its location when the engine shut down.   A couple minutes later it started back up and I perceived it was coming straight at me at high speed -- I was in a converging bay that became a channel, so, no doubt they were going to pass very close in any case.   Out came the 1/1.5 million candle-power spot light.  First I illuminated my sails, then when there was no change in pitch on the engine after a couple of seconds, I hit the approaching boat.  Why go that fast with no running lights at all?   It seemed madness.  As soon as the light hit them, they immediately pulled a wide circle around me careful not to get close enough for me to read the registration.   Still no lights.    The million / 2 million candle spotlight is a must in the cockpit.   In my case, from the time the boat started up again, until the time he passed, it was maybe 35-40 seconds, not time to find a spot light in a locker when the other boat is going at least 45 knots, maybe 60.   I swear his bow was so high out of the water, with no fly deck, he could not see any of my nav lights, only my masthead.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 6:27 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Isizu C221     You could drag most anchors for  boat that size with that kind off HP, even if it has set properly. I remember heading into Dodd  narrows one dark night, and encountering a fishboat coming thru,  heading my way, with a super bright halogen flood light pointing  right at my eyeballs, blinding me. I gave a  blast of  2 million candle power spotlight at their eyeballs,  and they got the message. | 35009|34984|2018-04-12 21:24:51|Brian Stannard|Re: Isizu C221|DarrenWhen sizing a propeller for an engine the ideal is one that allows max engine rpm but not more and not less. For a diesel you would typically cruise at about 80% of full rpm. This would apply to any engine - more horsepower and torque = larger pitch and/or diameter prop. As the engine horsepower increases you reach a point where there is not room for the propeller that it should match to - either in diameter or pitch.  On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Like all boat things it is a tradeoff.  I was hoping with someone with more diesel experience than me would comment on how oversized you can go before you run into problems with the engine (extra weight aside).  My understanding is that one of the common demises of marine diesel engines is carbon buildup on the piston rings which fouls them, causes a loss of compression and blow-by into the crankcase.  I know enough to know that charging your batteries with the main engine while at anchor doesn't put enough load on the engine and creates this type of fouling.  At some point an engine must be enough oversized that you run into the same problem motoring around at 5 or 6 knots, unless you add extra loads to the engine. It would seem like an oversized engine like this would be a natural match for something like the new Firefly carbon tech lead acid batteries or LiPO4 batteries that could accept really high charge rates from a massive alternator(s). On 18-04-12 08:24 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   First, I did look up the engine horsepower, and the first link I found said 73 hp, and I posted based on that a few days ago -- that went through.   After the feedback on HP from everyone, I looked it up again, and all other references agree -- 58 hp.   So Shane had it right from the start, but my post of that did not go through. Secondly, I entirely forgot about other uses of horsepower other than speed and electricity....  Darren had a really good post that I answered... it never came through.   I am reposting as a test: Darren has a good point with towing -- double the engine and prop can pull two boats of the same size at hull speed, that is really useful.   Then there is motoring into a very strong wind. Then there is motoring into a wind while towing. Then there is rapidly recovering speed between waves when motoring into waves strong enough to stop forward motion of the boat over ground for a moment - the bigger prop will result in a higher acceleration and higher average speed over ground -- sort of like accelerating sharply between stop signs with a car -- it is the fastest way through a series of stop signs.   With a boat though, one can actually, net, be swept backwards if one does not have enough horsepower to accelerate between waves.   This might make the difference getting out of surf, or maintaining more control (water speed over the rudder) when crossing the bar into or out of a channel in heavier waves. Thanks Darren. It would also help in setting larger anchors. It would also help in the docking or dock departure maneuvers that involve vectoring the prop wash with the rudder to result in lateral forces at the stern to hold against or push away from the dock in an unfavourable wind situation. Thinking about what Darren said I am convinced that yes, a bigger engine and prop might come in very handy.   I would still put a truck alternator on it, and a bigger diesel tank and have happier passengers with capacity for greater hotel loads. Come to think about it, incredible high power lighting like a set of halogen car headlights pointed all around from the mast head, might also be something I might add, on an auxiliary switch, so that everyone in 20 miles knows where I am -- for crossing shipping lanes when they are not paying attention. Matt -- CheersBrian | 35010|34984|2018-04-12 22:26:41|bargemaster24|Re: Isizu C221| I live on a narrowboat and the argument that you should put a load on a diesel engine  is a topic that comes up quiet often among boaters. The engine is made to take high loads but i fail to see why light loads would create problems. Whilst cruising the waterways the engine as to power the boat ,charge the batteries and  provide  hot water. While moored  it is used to charge the batteries and heat water normally an hour each morning Some boaters put the boat in gear to load the engine but in my opinion the wash just erodes the  bank. My own engine is a BMC 1500cc and is 50 odd years old ,In the sixties i worked on these engines as part of my apprenticeship .The dirty injectors  can  cause  loss of power and produce black smoke.  mikeafloat -----Original Message----- From: opusnz@... [origamiboats] To: origamiboats Sent: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 23:01 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Isizu C221 #ygrps-yiv-782125151 #ygrps-yiv-782125151AOLMsgPart_2_67d3aeb6-3364-4bd8-ac70-66faa544a79f td{color:black;}#ygrps-yiv-782125151 .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolReplacedBody .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_ygrp-photo-title{clear:both;font-size:smaller;height:15px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;width:75px;}#ygrps-yiv-782125151 .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolReplacedBody div.ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_ygrp-photo{background-position:center;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-color:white;border:1px solid black;height:62px;width:62px;}#ygrps-yiv-782125151 .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolReplacedBody div.ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-782125151 .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolReplacedBody div.ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-782125151 .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolReplacedBody div.ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-782125151 .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolReplacedBody div.ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#ygrps-yiv-782125151 .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolReplacedBody div.ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_attach-table div.ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_attach-row {clear:both;}#ygrps-yiv-782125151 .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolReplacedBody div.ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_attach-table div.ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_attach-row div {float:left;}#ygrps-yiv-782125151 .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolReplacedBody p {clear:both;padding:15px 0 3px 0;overflow:hidden;}#ygrps-yiv-782125151 .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolReplacedBody div.ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_ygrp-file {width:30px;}#ygrps-yiv-782125151 .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolReplacedBody div.ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_attach-table div.ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_attach-row div div a {text-decoration:none;}#ygrps-yiv-782125151 .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolReplacedBody div.ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_attach-table div.ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_attach-row div div span {font-weight:normal;}#ygrps-yiv-782125151 .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolReplacedBody div.ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_ygrp-file-title {font-weight:bold;}#ygrps-yiv-782125151 #ygrps-yiv-782125151AOLMsgPart_2_67d3aeb6-3364-4bd8-ac70-66faa544a79f td{color:black;}#ygrps-yiv-782125151 .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolReplacedBody #ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#ygrps-yiv-782125151 .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolReplacedBody #ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#ygrps-yiv-782125151 .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolReplacedBody #ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;}#ygrps-yiv-782125151 .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolReplacedBody #ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_ads {margin-bottom:10px;}#ygrps-yiv-782125151 .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolReplacedBody #ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_ad {padding:0 0;}#ygrps-yiv-782125151 .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolReplacedBody #ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_ad p {margin:0;}#ygrps-yiv-782125151 .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolReplacedBody #ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-782125151aolmail_ad a {color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} You are right.  You need to load diesels up and really make them work.  A lot of people screw up their engines by using them to charge batteries only.  I know of one couple who totally screwed their engine by running it for hour after hour just so they could play video games.  It blew black smoke everywhere and had no get up and go.  Just crazy..... ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Like all boat things it is a tradeoff.  I was hoping with someone with more diesel experience than me would comment on how oversized you can go before you run into problems with the engine (extra weight aside).  My understanding is that one of the common demises of marine diesel engines is carbon buildup on the piston rings which fouls them, causes a loss of compression and blow-by into the crankcase. | 35011|34984|2018-04-13 13:29:09|Darren Bos|Re: Isizu C221| I agree that you need to match the engine and prop for max engine rpm.  However, if you set 80% of full rpm for cruising, then with a 50hp engine, you use roughly 40hp and you are running around at hull speed (7.3 knots for a Swain 36) all the time, with the accordingly high fuel consumption.  Coming down about 1 knot in speed yields a large fuel savings.  However, at 6 knots you'd only be using about 20hp.  My question really was, at less than half the rated horsepower are you at risk of carbon build up on the rings?  It seems that running at high load high rpm at least some of the time is important to prevent this. I tried to answer this question myself and came across this thesis, which was a good as info as I found anywhere.  However, it looks like buildup on the rings and cylinders is not a straightforward process and there may not be an neat answer to just how low the load can go before you run into problems.  The thesis is pretty dense, but Table 2-1 on page 16 really has most of the info. With 50hp in a 36 footer, it seems like one or several large alternators, along with an engine driven watermaker would be a good idea. Time to go finish welding up the exhaust for my boat, Darren On 18-04-12 06:24 PM, Brian Stannard brianstannard@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Darren When sizing a propeller for an engine the ideal is one that allows max engine rpm but not more and not less. For a diesel you would typically cruise at about 80% of full rpm.. This would apply to any engine - more horsepower and torque = larger pitch and/or diameter prop. As the engine horsepower increases you reach a point where there is not room for the propeller that it should match to - either in diameter or pitch.  On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Like all boat things it is a tradeoff.  I was hoping with someone with more diesel experience than me would comment on how oversized you can go before you run into problems with the engine (extra weight aside).  My understanding is that one of the common demises of marine diesel engines is carbon buildup on the piston rings which fouls them, causes a loss of compression and blow-by into the crankcase.  I know enough to know that charging your batteries with the main engine while at anchor doesn't put enough load on the engine and creates this type of fouling.  At some point an engine must be enough oversized that you run into the same problem motoring around at 5 or 6 knots, unless you add extra loads to the engine. It would seem like an oversized engine like this would be a natural match for something like the new Firefly carbon tech lead acid batteries or LiPO4 batteries that could accept really high charge rates from a massive alternator(s). | 35012|34984|2018-04-13 14:51:47|brentswain38|Re: Isizu C221|If you can rev your engine up full throttle,then back it down slightly, and she slows down a bit, you are not over propped.If you have to throttle back a long way, before you hear her slow down ,you are definitely over propped, or over pitched.| 35013|34984|2018-04-13 15:55:26|opuspaul|Re: Isizu C221|The big problem as I understand it is really with the rings and cylinder glazing.http://www.fischerpanda.com.sg/uploads/4/3/5/6/43569463/carbon_build-up_and_cylinder_glazing.pdfhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diesel_engine_problems#Internal_glazing_and_carbon_build-up| 35014|34984|2018-04-13 20:21:17|rockrothwell|Re: Isizu C221|Thank you everyone for pitching in. Exellent.The engine and gearbox I bought came with a 21 x 17 prop and is a ""Suzie" put together by klassen diesel.Now have it at the isuzu geek in duncan. It is rather long in the tooth, is going to be a pain in the ass to get it in, gonna bugger up the galley and heads. But the plan is to completely rebuild it.At the same time, even if it was in a commercial trawler, wot maybe 150 hours a year, for 20 year is inly 6,000 hr. They go for 30, hell, even if it was omly 15-18,ooo that still leaves min 9,000 hrs service left in it  or about 15 year. I'll be dead by then.And yes I got it cheap, $2500 and got another few bucks into it.A complete rebuild of the engine would about another $4k.The geek is reseaching and will get back to me next week.But that does not include the gearbpx. Anyone knoe a good gearbox mechanic. It seems fine all but for the rear seal, but best to have it all checked out and put right now and not later| 35015|35015|2018-04-15 13:46:57|inter4905|Inflatable sail iws|inflatedwingsails.com/en/cAnyone heard about that?I wonder what it would do in a force 10!Martin| 35016|35015|2018-04-15 16:21:55|Matt Malone|Re: Inflatable sail iws| Martin, Those sails are really interesting, and entirely new dimension.  The actual shape they take on can potentially be far better than "flat" sails.  There are important differences between these and airplane wings and the differences might prevent them from achieving the efficiency of airfoil shapes on a more rigid structure.   Still, if one is just try to do better than a sail, they might be what one is looking for.   Inflated foil designs are great for paramotors and parachutes because their flight regime is narrow, resulting from a quickly-established equilibrium between forces.  With a parachute, one's downward and forward speed quickly settle into an equilibrium, and barring heavy turbulence, remains in a similar  flow condition until one lands.   The foil remains inflated, and in a design shape, for the entire trip.  The equivalent in sailing might be trade wind sailing where the wind varies little over the course of days.   The net benefit gained with a good design might accumulate substantially over days of sailing making any added complication certainly worth it.   Unfortunately, sailboats are more firmly rooted to the water than the air, and the air is fickle so an equilibrium between the sail and the wind might be more transitory.   One can experience large changes in wind speed and direction.   It is true a simple sail will luff back and forward and tighten sharply and cannot be counted on for performance during these transitions.   Once a sail snaps to shape, its performance, as poor as it might be compared to a 2-surface foil, is realized more instantly.   If the wind speed or direction change has at all deflated, or distorted the foil in a way that requires more time to re-establish shape, this is additional time that the full performance is not realized.   The sails must have drip-holes / vents, or the inflated parts might stow water, making the sail progressively heavier in rain.  These vents are how turbulence might partially collapse /change the foil shape.   The obvious response to wet weather / strong and changeable wind would be to have a different design which would be smaller, and stiffer in the sense of, it would take a greater air disturbance to cause the same deformation of the foil and the same the same fractional performance loss.    It is just a question of engineering and it might always be better than single surface-sails in raw numbers.   At some level of strong weather, the sailor's shift in priorities from performance to simplicity might make them favour a simple sail, even if the 2-surface foil might still be better in some measure.   Matt   From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2018 1:46 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Inflatable sail iws     inflatedwingsails.com/en/c Anyone heard about that? I wonder what it would do in a force 10! Martin | 35017|35015|2018-04-15 18:21:29|opuspaul|Re: Inflatable sail iws|I have never seen it but the junk rig guys experiment a lot and have tried just about anything.   I bet they have discussed it on their groups.  The retractable mast is the thing that seems to me to be the biggest risk for failure but there are few details about how it is done other than that it is in five sections and pneumatic.  If the inflated pressure on the sail gives it strength and rigidity, how is there any strength or rigidity when it is deflated and lowered in heavy winds?   Lowered down it looks like a floppy mess.I like how people experiment so don't want to criticize too much but I would give it ten years and see where they get with the concept :).  I have never been much of a fan of traditional junk rigs but I really respect what David Tyler has done with them.    He has experimented a lot while also doing heaps of miles offshore.  Despite his success (the wing sail really improves performance) it still seems far too complex (and expensive) to me.http://www.junkrigassociation.org/resources/Documents/Hall%20of%20Fame/Hall%20of%20Fame%20-%20David%20Tyler.pdfhttps://avoid.rocks/blog/soft-wing-sails-evolutionary-leap-towards-sailing-bliss-part/---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :inflatedwingsails.com/en/cAnyone heard about that?I wonder what it would do in a force 10!Martin| 35018|34605|2018-04-15 23:59:59|Darren Bos|Re: dry exhaust details| Thanks to everyone who gave advice about dry exhaust.  I suspect my final result was more complicated than some would do, but there are few details of my boat that I thought justified the complexity.  Given that I have an aluminum boat, I have to bolt the exhaust through-hull and rely on silicone to seal it, so I flexibly mounted the exhaust so that any expansion can work its way forward to the flex pipe rather than working at the bolts and silicone and maybe lead to a leak.  My situation is also different from those with a rigidly mounted engine.  I hated the noise from our old rigidly mounted engine, but the complexity of flexible motor mounts led me to include the flex pipe after the exhaust and to make sure the pipe-mounts could allow a little movement. Starting at the engine and moving backward, the first highlight is a bushing to check back-pressure at commissioning and then to house a pyrometer to keep an eye on exhaust temps when the boat is in use.  This first section of exhaust is supported by a strut that leads to the transmission.   After that, is the flex pipe, or bellows, that absorbs motor vibration and that can also compress to absorb the expanding exhaust as it heats up.  I used V-clamps with interlocking male/female flanges to make the flex-pipe easy to replace should it fail.  The inner liner of the flex pipe is super thin, even just my tacks were enough to melt it back and the whole thing required a bit of delicate welding.  After the flex pipe is semi flexible silicone mounts to hold the exhaust in place, but also allow a little movement as it expands with heat.   The green exhaust wrap between the pipe clamp and the pipe is to slow the movement of heat out of the muffler and into the mounts.  I made the silicone bushings for the mounts with a simple mold.  Adding 5% (by weight) cornstarch to the silicone helps it cure rapidly in the mold.  The silicone bushings may also help cut down on vibration noise transmitted from the exhaust to the mounts.  Aft, there is a loop upward almost to deck height.  Before the loop is a resonator (small straight flow muffler with stainless steel packing).  After the loop is a spiral muffler that I made.  The exhaust enters from the top, goes around a sealed spiral 3.5 times and then exits out the bottom.  Thus, any water that splashes up as far as the muffler has to go three times around the spiral and find its way out the top.  Hopefully that is unlikely and it won't find its way through the rest of the exhaust.  The last bit is the through hull.  It is a tube, within a tube design, that limits the transfer of heat to the hull and will hopefully help keep the epoxy coat of the hull in good condition.  I added a spring-loaded flapper to the exhaust to further ensure that water isn't going to find its way into the exhaust.  The flapper may get a coat of silicone if it proves to be noisy.  The yellow bits under the through hull flange are just scraps of foam to act as a temporary spacer.  Once the weather improves I'll repair the epoxy underneath and then use high temperature silicone to seal the exhaust fitting to the hull. Thanks again to everyone who provided advice, Darren | 35019|34984|2018-04-16 13:46:24|rockrothwell|Re: Isizu C221|Hey Darren, Winston clearly used threaded fittings for the 360 coming off the exhaust for 2 reasons I figure. Cheap &easy, but also,  it moves eventually it's gonna  break, this way you only have to replace the busted bit,  again, cheap & easy.I avent ripped it apart to look, but would figure only welding would be through transom n perhaps joining straight bits.Might have to upsize the exhaust meself.Re loading up the engine.Collectively you guys pretty much nailed my understanding of diesels.They want to work, but only when warm. The will work cold, but grudgingly, expensively.Chang the oil. Change 5he oil. .............. Glazing cylinders by underloading, yes, but I'm hoping to avoid that by mounting a hydraulic pump straight out the front of the engineon one of those 3 rubber fingered drive mounts.  No side load on fwd crank pulley & dead simple. Max power your gonna get outta the engine for accessories with the least stress on it. Friend who had a fishpacker sed it saved & solved lotsa problems.Then just run everything off hydraulics, 100amp alternator 4 welder  & another to charge(??), watermaker, winlass, sternroller & the ability to add more & freedom to put em where you like. Save heaps of hasstle. About $250 per device with hose.But also good to give it a good hard run for 10 minutes every 10 hours.5 knotts is comfy for crusing, but the ability to do over 7 could be useful I'm hoping that it will be enough to do 7 in pretty much any conditions (that I'd want to be out in anyway)Size & shape another factor.Most, including my friend with the packer, seem to believe the only way to mount an engine is perfectly in line with the prop shaft.Aside from the fact that access below would be availabe only by assuming the prenatal position if the engine were mounted that way,I think the very concept is abolutely perfectly suited for the "Yottie" ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Thank you everyone for pitching in. Exellent.The engine and gearbox I bought came with a 21 x 17 prop and is a ""Suzie" put together by klassen diesel.Now have it at the isuzu geek in duncan. It is rather long in the tooth, is going to be a pain in the ass to get it in, gonna bugger up the galley and heads. But the plan is to completely rebuild it.At the same time, even if it was in a commercial trawler, wot maybe 150 hours a year, for 20 year is inly 6,000 hr. They go for 30, hell, even if it was omly 15-18,ooo that still leaves min 9,000 hrs service left in it  or about 15 year. I'll be dead by then.And yes I got it cheap, $2500 and got another few bucks into it.A complete rebuild of the engine would about another $4k.The geek is reseaching and will get back to me next week.But that does not include the gearbpx. Anyone knoe a good gearbox mechanic. It seems fine all but for the rear seal, but best to have it all checked out and put right now and not later| 35020|34984|2018-04-16 17:07:33|rockrothwell|Re: Isizu C221|I was ranting on about the engine, got distracted. Hit send.Anyway, was saying that the practice of ligning up an engine perfectly with the shaft is a lotta bullshit that does nothing but keep the marine industry types whos specialty is wet exhausts and raw water cooling so very happyPut the engine anywhere you want it and use cv joints  and shorten or extend the drive shaft as needed. Use cv's, not universals as i have b4, cv's are more rugged, thanks Brent).Same concept exactly. You can safely go 15 degrees outta wack with a universal so would immagine similar with a cv jernt.And get a plumbers block for the end load.This way we can make almost all of little Suzie disappear, the rest we can hide ubder the dining table, have stowage above and exellent all round access should it be needed. Also gain heaps of room aft from it's old home.At least the engine bearers are simple....straight on top of the keel, the strongest part of the whole strucure isn't it?| 35021|34984|2018-04-16 20:02:27|opuspaul|Re: Isizu C221|I have a hydraulic system belted off the front of my engine running an anchor winch and a hydraulic motor for watermaker.   Before you commit to hydraulics, price out the cost of all the hoses, control valves and fittings.   It might surprise you how much it will cost.   Matching flow rates, pressures and hp rating is critical.   Hydraulic motors and pumps are also surprisingly noisy, often giving out a high pitched and annoying whine.| 35022|34984|2018-04-17 08:49:24|garyhlucas|Re: Isizu C221| I used to joke that ‘hydraulic’ is a French word, that means leak! Brent advocates simplicity, no way hydraulics are simple.  Not very efficient either, unless tremendous reduction ratios are needed which is where they excel.   From: mailto:origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 7:49 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Isizu C221     I have a hydraulic system belted off the front of my engine running an anchor winch and a hydraulic motor for watermaker.   Before you commit to hydraulics, price out the cost of all the hoses, control valves and fittings.   It might surprise you how much it will cost.   Matching flow rates, pressures and hp rating is critical.   Hydraulic motors and pumps are also surprisingly noisy, often giving out a high pitched and annoying whine.| 35023|34984|2018-04-17 10:02:27|Matt Malone|Re: Isizu C221| About the annoying whine of hydraulics....  Does yours make this whine when running accessories like the anchor winch or water maker or when you are not using the accessories, just running the engine?   Does the hydraulic circuit to the water maker have a valve, or its it always active?   Do you have a hydraulic accumulator anywhere in the system?  If the whine is caused by high frequency pressure variations coming off the pump, it may be possible to damp them down so they are not as annoying.   http://www.hydraulicspneumatics.com/other-technologies/getting-root-hydraulic-noise-problems They say putting an accumulator on the branch of a T fitting is not very effective.   It seems to me that the poor man's solution might be instead of having the accumulator T-off the pump supply line, reverse the accumulator and appliance feed hoses on the T so that the pump flow enters one side of the T, and the accumulator is in line on the other side of the T.   The bulk flow takes a turn, the vibrations head mainly straight to the accumulator.  This should be more effective in proportion to how much less effective having the accumulator on the branch part of the T is.   The reverse would be used at the hydraulic motor -- flow enters from the branch part of the T, with the accumulator to one side and the motor to the other.   If the motor is generating pulses back on the supply line, these should preferentially go to the accumulator.     Matt   From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 7:49 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Isizu C221     I have a hydraulic system belted off the front of my engine running an anchor winch and a hydraulic motor for watermaker.   Before you commit to hydraulics, price out the cost of all the hoses, control valves and fittings.   It might surprise you how much it will cost.   Matching flow rates, pressures and hp rating is critical.   Hydraulic motors and pumps are also surprisingly noisy, often giving out a high pitched and annoying whine. | 35024|34984|2018-04-17 10:53:33|rockrothwell|Re: Isizu C221|Thanks Paul for the heads up re hydraulic motor sound.Planning on a "least resistance ""system. No filter but a about a 10" long cylindrical screen in the tank. Real fine.Pump runs continious off harmonic equalizer directly and is plummed to pump directly back into the tank in a closed loop, but plumbed to a gallery of valves for your various devices.Have the tank setup and a single drive motor, coulpa valves & was figuring on $2k all in for hydraulics.I guess what you gain in effiency with the hydraulic pump direct off the front of hormonic equalizer, you lose in the inneffiency of hydraulic lines.But if you belt it, how much do you lose? 20%?And what about the side load on fwd main bearing? Any simple way to mitigate sideload?If it's gotta be out the side I'd be inclined to go chain drive, (mayhaps with a double sprocket out front to ballance the load)  Getting complex. Hydraulics sounding cheaper all the time n just insulate heaps....?| 35025|34605|2018-04-17 11:04:14|rockrothwell|Re: dry exhaust details|Hey Darren,That silicon gonna cost you mateI have no idea what it does to aluminum but being so acidic, I wonder.I have nothing but horror stories. Expensive nightmare.It eats copper, on fiberglass after about 2 year it leaks.Absolute crap.but really well advertized!If you are into castings, check out a company called "smooth on" in north delta, or they were.| 35026|34605|2018-04-17 14:14:38|Darren Bos|Re: dry exhaust details| It is during the cure that you get the acetic acid from some one-part silicones.  However, my parts were cured in mold, then washed and mounted.  I suspect it will be fine, but I will keep an eye on them.  Normally, I'd rather not use silicone on a boat, mostly because it is almost impossible to get all the residue off and not even silicone will bond to the old silicone residue. However, even with the tube-in-tube design of my exhaust exit, the sealant around the opening is going to see higher temps and silicone seems like a good choice for this application.  I intend to make the sealant about 1/4 thick.  Most sealants on boats fail because they are squeezed too thin and there isn't enough material to flex with expansion and contraction.  In the past I've used those clear little 3M rubber feet stuck to the back of portholes or window frames before adding the sealant to act as an in situ spacer.  None of those ports ever leaked.  The 3M feet are only about 3mm thick, so I'll have to figure something else out for the exhaust exit.  I'd be happy to hear of any other high-temp sealant options. On 18-04-17 08:03 AM, rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Hey Darren, That silicon gonna cost you mate I have no idea what it does to aluminum but being so acidic, I wonder. I have nothing but horror stories. Expensive nightmare. It eats copper, on fiberglass after about 2 year it leaks. Absolute crap.but really well advertized! If you are into castings, check out a company called "smooth on" in north delta, or they were. | 35027|34605|2018-04-17 22:20:21|opuspaul|Re: dry exhaust details|There are two basic kinds of silicon.  They are normally labeled either neutral cure and acetic cure.   The acetic cure is the common one (it smells like vinegar) and it will corrode metals like aluminum.   The neutral cure one should be safe.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Hey Darren,That silicon gonna cost you mateI have no idea what it does to aluminum but being so acidic, I wonder.I have nothing but horror stories. Expensive nightmare.It eats copper, on fiberglass after about 2 year it leaks.Absolute crap.but really well advertized!If you are into castings, check out a company called "smooth on" in north delta, or they were.| 35028|34984|2018-04-17 22:47:49|opuspaul|Re: Isizu C221|A simple hydraulic gear pump not much larger than your fist can deliver about 3 hp.   This is OK to belt off the front of the engine but any larger than that and you will get belt slippage.  On my setup, the hydraulic pump belt comes on and off when I need it.  You can use electric clutches but it is just something else to fail.   I use a lever arm and it only takes about 30 seconds to flip the belt on or off.  I would go direct drive if I was going to a full time system or wanted more horsepower.   Space can be a problem.   I don't think I would want hydraulic drive for my main propulsion system.   Nothing is really simpler than a gearbox like a Hurth (ZF) direct to a shaft.I have a screen filter in the tank pickup and a 20 micron spin on filter in the low pressure return line to the tank.   Without the 20 micron filter, you are asking for trouble.  Most likely you will have premature wear on the pump and motor or outright failure since it only takes a small bit to stuff them up, even with a gear pump.I love having a hydraulic anchor winch.  It is very fast, reliable and much more powerful than an electric system.  I had one horrible night when I am sure that without it I would have ended up on the beach.   The only problem I have had once I got the bugs worked out was after 15 years I started blowing seals in the motor.   I couldn't figure out what the problem was but it turned out being a collapsing hose in the return line.   So keep in mind that the hoses don't last forever and will have to be replaced.  I would use re-usable fittings and wrap them in Denso (petrolatum) tape rather trying to keep paint on them.   It is much easier and properly wrapped, they won't rust and will last forever.  I bought almost everything from either Princess Auto or Northern Tool.Hydraulics is not rocket science but it must be designed properly to work properly.    I designed my system using the hydraulic books available from Princess Auto.   I don't know if they are still available but I would read as much as you can before putting a system together.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Thanks Paul for the heads up re hydraulic motor sound.Planning on a "least resistance ""system. No filter but a about a 10" long cylindrical screen in the tank. Real fine.Pump runs continious off harmonic equalizer directly and is plummed to pump directly back into the tank in a closed loop, but plumbed to a gallery of valves for your various devices.Have the tank setup and a single drive motor, coulpa valves & was figuring on $2k all in for hydraulics.I guess what you gain in effiency with the hydraulic pump direct off the front of hormonic equalizer, you lose in the inneffiency of hydraulic lines.But if you belt it, how much do you lose? 20%?And what about the side load on fwd main bearing? Any simple way to mitigate sideload?If it's gotta be out the side I'd be inclined to go chain drive, (mayhaps with a double sprocket out front to ballance the load)  Getting complex. Hydraulics sounding cheaper all the time n just insulate heaps....?| 35029|34605|2018-04-18 08:54:56|garyhlucas|Re: dry exhaust details| Years ago I did some extensive research on silicones in trying to get a reliable seal on aluminum to concrete.  What I learned is that silicones get a bad rap primarily from being used wrong. Every building with large glass panes use silicone to seal between the panes with huge expansion and very few problems.  There are two things you must have for a good seal using silicone. The first is a gap large enough to allow the silicone to move from half its thickness to twice its thickness.  A 1/16” gap means motion must be restricted to 1/32” compression or 1/16” stretch.  I work with plastic tanks where the wall thickness varies a lot and we’ve found that gaskets twice the thickness variation on large flanges never leak or fail.  The second thing is shear.  That little tightfitting stainless cover plate to dress up the large gap needed for the silicone or any sealant just shears it right off.  Leave a large gap and use a foam backer deigned for this purpose so you can fill the gap easily.  Yes there are different curing systems for silicones and the ones designed for metals are not acidic.   From: mailto:origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 10:18 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] dry exhaust details     There are two basic kinds of silicon.  They are normally labeled either neutral cure and acetic cure.   The acetic cure is the common one (it smells like vinegar) and it will corrode metals like aluminum.   The neutral cure one should be safe. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Hey Darren, That silicon gonna cost you mate I have no idea what it does to aluminum but being so acidic, I wonder. I have nothing but horror stories. Expensive nightmare. It eats copper, on fiberglass after about 2 year it leaks. Absolute crap.but really well advertized! If you are into castings, check out a company called &qu ot;smooth on" in north delta, or they were.| 35030|34605|2018-04-18 09:44:45|Matt Malone|Re: dry exhaust details| Good discussion on silicones, and using the right one, and using it properly. I second that gap and silicone thickness is very important.  When I bed anything, I get it really clean, with a sanded finish, then apply a thick layer of silicon as a squat pyramid.  Then I lower my object onto it carefully so the silicone pyramid progressively squishes, providing no (fewer) air bubbles.  I let the silicone fully cure as a thick layer before torquing the bolts.  I have yet to have to bed something a second time.   I have had good experience with even premium hardware store silicone (acidic). I have used red high temperature silicone too, same pointers. Matt From: gary.lucas@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 08:57 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] dry exhaust details To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Years ago I did some extensive research on silicones in trying to get a reliable seal on aluminum to concrete.  What I learned is that silicones get a bad rap primarily from being used wrong. Every building with large glass panes use silicone to seal between the panes with huge expansion and very few problems.  There are two things you must have for a good seal using silicone. The first is a gap large enough to allow the silicone to move from half its thickness to twice its thickness.  A 1/16” gap means motion must be restricted to 1/32” compression or 1/16” stretch.  I work with plastic tanks where the wall thickness varies a lot and we’ve found that gaskets twice the thickness variation on large flanges never leak or fail.  The second thing is shear.  That little tightfitting stainless cover plate to dress up the large gap needed for the silicone or any sealant just shears it right off.  Leave a large gap and use a foam backer deigned for this purpose so you can fill the gap easily.  Yes there are different curing systems for silicones and the ones designed for metals are not acidic.   From: mailto:origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 10:18 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] dry exhaust details     There are two basic kinds of silicon.  They are normally labeled either neutral cure and acetic cure.   The acetic cure is the common one (it smells like vinegar) and it will corrode metals like aluminum.   The neutral cure one should be safe. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Hey Darren, That silicon gonna cost you mate I have no idea what it does to aluminum but being so acidic, I wonder. I have nothing but horror stories. Expensive nightmare. It eats copper, on fiberglass after about 2 year it leaks. Absolute crap.but really well advertized! If you are into castings, check out a company called &qu ot;smooth on" in north delta, or they were. | 35031|34605|2018-04-18 11:20:13|rockrothwell|Re: dry exhaust details|Clearly you know much more than I re silicon. Good luck| 35032|34984|2018-04-19 11:49:43|rockrothwell|Re: Isizu C221|Thank you Paul for yet anothet exellent disertation.Was it you who said that hydraulics are not simple (which kinda works cross purposes to the Brentboat mentality). Not in design perhaps but they sure simplify things when it picks up.That little Suzie is sweet. Got a call from the mechanic whilst he's still researching who raved. Confirmed it was the same donk used by the squillion in Thermocool reefeer units that go 30k between service and that parts still available. Got a buyer waiting...But it's 47" all up, plus the hydraulic  pump...... under the companionway steps & goodbye galley, heads & access on the stb'd side, under the dining table (it doesnt collapse into a bunk so not a setee) and it's a complete refigue down below having to not quite gut the lot.Mechanic said I'd have no problem selling it as is, or rebuilt, thankfully, as I'm reconsidering my options. Got a line on kubota in good nick....Even if it's only the winlass fwd, I'm going hydraulic. Got most of the bits for that anyway, it's all the other add ons that are gonna add cost & add complexity- got the book from princess Assholes (screwed me properly once, cheap but LAST choice) and sourcing a hydraulics geek.I try to avoid belts if I can, direct or chain drive is worth the extra. Can get more power with less strain/wearb & more dependable. But the room available, etc... Any idea how much power can be drawn for accessories off the pully fwd if it's direct drive off the front?Have been told no need for external filter, but a 20 mic on the return is gonna cost nothing in power to run & doubt there'd be any whine with no device running. Cheap insurance. water maker is the device that'd be run longest, but you got the engine running anyway, that's what ear protection is for.Gonna go with metal plumbing as much as possible & reusable fittings & denso. Thanx.| 35033|34984|2018-04-20 14:40:16|brentswain38|Re: Isizu C221|One can resolve the space and access to the engine  problem by redoing the interior around the engine, with removable panels. Quite simple !| 35034|34984|2018-04-20 14:43:40|Aethiopicus|Re: Isizu C221| That engine is the smaller bore version of the engine I've in my boat the c240 that one however also has the advantage of being used in 1981–1982 Chevy Luv and the 1981-1987 Isuzu Pups, quarter ton diesel pickups that you rarely see in canada but are in the states, so in theory you should be able to go to any car parts store and order parts for it, you just have to lie and tell them it's for a 1987 isuzu pup and don't tell them it's for a boat otherwise they'll say they can't help you As for driving off the crankshaft pulleys I don't really know how much load you can put on it but I doubt a hydraulic pump would be too much. As i couldn't find an Eight inch pulley (for the weldernator) that was made to fit the existing one on it I had a 1" keyed stub shaft made up and on that I attached a Browning taper-loc pulley to. | 35035|34984|2018-04-20 14:51:19|brentswain38|Re: Isizu C221|Main bearings take huge side loads with  pistons banging away on them thousands of times per minute. By comparison, belts are very small change.| 35036|34984|2018-04-20 14:55:59|brentswain38|Re: Isizu C221|I  have all the parts to  go hydraulic on my anchor winch, have had for years. What makes me reluctant is hydraulics make it extremely easy to seriously injure yourself , in remote areas.Last summer a friend lost  finger to a hydraulic anchor winch. Very little chance of that with a hand winch. Not making things  too easy, saves yuppies a fortune in gym fees.| 35037|34605|2018-04-20 15:15:12|brentswain38|Re: dry exhaust details|One could weld an aluminium 2 inch sch 40 pipe at the right angle, thru the transom, then run a 1 1//2 inch sch 40 thru it, for the exhaust pipe, with the space between them filled with silicone, pumped thru holes in the sch 40 pipe, drilled in  for that purpose. That would also give you  some flex at that point.| 35038|34984|2018-04-20 15:24:46|brentswain38|Re: Isizu C221|The hydraulic drives on Vancouver Harbour Sea Buses make a constant annoying whine whenever they  are underway. If they had a solution they would have used it by now.| 35039|35039|2018-04-22 19:05:18|aguysailing|Mainsail wanted used|Used mainsail wanted.   I am looking to replace my old mainsail 41'luff, 15' foot, 43'7" leech.   The sail had plastic insert sliders 1 5/8 x 15/16 inches and 2 reef points.I did find a used sail off a racing boat that has a bolt rope at the luff and no reef points.  It is located in Sydney at a used sail shop.  Just wondering if a grommet set to put in grommets beside the bolt rope would be strong enough for sliders?   And as for making reef points ... I have the old rings but not the sewing kit unless something else may suit.    .... thanks| 35040|35039|2018-04-23 11:35:57|rockrothwell|Re: Mainsail wanted used|What is the name of the used sail sshop in Sydney?The small gromets might work if you re-enfoce the hell outta it, but a big honkin' gromet that a sailmaker would use hydraulic press would be best.Got a helluva deal on a hand crank Singer sewing machine from a guy in south surry, a sewing machine geek. Who'd a thunk?Steve @ 778 317 5543 & he got me all sorted with info, manuals, wot needles & specifically wot thread for $100. | 35041|35039|2018-04-23 19:06:17|brentswain38|Re: Mainsail wanted used|usedsailloft.com was , I believe, the name.One can make a frame up to take a hydraulic jack, and make up dies to press in gromets---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :What is the name of the used sail sshop in Sydney?The small gromets might work if you re-enfoce the hell outta it, but a big honkin' gromet that a sailmaker would use hydraulic press would be best.Got a helluva deal on a hand crank Singer sewing machine from a guy in south surry, a sewing machine geek. Who'd a thunk?Steve @ 778 317 5543 & he got me all sorted with info, manuals, wot needles & specifically wot thread for $100. | 35042|34605|2018-04-27 12:17:14|rockrothwell|Re: Making your comment clear in context|Hi Mat,Guilt as charged, though not intentionally.As mmentioned in earlier posts, big brother will not allow me to spell names of family.Had to enter your name 4 times until it was not " corrected" on the 5th go.Same sorta bullshit with yahoo. In the email, in the origami group. Dropping messages, needing multiple repeats of keystokes & prompts.The only compensation is you guys. Your comment, help, contacts. Tremendous.But I have issues with the method of communication. Sorry to rant, will persevereCheers,Shane| 35043|35043|2018-04-29 18:25:15|brentswain38|36 single keeler for sale|Here is one of my 36 footers for sale. The owner, an Alaskan, has cruised  to Australia and back in her. Now he wants to build a twin keel version, for  Alaska cruising and fishing. https://anchorage.craigslist.org/boa/d/brent-swain-36-pilothouse/6560698726.html| 35044|35044|2018-04-30 17:48:43|jhess314|Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?|Seeing Brent's post for someone wanting to sell their single-keel boat so they could make a twin-keel boat got me to wondering. I like the idea of being able to dry out level, but I seldom see twin-keeled boats for sale. How big of a headache would it be to cut off a fin keel on a metal boat (not necessarily a BS) and replace it with a twin or bilge keel? How much of a discount on the cost of a used metal boat would be needed to pay for the necessary changes?| 35045|35044|2018-04-30 19:29:15|mountain man|Re: Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?| There were some threads since a year about that kind of conversion De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de j.hess@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 30 avril 2018 17:26:56 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?     Seeing Brent's post for someone wanting to sell their single-keel boat so they could make a twin-keel boat got me to wondering. I like the idea of being able to dry out level, but I seldom see twin-keeled boats for sale. How big of a headache would it be to cut off a fin keel on a metal boat (not necessarily a BS) and replace it with a twin or bilge keel? How much of a discount on the cost of a used metal boat would be needed to pay for the necessary changes? | 35046|34605|2018-04-30 20:34:09|Darren Bos|Re: dry exhaust details| Brent, my understanding is that the insulation for your dry exaust goes 1.5" fiberglass batting, aluminum foil, fiberglass tape, silicone coating.  What is the purpose of the aluminum foil?  Thanks in advance, Darren | 35047|35044|2018-04-30 20:41:44|opuspaul|Re: Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?|I wouldn't go to the expense, time or effort.  Just make up some sheer legs.  You could probably get away with one but I would have two on each side.  I made some that clamp to the scuppers.  I haven't used them in the mud yet on a tide but they have worked well when hauled out or moving the boat with a crane.http://www.atomvoyages.com/articles/improvement-projects/261-giving-your-boat-some-legs.html---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : There were some threads since a year about that kind of conversionDe : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de j.hess@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 30 avril 2018 17:26:56 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?  Seeing Brent's post for someone wanting to sell their single-keel boat so they could make a twin-keel boat got me to wondering. I like the idea of being able to dry out level, but I seldom see twin-keeled boats for sale. How big of a headache would it be to cut off a fin keel on a metal boat (not necessarily a BS) and replace it with a twin or bilge keel? How much of a discount on the cost of a used metal boat would be needed to pay for the necessary changes? #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ads {margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ad {padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ad p {margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ad a {color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_hd {margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_actions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_activity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_activity span {font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_activity span:x_first-child {text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_activity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_activity span span {color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_activity span .ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_underline {text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 .ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_attach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 .ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_attach div a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 .ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_attach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 .ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_attach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 .ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_attach label a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 .ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_bold {font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 .ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_bold a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 dd.ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_last p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 dd.ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_last p span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 dd.ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_last p span.ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_yshortcuts {margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 div.ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_attach-table div div a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 div.ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_attach-table {width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 div.ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 div.ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_file-title a:x_active, #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 div.ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_file-title a:x_hover, #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 div.ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_file-title a:x_visited {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 div.ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 div.ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_photo-title a:x_active, #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 div.ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_photo-title a:x_hover, #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 div.ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_photo-title a:x_visited {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 div#ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_yshortcuts {font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 .ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_green {color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 .ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_MsoNormal {margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 o {font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_photos div {float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_photos div div {border:1px solid #666666;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_photos div label {color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_reco-category {font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_reco-desc {font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 .ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_replbq {margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-actbar div a:x_first-child {margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 input, #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 textarea {font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_logo {padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-msg p a {font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_attach-count span {color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_reco-head {color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-reco {margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ov li a {font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ov li {font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ov ul {margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-text {font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-text p {margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-text tt {font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-1351401371 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1351401371ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-vital ul li:x_last-child {border-right:none!important;}| 35048|35044|2018-04-30 20:46:33|opuspaul|Re: Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?|My sheer legs are made from heavy angle iron welded to all thread rod.  They bolt to fence posts.  You could carry the brackets with you and then just get some fence posts when you want to haul out.  There are some photos here:https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/origamiboats/photos/albums/1756648977---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I wouldn't go to the expense, time or effort.  Just make up some sheer legs.  You could probably get away with one but I would have two on each side.  I made some that clamp to the scuppers.  I haven't used them in the mud yet on a tide but they have worked well when hauled out or moving the boat with a crane.http://www.atomvoyages.com/articles/improvement-projects/261-giving-your-boat-some-legs.html---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : There were some threads since a year about that kind of conversionDe : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de j.hess@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 30 avril 2018 17:26:56 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?  Seeing Brent's post for someone wanting to sell their single-keel boat so they could make a twin-keel boat got me to wondering. I like the idea of being able to dry out level, but I seldom see twin-keeled boats for sale. How big of a headache would it be to cut off a fin keel on a metal boat (not necessarily a BS) and replace it with a twin or bilge keel? How much of a discount on the cost of a used metal boat would be needed to pay for the necessary changes? #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ads {margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ad {padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ad p {margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ad a {color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_hd {margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_actions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_activity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_activity span {font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_activity span:x_first-child {text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_activity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_activity span span {color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_activity span .ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_underline {text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 .ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_attach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 .ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_attach div a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 .ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_attach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 .ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_attach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 .ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_attach label a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 .ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_bold {font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 .ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_bold a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 dd.ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_last p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 dd.ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_last p span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 dd.ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_last p span.ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_yshortcuts {margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 div.ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_attach-table div div a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 div.ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_attach-table {width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 div.ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 div.ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_file-title a:x_active, #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 div.ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_file-title a:x_hover, #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 div.ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_file-title a:x_visited {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 div.ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 div.ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_photo-title a:x_active, #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 div.ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_photo-title a:x_hover, #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 div.ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_photo-title a:x_visited {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 div#ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_yshortcuts {font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 .ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_green {color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 .ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_MsoNormal {margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 o {font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_photos div {float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_photos div div {border:1px solid #666666;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_photos div label {color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_reco-category {font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_reco-desc {font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 .ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_replbq {margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-actbar div a:x_first-child {margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 input, #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 textarea {font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_logo {padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-msg p a {font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_attach-count span {color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_reco-head {color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-reco {margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ov li a {font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ov li {font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ov ul {margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-text {font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-text p {margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-text tt {font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-1131376149 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083 #ygrps-yiv-1131376149ygrps-yiv-1394172492ygrps-yiv-1382628083x_ygrp-vital ul li:x_last-child {border-right:none!important;}| 35049|35044|2018-04-30 21:02:34|Matt Malone|Re: Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?| Why would you cut off the fin and put on bilge keels?  If you are just looking to dry out level, you just need to support the boat.  Yes bilge keels are more robust than spindly beach legs, but if you are into hull welding the sockets or brackets for far stronger legs are a lot less work.  Say you put a 150 pound budget to two legs.  75 pounds of steel say 5 feet long bolted near the waterline with braces.  That is potentially very strong. Alternately it could be like a 2 D craddle that clamps beam-wise on the boat so your boat has a cross-shaped footing on the bottom - the keel fore-aft, the frame beamwise.  150 pounds would go a long way on that too.  You could assemble it at the bow.  Using sealed tubes it could be 40 pounds in the water.  It could be form-fitted to fit two spots on the boat, one just ahead and one just behind the greatest beam, grasping the keel.  Lower it in, walk it back to its station and transport-truck cargo strap it up against the hull and keel with the strap going over the cabin. Matt From: j.hess@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 30, 17:48 Subject: [origamiboats] Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Seeing Brent's post for someone wanting to sell their single-keel boat so they could make a twin-keel boat got me to wondering. I like the idea of being able to dry out level, but I seldom see twin-keeled boats for sale. How big of a headache would it be to cut off a fin keel on a metal boat (not necessarily a BS) and replace it with a twin or bilge keel? How much of a discount on the cost of a used metal boat would be needed to pay for the necessary changes? | 35050|35044|2018-04-30 21:21:48|jhess314|Re: Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?|Thanks for all the sheer legs ideas. They certainly could be good idea for occasional use, under controlled conditions. But I prefer the stability of twin keels under adverse conditions, and so was wondering how much trouble it would be to retrofit twin keels. Here is one reason I'm less than enthusiastic about sheer legs. :)https://s7.postimg.cc/voir5q0jf/Boat_Leg_with_Keel_Too_Far_Back.jpg https://s7.postimg.cc/voir5q0jf/Boat_Leg_with_Keel_Too_F... View on s7.postimg.cc Preview by Yahoo  | 35051|35044|2018-04-30 21:34:14|opuspaul|Re: Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?|They didn't know what they are doing.  If I was only using two legs, I would put them forward of the leading edge of the keel about where the mast is located or add a prop under the bow.  Paul---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Thanks for all the sheer legs ideas. They certainly could be good idea for occasional use, under controlled conditions. But I prefer the stability of twin keels under adverse conditions, and so was wondering how much trouble it would be to retrofit twin keels. Here is one reason I'm less than enthusiastic about sheer legs. :)https://s7.postimg.cc/voir5q0jf/Boat_Leg_with_Keel_Too_Far_Back.jpg https://s7.postimg.cc/voir5q0jf/Boat_Leg_with_Keel_Too_F... View on s7.postimg.cc Preview by Yahoo  | 35052|35044|2018-04-30 21:39:08|opuspaul|Re: Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?|Looking at the picture again, think  about it as a tripod.   They don't have enough spread fore and aft.   The center of gravity is further forward than people think.   With such a short keel, I would feel much safer with  4 legs.   | 35053|35043|2018-05-01 07:08:45|Maxime Camirand|Re: 36 single keeler for sale|For some reason, Craigslist is telling me the post has been flagged for removal. On 30 April 2018 at 06:25, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Here is one of my 36 footers for sale. The owner, an Alaskan, has cruised  to Australia and back in her. Now he wants to build a twin keel version, for  Alaska cruising and fishing. https://anchorage.craigslist. org/boa/d/brent-swain-36- pilothouse/6560698726.html | 35054|35044|2018-05-01 07:24:53|Matt Malone|Re: Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?| Consider that the boat floats, all of the weight is above the bottom of the twin keels, and the separation between the keels is small in comparison to every other dimension of the boat.   It is not hard to see that in the wrong conditions one could end up on one side even with twin keels.  One big wave at the wrong moment, and some trip hazard on the bottom.    It is probable one would have to be more careful with shear legs, depending on the design.   But again, depending on design, they might provide far wider footing and more stability.  There is no limit to ingenuity for something that does not have to be part of the hull form at all times. Matt From: j.hess@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 30, 21:21 Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Thanks for all the sheer legs ideas. They certainly could be good idea for occasional use, under controlled conditions. But I prefer the stability of twin keels under adverse conditions, and so was wondering how much trouble it would be to retrofit twin keels. Here is one reason I'm less than enthusiastic about sheer legs. :) https://s7.postimg.cc/voir5q0jf/Boat_Leg_with_Keel_Too_Far_Back.jpg https://s7.postimg.cc/voir5q0jf/Boat_Leg_with_Keel_Too_F... View on s7.postimg.cc Preview by Yahoo   | 35055|35044|2018-05-01 07:32:54|Matt Malone|Re: Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?| Certainly with that keel shape in the photo.    Leg design depends on the boat.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 9:33 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?     They didn't know what they are doing.  If I was only using two legs, I would put them forward of the leading edge of the keel about where the mast is located or add a prop under the bow.  Paul ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Thanks for all the sheer legs ideas. They certainly could be good idea for occasional use, under controlled conditions. But I prefer the stability of twin keels under adverse conditions, and so was wondering how much trouble it would be to retrofit twin keels. Here is one reason I'm less than enthusiastic about sheer legs. :) https://s7.postimg.cc/voir5q0jf/Boat_Leg_with_Keel_Too_Far_Back.jpg https://s7.postimg.cc/voir5q0jf/Boat_Leg_with_Keel_Too_F... View on s7.postimg.cc Preview by Yahoo   | 35056|35044|2018-05-01 07:38:12|Matt Malone|Re: Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?| With such a small footing area, I would be concerned about yawing instability: the whole boat yaws around the keel contact, all the legs lean over and down she goes.   Particularly when the tide is washing and exposing the material the keel is standing on.   I would be inclined to have at least one leg as a bipod, possibly at the bow (bipod oriented beam-wise), to prevent yawing, and then 2 legs that are just columns.   A structure that locks into a longer keel than the one in the photo (boat tipped on its bow on a cut-away keel) would prevent yawing because it was locked to the keel.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 9:39 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?     Looking at the picture again, think  about it as a tripod.   They don't have enough spread fore and aft.   The center of gravity is further forward than people think.   With such a short keel, I would feel much safer with  4 legs.    | 35057|35043|2018-05-01 07:38:49|Matt Malone|Re: 36 single keeler for sale| Me too. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Maxime Camirand maxcamirand@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 7:08 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] 36 single keeler for sale     For some reason, Craigslist is telling me the post has been flagged for removal. On 30 April 2018 at 06:25, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Here is one of my 36 footers for sale. The owner, an Alaskan, has cruised  to Australia and back in her. Now he wants to build a twin keel version, for  Alaska cruising and fishing. https://anchorage.craigslist. org/boa/d/brent-swain-36- pilothouse/6560698726.html | 35058|35044|2018-05-01 09:29:48|jhess314|Re: Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?|Matt,Your points are well taken, but if I had to leave a boat unattended for a number of tide cycles, or if bottom conditions were gnarly, I still think that twin keels would be preferable. I suppose one could go with a belt-and-suspenders approach and go both with twin keels AND sheer legs. 8-)I'm hoping Brent will weigh in on the topic, both the value of twin keels over single keels, as well as the viability of converting a fin keeler to a twin/bilge keeler.For what it's worth, here is an argument someone has made regarding the hydrodynamics of bilge keels.http://www.brayyachtdesign.bc.ca/article_twinkeels.htmlJohn---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Consider that the boat floats, all of the weight is above the bottom of the twin keels, and the separation between the keels is small in comparison to every other dimension of the boat.   It is not hard to see that in the wrong conditions one could end up on one side even with twin keels.  One big wave at the wrong moment, and some trip hazard on the bottom.    It is probable one would have to be more careful with shear legs, depending on the design.   But again, depending on design, they might provide far wider footing and more stability.  There is no limit to ingenuity for something that does not have to be part of the hull form at all times. Matt   | 35059|35044|2018-05-01 11:19:51|Matt Malone|Hydrodynamics of bilge keelers| John, The article is definitely interesting and raised many points, many pluses, that are new to me.     John's link again is here: http://www.brayyachtdesign.bc.ca/article_twinkeels.html I recall the bilge keeler that was entered into the Sunday Times Golden Globe Race was judged to be entirely unsuitable as an actively sailing open ocean racer in the expected conditions even by modern commentators by virtue of the fact that it was a bilge keeler alone.  They must have been seeing something about that boat in particular, that was not representative of the class of boats, or some aspect that outweighed the efficiency gains possible according to this article.    I note that one of the photos in the article looks like a Colin Archer deep hull/keel, with an over-sized fin/small bilge keel sticking out.   So that would be a tri-keel ?   If this qualifies as a bilge keel, instead of a "bilge fin" then it is less surprising that possibly different designs can have the list of benefits given in the article ... but then it is still possible that no one design can have all of the listed advantages.   I did not see anything about robustness against gusts.  A single keel boat loses both sail effectiveness and keel effectiveness as it heels.   This will make an-already heeled single keeler in equilibrium with average conditions less responsive to sudden gusts, and this may be a good thing.  This allows the excessive energy of the gust to spill away with less affect on the boat.  It sounds more comfortable to me both in the reassurance sense that there is robustness, and in the literal comfort sense. On the other hand, the twin bilge keeler, whose one keel has yet to reach vertical, experiences increased effectiveness in a gust.   One would have to trim the boat differently and perhaps reef more to compensate.   If one sailed a twin keeler in the same way as a single keeler in highly variable gusts, it would be easier to catch one that tested the boat's stability margin to a greater extent.  On the other hand, the bilge keeler may be able to harness more of the energy of these gusts into sailing, instead of letting it wastefully spill away.   A plus and a minus... which to choose...   I did not see anything about tripping to capsize, heavy seas etc, certainly a tiny fraction of the time for a boat, but something that usually enters discussions about design differences.   If these are not the minuses of the design (all designs have pluses and minuses) that some might imagine, then I would like to hear what the truth is.   It would be fair to address these points in a comprehensive article.    The article also talked of bilge boards (retractable) instead of bilge keels.  The catamaran defense to unpredictable conditions of retracting keel boards and allowing the boat to skate sideways across the water in unexpected high lateral loads is one approach allowed by a variable form boat.   A boat with fixed bilge keels does not have that option.   The large single deep keel, with wineglass cross-section across the beam makes a boat that can lay 60 degrees over and lose effective grip on both the air and the water and give way on its side when overwhelmed.   Yes, if the lower rail goes under, one can get tremendous tripping forces, putting it the rest of the way.  Really heavy cruising motorcycles have all sorts of low side projections that seem really handily placed to act as a series of fulcrums -- intermediate contact points -- so that one does not have to be Hercules to lift them from a dropped position.   All the benefits of a bilge keel also seem, in the wrong conditions, to be assistive devices to make it easier for the wind and sea to roll the boat.   Further, if it were ever to fall over on a beach, these devices become greater impediments to righting the boat.   Worst case, if a single keeler lays over on its side, on a beach, if its companionway is centrally located, it is possible it might be floated vertical again without taking water, particularly if it is reoriented keel down-slope on a sloping beach.  Even if not, I can see a use for heavy plastic sheeting and rolls of really sticky tape, like Tuck tape, to seal all of the topside openings for a couple of hours until the boat regained enough flotation to start to right itself.  If a bilge keeler goes over, which is admittedly harder, but if it does, one better start digging a hole for one keel, or it seems far less likely it might be re-floated without flooding.   The plastic sheet and Tuck tape solution is still an option.   Bilge keelers and the advantage to beach them on remote beaches reminds me of a saying about 4x4 vehicles -- they are the best way to get stuck really badly, really far out, when things go wrong.   However, all that aside, I find the claimed 15-20% performance boost, combined with the ability to beach in favourable conditions with a great deal less preparation, might be the pluses that make me reconsider bilge keelers as a class.   A bilge board boat -- if one is building from scratch and has the opportunity to include innovative features -- seems a far easier way to gain the hydrodynamic and performance advantages (like Open 60s do).   If the bilge boards are robust enough, they could be beach legs, providing that advantage of a bilge keeler too.   When the bilge boards are a liability, retract them.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of j.hess@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 9:29 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?     Matt, Your points are well taken, but if I had to leave a boat unattended for a number of tide cycles, or if bottom conditions were gnarly, I still think that twin keels would be preferable. I suppose one could go with a belt-and-suspenders approach and go both with twin keels AND sheer legs. 8-) I'm hoping Brent will weigh in on the topic, both the value of twin keels over single keels, as well as the viability of converting a fin keeler to a twin/bilge keeler. For what it's worth, here is an argument someone has made regarding the hydrodynamics of bilge keels. http://www.brayyachtdesign.bc.ca/article_twinkeels.html John ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Consider that the boat floats, all of the weight is above the bottom of the twin keels, and the separation between the keels is small in comparison to every other dimension of the boat.   It is not hard to see that in the wrong conditions one could end up on one side even with twin keels.  One big wave at the wrong moment, and some trip hazard on the bottom.    It is probable one would have to be more careful with shear legs, depending on the design.   But again, depending on design, they might provide far wider footing and more stability.  There is no limit to ingenuity for something that does not have to be part of the hull form at all times. Matt   | 35060|35044|2018-05-01 11:48:26|Jfisher|Re: Hydrodynamics of bilge keelers|I personally think the idea of a twin keel boat tipping over on the beach is pretty unlikely.  Consider Alex's boat was pulled across a field on the keels they are quite stable.  The only real downside I can see with twin keels is that you can't deal with ice as well.  Being frozen in may damage the hull from the forces trying to crush the two keels.  I think the reason twin keels are not developed more at least on the model scale is the racing rules prohibit them.   The classes that do allow development, just jumped straight to water ballast or movable keels. John Sent from my iPad On May 1, 2018, at 09:19, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   John, The article is definitely interesting and raised many points, many pluses, that are new to me.     John's link again is here: http://www.brayyachtdesign.bc.ca/article_twinkeels.html I recall the bilge keeler that was entered into the Sunday Times Golden Globe Race was judged to be entirely unsuitable as an actively sailing open ocean racer in the expected conditions even by modern commentators by virtue of the fact that it was a bilge keeler alone.  They must have been seeing something about that boat in particular, that was not representative of the class of boats, or some aspect that outweighed the efficiency gains possible according to this article.    I note that one of the photos in the article looks like a Colin Archer deep hull/keel, with an over-sized fin/small bilge keel sticking out.   So that would be a tri-keel ?   If this qualifies as a bilge keel, instead of a "bilge fin" then it is less surprising that possibly different designs can have the list of benefits given in the article ... but then it is still possible that no one design can have all of the listed advantages.   I did not see anything about robustness against gusts.  A single keel boat loses both sail effectiveness and keel effectiveness as it heels.   This will make an-already heeled single keeler in equilibrium with average conditions less responsive to sudden gusts, and this may be a good thing.  This allows the excessive energy of the gust to spill away with less affect on the boat.  It sounds more comfortable to me both in the reassurance sense that there is robustness, and in the literal comfort sense. On the other hand, the twin bilge keeler, whose one keel has yet to reach vertical, experiences increased effectiveness in a gust.   One would have to trim the boat differently and perhaps reef more to compensate.   If one sailed a twin keeler in the same way as a single keeler in highly variable gusts, it would be easier to catch one that tested the boat's stability margin to a greater extent.  On the other hand, the bilge keeler may be able to harness more of the energy of these gusts into sailing, instead of letting it wastefully spill away.   A plus and a minus... which to choose...   I did not see anything about tripping to capsize, heavy seas etc, certainly a tiny fraction of the time for a boat, but something that usually enters discussions about design differences.   If these are not the minuses of the design (all designs have pluses and minuses) that some might imagine, then I would like to hear what the truth is.   It would be fair to address these points in a comprehensive article.    The article also talked of bilge boards (retractable) instead of bilge keels.  The catamaran defense to unpredictable conditions of retracting keel boards and allowing the boat to skate sideways across the water in unexpected high lateral loads is one approach allowed by a variable form boat.   A boat with fixed bilge keels does not have that option.   The large single deep keel, with wineglass cross-section across the beam makes a boat that can lay 60 degrees over and lose effective grip on both the air and the water and give way on its side when overwhelmed.   Yes, if the lower rail goes under, one can get tremendous tripping forces, putting it the rest of the way.  Really heavy cruising motorcycles have all sorts of low side projections that seem really handily placed to act as a series of fulcrums -- intermediate contact points -- so that one does not have to be Hercules to lift them from a dropped position.   All the benefits of a bilge keel also seem, in the wrong conditions, to be assistive devices to make it easier for the wind and sea to roll the boat.   Further, if it were ever to fall over on a beach, these devices become greater impediments to righting the boat.   Worst case, if a single keeler lays over on its side, on a beach, if its companionway is centrally located, it is possible it might be floated vertical again without taking water, particularly if it is reoriented keel down-slope on a sloping beach.  Even if not, I can see a use for heavy plastic sheeting and rolls of really sticky tape, like Tuck tape, to seal all of the topside openings for a couple of hours until the boat regained enough flotation to start to right itself.  If a bilge keeler goes over, which is admittedly harder, but if it does, one better start digging a hole for one keel, or it seems far less likely it might be re-floated without flooding.   The plastic sheet and Tuck tape solution is still an option.   Bilge keelers and the advantage to beach them on remote beaches reminds me of a saying about 4x4 vehicles -- they are the best way to get stuck really badly, really far out, when things go wrong.   However, all that aside, I find the claimed 15-20% performance boost, combined with the ability to beach in favourable conditions with a great deal less preparation, might be the pluses that make me reconsider bilge keelers as a class.   A bilge board boat -- if one is building from scratch and has the opportunity to include innovative features -- seems a far easier way to gain the hydrodynamic and performance advantages (like Open 60s do).   If the bilge boards are robust enough, they could be beach legs, providing that advantage of a bilge keeler too.   When the bilge boards are a liability, retract them.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of j.hess@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 9:29 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?     Matt, Your points are well taken, but if I had to leave a boat unattended for a number of tide cycles, or if bottom conditions were gnarly, I still think that twin keels would be preferable. I suppose one could go with a belt-and-suspenders approach and go both with twin keels AND sheer legs. 8-) I'm hoping Brent will weigh in on the topic, both the value of twin keels over single keels, as well as the viability of converting a fin keeler to a twin/bilge keeler. For what it's worth, here is an argument someone has made regarding the hydrodynamics of bilge keels. http://www.brayyachtdesign.bc.ca/article_twinkeels.html John ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Consider that the boat floats, all of the weight is above the bottom of the twin keels, and the separation between the keels is small in comparison to every other dimension of the boat.   It is not hard to see that in the wrong conditions one could end up on one side even with twin keels.  One big wave at the wrong moment, and some trip hazard on the bottom.    It is probable one would have to be more careful with shear legs, depending on the design.   But again, depending on design, they might provide far wider footing and more stability.  There is no limit to ingenuity for something that does not have to be part of the hull form at all times. Matt   | 35061|35044|2018-05-01 12:53:52|rockrothwell|Re: Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?|I put together a desugn for single leg with 2" cargo straps too..... but where do you put it? That's what killed it 4 me. Stowage. If you can just find a grid.......| 35062|35044|2018-05-01 17:35:07|Darren Bos|Re: Hydrodynamics of bilge keelers| Matt, I had a twin keeler for many years.  I prefer the term bilge keel to refer to the earliest versions of the design concept which had stubbier keels placed laterally, often in addition to a keel on the centreline, while the term twin keel refers the the later evolution of the the design where you see higher aspect ratio keels with only two keels spread and oriented so that they don't suffer the hydrodynamic interference suffered by many bilge keelers. There are lots of twin keel boats that take to ground at anchor, or at moorings, every tidal cycle regardless of conditions.  Tipping over is not much of a risk as long as you are on a suitable bottom.  I did once unintentionally get the bow of my boat to tip down by carelessly stacking a great deal of stuff on the bow and then walking forward myself.  Walking aft restored it to it more dignified pose without any damage. On 18-05-01 08:19 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   John, The article is definitely interesting and raised many points, many pluses, that are new to me.     John's link again is here: http://www.brayyachtdesign.bc.ca/article_twinkeels.html I recall the bilge keeler that was entered into the Sunday Times Golden Globe Race was judged to be entirely unsuitable as an actively sailing open ocean racer in the expected conditions even by modern commentators by virtue of the fact that it was a bilge keeler alone.  They must have been seeing something about that boat in particular, that was not representative of the class of boats, or some aspect that outweighed the efficiency gains possible according to this article.    I note that one of the photos in the article looks like a Colin Archer deep hull/keel, with an over-sized fin/small bilge keel sticking out.   So that would be a tri-keel ?   If this qualifies as a bilge keel, instead of a "bilge fin" then it is less surprising that possibly different designs can have the list of benefits given in the article ... but then it is still possible that no one design can have all of the listed advantages.   I did not see anything about robustness against gusts.  A single keel boat loses both sail effectiveness and keel effectiveness as it heels.   This will make an-already heeled single keeler in equilibrium with average conditions less responsive to sudden gusts, and this may be a good thing.  This allows the excessive energy of the gust to spill away with less affect on the boat.  It sounds more comfortable to me both in the reassurance sense that there is robustness, and in the literal comfort sense. On the other hand, the twin bilge keeler, whose one keel has yet to reach vertical, experiences increased effectiveness in a gust.   One would have to trim the boat differently and perhaps reef more to compensate.   If one sailed a twin keeler in the same way as a single keeler in highly variable gusts, it would be easier to catch one that tested the boat's stability margin to a greater extent.  On the other hand, the bilge keeler may be able to harness more of the energy of these gusts into sailing, instead of letting it wastefully spill away.   A plus and a minus... which to choose...   I did not see anything about tripping to capsize, heavy seas etc, certainly a tiny fraction of the time for a boat, but something that usually enters discussions about design differences.   If these are not the minuses of the design (all designs have pluses and minuses) that some might imagine, then I would like to hear what the truth is.   It would be fair to address these points in a comprehensive article.    The article also talked of bilge boards (retractable) instead of bilge keels.  The catamaran defense to unpredictable conditions of retracting keel boards and allowing the boat to skate sideways across the water in unexpected high lateral loads is one approach allowed by a variable form boat.   A boat with fixed bilge keels does not have that option.   The large single deep keel, with wineglass cross-section across the beam makes a boat that can lay 60 degrees over and lose effective grip on both the air and the water and give way on its side when overwhelmed.   Yes, if the lower rail goes under, one can get tremendous tripping forces, putting it the rest of the way.  Really heavy cruising motorcycles have all sorts of low side projections that seem really handily placed to act as a series of fulcrums -- intermediate contact points -- so that one does not have to be Hercules to lift them from a dropped position.   All the benefits of a bilge keel also seem, in the wrong conditions, to be assistive devices to make it easier for the wind and sea to roll the boat.   Further, if it were ever to fall over on a beach, these devices become greater impediments to righting the boat.   Worst case, if a single keeler lays over on its side, on a beach, if its companionway is centrally located, it is possible it might be floated vertical again without taking water, particularly if it is reoriented keel down-slope on a sloping beach.  Even if not, I can see a use for heavy plastic sheeting and rolls of really sticky tape, like Tuck tape, to seal all of the topside openings for a couple of hours until the boat regained enough flotation to start to right itself.  If a bilge keeler goes over, which is admittedly harder, but if it does, one better start digging a hole for one keel, or it seems far less likely it might be re-floated without flooding.   The plastic sheet and Tuck tape solution is still an option.   Bilge keelers and the advantage to beach them on remote beaches reminds me of a saying about 4x4 vehicles -- they are the best way to get stuck really badly, really far out, when things go wrong.   However, all that aside, I find the claimed 15-20% performance boost, combined with the ability to beach in favourable conditions with a great deal less preparation, might be the pluses that make me reconsider bilge keelers as a class.   A bilge board boat -- if one is building from scratch and has the opportunity to include innovative features -- seems a far easier way to gain the hydrodynamic and performance advantages (like Open 60s do).   If the bilge boards are robust enough, they could be beach legs, providing that advantage of a bilge keeler too.   When the bilge boards are a liability, retract them.   Matt | 35063|35044|2018-05-02 09:26:54|Matt Malone|Re: Hydrodynamics of bilge keelers| Thanks Darren, I had in mind not people who ground their bilge keelers on familiar ground, but those who might want to use that ability as they cruise.   Most boats stick close to home, so, the ability to dry on familiar ground is the largest fraction of the advantage.  By freeing owners from the services of a marina or drying grid the bilge keeler delivers substantial savings.   It is like owning a 4x4 so you do not have to pay someone to plow the snow from your driveway.   That is likely to keep it out of mud holes far from home.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, May 1, 2018 5:35 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Hydrodynamics of bilge keelers     Matt, I had a twin keeler for many years.  I prefer the term bilge keel to refer to the earliest versions of the design concept which had stubbier keels placed laterally, often in addition to a keel on the centreline, while the term twin keel refers the the later evolution of the the design where you see higher aspect ratio keels with only two keels spread and oriented so that they don't suffer the hydrodynamic interference suffered by many bilge keelers. There are lots of twin keel boats that take to ground at anchor, or at moorings, every tidal cycle regardless of conditions.  Tipping over is not much of a risk as long as you are on a suitable bottom.  I did once unintentionally get the bow of my boat to tip down by carelessly stacking a great deal of stuff on the bow and then walking forward myself.  Walking aft restored it to it more dignified pose without any damage. On 18-05-01 08:19 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   John, The article is definitely interesting and raised many points, many pluses, that are new to me.     John's link again is here: http://www.brayyachtdesign.bc.ca/article_twinkeels.html I recall the bilge keeler that was entered into the Sunday Times Golden Globe Race was judged to be entirely unsuitable as an actively sailing open ocean racer in the expected conditions even by modern commentators by virtue of the fact that it was a bilge keeler alone.  They must have been seeing something about that boat in particular, that was not representative of the class of boats, or some aspect that outweighed the efficiency gains possible according to this article.    I note that one of the photos in the article looks like a Colin Archer deep hull/keel, with an over-sized fin/small bilge keel sticking out.   So that would be a tri-keel ?   If this qualifies as a bilge keel, instead of a "bilge fin" then it is less surprising that possibly different designs can have the list of benefits given in the article ... but then it is still possible that no one design can have all of the listed advantages.   I did not see anything about robustness against gusts.  A single keel boat loses both sail effectiveness and keel effectiveness as it heels.   This will make an-already heeled single keeler in equilibrium with average conditions less responsive to sudden gusts, and this may be a good thing.  This allows the excessive energy of the gust to spill away with less affect on the boat.  It sounds more comfortable to me both in the reassurance sense that there is robustness, and in the literal comfort sense. On the other hand, the twin bilge keeler, whose one keel has yet to reach vertical, experiences increased effectiveness in a gust.   One would have to trim the boat differently and perhaps reef more to compensate.   If one sailed a twin keeler in the same way as a single keeler in highly variable gusts, it would be easier to catch one that tested the boat's stability margin to a greater extent.  On the other hand, the bilge keeler may be able to harness more of the energy of these gusts into sailing, instead of letting it wastefully spill away.   A plus and a minus... which to choose...   I did not see anything about tripping to capsize, heavy seas etc, certainly a tiny fraction of the time for a boat, but something that usually enters discussions about design differences.   If these are not the minuses of the design (all designs have pluses and minuses) that some might imagine, then I would like to hear what the truth is.   It would be fair to address these points in a comprehensive article.    The article also talked of bilge boards (retractable) instead of bilge keels.  The catamaran defense to unpredictable conditions of retracting keel boards and allowing the boat to skate sideways across the water in unexpected high lateral loads is one approach allowed by a variable form boat.   A boat with fixed bilge keels does not have that option.   The large single deep keel, with wineglass cross-section across the beam makes a boat that can lay 60 degrees over and lose effective grip on both the air and the water and give way on its side when overwhelmed.   Yes, if the lower rail goes under, one can get tremendous tripping forces, putting it the rest of the way.  Really heavy cruising motorcycles have all sorts of low side projections that seem really handily placed to act as a series of fulcrums -- intermediate contact points -- so that one does not have to be Hercules to lift them from a dropped position.   All the benefits of a bilge keel also seem, in the wrong conditions, to be assistive devices to make it easier for the wind and sea to roll the boat.   Further, if it were ever to fall over on a beach, these devices become greater impediments to righting the boat.   Worst case, if a single keeler lays over on its side, on a beach, if its companionway is centrally located, it is possible it might be floated vertical again without taking water, particularly if it is reoriented keel down-slope on a sloping beach.  Even if not, I can see a use for heavy plastic sheeting and rolls of really sticky tape, like Tuck tape, to seal all of the topside openings for a couple of hours until the boat regained enough flotation to start to right itself.  If a bilge keeler goes over, which is admittedly harder, but if it does, one better start digging a hole for one keel, or it seems far less likely it might be re-floated without flooding.   The plastic sheet and Tuck tape solution is still an option.   Bilge keelers and the advantage to beach them on remote beaches reminds me of a saying about 4x4 vehicles -- they are the best way to get stuck really badly, really far out, when things go wrong.   However, all that aside, I find the claimed 15-20% performance boost, combined with the ability to beach in favourable conditions with a great deal less preparation, might be the pluses that make me reconsider bilge keelers as a class.   A bilge board boat -- if one is building from scratch and has the opportunity to include innovative features -- seems a far easier way to gain the hydrodynamic and performance advantages (like Open 60s do).   If the bilge boards are robust enough, they could be beach legs, providing that advantage of a bilge keeler too.   When the bilge boards are a liability, retract them.   Matt | 35064|35044|2018-05-02 10:36:48|Darren Bos|Re: Hydrodynamics of bilge keelers| We took to shore with our twin keel in more than a few different spots.  If you scope out the area at the previous low tide, I don't think things are much different if you are out cruising than if you are close to home. On 18-05-02 06:25 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Thanks Darren, I had in mind not people who ground their bilge keelers on familiar ground, but those who might want to use that ability as they cruise.   Most boats stick close to home, so, the ability to dry on familiar ground is the largest fraction of the advantage.  By freeing owners from the services of a marina or drying grid the bilge keeler delivers substantial savings.   It is like owning a 4x4 so you do not have to pay someone to plow the snow from your driveway.   That is likely to keep it out of mud holes far from home.   Matt | 35065|35043|2018-05-02 14:07:57|jason wilson|Re: 36 single keeler for sale|That listing says it was flagged for removal. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 2:25 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Here is one of my 36 footers for sale. The owner, an Alaskan, has cruised  to Australia and back in her. Now he wants to build a twin keel version, for  Alaska cruising and fishing. https://anchorage.craigslist.org/boa/d/brent-swain-36-pilothouse/6560698726.html #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 -- #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-mkp { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-mkp hr { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331hd { color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ads { margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ad { padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ad p { margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ad a { color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-lc { font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331hd { margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ad { margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331actions { font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331activity { background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331activity span { font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331activity span:first-child { text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331activity span a { color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331activity span span { color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331activity span .ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331underline { text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 .ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331attach { clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 .ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331attach div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 .ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331attach img { border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 .ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331attach label { display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 .ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331attach label a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 blockquote { margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 .ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331bold { font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 .ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331bold a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 dd.ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331last p a { font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 dd.ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331last p span { margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 dd.ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331last p span.ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331yshortcuts { margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 div.ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331attach-table div div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 div.ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331attach-table { width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 div.ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 div.ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 div.ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 div.ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331file-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 div.ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 div.ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 div.ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 div.ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331photo-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 div#ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331yshortcuts { font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 .ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331green { color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 .ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331MsoNormal { margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 o { font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331photos div { float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331photos div div { border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331photos div label { color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331reco-category { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331reco-desc { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 .ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331replbq { margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-actbar div a:first-child { margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-mlmsg { font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-mlmsg table { font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 input, #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 textarea { font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-mlmsg pre, #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 code { font:115% monospace;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-mlmsg * { line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331logo { padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-msg p a { font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331attach-count span { color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331reco-head { color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-reco { margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ov li a { font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ov li { font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ov ul { margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-text { font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-text p { margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-text tt { font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1307377623yiv0994729331ygrp-vital ul li:last-child { border-right:none !important;} #ygrps-yiv-1307377623 | 35066|35043|2018-05-02 14:37:28|brentswain38|Re: 36 single keeler for sale|Maybe he sold her. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :That listing says it was flagged for removal. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 2:25 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:  Here is one of my 36 footers for sale. The owner, an Alaskan, has cruised  to Australia and back in her. Now he wants to build a twin keel version, for  Alaska cruising and fishing. https://anchorage.craigslist.org/boa/d/brent-swain-36-pilothouse/6560698726.html#ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 -- #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-mkp { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-mkp hr { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331hd { color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ads { margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ad { padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ad p { margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ad a { color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-lc { font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331hd { margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ad { margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331actions { font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331activity { background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331activity span { font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331activity span:first-child { text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331activity span a { color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331activity span span { color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331activity span .ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331underline { text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 .ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331attach { clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 .ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331attach div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 .ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331attach img { border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 .ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331attach label { display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 .ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331attach label a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 blockquote { margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 .ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331bold { font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 .ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331bold a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 dd.ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331last p a { font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 dd.ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331last p span { margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 dd.ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331last p span.ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331yshortcuts { margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 div.ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331attach-table div div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 div.ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331attach-table { width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 div.ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 div.ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 div.ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 div.ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331file-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 div.ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 div.ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 div.ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 div.ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331photo-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 div#ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331yshortcuts { font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 .ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331green { color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 .ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331MsoNormal { margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 o { font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331photos div { float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331photos div div { border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331photos div label { color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331reco-category { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331reco-desc { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 .ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331replbq { margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-actbar div a:first-child { margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-mlmsg { font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-mlmsg table { font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 input, #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 textarea { font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-mlmsg pre, #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 code { font:115% monospace;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-mlmsg * { line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331logo { padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-msg p a { font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331attach-count span { color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331reco-head { color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-reco { margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ov li a { font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ov li { font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ov ul { margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-text { font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-text p { margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-text tt { font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-1692301139 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331 #ygrps-yiv-1692301139ygrps-yiv-1478835725yiv0994729331ygrp-vital ul li:last-child { border-right:none !important;} | 35067|35044|2018-05-02 14:37:29|brentswain38|Re: Hydrodynamics of bilge keelers|Allen Farrell scoped out 20 anchorages in one area alone, which are off limits to boats which cant dry out. People  have told me that most of the Queensland coast's fully protected anchorages  are up rivers,  usable only  to boats which can dry out . Ditto most of the east coast of South Africa. Having not had to pay moorage on my current boat for 34 years, is largely due to my ability to dry out. I put in sockets at the chine on  single  keelers, for sheerlegs. They are about 8 inches long, stainless sch 40 pipe,  capped with stainless.  The inside is gusseted to the hull for strength. I weld in flush ,half inch stainless acorn nuts, 2 1/2 ft ahead of the socket, and   more , 2 1/2 ft  towards the centreline, so I can bolt  braces on the sheerlegs, if one is  staying longer  ,over several  tides.  That triangulates things , much stronger.Such sheerlegs are shorter, and thus easier to stow. They also don't need lines  to hold them in place, as the tide goes out. For occasional use, they can be aluminium . Oval feet on the bottom can have holes in them, to  nail planks to for softer bottoms. Run them verticaly, as that is the direction of the load on them .Don't flare them out at the bottom. I put them well ahead of the longitudinal  centre of gravity, at the front of the chines. No chance of the bow going down ,that  way. With 8 ft of keel in the  mud ,not much chance of her turning. Still better to scout out harder bottoms.  Gravel is best.However, for long term dry moorage, nothing beats twin keels.I have left my twin keeler in drying anchorages, while flying to another country to build boats, no worries, something I wouldn't feel comfortable with,  with sheerlegs . When a bit of swell runs in, pounding a bit at the right tide , I wouldn't feel to comfortable with sheerlegs. Changing from  a single keel to twins would not be all that  hard; for a bare hull, but once foamed ,it would n be a nightmare. You would have to scrape out a lot of foam and paint, and interior ,including where the transverse webs go , do your cutting and welding breathing the burning fumes of what was left , trying not to set things on fire, then put it all back.| 35068|35044|2018-05-02 14:41:05|brentswain38|Re: Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?|I took the ballasted model and checked  to see how far over she had to go, before tipping. Had to  go a very long way ,past 45 degrees.| 35069|35044|2018-05-02 14:55:18|brentswain38|Re: Hydrodynamics of bilge keelers|The first boat in the article ( the model) has badly designed twin keels, from a cruising standpoint. Get your anchor rode snagged between the keels and hooked on the back of one  ,in strong winds, and getting it free can be extremely difficult; and dangerous if off a lee shore.Mr Bray had pictures of one in a Pacific Yachting article years  ago, with  the ballast bulbs continuing well aft, far  beyond the keels,. I phoned him up,  pointing out the dangers, and the keels in the second picture was the result, a huge improvement. Putting keels on board and trying  to free a line fouled between them, makes it clear what works and what doesn't. A vertical one angled out at 25 degrees works ,more aft slope on the trailing edge helps more , but slope it forward, at  the same slope as the leading edge and you have  a problem.| 35070|35044|2018-05-02 17:50:18|opuspaul|Re: Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?|Brent, I am curious about something.   If I careened my single keeler, how high does the water come up the side or deck on my boat when laying/floating on it's side?  I assume the water doesn't come anywhere near the portholes.   Have you seen it done?  Thanks, Paul---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I took the ballasted model and checked  to see how far over she had to go, before tipping. Had to  go a very long way ,past 45 degrees.| 35071|35044|2018-05-02 19:08:41|jhess314|Re: Hydrodynamics of bilge keelers|Brent,Thanks for your comments regarding converting a single keel to a twin keel. I'm glad to know that structurally it would work, but I'm not surprised that removing part of the interior would be a huge job.John---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Allen Farrell scoped out 20 anchorages in one area alone, which are off limits to boats which cant dry out. People  have told me that most of the Queensland coast's fully protected anchorages  are up rivers,  usable only  to boats which can dry out . Ditto most of the east coast of South Africa. Having not had to pay moorage on my current boat for 34 years, is largely due to my ability to dry out... Changing from  a single keel to twins would not be all that  hard; for a bare hull, but once foamed ,it would n be a nightmare. You would have to scrape out a lot of foam and paint, and interior ,including where the transverse webs go , do your cutting and welding breathing the burning fumes of what was left , trying not to set things on fire, then put it all back.| 35072|35044|2018-05-02 21:59:58|brentswain38|Re: Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?|No chance of it reaching the port holes . However far it comes up going down, it comes up the same on a rising tide. Draw a line showing the angle you would reach on a flat surface at low tide ,on a drawing of your midships section. If you take a knock down to that angle, however far the water comes  is how far the water would come when rising off a beach.| 35073|35044|2018-05-02 22:01:59|brentswain38|Re: Converting Fin Keel to Twin Keel?|Mike on Shinola stored sheer legs  under the seat at his stern.| 35074|35044|2018-05-02 22:44:39|brentswain38|Re: Hydrodynamics of bilge keelers|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :#ygrps-yiv-1336222901 #ygrps-yiv-1336222901ygrps-yiv-66736979 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}Theoretically bilge keels can trip ,but are higher up the deadrise, and shallower ,  more than compensating for that. The reason they didn't want a bilge keeler in the race was probably  the same reason baboons automatically attack any  tribe member who tries anything different from what has always been done. We are not as evolved as we pretend we are. Having done many Pacific crossings in mine,  I see no disadvantage in seaworthiness. The motion is definitely  far  more comfortable, and the rolling far less.Two keels can be as fast as one, on most points of sail  Steve raced Silas Crosby against , Exit a single keel 36 . They were matched on all points of sail ,except to windward, where the single keeler had about a 5% advantage over the twin keeler.Not worth giving up the advantages of twin keels for  , in a cruising boat.Twin keels can be fast,  tri keels are almost inevitably slow . Too much interaction between them.  This can  be avoided with twin keels by angling them out at 25 degrees.   Those with twin  vertical  keels seem almost invariably slow, due to the huge interaction between them. Keels are best  kept in the water. When the windward one breaks the surface,  it gets noisy,and the drag increases drastically . The occasional  breaking  the surface doesn't matter much ,but you wouldn't want it to stay that   way.Bluebird of  Thorne drawings show asymetrical  keels toed out slightly . It was tank tested,   pushing it thru a tank from a fixed pin t,unlike a hull driven by sails, which is a completely different dynamic.Tank tests on keels toed in or out are completely irrelevant. Under sail ,if you want them toed in, just  sheet her in a bit and point  higher. Same thing! Toed out? Just  ease the sheets and point her lower. Same thing! With toed in keesl , the deeper ,upright one would tend to round her up,  screwing up balance and directional stability. I tried asymetricla keels on my first twin keelers, then went to symetrical,  parallel ones . No noticeable difference under sail. Deridder's boat "Magic Dragon"began with asymetrical  keels ,which  was a disaster , until they converted them to symetrical . An aluminium Brewer design  here is rumoured to have the same problem with asymetrical keels.Twin keelers like to  be sailed upright. Beating home from Tonga thru the trades, tying a reef in the main would some times give me an extra 2 knots to windward. Felt slower, but was going much faster.Bilge boards are moving parts, ie. problems.John,The article is definitely interesting and raised many points, many pluses, that are new to me.     John's link again is here: http://www.brayyachtdesign.bc.ca/article_twinkeels.htmlI recall the bilge keeler that was entered into the Sunday Times Golden Globe Race was judged to be entirely unsuitable as an actively sailing open ocean racer in the expected conditions even by modern commentators by virtue of the fact that it was a bilge keeler alone.  They must have been seeing something about that boat in particular, that was not representative of the class of boats, or some aspect that outweighed the efficiency gains possible according to this article.    I note that one of the photos in the article looks like a Colin Archer deep hull/keel, with an over-sized fin/small bilge keel sticking out.   So that would be a tri-keel ?   If this qualifies as a bilge keel, instead of a "bilge fin" then it is less surprising that possibly different designs can have the list of benefits given in the article ... but then it is still possible that no one design can have all of the listed advantages.  I did not see anything about robustness against gusts.  A single keel boat loses both sail effectiveness and keel effectiveness as it heels.   This will make an-already heeled single keeler in equilibrium with average conditions less responsive to sudden gusts, and this may be a good thing.  This allows the excessive energy of the gust to spill away with less affect on the boat.  It sounds more comfortable to me both in the reassurance sense that there is robustness, and in the literal comfort sense.On the other hand, the twin bilge keeler, whose one keel has yet to reach vertical, experiences increased effectiveness in a gust.   One would have to trim the boat differently and perhaps reef more to compensate.   If one sailed a twin keeler in the same way as a single keeler in highly variable gusts, it would be easier to catch one that tested the boat's stability margin to a greater extent.  On the other hand, the bilge keeler may be able to harness more of the energy of these gusts into sailing, instead of letting it wastefully spill away.   A plus and a minus... which to choose...   I did not see anything about tripping to capsize, heavy seas etc, certainly a tiny fraction of the time for a boat, but something that usually enters discussions about design differences.   If these are not the minuses of the design (all designs have pluses and minuses) that some might imagine, then I would like to hear what the truth is.   It would be fair to address these points in a comprehensive article.    The article also talked of bilge boards (retractable) instead of bilge keels.  The catamaran defense to unpredictable conditions of retracting keel boards and allowing the boat to skate sideways across the water in unexpected high lateral loads is one approach allowed by a variable form boat.   A boat with fixed bilge keels does not have that option.   The large single deep keel, with wineglass cross-section across the beam makes a boat that can lay 60 degrees over and lose effective grip on both the air and the water and give way on its side when overwhelmed.   Yes, if the lower rail goes under, one can get tremendous tripping forces, putting it the rest of the way.  Really heavy cruising motorcycles have all sorts of low side projections that seem really handily placed to act as a series of fulcrums -- intermediate contact points -- so that one does not have to be Hercules to lift them from a dropped position.   All the benefits of a bilge keel also seem, in the wrong conditions, to be assistive devices to make it easier for the wind and sea to roll the boat.   Further, if it were ever to fall over on a beach, these devices become greater impediments to righting the boat.   Worst case, if a single keeler lays over on its side, on a beach, if its companionway is centrally located, it is possible it might be floated vertical again without taking water, particularly if it is reoriented keel down-slope on a sloping beach.  Even if not, I can see a use for heavy plastic sheeting and rolls of really sticky tape, like Tuck tape, to seal all of the topside openings for a couple of hours until the boat regained enough flotation to start to right itself.  If a bilge keeler goes over, which is admittedly harder, but if it does, one better start digging a hole for one keel, or it seems far less likely it might be re-floated without flooding.   The plastic sheet and Tuck tape solution is still an option.   Bilge keelers and the advantage to beach them on remote beaches reminds me of a saying about 4x4 vehicles -- they are the best way to get stuck really badly, really far out, when things go wrong.   However, all that aside, I find the claimed 15-20% performance boost, combined with the ability to beach in favourable conditions with a great deal less preparation, might be the pluses that make me reconsider bilge keelers as a class.   A bilge board boat -- if one is building from scratch and has the opportunity to include innovative features -- seems a far easier way to gain the hydrodynamic and performance advantages (like Open 60s do).   If the bilge boards are robust enough, they could be beach legs, providing that advantage of a bilge keeler too.   When the bilge boards are a liability, retract them.   Matt | 35075|35044|2018-05-03 00:18:34|opuspaul|Re: Hydrodynamics of bilge keelers|Good summary.  I like my single keeler but not for any of the reasons you stated.  I like it for the extra tankage I can carry deep and low in the single keel.   My keel was 6 inches longer than the plans.  I carry 90 gallons of fuel and over 120 gallons of water.  This gives me a long range under power and enough water to have a shower and wash with fresh water without worrying too much about running a watermaker.  All the weight is kept central and low.   Most of the bilge keel boats I have been on have tanks under the seats or under the cockpit which in my mind ruins some of the best places for storage.  If I was to build again, I would probably go single keel again unless it was a very big boat (>44 feet?) in which case I would consider bilge keels or a retractable keel.  On smaller boats, you have more options but with bigger boats it becomes more limited.   Saving haulout fees on a boat 45 or 50 feet long can be a huge advantage on a big boat.    Tankage is not much of a problem.   I would consider a telescoping dagger board with a weighted bulb or a  ballasted centerboard.  Engineering is a challenge but it can be done.    You can then still beach your boat easily but retain good performance with a low wetted surface area and a deep keel for going to windward.   It wouldn't be these boats below but these give you and idea of the configurations I like.....http://www.expeditionsail.com/contacts/sailboat-seal.htmhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-Mq4oVQRZwFWIW, racing two boats against each other doesn't prove much unless all other factors are identical....sails, trim, mast, and having a clean bottom mean a lot.   When I did club racing many years ago, there were a few identical C & C 35's racing.  One of them was always much faster than the other due to the helming by the skipper.  It had nothing to do with the boat.   Having said that, a clean bottom on the boat makes a huge difference...as much as 2 or 3 knots with a badly fouled hull.  I think being able to clean the bottom easily is one of the biggest advantage in performance of bilge keel boats.| 35076|35044|2018-05-03 15:35:51|brentswain38|Re: Hydrodynamics of bilge keelers|Yes, you do get a lot of tankage in a single keeler. Most 36 ft bilge keelers I've  built had a nearly 100 gallon water  tank between the keels, and  a fuel tank under the wheelhouse floor.  You need a wheelhouse,  to put  a good sized fuel tank under the wheelhouse floor, which more than offsets the weight of the wheelhouse. Both drastically improve the AVS angle.| 35077|35044|2018-05-05 17:03:19|brentswain38|Re: Hydrodynamics of bilge keelers|One important thing one should not under estimate, is how much reinforcing one should put at the aft end of the keels, where they meet the hull.Any impact on the keels in a collision with  a rock, will put a huge impact on that area, forcing it upwards into the hull.| 35078|35044|2018-05-10 08:59:38|Matt Malone|Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?| Brent, Do you have a design smaller/lighter than 26 feet, and, what dimensions of steel sheets does it start with for the hull halves ?   My scrap yard has a pile of steel sheet going cheap.   I am hoping you will say 16 to 18 feet.   I am hoping for something made with maybe 1 tonne of steel.   Separately, what is the smallest size of your origami designs would be appropriate to build in 1/4 inch plate ? Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2018 12:18 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Hydrodynamics of bilge keelers     Good summary.  I like my single keeler but not for any of the reasons you stated.  I like it for the extra tankage I can carry deep and low in the single keel.   My keel was 6 inches longer than the plans.  I carry 90 gallons of fuel and over 120 gallons of water.  This gives me a long range under power and enough water to have a shower and wash with fresh water without worrying too much about running a watermaker.  All the weight is kept central and low.   Most of the bilge keel boats I have been on have tanks under the seats or under the cockpit which in my mind ruins some of the best places for storage.  If I was to build again, I would probably go single keel again unless it was a very big boat (>44 feet?) in which case I would consider bilge keels or a retractable keel.  On smaller boats, you have more options but with bigger boats it becomes more limited.   Saving haulout fees on a boat 45 or 50 feet long can be a huge advantage on a big boat.    Tankage is not much of a problem.   I would consider a telescoping dagger board with a weighted bulb or a  ballasted centerboard.  Engineering is a challenge but it can be done.    You can then still beach your boat easily but retain good performance with a low wetted surface area and a deep keel for going to windward.   It wouldn't be these boats below but these give you and idea of the configurations I like..... http://www.expeditionsail.com/contacts/sailboat-seal.htm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-Mq4oVQRZw FWIW, racing two boats against each other doesn't prove much unless all other factors are identical....sails, trim, mast, and having a clean bottom mean a lot.   When I did club racing many years ago, there were a few identical C & C 35's racing.  One of them was always much faster than the other due to the helming by the skipper.  It had nothing to do with the boat.   Having said that, a clean bottom on the boat makes a huge difference...as much as 2 or 3 knots with a badly fouled hull.  I think being able to clean the bottom easily is one of the biggest advantage in performance of bilge keel boats. | 35079|35044|2018-05-10 09:07:44|garyhlucas|Re: Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?| I think the problem is that scale factor becomes a problem going much smaller with steel.  As you get smaller the relative mass of the steel increases very fast until you wind up with either a very weak structure or a very heavy boat.   Gary H. LucasHave you read my blog? http://a-little-business.blogspot.com/   From: mailto:origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 8:59 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?       Brent,   Do you have a design smaller/lighter than 26 feet, and, what dimensions of steel sheets does it start with for the hull halves ?   My scrap yard has a pile of steel sheet going cheap.   I am hoping you will say 16 to 18 feet.   I am hoping for something made with maybe 1 tonne of steel.    Separately, what is the smallest size of your origami designs would be appropriate to build in 1/4 inch plate ?   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2018 12:18 AMTo: origamiboats@yahoogroups.comSubject: [origamiboats] Re: Hydrodynamics of bilge keelers     Good summary.  I like my single keeler but not for any of the reasons you stated.  I like it for the extra tankage I can carry deep and low in the single keel.   My keel was 6 inches longer than the plans.  I carry 90 gallons of fuel and over 120 gallons of water.  This gives me a long range under power and enough water to have a shower and wash with fresh water without worrying too much about running a watermaker.  All the weight is kept central and low.   Most of the bilge keel boats I have been on have tanks under the seats or under the cockpit which in my mind ruins some of the best places for storage.  If I was to build again, I would probably go single keel again unless it was a very big boat (>44 feet?) in which case I would consider bilge keels or a retractable keel.  On smaller boats, you have more options but with bigger boats it becomes more limited.   Saving haulout fees on a boat 45 or 50 feet long can be a huge advantage on a big boat.    Tankage is not much of a problem.   I would consider a telescoping dagger board with a weighted bulb or a  ballasted centerboard.  Engineering is a challenge but it can be done.    You can then still beach your boat easily but retain good performance with a low wetted surface area and a deep keel for going to windward.   It wouldn't be these boats below but these give you and idea of the configurations I like.....http://www.expeditionsail.com/contacts/sailboat-seal.htmhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-Mq4oVQRZwFWIW, racing two boats against each other doesn't prove much unless all other factors are identical....sails, trim, mast, and having a clean bottom mean a lot.   When I did club racing many years ago, there were a few identical C & C 35's racing.  One of them was always much faster than the other due to the helming by the skipper.  It had nothing to do with the boat.   Having said that, a clean bottom on the boat makes a huge difference...as much as 2 or 3 knots with a badly fouled hull.  I think being able to clean the bottom easily is one of the biggest advantage in performance of bilge keel boats. | 35080|35044|2018-05-10 13:17:57|Matt Malone|Re: Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?| Gary, in general you are correct.   Yes, a boat that floats maybe a little lower than a solid glass hull -- the only hull worth comparing to a metal one -- will have different performance.  However, if a solid glass hull with hardware and lines but no cargo in the 16-18 foot range weights 1-2 tons, that is potentially a lot of steel that is not that thin.   Building in steel, one gains the advantage of steel.     Lets consider 3/16" / 7 gauge.  It is 3.4 kg / square foot.   A tonne is 295 square feet.   That is believably a 16 foot boat with a enclosed cabin and a 6 foot beam.   I have a thin flimsy fibreglass boat that is that size and it weighs one quarter of that.   Which would you rather tow on a vacation and launch into new-to-you coastal waters ?   The 26 ft is a fine size, and has been demonstrated to be towable, but, not take it on-a-road-vacation-towable.   What could one do with a 16-18 foot boat?  Tow it on vacation.   Where?  Look at a map of North America and put a pin on any spot on the coast.   After deducting for the road portion of the trip, one could easily go a couple hundred miles on the water in a week in a 16-18 foot boat.   That puts a chunk of islands off the BC coast in range, the intercoastal on the east coast of the US, even the Bahamas from Florida.   Yes, it might be heavy, or one could call it durable.   And how many people can say they have visited half these places -- yes a lot of people here, but what fraction of 30 foot boat owners can say that?  Why?  They just did not have the time to sail their boat there, or the thousands to have it shipped there, and thousands to have it shipped back.    Also, reducing the boat to 16-18 feet, with a sail duration of a week in mind, one can dispense with a lot of the complication that makes a 26 footer a project that is not finished.  Outboard with pull-start, transom-hung rudder, no integrated tankage, one through-hull for the sink.  A propane tank strap-down area, a quality ice cooler that starts with a block of ice, 3 cube-shaped 20L camping water jugs, strapped down.  One solar panel, one AGM battery, and LED lighting.  Stow a 12V trolling motor for emergencies under the cockpit.    Everything is smaller, cheaper, less complicated.    A 16-18 foot boat with some type of retractable keel also looks substantially smaller to border people, not like a ship.   Of course it is coming back with us, we are not importing it -- an answer that is less convincing for a much larger boat.   Brent has said a 26 will get one to Tahiti... a lot of us just don't have time for that right now.   We may have a larger boat closer to home already.   A smaller steel boat will get some people sailing further from home, sooner.    Matt   From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of gary.lucas@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 9:07 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     I think the problem is that scale factor becomes a problem going much smaller with steel.  As you get smaller the relative mass of the steel increases very fast until you wind up with either a very weak structure or a very heavy boat.   Gary H. Lucas Have you read my blog? http://a-little-business.blogspot.com/   From: mailto:origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 8:59 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?       Brent,   Do you have a design smaller/lighter than 26 feet, and, what dimensions of steel sheets does it start with for the hull halves ?   My scrap yard has a pile of steel sheet going cheap.   I am hoping you will say 16 to 18 feet.   I am hoping for something made with maybe 1 tonne of steel.    Separately, what is the smallest size of your origami designs would be appropriate to build in 1/4 inch plate ?   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2018 12:18 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Hydrodynamics of bilge keelers     Good summary.  I like my single keeler but not for any of the reasons you stated.  I like it for the extra tankage I can carry deep and low in the single keel.   My keel was 6 inches longer than the plans.  I carry 90 gallons of fuel and over 120 gallons of water.  This gives me a long range under power and enough water to have a shower and wash with fresh water without worrying too much about running a watermaker.  All the weight is kept central and low.   Most of the bilge keel boats I have been on have tanks under the seats or under the cockpit which in my mind ruins some of the best places for storage.  If I was to build again, I would probably go single keel again unless it was a very big boat (>44 feet?) in which case I would consider bilge keels or a retractable keel.  On smaller boats, you have more options but with bigger boats it becomes more limited.   Saving haulout fees on a boat 45 or 50 feet long can be a huge advantage on a big boat.    Tankage is not much of a problem.   I would consider a telescoping dagger board with a weighted bulb or a  ballasted centerboard.  Engineering is a challenge but it can be done.    You can then still beach your boat easily but retain good performance with a low wetted surface area and a deep keel for going to windward.   It wouldn't be these boats below but these give you and idea of the configurations I like..... http://www.expeditionsail.com/contacts/sailboat-seal.htm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-Mq4oVQRZw FWIW, racing two boats against each other doesn't prove much unless all other factors are identical....sails, trim, mast, and having a clean bottom mean a lot.   When I did club racing many years ago, there were a few identical C & C 35's racing.  One of them was always much faster than the other due to the helming by the skipper.  It had nothing to do with the boat.   Having said that, a clean bottom on the boat makes a huge difference...as much as 2 or 3 knots with a badly fouled hull.  I think being able to clean the bottom easily is one of the biggest advantage in performance of bilge keel boats. | 35081|35044|2018-05-10 21:39:35|opuspaul|Re: Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?|Gary is right.  Thin steel sheet distorts too much when welded and is not stiff enough.  It will need a lot of bracing and you still have to line it with something which adds a lot of weight on a small boat.   Plywood (or possibly welded aluminum) construction is ideal for what you wish to do.  I can honestly say though that if all you want is a trailer boat to use for a few weeks a year, you are much better off to buy something used.  You will get it for less than the cost of materials to build something.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :#ygrps-yiv-2015304941 #ygrps-yiv-2015304941ygrps-yiv-762848690 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}Gary, in general you are correct.   Yes, a boat that floats maybe a little lower than a solid glass hull -- the only hull worth comparing to a metal one -- will have different performance.  However, if a solid glass hull with hardware and lines but no cargo in the 16-18 foot range weights 1-2 tons, that is potentially a lot of steel that is not that thin.   Building in steel, one gains the advantage of steel.     Lets consider 3/16" / 7 gauge.  It is 3.4 kg / square foot.   A tonne is 295 square feet.   That is believably a 16 foot boat with a enclosed cabin and a 6 foot beam.   I have a thin flimsy fibreglass boat that is that size and it weighs one quarter of that.   Which would you rather tow on a vacation and launch into new-to-you coastal waters ?  The 26 ft is a fine size, and has been demonstrated to be towable, but, not take it on-a-road-vacation-towable.   What could one do with a 16-18 foot boat?  Tow it on vacation.   Where?  Look at a map of North America and put a pin on any spot on the coast.   After deducting for the road portion of the trip, one could easily go a couple hundred miles on the water in a week in a 16-18 foot boat.   That puts a chunk of islands off the BC coast in range, the intercoastal on the east coast of the US, even the Bahamas from Florida.   Yes, it might be heavy, or one could call it durable.   And how many people can say they have visited half these places -- yes a lot of people here, but what fraction of 30 foot boat owners can say that?  Why?  They just did not have the time to sail their boat there, or the thousands to have it shipped there, and thousands to have it shipped back.   Also, reducing the boat to 16-18 feet, with a sail duration of a week in mind, one can dispense with a lot of the complication that makes a 26 footer a project that is not finished.  Outboard with pull-start, transom-hung rudder, no integrated tankage, one through-hull for the sink.  A propane tank strap-down area, a quality ice cooler that starts with a block of ice, 3 cube-shaped 20L camping water jugs, strapped down.  One solar panel, one AGM battery, and LED lighting.  Stow a 12V trolling motor for emergencies under the cockpit.    Everything is smaller, cheaper, less complicated.    A 16-18 foot boat with some type of retractable keel also looks substantially smaller to border people, not like a ship.   Of course it is coming back with us, we are not importing it -- an answer that is less convincing for a much larger boat.   Brent has said a 26 will get one to Tahiti... a lot of us just don't have time for that right now.   We may have a larger boat closer to home already.   A smaller steel boat will get some people sailing further from home, sooner.    Matt   From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of gary.lucas@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 9:07 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?  I think the problem is that scale factor becomes a problem going much smaller with steel.  As you get smaller the relative mass of the steel increases very fast until you wind up with either a very weak structure or a very heavy boat. Gary H. Lucas Have you read my blog? http://a-little-business.blogspot.com/ From: mailto:origamiboats@yahoogroups.comSent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 8:59 AMTo: origamiboats@yahoogroups.comSubject: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?    Brent, Do you have a design smaller/lighter than 26 feet, and, what dimensions of steel sheets does it start with for the hull halves ?   My scrap yard has a pile of steel sheet going cheap.   I am hoping you will say 16 to 18 feet.   I am hoping for something made with maybe 1 tonne of steel.  Separately, what is the smallest size of your origami designs would be appropriate to build in 1/4 inch plate ? Matt | 35082|35044|2018-05-11 11:01:30|Matt Malone|Re: Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?| I guess I was unclear... I understood the BS26 to be made from 3/16" sheet.   It is unclear why 3/16" would be OK for a BS26, but distort if it was formed into a smaller boat.   I am not asking about 22 gauge sheet here.   Yes, as Gary pointed out going with thick steel, the boat would be heavy, but so long as it sails reliably, can be carried on the trailer and towed easily, and confers the benefit of steel, I accept that penalty.  I do not know of any used steel sailboats with a closed cabin in the range of 16-18 feet. I do not have either the experience or equipment to weld aluminium.  Even aluminium scrap is really expensive and I have yet to see it in a stack of big sheets in a scrap yard.  In contrast, a pile of scrap steel sheets going cheap has been located, hence my question.   I was asking the question here to avoid the use of a fibreglass boat of any sort if possible.  In this size there are three types of fibreglass boats:  - thin boats made of woven mat -- I have on old one -- and for its weight it is strongish.  Unfamiliar waters, one pointy rock, no thank you.  - thick boats that are mostly resin because it is a chopper gun boat -- no thank you.  - thick solid woven mat boats -- The only ones I have seen are shaped like tiny offshore racing boats that one sits on.  They have a fixed keel with only sail lockers below, i.e., no cabin at all -- no thank you. Now if I could find a thick solid woven mat fibreglass sailboat boat (built heavy like a modern commercial lifeboat) that could hit a few point rocks (not too hard), and probably not sink, if I could find one for less than the cost of a pile of scrap steel sheet, I sure would consider it.   These are rare and appreciated boats and $1,500 is already more than the cost of the steel. On the point of one can buy a used anything for less than the cost of materials -- equally true for most owner-built boats, and many capable solid robust older fibreglass production boats that have become a burden to someone else.   This is less true of small boats that go easily on trailers in someone's backyard.  There is no yearly marina fee driving down the asking price.   One can get a robust solid glass boat of 30-40 feet for substantially less than $10,000 and it will weigh 8-10 tonnes.  A 16-18 foot crap-glass trailer boat will go for more than $1,000 and weigh less than 0.5 tonnes.   The trailer boat is just sitting on a trailer in the back yard, not costing them a dime, no pressure to sell.   Why would they sell for $500, they would sooner see it rot on the trailer -- I know I do.       Then there is plywood... Fibreglass is literally 10 times stronger when it is done correctly -- I know there are plywood boats, and very thin ones but, unfamiliar waters, one pointy rock -- no thank you.   I really want the benefit of steel if it is possible.   Again, I thought it was a fair question to Brent, and if the answer is no, then, it is no.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 9:39 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     Gary is right.  Thin steel sheet distorts too much when welded and is not stiff enough.  It will need a lot of bracing and you still have to line it with something which adds a lot of weight on a small boat.   Plywood (or possibly welded aluminum) construction is ideal for what you wish to do.  I can honestly say though that if all you want is a trailer boat to use for a few weeks a year, you are much better off to buy something used.  You will get it for less than the cost of materials to build something. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Gary, in general you are correct.   Yes, a boat that floats maybe a little lower than a solid glass hull -- the only hull worth comparing to a metal one -- will have different performance.  However, if a solid glass hull with hardware and lines but no cargo in the 16-18 foot range weights 1-2 tons, that is potentially a lot of steel that is not that thin.   Building in steel, one gains the advantage of steel.     Lets consider 3/16" / 7 gauge.  It is 3.4 kg / square foot.   A tonne is 295 square feet.   That is believably a 16 foot boat with a enclosed cabin and a 6 foot beam.   I have a thin flimsy fibreglass boat that is that size and it weighs one quarter of that.   Which would you rather tow on a vacation and launch into new-to-you coastal waters ?   The 26 ft is a fine size, and has been demonstrated to be towable, but, not take it on-a-road-vacation-towable.   What could one do with a 16-18 foot boat?  Tow it on vacation.   Where?  Look at a map of North America and put a pin on any spot on the coast.   After deducting for the road portion of the trip, one could easily go a couple hundred miles on the water in a week in a 16-18 foot boat.   That puts a chunk of islands off the BC coast in range, the intercoastal on the east coast of the US, even the Bahamas from Florida.   Yes, it might be heavy, or one could call it durable.   And how many people can say they have visited half these places -- yes a lot of people here, but what fraction of 30 foot boat owners can say that?  Why?  They just did not have the time to sail their boat there, or the thousands to have it shipped there, and thousands to have it shipped back.    Also, reducing the boat to 16-18 feet, with a sail duration of a week in mind, one can dispense with a lot of the complication that makes a 26 footer a project that is not finished.  Outboard with pull-start, transom-hung rudder, no integrated tankage, one through-hull for the sink.  A propane tank strap-down area, a quality ice cooler that starts with a block of ice, 3 cube-shaped 20L camping water jugs, strapped down.  One solar panel, one AGM battery, and LED lighting.  Stow a 12V trolling motor for emergencies under the cockpit.    Everything is smaller, cheaper, less complicated.    A 16-18 foot boat with some type of retractable keel also looks substantially smaller to border people, not like a ship.   Of course it is coming back with us, we are not importing it -- an answer that is less convincing for a much larger boat.   Brent has said a 26 will get one to Tahiti... a lot of us just don't have time for that right now.   We may have a larger boat closer to home already.   A smaller steel boat will get some people sailing further from home, sooner.    Matt   From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of gary.lucas@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 9:07 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     I think the problem is that scale factor becomes a problem going much smaller with steel.  As you get smaller the relative mass of the steel increases very fast until you wind up with either a very weak structure or a very heavy boat.   Gary H. Lucas Have you read my blog? http://a-little-business.blogspot.com/   From: mailto:origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 8:59 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?       Brent,   Do you have a design smaller/lighter than 26 feet, and, what dimensions of steel sheets does it start with for the hull halves ?   My scrap yard has a pile of steel sheet going cheap.   I am hoping you will say 16 to 18 feet.   I am hoping for something made with maybe 1 tonne of steel.    Separately, what is the smallest size of your origami designs would be appropriate to build in 1/4 inch plate ?   Matt | 35083|35044|2018-05-11 12:41:01|mountain man|Re: Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?| The Tom Thumb is 24 feet and in steel De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 11 mai 2018 11:01:27 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : Re: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     I guess I was unclear... I understood the BS26 to be made from 3/16" sheet.   It is unclear why 3/16" would be OK for a BS26, but distort if it was formed into a smaller boat.   I am not asking about 22 gauge sheet here.   Yes, as Gary pointed out going with thick steel, the boat would be heavy, but so long as it sails reliably, can be carried on the trailer and towed easily, and confers the benefit of steel, I accept that penalty.  I do not know of any used steel sailboats with a closed cabin in the range of 16-18 feet. I do not have either the experience or equipment to weld aluminium.  Even aluminium scrap is really expensive and I have yet to see it in a stack of big sheets in a scrap yard.  In contrast, a pile of scrap steel sheets going cheap has been located, hence my question.   I was asking the question here to avoid the use of a fibreglass boat of any sort if possible.  In this size there are three types of fibreglass boats:  - thin boats made of woven mat -- I have on old one -- and for its weight it is strongish.  Unfamiliar waters, one pointy rock, no thank you.  - thick boats that are mostly resin because it is a chopper gun boat -- no thank you.  - thick solid woven mat boats -- The only ones I have seen are shaped like tiny offshore racing boats that one sits on.  They have a fixed keel with only sail lockers below, i.e., no cabin at all -- no thank you. Now if I could find a thick solid woven mat fibreglass sailboat boat (built heavy like a modern commercial lifeboat) that could hit a few point rocks (not too hard), and probably not sink, if I could find one for less than the cost of a pile of scrap steel sheet, I sure would consider it.   These are rare and appreciated boats and $1,500 is already more than the cost of the steel. On the point of one can buy a used anything for less than the cost of materials -- equally true for most owner-built boats, and many capable solid robust older fibreglass production boats that have become a burden to someone else.   This is less true of small boats that go easily on trailers in someone's backyard.  There is no yearly marina fee driving down the asking price.   One can get a robust solid glass boat of 30-40 feet for substantially less than $10,000 and it will weigh 8-10 tonnes.  A 16-18 foot crap-glass trailer boat will go for more than $1,000 and weigh less than 0.5 tonnes.   The trailer boat is just sitting on a trailer in the back yard, not costing them a dime, no pressure to sell.   Why would they sell for $500, they would sooner see it rot on the trailer -- I know I do.       Then there is plywood... Fibreglass is literally 10 times stronger when it is done correctly -- I know there are plywood boats, and very thin ones but, unfamiliar waters, one pointy rock -- no thank you.   I really want the benefit of steel if it is possible.   Again, I thought it was a fair question to Brent, and if the answer is no, then, it is no.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 9:39 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     Gary is right.  Thin steel sheet distorts too much when welded and is not stiff enough.  It will need a lot of bracing and you still have to line it with something which adds a lot of weight on a small boat.   Plywood (or possibly welded aluminum) construction is ideal for what you wish to do.  I can honestly say though that if all you want is a trailer boat to use for a few weeks a year, you are much better off to buy something used.  You will get it for less than the cost of materials to build something. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Gary, in general you are correct.   Yes, a boat that floats maybe a little lower than a solid glass hull -- the only hull worth comparing to a metal one -- will have different performance.  However, if a solid glass hull with hardware and lines but no cargo in the 16-18 foot range weights 1-2 tons, that is potentially a lot of steel that is not that thin.   Building in steel, one gains the advantage of steel.     Lets consider 3/16" / 7 gauge.  It is 3.4 kg / square foot.   A tonne is 295 square feet.   That is believably a 16 foot boat with a enclosed cabin and a 6 foot beam.   I have a thin flimsy fibreglass boat that is that size and it weighs one quarter of that.   Which would you rather tow on a vacation and launch into new-to-you coastal waters ?   The 26 ft is a fine size, and has been demonstrated to be towable, but, not take it on-a-road-vacation-towable.   What could one do with a 16-18 foot boat?  Tow it on vacation.   Where?  Look at a map of North America and put a pin on any spot on the coast.   After deducting for the road portion of the trip, one could easily go a couple hundred miles on the water in a week in a 16-18 foot boat.   That puts a chunk of islands off the BC coast in range, the intercoastal on the east coast of the US, even the Bahamas from Florida.   Yes, it might be heavy, or one could call it durable.   And how many people can say they have visited half these places -- yes a lot of people here, but what fraction of 30 foot boat owners can say that?  Why?  They just did not have the time to sail their boat there, or the thousands to have it shipped there, and thousands to have it shipped back.    Also, reducing the boat to 16-18 feet, with a sail duration of a week in mind, one can dispense with a lot of the complication that makes a 26 footer a project that is not finished.  Outboard with pull-start, transom-hung rudder, no integrated tankage, one through-hull for the sink.  A propane tank strap-down area, a quality ice cooler that starts with a block of ice, 3 cube-shaped 20L camping water jugs, strapped down.  One solar panel, one AGM battery, and LED lighting.  Stow a 12V trolling motor for emergencies under the cockpit.    Everything is smaller, cheaper, less complicated.    A 16-18 foot boat with some type of retractable keel also looks substantially smaller to border people, not like a ship.   Of course it is coming back with us, we are not importing it -- an answer that is less convincing for a much larger boat.   Brent has said a 26 will get one to Tahiti... a lot of us just don't have time for that right now.   We may have a larger boat closer to home already.   A smaller steel boat will get some people sailing further from home, sooner.    Matt   From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of gary.lucas@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 9:07 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     I think the problem is that scale factor becomes a problem going much smaller with steel.  As you get smaller the relative mass of the steel increases very fast until you wind up with either a very weak structure or a very heavy boat.   Gary H. Lucas Have you read my blog? http://a-little-business.blogspot.com/   From: mailto:origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 8:59 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?       Brent,   Do you have a design smaller/lighter than 26 feet, and, what dimensions of steel sheets does it start with for the hull halves ?   My scrap yard has a pile of steel sheet going cheap.   I am hoping you will say 16 to 18 feet.   I am hoping for something made with maybe 1 tonne of steel.    Separately, what is the smallest size of your origami designs would be appropriate to build in 1/4 inch plate ?   Matt | 35084|35044|2018-05-11 13:00:43|rockrothwell|Re: Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?|26 feet is fine for offshore work. I have seen Thunderbird's in Manila and Sydney.| 35085|35044|2018-05-11 14:26:39|Matt Malone|Re: Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?| The Tom Thumb is 24' LWL, 26' LOA: https://www.finelineboatplans.com/bruce-roberts-tom-thumb-26-boat-plan It is also 9,000 pounds, plus another 1,000 pounds for a trailer and that is at the very limit for a 3/4 ton pickup, complicated brakes, etc.   Not exactly a casual vacation tow. At this moment, given the choice between a Tom Thumb 26 and a BS 26, I would choose a BS26 that Brent said was well built.   The question was for a much smaller and lighter boat built in steel shaped like this: Similar to the Hunter 490 (1,000 lbs, likely cored fibreglass), but with more cabin, less cockpit... http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=5949 Like this (1,350 lbs unknown fibreglass) but steel... http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=5716 I have this one (480 pounds, much thinner single layer but woven fiberglass) with only a cuddy, not an enclosed cabin: http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=7784 To use like this (1,600 lbs, constructed of 1" of plywood): http://www.microcruising.com/lc1.htm If a smaller origami design exists anywhere in Brent's papers, and maybe not as well known as his others, I would like to hear about it.   A steel boat like this could be built entirely within a single-car garage in the suburbs in any town in North America... No outdoor work yard is needed.    So what if it weighs 2,000-3,000 pounds (16-18 feet), all fitted out, in steel, it will still float.  At scrap prices, that is $1,000 in steel.  Try buying a trailerable P.O.S. fibreglass boat, let alone a good one, for $1,000.  So what if it is not a year round live-aboard like Brent's bigger boats.   With a retractable bulb or delta wing keel, it would go on a trailer very easily, launch shallow, sail fearlessly, beach it anywhere, go for a week at a time.   Any story Brent can tell about a BS26 pounding across a reef, by the physics of scaling, assuming the same metal thickness is used in this boat, this smaller, lighter, tougher little boat could laugh at the same reef.   Try that with plywood or fibreglass.  Certainly people can see a niche for that ?   Certainly people who only get a North American 2-3 week vacation can understand that ?    Yes, the "real" cruisers of 26' and larger are way better, but they are a different class of boat. I am starting to wonder, have I finally found an anarchist boating concept that is too far out there to be acceptable on Origamiboats, which is itself apparently too far out there for a site called Cruising Anarchy ...  Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of mountain man mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 12:40 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     The Tom Thumb is 24 feet and in steel De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 11 mai 2018 11:01:27 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : Re: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     I guess I was unclear... I understood the BS26 to be made from 3/16" sheet.   It is unclear why 3/16" would be OK for a BS26, but distort if it was formed into a smaller boat.   I am not asking about 22 gauge sheet here.   Yes, as Gary pointed out going with thick steel, the boat would be heavy, but so long as it sails reliably, can be carried on the trailer and towed easily, and confers the benefit of steel, I accept that penalty.  I do not know of any used steel sailboats with a closed cabin in the range of 16-18 feet. I do not have either the experience or equipment to weld aluminium.  Even aluminium scrap is really expensive and I have yet to see it in a stack of big sheets in a scrap yard.  In contrast, a pile of scrap steel sheets going cheap has been located, hence my question.   I was asking the question here to avoid the use of a fibreglass boat of any sort if possible.  In this size there are three types of fibreglass boats:  - thin boats made of woven mat -- I have on old one -- and for its weight it is strongish.  Unfamiliar waters, one pointy rock, no thank you.  - thick boats that are mostly resin because it is a chopper gun boat -- no thank you.  - thick solid woven mat boats -- The only ones I have seen are shaped like tiny offshore racing boats that one sits on.  They have a fixed keel with only sail lockers below, i.e., no cabin at all -- no thank you. Now if I could find a thick solid woven mat fibreglass sailboat boat (built heavy like a modern commercial lifeboat) that could hit a few point rocks (not too hard), and probably not sink, if I could find one for less than the cost of a pile of scrap steel sheet, I sure would consider it.   These are rare and appreciated boats and $1,500 is already more than the cost of the steel. On the point of one can buy a used anything for less than the cost of materials -- equally true for most owner-built boats, and many capable solid robust older fibreglass production boats that have become a burden to someone else.   This is less true of small boats that go easily on trailers in someone's backyard.  There is no yearly marina fee driving down the asking price.   One can get a robust solid glass boat of 30-40 feet for substantially less than $10,000 and it will weigh 8-10 tonnes.  A 16-18 foot crap-glass trailer boat will go for more than $1,000 and weigh less than 0.5 tonnes.   The trailer boat is just sitting on a trailer in the back yard, not costing them a dime, no pressure to sell.   Why would they sell for $500, they would sooner see it rot on the trailer -- I know I do.       Then there is plywood... Fibreglass is literally 10 times stronger when it is done correctly -- I know there are plywood boats, and very thin ones but, unfamiliar waters, one pointy rock -- no thank you.   I really want the benefit of steel if it is possible.   Again, I thought it was a fair question to Brent, and if the answer is no, then, it is no.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 9:39 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     Gary is right.  Thin steel sheet distorts too much when welded and is not stiff enough.  It will need a lot of bracing and you still have to line it with something which adds a lot of weight on a small boat.   Plywood (or possibly welded aluminum) construction is ideal for what you wish to do.  I can honestly say though that if all you want is a trailer boat to use for a few weeks a year, you are much better off to buy something used.  You will get it for less than the cost of materials to build something. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Gary, in general you are correct..   Yes, a boat that floats maybe a little lower than a solid glass hull -- the only hull worth comparing to a metal one -- will have different performance.  However, if a solid glass hull with hardware and lines but no cargo in the 16-18 foot range weights 1-2 tons, that is potentially a lot of steel that is not that thin.   Building in steel, one gains the advantage of steel.     Lets consider 3/16" / 7 gauge.  It is 3.4 kg / square foot.   A tonne is 295 square feet.   That is believably a 16 foot boat with a enclosed cabin and a 6 foot beam.   I have a thin flimsy fibreglass boat that is that size and it weighs one quarter of that.   Which would you rather tow on a vacation and launch into new-to-you coastal waters ?   The 26 ft is a fine size, and has been demonstrated to be towable, but, not take it on-a-road-vacation-towable.   What could one do with a 16-18 foot boat?  Tow it on vacation.   Where?  Look at a map of North America and put a pin on any spot on the coast.   After deducting for the road portion of the trip, one could easily go a couple hundred miles on the water in a week in a 16-18 foot boat.   That puts a chunk of islands off the BC coast in range, the intercoastal on the east coast of the US, even the Bahamas from Florida.   Yes, it might be heavy, or one could call it durable.   And how many people can say they have visited half these places -- yes a lot of people here, but what fraction of 30 foot boat owners can say that?  Why?  They just did not have the time to sail their boat there, or the thousands to have it shipped there, and thousands to have it shipped back.    Also, reducing the boat to 16-18 feet, with a sail duration of a week in mind, one can dispense with a lot of the complication that makes a 26 footer a project that is not finished.  Outboard with pull-start, transom-hung rudder, no integrated tankage, one through-hull for the sink.  A propane tank strap-down area, a quality ice cooler that starts with a block of ice, 3 cube-shaped 20L camping water jugs, strapped down.  One solar panel, one AGM battery, and LED lighting.  Stow a 12V trolling motor for emergencies under the cockpit.    Everything is smaller, cheaper, less complicated.    A 16-18 foot boat with some type of retractable keel also looks substantially smaller to border people, not like a ship.   Of course it is coming back with us, we are not importing it -- an answer that is less convincing for a much larger boat.   Brent has said a 26 will get one to Tahiti... a lot of us just don't have time for that right now.   We may have a larger boat closer to home already.   A smaller steel boat will get some people sailing further from home, sooner.    Matt   From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of gary.lucas@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 9:07 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     I think the problem is that scale factor becomes a problem going much smaller with steel.  As you get smaller the relative mass of the steel increases very fast until you wind up with either a very weak structure or a very heavy boat.   Gary H. Lucas Have you read my blog? http://a-little-business.blogspot.com/   From: mailto:origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 8:59 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?       Brent,   Do you have a design smaller/lighter than 26 feet, and, what dimensions of steel sheets does it start with for the hull halves ?   My scrap yard has a pile of steel sheet going cheap.   I am hoping you will say 16 to 18 feet.   I am hoping for something made with maybe 1 tonne of steel.    Separately, what is the smallest size of your origami designs would be appropriate to build in 1/4 inch plate ?   Matt | 35086|35044|2018-05-11 14:40:13|Jfisher|Re: Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?|Matt,I know of one welsford sweet pea that was welded up from aluminum.  It's a 17 ft small cabin cruiser. Not sure what it weighed or how it sailed.  I think there are quite a few small ply boats that might be suitable to weld up in aluminum.  Have you looked at Jim michalaks catalog of designs?  I think steel gets too heavy in a thickness that will hold it shape.  JohnSent from my iPad On May 11, 2018, at 12:26, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   The Tom Thumb is 24' LWL, 26' LOA: https://www.finelineboatplans.com/bruce-roberts-tom-thumb-26-boat-plan It is also 9,000 pounds, plus another 1,000 pounds for a trailer and that is at the very limit for a 3/4 ton pickup, complicated brakes, etc.   Not exactly a casual vacation tow. At this moment, given the choice between a Tom Thumb 26 and a BS 26, I would choose a BS26 that Brent said was well built.   The question was for a much smaller and lighter boat built in steel shaped like this: Similar to the Hunter 490 (1,000 lbs, likely cored fibreglass), but with more cabin, less cockpit... http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=5949 Like this (1,350 lbs unknown fibreglass) but steel... http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=5716 I have this one (480 pounds, much thinner single layer but woven fiberglass) with only a cuddy, not an enclosed cabin: http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=7784 To use like this (1,600 lbs, constructed of 1" of plywood): http://www.microcruising.com/lc1.htm If a smaller origami design exists anywhere in Brent's papers, and maybe not as well known as his others, I would like to hear about it.   A steel boat like this could be built entirely within a single-car garage in the suburbs in any town in North America... No outdoor work yard is needed.    So what if it weighs 2,000-3,000 pounds (16-18 feet), all fitted out, in steel, it will still float.  At scrap prices, that is $1,000 in steel.  Try buying a trailerable P.O.S. fibreglass boat, let alone a good one, for $1,000.  So what if it is not a year round live-aboard like Brent's bigger boats.   With a retractable bulb or delta wing keel, it would go on a trailer very easily, launch shallow, sail fearlessly, beach it anywhere, go for a week at a time.   Any story Brent can tell about a BS26 pounding across a reef, by the physics of scaling, assuming the same metal thickness is used in this boat, this smaller, lighter, tougher little boat could laugh at the same reef.   Try that with plywood or fibreglass.  Certainly people can see a niche for that ?   Certainly people who only get a North American 2-3 week vacation can understand that ?    Yes, the "real" cruisers of 26' and larger are way better, but they are a different class of boat. I am starting to wonder, have I finally found an anarchist boating concept that is too far out there to be acceptable on Origamiboats, which is itself apparently too far out there for a site called Cruising Anarchy ...  Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of mountain man mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 12:40 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     The Tom Thumb is 24 feet and in steel De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 11 mai 2018 11:01:27 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : Re: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     I guess I was unclear... I understood the BS26 to be made from 3/16" sheet.   It is unclear why 3/16" would be OK for a BS26, but distort if it was formed into a smaller boat.   I am not asking about 22 gauge sheet here.   Yes, as Gary pointed out going with thick steel, the boat would be heavy, but so long as it sails reliably, can be carried on the trailer and towed easily, and confers the benefit of steel, I accept that penalty.  I do not know of any used steel sailboats with a closed cabin in the range of 16-18 feet. I do not have either the experience or equipment to weld aluminium.  Even aluminium scrap is really expensive and I have yet to see it in a stack of big sheets in a scrap yard.  In contrast, a pile of scrap steel sheets going cheap has been located, hence my question.   I was asking the question here to avoid the use of a fibreglass boat of any sort if possible.  In this size there are three types of fibreglass boats:  - thin boats made of woven mat -- I have on old one -- and for its weight it is strongish.  Unfamiliar waters, one pointy rock, no thank you.  - thick boats that are mostly resin because it is a chopper gun boat -- no thank you.  - thick solid woven mat boats -- The only ones I have seen are shaped like tiny offshore racing boats that one sits on.  They have a fixed keel with only sail lockers below, i.e., no cabin at all -- no thank you. Now if I could find a thick solid woven mat fibreglass sailboat boat (built heavy like a modern commercial lifeboat) that could hit a few point rocks (not too hard), and probably not sink, if I could find one for less than the cost of a pile of scrap steel sheet, I sure would consider it.   These are rare and appreciated boats and $1,500 is already more than the cost of the steel. On the point of one can buy a used anything for less than the cost of materials -- equally true for most owner-built boats, and many capable solid robust older fibreglass production boats that have become a burden to someone else.   This is less true of small boats that go easily on trailers in someone's backyard.  There is no yearly marina fee driving down the asking price.   One can get a robust solid glass boat of 30-40 feet for substantially less than $10,000 and it will weigh 8-10 tonnes.  A 16-18 foot crap-glass trailer boat will go for more than $1,000 and weigh less than 0.5 tonnes.   The trailer boat is just sitting on a trailer in the back yard, not costing them a dime, no pressure to sell.   Why would they sell for $500, they would sooner see it rot on the trailer -- I know I do.       Then there is plywood... Fibreglass is literally 10 times stronger when it is done correctly -- I know there are plywood boats, and very thin ones but, unfamiliar waters, one pointy rock -- no thank you.   I really want the benefit of steel if it is possible.   Again, I thought it was a fair question to Brent, and if the answer is no, then, it is no.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@yahoo..ca [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 9:39 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     Gary is right.  Thin steel sheet distorts too much when welded and is not stiff enough.  It will need a lot of bracing and you still have to line it with something which adds a lot of weight on a small boat.   Plywood (or possibly welded aluminum) construction is ideal for what you wish to do.  I can honestly say though that if all you want is a trailer boat to use for a few weeks a year, you are much better off to buy something used.  You will get it for less than the cost of materials to build something. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Gary, in general you are correct...   Yes, a boat that floats maybe a little lower than a solid glass hull -- the only hull worth comparing to a metal one -- will have different performance.  However, if a solid glass hull with hardware and lines but no cargo in the 16-18 foot range weights 1-2 tons, that is potentially a lot of steel that is not that thin.   Building in steel, one gains the advantage of steel.     Lets consider 3/16" / 7 gauge.  It is 3.4 kg / square foot.   A tonne is 295 square feet.   That is believably a 16 foot boat with a enclosed cabin and a 6 foot beam.   I have a thin flimsy fibreglass boat that is that size and it weighs one quarter of that.   Which would you rather tow on a vacation and launch into new-to-you coastal waters ?   The 26 ft is a fine size, and has been demonstrated to be towable, but, not take it on-a-road-vacation-towable.   What could one do with a 16-18 foot boat?  Tow it on vacation.   Where?  Look at a map of North America and put a pin on any spot on the coast.   After deducting for the road portion of the trip, one could easily go a couple hundred miles on the water in a week in a 16-18 foot boat.   That puts a chunk of islands off the BC coast in range, the intercoastal on the east coast of the US, even the Bahamas from Florida.   Yes, it might be heavy, or one could call it durable.   And how many people can say they have visited half these places -- yes a lot of people here, but what fraction of 30 foot boat owners can say that?  Why?  They just did not have the time to sail their boat there, or the thousands to have it shipped there, and thousands to have it shipped back.    Also, reducing the boat to 16-18 feet, with a sail duration of a week in mind, one can dispense with a lot of the complication that makes a 26 footer a project that is not finished.  Outboard with pull-start, transom-hung rudder, no integrated tankage, one through-hull for the sink.  A propane tank strap-down area, a quality ice cooler that starts with a block of ice, 3 cube-shaped 20L camping water jugs, strapped down.  One solar panel, one AGM battery, and LED lighting.  Stow a 12V trolling motor for emergencies under the cockpit.    Everything is smaller, cheaper, less complicated.    A 16-18 foot boat with some type of retractable keel also looks substantially smaller to border people, not like a ship.   Of course it is coming back with us, we are not importing it -- an answer that is less convincing for a much larger boat.   Brent has said a 26 will get one to Tahiti... a lot of us just don't have time for that right now.   We may have a larger boat closer to home already.   A smaller steel boat will get some people sailing further from home, sooner.    Matt   From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of gary.lucas@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 9:07 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     I think the problem is that scale factor becomes a problem going much smaller with steel.  As you get smaller the relative mass of the steel increases very fast until you wind up with either a very weak structure or a very heavy boat.   Gary H. Lucas Have you read my blog? http://a-little-business.blogspot.com/   From: mailto:origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 8:59 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?       Brent,   Do you have a design smaller/lighter than 26 feet, and, what dimensions of steel sheets does it start with for the hull halves ?   My scrap yard has a pile of steel sheet going cheap.   I am hoping you will say 16 to 18 feet.   I am hoping for something made with maybe 1 tonne of steel.    Separately, what is the smallest size of your origami designs would be appropriate to build in 1/4 inch plate ?   Matt | 35087|35044|2018-05-11 14:56:04|brentswain38|Re: Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :#ygrps-yiv-175134714 #ygrps-yiv-175134714ygrps-yiv-527436642 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}The smallest I have is 26 feet. She can be trailered anywhere , on  a highway. She is the one Winston sailed thru the NW passage . One did the trip from BC to  Australia ,no problems. She uses 6 ft by 27 ft 10 gauge plate, altho 11 gauge would work OK. For anything smaller, aluminium would be a better bet. I don't think I would go 1/4 inch on anything under 45 feet. My designs only go up to 40 feet. Don't see the point in anything bigger.Brent,Do you have a design smaller/lighter than 26 feet, and, what dimensions of steel sheets does it start with for the hull halves ?   My scrap yard has a pile of steel sheet going cheap.   I am hoping you will say 16 to 18 feet.   I am hoping for something made with maybe 1 tonne of steel.  Separately, what is the smallest size of your origami designs would be appropriate to build in 1/4 inch plate ?Matt | 35088|35044|2018-05-11 18:36:30|Matt Malone|Re: Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?| Thank you John, Those looks simple to build and interesting and the plans are cheap.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Jfisher jfisher577@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 2:40 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     Matt, I know of one welsford sweet pea that was welded up from aluminum.  It's a 17 ft small cabin cruiser. Not sure what it weighed or how it sailed.   I think there are quite a few small ply boats that might be suitable to weld up in aluminum.  Have you looked at Jim michalaks catalog of designs?  I think steel gets too heavy in a thickness that will hold it shape.   John Sent from my iPad On May 11, 2018, at 12:26, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   The Tom Thumb is 24' LWL, 26' LOA: https://www.finelineboatplans.com/bruce-roberts-tom-thumb-26-boat-plan It is also 9,000 pounds, plus another 1,000 pounds for a trailer and that is at the very limit for a 3/4 ton pickup, complicated brakes, etc.   Not exactly a casual vacation tow. At this moment, given the choice between a Tom Thumb 26 and a BS 26, I would choose a BS26 that Brent said was well built.   The question was for a much smaller and lighter boat built in steel shaped like this: Similar to the Hunter 490 (1,000 lbs, likely cored fibreglass), but with more cabin, less cockpit... http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=5949 Like this (1,350 lbs unknown fibreglass) but steel... http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=5716 I have this one (480 pounds, much thinner single layer but woven fiberglass) with only a cuddy, not an enclosed cabin: http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=7784 To use like this (1,600 lbs, constructed of 1" of plywood): http://www.microcruising.com/lc1.htm If a smaller origami design exists anywhere in Brent's papers, and maybe not as well known as his others, I would like to hear about it.   A steel boat like this could be built entirely within a single-car garage in the suburbs in any town in North America... No outdoor work yard is needed.    So what if it weighs 2,000-3,000 pounds (16-18 feet), all fitted out, in steel, it will still float.  At scrap prices, that is $1,000 in steel.  Try buying a trailerable P.O.S. fibreglass boat, let alone a good one, for $1,000.  So what if it is not a year round live-aboard like Brent's bigger boats.   With a retractable bulb or delta wing keel, it would go on a trailer very easily, launch shallow, sail fearlessly, beach it anywhere, go for a week at a time.   Any story Brent can tell about a BS26 pounding across a reef, by the physics of scaling, assuming the same metal thickness is used in this boat, this smaller, lighter, tougher little boat could laugh at the same reef.   Try that with plywood or fibreglass.  Certainly people can see a niche for that ?   Certainly people who only get a North American 2-3 week vacation can understand that ?    Yes, the "real" cruisers of 26' and larger are way better, but they are a different class of boat. I am starting to wonder, have I finally found an anarchist boating concept that is too far out there to be acceptable on Origamiboats, which is itself apparently too far out there for a site called Cruising Anarchy ...  Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of mountain man mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 12:40 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     The Tom Thumb is 24 feet and in steel De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 11 mai 2018 11:01:27 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : Re: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     I guess I was unclear... I understood the BS26 to be made from 3/16" sheet.   It is unclear why 3/16" would be OK for a BS26, but distort if it was formed into a smaller boat.   I am not asking about 22 gauge sheet here.   Yes, as Gary pointed out going with thick steel, the boat would be heavy, but so long as it sails reliably, can be carried on the trailer and towed easily, and confers the benefit of steel, I accept that penalty.  I do not know of any used steel sailboats with a closed cabin in the range of 16-18 feet. I do not have either the experience or equipment to weld aluminium.  Even aluminium scrap is really expensive and I have yet to see it in a stack of big sheets in a scrap yard.  In contrast, a pile of scrap steel sheets going cheap has been located, hence my question.   I was asking the question here to avoid the use of a fibreglass boat of any sort if possible.  In this size there are three types of fibreglass boats:  - thin boats made of woven mat -- I have on old one -- and for its weight it is strongish.  Unfamiliar waters, one pointy rock, no thank you.  - thick boats that are mostly resin because it is a chopper gun boat -- no thank you.  - thick solid woven mat boats -- The only ones I have seen are shaped like tiny offshore racing boats that one sits on.  They have a fixed keel with only sail lockers below, i.e., no cabin at all -- no thank you. Now if I could find a thick solid woven mat fibreglass sailboat boat (built heavy like a modern commercial lifeboat) that could hit a few point rocks (not too hard), and probably not sink, if I could find one for less than the cost of a pile of scrap steel sheet, I sure would consider it.   These are rare and appreciated boats and $1,500 is already more than the cost of the steel. On the point of one can buy a used anything for less than the cost of materials -- equally true for most owner-built boats, and many capable solid robust older fibreglass production boats that have become a burden to someone else.   This is less true of small boats that go easily on trailers in someone's backyard.  There is no yearly marina fee driving down the asking price.   One can get a robust solid glass boat of 30-40 feet for substantially less than $10,000 and it will weigh 8-10 tonnes.  A 16-18 foot crap-glass trailer boat will go for more than $1,000 and weigh less than 0.5 tonnes.   The trailer boat is just sitting on a trailer in the back yard, not costing them a dime, no pressure to sell.   Why would they sell for $500, they would sooner see it rot on the trailer -- I know I do.       Then there is plywood... Fibreglass is literally 10 times stronger when it is done correctly -- I know there are plywood boats, and very thin ones but, unfamiliar waters, one pointy rock -- no thank you.   I really want the benefit of steel if it is possible.   Again, I thought it was a fair question to Brent, and if the answer is no, then, it is no.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@yahoo..ca [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 9:39 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     Gary is right.  Thin steel sheet distorts too much when welded and is not stiff enough.  It will need a lot of bracing and you still have to line it with something which adds a lot of weight on a small boat.   Plywood (or possibly welded aluminum) construction is ideal for what you wish to do.  I can honestly say though that if all you want is a trailer boat to use for a few weeks a year, you are much better off to buy something used.  You will get it for less than the cost of materials to build something. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Gary, in general you are correct....   Yes, a boat that floats maybe a little lower than a solid glass hull -- the only hull worth comparing to a metal one -- will have different performance.  However, if a solid glass hull with hardware and lines but no cargo in the 16-18 foot range weights 1-2 tons, that is potentially a lot of steel that is not that thin.   Building in steel, one gains the advantage of steel.     Lets consider 3/16" / 7 gauge.  It is 3.4 kg / square foot.   A tonne is 295 square feet.   That is believably a 16 foot boat with a enclosed cabin and a 6 foot beam.   I have a thin flimsy fibreglass boat that is that size and it weighs one quarter of that.   Which would you rather tow on a vacation and launch into new-to-you coastal waters ?   The 26 ft is a fine size, and has been demonstrated to be towable, but, not take it on-a-road-vacation-towable.   What could one do with a 16-18 foot boat?  Tow it on vacation.   Where?  Look at a map of North America and put a pin on any spot on the coast.   After deducting for the road portion of the trip, one could easily go a couple hundred miles on the water in a week in a 16-18 foot boat.   That puts a chunk of islands off the BC coast in range, the intercoastal on the east coast of the US, even the Bahamas from Florida.   Yes, it might be heavy, or one could call it durable.   And how many people can say they have visited half these places -- yes a lot of people here, but what fraction of 30 foot boat owners can say that?  Why?  They just did not have the time to sail their boat there, or the thousands to have it shipped there, and thousands to have it shipped back.    Also, reducing the boat to 16-18 feet, with a sail duration of a week in mind, one can dispense with a lot of the complication that makes a 26 footer a project that is not finished.  Outboard with pull-start, transom-hung rudder, no integrated tankage, one through-hull for the sink.  A propane tank strap-down area, a quality ice cooler that starts with a block of ice, 3 cube-shaped 20L camping water jugs, strapped down.  One solar panel, one AGM battery, and LED lighting.  Stow a 12V trolling motor for emergencies under the cockpit.    Everything is smaller, cheaper, less complicated.    A 16-18 foot boat with some type of retractable keel also looks substantially smaller to border people, not like a ship.   Of course it is coming back with us, we are not importing it -- an answer that is less convincing for a much larger boat.   Brent has said a 26 will get one to Tahiti... a lot of us just don't have time for that right now.   We may have a larger boat closer to home already.   A smaller steel boat will get some people sailing further from home, sooner.    Matt   From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of gary.lucas@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 9:07 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     I think the problem is that scale factor becomes a problem going much smaller with steel.  As you get smaller the relative mass of the steel increases very fast until you wind up with either a very weak structure or a very heavy boat.   Gary H. Lucas Have you read my blog? http://a-little-business.blogspot.com/   From: mailto:origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 8:59 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?       Brent,   Do you have a design smaller/lighter than 26 feet, and, what dimensions of steel sheets does it start with for the hull halves ?   My scrap yard has a pile of steel sheet going cheap.   I am hoping you will say 16 to 18 feet.   I am hoping for something made with maybe 1 tonne of steel.    Separately, what is the smallest size of your origami designs would be appropriate to build in 1/4 inch plate ?   Matt | 35089|35044|2018-05-11 18:52:08|Matt Malone|Re: Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?| Thank you Brent,  the BS26 is far from the small project I was considering and more than I would want to tow further than the nearest launch that will get me to a seaway.   For me that is between 50 and 100 miles.   I appreciate it would also be far cheaper to pay someone to ship it cross-country because it would easily go on a gooseneck flatbed trailer one often sees a 1-ton pickup towing construction equipment on.   It would not require a special boat moving trailer and a semitruck $$$.    The BS26 hits the small-boat, standing headroom unbounded cruising niche very well.   I followed Kim's construction with great interest.   The extent of a 26 is beyond my time budget, and casual expenditure pocket book.   It is not to be my big boat.   I am going to look at some home built, hard-chine retractable keel designs.     Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 2:54 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : The smallest I have is 26 feet. She can be trailered anywhere , on  a highway. She is the one Winston sailed thru the NW passage . One did the trip from BC to  Australia ,no problems. She uses 6 ft by 27 ft 10 gauge plate, altho 11 gauge would work OK. For anything smaller, aluminium would be a better bet. I don't think I would go 1/4 inch on anything under 45 feet. My designs only go up to 40 feet. Don't see the point in anything bigger. Brent, Do you have a design smaller/lighter than 26 feet, and, what dimensions of steel sheets does it start with for the hull halves ?   My scrap yard has a pile of steel sheet going cheap.   I am hoping you will say 16 to 18 feet.   I am hoping for something made with maybe 1 tonne of steel.   Separately, what is the smallest size of your origami designs would be appropriate to build in 1/4 inch plate ? Matt | 35090|35044|2018-05-11 19:03:52|Jfisher|Re: Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?|I have plans for the toon 19.  I have thought it might work for conversion to origami and maybe aluminum.  If not I might just make it in ply for really shallow water cruising.  Sent from my iPad On May 11, 2018, at 16:36, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Thank you John, Those looks simple to build and interesting and the plans are cheap.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Jfisher jfisher577@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 2:40 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     Matt, I know of one welsford sweet pea that was welded up from aluminum.  It's a 17 ft small cabin cruiser. Not sure what it weighed or how it sailed.   I think there are quite a few small ply boats that might be suitable to weld up in aluminum.  Have you looked at Jim michalaks catalog of designs?  I think steel gets too heavy in a thickness that will hold it shape.   John Sent from my iPad On May 11, 2018, at 12:26, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   The Tom Thumb is 24' LWL, 26' LOA: https://www.finelineboatplans.com/bruce-roberts-tom-thumb-26-boat-plan It is also 9,000 pounds, plus another 1,000 pounds for a trailer and that is at the very limit for a 3/4 ton pickup, complicated brakes, etc.   Not exactly a casual vacation tow. At this moment, given the choice between a Tom Thumb 26 and a BS 26, I would choose a BS26 that Brent said was well built.   The question was for a much smaller and lighter boat built in steel shaped like this: Similar to the Hunter 490 (1,000 lbs, likely cored fibreglass), but with more cabin, less cockpit... http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=5949 Like this (1,350 lbs unknown fibreglass) but steel... http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=5716 I have this one (480 pounds, much thinner single layer but woven fiberglass) with only a cuddy, not an enclosed cabin: http://sailboatdata.com/viewrecord.asp?class_id=7784 To use like this (1,600 lbs, constructed of 1" of plywood): http://www.microcruising.com/lc1.htm If a smaller origami design exists anywhere in Brent's papers, and maybe not as well known as his others, I would like to hear about it.   A steel boat like this could be built entirely within a single-car garage in the suburbs in any town in North America... No outdoor work yard is needed.    So what if it weighs 2,000-3,000 pounds (16-18 feet), all fitted out, in steel, it will still float.  At scrap prices, that is $1,000 in steel.  Try buying a trailerable P.O.S. fibreglass boat, let alone a good one, for $1,000.  So what if it is not a year round live-aboard like Brent's bigger boats.   With a retractable bulb or delta wing keel, it would go on a trailer very easily, launch shallow, sail fearlessly, beach it anywhere, go for a week at a time.   Any story Brent can tell about a BS26 pounding across a reef, by the physics of scaling, assuming the same metal thickness is used in this boat, this smaller, lighter, tougher little boat could laugh at the same reef.   Try that with plywood or fibreglass.  Certainly people can see a niche for that ?   Certainly people who only get a North American 2-3 week vacation can understand that ?    Yes, the "real" cruisers of 26' and larger are way better, but they are a different class of boat. I am starting to wonder, have I finally found an anarchist boating concept that is too far out there to be acceptable on Origamiboats, which is itself apparently too far out there for a site called Cruising Anarchy ...  Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of mountain man mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 12:40 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     The Tom Thumb is 24 feet and in steel De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 11 mai 2018 11:01:27 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : Re: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     I guess I was unclear... I understood the BS26 to be made from 3/16" sheet.   It is unclear why 3/16" would be OK for a BS26, but distort if it was formed into a smaller boat.   I am not asking about 22 gauge sheet here.   Yes, as Gary pointed out going with thick steel, the boat would be heavy, but so long as it sails reliably, can be carried on the trailer and towed easily, and confers the benefit of steel, I accept that penalty.  I do not know of any used steel sailboats with a closed cabin in the range of 16-18 feet. I do not have either the experience or equipment to weld aluminium.  Even aluminium scrap is really expensive and I have yet to see it in a stack of big sheets in a scrap yard.  In contrast, a pile of scrap steel sheets going cheap has been located, hence my question.   I was asking the question here to avoid the use of a fibreglass boat of any sort if possible.  In this size there are three types of fibreglass boats:  - thin boats made of woven mat -- I have on old one -- and for its weight it is strongish.  Unfamiliar waters, one pointy rock, no thank you.  - thick boats that are mostly resin because it is a chopper gun boat -- no thank you.  - thick solid woven mat boats -- The only ones I have seen are shaped like tiny offshore racing boats that one sits on.  They have a fixed keel with only sail lockers below, i.e., no cabin at all -- no thank you. Now if I could find a thick solid woven mat fibreglass sailboat boat (built heavy like a modern commercial lifeboat) that could hit a few point rocks (not too hard), and probably not sink, if I could find one for less than the cost of a pile of scrap steel sheet, I sure would consider it.   These are rare and appreciated boats and $1,500 is already more than the cost of the steel. On the point of one can buy a used anything for less than the cost of materials -- equally true for most owner-built boats, and many capable solid robust older fibreglass production boats that have become a burden to someone else.   This is less true of small boats that go easily on trailers in someone's backyard.  There is no yearly marina fee driving down the asking price.   One can get a robust solid glass boat of 30-40 feet for substantially less than $10,000 and it will weigh 8-10 tonnes.  A 16-18 foot crap-glass trailer boat will go for more than $1,000 and weigh less than 0.5 tonnes.   The trailer boat is just sitting on a trailer in the back yard, not costing them a dime, no pressure to sell.   Why would they sell for $500, they would sooner see it rot on the trailer -- I know I do.       Then there is plywood... Fibreglass is literally 10 times stronger when it is done correctly -- I know there are plywood boats, and very thin ones but, unfamiliar waters, one pointy rock -- no thank you.   I really want the benefit of steel if it is possible.   Again, I thought it was a fair question to Brent, and if the answer is no, then, it is no.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@yahoo..ca [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 9:39 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     Gary is right.  Thin steel sheet distorts too much when welded and is not stiff enough.  It will need a lot of bracing and you still have to line it with something which adds a lot of weight on a small boat.   Plywood (or possibly welded aluminum) construction is ideal for what you wish to do.  I can honestly say though that if all you want is a trailer boat to use for a few weeks a year, you are much better off to buy something used.  You will get it for less than the cost of materials to build something. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Gary, in general you are correct.....   Yes, a boat that floats maybe a little lower than a solid glass hull -- the only hull worth comparing to a metal one -- will have different performance.  However, if a solid glass hull with hardware and lines but no cargo in the 16-18 foot range weights 1-2 tons, that is potentially a lot of steel that is not that thin.   Building in steel, one gains the advantage of steel.     Lets consider 3/16" / 7 gauge.  It is 3.4 kg / square foot.   A tonne is 295 square feet.   That is believably a 16 foot boat with a enclosed cabin and a 6 foot beam.   I have a thin flimsy fibreglass boat that is that size and it weighs one quarter of that.   Which would you rather tow on a vacation and launch into new-to-you coastal waters ?   The 26 ft is a fine size, and has been demonstrated to be towable, but, not take it on-a-road-vacation-towable.   What could one do with a 16-18 foot boat?  Tow it on vacation.   Where?  Look at a map of North America and put a pin on any spot on the coast.   After deducting for the road portion of the trip, one could easily go a couple hundred miles on the water in a week in a 16-18 foot boat.   That puts a chunk of islands off the BC coast in range, the intercoastal on the east coast of the US, even the Bahamas from Florida.   Yes, it might be heavy, or one could call it durable.   And how many people can say they have visited half these places -- yes a lot of people here, but what fraction of 30 foot boat owners can say that?  Why?  They just did not have the time to sail their boat there, or the thousands to have it shipped there, and thousands to have it shipped back.    Also, reducing the boat to 16-18 feet, with a sail duration of a week in mind, one can dispense with a lot of the complication that makes a 26 footer a project that is not finished.  Outboard with pull-start, transom-hung rudder, no integrated tankage, one through-hull for the sink.  A propane tank strap-down area, a quality ice cooler that starts with a block of ice, 3 cube-shaped 20L camping water jugs, strapped down.  One solar panel, one AGM battery, and LED lighting.  Stow a 12V trolling motor for emergencies under the cockpit.    Everything is smaller, cheaper, less complicated.    A 16-18 foot boat with some type of retractable keel also looks substantially smaller to border people, not like a ship.   Of course it is coming back with us, we are not importing it -- an answer that is less convincing for a much larger boat.   Brent has said a 26 will get one to Tahiti... a lot of us just don't have time for that right now.   We may have a larger boat closer to home already.   A smaller steel boat will get some people sailing further from home, sooner.    Matt   From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of gary.lucas@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 9:07 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?     I think the problem is that scale factor becomes a problem going much smaller with steel.  As you get smaller the relative mass of the steel increases very fast until you wind up with either a very weak structure or a very heavy boat.   Gary H. Lucas Have you read my blog? http://a-little-business.blogspot.com/   From: mailto:origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 8:59 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?       Brent,   Do you have a design smaller/lighter than 26 feet, and, what dimensions of steel sheets does it start with for the hull halves ?   My scrap yard has a pile of steel sheet going cheap.   I am hoping you will say 16 to 18 feet.   I am hoping for something made with maybe 1 tonne of steel.    Separately, what is the smallest size of your origami designs would be appropriate to build in 1/4 inch plate ?   Matt | 35091|35044|2018-05-11 20:15:06|opuspaul|Re: Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?|It sounds to me like a Tiki 21 would fit the bill.   People have crossed oceans in them.https://www.wharram.com/site/self-build-boats/tiki21-design-competition-winnerI really think that you could find a used boat online for almost nothing but if I was building, I would also consider a ply flat bottom sailing dory or sharpie.   There are many different designs.   They are a very fast and easy build and still capable of going places with the right sailor.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cuHFK8HXxI| 35092|35044|2018-05-11 20:45:34|opuspaul|Re: Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?|The Core Sound 17 adn 20 are other very good designs.  Core Sound designs are popular with some of the long coastal races like the Everglades (Watertribe) Challenge and the Race to Alaska.   They can use water ballast which is a great idea for a trailer boat.  I don't see why you couldn't do this with one of the other dory designs.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zUbj8M178Qhttp://bandbyachtdesigns.com/cs17mk3/| 35093|35044|2018-05-12 13:59:44|ANDREW AIREY|Re: Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?|An interesting design for a single handed ocean crosser is the Bolger designed "Colonel Hasler" .This is 20ft long and made from 1/8th plate.I'd love to build one but am probably too old.It is designed to be sailed from inside the boat as much as possible in accordance with Haslers principles for ocean crossing - minimal exposure to the elements.He won the original OSTAR using a norwegian folkboat and was an enthusiast for the junkrig - which I don't think that Brent is.If Brents 26 footer is readily trailable then that would probably be the way to go.CheersAndy Airey| 35094|35044|2018-05-12 21:51:25|Brian Stannard|Re: Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?|Actually Chichester won the 1960 Ostar. Hasler was second out of 5 boats on Jester.  On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 10:59 AM, ANDREW AIREY andyairey@... [origamiboats] wrote:   An interesting design for a single handed ocean crosser is the Bolger designed "Colonel Hasler" .This is 20ft long and made from 1/8th plate.I'd love to build one but am probably too old.It is designed to be sailed from inside the boat as much as possible in accordance with Haslers principles for ocean crossing - minimal exposure to the elements.He won the original OSTAR using a norwegian folkboat and was an enthusiast for the junkrig - which I don't think that Brent is.If Brents 26 footer is readily trailable then that would probably be the way to go.CheersAndy Airey -- CheersBrian | 35095|35044|2018-05-13 08:17:01|ANDREW AIREY|Re: Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?|Insufficient research on my partapologiesAndrew Airey| 35096|35044|2018-05-13 11:04:59|brentswain38|Re: Smaller / Lighter than 26 ?|Weston Farmer's "Cherub" is the smallest stock steel boat I have seen, at 23 feet.She draws a lot of water, at nearly 4 feet, but that could be changed for a centreboarder or scheel keel . Like most of those designs, it is grossly overframed ,but could easily be done origami style. In the library yesterday, I found amagazine called "Small Craft Advisory" which has a lot of boats in the small size range you would be interested in.| 35097|35097|2018-05-15 22:06:30|aguysailing|3m vhb tape or butyl tape|My windows 12 yrs ago plexiglass fastened with screws onto sika flex have discoloured badly.  I watched some utube vids on 3m vhb tape and butyl tape.  Just wondering if anyone has used these to fasten their windows and specifically what version of the tape as 3m offers a variety.  I searched some threads but would like a bit of more recent advice ... thanksGary| 35098|35097|2018-05-15 23:04:52|opuspaul|Re: 3m vhb tape or butyl tape|I have never used the VHB tape but I have heard good reports.  It would certainly be easier and probably much cheaper.  Most adhesives are damaged by UV.  The same might be true of the VHB tape so be careful and read the data sheets.   FWIW, Sika recommends shielding from UV in their 295 application guide.  I masked and painted a  flat black border around the edge of mine and have had no problems.  Sika is a very good product if done correctly  with the right thickness and primer but I probably wouldn't use Sika again.   The shelf life is low and the cost is too high, especially when you add in the price of the primer which is absolutely outrageous.   Dow Corning is supposed to make an RTV based product that is supposed to be quite good but I can't remember the name.  I have no idea what it costs but I doubt it would be more than the Sika.  If you rely on plenty of mechanical fasteners and don't need an adhesive, then there is nothing wrong with Brent's tried and true method of using butyl sealant and a gasket.  I did some portholes many years ago with butyl and cork and they have been zero trouble.https://usa.sika.com/.../Bonding%20and%20Sealing%20Plastic%20Windows.pdf---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :My windows 12 yrs ago plexiglass fastened with screws onto sika flex have discoloured badly.  I watched some utube vids on 3m vhb tape and butyl tape.  Just wondering if anyone has used these to fasten their windows and specifically what version of the tape as 3m offers a variety.  I searched some threads but would like a bit of more recent advice ... thanksGary| 35099|35097|2018-05-16 00:08:05|bcboomer1948|Re: 3m vhb tape or butyl tape|I used this method last year and they look terrific and don't leak:https://www.sailmagazine.com/diy/replacing-fixed-portlightsDefinitely need the thicker tape and the Dow 795 is very easy to use.I just took the old plexi to my favorite plastics shop and they used them as patterns.Neil| 35100|35097|2018-05-16 00:45:58|Brian Stannard|Re: 3m vhb tape or butyl tape|The Dow product is 795. It is not expensive. VHB tape is excellent for adhering the plexiglas and it leaves a gap for sealant. Sealant is still needed as the VHB tape will not guaranteer the water is kept out. Do not use fasteners - they is the cause of failure with cracks radiating out from them. On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 8:04 PM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I have never used the VHB tape but I have heard good reports.  It would certainly be easier and probably much cheaper.  Most adhesives are damaged by UV.  The same might be true of the VHB tape so be careful and read the data sheets.   FWIW, Sika recommends shielding from UV in their 295 application guide.  I masked and painted a  flat black border around the edge of mine and have had no problems.  Sika is a very good product if done correctly  with the right thickness and primer but I probably wouldn't use Sika again.   The shelf life is low and the cost is too high, especially when you add in the price of the primer which is absolutely outrageous.   Dow Corning is supposed to make an RTV based product that is supposed to be quite good but I can't remember the name.  I have no idea what it costs but I doubt it would be more than the Sika.  If you rely on plenty of mechanical fasteners and don't need an adhesive, then there is nothing wrong with Brent's tried and true method of using butyl sealant and a gasket.  I did some portholes many years ago with butyl and cork and they have been zero trouble.https://usa.sika.com/.../ Bonding%20and%20Sealing% 20Plastic%20Windows.pdf---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :My windows 12 yrs ago plexiglass fastened with screws onto sika flex have discoloured badly.  I watched some utube vids on 3m vhb tape and butyl tape.  Just wondering if anyone has used these to fasten their windows and specifically what version of the tape as 3m offers a variety.  I searched some threads but would like a bit of more recent advice ... thanksGary -- CheersBrian | 35101|35097|2018-05-16 04:12:19|Brian Stannard|Re: 3m vhb tape or butyl tape|Here's a good article on installing ports. Scroll to the bottom to "surface mounting". Covers sealant and VHB tape.https://www.sailmagazine.com/diy/replacing-fixed-portlights On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Brian Stannard wrote:The Dow product is 795. It is not expensive. VHB tape is excellent for adhering the plexiglas and it leaves a gap for sealant. Sealant is still needed as the VHB tape will not guaranteer the water is kept out. Do not use fasteners - they is the cause of failure with cracks radiating out from them.On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 8:04 PM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I have never used the VHB tape but I have heard good reports.  It would certainly be easier and probably much cheaper.  Most adhesives are damaged by UV.  The same might be true of the VHB tape so be careful and read the data sheets.   FWIW, Sika recommends shielding from UV in their 295 application guide.  I masked and painted a  flat black border around the edge of mine and have had no problems.  Sika is a very good product if done correctly  with the right thickness and primer but I probably wouldn't use Sika again.   The shelf life is low and the cost is too high, especially when you add in the price of the primer which is absolutely outrageous.   Dow Corning is supposed to make an RTV based product that is supposed to be quite good but I can't remember the name.  I have no idea what it costs but I doubt it would be more than the Sika.  If you rely on plenty of mechanical fasteners and don't need an adhesive, then there is nothing wrong with Brent's tried and true method of using butyl sealant and a gasket.  I did some portholes many years ago with butyl and cork and they have been zero trouble.https://usa.sika.com/.../Bondi ng%20and%20Sealing%20Plastic% 20Windows.pdf---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :My windows 12 yrs ago plexiglass fastened with screws onto sika flex have discoloured badly.  I watched some utube vids on 3m vhb tape and butyl tape.  Just wondering if anyone has used these to fasten their windows and specifically what version of the tape as 3m offers a variety.  I searched some threads but would like a bit of more recent advice ... thanksGary -- CheersBrian -- CheersBrian | 35102|35097|2018-05-16 15:01:12|aguysailing|Re: 3m vhb tape or butyl tape|"Scroll to the bottom to "surface mounting". Covers sealant and VHB tape."... thanks for the link Brian.  I think I give the tape a go on one window.   Just wondering if the tape is hard to take off if not suitable?Gary| 35103|35103|2018-05-16 15:04:04|aguysailing|Radar dome|Now that I have my radar dome down; installed 12 yrs ago, never looked at since.  Just wondering if there is any maintenance to the inside electronics like a spray or etc...I have a JRC 1500 Mk 2| 35104|35097|2018-05-16 17:48:41|Brian Stannard|Re: 3m vhb tape or butyl tape|Impossible to remove the tape - the plexi will break first. Make sure the plexi is positioned correctly - there is no second chance. On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:59 AM, aguysailing@... [origamiboats] wrote:   "Scroll to the bottom to "surface mounting". Covers sealant and VHB tape."... thanks for the link Brian.  I think I give the tape a go on one window.   Just wondering if the tape is hard to take off if not suitable?Gary -- CheersBrian | 35105|35097|2018-05-16 19:34:38|brentswain38|Re: 3m vhb tape or butyl tape|Painting the plexi over the bedding helps keep the UV out.| 35106|35097|2018-05-16 19:37:33|brentswain38|Re: 3m vhb tape or butyl tape|Any thinner will take butyl off.| 35107|35103|2018-05-17 10:02:50|Matt Malone|Re: Radar dome| I would never do anything to electronics as a general rule.   If I were to consider doing anything, I would consider the following: First you need to have a reason to do something.   If the dome is in fact not well closed at all, then it is possible that over time contaminants like ocean salt from the air might accumulate.  This combined with condensation creates a salt solution in tiny droplets all over the board and this might reduce its service life.    Removing this salt accumulation might be a reason to do something.     Second, appraise vulnerabilities:  If I were considering doing anything, it would be look carefully at it and make sure there are no components that might hold a liquid or water -- this is not a complete list: old style paper capacitors like are found in old tube radios, old style transistor radio inductors contained in a can that is not sealed and very difficult to remove liquid from, any sort of LCD/LED/plasma display made of closely spaced layers -- the functionality of these items is destroyed by liquids, even if they do not "dissolve".   If ever in doubt, do nothing.   I am going to guess as outdoor electronics in a dome that is not hermetically sealed (otherwise you would not be talking about taking it apart) it is made to handle condensation.   None of the water-vulnerable types of electronic components can handle condensation.   I am going to guess that none of the components in the dome would hold water, and water in the form of condensation will not harm them.  Condensation is distilled water.    If one has determined that water would cause no harm, and there is a need to do something, then depowering it (and waiting for capacitors to discharge), washing it with DISTILLED water and fully drying in a low humidity environment before using it again is the only possible action.    That is not to say that washing it with water is advisable, it is just saying that using any other liquid is probably completely unsuitable.   Many petroleum-based solvents might mechanically remove salt (like a clean, oil-free air blast might), but they cannot dissolve salt, so they are not going to be as effective as distilled water.   Further, many important coatings on the electronics board, like those intended to reduce condensation or to protect conductors from the effects of salt, might be washed off by a petroleum-based solvent.   "Aggressive" solvents  ranging from alcohols to acetone, and chlorinated and fluorinated solvents and beyond may or may not dissolve the salt and may be more destructive to the coatings on the board. Therefore I recommend considering the need, the potential for damage, the potential of using distilled water as a wash medium, and a means to thoroughly dry the electronics again after washing them, before taking any action.   That said, my GPS and cell phone went into a fresh water lake and stayed under for 20 minutes.   Both had their batteries in them at the time, the phone was certainly powered.   Knowing that exposure to distilled water could not cause more damage than the lake already had*, I disassembled and thoroughly washed the subassemblies for each in distilled water and put them into a convection dryer overnight.   A purpose-built convection dryer uses forced air at about 40C (in an ambient 20C environment)** to aggressively dry electronics.   It might be comparable to a food dryer used to create dried fruit and jerky.   Obviously leaving raw meat and sliced fruit laying about to dry just anywhere is not a reliable way to make jerky or dried fruit so, a dryer is more aggressive drying than one might typically experience by just leaving something out to dry.  (Yes, jerky is raw meat, that is just soaked overnight in a sweet and spiced pickling solution.  It is easy to make, if you have a dryer.)   The outcome for the GPS and cell phone was, the cell phone worked, for a couple more years.   The GPS did not work, but I sent it in to the manufacturer for repairs and it came back working -- I do not know if they just replaced the board or something.  *More water cannot hurt:  I have used this same principle when I have spilled juice on electronics -- washed it with clean water in the sink -- and recommended washing with water to people who have had electronics exposed to other forms of impure water, including sewage.   More water cannot hurt.   ** Obviously, if one uses a 40C dryer in a tropical 35C ambient environment with 100% humidity, the dryer will not remove water as fast.   In such an environment, an active dehumidifier is required to treat the incoming air to remove water so that when heated, it aggressively removes water from the electronics.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of aguysailing@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 3:01 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Radar dome     Now that I have my radar dome down; installed 12 yrs ago, never looked at since.  Just wondering if there is any maintenance to the inside electronics like a spray or etc... I have a JRC 1500 Mk 2 | 35108|35103|2018-05-17 14:02:02|aguysailing|Re: Radar dome|Very good post Matt... thanks.   "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" as you pointed out.   .... Gary| 35109|35103|2018-05-17 15:01:06|Matt Malone|Washing to remove salt residue| On the other hand, if we are just talking about the inside of the boat in service areas: wiring, plumbing, engine and bilges, no electronics, I would not hesitate to spray clean fresh water in there to wash out all the salt residues that are slowly corroding all of my electrical connections, pipes, clamps and fittings.  I would do it every chance I got, at least twice a year, especially in conditions with hot sun and cool, dry air conditions when I could beach the boat.   It would not take too much to make the boat get quite warm inside -- either run up the wood stove in an insulated boat, or spread dark coloured tarps on the deck of an uninsulated boat -- and it would dry itself over the course of a few hours.   The bilge pump would remove the salt.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2018 10:02 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Radar dome     I would never do anything to electronics as a general rule.   If I were to consider doing anything, I would consider the following: First you need to have a reason to do something.   If the dome is in fact not well closed at all, then it is possible that over time contaminants like ocean salt from the air might accumulate.  This combined with condensation creates a salt solution in tiny droplets all over the board and this might reduce its service life.    Removing this salt accumulation might be a reason to do something.     Second, appraise vulnerabilities:  If I were considering doing anything, it would be look carefully at it and make sure there are no components that might hold a liquid or water -- this is not a complete list: old style paper capacitors like are found in old tube radios, old style transistor radio inductors contained in a can that is not sealed and very difficult to remove liquid from, any sort of LCD/LED/plasma display made of closely spaced layers -- the functionality of these items is destroyed by liquids, even if they do not "dissolve".   If ever in doubt, do nothing.   I am going to guess as outdoor electronics in a dome that is not hermetically sealed (otherwise you would not be talking about taking it apart) it is made to handle condensation.   None of the water-vulnerable types of electronic components can handle condensation.   I am going to guess that none of the components in the dome would hold water, and water in the form of condensation will not harm them.  Condensation is distilled water.    If one has determined that water would cause no harm, and there is a need to do something, then depowering it (and waiting for capacitors to discharge), washing it with DISTILLED water and fully drying in a low humidity environment before using it again is the only possible action.    That is not to say that washing it with water is advisable, it is just saying that using any other liquid is probably completely unsuitable.   Many petroleum-based solvents might mechanically remove salt (like a clean, oil-free air blast might), but they cannot dissolve salt, so they are not going to be as effective as distilled water.   Further, many important coatings on the electronics board, like those intended to reduce condensation or to protect conductors from the effects of salt, might be washed off by a petroleum-based solvent.   "Aggressive" solvents  ranging from alcohols to acetone, and chlorinated and fluorinated solvents and beyond may or may not dissolve the salt and may be more destructive to the coatings on the board. Therefore I recommend considering the need, the potential for damage, the potential of using distilled water as a wash medium, and a means to thoroughly dry the electronics again after washing them, before taking any action.   That said, my GPS and cell phone went into a fresh water lake and stayed under for 20 minutes.   Both had their batteries in them at the time, the phone was certainly powered.   Knowing that exposure to distilled water could not cause more damage than the lake already had*, I disassembled and thoroughly washed the subassemblies for each in distilled water and put them into a convection dryer overnight.   A purpose-built convection dryer uses forced air at about 40C (in an ambient 20C environment)** to aggressively dry electronics.   It might be comparable to a food dryer used to create dried fruit and jerky.   Obviously leaving raw meat and sliced fruit laying about to dry just anywhere is not a reliable way to make jerky or dried fruit so, a dryer is more aggressive drying than one might typically experience by just leaving something out to dry.  (Yes, jerky is raw meat, that is just soaked overnight in a sweet and spiced pickling solution.  It is easy to make, if you have a dryer.)   The outcome for the GPS and cell phone was, the cell phone worked, for a couple more years.   The GPS did not work, but I sent it in to the manufacturer for repairs and it came back working -- I do not know if they just replaced the board or something.  *More water cannot hurt:  I have used this same principle when I have spilled juice on electronics -- washed it with clean water in the sink -- and recommended washing with water to people who have had electronics exposed to other forms of impure water, including sewage.   More water cannot hurt.   ** Obviously, if one uses a 40C dryer in a tropical 35C ambient environment with 100% humidity, the dryer will not remove water as fast.   In such an environment, an active dehumidifier is required to treat the incoming air to remove water so that when heated, it aggressively removes water from the electronics.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of aguysailing@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 3:01 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Radar dome     Now that I have my radar dome down; installed 12 yrs ago, never looked at since.  Just wondering if there is any maintenance to the inside electronics like a spray or etc... I have a JRC 1500 Mk 2 | 35110|35097|2018-05-17 20:19:25|brentswain38|Re: 3m vhb tape or butyl tape|I wonder if one can get o ring material off a roll.One could possibly run a piece of O ring around your window bolts before bedding them down in butyl. That would give you an O ring to a back up the butyl.I have one port in the bow which is set inside a stainless 6 inch pipe. Next time I have to bed it, I will router an O ring grove in the edge of the plexi, and put an O ring in it ,for an O ring seal between the plexi and the stainless .| 35111|35111|2018-05-17 21:07:59|bilgekeeldave|Hull repairs|I hauled my 35 year old Brent Swain 30 twin keel boat last fall. Now that the weather is nice, I am getting ready to strip off the coatings on the bottom and re apply it. About 50% of the epoxy tar  is already gone, I think I will use a sandblasting attachment for a pressure washer to remove the layers of old bottom paint and epoxy.I am looking for recommendations for an epoxy coating to re apply to the hull.I noticed that there is an area about eight feet long and a foot wide on the port side of the hull, right near the centerline and aft of the keels, that has dime sized deep pits in the hull. My plan is to weld up the pits and grind the welds flush with the hull surface, there are a eleven pits in all. A couple of these pits penetrated the hull. I was thinking about welding a back up plates in the bilge over these holes and then weld up the hole and grind it flush from the outside. I have been removing all the spray foam from the bilge, in the area of the pits and holes. Brent, does this sound like a good plan? I have a 240 volt inverter MIG welder that can weld up to 1/4" steel, it is small enough to get it inside the boat to weld backing plates over the holes. Dave| 35112|35111|2018-05-21 16:22:52|brentswain38|Re: Hull repairs|Sounds like a good plan. You can measure the depth of the pits by putting a straight edge across them and sliding a dial caliper across it, measuring the change in depth as you go.Welding the hols is the best plan, plate can tap water behind them, unless set in flush. Be ready to very quickly seal the boat airtight, if the remaining foam should  catch fire. Sealing the boat airtight will put it out quickly, fighting the fire with he boat open,after the fire begins raging, is not a good idea . Have a hose handy and ready to go all the time you are welding.Have someone in the cockpit hose in hand, ready for action the whole time.There used to  be a great military surplus place just south of Port Townsend which I got my epoxy from .(Devoe Bar rust 235)  Don't know if it is still there.That ha worked well for many ,but in the the indies they mostly use Ameron.I dove  a boat which was painted there with Ameron,and it was immaculate. The glass platelets they use can be purchased separately and added to any epoxy. That makes any moisture take the scenic route around them, and the glass is impervious to  moisture . I would probably not be a good idea on any epoxy which is not high in solids, as they may entrap thinner.Make sure you give her lots of dry time, to avoid thinner entrapment.Bilges should never be foamed, a common ,big mistake.Just a good, heavy buildup of  epoxy ,below the floor boards.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I hauled my 35 year old Brent Swain 30 twin keel boat last fall. Now that the weather is nice, I am getting ready to strip off the coatings on the bottom and re apply it. About 50% of the epoxy tar  is already gone, I think I will use a sandblasting attachment for a pressure washer to remove the layers of old bottom paint and epoxy.I am looking for recommendations for an epoxy coating to re apply to the hull.I noticed that there is an area about eight feet long and a foot wide on the port side of the hull, right near the centerline and aft of the keels, that has dime sized deep pits in the hull. My plan is to weld up the pits and grind the welds flush with the hull surface, there are a eleven pits in all. A couple of these pits penetrated the hull. I was thinking about welding a back up plates in the bilge over these holes and then weld up the hole and grind it flush from the outside. I have been removing all the spray foam from the bilge, in the area of the pits and holes. Brent, does this sound like a good plan? I have a 240 volt inverter MIG welder that can weld up to 1/4" steel, it is small enough to get it inside the boat to weld backing plates over the holes. Dave| 35113|35097|2018-05-21 16:26:30|aguysailing|Re: 3m vhb tape or butyl tape|Dow 795 seems to be the go to sealant as far as the info fromsurfing boat forums.  I could not find a source in Canada ... ??| 35114|35097|2018-05-21 16:51:16|Neil Ramsey|Re: 3m vhb tape or butyl tape|Cascade Aqua-Tech in Burnaby is where I bought mine at a really good price.Neil On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 1:12 PM, aguysailing@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Dow 795 seems to be the go to sealant as far as the info fromsurfing boat forums.  I could not find a source in Canada ... ?? | 35115|35097|2018-05-21 17:05:24|Brian Stannard|Re: 3m vhb tape or butyl tape|795 is readily available in Canada, in Victoria and Vancouver that I know of. Try plastic fabrication shops. On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 1:12 PM, aguysailing@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Dow 795 seems to be the go to sealant as far as the info fromsurfing boat forums.  I could not find a source in Canada ... ?? -- CheersBrian | 35116|35103|2018-05-21 18:19:31|opuspaul|Re: Radar dome|I worked repairing radars and electronics for about 20 years.   A lot of electronics and motors gets ruined by spraying chemicals like WD-40 on boards.   WD-40 and carbon brushes in motors don't go well together and it can damage some plastics yet I am amazed how people seem to want to spray it and similar chemicals everywhere.    I wouldn't spray anything on a board, even electrical contact cleaner since some of them can damage plastics with their propellants.   Bottom line is it is normally best to just leave things alone.   If something is really bad/salty or even sunk, you can rinse the boards with fresh water to reclaim them but you must be absolutly sure it is dry before powering up again.  It will take many days for everything to dry out under a gentle heat source like a lamp.  There are special conformal/hysol coatings for circuit boards but if you apply them, you must be assured you don't get anything on the contact pins.  Unless you are comfortable with electronics, I wouldn't do it.  Marine electronics should have them on the boards anyway.   Silicone (dielectric) grease is safe with plastics and can be good on connectors.  Don't use too much of it can trap drops of water and moisture.   I am amazed how badly made marine electronics can be.  Aircraft electronics use gold contacts on their pins which never corrode.  Cheap marine electronics often have crappy pins and connectors using tin flashing on the contacts which can be troublesome.  Cheers, Paul---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Now that I have my radar dome down; installed 12 yrs ago, never looked at since.  Just wondering if there is any maintenance to the inside electronics like a spray or etc...I have a JRC 1500 Mk 2| 35117|35103|2018-05-21 20:44:46|Matt Malone|Re: Radar dome| Paul's post was excellent and detailed.  Contact cleaner is the best way to destroy electronics, plastics and weld together all delicate plastic moving parts.   A person who knew this handed me a can and told me to spray in into expensive and delicate machinery so that I would destroy it andbbe blamed.   When 5 seconds later, all the plastic melded and stuck together, I said its melting, and he said in a "you are so stupid" tone that I should not have used so much.  Seems he made few friends, he got fired less than a year later. Matt From: opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, May 21, 18:19 Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Radar dome To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I worked repairing radars and electronics for about 20 years.   A lot of electronics and motors gets ruined by spraying chemicals like WD-40 on boards.   WD-40 and carbon brushes in motors don't go well together and it can damage some plastics yet I am amazed how people seem to want to spray it and similar chemicals everywhere.    I wouldn't spray anything on a board, even electrical contact cleaner since some of them can damage plastics with their propellants.   Bottom line is it is normally best to just leave things alone.   If something is really bad/salty or even sunk, you can rinse the boards with fresh water to reclaim them but you must be absolutly sure it is dry before powering up again.  It will take many days for everything to dry out under a gentle heat source like a lamp.  There are special conformal/hysol coatings for circuit boards but if you apply them, you must be assured you don't get anything on the contact pins.  Unless you are comfortable with electronics, I wouldn't do it.  Marine electronics should have them on the boards anyway.   Silicone (dielectric) grease is safe with plastics and can be good on connectors.  Don't use too much of it can trap drops of water and moisture.   I am amazed how badly made marine electronics can be.  Aircraft electronics use gold contacts on their pins which never corrode.  Cheap marine electronics often have crappy pins and connectors using tin flashing on the contacts which can be troublesome.  Cheers, Paul ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Now that I have my radar dome down; installed 12 yrs ago, never looked at since.  Just wondering if there is any maintenance to the inside electronics like a spray or etc... I have a JRC 1500 Mk 2 | 35118|35103|2018-05-22 09:23:46|a.sobriquet|Re: Radar dome|You can remove moisture from LCDs by placing the item inside of a vacuum chamber. The higher the vacuum the better. Afterwards, seal the edges with epoxy.AS---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :#ygrps-yiv-112834320 #ygrps-yiv-112834320ygrps-yiv-1513911402 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}... any sort of LCD/LED/plasma display made of closely spaced layers -- the functionality of these items is destroyed by liquids, even if they do not "dissolve".... | 35119|35103|2018-05-22 11:06:46|Matt Malone|Re: Radar dome| Absolutely true, a vacuum chamber will remove water, but I am unsure of its effect on Liquid Crystal Displays (LCD) . My comment is on "good vacuum" and practical vacuum because I have had bitter experience trying to get water out of things with a vacuum.  At 20C, the vapour pressure of water is about 18mmHg, about 2% of an atmosphere.   The average roughing pump can get down to 10^-2 - 10^3 mmHg with no problem.  That is 200-2000 times lower pressure.  At 10^-2 mmHg, that is about 20 times lower than needed to make further decreases in pressure less than 10% improvement on the pumping rate.  Reaching for that 10% is all one can get by pumping harder, and any roughing pump will give you 9.5% of that 10%, minimum anyway.   Best case, better vacuum will see a 0.5% improvement. But the problem is, one can old back 2% of an atmosphere with one's little finger -- that is peanuts in the way of driving pressure to get the water out.   A lot of materials simply resist the escape of water with pressures greater than that making pumping very slow.  At the same time, the electricity consumed is raising that pressure by 98% of an atmosphere.   A hugely ineffective "lever".    So one is pumping a long time to remove a tiny amount of water.   Maybe on a small one or two-line LCD, this might take only a couple days.   If this is a $2,000 gyrocompass display, oh yes for sure I would try it.   Vacuum pumping sure was completely useless and a waste of electricity to try to get dozens of pounds of water out of hull material -- I got an ounce or two after a day.    Temperature is the key: http://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/topicreview/bp/ch14/tvsvp.html Temperature vs. Vapor Pressure - Purdue University chemed.chem.purdue.edu A plot of the vapor pressure of water versus the water's temperature Looking back at the graph, if one increases the temperature to 32C, the vapour pressure of water doubles, a 100% increase.    That doubles the driving pressure and the removal rate of water.     Low humidity and elevated temperature at atmospheric pressure is actually very effective, and easier to produce, and what an electronics dryer does.  But I have no idea about LCD.  All LCD displays were classified as un-dry-able by the company I worked for, that did electronics cleaning.   I sure will give vacuum a try on an a little calculator or 2-line LCD sometime, but I will warm it to increase the pumping rate by 100% or more.     Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of a.sobriquet@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 9:23 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Radar dome     You can remove moisture from LCDs by placing the item inside of a vacuum chamber. The higher the vacuum the better. Afterwards, seal the edges with epoxy. AS ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ... any sort of LCD/LED/plasma display made of closely spaced layers -- the functionality of these items is destroyed by liquids, even if they do not "dissolve".... | 35120|35103|2018-05-22 13:30:35|a.sobriquet|Re: Radar dome|My vicarious experience using a vacuum was with a small LCD display. The initial, lower vacuum didn't work. It took a higher vacuum.You may be correct that larger displays would be more problematical.AS---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :#ygrps-yiv-561623379 #ygrps-yiv-561623379ygrps-yiv-144015509 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}...So one is pumping a long time to remove a tiny amount of water.   Maybe on a small one or two-line LCD, this might take only a couple days.   If this is a $2,000 gyrocompass display, oh yes for sure I would try it.   Vacuum pumping sure was completely useless and a waste of electricity to try to get dozens of pounds of water out of hull material -- I got an ounce or two after a day...   | 35121|35111|2018-05-23 19:25:11|brentswain38|Re: Hull repairs|Sorry for all the typos.My computer was very slow and acting strange. A wet blanket inside, over the area you are welding, will help drastically reduce the fire hazzard. Scraping the foam will give you some idea  how much epoxy Phil put in before foaming.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Sounds like a good plan. You can measure the depth of the pits by putting a straight edge across them and sliding a dial caliper across it, measuring the change in depth as you go.Welding the hols is the best plan, plate can tap water behind them, unless set in flush. Be ready to very quickly seal the boat airtight, if the remaining foam should  catch fire. Sealing the boat airtight will put it out quickly, fighting the fire with he boat open,after the fire begins raging, is not a good idea . Have a hose handy and ready to go all the time you are welding.Have someone in the cockpit hose in hand, ready for action the whole time.There used to  be a great military surplus place just south of Port Townsend which I got my epoxy from .(Devoe Bar rust 235)  Don't know if it is still there.That ha worked well for many ,but in the the indies they mostly use Ameron.I dove  a boat which was painted there with Ameron,and it was immaculate. The glass platelets they use can be purchased separately and added to any epoxy. That makes any moisture take the scenic route around them, and the glass is impervious to  moisture . I would probably not be a good idea on any epoxy which is not high in solids, as they may entrap thinner.Make sure you give her lots of dry time, to avoid thinner entrapment.Bilges should never be foamed, a common ,big mistake.Just a good, heavy buildup of  epoxy ,below the floor boards.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I hauled my 35 year old Brent Swain 30 twin keel boat last fall. Now that the weather is nice, I am getting ready to strip off the coatings on the bottom and re apply it. About 50% of the epoxy tar  is already gone, I think I will use a sandblasting attachment for a pressure washer to remove the layers of old bottom paint and epoxy.I am looking for recommendations for an epoxy coating to re apply to the hull.I noticed that there is an area about eight feet long and a foot wide on the port side of the hull, right near the centerline and aft of the keels, that has dime sized deep pits in the hull. My plan is to weld up the pits and grind the welds flush with the hull surface, there are a eleven pits in all. A couple of these pits penetrated the hull. I was thinking about welding a back up plates in the bilge over these holes and then weld up the hole and grind it flush from the outside. I have been removing all the spray foam from the bilge, in the area of the pits and holes. Brent, does this sound like a good plan? I have a 240 volt inverter MIG welder that can weld up to 1/4" steel, it is small enough to get it inside the boat to weld backing plates over the holes. Dave| 35122|35103|2018-05-24 00:51:28|rockrothwell|Re: Radar dome|Having drowned electonics, er,.... memorably,Found the back shelf of the wood stove, about the 32 degrees mentioned, in a ziplock bag, with rice to burry it. Bag has condensation on it overnight. Change rice 2 - 3 times till no condenation on the bag over night & bake it a bit longer to make sure sure it's dry. Then fire it up, bout a 50:50 chanceBut if you give it power b4 its good & dry you'll fry it.A radar dome might be interesting.Try rice in big black plastic bag? In the sun?Any salt? If it's already seen water in watever form, clean is not gonna hurt. Your drying it anyway & salt is the killer.If everything was working right, is it sealed?  Can you have at the bearings to lube em?Do you need to? If it works, don't fix it....?I am asking here as "twiddle the knobs till you get a clear immage & don't screw up on range" was bout as far as I got.Someone else paying for it, worked well for meBut plan on buying used. What should I be looking for?Have heard that some people use dessicant in radar dome in the tropics, but then you must have access to change or dry the dessicant.And my gut feeling is that a sweep arm is pretty exposed so a dome or 'sealed' unit probaby  safer | 35123|35103|2018-05-24 14:34:10|jnhs@protonmail.com|Re: Radar dome|If you get water inside of an LCD display you can get it out if you can place it inside of a vacuum chamber -- the higher the vacuum the better. After the water is removed you may be able to seal the edges with epoxy to prevent moisture getting in again.For drying purposes, vacuum chambers are less common than ovens, but they are less likely to damage sensitive components than the heat of an oven.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :#ygrps-yiv-1052746477 #ygrps-yiv-1052746477ygrps-yiv-788379076 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} any sort of LCD/LED/plasma display made of closely spaced layers -- the functionality of these items is destroyed by liquids, even if they do not "dissolve".   If ever in doubt, do nothing.   | 35124|35103|2018-05-24 14:34:25|jnhs@protonmail.com|Re: Radar dome|Moisture that gets into LCD displays can be removed by placing the unit into a vacuum chamber, the higher the vacuum the better. You don't have to worry about overheating in an oven that way.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :#ygrps-yiv-926624181 #ygrps-yiv-926624181ygrps-yiv-1295746320 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} any sort of LCD/LED/plasma display made of closely spaced layers -- the functionality of these items is destroyed by liquids, even if they do not "dissolve".   If ever in doubt, do nothing.   | 35125|35103|2018-05-24 15:26:19|Darren Bos|Re: Radar dome| If all you have to work with is an oven, you can get the temp safe by preheating the oven on its lowest setting, then turning it off.  When the oven has cooled to the temp where you can just hold your hand on the grill indefinitely, put the phone/electronics in.  Then leave the oven to slowly cool.  Two or three cycles like this seems to do the trick.  If you are doing a phone, don't put the battery in the oven.  I usually throw a bit of rice in a tray into the oven at the same time.  When I go to bed, I take the phone and rice out of the oven, place them together in a plastic container and seal them in there together overnight.  Two evening cycles in the oven, plus an overnight in rice has brought my phone back from lake dunk and being run through the washing machine.  I also fixed another phone this way after an ocean dunk.  That one required a bunch of freshwater rinsing first, and although it worked it had reliability issues after. On 18-05-18 02:18 PM, jnhs@... [origamiboats] wrote:   For drying purposes, vacuum chambers are less common than ovens, but they are less likely to damage sensitive components than the heat of an oven. | 35126|35103|2018-05-24 15:51:10|brentswain38|Re: Radar dome| If it works, don't fix it....? If it aint broke , don't fix it.Then there is the government version.If it aint broke , fix it until it is broke!| 35127|35127|2018-05-27 17:08:59|jhess314|1/4" plate for hull and deck?|I'm looking at an advertisement for a 33' steel-hulled sailboat (not origami). 15,000 lbs displacement, 4200 lbs ballast. They claim that both the hull and the deck are made of 1/4" plate. That seems unusually heavy to me. Can any of you with more steel boat experience than I assure me that this is a reasonable scantling, or not?John| 35128|35127|2018-05-27 17:32:18|mountain man|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck?| When I bought my 37 ft sailboat, the seller garanteed me that it was 3/16 in thick plate until I placed my measuring tape in a thrue hull hole wich confirmed what I thought in the first place wichwas 1/8in ... On May 27, 2018, at 5:17 PM, "j.hess@... [origamiboats]" wrote:   I'm looking at an advertisement for a 33' steel-hulled sailboat (not origami). 15,000 lbs displacement, 4200 lbs ballast. They claim that both the hull and the deck are made of 1/4" plate. That seems unusually heavy to me. Can any of you with more steel boat experience than I assure me that this is a reasonable scantling, or not? John | 35129|35127|2018-05-27 19:04:35|Matt Malone|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck?| 1/4" steel or 2" of wood. 1/4" on a 12' beam in a barge hull cross-section draws about 12" water.  It is going to float and have a huge reserve buoyancy.   I see no reason from the point of view of floatation that 1/4" is "too much".  In precisely the same hull shape as a thinner boat it sure will draw more water, by maybe 6".  Yes, that 6" will be important not every single day, and not virtually never, but from time to time.  If one assumes it is well welded and well designed from a structural point of view then the BENEFIT of 1/4" over 7 gauge will give one more confidence every single day that there is less to worry about as one wonders how much water is under the keel. Now 1/4" sure is far more expensive than it needs to be, if one is building it and buying new steel.  I would agree all day long with Brent when he argues need and cost.  I also recognise that 1/4 is far harder to work with and bend like Brent bends it, with the tools he recommends.   A 1/4" boat built with more extensive hydraulic tools, by different methods, no build issue.  But it would be way more expensive to build.  But this is an already built, used boat, so none of this matters. I would consider buying it at an appropriate price.  Matt From: j.hess@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, May 27, 17:17 Subject: [origamiboats] 1/4" plate for hull and deck? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I'm looking at an advertisement for a 33' steel-hulled sailboat (not origami). 15,000 lbs displacement, 4200 lbs ballast. They claim that both the hull and the deck are made of 1/4" plate. That seems unusually heavy to me. Can any of you with more steel boat experience than I assure me that this is a reasonable scantling, or not? John | 35130|35127|2018-05-27 19:22:31|jhess314|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck?|I can sort of understand why a 1/4" hull would make it more bomb proof, but why would they use 1/4" plate for the deck? That would just make it more top-heavy. In fact, one of my questions was whether the 1/4" topsides would also make the boat top-heavy? Seems you would need more ballast to counter the heavy topsides/deck. Does 4200 lbs ballast (in a fin keel; 6'2" draft; 11' beam) seem sufficient?John---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : 1/4" steel or 2" of wood. 1/4" on a 12' beam in a barge hull cross-section draws about 12" water.  It is going to float and have a huge reserve buoyancy.   I see no reason from the point of view of floatation that 1/4" is "too much".  In precisely the same hull shape as a thinner boat it sure will draw more water, by maybe 6".  Yes, that 6" will be important not every single day, and not virtually never, but from time to time.  If one assumes it is well welded and well designed from a structural point of view then the BENEFIT of 1/4" over 7 gauge will give one more confidence every single day that there is less to worry about as one wonders how much water is under the keel. Now 1/4" sure is far more expensive than it needs to be, if one is building it and buying new steel.  I would agree all day long with Brent when he argues need and cost.  I also recognise that 1/4 is far harder to work with and bend like Brent bends it, with the tools he recommends.   A 1/4" boat built with more extensive hydraulic tools, by different methods, no build issue.  But it would be way more expensive to build.  But this is an already built, used boat, so none of this matters. I would consider buying it at an appropriate price.  Matt From: j.hess@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, May 27, 17:17 Subject: [origamiboats] 1/4" plate for hull and deck? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I'm looking at an advertisement for a 33' steel-hulled sailboat (not origami). 15,000 lbs displacement, 4200 lbs ballast. They claim that both the hull and the deck are made of 1/4" plate. That seems unusually heavy to me. Can any of you with more steel boat experience than I assure me that this is a reasonable scantling, or not? John | 35131|35127|2018-05-27 20:35:42|Matt Malone|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck?| Hello John, If the boat is in the water, I would ask to sail it.  If the deck makes a big difference, one would notice it. Yes, the deck is more mass above the cg.  It raises the cg.  But the heavier boat sinks lower, raising the center of buoyancy.  All of the additional buoyancy is at the waterline.  It is the difference in distance between the two that determines stability.  So it is not at all clear it would make a big difference.  One would need to know the nature of the ballast (poured lead?  Blocks of lead?  Etc), and some idea of the freeboard and deck shape -- double ended?  A picture looking down at the ballast will inform where the top  ballast is and its relative usefulness at 4,200 pounds.  If one sees the long (fore-aft), low aspect ratio fin keel is only half full of poured lead, that is a really useful 4,200 pounds because it is a longer distance below the cg.  I would buy that boat in a heartbeat because I could pour in another ton of lead in if I came to feel 4,200 pounds was not enough.  If the ballast is steel scrap and concrete, and overflows the top of a high aspect ratio fin keel, I would be inclined to be more doubtful of its effectiveness.  I would know I would have to increase the fin draft and bolt on a lead shoe -- a lot more work -- should I find 4,200 pounds insufficient. If the freeboard is relatively low, like a Contessa 32, that is different than a flat, high deck Columbia 35.  The extra deck weight, if it is low, is not as important. The data given so far is not yet certainly enough to be sure one way or the other.  4,200/15,000 is not small. One might take the data one has and look for similar shape and weight boats among the solid glass boats -- 2" of glass is heavier that 1/4" steel, but of the solid deck boats, I am not sure any are more than an inch in the deck -- still an inch might be comparable in mass to 1/4" steel.  Based on these comparisons one might get ideas. I also agree with mountainman, it may not be 1/4" everywhere, or even anywhere.  An ultrasonic thickness gauge would be really handy if you could borrow one.   One does not need anything super complex if one had samples of 1/4 to 10 gauge in hand to do comparisons. Matt From: j.hess@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, May 27, 19:22 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] 1/4" plate for hull and deck? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I can sort of understand why a 1/4" hull would make it more bomb proof, but why would they use 1/4" plate for the deck? That would just make it more top-heavy. In fact, one of my questions was whether the 1/4" topsides would also make the boat top-heavy? Seems you would need more ballast to counter the heavy topsides/deck. Does 4200 lbs ballast (in a fin keel; 6'2" draft; 11' beam) seem sufficient? John ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : 1/4" steel or 2" of wood. 1/4" on a 12' beam in a barge hull cross-section draws about 12" water.  It is going to float and have a huge reserve buoyancy.   I see no reason from the point of view of floatation that 1/4" is "too much".  In precisely the same hull shape as a thinner boat it sure will draw more water, by maybe 6".  Yes, that 6" will be important not every single day, and not virtually never, but from time to time.  If one assumes it is well welded and well designed from a structural point of view then the BENEFIT of 1/4" over 7 gauge will give one more confidence every single day that there is less to worry about as one wonders how much water is under the keel. Now 1/4" sure is far more expensive than it needs to be, if one is building it and buying new steel.  I would agree all day long with Brent when he argues need and cost.  I also recognise that 1/4 is far harder to work with and bend like Brent bends it, with the tools he recommends.   A 1/4" boat built with more extensive hydraulic tools, by different methods, no build issue.  But it would be way more expensive to build.  But this is an already built, used boat, so none of this matters. I would consider buying it at an appropriate price.  Matt From: j.hess@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, May 27, 17:17 Subject: [origamiboats] 1/4" plate for hull and deck? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I'm looking at an advertisement for a 33' steel-hulled sailboat (not origami). 15,000 lbs displacement, 4200 lbs ballast. They claim that both the hull and the deck are made of 1/4" plate. That seems unusually heavy to me. Can any of you with more steel boat experience than I assure me that this is a reasonable scantling, or not? John | 35132|35132|2018-05-28 04:41:05|ANDREW AIREY|Re: 1|1/4 plate used to be the standard for barge and narrow boat construction but modern narrow boats tend to be heavier plate nowWhy is it up for sale and who is the. designer. If ifs a Nick Scaife designed Wylo 2 snatch his hand off because this design bas a good cruising reputation. Cheers Andy AireySent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35133|35127|2018-05-28 09:29:31|Darren Bos|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck?| 1/4" plate sounds too thick for the deck and could negatively effect stability.  There is a chance the seller is wrong, as the displacement and ballast are not far off other boats built of thinner scantlings.  Do you know the displacement and ballast that the design is supposed to have, heavier displacement or lighter ballast might point to heavier plate having been used.  I have one of those inexpensive ultrasonic thickness gauges that can be found on ebay or princess auto.  It works well, but it has to be used on bare metal, it won't work through paint.  If, you can't remove some paint or remove a fitting, a marine surveyor that works with metal boats is likely to have one of the more expensive ultrasonic thickness gauges that will work through coatings. On 18-05-27 02:32 PM, mountain man mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] wrote:   When I bought my 37 ft sailboat, the seller garanteed me that it was 3/16 in thick plate until I placed my measuring tape in a thrue hull hole wich confirmed what I thought in the first place wichwas 1/8in ... On May 27, 2018, at 5:17 PM, "j.hess@... [origamiboats]" wrote:   I'm looking at an advertisement for a 33' steel-hulled sailboat (not origami). 15,000 lbs displacement, 4200 lbs ballast. They claim that both the hull and the deck are made of 1/4" plate. That seems unusually heavy to me. Can any of you with more steel boat experience than I assure me that this is a reasonable scantling, or not? John | 35134|35127|2018-05-28 11:44:35|Matt Malone|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck?| The correct Princess Auto link: https://www.princessauto.com/en/detail/ultrasonic-thickness-gauge/A-p8601205e $160 is pricey especially if there it no way for it to work through paint.  Perhaps some ultrasonic gel ?  Perhaps the machine can only handle one speed of sound discontinuity to allow it to work dry, but with gel it might work through paint...   Just a thought.   I would rather have a greasy spot on the paint, than chip through paint.   I just looked at ebay for A-Scan -- depth only at one spot -- NDT units like mine.   I saw none.  FYI,  B-scan shows a depth profile over a line -- most side-scrolling fish-finders are like B-scan devices.  C-scan is depth over an area, so full 3D.   The Opthalmic (to measure eyes) A and B scan units are really expensive but some show the result on a oscilloscope screen so one could compare any material of an unknown thickness to a sample of the same material of a known thickness.   I have never tried this but, it seems it works on thin steel and it falls into the category of an in the pocket, cheap option.   Steel can only carry so much magnetic field before it saturates.   Super-strong magnets, ones strong enough to fully permeate a thickness of mild steel with a magnetic field, will stick harder on thicker steel -- you may have noticed this.   One might judge how hard they stick to guess the thickness, up to the thickness where they cannot produce a field to fully permeate the steel.   Then compare the boat to mild steel samples of various thickness to guess which it is most similar too.   This would work with 20 gauge, not sure about 1/4".   I cannot think of any other pocket solutions right off the top of my head.   I guess the next thing would be to ask to remove a fitting or bolt and measure the plate in the hole -- there might be something on the topsides that might be removed easily.  If it is a keel stepped mast, there has to be a hole in the deck for the mast to pass through?   Perhaps they were not very careful with their plate sizing and seams around the top edge of the doghouse.  Perhaps what should have been a butt-weld on an outside corner of the doghouse became more like a T-weld where the thickness of the top plate is visible.    Perhaps on the area of the hatch or companionway, one can get a thickness inspection caliper on the plate thickness: https://www.princessauto.com/en/detail/3-pc-8-in-divider-and-caliper-set/A-p2940260e 3 pc 8 in. Divider and Caliper Set | Princess Auto www.princessauto.com Parts associated with this item We have not associated any parts with this item. There may be parts available - please call us toll free for more information: 1-800-665-8685 Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, May 28, 2018 9:29 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] 1/4" plate for hull and deck?     1/4" plate sounds too thick for the deck and could negatively effect stability.  There is a chance the seller is wrong, as the displacement and ballast are not far off other boats built of thinner scantlings.  Do you know the displacement and ballast that the design is supposed to have, heavier displacement or lighter ballast might point to heavier plate having been used.  I have one of those inexpensive ultrasonic thickness gauges that can be found on ebay or princess auto.  It works well, but it has to be used on bare metal, it won't work through paint.  If, you can't remove some paint or remove a fitting, a marine surveyor that works with metal boats is likely to have one of the more expensive ultrasonic thickness gauges that will work through coatings. On 18-05-27 02:32 PM, mountain man mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] wrote:   When I bought my 37 ft sailboat, the seller garanteed me that it was 3/16 in thick plate until I placed my measuring tape in a thrue hull hole wich confirmed what I thought in the first place wichwas 1/8in ... On May 27, 2018, at 5:17 PM, "j.hess@... [origamiboats]" wrote:   I'm looking at an advertisement for a 33' steel-hulled sailboat (not origami). 15,000 lbs displacement, 4200 lbs ballast. They claim that both the hull and the deck are made of 1/4" plate. That seems unusually heavy to me. Can any of you with more steel boat experience than I assure me that this is a reasonable scantling, or not? John | 35135|35127|2018-05-28 16:16:31|Darren Bos|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck?| Matt, You do need to use ultrasonic gel with the cheap ebay meter.  I'd always assumed that the more expensive meters were using more sophisticated filtering to deal with the component of reflection that you get as you pass from paint to metal.  I had a couple of pieces I cut out from my hull handy so here is an example of what the cheap meter is capable of.  With 0.25" (6.6mm) thick aluminum it reads 6.6 for clean bare metal.  For a piece with several layers of Brightsides polyurethane it reads 7.1 mm from the painted side, 6.6 from the non painted side and the paint plus aluminum measures 6.7 mm with vernier calipers.  So, with a relatively thin coat of paint it would be good enough to tell you the difference between 1/8, 3/16 and 1/4" decks.  I also had a piece of hull with many layers of epoxy and bottom paint.  From the rough slightly corroded side, it read 7.1mm, cleaning that up with 180 grit sandpaper yielded 6.6 mm, from the painted side it read 10.1 mm while the paint plus aluminum measured 8mm with vernier calipers.  Measurements taken from a painted surface are also much more variable than those from clean metal. When we were boat shopping a few years back, I bought mine on ebay for something like $60CAN, I see there are ones that can be had for $77CAN now.  For that price it has been useful enough.  When we were boat shopping I could usually find a place to check things like the nominal thickness of the hull and decks.  I had thought it might be useful to search for corrosion as well, but no longer think so.  Both this unit and the ones used by surveyors have pretty limited utility when searching for corrosion.  The area you look at with the meter is less than a square centimeter, you can only look at so many spots on the hull and the chances of you finding a small spot of corrosion with a random pattern are almost nil.  Large patches of corrosion are likely to be discovered with the meter, but the standard issue eyeball is also pretty good for that.  I suppose the meter does have value in that it tells you how much material is left in the corroded area, sometimes corrosion looks worse than it is. Darren On 18-05-28 08:44 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   The correct Princess Auto link: https://www.princessauto.com/en/detail/ultrasonic-thickness-gauge/A-p8601205e $160 is pricey especially if there it no way for it to work through paint.  Perhaps some ultrasonic gel ?  Perhaps the machine can only handle one speed of sound discontinuity to allow it to work dry, but with gel it might work through paint...   Just a thought.   I would rather have a greasy spot on the paint, than chip through paint.   I just looked at ebay for A-Scan -- depth only at one spot -- NDT units like mine.   I saw none.  FYI,  B-scan shows a depth profile over a line -- most side-scrolling fish-finders are like B-scan devices.  C-scan is depth over an area, so full 3D.   The Opthalmic (to measure eyes) A and B scan units are really expensive but some show the result on a oscilloscope screen so one could compare any material of an unknown thickness to a sample of the same material of a known thickness.   | 35136|35127|2018-05-28 16:56:21|Aaron|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck?|As long as the paint or coatings are firmly attached no air or delamination of coating any of the ultrasound type units for spot thickness reading will work plus or minus there rated accuracy and the coating thickness on the tested side only. The tester will not tell you the is or is not any coating on the other side.If you want 100% accuracy then one must buff sand or blast the coating and or corrosion away from test area.UT level 1 basic information AaronSent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Matt, You do need to use ultrasonic gel with the cheap ebay meter.  I'd always assumed that the more expensive meters were using more sophisticated filtering to deal with the component of reflection that you get as you pass from paint to metal.  I had a couple of pieces I cut out from my hull handy so here is an example of what the cheap meter is capable of.  With 0.25" (6.6mm) thick aluminum it reads 6.6 for clean bare metal.  For a piece with several layers of Brightsides polyurethane it reads 7.1 mm from the painted side, 6.6 from the non painted side and the paint plus aluminum measures 6.7 mm with vernier calipers.  So, with a relatively thin coat of paint it would be good enough to tell you the difference between 1/8, 3/16 and 1/4" decks.  I also had a piece of hull with many layers of epoxy and bottom paint.  From the rough slightly corroded side, it read 7.1mm, cleaning that up with 180 grit sandpaper yielded 6.6 mm, from the painted side it read 10.1 mm while the paint plus aluminum measured 8mm with vernier calipers.  Measurements taken from a painted surface are also much more variable than those from clean metal. When we were boat shopping a few years back, I bought mine on ebay for something like $60CAN, I see there are ones that can be had for $77CAN now.  For that price it has been useful enough.  When we were boat shopping I could usually find a place to check things like the nominal thickness of the hull and decks.  I had thought it might be useful to search for corrosion as well, but no longer think so.  Both this unit and the ones used by surveyors have pretty limited utility when searching for corrosion.  The area you look at with the meter is less than a square centimeter, you can only look at so many spots on the hull and the chances of you finding a small spot of corrosion with a random pattern are almost nil.  Large patches of corrosion are likely to be discovered with the meter, but the standard issue eyeball is also pretty good for that.  I suppose the meter does have value in that it tells you how much material is left in the corroded area, sometimes corrosion looks worse than it is. Darren On 18-05-28 08:44 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   The correct Princess Auto link: https://www.princessauto.com/en/detail/ultrasonic-thickness-gauge/A-p8601205e $160 is pricey especially if there it no way for it to work through paint.  Perhaps some ultrasonic gel ?  Perhaps the machine can only handle one speed of sound discontinuity to allow it to work dry, but with gel it might work through paint...   Just a thought.   I would rather have a greasy spot on the paint, than chip through paint.   I just looked at ebay for A-Scan -- depth only at one spot -- NDT units like mine.   I saw none.  FYI,  B-scan shows a depth profile over a line -- most side-scrolling fish-finders are like B-scan devices.  C-scan is depth over an area, so full 3D.   The Opthalmic (to measure eyes) A and B scan units are really expensive but some show the result on a oscilloscope screen so one could compare any material of an unknown thickness to a sample of the same material of a known thickness.   #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 -- #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-mkp { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-mkp hr { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463hd { color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ads { margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ad { padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ad p { margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ad a { color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-lc { font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463hd { margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ad { margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463actions { font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463activity { background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463activity span { font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463activity span:first-child { text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463activity span a { color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463activity span span { color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463activity span .ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463underline { text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 .ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463attach { clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 .ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463attach div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 .ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463attach img { border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 .ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463attach label { display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 .ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463attach label a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 blockquote { margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 .ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463bold { font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 .ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463bold a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 dd.ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463last p a { font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 dd.ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463last p span { margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 dd.ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463last p span.ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463yshortcuts { margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 div.ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463attach-table div div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 div.ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463attach-table { width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 div.ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 div.ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 div.ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 div.ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463file-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 div.ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 div.ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 div.ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 div.ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463photo-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 div#ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463yshortcuts { font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 .ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463green { color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 .ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463MsoNormal { margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 o { font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463photos div { float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463photos div div { border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463photos div label { color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463reco-category { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463reco-desc { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 .ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463replbq { margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-actbar div a:first-child { margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-mlmsg { font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-mlmsg table { font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 input, #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 textarea { font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-mlmsg pre, #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 code { font:115% monospace;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-mlmsg * { line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463logo { padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-msg p a { font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463attach-count span { color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463reco-head { color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-reco { margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ov li a { font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ov li { font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ov ul { margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-text { font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-text p { margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-text tt { font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463 #ygrps-yiv-479334526yiv5591805463ygrp-vital ul li:last-child { border-right:none !important;} #ygrps-yiv-479334526 | 35137|35127|2018-05-28 18:16:18|brentswain38|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck?|The common weight of most ferro cement hulls is the same as for 1/4 plate, or more. If the hull  and  decks are 1/4 inch plate , that would be over 2,000 lbs over 3/16th on the travel  lift scale. I doubt very much that it is that thick . 1/4 inch would definitely  be too heavy for decks cabin,  cockpit and skeg , and that  boat would be far more than 15,000 lbs  on the travel lift scale. Matt's suggestions will give you a good idea on how thick it really is. Where the keel joins the hull is another spot where you may find a plate edge to measure.| 35138|35127|2018-05-28 19:22:32|Matt Malone|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck?| I have no idea if gel can be used on the ebay meters.  The transducer might not be liquid tight, not really, not industrial spec.  I cant answer if it must be used, that the manual might say.  The meters must do some signal processing and make assumptions about reflections to decide what a valid signal is.  There is always some internal reflection at the measurement face of the transducer.  The machine must be programmed to eliminate that return signal from consideration, likely by using a valid window.  Then there would be a return signal from the bottom of the paint/top of the metal.  All these reflections cut down the amplitude and energy reaching the metal.  The reflection from the far side of the metal would be a fraction of this power, then it loses power again at the paint/metal interface, then again at the paint/transducer interface.  The gel will not change the fact that the paint may be in the valid window, however, it will reduce energy loss at the transducer/paint interface, twice, making the return signal from the far side of the metal stronger.  Fingers crossed, the stronger signal is selected as the most relevant and displayed.   Now, return signals are proportional to the magnitude of the mismatch of acoustic impedance.  (See google for clever experiments with heavy and light springs in sequence for an illustration.)  Steel to air is a bad match, so good reflections from the inside of the metal is bare on the inside.  Spots with foam, or wood cabinets, not so good.  Your observations and data from metal in various states illustrates the quirks and usefulness, after one has gotten used to a particular instrument on samples similar to the target structure.  I am used to looking at an oscilloscope screen where human eyes see the full set of reflections and one can move the cursor to measure between the reflections -- paint, rust, entirely unimportant if enough power penetrates to get a large enough echo recognize by eye.   My Dad always complained of "idiot lights" on the dashboard of cars without gauges.  He preferred gauges, as I think most of us do because you can see how hot, nit just hotter than some arbitrary number.  Well a scope screen is another step above a gauge.  I was showing my bias to see the forest of reflections.  With a scope screen on could find and measure internal structure, even if covered with foam or behind cabinets.  Your measurements prove the usefulness of the thickness meter you have Darren. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, May 28, 18:13 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] 1/4" plate for hull and deck? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Matt, You do need to use ultrasonic gel with the cheap ebay meter.  I'd always assumed that the more expensive meters were using more sophisticated filtering to deal with the component of reflection that you get as you pass from paint to metal.  I had a couple of pieces I cut out from my hull handy so here is an example of what the cheap meter is capable of.  With 0.25" (6.6mm) thick aluminum it reads 6.6 for clean bare metal.  For a piece with several layers of Brightsides polyurethane it reads 7.1 mm from the painted side, 6.6 from the non painted side and the paint plus aluminum measures 6.7 mm with vernier calipers.  So, with a relatively thin coat of paint it would be good enough to tell you the difference between 1/8, 3/16 and 1/4" decks.  I also had a piece of hull with many layers of epoxy and bottom paint.  From the rough slightly corroded side, it read 7.1mm, cleaning that up with 180 grit sandpaper yielded 6.6 mm, from the painted side it read 10.1 mm while the paint plus aluminum measured 8mm with vernier calipers.  Measurements taken from a painted surface are also much more variable than those from clean metal. When we were boat shopping a few years back, I bought mine on ebay for something like $60CAN, I see there are ones that can be had for $77CAN now.  For that price it has been useful enough.  When we were boat shopping I could usually find a place to check things like the nominal thickness of the hull and decks.  I had thought it might be useful to search for corrosion as well, but no longer think so.  Both this unit and the ones used by surveyors have pretty limited utility when searching for corrosion.  The area you look at with the meter is less than a square centimeter, you can only look at so many spots on the hull and the chances of you finding a small spot of corrosion with a random pattern are almost nil.  Large patches of corrosion are likely to be discovered with the meter, but the standard issue eyeball is also pretty good for that.  I suppose the meter does have value in that it tells you how much material is left in the corroded area, sometimes corrosion looks worse than it is. Darren On 18-05-28 08:44 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   The correct Princess Auto link: https://www.princessauto.com/en/detail/ultrasonic-thickness-gauge/A-p8601205e $160 is pricey especially if there it no way for it to work through paint.  Perhaps some ultrasonic gel ?  Perhaps the machine can only handle one speed of sound discontinuity to allow it to work dry, but with gel it might work through paint...   Just a thought.   I would rather have a greasy spot on the paint, than chip through paint.   I just looked at ebay for A-Scan -- depth only at one spot -- NDT units like mine.   I saw none.  FYI,  B-scan shows a depth profile over a line -- most side-scrolling fish-finders are like B-scan devices.  C-scan is depth over an area, so full 3D.   The Opthalmic (to measure eyes) A and B scan units are really expensive but some show the result on a oscilloscope screen so one could compare any material of an unknown thickness to a sample of the same material of a known thickness.   | 35139|35127|2018-05-29 10:00:01|jhess314|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck??|Thanks to Darren, Matt and Aaron for your discussion of ultrasonic thickness meters. I've learned about 1000% more than I previously knew.I've received a 2010 survey via the boat broker. The surveyor claims that both the hull and the deck are 1/4" plate. The hull configuration is flush-deck, with a very low pilot house, plus a cockpit. Headroom is 5'8" in the salon.The boat was designed by Gilbert Caroff, of France. I understand that he designed a number of boats for high latitude use. So maybe the 1/4" hull makes sense, for iceberg bashing. But still not so sure why a 1/4" deck?One of my concerns is that if the boat is too top-heavy then it might not right from a knockdown or roll-over. That capability is important to me. Not sure how I'd assess that characteristic without either the assurance of the designer, or the on-the-water experience of a user?John---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :1/4" plate sounds too thick for the deck and could negatively effect stability.  There is a chance the seller is wrong, as the displacement and ballast are not far off other boats built of thinner scantlings.  Do you know the displacement and ballast that the design is supposed to have, heavier displacement or lighter ballast might point to heavier plate having been used.  I have one of those inexpensive ultrasonic thickness gauges that can be found on ebay or princess auto.  It works well, but it has to be used on bare metal, it won't work through paint.  If, you can't remove some paint or remove a fitting, a marine surveyor that works with metal boats is likely to have one of the more expensive ultrasonic thickness gauges that will work through coatings. | 35140|35127|2018-05-29 10:01:54|jhess314|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck|I know the gaff-rigged ferro-cement boat Hannah has been sailed extensively at high latitudes. I suppose that speaks well of her ability to handle gnarly water, in spite of her weight.http://gafferhannah.blogspot.com/---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :The common weight of most ferro cement hulls is the same as for 1/4 plate, or more.If the hull  and  decks are 1/4 inch plate , that would be over 2,000 lbs over 3/16th on the travel  lift scale. I doubt very much that it is that thick . 1/4 inch would definitely  be too heavy for decks cabin,  cockpit and skeg , and that  boat would be far more than 15,000 lbs  on the travel lift scale. Matt's suggestions will give you a good idea on how thick it really is. Where the keel joins the hull is another spot where you may find a plate edge to measure.| 35141|35127|2018-05-29 10:31:53|Matt Malone|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck??| 5'8" is low headroom, that is probably how the designer compensated for 1/4" plate in the deck. Falling ice is a hazard in the high arctic.  The boat is stiffest in the plunge direction, tons per inch, so ice falling is like hitting an anvil.   Why does ice fall?   You are sailing one day, the little growlers are nicely spaced, anchor and go to bed, wind shifts, they pack up around you and before you know it, ramping and falling ice. Also flush thick deck provides far more beam-wise squeeze strength reinforcing to the hull over a thinner arched deck structure with a high doghouse.  If one leaves the boat anchored and ice blows in and out it is less to worry about.  Besides someone said the narrow boats that play bumper cars in the English canals are 1/4".   There you can step out onto the bank.  Would you want less with 5 ton growlers yards away and the next port 30 miles down the coast? Remember, solid glass and solid wood decks can be very heavy too, so comparison to thin steel is not convicting of poor stability.  My 1958 solid glass boat has over 6' of headroom everywhere, close to 7' near the hatch and it weighs 19,000 pounds, more than might think of that is the solid glass deck. That sounds like a boat I would look at for the right price.   Matt From: j.hess@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 10:02 Subject: [origamiboats] Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck?? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Thanks to Darren, Matt and Aaron for your discussion of ultrasonic thickness meters. I've learned about 1000% more than I previously knew. I've received a 2010 survey via the boat broker. The surveyor claims that both the hull and the deck are 1/4" plate. The hull configuration is flush-deck, with a very low pilot house, plus a cockpit. Headroom is 5'8" in the salon. The boat was designed by Gilbert Caroff, of France. I understand that he designed a number of boats for high latitude use. So maybe the 1/4" hull makes sense, for iceberg bashing. But still not so sure why a 1/4" deck? One of my concerns is that if the boat is too top-heavy then it might not right from a knockdown or roll-over. That capability is important to me. Not sure how I'd assess that characteristic without either the assurance of the designer, or the on-the-water experience of a user? John ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : 1/4" plate sounds too thick for the deck and could negatively effect stability.  There is a chance the seller is wrong, as the displacement and ballast are not far off other boats built of thinner scantlings.  Do you know the displacement and ballast that the design is supposed to have, heavier displacement or lighter ballast might point to heavier plate having been used.  I have one of those inexpensive ultrasonic thickness gauges that can be found on ebay or princess auto.  It works well, but it has to be used on bare metal, it won't work through paint.  If, you can't remove some paint or remove a fitting, a marine surveyor that works with metal boats is likely to have one of the more expensive ultrasonic thickness gauges that will work through coatings. | 35142|35127|2018-05-29 12:29:43|Darren Bos|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck?| In theory, yes Aaron, but for those without formal ultrasound training thinking of getting one of the ebay ultrasound units, the actual function has nuance.  The numbers I gave show the ebay meters are not returning paint plus plate thickness when used through thick layers of paint on the outside of the hull. I think most users would be most interested in below-the-waterline measurements where most problems tend to occur.  Here you are going to have a layer of epoxy or paint on the inside of a steel boat, and epoxy plus probably many layers of antifouling paint on the outside.  Given the many layers of paint, and the way that bottom paint is applied (entrained air) you are unlikely to get reliable readings from the outside of the boat.  In my test example the ultrasound meter measured 10.1mm for a plate that was actually 6.6mm with 1.4mm of paint.  So the meter reads 10.1 mm when the actual combined thickness is 8mm.  Because you inevitably have air in bottom paint as you roll it on, and often there are bonding problems between the many layers, ultrasound readings with the ebay meter are so variable and inaccurate from the outside of a hull they are useless.  However, if you want to use the meter inside the hull with fewer layers of paint, or if you want to measure the thickness or remaining plate in an area that you have found corrosion, then the tool has some merit. On 18-05-28 01:56 PM, Aaron akenai@... [origamiboats] wrote:   As long as the paint or coatings are firmly attached no air or delamination of coating any of the ultrasound type units for spot thickness reading will work plus or minus there rated accuracy and the coating thickness on the tested side only. The tester will not tell you the is or is not any coating on the other side. If you want 100% accuracy then one must buff sand or blast the coating and or corrosion away from test area. UT level 1 basic information  Aaron | 35143|35127|2018-05-29 13:44:55|Darren Bos|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck??| John, Given some survey reports I've seen, I'm not sure that info is any better than a best guess from the owner.  I've seen survey reports with glaring errors that were obviously just copied over from previous errors without ever actually checking what was in/on the boat. Taking a quick look at Gilbert Caroff's website I have the following thoughts.  If it was drawn with 1/4" plate on the deck then the stability is likely to be fine given the designer's credentials and high altitude sailing experience.  However, a lot of his boats look to be amateur built (not a bad thing) and if someone substituted 1/4" plate because that is what they had on hand, or just to "make it stronger", then the stability would be negatively effected, especially if the ballast was not modified at the same time.  If you are remote from the boat, I would try contacting Caroff's office (if someone is still maintaining it) and see if study plans are available, they are sometimes inexpensive and should include the scantlings.  If you have access to the boat and it is in the water, then a roll test can give you a beginning of an idea if the ballast is sufficient to offset the heavier decks.  I think one of Dave Gerr's books (maybe The Nature of Boats) goes into more details on the roll test, but I don't have access to my copies right now to check. Good Luck on your search. On 18-05-29 06:54 AM, j.hess@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Thanks to Darren, Matt and Aaron for your discussion of ultrasonic thickness meters. I've learned about 1000% more than I previously knew. I've received a 2010 survey via the boat broker. The surveyor claims that both the hull and the deck are 1/4" plate. The hull configuration is flush-deck, with a very low pilot house, plus a cockpit. Headroom is 5'8" in the salon. The boat was designed by Gilbert Caroff, of France. I understand that he designed a number of boats for high latitude use. So maybe the 1/4" hull makes sense, for iceberg bashing. But still not so sure why a 1/4" deck? One of my concerns is that if the boat is too top-heavy then it might not right from a knockdown or roll-over. That capability is important to me. Not sure how I'd assess that characteristic without either the assurance of the designer, or the on-the-water experience of a user? John | 35144|35127|2018-05-29 14:10:34|Matt Malone|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck??| 5'8" is low headroom, that is probably how the designer compensated for 1/4" plate in the deck. Falling ice is a hazard in the high arctic.  The boat is stiffest in the plunge direction, tons per inch, so ice falling is like hitting an anvil.   Why does ice fall?   You are sailing one day, the little growlers are nicely spaced, anchor and go to bed, wind shifts, they pack up around you and before you know it, ramping and falling ice. Also flush thick deck provides far more beam-wise squeeze strength reinforcing to the hull over a thinner arched deck structure with a high doghouse.  If one leaves the boat anchored and ice blows in and out it is less to worry about.  Besides someone said the narrow boats that play bumper cars in the English canals are 1/4".   There you can step out onto the bank.  Would you want less with 5 ton growlers yards away and the next port 30 miles down the coast? Remember, solid glass and solid wood decks can be very heavy too, so comparison to thin steel is not convicting of poor stability.  My 1958 solid glass boat has over 6' of headroom everywhere, close to 7' near the hatch and it weighs 19,000 pounds, more than might think of that is the solid glass deck. That sounds like a boat I would look at for the right price.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of j.hess@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 9:54 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck??     Thanks to Darren, Matt and Aaron for your discussion of ultrasonic thickness meters. I've learned about 1000% more than I previously knew. I've received a 2010 survey via the boat broker. The surveyor claims that both the hull and the deck are 1/4" plate. The hull configuration is flush-deck, with a very low pilot house, plus a cockpit. Headroom is 5'8" in the salon. The boat was designed by Gilbert Caroff, of France. I understand that he designed a number of boats for high latitude use. So maybe the 1/4" hull makes sense, for iceberg bashing. But still not so sure why a 1/4" deck? One of my concerns is that if the boat is too top-heavy then it might not right from a knockdown or roll-over. That capability is important to me. Not sure how I'd assess that characteristic without either the assurance of the designer, or the on-the-water experience of a user? John ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : 1/4" plate sounds too thick for the deck and could negatively effect stability.  There is a chance the seller is wrong, as the displacement and ballast are not far off other boats built of thinner scantlings.  Do you know the displacement and ballast that the design is supposed to have, heavier displacement or lighter ballast might point to heavier plate having been used.  I have one of those inexpensive ultrasonic thickness gauges that can be found on ebay or princess auto.  It works well, but it has to be used on bare metal, it won't work through paint.  If, you can't remove some paint or remove a fitting, a marine surveyor that works with metal boats is likely to have one of the more expensive ultrasonic thickness gauges that will work through coatings. | 35145|35127|2018-05-29 22:41:52|Brian Stannard|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck??|If there is an item of hardware bolted to the deck it could be removed and the thickness measured through the bolt hole.I agree that 1/4" is too thick. Framed many steel boats of that size and larger have decks 1/8" thick. On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 6:54 AM, j.hess@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Thanks to Darren, Matt and Aaron for your discussion of ultrasonic thickness meters. I've learned about 1000% more than I previously knew.I've received a 2010 survey via the boat broker. The surveyor claims that both the hull and the deck are 1/4" plate. The hull configuration is flush-deck, with a very low pilot house, plus a cockpit. Headroom is 5'8" in the salon.The boat was designed by Gilbert Caroff, of France. I understand that he designed a number of boats for high latitude use. So maybe the 1/4" hull makes sense, for iceberg bashing. But still not so sure why a 1/4" deck?One of my concerns is that if the boat is too top-heavy then it might not right from a knockdown or roll-over. That capability is important to me. Not sure how I'd assess that characteristic without either the assurance of the designer, or the on-the-water experience of a user?John---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :1/4" plate sounds too thick for the deck and could negatively effect stability.  There is a chance the seller is wrong, as the displacement and ballast are not far off other boats built of thinner scantlings.  Do you know the displacement and ballast that the design is supposed to have, heavier displacement or lighter ballast might point to heavier plate having been used.  I have one of those inexpensive ultrasonic thickness gauges that can be found on ebay or princess auto.  It works well, but it has to be used on bare metal, it won't work through paint.  If, you can't remove some paint or remove a fitting, a marine surveyor that works with metal boats is likely to have one of the more expensive ultrasonic thickness gauges that will work through coatings. -- CheersBrian | 35146|35127|2018-05-31 02:03:06|Aaron|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck?|DarrenI agree with you 99%Ultrasound works by direct contact so in order to create that contact you must use a couplant of some type because the sound wave created will not cross the air gap barrier.  The types of gels very depending on temperature and applications but the purpose for theit use is the same.One would have to be able calibrate the meter to the expected thickness of the steel. Then depending on the quality of the coating you would be able tell the steels relative thickness.If you want to know the coating thickness that's a different type of test meter.Like you said you get to many variations with cheep equipment some variable is the imperfections in steel coating and meters. Also it take a few hours of hands on instruction to learn how to use most UT meters where more advanced shearwave tech can take years to master interpretation of the anomalies that can be found.Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 8:32 AM, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote:   In theory, yes Aaron, but for those without formal ultrasound training thinking of getting one of the ebay ultrasound units, the actual function has nuance.  The numbers I gave show the ebay meters are not returning paint plus plate thickness when used through thick layers of paint on the outside of the hull. I think most users would be most interested in below-the-waterline measurements where most problems tend to occur.  Here you are going to have a layer of epoxy or paint on the inside of a steel boat, and epoxy plus probably many layers of antifouling paint on the outside.  Given the many layers of paint, and the way that bottom paint is applied (entrained air) you are unlikely to get reliable readings from the outside of the boat.  In my test example the ultrasound meter measured 10.1mm for a plate that was actually 6.6mm with 1.4mm of paint.  So the meter reads 10.1 mm when the actual combined thickness is 8mm.  Because you inevitably have air in bottom paint as you roll it on, and often there are bonding problems between the many layers, ultrasound readings with the ebay meter are so variable and inaccurate from the outside of a hull they are useless.  However, if you want to use the meter inside the hull with fewer layers of paint, or if you want to measure the thickness or remaining plate in an area that you have found corrosion, then the tool has some merit. On 18-05-28 01:56 PM, Aaron akenai@... [origamiboats] wrote:   As long as the paint or coatings are firmly attached no air or delamination of coating any of the ultrasound type units for spot thickness reading will work plus or minus there rated accuracy and the coating thickness on the tested side only. The tester will not tell you the is or is not any coating on the other side. If you want 100% accuracy then one must buff sand or blast the coating and or corrosion away from test area. UT level 1 basic information  Aaron #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 -- #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-mkp { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-mkp hr { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679hd { color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ads { margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ad { padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ad p { margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ad a { color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-lc { font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679hd { margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ad { margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679actions { font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679activity { background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679activity span { font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679activity span:first-child { text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679activity span a { color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679activity span span { color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679activity span .ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679underline { text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 .ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679attach { clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 .ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679attach div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 .ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679attach img { border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 .ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679attach label { display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 .ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679attach label a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 blockquote { margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 .ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679bold { font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 .ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679bold a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 dd.ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679last p a { font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 dd.ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679last p span { margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 dd.ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679last p span.ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679yshortcuts { margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 div.ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679attach-table div div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 div.ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679attach-table { width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 div.ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 div.ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 div.ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 div.ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679file-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 div.ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 div.ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 div.ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 div.ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679photo-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 div#ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679yshortcuts { font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 .ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679green { color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 .ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679MsoNormal { margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 o { font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679photos div { float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679photos div div { border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679photos div label { color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679reco-category { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679reco-desc { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 .ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679replbq { margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-actbar div a:first-child { margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-mlmsg { font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-mlmsg table { font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 input, #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 textarea { font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-mlmsg pre, #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 code { font:115% monospace;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-mlmsg * { line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679logo { padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-msg p a { font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679attach-count span { color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679reco-head { color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-reco { margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ov li a { font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ov li { font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ov ul { margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-text { font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-text p { margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-text tt { font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679 #ygrps-yiv-1375161902yiv4076135679ygrp-vital ul li:last-child { border-right:none !important;} #ygrps-yiv-1375161902 | 35147|35127|2018-05-31 10:11:14|jhess314|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck??|Darren,Thanks for the roll test article. It provides an easy, if crude, way to get an idea of whether a boat is top-heavy or not. Sadly, the boat I'm interested in is on the hard, and I am 700 miles away from it.When I first tried to access the article I was blocked by a paywall. Eventually I used Google to search for the article title (Use This Sailboat Stability Secret for Safer Sailing), and found that some of the time Google returned a link that bypassed the paywall, and sometimes not. So if someone wants to read the article but gets blocked by the paywall, keep trying with Google, perhaps using slightly different search terms.It's a good idea to try and get a study plan from the Caroff office. I'm also going to try and contact the owner, rather than rely on the broker for information.The survey said the boat was built by Robert Fleury, maybe of Canada. Does anyone recognize the name as a reputable builder?Here's a link to a poor photo from the 2010 survey showing rust in the bilges. From the photo can anyone assess whether the rust is significant or not?https://s15.postimg.cc/punub5x17/bilge_rust.jpg https://s15.postimg.cc/punub5x17/bilge_rust.jpg View on s15.postimg.cc Preview by Yahoo  Thanks,John ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :John, Given some survey reports I've seen, I'm not sure that info is any better than a best guess from the owner.  I've seen survey reports with glaring errors that were obviously just copied over from previous errors without ever actually checking what was in/on the boat.Taking a quick look at Gilbert Caroff's website I have the following thoughts.  If it was drawn with 1/4" plate on the deck then the stability is likely to be fine given the designer's credentials and high altitude sailing experience.  However, a lot of his boats look to be amateur built (not a bad thing) and if someone substituted 1/4" plate because that is what they had on hand, or just to "make it stronger", then the stability would be negatively effected, especially if the ballast was not modified at the same time.  If you are remote from the boat, I would try contacting Caroff's office (if someone is still maintaining it) and see if study plans are available, they are sometimes inexpensive and should include the scantlings.  If you have access to the boat and it is in the water, then a roll test can give you a beginning of an idea if the ballast is sufficient to offset the heavier decks.  I think one of Dave Gerr's books (maybe The Nature of Boats) goes into more details on the roll test, but I don't have access to my copies right now to check.Good Luck on your search. | 35148|35127|2018-05-31 12:00:59|Darren Bos|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck?| Agreed, There is clearly a lot to be learned with ultrasound, and a well trained professional with an expensive machine could do more than can be done with a $70 ebay unit.  I do think trying to shoot through thick bottom paint stacks the odds against even a well trained individual and a good quality machine.  If you are working from the inside of the hull then a guy could get reasonable results from the ebay unit with some care. Just to make sure I haven't missed something.  You are talking about setting the velocity appropriate to steel (or whatever you are measuring) and then calibrating it on an appropriate piece of the material, and then taking your actual measurements through paint to get the thickness of the steel.  You're not talking about messing around with the velocity parameter to compensate for the presence of paint or calibrating on a piece that has paint, are you? Thanks, Darren On 18-05-30 10:48 PM, Aaron akenai@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Darren I agree with you 99% Ultrasound works by direct contact so in order to create that contact you must use a couplant of some type because the sound wave created will not cross the air gap barrier.  The types of gels very depending on temperature and applications but the purpose for theit use is the same. One would have to be able calibrate the meter to the expected thickness of the steel. Then depending on the quality of the coating you would be able tell the steels relative thickness. If you want to know the coating thickness that's a different type of test meter. Like you said you get to many variations with cheep equipment some variable is the imperfections in steel coating and meters. Also it take a few hours of hands on instruction to learn how to use most UT meters where more advanced shearwave tech can take years to master interpretation of the anomalies that can be found. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 8:32 AM, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote:   In theory, yes Aaron, but for those without formal ultrasound training thinking of getting one of the ebay ultrasound units, the actual function has nuance.  The numbers I gave show the ebay meters are not returning paint plus plate thickness when used through thick layers of paint on the outside of the hull. I think most users would be most interested in below-the-waterline measurements where most problems tend to occur.  Here you are going to have a layer of epoxy or paint on the inside of a steel boat, and epoxy plus probably many layers of antifouling paint on the outside.  Given the many layers of paint, and the way that bottom paint is applied (entrained air) you are unlikely to get reliable readings from the outside of the boat.  In my test example the ultrasound meter measured 10.1mm for a plate that was actually 6.6mm with 1.4mm of paint.  So the meter reads 10.1 mm when the actual combined thickness is 8mm.  Because you inevitably have air in bottom paint as you roll it on, and often there are bonding problems between the many layers, ultrasound readings with the ebay meter are so variable and inaccurate from the outside of a hull they are useless.  However, if you want to use the meter inside the hull with fewer layers of paint, or if you want to measure the thickness or remaining plate in an area that you have found corrosion, then the tool has some merit. | 35149|35127|2018-05-31 14:27:43|Matt Malone|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck??| Hello John, Origami boats has not been taking my posts lately, but I will try again... I believe I found the boat listing.   That boat has very little freeboard, and a lot of the body is deep in the water, judging from the water line.   There is no doubt a BS would float more on top of the water, and this is firmly buried into it.   The deck would not be very far above the center of buoyancy, therefore it is not nearly as destabilizing as one might think if one did not see the boat with the high water line on the side.   As you said it is a flush deck, and I can see the low headroom below.    The 1/4" steel decks would not bother me at all.   I am still remembering that a solid glass deck could be heavier, and solid wood decks on an arctic boat could be heavier too.     The 1/4" steel decks would not bother me at all, in fact, on a flush deck boat they would provide a lot of beamwise stiffness to the boat versus being packed in ice because of a change in wind one day, or squished between a big ship and the inside of a lock.   I am not going to talk uselessly about a case that would leave a thinner steel boat dented and this one not because the window in energy between what would not dent a thinner boat, and the upper limit where this boat would survive might be 1/10th what a freighter could do -- maybe in 10% of cases one would see a difference in outcome.    Suffice it to say, on a flush-deck boat, there are good structural reasons to go thick on the deck plate.    I really think far too much importance is being put on the 1/4" deck.   Suffice it to say, I think it is an asset.   I am more interested in what I do not see in the photos.     - where is the photo of the cockpit ?   - where is the photo taken from the back of the cockpit looking toward the companionway ?   - where is the photo standing in the cockpit at the top of the companionway looking down into the boat.     - where is the photo from inside the boat looking out those windows all around the raised deck area near the companionway ? I would be more interested what is behind that white wood on the inside -- insulation ?   , and how does one get better access to the engine.    The next thing I would consider is the low freeboard, and the shallow cockpit (it has to be shallow because the water line on the side is so high and it is still self-draining)  and going into waves.  People called the Contessa 32 a wet boat, even a submarine, with waves sweeping unbroken over it.   Long before one would actually observe the 1/4" decks influencing an actual reduction in roll recovery moment (which I am not saying is at all a major concern, nor am I dismissing), if one were merely in weather where roll recovery is a though at all, then it seems one would already be standing in a constantly full swimming pool while considering it.  Before worrying about the 1/4" decks, I would consider any sort of cockpit protection, leeboards, that angled flange one sees on the deck just aft of the maximum beam that directs water racing down the deck toward the cockpit and redirects it over the side, even a wind-screen like deflection  barrier if not a cuddy at the front of the cockpit.   Is inside steering a possibility ? If anything concerned me (and not saying it does) I would compute the reserve buoyancy of the boat assuming the top of the black is the water line, and take a very close look at the hatches / companionway to make sure it seals quite tightly -- not drip proof but far slower to let water in than a casual manual pumping can keep ahead of.  I would look at the lowest opening that I could not keep water from leaking into at a 5 gallons/minute or more rate (about what one gets from a garden hose faucet) and figure out how much water would have to be in the boat before that opening is underwater.   I am not being alarmist, but, boats that float more on top of the water, like a giant piece of styrofoam, they have such a ridiculous amount of reserve buoyancy I would not be as concerned with how tightly it was possible to seal them.   It seems to me for every day one might spend actually observing the 1/4" deck have any observable impact, one would be spending a month knee deep in a cold swimming pool.       Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of j.hess@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 10:11 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck??     Darren, Thanks for the roll test article. It provides an easy, if crude, way to get an idea of whether a boat is top-heavy or not. Sadly, the boat I'm interested in is on the hard, and I am 700 miles away from it. When I first tried to access the article I was blocked by a paywall. Eventually I used Google to search for the article title (Use This Sailboat Stability Secret for Safer Sailing), and found that some of the time Google returned a link that bypassed the paywall, and sometimes not. So if someone wants to read the article but gets blocked by the paywall, keep trying with Google, perhaps using slightly different search terms. It's a good idea to try and get a study plan from the Caroff office. I'm also going to try and contact the owner, rather than rely on the broker for information. The survey said the boat was built by Robert Fleury, maybe of Canada. Does anyone recognize the name as a reputable builder? Here's a link to a poor photo from the 2010 survey showing rust in the bilges. From the photo can anyone assess whether the rust is significant or not? https://s15.postimg.cc/punub5x17/bilge_rust.jpg https://s15.postimg.cc/punub5x17/bilge_rust.jpg View on s15.postimg.cc Preview by Yahoo   Thanks, John  ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : John, Given some survey reports I've seen, I'm not sure that info is any better than a best guess from the owner.  I've seen survey reports with glaring errors that were obviously just copied over from previous errors without ever actually checking what was in/on the boat. Taking a quick look at Gilbert Caroff's website I have the following thoughts.  If it was drawn with 1/4" plate on the deck then the stability is likely to be fine given the designer's credentials and high altitude sailing experience.  However, a lot of his boats look to be amateur built (not a bad thing) and if someone substituted 1/4" plate because that is what they had on hand, or just to "make it stronger", then the stability would be negatively effected, especially if the ballast was not modified at the same time.  If you are remote from the boat, I would try contacting Caroff's office (if someone is still maintaining it) and see if study plans are available, they are sometimes inexpensive and should include the scantlings.  If you have access to the boat and it is in the water, then a roll test can give you a beginning of an idea if the ballast is sufficient to offset the heavier decks.  I think one of Dave Gerr's books (maybe The Nature of Boats) goes into more details on the roll test, but I don't have access to my copies right now to check. Good Luck on your search. | 35150|35127|2018-05-31 15:18:59|brentswain38|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck?|Any thick grease to eliminate the air space works. I have used lard effectively .| 35151|35127|2018-05-31 15:27:56|brentswain38|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck??|Looking at the shape of the midship section  will give you an idea of self righting ability. A beach ball with a tiny  amount of ballast is completely  self righting., A raft with a 70% ballast  ratio is not. So the closer your midships section is to  a ball( rounder), narrow beam and high camber cabintop or deck ,and the less it resembles a raft ( wide beam and flat, flush deck) the more self righting it will be.| 35152|35127|2018-05-31 15:33:51|brentswain38|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck??|When considering "Squeeze strength " one should consider a steel deck to be  a longitudinal ,fully welded steel bulkhead, with a tensile strength along it's  inside edge of around 7,000 lbs per linear inch. No lack of 'Squeeze strength" there---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : 5'8" is low headroom, that is probably how the designer compensated for 1/4" plate in the deck. Falling ice is a hazard in the high arctic.  The boat is stiffest in the plunge direction, tons per inch, so ice falling is like hitting an anvil.   Why does ice fall?   You are sailing one day, the little growlers are nicely spaced, anchor and go to bed, wind shifts, they pack up around you and before you know it, ramping and falling ice. Also flush thick deck provides far more beam-wise squeeze strength reinforcing to the hull over a thinner arched deck structure with a high doghouse.  If one leaves the boat anchored and ice blows in and out it is less to worry about.  | 35153|35127|2018-05-31 18:04:55|Matt Malone|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck?| I like the idea of lard for ultrasonic gel.  It is nontoxic, and I doubt it affects paint or plastics.  The same may not be said of some petroleum based greases or gels. Matt From: brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 31, 17:09 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] 1/4" plate for hull and deck? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Any thick grease to eliminate the air space works. I have used lard effectively . | 35154|35127|2018-05-31 23:37:45|Aaron|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck?| Yes steel for steel.  I have not met anyone that could calibrate for the coatings yet, but I know a few that tried.   On Thursday, May 31, 2018, 8:01:07 AM AKDT, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Agreed, There is clearly a lot to be learned with ultrasound, and a well trained professional with an expensive machine could do more than can be done with a $70 ebay unit.  I do think trying to shoot through thick bottom paint stacks the odds against even a well trained individual and a good quality machine.  If you are working from the inside of the hull then a guy could get reasonable results from the ebay unit with some care. Just to make sure I haven't missed something.  You are talking about setting the velocity appropriate to steel (or whatever you are measuring) and then calibrating it on an appropriate piece of the material, and then taking your actual measurements through paint to get the thickness of the steel.  You're not talking about messing around with the velocity parameter to compensate for the presence of paint or calibrating on a piece that has paint, are you? Thanks, Darren On 18-05-30 10:48 PM, Aaron akenai@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Darren I agree with you 99% Ultrasound works by direct contact so in order to create that contact you must use a couplant of some type because the sound wave created will not cross the air gap barrier.  The types of gels very depending on temperature and applications but the purpose for theit use is the same. One would have to be able calibrate the meter to the expected thickness of the steel. Then depending on the quality of the coating you would be able tell the steels relative thickness. If you want to know the coating thickness that's a different type of test meter. Like you said you get to many variations with cheep equipment some variable is the imperfections in steel coating and meters. Also it take a few hours of hands on instruction to learn how to use most UT meters where more advanced shearwave tech can take years to master interpretation of the anomalies that can be found. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 8:32 AM, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote:   In theory, yes Aaron, but for those without formal ultrasound training thinking of getting one of the ebay ultrasound units, the actual function has nuance.  The numbers I gave show the ebay meters are not returning paint plus plate thickness when used through thick layers of paint on the outside of the hull. I think most users would be most interested in below-the-waterline measurements where most problems tend to occur.  Here you are going to have a layer of epoxy or paint on the inside of a steel boat, and epoxy plus probably many layers of antifouling paint on the outside.  Given the many layers of paint, and the way that bottom paint is applied (entrained air) you are unlikely to get reliable readings from the outside of the boat.  In my test example the ultrasound meter measured 10.1mm for a plate that was actually 6.6mm with 1.4mm of paint.  So the meter reads 10.1 mm when the actual combined thickness is 8mm.  Because you inevitably have air in bottom paint as you roll it on, and often there are bonding problems between the many layers, ultrasound readings with the ebay meter are so variable and inaccurate from the outside of a hull they are useless.  However, if you want to use the meter inside the hull with fewer layers of paint, or if you want to measure the thickness or remaining plate in an area that you have found corrosion, then the tool has some merit. | 35155|35127|2018-06-01 10:37:42|Matt Malone|Light Steel| I was encouraged to post this in light of the recent posts with regard to a 1/4" steel boat, when viewed in the context of the historic mass of boats.   https://assets.heart.co.uk/2015/36/hoegh-target-worlds-biggest-car-carrier-ship-1441689395-large-article-0.jpg This is a boat undoubtly made of steel, and look at it.  A piece of styrofoam would not float as high out of the water.    That hull could be 90% full of water and it would still not sink.   Incredible reserve buoyancies while retaining strength and stiffness are possible when working in steel.   One may get spoiled very easily and forget that such reserve buoyancies were not possible with wood or solid glass for instance.   The materials were either weak (wood) or not very stiff (glass) requiring a lot more material to get acceptable results.   The great strength and stiffness of steel allow for much more slender construction that works out to far less mass for a given footprint in the water, and greater reserve buoyancy but potentially less grip on the water for going to wind etc -- in the sense that some old boats had a good grip on the water by having 2/3 to 3/4 of their hull under water.    Here are some examples of boats following the Colin Archer type designs.   They are firmly in the water.   http://www.kastenmarine.com/fantom.htm The 36' Double Ended Cutter "FANTOM" - Kasten Marine www.kastenmarine.com The 36' double-ended sailing yacht FANTOM. A rounded hull in steel for high latitude sailing. https://www.devalk.nl/images/thumbnails/website/ver-hoek-styled-colin-archer-250240_2e.jpg I will remind the reader that it was only this type of boat which received an unqualified positive evaluation in C.J.Marchaj's Seaworthiness the Forgotten Factor -- many other designs were examined and both strengths and weaknesses were discussed.   Without knowing the exact thickness of the deck, I think we can all look at the waterline and say these are darn heavy boats for their size.   It is not at all unreasonable to ask about roll moment in a heavy-built boat, but, lets be reasonable, some very seaworthy boats were far heavier using more traditional designs and other materials, so, there is really no way for anyone to be certain that a heavy built boat will not be seaworthy without an actual test, like a roll moment test, or a great deal of detailed dimensional data and computations.   Matt   From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 2:27 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck??     Hello John, Origami boats has not been taking my posts lately, but I will try again... I believe I found the boat listing.   That boat has very little freeboard, and a lot of the body is deep in the water, judging from the water line.   There is no doubt a BS would float more on top of the water, and this is firmly buried into it.   The deck would not be very far above the center of buoyancy, therefore it is not nearly as destabilizing as one might think if one did not see the boat with the high water line on the side.   As you said it is a flush deck, and I can see the low headroom below.    The 1/4" steel decks would not bother me at all.   I am still remembering that a solid glass deck could be heavier, and solid wood decks on an arctic boat could be heavier too.     The 1/4" steel decks would not bother me at all, in fact, on a flush deck boat they would provide a lot of beamwise stiffness to the boat versus being packed in ice because of a change in wind one day, or squished between a big ship and the inside of a lock.   I am not going to talk uselessly about a case that would leave a thinner steel boat dented and this one not because the window in energy between what would not dent a thinner boat, and the upper limit where this boat would survive might be 1/10th what a freighter could do -- maybe in 10% of cases one would see a difference in outcome.    Suffice it to say, on a flush-deck boat, there are good structural reasons to go thick on the deck plate.    I really think far too much importance is being put on the 1/4" deck.   Suffice it to say, I think it is an asset.   I am more interested in what I do not see in the photos.     - where is the photo of the cockpit ?   - where is the photo taken from the back of the cockpit looking toward the companionway ?   - where is the photo standing in the cockpit at the top of the companionway looking down into the boat.     - where is the photo from inside the boat looking out those windows all around the raised deck area near the companionway ? I would be more interested what is behind that white wood on the inside -- insulation ?   , and how does one get better access to the engine.    The next thing I would consider is the low freeboard, and the shallow cockpit (it has to be shallow because the water line on the side is so high and it is still self-draining)  and going into waves.  People called the Contessa 32 a wet boat, even a submarine, with waves sweeping unbroken over it.   Long before one would actually observe the 1/4" decks influencing an actual reduction in roll recovery moment (which I am not saying is at all a major concern, nor am I dismissing), if one were merely in weather where roll recovery is a though at all, then it seems one would already be standing in a constantly full swimming pool while considering it.  Before worrying about the 1/4" decks, I would consider any sort of cockpit protection, leeboards, that angled flange one sees on the deck just aft of the maximum beam that directs water racing down the deck toward the cockpit and redirects it over the side, even a wind-screen like deflection  barrier if not a cuddy at the front of the cockpit.   Is inside steering a possibility ? If anything concerned me (and not saying it does) I would compute the reserve buoyancy of the boat assuming the top of the black is the water line, and take a very close look at the hatches / companionway to make sure it seals quite tightly -- not drip proof but far slower to let water in than a casual manual pumping can keep ahead of.  I would look at the lowest opening that I could not keep water from leaking into at a 5 gallons/minute or more rate (about what one gets from a garden hose faucet) and figure out how much water would have to be in the boat before that opening is underwater.   I am not being alarmist, but, boats that float more on top of the water, like a giant piece of styrofoam, they have such a ridiculous amount of reserve buoyancy I would not be as concerned with how tightly it was possible to seal them.   It seems to me for every day one might spend actually observing the 1/4" deck have any observable impact, one would be spending a month knee deep in a cold swimming pool.       Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of j.hess@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 10:11 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck??     Darren, Thanks for the roll test article. It provides an easy, if crude, way to get an idea of whether a boat is top-heavy or not. Sadly, the boat I'm interested in is on the hard, and I am 700 miles away from it. When I first tried to access the article I was blocked by a paywall. Eventually I used Google to search for the article title (Use This Sailboat Stability Secret for Safer Sailing), and found that some of the time Google returned a link that bypassed the paywall, and sometimes not. So if someone wants to read the article but gets blocked by the paywall, keep trying with Google, perhaps using slightly different search terms. It's a good idea to try and get a study plan from the Caroff office. I'm also going to try and contact the owner, rather than rely on the broker for information. The survey said the boat was built by Robert Fleury, maybe of Canada. Does anyone recognize the name as a reputable builder? Here's a link to a poor photo from the 2010 survey showing rust in the bilges. From the photo can anyone assess whether the rust is significant or not? https://s15.postimg.cc/punub5x17/bilge_rust.jpg https://s15.postimg.cc/punub5x17/bilge_rust.jpg View on s15.postimg.cc Preview by Yahoo   Thanks, John  ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : John, Given some survey reports I've seen, I'm not sure that info is any better than a best guess from the owner.  I've seen survey reports with glaring errors that were obviously just copied over from previous errors without ever actually checking what was in/on the boat. Taking a quick look at Gilbert Caroff's website I have the following thoughts.  If it was drawn with 1/4" plate on the deck then the stability is likely to be fine given the designer's credentials and high altitude sailing experience.  However, a lot of his boats look to be amateur built (not a bad thing) and if someone substituted 1/4" plate because that is what they had on hand, or just to "make it stronger", then the stability would be negatively effected, especially if the ballast was not modified at the same time.  If you are remote from the boat, I would try contacting Caroff's office (if someone is still maintaining it) and see if study plans are available, they are sometimes inexpensive and should include the scantlings.  If you have access to the boat and it is in the water, then a roll test can give you a beginning of an idea if the ballast is sufficient to offset the heavier decks.  I think one of Dave Gerr's books (maybe The Nature of Boats) goes into more details on the roll test, but I don't have access to my copies right now to check. Good Luck on your search. | 35156|35127|2018-06-01 10:52:37|Matt Malone|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck??| John, I look at that photo, and what I seem to be seeing is the keel coming up into the bilge of the boat, and the keel seems to be filled completely with some material.   It looks to be painted, but, its flatness gives me the feeling of concrete, likely with steel scrap in it.    Low density concrete ballast is far less effective pound-for-pound in the same keel because it fills the keel taller, and the top surface of the ballast is closer to the center of buoyancy.    The center of mass of the ballast is not as deep, therefore one sees less righting moment per pound of ballast.   The 4,500 pounds you were concerned about, may be reduced in its effectiveness because of what it is.   I would ask clearly, what is the ballast made out of.   Poured lead will be far more effective than concrete-anything, even for the exact same weight of ballast.       This is likely to be a far larger factor it its roll-recovery moment.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of j.hess@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 10:11 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck??     Darren, Thanks for the roll test article. It provides an easy, if crude, way to get an idea of whether a boat is top-heavy or not. Sadly, the boat I'm interested in is on the hard, and I am 700 miles away from it. When I first tried to access the article I was blocked by a paywall. Eventually I used Google to search for the article title (Use This Sailboat Stability Secret for Safer Sailing), and found that some of the time Google returned a link that bypassed the paywall, and sometimes not. So if someone wants to read the article but gets blocked by the paywall, keep trying with Google, perhaps using slightly different search terms. It's a good idea to try and get a study plan from the Caroff office. I'm also going to try and contact the owner, rather than rely on the broker for information. The survey said the boat was built by Robert Fleury, maybe of Canada. Does anyone recognize the name as a reputable builder? Here's a link to a poor photo from the 2010 survey showing rust in the bilges. From the photo can anyone assess whether the rust is significant or not? https://s15.postimg.cc/punub5x17/bilge_rust.jpg https://s15.postimg.cc/punub5x17/bilge_rust.jpg View on s15.postimg.cc Preview by Yahoo   Thanks, John  ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : John, Given some survey reports I've seen, I'm not sure that info is any better than a best guess from the owner.  I've seen survey reports with glaring errors that were obviously just copied over from previous errors without ever actually checking what was in/on the boat. Taking a quick look at Gilbert Caroff's website I have the following thoughts.  If it was drawn with 1/4" plate on the deck then the stability is likely to be fine given the designer's credentials and high altitude sailing experience.  However, a lot of his boats look to be amateur built (not a bad thing) and if someone substituted 1/4" plate because that is what they had on hand, or just to "make it stronger", then the stability would be negatively effected, especially if the ballast was not modified at the same time.  If you are remote from the boat, I would try contacting Caroff's office (if someone is still maintaining it) and see if study plans are available, they are sometimes inexpensive and should include the scantlings.  If you have access to the boat and it is in the water, then a roll test can give you a beginning of an idea if the ballast is sufficient to offset the heavier decks.  I think one of Dave Gerr's books (maybe The Nature of Boats) goes into more details on the roll test, but I don't have access to my copies right now to check. Good Luck on your search. | 35157|35127|2018-06-01 16:04:02|brentswain38|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck??|The keel coming into  the boat is good place to measure thickness.| 35158|35127|2018-06-01 16:06:57|brentswain38|Re: Light Steel|Given that Kasten has repeatedly claimed  that origami can not be used for decks, cabins, wheelhouses, keels, rudders and skegs,something anyone here can see being done in the photos section and the video, something we have been doing since  the outset ( which  Kasten has been told, long ago) he is definitely not a reliable source of truth or judgement, nor  worth paying for judgement or advice. When asked if he  would attend the metal; boat festival, he responded with "Not if Brent Swain might be there!"One problem I  have seen with full length keels is the inaccessibility in the back of them for maintenance. One could use it for tankage, but that puts a lot of weigh in the stern, where you need it least.You could cap it, and leave it empty, and airtight. It still constitutes about 300 to 400 lbs of steel dead weight  in the stern.It also constitutes lot of extra work.With  steel being as strong as it is, it is easy to build  a skeg and keel massively over strength, strong enough to not be any worry about strength.Long fin keels and skegs on well balanced hulls have proven themselves for decades,and steel well done eliminates the structural worries, so why go backwards.  Unless, you think like Bob Perry has said "I fit doesn't break, its overbuilt."I guess that is why the Perry boat recently mentioned in Sail Magazine went thru 3 goose necks just getting  past Cape Horn. One didn't even  make it past Mexico. The guy was pumping for his life the whole way around, despite Moitessier having proved that totally unnecessary over a half century earlier, if one chooses a good steel boat. | 35159|35159|2018-06-01 17:45:39|brentswain38|Painting wood inside lockers|Back in the 70s, an Aussie friend used to work on old wooden fishboats. He said if he saw a bulkhead which was painted both sides,he could stand back and throw a screwdriver thru it.( rotten). If it was painted one side only ,and could breath, it was usually in good shape . Paint inside lockers is not a preservative , and may encourage rot, by sealing moisture in. My Sitka spruce mast has not had paint on it in nearly 30 years, and is as solid as the day I stepped her. The rain goes in, and the rain dries out in summer. Bare wood inside lockers is not a problem, and may be a liability. The only justification for painting there is to make it look pretty when you plan to sell the boat.The surveyor will then find only solid, rot free wood there. My boat is 34 years old , wood has never been painted inside lockers, and it is fine. Spend your time and money on things which actually matter.| 35160|35127|2018-06-01 18:06:13|Matt Malone|Re: Light Steel| I was not meaning to re-ignite old arguments with Kasten or Perry.  I wish I had chosen a different picture that simply illustrates, the water line is very high on heavy boats.   At the same time, it is possible with steel to make a boat with huge reserve buoyancy, and a very low water line.   The center of buoyancy is literally the volume-center of the part of the boat that is below the water.   Therefore with a high reserve buoyancy and a low water line, one has a low center of buoyancy.   Equally try, when one has a very low center of buoyancy, the deck is a very long distance from the center of buoyancy and can therefore be proportionately more destabilizing in proportion to its added weight, height, and the mass of the rest of the boat.   Conversely, it is possible to make a very heavy steel boat that rides low in the water with a very high water line, low reserve buoyancy, and a high center of buoyancy.  On these boats, a little added weight at deck level is not as far above the center of buoyancy and therefore has a smaller negative affect on stability.    Remember, when boats sink they ALWAYS orient keel down once under water (assuming the keel is still there).   A boat with very little reserve buoyancy is a boat much closer to sinking and therefore it is more likely to orient keel down, all other things being equal.   In general, it is a boat that has very high reserve buoyancy that one has to be more concerned about it being very stable floating upside down and having undesirable roll recovery moments and a poor angle of vanishing stability.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, June 1, 2018 3:51 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Light Steel     Given that Kasten has repeatedly claimed  that origami can not be used for decks, cabins, wheelhouses, keels, rudders and skegs,something anyone here can see being done in the photos section and the video, something we have been doing since  the outset ( which  Kasten has been told, long ago) he is definitely not a reliable source of truth or judgement, nor  worth paying for judgement or advice. When asked if he  would attend the metal; boat festival, he responded with "Not if Brent Swain might be there!" One problem I  have seen with full length keels is the inaccessibility in the back of them for maintenance. One could use it for tankage, but that puts a lot of weigh in the stern, where you need it least.You could cap it, and leave it empty, and airtight. It still constitutes about 300 to 400 lbs of steel dead weight  in the stern.It also constitutes lot of extra work. With  steel being as strong as it is, it is easy to build  a skeg and keel massively over strength, strong enough to not be any worry about strength. Long fin keels and skegs on well balanced hulls have proven themselves for decades,and steel well done eliminates the structural worries, so why go backwards.  Unless, you think like Bob Perry has said "I fit doesn't break, its overbuilt." I guess that is why the Perry boat recently mentioned in Sail Magazine went thru 3 goose necks just getting  past Cape Horn. One didn't even  make it past Mexico. The guy was pumping for his life the whole way around, despite Moitessier having proved that totally unnecessary over a half century earlier, if one chooses a good steel boat. | 35161|35159|2018-06-01 18:09:20|Matt Malone|Re: Painting wood inside lockers| Brent, How to you keep surface mould from growing in lockers (painted or otherwise)?    And how do you get mould out of a boat, particularly lockers and other closed-in areas?   Any chemical secrets or treatments you recommend ?    Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, June 1, 2018 5:45 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Painting wood inside lockers     Back in the 70s, an Aussie friend used to work on old wooden fishboats. He said if he saw a bulkhead which was painted both sides,he could stand back and throw a screwdriver thru it.( rotten). If it was painted one side only ,and could breath, it was usually in good shape . Paint inside lockers is not a preservative , and may encourage rot, by sealing moisture in. My Sitka spruce mast has not had paint on it in nearly 30 years, and is as solid as the day I stepped her. The rain goes in, and the rain dries out in summer. Bare wood inside lockers is not a problem, and may be a liability. The only justification for painting there is to make it look pretty when you plan to sell the boat.The surveyor will then find only solid, rot free wood there. My boat is 34 years old , wood has never been painted inside lockers, and it is fine. Spend your time and money on things which actually matter. | 35162|35159|2018-06-01 20:40:38|mountain man|Re: Painting wood inside lockers| Brent, Is your spruce mast solid? Martin De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 1 juin 2018 17:45:37 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] Painting wood inside lockers     Back in the 70s, an Aussie friend used to work on old wooden fishboats. He said if he saw a bulkhead which was painted both sides,he could stand back and throw a screwdriver thru it.( rotten). If it was painted one side only ,and could breath, it was usually in good shape . Paint inside lockers is not a preservative , and may encourage rot, by sealing moisture in. My Sitka spruce mast has not had paint on it in nearly 30 years, and is as solid as the day I stepped her. The rain goes in, and the rain dries out in summer. Bare wood inside lockers is not a problem, and may be a liability. The only justification for painting there is to make it look pretty when you plan to sell the boat.The surveyor will then find only solid, rot free wood there. My boat is 34 years old , wood has never been painted inside lockers, and it is fine. Spend your time and money on things which actually matter. | 35163|35159|2018-06-02 11:17:06|a.sobriquet|Re: Painting wood inside lockers|I've heard that a mix of water and boric acid works. More toxic is to coat the wood with common antifreeze.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :#ygrps-yiv-824876934 #ygrps-yiv-824876934ygrps-yiv-456406808 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}Brent, How to you keep surface mould from growing in lockers (painted or otherwise)?    And how do you get mould out of a boat, particularly lockers and other closed-in areas?   Any chemical secrets or treatments you recommend ?    Matt| 35164|35127|2018-06-02 18:25:49|brentswain38|Re: Light Steel|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :One should bear in mind that a 2 inch layer of water weighs almost the same as 1/4 inch plate, slightly more. So an extra 2 inches of free board  compensates for the weight of 1/4 inch plate, on a boat  in the inverted position.It will decrease stability when above the water ,but when immersed, every inch of extra freeboard improves AVS ,by  buoyancy on deck trying to right her. The same is true of watertight cabins and wheelhouses.The buoyancy of my wheelhouse is the equivalent  of adding 3,000lbs of ballast, when the boat is in the inverted position. In many ways, that which adds to stability when upright, wide beam, flush decks, etc, detracts from it when inverted. #ygrps-yiv-1443367374 #ygrps-yiv-1443367374ygrps-yiv-1094636229 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}I was not meaning to re-ignite old arguments with Kasten or Perry.  I wish I had chosen a different picture that simply illustrates, the water line is very high on heavy boats.   At the same time, it is possible with steel to make a boat with huge reserve buoyancy, and a very low water line.   The center of buoyancy is literally the volume-center of the part of the boat that is below the water.   Therefore with a high reserve buoyancy and a low water line, one has a low center of buoyancy.   Equally try, when one has a very low center of buoyancy, the deck is a very long distance from the center of buoyancy and can therefore be proportionately more destabilizing in proportion to its added weight, height, and the mass of the rest of the boat.   Conversely, it is possible to make a very heavy steel boat that rides low in the water with a very high water line, low reserve buoyancy, and a high center of buoyancy.  On these boats, a little added weight at deck level is not as far above the center of buoyancy and therefore has a smaller negative affect on stability.    Remember, when boats sink they ALWAYS orient keel down once under water (assuming the keel is still there).   A boat with very little reserve buoyancy is a boat much closer to sinking and therefore it is more likely to orient keel down, all other things being equal.   In general, it is a boat that has very high reserve buoyancy that one has to be more concerned about it being very stable floating upside down and having undesirable roll recovery moments and a poor angle of vanishing stability.  Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, June 1, 2018 3:51 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Light Steel  Given that Kasten has repeatedly claimed  that origami can not be used for decks, cabins, wheelhouses, keels, rudders and skegs,something anyone here can see being done in the photos section and the video, something we have been doing since  the outset ( which  Kasten has been told, long ago) he is definitely not a reliable source of truth or judgement, nor  worth paying for judgement or advice. When asked if he  would attend the metal; boat festival, he responded with "Not if Brent Swain might be there!"One problem I  have seen with full length keels is the inaccessibility in the back of them for maintenance. One could use it for tankage, but that puts a lot of weigh in the stern, where you need it least.You could cap it, and leave it empty, and airtight. It still constitutes about 300 to 400 lbs of steel dead weight  in the stern.It also constitutes lot of extra work.With  steel being as strong as it is, it is easy to build  a skeg and keel massively over strength, strong enough to not be any worry about strength.Long fin keels and skegs on well balanced hulls have proven themselves for decades,and steel well done eliminates the structural worries, so why go backwards.  Unless, you think like Bob Perry has said "I fit doesn't break, its overbuilt."I guess that is why the Perry boat recently mentioned in Sail Magazine went thru 3 goose necks just getting  past Cape Horn. One didn't even  make it past Mexico. The guy was pumping for his life the whole way around, despite Moitessier having proved that totally unnecessary over a half century earlier, if one chooses a good steel boat. | 35165|35159|2018-06-02 18:46:00|brentswain38|Re: Painting wood inside lockers|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :#ygrps-yiv-1622962365 #ygrps-yiv-1622962365ygrps-yiv-2010765089 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}In the tropics, I pained my hull white, to keep it cool . When I got back to BC, the cooler hull allowed the inside of lockers to get musty.So I painted the hull dark green, and in cold  arctic outflows ,when it is usually sunny around here  ,my dark  hull felt warm to the touch when frozen in, in ice at minus 12 degrees C. The lockers dried out and the mustiness disappeared. Well insulated with spray foam, and a good woodstove also help,  in fact are almost mandatory for comfort in these lattitudes. People who have gone from sheet foam to spray foam and wood stoves are amazed how much more comfortable their boats become.Going to the tropics , I put all my clothes, BC charts and books in plastic bags (Contractor clean up bags are far more heavy duty) with moth balls, eliminating any chance of them going moldy. When I get back, an hour or two out in the wind evaporates any smell.If I were concerned about mold behind paneling, I would drill one inch holes in the top of the  paneling and drop moth balls in. If there was no smell,  I would drop a  few more in.I have heard that washing a surface with a borax and water mix, and letting it dry, eliminates the chance  of it going moldy. If I were building  again, I would do that with all hidden  paneling and foam surfaces. Brent, How to you keep surface mould from growing in lockers (painted or otherwise)?    And how do you get mould out of a boat, particularly lockers and other closed-in areas?   Any chemical secrets or treatments you recommend ?    Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, June 1, 2018 5:45 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Painting wood inside lockers  Back in the 70s, an Aussie friend used to work on old wooden fishboats. He said if he saw a bulkhead which was painted both sides,he could stand back and throw a screwdriver thru it.( rotten). If it was painted one side only ,and could breath, it was usually in good shape . Paint inside lockers is not a preservative , and may encourage rot, by sealing moisture in. My Sitka spruce mast has not had paint on it in nearly 30 years, and is as solid as the day I stepped her. The rain goes in, and the rain dries out in summer. Bare wood inside lockers is not a problem, and may be a liability. The only justification for painting there is to make it look pretty when you plan to sell the boat.The surveyor will then find only solid, rot free wood there. My boat is 34 years old , wood has never been painted inside lockers, and it is fine. Spend your time and money on things which actually matter.| 35166|35159|2018-06-02 18:49:08|brentswain38|Re: Painting wood inside lockers|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Yes, 6 inch by 4 inch, quarter sawn air dried sitka spruce ,No glue lines,one piece. About 3- 1/4 inch knots in the whole mast Brent, Is your spruce mast solid? MartinDe : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 1 juin 2018 17:45:37 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] Painting wood inside lockers  Back in the 70s, an Aussie friend used to work on old wooden fishboats. He said if he saw a bulkhead which was painted both sides,he could stand back and throw a screwdriver thru it.( rotten). If it was painted one side only ,and could breath, it was usually in good shape . Paint inside lockers is not a preservative , and may encourage rot, by sealing moisture in. My Sitka spruce mast has not had paint on it in nearly 30 years, and is as solid as the day I stepped her. The rain goes in, and the rain dries out in summer. Bare wood inside lockers is not a problem, and may be a liability. The only justification for painting there is to make it look pretty when you plan to sell the boat.The surveyor will then find only solid, rot free wood there. My boat is 34 years old , wood has never been painted inside lockers, and it is fine. Spend your time and money on things which actually matter.#ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ads {margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ad {padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ad p {margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ad a {color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_hd {margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_actions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_activity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_activity span {font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_activity span:x_first-child {text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_activity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_activity span span {color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_activity span .ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_underline {text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 .ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_attach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 .ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_attach div a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 .ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_attach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 .ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_attach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 .ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_attach label a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 .ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_bold {font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 .ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_bold a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 dd.ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_last p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 dd.ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_last p span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 dd.ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_last p span.ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_yshortcuts {margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 div.ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_attach-table div div a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 div.ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_attach-table {width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 div.ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 div.ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_file-title a:x_active, #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 div.ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_file-title a:x_hover, #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 div.ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_file-title a:x_visited {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 div.ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 div.ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_photo-title a:x_active, #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 div.ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_photo-title a:x_hover, #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 div.ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_photo-title a:x_visited {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 div#ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_yshortcuts {font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 .ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_green {color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 .ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_MsoNormal {margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 o {font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_photos div {float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_photos div div {border:1px solid #666666;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_photos div label {color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_reco-category {font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_reco-desc {font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 .ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_replbq {margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-actbar div a:x_first-child {margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 input, #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 textarea {font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_logo {padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-msg p a {font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_attach-count span {color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_reco-head {color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-reco {margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ov li a {font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ov li {font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ov ul {margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-text {font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-text p {margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-text tt {font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-1490044899 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382 #ygrps-yiv-1490044899ygrps-yiv-1309902382x_ygrp-vital ul li:x_last-child {border-right:none!important;}| 35167|35127|2018-06-03 03:44:21|opuspaul|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck?|A 33 foot boat that weighs 15,000 tons with 1/4 inch steel decks makes no sense.  If it really is true, the builder (or designer) had no idea what he was doing.   it will be top heavy and is probably a pig of a boat.| 35168|35159|2018-06-03 08:46:45|mountain man|Re: Painting wood inside lockers| Brent, And how long is your spruce mast? Martin De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 2 juin 2018 18:49:03 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : RE: [origamiboats] Painting wood inside lockers     ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Yes, 6 inch by 4 inch, quarter sawn air dried sitka spruce ,No glue lines,one piece. About 3- 1/4 inch knots in the whole mast Brent, Is your spruce mast solid? Martin De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 1 juin 2018 17:45:37 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] Painting wood inside lockers     Back in the 70s, an Aussie friend used to work on old wooden fishboats. He said if he saw a bulkhead which was painted both sides,he could stand back and throw a screwdriver thru it.( rotten). If it was painted one side only ,and could breath, it was usually in good shape . Paint inside lockers is not a preservative , and may encourage rot, by sealing moisture in. My Sitka spruce mast has not had paint on it in nearly 30 years, and is as solid as the day I stepped her. The rain goes in, and the rain dries out in summer. Bare wood inside lockers is not a problem, and may be a liability. The only justification for painting there is to make it look pretty when you plan to sell the boat.The surveyor will then find only solid, rot free wood there. My boat is 34 years old , wood has never been painted inside lockers, and it is fine. Spend your time and money on things which actually matter. | 35169|35127|2018-06-03 11:06:07|Brian Stannard|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck?|I assume you mean 15,000 lbs, not tons. The Westsail 32 weighs 19,500 lbs. Whether it is a pig or not is a matter of opinion. On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 12:44 AM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:   A 33 foot boat that weighs 15,000 tons with 1/4 inch steel decks makes no sense.  If it really is true, the builder (or designer) had no idea what he was doing.   it will be top heavy and is probably a pig of a boat. -- CheersBrian | 35170|35159|2018-06-03 17:35:40|brentswain38|Re: Painting wood inside lockers|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :39 ft 6 inches.Perfect, when the boat was empty.I out sailed plenty of boats I  was not supposed to stand a chance against.No more, since I accumulated 34 years of living board junk .Now, I could use an extra 4 feet of mast Brent, And how long is your spruce mast? Martinwhich actually matter.#ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ads {margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ad {padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ad p {margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ad a {color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_hd {margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_actions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_activity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_activity span {font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_activity span:x_first-child {text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_activity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_activity span span {color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_activity span .ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_underline {text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 .ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_attach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 .ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_attach div a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 .ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_attach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 .ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_attach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 .ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_attach label a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 .ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_bold {font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 .ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_bold a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 dd.ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_last p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 dd.ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_last p span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 dd.ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_last p span.ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_yshortcuts {margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 div.ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_attach-table div div a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 div.ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_attach-table {width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 div.ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 div.ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_file-title a:x_active, #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 div.ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_file-title a:x_hover, #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 div.ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_file-title a:x_visited {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 div.ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 div.ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_photo-title a:x_active, #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 div.ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_photo-title a:x_hover, #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 div.ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_photo-title a:x_visited {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 div#ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_yshortcuts {font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 .ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_green {color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 .ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_MsoNormal {margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 o {font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_photos div {float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_photos div div {border:1px solid #666666;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_photos div label {color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_reco-category {font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_reco-desc {font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 .ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_replbq {margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-actbar div a:x_first-child {margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 input, #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 textarea {font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_logo {padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-msg p a {font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_attach-count span {color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_reco-head {color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-reco {margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ov li a {font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ov li {font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ov ul {margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-text {font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-text p {margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-text tt {font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-1091064786 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202 #ygrps-yiv-1091064786ygrps-yiv-644026202x_ygrp-vital ul li:x_last-child {border-right:none!important;}| 35171|35127|2018-06-03 17:43:18|brentswain38|Re: 1/4" plate for hull and deck?| The Westsail 32 was a copy of boats of the past, which commonly carried 1,000 sq feet of working sail.They put the sail area of modern, much  lighter boat on them. I heard of one guy who stepped a 49 ft mast on the deck of one, and outsailed many boats he was not supposed to outsail.Its not displacement alone which is important, but sail area to displacement ratio. The 36 ft Herreschoff Neria  is in the same weight ,and sails just  fine.This doesn't solve the double ender's habit of hobby horsing, tho.| 35172|35159|2018-06-03 18:07:44|Matt Malone|Brent's Sikta Spruce Mast| So it it 6x4 inch quarter sawn, 40 feet long. Did you buy it from a logger/sawmill or from a special mast place? How much does it weigh? How many spreaders? Please remind me, what is the length of the boat ? Matt From: brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, June 3, 17:56 Subject: RE: [origamiboats] Painting  wood inside lockers To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : 39 ft 6 inches.Perfect, when the boat was empty.I out sailed plenty of boats I  was not supposed to stand a chance against.No more, since I accumulated 34 years of living board junk .Now, I could use an extra 4 feet of mast Brent, And how long is your spruce mast? Martin which actually matter. | 35173|35159|2018-06-04 15:53:29|mountain man|Re: Painting wood inside lockers| Brent, I was sure you had a steel mast , on your boat ,like in your book Martin De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 3 juin 2018 17:34:26 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : RE: [origamiboats] Painting wood inside lockers     ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : 39 ft 6 inches.Perfect, when the boat was empty.I out sailed plenty of boats I  was not supposed to stand a chance against.No more, since I accumulated 34 years of living board junk .Now, I could use an extra 4 feet of mast Brent, And how long is your spruce mast? Martin which actually matter. | 35174|35159|2018-06-04 17:53:21|brentswain38|Re: Brent's Sikta Spruce Mast|A friend working in a sawmil wanted  a set of plans, and had no money.SoI told him "I'll trade you a set of plans for apiece of spruce.He walked in on day shift, and saw a 3 ft diameter spruce log about to be cut.He held up the sawyer for an hour ,turning and cutting to get two masts the same. He took all his lunch an coffee breaks alongside the masts, as  if he walked away, someone would come by and cut them in half . by quitting time he had arranged a truck to take them to my parents place for storage .Luckily ,I was there that day. He paid $75 each for  them Evan got one,  I the other.A couple of weeks earlier, while hitchiking north, I got picked up by a logger, who said he had some beautiful,  air dried standing, sitka spruce out of the Nimpkish valley.I got this number ,but he could only do 30 ft lengths. Luckily, I found 40 ft lengths, and didn't need those.Several friends  on 36 footers went from steel masts to aluminium. The difference was minimal, to unnoticeable.Bob Perry once mentioned doing a carbon fibre mast, at great expense, for a  35 footer. After circumnavigating Vancouver Island , Perry  asked him how much difference the much lighter mast made.The answer? Barely noticeable!| 35175|35159|2018-06-04 17:58:00|brentswain38|Re: Painting wood inside lockers|I thought steel  was a bit heavy for a 31, but  not for  a 36.Maybe not .One 31 here has a steel mast(5 inch OD 11 gauge wall)  and it works out fine.6X4 sitka spruce is 4.5 lbs per ft| 35176|35159|2018-06-04 19:28:14|brentswain38|Re: Painting wood inside lockers|Years ago I found an aluminum mastin a scrap yard and replaced our steel mast, thinking I'd get betterperformance with less weight aloft. We made a trip around the Pacificwith each mast and it turns out we couldn't tell any difference!  Istill have the original steel mast and will use that on the new boat.| 35177|35159|2018-06-05 16:43:02|brentswain38|Re: Painting wood inside lockers|This is a quote from a friend who, after years of cruising the Pacific in a 36 ft single keel brentboat, sold his single keel 36, to build the twin keel version, for Alaska cruising.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Years ago I found an aluminum mastin a scrap yard and replaced our steel mast, thinking I'd get betterperformance with less weight aloft. We made a trip around the Pacificwith each mast and it turns out we couldn't tell any difference!  Istill have the original steel mast and will use that on the new boat.| 35178|35159|2018-06-06 16:23:56|brentswain38|Re: Painting wood inside lockers|I stand corrected, The lady said they used clove oil in Hawaii, to stop mold. Just put it on a rag and wipe the surface with it.| 35179|35159|2018-06-06 18:41:36|Matt Malone|Re: Painting wood inside lockers| Does clove oil smell of cloves? Matt From: brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 18:18 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Painting  wood inside lockers To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I stand corrected, The lady said they used clove oil in Hawaii, to stop mold. Just put it on a rag and wipe the surface with it. | 35180|35159|2018-06-07 22:54:11|mountain man|Re: Painting wood inside lockers| Brent, Was your spruce mast tried and tested in storms and rough seas? De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 4 juin 2018 17:56:19 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : RE: [origamiboats] Painting wood inside lockers     I thought steel  was a bit heavy for a 31, but  not for  a 36.Maybe not .One 31 here has a steel mast(5 inch OD 11 gauge wall)  and it works out fine. 6X4 sitka spruce is 4.5 lbs per ft | 35181|35159|2018-06-08 14:59:21|brentswain38|Re: Painting wood inside lockers|Yes, 34 years of mostly full time cruising , including  ten trips to Haida Gwai,  two to Tonga and back, and one to Mexico and back. Crossed Hecate Strait when it was blowing 50 knots and gusting, according to the lighthouses.No problems .Never had a single rigging failure. origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Brent, Was your spruce mast tried and tested in storms and rough seas?#ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ads {margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ad {padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ad p {margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ad a {color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_hd {margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_actions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_activity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_activity span {font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_activity span:x_first-child {text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_activity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_activity span span {color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_activity span .ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_underline {text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 .ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_attach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 .ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_attach div a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 .ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_attach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 .ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_attach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 .ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_attach label a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 .ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_bold {font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 .ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_bold a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 dd.ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_last p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 dd.ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_last p span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 dd.ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_last p span.ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_yshortcuts {margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 div.ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_attach-table div div a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 div.ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_attach-table {width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 div.ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 div.ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_file-title a:x_active, #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 div.ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_file-title a:x_hover, #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 div.ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_file-title a:x_visited {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 div.ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 div.ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_photo-title a:x_active, #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 div.ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_photo-title a:x_hover, #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 div.ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_photo-title a:x_visited {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 div#ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_yshortcuts {font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 .ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_green {color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 .ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_MsoNormal {margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 o {font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_photos div {float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_photos div div {border:1px solid #666666;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_photos div label {color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_reco-category {font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_reco-desc {font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 .ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_replbq {margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-actbar div a:x_first-child {margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 input, #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 textarea {font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_logo {padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-msg p a {font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_attach-count span {color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_reco-head {color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-reco {margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ov li a {font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ov li {font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ov ul {margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-text {font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-text p {margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-text tt {font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-205014765 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391 #ygrps-yiv-205014765ygrps-yiv-823593391x_ygrp-vital ul li:x_last-child {border-right:none!important;}| 35182|35159|2018-06-09 16:49:35|mountain man|Re: Painting wood inside lockers| Brent, Regarding painting the mast, I always tought that epoxy, paint and varnish would protect a wooden mast against making small and big  cracks when dryi ng Martin De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 8 juin 2018 14:58:25 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : RE: [origamiboats] Painting wood inside lockers     Yes, 34 years of mostly full time cruising , including  ten trips to Haida Gwai,  two to Tonga and back,  and one to Mexico and back. Crossed Hecate Strait when it was blowing 50 knots and gusting, according to the lighthouses. No problems . Never had a single rigging failure.  origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Brent, Was your spruce mast tried and tested in storms and rough seas? | 35183|35159|2018-06-09 17:21:08|brentswain38|Re: Painting wood inside lockers|It was once believed that sealing balsa core in fibreglass would prevent any rot from entering.The result is, most balsa cored older  boats having thoroughly rotted  out cores.Theory and reality have way of turning out to be completely different things, something the armchair experts at drawing boards and computers, have trouble  comprehending. You can never guarantee that epoxy will permanently keep water out, indefinitely . Once in, it cant  get out thru epoxy. | 35184|35159|2018-06-10 17:11:10|brentswain38|Re: Painting wood inside lockers|Some  friends have had zero rot, after decades,  in an epoxy sealed mast.On others it has been a disaster,. You don't know which you will get.| 35185|35159|2018-06-10 21:39:58|a.sobriquet|Re: Painting wood inside lockers|I could speculate that tree trunks will unavoidably check as they dry. This will let water in, and if the mast is encapsulated, could result in rot. On the other hand, a hollow laminated mast will likely not check, and so if covered and sealed with fiberglass/epoxy, it probably will last for a long time with no rot.A.S.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Some  friends have had zero rot, after decades,  in an epoxy sealed mast.On others it has been a disaster,. You don't know which you will get.| 35186|35159|2018-06-10 22:38:37|Matt Malone|Re: Painting wood inside lockers| Depends on the climate too.  Matt From: a.sobriquet@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, June 10, 21:40 Subject: RE: [origamiboats] Painting  wood inside lockers To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I could speculate that tree trunks will unavoidably check as they dry. This will let water in, and if the mast is encapsulated, could result in rot. On the other hand, a hollow laminated mast will likely not check, and so if covered and sealed with fiberglass/epoxy, it probably will last for a long time with no rot. A.S. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Some  friends have had zero rot, after decades,  in an epoxy sealed mast.On others it has been a disaster,. You don't know which you will get. | 35187|35159|2018-06-11 17:19:01|brentswain38|Re: Painting wood inside lockers|Tree trunks have  heartwood, which shrinks far  less than the outside, causing checking. Quarter sawn, with no heart wood, thus checks  far less. Spruce checks far less than  fir,  or other woods.Mine was cut from the side of the log ,not the  centre.One way of reducing checking on a grown , one tree mast, is to make  a full length saw cut along one side, and let it open ,as the tree dries.  When the tree has fully dried ,glue  a spline in the check. This is also a good time to put wiring in the mast. You can put your sail track on the spline.Some have used such grown masts on my boats, but have made the common mistake  of a full length taper, making the top quite spindly. On a Bermuda sloop, the taper should only start 70%  above the deck.Water  coming in thru bolt and screw holes can also feed  rot. Bronze fastenings can help reduce this problem.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I could speculate that tree trunks will unavoidably check as they dry. This will let water in, and if the mast is encapsulated, could result in rot. On the other hand, a hollow laminated mast will likely not check, and so if covered and sealed with fiberglass/epoxy, it probably will last for a long time with no rot.A.S.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Some  friends have had zero rot, after decades,  in an epoxy sealed mast.On others it has been a disaster,. You don't know which you will get.| 35188|35159|2018-06-11 18:11:33|Matt Malone|Re: Painting wood inside lockers| Brent has it right on quarter sawed wood.  Heart wood is unpredictable.  Next time you are in the lumber yard or Home Despot, take a look at the cut ends of boards.  Count what fraction contain the center of the tree - nearly all of them right?  The sawmills know it is of low quality but the trees are so small when they harvest them now, they are lucky to get two 2x4s out of each tree. This is why I asked Brent where he got the mast.  A quarter sawed 4x6, 40 feet long is a rare.  A sawmill with access to 40 foot logs greater than 2 feet in diameter at the small end is rare. Matt From: brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, June 11, 17:46 Subject: RE: [origamiboats] Painting  wood inside lockers To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Tree trunks have  heartwood, which shrinks far  less than the outside, causing checking. Quarter sawn, with no heart wood, thus checks  far less. Spruce checks far less than  fir,  or other woods. Mine was cut from the side of the log ,not the  centre. One way of reducing checking on a grown , one tree mast, is to make  a full length saw cut along one side, and let it open ,as the tree dries.  When the tree has fully dried ,glue  a spline in the check. This is also a good time to put wiring in the mast. You can put your sail track on the spline. Some have used such grown masts on my boats, but have made the common mistake  of a full length taper, making the top quite spindly. On a Bermuda sloop, the taper should only start 70%  above the deck. Water  coming in thru bolt and screw holes can also feed  rot. Bronze fastenings can help reduce this problem. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : I could speculate that tree trunks will unavoidably check as they dry. This will let water in, and if the mast is encapsulated, could result in rot. On the other hand, a hollow laminated mast will likely not check, and so if covered and sealed with fiberglass/epoxy, it probably will last for a long time with no rot. A.S. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Some  friends have had zero rot, after decades,  in an epoxy sealed mast.On others it has been a disaster,. You don't know which you will get. | 35189|35159|2018-06-11 18:38:52|opuspaul|Re: Painting wood inside lockers|It is also very hard to find old growth wood.  I got some old growth fir that was quarter sawn and about 20 rings per inch.  It is beautiful stuff.   It is very stable, hard and much much stronger than the 4 rings per inch crap you see in lumber yards today.  You might find a specialty mill but the best timber I find lately is from demolitions.  Unfortunately is is often full of nail holes.  Having said that, I would rather have old growth with a few nail holes than new soft and punky lumber with only 3 or 4 grains per inch. Paul---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Brent has it right on quarter sawed wood.  Heart wood is unpredictable.  Next time you are in the lumber yard or Home Despot, take a look at the cut ends of boards.  Count what fraction contain the center of the tree - nearly all of them right?  The sawmills know it is of low quality but the trees are so small when they harvest them now, they are lucky to get two 2x4s out of each tree. This is why I asked Brent where he got the mast.  A quarter sawed 4x6, 40 feet long is a rare.  A sawmill with access to 40 foot logs greater than 2 feet in diameter at the small end is rare. Matt | 35190|35159|2018-06-13 16:20:54|brentswain38|Re: Painting wood inside lockers|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Does clove oil smell of cloves? Matt Yes , strong smell of cloves. You can dilute it with water, with  a bit of liquid detergent in it.Maybe a drop, giving only the smell of cloves, is enough to stop mold.| 35191|35191|2018-06-14 13:58:33|SHANE ROTHWELL|: Propellers|Hi Guys This little 2.2 litre Isuzu came with a 21 x 17 prop but it's rather mangled & I'd have to trim off about 30 or more % of it. If we have the power I want access to it. What I need is a method of comparing 2 props as I am looking at what appears to be very similar in it's ""grip/traction/friction" on the water. This other prop is 18 x 19 My thinking is to multiply the dimemtions of each and compate the results. 21 x 17 = 357 18 x 19 = 342 which is 95.798% of 357. If my math & methodology is right, there is less than 5% differance which to my mond is good enuf. Ya? -------------------------------------------- On Wed, 6/13/18,  wrote: Subject: [origamiboats] Digest Number 5304 To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Received: Wednesday, June 13, 2018, 7:03 PM       Origamiboats - Frameless steel and aluminum yachts                                            Origamiboats - Frameless steel and aluminum yachts   Group                                         1                     Message                              Digest #5304                                                                                                          1.1                                Re: Painting  wood inside lockers                         by                         brentswain38                                                                                                                                 Message                                                  1.1                                                 Re: Painting  wood inside lockers                                                        Wed Jun 13, 2018 1:20 pm        (PDT)         . Posted by:                                                 brentswain38                                                           ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :   Does clove oil smell of cloves?     Matt   Yes , strong smell of cloves. You can dilute it with water, with  a bit of liquid detergent in it.   Maybe a drop, giving only the smell of cloves, is enough to stop mold.                                                                                                                            Reply to sender                                                  .                                                   Reply to group                                                 .                                                  Reply  via Web Post                                                 .                                                   All Messages       (27)                                                .                                    Top ^                                                                                                                     To Post a message, send it to:   origamiboats@yahoogroups.com To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: origamiboats-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com                      Visit Your Group                           New Members        3                                                               • Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use     | 35192|35191|2018-06-14 15:43:22|Darren Bos|Re: : Propellers| It's not like that.  The power absorbed by the prop is much more strongly affected by diameter than it is by pitch.  Very rough rules of thumb are something like an inch of diameter is equal to 2.5 inches pitch.  The number of blades also affects the amount of power the prop can transmit to the water before the blade loading starts to get too high.  If you want a detailed way to figure things out, Dave Gerr has a great book on props, otherwise an online calculator is probably the way to go. I wouldn't cut away 30% of the prop.  A prop place can often do repairs and props that look surprisingly bad. Darren On 18-06-14 10:58 AM, SHANE ROTHWELL rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Hi Guys This little 2.2 litre Isuzu came with a 21 x 17 prop but it's rather mangled & I'd have to trim off about 30 or more % of it. If we have the power I want access to it. What I need is a method of comparing 2 props as I am looking at what appears to be very similar in it's ""grip/traction/friction" on the water. This other prop is 18 x 19 My thinking is to multiply the dimemtions of each and compate the results. 21 x 17 = 357 18 x 19 = 342 which is 95.798% of 357. If my math & methodology is right, there is less than 5% differance which to my mond is good enuf. Ya? -------------------------------------------- On Wed, 6/13/18,  wrote: Subject: [origamiboats] Digest Number 5304 To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Received: Wednesday, June 13, 2018, 7:03 PM       Origamiboats - Frameless steel and aluminum yachts                                            Origamiboats - Frameless steel and aluminum yachts   Group                                         1                     Message                              Digest #5304                                                                                                          1.1                                Re: Painting  wood inside lockers                         by                         brentswain38                                                                                                                                 Message                                                  1.1                                                 Re: Painting  wood inside lockers                                                        Wed Jun 13, 2018 1:20 pm        (PDT)         . Posted by:                                                 brentswain38                                                           ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :   Does clove oil smell of cloves?     Matt   Yes , strong smell of cloves. You can dilute it with water, with  a bit of liquid detergent in it.   Maybe a drop, giving only the smell of cloves, is enough to stop mold.                                                                                                                            Reply to sender                                                  .                                                   Reply to group                                                 .                                                  Reply  via Web Post                                                 .                                                   All Messages       (27)                                                .                                    Top ^                                                                                                                     To Post a message, send it to:   origamiboats@yahoogroups.com To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: origamiboats-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com                      Visit Your Group                           New Members        3                                                               • Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use     | 35193|35191|2018-06-14 17:31:40|brentswain38|Re: : Propellers|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :My book gives a simple way  to calculate  pitch, and balance. Simple math. A prop can be pitched up or down up to 4 inches, before you risk breaking the blade off. Any more than 2 inches and you should warm the blade with  a torch. For cutting down, I'd make a pattern and trace it with an  awl on each blade, being careful to get it in the same position on all blades.Balance it on your finger and tap it. If you hear a clear ring ,it doesn't have an electrolysis problem. A dull thunk means you do.Less than perfect balance means  quicker wear on your stern bearing. If that  doesn't  happen, you got her right.One shop I once worked in had a prop shop.  Noting mysterious about it, just mechanical common sense.It's not like that.  The power absorbed by the prop is much more strongly affected by diameter than it is by pitch.  Very rough rules of thumb are something like an inch of diameter is equal to 2.5 inches pitch.  The number of blades also affects the amount of power the prop can transmit to the water before the blade loading starts to get too high.  If you want a detailed way to figure things out, Dave Gerr has a great book on props, otherwise an online calculator is probably the way to go.I wouldn't cut away 30% of the prop.  A prop place can often do repairs and props that look surprisingly bad.Darren On 18-06-14 10:58 AM, SHANE ROTHWELL rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] wrote:  Hi Guys This little 2.2 litre Isuzu came with a 21 x 17 prop but it's rather mangled & I'd have to trim off about 30 or more % of it. If we have the power I want access to it. What I need is a method of comparing 2 props as I am looking at what appears to be very similar in it's ""grip/traction/friction" on the water. This other prop is 18 x 19 My thinking is to multiply the dimemtions of each and compate the results. 21 x 17 = 357 18 x 19 = 342 which is 95.798% of 357. If my math & methodology is right, there is less than 5% differance which to my mond is good enuf. Ya? | 35194|35191|2018-06-15 10:26:25|rockrothwell|Re: : Propellers|Exellent. Many thanks. Must admit I am rather lèery of taking it to a prop shop. Last choice only as I have an inborn revulsion for premadonna's & bullshit Any one got a 21 x 17 for a 1.25" shaft for sale? Cuz if I can't repair will be looking for a replacement| 35195|35191|2018-06-16 18:01:25|brentswain38|Re: : Propellers|The more you do for yourself, the less a prop shop can justify billing you for.and the fewer  "trial and error" expenses involved.| 35196|35159|2018-06-17 13:53:22|aguysailing|Re: Painting wood inside lockers|Straight white vinegar worked for me .. spray it on.Google up cloves for mold... seems to be a "wives tale" as some have said.  Not my opinion because I have not tried it.  As an oil ... I would like the idea as it clove oil would  last and if, as has been said here will discourage further mold...great.| 35197|35197|2018-06-21 12:02:26|aguysailing|Heat insulation|I am replacing a gear shifter cable which melted and seized because it rested against several wraps of foil backed insulation material covering the dry exhaust pipe.  I thought of wrapping with aluminum foil where it rests against this pipe.  (There is no other way to route this cable...it must rest against the covered pipe).  Just wondering if anyone knows of some kind of insulating hose that I could fit over the gear shifter cable to prevent this happening againthanks...| 35198|35197|2018-06-21 13:11:11|Matt Malone|Re: Heat insulation| The solution to high temperatures outside the source is to insulate the source and improve the heat loss for the thing you want to protect.   So a thin puck of compressed glass fibre insulation between them, and then a circular heat sink to stand off the cable and allow airflow around it.   http://www.qualitekengineers.com/index_files/pro9/vlb_images1/rlsh15.jpg Feed the cable through the heatsink, or, cut the heatsink in half and wire it back together.   If only 3 or 4 of the fins are in contact with the fibreglass puck, the cable will be far closer to the temperature of the other fins.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of aguysailing@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 12:02 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Heat insulation     I am replacing a gear shifter cable which melted and seized because it rested against several wraps of foil backed insulation material covering the dry exhaust pipe.  I thought of wrapping with aluminum foil where it rests against this pipe.  (There is no other way to route this cable...it must rest against the covered pipe).  Just wondering if anyone knows of some kind of insulating hose that I could fit over the gear shifter cable to prevent this happening again thanks... | 35199|35197|2018-06-21 14:04:44|aguysailing|Re: Heat insulation|Thanks Matt....   Good idea but not available to me ... so looks like several wrappings of aluminum foil for now.| 35200|35197|2018-06-21 15:18:50|Matt Malone|Re: Heat insulation| If you could throw even a layer of dry sheet structural fibreglass cloth under the aluminium foil, it would really help.   Aluminium is actually a good conductor, it is only the crinkling and lack of contact that helps.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of aguysailing@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 2:04 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Heat insulation     Thanks Matt....   Good idea but not available to me ... so looks like several wrappings of aluminum foil for now. | 35201|35197|2018-06-21 17:13:34|don bourgeois|Re: Heat insulation| Go down to the car wrecker and get the aluminum foil type insulation (they come in sandwiched varieties) which cars use between the exhaust pipe and the car body. Should be cheap or free. Premium brands (BMW etc) use better materials for this.   Don B.   From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com [ mailto: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com ] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 2:19 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Heat insulation       If you could throw even a layer of dry sheet structural fibreglass cloth under the aluminium foil, it would really help.   Aluminium is actually a good conductor, it is only the crinkling and lack of contact that helps.     Matt   From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com < origamiboats@yahoogroups.com > on behalf of aguysailing@... [origamiboats] < origamiboats@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 2:04 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Heat insulation     Thanks Matt....   Good idea but not available to me ... so looks like several wrappings of aluminum foil for now. | 35202|35197|2018-06-24 14:55:15|Zoa Scott|Re: Heat insulation|I am a heavy duty mechanic There is hose used for things like compressor discharge and turbo oil lines that has a heavy flex steel outer casing .Running shift cable through a section of that hose might be a cheap solutio Zoa  On Thu, Jun 21, 2018, 11:04 AM aguysailing@... [origamiboats], wrote:   Thanks Matt....   Good idea but not available to me ... so looks like several wrappings of aluminum foil for now. | 35203|35197|2018-06-24 15:01:50|brentswain38|Re: Heat insulation|My dry exhaust is insulated with fibreglass house insulation , covered with foam, then wrapped with 3 inch muffler tape, covered with silicone. It doesn't  even get warm, in days of motoring in the tropics.| 35204|35197|2018-06-25 08:33:12|rockrothwell|Re: Heat insulation|How about rockwool insulation... Does not burn.| 35205|35197|2018-06-25 16:36:57|brentswain38|Re: Heat insulation|Rockwool works fine.| 35206|35197|2018-06-26 18:31:15|aguysailing|Re: Heat insulation|How do you contain rockwool to use it?   On my my exhaust pipe, I have some kind of wrapping that had foil on one side and some kind of fibreglass insulation on the other.  Problem is after 3 years the fibreglass parts are dissolving if you rub against them and creates little pieces of very itchy bits.... very hard to get out of clothing.   I want to take it all out and try something else.   I can see Brent's because he is at anchor nearby but sounds like a big effort with insulation and foam etc...  Rockwool sounds good because apparently it is slag spun into a wool like sustance... just how would one use it.    .. thanks| 35207|35197|2018-06-26 20:15:26|brentswain38|Re: Heat insulation|I wrap any such fibreglass with foil, then 3 inch wide muffler tape. That, I cover with  cheap silicone calking, which should stop any fibres from coming thru,if well covered.| 35208|35043|2018-06-28 19:26:10|brentswain38|36 single keeler for sale|Bill Lornie's 36 ft single keel brentboat "Coracle" is for sale. She is in good shape, except for a bit of corrosion around the cockpit. You can phone him at 250-285-3519. She is on Quadra Island BC.| 35209|35197|2018-06-29 17:21:19|Matt Malone|Local BC Story| Brent, I know that you are mainly on the other side of Vancouver Island as are many other origamis, but... Does anyone have any insight here ? https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/deaths-of-two-in-bc-sailors-was-homicide/ar-AAzlF4z Deaths of two in B.C. sailors was homicide www.msn.com Investigators on Vancouver Island are treating the deaths of two sailors reported missing last month as homicides.  Matt | 35210|35197|2018-07-03 15:02:02|brentswain38|Re: Local BC Story|A guy, who said he knew them well, told me  their backpacks often looked like they were full of square ,solid lumps. Draw you own conclusions.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Brent, I know that you are mainly on the other side of Vancouver Island as are many other origamis, but... Does anyone have any insight here ? https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/deaths-of-two-in-bc-sailors-was-homicide/ar-AAzlF4z Deaths of two in B.C. sailors was homicide www.msn.com Investigators on Vancouver Island are treating the deaths of two sailors reported missing last month as homicides.  Matt | 35211|35211|2018-07-21 18:20:28|brentswain38|Interior salvage|I just found some beautifully made oak drawers and doors, in a burn pile. They looked just made, and the fronts were  solid oak, with 7 ply 3/8th inch sides. Pointed them others, who couldn't be bothered saving them so I picked them up and installed one today. No point in building what is already built, and going to waste Habitat for humanity has all kinds of ready made drawers and doors  very cheap,often less than the cost of materials. Worth slightly changing ones interior plans  to accommodate them.If you get restaurant parts,  you can get the same things in all stainless,  for scrap prices. Gets  you  beautiful interior with a fraction the cost ,and much more quickly.| 35212|35211|2018-07-21 19:13:10|opuspaul|Re: Interior salvage|I used red oak for the interior of my boat.  I looked really nice, wasn't too dark and was relatively cheap at the time.  25 years later, I really wish I never used it.    It is all black and stained.  You can try using wood bleach on it but the effect is temporary, it just goes black again, even when you think you have it all sealed.  White oak is an awesome wood but red oak has the wrong kind of grain for use on boats.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6t2AZubF8U&---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I just found some beautifully made oak drawers and doors, in a burn pile. They looked just made, and the fronts were  solid oak, with 7 ply 3/8th inch sides. Pointed them others, who couldn't be bothered saving them so I picked them up and installed one today. No point in building what is already built, and going to waste Habitat for humanity has all kinds of ready made drawers and doors  very cheap,often less than the cost of materials. Worth slightly changing ones interior plans  to accommodate them.If you get restaurant parts,  you can get the same things in all stainless,  for scrap prices. Gets  you  beautiful interior with a fraction the cost ,and much more quickly.| 35213|35211|2018-07-21 19:47:49|Matt Malone|Re: Interior salvage| Red oak has straws between the grain fibres.  One can (slowly) suck water through a foot-long stick.   It should plasticize well.  Matt From: opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, July 21, 19:13 Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Interior salvage To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I used red oak for the interior of my boat.  I looked really nice, wasn't too dark and was relatively cheap at the time.  25 years later, I really wish I never used it.    It is all black and stained.  You can try using wood bleach on it but the effect is temporary, it just goes black again, even when you think you have it all sealed.  White oak is an awesome wood but red oak has the wrong kind of grain for use on boats. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6t2AZubF8U& ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : I just found some beautifully made oak drawers and doors, in a burn pile. They looked just made, and the fronts were  solid oak, with 7 ply 3/8th inch sides. Pointed them others, who couldn't be bothered saving them so I picked them up and installed one today. No point in building what is already built, and going to waste Habitat for humanity has all kinds of ready made drawers and doors  very cheap,often less than the cost of materials. Worth slightly changing ones interior plans  to accommodate them.If you get restaurant parts,  you can get the same things in all stainless,  for scrap prices. Gets  you  beautiful interior with a fraction the cost ,and much more quickly. | 35214|35211|2018-07-23 17:07:42|brentswain38|Re: Interior salvage|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I have used some on my boat which has kept well.Must have got it completely sealed. A friend, who used it on a floor, saw it turn black the whole way thru. Mine is on drawers, which don't get walked on. No way of sealing it on something which takes a lot of wear.It should soak up epoxy sealer well. Red oak has straws between the grain fibres.  One can (slowly) suck water through a foot-long stick.   It should plasticize well.  Matt From: opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, July 21, 19:13 Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Interior salvage To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I used red oak for the interior of my boat.  I looked really nice, wasn't too dark and was relatively cheap at the time.  25 years later, I really wish I never used it.    It is all black and stained.  You can try using wood bleach on it but the effect is temporary, it just goes black again, even when you think you have it all sealed.  White oak is an awesome wood but red oak has the wrong kind of grain for use on boats. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6t2AZubF8U& ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : I just found some beautifully made oak drawers and doors, in a burn pile. They looked just made, and the fronts were  solid oak, with 7 ply 3/8th inch sides. Pointed them others, who couldn't be bothered saving them so I picked them up and installed one today. No point in building what is already built, and going to waste Habitat for humanity has all kinds of ready made drawers and doors  very cheap,often less than the cost of materials. Worth slightly changing ones interior plans  to accommodate them.If you get restaurant parts,  you can get the same things in all stainless,  for scrap prices. Gets  you  beautiful interior with a fraction the cost ,and much more quickly. | 35215|35211|2018-07-24 16:28:54|brentswain38|Re: Interior salvage|I heard an  interesting  item on CBC radio a while back, about how much trouble people were having getting rid of old stand up pianos. Appearantly they get so old, they become increasingly impossible to tune anymore, and no one wants them.Older ones have some solid ,extremely beautiful, tropical  hard woods to salvage, and some even have ivory and ebony  keys, if one can think of  a place to  use them. I think an ad requesting them .would bring lots of interest. No point in telling them what you intend to use them for. What you don't use makes good firewood.| 35216|35211|2018-07-24 16:38:47|Alan Boucher|Re: Interior salvage|Good Idea, Good wood.  Heavy!  A tenant left a baby grand in one of my apartments.  It was distressed beyond easy reclaim of the wood.  I had to pay to get it out of there.  Luckily the tenant's employer was involved and picked up the tab.  Besides  the wood and the ivory, the steel frames make good garden sculpture.  That in itself could be a good salable item. On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 4:28 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I heard an  interesting  item on CBC radio a while back, about how much trouble people were having getting rid of old stand up pianos. Appearantly they get so old, they become increasingly impossible to tune anymore, and no one wants them.Older ones have some solid ,extremely beautiful, tropical  hard woods to salvage, and some even have ivory and ebony  keys, if one can think of  a place to  use them. I think an ad requesting them .would bring lots of interest. No point in telling them what you intend to use them for. What you don't use makes good firewood. -- Al Boucher | 35217|34922|2018-08-02 17:21:43|smallboatvoyaguer|Re: Star Route BS 31 For Sale|Hey ya'll, I decided to keep my boat, Star Route, and finish it. I've been having friends help often, and I've found that if I weld for less than 2 hours a day and don't run the grinder or cutting wheels, I don't have much of a problem. This has added up to getting quite a but done. Most of the grinding is complete anyway.  I'll finish this afterall,   Marlin| 35218|34922|2018-08-02 21:48:09|Matt Malone|Re: Star Route BS 31 For Sale| #ygrps-yiv-2118601695 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} I am very happy to hear that Marlin, all the best.    Doug seems to have been very successful in getting people to help, that might lighten the load a bit for you too.    http://www.svseeker.com/wp/ You might consider a Patreon or something where, instead of asking for money, you ask for donations of time.   Some people will throw a few bucks at you instead, but that is OK.    For Patreon, you just have to make the people who might decide to help feel they get some satisfaction from it, and it could be as simple as entertainment.  You might also find people who want to practice by helping you before deciding to do an origami themselves.  An afternoon of boat work on someone else's boat is way less commitment than buying all the steel and starting their own project from scratch.  I am sure they would appreciate the learning opportunity.   Now that your boat is more complete-looking, it might be very satisfying for people to help and look to see how it went together. Matt   From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of musicasrevolution@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2018 5:14 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Star Route BS 31 For Sale     Hey ya'll,  I decided to keep my boat, Star Route, and finish it. I've been having friends help often, and I've found that if I weld for less than 2 hours a day and don't run the grinder or cutting wheels, I don't have much of a problem. This has added up to getting quite a but done. Most of the grinding is complete anyway.  I'll finish this afterall,    Marlin | 35219|34922|2018-08-03 14:45:15|brentswain38|Re: Star Route BS 31 For Sale|Good choice.! I have seen boat projects , which haven't been touched for years  at a time, eventually get finished. You are young enough to have the time. Take your time, and enjoy the project, at any pace you enjoy. Time also gives you more time to scrounge mast, sails,  rigging, engine,  and other materials. The more time you have, the cheaper they will be.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Hey ya'll, I decided to keep my boat, Star Route, and finish it. I've been having friends help often, and I've found that if I weld for less than 2 hours a day and don't run the grinder or cutting wheels, I don't have much of a problem. This has added up to getting quite a but done. Most of the grinding is complete anyway.  I'll finish this afterall,   Marlin| 35220|34922|2018-08-04 16:09:12|smallboatvoyaguer|Re: Star Route BS 31 For Sale|If anyone here uses Instagram, you can follow my progress at @starroutesail| 35221|34922|2018-08-08 12:21:53|Matt Malone|Solar Sale| #ygrps-yiv-957787980 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} I have posted before when ML Solar has had a fire sale price for panels: SANYO 195 Watt Used Solar Panel Special... ONLY US$40 each! Was the subject line.   68 V Open circuit, 55.3V maximum power point, 3.53A maximum power point, from a photo of the tag on the back, however, the ad misprinted the isc as 2.73A instead of 3.73A as it says on the back.   These are used panels !     They are selling them in skids only, a skid is 20 panels.   Their contact information is:  408-583-8101, www.mlsolar.com, sales@... ML Solar Online Solar Panel Store | Jeff Long If you need solar panel supplies, Jeff Long can help! Visit our site or contact us today for all of your solar panel related needs. www.mlsolar.com Ok, my commentary:  These panels are well matched for a "48V" solar system, though modern (expensive) MPPT charge controllers may be able to take them without incurring a large efficiency penalty.   I have seen cheap controllers that claim to be MPPT, but they have simply been pre-made to take 17V panels and charge 12V batteries -- they have no smarts in them at all, they do not track the actual voltage.   You need a good MPPT, or a "48V" system to use these panels.   48V systems are not uncommon.  For instance the telephone system runs on 48V DC in most places.   These panels would not be my first choice for a boat, both for the reason of the voltage, and also, new panels of exactly the same physical size are rated at 350W+  -- that is 70% more power for the same area of panel.   With boat space at a premium (unless I had some giant cat), I would pay a lot more for higher power density panels.   These panels would be very interesting for a back-woods installation.   Buy way more than you need, for less than higher power density panels, and they cover a larger fraction of the acreage -- who cares -- and you have oodles of power, and redundancy.   If these panels are like the ones I got, they were in service in a large solar farm, and then put on skids for resale.   Mine had grime and algae on them -- they needed to be washed -- dish detergent and a gentle scrub -- no big deal.     I had mine shipped to a UPS depot in the US, and crossed them myself.   I just paid HST on the way back.   No brokerage fees required.   UPS shipping costs for a skid to a UPS depot with a loading dock are not bad.  I bought 32 used panels from MLSOLAR.   The bottom 4 were smashed both because the pallet they were on was poor, but also poorly handled.   UPS stuck a second pallet under the stack and wrapped over the MLSOLAR shipping labels with more plastic wrap to try to hide what had happened, and tried to pretend that there was no problem in shipment.   I took photos, both at the UPS depot and later.  I had bought shipping insurance, so, I contacted MLSOLAR and I got a refund on those.  For fun I measured the power output of the smashed panels.   Smashed, they still produced 15-30W at odd voltages.   Then I leaned them up against a tree, MLSOLAR never asked for these 4 panels back.   When I went to test the remaining 28 (weeks later, after the refund for the 4 smashed ones was processed), I discovered one panel, one of the wires was pulled out of the back and "trash" was hand written in marker on the back.   My impression was, some solar farm field worker spent the entire day in the hot sun trying to find the problem, and when he found it, he yanked one wire out to make sure it would never get reattached again and wrote trash on it.    So, I paid for 28, got 27.   They were used panels, and at $40, you cannot be picky.   Buy shipping insurance, get used to the idea that there may be a defective panel.   As for power output, watch "Better Call Saul" and look at the scenes where they show the New Mexico sky -- it is a very dark blue, in full sun.  That is because the total humidity between the ground and the sun is very low -- more humidity leads to more scattering of sunlight and a lighter hue to the clear sky.   You just do not see that kind of sky in Canada.   It is even worse in Florida -- the sky looks a very light blue even on a completely cloudless day.   Flying in, on a completely cloudless day, you sometimes cannot see the ground clearly because it is so hazy and sunlight is scattering back up at you from the *air* below.   In contrast, flying across the American southwest, the air is so clear, you can make out minuscule details on the ground from cruising altitude.   The reality is, panel specs are given for sky and sun conditions that would be more like the New Mexico desert in summer.   Everywhere else a panel produces less power than the specs.   Get used to that idea before buying any panels to use anywhere.   In Canada, in March (perihelion, maximum sun intensity), on a reasonably cloudless day, I was measuring more than 100W output from used "150W" panels using a variable resistor bank to find find the maximum power point.    Brand new Canadian Tire panels, I was getting about 70% of their rating.   On reasonably sunny days, with panels oriented directly to the sun, in the middle half of the day (not the first and last quarter), one might be able to bet on 50% of ratings, though on good days one might hope for more.   *Your mileage will vary*   Reorienting panels is expensive.   If you do not reorient, if you just lean for the season, you will get less power out of the panel in each day.   Solution: Buy more panels.   At these prices, the panel is the cheapest piece of the system.   Even buying pressure-treated 2x4s and posts and bolts and washers to make the racks to hold them is going to be a reasonably fraction of the panel cost before considering power cables, the MPPT good to 70+V, batteries, a wacking big inverter, and an isolating transfer switch to meet code for interconnection with the grid power in the house.... etc etc.     So do not take 195W and multiply by 20 and think all your power needs are met.  On the best day of the year, you will get a fraction of that.   Do not take USD$40 times 20 and think that is the system cost either, it is the tip of the iceberg.   But at US$40 each, and likely 2,000W of actual delivered power from a skid, how can you resist if you were ever considering solar ?   Even buying a cheap ebay MPPT, unless it catches fire from wasted power, it still has to deliver at least 1,000W.   Matt | 35222|35222|2018-08-10 11:22:43|gerard.laverty|Shaft seal|I have a friend who is cruising in Alaska. The dripless shaft seal has an oil line to it, (the boat is a french aluminum ketch), the oil has turned a milkey colour. Water in the oil? Is this a big problem or can he continue to use the engine without doing serious damage to the shaft?Gerard.| 35223|35222|2018-08-11 05:31:03|brentswain38|Re: Shaft seal|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Oil and water mixed  naturally turns a milky colour. You can see that with water soluable machine oil, used for machining. Don't worry about it,  it will give you no problems. Water and the oil will naturally try to mix ,unavoidably.  I have a friend who is cruising in Alaska. The dripless shaft seal has an oil line to it, (the boat is a french aluminum ketch), the oil has turned a milkey colour. Water in the oil? Is this a big problem or can he continue to use the engine without doing serious damage to the shaft?Gerard.| 35224|35222|2018-08-11 07:39:02|Matt Malone|Re: Shaft seal| It is water in the oil.   Every petroleum product turns milky looking when it gets water in it, even wheel bearing grease.   Everything depends on whether the seal has its own oil system and pump or whether the oil comes from the engine and returns to the engine. If it were fresh water, I would be far less concerned.   Engines contain water coolant and produce water in combustion.   There will be traces of water.   But if salt water gets in the lubricant for an engine, and there is heat, like in an engine, particularly with a turbo with engine oil lubrication and cooling of the center bearing, the water can slowly evaporate from the crankcase leaving via the crankcase ventilation port, leading to a higher and higher salt content left behind.  Metals that are stainless versus a certain salt concentration may not be stainless verses a higher salt concentration at elevated temperatures. If this oil only serves the shaft seal, and has its own reservoir and pump, that is different.  A trace of water is probably unavoidable.  More than your typical trace of water may be unavoidable for this particular seal or it may be old and in need of maintenance. I would be inclined to look for a long term solution.   An oil-free graphite seal like the Dripless (trade name) seals provide no route for salt to enter the engine.  They also eliminate the seal lubrication system, if it is separate. My apologies if it is obvious these lubrication systems will always be separate or are separate on this particular French aluminium ketch. Matt From: brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, August 11, 05:31 Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Shaft seal To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Oil and water mixed  naturally turns a milky colour. You can see that with water soluable machine oil, used for machining. Don't worry about it,  it will give you no problems. Water and the oil will naturally try to mix ,unavoidably.  I have a friend who is cruising in Alaska. The dripless shaft seal has an oil line to it, (the boat is a french aluminum ketch), the oil has turned a milkey colour. Water in the oil? Is this a big problem or can he continue to use the engine without doing serious damage to the shaft? Gerard. | 35225|35222|2018-08-12 10:57:04|Aaron|Re: Shaft seal|It would help to know the brand name of his dripless seal. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 9:40 PM, gerard.laverty@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I have a friend who is cruising in Alaska. The dripless shaft seal has an oil line to it, (the boat is a french aluminum ketch), the oil has turned a milkey colour. Water in the oil? Is this a big problem or can he continue to use the engine without doing serious damage to the shaft?Gerard. #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 -- #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-mkp { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-mkp hr { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800hd { color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ads { margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ad { padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ad p { margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ad a { color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-lc { font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800hd { margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ad { margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800actions { font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800activity { background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800activity span { font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800activity span:first-child { text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800activity span a { color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800activity span span { color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800activity span .ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800underline { text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 .ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800attach { clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 .ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800attach div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 .ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800attach img { border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 .ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800attach label { display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 .ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800attach label a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 blockquote { margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 .ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800bold { font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 .ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800bold a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 dd.ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800last p a { font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 dd.ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800last p span { margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 dd.ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800last p span.ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800yshortcuts { margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 div.ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800attach-table div div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 div.ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800attach-table { width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 div.ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 div.ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 div.ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 div.ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800file-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 div.ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 div.ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 div.ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 div.ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800photo-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 div#ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800yshortcuts { font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 .ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800green { color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 .ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800MsoNormal { margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 o { font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800photos div { float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800photos div div { border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800photos div label { color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800reco-category { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800reco-desc { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 .ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800replbq { margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-actbar div a:first-child { margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-mlmsg { font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-mlmsg table { font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 input, #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 textarea { font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-mlmsg pre, #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 code { font:115% monospace;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-mlmsg * { line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800logo { padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-msg p a { font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800attach-count span { color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800reco-head { color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-reco { margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ov li a { font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ov li { font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ov ul { margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-text { font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-text p { margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-text tt { font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800 #ygrps-yiv-888601882yiv1029008800ygrp-vital ul li:last-child { border-right:none !important;} #ygrps-yiv-888601882 | 35226|35222|2018-08-12 12:26:24|gerard.laverty|Re: Shaft seal|He's out of communication range right now and I don't know the make. I've posted a few pictures of the part and one of the boat. It's a bilge keel design by Joubert for a trip he did through the NW passage a few years ago. It has twin 110 Mann diesels so it should not be too much of an issue. Thanks for the advice and any other thoughts would be appreciated. I think the oil supply is independent of the engine, that's what one photo shows, and I suspect the water is salt water.Gerard.| 35227|35222|2018-08-12 12:51:02|gerard.laverty|Re: Shaft seal|Looking at the Joubert-Nivelt website this boat is the Marguerite. I spent two weeks cruising up the coast of Alaska this past July on it.Gerard.| 35228|35222|2018-08-13 09:03:06|Matt Malone|Re: Shaft seal| #ygrps-yiv-379234506 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Gerard, I see the photos on the group now.   The shaft is misaligned right at the seal, with a universal joint.   I would avoid this in building whenever possible because this is a simple universal joint which induces vibration owing to variations in angular speed as the shafts go through a rotation.  If it could be replaced with constant velocity (CV) joint, that would be better.   This would reduce the torque variation on the engine and likely the vibration on the seal.   It might seal better.   2 weeks on the Alaska coast sounds like a wonderful trip.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of gerard.laverty@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2018 12:50 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Shaft seal     Looking at the Joubert-Nivelt website this boat is the Marguerite. I spent two weeks cruising up the coast of Alaska this past July on it. Gerard. | 35229|35222|2018-08-15 19:02:34|brentswain38|Re: Shaft seal|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :#ygrps-yiv-1277659115 #ygrps-yiv-1277659115ygrps-yiv-340841923 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}  I used a U joint on my last engine ,but it was extremely well lined up before the U joint went in. Worked well for over 10 years. Gerard, I see the photos on the group now.   The shaft is misaligned right at the seal, with a universal joint.   I would avoid this in building whenever possible because this is a simple universal joint which induces vibration owing to variations in angular speed as the shafts go through a rotation.  If it could be replaced with constant velocity (CV) joint, that would be better.   This would reduce the torque variation on the engine and likely the vibration on the seal.   It might seal better.   2 weeks on the Alaska coast sounds like a wonderful trip.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of gerard.laverty@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2018 12:50 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Shaft seal  Looking at the Joubert-Nivelt website this boat is the Marguerite. I spent two weeks cruising up the coast of Alaska this past July on it.Gerard.| 35230|35222|2018-08-15 19:36:45|Matt Malone|Re: Shaft seal| It is true, regular universal joints are quite good in a lot of applications.   When they are perfectly aligned they are perfectly linear and constant velocity.   Since vibrational distances are a small fraction of an inch, vibrations in a well-aligned linkage do not change the geometry enough to really affect linearity, so a regular universal joint can be an excellent choice in a driveline without going to more complex constant velocity joints.   If there is a misalignment, but the engine and final shafts are parallel, two properly aligned universal joints with a short diagonal shaft between them, because of the equal angle,  can be a constant velocity driveline.   The short shaft between them will undergo rhythmic acceleration and deceleration as the engine and prop turn at constant velocity.  If the intermediate shaft is light, it probably will not cause too much vibration. In the photos there is an angle visible at the universal joint.  If there were no issues with the seal, I would not mention the misalignment and the possibility of changing to a CV joint to reduce shaft vibration.  Even with a kink in the driveline, in a robust system, universal joints can be serviceable.  Matt From: brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 19:02 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Shaft seal To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :   I used a U joint on my last engine ,but it was extremely well lined up before the U joint went in. Worked well for over 10 years. Gerard, I see the photos on the group now.   The shaft is misaligned right at the seal, with a universal joint.   I would avoid this in building whenever possible because this is a simple universal joint which induces vibration owing to variations in angular speed as the shafts go through a rotation.  If it could be replaced with constant velocity (CV) joint, that would be better.   This would reduce the torque variation on the engine and likely the vibration on the seal.   It might seal better.   2 weeks on the Alaska coast sounds like a wonderful trip.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of gerard.laverty@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2018 12:50 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Shaft seal     Looking at the Joubert-Nivelt website this boat is the Marguerite. I spent two weeks cruising up the coast of Alaska this past July on it. Gerard. | 35231|35222|2018-08-16 18:01:18|brentswain38|Re: Shaft seal|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :A couple of u joints in a shaft on a wooden boat can be a bad idea.I was told of one such arrangement on a wooden boat, on which one U joint  broke, and made a flail out of the short connecting shaft, which smacked a hole in the  hull. It is true, regular universal joints are quite good in a lot of applications.   When they are perfectly aligned they are perfectly linear and constant velocity.   Since vibrational distances are a small fraction of an inch, vibrations in a well-aligned linkage do not change the geometry enough to really affect linearity, so a regular universal joint can be an excellent choice in a driveline without going to more complex constant velocity joints.   If there is a misalignment, but the engine and final shafts are parallel, two properly aligned universal joints with a short diagonal shaft between them, because of the equal angle,  can be a constant velocity driveline.   The short shaft between them will undergo rhythmic acceleration and deceleration as the engine and prop turn at constant velocity.  If the intermediate shaft is light, it probably will not cause too much vibration. In the photos there is an angle visible at the universal joint.  If there were no issues with the seal, I would not mention the misalignment and the possibility of changing to a CV joint to reduce shaft vibration.  Even with a kink in the driveline, in a robust system, universal joints can be serviceable.  Matt From: brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 19:02 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Shaft seal To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :   I used a U joint on my last engine ,but it was extremely well lined up before the U joint went in. Worked well for over 10 years. Gerard, I see the photos on the group now.   The shaft is misaligned right at the seal, with a universal joint.   I would avoid this in building whenever possible because this is a simple universal joint which induces vibration owing to variations in angular speed as the shafts go through a rotation.  If it could be replaced with constant velocity (CV) joint, that would be better.   This would reduce the torque variation on the engine and likely the vibration on the seal.   It might seal better.   2 weeks on the Alaska coast sounds like a wonderful trip.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of gerard.laverty@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2018 12:50 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Shaft seal     Looking at the Joubert-Nivelt website this boat is the Marguerite. I spent two weeks cruising up the coast of Alaska this past July on it. Gerard. | 35232|35222|2018-08-16 18:11:35|Matt Malone|Re: Shaft seal| #ygrps-yiv-1351244140 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Brent, absolutely correct.   Come to think of it, I have seen it happen, not on a boat.   But what a mess it would make on a boat.   You are right.   On a steel boat it could catch like a breaker bar against the hull and liquorice drive components quite badly as the engine came to a halt in a fraction of a turn.   How does one account for engine vibration that is not pivoting the engine around the U-joint ?   For instance, side to side or up and down vibration would lead to slight misalignment, and in a single U-joint system, that motion is transmitted through the U-joint.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 6:00 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Shaft seal     ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : A couple of u joints in a shaft on a wooden boat can be a bad idea.I was told of one such arrangement on a wooden boat, on which one U joint  broke, and made a flail out of the short connecting shaft, which smacked a hole in the  hull. It is true, regular universal joints are quite good in a lot of applications.   When they are perfectly aligned they are perfectly linear and constant velocity.   Since vibrational distances are a small fraction of an inch, vibrations in a well-aligned linkage do not change the geometry enough to really affect linearity, so a regular universal joint can be an excellent choice in a driveline without going to more complex constant velocity joints.   If there is a misalignment, but the engine and final shafts are parallel, two properly aligned universal joints with a short diagonal shaft between them, because of the equal angle,  can be a constant velocity driveline.   The short shaft between them will undergo rhythmic acceleration and deceleration as the engine and prop turn at constant velocity.  If the intermediate shaft is light, it probably will not cause too much vibration. In the photos there is an angle visible at the universal joint.  If there were no issues with the seal, I would not mention the misalignment and the possibility of changing to a CV joint to reduce shaft vibration.  Even with a kink in the driveline, in a robust system, universal joints can be serviceable.  Matt From: brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 19:02 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Shaft seal To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :   I used a U joint on my last engine ,but it was extremely well lined up before the U joint went in. Worked well for over 10 years. Gerard, I see the photos on the group now.   The shaft is misaligned right at the seal, with a universal joint.   I would avoid this in building whenever possible because this is a simple universal joint which induces vibration owing to variations in angular speed as the shafts go through a rotation.  If it could be replaced with constant velocity (CV) joint, that would be better.   This would reduce the torque variation on the engine and likely the vibration on the seal.   It might seal better.   2 weeks on the Alaska coast sounds like a wonderful trip.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of gerard.laverty@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2018 12:50 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Shaft seal     Looking at the Joubert-Nivelt website this boat is the Marguerite. I spent two weeks cruising up the coast of Alaska this past July on it. Gerard. | 35233|35222|2018-08-17 18:11:41|brentswain38|Re: Shaft seal|I have always used solid mounts, minimizing such movement. I used  single U joint. I never liked rubber soft mounts, for that  reason.  A plastic  Spencer 35 was  off the Great Barrier Reef a few years ago, and her super soft Yanmar mounts all sheered off, leaving the engine flopping around inside the hull, where it quickly punched a hole in the hull. The guy was lifted off by a helicopter as the boat sank under him. Not the first time I heard of that happening.He later disappeared without a trace on another  Spencer 35,while  sailing back to BC from Hawaii.| 35234|35234|2018-08-18 10:43:31|SHANE ROTHWELL|Foam Options|Hi Guys,I'm ripping out foam , quite a bit, to weld on all sorts and need a heads up re foam products available.Titan foam was mentioned, but what kind... they make a wide variety. Aparently only available over the internet...Also mentioned years ago I think, a 2 part kit (bottles?) , spray on, about $600?? Contained a reasonable amount....???Any info much appriciated as I gotta get this together before the weather turnsThanx | 35235|9744|2018-08-18 10:50:55|SHANE ROTHWELL|Foam|These computers... or my system, is getting the better of meAm ripping out heaps of foam and scrambling to get things welded, coated and foamed.Titan foam was mentioned, only available over the net apparently, but what kind? They make a wide selection.Also mentioned coupla years back, a 2 part system, spray-on, about$600?Thanks| 35236|35234|2018-08-18 15:35:31|Darren Bos|Re: Foam Options| Tiger foam is one option.  I think you're on the West Coast Shane?  If so, it is available in Burnaby, BC, although more expensive than shown online. Because there are Canadian distributors I couldn't the Americans to ship it here.  I haven't used my kits yet, but decided on it after talking to someone who had done their whole boat with it and was happy with the result.  The foam is closed cell and fire retardant.   I think it was the Fast Rise Class 1 fire retardant formula I went with. On 18-08-18 07:43 AM, SHANE ROTHWELL rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Hi Guys, I'm ripping out foam , quite a bit, to weld on all sorts and need a heads up re foam products available. Titan foam was mentioned, but what kind... they make a wide variety. Aparently only available over the internet... Also mentioned years ago I think, a 2 part kit (bottles?) , spray on, about $600?? Contained a reasonable amount....??? Any info much appriciated as I gotta get this together before the weather turns Thanx  | 35237|35234|2018-08-18 15:40:40|Maxime Camirand|Re: Foam Options|If you can't get an American company to ship you something to a Canadian address, you can use reship.com. I use it a lot. On 18 August 2018 at 15:35, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Tiger foam is one option.  I think you're on the West Coast Shane?  If so, it is available in Burnaby, BC, although more expensive than shown online. Because there are Canadian distributors I couldn't the Americans to ship it here.  I haven't used my kits yet, but decided on it after talking to someone who had done their whole boat with it and was happy with the result.  The foam is closed cell and fire retardant.   I think it was the Fast Rise Class 1 fire retardant formula I went with. On 18-08-18 07:43 AM, SHANE ROTHWELL rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Hi Guys, I'm ripping out foam , quite a bit, to weld on all sorts and need a heads up re foam products available. Titan foam was mentioned, but what kind... they make a wide variety. Aparently only available over the internet... Also mentioned years ago I think, a 2 part kit (bottles?) , spray on, about $600?? Contained a reasonable amount....??? Any info much appriciated as I gotta get this together before the weather turns Thanx  | 35238|35238|2018-08-18 16:33:18|m44um44u|Blue Water Navigation|The latest budget proposal to Congress includes the shutting down go WWV / WWVH. It is important for those who actually navigate, and for those who go to sea, it is of vital importance. Check out the link below and let's hope it doesn't get cut.   It needs 100,000 signatures by September 15th to insure a response by the White House and to date there are just 228.https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/maintain-funding-nist-stations-wwv-wwvhPlease pass it on.| 35239|35234|2018-08-18 18:12:44|brentswain38|Re: Foam Options|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Angi just spray foamed her boat with a kit. 650 board feet for $720. Make sure you get closed cell. Open  cell is  a disaster, but is half the price. Open  cell is not worth any price. I believe she said she got it at Home Despot, but she said check for it on EbayI mentioned to another young lady living aboard here, that $720 is far  less than a month's rent ashore , but will give you the most comfortable home you will ever live in.Hi Guys,I'm ripping out foam , quite a bit, to weld on all sorts and need a heads up re foam products available.Titan foam was mentioned, but what kind... they make a wide variety. Aparently only available over the internet...Also mentioned years ago I think, a 2 part kit (bottles?) , spray on, about $600?? Contained a reasonable amount....???Any info much appriciated as I gotta get this together before the weather turnsThanx | 35240|35238|2018-08-18 18:20:43|brentswain38|Re: Blue Water Navigation|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Just signed it.I hear navies around the world are starting to teach celestial navigation again, after realizing how easily satellite systems can  be hacked, and rendered useless,leaving  navies "lost at sea." That will become the new warfare.For them to not realize this, makes them as dense as a smoker in a forest fire .The latest budget proposal to Congress includes the shutting down go WWV / WWVH. It is important for those who actually navigate, and for those who go to sea, it is of vital importance. Check out the link below and let's hope it doesn't get cut.   It needs 100,000 signatures by September 15th to insure a response by the White House and to date there are just 228.https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/maintain-funding-nist-stations-wwv-wwvhPlease pass it on.| 35241|35238|2018-08-19 12:49:48|Darren Bos|Re: Blue Water Navigation| I usually try not to speak when I know very little about what's going on, but with the hope of getting educated, is WWV/WWVH really necessary?  In the era where you didn't have cheap, but very accurate timepieces it was really useful.  However, nowadays even a sailor with a very restricted budget could afford a dozen quartz watches with which to compare the time.  While the GPS constellation is functioning normally it provides accurate time, and I think it would be delightfully ironic just to use only the time from GPS for navigation.  Also, should the GPS satellite array ever go down, you still have your watches that you have observed over the years and thus know their rate of deviation.  With a small collection of quartz watches you'd have time-keeping good enough to make Cook or Vancouver green with envy.  So what have I missed that makes WWV/WWVH necessary? On 18-08-18 11:58 AM, m44um44u@... [origamiboats] wrote:   The latest budget proposal to Congress includes the shutting down go WWV / WWVH. It is important for those who actually navigate, and for those who go to sea, it is of vital importance. Check out the link below and let's hope it doesn't get cut.    It needs 100,000 signatures by September 15th to insure a response by the White House and to date there are just 228. https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/maintain-funding-nist-stations-wwv-wwvh Please pass it on. | 35242|35238|2018-08-19 14:41:03|Matt Malone|Re: Blue Water Navigation| #ygrps-yiv-1028032841 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Darren, I agree.  I have read all that WWV/WWVH does on the petition.   All of it has some convenience and purpose.    It is convenient they are all available through the same all-band radio as many other sources of information and it is audible so one can hear variations in reception.   With digital-straight-to-the-receiver antennas, like GPS or AIS, you either see output or not.  There is no feedback as to whether you are close to getting adequate reception.   Almost getting reception looks exactly the same as a dead something, or broken antenna wire, or....  However, I cannot pull in the stations.   Well I can tell there is a station on 15MHz, but I cannot understand what is being said.  There was a service out of Ottawa, CHU Canada broadcast by the NRC, but same story.   250 miles away, we could barely get it in the 1970s and now, I cannot pick it up anymore for all the static.   The radio seems to pick up local and international broadcasts on other frequencies, so I doubt it is my radio.  I think these are just low power stations that need to boost their signal to stay relevant. If GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou and Galileo are all lost globally (as opposed to being jammed locally), that would be apocalyptic, like an anti-satellite weapon war at the least.    If one is planning for such a situation, I would recommend a table of lunars generated for the next few centuries.  Right now, before the apocalypse, it would not be hard to download the data and print it, and copy a guide for the lunar method from an old copy of Bowditch.   The information would make a tiny booklet that needs no batteries or tending all the way to the apocalypse, because, no one would announce, "GPS going down in 10 minutes, set your clocks."   It would be paper.  Just seal it up and put it away.   I am not making fun, I am just pointing out something far more liable, and long lived, accessible and maintainable than a collection of quartz clocks, even if lunars are not as accurate.  Alternately, sunrise or sunset at known locations can also be used to set the time with corrections for season, known longitude etc. If the apocalypse happens I think there will be some smart people in most ports who will have a collection of quartz clocks or something from which to set your boat's clock. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2018 12:49 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Blue Water Navigation     I usually try not to speak when I know very little about what's going on, but with the hope of getting educated, is WWV/WWVH really necessary?  In the era where you didn't have cheap, but very accurate timepieces it was really useful.  However, nowadays even a sailor with a very restricted budget could afford a dozen quartz watches with which to compare the time.  While the GPS constellation is functioning normally it provides accurate time, and I think it would be delightfully ironic just to use only the time from GPS for navigation.  Also, should the GPS satellite array ever go down, you still have your watches that you have observed over the years and thus know their rate of deviation.  With a small collection of quartz watches you'd have time-keeping good enough to make Cook or Vancouver green with envy.  So what have I missed that makes WWV/WWVH necessary? On 18-08-18 11:58 AM, m44um44u@... [origamiboats] wrote:   The latest budget proposal to Congress includes the shutting down go WWV / WWVH. It is important for those who actually navigate, and for those who go to sea, it is of vital importance. Check out the link below and let's hope it doesn't get cut.    It needs 100,000 signatures by September 15th to insure a response by the White House and to date there are just 228. https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/maintain-funding-nist-stations-wwv-wwvh Please pass it on. | 35243|35238|2018-08-19 18:25:07|brentswain38|Re: Blue Water Navigation|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Given that I can talk around the world on a cheap ham or SSB , I doubt if WWV is all that  expensive to run.I received it on one frequency or another all over the S Pacific.Their weather forecasts were extremely useful, saving me a lot of trouble ,for a tiny fraction of the cost of a computer version, far simpler,  and  far less prone to  problems, with a tiny fraction the power draw. #ygrps-yiv-1494139392 #ygrps-yiv-1494139392ygrps-yiv-338452127 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Darren, I agree.  I have read all that WWV/WWVH does on the petition.   All of it has some convenience and purpose.    It is convenient they are all available through the same all-band radio as many other sources of information and it is audible so one can hear variations in reception.   With digital-straight-to-the-receiver antennas, like GPS or AIS, you either see output or not.  There is no feedback as to whether you are close to getting adequate reception.   Almost getting reception looks exactly the same as a dead something, or broken antenna wire, or....  However, I cannot pull in the stations.   Well I can tell there is a station on 15MHz, but I cannot understand what is being said.  There was a service out of Ottawa, CHU Canada broadcast by the NRC, but same story.   250 miles away, we could barely get it in the 1970s and now, I cannot pick it up anymore for all the static.   The radio seems to pick up local and international broadcasts on other frequencies, so I doubt it is my radio.  I think these are just low power stations that need to boost their signal to stay relevant. If GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou and Galileo are all lost globally (as opposed to being jammed locally), that would be apocalyptic, like an anti-satellite weapon war at the least.    If one is planning for such a situation, I would recommend a table of lunars generated for the next few centuries.  Right now, before the apocalypse, it would not be hard to download the data and print it, and copy a guide for the lunar method from an old copy of Bowditch.   The information would make a tiny booklet that needs no batteries or tending all the way to the apocalypse, because, no one would announce, "GPS going down in 10 minutes, set your clocks."   It would be paper.  Just seal it up and put it away.   I am not making fun, I am just pointing out something far more liable, and long lived, accessible and maintainable than a collection of quartz clocks, even if lunars are not as accurate.  Alternately, sunrise or sunset at known locations can also be used to set the time with corrections for season, known longitude etc. If the apocalypse happens I think there will be some smart people in most ports who will have a collection of quartz clocks or something from which to set your boat's clock. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2018 12:49 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Blue Water Navigation  I usually try not to speak when I know very little about what's going on, but with the hope of getting educated, is WWV/WWVH really necessary?  In the era where you didn't have cheap, but very accurate timepieces it was really useful.  However, nowadays even a sailor with a very restricted budget could afford a dozen quartz watches with which to compare the time.  While the GPS constellation is functioning normally it provides accurate time, and I think it would be delightfully ironic just to use only the time from GPS for navigation.  Also, should the GPS satellite array ever go down, you still have your watches that you have observed over the years and thus know their rate of deviation.  With a small collection of quartz watches you'd have time-keeping good enough to make Cook or Vancouver green with envy.  So what have I missed that makes WWV/WWVH necessary? On 18-08-18 11:58 AM, m44um44u@... [origamiboats] wrote:  The latest budget proposal to Congress includes the shutting down go WWV / WWVH. It is important for those who actually navigate, and for those who go to sea, it is of vital importance. Check out the link below and let's hope it doesn't get cut.   It needs 100,000 signatures by September 15th to insure a response by the White House and to date there are just 228.https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/maintain-funding-nist-stations-wwv-wwvhPlease pass it on. | 35244|35238|2018-08-20 09:50:30|Matt Malone|Re: Blue Water Navigation| #ygrps-yiv-1521370378 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Brent, Right now the K-index of the sun's radio interference activity is at a 4, which is just below "minor storm": https://www.qrparci.org/resource/FDIM81.pdf But I am surprised that you report such good reception of WWVH in the Pacific when (today, in daylight) I cannot hear WWV Denver (2200 km) on 2.5, 5, 15 or 20 MHz, and can only make out there is a station on 10MHz.   Similarly, CHU Canada, at 370km away, is only slightly more detectable on 3330 kHz, and 7850 and 14670kHz are completely undetectable.   I am getting very intermittent reception.  I get it, hold position, and after a few seconds it turns completely to static only to come back a little later. Can others pull in these stations today, in daylight?   Separately, can you reliably pull in these stations?  Reliable enough to make them useful sources of information ?   Can you get them only with a boat-sized antenna ?   Or can you get them with a table-top radio ?  Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2018 6:25 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Blue Water Navigation     ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Given that I can talk around the world on a cheap ham or SSB , I doubt if WWV is all that  expensive to run.I received it on one frequency or another all over the S Pacific.Their weather forecasts were extremely useful, saving me a lot of trouble ,for a tiny fraction of the cost of a computer version, far simpler,  and  far less prone to  problems, with a tiny fraction the power draw. Darren, I agree.  I have read all that WWV/WWVH does on the petition.   All of it has some convenience and purpose.    It is convenient they are all available through the same all-band radio as many other sources of information and it is audible so one can hear variations in reception.   With digital-straight-to-the-receiver antennas, like GPS or AIS, you either see output or not.  There is no feedback as to whether you are close to getting adequate reception.   Almost getting reception looks exactly the same as a dead something, or broken antenna wire, or....  However, I cannot pull in the stations.   Well I can tell there is a station on 15MHz, but I cannot understand what is being said.  There was a service out of Ottawa, CHU Canada broadcast by the NRC, but same story.   250 miles away, we could barely get it in the 1970s and now, I cannot pick it up anymore for all the static.   The radio seems to pick up local and international broadcasts on other frequencies, so I doubt it is my radio.  I think these are just low power stations that need to boost their signal to stay relevant. If GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou and Galileo are all lost globally (as opposed to being jammed locally), that would be apocalyptic, like an anti-satellite weapon war at the least.    If one is planning for such a situation, I would recommend a table of lunars generated for the next few centuries.  Right now, before the apocalypse, it would not be hard to download the data and print it, and copy a guide for the lunar method from an old copy of Bowditch.   The information would make a tiny booklet that needs no batteries or tending all the way to the apocalypse, because, no one would announce, "GPS going down in 10 minutes, set your clocks."   It would be paper.  Just seal it up and put it away.   I am not making fun, I am just pointing out something far more liable, and long lived, accessible and maintainable than a collection of quartz clocks, even if lunars are not as accurate.  Alternately, sunrise or sunset at known locations can also be used to set the time with corrections for season, known longitude etc. If the apocalypse happens I think there will be some smart people in most ports who will have a collection of quartz clocks or something from which to set your boat's clock. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2018 12:49 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Blue Water Navigation     I usually try not to speak when I know very little about what's going on, but with the hope of getting educated, is WWV/WWVH really necessary?  In the era where you didn't have cheap, but very accurate timepieces it was really useful.  However, nowadays even a sailor with a very restricted budget could afford a dozen quartz watches with which to compare the time.  While the GPS constellation is functioning normally it provides accurate time, and I think it would be delightfully ironic just to use only the time from GPS for navigation.  Also, should the GPS satellite array ever go down, you still have your watches that you have observed over the years and thus know their rate of deviation.  With a small collection of quartz watches you'd have time-keeping good enough to make Cook or Vancouver green with envy.  So what have I missed that makes WWV/WWVH necessary? On 18-08-18 11:58 AM, m44um44u@... [origamiboats] wrote:   The latest budget proposal to Congress includes the shutting down go WWV / WWVH. It is important for those who actually navigate, and for those who go to sea, it is of vital importance. Check out the link below and let's hope it doesn't get cut.    It needs 100,000 signatures by September 15th to insure a response by the White House and to date there are just 228. https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/maintain-funding-nist-stations-wwv-wwvh Please pass it on. | 35245|35238|2018-08-20 12:11:19|Darren Bos|Re: Blue Water Navigation| According to the NIST budget, dropping WWV and WWHV would reduce their budget by 6.3 million dollars.  I'd missed the fact that they had a some weather information.  On 18-08-19 03:25 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Given that I can talk around the world on a cheap ham or SSB , I doubt if WWV is all that  expensive to run.I received it on one frequency or another all over the S Pacific.Their weather forecasts were extremely useful, saving me a lot of trouble ,for a tiny fraction of the cost of a computer version, far simpler,  and  far less prone to  problems, with a tiny fraction the power draw. Darren, I agree.  I have read all that WWV/WWVH does on the petition.   All of it has some convenience and purpose.    It is convenient they are all available through the same all-band radio as many other sources of information and it is audible so one can hear variations in reception.   With digital-straight-to-the-receiver antennas, like GPS or AIS, you either see output or not.  There is no feedback as to whether you are close to getting adequate reception.   Almost getting reception looks exactly the same as a dead something, or broken antenna wire, or....  However, I cannot pull in the stations.   Well I can tell there is a station on 15MHz, but I cannot understand what is being said.  There was a service out of Ottawa, CHU Canada broadcast by the NRC, but same story.   250 miles away, we could barely get it in the 1970s and now, I cannot pick it up anymore for all the static.   The radio seems to pick up local and international broadcasts on other frequencies, so I doubt it is my radio.  I think these are just low power stations that need to boost their signal to stay relevant. If GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou and Galileo are all lost globally (as opposed to being jammed locally), that would be apocalyptic, like an anti-satellite weapon war at the least.    If one is planning for such a situation, I would recommend a table of lunars generated for the next few centuries.  Right now, before the apocalypse, it would not be hard to download the data and print it, and copy a guide for the lunar method from an old copy of Bowditch.   The information would make a tiny booklet that needs no batteries or tending all the way to the apocalypse, because, no one would announce, "GPS going down in 10 minutes, set your clocks."   It would be paper.  Just seal it up and put it away.   I am not making fun, I am just pointing out something far more liable, and long lived, accessible and maintainable than a collection of quartz clocks, even if lunars are not as accurate.  Alternately, sunrise or sunset at known locations can also be used to set the time with corrections for season, known longitude etc. If the apocalypse happens I think there will be some smart people in most ports who will have a collection of quartz clocks or something from which to set your boat's clock. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2018 12:49 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Blue Water Navigation     I usually try not to speak when I know very little about what's going on, but with the hope of getting educated, is WWV/WWVH really necessary?  In the era where you didn't have cheap, but very accurate timepieces it was really useful.  However, nowadays even a sailor with a very restricted budget could afford a dozen quartz watches with which to compare the time.  While the GPS constellation is functioning normally it provides accurate time, and I think it would be delightfully ironic just to use only the time from GPS for navigation.  Also, should the GPS satellite array ever go down, you still have your watches that you have observed over the years and thus know their rate of deviation.  With a small collection of quartz watches you'd have time-keeping good enough to make Cook or Vancouver green with envy.  So what have I missed that makes WWV/WWVH necessary? On 18-08-18 11:58 AM, m44um44u@... [origamiboats] wrote:   The latest budget proposal to Congress includes the shutting down go WWV / WWVH. It is important for those who actually navigate, and for those who go to sea, it is of vital importance. Check out the link below and let's hope it doesn't get cut.    It needs 100,000 signatures by September 15th to insure a response by the White House and to date there are just 228. https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/maintain-funding-nist-stations-wwv-wwvh Please pass it on. | 35246|35238|2018-08-20 12:35:26|Darren Bos|Re: Blue Water Navigation| I tried this morning in Vancouver, BC.  I can just barely get useful info on 10MHz and nothing on the others.  I was using the built in antenna on my Sony tabletop radio.  I get both WWV and WWHV as judged by the presence of both male and female voices.  I'm not a HAM, but given the short antenna and being so near so many sources of interference in the city, that doesn't seem so bad.  If you switched off electronics/engine on a boat I suspect things would be better, even with just the stock antenna. On 18-08-20 06:50 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Brent, Right now the K-index of the sun's radio interference activity is at a 4, which is just below "minor storm": https://www.qrparci.org/resource/FDIM81.pdf But I am surprised that you report such good reception of WWVH in the Pacific when (today, in daylight) I cannot hear WWV Denver (2200 km) on 2.5, 5, 15 or 20 MHz, and can only make out there is a station on 10MHz.   Similarly, CHU Canada, at 370km away, is only slightly more detectable on 3330 kHz, and 7850 and 14670kHz are completely undetectable.   I am getting very intermittent reception.  I get it, hold position, and after a few seconds it turns completely to static only to come back a little later. Can others pull in these stations today, in daylight?   Separately, can you reliably pull in these stations?  Reliable enough to make them useful sources of information ?   Can you get them only with a boat-sized antenna ?   Or can you get them with a table-top radio ?  Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2018 6:25 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Blue Water Navigation     ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Given that I can talk around the world on a cheap ham or SSB , I doubt if WWV is all that  expensive to run.I received it on one frequency or another all over the S Pacific.Their weather forecasts were extremely useful, saving me a lot of trouble ,for a tiny fraction of the cost of a computer version, far simpler,  and  far less prone to  problems, with a tiny fraction the power draw. Darren, I agree.  I have read all that WWV/WWVH does on the petition.   All of it has some convenience and purpose.    It is convenient they are all available through the same all-band radio as many other sources of information and it is audible so one can hear variations in reception.   With digital-straight-to-the-receiver antennas, like GPS or AIS, you either see output or not.  There is no feedback as to whether you are close to getting adequate reception.   Almost getting reception looks exactly the same as a dead something, or broken antenna wire, or....  However, I cannot pull in the stations.   Well I can tell there is a station on 15MHz, but I cannot understand what is being said.  There was a service out of Ottawa, CHU Canada broadcast by the NRC, but same story.   250 miles away, we could barely get it in the 1970s and now, I cannot pick it up anymore for all the static.   The radio seems to pick up local and international broadcasts on other frequencies, so I doubt it is my radio.  I think these are just low power stations that need to boost their signal to stay relevant. If GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou and Galileo are all lost globally (as opposed to being jammed locally), that would be apocalyptic, like an anti-satellite weapon war at the least.    If one is planning for such a situation, I would recommend a table of lunars generated for the next few centuries.  Right now, before the apocalypse, it would not be hard to download the data and print it, and copy a guide for the lunar method from an old copy of Bowditch.   The information would make a tiny booklet that needs no batteries or tending all the way to the apocalypse, because, no one would announce, "GPS going down in 10 minutes, set your clocks."   It would be paper.  Just seal it up and put it away.   I am not making fun, I am just pointing out something far more liable, and long lived, accessible and maintainable than a collection of quartz clocks, even if lunars are not as accurate.  Alternately, sunrise or sunset at known locations can also be used to set the time with corrections for season, known longitude etc. If the apocalypse happens I think there will be some smart people in most ports who will have a collection of quartz clocks or something from which to set your boat's clock. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2018 12:49 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Blue Water Navigation     I usually try not to speak when I know very little about what's going on, but with the hope of getting educated, is WWV/WWVH really necessary?  In the era where you didn't have cheap, but very accurate timepieces it was really useful.  However, nowadays even a sailor with a very restricted budget could afford a dozen quartz watches with which to compare the time.  While the GPS constellation is functioning normally it provides accurate time, and I think it would be delightfully ironic just to use only the time from GPS for navigation.  Also, should the GPS satellite array ever go down, you still have your watches that you have observed over the years and thus know their rate of deviation.  With a small collection of quartz watches you'd have time-keeping good enough to make Cook or Vancouver green with envy.  So what have I missed that makes WWV/WWVH necessary? On 18-08-18 11:58 AM, m44um44u@... [origamiboats] wrote:   The latest budget proposal to Congress includes the shutting down go WWV / WWVH. It is important for those who actually navigate, and for those who go to sea, it is of vital importance. Check out the link below and let's hope it doesn't get cut.    It needs 100,000 signatures by September 15th to insure a response by the White House and to date there are just 228. https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/maintain-funding-nist-stations-wwv-wwvh Please pass it on. | 35247|35238|2018-08-20 16:38:54|brentswain38|Re: Blue Water Navigation|My backstay, insulted both ends, makes a great short wave antenna. With it I have got Vancouver AM radio,clearly , for  a short time, from Bora Bora.I get radio New Zealand on short wave, very clearly, every  night.I also get  Radio Havanna.Add a lot of external, wire  antenna.For time and weather checks ,night reception is all you  need.#ygrps-yiv-891342599 #ygrps-yiv-891342599ygrps-yiv-191254117 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Brent, Right now the K-index of the sun's radio interference activity is at a 4, which is just below "minor storm": https://www.qrparci.org/resource/FDIM81.pdf But I am surprised that you report such good reception of WWVH in the Pacific when (today, in daylight) I cannot hear WWV Denver (2200 km) on 2.5, 5, 15 or 20 MHz, and can only make out there is a station on 10MHz.   Similarly, CHU Canada, at 370km away, is only slightly more detectable on 3330 kHz, and 7850 and 14670kHz are completely undetectable.   I am getting very intermittent reception.  I get it, hold position, and after a few seconds it turns completely to static only to come back a little later. Can others pull in these stations today, in daylight?   Separately, can you reliably pull in these stations?  Reliable enough to make them useful sources of information ?   Can you get them only with a boat-sized antenna ?   Or can you get them with a table-top radio ?  Matt | 35248|35238|2018-08-20 16:42:34|brentswain38|Re: Blue Water Navigation|I wonder how much of that budget is totally useless bureaucrats  who we could get long much better without . The key to being a successful parasite, is to not kill your host.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :According to the NIST budget, dropping WWV and WWHV would reduce their budget by 6.3 million dollars.  I'd missed the fact that they had a some weather information.  On 18-08-19 03:25 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   | 35249|35238|2018-08-20 17:59:38|opuspaul|Re: Blue Water Navigation|The further you get away from cities and electrical noise, the better the reception of radio signals.   The world is awash with electrical noise now.   I used to be able to get the HF radios regularly from the yachts in Fiji and Tonga from NZ but gave up a few years ago.  It could just be a coincidence but the reception problems seemed to start when they started putting up wireless internet everywhere.I remember getting FM and AM signals from Washington, California and BC when I was in Fanning Island.   There were almost no generators and no power on the island.    I just clipped the antenna lead to a wire halyard.   The same kind of thing would work for shortwave receivers.   If you want maximum reception, you need to experiment and turn everything else off.   Things like LED lights, chargers, regulators or refridgerators can create a lot of background noise.| 35250|35238|2018-08-21 16:43:09|brentswain38|Re: Blue Water Navigation|I got radio New Zealand here in Heriot Bay loud and clear last night, along with  WWV 10. No problem.| 35251|35251|2018-08-28 18:01:36|brentswain38|Anchor well|I just did a bit of maintenance on my anchor well, for the first time in 34 years. I recon it is good for that many more years now, but if I were doing it again, I would use stainless for the back and bottom, or 1/4" plate. It is such a tiny piece that the extra weight of 1/4 inch plate, or the cost of stainless would be insignificant.| 35252|35251|2018-08-28 20:49:00|Aaron|Re: Anchor well|I almost did use SS on mine and decided not to, thinking that truck bed liner would last a long time Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 2:01 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I just did a bit of maintenance on my anchor well, for the first time in 34 years. I recon it is good for that many more years now, but if I were doing it again, I would use stainless for the back and bottom, or 1/4" plate. It is such a tiny piece that the extra weight of 1/4 inch plate, or the cost of stainless would be insignificant. #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 -- #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-mkp { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-mkp hr { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709hd { color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ads { margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ad { padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ad p { margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ad a { color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-lc { font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709hd { margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ad { margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709actions { font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709activity { background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709activity span { font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709activity span:first-child { text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709activity span a { color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709activity span span { color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709activity span .ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709underline { text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 .ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709attach { clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 .ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709attach div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 .ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709attach img { border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 .ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709attach label { display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 .ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709attach label a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 blockquote { margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 .ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709bold { font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 .ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709bold a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 dd.ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709last p a { font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 dd.ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709last p span { margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 dd.ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709last p span.ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709yshortcuts { margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 div.ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709attach-table div div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 div.ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709attach-table { width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 div.ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 div.ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 div.ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 div.ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709file-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 div.ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 div.ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 div.ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 div.ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709photo-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 div#ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709yshortcuts { font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 .ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709green { color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 .ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709MsoNormal { margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 o { font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709photos div { float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709photos div div { border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709photos div label { color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709reco-category { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709reco-desc { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 .ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709replbq { margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-actbar div a:first-child { margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-mlmsg { font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-mlmsg table { font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 input, #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 textarea { font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-mlmsg pre, #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 code { font:115% monospace;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-mlmsg * { line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709logo { padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-msg p a { font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709attach-count span { color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709reco-head { color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-reco { margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ov li a { font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ov li { font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ov ul { margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-text { font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-text p { margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-text tt { font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709 #ygrps-yiv-695071076yiv0045833709ygrp-vital ul li:last-child { border-right:none !important;} #ygrps-yiv-695071076 | 35253|35251|2018-08-29 18:29:36|opuspaul|Re: Anchor well|I never put in an anchor well and I have never missed it.| 35254|35251|2018-08-29 18:33:33|Matt Malone|Re: Anchor well| What do you do with anchor chain? Matt From: opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 18:29 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Anchor well To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I never put in an anchor well and I have never missed it. | 35255|35251|2018-08-29 19:17:26|opuspaul|Re: Anchor well|The cable and chain for my primary anchor lives right on the drum which is slightly bigger than Brent's plans.     I keep an emergency 22 pound Danforth anchor with nylon rode and about 25 feet of 5/16 chain stored at the stern on a hose reel.  My primary anchor is now a 55 pound Excel.   It is awesome, digging fast and digging deep.  My old primary anchor was a 45 pound plow which let me down more than once despite best practice.  Plows will often just lay on their side and not dig in properly while merrily skipping along the bottom.  Having said that, I used one for many 20 years.   After a few bad experiences, I learned to sometimes add the Danforth to it in series.   I never dragged using this setup and it was quick and easy to rig up.  I am a firm believer in tandem anchoring and would rather have one large bow roller for a massive anchor and chain setup than have two anchors going off the bow on separate but smaller rollers.  https://www.petersmith.net.nz/boat-anchors/tandem-anchoring.phpAll anchor rollers should spin freely or they will chafe or burn up lines in a surge.   I had almost no wear at all on the nylon mooring line when I rode out cyclone Ami in Fiji.  Other boats that relied on lines through anchor chocks or had poor rollers were in real trouble. Anyway, I digress.  My other anchors (rarely used) store down below.   Extra chain is stored under the floor in the bilge where the weight is kept low or in a small plastic barrel or jerry can with some vegetable oil.  I keep a few 40 or 50 foot lengths of old wire cable.  I could dive down and shackle them around a coral head if needed in a cyclone or use them for emergency rigging. Paul| 35256|35251|2018-08-30 21:07:57|aguysailing|Re: Anchor well|Massive anchor and all chain... does that affect bow being low in the water?| 35257|35251|2018-08-30 23:25:07|opuspaul|Re: Anchor well|I use steel cable with about 75 feet of 3/8 inch chain.  When I am sailing on a long trip offshore, I normally take the anchor off the bow roller and put either on the cockpit floor or below.    I don't do this for weight but because it will slam and make a racket if you end up pounding into waves.   On shorter trips I have used a ratchet strap or lashing to hold it tightly in place.The weight of steel cable is much less than chain and it is normally on the drum which is set back from the bow.   This is one of the drums big advantages.    Some boats who use all chain end up going to high test chain to save weight in the bow but it costs a fortune, especially when you consider you should have about 300 feet or 100 meters.   Using nylon rope isn't really an option in the tropics.  Having got used to cable, I am not sure I will ever use nylon rope again.| 35258|35251|2018-08-31 11:25:12|Shawn Green|Re: Anchor well|I also welded my foredeck shut. Just didn't like the well at all. The storage space is not significant in my mind.| 35259|35251|2018-08-31 12:29:52|Matt Malone|Re: Anchor well| #ygrps-yiv-675340796 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} I have a question about the options to an anchor well.   What are the thoughts on a chain well deep by the keel, fed by a pipe where the diameter of the pipe does not allow a doubled section of chain to pass?   The pipe carries chain at two times -- lowering the anchor and raising the anchor.   If the gypsy feeds smoothly to a flared pipe, it seems that no snags can happen in raising the anchor if there is nothing stuck to the chain.   I have read reports that chain in a chain well that is being withdrawn to lower the anchor can tangle on the way to the pipe, possibly owing to shifting of the chain while underway.    Never the less, I have been considering this to eliminate the chain locker.    Brent will no doubt have strong feelings, he always does.   At present my boat has a very large chain well in the bow.  My chain well is large enough for me to lay down in and sit up in (not comfortably), with all of my chain in it.  It has a significant length of chain in it -- a decent load in a wheelbarrow or shopping cart amount of chain.   I would not be surprised if there is 300 feet and over 300 pounds of weight high in the bow.  The well takes the first 5 or 6 feet of the bow of the boat.  The chain itself may well be replaced, it is far down the list of to-dos, it just gives me a sense of how over-large this well is.  There is a huge amount of open space in this well that is not being used.   I could hang stuff from the walls of the well, leaving a large gap in the middle for chain to fall from the gypsy to the bottom of the well.   This well is not sealed in any sense from the interior of the boat -- it is behind a cute set of louvered doors in the fore-peak as was fashionable at the time.  To my mind these doors serve no purpose.  They do not prevent the smell of the chain from entering the cabin, nor would they hold back water.   The well is no completely sealed from outside either because of the open hole to feed the chain to the gyspy -- there is currently no cap to cover the hole, but hammering in a wooden dowel would effectively seal it.  The scupper leading to the the bilge is more than adequate to carry away any leakage into this locker, leaving pumping to be done.      I have been following Roger Taylor and his single handed journeys in Mingming and Mingming II.   He really had no intention of anchoring anywhere so his boat is not set up to make anchoring easy.   As far as I can tell, he has no anchor well, or anything at the bow, he has in fact closed it behind a bulkhead and filled it with foam.    He does a similar thing to the aft of the boat so that his boat is unsinkable.  After being in a major wreck, his logic is simple, knowing your boat is unsinkable is reassuring.   I know Brent has much the same feeling about steel, I believe for the same reasons, and both are warranted.   A re-purposed and sealed up anchor well or chain well is not by itself enough volume to keep a boat afloat in any reasonable design, but this is a huge poorly-used volume that might be better sealed off, and holding lighter stowage than chain, remaining dry and sealed.   At this point, no part of my boat is sealed from any other.   There are what I would call 3/4 bulkheads -- five of them -- that cover 3/4 of a section through the boat, but not the remainder.   The chain well is the forward-most, begging for an interior hatch, and to be sealed at the deck leaving my chain to be stored elsewhere, lower, in a space that is not so excessive.    But to do that, I really need to use a chain pipe and chain well, so, what are the thoughts on this ? Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Shawn Green greenseaboats@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2018 11:24 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Anchor well     I also welded my foredeck shut. Just didn't like the well at all. The storage space is not significant in my mind. | 35260|35251|2018-08-31 13:18:42|Zoa Scott|Re: Anchor well|My boat has a fiberglassed plywood bin that fits in for chain Works well  On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 8:25 AM Shawn Green greenseaboats@... [origamiboats], wrote:   I also welded my foredeck shut. Just didn't like the well at all. The storage space is not significant in my mind. | 35261|35251|2018-08-31 23:02:50|brentswain38|Re: Anchor well|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I find that turning my anchor upside down in the bow roller eliminates slamming. I used to cat my anchor on deck  for long passages. In coral free higher latitude  waters, I find that nylon and 15 feet of chain is all I have ever needed .  I have a litre of lead, about 30 lbs, as a kellet.I only use wire in the tropics.I use steel cable with about 75 feet of 3/8 inch chain.  When I am sailing on a long trip offshore, I normally take the anchor off the bow roller and put either on the cockpit floor or below.    I don't do this for weight but because it will slam and make a racket if you end up pounding into waves.   On shorter trips I have used a ratchet strap or lashing to hold it tightly in place.The weight of steel cable is much less than chain and it is normally on the drum which is set back from the bow.   This is one of the drums big advantages.    Some boats who use all chain end up going to high test chain to save weight in the bow but it costs a fortune, especially when you consider you should have about 300 feet or 100 meters.   Using nylon rope isn't really an option in the tropics.  Having got used to cable, I am not sure I will ever use nylon rope again.| 35262|35251|2018-08-31 23:18:55|brentswain38|Re: Anchor well|  I find my well extremely useful for 160 feet of 3/4 inch braid, two 30 lb kellets an extension handle for the winch, etc., all of which you have to haul from the cockpit, if you don't have the well. I wouldn't be without it.I remember dragging anchor in the entrance to Whangarei one morning. My chain jammed in the hawse pipe, so I piled it on deck, just to get underway before hitting the rocks. Forgot about it all the way to Cape Brett, a nice broad reach, with offshore winds. Turning into the Bay of Islands, the works went overboard, and I had to hand pull it all in, beating into a 25 knot SW wind.   Resolved then and there to always have someplace to put things down forward of the cockpit, with no fear of it going overboard.Without it, everything  has to be packed from the cockpit, potentially dangerous, if it means having to  quickly set  another anchor. I always have  a second one on the bow, ready to go instantly, thanks to the well.| 35263|35251|2018-09-01 02:35:25|opuspaul|Re: Anchor well|I am not sure I follow you.   Does your chain go through a hawse pipe or over a roller or do you mean a hawse pipe to chain stored below?  Do you keep the chain on the drum like I do?   If so, it should be instantly available and only take a minute to roll on the drum if you happened to pull it on deck first.I am really surpised you use so little chain and nylon line.   I would be worried it might get cut on a sharp rock or bit of debris on the bottom.   I  have some big lead kellets on board but found with 50 or 75 feet of chain, I never felt the need for them.  I have hydraulic drive to my anchor winch so don't worry about how easy or hard it is to haul it up.    As I said before, for a spare anchor for instant use, I use my stern anchor.  It has come in really handy a few times and also makes a good towing line.  I find hose reels for very long lines really handy.  They are just about the only thing guaranteed to self feed if you are alone and towing out a line or anchor with a dinghy.I remember one nasty night where I was dragging with no room to go on the north coast of Maui.   I just turned the engine and the hydraulic winch on and let it haul while I drove the boat out of the bay from the cockpit.  This was probably the worst experience I ever had on the boat.   I just ran out of the bay at the end of it but I had actually dragged earlier and then had to change my anchor after it got bent  it in the storm and swells.   I was alone and the wind and spray was so bad I could hardly see with 100 mph gusts coming off the mountains against the waves wrapping into the bay.  Without the hydraulic winch I am pretty sure I would have ended up on the beach.  The storm lasted over 2 days from beginning to end with little to no sleep.   The waves so high and the chop so steep that the steel anchor cable kept jumping out of the bow roller.   The winter storms I had in Hawaii with their big swells and unprotected anchorages are just crazy.   Worse than any cyclones I have been in.     Paul---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :  I find my well extremely useful for 160 feet of 3/4 inch braid, two 30 lb kellets an extension handle for the winch, etc., all of which you have to haul from the cockpit, if you don't have the well. I wouldn't be without it.I remember dragging anchor in the entrance to Whangarei one morning. My chain jammed in the hawse pipe, so I piled it on deck, just to get underway before hitting the rocks. Forgot about it all the way to Cape Brett, a nice broad reach, with offshore winds. Turning into the Bay of Islands, the works went overboard, and I had to hand pull it all in, beating into a 25 knot SW wind.   Resolved then and there to always have someplace to put things down forward of the cockpit, with no fear of it going overboard.Without it, everything  has to be packed from the cockpit, potentially dangerous, if it means having to  quickly set  another anchor. I always have  a second one on the bow, ready to go instantly, thanks to the well.| 35264|35251|2018-09-01 08:53:50|a.sobriquet|Re: Anchor well|Paul,What do you mean by a hose reel? Surely not a garden hose reel. Maybe a firehose reel? Where do you find such?Thank you,A.S.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :... I find hose reels for very long lines really handy.  They are just about the only thing guaranteed to self feed if you are alone and towing out a line or anchor with a dinghy.... Paul| 35265|35251|2018-09-01 11:29:10|Darren Bos|Re: Anchor well| Matt, While it is attractive to get the weight down really low, the chain piled in a short wide locker will eventually fall over on itself and make a tangle.  To convince yourself, just pile your chain from a single point and watch it pile.  Left to its own devices, it makes a surprisingly high pyramid that is just waiting to fall-over or slide-over and create an opportunity for a tangle.  When you go to re-deploy the anchor, that tangle is going to hit the pipe with a fair bit of force as the chain is being let out, leading to further problems (a plastic pipe will likely break, the chain might jam itself into a thin-walled metal pipe and a thick walled metal pipe is going to transfer the force somewhere you don't want). Since we're refitting our boat, I already had chain and a windlass so keeping them made that option inexpensive.  I think the ideal chain locker is tall and narrow.  To store enough chain you are probably going to need to pile it from the top of the keel to near deck height, but that still probably puts the centre of mass lower than it would be in the average triangular-bow-chain-locker.  I built my chain locker out of a piece of 10" ID PVC pipe.  I'd had the idea in the back of my mind, and after a bunch of looking (just as a matter of keeping an eye out), I found a scrap piece of PVC pipe for free (I'd make the pipe out of fiberglass instead of buying new PVC pipe).  At 10" ID the pipe is narrow enough that the chain can't pull its trick of piling high and falling over on itself.  My chain locker comfortably holds our 250' of 5/16" chain.  Because the pipe is completely sealed it can be moved aft in the boat and abut a living space without problems of water and smell.  I've mounted a manual diaphragm pump to empty the pipe of water/sludge.  I used G-flex to glue the PVC.  I might use a hot-air plastic welder if I were to do it again. So, wherever you were going to run your chain pipe, why not just upgrade the pipe size quite a few sizes and make it into a self-tending vertically oriented chain well? On 18-08-31 09:29 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I have a question about the options to an anchor well.   What are the thoughts on a chain well deep by the keel, fed by a pipe where the diameter of the pipe does not allow a doubled section of chain to pass?   The pipe carries chain at two times -- lowering the anchor and raising the anchor.   If the gypsy feeds smoothly to a flared pipe, it seems that no snags can happen in raising the anchor if there is nothing stuck to the chain.   I have read reports that chain in a chain well that is being withdrawn to lower the anchor can tangle on the way to the pipe, possibly owing to shifting of the chain while underway.    Never the less, I have been considering this to eliminate the chain locker.    Brent will no doubt have strong feelings, he always does.   ..... But to do that, I really need to use a chain pipe and chain well, so, what are the thoughts on this ? Matt | 35266|35251|2018-09-01 18:33:43|brentswain38|Re: Anchor well|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :   Back then, I had no drum.   Now, I roll it all on the drum. I never had the rope cut, in over 40 years of cruising, mostly full time.Sometimes, getting out of a narrow bay against the wind, I have run the rode down the sided deck to the cockpit, so I can pull it in without leaving the  helm. I roll it on the drum after reaching open  water. I have suggested this to those who don't have an anchor winch, yet.  Lets them use their sheet winches. Easy to do,  if you don't have too much  chain on.   The nice thing about kellets intsead of chain, is you get to lift them separately. With chain, you lift the  weigh of chain and anchor simultaneously. Most rope comes on beautiful plastic reels, which get thrown out after use ( freebees from the dumpster).The black ones don't break down in UV.   I remember someone on some "Yottie" site asking if a stern reel was worth the $400 they cost! I informed them of free options ( which probably helped get me banned from that site, by their sponsors).I am not sure I follow you.   Does your chain go through a hawse pipe or over a roller or do you mean a hawse pipe to chain stored below?  Do you keep the chain on the drum like I do?   If so, it should be instantly available and only take a minute to roll on the drum if you happened to pull it on deck first.I am really surpised you use so little chain and nylon line.   I would be worried it might get cut on a sharp rock or bit of debris on the bottom.   I  have some big lead kellets on board but found with 50 or 75 feet of chain, I never felt the need for them.  I have hydraulic drive to my anchor winch so don't worry about how easy or hard it is to haul it up.    As I said before, for a spare anchor for instant use, I use my stern anchor.  It has come in really handy a few times and also makes a good towing line.  I find hose reels for very long lines really handy.  They are just about the only thing guaranteed to self feed if you are alone and towing out a line or anchor with a dinghy.I remember one nasty night where I was dragging with no room to go on the north coast of Maui.   I just turned the engine and the hydraulic winch on and let it haul while I drove the boat out of the bay from the cockpit.  This was probably the worst experience I ever had on the boat.   I just ran out of the bay at the end of it but I had actually dragged earlier and then had to change my anchor after it got bent  it in the storm and swells.   I was alone and the wind and spray was so bad I could hardly see with 100 mph gusts coming off the mountains against the waves wrapping into the bay.  Without the hydraulic winch I am pretty sure I would have ended up on the beach.  The storm lasted over 2 days from beginning to end with little to no sleep.   The waves so high and the chop so steep that the steel anchor cable kept jumping out of the bow roller.   The winter storms I had in Hawaii with their big swells and unprotected anchorages are just crazy.   Worse than any cyclones I have been in.     Paul---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :  I find my well extremely useful for 160 feet of 3/4 inch braid, two 30 lb kellets an extension handle for the winch, etc., all of which you have to haul from the cockpit, if you don't have the well. I wouldn't be without it.I remember dragging anchor in the entrance to Whangarei one morning. My chain jammed in the hawse pipe, so I piled it on deck, just to get underway before hitting the rocks. Forgot about it all the way to Cape Brett, a nice broad reach, with offshore winds. Turning into the Bay of Islands, the works went overboard, and I had to hand pull it all in, beating into a 25 knot SW wind.   Resolved then and there to always have someplace to put things down forward of the cockpit, with no fear of it going overboard.Without it, everything  has to be packed from the cockpit, potentially dangerous, if it means having to  quickly set  another anchor. I always have  a second one on the bow, ready to go instantly, thanks to the well.| 35267|35251|2018-09-01 18:44:58|brentswain38|Re: Anchor well|  Any cone shape with the point  directly under the hawse pipe will prevent chain from piling up. Traffic cones have the right shape ,but will collapse under the weight of chain. Building up the inside of the cone with lots of  fibreglass, solves that  problem.   A plastic 45 gallon drum makes a good chain locker ,if it will fit.You can cut the top off, and cut the top  down enough to fit inside, then bolt the cone to it at the right place . Slots near the top,  to take  turnbuckles to  hold it down, eliminates the need for bolt holes near the bottom; so it won't  leak. You can put a thru hull and ball valve on the bottom to drain it at your leisure. Used poly plastic water tanks also work as chain lockers.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Matt,While it is attractive to get the weight down really low, the chain piled in a short wide locker will eventually fall over on itself and make a tangle.  To convince yourself, just pile your chain from a single point and watch it pile.  Left to its own devices, it makes a surprisingly high pyramid that is just waiting to fall-over or slide-over and create an opportunity for a tangle.  When you go to re-deploy the anchor, that tangle is going to hit the pipe with a fair bit of force as the chain is being let out, leading to further problems (a plastic pipe will likely break, the chain might jam itself into a thin-walled metal pipe and a thick walled metal pipe is going to transfer the force somewhere you don't want).| 35268|35251|2018-09-01 19:22:54|opuspaul|Re: Anchor well|It is just is a plastic garden hose reel.   The kind that fits flat on a wall and is mounted to some plywood and then lashed to the rail.   It may not seem very robust but it has lasted many years.    You can see it a video here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8NEnluSA9IExcuse the mess....I had some projects going on.If I was going to Fiordland or the south tip of NZ I would probably get more lines and want something more robust.   You should see what Skip Novak uses here:  Go to the 5 min mark.  I have a friend who runs charters to the Subantarctic Islands and he has a similar arrangement.  Serious stuff.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L23OJOrOez4| 35269|35251|2018-09-02 07:18:19|Matt Malone|Re: Anchor well| Excellent suggestion Darren. (A piece of thick plastic watermain/sewer pipe as a chain locker, mounted vertically.) Some details to work out: - how and where to connect the bitter end of the hawser that keeps all the chain from paying out. - a grating at the bottom to.keep the chain from laying in the sludge that is washed off. - a two-hand sized inspection hatch near the top to deal with the unimaginable tangle. - a wash spray nossle built in at the top for rinses of the chain with non-stinky water from outside the harbour/rainwater finish. - a 2" pipe, connected to the side, below the grate, above the pump out, with a 90 pointed up, pipe up the outside of the locker, a valve, and a little computer fan to blow warm air down the pipe and up through the stack of chain and out the hawse pipe, as a vent, to dry the chain and vent the locker. - also serves to warm the chain in cold water sailing to reduce the un-foamed locker's tendency to gather condensation like a toilet tank right after pulling in 100 pounds of cold chain.  Any condensation would form on the chain, more rapidly heating it, dripping down into  the pump out. If one takes steps to keep the chain clean and dry, it will stink a lot less and last a lot longer.   If one has their chain in a sealed plastic pipe why not make the pipe into a washer-dryer, or at least an aerobic composter, like the head. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, September 1, 11:29 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Anchor well To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Matt, While it is attractive to get the weight down really low, the chain piled in a short wide locker will eventually fall over on itself and make a tangle.  To convince yourself, just pile your chain from a single point and watch it pile.  Left to its own devices, it makes a surprisingly high pyramid that is just waiting to fall-over or slide-over and create an opportunity for a tangle.  When you go to re-deploy the anchor, that tangle is going to hit the pipe with a fair bit of force as the chain is being let out, leading to further problems (a plastic pipe will likely break, the chain might jam itself into a thin-walled metal pipe and a thick walled metal pipe is going to transfer the force somewhere you don't want). Since we're refitting our boat, I already had chain and a windlass so keeping them made that option inexpensive.  I think the ideal chain locker is tall and narrow.  To store enough chain you are probably going to need to pile it from the top of the keel to near deck height, but that still probably puts the centre of mass lower than it would be in the average triangular-bow-chain-locker.  I built my chain locker out of a piece of 10" ID PVC pipe.  I'd had the idea in the back of my mind, and after a bunch of looking (just as a matter of keeping an eye out), I found a scrap piece of PVC pipe for free (I'd make the pipe out of fiberglass instead of buying new PVC pipe).  At 10" ID the pipe is narrow enough that the chain can't pull its trick of piling high and falling over on itself.  My chain locker comfortably holds our 250' of 5/16" chain.  Because the pipe is completely sealed it can be moved aft in the boat and abut a living space without problems of water and smell.  I've mounted a manual diaphragm pump to empty the pipe of water/sludge.  I used G-flex to glue the PVC.  I might use a hot-air plastic welder if I were to do it again. So, wherever you were going to run your chain pipe, why not just upgrade the pipe size quite a few sizes and make it into a self-tending vertically oriented chain well? On 18-08-31 09:29 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I have a question about the options to an anchor well.   What are the thoughts on a chain well deep by the keel, fed by a pipe where the diameter of the pipe does not allow a doubled section of chain to pass?   The pipe carries chain at two times -- lowering the anchor and raising the anchor.   If the gypsy feeds smoothly to a flared pipe, it seems that no snags can happen in raising the anchor if there is nothing stuck to the chain.   I have read reports that chain in a chain well that is being withdrawn to lower the anchor can tangle on the way to the pipe, possibly owing to shifting of the chain while underway.    Never the less, I have been considering this to eliminate the chain locker.    Brent will no doubt have strong feelings, he always does.   ..... But to do that, I really need to use a chain pipe and chain well, so, what are the thoughts on this ? Matt | 35270|35251|2018-09-02 07:50:00|Matt Malone|Re: Anchor well| Yes, a drum makes sense.  I like the ones where the lid can come off and be clamped back on with the bevel-ring and bead style closure.   45 gallons might be too large a volume, too large diameter. I am liking the thick plastic watermain pipe idea that Darren suggested.  Thicker, more rust resistant than either a drum or plastic barrel.  Easier to find a spot for it inside the boat... I wonder if I could have it inside a compression column structure that is just a little wider than my mast, to change to a deck-stepped mast....  chain filling an otherwise unused volume.  Until now i had considered that i might make a water system pressure tank based on a thick-wall stainless pipe that doubles as the compression column.  It would be way easier to weld up a square truss that a watermain pipe fits inside.  But worst case that creates a combined failure where the chain rips the support of from under my mast.  It would be way easier to find space for two vertical pipes side by side than a barrel, particularly if the two pipes are both watermain pipe. If I had a 60 foot monster like SVSeeker, I sure would consider a 45 gallon stainless drum ($350), or two, for chain. Matt From: brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, September 1, 18:45 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Anchor well To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com     Any cone shape with the point  directly under the hawse pipe will prevent chain from piling up. Traffic cones have the right shape ,but will collapse under the weight of chain. Building up the inside of the cone with lots of  fibreglass, solves that  problem.    A plastic 45 gallon drum makes a good chain locker ,if it will fit.You can cut the top off, and cut the top  down enough to fit inside, then bolt the cone to it at the right place . Slots near the top,  to take  turnbuckles to  hold it down, eliminates the need for bolt holes near the bottom; so it won't  leak. You can put a thru hull and ball valve on the bottom to drain it at your leisure. Used poly plastic water tanks also work as chain lockers. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Matt, While it is attractive to get the weight down really low, the chain piled in a short wide locker will eventually fall over on itself and make a tangle.  To convince yourself, just pile your chain from a single point and watch it pile.  Left to its own devices, it makes a surprisingly high pyramid that is just waiting to fall-over or slide-over and create an opportunity for a tangle.  When you go to re-deploy the anchor, that tangle is going to hit the pipe with a fair bit of force as the chain is being let out, leading to further problems (a plastic pipe will likely break, the chain might jam itself into a thin-walled metal pipe and a thick walled metal pipe is going to transfer the force somewhere you don't want). | 35271|35251|2018-09-02 10:37:12|a.sobriquet|Re: Anchor well|Thanks for the suggestions. It's always nice when inexpensive everyday items work well in a marine environment.A.S.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :It is just is a plastic garden hose reel.   The kind that fits flat on a wall and is mounted to some plywood and then lashed to the rail.   It may not seem very robust but it has lasted many years.    You can see it a video here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8NEnluSA9IExcuse the mess....I had some projects going on.If I was going to Fiordland or the south tip of NZ I would probably get more lines and want something more robust.   You should see what Skip Novak uses here:  Go to the 5 min mark.  I have a friend who runs charters to the Subantarctic Islands and he has a similar arrangement.  Serious stuff.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L23OJOrOez4| 35272|35251|2018-09-02 12:28:51|Matt Malone|Re: Anchor well| Not sure why this did not go before... Excellent suggestion Darren. (A piece of thick plastic watermain/sewer pipe as a chain locker, mounted vertically.) Some details to work out: - how and where to connect the bitter end of the hawser that keeps all the chain from paying out. - a grating at the bottom to.keep the chain from laying in the sludge that is washed off. - a two-hand sized inspection hatch near the top to deal with the unimaginable tangle. - a wash spray nossle built in at the top for rinses of the chain with non-stinky water from outside the harbour/rainwater finish. - a 2" pipe, connected to the side, below the grate, above the pump out, with a 90 pointed up, pipe up the outside of the locker, a valve, and a little computer fan to blow warm air down the pipe and up through the stack of chain and out the hawse pipe, as a vent, to dry the chain and vent the locker. - also serves to warm the chain in cold water sailing to reduce the un-foamed locker's tendency to gather condensation like a toilet tank right after pulling in 100 pounds of cold chain.  Any condensation would form on the chain, more rapidly heating it, dripping down into  the pump out. If one takes steps to keep the chain clean and dry, it will stink a lot less and last a lot longer.   If one has their chain in a sealed plastic pipe why not make the pipe into a washer-dryer, or at least an aerobic composter, like the head. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, September 1, 11:29 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Anchor well To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Matt, While it is attractive to get the weight down really low, the chain piled in a short wide locker will eventually fall over on itself and make a tangle.  To convince yourself, just pile your chain from a single point and watch it pile.  Left to its own devices, it makes a surprisingly high pyramid that is just waiting to fall-over or slide-over and create an opportunity for a tangle.  When you go to re-deploy the anchor, that tangle is going to hit the pipe with a fair bit of force as the chain is being let out, leading to further problems (a plastic pipe will likely break, the chain might jam itself into a thin-walled metal pipe and a thick walled metal pipe is going to transfer the force somewhere you don't want). Since we're refitting our boat, I already had chain and a windlass so keeping them made that option inexpensive.  I think the ideal chain locker is tall and narrow.  To store enough chain you are probably going to need to pile it from the top of the keel to near deck height, but that still probably puts the centre of mass lower than it would be in the average triangular-bow-chain-locker.  I built my chain locker out of a piece of 10" ID PVC pipe.  I'd had the idea in the back of my mind, and after a bunch of looking (just as a matter of keeping an eye out), I found a scrap piece of PVC pipe for free (I'd make the pipe out of fiberglass instead of buying new PVC pipe).  At 10" ID the pipe is narrow enough that the chain can't pull its trick of piling high and falling over on itself.  My chain locker comfortably holds our 250' of 5/16" chain.  Because the pipe is completely sealed it can be moved aft in the boat and abut a living space without problems of water and smell.  I've mounted a manual diaphragm pump to empty the pipe of water/sludge.  I used G-flex to glue the PVC.  I might use a hot-air plastic welder if I were to do it again. So, wherever you were going to run your chain pipe, why not just upgrade the pipe size quite a few sizes and make it into a self-tending vertically oriented chain well? On 18-08-31 09:29 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I have a question about the options to an anchor well.   What are the thoughts on a chain well deep by the keel, fed by a pipe where the diameter of the pipe does not allow a doubled section of chain to pass?   The pipe carries chain at two times -- lowering the anchor and raising the anchor.   If the gypsy feeds smoothly to a flared pipe, it seems that no snags can happen in raising the anchor if there is nothing stuck to the chain.   I have read reports that chain in a chain well that is being withdrawn to lower the anchor can tangle on the way to the pipe, possibly owing to shifting of the chain while underway.    Never the less, I have been considering this to eliminate the chain locker.    Brent will no doubt have strong feelings, he always does.   ..... But to do that, I really need to use a chain pipe and chain well, so, what are the thoughts on this ? Matt | 35273|35251|2018-09-02 15:05:45|Matt Malone|Re: Anchor well| #ygrps-yiv-239990918 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Twice now the list has failed to post this post, but it took a different one I sent minutes later....   Sending it for the 3rd time Excellent suggestion Darren. (A piece of thick plastic watermain/sewer pipe as a chain locker, mounted vertically.) Some details to work out: - how and where to connect the bitter end of the hawser that keeps all the chain from paying out. - a grating at the bottom to.keep the chain from laying in the sludge that is washed off. - a two-hand sized inspection hatch near the top to deal with the unimaginable tangle. - a wash spray nossle built in at the top for rinses of the chain with non-stinky water from outside the harbour/rainwater finish. - a 2" pipe, connected to the side, below the grate, above the pump out, with a 90 pointed up, pipe up the outside of the locker, a valve, and a little computer fan to blow warm air down the pipe and up through the stack of chain and out the hawse pipe, as a vent, to dry the chain and vent the locker. - also serves to warm the chain in cold water sailing to reduce the un-foamed locker's tendency to gather condensation like a toilet tank right after pulling in 100 pounds of cold chain.  Any condensation would form on the chain, more rapidly heating it, dripping down into  the pump out. If one takes steps to keep the chain clean and dry, it will stink a lot less and last a lot longer.   If one has their chain in a sealed plastic pipe why not make the pipe into a washer-dryer, or at least an aerobic composter, like the head. Matt | 35274|35251|2018-09-02 18:09:17|brentswain38|Re: Anchor well|Suggesting inexpensive ,everyday items, as alternatives to what the marine industry sells for exorbitant prices, will get you banned from many sites ,in response to demands from their sponsors.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Thanks for the suggestions. It's always nice when inexpensive everyday items work well in a marine environment.A.S.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :It is just is a plastic garden hose reel.   The kind that fits flat on a wall and is mounted to some plywood and then lashed to the rail.   It may not seem very robust but it has lasted many years.    You can see it a video here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8NEnluSA9IExcuse the mess....I had some projects going on.If I was going to Fiordland or the south tip of NZ I would probably get more lines and want something more robust.   You should see what Skip Novak uses here:  Go to the 5 min mark.  I have a friend who runs charters to the Subantarctic Islands and he has a similar arrangement.  Serious stuff.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L23OJOrOez4| 35275|35251|2018-09-02 19:24:46|brentswain38|Re: Anchor well|A cone solves the diameter problem.You can cut the height down. The lid inside, on the bottom, keeps the  chain off the bottom.That lets you spray the chain with light oil, if you're not going to use it for  while,or baking soda and water,to slow down corrosion.It only works on big boats. Bar tenders tell me they pay a $35 deposit on stainless beer kegs. You could probably buy one off a bar owner, for the deposit, Scrap yards also have them. Makes a quick and easy 'hippy killer " wood stove, or tanks.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Yes, a drum makes sense.  I like the ones where the lid can come off and be clamped back on with the bevel-ring and bead style closure.   45 gallons might be too large a volume, too large diameter. If I had a 60 foot monster like SVSeeker, I sure would consider a 45 gallon stainless drum ($350), or two, for chain. Matt | 35276|35251|2018-09-03 00:37:38|Darren Bos|Re: Anchor well| Hey Matt, I've sent some pics to you directly as I haven't been able to post any to the Origamiboats photos/files section for some time.  Comments on your questions inserted below in bold. On 18-09-02 12:05 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Twice now the list has failed to post this post, but it took a different one I sent minutes later....   Sending it for the 3rd time Excellent suggestion Darren. (A piece of thick plastic watermain/sewer pipe as a chain locker, mounted vertically.) Some details to work out: - how and where to connect the bitter end of the hawser that keeps all the chain from paying out. I attached a line to then end of my chain long enough for the chain to run out on deck where it could be cut in an emergency.  The line is strong enough to hold chain and anchor pulled to length, but weak enough that it couldn't pull out the reinforced deck in the area of the windlass.  The end of the rope has a shackle on it that is too large to fit through the hole under the windlass. - a grating at the bottom to.keep the chain from laying in the sludge that is washed off. Sent a pic of this to you.  I made a grate and a support for the bottom of the tube using the material from the tub itself.  PVC pipe flattens to sheet stock really nicely if you cut a chunk lengthwise, heat it in an oven to just enough to soften it and then clamp it between some pieces of 3/4" plywood.  With this flat stock I made a raised grate inside the tube, a support for the great, and a piece to seal the bottom of the tube. - a two-hand sized inspection hatch near the top to deal with the unimaginable tangle. I cut a window out of the pipe near deck level.  Glued another section of pipe inside to make a lip inside the cutout opening for the cutout section to rest against, then reinstalled cutout window with some spring loaded over-centre latches.  Before glueing it into place the I made a groove on the inside lip that accepts some round foam gasket that seems to seal well. - a wash spray nossle built in at the top for rinses of the chain with non-stinky water from outside the harbour/rainwater finish. I can spray the chain as it comesin.  I also put a nozzle right on the bow roller, but I haven't had a chance to use it yet.  There is no reason you can't spray water down the hawse-pipe from the windlass as well, just remember to pump it out before the water level reaches the inspection port. - a 2" pipe, connected to the side, below the grate, above the pump out, with a 90 pointed up, pipe up the outside of the locker, a valve, and a little computer fan to blow warm air down the pipe and up through the stack of chain and out the hawse pipe, as a vent, to dry the chain and vent the locker. I used 1" pipe as my pumpout, but I haven't made any allowances for drying. - also serves to warm the chain in cold water sailing to reduce the un-foamed locker's tendency to gather condensation like a toilet tank right after pulling in 100 pounds of cold chain.  Any condensation would form on the chain, more rapidly heating it, dripping down into  the pump out. If one takes steps to keep the chain clean and dry, it will stink a lot less and last a lot longer.   If one has their chain in a sealed plastic pipe why not make the pipe into a washer-dryer, or at least an aerobic composter, like the head. The tube that makes my chain locker is sealed well enough from the rest of the boat that the chain can get pretty smelly without affecting the interiour.  I'm sure keeping it dry would make it last much longer though. Darren | 35277|35251|2018-09-03 05:25:08|rockrothwell|Stern Roller|Hi Guys, To keep things simple & solid, whilst I'm at it am building a roller exactly the same as the winlass forward. Mounted at mid level cross braçe of the pullpit, port quarter, braced down to the bullworks. All the 5/8 braid-on rode from the winlass fwd 4-500 feet will go on it and the bit of chain & a hook for immediate deployment. Line for prawn traps atop the rode to haul with a separate cheepie spool to store Hydraulicly powered, but with no gear & rachet/paul on it, fteewheel hand crank roller or hydraulic. Working from the Heretics Guide it's pretty much paint by numbers, just with grinder & stick. With the exeptio of sailing, about the most fun you can have with your cloths on| 35278|35251|2018-09-03 06:29:34|brentswain38|Re: Anchor well|A great rundown of all the problems one avoids by using a drum winch. The bitter end should always have rope on it so, you can cut it free if you drag, and don't have time to get it back up. In the Cabo disaster, people were on the foredeck, buried in green water,  trying to  hack  saw thru their chain. Floating rope makes it easier to recover later .---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Excellent suggestion Darren. (A piece of thick plastic watermain/sewer pipe as a chain locker, mounted vertically.) Some details to work out: - how and where to connect the bitter end of the hawser that keeps all the chain from paying out. - a grating at the bottom to.keep the chain from laying in the sludge that is washed off. - a two-hand sized inspection hatch near the top to deal with the unimaginable tangle. - a wash spray nossle built in at the top for rinses of the chain with non-stinky water from outside the harbour/rainwater finish. - a 2" pipe, connected to the side, below the grate, above the pump out, with a 90 pointed up, pipe up the outside of the locker, a valve, and a little computer fan to blow warm air down the pipe and up through the stack of chain and out the hawse pipe, as a vent, to dry the chain and vent the locker. - also serves to warm the chain in cold water sailing to reduce the un-foamed locker's tendency to gather condensation like a toilet tank right after pulling in 100 pounds of cold chain.  Any condensation would form on the chain, more rapidly heating it, dripping down into  the pump out. If one takes steps to keep the chain clean and dry, it will stink a lot less and last a lot longer.   If one has their chain in a sealed plastic pipe why not make the pipe into a washer-dryer, or at least an aerobic composter, like the head. Matt | 35279|35251|2018-09-03 09:44:03|Matt Malone|"Cabo disaster"| #ygrps-yiv-697160542 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Do you mean hurricane Odile in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico in 2014 ?   You have mentioned Cabo before, but I can never find any boat-related news about it.   There is this: https://globalnews.ca/news/1569753/photo-gallery-canadians-in-cabo-san-lucas-begin-returning-home-share-images-of-destruction/ But no images of the harbour / anchorages.   I was sure you mentioned Cabo years ago, if so, it was not 2014. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, September 2, 2018 5:56 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Anchor well     A great rundown of all the problems one avoids by using a drum winch. The bitter end should always have rope on it so, you can cut it free if you drag, and don't have time to get it back up. In the Cabo disaster, people were on the foredeck, buried in green water,  trying to  hack  saw thru their chain. Floating rope makes it easier to recover later . | 35280|35251|2018-09-03 13:30:08|Brian Stannard|Re: "Cabo disaster"|I am sure Brent is referring to the Cabo disaster that occurred around 1980. Many boats hit the beach including Motessier's Joshua. Most were caught totally unprepared. On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 10:09 AM Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Do you mean hurricane Odile in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico in 2014 ?   You have mentioned Cabo before, but I can never find any boat-related news about it.   There is this: https://globalnews.ca/news/1569753/photo-gallery-canadians-in-cabo-san-lucas-begin-returning-home-share-images-of-destruction/ But no images of the harbour / anchorages.   I was sure you mentioned Cabo years ago, if so, it was not 2014. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, September 2, 2018 5:56 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Anchor well     A great rundown of all the problems one avoids by using a drum winch. The bitter end should always have rope on it so, you can cut it free if you drag, and don't have time to get it back up. In the Cabo disaster, people were on the foredeck, buried in green water,  trying to  hack  saw thru their chain. Floating rope makes it easier to recover later . -- CheersBrian | 35281|35251|2018-09-03 15:19:24|Matt Malone|Re: "Cabo disaster"| #ygrps-yiv-737492397 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} https://www.boatbuilding.xyz/seamanship-skills/cabo-san-lucas-1.html Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Brian Stannard brianstannard@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, September 3, 2018 1:29 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] "Cabo disaster"     I am sure Brent is referring to the Cabo disaster that occurred around 1980. Many boats hit the beach including Motessier's Joshua. Most were caught totally unprepared. On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 10:09 AM Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Do you mean hurricane Odile in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico in 2014 ?   You have mentioned Cabo before, but I can never find any boat-related news about it.   There is this: https://globalnews.ca/news/1569753/photo-gallery-canadians-in-cabo-san-lucas-begin-returning-home-share-images-of-destruction/ But no images of the harbour / anchorages.   I was sure you mentioned Cabo years ago, if so, it was not 2014. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, September 2, 2018 5:56 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Anchor well     A great rundown of all the problems one avoids by using a drum winch. The bitter end should always have rope on it so, you can cut it free if you drag, and don't have time to get it back up. In the Cabo disaster, people were on the foredeck, buried in green water,  trying to  hack  saw thru their chain. Floating rope makes it easier to recover later . -- Cheers Brian | 35282|35251|2018-09-03 19:24:51|brentswain38|Re: "Cabo disaster"|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Yes late in1982I am sure Brent is referring to the Cabo disaster that occurred around 1980. Many boats hit the beach including Motessier's Joshua. Most were caught totally unprepared. From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, September 2, 2018 5:56 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Anchor well  A great rundown of all the problems one avoids by using a drum winch. The bitter end should always have rope on it so, you can cut it free if you drag, and don't have time to get it back up. In the Cabo disaster, people were on the foredeck, buried in green water,  trying to  hack  saw thru their chain. Floating rope makes it easier to recover later . | 35283|35251|2018-09-03 19:59:06|opuspaul|Re: Anchor well|I don't normally like the stuff since it is not as nice to handle and seems to be more effected by UV damage but it is a good idea to use a floating polypropylene line for your stern anchor or tow line.  A lot of boats with nylon stern lines end up getting them tangled in their prop.  The same thing goes for your dinghy painter.  A good friend of mine almost put his 45 footer on a reef one night after he got his dinghy painter caught in the prop.  ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :A great rundown of all the problems one avoids by using a drum winch. The bitter end should always have rope on it so, you can cut it free if you drag, and don't have time to get it back up. In the Cabo disaster, people were on the foredeck, buried in green water,  trying to  hack  saw thru their chain. Floating rope makes it easier to recover later .| 35284|35251|2018-09-05 09:51:42|Matt Malone|Posting oddities| #ygrps-yiv-1241795701 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} QUESTION: ------------------ I am trying to diagnose oddities with the origamiboats@yahoogroups.com email list.  If others could please check their inbox and check to see, if their email records are close to the same as these dates and times for these two messages, or days different, then please reply with when you received these messages:   - Matt Malone, September 4 at 11:31pm (EDT) "Not sure why this did not go before..."  - Darren Bos, September 5 at 5:10am (EDT) "Hey Matt, I've sent some pics to you directly as I haven't been able to post any to the Origamiboats photos/files section for some time." According to my records, these two messages were delayed by days from when they were actually sent. Background: ------------------ From time to time, there is something wrong with the mailing list.  In the past, I send a message, and it refuses to send it back out by the mailing list.   It happened twice before that I remember.    This time something different happened.  These are my email records for 3 attempts to send the same message, and the 3 eventual receipts of the attempts. Sunday 7:18am (EDT) - Sent "Excellent Suggestion Darren.  (A piece of thick plastic watermain/sewer pipe as a chain locker, mounted vertically.)" the first time Sunday 7:49am - Sent "Yes, a drum makes sense." in response to Brent.   Sunday 7:50am - Received "Yes, a drum makes sense."  --- The turn around of this message was prompt, as usual, so I decided that the list was working but that it had somehow lost the 7:18am message.   This had happened like twice before, months ago, and about 2 months apart.   This time I waited to see if the first message would come. Sunday 12:28pm - Resent "Excellent Suggestion Darren." this time with the first line "Not sure why this did not go before..."   I figured, after 5 hours, it was not coming, so I just sent it again.  I changed nothing about the message, it still had a long chain of messages back and forth below it.  Sunday 3:05pm - Resent "Excellent Suggestion Darren." this time with the first line "Twice now the list has failed to pose this post...."   -- the difference was, I trimmed off the chain of back and forth messages below it.   I guessed the chain of back and forth messages might have been the problem. Sunday 3:06pm - Received the third attempt: "Twice now the list has failed to pose this post...." -- On the third attempt, the list put out the message in 1 minute.   That leaves two copies of the message apparently lost.   Monday 3:07am - Received the first attempt:  "Excellent Suggestion Darren.  (A piece of thick plastic watermain/sewer pipe as a chain locker, mounted vertically.)" The first attempt to send the message, 20 hours after it was sent.  Never have I had messages delayed this long.   Tuesday 11:31pm - Received the second attempt: "Not sure why this did not go before..." -- that is 59 hours after I sent it to the list.  I have just now checked the Origami boats group on the web -- I almost never look there, I rely on the mailing list.   The chronology is totally different.   The first message was posted to the web group on September 2 4:18am (PDT), the moment I posted it. The second message was posted to the web group on September 2 9:28am (PDT), the moment I posted it.  The third message was posted to the web group on September 2 12:05pm (PDT), the moment I posted it.   Therefore the web group is getting updated immediately, but the mailing list is not, or there is just a problem at my end.   Only hearing if you see the same thing in your email records will tell me if the list messed up, or if it is my email.  
Darren responded to my third posting on September 2 at 9:37pm (PST), "Hey Matt, I've sent some pics to you directly as I haven't been able to post any to the Origamiboats photos/files section for some time."  The time is what the web group has recorded for that, I have no idea when Darren sent the message, however, it did not reach my inbox via the mailing list until September 5 at 5:10am (EDT) --- that is a delay of 52.5 hours. The private email Darren sent directly to my email, with the photos, it arrived to me September 3 14:46am (EDT) -- just 9 minutes after Darren's post appeared on the Origami web group.   So to me it looks like the web group is updating immediately, however messages are coming through the mailing list with 20-59 hours delay, from time to time.  Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, September 3, 2018 12:37 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Anchor well     Hey Matt, I've sent some pics to you directly as I haven't been able to post any to the Origamiboats photos/files section for some time.  Comments on your questions inserted below in bold. On 18-09-02 12:05 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Twice now the list has failed to post this post, but it took a different one I sent minutes later....   Sending it for the 3rd time Excellent suggestion Darren. (A piece of thick plastic watermain/sewer pipe as a chain locker, mounted vertically.) Some details to work out: - how and where to connect the bitter end of the hawser that keeps all the chain from paying out. I attached a line to then end of my chain long enough for the chain to run out on deck where it could be cut in an emergency.  The line is strong enough to hold chain and anchor pulled to length, but weak enough that it couldn't pull out the reinforced deck in the area of the windlass.  The end of the rope has a shackle on it that is too large to fit through the hole under the windlass. - a grating at the bottom to.keep the chain from laying in the sludge that is washed off. Sent a pic of this to you.  I made a grate and a support for the bottom of the tube using the material from the tub itself.  PVC pipe flattens to sheet stock really nicely if you cut a chunk lengthwise, heat it in an oven to just enough to soften it and then clamp it between some pieces of 3/4" plywood.  With this flat stock I made a raised grate inside the tube, a support for the great, and a piece to seal the bottom of the tube. - a two-hand sized inspection hatch near the top to deal with the unimaginable tangle. I cut a window out of the pipe near deck level.  Glued another section of pipe inside to make a lip inside the cutout opening for the cutout section to rest against, then reinstalled cutout window with some spring loaded over-centre latches.  Before glueing it into place the I made a groove on the inside lip that accepts some round foam gasket that seems to seal well. - a wash spray nossle built in at the top for rinses of the chain with non-stinky water from outside the harbour/rainwater finish. I can spray the chain as it comesin.  I also put a nozzle right on the bow roller, but I haven't had a chance to use it yet.  There is no reason you can't spray water down the hawse-pipe from the windlass as well, just remember to pump it out before the water level reaches the inspection port. - a 2" pipe, connected to the side, below the grate, above the pump out, with a 90 pointed up, pipe up the outside of the locker, a valve, and a little computer fan to blow warm air down the pipe and up through the stack of chain and out the hawse pipe, as a vent, to dry the chain and vent the locker. I used 1" pipe as my pumpout, but I haven't made any allowances for drying. - also serves to warm the chain in cold water sailing to reduce the un-foamed locker's tendency to gather condensation like a toilet tank right after pulling in 100 pounds of cold chain.  Any condensation would form on the chain, more rapidly heating it, dripping down into  the pump out. If one takes steps to keep the chain clean and dry, it will stink a lot less and last a lot longer.   If one has their chain in a sealed plastic pipe why not make the pipe into a washer-dryer, or at least an aerobic composter, like the head. The tube that makes my chain locker is sealed well enough from the rest of the boat that the chain can get pretty smelly without affecting the interiour.  I'm sure keeping it dry would make it last much longer though. Darren | 35285|35251|2018-09-08 10:39:28|Darren Bos|Helical anchors| Matt and I have been talking offline and we thought some of you might be interested in the helical anchors we were discussing.  For the amount of material they use, they offer very high holding power.  For anyone who can build an Origami boat they would be simple and cheap to make.  Here is a commercial example that gives you all the info you would  need to make your own.  There are times when a smaller round-shaft version can make a handy point for a shore line, an handful in bilge might be used to tie into a mangrove when there is a storm coming.  The larger versions would make an inexpensive mooring.  | 35286|35251|2018-09-08 18:13:56|brentswain38|Re: Helical anchors|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :An Alberta farmer, who had built on of my 36 twin keelers, had a drying moorage. After having his boat drag a few times, he took a section of grain auger, welded a loop on top, and simply screwed it into the hard sand and mud. That was years ago, and he never dragged again. Matt and I have been talking offline and we thought some of you might be interested in the helical anchors we were discussing.  For the amount of material they use, they offer very high holding power.  For anyone who can build an Origami boat they would be simple and cheap to make.  Here is a commercial example that gives you all the info you would  need to make your own.  There are times when a smaller round-shaft version can make a handy point for a shore line, an handful in bilge might be used to tie into a mangrove when there is a storm coming.  The larger versions would make an inexpensive mooring.  | 35287|35251|2018-09-09 00:35:51|opuspaul|Re: Helical anchors|They put helical moorings in Savusavu.   They are great and really hold but not foolproof since they are only as good as the attachment/shackles at the top.  If I remember right, one of them failed when a swivel or shackle got twisted and bent at the top.   They will still need to be removed and checked once in awhile and need inspection.   I know of one boat that kept one in their bilge to use as a cyclone mooring/anchor.  The plan was to screw it in by hand while diving using a long T bar but I don't know if they ever used it.  I don't think one size fits all.   You need to match the number of screws and the length or depth to the type of bottom.    Putting one in might be tricky but if I was in a place with few hurricane holes like Tonga for the cyclone season I might put one in while the weather is good so it would be ready when needed.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxNIZ10L_J4You don't normally need special anchors if nestled in the mangroves.   The roots of the larger trees are good enough.  Just tie a bunch of lines in to them to spread the load.    A large fluke anchor like a Danforth or fortress will really dig deep into the mud.  You won't be swinging around so you can really crank them in deep.  In a dense mangrove, you are very sheltered and won't feel much wind at deck level.  The following videos show the process.  In Fiji, the mangroves are great, you can get in really deep, but you need to get in early to get your spot before the bigger cruise boats come in and close it off with their large lines.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4PdWV9T1jIhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8ZXROtzlyA| 35288|35288|2018-09-09 18:35:18|aguysailing|zincs|Local supplier advertises zincs with aluminum tabs or steel tabs.. the latter more $.  Any probs with going with aluminum tabs?   As for the main body of the zinc is the preference now for aluminum or zinc?.... thanks| 35289|35288|2018-09-09 20:09:44|aguysailing|Re: zincs|... saw this on line."Many sailors mistakenly perceive these especially “long-lived” zincs as effective. In reality, they’re anything but; even where anodes are still present, they provide no anodic protection at all. An anode that lasts for an inordinately long time probably isn’t working for any number of reasons, calcareous coating or otherwise. Aluminum anodes, alternatively, offer several advantages. They’re immune to the calcareous coating menace and are therefore well suited for use in seawater, as well as brackish and fresh water. Aluminum anodes also pack more of a punch; they either last longer than zinc anodes of the same weight, or provide the same protection as zinc in a lighter package. Surprisingly, aluminum anodes are often no more costly than zinc ones. Also, because most are cadmium-free, aluminum anodes are less of a hazard to the marine environment. So, regardless of what a diver, boatyard manager or other industry pro tells you, there are several advantages, and no drawbacks, to switching to aluminum anodes".| 35290|35288|2018-09-10 12:01:11|Matt Malone|Re: zincs| Except the issue of maintaining electrical contact with aluminium.  This is nearly solved technology in electrical distribution, and in home wiring in ideal circumstances with appropriate preparation and paste to protect contacts. The marine environment is different, more harsh.  Provided there is good contact, and anode remaining, there will be protection.  Someone mentioned a meter, a measurement device, that measures the adequacy of protection.  http://www.caltechindia.com/Digital-CP-Multimeter.htm I am guessing something like an orp meter should work as well. I would sooner trust an objective measurement than sales literature or word of mouth, the the later will help you test a far smaller set of things, and probably spend less money getting something that checks out. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of aguysailing@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, September 9, 2018 8:09:41 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: zincs     ... saw this on line. "Many sailors mistakenly perceive these especially “long-lived” zincs as effective. In reality, they’re anything but; even where anodes are still present, they provide no anodic protection at all. An anode that lasts for an inordinately long time probably isn’t working for any number of reasons, calcareous coating or otherwise. Aluminum anodes, alternatively, offer several advantages. They’re immune to the calcareous coating menace and are therefore well suited for use in seawater, as well as brackish and fresh water. Aluminum anodes also pack more of a punch; they either last longer than zinc anodes of the same weight, or provide the same protection as zinc in a lighter package. Surprisingly, aluminum anodes are often no more costly than zinc ones. Also, because most are cadmium-free, aluminum anodes are less of a hazard to the marine environment. So, regardless of what a diver, boatyard manager or other industry pro tells you, there are several advantages, and no drawbacks, to switching to aluminum anodes". | 35291|35288|2018-09-10 17:05:27|brentswain38|Re: zincs|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I have used zincs until they fell off the straps, and they  gave good protection until they did. It  is when they don't corrode at all, that you have no connection. That is why I put a bit of stainless weld bead around the bolt holes, and tack one corner of the  strap on, when the opportunity arrives. Nice when  some throw them away, for us too cheap to buy new ones, when they still  have years of life in them. I have been told that, if you go aluminium you have to go all aluminium. I don't necessarily buy that,  as the zinc should  protect  both the aluminium and steel,  and the zinc will simply go a bit faster, protecting the auluminium, and the steel, at the same time, until the zinc is gone.No ham done.If I were buying all new anodes, I would definitely go aluminium.... saw this on line."Many sailors mistakenly perceive these especially “long-lived” zincs as effective. In reality, they’re anything but; even where anodes are still present, they provide no anodic protection at all. An anode that lasts for an inordinately long time probably isn’t working for any number of reasons, calcareous coating or otherwise.Aluminum anodes, alternatively, offer several advantages. They’re immune to the calcareous coating menace and are therefore well suited for use in seawater, as well as brackish and fresh water. Aluminum anodes also pack more of a punch; they either last longer than zinc anodes of the same weight, or provide the same protection as zinc in a lighter package.Surprisingly, aluminum anodes are often no more costly than zinc ones. Also, because most are cadmium-free, aluminum anodes are less of a hazard to the marine environment. So, regardless of what a diver, boatyard manager or other industry pro tells you, there are several advantages, and no drawbacks, to switching to aluminum anodes".| 35292|35288|2018-09-10 17:38:36|opuspaul|Re: zincs|I would use steel.  I mount mine with bolts.   It is probably not necessary but if I can, I place a small tack with the welder on the head nut to ensure a good electrical bond.  If you need to change them later and don't have access to a welder, you can still file or grind off the tack and back the nuts off.We will see if this message makes it through....Yahoo is eating my posts lately.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Local supplier advertises zincs with aluminum tabs or steel tabs.. the latter more $.  Any probs with going with aluminum tabs?   As for the main body of the zinc is the preference now for aluminum or zinc?.... thanks| 35293|35288|2018-09-10 18:28:56|Matt Malone|Re: zincs| I really like 7018 to tack nuts on. It is hard but does not penetrate.  Less trouble to file later. Matt From: opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, September 10, 18:19 Subject: [origamiboats] Re: zincs To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I would use steel.  I mount mine with bolts.   It is probably not necessary but if I can, I place a small tack with the welder on the head nut to ensure a good electrical bond.  If you need to change them later and don't have access to a welder, you can still file or grind off the tack and back the nuts off. We will see if this message makes it through....Yahoo is eating my posts lately. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Local supplier advertises zincs with aluminum tabs or steel tabs.. the latter more $.  Any probs with going with aluminum tabs?   As for the main body of the zinc is the preference now for aluminum or zinc? .... thanks | 35294|35288|2018-09-10 21:42:06|brentswain38|Re: zincs|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Like discussing metal boats on general cruising sites, a huge amount of what is online is totally  made up bullshit,by people who know very little about the  subject, but simply swarm and outnumber those who do. Except the issue of maintaining electrical contact with aluminium.  This is nearly solved technology in electrical distribution, and in home wiring in ideal circumstances with appropriate preparation and paste to protect contacts. The marine environment is different, more harsh.  Provided there is good contact, and anode remaining, there will be protection.  Someone mentioned a meter, a measurement device, that measures the adequacy of protection.  http://www.caltechindia.com/Digital-CP-Multimeter.htm I am guessing something like an orp meter should work as well. I would sooner trust an objective measurement than sales literature or word of mouth, the the later will help you test a far smaller set of things, and probably spend less money getting something that checks out. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of aguysailing@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, September 9, 2018 8:09:41 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: zincs  ... saw this on line."Many sailors mistakenly perceive these especially “long-lived” zincs as effective. In reality, they’re anything but; even where anodes are still present, they provide no anodic protection at all. An anode that lasts for an inordinately long time probably isn’t working for any number of reasons, calcareous coating or otherwise.Aluminum anodes, alternatively, offer several advantages. They’re immune to the calcareous coating menace and are therefore well suited for use in seawater, as well as brackish and fresh water. Aluminum anodes also pack more of a punch; they either last longer than zinc anodes of the same weight, or provide the same protection as zinc in a lighter package.Surprisingly, aluminum anodes are often no more costly than zinc ones. Also, because most are cadmium-free, aluminum anodes are less of a hazard to the marine environment. So, regardless of what a diver, boatyard manager or other industry pro tells you, there are several advantages, and no drawbacks, to switching to aluminum anodes".#ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ads {margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ad {padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ad p {margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ad a {color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003hd {margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003actions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003activity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003activity span {font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003activity span:first-child {text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003activity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003activity span span {color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003activity span .ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003underline {text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 .ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003attach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 .ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003attach div a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 .ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003attach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 .ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003attach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 .ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003attach label a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 .ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003bold {font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 .ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003bold a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 dd.ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003last p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 dd.ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003last p span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 dd.ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003last p span.ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003yshortcuts {margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 div.ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003attach-table div div a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 div.ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003attach-table {width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 div.ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 div.ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 div.ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 div.ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003file-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 div.ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 div.ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 div.ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 div.ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 div#ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003yshortcuts {font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 .ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003green {color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 .ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003MsoNormal {margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 o {font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003photos div {float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003photos div div {border:1px solid #666666;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003photos div label {color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003reco-category {font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003reco-desc {font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 .ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003replbq {margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-actbar div a:first-child {margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 input, #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 textarea {font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003logo {padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-msg p a {font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003attach-count span {color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003reco-head {color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-reco {margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ov li a {font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ov li {font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ov ul {margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-text {font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-text p {margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-text tt {font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-974966406 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003 #ygrps-yiv-974966406ygrps-yiv-1633789003ygrp-vital ul li:last-child {border-right:none!important;}| 35295|35288|2018-09-10 23:07:48|Shawn Green|Re: zincs|I just assume that the steel tabbed ones  are intended for steel boats, and that the aluminum ones are intended for Alu boats. Im not certain it would make any difference in the world. they all started as weld on zincs before someone drilled a hole in them.As an aside, is anyone interested in moving this group somewhere else?, such as facebook or even reddit? this yahoo thing is cumbersome and often just plain doesn't work properly.| 35296|35288|2018-09-11 08:22:30|brentswain38|Re: zincs|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I am about to find out, as I have an aluminium tab one to bolt on my rudder. Cant see it doing any harm, as the aluminium  will protect steel a bit, when the zinc ifs gone. A poor electrical connection could be the only negative,but with our twin keelers dry much of the time, it is easy to keep an eye on it, and make changes if necessary. Makes it up to us to do the experimenting.Local supplier advertises zincs with aluminum tabs or steel tabs.. the latter more $.  Any probs with going with aluminum tabs?   As for the main body of the zinc is the preference now for aluminum or zinc?.... thanks| 35297|35251|2018-09-11 09:18:13|Matt Malone|Re: Helical anchors| #ygrps-yiv-271989388 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} I had not seen that video of how the helical anchor was driven. - two parts driven separately.   - power unit with some sort of jack leg and scuba gear used... possibly just to show people what is happening underwater. - not driven below the surface of the bottom. - rope all the way to the head of the anchor, no chain. Mooring to mangroves with lots of ropes is a proven method.   The process is very tedious but as the video explains, the second best thing to being on land.   After seeing some 30' boats tossed around in parking lots by hurricanes (right across the road from where sand washed into the second story of building by waves and storm surge) I am convinced that not just *any* place on land is more secure than a well-planned mooring.   The best way to spread the load over many points is to use many long stretchy ropes, tightened equally.   Their springiness keeps the load reasonably balanced between tie-offs despite small variations in how they are tied off.  This way all the tie-off points share the load, making an extremely secure mooring.   Worst case (like another boat drifts into your steel boat) either all your lines hold, or possibly, the weakest tie-off point breaks, putting more load on the rest, and possibly another breaks, and you get a zipper effect -- very unlikely but a possible outcome of assuring all tie-offs are equally loaded.  Still this is the strongest mooring because the strength of the tie off points add most effectively. The way the video shows, they are using fewer long ropes and then multiple tie-offs with what look like short stiff ropes.  The springiness of the mangrove roots themselves is now the important load balance between the short ropes to get the strongest moor.   Tying one rope a few millimeters tighter can leave that root carrying a lot more load, and now the strengths of the tie-offs are not adding as effectively.  Worst case, the moor is weaker (lower maximum load), but more robust (if we assume the total number of roots tied-off to is greater) as one would have to break a lot more roots to come completely free. Tedious to get something secure, and much depends on the details of equalizing the rope tightening that was not well documented in the video.   I am looking at his secondary anchor in the video.  In another video, he lifts his secondary anchor effortlessly with one hand.   I see great value in a light, easily-deployed anchor as a key element in some situations (like his video of the Bahamian mooring vs a predictable current), but not in mangrove mooring for a storm.  The Ronca is his primary anchor, and everyone will use their primary, that is a given, likely to start the process.   When it comes time to pull a secondary anchor out, sorry, but the way that helical anchor went into the bottom,  that was "convincing".  One spends all day climbing tediously through mangroves tying ropes and for the other half of the mooring,  a secondary anchor one can lift with one hand is a credible part?  If I understood correctly, he had one Ronca and 2 light secondary anchors at one end, and more than a dozen mangrove roots at the other.   It seems unbalanced, the anchor side seems far inferior in rootedness.  It is the anchor side that keeps one out of the mangroves.   I would be inclined to invest the sweat and hours in screwing in a helical anchor if I am tying off to so many mangroves.  I may have a  light secondary anchor in the bilge, and I would set it, after screwing in the helical which I will definitely have in the bilge. The video shows he was successful.  The video shows, but does not explain why, others were not successful.   The video did not make clear, if the wind had been stronger, would he have been successful?   On the mangrove side, no doubt he had more little ropes and a thousand more roots to tie off to -- there was room for expansion.  On the anchor side, it is not at all clear he had any anchors left undeployed.   A helical anchor in the bilge, and a T wrench and pipe to drive it just seems "worth it".   Particularly since it appears a helical anchor might not be that hard to make. Matt From: opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 01:18 Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Helical anchors To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   They put helical moorings in Savusavu.   They are great and really hold but not foolproof since they are only as good as the attachment/shackles at the top.  If I remember right, one of them failed when a swivel or shackle got twisted and bent at the top.   They will still need to be removed and checked once in awhile and need inspection.   I know of one boat that kept one in their bilge to use as a cyclone mooring/anchor.  The plan was to screw it in by hand while diving using a long T bar but I don't know if they ever used it.  I don't think one size fits all.   You need to match the number of screws and the length or depth to the type of bottom.    Putting one in might be tricky but if I was in a place with few hurricane holes like Tonga for the cyclone season I might put one in while the weather is good so it would be ready when needed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxNIZ10L_J4 You don't normally need special anchors if nestled in the mangroves.   The roots of the larger trees are good enough.  Just tie a bunch of lines in to them to spread the load.    A large fluke anchor like a Danforth or fortress will really dig deep into the mud.  You won't be swinging around so you can really crank them in deep.  In a dense mangrove, you are very sheltered and won't feel much wind at deck level.  The following videos show the process.  In Fiji, the mangroves are great, you can get in really deep, but you need to get in early to get your spot before the bigger cruise boats come in and close it off with their large lines.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4PdWV9T1jI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8ZXROtzlyA | 35298|35288|2018-09-11 10:29:48|Darren Bos|Re: zincs| The aluminum anodes look attractive and I've considered upgrading to them.  In a place like coastal BC where you can often have a bunch of fresh/brackish water floating on the salt, the lack of calcareous fouling seems to be an advantage.  Aluminum anodes are more reactive than zinc anodes, so if you were close to being overprotected with zinc, switching to aluminum might push you over the limit.  A lot of epoxy-coated metal boats successfully use levels of zinc that are at or below traditional recommendations.  In this case, switching to aluminum is unlikely to cause trouble.  In places where there are a lot of boats in marinas, the aluminum anodes also have the benefit of not having the toxic cadmium found in zinc anodes.  Because most boats are found in crowded marinas, I suspect that zinc anodes will eventually go the way of tin-based antifouling.  I think the reason you can't mix zinc and aluminum anodes is that the zinc is more noble than the aluminum anode (aluminum anodes are actually an aluminum indium alloy and are thus more reactive than marine aluminum alloys and zinc anodes).  So, if you have a mix underwater your aluminum anodes would get eaten first (and faster than if  you had only aluminum anodes) and you would have a small current running through the hull.  Depending on the placement of your anodes you could end up with some areas of the hull under protected if you mix anodes. On 18-09-10 02:04 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : I have used zincs until they fell off the straps, and they  gave good protection until they did. It  is when they don't corrode at all, that you have no connection. That is why I put a bit of stainless weld bead around the bolt holes, and tack one corner of the  strap on, when the opportunity arrives. Nice when  some throw them away, for us too cheap to buy new ones, when they still  have years of life in them. I have been told that, if you go aluminium you have to go all aluminium. I don't necessarily buy that,  as the zinc should  protect  both the aluminium and steel,  and the zinc will simply go a bit faster, protecting the auluminium, and the steel, at the same time, until the zinc is gone.No ham done .If I were buying all new anodes, I would definitely go aluminium. ... saw this on line. "Many sailors mistakenly perceive these especially “long-lived” zincs as effective. In reality, they’re anything but; even where anodes are still present, they provide no anodic protection at all. An anode that lasts for an inordinately long time probably isn’t working for any number of reasons, calcareous coating or otherwise. Aluminum anodes, alternatively, offer several advantages. They’re immune to the calcareous coating menace and are therefore well suited for use in seawater, as well as brackish and fresh water. Aluminum anodes also pack more of a punch; they either last longer than zinc anodes of the same weight, or provide the same protection as zinc in a lighter package. Surprisingly, aluminum anodes are often no more costly than zinc ones. Also, because most are cadmium-free, aluminum anodes are less of a hazard to the marine environment. So, regardless of what a diver, boatyard manager or other industry pro tells you, there are several advantages, and no drawbacks, to switching to aluminum anodes". | 35299|35251|2018-09-11 14:27:11|a.sobriquet|Re: Helical anchors|How would you brace yourself to screw in a helical anchor by hand? You can't do if from a dinghy -- the dinghy would just spin around. And I think you couldn't do it as a (free? snorkel? scuba?) diver either, as you wouldn't "weigh" enough to hold you firmly to the sea floor?---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :...A helical anchor in the bilge, and a T wrench and pipe to drive it just seems "worth it".   Particularly since it appears a helical anchor might not be that hard to make. Matt | 35300|35251|2018-09-11 15:45:57|Darren Bos|Re: Helical anchors| A smaller helical anchor could be put in a by a diver.  You'd need scuba or a hookah diving rig to do this.  You'd start it by hand with a shorter lever and then switch to a much longer lever to drive it home.  Matt and I were also talking about how to drive the larger helical anchors.  For that you would need at least three anchors to hold the boat in place.  Then, you also need enough sections of rigid tube to connect to the anchor.  The company I linked to uses hydraulics to drive in the helical anchors.  But, for a single one you could likely get by with a ratcheting T-head, long levers and a couple of guys.  While you're driving-in the helical anchor, the forces on the three anchors holding the boat in place are fairly low, so you don't need big anchors to hold the boat in place.  However, the sections of pipe required to connect to the helical anchor would be a pain to carry along.  So, if your boat is under 30ft then you could probably set up a mooring or storm anchor fairly quickly by diving.  For boats over 40', it might still be worth the trouble if you were setting up mooring and could get the tube/pipe needed to drive the anchor locally. On 18-09-11 11:11 AM, a.sobriquet@... [origamiboats] wrote:   How would you brace yourself to screw in a helical anchor by hand? You can't do if from a dinghy -- the dinghy would just spin around. And I think you couldn't do it as a (free? snorkel? scuba?) diver either, as you wouldn't "weigh" enough to hold you firmly to the sea floor? ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ...A helical anchor in the bilge, and a T wrench and pipe to drive it just seems "worth it".   Particularly since it appears a helical anchor might not be that hard to make. Matt | 35301|35251|2018-09-11 16:04:40|Matt Malone|Re: Helical anchors| Darren and I discussed that.   4 ropes on the boat: - one bow line to a regular anchor straight forward - one bow line to starboard to a regular anchor, - one very long line straight off the stern to a mangrove - very long so eventual location of boat is closer to mangroves, - one line from the aft straight to port to an anchor, another boat already moored, or mangrove. On a 40 foot boat, 30 pounds load on the aft-port and bow-starboard lines gives you 1,200 foot pounds of torque on your anchor driver somewhere amidships.   That is enough to liquorice the steel stem of the anchor and is nothing for load on either the lines or even lunch anchors for a 40 foot boat.  That is 1,200 foot pounds reacted (equal and opposite) using the mechanical advantage of the length of the boat.  How is 1,200 foot pounds applied?  Hydraulics or a very long lever.  I like a home made ratchetting box wrench with the box in the middle.  2 men heaving 100 pounds on either end of a 12 foot wrench is 1,200 foot pounds.   I suspect these anchors are much easier to drive than that.   2 men can hold a post hole auger.   Imagine driving the anchor amid-ships on the starboard side.  A single man might tie a bowline around the steel square section used to drive the anchor run back to the stern (to react 100 pounds) and some smaller breast lines to keep it from falling away from the boat, then walk a 12 foot lever from aft forward to give the torque, like an old ships capstan. Walk back to ratchet.   Or if one already had hydraulics, use the engine and a spare hydraulic motor. Yes it requires thinking ahead, and some pieces of steel made and stowed, but imagine the value.   One has to stow a couple 6 foot sections of drive tube and one or two 6 foot sections of lever bar.  The box ratchet would be a little welding job. Why not stow only one auger anchor? I think a chain one could swim down to tie a loop around a boulder is the only more-compact mooring-level anchor, if one can find a single boulder. Matt From: a.sobriquet@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 14:30 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Helical anchors To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   How would you brace yourself to screw in a helical anchor by hand? You can't do if from a dinghy -- the dinghy would just spin around. And I think you couldn't do it as a (free? snorkel? scuba?) diver either, as you wouldn't "weigh" enough to hold you firmly to the sea floor? ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ...A helical anchor in the bilge, and a T wrench and pipe to drive it just seems "worth it".   Particularly since it appears a helical anchor might not be that hard to make. Matt | 35302|35288|2018-09-11 16:21:03|a.sobriquet|Yahoo, Facebook, Reddit|I'll pass on Facebook. Facebook may be more stable then Yahoo, but I don't like their mining of personal data. Though I suppose Yahoo does the same, though perhaps on a smaller scale.Don't know much about Reddit. Why do you think it's better than Yahoo for this group?---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :...As an aside, is anyone interested in moving this group somewhere else?, such as facebook or even reddit? this yahoo thing is cumbersome and often just plain doesn't work properly.| 35303|35251|2018-09-11 17:45:45|jpronk1|Re: Helical anchors|I was thinking the same thing! How would you do that under water? I have a hard enough time retrieving dishes, pot lids and BBQ parts free diving! I tried once to free our snagged anchor in brackish water once, I couldn’t see my hand in front of my face! Then my wife started yelling at me to get out of the water. Seams the guide book said it was a great spot to see alligators! If you had SCUBA gear could you brace your self against something or use a very heavy weight belt? Could you put out a bow and stern anchor and do it with a long handle? I have not been able to look at or post photos for over two years now? Can’t access the page as a member anymore? Trying to start back at my build! James Pronk Sent from my iPhone| 35304|35251|2018-09-11 18:12:23|opuspaul|Re: Helical anchors|I don't think you could ever do it free diving.   I know people have done it with scuba and a T bar but it is not easy.    You need to be able to brace yourself on the bottom and it is probably easier with two people.    The hydraulic drive they use for installation must vibrate/hammer the helix around since the diver in the video doesn't seem to use much effort to hold it.   http://www.alphamarineinstallations.com/index.html  White coral sand is probably easiest when it comes to visibility.......mud would get stirred up and be by feel.Compared to putting in a helical anchor, putting a long steel cable with a couple of shackles around a large rock or coral head is relatively easy.  ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I was thinking the same thing! How would you do that under water? I have a hard enough time retrieving dishes, pot lids and BBQ parts free diving! I tried once to free our snagged anchor in brackish water once, I couldn’t see my hand in front of my face! Then my wife started yelling at me to get out of the water. Seams the guide book said it was a great spot to see alligators! If you had SCUBA gear could you brace your self against something or use a very heavy weight belt? Could you put out a bow and stern anchor and do it with a long handle? I have not been able to look at or post photos for over two years now? Can’t access the page as a member anymore? Trying to start back at my build! James Pronk Sent from my iPhone| 35305|35251|2018-09-11 20:42:31|Matt Malone|Re: Helical anchors| Well, I answered in detail.  Lets see if the message comes through. Matt From: opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 20:27 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Helical anchors To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I don't think you could ever do it free diving.   I know people have done it with scuba and a T bar but it is not easy.    You need to be able to brace yourself on the bottom and it is probably easier with two people.    The hydraulic drive they use for installation must vibrate/hammer the helix around since the diver in the video doesn't seem to use much effort to hold it.   http://www.alphamarineinstallations.com/index.html  White coral sand is probably easiest when it comes to visibility.......mud would get stirred up and be by feel. Compared to putting in a helical anchor, putting a long steel cable with a couple of shackles around a large rock or coral head is relatively easy.  ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : I was thinking the same thing! How would you do that under water? I have a hard enough time retrieving dishes, pot lids and BBQ parts free diving! I tried once to free our snagged anchor in brackish water once, I couldn’t see my hand in front of my face! Then my wife started yelling at me to get out of the water. Seams the guide book said it was a great spot to see alligators! If you had SCUBA gear could you brace your self against something or use a very heavy weight belt? Could you put out a bow and stern anchor and do it with a long handle? I have not been able to look at or post photos for over two years now? Can’t access the page as a member anymore? Trying to start back at my build! James Pronk Sent from my iPhone | 35306|35251|2018-09-11 20:43:34|Matt Malone|Re: Helical anchors| Trying again... From: Matt Malone Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 16:04 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Helical anchors To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Darren and I discussed that.   4 ropes on the boat: - one bow line to a regular anchor straight forward - one bow line to starboard to a regular anchor, - one very long line straight off the stern to a mangrove - very long so eventual location of boat is closer to mangroves, - one line from the aft straight to port to an anchor, another boat already moored, or mangrove. On a 40 foot boat, 30 pounds load on the aft-port and bow-starboard lines gives you 1,200 foot pounds of torque on your anchor driver somewhere amidships.   That is enough to liquorice the steel stem of the anchor and is nothing for load on either the lines or even lunch anchors for a 40 foot boat.  That is 1,200 foot pounds reacted (equal and opposite) using the mechanical advantage of the length of the boat.  How is 1,200 foot pounds applied?  Hydraulics or a very long lever.  I like a home made ratchetting box wrench with the box in the middle.  2 men heaving 100 pounds on either end of a 12 foot wrench is 1,200 foot pounds.   I suspect these anchors are much easier to drive than that.   2 men can hold a post hole auger.   Imagine driving the anchor amid-ships on the starboard side.  A single man might tie a bowline around the steel square section used to drive the anchor run back to the stern (to react 100 pounds) and some smaller breast lines to keep it from falling away from the boat, then walk a 12 foot lever from aft forward to give the torque, like an old ships capstan. Walk back to ratchet.   Or if one already had hydraulics, use the engine and a spare hydraulic motor. Yes it requires thinking ahead, and some pieces of steel made and stowed, but imagine the value.   One has to stow a couple 6 foot sections of drive tube and one or two 6 foot sections of lever bar.  The box ratchet would be a little welding job. Why not stow only one auger anchor? I think a chain one could swim down to tie a loop around a boulder is the only more-compact mooring-level anchor, if one can find a single boulder. Matt From: a.sobriquet@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 14:30 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Helical anchors To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   How would you brace yourself to screw in a helical anchor by hand? You can't do if from a dinghy -- the dinghy would just spin around. And I think you couldn't do it as a (free? snorkel? scuba?) diver either, as you wouldn't "weigh" enough to hold you firmly to the sea floor? ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ...A helical anchor in the bilge, and a T wrench and pipe to drive it just seems "worth it".   Particularly since it appears a helical anchor might not be that hard to make. Matt | 35307|35288|2018-09-12 15:58:07|aguysailing|Re: zincs|I phoned the Cdn manufacturer of anodes... said exactly that... aluminum straps for alum boats and steel for steel..Apparently zince anodes have been banned in many US states and soon here.| 35308|35288|2018-09-12 16:12:44|Matt Malone|Re: zincs| #ygrps-yiv-1821757214 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} I have read about magnesium anodes as being the least noble, most quickly dissolved, best protecting anodes there are.   Given that magnesium is:  - a significant, naturally-occurring part of seawater and therefore there is no environmental concern at all in seawater, and  - magnesium can be extracted from sea water and should not be too expensive for lumps of it, anywhere, https://www.westmarine.com/buy/martyr--bolt-on-magnesium-medium-hull-anode-2-65-x-5-75-x-0-75--17306325?recordNum=29 This one is bolt on.  It seems that welding a couple of stubby stainless steel bolts head-first onto the hull would be very simple -- just tighten the nuts from time to time to make sure they bite the anode.   I have to ask myself, what is the downside of magnesium "zincs" for a boat ?   Is there any adverse effect to protection that is too good?   It would seem in a tidal area, the Swain twin keelers would be ideal for magnesium because, even if they corrode away quickly, they could be replaced easily.   Matt   From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of aguysailing@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 2:05 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: zincs     I phoned the Cdn manufacturer of anodes... said exactly that... aluminum straps for alum boats and steel for steel.. Apparently zince anodes have been banned in many US states and soon here. | 35309|35288|2018-09-12 17:56:36|opuspaul|Re: zincs|I wouldn't overthink it.  Zinc, Aluminum, Magnesium....I really wouldn't care as long as they are electrically bonded to the hull.| 35310|35288|2018-09-12 19:37:19|Brian Stannard|Re: zincs|Magnesium is an anode for fresh water, not salt or brackish water. Would only last a week or 2 in salt water and may cause adjacent paint to bubble as they are so active. On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 2:25 PM Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I have read about magnesium anodes as being the least noble, most quickly dissolved, best protecting anodes there are.   Given that magnesium is:  - a significant, naturally-occurring part of seawater and therefore there is no environmental concern at all in seawater, and  - magnesium can be extracted from sea water and should not be too expensive for lumps of it, anywhere, https://www.westmarine.com/buy/martyr--bolt-on-magnesium-medium-hull-anode-2-65-x-5-75-x-0-75--17306325?recordNum=29 This one is bolt on.  It seems that welding a couple of stubby stainless steel bolts head-first onto the hull would be very simple -- just tighten the nuts from time to time to make sure they bite the anode.   I have to ask myself, what is the downside of magnesium "zincs" for a boat ?   Is there any adverse effect to protection that is too good?   It would seem in a tidal area, the Swain twin keelers would be ideal for magnesium because, even if they corrode away quickly, they could be replaced easily.   Matt   From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of aguysailing@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 2:05 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: zincs     I phoned the Cdn manufacturer of anodes... said exactly that... aluminum straps for alum boats and steel for steel.. Apparently zince anodes have been banned in many US states and soon here. -- CheersBrian | 35311|35251|2018-09-13 02:42:06|brentswain38|Re: Helical anchors|Us twin keelers in drying anchorages can  simply do it at low tide.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :A smaller helical anchor could be put in a by a diver.  You'd need scuba or a hookah diving rig to do this.  You'd start it by hand with a shorter lever and then switch to a much longer lever to drive it home.  Matt and I were also talking about how to drive the larger helical anchors.  For that you would need at least three anchors to hold the boat in place.  Then, you also need enough sections of rigid tube to connect to the anchor.  The company I linked to uses hydraulics to drive in the helical anchors.  But, for a single one you could likely get by with a ratcheting T-head, long levers and a couple of guys.  While you're driving-in the helical anchor, the forces on the three anchors holding the boat in place are fairly low, so you don't need big anchors to hold the boat in place.  However, the sections of pipe required to connect to the helical anchor would be a pain to carry along.  So, if your boat is under 30ft then you could probably set up a mooring or storm anchor fairly quickly by diving.  For boats over 40', it might still be worth the trouble if you were setting up mooring and could get the tube/pipe needed to drive the anchor locally. On 18-09-11 11:11 AM, a.sobriquet@... [origamiboats] wrote:  How would you brace yourself to screw in a helical anchor by hand? You can't do if from a dinghy -- the dinghy would just spin around. And I think you couldn't do it as a (free? snorkel? scuba?) diver either, as you wouldn't "weigh" enough to hold you firmly to the sea floor? ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :...A helical anchor in the bilge, and a T wrench and pipe to drive it just seems "worth it".   Particularly since it appears a helical anchor might not be that hard to make.Matt #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-mkp { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-mkp hr { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658hd { color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ads { margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ad { padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ad p { margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ad a { color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-lc { font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658hd { margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ad { margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658actions { font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658activity { background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658activity span { font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658activity span:first-child { text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658activity span a { color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658activity span span { color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658activity span .ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658underline { text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 .ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658attach { clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 .ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658attach div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 .ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658attach img { border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 .ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658attach label { display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 .ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658attach label a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 blockquote { margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 .ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658bold { font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 .ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658bold a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 dd.ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658last p a { font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 dd.ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658last p span { margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 dd.ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658last p span.ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658yshortcuts { margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 div.ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658attach-table div div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 div.ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658attach-table { width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 div.ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 div.ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 div.ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 div.ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658file-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 div.ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 div.ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 div.ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 div.ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658photo-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 div#ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658yshortcuts { font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 .ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658green { color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 .ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658MsoNormal { margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 o { font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658photos div { float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658photos div div { border:1px solid #666666;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658photos div label { color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658reco-category { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658reco-desc { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 .ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658replbq { margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-actbar div a:first-child { margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-mlmsg { font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-mlmsg table { font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 input, #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 textarea { font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-mlmsg pre, #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 code { font:115% monospace;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-mlmsg * { line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658logo { padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-msg p a { font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658attach-count span { color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658reco-head { color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-reco { margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ov li a { font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ov li { font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ov ul { margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-text { font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-text p { margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-text tt { font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-1456005070 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658 #ygrps-yiv-1456005070ygrps-yiv-37417658ygrp-vital ul li:last-child { border-right:none !important;} | 35312|35251|2018-09-13 10:09:27|Hannu Venermo|Re: Helical anchors| I like the idea conceptually. As I See It .. It is a hard-pile fixed pilon, for anchoring against. For normal moorage, why bother ? For hurricanes .. It seems an excellent solution technically one can implement with scuba and time and only a few $$ in stuff. But a 40 foot boat in such conditions (hurricane, typhoon) exerts tremendous peak impact loads, jerks, via heavy wind pressure, ongoing water/current/air pressure, and swell. Imho 99% of the envisioned use cases have 10-50x higher loads than envisioned in real life in/at such conditions. A 10 metric ton yacht can easily have 40 tons of peak loads due to waves, surge, and storm effects. On 11/09/2018 20:11, a.sobriquet@... [origamiboats] wrote: ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ...A helical anchor in the bilge, and a T wrench and pipe to drive it just seems "worth it".   Particularly since it appears a helical anchor might not be that hard to make. Matt -- -hanermo (cnc designs) | 35313|35288|2018-09-13 11:06:29|Darren Bos|Re: zincs| As I understand it, magnesium anodes could lead to over-protection of the hull in salt water.  Effectively this means that too much current is created by the anode system.  For a metal boat this can mean loss of your underwater epoxy/paint coatings though hydrogen or alkali production.  If you go to this boatdesign.net forum thread and scroll partway down the page you'll find a link to "Galvanics.doc",  this was one of the better resources I found when trying to decide how many and what type of anodes to put on my hull.  It also seems like a silver-silver/chloride reference cell would be a good investment to check you have the anodes right to start and as an easy way to check that all is well in the future.  It seems to me it might be possible to make your own half cell reference electrode.  The problem with regular electrodes is that they're filled with their own electrolyte and thus have a limited lifespan.  I've wondered if you couldn't just hang a bit of titanium from some stainless fishing leader and have your own reference electrode.  As I haven't launched my boat yet, I haven't got around to trying it.  I think the two disadvantages are that you would need to calculate the voltage potential you want rather than just relying on the tables that are made for silver-silver chloride electrodes.  Also, the "electrolyte" your electrode would be using is seawater and that will change as you move from brackish coastal to saltwater, or from the poles to the equator.  Maybe someone with more chemistry knowledge can set me straight.  The advantage of this DIY electrode would be that it is cheap to make and last forever. Darren On 18-09-12 01:12 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I have read about magnesium anodes as being the least noble, most quickly dissolved, best protecting anodes there are.   Given that magnesium is:  - a significant, naturally-occurring part of seawater and therefore there is no environmental concern at all in seawater, and  - magnesium can be extracted from sea water and should not be too expensive for lumps of it, anywhere, https://www.westmarine.com/buy/martyr--bolt-on-magnesium-medium-hull-anode-2-65-x-5-75-x-0-75--17306325?recordNum=29 This one is bolt on.  It seems that welding a couple of stubby stainless steel bolts head-first onto the hull would be very simple -- just tighten the nuts from time to time to make sure they bite the anode.   I have to ask myself, what is the downside of magnesium "zincs" for a boat ?   Is there any adverse effect to protection that is too good?   It would seem in a tidal area, the Swain twin keelers would be ideal for magnesium because, even if they corrode away quickly, they could be replaced easily.   Matt | 35314|35251|2018-09-13 18:48:53|brentswain38|Re: Helical anchors|At Fanning Island, with a strong trade wind across the lagoon, and me tied to  a sunken  tug, with 3/4 inc polyester braid , the line was snubbing hard. I put one 30 lb kellet on,and it still snubbed . A second 30 lb kellet helped a bit , but a big orange scotsman buoy between the last one and my boat ,stopped the snubbing completely.| 35315|35288|2018-09-13 18:56:14|brentswain38|Re: zincs|Years ago, there was an article in Metal Boat Quarterly, on how to build your own measurement device. It consisted of a one volt,  volt meter hooked up to the hull on one side, and to  a 3/8th inch bronze bolt, running thru, but insulated from the hull, just the head exposed, outside, below the waterline.It was suggested that  a reading of 3/4 of a volt was about right.Sounds simple  enough. It will, at any rate, give you some measurement of how electrically  hot your mooring spot is.| 35316|35251|2018-09-13 19:44:50|Matt Malone|Re: Helical anchors| Shock loading seems like a problem with all moorings.  Brent mentioned kettles and buoys.  I have heard of hydrodynamic objects on the line to create drag and absorb boat energy before it hits the end of the line.  The shock loads are inversely proportional to the stiffness of the line and proportional to the square of boat velocity when it hits the end.  Step one is a heavy nylon rode for its stretchiness. I prefer to mention novel things though I would certainly try tried and proven methods first.   The most novel one is a 16" to 2 foot square of inch-thick plywood.  It is weighted to sink easily in an edge-on orientation.  When pulled upward, the plywood is unstable, turns flat to the force, wasting energy being dragged up from the bottom, stirring water all the way. Located like a kettle, or with a kettle to sink the plywood plate, the geometry as the rope straightens is non-linear.  The differential movement of the plate is infinite as the rope comes straight.   If unlimited energy were available, the plywood will be accelerated so quickly at the end to cavitate the water, a load of over 14 psi.  On a 16 by 16 plate, that is about 2.75 tons.  Imagine a 2.75 ton kettle, or a buoy 5 feet in diameter.  Still, this is like a naturally stiffening snubber, very effective at reducing the final shock speed of the boat. But realistically, if the plate is in 20 feet of water and is hauled to the surface, it is going to slow the boat long before cavitating. I have to believe that moorings are safer than anchors in a hurricane hole without breaking waves, and there are ways to deal with shock loads. I would like to hear any other proven methods. Matt From: Hannu Venermo gcode.fi@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 13:39 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Helical anchors To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I like the idea conceptually. As I See It .. It is a hard-pile fixed pilon, for anchoring against. For normal moorage, why bother ? For hurricanes .. It seems an excellent solution technically one can implement with scuba and time and only a few $$ in stuff. But a 40 foot boat in such conditions (hurricane, typhoon) exerts tremendous peak impact loads, jerks, via heavy wind pressure, ongoing water/current/air pressure, and swell. Imho 99% of the envisioned use cases have 10-50x higher loads than envisioned in real life in/at such conditions. A 10 metric ton yacht can easily have 40 tons of peak loads due to waves, surge, and storm effects. On 11/09/2018 20:11, a.sobriquet@... [origamiboats] wrote: ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ...A helical anchor in the bilge, and a T wrench and pipe to drive it just seems "worth it".   Particularly since it appears a helical anchor might not be that hard to make. Matt -- -hanermo (cnc designs) | 35317|35288|2018-09-13 22:17:25|brentswain38|Re: Yahoo, Facebook, Reddit|If it aint broke don't fix it.Then there is the govt versionIf it aint broke ,fix it until it is broke. Metal boat society sold their site to facebook,and it went off  line for a long time, arbitrarily ,until the efforts and lobbying of many people, got them around to putting it back online , with lots of work from a lot of people. They can shut us down on a whim, any time.  They can also allow it to be swamped by extremely ignorant people, like the Bob Perry troll  gang who scour the internet, to kill any suggestion of  innovation, and swamp any site Perry doesn't like, with made up lies and distortion , to block any passing  on of of more affordable, innovative ways of doing things,as they have done on many sites,attacking any suggestion of steel boats for ocean cruising.Don't change it !---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I'll pass on Facebook. Facebook may be more stable then Yahoo, but I don't like their mining of personal data. Though I suppose Yahoo does the same, though perhaps on a smaller scale.Don't know much about Reddit. Why do you think it's better than Yahoo for this group?---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :...As an aside, is anyone interested in moving this group somewhere else?, such as facebook or even reddit? this yahoo thing is cumbersome and often just plain doesn't work properly.| 35318|35288|2018-09-14 18:28:21|Murat Ergun|Re: Yahoo, Facebook, Reddit|Hello,I'm new here. I would like to know where can I find the plan file (dxf, dwg, igs etc). And I would like to Is this have a fixed geometry and it's scaling for boat length?Thanks for your valuable help.brentswain38@... [origamiboats] , 14 Eyl 2018 Cum, 10:30 tarihinde ÅŸunu yazdı:   If it aint broke don't fix it.Then there is the govt versionIf it aint broke ,fix it until it is broke. Metal boat society sold their site to facebook,and it went off  line for a long time, arbitrarily ,until the efforts and lobbying of many people, got them around to putting it back online , with lots of work from a lot of people. They can shut us down on a whim, any time.  They can also allow it to be swamped by extremely ignorant people, like the Bob Perry troll  gang who scour the internet, to kill any suggestion of  innovation, and swamp any site Perry doesn't like, with made up lies and distortion , to block any passing  on of of more affordable, innovative ways of doing things,as they have done on many sites,attacking any suggestion of steel boats for ocean cruising.Don't change it !---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I'll pass on Facebook. Facebook may be more stable then Yahoo, but I don't like their mining of personal data. Though I suppose Yahoo does the same, though perhaps on a smaller scale..Don't know much about Reddit. Why do you think it's better than Yahoo for this group?---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :...As an aside, is anyone interested in moving this group somewhere else?, such as facebook or even reddit? this yahoo thing is cumbersome and often just plain doesn't work properly. | 35319|35319|2018-09-15 03:37:25|brentswain38|Decreed "Trendy?"|Has anyone noticed that some of the newer plastic boats ( Jeneau, Beneteau, etc) have slab sided topsides with chines, just like the single chine steel  hulls they used to call "Ugly!"Sad, when I think of all the trouble , time and expense a lot of metal boat builders have gone to, to make their topsides round, because that was what was decreed "Beautiful" ,and "Stylish"It shows just hows arbritrary, and shallow  their decrees can be. Much easier, and more logical , to simply build what you need, what works well,  and cruise until a positive decree comes along. Meanwhile, don't give  a shit.(A 'Successful" designer, is one who doesn't have to use the death of his son,  as an excuse to go asking   for handouts).| 35320|35319|2018-09-15 21:51:10|Larry Dale|Re: Decreed "Trendy?"|I have noticed and I have also noticed the big plexiglass windows that they put in those topsides - nothing to leak there! ha.ha. I wonder how many times you could fall off a wave and slam down on that topside before the window would start to leak. From: "brentswain38@... [origamiboats]" To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2018 3:38 AM Subject: [origamiboats] Decreed "Trendy?" Has anyone noticed that some of the newer plastic boats ( Jeneau, Beneteau, etc) have slab sided topsides with chines, just like the single chine steel  hulls they used to call "Ugly!"Sad, when I think of all the trouble , time and expense a lot of metal boat builders have gone to, to make their topsides round, because that was what was decreed "Beautiful" ,and "Stylish"It shows just hows arbritrary, and shallow  their decrees can be. Much easier, and more logical , to simply build what you need, what works well,  and cruise until a positive decree comes along. Meanwhile, don't give  a shit.(A 'Successful" designer, is one who doesn't have to use the death of his son,  as an excuse to go asking   for handouts). | 35321|35319|2018-09-16 17:32:59|brentswain38|Re: Decreed "Trendy?"|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :That is an extremely hard place to  prevent from leaking, long term, given how much time it spends submerged. I guess  one could rout an O ring grove around the edge, for an o ring seal against the frame, but I doubt they would ever accept any  suggestion coming  from me. They would probably believe in infallibility promises from the goop manufacturers.I have noticed and I have also noticed the big plexiglass windows that they put in those topsides - nothing to leak there! ha.ha. I wonder how many times you could fall off a wave and slam down on that topside before the window would start to leak. From: "brentswain38@... [origamiboats]" To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2018 3:38 AM Subject: [origamiboats] Decreed "Trendy?" #ygrps-yiv-792506031 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623 .ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623ygrp-photo-title{ clear:both;font-size:smaller;min-height:15px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;width:75px;} #ygrps-yiv-792506031 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623 div.ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623ygrp-photo{ background-position:center;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-color:white;border:1px solid black;min-height:62px;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-792506031 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623 div.ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-792506031 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623 div.ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-792506031 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623 div.ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-792506031 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623 div.ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623photo-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-792506031 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623 div.ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623attach-table div.ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623attach-row { clear:both;} #ygrps-yiv-792506031 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623 div.ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623attach-table div.ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623attach-row div { float:left;} #ygrps-yiv-792506031 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623 p { clear:both;padding:15px 0 3px 0;overflow:hidden;} #ygrps-yiv-792506031 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623 div.ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623ygrp-file { width:30px;} #ygrps-yiv-792506031 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623 div.ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623attach-table div.ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623attach-row div div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-792506031 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623 div.ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623attach-table div.ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623attach-row div div span { font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-792506031 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623 div.ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623ygrp-file-title { font-weight:bold;} #ygrps-yiv-792506031 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623ygrp-mkp { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-792506031 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623ygrp-mkp hr { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-792506031 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623hd { color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-792506031 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623ads { margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-792506031 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623ad { padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-792506031 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623ad p { margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-792506031 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623 #ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-792506031ygrps-yiv-892757046yiv0380597623ad a { color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;}Has anyone noticed that some of the newer plastic boats ( Jeneau, Beneteau, etc) have slab sided topsides with chines, just like the single chine steel  hulls they used to call "Ugly!"Sad, when I think of all the trouble , time and expense a lot of metal boat builders have gone to, to make their topsides round, because that was what was decreed "Beautiful" ,and "Stylish"It shows just hows arbritrary, and shallow  their decrees can be. Much easier, and more logical , to simply build what you need, what works well,  and cruise until a positive decree comes along. Meanwhile, don't give  a shit.(A 'Successful" designer, is one who doesn't have to use the death of his son,  as an excuse to go asking   for handouts).| 35322|35319|2018-09-16 17:40:45|opuspaul|Re: Decreed "Trendy?"|The new fat cruising boats are modeled after the extremely wide round the world race boats.   The benefit to their customers is that they maximize volume for a given length.    A 40 footer may have the room inside as an older model 50 footer.   They also fit a huge amount of people in the cockpit for those cocktail parties so important to the marina crowd ;).   Forget about using a simple windwane.   You will need a good crew to keep them in the groove or an extremely expensive and power hungry gyro stabilized autopilot if want to sleep at night and keep them moving fast.   With no deep bilge,  I imagine a few gallons of water in the bilge would soon be splashed all over the inside of the boat when heeled.   Most of these newer designs are very thin skinned and use the interior structure bonded to the hull with glue for stiffness.  I liken them to a plastic bag propped open by cardboard.   Hit a reef and pound a few hours and you are screwed.   No thanks.   Given a choice, I would rather have a moderate boat that takes care of me rather than an extreme boat where I need to take care of it.  | 35323|35323|2018-09-17 15:28:58|zoascott74@gmail.com|Hull beside highway to swartz bay.|Hey im new here ,i have my boat hauled out at canoe cove been working on it this summer . I keep seeing the one tucked away on ocean side of highway in sanich .looks pretty rough but wonder if anyone knows the story ... Thanks Zoa| 35324|35319|2018-09-17 20:54:27|brentswain38|Re: Decreed "Trendy?"|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :One such round the world racer had to  quit in South Africa because she kept constantly burning out autopilots.Some have all the wiring and plumbing put in, then  a solid  liner put on top of it all .You have to  cut holes in the liners to  get at at anything.With such  deep keels and narrow keel attachments to the hulls, keels falling off are not uncommon.I once saw a Beneteau hauled out in Nanaimo, with  38 fragile, white plastic thru hulls, just above the waterline,  where UV makes them even more  fragile.A friend, crewing on one of those boats, said they couldn't leave the helm for a second, without it  immediately veering off course.Sad to se designers who used to design good boats,  going like sheeple in that  direction.The new fat cruising boats are modeled after the extremely wide round the world race boats.   The benefit to their customers is that they maximize volume for a given length.    A 40 footer may have the room inside as an older model 50 footer.   They also fit a huge amount of people in the cockpit for those cocktail parties so important to the marina crowd ;).   Forget about using a simple windwane.   You will need a good crew to keep them in the groove or an extremely expensive and power hungry gyro stabilized autopilot if want to sleep at night and keep them moving fast.   With no deep bilge,  I imagine a few gallons of water in the bilge would soon be splashed all over the inside of the boat when heeled.   Most of these newer designs are very thin skinned and use the interior structure bonded to the hull with glue for stiffness.  I liken them to a plastic bag propped open by cardboard.   Hit a reef and pound a few hours and you are screwed.   No thanks.   Given a choice, I would rather have a moderate boat that takes care of me rather than an extreme boat where I need to take care of it. | 35325|35323|2018-09-17 21:27:35|brentswain38|Re: Hull beside highway to swartz bay.|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Sounds like the  boat  Miles built, named "Avro." a single keel 36  built on Quadra Island , back in the 80's.He went on to be a steel fabricator, working on pulp mills. Building that  boat, before I had written the book ,or the video was out,  from pictures, plans and taped instructions, was his first steel  working experience.Hey im new here ,i have my boat hauled out at canoe cove been working on it this summer . I keep seeing the one tucked away on ocean side of highway in sanich .looks pretty rough but wonder if anyone knows the story ... Thanks Zoa| 35326|35326|2018-09-18 00:15:13|akenai|Skeg plate stiffener|Bret what is recommended for the plate thickness and run lengthof the stiffener plate that is attached from forward of the skeg to the hull?Aaron| 35327|35319|2018-09-18 01:20:46|brentswain38|Re: Decreed "Trendy?"|ZERO chance of encountering  a kelp bed or net in the nigh,t with the keels and rudders they put on those contraptions, without fouling in a huge pile of stuff ,very hard to  get free of.| 35328|35319|2018-09-18 17:50:28|opuspaul|Re: Decreed "Trendy?"|The base autopilots for these light wide race boats are very expensive.  Add in a few spares, and you are talking real money.   NKE seems to be the popular one.  There was one on a Class 40 racer in the 2014 Solo Tasman race that had one.   If I remember right, he said at the time all up with instruments he had spent well over 20K.The failure rate of marine autopilots are very high.   In a past life, I have worked on aircraft autopilots for a living and worked on many marine autopilots and there is no comparison in build quality.  Most of the ones built for recreation boating are absolute pieces of shit.  Having seen many failures over the years, I wouldn't touch a new Raymarine wheel pilot with a ten foot pole.   The plastic gears, plastic parts, tiny motors and belts and crappy connectors are a joke.   The engineers should have to hand steer a boat for a week in a rough sea before they ever design something.   The setup procedure on the new Raymarine stuff is a real pain in the ass.  Trying to reset one at sea if something goes wrong can be next to impossible.   Stick to commercial stuff.   It may use more power with a bigger motor drive system and heavier parts but at least it will work.  My friend had a basic TMQ wheelpilot which was OK.   It was a commercial unit designed for hydraulic steering and quite reliable once he finally got a ram that was up to the task.  Brent has the right idea.   Contrast the above with a home made windvane and cheap electronic tiller pilot running off the vane trim tab on transom hung rudder.   My windvane cost less than $200 to build.   In 25+ years, it has never let me down.   I bought a new tillerpilot for less than $500.  Pushing the small tab, it uses very little current and won't burn out.   A cheap tillerpilot on the tab will last many years as long as you keep the water out of it and don't bang it around.  My original tillerpilot worked over 20 yrs before the flux compass gave out.   I bought another one and now carry a (used) spare.  Don't assume any tillerpilot is waterproof.  None are despite what they say.   Quite often they will eventually leak through the buttons and as the ram goes in or out it will suck in moist air through the vent hole on the bottom.   So I run mine with goop or sealant around the case seams and run it in a clear plastic bag if it is going to be out in the rain or spray.   Hand steering for 2 or 3 days under power when you are short handed is no fun.  Paul---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :One such round the world racer had to  quit in South Africa because she kept constantly burning out autopilots.Some have all the wiring and plumbing put in, then  a solid  liner put on top of it all .You have to  cut holes in the liners to  get at at anything.With such  deep keels and narrow keel attachments to the hulls, keels falling off are not uncommon.I once saw a Beneteau hauled out in Nanaimo, with  38 fragile, white plastic thru hulls, just above the waterline,  where UV makes them even more  fragile.A friend, crewing on one of those boats, said they couldn't leave the helm for a second, without it  immediately veering off course.Sad to se designers who used to design good boats,  going like sheeple in that  direction.| 35329|35326|2018-09-18 22:19:22|jpronk1|Re: Skeg plate stiffener|Is this a plate welded to the leading edge of the skeg on the exterior of the hull and welded into the centre line? James Sent from my iPhone| 35330|35326|2018-09-19 02:35:14|Aaron|Re: Skeg plate stiffener|Yes that is the location I am working on nextAaronSent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 9:03 PM, jpronk1@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Is this a plate welded to the leading edge of the skeg on the exterior of the hull and welded into the centre line? James Sent from my iPhone #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 -- #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-mkp { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-mkp hr { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964hd { color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ads { margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ad { padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ad p { margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ad a { color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-lc { font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964hd { margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ad { margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964actions { font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964activity { background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964activity span { font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964activity span:first-child { text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964activity span a { color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964activity span span { color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964activity span .ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964underline { text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 .ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964attach { clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 .ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964attach div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 .ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964attach img { border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 .ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964attach label { display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 .ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964attach label a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 blockquote { margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 .ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964bold { font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 .ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964bold a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 dd.ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964last p a { font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 dd.ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964last p span { margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 dd.ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964last p span.ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964yshortcuts { margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 div.ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964attach-table div div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 div.ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964attach-table { width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 div.ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 div.ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 div.ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 div.ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964file-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 div.ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 div.ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 div.ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 div.ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964photo-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 div#ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964yshortcuts { font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 .ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964green { color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 .ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964MsoNormal { margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 o { font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964photos div { float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964photos div div { border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964photos div label { color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964reco-category { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964reco-desc { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 .ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964replbq { margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-actbar div a:first-child { margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-mlmsg { font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-mlmsg table { font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 input, #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 textarea { font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-mlmsg pre, #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 code { font:115% monospace;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-mlmsg * { line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964logo { padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-msg p a { font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964attach-count span { color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964reco-head { color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-reco { margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ov li a { font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ov li { font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ov ul { margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-text { font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-text p { margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-text tt { font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964 #ygrps-yiv-50889613yiv5771545964ygrp-vital ul li:last-child { border-right:none !important;} #ygrps-yiv-50889613 | 35331|35331|2018-09-19 12:26:55|opuspaul|Yahoo is getting worse....|....and more frustrating.    I am using yahoo with Thunderbird to collect and download the messages.   I have messages that vanish completely after composing them and other messages that vanish and then suddenly appear after time periods of anwhere from 2 hours to 3 days.  Other messages come in immediately with no problem and other messages  are sent to me repeatedly....up to 4 times.My other yahoo groups seem to be having similar problems.  I really think yahoo groups will be gone in the next year or two.  Maybe sooner.   This sucks.   One of my groups, Proafile moved to Reddit.  You can see what it looks like here:https://www.reddit.com/r/proasailingI know others have suggested doing something before everything gets locked out or lost.   Something to think about.....| 35332|35331|2018-09-19 20:49:40|Matt Malone|Re: Yahoo is getting worse....| Yahoo unilaterally pulled Geocities, and I lost all my web content.  It would be a pity if all of origami boats we lost.  Is there a backup of the content anywhere? Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 6:11:00 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Yahoo is getting worse....     ....and more frustrating.    I am using yahoo with Thunderbird to collect and download the messages.   I have messages that vanish completely after composing them and other messages that vanish and then suddenly appear after time periods of anwhere from 2 hours to 3 days.  Other messages come in immediately with no problem and other messages  are sent to me repeatedly....up to 4 times. My other yahoo groups seem to be having similar problems.  I really think yahoo groups will be gone in the next year or two.  Maybe sooner.   This sucks.   One of my groups, Proafile moved to Reddit.  You can see what it looks like here: https://www.reddit.com/r/proasailing I know others have suggested doing something before everything gets locked out or lost.   Something to think about..... | 35333|35331|2018-09-20 09:24:57|Shawn Green|Re: Yahoo is getting worse....|I'm not a fan of yahoo at all.Like I said last week, I would be happy to move, however there was some opposition . Not that I really understood the arguments against it,but heh.Yahoo will be defunct within a few years at most. most likely without much warning. Facebook groups are the easiest way to handle something like this, and the format and ease of use is infinitely better. However i understand that not everyone wants to be a user of Facebook.| 35334|35331|2018-09-20 11:12:24|Darren Bos|Re: Yahoo is getting worse....| I have no idea what the best option is, but it does seem like Origamiboats may need to move if it is to survive.  For me, if the group moves I'd follow if it were a place that still provided e-mails of the messages.  It would be great if the location had a good way to search messages.  Right now, I usually use the search in my email program (I have group messages back to 2005 stored) as it does better than Yahoo's search function.  I'm not a fan of facebook and probably wouldn't migrate if the group moved there.  On 18-09-18 03:11 PM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:   ....and more frustrating.    I am using yahoo with Thunderbird to collect and download the messages.   I have messages that vanish completely after composing them and other messages that vanish and then suddenly appear after time periods of anwhere from 2 hours to 3 days.  Other messages come in immediately with no problem and other messages  are sent to me repeatedly....up to 4 times. My other yahoo groups seem to be having similar problems.  I really think yahoo groups will be gone in the next year or two.  Maybe sooner.   This sucks.   One of my groups, Proafile moved to Reddit.  You can see what it looks like here: https://www.reddit.com/r/proasailing I know others have suggested doing something before everything gets locked out or lost.   Something to think about..... | 35335|35323|2018-09-20 14:23:22|Zoa Scott|Re: Hull beside highway to swartz bay.|Wow good for him.Shame seeing it just sit there . On Mon, Sep 17, 2018, 11:05 PM brentswain38@... [origamiboats], wrote:   ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Sounds like the  boat  Miles built, named "Avro." a single keel 36  built on Quadra Island , back in the 80's.He went on to be a steel fabricator, working on pulp mills. Building that  boat, before I had written the book ,or the video was out,  from pictures, plans and taped instructions, was his first steel  working experience.Hey im new here ,i have my boat hauled out at canoe cove been working on it this summer . I keep seeing the one tucked away on ocean side of highway in sanich .looks pretty rough but wonder if anyone knows the story ... Thanks Zoa | 35336|35326|2018-09-20 14:26:11|brentswain38|Re: Skeg plate stiffener|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I use 1/2 inch plate. and run it into the back of a single keel, or about 3 feet ahead of the skeg, on a single keeler.Bret what is recommended for the plate thickness and run length of the stiffener plate that is attached from forward of the skeg to the hull?Aaron| 35337|35331|2018-09-20 14:37:36|brentswain38|Re: Yahoo is getting worse....|Maybe some one could put it on memory sticks for safeguarding. I have it archived from 2010 back,  on an old computer ,if that  computer still works. A friend Emails me on something called Protonmail. It is strictly Swiss subject to Swiss privacy laws, encripted on both ends, so not even the server can read your mail. Thinking of going that  route for my email address, Trump has zero control over it.| 35338|35326|2018-09-20 14:47:05|Aaron|Re: Skeg plate stiffener|Thanks Brent I am building the twin keel version would the 3 feet forward still be enough? Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:26 AM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I use 1/2 inch plate. and run it into the back of a single keel, or about 3 feet ahead of the skeg, on a single keeler.Bret what is recommended for the plate thickness and run length of the stiffener plate that is attached from forward of the skeg to the hull?Aaron #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 -- #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-mkp { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-mkp hr { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293hd { color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ads { margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ad { padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ad p { margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ad a { color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-lc { font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293hd { margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ad { margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293actions { font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293activity { background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293activity span { font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293activity span:first-child { text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293activity span a { color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293activity span span { color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293activity span .ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293underline { text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 .ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293attach { clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 .ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293attach div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 .ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293attach img { border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 .ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293attach label { display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 .ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293attach label a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 blockquote { margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 .ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293bold { font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 .ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293bold a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 dd.ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293last p a { font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 dd.ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293last p span { margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 dd.ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293last p span.ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293yshortcuts { margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 div.ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293attach-table div div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 div.ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293attach-table { width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 div.ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 div.ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 div.ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 div.ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293file-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 div.ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 div.ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 div.ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 div.ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293photo-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 div#ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293yshortcuts { font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 .ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293green { color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 .ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293MsoNormal { margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 o { font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293photos div { float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293photos div div { border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293photos div label { color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293reco-category { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293reco-desc { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 .ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293replbq { margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-actbar div a:first-child { margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-mlmsg { font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-mlmsg table { font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 input, #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 textarea { font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-mlmsg pre, #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 code { font:115% monospace;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-mlmsg * { line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293logo { padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-msg p a { font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293attach-count span { color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293reco-head { color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-reco { margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ov li a { font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ov li { font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ov ul { margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-text { font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-text p { margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-text tt { font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-455513357yiv8291121293ygrp-vital ul li:last-child { border-right:none !important;} #ygrps-yiv-455513357 | 35339|35331|2018-09-20 16:51:23|opuspaul|Re: Yahoo is getting worse....|There is absolutely no way I would move to Facebook.   Whatever we use, I would prefer to be able to download messages or have have the option to have them emailed to me so that I could read them offline.    Not everybody is on high speed internet all the time.| 35340|35331|2018-09-20 18:14:36|Matt Malone|Re: Yahoo is getting worse....| So, what are the options for - hosting a "group" - that mirrors as a mailing list and - integrates image storage with the group archive, - does the appropriate access control that prevents outright vandalism, but allows posting by non-fans that borders on trolling - and is not linked to a corporation like facebook, google etc. - not dependent on a single person and ongoing labor, - has no cost. ? We were really spoiled by Yahoo. It seems the facebook and google business models are economically more successful than others, suggesting greater longevity.  Despite what some people do not like about them, a lot of people are willing to give up many things taken for granted as good things 30 years ago, for a money-less, convenience. Matt From: opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 16:52 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Yahoo is getting worse.... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   There is absolutely no way I would move to Facebook.   Whatever we use, I would prefer to be able to download messages or have have the option to have them emailed to me so that I could read them offline.    Not everybody is on high speed internet all the time. | 35341|35319|2018-09-21 18:04:11|Zoa Scott|Re: Decreed "Trendy?"|Little bit off topic but i have seen hunters,catalinas,hanse,beneteaus and jeanneaus all having to have keels removed this summer from what appears to be fairly minor impact.Its actually kinda mindboggling what overpriced junk they are .Just my opinion . On Wed, Sep 19, 2018, 12:54 PM opusnz@... [origamiboats], wrote:   The base autopilots for these light wide race boats are very expensive.  Add in a few spares, and you are talking real money.   NKE seems to be the popular one.  There was one on a Class 40 racer in the 2014 Solo Tasman race that had one.   If I remember right, he said at the time all up with instruments he had spent well over 20K.The failure rate of marine autopilots are very high.   In a past life, I have worked on aircraft autopilots for a living and worked on many marine autopilots and there is no comparison in build quality.  Most of the ones built for recreation boating are absolute pieces of shit.  Having seen many failures over the years, I wouldn't touch a new Raymarine wheel pilot with a ten foot pole.   The plastic gears, plastic parts, tiny motors and belts and crappy connectors are a joke.   The engineers should have to hand steer a boat for a week in a rough sea before they ever design something.   The setup procedure on the new Raymarine stuff is a real pain in the ass.  Trying to reset one at sea if something goes wrong can be next to impossible.   Stick to commercial stuff.   It may use more power with a bigger motor drive system and heavier parts but at least it will work.  My friend had a basic TMQ wheelpilot which was OK.   It was a commercial unit designed for hydraulic steering and quite reliable once he finally got a ram that was up to the task.  Brent has the right idea.   Contrast the above with a home made windvane and cheap electronic tiller pilot running off the vane trim tab on transom hung rudder.   My windvane cost less than $200 to build.   In 25+ years, it has never let me down.   I bought a new tillerpilot for less than $500.  Pushing the small tab, it uses very little current and won't burn out.   A cheap tillerpilot on the tab will last many years as long as you keep the water out of it and don't bang it around.  My original tillerpilot worked over 20 yrs before the flux compass gave out.   I bought another one and now carry a (used) spare.  Don't assume any tillerpilot is waterproof.  None are despite what they say.   Quite often they will eventually leak through the buttons and as the ram goes in or out it will suck in moist air through the vent hole on the bottom.   So I run mine with goop or sealant around the case seams and run it in a clear plastic bag if it is going to be out in the rain or spray.   Hand steering for 2 or 3 days under power when you are short handed is no fun.  Paul---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :One such round the world racer had to  quit in South Africa because she kept constantly burning out autopilots.Some have all the wiring and plumbing put in, then  a solid  liner put on top of it all .You have to  cut holes in the liners to  get at at anything.With such  deep keels and narrow keel attachments to the hulls, keels falling off are not uncommon.I once saw a Beneteau hauled out in Nanaimo, with  38 fragile, white plastic thru hulls, just above the waterline,  where UV makes them even more  fragile.A friend, crewing on one of those boats, said they couldn't leave the helm for a second, without it  immediately veering off course.Sad to se designers who used to design good boats,  going like sheeple in that  direction. | 35342|35326|2018-09-21 18:15:40|brentswain38|Re: Skeg plate stiffener|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Yes altho bit more wouldn't hurt anything.Thanks Brent I am building the twin keel version would the 3 feet forward still be enough? Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:26 AM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:  ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I use 1/2 inch plate. and run it into the back of a single keel, or about 3 feet ahead of the skeg, on a single keeler.Bret what is recommended for the plate thickness and run length of the stiffener plate that is attached from forward of the skeg to the hull?Aaron#ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 -- #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-mkp { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-mkp hr { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293hd { color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ads { margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ad { padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ad p { margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ad a { color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-lc { font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293hd { margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ad { margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293actions { font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293activity { background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293activity span { font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293activity span:first-child { text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293activity span a { color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293activity span span { color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293activity span .ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293underline { text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 .ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293attach { clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 .ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293attach div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 .ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293attach img { border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 .ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293attach label { display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 .ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293attach label a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 blockquote { margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 .ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293bold { font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 .ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293bold a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 dd.ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293last p a { font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 dd.ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293last p span { margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 dd.ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293last p span.ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293yshortcuts { margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 div.ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293attach-table div div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 div.ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293attach-table { width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 div.ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 div.ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 div.ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 div.ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293file-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 div.ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 div.ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 div.ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 div.ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293photo-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 div#ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293yshortcuts { font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 .ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293green { color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 .ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293MsoNormal { margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 o { font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293photos div { float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293photos div div { border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293photos div label { color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293reco-category { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293reco-desc { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 .ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293replbq { margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-actbar div a:first-child { margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-mlmsg { font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-mlmsg table { font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 input, #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 textarea { font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-mlmsg pre, #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 code { font:115% monospace;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-mlmsg * { line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293logo { padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-msg p a { font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293attach-count span { color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293reco-head { color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-reco { margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ov li a { font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ov li { font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ov ul { margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-text { font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-text p { margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-text tt { font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-644729034 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293 #ygrps-yiv-644729034ygrps-yiv-1940076629yiv8291121293ygrp-vital ul li:last-child { border-right:none !important;} | 35343|35319|2018-09-21 18:18:30|brentswain38|Re: Decreed "Trendy?"|Scantling rules  specify an inch of keel bolt cross section for every 1500 lbs of keel weight. That works fine; for shallow, wide keel attachments to the hull. As keels got deeper, and the  attachment point to  the hull got narrower , the loads on the keel bolts increased exponentially. The original rules didn't make any allowance for this .It has reached the point where, in some boats, it puts  a bending,load on the keel bolts, making metal fatigue of those bolts inevitable.The best way to do those keels is the Thunderbird, Haida 26 style, a flange on top, to spread the loads out wider. This has the added advantage of allowing one to remove any bolt, any time ,easily, and check and replace it, if necessary. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Little bit off topic but i have seen hunters,catalinas,hanse,beneteaus and jeanneaus all having to have keels removed this summer from what appears to be fairly minor impact.Its actually kinda mindboggling what overpriced junk they are .Just my opinion . On Wed, Sep 19, 2018, 12:54 PM opusnz@... [origamiboats], wrote:  The base autopilots for these light wide race boats are very expensive.  Add in a few spares, and you are talking real money.   NKE seems to be the popular one.  There was one on a Class 40 racer in the 2014 Solo Tasman race that had one.   If I remember right, he said at the time all up with instruments he had spent well over 20K.The failure rate of marine autopilots are very high.   In a past life, I have worked on aircraft autopilots for a living and worked on many marine autopilots and there is no comparison in build quality.  Most of the ones built for recreation boating are absolute pieces of shit.  Having seen many failures over the years, I wouldn't touch a new Raymarine wheel pilot with a ten foot pole.   The plastic gears, plastic parts, tiny motors and belts and crappy connectors are a joke.   The engineers should have to hand steer a boat for a week in a rough sea before they ever design something.   The setup procedure on the new Raymarine stuff is a real pain in the ass.  Trying to reset one at sea if something goes wrong can be next to impossible.   Stick to commercial stuff.   It may use more power with a bigger motor drive system and heavier parts but at least it will work.  My friend had a basic TMQ wheelpilot which was OK.   It was a commercial unit designed for hydraulic steering and quite reliable once he finally got a ram that was up to the task.  Brent has the right idea.   Contrast the above with a home made windvane and cheap electronic tiller pilot running off the vane trim tab on transom hung rudder.   My windvane cost less than $200 to build.   In 25+ years, it has never let me down.   I bought a new tillerpilot for less than $500.  Pushing the small tab, it uses very little current and won't burn out.   A cheap tillerpilot on the tab will last many years as long as you keep the water out of it and don't bang it around.  My original tillerpilot worked over 20 yrs before the flux compass gave out.   I bought another one and now carry a (used) spare.  Don't assume any tillerpilot is waterproof.  None are despite what they say.   Quite often they will eventually leak through the buttons and as the ram goes in or out it will suck in moist air through the vent hole on the bottom.   So I run mine with goop or sealant around the case seams and run it in a clear plastic bag if it is going to be out in the rain or spray.   Hand steering for 2 or 3 days under power when you are short handed is no fun.  Paul---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :One such round the world racer had to  quit in South Africa because she kept constantly burning out autopilots.Some have all the wiring and plumbing put in, then  a solid  liner put on top of it all .You have to  cut holes in the liners to  get at at anything.With such  deep keels and narrow keel attachments to the hulls, keels falling off are not uncommon.I once saw a Beneteau hauled out in Nanaimo, with  38 fragile, white plastic thru hulls, just above the waterline,  where UV makes them even more  fragile.A friend, crewing on one of those boats, said they couldn't leave the helm for a second, without it  immediately veering off course.Sad to se designers who used to design good boats,  going like sheeple in that  direction. | 35344|35319|2018-09-21 18:34:08|Matt Malone|Re: Decreed \Trendy?\| Don't forget the increased speed of modern designs with high aspect keels.   Higher speed of impact also puts greater loads on bolts. Matt From: brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, September 21, 18:18 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Decreed "Trendy?" To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Scantling rules  specify an inch of keel bolt cross section for every 1500 lbs of keel weight. That works fine; for shallow, wide keel attachments to the hull. As keels got deeper, and the  attachment point to  the hull got narrower , the loads on the keel bolts increased exponentially. The original rules didn't make any allowance for this .It has reached the point where, in some boats, it puts  a bending,load on the keel bolts, making metal fatigue of those bolts inevitable. The best way to do those keels is the Thunderbird, Haida 26 style, a flange on top, to spread the loads out wider. This has the added advantage of allowing one to remove any bolt, any time ,easily, and check and replace it, if necessary. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Little bit off topic but i have seen hunters,catalinas,hanse,beneteaus and jeanneaus all having to have keels removed this summer from what appears to be fairly minor impact. Its actually kinda mindboggling what overpriced junk they are . Just my opinion . On Wed, Sep 19, 2018, 12:54 PM opusnz@... [origamiboats], wrote:   The base autopilots for these light wide race boats are very expensive.  Add in a few spares, and you are talking real money.   NKE seems to be the popular one.  There was one on a Class 40 racer in the 2014 Solo Tasman race that had one.   If I remember right, he said at the time all up with instruments he had spent well over 20K. The failure rate of marine autopilots are very high.   In a past life, I have worked on aircraft autopilots for a living and worked on many marine autopilots and there is no comparison in build quality.  Most of the ones built for recreation boating are absolute pieces of shit.  Having seen many failures over the years, I wouldn't touch a new Raymarine wheel pilot with a ten foot pole.   The plastic gears, plastic parts, tiny motors and belts and crappy connectors are a joke.   The engineers should have to hand steer a boat for a week in a rough sea before they ever design something.   The setup procedure on the new Raymarine stuff is a real pain in the ass.  Trying to reset one at sea if something goes wrong can be next to impossible.   Stick to commercial stuff.   It may use more power with a bigger motor drive system and heavier parts but at least it will work.  My friend had a basic TMQ wheelpilot which was OK.   It was a commercial unit designed for hydraulic steering and quite reliable once he finally got a ram that was up to the task.  Brent has the right idea.   Contrast the above with a home made windvane and cheap electronic tiller pilot running off the vane trim tab on transom hung rudder.   My windvane cost less than $200 to build.   In 25+ years, it has never let me down.   I bought a new tillerpilot for less than $500.  Pushing the small tab, it uses very little current and won't burn out.   A cheap tillerpilot on the tab will last many years as long as you keep the water out of it and don't bang it around.  My original tillerpilot worked over 20 yrs before the flux compass gave out.   I bought another one and now carry a (used) spare.  Don't assume any tillerpilot is waterproof.  None are despite what they say.   Quite often they will eventually leak through the buttons and as the ram goes in or out it will suck in moist air through the vent hole on the bottom.   So I run mine with goop or sealant around the case seams and run it in a clear plastic bag if it is going to be out in the rain or spray.   Hand steering for 2 or 3 days under power when you are short handed is no fun.  Paul ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : One such round the world racer had to  quit in South Africa because she kept constantly burning out autopilots. Some have all the wiring and plumbing put in, then  a solid  liner put on top of it all .You have to  cut holes in the liners to  get at at anything. With such  deep keels and narrow keel attachments to the hulls, keels falling off are not uncommon. I once saw a Beneteau hauled out in Nanaimo, with  38 fragile, white plastic thru hulls, just above the waterline,  where UV makes them even more  fragile. A friend, crewing on one of those boats, said they couldn't leave the helm for a second, without it  immediately veering off course. Sad to se designers who used to design good boats,  going like sheeple in that  direction. | 35345|35319|2018-09-21 20:10:50|opuspaul|Re: Decreed \Trendy?\|Worse than the keel attachment is how the hulls are built.   They rely on the interior structure bonded to the hull with high strength glue for stiffness.  Once these boats hit a rock or reef or rack a bit from twisting, the interior breaks away from the hull and it is almost impossible to fix.   There is little to no access and it is almost impossible to tell if the glue has come unstuck. I know a guy who bought a Hunter 41 for next to nothing in Fiji after it had pounded on the reef.  He spent months fixing it up but on the first offshore trip to windward the hull around the keel started cracking as the keel wobbled back and forth.  He was taking on water and couldn't make Vavau and couldn't make it back to Fiji so he was forced to sail the boat to Tin Can Island (NiuafoÊ»ou).   There were no facilities or anchorage so he was forced to abandon the boat to the villagers as the boat sunk.  He lost everything.Rudders also are a joke on some production hulls.   It is hard to believe but some of them actually use aluminum rudder posts or thin composite shafts on their spade rudders.    Just google your brand (Hanse, Hunter, etc) along with Rudder and you will read about all the failures.  There are so many problems that there are companies who specialize in replacements.   https://www.newrudders.com/standard-rudders/    Bottom line is that you really need to do a lot of research if you are buying a production hull.  Just because a boat has crossed an ocean doesn't mean it is any good for long term cruising.   The real test is when you hit something, drag anchor one night and end up on the rocks or get smashed by a large breaking wave offshore.  It happens.   I prefer older and more robust designs that have thick hulls that you can access and see.  Paul| 35346|35319|2018-09-21 20:26:43|opuspaul|Re: Decreed \Trendy?\|Look at how they make a rudder on a Hanse.   What a joke.   They say this is reliable and won't corrode but reality is different than theory.   I know of a brand new Hanse that was being delivered to Nelson from Auckland.   The delivery crew came into New Plymouth with the rudder bearings leaking so badly from the rudder flexing and working that they were scared to continue another 24 hrs without talking and getting approval from the dealer and the insurance company.  Imagine what the aluminum alloy rudder stock will be like after 10 years in the water with copper bottom paint.   These engineers need to go back to school or spend some time offshore.  Foam with a thin glass skin and a few internal struts to hold it all together is just not good enough. Paulhttp://www.windcrafthanse.com/hanse-steering/http://www.myhanse.com/rudder-problems-on-atlantic-crossing-dove-ii_topic10072.html| 35347|35319|2018-09-22 20:22:42|brentswain38|Re: Decreed \Trendy?\|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :In a recent article in Sail magazine, Tom Cunliffe state that skegless, fig leaf rudders have the highest failure rate of any rudder ever invented. Yet Bob Perry said, if he were designing the Valiant 40 today, it would have a fig leaf rudder on a composite shaft, and a deep, high aspect, kelp and  net grabber  keel. Those are  the kind of decisions you get from someone with no offshore cruising experience, who's self promotion is made up entirely of following whatever is deemed  "Trendy," and "The latest style."Another area I have seen ignored, with disasterous results, is the area around such a shaft must also be at least as strong as any rudder shaft passing  thru it.Look at how they make a rudder on a Hanse.   What a joke.   They say this is reliable and won't corrode but reality is different than theory.   I know of a brand new Hanse that was being delivered to Nelson from Auckland.   The delivery crew came into New Plymouth with the rudder bearings leaking so badly from the rudder flexing and working that they were scared to continue another 24 hrs without talking and getting approval from the dealer and the insurance company.  Imagine what the aluminum alloy rudder stock will be like after 10 years in the water with copper bottom paint.   These engineers need to go back to school or spend some time offshore.  Foam with a thin glass skin and a few internal struts to hold it all together is just not good enough. Paulhttp://www.windcrafthanse.com/hanse-steering/http://www.myhanse.com/rudder-problems-on-atlantic-crossing-dove-ii_topic10072.html| 35348|35319|2018-09-22 20:31:27|brentswain38|Re: Decreed \Trendy?\|Tank tests have shown that  raking the rudder post aft any amount, drastically reduces rudder efficiency, by  dragging air  down it, inducing a stall. Friends who have had that kind of rudder, have confirmed it, in real life situations.Read what Donald Street has to say about it.He asked many designers why they would design a rudder that  way , and the only answer he could get,  was  "It looks fast, and sells boats".Bob Perry has  said  it is not a good idea or design a boat to withstand collisions, because boats are not supposed to hit things! He ridicules structural strength in a boat.| 35349|35319|2018-09-29 17:57:34|Zoa Scott|Re: Decreed \Trendy?\|There is a Hanse out of the water at boatyard with keel removed from slight impact It actually delamed/seperated hull as well .I could post some interesting pics but not sure how  On Sat, Sep 22, 2018, 5:31 PM brentswain38@... [origamiboats], wrote:   Tank tests have shown that  raking the rudder post aft any amount, drastically reduces rudder efficiency, by  dragging air  down it, inducing a stall. Friends who have had that kind of rudder, have confirmed it, in real life situations.Read what Donald Street has to say about it.He asked many designers why they would design a rudder that  way , and the only answer he could get,  was  "It looks fast, and sells boats".Bob Perry has  said  it is not a good idea or design a boat to withstand collisions, because boats are not supposed to hit things! He ridicules structural strength in a boat. | 35350|35319|2018-10-04 17:16:26|brentswain38|Re: Decreed "Trendy?"|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :lf you tried to built  a production, stock plastic boat today ,properly, with the current cost of labour and materials and the glutted small boat market, you would go bankrupt very quickly.Thus the only ones still in the production boat market are those who have skimped on materials to the minimum which  will still stay afloat (mostly in marinas) .Little bit off topic but i have seen hunters,catalinas,hanse,beneteaus and jeanneaus all having to have keels removed this summer from what appears to be fairly minor impact.Its actually kinda mindboggling what overpriced junk they are .Just my opinion . With such  deep keels and narrow keel attachments to the hulls, keels falling off are not uncommon.I once saw a Beneteau hauled out in Nanaimo, with  38 fragile, white plastic thru hulls, just above the waterline,  where UV makes them even more  fragile.A friend, crewing on one of those boats, said they couldn't leave the helm for a second, without it  immediately veering off course.Sad to se designers who used to design good boats,  going like sheeple in that  direction. | 35351|35351|2018-10-17 18:23:57|brentswain38|Origamiboat mileage|I just did a rough estimate of how many open ocean miles my boats have put in their wake ,roughly 385,000 miles, enough to stretch to the moon and nearly half way back. That doesn't  include over 4 decades of coastal cruising. Mostly 36 footers. ZERO serious structural problems at sea. I wonder how many other steel boat designs have that much proven success..| 35352|35351|2018-10-17 22:39:01|prairiemaidca|Re: Origamiboat mileage|    Prairie Maid has over 1100 nm cruising the coast of B.C.  for the 2018 season.  She has been in the water for 5 years now as of oct.   She has proven to be every thing that she was billed as and more in all her abilities and sea keeping.  I'm certainly no nautical expert by any means but as far as her hull design I don't have any complaints or changes that I would implement.  Of course there are a few things I'd do differently that were strictly of my own doings but that has nothing to do with her overall performance and especially her design.  Mr. Swain your boats are solid and sea worthy vessels in design.  "Well Done"Martin  (Prairie Maid}| 35353|35353|2018-10-19 15:59:00|brentswain38|Deck tracks|Don't tack or plug weld  track to the deck of a steel boat. When corrosion begins under it, it is impossible to deal with, without cutting the whole track off, not an easy task. The beam of a brentboat is just right for attaching the jib sheet to the bulwark cap. If you have  a boat with  greater beam, then a row of flush SS acorn nuts along the deck is  much better solution.| 35354|35351|2018-10-19 16:16:40|brentswain38|Re: Origamiboat mileage|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Thanks Martin  . The crew of Shinola, a 36ft  brentboat, after sailing her to New Zealand and back to BC, said they didn't see another boat on the whole voyage, that  they would rather be in. Mike, the skipper, said he hasn't seen one departure from the original design,  which was an improvement.  Prairie Maid has over 1100 nm cruising the coast of B.C.  for the 2018 season.  She has been in the water for 5 years now as of oct.   She has proven to be every thing that she was billed as and more in all her abilities and sea keeping.  I'm certainly no nautical expert by any means but as far as her hull design I don't have any complaints or changes that I would implement.  Of course there are a few things I'd do differently that were strictly of my own doings but that has nothing to do with her overall performance and especially her design.  Mr. Swain your boats are solid and sea worthy vessels in design.  "Well Done"Martin  (Prairie Maid}| 35355|35351|2018-10-19 22:54:13|aguysailing|Re: Origamiboat mileage|Not mentioned but worthy of note.  How many jars of venison processed since your launch.   I am betting you could come close with a guess....| 35356|35351|2018-10-20 18:57:23|brentswain38|Re: Origamiboat mileage|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Not mentioned but worthy of note.  How many jars of venison processed since your launch.   I am betting you could come close with a guess....Lost track decades ago. Given the possession limit in Haida Gwai is 5, and I have always filled all my jars when up there, and did well  most times down here,  I have no idea what the total is.| 35357|35357|2018-10-25 16:55:04|brentswain38|Anchor slamming in the bow roller|Before embarking on a long passage, turn the anchors upside down in the bow roller, with the flukes pointed upward, to stop it from slamming in a head sea. This eliminates that  problem, while keeping it instantly deployable. Much easier than having to cat the anchors onto the decks.| 35358|35358|2018-10-31 15:45:13|brentswain38|Attaching interiors|Some have said that it takes hundreds of tabs to attach an interior to a steel boat. Gerr has made similar foolish claims.My boat has roughly 35 tabs, 3 or 4 per bulkhead. The rest of my interior is hung off the bulkheads, with longitudinal 2x4s off the bulkheads for bunk faces  tops and backs, and counter tops. Not everything has to be attached to the hull, some can be attached to each other| 35359|35358|2018-11-01 14:51:26|Hannu Venermo|Re: Attaching interiors| +1 On 31/10/2018 20:13, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote: Some have said that it takes hundreds of tabs to attach an interior to a steel boat. Gerr has made similar foolish claims.My boat has roughly 35 tabs, 3 or 4 per bulkhead. The rest of my interior is hung off the bulkheads, with longitudinal 2x4s off the bulkheads for bunk faces  tops and backs, and counter tops. Not everything has to be attached to the hull, some can be attached to each other -- -hanermo (cnc designs) | 35360|35358|2018-11-01 17:45:18|Aaron|Re: Attaching interiors|Could they be referring to the smaller tabs that you recommended putting at 36" apart for the furring to attachSent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Hannu Venermo gcode.fi@... [origamiboats] wrote:   +1 On 31/10/2018 20:13, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote: Some have said that it takes hundreds of tabs to attach an interior to a steel boat. Gerr has made similar foolish claims.My boat has roughly 35 tabs, 3 or 4 per bulkhead. The rest of my interior is hung off the bulkheads, with longitudinal 2x4s off the bulkheads for bunk faces  tops and backs, and counter tops. Not everything has to be attached to the hull, some can be attached to each other -- -hanermo (cnc designs) #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 -- #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-mkp { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-mkp hr { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481hd { color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ads { margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ad { padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ad p { margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ad a { color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-lc { font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481hd { margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ad { margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481actions { font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481activity { background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481activity span { font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481activity span:first-child { text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481activity span a { color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481activity span span { color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481activity span .ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481underline { text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 .ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481attach { clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 .ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481attach div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 .ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481attach img { border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 .ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481attach label { display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 .ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481attach label a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 blockquote { margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 .ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481bold { font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 .ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481bold a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 dd.ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481last p a { font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 dd.ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481last p span { margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 dd.ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481last p span.ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481yshortcuts { margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 div.ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481attach-table div div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 div.ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481attach-table { width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 div.ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 div.ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 div.ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 div.ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481file-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 div.ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 div.ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 div.ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 div.ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481photo-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 div#ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481yshortcuts { font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 .ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481green { color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 .ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481MsoNormal { margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 o { font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481photos div { float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481photos div div { border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481photos div label { color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481reco-category { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481reco-desc { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 .ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481replbq { margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-actbar div a:first-child { margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-mlmsg { font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-mlmsg table { font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 input, #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 textarea { font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-mlmsg pre, #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 code { font:115% monospace;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-mlmsg * { line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481logo { padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-msg p a { font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481attach-count span { color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481reco-head { color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-reco { margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ov li a { font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ov li { font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ov ul { margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-text { font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-text p { margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-text tt { font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-1757792132yiv4872111481ygrp-vital ul li:last-child { border-right:none !important;} #ygrps-yiv-1757792132 | 35361|35358|2018-11-01 22:32:40|brentswain38|Re: Attaching interiors|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I am referring tot he 3 or 4 tabs per bulkhead, and tabs for longitudinal firring strips for the paneling to  attach to.Could they be referring to the smaller tabs that you recommended putting at 36" apart for the furring to attachSent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Hannu Venermo gcode.fi@... [origamiboats] wrote:   +1 On 31/10/2018 20:13, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:Some have said that it takes hundreds of tabs to attach an interior to a steel boat. Gerr has made similar foolish claims.My boat has roughly 35 tabs, 3 or 4 per bulkhead. The rest of my interior is hung off the bulkheads, with longitudinal 2x4s off the bulkheads for bunk faces  tops and backs, and counter tops. Not everything has to be attached to the hull, some can be attached to each other -- -hanermo (cnc designs) #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 -- #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-mkp { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-mkp hr { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481hd { color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ads { margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ad { padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ad p { margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ad a { color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-lc { font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481hd { margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ad { margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481actions { font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481activity { background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481activity span { font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481activity span:first-child { text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481activity span a { color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481activity span span { color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481activity span .ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481underline { text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 .ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481attach { clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 .ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481attach div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 .ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481attach img { border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 .ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481attach label { display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 .ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481attach label a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 blockquote { margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 .ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481bold { font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 .ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481bold a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 dd.ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481last p a { font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 dd.ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481last p span { margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 dd.ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481last p span.ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481yshortcuts { margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 div.ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481attach-table div div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 div.ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481attach-table { width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 div.ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 div.ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 div.ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 div.ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481file-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 div.ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 div.ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 div.ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 div.ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481photo-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 div#ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481yshortcuts { font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 .ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481green { color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 .ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481MsoNormal { margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 o { font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481photos div { float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481photos div div { border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481photos div label { color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481reco-category { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481reco-desc { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 .ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481replbq { margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-actbar div a:first-child { margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-mlmsg { font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-mlmsg table { font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 input, #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 textarea { font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-mlmsg pre, #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 code { font:115% monospace;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-mlmsg * { line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481logo { padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-msg p a { font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481attach-count span { color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481reco-head { color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-reco { margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ov li a { font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ov li { font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ov ul { margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-text { font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-text p { margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-text tt { font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-385299817 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481 #ygrps-yiv-385299817ygrps-yiv-1401324018yiv4872111481ygrp-vital ul li:last-child { border-right:none !important;} | 35362|35362|2018-11-02 00:50:40|brentswain38|Functional quality vs cosmetic quality|Some, when referring to 'Quality "in a   boat, confuse functional quality with cosmetic quality. Often ,they are polar opposites. A teak deck, hatches, and teak trim are the opposite of functional, as is a huge, wide hardwood floor in a sailing  vessel, for the sake of cosmetics. Hiding an engine and equipment out of sight may be great  for cosmetic quality, but a poor choice for easy  access, and thus the opposite of functional quality. Ditto dangerously low lifelines , teak handrails, excessive complexity in a boat, the list goes on and on. Plastic thru hulls may look pretty, but are dangerously fragile. Ditto a lot of yottie gear. This kind of functional quality doesn't necessarily add  much, if anything to  the cost of boat ,but can  make a boat costing far less, a much better choice, and thus a much better boat overall,  than those which favour cosmetic quality over functional quality . Get the logic right, and a good boat can be inexpensive .Get  the logic wrong, and you have a piece of crap, no matter how much money you throw at her.| 35363|35363|2018-11-02 01:00:11|Maxime Camirand|Insulating a hull|Hi group,I'm looking at a very nice used steel boat that has lived in fresh water its whole life. However, the inside of the hull does not appear to have been insulated at all, judging from the photos (pending more information).I don't have experience with steel yachts. Would it be impractical to insulate the inside of the hull now? The interior is very nice, and I wouldn't want to gut it completely, so I'm wondering if it's possible to progressively dismantle some parts to expose the hull, insulate, and move on to the next part, while living on the boat.I don't know what type of insulation would be best for this. Some kind of closed-cell foam that can be batch-mixed? Flexible sheets of closed-cell foam I could glue in place?I'd appreciate hearing about your experiences.Max| 35364|35331|2018-11-02 01:22:30|Maxime Camirand|Re: Yahoo is getting worse....|Up until you said "not controlled by Google", I would have suggested Google Groups. They can do emails and so on.Otherwise, there's always Usenet... that doesn't do emails but the format is similar. Zero protection against trolls, though, and it's very outdated.I could also run a Listserv-type server for the group. Then we'd all get emails, but there would be no web platform and no photos. On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 at 06:14, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   So, what are the options for - hosting a "group" - that mirrors as a mailing list and - integrates image storage with the group archive, - does the appropriate access control that prevents outright vandalism, but allows posting by non-fans that borders on trolling - and is not linked to a corporation like facebook, google etc. - not dependent on a single person and ongoing labor, - has no cost. ? We were really spoiled by Yahoo. It seems the facebook and google business models are economically more successful than others, suggesting greater longevity.  Despite what some people do not like about them, a lot of people are willing to give up many things taken for granted as good things 30 years ago, for a money-less, convenience. Matt From: opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 16:52 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Yahoo is getting worse.... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   There is absolutely no way I would move to Facebook.   Whatever we use, I would prefer to be able to download messages or have have the option to have them emailed to me so that I could read them offline.    Not everybody is on high speed internet all the time. | 35365|35363|2018-11-02 18:59:43|brentswain38|Re: Insulating a hull|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Make sure you have at least 3 coats of epoxy tar inside ,more is  better. before foaming. I tried fibreglass insulation,with a vapour barrier. No matter how meticulous I was with the vapour barrier ,the steel  was constantly soaking wet with condensation, which saturated the fibreglass. With  sheet foam,the steel was just as  wet, which caused tiny paint blisters on it. So I had it sprayfoamed, and ended all such problems. Do it yourself spray foam kits are readily available, and those who have used them say they are easy to use. They are like a couple of propane bottles you hook together, and come in different sizes. I foamed my boat after most of the big stuff in the interior was in. I removed the bunk tops and counter faces. Not all that  hard to remove and put them back after foaming. Make sure you cover every speck of steel with at  least 1/4 inch or more of foam,as a piece of steel the size of your fingernail poking thru the foam will drip condensation like a leaky faucet.Spray foaming is a huge ,drastic improvement in comfort aboard a boat, well worth the effort and  cost. Without it  a boat becomes almost unliveable in a cold climate.Hi group,I'm looking at a very nice used steel boat that has lived in fresh water its whole life. However, the inside of the hull does not appear to have been insulated at all, judging from the photos (pending more information).I don't have experience with steel yachts. Would it be impractical to insulate the inside of the hull now? The interior is very nice, and I wouldn't want to gut it completely, so I'm wondering if it's possible to progressively dismantle some parts to expose the hull, insulate, and move on to the next part, while living on the boat.I don't know what type of insulation would be best for this. Some kind of closed-cell foam that can be batch-mixed? Flexible sheets of closed-cell foam I could glue in place?I'd appreciate hearing about your experiences.Max| 35366|35366|2018-11-02 22:22:33|SHANE ROTHWELL|Safety at sea on the Sulu Sea|Hi all,I'm in the small town of Palompon in Leyte province PI which is in the NE quadrant of the Sulu sea not far from where they chopped the Canuck's head off a coupla years ago.Flew here and had pretty much given up the idea of cruising the PI but saw a coupla cruising yachts at anchor & went out to chat.Safety at sea? Got me a responce of "pushaw mate, the Indo's, Maylay's & the PI are running joint patrolls. Made a few examples and if you don't go south of here (basically around the area of Cebu), no worries, none"Dutarte may not have the approval of the west, (especially the yanks after being sick of being shit on forever and says straight out "fuck off yanks") but 2 years ago it was considered insanity to go walking around here at night & that was for the locals. Now...every evening with probably more in my pocket than a my pocket than most earn in a year with absolutely no problems.They love Dutarte for what he has done & he makes no bones about it & says regularly & often "I love my country, don't fuck with me or I WILL KILL YOU".....and he does.They love this guy & having cleaned up a lot of the indemic problems here it's not hard to see why.So looks like the Sulu is safe for the first time in...foreverSent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35367|35363|2018-11-03 02:12:13|rockrothwell|Re: Insulating a hull|I'm assuming these spray foam kits are 2 part closed cell polyeurathane? Is/are any of them easier to apply or in one way or another a superior product? Brent is not kidding re foam coverage. I've been ripping out foam & cleaning up the bildges and on the framing for the bollards down below there were bits fully 6" inboard of the hull that just peed condensation & pretty badly corroded though no structural dammage as it's only been 30 years. Bye the bye, the other area to be careful of re condensation is the bildges. On the Dove no one cleaned the bildges ever. They were also not ventilated and the result was about a quarter inch of perpeyually wet dust & lint over an absolitly horroble rusty mess. No wonder the epoxy failed. So ventilate the bildges throughout and clean em every decade if they need it or not| 35368|35363|2018-11-03 09:31:30|Maxime Camirand|Re: Insulating a hull|Thanks for the replies. It's a relief to know it's a doable job. How far down the hull sides should I insulate? Another member said in an email that down to the waterline is enough.Maybe this is a bit of a blessing, since I can add a few coats of epoxy on top of whatever is already there first (right?), and I can inspect the interior of the hull more completely before purchase.Max On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 at 07:00, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Make sure you have at least 3 coats of epoxy tar inside ,more is  better. before foaming. I tried fibreglass insulation,with a vapour barrier. No matter how meticulous I was with the vapour barrier ,the steel  was constantly soaking wet with condensation, which saturated the fibreglass. With  sheet foam,the steel was just as  wet, which caused tiny paint blisters on it. So I had it sprayfoamed, and ended all such problems. Do it yourself spray foam kits are readily available, and those who have used them say they are easy to use. They are like a couple of propane bottles you hook together, and come in different sizes. I foamed my boat after most of the big stuff in the interior was in. I removed the bunk tops and counter faces. Not all that  hard to remove and put them back after foaming. Make sure you cover every speck of steel with at  least 1/4 inch or more of foam,as a piece of steel the size of your fingernail poking thru the foam will drip condensation like a leaky faucet.Spray foaming is a huge ,drastic improvement in comfort aboard a boat, well worth the effort and  cost. Without it  a boat becomes almost unliveable in a cold climate.Hi group,I'm looking at a very nice used steel boat that has lived in fresh water its whole life. However, the inside of the hull does not appear to have been insulated at all, judging from the photos (pending more information).I don't have experience with steel yachts. Would it be impractical to insulate the inside of the hull now? The interior is very nice, and I wouldn't want to gut it completely, so I'm wondering if it's possible to progressively dismantle some parts to expose the hull, insulate, and move on to the next part, while living on the boat.I don't know what type of insulation would be best for this. Some kind of closed-cell foam that can be batch-mixed? Flexible sheets of closed-cell foam I could glue in place?I'd appreciate hearing about your experiences.Max | 35369|35363|2018-11-03 17:42:23|brentswain38|Re: Insulating a hull|Yes, they are  2 part polyurethane. Make sure you get the closed cell type, as  open cell is temptingly cheaper, but a big mistake. Don't know about brands ,but people have been happy with whatever they used.________________________________________________________________I'm assuming these spray foam kits are 2 part closed cell polyeurathane? Is/are any of them easier to apply or in one way or another a superior product? Brent is not kidding re foam coverage. I've been ripping out foam & cleaning up the bildges and on the framing for the bollards down below there were bits fully 6" inboard of the hull that just peed condensation & pretty badly corroded though no structural dammage as it's only been 30 years. Bye the bye, the other area to be careful of re condensation is the bildges. On the Dove no one cleaned the bildges ever. They were also not ventilated and the result was about a quarter inch of perpeyually wet dust & lint over an absolitly horroble rusty mess. No wonder the epoxy failed. So ventilate the bildges throughout and clean em every decade if they need it or not| 35370|35363|2018-11-03 17:47:26|brentswain38|Re: Insulating a hull|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Insulate right down to the floor boards. If you don't insulate  under the bunks, they will be constantly  soaking wet with condensation, making everything in them soaking wet.  On my first boat a ferro cement hull the condensation was only below the waterline when she warmed up. You could clearly see the waterline where the condensation ended.Thanks for the replies. It's a relief to know it's a doable job. How far down the hull sides should I insulate? Another member said in an email that down to the waterline is enough.Maybe this is a bit of a blessing, since I can add a few coats of epoxy on top of whatever is already there first (right?), and I can inspect the interior of the hull more completely before purchase.Max On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 at 07:00, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:  ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Make sure you have at least 3 coats of epoxy tar inside ,more is  better. before foaming. I tried fibreglass insulation,with a vapour barrier. No matter how meticulous I was with the vapour barrier ,the steel  was constantly soaking wet with condensation, which saturated the fibreglass. With  sheet foam,the steel was just as  wet, which caused tiny paint blisters on it. So I had it sprayfoamed, and ended all such problems. Do it yourself spray foam kits are readily available, and those who have used them say they are easy to use. They are like a couple of propane bottles you hook together, and come in different sizes. I foamed my boat after most of the big stuff in the interior was in. I removed the bunk tops and counter faces. Not all that  hard to remove and put them back after foaming. Make sure you cover every speck of steel with at  least 1/4 inch or more of foam,as a piece of steel the size of your fingernail poking thru the foam will drip condensation like a leaky faucet.Spray foaming is a huge ,drastic improvement in comfort aboard a boat, well worth the effort and  cost. Without it  a boat becomes almost unliveable in a cold climate.Hi group,I'm looking at a very nice used steel boat that has lived in fresh water its whole life. However, the inside of the hull does not appear to have been insulated at all, judging from the photos (pending more information).I don't have experience with steel yachts. Would it be impractical to insulate the inside of the hull now? The interior is very nice, and I wouldn't want to gut it completely, so I'm wondering if it's possible to progressively dismantle some parts to expose the hull, insulate, and move on to the next part, while living on the boat.I don't know what type of insulation would be best for this. Some kind of closed-cell foam that can be batch-mixed? Flexible sheets of closed-cell foam I could glue in place?I'd appreciate hearing about your experiences.Max | 35371|35371|2018-11-03 21:29:58|Arthur D. Saftlas|2 Practical Sailor articles|In case you don’t know about badly built race boats.https://www.practical-sailor.com/blog/Cheeki-Rafiki-Loss-Puts-Spotlight-on-Keels-11428-1.htmlhttps://www.practical-sailor.com/issues/37_73/features/Risk-Management-and-Renting-Adventure_12145-1.html?ET=practicalsailor:e38835:2408158a:&st=email&s=p_Waypoints110318| 35372|35363|2018-11-03 23:07:30|Maxime Camirand|Re: Insulating a hull|Understood. Regarding the epoxy, that can be applied over top of whatever unknown paint is currently on the inside, right? Without chipping/buffing/blasting (which would be hell in a finished boat)? On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 at 05:47, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Insulate right down to the floor boards. If you don't insulate  under the bunks, they will be constantly  soaking wet with condensation, making everything in them soaking wet.  On my first boat a ferro cement hull the condensation was only below the waterline when she warmed up. You could clearly see the waterline where the condensation ended.Thanks for the replies. It's a relief to know it's a doable job. How far down the hull sides should I insulate? Another member said in an email that down to the waterline is enough.Maybe this is a bit of a blessing, since I can add a few coats of epoxy on top of whatever is already there first (right?), and I can inspect the interior of the hull more completely before purchase.MaxOn Sat, 3 Nov 2018 at 07:00, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:  ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Make sure you have at least 3 coats of epoxy tar inside ,more is  better. before foaming. I tried fibreglass insulation,with a vapour barrier. No matter how meticulous I was with the vapour barrier ,the steel  was constantly soaking wet with condensation, which saturated the fibreglass. With  sheet foam,the steel was just as  wet, which caused tiny paint blisters on it. So I had it sprayfoamed, and ended all such problems. Do it yourself spray foam kits are readily available, and those who have used them say they are easy to use. They are like a couple of propane bottles you hook together, and come in different sizes. I foamed my boat after most of the big stuff in the interior was in. I removed the bunk tops and counter faces. Not all that  hard to remove and put them back after foaming. Make sure you cover every speck of steel with at  least 1/4 inch or more of foam,as a piece of steel the size of your fingernail poking thru the foam will drip condensation like a leaky faucet.Spray foaming is a huge ,drastic improvement in comfort aboard a boat, well worth the effort and  cost. Without it  a boat becomes almost unliveable in a cold climate.Hi group,I'm looking at a very nice used steel boat that has lived in fresh water its whole life. However, the inside of the hull does not appear to have been insulated at all, judging from the photos (pending more information).I don't have experience with steel yachts. Would it be impractical to insulate the inside of the hull now? The interior is very nice, and I wouldn't want to gut it completely, so I'm wondering if it's possible to progressively dismantle some parts to expose the hull, insulate, and move on to the next part, while living on the boat.I don't know what type of insulation would be best for this. Some kind of closed-cell foam that can be batch-mixed? Flexible sheets of closed-cell foam I could glue in place?I'd appreciate hearing about your experiences.Max | 35373|35363|2018-11-04 10:18:57|Brian Johnston|Re: Insulating a hull|I’m not an expert in adhesives, but insulation foam is urethane, such as Gorilla Glue, not epoxy based. I’d use epoxy first on bare metal, but if there’s old paint without corrosion, I’d either foam it or paint and foam depending on a subjective decision after inspecting the appearance. Insulation foam is closed cell. It should be water impervious, and application should seal out corrosive water salt and oxygen. Like they said, the trick is getting complete coverage of the metal longs and frames. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 3, 2018, at 8:07 PM, Maxime Camirand maxcamirand@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Understood. Regarding the epoxy, that can be applied over top of whatever unknown paint is currently on the inside, right? Without chipping/buffing/blasting (which would be hell in a finished boat)? On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 at 05:47, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Insulate right down to the floor boards. If you don't insulate  under the bunks, they will be constantly  soaking wet with condensation, making everything in them soaking wet.  On my first boat a ferro cement hull the condensation was only below the waterline when she warmed up. You could clearly see the waterline where the condensation ended.Thanks for the replies. It's a relief to know it's a doable job. How far down the hull sides should I insulate? Another member said in an email that down to the waterline is enough.Maybe this is a bit of a blessing, since I can add a few coats of epoxy on top of whatever is already there first (right?), and I can inspect the interior of the hull more completely before purchase.MaxOn Sat, 3 Nov 2018 at 07:00, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:  ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Make sure you have at least 3 coats of epoxy tar inside ,more is  better. before foaming. I tried fibreglass insulation,with a vapour barrier. No matter how meticulous I was with the vapour barrier ,the steel  was constantly soaking wet with condensation, which saturated the fibreglass. With  sheet foam,the steel was just as  wet, which caused tiny paint blisters on it. So I had it sprayfoamed, and ended all such problems. Do it yourself spray foam kits are readily available, and those who have used them say they are easy to use. They are like a couple of propane bottles you hook together, and come in different sizes. I foamed my boat after most of the big stuff in the interior was in. I removed the bunk tops and counter faces. Not all that  hard to remove and put them back after foaming. Make sure you cover every speck of steel with at  least 1/4 inch or more of foam,as a piece of steel the size of your fingernail poking thru the foam will drip condensation like a leaky faucet.Spray foaming is a huge ,drastic improvement in comfort aboard a boat, well worth the effort and  cost. Without it  a boat becomes almost unliveable in a cold climate.Hi group,I'm looking at a very nice used steel boat that has lived in fresh water its whole life. However, the inside of the hull does not appear to have been insulated at all, judging from the photos (pending more information).I don't have experience with steel yachts. Would it be impractical to insulate the inside of the hull now? The interior is very nice, and I wouldn't want to gut it completely, so I'm wondering if it's possible to progressively dismantle some parts to expose the hull, insulate, and move on to the next part, while living on the boat.I don't know what type of insulation would be best for this. Some kind of closed-cell foam that can be batch-mixed? Flexible sheets of closed-cell foam I could glue in place?I'd appreciate hearing about your experiences.Max | 35374|35363|2018-11-04 18:00:16|Brian Johnston|Re: Insulating a hull|I’d research carefully about spray foam. Sometimes, the chemicals do not mix as intended, and the foam emits toxic fumes that require all the foam to be removed at many times the original cost of installation. Even professionals screw up the application processSent from my iPhone On Nov 2, 2018, at 11:12 PM, rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I'm assuming these spray foam kits are 2 part closed cell polyeurathane? Is/are any of them easier to apply or in one way or another a superior product? Brent is not kidding re foam coverage. I've been ripping out foam & cleaning up the bildges and on the framing for the bollards down below there were bits fully 6" inboard of the hull that just peed condensation & pretty badly corroded though no structural dammage as it's only been 30 years. Bye the bye, the other area to be careful of re condensation is the bildges. On the Dove no one cleaned the bildges ever. They were also not ventilated and the result was about a quarter inch of perpeyually wet dust & lint over an absolitly horroble rusty mess. No wonder the epoxy failed. So ventilate the bildges throughout and clean em every decade if they need it or not | 35375|35363|2018-11-04 18:12:12|Matt Malone|Re: Insulating a hull| My understanding is never apply a 2-part compound over a 2-part compound like a regular paint.   This is my nightmare.  I have a fibreglass boat.  The innermost glass layer was not thoroughly wetted with epoxy.  Subsequently someone painted regular paint on the inside.   I am looking at sanding out a lot of area inside down to bare glass and applying 2-part compounds first.  Matt From: Maxime Camirand maxcamirand@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, November 3, 20:07 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Insulating a hull To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Understood. Regarding the epoxy, that can be applied over top of whatever unknown paint is currently on the inside, right? Without chipping/buffing/blasting (which would be hell in a finished boat)? On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 at 05:47, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Insulate right down to the floor boards. If you don't insulate  under the bunks, they will be constantly  soaking wet with condensation, making everything in them soaking wet.  On my first boat a ferro cement hull the condensation was only below the waterline when she warmed up. You could clearly see the waterline where the condensation ended. Thanks for the replies. It's a relief to know it's a doable job. How far down the hull sides should I insulate? Another member said in an email that down to the waterline is enough. Maybe this is a bit of a blessing, since I can add a few coats of epoxy on top of whatever is already there first (right?), and I can inspect the interior of the hull more completely before purchase. Max On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 at 07:00, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Make sure you have at least 3 coats of epoxy tar inside ,more is  better. before foaming. I tried fibreglass insulation,with a vapour barrier. No matter how meticulous I was with the vapour barrier ,the steel  was constantly soaking wet with condensation, which saturated the fibreglass. With  sheet foam,the steel was just as  wet, which caused tiny paint blisters on it. So I had it sprayfoamed, and ended all such problems.  Do it yourself spray foam kits are readily available, and those who have used them say they are easy to use. They are like a couple of propane bottles you hook together, and come in different sizes.  I foamed my boat after most of the big stuff in the interior was in. I removed the bunk tops and counter faces. Not all that  hard to remove and put them back after foaming. Make sure you cover every speck of steel with at  least 1/4 inch or more of foam,as a piece of steel the size of your fingernail poking thru the foam will drip condensation like a leaky faucet. Spray foaming is a huge ,drastic improvement in comfort aboard a boat, well worth the effort and  cost. Without it  a boat becomes almost unliveable in a cold climate. Hi group, I'm looking at a very nice used steel boat that has lived in fresh water its whole life. However, the inside of the hull does not appear to have been insulated at all, judging from the photos (pending more information). I don't have experience with steel yachts. Would it be impractical to insulate the inside of the hull now? The interior is very nice, and I wouldn't want to gut it completely, so I'm wondering if it's possible to progressively dismantle some parts to expose the hull, insulate, and move on to the next part, while living on the boat. I don't know what type of insulation would be best for this. Some kind of closed-cell foam that can be batch-mixed? Flexible sheets of closed-cell foam I could glue in place? I'd appreciate hearing about your experiences. Max | 35376|35363|2018-11-04 18:16:10|brentswain38|Re: Insulating a hull|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :In nearly 50 yeas of messing around with boats, I have never heard of any one having that problem.I’d research carefully about spray foam. Sometimes, the chemicals do not mix as intended, and the foam emits toxic fumes that require all the foam to be removed at many times the original cost of installation. Even professionals screw up the application processSent from my iPhone On Nov 2, 2018, at 11:12 PM, rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] wrote:  I'm assuming these spray foam kits are 2 part closed cell polyeurathane? Is/are any of them easier to apply or in one way or another a superior product? Brent is not kidding re foam coverage. I've been ripping out foam & cleaning up the bildges and on the framing for the bollards down below there were bits fully 6" inboard of the hull that just peed condensation & pretty badly corroded though no structural dammage as it's only been 30 years. Bye the bye, the other area to be careful of re condensation is the bildges. On the Dove no one cleaned the bildges ever. They were also not ventilated and the result was about a quarter inch of perpeyually wet dust & lint over an absolitly horroble rusty mess. No wonder the epoxy failed. So ventilate the bildges throughout and clean em every decade if they need it or not| 35377|35363|2018-11-04 18:22:27|brentswain38|Re: Insulating a hull|I have lapped epoxy onto old well hardened alkyd paint ,with no problems. That only works on old alkyd paint It would lift newer alkyd paint.Polyester would lift even old alkyd paint. It is much  more volatile. Paint remover would work on alkyd enamel.)________________________________________________________. My understanding is never apply a 2-part compound over a 1-part compound like a regular paint.   This is my nightmare.  I have a fibreglass boat.  The innermost glass layer was not thoroughly wetted with epoxy.  Subsequently someone painted regular paint on the inside.   I am looking at sanding out a lot of area inside down to bare glass and applying 2-part compounds first.  Matt | 35378|35366|2018-11-04 18:26:50|brentswain38|Re: Safety at sea on the Sulu Sea|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :That also means that anyone who doesn't like you, is free to shoot you any time, then claim you tried to sell them drugs. Case dismissed . No appeal ,no evidence required.No consequences for them. French had a similar experience with Robespiere. They loved him ;;initially !History has a way of repeating itself.Hi all,I'm in the small town of Palompon in Leyte province PI which is in the NE quadrant of the Sulu sea not far from where they chopped the Canuck's head off a coupla years ago.Flew here and had pretty much given up the idea of cruising the PI but saw a coupla cruising yachts at anchor & went out to chat.Safety at sea? Got me a responce of "pushaw mate, the Indo's, Maylay's & the PI are running joint patrolls. Made a few examples and if you don't go south of here (basically around the area of Cebu), no worries, none"Dutarte may not have the approval of the west, (especially the yanks after being sick of being shit on forever and says straight out "fuck off yanks") but 2 years ago it was considered insanity to go walking around here at night & that was for the locals. Now...every evening with probably more in my pocket than a my pocket than most earn in a year with absolutely no problems.They love Dutarte for what he has done & he makes no bones about it & says regularly & often "I love my country, don't fuck with me or I WILL KILL YOU".....and he does.They love this guy & having cleaned up a lot of the indemic problems here it's not hard to see why.So looks like the Sulu is safe for the first time in...foreverSent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35379|35363|2018-11-04 18:32:28|Matt Malone|Re: Insulating a hull| Most paint removers contain methylene chloride and this will (more slowly) eat the epoxy or polyester of the boat.   One ends up sanding off a bit of the fibreglass to get down to stuff that was not attacked by methylene chloride.  It might try it on my thick boat, high on the freeboard on the inside, or on the outside provided I have a garden hose to rapidly wash off the methylene chloride.  Last thing I would want is full strength paint remover in the bilge on the encapsulated ballast. This is an advantage I concede to metal boats - less worries about paint strippers. Matt From: brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, November 4, 15:24 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Insulating a hull To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I have lapped epoxy onto old well hardened alkyd paint ,with no problems. That only works on old alkyd paint It would lift newer alkyd paint. Polyester would lift even old alkyd paint. It is much  more volatile. Paint remover would work on alkyd enamel. )________________________________________________________ . My understanding is never apply a 2-part compound over a 1-part compound like a regular paint.   This is my nightmare.  I have a fibreglass boat.  The innermost glass layer was not thoroughly wetted with epoxy.  Subsequently someone painted regular paint on the inside.   I am looking at sanding out a lot of area inside down to bare glass and applying 2-part compounds first.  Matt | 35380|35371|2018-11-04 18:34:08|brentswain38|Re: 2 Practical Sailor articles|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :The picture says it all,  a narrow keel with bolts along it's centreline only. This ends up putting a bending load on the bolts if the hull flexes in the least. A Thunderbird- Haida 26 arrangement, with flanges on the top of the keels, and bolts thru the flanges would be a far better arrangement.This spreads the loads out athwartships ,reducing the leverage on them, and makes the bolts easily removable for easy inspection or replacement,  any time.In case you don’t know about badly built race boats.https://www.practical-sailor.com/blog/Cheeki-Rafiki-Loss-Puts-Spotlight-on-Keels-11428-1.htmlhttps://www.practical-sailor.com/issues/37_73/features/Risk-Management-and-Renting-Adventure_12145-1.html?ET=practicalsailor:e38835:2408158a:&st=email&s=p_Waypoints110318| 35381|35363|2018-11-04 19:52:43|Darren Bos|Re: Insulating a hull| I've used two kinds of spray foam DIY kits including Tiger Foam and Touch n Foam (Home Depot).  They differ from commercial spray foam in that they are sprayed at lower pressure and use a special mixing tip to combine the chemicals.  This tip means that every time you let go of the trigger you only have 30 seconds to start spraying again before the foam cures in the tip (you can and will have to replace the tips).  I found this made the work pace a bit frenetic.  Also, the tanks of foam chemicals need to be very warm if they are going to cure well.  The temperature for the tanks should be something like 30C and the surface temp is something like 20C minimum, with warmer being better.  The unreacted chemicals are pretty toxic.  If you have VERY GOOD ventilation of the boat you could get away with good quality organic vapor cartridges on a respirator (full face would be better than half face).  I actually piped fresh air in to a respirator, but then you have one more hose to wrestle with besides the two from the foam tanks.  In the end I found foaming the boat to be the most miserable job so far and wouldn't choose to do it again.  I did it over two days and after each session I was soaking wet in sweat, tired from wrestling hoses and tanks and my clothes stank with the smell of the foam (after curing for a day or two the boat didn't smell of foam chemicals any more).  I'd hoped by spraying it myself I could do a neater job with less cutting-back of foam required.  However, we still had a lot of foam trimming to do.  If I were to do it again I'd hire someone to do it, and be happy to pay for their work.  It is hard not to miss spots.  I'd pay for a thicker layer of foam which makes it more likely spots don't get missed and I'd do as Brent recommends and check over the boat before the foam guy leaves. I can't imagine a way other than spray foam where you could cover every millimeter of metal well, but it is not fun work. I've forgotten who here recommended using a Fein-style tool for cutting back the foam, but it works brilliantly.  I picked up a Genesis brand one from Princess Auto and with a rigid scraper attachment it goes through foam like the proverbial hot knife through butter.  The only issue is that my hands started to tingle after a few hours of use.  I solved that by wearing insulated winter nitrile dipped gloves.  The insulation cut down the vibration enough to avoid hand tingling. Darren On 18-11-02 11:12 PM, rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I'm assuming these spray foam kits are 2 part closed cell polyeurathane? Is/are any of them easier to apply or in one way or another a superior product? Brent is not kidding re foam coverage. I've been ripping out foam & cleaning up the bildges and on the framing for the bollards down below there were bits fully 6" inboard of the hull that just peed condensation & pretty badly corroded though no structural dammage as it's only been 30 years. Bye the bye, the other area to be careful of re condensation is the bildges. On the Dove no one cleaned the bildges ever. They were also not ventilated and the result was about a quarter inch of perpeyually wet dust & lint over an absolitly horroble rusty mess. No wonder the epoxy failed. So ventilate the bildges throughout and clean em every decade if they need it or not | 35382|35382|2018-11-04 20:12:17|jaybeecherbay|Measuring standing rigging|I am about to step the mast next week...using 5/16th 1x7 galvanized plow steel wire, and open forged jaw and jaw galvanized turnbuckles.my mast is 6" sch 40 aluminum pipe, 45' off the deck, single spreaders, no intermediates ..I am looking for advice on how to accurately measure the needed lengths for the stays.  I will be getting a shop to do the swaging. ...So far i am going draw it up to get the lengths for at least the lowers then step the mast with the lowers on and then run a good long tape to get shrouds, forestay, and backstays length once the mast is stepped..thoughts?advice?thanks| 35383|35363|2018-11-04 20:43:29|Maxime Camirand|Re: Insulating a hull|Thanks for all the answers! I have yet to inspect, let alone buy the boat, but if I do, I will:- Spot-buff any corroded spots on in interior of the hull- Clean and degrease the paint on the interior of the hull- Repaint corroded spots with epoxy / epoxy paint / epoxy tar (will seek more advice)- Foam everything down to floorboards with two-part, closed-cell foam- Rent a force-ventilated full-face mask for the job, + ventilate the boat as well as I can- Insulate the undersides of bunks and floorboards- Clean the bilges, repaint if needed On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 08:52, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I've used two kinds of spray foam DIY kits including Tiger Foam and Touch n Foam (Home Depot).  They differ from commercial spray foam in that they are sprayed at lower pressure and use a special mixing tip to combine the chemicals.  This tip means that every time you let go of the trigger you only have 30 seconds to start spraying again before the foam cures in the tip (you can and will have to replace the tips).  I found this made the work pace a bit frenetic.  Also, the tanks of foam chemicals need to be very warm if they are going to cure well.  The temperature for the tanks should be something like 30C and the surface temp is something like 20C minimum, with warmer being better.  The unreacted chemicals are pretty toxic.  If you have VERY GOOD ventilation of the boat you could get away with good quality organic vapor cartridges on a respirator (full face would be better than half face).  I actually piped fresh air in to a respirator, but then you have one more hose to wrestle with besides the two from the foam tanks.  In the end I found foaming the boat to be the most miserable job so far and wouldn't choose to do it again.  I did it over two days and after each session I was soaking wet in sweat, tired from wrestling hoses and tanks and my clothes stank with the smell of the foam (after curing for a day or two the boat didn't smell of foam chemicals any more).  I'd hoped by spraying it myself I could do a neater job with less cutting-back of foam required.  However, we still had a lot of foam trimming to do.  If I were to do it again I'd hire someone to do it, and be happy to pay for their work.  It is hard not to miss spots.  I'd pay for a thicker layer of foam which makes it more likely spots don't get missed and I'd do as Brent recommends and check over the boat before the foam guy leaves. I can't imagine a way other than spray foam where you could cover every millimeter of metal well, but it is not fun work. I've forgotten who here recommended using a Fein-style tool for cutting back the foam, but it works brilliantly.  I picked up a Genesis brand one from Princess Auto and with a rigid scraper attachment it goes through foam like the proverbial hot knife through butter.  The only issue is that my hands started to tingle after a few hours of use.  I solved that by wearing insulated winter nitrile dipped gloves.  The insulation cut down the vibration enough to avoid hand tingling. Darren On 18-11-02 11:12 PM, rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I'm assuming these spray foam kits are 2 part closed cell polyeurathane? Is/are any of them easier to apply or in one way or another a superior product? Brent is not kidding re foam coverage. I've been ripping out foam & cleaning up the bildges and on the framing for the bollards down below there were bits fully 6" inboard of the hull that just peed condensation & pretty badly corroded though no structural dammage as it's only been 30 years. Bye the bye, the other area to be careful of re condensation is the bildges. On the Dove no one cleaned the bildges ever. They were also not ventilated and the result was about a quarter inch of perpeyually wet dust & lint over an absolitly horroble rusty mess. No wonder the epoxy failed. So ventilate the bildges throughout and clean em every decade if they need it or not | 35384|35363|2018-11-04 21:35:56|Darren Bos|Re: Insulating a hull| If you get DIY kits, buy the foam close to when you are planning to use it.  Tigerfoam Canada sold me kits that were nearly expired when I bought them, the kit I got from Home Depot was good for close to a year from the purchase date.  There are enough complications with the stuff that you don't want to worry about kits past their expiry dates. On 18-11-04 05:43 PM, Maxime Camirand maxcamirand@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Thanks for all the answers! I have yet to inspect, let alone buy the boat, but if I do, I will: - Spot-buff any corroded spots on in interior of the hull - Clean and degrease the paint on the interior of the hull - Repaint corroded spots with epoxy / epoxy paint / epoxy tar (will seek more advice) - Foam everything down to floorboards with two-part, closed-cell foam - Rent a force-ventilated full-face mask for the job, + ventilate the boat as well as I can - Insulate the undersides of bunks and floorboards - Clean the bilges, repaint if needed On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 08:52, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I've used two kinds of spray foam DIY kits including Tiger Foam and Touch n Foam (Home Depot).  They differ from commercial spray foam in that they are sprayed at lower pressure and use a special mixing tip to combine the chemicals.  This tip means that every time you let go of the trigger you only have 30 seconds to start spraying again before the foam cures in the tip (you can and will have to replace the tips).  I found this made the work pace a bit frenetic.  Also, the tanks of foam chemicals need to be very warm if they are going to cure well.  The temperature for the tanks should be something like 30C and the surface temp is something like 20C minimum, with warmer being better.  The unreacted chemicals are pretty toxic.  If you have VERY GOOD ventilation of the boat you could get away with good quality organic vapor cartridges on a respirator (full face would be better than half face).  I actually piped fresh air in to a respirator, but then you have one more hose to wrestle with besides the two from the foam tanks.  In the end I found foaming the boat to be the most miserable job so far and wouldn't choose to do it again.  I did it over two days and after each session I was soaking wet in sweat, tired from wrestling hoses and tanks and my clothes stank with the smell of the foam (after curing for a day or two the boat didn't smell of foam chemicals any more).  I'd hoped by spraying it myself I could do a neater job with less cutting-back of foam required.  However, we still had a lot of foam trimming to do.  If I were to do it again I'd hire someone to do it, and be happy to pay for their work.  It is hard not to miss spots.  I'd pay for a thicker layer of foam which makes it more likely spots don't get missed and I'd do as Brent recommends and check over the boat before the foam guy leaves. I can't imagine a way other than spray foam where you could cover every millimeter of metal well, but it is not fun work. I've forgotten who here recommended using a Fein-style tool for cutting back the foam, but it works brilliantly.  I picked up a Genesis brand one from Princess Auto and with a rigid scraper attachment it goes through foam like the proverbial hot knife through butter.  The only issue is that my hands started to tingle after a few hours of use.  I solved that by wearing insulated winter nitrile dipped gloves.  The insulation cut down the vibration enough to avoid hand tingling. Darren | 35385|35363|2018-11-05 01:58:35|rockrothwell|Re: Insulating a hull|Exllent points Darren thanks. but any kind of respirator is iffy at best. Just go with remote air supply. Easy. Get a north brand respirator and they are cheap. Then get the double extension tubes that put the filters about the centre of your back and they are a complete rip off at $100 (but I plan on fixing that & off to Gwong Dong to work with my mate I did the lenz washer for Barns-Hind with A project that .it only went for 22 years & 8kk pieces) From there you get a 1.25" sump pump hose which again is cheap. Bojang it together with strips of innertube. A blower helps but is not needed is you just go 20'. It removes ALL of the bullshit associated with filters etc & no confusion as as long as you put the intake to windward you get clean air but dont forget a bit of fabric over the intake as just one insect might be rather awkward. Someone else mentioned that cured foam is impervious to water and salt. Bullshit syraight undiluted bullshit. The bildges of the Dove were insulated down to the lowest stringer but the insulation above that lowest stringer, just in a humid environment was wet with the steel below it corroded. Same thing where the exposed steel of the bollard framing had dripped onto the foam below with corrosion below the foam. I'm sure whoever said it was impervious to h20 meant well but the jerkoff salesman who told him that lied through his teeth. It might be closed cell foam but it's still foam. Another little beaut I saw on a Folk boat was under & aft of the chain locker so brilliantly located below decks. With all the bottom crap brought aboard was just a bit of salt h20... the usual usage of 2 weeks per year & most of the h2o evaporates, but the salt remains and salt is hydophilic (is that the right word?) anyway, perpetually damp & salty with a lovely little dribble of rusty water dribbling from under the foam into the forward bildge. Lastly, I find it amazing the extent to which we get screwed in Canada. Epoxy paint, the best of the best sells for $18 a seppo gallon here & less than that in the big city. A carpenter is $10/day & a ticketed welder is $15/day| 35386|35363|2018-11-05 11:36:16|Zoa Scott|Re: Insulating a hull|You think prices in canada are brutal try parts of europe ....Its eye watering .Zoa  On Sun, Nov 4, 2018, 10:58 PM rockrothwell@... [origamiboats]   Exllent points Darren thanks. but any kind of respirator is iffy at best. Just go with remote air supply. Easy. Get a north brand respirator and they are cheap. Then get the double extension tubes that put the filters about the centre of your back and they are a complete rip off at $100 (but I plan on fixing that & off to Gwong Dong to work with my mate I did the lenz washer for Barns-Hind with A project that .it only went for 22 years & 8kk pieces) From there you get a 1.25" sump pump hose which again is cheap. Bojang it together with strips of innertube. A blower helps but is not needed is you just go 20'. It removes ALL of the bullshit associated with filters etc & no confusion as as long as you put the intake to windward you get clean air but dont forget a bit of fabric over the intake as just one insect might be rather awkward. Someone else mentioned that cured foam is impervious to water and salt. Bullshit syraight undiluted bullshit. The bildges of the Dove were insulated down to the lowest stringer but the insulation above that lowest stringer, just in a humid environment was wet with the steel below it corroded. Same thing where the exposed steel of the bollard framing had dripped onto the foam below with corrosion below the foam. I'm sure whoever said it was impervious to h20 meant well but the jerkoff salesman who told him that lied through his teeth. It might be closed cell foam but it's still foam. Another little beaut I saw on a Folk boat was under & aft of the chain locker so brilliantly located below decks. With all the bottom crap brought aboard was just a bit of salt h20... the usual usage of 2 weeks per year & most of the h2o evaporates, but the salt remains and salt is hydophilic (is that the right word?) anyway, perpetually damp & salty with a lovely little dribble of rusty water dribbling from under the foam into the forward bildge. Lastly, I find it amazing the extent to which we get screwed in Canada. Epoxy paint, the best of the best sells for $18 a seppo gallon here & less than that in the big city. A carpenter is $10/day & a ticketed welder is $15/day | 35387|35363|2018-11-05 17:02:01|Brian Johnston|Re: Insulating a hull|Sent from my https://youtu.be/0Hh5MYv7lWc On Nov 4, 2018, at 3:32 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Most paint removers contain methylene chloride and this will (more slowly) eat the epoxy or polyester of the boat.   One ends up sanding off a bit of the fibreglass to get down to stuff that was not attacked by methylene chloride.  It might try it on my thick boat, high on the freeboard on the inside, or on the outside provided I have a garden hose to rapidly wash off the methylene chloride.  Last thing I would want is full strength paint remover in the bilge on the encapsulated ballast. This is an advantage I concede to metal boats - less worries about paint strippers. Matt From: brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, November 4, 15:24 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Insulating a hull To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I have lapped epoxy onto old well hardened alkyd paint ,with no problems. That only works on old alkyd paint It would lift newer alkyd paint. Polyester would lift even old alkyd paint. It is much  more volatile. Paint remover would work on alkyd enamel. )________________________________________________________ ... My understanding is never apply a 2-part compound over a 1-part compound like a regular paint.   This is my nightmare.  I have a fibreglass boat.  The innermost glass layer was not thoroughly wetted with epoxy.  Subsequently someone painted regular paint on the inside.   I am looking at sanding out a lot of area inside down to bare glass and applying 2-part compounds first.  Matt | 35388|35363|2018-11-05 17:26:46|brentswain38|Re: Insulating a hull|Is Europe littered with abandoned boats no one wants. Could one buy such a disposable for a cruise there| 35389|35382|2018-11-05 17:43:04|brentswain38|Re: Measuring standing rigging|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Most people just swage  the top ends , and use cable clamps on the bottoms until they can take them into town later,  one or 2 at a time , and have the bottoms done later. You could run a straight edge across the mast step, to determine how much to allow for cabin top camber and height above the chain plates .I am about to step the mast next week...using 5/16th 1x7 galvanized plow steel wire, and open forged jaw and jaw galvanized turnbuckles.my mast is 6" sch 40 aluminum pipe, 45' off the deck, single spreaders, no intermediates ..I am looking for advice on how to accurately measure the needed lengths for the stays.  I will be getting a shop to do the swaging. ...So far i am going draw it up to get the lengths for at least the lowers then step the mast with the lowers on and then run a good long tape to get shrouds, forestay, and backstays length once the mast is stepped..thoughts?advice?thanks| 35390|35363|2018-11-05 17:44:44|brentswain38|Re: Insulating a hull|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : . A carpenter is $10/day & a ticketed welder is $15/dayAnd if you were from a country which paid the same scab wages, you too would be paid that kind of wages, and couldn`t afford to hire either of them. | 35391|35363|2018-11-05 17:51:08|brentswain38|Re: Insulating a hull|Yes , I have had the stuff in the spray cans get to old to come out of the can, too.________________________________________________________________-If you get DIY kits, buy the foam close to when you are planning to use it.  Tigerfoam Canada sold me kits that were nearly expired when I bought them, the kit I got from Home Depot was good for close to a year from the purchase date.  There are enough complications with the stuff that you don't want to worry about kits past their expiry dates. | 35392|35382|2018-11-05 19:13:41|Matt Malone|Re: Measuring standing rigging| #ygrps-yiv-10018363 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Hi Jay, There are practical factors such as rigging stretch, which will depend on the wire rope used, and boat flexing, which will depend on the loads.    I cannot help you with that. Ignoring these, it is relatively straight forward geometry to get the dimensions of the diagonals.   I recommend a piece of trim (baseboard), stood on edge to use as a giant wooden straight edge and then measure from the bottom of the trim down to the chain plates to get vertical off-sets and then from positions on the trim to get the horizontal separation between chain plates.  Do not forget to subract the width of the mast from this horizontal dimension before dividing this by two to get the base of the lateral rigging triangle.   The fore-aft measurements are more difficult because the distance from the mast step is greater.   If the boat is on the hard, I would rent a builder laser-level, set it on the front deck and do all vertical measurements relative to the plane of the beam.   Once one has calculated the total lengths from geometry, then one must compute for the hardware at each end and subtract these from the total length.   Of note is, it is not the length to the outside of say shackles that is important but the length between the insides of the shackles.  Imagine a chain of shackles.   As the chain comes taught it is the inside lengths that add to create the total length.  It is the inside lengths of each piece of hardware in the chain that must be subtracted. The chances of getting this, and flex of the boat right the first time is low.   I would do as Brent suggests, have the tops swaged and leave the ends long based on the rough calculations.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, November 5, 2018 5:09 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Measuring standing rigging     ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Most people just swage  the top ends , and use cable clamps on the bottoms until they can take them into town later,  one or 2 at a time , and have the bottoms done later. You could run a straight edge across the mast step, to determine how much to allow for cabin top camber and height above the chain plates . I am about to step the mast next week...using 5/16th 1x7 galvanized plow steel wire, and open forged jaw and jaw galvanized turnbuckles. my mast is 6" sch 40 aluminum pipe, 45' off the deck, single spreaders, no intermediates .. I am looking for advice on how to accurately measure the needed lengths for the stays.  I will be getting a shop to do the swaging. ... So far i am going draw it up to get the lengths for at least the lowers then step the mast with the lowers on and then run a good long tape to get shrouds, forestay, and backstays length once the mast is stepped.. thoughts? advice? thanks | 35393|35393|2018-11-05 20:09:17|brentswain38|Spade rudders|I just read an Argentina article about spade rudders. Amazing! They talk about a week worth of machining to get just the shaft done, at machine shop rates. Then, several more days tacking stiffeners on,. Then the fibreglassing.`Tom Cunliff,  in Sail Magazine, said spade rudders have the highest failure rate of any rudder design.  I have cut out and tacked together a rudder in a couple of hours, and one day gets her hung and finished .Then, they go on to describe complex and expensive yearly maintenance, and many other liabilities. I have done almost zero maintenance on mine, except painting, in 34 years.Keep it simple .None of mine has had any failures in over 385,000 miles of offshore cruising, and over 40 years. Sounds like my critics may be right, and I am doing it all wrong`!Ya sure!| 35394|35363|2018-11-05 20:53:15|brentswain38|Re: Insulating a hull|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :24 feet  of  corrugated plastic sump drain hose is easier to suck air thru than a filtre,  and much cheaper. You can  put it on a surplus gas mask. No need for forced air , unless you have a beard.Thanks for all the answers! I have yet to inspect, let alone buy the boat, but if I do, I will:- Spot-buff any corroded spots on in interior of the hull- Clean and degrease the paint on the interior of the hull- Repaint corroded spots with epoxy / epoxy paint / epoxy tar (will seek more advice)- Foam everything down to floorboards with two-part, closed-cell foam- Rent a force-ventilated full-face mask for the job, + ventilate the boat as well as I can- Insulate the undersides of bunks and floorboards- Clean the bilges, repaint if needed | 35395|35382|2018-11-05 21:19:21|opuspaul|Re: Measuring standing rigging|When I rigged my boat, I stepped the mast with regular rope and then measured the stays pin to pin once the mast was put where I wanted it.   I cut the stays and installed the lower fittings over a couple of days while sitting at the dock.  I tried to make it so that the turnbuckles were about 3/4 extended.  This allowed for some take-up later due to stretch.| 35396|35393|2018-11-05 23:00:01|rockrothwell|Re: Spade rudders|And if the skeg and the keel don't line up perfectly... and thus the rudder as they don't on the Dove, it makrs no differance at all. Winston & Carole put gawd knows how many miles on her and I didn't even notice till someone pointed it out. As for strength it's a no brainer with absolutely no bullshit, maintainanance or worries. Thanks Brent.| 35397|35363|2018-11-06 01:27:41|rockrothwell|Re: Insulating a hull|Quite right. It's admittedly undeserved privalidge that some aÅ•e able to take advantage of. Aside from the savings available, if you pay them a bit of a premium (which aint much) you gain a lot of good will and get the best| 35398|35382|2018-11-06 10:41:17|Frank N Furter|Re: Measuring standing rigging|I did the same as Paul, with rope that later became sheets and halyards. I opted to measure it once it was up, not trusting my calculations however the calculations I had made measuring the deck and mast were all with an inch or two anyway. The 5/8 galvanized turnbuckles have almost a foot of extension so it be pretty hard to screw up, shorter being easier to fix than too long.| 35399|35382|2018-11-06 13:56:12|Matt Malone|Re: Measuring standing rigging| "... shorter being easier to fix than too long." I would aim for mid-extension on the turn buckles because wire rope does not shrink, it only gets longer with tension.  This means if anything turn buckles will be tightened shorter. That said, leaving the cable longer allows a thimble and Crosby clamps or swaging, even cutting and. swaging shorter the second time. One of my boats, I was unhappy that the mast appeared to lean to one side, but I was out of extension on the turn buckle on the short side.  I was going to do something complex with stainless plates and pins but ended up just using a stainless "long-shackle" to make the standing rigging chain on the short side longer.  That put the turn buckle back into its range of adjustment with the mast vertical. So, it seems to me there are options whether the cables are too long or too short. Matt From: Frank N Furter haidan@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 11:07 Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Measuring standing rigging To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I did the same as Paul, with rope that later became sheets and halyards. I opted to measure it once it was up, not trusting my calculations however the calculations I had made measuring the deck and mast were all with an inch or two anyway. The 5/8 galvanized turnbuckles have almost a foot of extension so it be pretty hard to screw up, shorter being easier to fix than too long. | 35400|35382|2018-11-06 20:33:16|opuspaul|Re: Measuring standing rigging|Check out he breaking strength of a stainless long shackle.   You will be surprised how weak they are....they really don't belong in standing rigging.  The only place I might use them is in dual backstays or forestays where if one fails, you still have the other.  Paulhttps://www.suncorstainless.com/straight-d-shackle-w-screw-pin| 35401|35382|2018-11-06 20:56:40|Matt Malone|Re: Measuring standing rigging| Yes, you are right, a stainless shackle's guaranteed safe working load are not as strong as one might think. It seems they are substantially de-rated. That boat is trailerable, not an offshore cruiser, and the shackle is the heaviest one that will fit in the holes in the chainplates.  I have inspected the shackle, it seems undeformed. Still, at some thickness, plates and pins are a way to extend the chain plates to the bottom of the turn buckle and compensate for short standing rigging cable. Matt From: opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 20:33 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Measuring standing rigging To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Check out he breaking strength of a stainless long shackle.   You will be surprised how weak they are....they really don't belong in standing rigging.  The only place I might use them is in dual backstays or forestays where if one fails, you still have the other.  Paul https://www.suncorstainless.com/straight-d-shackle-w-screw-pin | 35402|35366|2018-11-07 18:36:54|Brian Johnston|Re: Safety at sea on the Sulu Sea|I love what Dutarte did for Davao, but you drive 5 minutes out of the city and you are surrounded by both Marxist and Muslim insurgents who will kill whitey for fun. Sulu isn’t safe by any measure, or we wouldn’t have been running counterinsurgency operations there with Special Forces and SEALs for nearly 30 years.Retired Green BeretSent from my iPhone On Nov 2, 2018, at 7:22 PM, SHANE ROTHWELL rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Hi all,I'm in the small town of Palompon in Leyte province PI which is in the NE quadrant of the Sulu sea not far from where they chopped the Canuck's head off a coupla years ago.Flew here and had pretty much given up the idea of cruising the PI but saw a coupla cruising yachts at anchor & went out to chat.Safety at sea? Got me a responce of "pushaw mate, the Indo's, Maylay's & the PI are running joint patrolls. Made a few examples and if you don't go south of here (basically around the area of Cebu), no worries, none"Dutarte may not have the approval of the west, (especially the yanks after being sick of being shit on forever and says straight out "fuck off yanks") but 2 years ago it was considered insanity to go walking around here at night & that was for the locals. Now...every evening with probably more in my pocket than a my pocket than most earn in a year with absolutely no problems..They love Dutarte for what he has done & he makes no bones about it & says regularly & often "I love my country, don't fuck with me or I WILL KILL YOU"......and he does.They love this guy & having cleaned up a lot of the indemic problems here it's not hard to see why.So looks like the Sulu is safe for the first time in...foreverSent from Yahoo Mail on Android | 35403|35366|2018-11-07 18:49:36|brentswain38|Re: Safety at sea on the Sulu Sea|Now, anyone can kill you , any time, and if they claim you tried to sell them drugs or saw you  smoke a doobie ,they have no consequences. Foreign vigilante goons ( green berets) are no solution, especially those so incompetent they got their ass  kicked by a banana republic like Vietnam. I prefer a place where police and others face some  consequences when  they kill someone, not where I am fair game for any goon.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I love what Dutarte did for Davao, but you drive 5 minutes out of the city and you are surrounded by both Marxist and Muslim insurgents who will kill whitey for fun. Sulu isn’t safe by any measure, or we wouldn’t have been running counterinsurgency operations there with Special Forces and SEALs for nearly 30 years.Retired Green BeretSent from my iPhone On Nov 2, 2018, at 7:22 PM, SHANE ROTHWELL rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] wrote: Hi all,I'm in the small town of Palompon in Leyte province PI which is in the NE quadrant of the Sulu sea not far from where they chopped the Canuck's head off a coupla years ago.Flew here and had pretty much given up the idea of cruising the PI but saw a coupla cruising yachts at anchor & went out to chat.Safety at sea? Got me a responce of "pushaw mate, the Indo's, Maylay's & the PI are running joint patrolls. Made a few examples and if you don't go south of here (basically around the area of Cebu), no worries, none"Dutarte may not have the approval of the west, (especially the yanks after being sick of being shit on forever and says straight out "fuck off yanks") but 2 years ago it was considered insanity to go walking around here at night & that was for the locals. Now...every evening with probably more in my pocket than a my pocket than most earn in a year with absolutely no problems..They love Dutarte for what he has done & he makes no bones about it & says regularly & often "I love my country, don't fuck with me or I WILL KILL YOU"......and he does.They love this guy & having cleaned up a lot of the indemic problems here it's not hard to see why.So looks like the Sulu is safe for the first time in...foreverSent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35404|35382|2018-11-07 19:04:31|brentswain38|Re: Measuring standing rigging|Plates and pins are more reliable than shackles| 35405|35366|2018-11-07 21:05:00|opuspaul|Re: Safety at sea on the Sulu Sea|Duterte is a nutjob.  He claims to have been on death squads, participated in killings and joked about rape.  When his own daughter claimed to be raped, he called her a drama queen.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodrigo_Duterte#Davao_Death_SquadI lived in Philippines for almost 3 years in the early 2000s when the kidnapping and beheading in the south was going on.  There were also a lot of bombings in the trains and shopping malls.  Most of it was from the muslim separatists in the south but they were coming up to Manila to do the bombings.  We were constantly patted down and searched, even to enter a shopping mall.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rizal_Day_bombingsWalking around Manila late at night, I was more worried about the police than anybody else.  They were all on the take, looking for bribes and trigger happy.   If somebody was stupid enough to try to run from something, they would likely get a bullet in the back. The real problem with the Philippines is too many people and too much poverty.   If you have 90 million people and only 1% are bad, that is still a lot of bad (or desperate) people.   I saw much worse poverty in the slums of Manila than I ever saw backpacking in India.  You can say what you want about India but everybody seems to have a job, even if it is awful.  In Manila, I saw people so poor they lived off garbage piles and didn't even have clothes.  They had a landslide in a garbage dump there that killed hundreds of people.  Seriously, how bad does it have to get before the catholics change their policy on birth control?  None of this has to do with Muslims.http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/830809.stmWhen I comes to sailing, I am tempted but the worst storms on earth happen in the Pacific in the area around the Philippines.  The Super-Typhoons are terrible  and and unlike other hurrican or cyclone areas, the typhoons can happen almost any time of the year.The areas around Palawan are incredible...bays and islands that you can only dream of.   I am tempted, but I don't think I could leave my boat in a remote area like that and go ashore without taking a big risk.   Sooner or later I think you would get robbed if you didn't have somebody stay on board all the time or hire a guard. Most of the sailors I know who have gone there don't "cruise" the Philippines.  They go to a bay like Puerto Galera and park up for the cheap beer, the cheap girls and the cheap Ex-Pat lifestyle.  It could be good but it ain't voyaging and it ain't cruising.Despite all this, I liked the Philippines much more than I thought I would.  The people I worked with were great with a good sense of humor, good education and a lot of skills.  There are some amazing sites and there is some amazing history.  I will never forget my tour of Corregidor. I would love to go back again....as a backpacker.My dream is to have one boat in the South Pacific and one boat in Malaysia or Thailand to use as a base..... 6 months here, 6 months there.....cheap flights to visit neighboring countries like Laos, Cambodia, Burma,  Vietnam, etc as a backpacker.Paul| 35406|35366|2018-11-08 15:33:05|a.sobriquet|Re: Safety at sea on the Sulu Sea|Paul, I know we're getting a bit off the topic of origami boats, but I wondered how difficult it is for an English-only-speaking person to travel in the Asian countries you mentioned (Malaysia,Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Burma, Vietnam), particularly away from the tourist areas or the more cosmopolitan cities? Would it be imprudent for an older, white couple to "backpack" in these countries? How do you find food, lodging, and transportation?A.S.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Duterte is a nutjob.  He claims to have been on death squads, participated in killings and joked about rape.  When his own daughter claimed to be raped, he called her a drama queen.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodrigo_Duterte#Davao_Death_SquadI lived in Philippines for almost 3 years in the early 2000s when the kidnapping and beheading in the south was going on.  There were also a lot of bombings in the trains and shopping malls.  Most of it was from the muslim separatists in the south but they were coming up to Manila to do the bombings.  We were constantly patted down and searched, even to enter a shopping mall.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rizal_Day_bombingsWalking around Manila late at night, I was more worried about the police than anybody else.  They were all on the take, looking for bribes and trigger happy.   If somebody was stupid enough to try to run from something, they would likely get a bullet in the back. The real problem with the Philippines is too many people and too much poverty.   If you have 90 million people and only 1% are bad, that is still a lot of bad (or desperate) people.   I saw much worse poverty in the slums of Manila than I ever saw backpacking in India.  You can say what you want about India but everybody seems to have a job, even if it is awful.  In Manila, I saw people so poor they lived off garbage piles and didn't even have clothes.  They had a landslide in a garbage dump there that killed hundreds of people.  Seriously, how bad does it have to get before the catholics change their policy on birth control?  None of this has to do with Muslims.http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/830809.stmWhen I comes to sailing, I am tempted but the worst storms on earth happen in the Pacific in the area around the Philippines.  The Super-Typhoons are terrible  and and unlike other hurrican or cyclone areas, the typhoons can happen almost any time of the year.The areas around Palawan are incredible...bays and islands that you can only dream of.   I am tempted, but I don't think I could leave my boat in a remote area like that and go ashore without taking a big risk.   Sooner or later I think you would get robbed if you didn't have somebody stay on board all the time or hire a guard. Most of the sailors I know who have gone there don't "cruise" the Philippines.  They go to a bay like Puerto Galera and park up for the cheap beer, the cheap girls and the cheap Ex-Pat lifestyle.  It could be good but it ain't voyaging and it ain't cruising.Despite all this, I liked the Philippines much more than I thought I would.  The people I worked with were great with a good sense of humor, good education and a lot of skills.  There are some amazing sites and there is some amazing history.  I will never forget my tour of Corregidor. I would love to go back again....as a backpacker.My dream is to have one boat in the South Pacific and one boat in Malaysia or Thailand to use as a base..... 6 months here, 6 months there.....cheap flights to visit neighboring countries like Laos, Cambodia, Burma,  Vietnam, etc as a backpacker.Paul| 35407|35366|2018-11-08 21:46:20|opuspaul|Re: Safety at sea on the Sulu Sea|I am terrible with languages.  I only speak English and sometimes I struggle with that.   I haven't been to Vietnam or Cambodia or Laos yet but I suspect it is a lot like Thailand.   There are so many tourists that you can usually find somebody to help out.   Malaysia has a large Chinese population and English is relatively common.   I found language-wise, it was easier than Thailand which is surprising considering how many tourists go to Thailand.  The same goes for Burma....I lived there almost 3 years.   Amazing, primitive but wonderful place if you can ignore the govt BS that goes on there.  The Burmese have a thirst for English and will try to help out any way they can.  I want to go back.   Just about everybody in India and Philippines speak English.  I went to Bangladesh a few times and think it is dangerous.  Constant riots and you will get robbed or even killed if they think you have money and they can get away with it.   I would never backpack there.Anyway, there is absolutely no reason why older white couples with open minds can't go the backpacker route. I have cruising friends in their 70s that have done it.   I feel safer traveling in Asia than the USA.  We went months in India and rarely booked anything in advance.  Local travel can be a real killer.   The trains and buses in India varied from fair to awful but I took at it as part of the adventure.  We spent more than a few hours in Burma in the back of a pickup truck getting around.  You can't be squeamish or upset when things don't work out as planned.  Power outages are common and things might never show up on time.  I am much more familiar with human body functions than I ever thought possible.     If you think you might want to try, grab some travel guides and just go.   If you are worried about it, go to some place commonly traveled by others and try it for a few weeks.   Go on youtube and look at some travel blogs done by individuals rather than the travel companies.  Some of them are quite good but nothing replaces being there.  I think most people cruising should leave the boat once in awhile (if it is safe) and go inland traveling.    There is so much to see in the world.  Paul  ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Paul, I know we're getting a bit off the topic of origami boats, but I wondered how difficult it is for an English-only-speaking person to travel in the Asian countries you mentioned (Malaysia,Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Burma, Vietnam), particularly away from the tourist areas or the more cosmopolitan cities? Would it be imprudent for an older, white couple to "backpack" in these countries? How do you find food, lodging, and transportation?A.S.| 35408|35366|2018-11-08 22:01:04|opuspaul|Re: Safety at sea on the Sulu Sea|One final point. I could probably travel for 4 months backpacking in India staying at guest houses for what it cost me to stay 2 weeks in Hawaii.   I would see much more in India and unlike a place like Hawaii with it's sterile tourist traps,  I would never be bored.   I also might learn something.| 35409|35366|2018-11-08 22:33:29|a.sobriquet|Re: Safety at sea on the Sulu Sea|Paul, thanks for the suggestions and encouragement. How do you determine whether the local food or water will not cause GI problems?---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I am terrible with languages.  I only speak English and sometimes I struggle with that.   I haven't been to Vietnam or Cambodia or Laos yet but I suspect it is a lot like Thailand.   There are so many tourists that you can usually find somebody to help out.   Malaysia has a large Chinese population and English is relatively common.   I found language-wise, it was easier than Thailand which is surprising considering how many tourists go to Thailand.  The same goes for Burma....I lived there almost 3 years.   Amazing, primitive but wonderful place if you can ignore the govt BS that goes on there.  The Burmese have a thirst for English and will try to help out any way they can.  I want to go back.   Just about everybody in India and Philippines speak English.  I went to Bangladesh a few times and think it is dangerous.  Constant riots and you will get robbed or even killed if they think you have money and they can get away with it.   I would never backpack there.Anyway, there is absolutely no reason why older white couples with open minds can't go the backpacker route. I have cruising friends in their 70s that have done it.   I feel safer traveling in Asia than the USA.  We went months in India and rarely booked anything in advance.  Local travel can be a real killer.   The trains and buses in India varied from fair to awful but I took at it as part of the adventure.  We spent more than a few hours in Burma in the back of a pickup truck getting around.  You can't be squeamish or upset when things don't work out as planned.  Power outages are common and things might never show up on time.  I am much more familiar with human body functions than I ever thought possible.     If you think you might want to try, grab some travel guides and just go.   If you are worried about it, go to some place commonly traveled by others and try it for a few weeks.   Go on youtube and look at some travel blogs done by individuals rather than the travel companies.  Some of them are quite good but nothing replaces being there.  I think most people cruising should leave the boat once in awhile (if it is safe) and go inland traveling.    There is so much to see in the world.  Paul  ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Paul, I know we're getting a bit off the topic of origami boats, but I wondered how difficult it is for an English-only-speaking person to travel in the Asian countries you mentioned (Malaysia,Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Burma, Vietnam), particularly away from the tourist areas or the more cosmopolitan cities? Would it be imprudent for an older, white couple to "backpack" in these countries? How do you find food, lodging, and transportation?A.S.| 35410|35366|2018-11-09 00:01:27|SHANE ROTHWELL|Re: Safety at sea on the Sulu Sea|I spent 15 years living in Asia.As only about 7% of communication is verbal, if people want to communicate they can.It starts with respect. If you are an asshoĺe & treat people like dirt you get everything you deserve. Human dignity has naught to do with money, lifes situation or the pigmentation of your skin.Ignore that & disregard 'face' and it may cost you your life & if you are  racist pig, goodriddance.Safety is another matter. Do not flash cash, leave jewlry at home & do not "navigate" with a cell phone. You were given a brain for that. Kèep your whits about you, stay out of dark allys at night, show a bit of respect a d your fine.And even us stund buggers with only english get bye as most people, even completely illiterate speak 2,3,4 languagesSent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35411|35366|2018-11-09 00:05:36|SHANE ROTHWELL|Re: Safety at sea on the Sulu Sea|Oh ya, don't drink the water. NO fresh veggies and ice while much better  now ca  never be trustedSent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35412|35366|2018-11-09 00:09:17|SHANE ROTHWELL|Re: Safety at sea on the Sulu Sea|Oh yaAnother good point by Paul. You can not be squeemish or impatient. Losing it can cost. Sden it. Mostly those who get into trouble deserve itSent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35413|35413|2018-11-09 00:38:49|SHANE ROTHWELL|Safety on the sulu sea|Don't know if I agree with you entirely Brent.The vigilanty goons are mercinaries and stories of them being spit on when the got back to the septic states of amarica prove there are some decent yanks. Some. But untill proven only a fool turns  his back on em.It was your comment about the Vietnamese. "Good" (my ass) 'ol uncle sam went in for one purpose and one purpose only. MONEY. And the tràined goons with unlimited money & tecknology got their asses kicked because their motivations were:A. They were/are mercinaries. Hired heat paid to killB. That good ol son of a bitch uncle sam had a gun at their backThe Vietnamese however had only one single motivation. Survival, and every man, woman, child and the neibours dog knew that clearly. Sadly it took literally HALF of their population to get rid of them.As they have done the same the world over since their formation it boggles the mind that they don't seem able to underdrstand why they are universally dispised and yes that includes CanadaSent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35414|35366|2018-11-09 14:03:28|opuspaul|Re: Safety at sea on the Sulu Sea|Shane's advice is good advice for every country.   I will keep writing since a lot of this applies to sailors visiting foreign countries, not just backpackers. When I walk around at night, I only carry an ID and the cash I need for the evening.  I get tired of Canadians who always walk around with CDN flags all over their bags and constantly yapping that they are from Canada and not USA.   Nobody cares and it like putting a big sign on yourself saying that you are a newby.   As Shane said, respect is very important.  Some idiots just got thrown in jail for putting graffiti on a temple in Thailand.  Some people have gone to jail just for insulting/defacing  the King of Thailand. This is very serious to the locals.  http://www.rcinet.ca/en/2018/10/19/canadian-faces-10-years-in-jail-for-spray-painting-ancient-thai-wall/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jun/09/man-jailed-for-35-years-in-thailand-for-insulting-monarchy-on-facebookI know of Burmese people who got in serious trouble and got thrown in jail because of rules that got broken by westerners.  If you misbehave you might get kicked out of the country in a few days but the consequences for the locals may be permanent.  You have to be an idiot to buy or take illegal drugs in a foreign country.  Even if it is a party atmosphere and everyone seems to be doing it around you, don't.  You are asking for real trouble. I can't believe how much crap people take with them.  They end up just dragging dirty laundry around with them. Experienced travelers go light.  In a hot climate all you need is one bag with just a few shirts, one pair of pants, a few pairs of shorts, a good wind/rain jacket and a towel and toiletries.   I would just wear my clothing in the shower after a long day and it would be dry in a few hours.  Asia has billions of people and makes just about everything so if you find you lack something, you can just buy it.I always eat local food and rarely get sick.  I got amoebic dysentry while working in Thailand but I am sure I got it by eating a western breakfast at a "good" restaurant....probably from the eggs.  I thought I would die.  I will eat at any street vendor, even in slum areas and drink the hot tea.  My rule is that I don't care about the water quality if the tea is boiled or the food is stir fried or boiled.  If in doubt, order a hot rice stir fry.  If you buy bottled water, make sure the seals are still good.   In some places, they think "bottled water" just means "water that comes in a bottle".   Just about anthing will live in water but alcohol, beer or even coke will help kill bacteria and also tastes good!  Win win.   The people who want to eat "healthy" and order fresh vegetables or anything uncooked  like salads end up getting sick as a dog.  I know of one guy visiting a co-worker while I was in Manila.  I don't know why he was there since he hated travel and whined and complained constantly about the local food.   On his final day there, he ordered rabbit at a fancy restaurant to celebrate going home.  Rabbit in Manila?   Give me a break.   He ended up getting salmonella so bad that they had to asign him his own toilet on the flight home.  Couldn't happen to a nicer guy.As a westerner, you have no natural immunity and are at a high risk for any mosquito born disease.  Watch out for any fever with chills and extreme cycling temperature.  It could be malaria or dengue fever.  I always try to stay covered  and wear pants at night.   I don't take any drugs for long term protection but travel with artesunate in my bag which you can get almost anywhere in Asia for a few dollars.   I know people who have used it and a physician who worked for Doctors Without Borders and he said it worked.  You don't hear about it in the west because it is so widely available and the drug companies make no money from it.  The private hospitals that cater to tourists in Thailand and Malaysia are excellent.   Some of them put western hospitals to shame.   Having said that, if I am in remote areas or more than a few days from good medical care,  I always travel with a good 10 day course of some good antibiotics.   Amoxicillin for general infections and Cipro for stomach bugs.  I think all sailors should keep them in their medical kit.   Some of this might sound like overkill but I think it is just being independent/prepared.  Chances are it will never get used.Don't let this talk scare you from going.  People get sick in North America or Europe too.Cheers, Paulhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artesunate---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I spent 15 years living in Asia.As only about 7% of communication is verbal, if people want to communicate they can.It starts with respect. If you are an asshoĺe & treat people like dirt you get everything you deserve. Human dignity has naught to do with money, lifes situation or the pigmentation of your skin.Ignore that & disregard 'face' and it may cost you your life & if you are  racist pig, goodriddance.Safety is another matter. Do not flash cash, leave jewlry at home & do not "navigate" with a cell phone. You were given a brain for that. Kèep your whits about you, stay out of dark allys at night, show a bit of respect a d your fine.And even us stund buggers with only english get bye as most people, even completely illiterate speak 2,3,4 languagesSent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35415|35366|2018-11-09 18:10:55|brentswain38|Re: Safety at sea on the Sulu Sea|Seems total nutbars are getting elected in increasing numbers, Philippines, Brazil ,the US. etc . Loved Cuba,  a very , peaceful, crime free place . Poor, but no one is desperately poor. $25 a night for a casa particular , some times with breakfast. Meals off the beaten path for $3.50 ,$10 for a  big plate of lobster. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Duterte is a nutjob.  He claims to have been on death squads, participated in killings and joked about rape.  When his own daughter claimed to be raped, he called her a drama queen.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodrigo_Duterte#Davao_Death_SquadI lived in Philippines for almost 3 years in the early 2000s when the kidnapping and beheading in the south was going on.  There were also a lot of bombings in the trains and shopping malls.  Most of it was from the muslim separatists in the south but they were coming up to Manila to do the bombings.  We were constantly patted down and searched, even to enter a shopping mall.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rizal_Day_bombingsWalking around Manila late at night, I was more worried about the police than anybody else.  They were all on the take, looking for bribes and trigger happy.   If somebody was stupid enough to try to run from something, they would likely get a bullet in the back. The real problem with the Philippines is too many people and too much poverty.   If you have 90 million people and only 1% are bad, that is still a lot of bad (or desperate) people.   I saw much worse poverty in the slums of Manila than I ever saw backpacking in India.  You can say what you want about India but everybody seems to have a job, even if it is awful.  In Manila, I saw people so poor they lived off garbage piles and didn't even have clothes.  They had a landslide in a garbage dump there that killed hundreds of people.  Seriously, how bad does it have to get before the catholics change their policy on birth control?  None of this has to do with Muslims.http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/830809.stmWhen I comes to sailing, I am tempted but the worst storms on earth happen in the Pacific in the area around the Philippines.  The Super-Typhoons are terrible  and and unlike other hurrican or cyclone areas, the typhoons can happen almost any time of the year.The areas around Palawan are incredible...bays and islands that you can only dream of.   I am tempted, but I don't think I could leave my boat in a remote area like that and go ashore without taking a big risk.   Sooner or later I think you would get robbed if you didn't have somebody stay on board all the time or hire a guard. Most of the sailors I know who have gone there don't "cruise" the Philippines.  They go to a bay like Puerto Galera and park up for the cheap beer, the cheap girls and the cheap Ex-Pat lifestyle.  It could be good but it ain't voyaging and it ain't cruising.Despite all this, I liked the Philippines much more than I thought I would.  The people I worked with were great with a good sense of humor, good education and a lot of skills.  There are some amazing sites and there is some amazing history.  I will never forget my tour of Corregidor. I would love to go back again....as a backpacker.My dream is to have one boat in the South Pacific and one boat in Malaysia or Thailand to use as a base..... 6 months here, 6 months there.....cheap flights to visit neighboring countries like Laos, Cambodia, Burma,  Vietnam, etc as a backpacker.Paul| 35416|35363|2018-11-09 18:12:24|Brian Johnston|Re: Insulating a hull|Rock,Thanks for that feedback. Here you have it, folks. Definitive answers. Closed cell foam is NOT impervious to water. Glad we cleared that up. Thanks again Rock.Sent from my iPhone On Nov 4, 2018, at 10:44 PM, rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Exllent points Darren thanks. but any kind of respirator is iffy at best. Just go with remote air supply. Easy. Get a north brand respirator and they are cheap. Then get the double extension tubes that put the filters about the centre of your back and they are a complete rip off at $100 (but I plan on fixing that & off to Gwong Dong to work with my mate I did the lenz washer for Barns-Hind with A project that .it only went for 22 years & 8kk pieces) From there you get a 1.25" sump pump hose which again is cheap. Bojang it together with strips of innertube. A blower helps but is not needed is you just go 20'. It removes ALL of the bullshit associated with filters etc & no confusion as as long as you put the intake to windward you get clean air but dont forget a bit of fabric over the intake as just one insect might be rather awkward. Someone else mentioned that cured foam is impervious to water and salt. Bullshit syraight undiluted bullshit. The bildges of the Dove were insulated down to the lowest stringer but the insulation above that lowest stringer, just in a humid environment was wet with the steel below it corroded. Same thing where the exposed steel of the bollard framing had dripped onto the foam below with corrosion below the foam. I'm sure whoever said it was impervious to h20 meant well but the jerkoff salesman who told him that lied through his teeth. It might be closed cell foam but it's still foam. Another little beaut I saw on a Folk boat was under & aft of the chain locker so brilliantly located below decks. With all the bottom crap brought aboard was just a bit of salt h20... the usual usage of 2 weeks per year & most of the h2o evaporates, but the salt remains and salt is hydophilic (is that the right word?) anyway, perpetually damp & salty with a lovely little dribble of rusty water dribbling from under the foam into the forward bildge. Lastly, I find it amazing the extent to which we get screwed in Canada. Epoxy paint, the best of the best sells for $18 a seppo gallon here & less than that in the big city. A carpenter is $10/day & a ticketed welder is $15/day | 35417|35363|2018-11-09 18:33:09|Matt Malone|Re: Insulating a hull| Yes closed cell foam can still take on water.  I have a 70s Boston Whaler 11' that was 150 pounds when new.  It weighs 250 pounds now.   I removed closed cell foam from a 70s boat where some pieces would sink.  Perhaps freeze/thaw helped break it down.  I have seen commercial freezer wall panels, closed cell foam enclosed in aluminum sheet, that absorbed a tremendous amount of water and were saturated with ice, always frozen, and not effective. Cheap foam takes on water rapidly.  Getting it out is practically possible, leave it in a dry barn for 6 months+.  Closed cell foam, all of my experience says after decades of absorption, it is nearly impossible to get the water out.  I have used heat, vacuum, low humidity and time, nothing extracted more than 0.5% of the water. Not applicable to all uses of closed cell foam, I am leaning toward sealed PETE bottles from carbonated drinks (pressure=thicker, tougher bottles).   No they do not pack perfectly, but I can empty them in no time, replace them, recycle them.  Matt From: Brian Johnston mosahlah@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, November 9, 18:12 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Insulating a hull To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Rock, Thanks for that feedback. Here you have it, folks. Definitive answers. Closed cell foam is NOT impervious to water. Glad we cleared that up. Thanks again Rock. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 4, 2018, at 10:44 PM, rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Exllent points Darren thanks. but any kind of respirator is iffy at best. Just go with remote air supply. Easy. Get a north brand respirator and they are cheap. Then get the double extension tubes that put the filters about the centre of your back and they are a complete rip off at $100 (but I plan on fixing that & off to Gwong Dong to work with my mate I did the lenz washer for Barns-Hind with A project that .it only went for 22 years & 8kk pieces) From there you get a 1.25" sump pump hose which again is cheap. Bojang it together with strips of innertube. A blower helps but is not needed is you just go 20'. It removes ALL of the bullshit associated with filters etc & no confusion as as long as you put the intake to windward you get clean air but dont forget a bit of fabric over the intake as just one insect might be rather awkward. Someone else mentioned that cured foam is impervious to water and salt. Bullshit syraight undiluted bullshit. The bildges of the Dove were insulated down to the lowest stringer but the insulation above that lowest stringer, just in a humid environment was wet with the steel below it corroded. Same thing where the exposed steel of the bollard framing had dripped onto the foam below with corrosion below the foam. I'm sure whoever said it was impervious to h20 meant well but the jerkoff salesman who told him that lied through his teeth. It might be closed cell foam but it's still foam. Another little beaut I saw on a Folk boat was under & aft of the chain locker so brilliantly located below decks. With all the bottom crap brought aboard was just a bit of salt h20... the usual usage of 2 weeks per year & most of the h2o evaporates, but the salt remains and salt is hydophilic (is that the right word?) anyway, perpetually damp & salty with a lovely little dribble of rusty water dribbling from under the foam into the forward bildge. Lastly, I find it amazing the extent to which we get screwed in Canada. Epoxy paint, the best of the best sells for $18 a seppo gallon here & less than that in the big city. A carpenter is $10/day & a ticketed welder is $15/day | 35418|35413|2018-11-09 19:49:06|brentswain38|Re: Safety on the sulu sea|Canada sold the yanks the ammo and agent orange for the Vietnam  war . My brother worked in the IPSCO  chemical plant  in Saskatoon, making agent orange for them .The French company Gevelot set up shop ,manufacturing  ammo in Saskatoon, for the Vietnam war.Many mining companies are registered in Canada, because only Canada will let them get away with gang  rape and murder  in third world  countries.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Don't know if I agree with you entirely Brent.The vigilanty goons are mercinaries and stories of them being spit on when the got back to the septic states of amarica prove there are some decent yanks. Some. But untill proven only a fool turns  his back on em.It was your comment about the Vietnamese. "Good" (my ass) 'ol uncle sam went in for one purpose and one purpose only. MONEY. And the tràined goons with unlimited money & tecknology got their asses kicked because their motivations were:A. They were/are mercinaries. Hired heat paid to killB. That good ol son of a bitch uncle sam had a gun at their backThe Vietnamese however had only one single motivation. Survival, and every man, woman, child and the neibours dog knew that clearly. Sadly it took literally HALF of their population to get rid of them.As they have done the same the world over since their formation it boggles the mind that they don't seem able to underdrstand why they are universally dispised and yes that includes CanadaSent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35419|35413|2018-11-09 20:19:32|Matt Malone|Re: Safety on the sulu sea| This is getting a little dark. Other than the non-political, tourist-facing side of Cuba which you have spoken positively of, is there anywhere else you have positive comments about? Matt From: brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, November 9, 20:13 Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Safety on the sulu sea To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Canada sold the yanks the ammo and agent orange for the Vietnam  war . My brother worked in the IPSCO  chemical plant  in Saskatoon, making agent orange for them .The French company Gevelot set up shop ,manufacturing  ammo in Saskatoon, for the Vietnam war. Many mining companies are registered in Canada, because only Canada will let them get away with gang  rape and murder  in third world  countries. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Don't know if I agree with you entirely Brent. The vigilanty goons are mercinaries and stories of them being spit on when the got back to the septic states of amarica prove there are some decent yanks. Some. But untill proven only a fool turns  his back on em. It was your comment about the Vietnamese. "Good" (my ass) 'ol uncle sam went in for one purpose and one purpose only. MONEY. And the tràined goons with unlimited money & tecknology got their asses kicked because their motivations were: A. They were/are mercinaries. Hired heat paid to kill B. That good ol son of a bitch uncle sam had a gun at their back The Vietnamese however had only one single motivation. Survival, and every man, woman, child and the neibours dog knew that clearly.  Sadly it took literally HALF of their population to get rid of them. As they have done the same the world over since their formation it boggles the mind that they don't seem able to underdrstand why they are universally dispised and yes that includes Canada Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android | 35420|35420|2018-11-10 00:17:31|SHANE ROTHWELL|Re: Safety on the Sulu Sea|Matt,Qiute right.Nuf sedSent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35421|35421|2018-11-10 00:41:54|SHANE ROTHWELL|Re: safty on the Sulu sea|Good points PaulYes, hospitals in Thailand DO put the west to shame.Innoculations are a total rip in CanadaSave half the cost of your flight & hit the tropical desese centre in Bangers, but don't fart around. Go straight there. Actually you save half your flight on Japanese Encephalitis jabs aloneAlso thanks for the additional info on drugs to carry Will double check mine but its been sooo long and in the grab bag with me passport so I can literally just....goAnd yes, hand cary only. No bags to lose. I'm now travelling heavy at 6kÄŸ but I'm only away just shy of 6 month & need decent clothing for a bit of business on the way home in HonkersBy the way. Having had my passport stolen when leaving it as security on a bike. They sold it and"advised" me in no uncrtian terms it was time to leave..took almost a month & cost just shy of $3k in '84 to get that sorted..now the only people who even touch my pp are immivration or a man with a gun.Anyone demands your pp it just not worth it. Politely move on dispite what you might want to say. Your in THEIR natural environment & maybe you don't see it coming...Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35422|35363|2018-11-10 01:04:07|aguysailing|Re: Insulating a hull|I hired a mobile guy ...sprayed in the foam which was painted with latex.  Just checked throughout my 36' launched 12 yrs ago and all is dry as a bone...| 35423|35366|2018-11-10 08:54:22|a.sobriquet|Re: Safety at sea on the Sulu Sea|Thanks for sharing your experience, and the helpful tips. If you have more thoughts I'd appreciate hearing them.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I will keep writing since a lot of this applies to sailors visiting foreign countries, not just backpackers. ...| 35424|35421|2018-11-10 09:31:07|Matt Malone|Re: safty on the Sulu sea| Shane, on the passport thing:  It seems in French sphere countries, surrendering ones passport seems a more common requirement, for things as mundane as staying in lodgings.  Surrendering ones passport for weeks or months for visa applications is apparently standard.  Recently Gone With the Wynns documented exactly that for a long stay visa for French Polynesia. Are there workarounds for the more mundane passport requests that would seem to be required?  Obviously, for some vida requests it may be unavoidable. Matt From: SHANE ROTHWELL rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, November 10, 00:42 Subject: [origamiboats] Re: safty on the Sulu sea To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Good points Paul Yes, hospitals in Thailand DO put the west to shame. Innoculations are a total rip in Canada Save half the cost of your flight & hit the tropical desese centre in Bangers, but don't fart around. Go straight there. Actually you save half your flight on Japanese Encephalitis jabs alone Also thanks for the additional info on drugs to carry  Will double check mine but its been sooo long and in the grab bag with me passport so I can literally just....go And yes, hand cary only. No bags to lose. I'm now travelling heavy at 6kÄŸ but I'm only away just shy of 6 month & need decent clothing for a bit of business on the way home in Honkers By the way. Having had my passport stolen when leaving it as security on a bike. They sold it and "advised" me in no uncrtian terms it was time to leave..took almost a month & cost just shy of $3k in '84 to get that sorted..now the only people who even touch my pp are immivration or a man with a gun. Anyone demands your pp it just not worth it. Politely move on dispite what you might want to say. Your in THEIR natural environment & maybe you don't see it coming... Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android | 35425|35413|2018-11-10 17:12:20|brentswain38|Re: Safety on the sulu sea|The nice thing about the political side of Cuba is you don't see starving kids in rags begging for their  survival , unlike other third world countries. You know the money you spend there often goes to their free education,health  care ,etc,  not to make the already rich, richer.  After 2 years cruising the S Pacific in my first  boat ,I  was getting bit homesick , until I got to Fiji. Then I felt at home.No language barrier, super cheap living, super friendly people, including tourists of the single  female kind ( important, as I was in my mid 20;s) Super diving and spearfishing, a nice variety of climate from the wet side to the western  dry side,  a huge variety and choice of anchorages.I highly recommend Fiji.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : This is getting a little dark. Other than the non-political, tourist-facing side of Cuba which you have spoken positively of, is there anywhere else you have positive comments about? Matt | 35426|35421|2018-11-10 17:16:33|brentswain38|Re: safty on the Sulu sea|If you pack clothes to Asia you may just be taking what was made there,  and bought at many times the price, to ship back to where they can be bought new, for a fraction the price Kinda like shipping ice to  Greenland.| 35427|35366|2018-11-10 17:17:28|Brian Johnston|Re: Safety at sea on the Sulu Sea|Stay away from Malaysia and Indo.  Bunch of our guys have been attacked on the street there. Lost a couple of friends in Philippines. Stay north of mindanao, and out of communist country. Thailand is fine, but criminals are an issue. Don’t screw ariund in Vietnam. Authorities are merciless. Etc. blah blahSent from my iPhone On Nov 8, 2018, at 11:14 AM, a.sobriquet@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Paul, I know we're getting a bit off the topic of origami boats, but I wondered how difficult it is for an English-only-speaking person to travel in the Asian countries you mentioned (Malaysia,Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Burma, Vietnam), particularly away from the tourist areas or the more cosmopolitan cities? Would it be imprudent for an older, white couple to "backpack" in these countries? How do you find food, lodging, and transportation?A.S.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Duterte is a nutjob.  He claims to have been on death squads, participated in killings and joked about rape.  When his own daughter claimed to be raped, he called her a drama queen.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodrigo_Duterte#Davao_Death_SquadI lived in Philippines for almost 3 years in the early 2000s when the kidnapping and beheading in the south was going on.  There were also a lot of bombings in the trains and shopping malls.  Most of it was from the muslim separatists in the south but they were coming up to Manila to do the bombings.  We were constantly patted down and searched, even to enter a shopping mall.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rizal_Day_bombingsWalking around Manila late at night, I was more worried about the police than anybody else.  They were all on the take, looking for bribes and trigger happy.   If somebody was stupid enough to try to run from something, they would likely get a bullet in the back. The real problem with the Philippines is too many people and too much poverty.   If you have 90 million people and only 1% are bad, that is still a lot of bad (or desperate) people.   I saw much worse poverty in the slums of Manila than I ever saw backpacking in India.  You can say what you want about India but everybody seems to have a job, even if it is awful.  In Manila, I saw people so poor they lived off garbage piles and didn't even have clothes.  They had a landslide in a garbage dump there that killed hundreds of people.  Seriously, how bad does it have to get before the catholics change their policy on birth control?  None of this has to do with Muslims.http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/830809.stmWhen I comes to sailing, I am tempted but the worst storms on earth happen in the Pacific in the area around the Philippines.  The Super-Typhoons are terrible  and and unlike other hurrican or cyclone areas, the typhoons can happen almost any time of the year.The areas around Palawan are incredible...bays and islands that you can only dream of.   I am tempted, but I don't think I could leave my boat in a remote area like that and go ashore without taking a big risk..   Sooner or later I think you would get robbed if you didn't have somebody stay on board all the time or hire a guard. Most of the sailors I know who have gone there don't "cruise" the Philippines.  They go to a bay like Puerto Galera and park up for the cheap beer, the cheap girls and the cheap Ex-Pat lifestyle.  It could be good but it ain't voyaging and it ain't cruising.Despite all this, I liked the Philippines much more than I thought I would.  The people I worked with were great with a good sense of humor, good education and a lot of skills.  There are some amazing sites and there is some amazing history.  I will never forget my tour of Corregidor. I would love to go back again....as a backpacker.My dream is to have one boat in the South Pacific and one boat in Malaysia or Thailand to use as a base..... 6 months here, 6 months there.....cheap flights to visit neighboring countries like Laos, Cambodia, Burma,  Vietnam, etc as a backpacker.Paul | 35428|35421|2018-11-10 17:20:18|brentswain38|Re: safty on the Sulu sea|Some will settle for a photo copy of a passport. Carrying them is a backup for  a lost passport, sometimes, a good idea anyway.| 35429|35413|2018-11-11 21:21:20|SHANE ROTHWELL|Re: Safety on the sulu sea|Good points Brent.Re insulating the hull. Above the bildge the foam on the Dove was dry as a bone too & that after 30 years with paint that i assume was latex. Only problems were in the bildge with condensation from un insulated parts. No cleaning during that time and no  ventilation at allRe the guy who recommends not visiting....Thailand, Malaya, Cambodia, Vietnam etc etc.Perhaps a sterile coocoon is more your style?Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35430|35363|2018-11-13 14:42:11|lisnion|Re: Insulating a hull|Hi Guys,After following the insulation thread I ordered a Tiger Foam TF600SR closed cell 600 board foot slow rise foam kit to insulate an RV. After looking things over and talking to the Tiger foam tech support guys I decided the TF fast rise stuff is more appropriate for what I want to do. So; I've got an unopened TF600SR kit for sale, it cost me about $800 USD. I'm not sure what to charge as shipping from Colorado may be troublesome. I'd prefer to ship to a US address. Expiration date on the tanks is July 2019. Is anyone interested or should I take my chances on Craigslist?IonColorado| 35431|35413|2018-11-13 14:42:25|Brian Johnston|Re: Safety on the sulu sea|The guy who doesn’t recommend visiting Philippines Malaysia and Indonesia doesn’t know what he’s talking about. And besides, I don’t think he was talking about the whore houses. On the other hand, maybe he’s an actual professional who knows something about counterinsurgency operations ongoing. Whatever, you’re the expert. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 11, 2018, at 6:21 PM, SHANE ROTHWELL rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Good points Brent.Re insulating the hull. Above the bildge the foam on the Dove was dry as a bone too & that after 30 years with paint that i assume was latex. Only problems were in the bildge with condensation from un insulated parts. No cleaning during that time and no  ventilation at allRe the guy who recommends not visiting....Thailand, Malaya, Cambodia, Vietnam etc etc.Perhaps a sterile coocoon is more your style?Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android | 35432|35413|2018-11-13 16:59:55|Matt Malone|Boat Fire Extinguishing| #ygrps-yiv-2038633518 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} I keep remembering Brent's suggestion for a fire in a boat -- close it up tight and wait for the fire to go out.  The concept is not new, but I just saw a video of this demonstrated:   https://www.amazon.ca/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=fire+extinguisher+ball&tag=googcana-20&index=aps&hvadid=208405161004&hvpos=1t1&hvnetw=g&hvrand=10732189469617902306&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=e&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9000792&hvtargid=kwd-300972080862&ref=pd_sl_5aahb9a8ig_e It even comes with a holder so that it can be mounted permanently in a place where one expects there might be fire.   It would be really inconvenient if it went off automatically, spreading extinguishing media everywhere, but it is the simplest automatic extinguisher I have seen.   It is also reasonably priced compared to a lot of boat hardware.   I am not suggesting it as a replacement for required extinguishers, I was thinking of it as in addition to manual extinguishers, one that works when you are not at home or when the fire is inside a difficult to reach space.   If one is using the close-it-up-and-wait method of boat fire fighting, it seems this would shorten the wait.    There is a closed space under my cockpit that houses the fuel tank, batteries and exhaust.  It is accessed by removing the companionway stairs (yes, one's escape route) and opening a closet-under-the-stairs type door.  Even with this door open, the space is not well seen.   I still like fixed sprinkler pipes accessed and pumped into from outside the boat.   Unthread the pipe cap, attached the hose, start pumping.      Matt | 35433|35363|2018-11-13 19:55:38|opuspaul|Re: Insulating a hull|I just watched a series of videos on this from a guy building a boat in Australia.  It is an interesting channel.  He is doing some very good work but I think he put it the insulation on a bit too thin if you are really going to be in a cold climate.  He stresses in one of the videos the importance of shaking the bottles before spraying and the fact that it doesn't go as far as they say.  The foaming starts at episode 9. Good luck, Paulhttps://www.youtube.com/user/bmwfreedom/videos| 35434|35434|2018-11-13 22:20:18|SHANE ROTHWELL|Re: Safety on board|As I've the luxury of chopping & changing things aboard & not interested in the shotgun stowed in the aft end of the boom (& who hasn't figured that out, don't declare it & might spoil your plans...)But the need to incapacitate unwanted boarders still needed just in caseI'm thinking of plumbing  copper or even pex tubing. A series of "t's" mounted into the aft side of the deckhouse aimed at the cockpit. A bit of wax or wotever on the inboard end of the "t" to hold a charge of powdered cayenne pepper. The outboard end sealing the charge with drywall putty. Faired & painted over so it will bust out easy when yougive it a short blast of compressed air.A blast of pepper in the face should stop 'em...without killing em.To cover up just a bit more drywallmud or a bit of masking tape & a lick of paint.I figure 4-6 of em should give you enuf options so you can stay below,  let them look and let 'em have it right in the face as they look in through the ports. Then up hook & get out.Your thoughts gentlemen?Another one I've been thinking of, the "captian Nemo", right round on the railing. A 12v electric   fence charger connected to one all round wire (if that is you can depend on a good ground to the railing...but paint may be enuf to insulate..) or a 2nd wire for a ground.Haven't figured yet how to turn it off inconspicuously when I come aboard, but that' a minor detail.You could arm it while you are aboard  so you know if someone is trying to bord as you sleep or when you  go ashore to discourage the curious.Either way you would have to set it up so the only way to grab the rail you would also grab the wire/wires at the same time.If you've ever been zapped even by a little fence charger you kmow it'll knock you on your ass. A boarder who is unaware coming aboard from a small boat will probably end up swimming & induce thought.The only potential problem I can think of would be the possibility/probability (?) Of electrolysis of  the hull or blowing out your zinks real fast. (Also radio interferance but then you just turn it off)Perhaps a dedicated zink for a ground you slip overside when you switch on....?Can anyone enlighten me pleaseSent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35435|35435|2018-11-13 22:33:15|SHANE ROTHWELL|Re: safety on the Sulu|We're getting a bit off topic.. Perhaps a new name for the thread...And hey Brian, thanks for the kudos but though I spenta good chunk in Asia, much of it was just getting away with it.  But being a born shit  disterber...don't follow me man, I'm lostSent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35436|35413|2018-11-13 22:40:48|SHANE ROTHWELL|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|What about a small welding bottle with Co2 with a line/wire mounted somewhere outboard of the hull so fire drill is Monty Python's "run away, run away!", slam everything shut & pull the line/wire to flood the hull with co2. Not so messy either & like you said will starve the fire even fasterSent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35437|35434|2018-11-13 23:58:06|Matt Malone|Re: Safety on board| Cayenne pepper yes, but industrial quantities of food grade capsaicin (the pure chemical in hot peppers, bear spray, police pepper spray) comes in 45 gallon drums, I have two empties.  I got just a little residue from an empty barrel on my hands and thought I was having an asthma attack from the inside, not inhaling it.  I wiped off my hands and I put on a pair of work gloves.  After wiping it off my hands, I got enough residue on the inside of the gloves that I got the same symptoms again the next time I put the gloves on.  A quart would last a lifetime.  I recommend dilution. How to turn on an electric fence or anything else 12V.  There are car remotes/receiver modules sold at Canadian Tire with three buttons and contacts for three relays on the receiver.  Electric fence, no problemo.   Many GSM/SMS alarm systems (ebay $60-100) have a dry contact that might be used for the electric fence driver.  Such alarm systems come with car remote type things with activate/deactivate buttons. Problem is, you leave it on or it gets triggered while you are walking in town, and you zap the well-liked kid that comes to sell you fruit and he drowns because he cannot swim, the law is your smallest problem.   Also, the voltage is not high enough for serious baddies/pirates on drugs.   The wires do not move.  The second pirate laughs at the first pirate and jumps aboard.  A medium speed motor with 4' fine cable on it that spins and spreads to a big umbrella shape electric zapping umbrella makes the entire cockpit inhospitable. I think for town, you just want something ignorantly loud, bright lights and SMS on your phone.  I have a 1970s fire alarm from a public school.  A single alarm system dry contact can drive several relays that in turn activate everything. Consider the advantages of a steel boat, and a couple sections made of 1/4" plate (wont stop AP ammo) and look to armored (Brinks) trucks and their gun ports.   A handful of tacks on the deck deals with stealthy night-time raids.  Armed pirates, perhaps with guns, even AP ammo, perhaps with an RPG, that is not necessarily a solved problem.   If they are high on drugs, plans should not depend on rational choices. A sailor, friend of a friend, had two firearms, one an AK-47 for up close, and a long range rifle to start shooting effectively before they get close.   He reportedly had occasion to use both.  Reportedly effective, but it could just be tall tales. I have heard several times of tangling fibres, like unravelled ropes to foul propellers of pirate boats.  It seems their boats travel faster than rope, and their bullets even faster. Smart sailors do not talk about their plans. Matt From: SHANE ROTHWELL rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 22:20 Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Safety on board To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   As I've the luxury of chopping & changing things aboard & not interested in the shotgun stowed in the aft end of the boom (& who hasn't figured that out, don't declare it & might spoil your plans...) But the need to incapacitate unwanted boarders still needed just in case I'm thinking of plumbing  copper or even pex tubing. A series of "t's" mounted into the aft side of the deckhouse aimed at the cockpit. A bit of wax or wotever on the inboard end of the "t" to hold a charge of powdered cayenne pepper. The outboard end sealing the charge with drywall putty. Faired & painted over so it will bust out easy when yougive it a short blast of compressed air. A blast of pepper in the face should stop 'em...without killing em. To cover up just a bit more drywall mud or a bit of masking tape & a lick of paint. I figure 4-6 of em should give you enuf options so you can stay below,  let them look and let 'em have it right in the face as they look in through the ports. Then up hook & get out. Your thoughts gentlemen? Another one I've been thinking of, the "captian Nemo", right round on the railing. A 12v electric   fence charger connected to one all round wire (if that is you can depend on a good ground to the railing...but paint may be enuf to insulate..) or a 2nd wire for a ground. Haven't figured yet how to turn it off inconspicuously when I come aboard, but that' a minor detail. You could arm it while you are aboard  so you know if someone is trying to bord as you sleep or when you  go ashore to discourage the curious. Either way you would have to set it up so the only way to grab the rail you would also grab the wire/wires at the same time. If you've ever been zapped even by a little fence charger you kmow it'll knock you on your ass. A boarder who is unaware coming aboard from a small boat will probably end up swimming & induce thought. The only potential problem I can think of would be the possibility/probability (?) Of electrolysis of  the hull or blowing out your zinks real fast. (Also radio interferance but then you just turn it off) Perhaps a dedicated zink for a ground you slip overside when you switch on....? Can anyone enlighten me please Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android | 35438|35413|2018-11-14 12:51:03|Matt Malone|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing| #ygrps-yiv-1455290983 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} CO2 is obvious good as is water, but both can actually engage in the oxidation of glowing char:   CO2 + C (glowing) ==> 2 CO -- carbon monoxide that can burn elsewhere H2O + C (glowing) ==> CO + H2 -- both of which can burn elsewhere Both reactions are endothermic, robbing heat from the fire, but change a solid fuel in one spot into a gaseous fuel that can be more trouble. Both CO2 and water require overwhelming amounts to work well.   In overwhelming amounts both also suck the heat out of the fire -- water by its heat of vapourization -- the energy required to make steam, and CO2 by its cooling as it expands out of the nozzle from a pressurized container.  Overwhelming amounts of water is typically not a problem, so the char reaction effect is rarely noticed.   I would want to calculate how many cubic feet of CO2 is in your cannister and make sure it overwhelms the boat.   I recall CO2 cannisters even for small server rooms were huge, twice the size, maybe 4 times the volume of scuba tanks.  Water is free and plentiful. Dry chemical is better. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of SHANE ROTHWELL rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 10:40 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing     What about a small welding bottle with Co2 with a line/wire mounted somewhere outboard of the hull so fire drill is Monty Python's "run away, run away!", slam everything shut & pull the line/wire to flood the hull with co2. Not so messy either & like you said will starve the fire even faster Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android | 35439|35439|2018-11-14 13:27:17|opuspaul|GGR Race|Who has been following the Golden Globe Race?  Some amazing things going on.  If you are keen, go back to the beginning for the full story.  I think this race is much more iimportant and relevant to regular sailors like us since the boats they sail are much more like ours.  Jean-Luc Van Den Heede is one hell of a guy.  https://goldengloberace.com/day-135-jean-luc-van-den-heede-facing-fresh-storm/https://goldengloberace.com/skipper/jean-luc-van-den-heede-13/| 35440|34922|2018-11-14 13:42:55|Matt Malone|Re: Solar Sale| #ygrps-yiv-2053797163 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Yet another sale on solar, this time "305 Watt" panels.   For many atmospheric reasons, expect a lot less less unless you live in the New Mexico desert, and then expect a little less, if nothing else because these are used panels. SUNPOWER 305W Mono Black Frame Solar Panels... SALE $90! Model Number  SPR-305-WHT-U Pmax - 305W Vmpp - 54.7V Impp - 5.58A Voc - 64.2V Isc - 5.98A Minimum 20 panel order Better suited to "48V" off-grid installations.   Various grades of inverters and charge controllers might make them useful on a boat.   The advantage of "48V" panels is, the wires are thinner for the same power, but good charge controllers and inverters for "48V" systems are generally more expensive but are also more commonly industrial grade.  For "48V" systems, "120V" inverters can tend to be more efficient.  Voltage step-down converters to "24V" or "12V" are possible, and expect the cheaper (ebay) ones to have very poor efficiency and as a result get quite hot.    inefficient == hot, and hot == inefficient, a truism resulting from basic physics.   A system that stays only warm under load might start at thousands of dollars.   The minimum 20 panel order, is the start of a serious system for a house in a sunny area, or cottage in a less-sunny area.   But "6000W" for less than USD$2,000 ... what is that, a year of hydro bills ?   Is that the price of one power pole to string a wire to your cottage ?   But how many power poles do they need to put in to reach your cottage?   But how many years might you get out of these panels?   Note everything else to make a safe, minimal off-grid system will be a lot more money, perhaps even just the pressure treated wood to make the structure to hold them up at your cottage.    On a boat where the alternative is wind or engine fuel, solar has completely different economics.  I would prefer brand-new "360W" or "380W" panels, suited to a "24V" system.  Using "24V" panels tends to allow the inexpensive "12V" voltage converters work less inefficiently.   Using inexpensive converters does sacrifice efficiency, however, I can afford to buy two, and keep one wrapped up as a spare, or keep an inexpensive one as a spare.   Using "24V" panels also reduces voltage hazards of working around "48V" systems in tight spaces.   At a cottage, no problem, lay out the "48V" system on a wall where one has space to step back, and one is standing with lots of elbow room while doing all work. Lastly there are some nice "48V" 10 hp DC motors that are popular on electric vehicles... Google "10 HP DC motor".     Electric motor HP are minimums for 100% duty, where fuel engine HP are maximums for a shorter service life ... for "ordinary service" of a fuel engine, 10 hp electric will go a long way.  Panels, batteries and motors, all with compatible voltages... simplifies the system and makes it cost less.   One still would need a PWM controller to run the motor at varying speeds.  If one motors only to clear the jetty and not during passages, then one might dispose of fuel all together on the boat and instead have more batteries ... with their own hazards and costs.   The contact information is the same as below. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 12:21 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Solar Sale     I have posted before when ML Solar has had a fire sale price for panels: SANYO 195 Watt Used Solar Panel Special... ONLY US$40 each! Was the subject line.   68 V Open circuit, 55.3V maximum power point, 3.53A maximum power point, from a photo of the tag on the back, however, the ad misprinted the isc as 2.73A instead of 3.73A as it says on the back.   These are used panels !     They are selling them in skids only, a skid is 20 panels.   Their contact information is:  408-583-8101, www.mlsolar.com, sales@... ML Solar Online Solar Panel Store | Jeff Long If you need solar panel supplies, Jeff Long can help! Visit our site or contact us today for all of your solar panel related needs. www.mlsolar.com Ok, my commentary:  These panels are well matched for a "48V" solar system, though modern (expensive) MPPT charge controllers may be able to take them without incurring a large efficiency penalty.   I have seen cheap controllers that claim to be MPPT, but they have simply been pre-made to take 17V panels and charge 12V batteries -- they have no smarts in them at all, they do not track the actual voltage.   You need a good MPPT, or a "48V" system to use these panels.   48V systems are not uncommon.  For instance the telephone system runs on 48V DC in most places.   These panels would not be my first choice for a boat, both for the reason of the voltage, and also, new panels of exactly the same physical size are rated at 350W+  -- that is 70% more power for the same area of panel.   With boat space at a premium (unless I had some giant cat), I would pay a lot more for higher power density panels.   These panels would be very interesting for a back-woods installation.   Buy way more than you need, for less than higher power density panels, and they cover a larger fraction of the acreage -- who cares -- and you have oodles of power, and redundancy.   If these panels are like the ones I got, they were in service in a large solar farm, and then put on skids for resale.   Mine had grime and algae on them -- they needed to be washed -- dish detergent and a gentle scrub -- no big deal.     I had mine shipped to a UPS depot in the US, and crossed them myself.   I just paid HST on the way back.   No brokerage fees required.   UPS shipping costs for a skid to a UPS depot with a loading dock are not bad.  I bought 32 used panels from MLSOLAR.   The bottom 4 were smashed both because the pallet they were on was poor, but also poorly handled.   UPS stuck a second pallet under the stack and wrapped over the MLSOLAR shipping labels with more plastic wrap to try to hide what had happened, and tried to pretend that there was no problem in shipment.   I took photos, both at the UPS depot and later.  I had bought shipping insurance, so, I contacted MLSOLAR and I got a refund on those.  For fun I measured the power output of the smashed panels.   Smashed, they still produced 15-30W at odd voltages.   Then I leaned them up against a tree, MLSOLAR never asked for these 4 panels back.   When I went to test the remaining 28 (weeks later, after the refund for the 4 smashed ones was processed), I discovered one panel, one of the wires was pulled out of the back and "trash" was hand written in marker on the back.   My impression was, some solar farm field worker spent the entire day in the hot sun trying to find the problem, and when he found it, he yanked one wire out to make sure it would never get reattached again and wrote trash on it.    So, I paid for 28, got 27.   They were used panels, and at $40, you cannot be picky.   Buy shipping insurance, get used to the idea that there may be a defective panel.   As for power output, watch "Better Call Saul" and look at the scenes where they show the New Mexico sky -- it is a very dark blue, in full sun.  That is because the total humidity between the ground and the sun is very low -- more humidity leads to more scattering of sunlight and a lighter hue to the clear sky.   You just do not see that kind of sky in Canada.   It is even worse in Florida -- the sky looks a very light blue even on a completely cloudless day.   Flying in, on a completely cloudless day, you sometimes cannot see the ground clearly because it is so hazy and sunlight is scattering back up at you from the *air* below.   In contrast, flying across the American southwest, the air is so clear, you can make out minuscule details on the ground from cruising altitude.   The reality is, panel specs are given for sky and sun conditions that would be more like the New Mexico desert in summer.   Everywhere else a panel produces less power than the specs.   Get used to that idea before buying any panels to use anywhere.   In Canada, in March (perihelion, maximum sun intensity), on a reasonably cloudless day, I was measuring more than 100W output from used "150W" panels using a variable resistor bank to find find the maximum power point.    Brand new Canadian Tire panels, I was getting about 70% of their rating.   On reasonably sunny days, with panels oriented directly to the sun, in the middle half of the day (not the first and last quarter), one might be able to bet on 50% of ratings, though on good days one might hope for more.   *Your mileage will vary*   Reorienting panels is expensive.   If you do not reorient, if you just lean for the season, you will get less power out of the panel in each day.   Solution: Buy more panels.   At these prices, the panel is the cheapest piece of the system.   Even buying pressure-treated 2x4s and posts and bolts and washers to make the racks to hold them is going to be a reasonably fraction of the panel cost before considering power cables, the MPPT good to 70+V, batteries, a wacking big inverter, and an isolating transfer switch to meet code for interconnection with the grid power in the house.... etc etc.     So do not take 195W and multiply by 20 and think all your power needs are met.  On the best day of the year, you will get a fraction of that.   Do not take USD$40 times 20 and think that is the system cost either, it is the tip of the iceberg.   But at US$40 each, and likely 2,000W of actual delivered power from a skid, how can you resist if you were ever considering solar ?   Even buying a cheap ebay MPPT, unless it catches fire from wasted power, it still has to deliver at least 1,000W.   Matt | 35441|34922|2018-11-14 15:53:37|opuspaul|Re: Solar Sale|That is so cheap.  I remember paying over $400 for a single 80 watt panel.  If you could get together with enough other people to get the minimum order, you are laughing.If you have a place to put them, the large high voltage panels with a good MPPT controller is the way to go.   | 35442|35434|2018-11-14 17:17:15|brentswain38|Re: Safety on board|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I read about a lady cruising who had a big fire extinguisher filled with Cayenne.I use an extra high lifeline off my shrouds, about shoulder height, at sea.It is not in the way of anything, sailing. It would  be easy to insulate and hook up to wires going below to hook to my inverter, should trouble try to board. Metal hatches would give me plenty time to judge the situation. Cayenne pepper yes, but industrial quantities of food grade capsaicin (the pure chemical in hot peppers, bear spray, police pepper spray) comes in 45 gallon drums, I have two empties.  I got just a little residue from an empty barrel on my hands and thought I was having an asthma attack from the inside, not inhaling it.  I wiped off my hands and I put on a pair of work gloves.  After wiping it off my hands, I got enough residue on the inside of the gloves that I got the same symptoms again the next time I put the gloves on.  A quart would last a lifetime.  I recommend dilution. How to turn on an electric fence or anything else 12V.  There are car remotes/receiver modules sold at Canadian Tire with three buttons and contacts for three relays on the receiver.  Electric fence, no problemo.   Many GSM/SMS alarm systems (ebay $60-100) have a dry contact that might be used for the electric fence driver.  Such alarm systems come with car remote type things with activate/deactivate buttons. Problem is, you leave it on or it gets triggered while you are walking in town, and you zap the well-liked kid that comes to sell you fruit and he drowns because he cannot swim, the law is your smallest problem.   Also, the voltage is not high enough for serious baddies/pirates on drugs.   The wires do not move.  The second pirate laughs at the first pirate and jumps aboard.  A medium speed motor with 4' fine cable on it that spins and spreads to a big umbrella shape electric zapping umbrella makes the entire cockpit inhospitable. I think for town, you just want something ignorantly loud, bright lights and SMS on your phone.  I have a 1970s fire alarm from a public school.  A single alarm system dry contact can drive several relays that in turn activate everything. Consider the advantages of a steel boat, and a couple sections made of 1/4" plate (wont stop AP ammo) and look to armored (Brinks) trucks and their gun ports.   A handful of tacks on the deck deals with stealthy night-time raids.  Armed pirates, perhaps with guns, even AP ammo, perhaps with an RPG, that is not necessarily a solved problem.   If they are high on drugs, plans should not depend on rational choices. A sailor, friend of a friend, had two firearms, one an AK-47 for up close, and a long range rifle to start shooting effectively before they get close.   He reportedly had occasion to use both.  Reportedly effective, but it could just be tall tales. I have heard several times of tangling fibres, like unravelled ropes to foul propellers of pirate boats.  It seems their boats travel faster than rope, and their bullets even faster. Smart sailors do not talk about their plans. Matt | 35443|35413|2018-11-14 17:44:06|brentswain38|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :That would work well. Air is roughly 20% oxygen. How low does the percentage have to go to stop a fire? 15%? 10%  5%?   I'm sure it doesn't have to  go to zero %.What about a small welding bottle with Co2 with a line/wire mounted somewhere outboard of the hull so fire drill is Monty Python's "run away, run away!", slam everything shut & pull the line/wire to flood the hull with co2. Not so messy either & like you said will starve the fire even fasterSent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35444|35439|2018-11-14 18:04:51|opuspaul|Re: GGR Race|One thing I have noticed is that the boats in the race seem to be having a real problem with fouling and barnacles.  Modern anti-fouling paints, now that the eco-terrorists have "improved them" are absolute crap.   When I left Canada, my tin-based anti-fouling lasted almost 3 years.   The paint I buy now starts getting barnacles after 6 months.  Think about how much extra fuel is used and wasted around the world.   Think about how many more haulouts and scrapes need to get done and think about how many extra gallons of useless and ineffective copper paint get produced and sold every year.  It must really add up.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Who has been following the Golden Globe Race?  Some amazing things going on.  If you are keen, go back to the beginning for the full story.  I think this race is much more iimportant and relevant to regular sailors like us since the boats they sail are much more like ours.  Jean-Luc Van Den Heede is one hell of a guy.  https://goldengloberace.com/day-135-jean-luc-van-den-heede-facing-fresh-storm/https://goldengloberace.com/skipper/jean-luc-van-den-heede-13/| 35445|35413|2018-11-14 18:36:16|Matt Malone|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing| #ygrps-yiv-707208954 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Instead of oxygen percentage, one might think about the time between closing the hatch and it being safe to open it again.   One can bring the oxygen level down to practically zero, open the hatch and the fire will flare up again from stored heat and pyrolysis that continues after oxygen is depleted.   The lower one can bring the oxygen percentage, the faster all other reactions stop, and the sooner one gets to the stage where one is merely waiting for the heat to dissipate.   Starving a fire of oxygen to the point it cannot restart is a slow process.   Spraying it with copious amounts of water and removing its heat kills it more immediately.   Dry extinguisher interferes with and ends the chemistry, and is still present even if air is let back in.   Then one must consider, what started the fire?   If it was a short in electrical wires, it is only likely to still be there, possibly with current running through char, and possibly with more shorts.   If one opens it up and lets air in, is one allow combustible pyrolysis gases like carbon monoxide and hydrogen mix with air in the presence of an ignition source ?  A one-pull CO2 extinguisher has to keep the air out until there is no chance of rekindling.   A steel boat hull might be the only place that is really possible, but then again, another steel boat might let a little more air in, say around a hatch, or the bilge vent blower exhaust.   Dry chemical stays there.   Water can completely remove heat. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 4:29 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing     ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : That would work well. Air is roughly 20% oxygen. How low does the percentage have to go to stop a fire? 15%? 10%  5%?   I'm sure it doesn't have to  go to zero %. What about a small welding bottle with Co2 with a line/wire mounted somewhere outboard of the hull so fire drill is Monty Python's "run away, run away!", slam everything shut & pull the line/wire to flood the hull with co2. Not so messy either & like you said will starve the fire even faster Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android | 35446|35434|2018-11-14 18:54:48|brentswain38|Re: Safety on board|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :It takes serious tools and time  to go thru metal hatches locked from inside. That is when you turn the electrics on, and only  then . A Cop in Samoa asked me how I deal  with pirates. I told him "We all know where  the pirates are, Philippines , Red Sea ,Central America. etc. Simple . Don't go there.  The Pacific Islands are 95% free of  pirates. One can cruise a lifetime , to no shortage of great cruising grounds,, and not go into places where pirates are  a problem."As I've the luxury of chopping & changing things aboard & not interested in the shotgun stowed in the aft end of the boom (& who hasn't figured that out, don't declare it & might spoil your plans...)But the need to incapacitate unwanted boarders still needed just in caseI'm thinking of plumbing  copper or even pex tubing. A series of "t's" mounted into the aft side of the deckhouse aimed at the cockpit. A bit of wax or wotever on the inboard end of the "t" to hold a charge of powdered cayenne pepper. The outboard end sealing the charge with drywall putty. Faired & painted over so it will bust out easy when yougive it a short blast of compressed air.A blast of pepper in the face should stop 'em...without killing em.To cover up just a bit more drywallmud or a bit of masking tape & a lick of paint.I figure 4-6 of em should give you enuf options so you can stay below,  let them look and let 'em have it right in the face as they look in through the ports. Then up hook & get out.Your thoughts gentlemen?Another one I've been thinking of, the "captian Nemo", right round on the railing. A 12v electric   fence charger connected to one all round wire (if that is you can depend on a good ground to the railing...but paint may be enuf to insulate..) or a 2nd wire for a ground.Haven't figured yet how to turn it off inconspicuously when I come aboard, but that' a minor detail.You could arm it while you are aboard  so you know if someone is trying to bord as you sleep or when you  go ashore to discourage the curious.Either way you would have to set it up so the only way to grab the rail you would also grab the wire/wires at the same time.If you've ever been zapped even by a little fence charger you kmow it'll knock you on your ass. A boarder who is unaware coming aboard from a small boat will probably end up swimming & induce thought.The only potential problem I can think of would be the possibility/probability (?) Of electrolysis of  the hull or blowing out your zinks real fast. (Also radio interferance but then you just turn it off)Perhaps a dedicated zink for a ground you slip overside when you switch on....?Can anyone enlighten me pleaseSent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35447|35439|2018-11-14 19:00:25|Matt Malone|Re: GGR Race| #ygrps-yiv-866729504 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} I too was amazed by the size of the individual barnacles in the pictures. Does copper anti-fouling not completely prevent growth of this sort, even in the ocean, while it is still there ?   I thought one ended up with algae-like scum, but nothing else.   One can still buy copper anti-fouling in Ontario.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 5:44 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: GGR Race     One thing I have noticed is that the boats in the race seem to be having a real problem with fouling and barnacles.  Modern anti-fouling paints, now that the eco-terrorists have "improved them" are absolute crap.   When I left Canada, my tin-based anti-fouling lasted almost 3 years.   The paint I buy now starts getting barnacles after 6 months.  Think about how much extra fuel is used and wasted around the world.   Think about how many more haulouts and scrapes need to get done and think about how many extra gallons of useless and ineffective copper paint get produced and sold every year.  It must really add up. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Who has been following the Golden Globe Race?  Some amazing things going on.  If you are keen, go back to the beginning for the full story.  I think this race is much more iimportant and relevant to regular sailors like us since the boats they sail are much more like ours.  Jean-Luc Van Den Heede is one hell of a guy.  https://goldengloberace.com/day-135-jean-luc-van-den-heede-facing-fresh-storm/ https://goldengloberace.com/skipper/jean-luc-van-den-heede-13/ | 35448|35413|2018-11-14 19:03:14|brentswain38|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Sealing the boat airtight has worked for me and friends.  Fires  need oxygen ,no oxygen,  no fire. Doing that  quickly should be practiced well in advance. CO2 is obvious good as is water, but both can actually engage in the oxidation of glowing char:   CO2 + C (glowing) ==> 2 CO -- carbon monoxide that can burn elsewhere H2O + C (glowing) ==> CO + H2 -- both of which can burn elsewhere Both reactions are endothermic, robbing heat from the fire, but change a solid fuel in one spot into a gaseous fuel that can be more trouble. Both CO2 and water require overwhelming amounts to work well.   In overwhelming amounts both also suck the heat out of the fire -- water by its heat of vapourization -- the energy required to make steam, and CO2 by its cooling as it expands out of the nozzle from a pressurized container.  Overwhelming amounts of water is typically not a problem, so the char reaction effect is rarely noticed.   I would want to calculate how many cubic feet of CO2 is in your cannister and make sure it overwhelms the boat.   I recall CO2 cannisters even for small server rooms were huge, twice the size, maybe 4 times the volume of scuba tanks.  Water is free and plentiful. Dry chemical is better. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of SHANE ROTHWELL rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 10:40 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing  What about a small welding bottle with Co2 with a line/wire mounted somewhere outboard of the hull so fire drill is Monty Python's "run away, run away!", slam everything shut & pull the line/wire to flood the hull with co2. Not so messy either & like you said will starve the fire even faster Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35449|34922|2018-11-15 01:21:58|SHANE ROTHWELL|Re: Solar Sale|Back in the early 90's solar pannels were about $8.5 us per watt. Just a wet dream.In Powell River I jumped on 275w pannels that were under C$1.- per watt. At these prices why buy used?Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35450|35450|2018-11-15 01:45:25|SHANE ROTHWELL|Re: Fire Fighting|Good points all.I'm going for the seal & slam method and though I've got chemical extinguishers I'd be lothe to use em in confoned quarters & a helluva mess.Patience will solve the flashback/restart from heat but the restart from an electrical system still shorting out could rather awkward. An electrical answer like a car remote system would get lost in the confussion.Perhaps a big giotine switch right at the batteries on a bit of aircraft cable mounted on deck. Pull to disconnect...Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35451|35450|2018-11-15 09:09:43|Matt Malone|Re: Fire Fighting| Anything that is not a sealed switch or firmly bolted connection in high current cables can be a fire hazard as corrosion from road/ocean salt builds up.   Please do not use a knife switch or you will be constantly cleaning it so it does not start to smoke.   Anyone ever seen a poor cable connection start to smoke when the starter kicks in?  Same thing. I have seen poor connections go to full-fledged fires. One might have a regular sealed rotary battery disconnect switch with an axle and rod through the hull to a lever outside, but then that becomes a security risk.    Someone could shut down all electrics, including your alarm system. How about the battery disconnect switch is in the path of escape, just inside the hatch/by the companion way steps? Matt From: SHANE ROTHWELL rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 01:45 Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Fire Fighting To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Good points all. I'm going for the seal & slam method and though I've got chemical extinguishers I'd be lothe to use em in confoned quarters & a helluva mess. Patience will solve the flashback/restart from heat but the restart from an electrical system still shorting out could rather awkward. An electrical answer like a car remote system would get lost in the confussion. Perhaps a big giotine switch right at the batteries on a bit of aircraft cable mounted on deck. Pull to disconnect... Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android | 35452|35439|2018-11-15 15:03:50|a.sobriquet|copper-nickle antifouling|I understand that a copper-nickle alloy (70/30) is far superior to pure copper as an antifouling. For those with deep pockets CU-NI plating might be ideal, but for those of us on a budget a CU-NI foil with self-adhesive might be a reasonable alternative.https://www.copper.org/applications/marine/cuni/applications/hulls/performance_corrosion.html---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :One thing I have noticed is that the boats in the race seem to be having a real problem with fouling and barnacles.  Modern anti-fouling paints, now that the eco-terrorists have "improved them" are absolute crap.   When I left Canada, my tin-based anti-fouling lasted almost 3 years.   The paint I buy now starts getting barnacles after 6 months.  Think about how much extra fuel is used and wasted around the world.   Think about how many more haulouts and scrapes need to get done and think about how many extra gallons of useless and ineffective copper paint get produced and sold every year.  It must really add up.| 35453|35413|2018-11-15 15:04:26|a.sobriquet|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|I think I'd be very cautious about having CO2 capable of flooding the interior of a boat. If you get a small leak it could slowly fill the bilges and smother sleeping occupants.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :What about a small welding bottle with Co2 with a line/wire mounted somewhere outboard of the hull so fire drill is Monty Python's "run away, run away!", slam everything shut & pull the line/wire to flood the hull with co2. Not so messy either & like you said will starve the fire even fasterSent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35454|35413|2018-11-15 15:25:28|Matt Malone|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing| #ygrps-yiv-437840437 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Yes.   Same with any gas, propane, etc.   You mentioning this reminds me of my safety training.  Carbon dioxide is different, it is bio-active, not just an asphyxiant (air displacer): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5380556/ https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/a-view-to-a-kill-in-the-morning-carbon-dioxide/ https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1258/0023677053739747 Causing both toxic and anaesthetic effects, and has been found to kill sleeping/intoxicated people without waking them.   Dry chemical extinguishers that have not been jury-rigged to be remote-discharge, which we probably all have on our boats -- apparently they contain compressed nitrogen, which is an asphyxiant (air displacer), but not toxic or bio-active like CO2.   It seems a cannister of CO2 is just one more thing to think about.   Another consideration when deciding on extinguishing methods.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of a.sobriquet@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 2:54 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing     I think I'd be very cautious about having CO2 capable of flooding the interior of a boat. If you get a small leak it could slowly fill the bilges and smother sleeping occupants. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : What about a small welding bottle with Co2 with a line/wire mounted somewhere outboard of the hull so fire drill is Monty Python's "run away, run away!", slam everything shut & pull the line/wire to flood the hull with co2. Not so messy either & like you said will starve the fire even faster Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android | 35455|35413|2018-11-15 18:25:21|brentswain38|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :A CO bottle in the cockpit locker, and  an engine room vent in the cockpit solves that problem.#ygrps-yiv-540947712 #ygrps-yiv-540947712ygrps-yiv-1894149137 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Yes.   Same with any gas, propane, etc.   You mentioning this reminds me of my safety training.  Carbon dioxide is different, it is bio-active, not just an asphyxiant (air displacer): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5380556/ https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/a-view-to-a-kill-in-the-morning-carbon-dioxide/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1258/0023677053739747Causing both toxic and anaesthetic effects, and has been found to kill sleeping/intoxicated people without waking them.   Dry chemical extinguishers that have not been jury-rigged to be remote-discharge, which we probably all have on our boats -- apparently they contain compressed nitrogen, which is an asphyxiant (air displacer), but not toxic or bio-active like CO2.   It seems a cannister of CO2 is just one more thing to think about.   Another consideration when deciding on extinguishing methods.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of a.sobriquet@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 2:54 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing  I think I'd be very cautious about having CO2 capable of flooding the interior of a boat. If you get a small leak it could slowly fill the bilges and smother sleeping occupants. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : What about a small welding bottle with Co2 with a line/wire mounted somewhere outboard of the hull so fire drill is Monty Python's "run away, run away!", slam everything shut & pull the line/wire to flood the hull with co2. Not so messy either & like you said will starve the fire even faster Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35456|35450|2018-11-15 18:28:19|brentswain38|Re: Fire Fighting|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :After burning out ":yottie" plastic selection  switches I went for a big brass ceramic knife switch I bought in Mexico.No more problems.Shane , you could find one more easily in SE Asia than here, where they are probably banned. Bring some spares back home.Good points all.I'm going for the seal & slam method and though I've got chemical extinguishers I'd be lothe to use em in confoned quarters & a helluva mess.Patience will solve the flashback/restart from heat but the restart from an electrical system still shorting out could rather awkward. An electrical answer like a car remote system would get lost in the confussion.Perhaps a big giotine switch right at the batteries on a bit of aircraft cable mounted on deck. Pull to disconnect...Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35457|35450|2018-11-15 21:25:35|jpronk1|Re: Fire Fighting|I love our big old knife switch, it works great as the main shut off for our battery bank. Also, you can get nitrogen cylinders with far greater volume then other gas cylinders. 3500 psi rather then 2200 psi. James Sent from my iPhone| 35458|35450|2018-11-16 16:23:52|Darren Bos|Re: Fire Fighting| I think nitrogen is actually just a compressed gas, while CO2 is actually a liquid under the pressures found in welding tanks (or CO2 fire extinguishers).  Given the huge expansion from a liquid to a gas, a smaller CO2 cylinder can actually have more gas in it than a larger nitrogen cylinder. On 18-11-15 06:25 PM, jpronk1@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I love our big old knife switch, it works great as the main shut off for our battery bank. Also, you can get nitrogen cylinders with far greater volume then other gas cylinders. 3500 psi rather then 2200 psi. James Sent from my iPhone | 35459|35413|2018-11-16 17:04:14|Darren Bos|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing| Matt, The fact that CO2 is bio-active might not be all bad.  Your body controls respiration based on CO2 levels, not O2.  When CO2 levels start to rise, you start to breath faster and anxiety is also a common effect of rising CO2.  This is a good reminder to get the hell out of the boat. I spent some time thinking about my firefighting strategy and went over it with friend who is a firefighter.  There have been lots of interesting ideas here, but it is worth practicing whatever you settle on and realize that if you have a significant fire there is no strategy that doesn't involve having to almost immediately evacuate from down below, especially if you use a fire extinguisher.  The one couple I met that dealt with an on board fire said it was almost impossible to breath and see in very short order and this got much worse once they used the powder extinguisher.  The firefighter friend relayed that without protective equipment there is not much you can do.  Remember, each of your extinguishers is only good for seconds for firefighting, not minutes. Here is what I'm employing: -go over every inch of your electrical system.  Electrics and the galley are where most fires start, look for loose connections, worn insulation, nearby sharp corners, unsupported wires, too small gauge wires etc. -I have a very beefy master switch for the batts that is accessible.  I also store my bolt cutters next to the batteries. -Fire blanket in the galley (easy to use and one of the safest ways to put out a grease fire) -ReinoldMax fire extinguisher for the galley.  These look like spray cans and are not intimidating to use.  If you have a guest aboard at the stove and you've made them aware of this extinguisher they wouldn't hesitate to use it.  Cold Fire makes a similar product.  I was trained in basic firefighting in a refinery I worked in when I was in university.  I'm amazed at what these little aerosol cans are capable of. -CO2 fire extinguisher that matches a fire port in the completely sealed engine room (air supply through dorades on deck).  A powder extinguisher deployed on an engine makes it very likely you won't have a running engine even if you get the fire out. -we still have two dry powder extinguishers leftover, but I'm looking to get rid of them.  These extinguishers are really common, try firing an old one, the cloud of powder is choking, and interferes with vision as it gets in your eyes.  They really aren't meant for closed-space fire-fighting.  I'm told that if they are deployed inside a boat you never really manage to clean up all the powder.  We're going to replace our powder extinguishers with additional CO2 ones. -The covers for all of our dorade vents are kept near the companionway, they're easy to grab on the way out to finish sealing up the boat. Darren On 18-11-15 12:25 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Yes.   Same with any gas, propane, etc.   You mentioning this reminds me of my safety training.  Carbon dioxide is different, it is bio-active, not just an asphyxiant (air displacer): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5380556/ https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/a-view-to-a-kill-in-the-morning-carbon-dioxide/ https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1258/0023677053739747 Causing both toxic and anaesthetic effects, and has been found to kill sleeping/intoxicated people without waking them.   Dry chemical extinguishers that have not been jury-rigged to be remote-discharge, which we probably all have on our boats -- apparently they contain compressed nitrogen, which is an asphyxiant (air displacer), but not toxic or bio-active like CO2.   It seems a cannister of CO2 is just one more thing to think about.   Another consideration when deciding on extinguishing methods.   Matt | 35460|35413|2018-11-16 22:57:47|SHANE ROTHWELL|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|Much appreciated your comments lads.  Gonna bin the ABC powder extinguishers. Already setting it up for the dash & slam sealing up everything with a wire pull on deck to isolate  the batteries. Being a life time member of the CSSOS (the chicken shit school of sailing) when it comes to fire, a small galley fire gets a pull of the small wire around a plastic bag with about a kg of flower in it that's mounted directly over the cooker. If that don't work immediatly it's dash, slam, seal everything, pull the wire to deploy the co2 & also the giotine switch to isolate the batteries (so the deadly effects of co2 not an issuefor me) and if not at sea, go ashore for a cold beer till it's cooled right down as there isn't really anything else to do.Also, I figured I needed awg#6 wire for the solar pannels that  pump out 15 amps, each. The wind/tow charger will be about the same (enuf?) and for a hot & a ground line that goes right round down below to just tap into & fuse for each device. Simple & trouble shooting dead easy. But prices for#6 were rediculous & I got tinned awg#4 for the lot. Whilst not cheap it cost less than the #6 and it's overkill keeping me in good standing in the CSSOSSent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35461|35413|2018-11-16 23:03:16|Matt Malone|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing| Flour is not a good idea.  Sand or baking soda. Matt From: SHANE ROTHWELL rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, November 16, 22:58 Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Much appreciated your comments lads.  Gonna bin the ABC powder extinguishers. Already setting it up for the dash & slam sealing up everything with a wire pull on deck to isolate  the batteries.  Being a life time member of the CSSOS (the chicken shit school of sailing) when it comes to fire, a small galley fire gets a pull of the small wire around a plastic bag with about a kg of flower in it that's mounted directly over the cooker. If that don't work immediatly it's dash, slam, seal everything, pull the wire to deploy the co2 & also the giotine switch to isolate the batteries (so the deadly effects of co2 not an issue for me) and if not at sea, go ashore for a cold beer till it's cooled right down as there isn't really anything else to do. Also, I figured I needed awg#6 wire for the solar pannels that  pump out 15 amps, each. The wind/tow charger will be about the same (enuf?) and for a hot & a ground line that goes right round down below to just tap into & fuse for each device. Simple & trouble shooting dead easy. But prices for#6 were rediculous & I got tinned awg#4 for the lot. Whilst not cheap it cost less than the #6 and it's overkill keeping me in good standing in the CSSOS Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android | 35462|35413|2018-11-17 03:29:04|SHANE ROTHWELL|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|Got a private email from Niel Ramsey.Sorry but I was wrong about the use of flower for fire extinguishing.Seems the dust is explosive with an ignition sòurce. But I thot it was good for grease/oil fires.Sorry. I was wrong.Does anyone know what can be safely used on a galley fire as water is just gonna spread an oil fireSent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35463|35413|2018-11-17 11:19:33|opuspaul|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|I keep a fire blanket close to the galley.   Baking soda is also supposed to be good for fires so you could dump that on.....| 35464|35413|2018-11-17 14:35:51|Matt Malone|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing| #ygrps-yiv-1980008713 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} A fire blanket is a good idea.   How does one get it down tight enough to some surface in a crowded stove-top, with perhaps a grill and burners below to smother a fire ? Baking Soda: Sodium Bicarbonate Above 50 °C (122 °F), sodium bicarbonate gradually decomposes into sodium carbonate, water, and carbon dioxide. 2 NaHCO3 → Na2CO3 + H2O + CO2    The conversion is fast at 200 °C (392 °F) If anhydrous sodium carbonate is heated, loss in weight — due to dissociation and volatilization — begins at 400° C (752° F). Carbon dioxide is evolved as indicated by the reaction equation. Na2CO3 → Na2O + CO2 So baking soda turns into 1 carbon dioxide and 1/2 water, and a stable oxide that just smothers the fire like sand or ash would.   It is safe, cheap, bio-compatible and likely to be legal everywhere bread is legal.   One drawback is, it is not very water soluable, so cleanup later is only slightly better than dry chemical. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2018 11:15 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing     I keep a fire blanket close to the galley.   Baking soda is also supposed to be good for fires so you could dump that on..... | 35465|35413|2018-11-17 23:49:56|SHANE ROTHWELL|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|Baking soda it is! Many thanks.It might make an aweful mess but at least its not toxic like dry fire extinguishers. Cheap easy but you sure it's legal?Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35466|35413|2018-11-18 11:44:33|garyhlucas|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing| I think fighting a fire on a boat is not about easy cleanup but about saving the boat.  Dry chemical is effective on all kinds of fires so you should have one on board as the last resort and maybe label it that way.  All the other methods are maybe better for cleanup, but if you lose the boat then it doesn’t matter!   From: mailto:origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2018 11:49 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing     Baking soda it is! Many thanks. It might make an aweful mess but at least its not toxic like dry fire extinguishers. Cheap easy but you sure it's legal?     Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35467|35413|2018-11-18 11:56:50|Alan Boucher|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|Should the dry chemical get sucked into a running engine, the cleanup could entail a major rebuild. On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 11:44 AM gary.lucas@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I think fighting a fire on a boat is not about easy cleanup but about saving the boat.  Dry chemical is effective on all kinds of fires so you should have one on board as the last resort and maybe label it that way.  All the other methods are maybe better for cleanup, but if you lose the boat then it doesn’t matter!   From: mailto:origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2018 11:49 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing     Baking soda it is! Many thanks. It might make an aweful mess but at least its not toxic like dry fire extinguishers. Cheap easy but you sure it's legal?     Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android -- Al Boucher | 35468|35413|2018-11-18 13:32:45|Darren Bos|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing| The fire blanket won't solve all problems, but it is quick easy and cheap for a small fire.  It's a tool to quickly keep a small fire from turning into a bigger one.  You don't need a perfect seal to put out the fire, just tuck it in enough to shift the fire triangle to the point where the fire is no longer self sustaining.  Even if you don't put the fire out completely, if you have to use an extinguisher afterward at least the fire blanket shields the liquid contents that are on fire so that they don't get spewed around should you use a traditional fire extinguisher improperly (which a lot of folks are likely to do if they've never practiced).  If you have a propane stove, then you might have less of a need for a fire blanket, if you cook with kerosene or alcohol there is a greater chance you'll have need of it.  They are small, cheap, easy to mount, and tend to draw attention and start conversations about firefighting aboard. Related to boat fires, I was at a marine electrics course yesterday and they showed part of this video.  The interesting part is to see how much smoke just 12" of 14 ga wire produces in a dead short situation.  You can imagine how toxic and choking that smoke is.  If you have more than 12" of wire it is easy to imagine how quickly you won't be able to see or breath in the cabin.  Solar panels are a great example that often lack a fuse at the battery end. Darren On 18-11-17 11:35 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   A fire blanket is a good idea.   How does one get it down tight enough to some surface in a crowded stove-top, with perhaps a grill and burners below to smother a fire ? Baking Soda: Sodium Bicarbonate Above 50 °C (122 °F), sodium bicarbonate gradually decomposes into sodium carbonate, water, and carbon dioxide. 2 NaHCO3 → Na2CO3 + H2O + CO2    The conversion is fast at 200 °C (392 °F) If anhydrous sodium carbonate is heated, loss in weight — due to dissociation and volatilization — begins at 400° C (752° F). Carbon dioxide is evolved as indicated by the reaction equation. Na2CO3 → Na2O + CO2 So baking soda turns into 1 carbon dioxide and 1/2 water, and a stable oxide that just smothers the fire like sand or ash would.   It is safe, cheap, bio-compatible and likely to be legal everywhere bread is legal.   One drawback is, it is not very water soluable, so cleanup later is only slightly better than dry chemical. Matt . | 35469|35413|2018-11-18 15:53:52|a.sobriquet|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|An air filter wouldn't capture the dry chemical?---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Should the dry chemical get sucked into a running engine, the cleanup could entail a major rebuild. On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 11:44 AM gary.lucas@... [origamiboats] wrote:  I think fighting a fire on a boat is not about easy cleanup but about saving the boat.  Dry chemical is effective on all kinds of fires so you should have one on board as the last resort and maybe label it that way.  All the other methods are maybe better for cleanup, but if you lose the boat then it doesn’t matter!-- Al Boucher | 35470|35413|2018-11-18 16:06:01|bcboomer1948|Re: Safety on the sulu sea|You might want to look into the MAUS extinguisher.  They claim no damage to engines.There is a thread about them on the "Attainable Adventure Cruising" site with lots of info about good solutions.  Some input from professionals with a lot of hands on experience.| 35471|35413|2018-11-18 19:47:39|Matt Malone|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing| #ygrps-yiv-773079833 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} One thing I learned in safety training was that the theory of fire extinguishers and the reality of using an extinguisher well, are two different things.   The shut-it-up-tight method still requires training drills to find and install all of the vent plugs.   For various extinguishers, nothing beats actually trying to use one on a sample fire.   In training were were given a 2 foot-diameter flammable liquid pool fire to put out and we were told at the outset that this was really the reliable limit of a hand-held extinguisher.   The task of using the extinguisher was something that required practice.   One could experiment with old extinguishers (roll them and shake them first, dry chemical settles and compacts over time).    I saw a bunch of extinguishers at the scrap yard once.   They were out of date but if they were up to pressure, then I might buy one to try.   It has been 30 years since I tried one.   Whatever your fire plan, or extinguishing method, I recommend practising it.   Darren,   Are fire blankets single use?  Or multiple use, provided it is not soaked in bacon grease ?   Would a fibreglass welding blanket work as a fire blanket ? Matt  From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2018 1:32 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing     The fire blanket won't solve all problems, but it is quick easy and cheap for a small fire.  It's a tool to quickly keep a small fire from turning into a bigger one.  You don't need a perfect seal to put out the fire, just tuck it in enough to shift the fire triangle to the point where the fire is no longer self sustaining.  Even if you don't put the fire out completely, if you have to use an extinguisher afterward at least the fire blanket shields the liquid contents that are on fire so that they don't get spewed around should you use a traditional fire extinguisher improperly (which a lot of folks are likely to do if they've never practiced).  If you have a propane stove, then you might have less of a need for a fire blanket, if you cook with kerosene or alcohol there is a greater chance you'll have need of it.  They are small, cheap, easy to mount, and tend to draw attention and start conversations about firefighting aboard. Related to boat fires, I was at a marine electrics course yesterday and they showed part of this video.  The interesting part is to see how much smoke just 12" of 14 ga wire produces in a dead short situation.  You can imagine how toxic and choking that smoke is.  If you have more than 12" of wire it is easy to imagine how quickly you won't be able to see or breath in the cabin.  Solar panels are a great example that often lack a fuse at the battery end. Darren On 18-11-17 11:35 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   A fire blanket is a good idea.   How does one get it down tight enough to some surface in a crowded stove-top, with perhaps a grill and burners below to smother a fire ? Baking Soda: Sodium Bicarbonate Above 50 °C (122 °F), sodium bicarbonate gradually decomposes into sodium carbonate, water, and carbon dioxide. 2 NaHCO3 → Na2CO3 + H2O + CO2    The conversion is fast at 200 °C (392 °F) If anhydrous sodium carbonate is heated, loss in weight — due to dissociation and volatilization — begins at 400° C (752° F). Carbon dioxide is evolved as indicated by the reaction equation. Na2CO3 → Na2O + CO2 So baking soda turns into 1 carbon dioxide and 1/2 water, and a stable oxide that just smothers the fire like sand or ash would.   It is safe, cheap, bio-compatible and likely to be legal everywhere bread is legal.   One drawback is, it is not very water soluable, so cleanup later is only slightly better than dry chemical. Matt . | 35472|35413|2018-11-18 22:00:18|Darren Bos|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing| Dry chemical extinguishers are not recommended to be used in enclosed spaces.  Foam and CO2 extinguishers provide options that don't fill the air with choking dust that prevent you from seeing and breathing.  If you are the only one aboard and you've thought through your firefighting strategy, then maybe a powder extinguisher as a last resort isn't a bad idea.  If you ever have other folks aboard then making sure one of them doesn't grab an accessible dry powder extinguisher is more of a problem. It's one thing to think about cleaning up after the fire at a marina, it's another when your offshore and the outside temps are cold enough to make things serious.  If you haven't tried a powder extinguisher in a small space, it is going to be a big surprise.  They are so common, that I think most folks don't think much about them.  Being so common, it is easy to get your hands on an old one and try it out.  Even outdoors the plume of dust is significant.  If you use a dry chemical extinguisher below decks, plan that you and anyone else down below won't be able to see from the moment you pull the trigger.  You won't be able to see the fire, you won't be able to see the way out, and you'll be choking on the dust. On 18-11-18 08:44 AM, gary.lucas@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I think fighting a fire on a boat is not about easy cleanup but about saving the boat.  Dry chemical is effective on all kinds of fires so you should have one on board as the last resort and maybe label it that way.  All the other methods are maybe better for cleanup, but if you lose the boat then it doesn’t matter!   | 35473|35413|2018-11-19 00:53:50|Matt Malone|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing| #ygrps-yiv-1511738621 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Darren Wrote: >If you haven't tried a powder extinguisher in a small space, it is going to be a big surprise.  .... >You won't be able to see the fire, you won't be able to see the way out, and you'll be choking on the dust. One guy set one off in an old-style phone booth inside a building.   You could not see the phone 2 feet behind the glass.   He left choking but he survived. Absolutely one will be blind and choking as would passengers.  But I would absolutely have one.   I like the idea of a fire port on the engine compartment, any measure possible to more-localize the extinguishing media to the fire, whether it be CO2 or dry chemical or something else.  I would not hesitate for a second to use a dry chemical extinguisher.   I would take several deep breaths and hold it for as long as I could and make sure I could make it out without taking a breath.     With dry chemical, the dust settles.  I work around it all the time.  I am careful not to put it back into the air.  Cleaning it would be a chore, but not one I have to do.   It is not considered toxic, just an irritant -- asthma etc may change the analysis.  If one has just used a dry chemical, waiting for the fire to be out and opening the hatches and ports to clean the suspended dust out of the air, it would not take too long for the cabin to feel survivable again -- bothersome, but survivable.  I will use every extinguishing method available, including dry chemical because it is effective in a way that CO2 is not.   It forms a blanket of dust, and just physically, progressively smoothers the fire, in addition to its chemical action to inhibit flames.   CO2 is quick to spread, but quick to dissipate.  The fire has to be one that wants to be out if at any given moment it has no flames.  An electrical fire, if you get enough dry chemical on it, it may not flame and spread, even though it is still shorting -- giving you time to use the bolt cutters to stop the short.  I have seen a lot of people with a CO2 extinguisher chase the fire around a burning liquid fire.  Dry chemical is a little more foolproof.  You just keep pouring the dust to it and eventually the liquid absorbs into it and what was a burning liquid is non-combustible mud with a dry caked surface.   I will definitely have a CO2 also.   If it is a fire I think I can kill with CO2, I sure would like to avoid the clean up.    If the choice is between an hour outside in the worst conditions, or swimming offshore for the rest of your life in the best conditions ... I choose the first one.   Brent's "choose a steel boat" and "close it up and wait" strategy is the same choice. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2018 10:00 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing     Dry chemical extinguishers are not recommended to be used in enclosed spaces.  Foam and CO2 extinguishers provide options that don't fill the air with choking dust that prevent you from seeing and breathing.  If you are the only one aboard and you've thought through your firefighting strategy, then maybe a powder extinguisher as a last resort isn't a bad idea.  If you ever have other folks aboard then making sure one of them doesn't grab an accessible dry powder extinguisher is more of a problem. It's one thing to think about cleaning up after the fire at a marina, it's another when your offshore and the outside temps are cold enough to make things serious.  If you haven't tried a powder extinguisher in a small space, it is going to be a big surprise.  They are so common, that I think most folks don't think much about them.  Being so common, it is easy to get your hands on an old one and try it out.  Even outdoors the plume of dust is significant.  If you use a dry chemical extinguisher below decks, plan that you and anyone else down below won't be able to see from the moment you pull the trigger.  You won't be able to see the fire, you won't be able to see the way out, and you'll be choking on the dust. On 18-11-18 08:44 AM, gary.lucas@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I think fighting a fire on a boat is not about easy cleanup but about saving the boat.  Dry chemical is effective on all kinds of fires so you should have one on board as the last resort and maybe label it that way.  All the other methods are maybe better for cleanup, but if you lose the boat then it doesn’t matter!   | 35474|35413|2018-11-19 14:02:03|Darren Bos|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing| Fire blankets are sold as single use.  If you were away from a place to re-supply, I suspect you would find that it can be re-used.   I've looked at my fiberglass welding blanket with the same thought.  The welding blanket I have has a weave that it coarser than the fire blanket I have.  However, i suspect it would still be enough to get the job done. I had fire training long ago, I mostly used CO2 extinguishers to put out fires while welding inside oil storage tanks at a refinery.  Like you, it was long ago, so while refitting the boat I took one of the old dry powder extinguishers out and tried it.  As you say, these settle and age, so if you've got really old extinguishers they should probably be replaced and it is a good opportunity to try one. On 18-11-18 04:47 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   One thing I learned in safety training was that the theory of fire extinguishers and the reality of using an extinguisher well, are two different things.   The shut-it-up-tight method still requires training drills to find and install all of the vent plugs.   For various extinguishers, nothing beats actually trying to use one on a sample fire.   In training were were given a 2 foot-diameter flammable liquid pool fire to put out and we were told at the outset that this was really the reliable limit of a hand-held extinguisher.   The task of using the extinguisher was something that required practice.   One could experiment with old extinguishers (roll them and shake them first, dry chemical settles and compacts over time).    I saw a bunch of extinguishers at the scrap yard once.   They were out of date but if they were up to pressure, then I might buy one to try.   It has been 30 years since I tried one.   Whatever your fire plan, or extinguishing method, I recommend practising it.   Darren,   Are fire blankets single use?  Or multiple use, provided it is not soaked in bacon grease ?   Would a fibreglass welding blanket work as a fire blanket ? Matt  From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2018 1:32 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing     The fire blanket won't solve all problems, but it is quick easy and cheap for a small fire.  It's a tool to quickly keep a small fire from turning into a bigger one.  You don't need a perfect seal to put out the fire, just tuck it in enough to shift the fire triangle to the point where the fire is no longer self sustaining.  Even if you don't put the fire out completely, if you have to use an extinguisher afterward at least the fire blanket shields the liquid contents that are on fire so that they don't get spewed around should you use a traditional fire extinguisher improperly (which a lot of folks are likely to do if they've never practiced).  If you have a propane stove, then you might have less of a need for a fire blanket, if you cook with kerosene or alcohol there is a greater chance you'll have need of it.  They are small, cheap, easy to mount, and tend to draw attention and start conversations about firefighting aboard. Related to boat fires, I was at a marine electrics course yesterday and they showed part of this video.  The interesting part is to see how much smoke just 12" of 14 ga wire produces in a dead short situation.  You can imagine how toxic and choking that smoke is.  If you have more than 12" of wire it is easy to imagine how quickly you won't be able to see or breath in the cabin.  Solar panels are a great example that often lack a fuse at the battery end. Darren On 18-11-17 11:35 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   A fire blanket is a good idea.   How does one get it down tight enough to some surface in a crowded stove-top, with perhaps a grill and burners below to smother a fire ? Baking Soda: Sodium Bicarbonate Above 50 °C (122 °F), sodium bicarbonate gradually decomposes into sodium carbonate, water, and carbon dioxide. 2 NaHCO3 → Na2CO3 + H2O + CO2    The conversion is fast at 200 °C (392 °F) If anhydrous sodium carbonate is heated, loss in weight — due to dissociation and volatilization — begins at 400° C (752° F). Carbon dioxide is evolved as indicated by the reaction equation. Na2CO3 → Na2O + CO2 So baking soda turns into 1 carbon dioxide and 1/2 water, and a stable oxide that just smothers the fire like sand or ash would.   It is safe, cheap, bio-compatible and likely to be legal everywhere bread is legal.   One drawback is, it is not very water soluable, so cleanup later is only slightly better than dry chemical. Matt . | 35475|35413|2018-11-19 19:52:49|SHANE ROTHWELL|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|I took the fire fighting course at justice institute many years ago & I figure if it's small, real small & you have bicarb/blanket/extinguisher or whatever to lay your hands on immediately you take one deep brearth & hold it & give it everything you got. If it's not contained in max 15 seconds or well before you need another gulp of air RUN slam seal etc cuz especially in a contained environment an oil fire or dead short can move so fast & contaminte the air so fast that you will not get that 2nd gulp of air. Is it worth it? Have a plan. Confirm that it works. Practice it, but just like war, the best battles are those never fought.Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35476|35413|2018-11-19 21:27:05|brentswain38|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|When Jack and Monica had a fire on Island Breeze they said their dry chems were  useless, but  their  C02s were far more effective. | 35477|35413|2018-11-20 17:19:53|prairiemaidca|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|I would be very interested to know what caused the fire onboard??   I have a pretty good handle on what I think could be a possible fire item/area but it's always good to know about actual incidences that one may not have considered.  As a trucker I hauled liquid CO2, O2, N2 and argon.  All products that can cause asphyxiation.  Not good things to have in closed quarters with you, like in a boat cabin.  We just had an industrial accident in Edmonton where three men lost their lives and it's looking a lot like nitrogen gas asphyxiation.   Martin..  (Prairie Maid)| 35478|35413|2018-11-20 17:57:50|brentswain38|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|Jack was welding on the transom ,Monica was inside with the hose. The boat started drifting in ,and Jack said "Come give me a hand." Monica climbed out , and  the fire started instantly . Had she stayed put with the hose, it would  have never happened.| 35479|35413|2018-11-21 12:23:31|aguysailing|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|2 years ago in my Swain 36 while steering in the cockpit thick smoke came up from below in the engine compartment.  A battery wire had chafed against the engine mount ... There was no fire but lots of smoke and smoldering at the contact which I held my breath and moved aside.   Could have been worse ... I was way within Belize inlet and no hope of quick help if needed... Lucky for sure.  This a good thread...  any closer to best preparedness yet?| 35480|35413|2018-11-21 14:31:48|opuspaul|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|I cooked and melted my shift cables once when the ground  lug to my alternator broke off due to vibration.   The only path to ground was through the cables and they were destroyed.   I am amazed that electrical fires don't happen more often on boats.   It is a good idea to have a very large fuse that feeds the battery in case something big shorts out.     On aircraft, there are regular inspections of wiring since vibrations and chafe is often such a problem.   The wiring around the engine on helicopters can be a daily inspection yet on boats nobody seems to ever look at anything until it is a problem.  I once rewired the engines on a catamaran and before I knew it, I had used several hundred wire ties getting things to where I wanted them.  Paul---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :2 years ago in my Swain 36 while steering in the cockpit thick smoke came up from below in the engine compartment.  A battery wire had chafed against the engine mount ... There was no fire but lots of smoke and smoldering at the contact which I held my breath and moved aside.   Could have been worse ... I was way within Belize inlet and no hope of quick help if needed... Lucky for sure.  This a good thread...  any closer to best preparedness yet?| 35481|35413|2018-11-21 14:51:12|Matt Malone|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing| #ygrps-yiv-847954006 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Commercial vehicles use stainless steel P-clips covered with silicone rubber: https://www.dimecitycycles.com/red-silicone-cushioned-stainless-steel-p-clamps.html particularly for heavy cables.   It securely fastens the cable and stands it off of whatever it is fastened to.   On boundaries between moving (vibrating) and non-moving areas -- like from the frame to the engine/alternator -- they often use many P-clips on both sides of the divide.   This would be something to help preserve the electrical contact studs on the starter, and alternator.  Your fire involving the ground disconnecting, and current finding its way to ground another way -- I have seen that too.   It involved a two-way radio.  The ground wire terminal was not tightened.   The radio found ground through the shield of the coaxial cable running to the head unit where the microphone hung.    You are lucky the alternator did not find ground through the propeller shaft bearing and cause arc-damage to the hardened surfaces, requiring replacement.   As much as replacing cables is a pain, it does not require hauling the boat. Perhaps this is a tip -- connect a ground strap from the engine block to the metal frame of the boat.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 2:28 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing     I cooked and melted my shift cables once when the ground  lug to my alternator broke off due to vibration.   The only path to ground was through the cables and they were destroyed.   I am amazed that electrical fires don't happen more often on boats.   It is a good idea to have a very large fuse that feeds the battery in case something big shorts out.     On aircraft, there are regular inspections of wiring since vibrations and chafe is often such a problem.   The wiring around the engine on helicopters can be a daily inspection yet on boats nobody seems to ever look at anything until it is a problem.  I once rewired the engines on a catamaran and before I knew it, I had used several hundred wire ties getting things to where I wanted them.  Paul ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : 2 years ago in my Swain 36 while steering in the cockpit thick smoke came up from below in the engine compartment.  A battery wire had chafed against the engine mount ... There was no fire but lots of smoke and smoldering at the contact which I held my breath and moved aside.   Could have been worse ... I was way within Belize inlet and no hope of quick help if needed... Lucky for sure.  This a good thread...  any closer to best preparedness yet? | 35482|35413|2018-11-21 15:03:27|Darren Bos|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing| Alternator & starter wires seem to be a really common cause of fires.  Perhaps this isn't surprising given the massive current they are capable of carrying.  Lots of installs don't have a fuse for alternator and starter leads (even ABYC doesn't even require them).  However, it seems to me the exclusion for fusing battery to starter wires applies more to big boats than what most of us here have.  The small (<50hp) motors found in our boats have pretty modest cranking requirements and fuses can be had that are suitable.  The MRBF fuses by BlueSea are an easy way to accomplish this.  They are a bit of an odd fuse, so carrying spares seems necessary, but if you end up blowing a 300A fuse, you'll be glad you had it in place.  As to the argument that you shouldn't fuse the starter leads because if the fuse blows you can't start the engine, if you blow a 300A fuse with a small diesel, it means that you either saved the starter or saved a fire, either way the engine wasn't going to start anyway. In Paul's case, the 300A fuse might not have blown (how many amps can a shift cable conduct?), but more often the problem is something like a positive lead coming loose on the alternator, or the starter cable chafing on the engine, where the fuse should blow. On 18-11-21 11:28 AM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I cooked and melted my shift cables once when the ground  lug to my alternator broke off due to vibration.   The only path to ground was through the cables and they were destroyed.   I am amazed that electrical fires don't happen more often on boats.   It is a good idea to have a very large fuse that feeds the battery in case something big shorts out.     On aircraft, there are regular inspections of wiring since vibrations and chafe is often such a problem.   The wiring around the engine on helicopters can be a daily inspection yet on boats nobody seems to ever look at anything until it is a problem.  I once rewired the engines on a catamaran and before I knew it, I had used several hundred wire ties getting things to where I wanted them.  Paul . | 35483|35413|2018-11-21 15:45:01|opuspaul|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|My problem with my shift cable melting was a weird one.   There was no overcurrent condition so a fuse wouldn't have helped.   All I saw was the charge current on the meter (about 80 amps) wavering up and down a little bit from the alternator.   I really only noticed the problem when I went to shift the engine out of forward and found it was stuck in gear.  It took me awhile to notice the ground lug broken.  Most alternators are grounded but in my case the alternator has a floating case.  My engine is grounded to the boat frame with a large cable  at the alternator ground which goes to the batteries negative.   It was this cable which had the broken lug terminal.  I have a dual battery/ alternator charging system that is totally independent from each other so the engine start system has it's own ground to to it's own battery alternator and the starter.| 35484|35413|2018-11-21 16:05:52|Matt Malone|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing| #ygrps-yiv-1530900323 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Darren, I appreciate the idea of putting a fuse in a heavy cable.  That is the problem....  300A is a lot.   At least 300 times what is needed to start a fire in the wrong circumstances.   A lot of things that will start a fire, do so at less than 300A.   I have seen cables melt into several  P-clips before burning a 150A fuse.  At the same time, batteries have a Cold Cranking Amps rating of 400-650 Amps because that is the sort of current sometimes needed for starting an engine.     Ok, so a little 30hp diesel is smaller than most small cars, but still, the CCA rating is there for a reason.   The next problem is, you want to put the fuse between the source of power and where a short might occur.  But for an engine, there are two sources of power, the batteries and the alternator.  So you need a fuse just by the battery, and another, maybe 100Amp fuse by the alternator.   But fuses are just strips of metal.   For them to blow clear at their rating, they still have a voltage drop near their rating.  If the current coming from your alternator to you batteries must have two fuse voltage drops, maybe your batteries do not charge well.   Maybe you attach the alternator sense wire (for alternators that have one) to the batteries, bypassing the fuses to get a better reading of the voltage on the batteries so the output of the alternator is upped to get the proper charging.  But now you have an unfused 16 gauge wire.   So you put a fuse in it.  Because the current through the sense wire is so much lower than the main wire, this does not drop the voltage too much, and one gets good charging.   This is complicated in 2-battery systems where the sense wire is connected to one battery or the other, but not both.  If a fuse between one battery with the sense wire and the alternator blows, then there is no connection between the sense wire and the output of the alternator, and the alternator goes to maximum voltage trying to charge the other batteries, and this can cause a fire too -- I have seen one of those.   Even if one has only a single battery system, with the battery disconnected and the alternator going over voltage (17V?, 20V?), this might blow electronics. Then an alternative -- have a second solenoid hooked up to the key, that when activated, bridges across the fuse between the battery and starter motor when the key is in the start position -- so that fuse can be much smaller.   Why?  Perhaps the power for the engine control module is connected to the stud on the starter and you want to size the fuse for the engine's running electrical load and not its starter load.   So, I am not certainly against fuses in the main cables, but:  - They do not necessarily prevent fires at any particular current level, thought they may be more effective at a lower current level.    - At any current level under the CCA rating of the battery, either the battery is overpowered, or under some circumstances, the starter may peak out at a current comparable to the CCA of the battery and the fuse may blow.    - You need 2 fuses on the cable from the battery to the alternator.    - You have to be really careful in multiple battery systems compensating for the voltage drop through the fuses from the alternator to the batteries by use of the sense wire.    - Even with single battery systems, there might be problems if the sense wire is no longer attached to the output of the alternator. Personally, I would much rather spend $100 on a double-handful of really good P-clips, drill a lot of holes in flanges to route the cable super-cautiously, and leave that cable unfused.   I know that some car manufacturers (with single battery systems) include a fuse in this wire from the factory, so clearly this is a problem they think is better solved by a fuse.  Matt  From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 3:03 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing     Alternator & starter wires seem to be a really common cause of fires.  Perhaps this isn't surprising given the massive current they are capable of carrying.  Lots of installs don't have a fuse for alternator and starter leads (even ABYC doesn't even require them).  However, it seems to me the exclusion for fusing battery to starter wires applies more to big boats than what most of us here have.  The small (<50hp) motors found in our boats have pretty modest cranking requirements and fuses can be had that are suitable.  The MRBF fuses by BlueSea are an easy way to accomplish this.  They are a bit of an odd fuse, so carrying spares seems necessary, but if you end up blowing a 300A fuse, you'll be glad you had it in place.  As to the argument that you shouldn't fuse the starter leads because if the fuse blows you can't start the engine, if you blow a 300A fuse with a small diesel, it means that you either saved the starter or saved a fire, either way the engine wasn't going to start anyway. In Paul's case, the 300A fuse might not have blown (how many amps can a shift cable conduct?), but more often the problem is something like a positive lead coming loose on the alternator, or the starter cable chafing on the engine, where the fuse should blow. On 18-11-21 11:28 AM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I cooked and melted my shift cables once when the ground  lug to my alternator broke off due to vibration.   The only path to ground was through the cables and they were destroyed.   I am amazed that electrical fires don't happen more often on boats.   It is a good idea to have a very large fuse that feeds the battery in case something big shorts out.     On aircraft, there are regular inspections of wiring since vibrations and chafe is often such a problem.   The wiring around the engine on helicopters can be a daily inspection yet on boats nobody seems to ever look at anything until it is a problem.  I once rewired the engines on a catamaran and before I knew it, I had used several hundred wire ties getting things to where I wanted them.  Paul . | 35485|35413|2018-11-21 18:20:01|Darren Bos|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing| Good thoughts Matt, and I agree there are always extra considerations.  I'd add that I think the start batteries we are using are generally oversized for little diesel engines, but there is not much point in having a lower CCA battery.  As an example, the starter on a 40hp Kubota v2203 is 1400 kW and thus is rated to draw roughly 120A (the actual current exceeds this momentarily and changes dynamically during the start).  At the same time, a 300A MRBF fuse is rated at 200% for 60 seconds, while your starter is only designed to run in 30 second bursts.  Here is a link with a bit more discussion and a bit of data and experience. Just to be clear, I was suggesting one MRBF fuse per battery bank, not per battery in a bank. Off to look for really good P-clips, Darren On 18-11-21 01:05 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Darren, I appreciate the idea of putting a fuse in a heavy cable.  That is the problem....  300A is a lot.   At least 300 times what is needed to start a fire in the wrong circumstances.   A lot of things that will start a fire, do so at less than 300A.   I have seen cables melt into several  P-clips before burning a 150A fuse.  At the same time, batteries have a Cold Cranking Amps rating of 400-650 Amps because that is the sort of current sometimes needed for starting an engine.     Ok, so a little 30hp diesel is smaller than most small cars, but still, the CCA rating is there for a reason.   The next problem is, you want to put the fuse between the source of power and where a short might occur.  But for an engine, there are two sources of power, the batteries and the alternator.  So you need a fuse just by the battery, and another, maybe 100Amp fuse by the alternator.   But fuses are just strips of metal.   For them to blow clear at their rating, they still have a voltage drop near their rating.  If the current coming from your alternator to you batteries must have two fuse voltage drops, maybe your batteries do not charge well.   Maybe you attach the alternator sense wire (for alternators that have one) to the batteries, bypassing the fuses to get a better reading of the voltage on the batteries so the output of the alternator is upped to get the proper charging.  But now you have an unfused 16 gauge wire.   So you put a fuse in it.  Because the current through the sense wire is so much lower than the main wire, this does not drop the voltage too much, and one gets good charging.   This is complicated in 2-battery systems where the sense wire is connected to one battery or the other, but not both.  If a fuse between one battery with the sense wire and the alternator blows, then there is no connection between the sense wire and the output of the alternator, and the alternator goes to maximum voltage trying to charge the other batteries, and this can cause a fire too -- I have seen one of those.   Even if one has only a single battery system, with the battery disconnected and the alternator going over voltage (17V?, 20V?), this might blow electronics. Then an alternative -- have a second solenoid hooked up to the key, that when activated, bridges across the fuse between the battery and starter motor when the key is in the start position -- so that fuse can be much smaller.   Why?  Perhaps the power for the engine control module is connected to the stud on the starter and you want to size the fuse for the engine's running electrical load and not its starter load.   So, I am not certainly against fuses in the main cables, but:  - They do not necessarily prevent fires at any particular current level, thought they may be more effective at a lower current level.    - At any current level under the CCA rating of the battery, either the battery is overpowered, or under some circumstances, the starter may peak out at a current comparable to the CCA of the battery and the fuse may blow.    - You need 2 fuses on the cable from the battery to the alternator.    - You have to be really careful in multiple battery systems compensating for the voltage drop through the fuses from the alternator to the batteries by use of the sense wire.    - Even with single battery systems, there might be problems if the sense wire is no longer attached to the output of the alternator. Personally, I would much rather spend $100 on a double-handful of really good P-clips, drill a lot of holes in flanges to route the cable super-cautiously, and leave that cable unfused.   I know that some car manufacturers (with single battery systems) include a fuse in this wire from the factory, so clearly this is a problem they think is better solved by a fuse.  Matt  From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 3:03 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing     Alternator & starter wires seem to be a really common cause of fires.  Perhaps this isn't surprising given the massive current they are capable of carrying.  Lots of installs don't have a fuse for alternator and starter leads (even ABYC doesn't even require them).  However, it seems to me the exclusion for fusing battery to starter wires applies more to big boats than what most of us here have.  The small (<50hp) motors found in our boats have pretty modest cranking requirements and fuses can be had that are suitable.  The MRBF fuses by BlueSea are an easy way to accomplish this.  They are a bit of an odd fuse, so carrying spares seems necessary, but if you end up blowing a 300A fuse, you'll be glad you had it in place.  As to the argument that you shouldn't fuse the starter leads because if the fuse blows you can't start the engine, if you blow a 300A fuse with a small diesel, it means that you either saved the starter or saved a fire, either way the engine wasn't going to start anyway. In Paul's case, the 300A fuse might not have blown (how many amps can a shift cable conduct?), but more often the problem is something like a positive lead coming loose on the alternator, or the starter cable chafing on the engine, where the fuse should blow. On 18-11-21 11:28 AM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I cooked and melted my shift cables once when the ground  lug to my alternator broke off due to vibration.   The only path to ground was through the cables and they were destroyed.   I am amazed that electrical fires don't happen more often on boats.   It is a good idea to have a very large fuse that feeds the battery in case something big shorts out.     On aircraft, there are regular inspections of wiring since vibrations and chafe is often such a problem.   The wiring around the engine on helicopters can be a daily inspection yet on boats nobody seems to ever look at anything until it is a problem.  I once rewired the engines on a catamaran and before I knew it, I had used several hundred wire ties getting things to where I wanted them.  Paul . | 35486|35413|2018-11-21 19:32:52|Matt Malone|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing| About the distinction between batteries and banks....   Dual battery vehicles like ambulances, fire trucks and police cars have 2 batteries in separate banks.  They use a battery isolator to keep the banks, the two batteries separate. RVs, boats can have more complex collections of batteries.  The starting battery is usually a single battery comprising its own bank, and separate from the "house" batteries.  The house batteries might be divided into banks, and each bank might have more than one battery placed in parallel so that multiple batteries make up one bank.  There are logical reasons to have a fuse on each battery.  There are reasons to have a fuse instead on each bank.  Lastly there are reasons to have a main panel fuse.   Each has its strengths and drawbacks, I will not go into all the possibilities, but suffice it to say, a fire is possible.   When I am talking about fires in two-bank systems, each bank had only one battery.   In each case the alternator had a sense wire to assure the alternator output adequately charged the batteries.  A main fuse blow would leave the alternator and sense disconnected and leave the vehicle systems at max alternator output voltage.   A fuse blow on the bank with the sense leaves the other bank subject to overcharging.   If the bank with the sense were two batteries in parallel and one of the battery fuses blew, the other battery would still be there.   Depending on where the sense was connected, to the diconnected battery, the connected battery, or the bank after the fuses, there would be different outcomes. Lots of possibilities. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 18:20 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Good thoughts Matt, and I agree there are always extra considerations.  I'd add that I think the start batteries we are using are generally oversized for little diesel engines, but there is not much point in having a lower CCA battery.  As an example, the starter on a 40hp Kubota v2203 is 1400 kW and thus is rated to draw roughly 120A (the actual current exceeds this momentarily and changes dynamically during the start).  At the same time, a 300A MRBF fuse is rated at 200% for 60 seconds, while your starter is only designed to run in 30 second bursts.  Here is a link with a bit more discussion and a bit of data and experience. Just to be clear, I was suggesting one MRBF fuse per battery bank, not per battery in a bank. Off to look for really good P-clips, Darren On 18-11-21 01:05 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Darren, I appreciate the idea of putting a fuse in a heavy cable.  That is the problem....  300A is a lot.   At least 300 times what is needed to start a fire in the wrong circumstances.   A lot of things that will start a fire, do so at less than 300A.   I have seen cables melt into several  P-clips before burning a 150A fuse.  At the same time, batteries have a Cold Cranking Amps rating of 400-650 Amps because that is the sort of current sometimes needed for starting an engine.     Ok, so a little 30hp diesel is smaller than most small cars, but still, the CCA rating is there for a reason.   The next problem is, you want to put the fuse between the source of power and where a short might occur.  But for an engine, there are two sources of power, the batteries and the alternator.  So you need a fuse just by the battery, and another, maybe 100Amp fuse by the alternator.   But fuses are just strips of metal.   For them to blow clear at their rating, they still have a voltage drop near their rating.  If the current coming from your alternator to you batteries must have two fuse voltage drops, maybe your batteries do not charge well.   Maybe you attach the alternator sense wire (for alternators that have one) to the batteries, bypassing the fuses to get a better reading of the voltage on the batteries so the output of the alternator is upped to get the proper charging.  But now you have an unfused 16 gauge wire.   So you put a fuse in it.  Because the current through the sense wire is so much lower than the main wire, this does not drop the voltage too much, and one gets good charging.   This is complicated in 2-battery systems where the sense wire is connected to one battery or the other, but not both.  If a fuse between one battery with the sense wire and the alternator blows, then there is no connection between the sense wire and the output of the alternator, and the alternator goes to maximum voltage trying to charge the other batteries, and this can cause a fire too -- I have seen one of those.   Even if one has only a single battery system, with the battery disconnected and the alternator going over voltage (17V?, 20V?), this might blow electronics. Then an alternative -- have a second solenoid hooked up to the key, that when activated, bridges across the fuse between the battery and starter motor when the key is in the start position -- so that fuse can be much smaller.   Why?  Perhaps the power for the engine control module is connected to the stud on the starter and you want to size the fuse for the engine's running electrical load and not its starter load.   So, I am not certainly against fuses in the main cables, but:  - They do not necessarily prevent fires at any particular current level, thought they may be more effective at a lower current level.    - At any current level under the CCA rating of the battery, either the battery is overpowered, or under some circumstances, the starter may peak out at a current comparable to the CCA of the battery and the fuse may blow.    - You need 2 fuses on the cable from the battery to the alternator.    - You have to be really careful in multiple battery systems compensating for the voltage drop through the fuses from the alternator to the batteries by use of the sense wire.    - Even with single battery systems, there might be problems if the sense wire is no longer attached to the output of the alternator. Personally, I would much rather spend $100 on a double-handful of really good P-clips, drill a lot of holes in flanges to route the cable super-cautiously, and leave that cable unfused.   I know that some car manufacturers (with single battery systems) include a fuse in this wire from the factory, so clearly this is a problem they think is better solved by a fuse.  Matt  From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 3:03 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing     Alternator & starter wires seem to be a really common cause of fires.  Perhaps this isn't surprising given the massive current they are capable of carrying.  Lots of installs don't have a fuse for alternator and starter leads (even ABYC doesn't even require them).  However, it seems to me the exclusion for fusing battery to starter wires applies more to big boats than what most of us here have.  The small (<50hp) motors found in our boats have pretty modest cranking requirements and fuses can be had that are suitable.  The MRBF fuses by BlueSea are an easy way to accomplish this.  They are a bit of an odd fuse, so carrying spares seems necessary, but if you end up blowing a 300A fuse, you'll be glad you had it in place.  As to the argument that you shouldn't fuse the starter leads because if the fuse blows you can't start the engine, if you blow a 300A fuse with a small diesel, it means that you either saved the starter or saved a fire, either way the engine wasn't going to start anyway. In Paul's case, the 300A fuse might not have blown (how many amps can a shift cable conduct?), but more often the problem is something like a positive lead coming loose on the alternator, or the starter cable chafing on the engine, where the fuse should blow. On 18-11-21 11:28 AM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I cooked and melted my shift cables once when the ground  lug to my alternator broke off due to vibration.   The only path to ground was through the cables and they were destroyed.   I am amazed that electrical fires don't happen more often on boats.   It is a good idea to have a very large fuse that feeds the battery in case something big shorts out.     On aircraft, there are regular inspections of wiring since vibrations and chafe is often such a problem.   The wiring around the engine on helicopters can be a daily inspection yet on boats nobody seems to ever look at anything until it is a problem.  I once rewired the engines on a catamaran and before I knew it, I had used several hundred wire ties getting things to where I wanted them.  Paul . | 35487|35413|2018-11-22 13:14:31|brentswain38|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|I have rigged a push rod on my starters, so I don't  have to  rely on a solinoid,  if it quits.| 35488|34922|2018-11-23 05:44:45|Hannu Venermo|Re: Solar Sale| Current EU landed prices for new panels are about 0.50$ / watt, new. On 15/11/2018 07:21, SHANE ROTHWELL rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] wrote: Back in the early 90's solar pannels were about $8.5 us per watt. Just a wet dream. In Powell River I jumped on 275w pannels that were under C$1.- per watt. At these prices why buy used? -- -hanermo (cnc designs) | 35489|35489|2018-11-24 11:37:32|opuspaul|Metal and wood|This doesn't have much to do with steel boats but I found this blog entry bloody interesting.   If you have anything wood on you boat constantly exposed to salt water,  it is definitely worth a read.   Click the links within.https://waitematawoodys.com/2018/11/20/what-does-electrochemical-deterioration-in-a-wooden-boat-look-like/| 35490|35489|2018-11-24 18:29:04|brentswain38|Re: Metal and wood|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Very interesting reading. Sodium hydroxide ,being an alkali, would be an advantage in protecting steel .I have often wondered about using copper sulfate in the bilges of a copper fastened  wooden boat, to stop both teredos and rot.Seems it could also be a  good, water soluable wood preservative for wooden masts before gluing them up ,having no effect  on the glue lines.Could be good for other wood in soggy locationsWhats your reading  on this, vs electrolysis, Paul?In over 45 yeas of cruising, I have never used a prop  zinc, and never had a problem there.This doesn't have much to do with steel boats but I found this blog entry bloody interesting.   If you have anything wood on you boat constantly exposed to salt water,  it is definitely worth a read.   Click the links within.https://waitematawoodys.com/2018/11/20/what-does-electrochemical-deterioration-in-a-wooden-boat-look-like/| 35491|35413|2018-11-28 17:36:02|Maxime Camirand|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|Not sure if it was mentioned, but I'd look into getting an "escape" type respirator hood. They're basically just a plastic hood with a clear plastic window, connected to a small pressurised air bottle. They don't provide air for nearly as long as a proper breathing apparatus, nor do they seal well, but they might offer a minute or two of additional fire-fighting time after the air in the boat has gotten too smoky for unprotected lungs and eyes. Some of them use a particulate filter instead of compressed air.A quick glance at the Acklands catalogue shows them at $500 retail, but they've very common in industry and on ships, so you could probably pick one up cheap on ebay.I'm no expert, but I did basic and advanced shipboard firefighting qualifications for the merchant navy. CO2 works pretty well but it runs out very quickly. I like the idea of a CO2 extinguisher for the engine compartment, along with a port sized for the hose. Just the same as any asphyxiant gas, I'd rather keep it outside the cabin. Seems like your biggest risk (aside from losing the boat) would be to try fighting the fire for more than a few seconds, down in the enclosed space of a boat. You might quickly get knocked out, then it's curtains for you. If your boat seals well, that's a sane approach. Better to rebuild part of your interior than to lose the entire boat or your life.For an oil fire, water isn't the best, but it will still eventually work if you apply enough of it. Just an idea: You could have a pump with a hose and a sprinkler nozzle on a long wand (4-5 foot), kept outside the cabin. Then if you have a fire in one area, seal the boat, break the porthole nearest your fire, stick in the wand, stuff the gap around your wand with a wet sweater or whatever's at hand, and pump away. We usually carry a similar tool on ships. The water will directly cool and eventually put out the fire, as well as make everything around it wet and harder to inflame.Max On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 at 13:14, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I have rigged a push rod on my starters, so I don't  have to  rely on a solinoid,  if it quits. | 35492|35413|2018-11-29 19:02:23|brentswain38|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|\\\I think I would just seal her up and get out. Fighting the fire with the  hatch open would just keep a  steady supply of oxygen flowing in , making the fire bigger as you try fight it.| 35494|35413|2018-12-06 00:35:49|aguysailing|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|How long would a fire take to deplete the oxygen in a 36'.  (guess it depends on the size of the fire).   As far as I know most diesel tanks are not too far from the engine (if that was the fire source)... how long ya got before the big bang?| 35495|35413|2018-12-06 08:50:07|Matt Malone|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing| The big bang is caused by fuel exceeding its boiling point, building pressure, rupturing something, and spreading fire.   It one has any sections of hose as opposed to hard pipe, that can burn through and perhaps siphon.   With unlimited air, that is a fire that grows rapidly. How long does it take to put out a fire by suffocation?  A lot longer than you think.   One wants to wait for the batteries to discharge if their is an ongoing short, and all the heat to dissipate.   One has to be careful than just enough air does not leak in to keep the fire going.   A proper marine ventilator can only be blocked at the inner pipe.   Blocking the outer pipe leaves the drains.   The engine ventilation dorades can deliver fresh air low, as smoke leaks out high -- natural convection.   So one would also want to watch the diminishing of smoke escaping, and better seal the boat in further activities, leaving one smoke leak-out point,  to make it easy to tell when it is out.   As the fire diminishes and the air in the boat cools and contracts, the smoke vent can start alternating sucking air in and letting smoke out.   That is when you want to seal that one.   Now you are at the point where the fire is diminishing.  You should check the polymer ports and vents to make sure they stay cool enough not to melt - wet towel.   If one has made it to this point, get comfortable.   The last thing one wants to do is open a hatch prematurely and as one is leaning over to look in it flares up in a woof. After that, one has to remember the woodstove and shorts ready to ignite the cold but combustible smoke and vapours that still fill the cabin. If one locks off the woodstove, how long does it take before you can let air in and not see a glowing ember?   Hours? There are too many variables to give a time frame. Matt From: aguysailing@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, December 6, 00:36 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   How long would a fire take to deplete the oxygen in a 36'.  (guess it depends on the size of the fire).   As far as I know most diesel tanks are not too far from the engine (if that was the fire source)... how long ya got before the big bang? | 35496|35413|2018-12-06 13:50:30|brentswain38|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :My brother was a fireman most of his working life. He said he has seen a  fire going well,  in the corner of a department store, go out quickly, due to lack of oxygen despite there being plenty of fuel around.It didnt take long for it to use up all the oxygen, or deplete it to a point he fire could no longer be sustained. Where is that point? 15%,10%, 5% oxygen? Who knows?When I had a foam fire on my boat, it didn't take long for it to go out, once I sealed her up.A friend had an oil stove overflow and start a fire, on a 35 ft Saugeen Witch. The fire burned about 4 sq feet of foam and paneling then went out, despite there being 20 gallons of unburned oil on the floor and despite having wooden hatches and plastic vents and ports . It couldn't keep burning long enough to even burn or melt them. Not enough oxygen ,in a 35 footer.If I put the only air intake on a woodstove, on top, like a hatch or vent, it would not keep burning. The air has to get down low, somehow.. The big bang is caused by fuel exceeding its boiling point, building pressure, rupturing something, and spreading fire.   It one has any sections of hose as opposed to hard pipe, that can burn through and perhaps siphon.   With unlimited air, that is a fire that grows rapidly. How long does it take to put out a fire by suffocation?  A lot longer than you think.   One wants to wait for the batteries to discharge if their is an ongoing short, and all the heat to dissipate.   One has to be careful than just enough air does not leak in to keep the fire going.   A proper marine ventilator can only be blocked at the inner pipe.   Blocking the outer pipe leaves the drains.   The engine ventilation dorades can deliver fresh air low, as smoke leaks out high -- natural convection.   So one would also want to watch the diminishing of smoke escaping, and better seal the boat in further activities, leaving one smoke leak-out point,  to make it easy to tell when it is out.   As the fire diminishes and the air in the boat cools and contracts, the smoke vent can start alternating sucking air in and letting smoke out.   That is when you want to seal that one.   Now you are at the point where the fire is diminishing.  You should check the polymer ports and vents to make sure they stay cool enough not to melt - wet towel.   If one has made it to this point, get comfortable.   The last thing one wants to do is open a hatch prematurely and as one is leaning over to look in it flares up in a woof. After that, one has to remember the woodstove and shorts ready to ignite the cold but combustible smoke and vapours that still fill the cabin. If one locks off the woodstove, how long does it take before you can let air in and not see a glowing ember?   Hours? There are too many variables to give a time frame. Matt From: aguysailing@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, December 6, 00:36 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   How long would a fire take to deplete the oxygen in a 36'.  (guess it depends on the size of the fire).   As far as I know most diesel tanks are not too far from the engine (if that was the fire source)... how long ya got before the big bang? | 35497|35413|2018-12-06 14:15:50|Matt Malone|Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing| #ygrps-yiv-742578415 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} All the things Brent says are true.   Fires go out by themselves all the time.   Other fires need only a little help to push them over into decline and extinction.    And at the other hand, I have been on fire sites where the fire rekindles daily, for days later.   The difference is fire in natural-fibre natural-polymer carbonaceous fuel like wood, paper, and some dry foods etc is capable of smouldering and is therefore capable of surviving far longer. If it were easy to starve all fires of oxygen and for them to go out, there would be no such thing as coal mine fires that have resisted extinguishing for decades or hundreds of years. The question was, in a 35' boat, how long do you have to wait.   The answers is, to be absolutely sure, maybe a long time.  But if you are lucky, yes, it could be minutes.    All it takes is one lousy book, or newspaper, roll of toilet paper, paper towel or box of bran cereal to hold the combustion going long enough to out-wait the impatient.      If I were anchored out, and I was certain the fire was out, and there was not one more thing I could do on the boat other than opening the hatch, I sure would consider rowing the dingy to shore for some lunch, reflect, take stock, and watch it from the wharf for another half hour at least.   Once I open the hatch I know the work is going to start, and best to have a good meal first before getting hip deep in it. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2018 1:46 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing     ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : My brother was a fireman most of his working life. He said he has seen a  fire going well,  in the corner of a department store, go out quickly, due to lack of oxygen despite there being plenty of fuel around.It didnt take long for it to use up all the oxygen, or deplete it to a point he fire could no longer be sustained. Where is that point? 15%,10%, 5% oxygen? Who knows? When I had a foam fire on my boat, it didn't take long for it to go out, once I sealed her up. A friend had an oil stove overflow and start a fire, on a 35 ft Saugeen Witch. The fire burned about 4 sq feet of foam and paneling then went out, despite there being 20 gallons of unburned oil on the floor and despite having wooden hatches and plastic vents and ports . It couldn't keep burning long enough to even burn or melt them. Not enough oxygen ,in a 35 footer. If I put the only air intake on a woodstove, on top, like a hatch or vent, it would not keep burning. The air has to get down low, somehow.. The big bang is caused by fuel exceeding its boiling point, building pressure, rupturing something, and spreading fire.   It one has any sections of hose as opposed to hard pipe, that can burn through and perhaps siphon.   With unlimited air, that is a fire that grows rapidly. How long does it take to put out a fire by suffocation?  A lot longer than you think.   One wants to wait for the batteries to discharge if their is an ongoing short, and all the heat to dissipate.   One has to be careful than just enough air does not leak in to keep the fire going.   A proper marine ventilator can only be blocked at the inner pipe.   Blocking the outer pipe leaves the drains.   The engine ventilation dorades can deliver fresh air low, as smoke leaks out high -- natural convection.   So one would also want to watch the diminishing of smoke escaping, and better seal the boat in further activities, leaving one smoke leak-out point,  to make it easy to tell when it is out.   As the fire diminishes and the air in the boat cools and contracts, the smoke vent can start alternating sucking air in and letting smoke out.   That is when you want to seal that one.   Now you are at the point where the fire is diminishing.  You should check the polymer ports and vents to make sure they stay cool enough not to melt - wet towel.   If one has made it to this point, get comfortable.   The last thing one wants to do is open a hatch prematurely and as one is leaning over to look in it flares up in a woof. After that, one has to remember the woodstove and shorts ready to ignite the cold but combustible smoke and vapours that still fill the cabin. If one locks off the woodstove, how long does it take before you can let air in and not see a glowing ember?   Hours? There are too many variables to give a time frame. Matt From: aguysailing@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, December 6, 00:36 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Boat Fire Extinguishing To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   How long would a fire take to deplete the oxygen in a 36'.  (guess it depends on the size of the fire).   As far as I know most diesel tanks are not too far from the engine (if that was the fire source)... how long ya got before the big bang? | 35498|35498|2019-01-14 14:09:10|brentswain38|"Curvy" steel boat topsides|I find interesting, the lengths and expenses some will go to, to try make  the midships  topsides of a steel boat rounder,  and "less boxy."( multi chine ,extreme topsides flare,  radiused  chines, etc.) If you look at most round bilge cruisers, you see very little round in the  space  between the sheer and the waterline. and, in most  cases, very little flare . The newest Beneteaus have almost none;  of either. Single chine hull performance, of single hard chine boats, like thunderbirds, stars class,"Ragtime":, " Bucaneer,",my 36 footers ,etc, show there is little difference  in performance , certainly not enough  to justify the sometimes huge increase in complexity, welding, building time, potential for distortion, and expense, nor in having an ugly chine above the waterline, full length. When there s no justification, neither  functionally nor aesthetically, then keep it simple.| 35499|35498|2019-01-14 14:58:03|mountain man|Re: "Curvy" steel boat topsides| We live in a complex world... So people are complex, infortunatly... De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 14 janvier 2019 14:07:31 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] "Curvy" steel boat topsides     I find interesting, the lengths and expenses some will go to, to try make  the midships  topsides of a steel boat rounder,  and "less boxy."( multi chine ,extreme topsides flare,  radiused  chines, etc.) If you look at most round bilge cruisers, you see very little round in the  space  between the sheer and the waterline. and, in most  cases, very little flare . The newest Beneteaus have almost none;  of either.  Single chine hull performance, of single hard chine boats, like thunderbirds, stars class,"Ragtime":, " Bucaneer,",my 36 footers ,etc, show there is little difference  in performance , certainly not enough  to justify the sometimes huge increase in complexity, welding, building time, potential for distortion, and expense, nor in having an ugly chine above the waterline, full length. When there s no justification, neither  functionally nor aesthetically, then keep it simple. | 35500|35498|2019-01-14 15:47:15|Matt Malone|Re: "Curvy" steel boat topsides| #ygrps-yiv-1864775570 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Yes, I have noticed this and further, the more "high performance" the boat is (better suited to planing in heavy air) the less rounded boat-dimension curve there is.  The curve at the turn of the bilge from the top sides to the bilge has a small radius.   The bows are cardboard box straight.  The longest curve comparable to boat-dimensions seems to be in the arch over the rear of the cabin at the front of the cockpit.   Perhaps to get some attention from the performance and and perform-sumer crowd, you could weld up a steel Open 60 using some geometry-simplifying techniques (not orgami, but maybe like you use on the keels, plates and segments of round pipe and such) and then go out and blow all the Beneteaux out of the water with used sails, an irrigation pipe for a mast and an old car engine to power it.   protect the interior, but don't bother with foam, just paint the outside nice and make a statement.  Then write a glitz magazine article with photos showing only exterior photos, a planing reach and smear of foam behind.  Do not include a list of how much it cost, focus on performance, a list of the $1M yachts you passed so fast you did not get to read their home ports.  Structure it as a little story, like trying to set a record for cruising from Tacoma, Washington to Zihuatenejo, Mexico -- appeal to tech geeks in Seattle with a desire to "break out" -- some adventure going-places shlock, sprinkled with adventures in vacuous tourist locations along the way.  After the article, someone would buy it.   Then publish the genuine-Brent follow up article on the building, the costs and how much it sold for, not to make fun of the buyer but rather to credit him for getting a good boat cheap.  Focus on how you made all those production boats look slow at a tiny fraction of the cost using durable steel.   Anyone who sees that large expanse of empty volume inside and cannot imagine building an interior for it was never going to listen anyway.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of mountain man mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 2:54 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [origamiboats] "Curvy" steel boat topsides     We live in a complex world... So people are complex, infortunatly... De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 14 janvier 2019 14:07:31 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] "Curvy" steel boat topsides     I find interesting, the lengths and expenses some will go to, to try make  the midships  topsides of a steel boat rounder,  and "less boxy."( multi chine ,extreme topsides flare,  radiused  chines, etc.) If you look at most round bilge cruisers, you see very little round in the  space  between the sheer and the waterline. and, in most  cases, very little flare . The newest Beneteaus have almost none;  of either.  Single chine hull performance, of single hard chine boats, like thunderbirds, stars class,"Ragtime":, " Bucaneer,",my 36 footers ,etc, show there is little difference  in performance , certainly not enough  to justify the sometimes huge increase in complexity, welding, building time, potential for distortion, and expense, nor in having an ugly chine above the waterline, full length. When there s no justification, neither  functionally nor aesthetically, then keep it simple. | 35501|35501|2019-01-15 15:26:41|jason wilson|For sale. BS 31|Hello, is anyone looking for or know someone who is looking for a BS 31. I bought it a few years ago in Mexico, its a great hull with a lot of potential. it is a project but it has a lot going for it. I just don't have the resources to proceed. i paid 22,000. for it ill take a reasonable offer. let me know on here or call or text me at 907-491-1181 thanks.  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]| 35502|35501|2019-01-15 15:40:21|Jfisher|Re: For sale. BS 31|Single or double keel and where is it now?Sent from my iPad On Jan 15, 2019, at 12:14, jason wilson wanderingwilson@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Hello, is anyone looking for or know someone who is looking for a BS 31. I bought it a few years ago in Mexico, its a great hull with a lot of potential. it is a project but it has a lot going for it. I just don't have the resources to proceed. i paid 22,000. for it ill take a reasonable offer. let me know on here or call or text me at 907-491-1181 thanks..  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] | 35503|35498|2019-01-15 17:18:34|brentswain38|Re: "Curvy" steel boat topsides|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :#ygrps-yiv-449155742 #ygrps-yiv-449155742ygrps-yiv-1731179237 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} In the early 70s, here in BC, a school teacher designed his own plastic  boat and made his own sails. He had no previous boat design experience. He used all galvanized rigging, and had one sheet winch, in the middle of the cockpit; all sheets led to it.Then he raced her,under PHRF rules , where snobs  give  a rating ,based on how fast the snobs think it can sail. They laughed at and ridiculed the galvanized rigging ,and the thought of his making his own sails with no previous sail making  experience,horrified them. Designing his own boat with no previous designing experience ? "Laughable !Too cheap to sail any faster than a half tide rock The designer and  builder were not even "famous; "what a joke!Then he went out and repeatedly beat some of the fastest boats , boat for boat. They grumbled about his low  rating ,but couldn't bring themselves to admit that someone of his low rank in their yacht snobbery pecking order could sail so fast.So they reluctantly, gradually, raised his rating , and  he kept beating them boat for boat. He raced against their "childish snobbery", an  easy victory.He gave them what  they deserved!I once read an article about an Aussie who kept beating the racing yachts with his 1930s gaff ketch. They banned him from  racing, officially, so he went out and sailed circles around then anyway. Yes, I have noticed this and further, the more "high performance" the boat is (better suited to planing in heavy air) the less rounded boat-dimension curve there is.  The curve at the turn of the bilge from the top sides to the bilge has a small radius.   The bows are cardboard box straight.  The longest curve comparable to boat-dimensions seems to be in the arch over the rear of the cabin at the front of the cockpit.   Perhaps to get some attention from the performance and and perform-sumer crowd, you could weld up a steel Open 60 using some geometry-simplifying techniques (not orgami, but maybe like you use on the keels, plates and segments of round pipe and such) and then go out and blow all the Beneteaux out of the water with used sails, an irrigation pipe for a mast and an old car engine to power it.   protect the interior, but don't bother with foam, just paint the outside nice and make a statement.  Then write a glitz magazine article with photos showing only exterior photos, a planing reach and smear of foam behind.  Do not include a list of how much it cost, focus on performance, a list of the $1M yachts you passed so fast you did not get to read their home ports.  Structure it as a little story, like trying to set a record for cruising from Tacoma, Washington to Zihuatenejo, Mexico -- appeal to tech geeks in Seattle with a desire to "break out" -- some adventure going-places shlock, sprinkled with adventures in vacuous tourist locations along the way.  After the article, someone would buy it.   Then publish the genuine-Brent follow up article on the building, the costs and how much it sold for, not to make fun of the buyer but rather to credit him for getting a good boat cheap.  Focus on how you made all those production boats look slow at a tiny fraction of the cost using durable steel.   Anyone who sees that large expanse of empty volume inside and cannot imagine building an interior for it was never going to listen anyway.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of mountain man mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 2:54 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [origamiboats] "Curvy" steel boat topsides  We live in a complex world... So people are complex, infortunatly...De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 14 janvier 2019 14:07:31 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] "Curvy" steel boat topsides  I find interesting, the lengths and expenses some will go to, to try make  the midships  topsides of a steel boat rounder,  and "less boxy."( multi chine ,extreme topsides flare,  radiused  chines, etc.)If you look at most round bilge cruisers, you see very little round in the  space  between the sheer and the waterline. and, in most  cases, very little flare . The newest Beneteaus have almost none;  of either. Single chine hull performance, of single hard chine boats, like thunderbirds, stars class,"Ragtime":, " Bucaneer,",my 36 footers ,etc, show there is little difference  in performance , certainly not enough  to justify the sometimes huge increase in complexity, welding, building time, potential for distortion, and expense, nor in having an ugly chine above the waterline, full length. When there s no justification, neither  functionally nor aesthetically, then keep it simple. | 35504|35501|2019-01-15 17:20:42|brentswain38|Re: For sale. BS 31|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Is that the"Nomadic?"Hello, is anyone looking for or know someone who is looking for a BS 31. I bought it a few years ago in Mexico, its a great hull with a lot of potential. it is a project but it has a lot going for it. I just don't have the resources to proceed. i paid 22,000. for it ill take a reasonable offer. let me know on here or call or text me at 907-491-1181 thanks.  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]| 35505|35501|2019-01-16 17:05:00|jason wilson|Re: For sale. BS 31|Single it's in guaymas Mexico. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 1:41 PM, Jfisher jfisher577@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Single or double keel and where is it now?Sent from my iPadOn Jan 15, 2019, at 12:14, jason wilson wanderingwilson@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Hello, is anyone looking for or know someone who is looking for a BS 31. I bought it a few years ago in Mexico, its a great hull with a lot of potential. it is a project but it has a lot going for it. I just don't have the resources to proceed. i paid 22,000. for it ill take a reasonable offer. let me know on here or call or text me at 907-491-1181 thanks..  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 -- #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-mkp { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-mkp hr { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327hd { color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ads { margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ad { padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ad p { margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ad a { color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-lc { font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327hd { margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ad { margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327actions { font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327activity { background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327activity span { font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327activity span:first-child { text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327activity span a { color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327activity span span { color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327activity span .ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327underline { text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 .ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327attach { clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 .ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327attach div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 .ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327attach img { border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 .ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327attach label { display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 .ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327attach label a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 blockquote { margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 .ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327bold { font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 .ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327bold a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 dd.ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327last p a { font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 dd.ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327last p span { margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 dd.ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327last p span.ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327yshortcuts { margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 div.ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327attach-table div div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 div.ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327attach-table { width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 div.ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 div.ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 div.ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 div.ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327file-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 div.ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 div.ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 div.ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 div.ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327photo-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 div#ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327yshortcuts { font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 .ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327green { color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 .ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327MsoNormal { margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 o { font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327photos div { float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327photos div div { border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327photos div label { color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327reco-category { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327reco-desc { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 .ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327replbq { margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-actbar div a:first-child { margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-mlmsg { font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-mlmsg table { font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 input, #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 textarea { font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-mlmsg pre, #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 code { font:115% monospace;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-mlmsg * { line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327logo { padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-msg p a { font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327attach-count span { color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327reco-head { color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-reco { margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ov li a { font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ov li { font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ov ul { margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-text { font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-text p { margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-text tt { font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327 #ygrps-yiv-1966589967yiv6195138327ygrp-vital ul li:last-child { border-right:none !important;} #ygrps-yiv-1966589967 | 35506|35501|2019-01-17 16:34:27|jason wilson|Re: For sale. BS 31|Yes it's nomadicSent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 3:21 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Is that the"Nomadic?"Hello, is anyone looking for or know someone who is looking for a BS 31. I bought it a few years ago in Mexico, its a great hull with a lot of potential. it is a project but it has a lot going for it. I just don't have the resources to proceed. i paid 22,000. for it ill take a reasonable offer. let me know on here or call or text me at 907-491-1181 thanks.  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 -- #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-mkp { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-mkp hr { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648hd { color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ads { margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ad { padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ad p { margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ad a { color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-lc { font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648hd { margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ad { margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648actions { font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648activity { background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648activity span { font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648activity span:first-child { text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648activity span a { color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648activity span span { color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648activity span .ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648underline { text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 .ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648attach { clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 .ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648attach div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 .ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648attach img { border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 .ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648attach label { display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 .ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648attach label a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 blockquote { margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 .ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648bold { font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 .ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648bold a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 dd.ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648last p a { font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 dd.ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648last p span { margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 dd.ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648last p span.ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648yshortcuts { margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 div.ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648attach-table div div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 div.ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648attach-table { width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 div.ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 div.ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 div.ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 div.ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648file-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 div.ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 div.ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 div.ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 div.ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648photo-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 div#ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648yshortcuts { font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 .ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648green { color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 .ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648MsoNormal { margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 o { font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648photos div { float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648photos div div { border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648photos div label { color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648reco-category { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648reco-desc { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 .ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648replbq { margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-actbar div a:first-child { margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-mlmsg { font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-mlmsg table { font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 input, #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 textarea { font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-mlmsg pre, #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 code { font:115% monospace;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-mlmsg * { line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648logo { padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-msg p a { font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648attach-count span { color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648reco-head { color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-reco { margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ov li a { font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ov li { font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ov ul { margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-text { font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-text p { margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-text tt { font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648 #ygrps-yiv-914447842yiv8743480648ygrp-vital ul li:last-child { border-right:none !important;} #ygrps-yiv-914447842 | 35507|35507|2019-01-17 18:33:15|aguysailing|Anodes|I will be putting aluminum anodes on my BS 36 after zinc ones deteriorate.  I was told by a marine supply store NOT to put an aluminum anode (collar) on my stainless steel 1.25" prop shaft?  Would this guy be right?... thanks  | 35508|35507|2019-01-17 18:41:03|Brian Stannard|Re: Anodes|He's wrong. You can use aluminum or zinc if in salt water. Don't mix though - all zinc or all aluminum. Your shaft is the noble underwater metal. The anode is there to protect the propeller. Virus-free. www.avast.com On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 3:33 PM aguysailing@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I will be putting aluminum anodes on my BS 36 after zinc ones deteriorate.  I was told by a marine supply store NOT to put an aluminum anode (collar) on my stainless steel 1.25" prop shaft?  Would this guy be right?... thanks  -- CheersBrian Virus-free. www.avast.com | 35509|35509|2019-01-17 20:27:20|ragnarpar|EXTENDING 40' PLANS|I seem to recall Brent saying that extending the 40' plans by 10% all the way around and keeping the 3/16" hull plate was ok   Has anyone done such??  If Brent is about or anyone has any input on such, with the idea of a basic schooner rig, I would appreciate such thoughts.Would the twin keels prove sufficient for the schooner rig and how would I go about placing the mast to balance things properly?Thanks for ideas here Par | 35510|35509|2019-01-18 06:05:23|Aaron|Re: EXTENDING 40' PLANS|I think that was 1/4" for the 40' Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 4:29 PM, ragnarpar@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I seem to recall Brent saying that extending the 40' plans by 10% all the way around and keeping the 3/16" hull plate was ok   Has anyone done such??  If Brent is about or anyone has any input on such, with the idea of a basic schooner rig, I would appreciate such thoughts.Would the twin keels prove sufficient for the schooner rig and how would I go about placing the mast to balance things properly?Thanks for ideas here Par #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 -- #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-mkp { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-mkp hr { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352hd { color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ads { margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ad { padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ad p { margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ad a { color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-lc { font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352hd { margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ad { margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352actions { font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352activity { background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352activity span { font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352activity span:first-child { text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352activity span a { color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352activity span span { color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352activity span .ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352underline { text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 .ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352attach { clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 .ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352attach div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 .ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352attach img { border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 .ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352attach label { display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 .ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352attach label a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 blockquote { margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 .ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352bold { font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 .ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352bold a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 dd.ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352last p a { font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 dd.ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352last p span { margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 dd.ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352last p span.ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352yshortcuts { margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 div.ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352attach-table div div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 div.ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352attach-table { width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 div.ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 div.ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 div.ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 div.ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352file-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 div.ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 div.ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 div.ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 div.ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352photo-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 div#ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352yshortcuts { font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 .ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352green { color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 .ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352MsoNormal { margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 o { font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352photos div { float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352photos div div { border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352photos div label { color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352reco-category { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352reco-desc { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 .ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352replbq { margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-actbar div a:first-child { margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-mlmsg { font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-mlmsg table { font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 input, #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 textarea { font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-mlmsg pre, #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 code { font:115% monospace;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-mlmsg * { line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352logo { padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-msg p a { font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352attach-count span { color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352reco-head { color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-reco { margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ov li a { font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ov li { font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ov ul { margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-text { font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-text p { margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-text tt { font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352 #ygrps-yiv-960471683yiv8566258352ygrp-vital ul li:last-child { border-right:none !important;} #ygrps-yiv-960471683 | 35511|35501|2019-01-18 12:41:28|Matt Malone|Re: For sale. BS 31| #ygrps-yiv-860816097 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} If I were looking for a steel boat, which I cannot say that I am, I would be interested in:  - seeing one or two photographs giving me a general sense of what stage the construction is in,  - such things as the yearly cost of the work yard where it is currently located, in Mexico  - whether there is any indication if it can stay or whether it must go,   - and if it must go, how much more work before it can be floated/sailed to somewhere more preferred by the buyer where it can be completed,  - the other option is trucking, and people can get estimates for that, provided they have an idea what sort of load it would be. I went through the trucking option, and it was a little less than 1/4 of your purchase price for half a continent of trucking -- not a prohibitive cost, but, it was a pain to schedule at that price, and the schedule was left hanging for a long time, as it was a back-haul to a yacht going in the other direction.   Floating it might be preferable, if practical.  Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of jason wilson wanderingwilson@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 6:00 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: For sale. BS 31     Yes it's nomadic Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 3:21 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Is that the"Nomadic?" Hello, is anyone looking for or know someone who is looking for a BS 31. I bought it a few years ago in Mexico, its a great hull with a lot of potential. it is a project but it has a lot going for it. I just don't have the resources to proceed. i paid 22,000. for it ill take a reasonable offer. let me know on here or call or text me at 907-491-1181 thanks.  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] | 35512|35509|2019-01-21 16:13:39|brentswain38|Re: EXTENDING 40' PLANS|I wouldn't advise extending the 40 footer up. Anything much bigger than 40 ft (ie 45 ft)should be `1/4 inch  plate.Provided they are in the right place , twin keels should be no problem on a schooner. Compare to the positions of similar keel profiles on other schooners.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I seem to recall Brent saying that extending the 40' plans by 10% all the way around and keeping the 3/16" hull plate was ok   Has anyone done such??  If Brent is about or anyone has any input on such, with the idea of a basic schooner rig, I would appreciate such thoughts.Would the twin keels prove sufficient for the schooner rig and how would I go about placing the mast to balance things properly?Thanks for ideas here Par | 35513|35501|2019-01-23 16:33:55|jason wilson|Re: For sale. BS 31| Thanks Matt, well if you are interested or know someone that is give them my email address and i can answer all those questions.  On Friday, January 18, 2019, 11:08:10 AM MST, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   If I were looking for a steel boat, which I cannot say that I am, I would be interested in:  - seeing one or two photographs giving me a general sense of what stage the construction is in,  - such things as the yearly cost of the work yard where it is currently located, in Mexico  - whether there is any indication if it can stay or whether it must go,   - and if it must go, how much more work before it can be floated/sailed to somewhere more preferred by the buyer where it can be completed,  - the other option is trucking, and people can get estimates for that, provided they have an idea what sort of load it would be. I went through the trucking option, and it was a little less than 1/4 of your purchase price for half a continent of trucking -- not a prohibitive cost, but, it was a pain to schedule at that price, and the schedule was left hanging for a long time, as it was a back-haul to a yacht going in the other direction.   Floating it might be preferable, if practical.  Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of jason wilson wanderingwilson@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 6:00 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: For sale. BS 31     Yes it's nomadic Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 3:21 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Is that the"Nomadic?" Hello, is anyone looking for or know someone who is looking for a BS 31. I bought it a few years ago in Mexico, its a great hull with a lot of potential. it is a project but it has a lot going for it. I just don't have the resources to proceed. i paid 22,000. for it ill take a reasonable offer. let me know on here or call or text me at 907-491-1181 thanks.  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 -- #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-mkp { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-mkp hr { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476hd { color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ads { margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ad { padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ad p { margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ad a { color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-lc { font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476hd { margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ad { margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476actions { font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476activity { background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476activity span { font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476activity span:first-child { text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476activity span a { color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476activity span span { color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476activity span .ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476underline { text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 .ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476attach { clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 .ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476attach div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 .ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476attach img { border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 .ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476attach label { display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 .ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476attach label a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 blockquote { margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 .ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476bold { font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 .ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476bold a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 dd.ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476last p a { font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 dd.ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476last p span { margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 dd.ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476last p span.ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476yshortcuts { margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 div.ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476attach-table div div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 div.ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476attach-table { width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 div.ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 div.ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 div.ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 div.ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476file-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 div.ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 div.ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 div.ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 div.ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476photo-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 div#ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476yshortcuts { font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 .ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476green { color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 .ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476MsoNormal { margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 o { font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476photos div { float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476photos div div { border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476photos div label { color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476reco-category { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476reco-desc { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 .ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476replbq { margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-actbar div a:first-child { margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-mlmsg { font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-mlmsg table { font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 input, #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 textarea { font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-mlmsg pre, #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 code { font:115% monospace;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-mlmsg * { line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476logo { padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-msg p a { font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476attach-count span { color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476reco-head { color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-reco { margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ov li a { font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ov li { font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ov ul { margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-text { font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-text p { margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-text tt { font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476 #ygrps-yiv-824528992yiv1240521476ygrp-vital ul li:last-child { border-right:none !important;} #ygrps-yiv-824528992 | 35514|35514|2019-02-04 10:38:00|brentswain38|Shackles|I once went to a testing facility in San Francisco, with a friend who wanted cheap Chinese shackles tested.Where did they break? On some, the pin bent, and the threaded end pulled out. I guess that is why the industrial ones have much thicker pins than the shackle body.On some, the ends around the pins broke. On industrial ones, that part has a lot thicker metal around the pins. I have never seen these features on any stainless shackles, ever. Amazingly , cheap 5/16th shackles  broke at 15,000 lbs.| 35515|35515|2019-02-07 14:22:17|aguysailing|Sailboat for sale|I am handling the sale of a friend's 33' sailboat.   He has had a heart attack and is out of the game.  If you are building a BS all your "everything" is on this boat including a new Volvo Penta D120.  He had it for sale on Kijiji $28,000.  It is ready to sail or all the stuff you need for your BS.  It is a Riviera 316.  He is a retired guy boat hobbyist and has never taken the boat out.  Survey etc... Your offer might shock you.  It goes to the estate and a broker otherwise.| 35516|35516|2019-02-07 14:37:27|aguysailing|Info Summary Sailboat for Sale|Info summary for the below posting is in Album Riviera 316...thanks| 35517|35517|2019-02-08 10:29:11|brentswain38|SS dodger frame|A friend has a stainless frame for a dodger, free.Here is his email addresszoascott74@...>| 35518|35331|2019-02-09 23:31:59|wild_explorer|Re: Yahoo is getting worse....|Disclaimer: I gave up on Yahoo and Gmail as e-mail for everyday use. Reason - most of the time I can NOT access my accounts. Ones I move to another location, my e-mail is blocked for 2-3 days.ALL "used to be FREE" e-mails sites in US are sold to cell phones companies and they want to track you at ALL time.Below is the message which appears when i try to see Origamiboats group from Europe (because of NEW user data law protection in Europe which US companies want to bypass):Quote:Yahoo is part of Oath. Oath and our partners need your consent to access your device and use your data (including location) to understand your interests, and provide and measure personalised ads. Oath will also provide you personalised ads on partner products. Learn More. Select 'OK' to continue and allow Oath and our partners to use your data, or select 'Manage options' to view your choices.To continue using Yahoo and other Oath sites and apps, we need you to let us set cookies to collect your data. This helps us improve and create new products, enhance our product security, and give you personalised content and ads. Learn More about how we use your data.Scroll down and select 'OK' to proceed, otherwise you will not be able to access our sites and apps.Below, you can further customise what data you share to personalise your experience across our network.End of quote.Anyway...Back in 2010, I was trying to to make a backup of Yahoo Origamiboats group using Google groups. All information is gone by now - no information left (deleted by Google) I created backup, plus posted some additional information (may be some people still remember that - it was a big scream in Yahoo group about it). I have created few few related Google groups. If I remember correctly, main disadvantage of Google group - it is need to have Gmail address.I offered Brent to take over those groups, but he had no time to manage it and he was not interested because of that.Groups are:https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboatshttps://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-3d-modelinghttps://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-improvehttps://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-enginehttps://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-electricalIf someone cam manage it, contact Brent, and I will give him all information I have about it (and access as well). I am NOT interested to manage it (I have no time for it)Best solution will be to create INDEPENDENT website (not a big deal) but it will require to use paid web-hosting,Remember: There is NO free cheese in the mouse trap ;-))) Every "free" service usually comes with a price - your personal data.| 35519|35331|2019-02-10 00:28:16|Matt Malone|Re: Yahoo is getting worse....| So there is free cheese at google? From: williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, February 9, 23:33 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Yahoo is getting worse.... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Disclaimer: I gave up on Yahoo and Gmail as e-mail for everyday use. Reason - most of the time I can NOT access my accounts. Ones I move to another location, my e-mail is blocked for 2-3 days. ALL "used to be FREE" e-mails sites in US are sold to cell phones companies and they want to track you at ALL time. Below is the message which appears when i try to see Origamiboats group from Europe (because of NEW user data law protection in Europe which US companies want to bypass): Quote: Yahoo is part of Oath. Oath and our partners need your consent to access your device and use your data (including location) to understand your interests, and provide and measure personalised ads. Oath will also provide you personalised ads on partner products. Learn More. Select 'OK' to continue and allow Oath and our partners to use your data, or select 'Manage options' to view your choices. To continue using Yahoo and other Oath sites and apps, we need you to let us set cookies to collect your data. This helps us improve and create new products, enhance our product security, and give you personalised content and ads. Learn More about how we use your data. Scroll down and select 'OK' to proceed, otherwise you will not be able to access our sites and apps. Below, you can further customise what data you share to personalise your experience across our network. End of quote. Anyway... Back in 2010, I was trying to to make a backup of Yahoo Origamiboats group using Google groups. All information is gone by now - no information left (deleted by Google) I created backup, plus posted some additional information (may be some people still remember that - it was a big scream in Yahoo group about it). I have created few few related Google groups. If I remember correctly, main disadvantage of Google group - it is need to have Gmail address. I offered Brent to take over those groups, but he had no time to manage it and he was not interested because of that. Groups are: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-3d-modeling https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-improve https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-engine https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-electrical If someone cam manage it, contact Brent, and I will give him all information I have about it (and access as well). I am NOT interested to manage it (I have no time for it) Best solution will be to create INDEPENDENT website (not a big deal) but it will require to use paid web-hosting, Remember: There is NO free cheese in the mouse trap ;-))) Every "free" service usually comes with a price - your personal data. | 35520|35509|2019-02-10 00:34:43|wild_explorer|Re: EXTENDING 40' PLANS|My 40 ft hull is using 3/16 plate. It was relatively hard to pull it together anyway (should be simpler than to pull 36 pattern by the logic). It would be even harder to pull 1/4 plate pattern.1/4 plate might be too much of the weight for 40 ft (I did some calculations, but forgot what Max plate thickness is for 40 footer to keep designed draft).40 footer Origamiboat is pretty big inside compare to other designs. If I did it again, I would go for 36 footer.45 footer will be a lot of work (which is NOT proportional to the added size).As I remember, one of the suggestion was to use 1/4 plate for lower portion of the pattern (below waterline and slightly above), and use 3/16 above waterline.P.S. Brent should now better if his plans will accept "scale up".| 35521|35331|2019-02-10 01:20:00|wild_explorer|Re: Yahoo is getting worse....|If FREE="cheese in the mouse trap", I would say yes ;-) No wonder that Google is banned (one way or another) in many countries due to extensive collection of personal data and providing biased "search results".If I remember correctly, Google has continuous problems with The European Union (antitrust lawsuits).Google will change Google group policy May 6 2019.If group will go for INDEPENDENT website, hosting provider need to be located in Europe, NOT in US. EU has better law for protection of "user data". US hosting becomes TOO problematic to have business with.Main point: Many European users will be cut off from using Yahoo groups if they do not agree to allow collect their personal data (mandatory to access Yahoo services).P.S. I use different way to avoid data collection (some tricks still work), or I would not be able to post anything here.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : So there is free cheese at google? From: williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, February 9, 23:33 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Yahoo is getting worse.... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Disclaimer: I gave up on Yahoo and Gmail as e-mail for everyday use. Reason - most of the time I can NOT access my accounts. Ones I move to another location, my e-mail is blocked for 2-3 days. ALL "used to be FREE" e-mails sites in US are sold to cell phones companies and they want to track you at ALL time. Below is the message which appears when i try to see Origamiboats group from Europe (because of NEW user data law protection in Europe which US companies want to bypass): Quote: Yahoo is part of Oath. Oath and our partners need your consent to access your device and use your data (including location) to understand your interests, and provide and measure personalised ads. Oath will also provide you personalised ads on partner products. Learn More. Select 'OK' to continue and allow Oath and our partners to use your data, or select 'Manage options' to view your choices. To continue using Yahoo and other Oath sites and apps, we need you to let us set cookies to collect your data. This helps us improve and create new products, enhance our product security, and give you personalised content and ads. Learn More about how we use your data. Scroll down and select 'OK' to proceed, otherwise you will not be able to access our sites and apps. Below, you can further customise what data you share to personalise your experience across our network. End of quote. Anyway... Back in 2010, I was trying to to make a backup of Yahoo Origamiboats group using Google groups. All information is gone by now - no information left (deleted by Google) I created backup, plus posted some additional information (may be some people still remember that - it was a big scream in Yahoo group about it). I have created few few related Google groups. If I remember correctly, main disadvantage of Google group - it is need to have Gmail address. I offered Brent to take over those groups, but he had no time to manage it and he was not interested because of that. Groups are: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-3d-modeling https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-improve https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-engine https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-electrical If someone cam manage it, contact Brent, and I will give him all information I have about it (and access as well). I am NOT interested to manage it (I have no time for it) Best solution will be to create INDEPENDENT website (not a big deal) but it will require to use paid web-hosting, Remember: There is NO free cheese in the mouse trap ;-))) Every "free" service usually comes with a price - your personal data. | 35522|35331|2019-02-10 10:33:31|brentswain38|Re: Yahoo is getting worse....|I am gradually switching to protonmail. Search Protonmail,comIt is Swiss based, with strict Swiss privacy laws , like an email Swiss bank account. It is encrypted both ends, and even the provider cant read your emails.Uncle Sam has no control over them.I'll be using brentswain36@...The more people switch to those using such privacy laws, the more pressure there is on others to do likewise, or get abandoned en mass.Couldn''t use yahoo in Cuba . Where I travel is none of their fucking business.| 35523|35331|2019-02-10 10:36:22|brentswain38|Re: Yahoo is getting worse....|I use Duckduckgo for a search engine. They keep no track of where you have searched ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : So there is free cheese at google? From: williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, February 9, 23:33 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Yahoo is getting worse.... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Disclaimer: I gave up on Yahoo and Gmail as e-mail for everyday use. Reason - most of the time I can NOT access my accounts. Ones I move to another location, my e-mail is blocked for 2-3 days. ALL "used to be FREE" e-mails sites in US are sold to cell phones companies and they want to track you at ALL time. Below is the message which appears when i try to see Origamiboats group from Europe (because of NEW user data law protection in Europe which US companies want to bypass): Quote: Yahoo is part of Oath. Oath and our partners need your consent to access your device and use your data (including location) to understand your interests, and provide and measure personalised ads. Oath will also provide you personalised ads on partner products. Learn More. Select 'OK' to continue and allow Oath and our partners to use your data, or select 'Manage options' to view your choices. To continue using Yahoo and other Oath sites and apps, we need you to let us set cookies to collect your data. This helps us improve and create new products, enhance our product security, and give you personalised content and ads. Learn More about how we use your data. Scroll down and select 'OK' to proceed, otherwise you will not be able to access our sites and apps. Below, you can further customise what data you share to personalise your experience across our network. End of quote. Anyway... Back in 2010, I was trying to to make a backup of Yahoo Origamiboats group using Google groups. All information is gone by now - no information left (deleted by Google) I created backup, plus posted some additional information (may be some people still remember that - it was a big scream in Yahoo group about it). I have created few few related Google groups. If I remember correctly, main disadvantage of Google group - it is need to have Gmail address. I offered Brent to take over those groups, but he had no time to manage it and he was not interested because of that. Groups are: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-3d-modeling https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-improve https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-engine https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-electrical If someone cam manage it, contact Brent, and I will give him all information I have about it (and access as well). I am NOT interested to manage it (I have no time for it) Best solution will be to create INDEPENDENT website (not a big deal) but it will require to use paid web-hosting, Remember: There is NO free cheese in the mouse trap ;-))) Every "free" service usually comes with a price - your personal data. | 35524|35509|2019-02-10 10:42:10|brentswain38|Re: EXTENDING 40' PLANS|I wouldnt go for 1/4 plate in a boat under 45 feet. Renting some big comealongs ,over 3 tons,  helps a lot, altho I cant seé any usefulenes for a boat over 40 feet, for the average cruiser. That is why I was reluctant to design the 40 footer. Too big a boat has screwed up far too many cruising  dreams.'When I wrote some articles for Pacific Yachting, the editor told me that a 40 footer would be very popular,as 36 was too small for many people. So I did, and sold a hanful of 40  plans, while the demand for 36 footers far outweighed the 40, by a wide margin.| 35525|35509|2019-02-10 11:26:32|jpronk1|Re: EXTENDING 40' PLANS|There is a lot to be said about cruising in a boat that is not too big. On our 27 footer we were able to sneak into a lot of tight spots. Quit often I was docking and doing locks single handily. I know lots of other people who were on much bigger boats doing the same, but at unbelievable prices for the gear to make the boats more maneuverable. I am a huge believer in keeping things as simple as possible. James Sent from my iPhone| 35526|35331|2019-02-10 14:28:13|Matt Malone|Re: Yahoo is getting worse....| #ygrps-yiv-1894846233 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} So I am confused.   You say both yahoo and google track people.    I am not clear why there would be a point in switching from yahoo to google.   There are some directions that Origami can go.   I agree, if one wanted to spend a little money, constantly, forever, a private server would be better.   I think Brent would be the one to make that decision, and I think he has.   If there were a patron, as in Patreon, who took on the costs and a volunteer who took on the day to day task of keeping the knowledge alive, it would not be an expensive project.   Problem is, with patrons, their comfort level with the content is a factor to be considered.  People like these do OK with patrons: https://www.gonewiththewynns.com/ Gone With The Wynns Gone With the Wynns is an unscripted tale of the quirky couple who traded in everyday life to satisfy their wear-out-your-shoes sense of adventure. www.gonewiththewynns.com These people check a number of boxes and are more ideally suited to a patron model.   Lets just say, Brent is more of your normal guy, with the normal rough spots, not ideally suited to drawing and keeping a patron when there are people who go out of their way to be more polished and reliably palatable.   I do not think a private server is what is going to serve origami boats best in the long-run. Plan B:  An Offline Compendium Published Yearly   Books are the mechanism by which knowledge has been preserved in the past.   In an electronic form, a tighter collection of easily transferred information can still be called a "book".   One does not need an external server to read .html files, when one clicks a link, it can lead to another local file.   The entire origami boats group could be backed up to a  self-referencing .zip file, say once a year and distributed as a torrent.  So Origami-Boats-2019, Origami-Boats-2020, etc becomes a free publication.    Call it a highly distributed backup. Plan C: A Book Plus Curated Compendium   Internet groups are full of a lot of low-content stuff.   Curating it into a tighter, smaller reference would be far more useful to a future reader.   Brent might be better off curating the origami boats group, and putting together a second book, including content from the first book along with a compendium of the better ideas and photos from the group.    I would recommend a PDF format e-book.   It would get into so many computers, it will never disappear.   But I recommend changes... To make the content were patron-friendly, public-friendly a change in tone from that in the group and discussions Brent has gotten into in other forums, and probably the book would be helpful.   The tone which is adversarial to traditional naval architecture might be replaced with a more "alternative" to naval architecture, suitable for small boats.  Suitable would be supported with data such as X number of sea-miles/Y years/a globe map of all voyages for the 26'.   Then an entirely separate set of data for the 33' etc.   One can make several indisputable points such as, naval architecture methods predate the availability of reliable arc welding to the hobbyist and this has opened up a new type of boat to the committed owner-builder.       In the end, the design of origami boats makes the skin of the boat more of the load-carrying structure than naval architecture methods would normally do.   For large ships, built commercially, origami would be a poor way to build.   Far more steel would be used, the design would not be as amenable to numerical analysis needed to prove the design meets design goals, unknown stresses would remain in the structure, hull shape would be more restricted and less efficient than possible with modern postage-stamp jigsaw steel constructions on frames.   Also, anyone who makes a living doing things, does so by seeking uniformity and efficiency.  Ship building is no different.  The inability to numerically determine every dimension prior to construction with origami means the steel cutting cannot be farmed out to a shop.  One cannot set low-paid hourly wage workers to the task (as opposed to an owner with project-commitment).  The plans cannot be sent to a fab shop in a remote location in a foreign land, which is where the bulk of manufacturing happens these days.   To naval designers, that is what "proper" plans are -- fool-proof at least to the standard that it can be sent to an outside shop where it can be executed without constant oversight by a committed owner.   If one cannot provide those plans, one is not a naval architect and it is not a full boat design in a practical industrial sense.    It is self-evident that origami cannot be stretched to replace naval architecture.  It is equally self-evident that naval architecture has little relevance to traditional methods of building a canoe.   I see origami as a new-traditional method using steel and reliable welding, to make small boat building amenable to an owner who is project-committed.   The bigger the origami boat, the more it needs someone like Doug of S/V Seeker to keep it on track.   That is not a project for a backyard handy-man, Doug is engineering his own boat, based on the Brent's original design.   So lets keep it real, origami has a practical limit in size that is as much related to who is doing the actual building, as the limits of steel and build geometry. Some commentators have compared Brent to a traditional beach-builder of boats, and some of the same commentators have recognized that beach-built boats can be really good.   Some individual, well-known small boats were beach-built.   Brent has found a way to take beach-building to the backyard of anyone who can weld, and the product is a steel boat, in many measures indisputably superior to cheaply bulk-produced glass boats today.   Though the product is not dimensionally identical to, it is comparable to dozens of boats of the same design as seen on pages .....  (referring back to the voyage maps).       I believe one can make a case for origami in a book without stating it as a conflict.  That is a book that will bring patrons and a larger following.   The strong-minded, otherwise skilled individuals who choose to build will pay no heed to the conflict anyway.  Those easily convinced or dissuaded or without the life experience with steel work, maybe a smaller origami is as big a project as they should take on.  If they want a big boat, maybe they should just buy one and sail it until they gather experience and certainty as to what they want.  The information can be gathered together into a pure nut of knowledge going forward ... or not.  It can languish at the level it is now to disappear slowly as a few volunteers fade away.   If it collected, and published, and is electronic, it will never die.  It will keep coming up again and again every time someone says, "I just read a great book called... "  There will never be a last origami ever built.    Why Put Any More Effort In?  The Golden Age of Origami Boats is Coming Consider everything done in Origami Boats to this point as the Beta Test, the shake-out, the proof on which something more permanent is built.   What people should keep in mind is, we are approaching a cusp with internet technology with Starlink and similar affordable global satellite internet concepts.   Global internet will work to decouple earning from location even more so than it has already.  As a non-geostationary system it cannot be made substantially less available at any longitude in any tropical or temperate climes anywhere on Earth that has a densely habited location somewhere at that latitude on Earth.   What I mean is, if Starlink will service Edinburgh, UK at 56 degrees north latitude, then it will service 3/4 of the Aleutians to a comparable extent.   Because circular orbits must extend equal distances south of the equator, one should get comparable service as far south as Cape Horn.  (Molyina orbits are not symmetric and were used by USSR to provide better coverage of the USSR only.) This will be a game-changer.   It will substantially expand the gamut of places where a fraction of the workforce can live including to huge areas of water on the planet.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink_(satellite_constellation)  "SpaceX has articulated the explicit goal to provide broadband internet connectivity to underserved areas of the planet, as well as provide competitively-priced service to urban areas." If one can have internet in the middle of the Pacific at a price that is even 3 times what it is in urban areas, at even at 1/4 of full streaming speed, remote working becomes as possible as it currently is in a suburban basement over much of the developed world.   I know not everyone can be a digital remote worker, and it will never will be everyone, but for more and more people, it will free their ability to earn a living in a digital trade.   Even if StarLink is delayed or fails, the race has started, and in a decade some system will be reliable and established.   The world will substantially change.  Affordable Global Internet On Every Small Boat With global internet in an affordable price range, every small boat could upload its current conditions weather data, it could be crowd-sourced and made available to all, like traffic data is now with route-planning apps like Waze in larger cities -- the oceans would become much more friendly places for small boats.   The number of nice days would increase, the rough days would decrease in severity and frequency, and the chance of a major storm would go down, and life-threatening weather could be avoided more effectively.   Within a decade one would have a weather nanny app constantly watching developments and recommending where to go to avoid bad weather.   Any boat capable of 150 miles a day could substantially change their expected weather profile.  Living Aboard While Brent knows full well, most people own a home, he has made it clear, origami has been a vehicle for him to live land-free, and house-free, avoiding the taxes and costs related to home ownership.   He has not been shy about holding himself out as a model.   Living on boats has had a long tradition in Europe and Great Britain.   Origami with something like Starlink, can be a stepping stone for the individual to live differently while earning in the global marketplace.    Living aboard would not be so much about subsistence, or benefit by keeping minimal costs below modest incomes, it could be about modest costs and globally-competitive incomes.  The origami designs that exist today are suitable to a desk-based digital remote worker.   But that is not everyone. A slightly inconvenient issue for live-aboard is children.  The average expectations for opportunities for children has grown, in may ways beyond what were perfectly acceptable learning and living situations in the past.   Yes, there is a lot to learn on the water but to consider it as a lifestyle to move toward, it needs to offer little compromise on the opportunities afforded to children.  With Starlink or a similar system, children could maintain enrolment in a land-based curriculum and easily-recognized parity of opportunity -- if one had the space for these activities aboard. Remote Living Needing More Space Than Current Origami Designs Affordable global internet will offer the same opportunities for those who design practical alternative homes, not specifically the "Earthships" (https://www.earthshipglobal.com/), but more broadly, well-engineered self-sufficient homes where the design changes, depending on what climate it is built in.   Cheap solar, and the abundance of space around a home on solid ground in a remote area provide opportunities for earning not available on a boat at an arbitrary position on Earth.  A land-based remote living location provides the space for a large-shop worker, and the space for a power system for substantial business-related loads.    I once visited a 4,000 square foot machine shop business with huge CNC machines powered entirely from a bio-fuel burning generator -- and they were only a few kilometres from the end of the power line in a farming area in Ontario.  No individual can be expected to build a boat large enough to compete with what is possible on even a 1 acre lot, let alone 20 acres.  There is however a tried and proven boat configuration missing from the Origami catalog that can help:    Plan D: The Origami Catamaran The interior volume on catamarans is a substantial step up from monohulls.   A steel cat might have the space for a family of digital desk workers, or a small-shop worker.   This would open up living on the water to more people, more families.   If Brent were to come out of retirement and add just one more design to his inventory, a cat that looks more like a cross between a house boat and a regular cruising cat, (a broader top-deck cabin, more internal volume) that is a new level of boat.   The top-deck cabin on a cat can have more-flat, more-square spaces, and can be more easily finished to a better style.  The hull "basement spaces" need only have comfy births for style, and then large walled-off utility spaces that are easy to work in for practicality.   Would it be based on two 33' hulls to start with -- something Brent knows the best ?   Who knows, but, it is a design Origami needs in its catalog to address a niche in the future.    Cats give more space for families, earning and doing school studies.  Cats dry nicely with single stubby keel nubs on each hull.   I think there is a lot of Brent philosophy that can be poured into one cat design.   It only takes one design.       Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2019 1:19 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Yahoo is getting worse....     If FREE="cheese in the mouse trap", I would say yes ;-) No wonder that Google is banned (one way or another) in many countries due to extensive collection of personal data and providing biased "search results". If I remember correctly, Google has continuous problems with The European Union (antitrust lawsuits). Google will change Google group policy May 6 2019. If group will go for INDEPENDENT website, hosting provider need to be located in Europe, NOT in US. EU has better law for protection of "user data". US hosting becomes TOO problematic to have business with. Main point: Many European users will be cut off from using Yahoo groups if they do not agree to allow collect their personal data (mandatory to access Yahoo services). P.S. I use different way to avoid data collection (some tricks still work), or I would not be able to post anything here. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : So there is free cheese at google? From: williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, February 9, 23:33 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Yahoo is getting worse.... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Disclaimer: I gave up on Yahoo and Gmail as e-mail for everyday use. Reason - most of the time I can NOT access my accounts. Ones I move to another location, my e-mail is blocked for 2-3 days. ALL "used to be FREE" e-mails sites in US are sold to cell phones companies and they want to track you at ALL time. Below is the message which appears when i try to see Origamiboats group from Europe (because of NEW user data law protection in Europe which US companies want to bypass): Quote: Yahoo is part of Oath. Oath and our partners need your consent to access your device and use your data (including location) to understand your interests, and provide and measure personalised ads. Oath will also provide you personalised ads on partner products. Learn More. Select 'OK' to continue and allow Oath and our partners to use your data, or select 'Manage options' to view your choices. To continue using Yahoo and other Oath sites and apps, we need you to let us set cookies to collect your data. This helps us improve and create new products, enhance our product security, and give you personalised content and ads. Learn More about how we use your data. Scroll down and select 'OK' to proceed, otherwise you will not be able to access our sites and apps. Below, you can further customise what data you share to personalise your experience across our network. End of quote. Anyway... Back in 2010, I was trying to to make a backup of Yahoo Origamiboats group using Google groups. All information is gone by now - no information left (deleted by Google) I created backup, plus posted some additional information (may be some people still remember that - it was a big scream in Yahoo group about it). I have created few few related Google groups. If I remember correctly, main disadvantage of Google group - it is need to have Gmail address. I offered Brent to take over those groups, but he had no time to manage it and he was not interested because of that. Groups are: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-3d-modeling https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-improve https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-engine https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-electrical If someone cam manage it, contact Brent, and I will give him all information I have about it (and access as well). I am NOT interested to manage it (I have no time for it) Best solution will be to create INDEPENDENT website (not a big deal) but it will require to use paid web-hosting, Remember: There is NO free cheese in the mouse trap ;-))) Every "free" service usually comes with a price - your personal data. | 35527|35331|2019-02-10 19:07:33|wild_explorer|Re: Yahoo is getting worse....|Protonmail has very good concept, however:1. Swiss law is not as good now as it was before (same applies to banks too) - but MUCH better than in US2. It is commercial project with all related concerns3. FREE account has major drawback - you cannot use mailing agent (Thunderbird, etc) to download your emails and read/answer it offline.4. To be able to use mailing agent, you need to switch to a paid account (not such a big deal) AND install extra software (Bridge) on your computer (BIG deal). So far, Proton did not answer my technical questions what actually that software does on a computer (Linux version of it still unavailable). I really do not like that some "unknown" software does something on my computer.Otherwise, it is very good alternative to "used to be FREE" US e-mail accounts, At least, I can access ProtonMail account from different locations and I like that my emails are stored encrypted. Of cause, If I loose my password, I loose access to my account - but it is MY problem.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I am gradually switching to protonmail. Search Protonmail,comIt is Swiss based, with strict Swiss privacy laws , like an email Swiss bank account. It is encrypted both ends, and even the provider cant read your emails.Uncle Sam has no control over them.I'll be using brentswain36@...The more people switch to those using such privacy laws, the more pressure there is on others to do likewise, or get abandoned en mass.Couldn''t use yahoo in Cuba . Where I travel is none of their fucking business.| 35528|35331|2019-02-10 19:45:55|wild_explorer|Re: Yahoo is getting worse....|Matt, there is no reason to SWITCH to Google groups. If someone has time, Google group could be used as a MIRROR backup. Just in case... As you can see, almost ALL information which was there is gone. So, you cannot trust Google to save your data as well.Of cause, there are some organizational and technical challenges to create INDEPENDENT website, but main questions are:1. Financing (for domain registration, web-hosting, etc). Even with some volunteers, this will be the MAIN question. Many people will say "good idea, but I am not paying for it". I am researching similar project and I can come up with some price/per_year to run group's web-site,2. Money processing service (PayPal does NOT work in this case).PayPal can freeze your money at ANY time (there are too many cases already) and you will loose all your money on your account (regardless if it is free or business account type).3. It will take relatively long time for a transition (several month) and will require to manage and support Yahoo group and new server as well.4. I do not see much of the reason to abandon Yahoo group even with a new website. At least all possible information should be MIRRORED. It will put extra load on Moderator or Co-Moderator.5. "Private" server (at someone home) will not work, simply because almost ALL Internet providers have Upload speed limit, Data Cap and no fixed IP for residential accounts. If someone has UNLIMITED Data Cap account with 1 - 2Gbs speed or more, AND static IP - we can talk.It is CLEAR that it is need to do something about BACK-UP of Yahoo group information and you came up with some good ideas. It all depends if Group's Member actually will support it (not just by words, but with their actions and money as well)---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : #ygrps-yiv-1083775034 #ygrps-yiv-1083775034ygrps-yiv-232666052 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} So I am confused.   You say both yahoo and google track people.    I am not clear why there would be a point in switching from yahoo to google.   There are some directions that Origami can go.   I agree, if one wanted to spend a little money, constantly, forever, a private server would be better.   I think Brent would be the one to make that decision, and I think he has.   If there were a patron, as in Patreon, who took on the costs and a volunteer who took on the day to day task of keeping the knowledge alive, it would not be an expensive project.   Problem is, with patrons, their comfort level with the content is a factor to be considered.  People like these do OK with patrons: https://www.gonewiththewynns.com/ Gone With The Wynns Gone With the Wynns is an unscripted tale of the quirky couple who traded in everyday life to satisfy their wear-out-your-shoes sense of adventure. www.gonewiththewynns.com These people check a number of boxes and are more ideally suited to a patron model.   Lets just say, Brent is more of your normal guy, with the normal rough spots, not ideally suited to drawing and keeping a patron when there are people who go out of their way to be more polished and reliably palatable.   I do not think a private server is what is going to serve origami boats best in the long-run. Plan B:  An Offline Compendium Published Yearly   Books are the mechanism by which knowledge has been preserved in the past.   In an electronic form, a tighter collection of easily transferred information can still be called a "book".   One does not need an external server to read .html files, when one clicks a link, it can lead to another local file.   The entire origami boats group could be backed up to a  self-referencing .zip file, say once a year and distributed as a torrent.  So Origami-Boats-2019, Origami-Boats-2020, etc becomes a free publication.    Call it a highly distributed backup. Plan C: A Book Plus Curated Compendium   Internet groups are full of a lot of low-content stuff.   Curating it into a tighter, smaller reference would be far more useful to a future reader.   Brent might be better off curating the origami boats group, and putting together a second book, including content from the first book along with a compendium of the better ideas and photos from the group.    I would recommend a PDF format e-book.   It would get into so many computers, it will never disappear.   But I recommend changes... To make the content were patron-friendly, public-friendly a change in tone from that in the group and discussions Brent has gotten into in other forums, and probably the book would be helpful.   The tone which is adversarial to traditional naval architecture might be replaced with a more "alternative" to naval architecture, suitable for small boats.  Suitable would be supported with data such as X number of sea-miles/Y years/a globe map of all voyages for the 26'.   Then an entirely separate set of data for the 33' etc.   One can make several indisputable points such as, naval architecture methods predate the availability of reliable arc welding to the hobbyist and this has opened up a new type of boat to the committed owner-builder.       In the end, the design of origami boats makes the skin of the boat more of the load-carrying structure than naval architecture methods would normally do.   For large ships, built commercially, origami would be a poor way to build.   Far more steel would be used, the design would not be as amenable to numerical analysis needed to prove the design meets design goals, unknown stresses would remain in the structure, hull shape would be more restricted and less efficient than possible with modern postage-stamp jigsaw steel constructions on frames.   Also, anyone who makes a living doing things, does so by seeking uniformity and efficiency.  Ship building is no different.  The inability to numerically determine every dimension prior to construction with origami means the steel cutting cannot be farmed out to a shop.  One cannot set low-paid hourly wage workers to the task (as opposed to an owner with project-commitment).  The plans cannot be sent to a fab shop in a remote location in a foreign land, which is where the bulk of manufacturing happens these days.   To naval designers, that is what "proper" plans are -- fool-proof at least to the standard that it can be sent to an outside shop where it can be executed without constant oversight by a committed owner.   If one cannot provide those plans, one is not a naval architect and it is not a full boat design in a practical industrial sense.    It is self-evident that origami cannot be stretched to replace naval architecture.  It is equally self-evident that naval architecture has little relevance to traditional methods of building a canoe.   I see origami as a new-traditional method using steel and reliable welding, to make small boat building amenable to an owner who is project-committed.   The bigger the origami boat, the more it needs someone like Doug of S/V Seeker to keep it on track.   That is not a project for a backyard handy-man, Doug is engineering his own boat, based on the Brent's original design.   So lets keep it real, origami has a practical limit in size that is as much related to who is doing the actual building, as the limits of steel and build geometry. Some commentators have compared Brent to a traditional beach-builder of boats, and some of the same commentators have recognized that beach-built boats can be really good.   Some individual, well-known small boats were beach-built.   Brent has found a way to take beach-building to the backyard of anyone who can weld, and the product is a steel boat, in many measures indisputably superior to cheaply bulk-produced glass boats today.   Though the product is not dimensionally identical to, it is comparable to dozens of boats of the same design as seen on pages .....  (referring back to the voyage maps).       I believe one can make a case for origami in a book without stating it as a conflict.  That is a book that will bring patrons and a larger following.   The strong-minded, otherwise skilled individuals who choose to build will pay no heed to the conflict anyway.  Those easily convinced or dissuaded or without the life experience with steel work, maybe a smaller origami is as big a project as they should take on.  If they want a big boat, maybe they should just buy one and sail it until they gather experience and certainty as to what they want.  The information can be gathered together into a pure nut of knowledge going forward ... or not.  It can languish at the level it is now to disappear slowly as a few volunteers fade away.   If it collected, and published, and is electronic, it will never die.  It will keep coming up again and again every time someone says, "I just read a great book called... "  There will never be a last origami ever built.    Why Put Any More Effort In?  The Golden Age of Origami Boats is Coming Consider everything done in Origami Boats to this point as the Beta Test, the shake-out, the proof on which something more permanent is built.   What people should keep in mind is, we are approaching a cusp with internet technology with Starlink and similar affordable global satellite internet concepts.   Global internet will work to decouple earning from location even more so than it has already.  As a non-geostationary system it cannot be made substantially less available at any longitude in any tropical or temperate climes anywhere on Earth that has a densely habited location somewhere at that latitude on Earth.   What I mean is, if Starlink will service Edinburgh, UK at 56 degrees north latitude, then it will service 3/4 of the Aleutians to a comparable extent.   Because circular orbits must extend equal distances south of the equator, one should get comparable service as far south as Cape Horn.  (Molyina orbits are not symmetric and were used by USSR to provide better coverage of the USSR only.) This will be a game-changer.   It will substantially expand the gamut of places where a fraction of the workforce can live including to huge areas of water on the planet.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink_(satellite_constellation)  "SpaceX has articulated the explicit goal to provide broadband internet connectivity to underserved areas of the planet, as well as provide competitively-priced service to urban areas." If one can have internet in the middle of the Pacific at a price that is even 3 times what it is in urban areas, at even at 1/4 of full streaming speed, remote working becomes as possible as it currently is in a suburban basement over much of the developed world.   I know not everyone can be a digital remote worker, and it will never will be everyone, but for more and more people, it will free their ability to earn a living in a digital trade.   Even if StarLink is delayed or fails, the race has started, and in a decade some system will be reliable and established.   The world will substantially change.  Affordable Global Internet On Every Small Boat With global internet in an affordable price range, every small boat could upload its current conditions weather data, it could be crowd-sourced and made available to all, like traffic data is now with route-planning apps like Waze in larger cities -- the oceans would become much more friendly places for small boats.   The number of nice days would increase, the rough days would decrease in severity and frequency, and the chance of a major storm would go down, and life-threatening weather could be avoided more effectively.   Within a decade one would have a weather nanny app constantly watching developments and recommending where to go to avoid bad weather.   Any boat capable of 150 miles a day could substantially change their expected weather profile.  Living Aboard While Brent knows full well, most people own a home, he has made it clear, origami has been a vehicle for him to live land-free, and house-free, avoiding the taxes and costs related to home ownership.   He has not been shy about holding himself out as a model.   Living on boats has had a long tradition in Europe and Great Britain.   Origami with something like Starlink, can be a stepping stone for the individual to live differently while earning in the global marketplace.    Living aboard would not be so much about subsistence, or benefit by keeping minimal costs below modest incomes, it could be about modest costs and globally-competitive incomes.  The origami designs that exist today are suitable to a desk-based digital remote worker.   But that is not everyone. A slightly inconvenient issue for live-aboard is children.  The average expectations for opportunities for children has grown, in may ways beyond what were perfectly acceptable learning and living situations in the past.   Yes, there is a lot to learn on the water but to consider it as a lifestyle to move toward, it needs to offer little compromise on the opportunities afforded to children.  With Starlink or a similar system, children could maintain enrolment in a land-based curriculum and easily-recognized parity of opportunity -- if one had the space for these activities aboard. Remote Living Needing More Space Than Current Origami Designs Affordable global internet will offer the same opportunities for those who design practical alternative homes, not specifically the "Earthships" (https://www.earthshipglobal.com/), but more broadly, well-engineered self-sufficient homes where the design changes, depending on what climate it is built in.   Cheap solar, and the abundance of space around a home on solid ground in a remote area provide opportunities for earning not available on a boat at an arbitrary position on Earth.  A land-based remote living location provides the space for a large-shop worker, and the space for a power system for substantial business-related loads.    I once visited a 4,000 square foot machine shop business with huge CNC machines powered entirely from a bio-fuel burning generator -- and they were only a few kilometres from the end of the power line in a farming area in Ontario.  No individual can be expected to build a boat large enough to compete with what is possible on even a 1 acre lot, let alone 20 acres.  There is however a tried and proven boat configuration missing from the Origami catalog that can help:    Plan D: The Origami Catamaran The interior volume on catamarans is a substantial step up from monohulls.   A steel cat might have the space for a family of digital desk workers, or a small-shop worker.   This would open up living on the water to more people, more families.   If Brent were to come out of retirement and add just one more design to his inventory, a cat that looks more like a cross between a house boat and a regular cruising cat, (a broader top-deck cabin, more internal volume) that is a new level of boat.   The top-deck cabin on a cat can have more-flat, more-square spaces, and can be more easily finished to a better style.  The hull "basement spaces" need only have comfy births for style, and then large walled-off utility spaces that are easy to work in for practicality.   Would it be based on two 33' hulls to start with -- something Brent knows the best ?   Who knows, but, it is a design Origami needs in its catalog to address a niche in the future.    Cats give more space for families, earning and doing school studies.  Cats dry nicely with single stubby keel nubs on each hull.   I think there is a lot of Brent philosophy that can be poured into one cat design.   It only takes one design.       Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2019 1:19 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Yahoo is getting worse....     If FREE="cheese in the mouse trap", I would say yes ;-) No wonder that Google is banned (one way or another) in many countries due to extensive collection of personal data and providing biased "search results". If I remember correctly, Google has continuous problems with The European Union (antitrust lawsuits). Google will change Google group policy May 6 2019. If group will go for INDEPENDENT website, hosting provider need to be located in Europe, NOT in US. EU has better law for protection of "user data". US hosting becomes TOO problematic to have business with. Main point: Many European users will be cut off from using Yahoo groups if they do not agree to allow collect their personal data (mandatory to access Yahoo services). P.S. I use different way to avoid data collection (some tricks still work), or I would not be able to post anything here. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : So there is free cheese at google? From: williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, February 9, 23:33 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Yahoo is getting worse.... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Disclaimer: I gave up on Yahoo and Gmail as e-mail for everyday use. Reason - most of the time I can NOT access my accounts. Ones I move to another location, my e-mail is blocked for 2-3 days. ALL "used to be FREE" e-mails sites in US are sold to cell phones companies and they want to track you at ALL time. Below is the message which appears when i try to see Origamiboats group from Europe (because of NEW user data law protection in Europe which US companies want to bypass): Quote: Yahoo is part of Oath. Oath and our partners need your consent to access your device and use your data (including location) to understand your interests, and provide and measure personalised ads. Oath will also provide you personalised ads on partner products. Learn More. Select 'OK' to continue and allow Oath and our partners to use your data, or select 'Manage options' to view your choices. To continue using Yahoo and other Oath sites and apps, we need you to let us set cookies to collect your data. This helps us improve and create new products, enhance our product security, and give you personalised content and ads. Learn More about how we use your data. Scroll down and select 'OK' to proceed, otherwise you will not be able to access our sites and apps. Below, you can further customise what data you share to personalise your experience across our network. End of quote. Anyway... Back in 2010, I was trying to to make a backup of Yahoo Origamiboats group using Google groups. All information is gone by now - no information left (deleted by Google) I created backup, plus posted some additional information (may be some people still remember that - it was a big scream in Yahoo group about it). I have created few few related Google groups. If I remember correctly, main disadvantage of Google group - it is need to have Gmail address. I offered Brent to take over those groups, but he had no time to manage it and he was not interested because of that. Groups are: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-3d-modeling https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-improve https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-engine https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/origamiboats-electrical If someone cam manage it, contact Brent, and I will give him all information I have about it (and access as well). I am NOT interested to manage it (I have no time for it) Best solution will be to create INDEPENDENT website (not a big deal) but it will require to use paid web-hosting, Remember: There is NO free cheese in the mouse trap ;-))) Every "free" service usually comes with a price - your personal data. | 35529|35331|2019-02-10 21:00:32|brentswain38|Re: Yahoo is getting worse....|When I am on a library computer,which is on google, I  google duckduckgo, and search with it.The trail  goes cold from that point on.| 35530|32236|2019-02-10 21:03:30|brentswain38|Re: Anchor Winch Materials List|Yes I definiely like them removeable. You can go either way, plate on axle or pipe on axle. Pipe on axle is better.Mine is stainless on stainless,  no bushings of any kind , and no problem in over 34 years of use.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Brent,It is a nice option to have winch axle (and drum) removable from winch base.Do side plates (1/8" plate) run on drum's axle (1" pipe) directly?Or side plates are welded to 1-1/4" pipe (which goes through both side plates) and axle goes through 1-1/4 pipe (1-1/4 pipe runs on 1" pipe)? ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :1 inch sch 40 fits nicely in 1 1/4 inch sch 40 for bearings .I'd leave the  drum axle removeableYes the core gets welded to the side plates, regardless of core size.Doesn't mater how many teeth you have, as long as they  remain big enough.| 35531|32236|2019-02-10 21:11:58|brentswain38|Re: Anchor Winch Materials List|1. Never had a problem with1 inch sch 40 over 1 1/4 inch sch 402 Yes drum axle mounts also serve as bearings3. Dont weld the axle to the drum side plates, so it will remain removeable4.Yes, the 2 inch is welded to the side plates. This shrinkage in the middle of the plates warps it slightly.Make a zip cut from the 2 inch pipe out to the edge,  to relieve the stress, then tap it straight,  before rewelding the zip cut.5 .Rachet wheel is welded to the drum side plate6 . It doesnt matter, as long as the teeth are big enough7. Yes same arangement ,but why would you go bigger?  ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Back to material list.As I understand,drum axle is 1" sch40 pipe (1.31" OD),drum axle mounts are 1-1/4" sch40 pipe (1.38" ID)Questions:1. 1.31" and 1.38" is a tight fit. Does it need to have "seamless" 1-1/4" pipe for it? Welded pipe usually has a welding bump inside.2. Do drum axle mounts are used as an axle bearings as well?3. Do drum side plates go over drum axle and get welded to it?4. Does drum core (2" sch40) get welded to the side plates?5. Ratchet wheel is welded to what?Does anyone have a close up pictures of the winch (where all details of the winch could be marked and labeled to make it like 3D material list)?6. Is it critical to have 18 tooth ratchet wheel or might it has less (and different profile - square/rectangular type).7. If to go for a bigger drum core, what arrangement would you suggest (the same as 2", drum core through winch base, ratchet wheel over drum core, etc)?| 35532|35331|2019-02-10 21:19:06|opuspaul|Re: Yahoo is getting worse....|Try GMX.  I use pop forwarding and it works great with Thunderbird.  It is free, very stable and is based in Germany.  One thing I like is that it sends an email once a week with a summary of all my spam emails.  Yahoo keeps sending legit emails to spam and I keep losing important emails every since they "upgraded" their system.  This happens even if you say "not spam" .  Cheers, Paul---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Protonmail has very good concept, however:1. Swiss law is not as good now as it was before (same applies to banks too) - but MUCH better than in US2. It is commercial project with all related concerns3. FREE account has major drawback - you cannot use mailing agent (Thunderbird, etc) to download your emails and read/answer it offline.4. To be able to use mailing agent, you need to switch to a paid account (not such a big deal) AND install extra software (Bridge) on your computer (BIG deal). So far, Proton did not answer my technical questions what actually that software does on a computer (Linux version of it still unavailable). I really do not like that some "unknown" software does something on my computer.Otherwise, it is very good alternative to "used to be FREE" US e-mail accounts, At least, I can access ProtonMail account from different locations and I like that my emails are stored encrypted. Of cause, If I loose my password, I loose access to my account - but it is MY problem.| 35533|35533|2019-02-21 20:34:33|brentswain38|Ballasting and trim|If you have made  some changes to a  design, and are not  sure where to put your ballast so she will float level, the solution is simple. Jack her up and put a piece of shaft under the keel at the designed Longitudinal centre of gravity. Move your ballast  inside, fore and aft, until she rocks easily on the shaft. That is where  your ballast should go.As most boats tend to squat , and go  down by the stern when you load  them up,  slightly  heavier in the bow is a good thing. Trim ballast? On a cruising boat, that is your tools, spare anchors , scuba gear, and any other heavy stuff| 35534|35533|2019-02-22 07:30:16|mountain man|Re: Ballasting and trim| Brent, Can you do something similar to locate the position of the keel? Martin De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 21 février 2019 20:34:29 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] Ballasting and trim     If you have made  some changes to a  design, and are not  sure where to put your ballast so she will float level, the solution is simple. Jack her up and put a piece of shaft under the keel at the designed Longitudinal centre of gravity. Move your ballast  inside, fore and aft, until she rocks easily on the shaft. That is where  your ballast should go. As most boats tend to squat , and go  down by the stern when you load  them up,  slightly  heavier in the bow is a good thing. Trim ballast? On a cruising boat, that is your tools, spare anchors , scuba gear, and any other heavy stuff | 35535|35533|2019-02-22 10:16:46|Matt Malone|Re: Ballasting and trim| The keel is not only a mass balance, it is a hydrodynamic/aerodynamic balance too and relates to boat shape and rigging layout etc.   Best to position the shape of the keel relative to the hull for hydrodynamics, then place the lead within the keel for mass balance.   I believe Brents design allows one to pour lead into the keel, which means the shape for hydrodynamics, lead filling and location all have a special relationship which may not be present in other designs.  The ballast in my boat is sloped up toward the bow.   If one were to pour it, the boat/mould would have to tip bow-down about 15 degrees first. Long story short, do it as specified in the design because its complicated and there are factors that have been determined by experiment, trial and error, sea trials etc that there is in general no shortcut to replicate in the yard.   Alternately, one could position the keel sensibly, then experiment and modify the rig, for instance add a bowsprit or yawl mizen to recover overall balance.  But then you are doing your own design and sea trials. Matt From: mountain man mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, February 22, 07:30 Subject: RE: [origamiboats] Ballasting and trim To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Brent, Can you do something similar to locate the position of the keel? Martin De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 21 février 2019 20:34:29 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] Ballasting and trim     If you have made  some changes to a  design, and are not  sure where to put your ballast so she will float level, the solution is simple. Jack her up and put a piece of shaft under the keel at the designed Longitudinal centre of gravity. Move your ballast  inside, fore and aft, until she rocks easily on the shaft. That is where  your ballast should go. As most boats tend to squat , and go  down by the stern when you load  them up,  slightly  heavier in the bow is a good thing. Trim ballast? On a cruising boat, that is your tools, spare anchors , scuba gear, and any other heavy stuff | 35536|35533|2019-02-22 10:24:49|mountain man|Re: Ballasting and trim| Matt, I agree with you about a specific boat design, But I was answering Brent's , about the situation when you made some changes to the design like he said Martin De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 22 février 2019 10:16:41 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : Re: [origamiboats] Ballasting and trim     The keel is not only a mass balance, it is a hydrodynamic/aerodynamic balance too and relates to boat shape and rigging layout etc.   Best to position the shape of the keel relative to the hull for hydrodynamics, then place the lead within the keel for mass balance.   I believe Brents design allows one to pour lead into the keel, which means the shape for hydrodynamics, lead filling and location all have a special relationship which may not be present in other designs..  The ballast in my boat is sloped up toward the bow.   If one were to pour it, the boat/mould would have to tip bow-down about 15 degrees first. Long story short, do it as specified in the design because its complicated and there are factors that have been determined by experiment, trial and error, sea trials etc that there is in general no shortcut to replicate in the yard.   Alternately, one could position the keel sensibly, then experiment and modify the rig, for instance add a bowsprit or yawl mizen to recover overall balance.  But then you are doing your own design and sea trials. Matt From: mountain man mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, February 22, 07:30 Subject: RE: [origamiboats] Ballasting and trim To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Brent, Can you do something similar to locate the position of the keel? Martin De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 21 février 2019 20:34:29 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] Ballasting and trim     If you have made  some changes to a  design, and are not  sure where to put your ballast so she will float level, the solution is simple. Jack her up and put a piece of shaft under the keel at the designed Longitudinal centre of gravity. Move your ballast  inside, fore and aft, until she rocks easily on the shaft. That is where  your ballast should go.. As most boats tend to squat , and go  down by the stern when you load  them up,  slightly  heavier in the bow is a good thing. Trim ballast? On a cruising boat, that is your tools, spare anchors , scuba gear, and any other heavy stuff | 35537|35533|2019-02-22 10:40:05|Matt Malone|Re: Ballasting and trim| Moving two big tool boxes from the back to the front is a lot of trim.  That is just a fraction of what can be moved or what can screw up a previously good balance.  Boats sometimes have more than one freshwater tank and can use that to move ballast, but fuel and holding tanks only empty and refill, so, no matter how perfect the empty balance, or trim the fully geared balance, balance will change.   The balance will be different downwind -- slightly burying the bow -- then upwind.   If one wanted to be very optimal, a few heavy things might be moved around frequently to keep balance.  Isnt this just too much focus?   Depends.   Careful attention might greatly change the daily Amp-hours of electrical power consumption of the autopilot if one is quite fastidious about balance.   Chichester had a naturally balanced boat but further maintained his boat in such sail and weight balance that it did not need a wind vane or autopilot at all.   His contemporaries were incredulous that this would be possible.  Now it is just a question of Amp-hours. Matt From: Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, February 22, 10:17 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Ballasting and trim To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   The keel is not only a mass balance, it is a hydrodynamic/aerodynamic balance too and relates to boat shape and rigging layout etc.   Best to position the shape of the keel relative to the hull for hydrodynamics, then place the lead within the keel for mass balance.   I believe Brents design allows one to pour lead into the keel, which means the shape for hydrodynamics, lead filling and location all have a special relationship which may not be present in other designs..  The ballast in my boat is sloped up toward the bow.   If one were to pour it, the boat/mould would have to tip bow-down about 15 degrees first. Long story short, do it as specified in the design because its complicated and there are factors that have been determined by experiment, trial and error, sea trials etc that there is in general no shortcut to replicate in the yard.   Alternately, one could position the keel sensibly, then experiment and modify the rig, for instance add a bowsprit or yawl mizen to recover overall balance.  But then you are doing your own design and sea trials. Matt From: mountain man mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, February 22, 07:30 Subject: RE: [origamiboats] Ballasting and trim To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Brent, Can you do something similar to locate the position of the keel? Martin De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 21 février 2019 20:34:29 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] Ballasting and trim     If you have made  some changes to a  design, and are not  sure where to put your ballast so she will float level, the solution is simple. Jack her up and put a piece of shaft under the keel at the designed Longitudinal centre of gravity. Move your ballast  inside, fore and aft, until she rocks easily on the shaft. That is where  your ballast should go.. As most boats tend to squat , and go  down by the stern when you load  them up,  slightly  heavier in the bow is a good thing. Trim ballast? On a cruising boat, that is your tools, spare anchors , scuba gear, and any other heavy stuff | 35538|35538|2019-02-22 11:26:14|Arthur D. Saftlas|This is the new Amel group moved from Yahoo, for your info|This is the new Amel group moved from Yahoo, for your info A very active group with lots of info shared, They seem to like this new group. Begin forwarded message:From: "main@..." Subject: main@... Digest #20Date: February 21, 2019 at 11:19:42 PM PSTTo: art@...This is a digest for main@.... Change Your SubscriptionDo not reply to this email. To reply to a message, click the Reply link under the message.TOPICS IN THIS DIGEST:.1.Re: Volvo D2-75 RepowerMESSAGES:.1a. Re: Volvo D2-75 Repower From: josegvenegas@...Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 16:58:33 CST Eric and Ian,With respect to the autoprop zinc, I have been using plastic screws and painting with nail polish the surface of the zinc on the thin areas outside of the screw hole. The plastic screws keep good compression between the zinc and the prop and prevent seising between two metals. The painting of the zinc prevents it from falling out when those areas are prematurely worn out. Last year’s zinc was still 50% at the end of the season !View/Reply Online | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute Topic | Top ^ | New Topic© 2019 Groups.ioYou are receiving this email because you are subscribed to main@...via art@.... You can unsubscribe here.| 35539|35533|2019-02-22 12:30:50|wild_explorer|Re: Ballasting and trim|Brent's way to locate center of gravity (CG) of the boat works perfect. I used it to rotate the hull in horizontal plane. I knew where the CG was supposed to be according to calculations, but I used Brent's advice. Calculated CG marked on the hull and Real CG was slightly off. I was able to rotate the hull just by hands.Position of the keel is MUCH harder to match to the hull. It is need to align Center of Lateral Resistance (CLR) of the hull with CLR of the keel to make resulting CLR slightly forward (Brent knows better where it is suppose to be in relation to CG). Keel's kCLR and kCG are usually different as well. It will depend what shape and keel's hydrofoil you are going to use.The EASIEST way to balance your changed design is to make 1:10 model. You can easily do adjustment (move the keel) and balance the model. You would NOT need any calculations to find CLR of your changed design - just use the method used by RC sailboat builders. Method: Put a string from bow to stern of the hull with sliding ring on it. Attach another string to the ring (it will make 90 deg between strings). Put the hull on the water. Move the ring somewhere around the center of the hull and pull the string attached to the ring. If hull starts rotating, move the ring to the location where hull stops rotating and moves toward you side way without rotating (90 degrees between strings). Mark the location of the ring. You found the CLR of your hull.You can do the same with real hull as well - just attach rope to the side rail. Do your test when no wind an no current are on the water.When you know hull's CLR, you can match Rigging plan as well. There is lot of information on this subject.Wild---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Brent, Can you do something similar to locate the position of the keel? MartinDe : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 21 février 2019 20:34:29 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] Ballasting and trim  If you have made  some changes to a  design, and are not  sure where to put your ballast so she will float level, the solution is simple. Jack her up and put a piece of shaft under the keel at the designed Longitudinal centre of gravity. Move your ballast  inside, fore and aft, until she rocks easily on the shaft. That is where  your ballast should go.As most boats tend to squat , and go  down by the stern when you load  them up,  slightly  heavier in the bow is a good thing. Trim ballast? On a cruising boat, that is your tools, spare anchors , scuba gear, and any other heavy stuff #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ads {margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ad {padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ad p {margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ad a {color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_hd {margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_actions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_activity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_activity span {font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_activity span:first-child {text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_activity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_activity span span {color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_activity span .ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_underline {text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 .ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_attach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 .ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_attach div a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 .ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_attach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 .ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_attach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 .ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_attach label a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 .ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_bold {font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 .ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_bold a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 dd.ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_last p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 dd.ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_last p span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 dd.ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_last p span.ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_yshortcuts {margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 div.ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_attach-table div div a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 div.ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_attach-table {width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 div.ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 div.ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 div.ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 div.ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_file-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 div.ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 div.ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 div.ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 div.ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 div#ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_yshortcuts {font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 .ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_green {color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 .ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_MsoNormal {margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 o {font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_photos div {float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_photos div div {border:1px solid #666666;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_photos div label {color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_reco-category {font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_reco-desc {font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 .ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_replbq {margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-actbar div a:first-child {margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 input, #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 textarea {font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_logo {padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-msg p a {font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_attach-count span {color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_reco-head {color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-reco {margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ov li a {font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ov li {font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ov ul {margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-text {font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-text p {margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-text tt {font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-1766354989 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821 #ygrps-yiv-1766354989ygrps-yiv-175840821x_ygrp-vital ul li:last-child {border-right:none!important;}| 35540|35533|2019-02-22 12:37:36|mountain man|Re: Ballasting and trim| That string trick is good to know!! De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de williswildest@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 22 février 2019 12:27:14 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : RE: [origamiboats] Ballasting and trim     Brent's way to locate center of gravity (CG) of the boat works perfect. I used it to rotate the hull in horizontal plane. I knew where the CG was supposed to be according to calculations, but I used Brent's advice. Calculated CG marked on the hull and Real CG was slightly off. I was able to rotate the hull just by hands. Position of the keel is MUCH harder to match to the hull. It is need to align Center of Lateral Resistance (CLR) of the hull with CLR of the keel to make resulting CLR slightly forward (Brent knows better where it is suppose to be in relation to CG). Keel's kCLR and kCG are usually different as well. It will depend what shape and keel's hydrofoil you are going to use. The EASIEST way to balance your changed design is to make 1:10 model. You can easily do adjustment (move the keel) and balance the model. You would NOT need any calculations to find CLR of your changed design - just use the method used by RC sailboat builders. Method: Put a string from bow to stern of the hull with sliding ring on it. Attach another string to the ring (it will make 90 deg between strings). Put the hull on the water. Move the ring somewhere around the center of the hull and pull the string attached to the ring. If hull starts rotating, move the ring to the location where hull stops rotating and moves toward you side way without rotating (90 degrees between strings). Mark the location of the ring. You found the CLR of your hull. You can do the same with real hull as well - just attach rope to the side rail. Do your test when no wind an no current are on the water. When you know hull's CLR, you can match Rigging plan as well. There is lot of information on this subject. Wild ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Brent, Can you do something similar to locate the position of the keel? Martin De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 21 février 2019 20:34:29 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] Ballasting and trim     If you have made  some changes to a  design, and are not  sure where to put your ballast so she will float level, the solution is simple. Jack her up and put a piece of shaft under the keel at the designed Longitudinal centre of gravity. Move your ballast  inside, fore and aft, until she rocks easily on the shaft. That is where  your ballast should go. As most boats tend to squat , and go  down by the stern when you load  them up,  slightly  heavier in the bow is a good thing. Trim ballast? On a cruising boat, that is your tools, spare anchors , scuba gear, and any other heavy stuff | 35541|35533|2019-02-22 15:30:58|brentswain38|Re: Ballasting and trim|No. The keel is your point of lateral resistance. Changing that would screw up your sail balance.| 35542|35533|2019-02-22 16:58:28|Matt Malone|Re: Ballasting and trim| #ygrps-yiv-784910304 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} The string thing is very attractive, but, that does not find the effective centre of lateral resistance (CLR) for a forward-moving boat, it finds the still CLR which is not the same.    The forward-motion centre of lateral resistance (CLR) of any streamlined object moves toward the bow from the still CLR location when the the shape is moving forward through a fluid.   Illustration of the truth of this:  The CLR of a flat plate is exactly the midline -- 50% chord.  Is it not self-evident that the centre of mass and centre of lateral resistance are lined up at the 50% chord ?   So if you dropped a flat plate, it should fall flat right?   But wait, why does a 4 foot long piece of 1/2" thick by 2-3" wide strip of styrofoam do THAT when you drop it.  (try it)  https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/282710/paper-rectangle-spinning-phenomenon http://dragonfly.tam.cornell.edu/publications/S002211200500594Xa.pdf No, once the flat plates starts falling even on a little angle so that flow is more one way than the other, the CLR moves, makes it unstable and drives it like an axial propeller over a fraction of a cycle, then as the plate flips over, the CLR moves again and continues to drive the plate in increasing axial rotation.   It tumbles axially through the air and falls on a glide-path, not straight down. A better experiment is a tow tank.  String the string from the bow to stern of the model the same as before.  Tie a second string to the first string by a Prusik knot just aft of the bow.   Pull the model in a channel.  Move the Prusik knot slowly toward the stern and repeat.  When the model cannot be pulled forward, when it wants to pull to the side like a water skier cutting an arc, that is the effective CLR when moving forward.  Make sure to account for the actual line of action to the centre line of the boat -- the bow-stern string will pull off the CL.  The moving and stationary CLR are not the same, and not the same for forward motion as backward motion.   One wants the forward-motion CLR. Now, a good boat design, when pulled to the side will not do anything rapid, and ideally, should turn bow into the motion, shifting the CLR toward the design point for normal forward operation. It was conspicuous to me once at a launch ramp.  I came up parallel to the wharf, pointed at the launch ramp.  I was a few couple feet out from the wharf with a side wind blowing me onto the wharf.  I thought, no problem, that is where I want to be, to tie up, go get the trailer and load up.  Had I not been yards from the slope of the ramp, I would not have noticed to just what a degree my boat wanted to be moving forward in the water as the result of any disturbance.   It moved forward 2-3 feet for every foot it moved to the side.  I have noticed the same effect anchoring in very shallow water where I can see the bottom go by under the bow.   Unless one takes great pains to point up into the wind, and hold it there, and make sure the boat is moving backward while dropping the anchor, the boat will veer off the wind and begin to move forward, putting the anchor astern and perhaps under the boat before it is set.  Yes, an engine produces more control, but doing it unpowered, you learn more about the shifting balance of your boat between moving and not moving.   I recommend a broad sandy bottom for learning, not a crowded anchorage.   If one learns what the boat wants to do when crossing from forward to still to reverse in the presence of wind, and plans the manoeuvre for it, it comes off smoother. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of mountain man mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 12:37 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [origamiboats] Ballasting and trim     That string trick is good to know!! De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de williswildest@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 22 février 2019 12:27:14 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : RE: [origamiboats] Ballasting and trim     Brent's way to locate center of gravity (CG) of the boat works perfect.. I used it to rotate the hull in horizontal plane. I knew where the CG was supposed to be according to calculations, but I used Brent's advice. Calculated CG marked on the hull and Real CG was slightly off. I was able to rotate the hull just by hands. Position of the keel is MUCH harder to match to the hull. It is need to align Center of Lateral Resistance (CLR) of the hull with CLR of the keel to make resulting CLR slightly forward (Brent knows better where it is suppose to be in relation to CG). Keel's kCLR and kCG are usually different as well. It will depend what shape and keel's hydrofoil you are going to use. The EASIEST way to balance your changed design is to make 1:10 model. You can easily do adjustment (move the keel) and balance the model. You would NOT need any calculations to find CLR of your changed design - just use the method used by RC sailboat builders. Method: Put a string from bow to stern of the hull with sliding ring on it. Attach another string to the ring (it will make 90 deg between strings). Put the hull on the water. Move the ring somewhere around the center of the hull and pull the string attached to the ring. If hull starts rotating, move the ring to the location where hull stops rotating and moves toward you side way without rotating (90 degrees between strings). Mark the location of the ring. You found the CLR of your hull. You can do the same with real hull as well - just attach rope to the side rail. Do your test when no wind an no current are on the water. When you know hull's CLR, you can match Rigging plan as well. There is lot of information on this subject. Wild ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Brent, Can you do something similar to locate the position of the keel? Martin De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 21 février 2019 20:34:29 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] Ballasting and trim     If you have made  some changes to a  design, and are not  sure where to put your ballast so she will float level, the solution is simple. Jack her up and put a piece of shaft under the keel at the designed Longitudinal centre of gravity. Move your ballast  inside, fore and aft, until she rocks easily on the shaft. That is where  your ballast should go. As most boats tend to squat , and go  down by the stern when you load  them up,  slightly  heavier in the bow is a good thing. Trim ballast? On a cruising boat, that is your tools, spare anchors , scuba gear, and any other heavy stuff | 35543|35533|2019-02-22 18:08:12|brentswain38|Re: Ballasting and trim|The centre of lift on an airplane wing is 20% of the chord back from the leading edge.The best way on a  boat is, compare to well balanced, similar types of boats, with similar rigs.| 35544|35533|2019-02-22 22:55:23|wild_explorer|Re: Ballasting and trim|Matt, according to your information, Effective CLR is forward of Still CLR. Is it correct?1. As I understand, it suppose to be good when CLR is ahead of center of flotation (CF) and if Effective CLR ahead of Still CLR is even better. It suppose to keep boat on course.2. Does 2-nd string go along Center string (or boat's Center Line) - not 90 deg to it?3. Do you mean that "Model cannot be moved forward straight"? Move knot along Center string until model start moving sideways instead of moving straight forward?Sorry, I have a hard time to envision that setup correctly - some schematic will help. Any clarification would be greatly appreciated.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :#ygrps-yiv-1086658225 #ygrps-yiv-1086658225ygrps-yiv-31670099 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} The string thing is very attractive, but, that does not find the effective centre of lateral resistance (CLR) for a forward-moving boat, it finds the still CLR which is not the same.    The forward-motion centre of lateral resistance (CLR) of any streamlined object moves toward the bow from the still CLR location when the the shape is moving forward through a fluid.   ...Skipped..... A better experiment is a tow tank.  String the string from the bow to stern of the model the same as before.  Tie a second string to the first string by a Prusik knot just aft of the bow.   Pull the model in a channel.  Move the Prusik knot slowly toward the stern and repeat.  When the model cannot be pulled forward, when it wants to pull to the side like a water skier cutting an arc, that is the effective CLR when moving forward.  Make sure to account for the actual line of action to the centre line of the boat -- the bow-stern string will pull off the CL.  The moving and stationary CLR are not the same, and not the same for forward motion as backward motion.   One wants the forward-motion CLR. Now, a good boat design, when pulled to the side will not do anything rapid, and ideally, should turn bow into the motion, shifting the CLR toward the design point for normal forward operation. | 35545|35533|2019-02-22 23:43:40|Matt Malone|Re: Ballasting and trim| Ok, an aerodynamic object in motion through a fluid has a different center of lateral resistance than the same object at rest.   An airplane wing or fin keel its CLR is at the 50% point when it is stationary being dragged slowly sideways to proper motion.   When it moves forward at speed, so long as it does not stall, the CLR is at 25% back from the leading edge (Brent almost remembered it right when he said 20%).  That means, on a 40 foot hull cat hull (no dagger boards) the CLR can move as much as 10 feet between stationary and moving.  That is a lot of wiggle, but it happens at close to zero speed, so nothing really dangerous happens.  The boat seems to lurch a little funny, before it "catches" and goes.  So string one is tied tight from bow to stern.  String 2 is tied to string 1 with a knot that will not slip along string 1, a Prusik knot.  You would use the same knots as safety and cinching knots to climb a halyard to get to the top of your mast.  Google No Bullshit Just Sailing on youtube... there is a Norwegian there who is worth watching, he has a video where he demonstrates climbing his mast.  A lot of his fancy gear could be replaced with the right knots. So, grab the body of the Prusik knot and slide it along string 1 to the bow.   Now pull on the bitter endvof string 2 - the knot cinches and grabs string 1.   What happens.  Of course you have effectively attached string 2 to the bow, the boat will pivot, the bow will point atbyour hand and the boat will follow you like an arrow or weathervane.  Pull in a different direction, the boat will weathervane and follow your hand.  Grab the body of the Prusik knot and slide it aft 5%, and again pull String 2 - the knot cinches down tight on string 1 and holds position.  The boat weathervanes and follows your hand, like an arrow straight in the path of the pull. Grab the body of the Prusik knot and slide it back another 5%, and try again, slide it back and try it again etc.   Until the knot reaches the CLR, the boat will just pivot, weathervane, point the bow in the direction of pull and follow in a straight line right behind your pulling hand.  When the knot is placed at the CLR, and you try to pull the boat, it will pull out to the side in an arc like a waterskier.  It will not follow in the path of your hand.  It will eventually straighten and follow a parallel path to your hand, like a water skier can ski to the side, outside of the wake of a straight-running tow boat. I would have to think about your question #1. Matt From: williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, February 22, 22:56 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Ballasting and trim To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Matt, according to your information, Effective CLR is forward of Still CLR. Is it correct? 1. As I understand, it suppose to be good when CLR is ahead of center of flotation (CF) and if Effective CLR ahead of Still CLR is even better. It suppose to keep boat on course. 2. Does 2-nd string go along Center string (or boat's Center Line) - not 90 deg to it? 3. Do you mean that "Model cannot be moved forward straight"? Move knot along Center string until model start moving sideways instead of moving straight forward? Sorry, I have a hard time to envision that setup correctly - some schematic will help. Any clarification would be greatly appreciated. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : The string thing is very attractive, but, that does not find the effective centre of lateral resistance (CLR) for a forward-moving boat, it finds the still CLR which is not the same.    The forward-motion centre of lateral resistance (CLR) of any streamlined object moves toward the bow from the still CLR location when the the shape is moving forward through a fluid.   ...Skipped..... A better experiment is a tow tank.  String the string from the bow to stern of the model the same as before.  Tie a second string to the first string by a Prusik knot just aft of the bow.   Pull the model in a channel.  Move the Prusik knot slowly toward the stern and repeat.  When the model cannot be pulled forward, when it wants to pull to the side like a water skier cutting an arc, that is the effective CLR when moving forward.  Make sure to account for the actual line of action to the centre line of the boat -- the bow-stern string will pull off the CL.  The moving and stationary CLR are not the same, and not the same for forward motion as backward motion.   One wants the forward-motion CLR. Now, a good boat design, when pulled to the side will not do anything rapid, and ideally, should turn bow into the motion, shifting the CLR toward the design point for normal forward operation. | 35546|35533|2019-02-23 03:44:44|wild_explorer|Re: Ballasting and trim|Thank you Matt for detailed explanation about setup. The confusion was about usage of Prusik knot. It is used as a knot for lifting as well (not in line to the main rope which is attached to 2 ends of the load), to tilt the load with offset CG.I guess that we are talking ONLY about rectangular wing/keel at this point. About Effective CLR moving forward vs Still CLR... What I got so far, it is true ONLY for asymmetric airfoil. CLR moves forward when angle of attack increase on asymmetric airfoil. CLR for symmetric airfoil stays the same regardless of angle of attack. Most symmetric airfoils have CLR around 25% back from the leading edge. BUT... there is symmetrical airfoil (acrobatic) which has CLR at 50%. It will only affect location of the keel in relation to the hull depending of what airfoil was used (CLR location depends on what actual airfoil was used for the keel) to keep resulting CLR where needed.Anyway... we can say that the hull has airfoil shape as well (we are interested in underwater part). Keel and hull become combined airfoil shape in this case. Badly designed hull WHEN HEELED, will become asymmetric airfoil shape. Good designed hull will keep symmetric airfoil shape.So... Badly designed hull will have CLR moving forward and back. Good hull design will keep CLR the same (or with very small move).Relation CF to CLR of the hull affects weather helm. I cannot find the link I had on my old computer (with very good explanation about CF & CLR relation). If I remember correctly, when CLR behind CF - it is easier to turn hull (harder to keep course), if CLR ahead of CF - it is harder to turn hull (stays on course better, but harder to turn)About sail plan and center of effort (CE) location.CE dictates where mast/masts location suppose to be on the hull for the Sail Plan in use. If I remember correctly, CE should be slightly forward of CLR. If CLR moves big time, CE might become behind CLR and it will create helm problems (very common problem on badly designed sailboats).---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Ok, an aerodynamic object in motion through a fluid has a different center of lateral resistance than the same object at rest.   An airplane wing or fin keel its CLR is at the 50% point when it is stationary being dragged slowly sideways to proper motion.   When it moves forward at speed, so long as it does not stall, the CLR is at 25% back from the leading edge (Brent almost remembered it right when he said 20%).  That means, on a 40 foot hull cat hull (no dagger boards) the CLR can move as much as 10 feet between stationary and moving.  That is a lot of wiggle, but it happens at close to zero speed, so nothing really dangerous happens.  The boat seems to lurch a little funny, before it "catches" and goes.  | 35547|35533|2019-02-23 10:53:42|Matt Malone|Re: Ballasting and trim| You keep saying the effective CLR.   There is only one CLR for a particular flow regime.  The only important one for a sailboat is when the boat has forward motion. The tow test works to determine the properties of any hull shape or keel shape, for a given tow speed.   It is not restricted to particular spade, swept or bilge keels, or delta wing footed keels -- profile does not matter. Assymmetric as in the port shape is different than the starboard shape is not interesting to cruising sailboats.   A cat with a dagger board down on one side but not the other is still two symmetric shapes moving together.   Yes heel will cause assymmetry.   It will have the effect of introducing a yaw torque on a moving boat that is moving straight forward.  In aerodynamics of a flying plane, the aerodynamic centre is considered to be stationary.  The actuation of flaps or other moveable surfaces is modelled to create additional lift and torque about a stationary aerodynamic centre. I think it is better to consider the CLR to be stationary, then rudder actuations merely induce control torques about this centre.  Yes, if one has a shallow spade rudder positioned far aft, that dips more into and out of the water as the boat pitches on waves, yes, this will play with the CLR.   This is just a design that is harder to analyze.   It is a design that is subject to reverse surface flows on the rudder when running on the face of a broken wave.   It is a vulnerable design, a design that will be more fickle and more difficult to control in some conditions.  This is where the big keel hung rudders that are broadest below the prop window are just more gentle in their CLR movements in extreme pitch and reverse surface flow conditions. When it comes down to it, it will always be possible to find a situation, particularly transient conditions, that is impossible to analyse.   Two things are your friend here.  1) The boat has its momentum that will resist momentary transients in odd situations.  In addition there is a virtual mass of the displaced water which also has momentum, so a 10 ton boat behaves like a 20 ton object on land when trying to knock it off course.  Momentum means one can worry less about transients. 2) There are proven, that is sea-mile-proven and years and decades-proven designs that one can choose and just trust that if one sails sensibly, using good seamanship, one will experience the same outcomes as those who have sailed those designs before. With these two tools, one can travel a lot farther than with mathematics by hand.  I did not analyse my boat before I bought it.  It was a traditional design, built in fibreglass to duplicate a very successful wood boat design.  In hull form, it looks a lot like the fishing schooners of the late 1800s, and those shapes were not arrived at by racing rules, or math, but by years and many sea miles in North Atlantic conditions.  They earned the owners and crews money fishing and brought the sailors home safe with good seamanship. Brent has designed boats an built boats for a small number of decades.   They have been sailed for a similar period.  If you choose a Brent design, do it like others have.   If you want an Colin Archer design, well they have more decades and known pluses and minuses (heavy and slow). If you want a cat, in cruising boats, I think they have one decade on Brent, and their own pluses and minuses. As I see it Brent is open about the pluses, steel toughness, buildability, and cruising suitability.   Brent never promised it would be the fastest boat, or the easiest boat to sail in particular conditions.   In performance he has only implied it is as generally suitable as any production fiberglass boat made for general cruising.   He has always focused on the safety of the toughness of steel for the oh crap moments when general cruising -- floating logs at night of BC, bouncing across reefs.   Yes the detractors like to point at the dent suffered by one boat left perched on a rock when the tide lowered, while missing the obvious, a dent is better than a hole.  I personally feel a hydraulic jack and timbers on the inside might have pushed that dent mainly out.   I would never try to make it perfect. Anyway, I do not see the point of a lot of back of the envelop calculations, or spreadsheet calculations when an amateur has these advantages at their disposal and the desired goal is to personally go somewhere.  Naturally naval architects have to create "new" deigns because "copying" is not new creativity.  I am sure a spreadsheet would accomplish the oga-booga level of math involved in most cases, but really, that was only passable until the 1970s and early 80s.   Yes I am sure some are doing leading bleeding edge unsteady computational fluid mechanics on 1,000 processor cluster computers.   Might I point out, I have yet to see any evidence that a modern computer approach has proven any historic design to be unsuitable in a way that was not previously understood.  Old Colin Archers are still the same boats they were before the 1,000 processor computational clusters.  I recommend you build the boat as Brent and past builders have, or your past designer of choice has.  I recommend you just go with historical experience with existing designs, momentum to average out perplexing transient conditions and of course seamanship to keep the outcomes the same as past cruisers.  I recommend this as the best way to get you where you want to travel. Matt From: williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, February 23, 03:54 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Ballasting and trim To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Thank you Matt for detailed explanation about setup. The confusion was about usage of Prusik knot. It is used as a knot for lifting as well (not in line to the main rope which is attached to 2 ends of the load), to tilt the load with offset CG. I guess that we are talking ONLY about rectangular wing/keel at this point. About Effective CLR moving forward vs Still CLR... What I got so far, it is true ONLY for asymmetric airfoil. CLR moves forward when angle of attack increase on asymmetric airfoil. CLR for symmetric airfoil stays the same regardless of angle of attack. Most symmetric airfoils have CLR around 25% back from the leading edge. BUT... there is symmetrical airfoil (acrobatic) which has CLR at 50%. It will only affect location of the keel in relation to the hull depending of what airfoil was used (CLR location depends on what actual airfoil was used for the keel) to keep resulting CLR where needed. Anyway... we can say that the hull has airfoil shape as well (we are interested in underwater part). Keel and hull become combined airfoil shape in this case. Badly designed hull WHEN HEELED, will become asymmetric airfoil shape. Good designed hull will keep symmetric airfoil shape. So... Badly designed hull will have CLR moving forward and back. Good hull design will keep CLR the same (or with very small move). Relation CF to CLR of the hull affects weather helm. I cannot find the link I had on my old computer (with very good explanation about CF & CLR relation). If I remember correctly, when CLR behind CF - it is easier to turn hull (harder to keep course), if CLR ahead of CF - it is harder to turn hull (stays on course better, but harder to turn) About sail plan and center of effort (CE) location. CE dictates where mast/masts location suppose to be on the hull for the Sail Plan in use. If I remember correctly, CE should be slightly forward of CLR. If CLR moves big time, CE might become behind CLR and it will create helm problems (very common problem on badly designed sailboats). ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Ok, an aerodynamic object in motion through a fluid has a different center of lateral resistance than the same object at rest.   An airplane wing or fin keel its CLR is at the 50% point when it is stationary being dragged slowly sideways to proper motion.   When it moves forward at speed, so long as it does not stall, the CLR is at 25% back from the leading edge (Brent almost remembered it right when he said 20%).  That means, on a 40 foot hull cat hull (no dagger boards) the CLR can move as much as 10 feet between stationary and moving.  That is a lot of wiggle, but it happens at close to zero speed, so nothing really dangerous happens.  The boat seems to lurch a little funny, before it "catches" and goes.  | 35548|35533|2019-02-23 13:11:49|wild_explorer|Re: Ballasting and trim|Agree, there is no reason to go too deep into the theory - it has no practical application to group members. However, understanding BASIC concepts is very helpful.I was interested in a testing setup you suggested and I just was asked questions. It might be useful to use Prusik knot instead of a ring in "side test" (especially on real hull). Both of these tests ("side test" and "tow test") can be done on a toy sailboat in a bathtub. If results are the same, fine - 2 tests ate better than 1. If they are different - need to think about it. That all.Brent is working long time on his design. He testing changes in sea trials and he made his design almost perfect (there is always some small things to improve in any design, no matter how good it is). But... "modifying" keel, rudder or sail plan by "The Builder" is not "small things". It is VERY easy to crew up there. So, unless you absolutely sure that you know what you are doing - DO NOT do it. Ask Brent - he knows his design, and he can evaluate your proposed modifications."Good old designs" were perfected over the time without understanding hydrostatics. Tall ships did not have sailboat keel, but had very good sailing characteristics anyway. Modern computer modeling allows to analyze what hydrostatics "old good designs" had and how to apply that knowledge to a "new" design (without major screw-ups).---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :.... Skipped ...... Brent has designed boats an built boats for a small number of decades.   They have been sailed for a similar period.  If you choose a Brent design, do it like others have.   If you want an Colin Archer design, well they have more decades and known pluses and minuses (heavy and slow). If you want a cat, in cruising boats, I think they have one decade on Brent, and their own pluses and minuses. As I see it Brent is open about the pluses, steel toughness, buildability, and cruising suitability.   Brent never promised it would be the fastest boat, or the easiest boat to sail in particular conditions.   In performance he has only implied it is as generally suitable as any production fiberglass boat made for general cruising.   He has always focused on the safety of the toughness of steel for the oh crap moments when general cruising -- floating logs at night of BC, bouncing across reefs.   Yes the detractors like to point at the dent suffered by one boat left perched on a rock when the tide lowered, while missing the obvious, a dent is better than a hole.  I personally feel a hydraulic jack and timbers on the inside might have pushed that dent mainly out.   I would never try to make it perfect. Anyway, I do not see the point of a lot of back of the envelop calculations, or spreadsheet calculations when an amateur has these advantages at their disposal and the desired goal is to personally go somewhere.  Naturally naval architects have to create "new" deigns because "copying" is not new creativity.  I am sure a spreadsheet would accomplish the oga-booga level of math involved in most cases, but really, that was only passable until the 1970s and early 80s.   Yes I am sure some are doing leading bleeding edge unsteady computational fluid mechanics on 1,000 processor cluster computers.   Might I point out, I have yet to see any evidence that a modern computer approach has proven any historic design to be unsuitable in a way that was not previously understood.  Old Colin Archers are still the same boats they were before the 1,000 processor computational clusters.  I recommend you build the boat as Brent and past builders have, or your past designer of choice has.  I recommend you just go with historical experience with existing designs, momentum to average out perplexing transient conditions and of course seamanship to keep the outcomes the same as past cruisers.  I recommend this as the best way to get you where you want to travel. Matt | 35549|35549|2019-02-23 13:48:53|aguysailing|North sea|Very interesting vid about small plastic sailboat crossing the north sea in the winter.   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Rm1J-g2enk&t=166sI have been in similar north of Vancouver Island.  I noticed the sailor set up his windvane and went for a nap.  Despite switching to welded SS windvane on my BS 36 Twin Keeler I found myself at the helm in order to handle swells and cross winds.  My leg muscles got a free workout that day...both feet pushing on the tiller.  The forces were amazing.  Your experiences appreciated to hear.  I would really have liked to be napping like that guy..... Gary| 35550|35549|2019-02-23 14:11:53|Matt Malone|Re: North sea| Yes, that is Erik Aanderaa of No Bullshit Just Sailing.   His boat is a Contessa 35.  He sails in winter, in snowstorms and everything.  He leaves the main companionway hatch wide open and this makes me uneasy.   I have watched a number of his videos.  He is an offshore platform safety trainer.   His philosophy is get out there, sail in good conditions get experience, then add more wind and waves over the years of experience.  He has a weekend destination not far from his home port, a shelter harbour in River Island (Roever, where the oe is one letter).   He also does longer excursions like the video shown.  Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of aguysailing@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2019 1:48:13 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] North sea     Very interesting vid about small plastic sailboat crossing the north sea in the winter.   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Rm1J-g2enk&t=166s I have been in similar north of Vancouver Island.  I noticed the sailor set up his windvane and went for a nap.  Despite switching to welded SS windvane on my BS 36 Twin Keeler I found myself at the helm in order to handle swells and cross winds.  My leg muscles got a free workout that day...both feet pushing on the tiller.  The forces were amazing.  Your experiences appreciated to hear.  I would really have liked to be napping like that guy.. ... Gary | 35551|35549|2019-02-23 14:16:55|Matt Malone|Re: North sea| Sorry Rovaer Island, Norway,  o with the stroke through it, ae as one letter. Matt From: aguysailing@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, February 23, 13:49 Subject: [origamiboats] North sea To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Very interesting vid about small plastic sailboat crossing the north sea in the winter.   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Rm1J-g2enk&t=166s I have been in similar north of Vancouver Island.  I noticed the sailor set up his windvane and went for a nap.  Despite switching to welded SS windvane on my BS 36 Twin Keeler I found myself at the helm in order to handle swells and cross winds.  My leg muscles got a free workout that day...both feet pushing on the tiller.  The forces were amazing.  Your experiences appreciated to hear.  I would really have liked to be napping like that guy.. ... Gary | 35552|35549|2019-02-23 17:47:53|brentswain38|Re: North sea|I'd be happy to  enlarge your windvane and trim tab, as I have suggested. Shortening sail, especially the main, helps a lot.| 35553|35549|2019-02-23 18:28:08|opuspaul|Re: North sea|Not being able to sleep under windvane would really suck.   I have never had any problems with the windvane on my 36 single keeler.  Probably the worst condition is a very large quartering sea which may cause you to yaw but the vane and large skeg then grabs on and brings the boat back in no-time.   It also doesn't demand sleep or hot drinks ;).Does she steer well when you just grab the trim tab and move it by hand?  If not, it may be undersized or shaped poorly.  You need to make sure the tab is good or the best vane in the world won't control it.  You should be able to move the tab with one finger when the vane is disconnected.    Steering with the tab by hand is much less tiring than steering with the tiller. My wife and I steered for 3 days like this when motorsailing into NZ after our tillerpilot quit.  Paul---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Very interesting vid about small plastic sailboat crossing the north sea in the winter.   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Rm1J-g2enk&t=166sI have been in similar north of Vancouver Island.  I noticed the sailor set up his windvane and went for a nap.  Despite switching to welded SS windvane on my BS 36 Twin Keeler I found myself at the helm in order to handle swells and cross winds.  My leg muscles got a free workout that day...both feet pushing on the tiller.  The forces were amazing.  Your experiences appreciated to hear.  I would really have liked to be napping like that guy..... Gary| 35554|22|2019-02-23 20:47:06|origamiboats@yahoogroups.com|New file uploaded to origamiboats|Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the origamiboats group. File : /Frame-03-01-2019-12-32-51.tiff Uploaded by : svsalmoneyes@... Description : Bow section with Transverse only You can access this file at the URL: https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/origamiboats/files/Frame-03-01-2019-12-32-51.tiff To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit: https://help.yahoo.com/kb/index?page=content&y=PROD_GRPS&locale=en_US&id=SLN15398 Regards, svsalmoneyes@... | 35555|35555|2019-02-24 03:17:25|wild_explorer|Playing with sailboat toy|OK Matt, I went to a local hobby shop and got a child's toy "Sailboat Racer Kit SR470". It cost me almost $7.... :-))https://pinecar.woodlandscenics.com/show/item/SR470Good:Close enough for our "test". LOA= 172mm, Beam=52mm Hull's_height=20mmMax_Beam is 68mm from the stern.Hull suppose to have "good enough" hydrostatics.Kit has:- a hull shaped as a sailboat with FLAT bottom (easier to estimate hydrostatic's centers)- tapered to the bottom sides- slot on a bottom to install and MOVE keel and skeg-rudder (very helpful)- mast (not needed, but was used to find CG)- "sail" (not needed now, but might be used later to test weather helm)- piece of metal plate which looks like a keel (flat - no airfoil profile)- plastic imitation of skeg-rudder (flat, all-in-one piece which is MUCH longer longitudinally than a keel)- made in USA (unbelievable !!!)Bad:- it absorbs water VERY fast - need to seal or paint it (does not matter right now).My setup:- I marked Centerline (CL) of the hull and put 2 push-pins on it (1 at stern, 1 at bow)- I used 2mm solid copper wire (instead of longitudinal string) attached to push-pins to eliminate string's sag.- Floss as a pulling string (attached by Prusik knot) - because it is waterproof- Found and marked Center of Gravity (CG) of the hull by Brent's method (balancing the hull on the mast)  1st test - Hull only, pulling Floss at 90 deg to the CL. Pulling Floss toward me,I found Center of Lateral Resistance (CLR) pretty fast. Moving floss 2mm in any direction will start rotating the hull (instead of moving hull without rotating when Floss is at CLR). Very repeatable results.2nd test - Hull only, pulling Floss ALONG center line at the beginning and then trying to make hull "follow the Floss". I just could not get any repeatable results. May be I am doing something wrong....3d test - Put a keel and skeg-rudder in the slot (where it looks OK). Using 90 deg method.CLR went WAY back - about 15mm from original position.More likely I can "put" CLR back where it was in a 1st test. But I will need to move keel and skeg-rudder forward. Hopefully, slot on the bottom will be long enough to alow to move the keel (and adjust resulting CLR)Conclusion:This toy is a good way to learn "hands-on" how to balance the boat (from hydrostatics point of view).P.S. Matt, what I am doing wrong? I was unable to make hull follow the Floss. I was starting moving the hull with Floss pointing from where it was attached and projected through the bow's pin. Only attaching Floss almost next to a bows' pin will make hull follow the Floss (more or less).| 35556|35549|2019-02-24 03:26:41|wild_explorer|Re: North sea|Balance of the sailboat with Single keel is different that with Twin keels (according to a modeling program).I was trying to balance the same hull using Single keel and Twin keel. It was easy with Single keel, but it was MUCH harder to find correct airfoil and shape for Twin setup. I was unable completely replicate hydrostatics of the hull with Single keel by replacing it with Twin keels.36 BrentBoat suppose to have very good handling (at least with a Single keel)Brent already pointed out solution with the sails. If you have movable mast, you can try to move it forward. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Not being able to sleep under windvane would really suck.   I have never had any problems with the windvane on my 36 single keeler.| 35557|35557|2019-02-24 08:34:48|Rick Jackson|Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|No Idea if I’m posting where I should be or not, but after spending hundreds of hours researching, I feel like this Origami Hull group might be where the information we need is available…Wife and I bought a 12M steel ketch with an apparent notable pedigree… After dismantling, we noticed it was built much different than my experience is aware of.  After numerous conversations with the notable designer, he claims he never designed this boat as built. This designer along with a number of other “experts” claim it is way under built and needs more transverse framing and it needs longitude members which currently it has none…It appears to have been welded up “without" framing members, with the transverse members added in later.  After looking it over carefully, I think it may have been a great idea. The hull plates are 100% welded inside and out, and done quite well with a level of craftsmanship that took years of practice..She was built in Sweden in 1982, and has circumnavigated, with a number of haul outs, and at least 3 groundings per previous owner, so the strength of the hull is clearly proven to me.I am hoping to get some input from folks familiar with this type of hull construction. Specifically, some feed back on what my experience does tell which is  â€œa 12m hull built from 6mm steel is overkill and strong, with all steel bulkheads, welded in tankage and engine perches, all contributing to the overall strength to the hull, making Longs and extra Trans unnecessary..| 35558|35555|2019-02-24 09:55:05|Matt Malone|Re: Playing with sailboat toy| I am thinking the model was too small and light.  I am guessing you have a table saw with a fence and basic carpentry skills.  Try starting with a 6x6 -  2 feet long.   You are going to be making this more progressively more hull shaped by ripping it through the table saw in subsequent experiments, but start with the full rectangular block. Screw a piece of 1/4 steel plate flat to one side, that becomes the bottom.  Write "bow" at one end.   Rub it with oil or varnish to keep it from absorbing water.  This block is now the model.  It has a large number of potential hull shapes contained within it. Hammer two nails in the top, one at both the bow the other at the stern leaving them 1/4 inch tall to tie onto.  Make sure they are on the beamwise centerline like a mast.  Make sure they are not angled to port or starboard but straight, like a mast.  Angle the bow one so it points a little forward halfway between a bow sprit angle and a mast angle.   Tie string 1 -- a thin coat hanger wire or mechanics wire might be better -- string it really tight..   Take it to a flowing creek.  Used a pole/boat hook for safety, and so one might hold the pulling end of string 2 down close to the water. Tie string 2 to the bow nail and the tip of the pole.  Position the block in a smooth, straight, slow flowing area of the creek, so it looks like a barge traveling upstream in a broad slow river.   It may waggle a bit because of the bluff bow end of the model, but it must orient with the stern nail, bow nail, string 2 and the tip of the pole in a line. Unscrew the plate from the bottom.  Imagine a sailboat shape with the block, but do not a sailboat shape yet.  Rip the block it to give primitive but symmetric bow, being careful not to cut away any of the sailboat shape within the block.  Utilize the fence to make sure the cuts are symmetric.  With a primitive bow, it might look like a barge shape now. Apply more oil/varnish and tow it again in the creek.  This time, now that it has a bow, try moving string 2 along string 1 to find the CLR. Progressively rip the block to give it a more hull shape, from barge to tanker to Colin Archer to the sailboat you imagine in a sequence, testing between them.  Screw a fin keel of 1/4" plate to the bottom, do anything you want. You are now repeating the bronze age to 1830, using the methods they used, gaining insight along the way.  You may decide you like this work more than going sailing.  Matt From: williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, February 24, 03:17 Subject: [origamiboats] Playing with sailboat toy To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   OK Matt, I went to a local hobby shop and got a child's toy "Sailboat Racer Kit SR470". It cost me almost $7.... :-)) https://pinecar.woodlandscenics.com/show/item/SR470 Good: Close enough for our "test". LOA= 172mm, Beam=52mm Hull's_height=20mm Max_Beam is 68mm from the stern. Hull suppose to have "good enough" hydrostatics. Kit has: - a hull shaped as a sailboat with FLAT bottom (easier to estimate hydrostatic's centers) - tapered to the bottom sides - slot on a bottom to install and MOVE keel and skeg-rudder (very helpful) - mast (not needed, but was used to find CG) - "sail" (not needed now, but might be used later to test weather helm) - piece of metal plate which looks like a keel (flat - no airfoil profile) - plastic imitation of skeg-rudder (flat, all-in-one piece which is MUCH longer longitudinally than a keel) - made in USA (unbelievable !!!) Bad: - it absorbs water VERY fast - need to seal or paint it (does not matter right now). My setup: - I marked Centerline (CL) of the hull and put 2 push-pins on it (1 at stern, 1 at bow) - I used 2mm solid copper wire (instead of longitudinal string) attached to push-pins to eliminate string's sag. - Floss as a pulling string (attached by Prusik knot) - because it is waterproof - Found and marked Center of Gravity (CG) of the hull by Brent's method (balancing the hull on the mast)  1st test - Hull only, pulling Floss at 90 deg to the CL. Pulling Floss toward me, I found Center of Lateral Resistance (CLR) pretty fast. Moving floss 2mm in any direction will start rotating the hull (instead of moving hull without rotating when Floss is at CLR). Very repeatable results. 2nd test - Hull only, pulling Floss ALONG center line at the beginning and then trying to make hull "follow the Floss". I just could not get any repeatable results. May be I am doing something wrong.... 3d test - Put a keel and skeg-rudder in the slot (where it looks OK). Using 90 deg method. CLR went WAY back - about 15mm from original position. More likely I can "put" CLR back where it was in a 1st test. But I will need to move keel and skeg-rudder forward. Hopefully, slot on the bottom will be long enough to alow to move the keel (and adjust resulting CLR) Conclusion: This toy is a good way to learn "hands-on" how to balance the boat (from hydrostatics point of view). P.S. Matt, what I am doing wrong? I was unable to make hull follow the Floss. I was starting moving the hull with Floss pointing from where it was attached and projected through the bow's pin. Only attaching Floss almost next to a bows' pin will make hull follow the Floss (more or less). | 35559|35557|2019-02-24 10:52:13|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Hello Rick, How the heck did you manage to get photos in an origamiboats email? That is a feat. In general, no one, from just photos, can tell you what is proper or safe or a good modification to a design. You may get ideas from this group, but do not imagine anything to be answer or solution. Do you see and evidence or cracking, flexing or anything you can put your finger on as a specific problem? If yes, focus on that aspect and explain what you SEE (or what the previous own reported experiencing in operation) that gives you cause to doubt the boat. If not, then I say: You said the boat had circumnavigated and grounded 3 times. It is made of steel. How bad could it be? Compare it to a production fibreglass boat where they skimp on the glass and throw most of their effort into prettiafying the cabin to be attractive to certain buyers. Do you still think there is any emergency here? So you sail it like a flimsy fibreglass boat. You do your best to keep out of weather, do everything you can not to run aground or hit pointy rocks. It would be hard to imagine this being less safe than a flimsy fibreglass boat. It would seem that being this cautious should leave you a large reserve of untested strength and toughness in the steel. (I say flimsy fibreglass, because there are other boats made of inches of glass, not at all flimsy, and in a single impact, both stronger and tougher than your average steel boat. In rubbing on pointy rocks, they will eventually hole, where a steel boat may not. If you have a steel boat, why switch. If you do not have a boat, I would consider the potential bargain of an inches thick glass boat going cheap because it is 60 years old and no hurricane has yet managed to sink. Some of these boats have been well maintained, and are well geared and expensive (CSY boats), others are going for next to nothing. If one had an inches thick glass boat, why go to the bother of welding a steel one, and trying to sell a 60 year old glass boat.) Second, if you do anything to this boat involving a welder, you are looking at recoating, and a long time out of the water before it goes anywhere. Is there anywhere you want to go that is substantially different from where it has already been? Like do you want to go bumping growlers (truck sized chunks of ice) off Greenland, or the Southern Ocean? Or do you want to sail the Bahamas beside post-oil-crisis 1970s flimsy fibreglass boats that have not sunk in 40 years? So, think carefully before someone talks you into doing something. The original designer might have just been covering their own ass in denying responsibility for the future of a boat. If one were cynical, one might speculate the problem might be YOU have yet to pay him for a year of work where he directs you specifically on what to do. Failing this, he may decline to give YOU any assurances, and on the contrary might find it profitable to create doubt if you do not hire him. (Whereas the previous owner may have received assurances after they paid a substantial sum.) But that would only be if one were cynical. Flipped the other way, no professional will say a boat is proper without at least extensively surveying it and getting paid a good amount of money for their professional work. So, what thickness of steel is the hull made from? Matt From: Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, February 24, 08:35 Subject: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com No Idea if I�m posting where I should be or not, but after spending hundreds of hours researching, I feel like this Origami Hull group might be where the information we need is available� Wife and I bought a 12M steel ketch with an apparent notable pedigree� After dismantling, we noticed it was built much different than my experience is aware of. After numerous conversations with the notable designer, he claims he never designed this boat as built. This designer along with a number of other �experts� claim it is way under built and needs more transverse framing and it needs longitude members which currently it has none� It appears to have been welded up �without" framing members, with the transverse members added in later. After looking it over carefully, I think it may have been a great idea. The hull plates are 100% welded inside and out, and done quite well with a level of craftsmanship that took years of practice.. She was built in Sweden in 1982, and has circumnavigated, with a number of haul outs, and at least 3 groundings per previous owner, so the strength of the hull is clearly proven to me. I am hoping to get some input from folks familiar with this type of hull construction. Specifically, some feed back on what my experience does tell which is �a 12m hull built from 6mm steel is overkill and strong, with all steel bulkheads, welded in tankage and engine perches, all contributing to the overall strength to the hull, making Longs and extra Trans unnecessary.. [Image] [Image] [Image] [Image] [Image] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]| 35560|35557|2019-02-24 11:07:17|mountain man|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|What is the model of your boat? ________________________________ De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Envoy� : 23 f�vrier 2019 21:13:37 � : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group... No Idea if I�m posting where I should be or not, but after spending hundreds of hours researching, I feel like this Origami Hull group might be where the information we need is available� Wife and I bought a 12M steel ketch with an apparent notable pedigree� After dismantling, we noticed it was built much different than my experience is aware of. After numerous conversations with the notable designer, he claims he never designed this boat as built. This designer along with a number of other �experts� claim it is way under built and needs more transverse framing and it needs longitude members which currently it has none� It appears to have been welded up �without" framing members, with the transverse members added in later. After looking it over carefully, I think it may have been a great idea. The hull plates are 100% welded inside and out, and done quite well with a level of craftsmanship that took years of practice.. She was built in Sweden in 1982, and has circumnavigated, with a number of haul outs, and at least 3 groundings per previous owner, so the strength of the hull is clearly proven to me. I am hoping to get some input from folks familiar with this type of hull construction. Specifically, some feed back on what my experience does tell which is �a 12m hull built from 6mm steel is overkill and strong, with all steel bulkheads, welded in tankage and engine perches, all contributing to the overall strength to the hull, making Longs and extra Trans unnecessary.. [cid:F6BBD635-90CB-4A62-B94F-4D6F0C369286][cid:0044575B-276D-4B82-869F-0BC4FC4A364C][cid:3091F5C0-44B3-4F79-B0EC-B5F41C07BAAE][cid:9744492E-D6B1-4DCA-9780-71A4E3377ACE][cid:6D99E897-175E-485B-A09E-E8D90B0CE7F2] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]| 35561|35549|2019-02-24 12:43:02|aguysailing|Re: North sea|Hi Paul... yes, manually turning the trim tab all the way and no response in conditions mentioned.  I patterned the trim tab based on other Brent 36's.  I have talked this over with Brent before and his solution is to make the tab bigger seems the best choice.  Brent and I sail the same area so... gonna arrange this with him (finally) since I have open water plans this year.  . | 35562|35555|2019-02-24 14:39:47|wild_explorer|Re: Playing with sailboat toy|Stop pulling my legs Matt...  :-))) Please...1. If method does not work on "small" model, it will not work on "larger" one. I used the model I got, because it is done by CNC router - means "pretty precise  dimensions even for a small model". And if someone what to try what I did they will get similar results (because this is production kit and model will be the same). Sure, creek's water flow (instead of towing) is better than "testing tank" for "moving hull" experiment. It just need to fix string 2 to a point on the ground in  line with a water flow. i am just curious how you going to adjust String_2 and prevent boat from rotating? You need to put hull on a water very precisely (string alignment). 2. Beside the size of the model, model's set up was exactly the same as you describe. Only difference was in  thick solid wire instead of String_1 (keeps wire EXACTLY at the centerline all the time).3. The weight of the model is enough to have draft above half of the height of of the "hull" - about 12-14mm of 20mm4. This method looks unpractical. I could not get any noticeable repeatability on a model. How do you propose to do it on a real boat with such repeatability?Brent's method of finding Center of Gravity works perfect on a "small" model and real hull. Same is for "Simple way to find CLR of the hull" (90 deg string method) - I learned it on RC Sailboats forum. And they do 1 meter models - not "small" by any estimate.My simple test shows the same results of moving Hydrostatic centers when keel, skeg and rudder added to the hull. I already learned it when I was using modeling software. So, I will skip wasting my time playing in a creek ;-))---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : I am thinking the model was too small and light.  I am guessing you have a table saw with a fence and basic carpentry skills.  Try starting with a 6x6 -  2 feet long.   You are going to be making this more progressively more hull shaped by ripping it through the table saw in subsequent experiments, but start with the full rectangular block. Screw a piece of 1/4 steel plate flat to one side, that becomes the bottom.  Write "bow" at one end.   Rub it with oil or varnish to keep it from absorbing water.  This block is now the model.  It has a large number of potential hull shapes contained within it. Hammer two nails in the top, one at both the bow the other at the stern leaving them 1/4 inch tall to tie onto.  Make sure they are on the beamwise centerline like a mast.  Make sure they are not angled to port or starboard but straight, like a mast.  Angle the bow one so it points a little forward halfway between a bow sprit angle and a mast angle.   Tie string 1 -- a thin coat hanger wire or mechanics wire might be better -- string it really tight..   Take it to a flowing creek.  Used a pole/boat hook for safety, and so one might hold the pulling end of string 2 down close to the water. Tie string 2 to the bow nail and the tip of the pole.  Position the block in a smooth, straight, slow flowing area of the creek, so it looks like a barge traveling upstream in a broad slow river.   It may waggle a bit because of the bluff bow end of the model, but it must orient with the stern nail, bow nail, string 2 and the tip of the pole in a line. Unscrew the plate from the bottom.  Imagine a sailboat shape with the block, but do not a sailboat shape yet.  Rip the block it to give primitive but symmetric bow, being careful not to cut away any of the sailboat shape within the block.  Utilize the fence to make sure the cuts are symmetric.  With a primitive bow, it might look like a barge shape now. Apply more oil/varnish and tow it again in the creek.  This time, now that it has a bow, try moving string 2 along string 1 to find the CLR. Progressively rip the block to give it a more hull shape, from barge to tanker to Colin Archer to the sailboat you imagine in a sequence, testing between them.  Screw a fin keel of 1/4" plate to the bottom, do anything you want. You are now repeating the bronze age to 1830, using the methods they used, gaining insight along the way.  You may decide you like this work more than going sailing.  Matt From: williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, February 24, 03:17 Subject: [origamiboats] Playing with sailboat toy To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   OK Matt, I went to a local hobby shop and got a child's toy "Sailboat Racer Kit SR470". It cost me almost $7.... :-)) https://pinecar.woodlandscenics.com/show/item/SR470 Good: Close enough for our "test". LOA= 172mm, Beam=52mm Hull's_height=20mm Max_Beam is 68mm from the stern. Hull suppose to have "good enough" hydrostatics. Kit has: - a hull shaped as a sailboat with FLAT bottom (easier to estimate hydrostatic's centers) - tapered to the bottom sides - slot on a bottom to install and MOVE keel and skeg-rudder (very helpful) - mast (not needed, but was used to find CG) - "sail" (not needed now, but might be used later to test weather helm) - piece of metal plate which looks like a keel (flat - no airfoil profile) - plastic imitation of skeg-rudder (flat, all-in-one piece which is MUCH longer longitudinally than a keel) - made in USA (unbelievable !!!) Bad: - it absorbs water VERY fast - need to seal or paint it (does not matter right now). My setup: - I marked Centerline (CL) of the hull and put 2 push-pins on it (1 at stern, 1 at bow) - I used 2mm solid copper wire (instead of longitudinal string) attached to push-pins to eliminate string's sag. - Floss as a pulling string (attached by Prusik knot) - because it is waterproof - Found and marked Center of Gravity (CG) of the hull by Brent's method (balancing the hull on the mast)  1st test - Hull only, pulling Floss at 90 deg to the CL. Pulling Floss toward me, I found Center of Lateral Resistance (CLR) pretty fast. Moving floss 2mm in any direction will start rotating the hull (instead of moving hull without rotating when Floss is at CLR). Very repeatable results. 2nd test - Hull only, pulling Floss ALONG center line at the beginning and then trying to make hull "follow the Floss". I just could not get any repeatable results. May be I am doing something wrong.... 3d test - Put a keel and skeg-rudder in the slot (where it looks OK). Using 90 deg method. CLR went WAY back - about 15mm from original position. More likely I can "put" CLR back where it was in a 1st test. But I will need to move keel and skeg-rudder forward. Hopefully, slot on the bottom will be long enough to alow to move the keel (and adjust resulting CLR) Conclusion: This toy is a good way to learn "hands-on" how to balance the boat (from hydrostatics point of view). P.S. Matt, what I am doing wrong? I was unable to make hull follow the Floss. I was starting moving the hull with Floss pointing from where it was attached and projected through the bow's pin. Only attaching Floss almost next to a bows' pin will make hull follow the Floss (more or less). | 35563|35557|2019-02-24 17:11:07|brentswain38|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|What she has been thru, with  zero problems related to structure, proves far more conclusively that she needs nothing more, proven  far more accurately than the most over  rated armchair expert. Is she round bilged?Curves are far more effective than frames, by a wide margin.6mmis thick ,but lighter than most ferro cement hulls, and exponentially tougher. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :No Idea if I’m posting where I should be or not, but after spending hundreds of hours researching, I feel like this Origami Hull group might be where the information we need is available…Wife and I bought a 12M steel ketch with an apparent notable pedigree… After dismantling, we noticed it was built much different than my experience is aware of.  After numerous conversations with the notable designer, he claims he never designed this boat as built. This designer along with a number of other “experts” claim it is way under built and needs more transverse framing and it needs longitude members which currently it has none…It appears to have been welded up “without" framing members, with the transverse members added in later.  After looking it over carefully, I think it may have been a great idea. The hull plates are 100% welded inside and out, and done quite well with a level of craftsmanship that took years of practice..She was built in Sweden in 1982, and has circumnavigated, with a number of haul outs, and at least 3 groundings per previous owner, so the strength of the hull is clearly proven to me.I am hoping to get some input from folks familiar with this type of hull construction. Specifically, some feed back on what my experience does tell which is  â€œa 12m hull built from 6mm steel is overkill and strong, with all steel bulkheads, welded in tankage and engine perches, all contributing to the overall strength to the hull, making Longs and extra Trans unnecessary..| 35564|35557|2019-02-24 17:14:10|Rick Jackson|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|My apologizes, the masts were on the boat when we had her scaled at the Pilot Truck Stop…. > On Feb 24, 2019, at 10:55 AM, Rick Jackson wrote: > > I realized after I read the response, that I could write much more information… > > Boat is now officially a one off hull built in a shipyard in Sweden > > Her numbers are > > LOD 39’ > LWL 34.88’ > Beam 13’ > Draft 6’ > Displacement 37357 (scaled at truck stop) (no masts, sails or rigging, no anchor and chain) > > She was “commissioned” in 1982, by 4, 20 something year old Sweeds to sail around the world and then sell to pay for the experience.. > I have spoken to one of the 4 and aside from the above information, I was told they bought plans from a “magazine” article, took the plans to the ship yard and the hull was built from those plans.. However, the plans do not exist, and the named designer says not his…. > > I was also told that when the boat was completed, it sat 8 inches deeper in the water than the plans called for, requiring the boat to be hauled and the paint line raised…Hull is 6mm plate, which is overkill on a 12M hull, but makes he Ice capable... > > Apparently once they sea trialed it, they had some “issues” which were never described in detail, that caused them to pull the boat again, and replace the 7500 pounds of steel marbles with 8000 pounds of lead. The lead change apparently made her sail very well, > > > My main inquiry regarding our hulls construction, “origami?” Or “frameless” is recognized by any of the members here, and if it appears to have followed what is acceptable in those construction techniques… > > Clearly, it has functioned and survived, despite what nay sayers to “Origami & Frameless” construction practices say. I am not one who ignores those with more knowledge and experience in their field, but in this case, so many Naval Architects say it needs more framing members. If it were not for the fact that the hull is extremely heavy already, I would add more framing for the peace of mind. As it is, Displacement/Waterline ratio is over 420 putting her well into the Heavy Motorsailer category. Additionally, her sail plan allows for 950 sq’ which is a very manageable sail plan for us, but on the light side for a hull with this displacement. > > Where should I post photos so you can see what I am taking about? > > > >> On Feb 24, 2019, at 8:07 AM, mountain man mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] wrote: >> >> What is the model of your boat? >> ________________________________ >> De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] >> Envoyé : 23 février 2019 21:13:37 >> À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com >> Objet : [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group... >> >> >> >> No Idea if IÂ’m posting where I should be or not, but after spending hundreds of hours researching, I feel like this Origami Hull group might be where the information we need is available >> >> >> >> Wife and I bought a 12M steel ketch with an apparent notable pedigree >> After dismantling, we noticed it was built much different than my experience is aware of. After numerous conversations with the notable designer, he claims he never designed this boat as built. >> >> This designer along with a number of other “experts” claim it is way under built and needs more transverse framing and it needs longitude members which currently it has none >> >> >> >> It appears to have been welded up “without" framing members, with the transverse members added in later. After looking it over carefully, I think it may have been a great idea. The hull plates are 100% welded inside and out, and done quite well with a level of craftsmanship that took years of practice.. >> >> >> She was built in Sweden in 1982, and has circumnavigated, with a number of haul outs, and at least 3 groundings per previous owner, so the strength of the hull is clearly proven to me. >> >> I am hoping to get some input from folks familiar with this type of hull construction. Specifically, some feed back on what my experience does tell which is “a 12m hull built from 6mm steel is overkill and strong, with all steel bulkheads, welded in tankage and engine perches, all contributing to the overall strength to the hull, making Longs and extra Trans unnecessary... >> >> >> >> >> [cid:F6BBD635-90CB-4A62-B94F-4D6F0C369286][cid:0044575B-276D-4B82-869F-0BC4FC4A364C][cid:3091F5C0-44B3-4F79-B0EC-B5F41C07BAAE][cid:9744492E-D6B1-4DCA-9780-71A4E3377ACE][cid:6D99E897-175E-485B-A09E-E8D90B0CE7F2] >> >> >> >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------ >> >> ------------------------------------ >> >> To Post a message, send it to: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com >> To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: origamiboats-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com >> ------------------------------------ >> >> Yahoo Groups Links >> >> >> > | 35565|35557|2019-02-24 17:36:26|jpronk1|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|The boat is 37 years old, it looks awesome. Don’t listen to the armchair experts, they will never leave their armchairs! James Sent from my iPhone| 35566|35555|2019-02-24 18:39:13|Matt Malone|Re: Playing with sailboat toy| Why are things different when they are small.   Reynolds number which tends to determine flow patterns, scales by speed times model dimension.  A 1 foot model of a 40 foot boat needs to be pulled through the water 40 times faster for some aspects of hydrodynamics to be right.  At 6 knots x 40 = 240 knots, a little toy would skip on the water and nothing would be the same as a 40 foot boat at 6 knots. Some aspects of hydrodynamics, the absolute magnitude of some forces is proportional to velocity squared and a plan or frontal area.   If one tows a 1 foot model at 1 knot, to simulate of a 40 foot boat at 6 knots, the absolute magnitude of the forces are 36x1600 = 57,600 times smaller.  If it takes 200 pounds to hold the 40 foot boat at speed, it would take 1/283 of a pound, not even two grams to hold the model at speed.   At those loads, the twist in the string, its desire to curl into loops, the angle at which the knot holds the string out to the side all become important to what the model will do.  These tiny effects are why plumbobs have a machined hole on the centreline to hold the string perfectly straight and centred, and why real plumbobs are better than a nut hanging on a piece of string.  Going to a 2 foot long 6x6 reduces the problem by a factor of 16 by increasing the forces on the model. Mass scales with a dimension cubed.  So where one might smoothly pull a 40 foot boat along a dock a 2 knots, at 1 foot model would accelerate 64,000 times more quickly, being more twitchy, subject to surging and over reacting and a jerky force profile in string 2.  A jerky force profile would throw off an experiment.  Doubling model size increases momentum and mass by a factor of 8, smoothing results.   Free surface waves travel at a speed proportional to the square root of length.  This is where tow tanks work the best.   A 1 foot model would have to be pulled at slightly less than 1 knot for the surface waves to look similar to a 40 foot boat at 6 knots. A lot of hydrodynamic forces are influenced by how far one gets from the starting vortex.  Put a spoon in tea and pull it through the tea and one sees the starting vortex of the spoon.   One cannot tow a 1 foot model in a bathtub, one cannot get far enough away from the starting vortex.   Towing tanks are dozens of model lengths long.  A stream completely solves this problem -- the starting vortex is washed far down stream in dozens of seconds. Now specifically, I have played with boat models on strings at my kids bath time.  One invariably ends up jerking the model at the start, the string goes slack, because there is no way to hold speed and pull less than 2 grams continuously.  If the string goes even a little slack the model can do anything.  If I really wanted to use a very small model, I would use the lightest most flexible thread for string two.  I would then tie it to a 3 foot long stock of grass which is really flexible, then I would visually watch the stock to try to maintain constant flex, and therefore force. So no, there are a lot of experiments that are easier on big models and real boats and small models are just far to finicky and the results too intermittent to be certain. One can do the towing CLR test on a full-sized boat in a river.   Tie a safety line from a pile to the boat bow.  Tie rope 2 to the pile and take it in hand.  Stand at the bow and pull rope 2 until the safety line goes slack and floats on the water exerting no force on the boat.   Nothing will happen.  The boat will continue to point upstream.  Let the boat fall back until the safety line is tight.  Sit firmly braced on the foredeck and pull line 2 again.   If you are forward of the CLR, nothing will happen, the boat will point at the pile.  If you are aft of the CLR, the boat will start to pivot a little off of bow-into the current and will start moving laterally at right angles to the current and the angle between the centerline and rope 2 will increase.  You are waterskiing your boat.   Move forward of the CLR or ease the boat back onto the safety line   Caution... just my weight on the foredeck of my 16 or 23 foot boats puts it bow down enough to influence the CLR. When I first described the process, two emails ago, I was merely conceptually explaining the way to find the CLR of a forward moving boat and why the results are different than just pulling it sideways, and why just pulling it sideways gives you the less useful CLR.  Then Will you said I was not clear, so I explained more clearly.   Then you bought a model and said the method did not work.  Now I have explained problems with models.   Now if a model boat has a surfboard-like bottom which provides little lateral resistance and a dagger board as the keel, and a rudder daggerboard, then the CLR of each daggerboard will move only slightly on the scale of the boat overall length when one goes from pulling it straight sideways to towing it like I suggest.  The geometric sum of the two will dominate the boat CLR.  For some boats, and some models, pulling it sideways might be close enough.   A deeply wetted full keel Colin Archer design, where the hull is most of the lateral resistance, there will be a big difference between towing and just pulling it sideways. But you do what you think is the right amount of effort to delve into the subject as deeply as suits you.   I was not meaning to mock you in suggesting trying a creek, it is the most practical towing channel at most people's disposal.  With a little instrumentation, one could take real scientific measurements at the right spot in a smooth, uniform creek (as opposed to a lumpy rapids with eddies). A proper tow tank is better than a creek because no matter how smooth the creek, the water flowing over the stationary bottom creates flow non-uniformities.  In a proper tow tank, only the model moves. Matt From: williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, February 24, 14:39 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Playing with sailboat toy To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Stop pulling my legs Matt...  :-))) Please... 1. If method does not work on "small" model, it will not work on "larger" one. I used the model I got, because it is done by CNC router - means "pretty precise  dimensions even for a small model". And if someone what to try what I did they will get similar results (because this is production kit and model will be the same). Sure, creek's water flow (instead of towing) is better than "testing tank" for "moving hull" experiment. It just need to fix string 2 to a point on the ground in  line with a water flow. i am just curious how you going to adjust String_2 and prevent boat from rotating? You need to put hull on a water very precisely (string alignment). 2. Beside the size of the model, model's set up was exactly the same as you describe. Only difference was in  thick solid wire instead of String_1 (keeps wire EXACTLY at the centerline all the time). 3. The weight of the model is enough to have draft above half of the height of of the "hull" - about 12-14mm of 20mm 4. This method looks unpractical. I could not get any noticeable repeatability on a model. How do you propose to do it on a real boat with such repeatability? Brent's method of finding Center of Gravity works perfect on a "small" model and real hull. Same is for "Simple way to find CLR of the hull" (90 deg string method) - I learned it on RC Sailboats forum. And they do 1 meter models - not "small" by any estimate. My simple test shows the same results of moving Hydrostatic centers when keel, skeg and rudder added to the hull. I already learned it when I was using modeling software. So, I will skip wasting my time playing in a creek ;-)) ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : I am thinking the model was too small and light.  I am guessing you have a table saw with a fence and basic carpentry skills.  Try starting with a 6x6 -  2 feet long.   You are going to be making this more progressively more hull shaped by ripping it through the table saw in subsequent experiments, but start with the full rectangular block. Screw a piece of 1/4 steel plate flat to one side, that becomes the bottom.  Write "bow" at one end.   Rub it with oil or varnish to keep it from absorbing water.  This block is now the model.  It has a large number of potential hull shapes contained within it. Hammer two nails in the top, one at both the bow the other at the stern leaving them 1/4 inch tall to tie onto.  Make sure they are on the beamwise centerline like a mast.  Make sure they are not angled to port or starboard but straight, like a mast.  Angle the bow one so it points a little forward halfway between a bow sprit angle and a mast angle.   Tie string 1 -- a thin coat hanger wire or mechanics wire might be better -- string it really tight..   Take it to a flowing creek.  Used a pole/boat hook for safety, and so one might hold the pulling end of string 2 down close to the water. Tie string 2 to the bow nail and the tip of the pole.  Position the block in a smooth, straight, slow flowing area of the creek, so it looks like a barge traveling upstream in a broad slow river.   It may waggle a bit because of the bluff bow end of the model, but it must orient with the stern nail, bow nail, string 2 and the tip of the pole in a line. Unscrew the plate from the bottom.  Imagine a sailboat shape with the block, but do not a sailboat shape yet.  Rip the block it to give primitive but symmetric bow, being careful not to cut away any of the sailboat shape within the block.  Utilize the fence to make sure the cuts are symmetric.  With a primitive bow, it might look like a barge shape now. Apply more oil/varnish and tow it again in the creek.  This time, now that it has a bow, try moving string 2 along string 1 to find the CLR. Progressively rip the block to give it a more hull shape, from barge to tanker to Colin Archer to the sailboat you imagine in a sequence, testing between them.  Screw a fin keel of 1/4" plate to the bottom, do anything you want. You are now repeating the bronze age to 1830, using the methods they used, gaining insight along the way.  You may decide you like this work more than going sailing.  Matt From: williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, February 24, 03:17 Subject: [origamiboats] Playing with sailboat toy To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   OK Matt, I went to a local hobby shop and got a child's toy "Sailboat Racer Kit SR470". It cost me almost $7.... :-)) https://pinecar.woodlandscenics.com/show/item/SR470 Good: Close enough for our "test". LOA= 172mm, Beam=52mm Hull's_height=20mm Max_Beam is 68mm from the stern. Hull suppose to have "good enough" hydrostatics. Kit has: - a hull shaped as a sailboat with FLAT bottom (easier to estimate hydrostatic's centers) - tapered to the bottom sides - slot on a bottom to install and MOVE keel and skeg-rudder (very helpful) - mast (not needed, but was used to find CG) - "sail" (not needed now, but might be used later to test weather helm) - piece of metal plate which looks like a keel (flat - no airfoil profile) - plastic imitation of skeg-rudder (flat, all-in-one piece which is MUCH longer longitudinally than a keel) - made in USA (unbelievable !!!) Bad: - it absorbs water VERY fast - need to seal or paint it (does not matter right now). My setup: - I marked Centerline (CL) of the hull and put 2 push-pins on it (1 at stern, 1 at bow) - I used 2mm solid copper wire (instead of longitudinal string) attached to push-pins to eliminate string's sag. - Floss as a pulling string (attached by Prusik knot) - because it is waterproof - Found and marked Center of Gravity (CG) of the hull by Brent's method (balancing the hull on the mast)  1st test - Hull only, pulling Floss at 90 deg to the CL. Pulling Floss toward me, I found Center of Lateral Resistance (CLR) pretty fast. Moving floss 2mm in any direction will start rotating the hull (instead of moving hull without rotating when Floss is at CLR). Very repeatable results. 2nd test - Hull only, pulling Floss ALONG center line at the beginning and then trying to make hull "follow the Floss". I just could not get any repeatable results. May be I am doing something wrong.... 3d test - Put a keel and skeg-rudder in the slot (where it looks OK). Using 90 deg method. CLR went WAY back - about 15mm from original position. More likely I can "put" CLR back where it was in a 1st test. But I will need to move keel and skeg-rudder forward. Hopefully, slot on the bottom will be long enough to alow to move the keel (and adjust resulting CLR) Conclusion: This toy is a good way to learn "hands-on" how to balance the boat (from hydrostatics point of view). P.S. Matt, what I am doing wrong? I was unable to make hull follow the Floss. I was starting moving the hull with Floss pointing from where it was attached and projected through the bow's pin. Only attaching Floss almost next to a bows' pin will make hull follow the Floss (more or less). | 35567|35555|2019-02-24 19:14:56|opuspaul|Re: Playing with sailboat toy|Scaling is a huge factor.   If I remember correctly, they have used models up to 24 feet long when tanking testing  for the old 65 foot America's Cup boats.   This is about 3 to 1.   Something 10 to 1 introduces huge errors.   I think if you are playing with models, you are probably better off using the computer models derived using the yacht design programs.  Freeship (Delftship) is a free one and I have had a lot of fun playing with it.  It doesn't really help much with balance however....rig can make a huge difference.   As Brent said, real world comparison to existing designs is probably most accurate.  There are a few rules of thumbs in the better yacht design books but many yachts are still  "cranky" and bear to steer despite the best intentions of experienced designers.   | 35568|35557|2019-02-24 19:51:12|Rick Jackson|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|I realized after I read the response, that I could write much more information… Boat is now officially a one off hull built in a shipyard in Sweden Her numbers are LOD 39’ LWL 34.88’ Beam 13’ Draft 6’ Displacement 37357 (scaled at truck stop) (no masts, sails or rigging, no anchor and chain) She was “commissioned” in 1982, by 4, 20 something year old Sweeds to sail around the world and then sell to pay for the experience.. I have spoken to one of the 4 and aside from the above information, I was told they bought plans from a “magazine” article, took the plans to the ship yard and the hull was built from those plans.. However, the plans do not exist, and the named designer says not his…. I was also told that when the boat was completed, it sat 8 inches deeper in the water than the plans called for, requiring the boat to be hauled and the paint line raised…Hull is 6mm plate, which is overkill on a 12M hull, but makes he Ice capable... Apparently once they sea trialed it, they had some “issues” which were never described in detail, that caused them to pull the boat again, and replace the 7500 pounds of steel marbles with 8000 pounds of lead. The lead change apparently made her sail very well, My main inquiry regarding our hulls construction, “origami?” Or “frameless” is recognized by any of the members here, and if it appears to have followed what is acceptable in those construction techniques… Clearly, it has functioned and survived, despite what nay sayers to “Origami & Frameless” construction practices say. I am not one who ignores those with more knowledge and experience in their field, but in this case, so many Naval Architects say it needs more framing members. If it were not for the fact that the hull is extremely heavy already, I would add more framing for the peace of mind. As it is, Displacement/Waterline ratio is over 420 putting her well into the Heavy Motorsailer category. Additionally, her sail plan allows for 950 sq’ which is a very manageable sail plan for us, but on the light side for a hull with this displacement. Where should I post photos so you can see what I am taking about? > On Feb 24, 2019, at 8:07 AM, mountain man mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] wrote: > > What is the model of your boat? > ________________________________ > De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] > Envoyé : 23 février 2019 21:13:37 > À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com > Objet : [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group... > > > > No Idea if IÂ’m posting where I should be or not, but after spending hundreds of hours researching, I feel like this Origami Hull group might be where the information we need is available > > > > Wife and I bought a 12M steel ketch with an apparent notable pedigree > After dismantling, we noticed it was built much different than my experience is aware of. After numerous conversations with the notable designer, he claims he never designed this boat as built. > > This designer along with a number of other “experts” claim it is way under built and needs more transverse framing and it needs longitude members which currently it has none > > > > It appears to have been welded up “without" framing members, with the transverse members added in later. After looking it over carefully, I think it may have been a great idea. The hull plates are 100% welded inside and out, and done quite well with a level of craftsmanship that took years of practice.. > > > She was built in Sweden in 1982, and has circumnavigated, with a number of haul outs, and at least 3 groundings per previous owner, so the strength of the hull is clearly proven to me. > > I am hoping to get some input from folks familiar with this type of hull construction. Specifically, some feed back on what my experience does tell which is “a 12m hull built from 6mm steel is overkill and strong, with all steel bulkheads, welded in tankage and engine perches, all contributing to the overall strength to the hull, making Longs and extra Trans unnecessary... > > > > > [cid:F6BBD635-90CB-4A62-B94F-4D6F0C369286][cid:0044575B-276D-4B82-869F-0BC4FC4A364C][cid:3091F5C0-44B3-4F79-B0EC-B5F41C07BAAE][cid:9744492E-D6B1-4DCA-9780-71A4E3377ACE][cid:6D99E897-175E-485B-A09E-E8D90B0CE7F2] > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------ > > To Post a message, send it to: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com > To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: origamiboats-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo Groups Links > > > | 35569|35555|2019-02-24 20:24:04|wild_explorer|Re: Playing with sailboat toy|Your explanation is very appreciated. However, It looks like we are going "too deep" into the theory again. More practical approach would be more interesting to the Group. If effect is unnoticeable on a model, it can be classified as "minor" and useful only for "fine tuning" of the Full Scale boat. I would be more interested HOW and WHERE CLR moves using "tow test CLR" vs "Static CLR". It should be some statistics or examples if someone did it on "average boat".I have some doubts about cleanness of "creek/river test". If creek/river was very wide, deep and with perfectly flat bottom  I would agree. Real creek/river might have hidden currents, vortexes, etc due to bottom profile. It will affect results of the test. Rope will need to be very long as well (actually 2 ropes as you describe).Yes, trim of the boat will affect "Static CLR" very slightly (at least for a good hydrostatically balanced boat).So, test on a real boat (as you explained) looks doable. How useful it will be for practical application? It will depend HOW CLR moves and if it will noticeably affect hydrostatic balance of the boat (make it better or worth). As I understand, it is need to start from a location some distabce forward of "Staic CLR" and move back to find "Towing CLR".When I put keel and skeg/rudder on a touy-model just "where it looks OK", Static CLR moved about 10% LOA back from the location where it was suppose to be for a good balance (which will make boat to fish-tail). That was very noticeable result.What was the result "Static CLR" vs "Toving CLR" (difference in % to LOA and what direction) when you did it on your boat?---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Why are things different when they are small.   skept.... One can do the towing CLR test on a full-sized boat in a river.   Tie a safety line from a pile to the boat bow.  Tie rope 2 to the pile and take it in hand.  Stand at the bow and pull rope 2 until the safety line goes slack and floats on the water exerting no force on the boat.   Nothing will happen.  The boat will continue to point upstream.  Let the boat fall back until the safety line is tight.  Sit firmly braced on the foredeck and pull line 2 again.   If you are forward of the CLR, nothing will happen, the boat will point at the pile.  If you are aft of the CLR, the boat will start to pivot a little off of bow-into the current and will start moving laterally at right angles to the current and the angle between the centerline and rope 2 will increase.  You are waterskiing your boat.   Move forward of the CLR or ease the boat back onto the safety line   Caution... just my weight on the foredeck of my 16 or 23 foot boats puts it bow down enough to influence the CLR. When I first described the process, two emails ago, I was merely conceptually explaining the way to find the CLR of a forward moving boat and why the results are different than just pulling it sideways, and why just pulling it sideways gives you the less useful CLR.  Then Will you said I was not clear, so I explained more clearly.   Then you bought a model and said the method did not work.  Now I have explained problems with models.   Now if a model boat has a surfboard-like bottom which provides little lateral resistance and a dagger board as the keel, and a rudder daggerboard, then the CLR of each daggerboard will move only slightly on the scale of the boat overall length when one goes from pulling it straight sideways to towing it like I suggest.  The geometric sum of the two will dominate the boat CLR.  For some boats, and some models, pulling it sideways might be close enough.   A deeply wetted full keel Colin Archer design, where the hull is most of the lateral resistance, there will be a big difference between towing and just pulling it sideways. | 35570|35555|2019-02-24 21:01:45|Norm Moore|Re: Playing with sailboat toy|What about testing in a canal?  California’s got a few...Sent from my iPhone On Feb 24, 2019, at 5:24 PM, williswildest@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Your explanation is very appreciated. However, It looks like we are going "too deep" into the theory again. More practical approach would be more interesting to the Group. If effect is unnoticeable on a model, it can be classified as "minor" and useful only for "fine tuning" of the Full Scale boat. I would be more interested HOW and WHERE CLR moves using "tow test CLR" vs "Static CLR". It should be some statistics or examples if someone did it on "average boat".I have some doubts about cleanness of "creek/river test". If creek/river was very wide, deep and with perfectly flat bottom  I would agree. Real creek/river might have hidden currents, vortexes, etc due to bottom profile. It will affect results of the test. Rope will need to be very long as well (actually 2 ropes as you describe).Yes, trim of the boat will affect "Static CLR" very slightly (at least for a good hydrostatically balanced boat).So, test on a real boat (as you explained) looks doable. How useful it will be for practical application? It will depend HOW CLR moves and if it will noticeably affect hydrostatic balance of the boat (make it better or worth). As I understand, it is need to start from a location some distabce forward of "Staic CLR" and move back to find "Towing CLR".When I put keel and skeg/rudder on a touy-model just "where it looks OK", Static CLR moved about 10% LOA back from the location where it was suppose to be for a good balance (which will make boat to fish-tail). That was very noticeable result.What was the result "Static CLR" vs "Toving CLR" (difference in % to LOA and what direction) when you did it on your boat?! ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Why are things different when they are small.   skept.... One can do the towing CLR test on a full-sized boat in a river.   Tie a safety line from a pile to the boat bow.  Tie rope 2 to the pile and take it in hand.  Stand at the bow and pull rope 2 until the safety line goes slack and floats on the water exerting no force on the boat.   Nothing will happen.  The boat will continue to point upstream.  Let the boat fall back until the safety line is tight.  Sit firmly braced on the foredeck and pull line 2 again.   If you are forward of the CLR, nothing will happen, the boat will point at the pile.  If you are aft of the CLR, the boat will start to pivot a little off of bow-into the current and will start moving laterally at right angles to the current and the angle between the centerline and rope 2 will increase.  You are waterskiing your boat.   Move forward of the CLR or ease the boat back onto the safety line   Caution... just my weight on the foredeck of my 16 or 23 foot boats puts it bow down enough to influence the CLR. When I first described the process, two emails ago, I was merely conceptually explaining the way to find the CLR of a forward moving boat and why the results are different than just pulling it sideways, and why just pulling it sideways gives you the less useful CLR.  Then Will you said I was not clear, so I explained more clearly.   Then you bought a model and said the method did not work.  Now I have explained problems with models.   Now if a model boat has a surfboard-like bottom which provides little lateral resistance and a dagger board as the keel, and a rudder daggerboard, then the CLR of each daggerboard will move only slightly on the scale of the boat overall length when one goes from pulling it straight sideways to towing it like I suggest.  The geometric sum of the two will dominate the boat CLR.  For some boats, and some models, pulling it sideways might be close enough.   A deeply wetted full keel Colin Archer design, where the hull is most of the lateral resistance, there will be a big difference between towing and just pulling it sideways. | 35571|35555|2019-02-24 21:45:47|wild_explorer|Re: Playing with sailboat toy|Yep, modeling software is a good tool for someone who wants to learn it. Most people are not interested in it. And it is more "theoretical" than "practical" for field application. That why I want to know some "good enough" methods which could be used on the field for a full scale boat (testing on the scaled model first is good too).Example: recent post of aguysailinghttps://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/origamiboats/conversations/messages/35549He would be more interested what practical steps he can take, and what test he can run to start to troubleshoot the problem he noticed.On a real boat:- Brent should know where Center of flotation should be on 36 BrentBoat (mark it).- Center of gravity suppose to be known as well after construction (and already marked)- Run Static CLR test and mark its location,- Use existing sail plan to find CE of the sails (simple geometrical estimate).- Estimate where the mast suppose to be (starting point) in relation to CLR.- Analyze all results and choose what is the easiest way to fix a problem.Adjust as necessary and do sea trial. Repeat some steps if necessary (more likely different setup for mast and sails). It is unpractical/impossible to change all others (keel/s & skeg location)Of cause, It is need to know some basics how to balance the boat from hydrostatics point of view (relation between locations of the centers for a good balanced boat)...I guess, Brent have that information for his design. It is much easier to do it "practical way" than to put all information into modeling software. And... "practical way" does not require computer.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Scaling is a huge factor.   If I remember correctly, they have used models up to 24 feet long when tanking testing  for the old 65 foot America's Cup boats.   This is about 3 to 1.   Something 10 to 1 introduces huge errors.   I think if you are playing with models, you are probably better off using the computer models derived using the yacht design programs.  Freeship (Delftship) is a free one and I have had a lot of fun playing with it.  It doesn't really help much with balance however....rig can make a huge difference.   As Brent said, real world comparison to existing designs is probably most accurate.  There are a few rules of thumbs in the better yacht design books but many yachts are still  "cranky" and bear to steer despite the best intentions of experienced designers.   | 35572|35557|2019-02-24 22:08:12|wild_explorer|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|What country do you plan to register your boat?---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I realized after I read the response, that I could write much more information… Boat is now officially a one off hull built in a shipyard in Sweden Her numbers are LOD 39’ LWL 34.88’ Beam 13’ Draft 6’ Displacement 37357 (scaled at truck stop) (no masts, sails or rigging, no anchor and chain) | 35573|35557|2019-02-24 22:17:27|wild_explorer|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Create Album in Photos (Photos link is next to Conversations) and post pictures you want there.or use this linkhttps://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/origamiboats/photos/photostream---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Where should I post photos so you can see what I am taking about? | 35574|35557|2019-02-25 10:43:10|Rick Jackson|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|On Feb 24, 2019, at 7:08 PM, williswildest@... [origamiboats] wrote:What country do you plan to register your boat?She is US Coast Guard Registered…. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I realized after I read the response, that I could write much more information…Boat is now officially a one off hull built in a shipyard in SwedenHer numbers areLOD 39’LWL 34.88’Beam 13’Draft 6’Displacement 37357 (scaled at truck stop) (no masts, sails or rigging, no anchor and chain)| 35575|35557|2019-02-25 12:31:28|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| Rick, 6mm steel is very close to 1/4 inch.   This is not far off what Brent includes in his similar-length but different designs -- that is not confirmation that it is good, only that that aspect is a plausible beginning.   At that thickness, unless there were some bad choices that oddly concentrated force somewhere in particular, I would focus attention on larger scale deformations. Did the previous owner report "oil canning" where a large section of the hull moves in and out a small amount, possibly in heavy seas? Was there any evidence of oil canning when you removed the interior?  Any evidence of fasteners popped out or pulled through where tall cabinetry or wood bulkheads attached to the hull?  Evidence of rub or abrasion that would give you the impression part of the hull was moving relative to another? If there is no evidence of an actual problem, but you are determined to add stiffness and strength there may be an option.  It would always be advisable to take direction from a professional who has extensively surveyed and analysed your hull.  This group is based on people experienced with steel construction how might take an approach more based on experience, and given the superior properties of steel it may work out in proportion to their experience.  Still if one takes the advice of an experienced steel boat builder, it can only be based on a first hand survey of your boat. If the hull could truly benefit from stiffer frames, it is likely they will describe adding frames on the existing ribs.  As a minimize-the-work-modification to be cautious in the absence of actual evidence of a problem, it might be possible to tack flat bar on edge to the top of the existing ribs, taking care to cool the hull in the area as one works to protect exterior coatings.  This would be consistent with the frames-after hull philosophy used in orgami, where traditional building is frames first, then the hull skin.   With a skin thickness comparable to an origami, the approach has potential.  The flat bars would be cut to fit a particular rib, with separate pieces for each panel between chines.   Then the flat bars could be better welded together at the chines while they have little thermal connection to the hull.  I would take great care to keep the heat effected zone as small as possible, welding very short beads at a time.  Perhaps one could weld a little on one rib, a little on another etc before circling back to the first.  Then lastly, one could add more segments of weld between the added bars and the existing ribs.  If one made the gaps very close-fitting and the bar-to-existing-rib welds individually short, one might minimize any warpage.  Without evidence of an actual problem, I would be inclined to do this to a small number of ribs, more in areas where the hull is taller and flatter and individual panels between chines are taller/broader, where oil canning pattern deflections might start if they were ever to occur.   What does the first actual deflection of an actual boat mean?  A boat that actually is oil canning is just pointing to the most flexible pattern of deflection -- if there were a more-flexible pattern, it would be doing that also, or instead.  Adding stiffness against what you anticipate the most flexible pattern of deflection might be is merely in approach to focus work with some logic.  If no evidence has actually been observed, it is still an approach just based on a guess.  If your guess is poor, the work might best case be unnecessary, worst case make things worse.  Here is an example. Remember, one wants a steel boat to dent substantially before ripping to get the full benefit of the tough properties of steel.  The goal is, as much as possible, make all areas of the boat a crumple zone against truly irresistable forces.  Denting steel absorbs a tremendous amount of energy.  One wants to be careful about adding members that individually have a high compression strength.  When this compression strength is used on a member added on the inside, it is nearly certain to induce equal tension on the hull.   One does not want to create a stiff fulcum by which an external force can rip open part of the hull.  If internal structure is kept to thin flatbar on edge, it is tremendously strong in tension (putting the nearby segment of hull in compression).  The same thin flatbar member will inner-edge buckle in compression.  If one puts a uniform rib all the way around a lateral slice through the hull -- a bulkhead slice -- and it encounters a lateral, beamwise squeezing force, the tension parts of the rib are sufficient geometrically to hold the shape, one need not rely on the compression portion of the ribs.  Same idea as the spokes in a bicycle wheel one does not need any compression spokes, so long as there are lots of tension spokes and a locally stiff rim.  Naturally, the compression post under a deck-stepped mast is the exception. Again, if there was no report of flexibility, and you observed no evidence of flexibility, consider the record of sailing, Brent's comments, and the option of doing nothing.   Matt From: Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, February 25, 10:50 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   On Feb 24, 2019, at 7:08 PM, williswildest@... [origamiboats] wrote: What country do you plan to register your boat? She is US Coast Guard Registered….  ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : I realized after I read the response, that I could write much more information… Boat is now officially a one off hull built in a shipyard in Sweden Her numbers are LOD 39’ LWL 34.88’ Beam 13’ Draft 6’ Displacement 37357 (scaled at truck stop) (no masts, sails or rigging, no anchor and chain) | 35576|35557|2019-02-25 12:38:20|Darren Bos|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| Rick, Others have posted some good info, I would add that the interior has been stripped out and that may have been functionally part of the framework.  If you are putting the same interior back in then there is no change, if you are modifying the interior then it is worth keeping in mind that even ply bulkheads can provide effective transverse framing, while something that might look innocuous as a settee couch or book shelf might be acting as a longitudinal.  This type of construction is more common on glass boats than steel, but you have an unusual boat so it is worth considering. My wife and I are doing a project that is very similar to yours (we gutted a 12m full keel pilothouse in aluminum, mostly a Benford design, with a slight stretch in beam and conversion to aluminum by Brandlmayr, but with the exact nature of changes lost in time) .  I wanted to remove some bulkheads to change the layout.  I ended up leaving 4" around the outside to act as a transverse frame.  Although I first convinced myself it could work, I paid what I thought was a very reasonable sum to a naval architect to be sure I wasn't making a mistake.  I chose an architect whose work I respected, and who is very practical in his boat designs.  There's no one right solution for everyone, you just need to come to a point that you are sufficiently convinced that doubt doesn't niggle at you during a 3am watch when you are crashing off waves. Darren On 2019-02-25 7:12 a.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   On Feb 24, 2019, at 7:08 PM, williswildest@... [origamiboats] wrote: What country do you plan to register your boat? She is US Coast Guard Registered….  ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : I realized after I read the response, that I could write much more information… Boat is now officially a one off hull built in a shipyard in Sweden Her numbers are LOD 39’ LWL 34.88’ Beam 13’ Draft 6’ Displacement 37357 (scaled at truck stop) (no masts, sails or rigging, no anchor and chain) | 35577|35557|2019-02-25 13:17:45|wild_explorer|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|If she is already registered, you have less things to worry about. Please post the pictures in Photos section - it will help a lot. As Brent already pointed out, shape of the boat's hull is a BIG deal.I am not the expert, but I was doing a good amount of research as well before starting building "origami" type boat.Asking advice from the experts is fine, but keep in mind that they have different sets of requirements than you do.You boat is under 40ft and is SMALL according to ship standards.For a NEW design, designer have to comply with current requirements for a production boat. It does not matter if some requirements may go against common sense."Common sense" points:- If to compare ship to a skyscraper - you have very small log cabin. Log cabin will have overkill structural integrity compare to a skyscraper made from the same material (logs)- You boat is built PROFESSIONALLY in a SHIP yard (not a boat yard)- Ship yard has their own engineers. They would not take the order which seems "unsafe" by their estimates.- Steel in shipyard is a very good quality by default (usually requires to pass special inspection), I believe that 6mm is a minimal thickness ship yards have in stock for the hull plating.- Your boat passed sea trial.- 6mm hull plate is more than boat under 40ft needs- You boat has bulkheads (is it correct?)- Small aluminum motor boats do not have "frames" in production boats and nobody question it,- If you buy very old car (let say 50-60 years old), it will NOT pass modern requirements, because.... it does not have safety belt.More points might be added to this list by others.MAIN question:Do you feel that this is the boat you wanted and feel good about its safety (without looking at someone comments)? If your answer is "Yes" - you do not need anything else.Just remember, that Vikings crossed the ocean in small wooden boats and they would be glad to have your boat at their disposal ;-)))---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : She is US Coast Guard Registered…. | 35578|35557|2019-02-25 13:25:35|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| Good point Darren about the old interior perhaps adding stiffness. Wood that is loaded and unloaded, and loaded in reverse will often creak conspicuously, and work fasteners.  Again, the previous owner might have something to say, or Rick you might have observed something when you removed the interior.  I would dig for evidence before considering a course of action. Doubts promote vigilance, so my position is, a little is a good thing.   Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, February 25, 13:04 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Rick, Others have posted some good info, I would add that the interior has been stripped out and that may have been functionally part of the framework.  If you are putting the same interior back in then there is no change, if you are modifying the interior then it is worth keeping in mind that even ply bulkheads can provide effective transverse framing, while something that might look innocuous as a settee couch or book shelf might be acting as a longitudinal.  This type of construction is more common on glass boats than steel, but you have an unusual boat so it is worth considering. My wife and I are doing a project that is very similar to yours (we gutted a 12m full keel pilothouse in aluminum, mostly a Benford design, with a slight stretch in beam and conversion to aluminum by Brandlmayr, but with the exact nature of changes lost in time) .  I wanted to remove some bulkheads to change the layout.  I ended up leaving 4" around the outside to act as a transverse frame.  Although I first convinced myself it could work, I paid what I thought was a very reasonable sum to a naval architect to be sure I wasn't making a mistake.  I chose an architect whose work I respected, and who is very practical in his boat designs.  There's no one right solution for everyone, you just need to come to a point that you are sufficiently convinced that doubt doesn't niggle at you during a 3am watch when you are crashing off waves. Darren On 2019-02-25 7:12 a.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   On Feb 24, 2019, at 7:08 PM, williswildest@... [origamiboats] < origamiboats@yahoogroups.com> wrote: What country do you plan to register your boat? She is US Coast Guard Registered….  ---In  origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : I realized after I read the response, that I could write much more information… Boat is now officially a one off hull built in a shipyard in Sweden Her numbers are LOD 39’ LWL 34.88’ Beam 13’ Draft 6’ Displacement 37357 (scaled at truck stop) (no masts, sails or rigging, no anchor and chain) | 35579|35557|2019-02-25 14:09:45|wild_explorer|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Another way of hull's reinforcement is to add insulation foam. Resulting stiffness of 4-5 inches of closed-cell foam over steel plate "sandwich" will make hull even stronger with minimal weight addition. And it has benefit of thermal and sound insulation (as initially was intended). I agree with already well explained point - Interior is you friend in boat hull "framing"---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Good point Darren about the old interior perhaps adding stiffness. | 35580|35557|2019-02-25 14:59:07|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| Will,  If you are suggesting just foam, that is negligible.  If you are suggesting a second layer of steel plate, or even a 3/4" plywood second hull on the inside, that is different.  But then one would have all the problems of other double-wall cored structures.  It also seems easier to make an entire new origami than fit a second structural hull inside an existing one... but maybe you have some tricks to tip the balance. Matt From: williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, February 25, 14:52 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Another way of hull's reinforcement is to add insulation foam. Resulting stiffness of 4-5 inches of closed-cell foam over steel plate "sandwich" will make hull even stronger with minimal weight addition. And it has benefit of thermal and sound insulation (as initially was intended). I agree with already well explained point - Interior is you friend in boat hull "framing" ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Good point Darren about the old interior perhaps adding stiffness. | 35581|35581|2019-02-25 15:31:04|wild_explorer|A Solo circumnavigation of the Southern Hemisphere on the Rowboat |Are you worried about going off-shore on a steel sailboat??? ;-))))https://konyukhov.ru/en/project/expedition/a-solo-circumnavigation-of-the-southern-hemisphere-on-the-rowboat-akros/https://www.flickr.com/photos/101436685@N08/| 35582|35557|2019-02-25 16:08:13|wild_explorer|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|No, I am talking just about adding spray foam on the inside of existing hull. As Brent already pointed out many times. that foam is very rigid by itself. You can go to any home-building store and take similar hard insulating panel 3-4 inches thick and see how rigid it is.It may not increase rigidity of the plate much, but spray foam will help to re-distribute the force of an impact  to a large area. Brent recommends, before applying spray foam, to put wood planks (2x4 ???) bolted to the metal angle tabs (tubs are welded to the hull) for the floor and interior. This actually may be considered as "wooden frames" from structural point of view. After applying spray foam on hull's plate with the thickness "slightly over" wood planks, it will make very strong structure already. Interior (made of wood or plywood) will embrace hull's structure even more.So, it is need to take into account ALL elements, not just hull plate thickness and metal "frames" attached to it.Small sailboat is NOT a cargo ship. I saw how cargo ship (built by all modern standards and loaded with sand) was visually twisting and flexing during the storm. Scary!---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Will,  If you are suggesting just foam, that is negligible.  If you are suggesting a second layer of steel plate, or even a 3/4" plywood second hull on the inside, that is different.  But then one would have all the problems of other double-wall cored structures.  It also seems easier to make an entire new origami than fit a second structural hull inside an existing one... but maybe you have some tricks to tip the balance. Matt From: williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, February 25, 14:52 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Another way of hull's reinforcement is to add insulation foam. Resulting stiffness of 4-5 inches of closed-cell foam over steel plate "sandwich" will make hull even stronger with minimal weight addition. And it has benefit of thermal and sound insulation (as initially was intended). I agree with already well explained point - Interior is you friend in boat hull "framing" ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Good point Darren about the old interior perhaps adding stiffness. | 35583|35557|2019-02-25 16:29:10|Rick Jackson|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|That is what I was hoping to hear and from someone other than “arm chair experts”… That said,, I certainly do not want to be guilty of just looking for affirmation to my personal opinion, rather I would like to hear enough to formulate an opinion of my own which I currently do not have, but getting there….She is a single hard chine much like a trawler hull….With a massive full and long keel with a full 36 inches at its “shortest” profile and 50 inches of keel at the prop… She just looks like a battle tested, nomadic ocean voyager… We love it… can not wait to finish her... On Feb 24, 2019, at 2:11 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:What she has been thru, with  zero problems related to structure, proves far more conclusively that she needs nothing more, proven  far more accurately than the most over  rated armchair expert. Is she round bilged?Curves are far more effective than frames, by a wide margin.6mmis thick ,but lighter than most ferro cement hulls, and exponentially tougher. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :No Idea if I’m posting where I should be or not, but after spending hundreds of hours researching, I feel like this Origami Hull group might be where the information we need is available…Wife and I bought a 12M steel ketch with an apparent notable pedigree… After dismantling, we noticed it was built much different than my experience is aware of.  After numerous conversations with the notable designer, he claims he never designed this boat as built. This designer along with a number of other “experts” claim it is way under built and needs more transverse framing and it needs longitude members which currently it has none…It appears to have been welded up “without" framing members, with the transverse members added in later.  After looking it over carefully, I think it may have been a great idea. The hull plates are 100% welded inside and out, and done quite well with a level of craftsmanship that took years of practice..She was built in Sweden in 1982, and has circumnavigated, with a number of haul outs, and at least 3 groundings per previous owner, so the strength of the hull is clearly proven to me.I am hoping to get some input from folks familiar with this type of hull construction. Specifically, some feed back on what my experience does tell which is  â€œa 12m hull built from 6mm steel is overkill and strong, with all steel bulkheads, welded in tankage and engine perches, all contributing to the overall strength to the hull, making Longs and extra Trans unnecessary..| 35584|35557|2019-02-25 16:30:01|Rick Jackson|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Agreed, Good thoughts I hadn’t considered during the removal of interior… Im a builder by trade so I generally pay attention to that, and what jumped out at me was just how well and solid it was put together..First off,,, the teak was all rough sawn which the guys milled and build all the cabinetry and rails.. It was so solidly screwed down with brass or bronze screws that it made it impossible to remove and keep in tact. Sorry, and a bit ashamed to say, I cut it all out with a sawmill. I had spent 3 days taking the wood out of the master state room with the idea to save. Then gave up and started cutting…It looked as if they started aft and over played wood on top of wood going forward… I would have been easier to start in the V berth and peel it all out…. Replacement is all going to be HDPE panels attached with trim screws and built to be easily removed without causing damage to any thing for inspection and repairs if needed. (No blown in foam) The entire interior, sole, bulkheads, hull and lid, had 2x2 wood wedged between all steel framing members.. No holes were drilled anywhere through framing to attach wood.  The pilothouse floor and its fore and aft bulkheads were steel plated with what looks like 10 gauge with 1/4 inch 2x2 T framing members.   I saw no oil canning, no distorted panels and no evidence of heat warping from welding… Absolutely convinced the hull was built by a professional welder…The swim platform was an add on which caused most of the water damage we have.. Poor welds, and the welds leaked… the heat caused the epoxy interior paint to blister which allowed water to get in between it and the steel… Easy fixes…Also the windows were poly and original. They had spider crabs around all the screws and they all leaked pretty bad. Steel at bottoms of windows and corners is all in need of replacing. New windows will be 1/2 inch glass…We have a NA who has agreed to help us whom I could never afford otherwise.  He is teaching me to help myself by looking the ideas over and helping explain the math. We need to set up a jig and do a complete Lines Take Off which we will upload into software and reproduce a set of plans. It will give us all of our Hydrostatic Calculations and the NA will help us figure out how the proposed changes will affect handling.  His opinion is pretty Blaise about the framing members. He says as long as the calculations say its within the realm of accepted practices, he is ok with it… This group seems to be the red headed step brother (no offense to reds,, I was red ish before it fell out) to the rest of the traditional boat builder crowd. Its new to me, but in educating myself, it seems like this is very common in the Netherlands and Scandinavians, whom have been building smaller (12-15meter) steel boats for many many years. Those boats are built to withstand ice which the Baltic sees every winter.  I guess I just allowed some folks here in the states with many years of experience to put in my head that this type of hull construction was inferior and just some current fad for low tech back yard boat builders.. I feel better about it now, and I think I am going to subscribe to the thought that folks who have been fishing and building boats (albeit wood) longer than America has existed, and might know a little bit more about this subject… On Feb 25, 2019, at 10:25 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:Good point Darren about the old interior perhaps adding stiffness. Wood that is loaded and unloaded, and loaded in reverse will often creak conspicuously, and work fasteners.  Again, the previous owner might have something to say, or Rick you might have observed something when you removed the interior.  I would dig for evidence before considering a course of action. Doubts promote vigilance, so my position is, a little is a good thing.   Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, February 25, 13:04 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Rick, Others have posted some good info, I would add that the interior has been stripped out and that may have been functionally part of the framework.  If you are putting the same interior back in then there is no change, if you are modifying the interior then it is worth keeping in mind that even ply bulkheads can provide effective transverse framing, while something that might look innocuous as a settee couch or book shelf might be acting as a longitudinal.  This type of construction is more common on glass boats than steel, but you have an unusual boat so it is worth considering. My wife and I are doing a project that is very similar to yours (we gutted a 12m full keel pilothouse in aluminum, mostly a Benford design, with a slight stretch in beam and conversion to aluminum by Brandlmayr, but with the exact nature of changes lost in time) .  I wanted to remove some bulkheads to change the layout.  I ended up leaving 4" around the outside to act as a transverse frame.  Although I first convinced myself it could work, I paid what I thought was a very reasonable sum to a naval architect to be sure I wasn't making a mistake.  I chose an architect whose work I respected, and who is very practical in his boat designs.  There's no one right solution for everyone, you just need to come to a point that you are sufficiently convinced that doubt doesn't niggle at you during a 3am watch when you are crashing off waves. Darren On 2019-02-25 7:12 a.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   On Feb 24, 2019, at 7:08 PM, williswildest@... [origamiboats] < origamiboats@yahoogroups.com> wrote: What country do you plan to register your boat? She is US Coast Guard Registered….  ---In  origamiboats@yahoogroups.com,  wrote : I realized after I read the response, that I could write much more information… Boat is now officially a one off hull built in a shipyard in Sweden Her numbers are LOD 39’ LWL 34.88’ Beam 13’ Draft 6’ Displacement 37357 (scaled at truck stop) (no masts, sails or rigging, no anchor and chain) | 35585|35557|2019-02-25 16:39:17|brentswain38|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|2x2s are enough for attaching panleling. 2x4s between the bulkheads for bunks, counter tops etc.| 35586|35557|2019-02-25 16:42:35|brentswain38|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Make sure you get a good buildup of epoxy tar on clean steel,  before foaming ,and keep the foam out of the bilges, so any  water can drain out of it. The botomof foam in bilge water will  wick it up, well up the hull  , and cause serious corrosion.| 35587|35557|2019-02-25 17:39:17|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| #ygrps-yiv-426636752 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} That is a lot of teak.   Teak, in the grain direction, has a strength (200 MPa) per unit dimension that is about half that of mild steel (350-400MPa), and a stiffness (14 Gpa) of 1/14 that of steel (200 GPa).  But if one had 1" of boards on the inside, that is 4 times more thickness than the steel, so, this is not at all negligible.   If one had a cabinet or a bulkhead, the geometric stiffness of a structure a foot or more thick edge-on would be tremendous as compared to 1/4" plate.   Versus oil canning type small displacements, this could be very capable and the deciding factor.   Verses a solid impact, it would absorb negligible energy compared to the steel -- the wood would splinter comparatively easily and the steel would deform absorbing most of the energy.           Foam has a strength (0.200 - 0.500 MPa) about 800-2,000 times less than steel, and a stiffness (10 MPa) about 20,000 times smaller than steel.   Foam would be negligible for structural forces and stiffness.   Inches of foam would have a damping orders of magnitude greater than steel, so, it would absorb structural vibrations both in the audible range and sub-audible range.   This would quiet the hull, and reduce the vibration felt in the hull which are both great positives.  Any impression of strength that these might convey are false impressions -- sort of like the solid-sounding door-slam of a car.   A false impression can be quite comforting however, and comfort is important.   Brent has openly said, in rough weather, wearing earplugs in a steel boat helps one's stress level.        Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 3:26 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...     Agreed, Good thoughts I hadn’t considered during the removal of interior… Im a builder by trade so I generally pay attention to that, and what jumped out at me was just how well and solid it was put together.. First off,,, the teak was all rough sawn which the guys milled and build all the cabinetry and rails.. It was so solidly screwed down with brass or bronze screws that it made it impossible to remove and keep in tact. Sorry, and a bit ashamed to say, I cut it all out with a sawmill. I had spent 3 days taking the wood out of the master state room with the idea to save. Then gave up and started cutting…It looked as if they started aft and over played wood on top of wood going forward… I would have been easier to start in the V berth and peel it all out…. Replacement is all going to be HDPE panels attached with trim screws and built to be easily removed without causing damage to any thing for inspection and repairs if needed. (No blown in foam)  The entire interior, sole, bulkheads, hull and lid, had 2x2 wood wedged between all steel framing members.. No holes were drilled anywhere through framing to attach wood.  The pilothouse floor and its fore and aft bulkheads were steel plated with what looks like 10 gauge with 1/4 inch 2x2 T framing members.   I saw no oil canning, no distorted panels and no evidence of heat warping from welding… Absolutely convinced the hull was built by a professional welder… The swim platform was an add on which caused most of the water damage we have.. Poor welds, and the welds leaked… the heat caused the epoxy interior paint to blister which allowed water to get in between it and the steel… Easy fixes… Also the windows were poly and original. They had spider crabs around all the screws and they all leaked pretty bad. Steel at bottoms of windows and corners is all in need of replacing. New windows will be 1/2 inch glass… We have a NA who has agreed to help us whom I could never afford otherwise.  He is teaching me to help myself by looking the ideas over and helping explain the math. We need to set up a jig and do a complete Lines Take Off which we will upload into software and reproduce a set of plans. It will give us all of our Hydrostatic Calculations and the NA will help us figure out how the proposed changes will affect handling.  His opinion is pretty Blaise about the framing members. He says as long as the calculations say its within the realm of accepted practices, he is ok with it…  This group seems to be the red headed step brother (no offense to reds,, I was red ish before it fell out) to the rest of the traditional boat builder crowd. Its new to me, but in educating myself, it seems like this is very common in the Netherlands and Scandinavians, whom have been building smaller (12-15meter) steel boats for many many years. Those boats are built to withstand ice which the Baltic sees every winter.   I guess I just allowed some folks here in the states with many years of experience to put in my head that this type of hull construction was inferior and just some current fad for low tech back yard boat builders.. I feel better about it now, and I think I am going to subscribe to the thought that folks who have been fishing and building boats (albeit wood) longer than America has existed, and might know a little bit more about this subject… On Feb 25, 2019, at 10:25 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote: Good point Darren about the old interior perhaps adding stiffness..  Wood that is loaded and unloaded, and loaded in reverse will often creak conspicuously, and work fasteners.  Again, the previous owner might have something to say, or Rick you might have observed something when you removed the interior.  I would dig for evidence before considering a course of action.  Doubts promote vigilance, so my position is, a little is a good thing.    Matt  From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats]  Sent: Monday, February 25, 13:04  Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...  To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com     Rick,  Others have posted some good info, I would add that the interior has been stripped out and that may have been functionally part of the framework.  If you are putting the same interior back in then there is no change, if you are modifying the interior then it is worth keeping in mind that even ply bulkheads can provide effective transverse framing, while something that might look innocuous as a settee couch or book shelf might be acting as a longitudinal.  This type of construction is more common on glass boats than steel, but you have an unusual boat so it is worth considering.  My wife and I are doing a project that is very similar to yours (we gutted a 12m full keel pilothouse in aluminum, mostly a Benford design, with a slight stretch in beam and conversion to aluminum by Brandlmayr, but with the exact nature of changes lost in time) .  I wanted to remove some bulkheads to change the layout.  I ended up leaving 4" around the outside to act as a transverse frame.  Although I first convinced myself it could work, I paid what I thought was a very reasonable sum to a naval architect to be sure I wasn't making a mistake.  I chose an architect whose work I respected, and who is very practical in his boat designs.  There's no one right solution for everyone, you just need to come to a point that you are sufficiently convinced that doubt doesn't niggle at you during a 3am watch when you are crashing off waves.  Darren  On 2019-02-25 7:12 a.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:     On Feb 24, 2019, at 7:08 PM, williswildest@... [origamiboats] < origamiboats@yahoogroups.com> wrote:  What country do you plan to register your boat?  She is US Coast Guard Registered….   ---In  origamiboats@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :  I realized after I read the response, that I could write much more information…  Boat is now officially a one off hull built in a shipyard in Sweden  Her numbers are  LOD 39’  LWL 34.88’  Beam 13’  Draft 6’  Displacement 37357 (scaled at truck stop) (no masts, sails or rigging, no anchor and chain)  | 35588|35557|2019-02-25 19:07:20|wild_explorer|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Was she waiting ~37,000 Lbs ( ~ 16.8t) on a truck scale?I am wondering why it weight so much with only 8,000 Lbs (~ 3.6t) ballast? The hull's weight (with interior, etc)   will be about 13t in this case??? Looks too much....I am building 40 ft boat with similar dimensions (with 5.24mm plate for the hull). I estimate it to be ~15t (when finished) including 8t ballast.Are you sure she has 6mm plate for the hull?It is nice if you are able to get NA's help. I am just curios how NA going to estimate added strength to the hull due to hull's shape and interior. As I know, most ship software (at leas affordable ones) can only do "regular" type of estimates for ship structures.If I remember correctly, even Bureau Veritas starts asking to meet shipbuilding rules only for boats above 70 meters LOA.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I realized after I read the response, that I could write much more information… Boat is now officially a one off hull built in a shipyard in Sweden Her numbers are LOD 39’ LWL 34.88’ Beam 13’ Draft 6’ Displacement 37357 (scaled at truck stop) (no masts, sails or rigging, no anchor and chain) ....skept... I was also told that when the boat was completed, it sat 8 inches deeper in the water than the plans called for, requiring the boat to be hauled and the paint line raised…Hull is 6mm plate, which is overkill on a 12M hull, but makes he Ice capable... Apparently once they sea trialed it, they had some “issues” which were never described in detail, that caused them to pull the boat again, and replace the 7500 pounds of steel marbles with 8000 pounds of lead. The lead change apparently made her sail very well, | 35589|35557|2019-02-25 19:30:49|wild_explorer|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Thanks for the information - good to know. Point is taken.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :#ygrps-yiv-305870609 #ygrps-yiv-305870609ygrps-yiv-1808572844 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Teak, in the grain direction, has a strength (200 MPa) per unit dimension that is about half that of mild steel (350-400MPa), and a stiffness (14 Gpa) of 1/14 that of steel (200 GPa).  But if one had 1" of boards on the inside, that is 4 times more thickness than the steel, so, this is not at all negligible.   If one had a cabinet or a bulkhead, the geometric stiffness of a structure a foot or more thick edge-on would be tremendous as compared to 1/4" plate.   Versus oil canning type small displacements, this could be very capable and the deciding factor.   Verses a solid impact, it would absorb negligible energy compared to the steel -- the wood would splinter comparatively easily and the steel would deform absorbing most of the energy.           Foam has a strength (0.200 - 0.500 MPa) about 800-2,000 times less than steel, and a stiffness (10 MPa) about 20,000 times smaller than steel.   Foam would be negligible for structural forces and stiffness.   ...skept... Matt| 35590|35557|2019-02-26 11:12:57|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| Rick you mentioned 1/2" glass. Naturally there are many types of glass, but I saw this video of laminated "bullet proof" glass.   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pq79-7S8cnA There are many grades of glass, but I did not expect this.  Having seen various types of safety glass and windshield glass, basketball backboard glass, and hockey spectator glass all break, I was not especially impressed with readily available glass.  Further for fitting glass to a hole in a boat, the glass has to be ordered perfect, curved perfectly.   I was thinking polycarbonate for my window replacements.   They say new polycarbonate is UV stable, and it can still be worked with wood tools, saws and a router.  It can be bent to the curvature needed on site, with an oven or heat gun if needed.  It just seemed easier, and at 3/4", it seemed impact proof enough.   If I had to replace it every 10 years, that seemed ok. But this laminated glass, that is just incredible.  So Rick, what type of glass are you looking at? Matt From: Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, February 25, 16:32 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Agreed, Good thoughts I hadn’t considered during the removal of interior… Im a builder by trade so I generally pay attention to that, and what jumped out at me was just how well and solid it was put together.. First off,,, the teak was all rough sawn which the guys milled and build all the cabinetry and rails.. It was so solidly screwed down with brass or bronze screws that it made it impossible to remove and keep in tact. Sorry, and a bit ashamed to say, I cut it all out with a sawmill. I had spent 3 days taking the wood out of the master state room with the idea to save. Then gave up and started cutting…It looked as if they started aft and over played wood on top of wood going forward… I would have been easier to start in the V berth and peel it all out…. Replacement is all going to be HDPE panels attached with trim screws and built to be easily removed without causing damage to any thing for inspection and repairs if needed. (No blown in foam)  The entire interior, sole, bulkheads, hull and lid, had 2x2 wood wedged between all steel framing members.. No holes were drilled anywhere through framing to attach wood.  The pilothouse floor and its fore and aft bulkheads were steel plated with what looks like 10 gauge with 1/4 inch 2x2 T framing members.   I saw no oil canning, no distorted panels and no evidence of heat warping from welding… Absolutely convinced the hull was built by a professional welder… The swim platform was an add on which caused most of the water damage we have.. Poor welds, and the welds leaked… the heat caused the epoxy interior paint to blister which allowed water to get in between it and the steel… Easy fixes… Also the windows were poly and original. They had spider crabs around all the screws and they all leaked pretty bad. Steel at bottoms of windows and corners is all in need of replacing. New windows will be 1/2 inch glass… We have a NA who has agreed to help us whom I could never afford otherwise.  He is teaching me to help myself by looking the ideas over and helping explain the math. We need to set up a jig and do a complete Lines Take Off which we will upload into software and reproduce a set of plans. It will give us all of our Hydrostatic Calculations and the NA will help us figure out how the proposed changes will affect handling.  His opinion is pretty Blaise about the framing members. He says as long as the calculations say its within the realm of accepted practices, he is ok with it…  This group seems to be the red headed step brother (no offense to reds,, I was red ish before it fell out) to the rest of the traditional boat builder crowd. Its new to me, but in educating myself, it seems like this is very common in the Netherlands and Scandinavians, whom have been building smaller (12-15meter) steel boats for many many years. Those boats are built to withstand ice which the Baltic sees every winter.   I guess I just allowed some folks here in the states with many years of experience to put in my head that this type of hull construction was inferior and just some current fad for low tech back yard boat builders.. I feel better about it now, and I think I am going to subscribe to the thought that folks who have been fishing and building boats (albeit wood) longer than America has existed, and might know a little bit more about this subject… On Feb 25, 2019, at 10:25 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote: Good point Darren about the old interior perhaps adding stiffness..  Wood that is loaded and unloaded, and loaded in reverse will often creak conspicuously, and work fasteners.  Again, the previous owner might have something to say, or Rick you might have observed something when you removed the interior.  I would dig for evidence before considering a course of action.  Doubts promote vigilance, so my position is, a little is a good thing.    Matt  From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats]  Sent: Monday, February 25, 13:04  Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...  To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com     Rick,  Others have posted some good info, I would add that the interior has been stripped out and that may have been functionally part of the framework.  If you are putting the same interior back in then there is no change, if you are modifying the interior then it is worth keeping in mind that even ply bulkheads can provide effective transverse framing, while something that might look innocuous as a settee couch or book shelf might be acting as a longitudinal.  This type of construction is more common on glass boats than steel, but you have an unusual boat so it is worth considering.  My wife and I are doing a project that is very similar to yours (we gutted a 12m full keel pilothouse in aluminum, mostly a Benford design, with a slight stretch in beam and conversion to aluminum by Brandlmayr, but with the exact nature of changes lost in time) .  I wanted to remove some bulkheads to change the layout.  I ended up leaving 4" around the outside to act as a transverse frame.  Although I first convinced myself it could work, I paid what I thought was a very reasonable sum to a naval architect to be sure I wasn't making a mistake.  I chose an architect whose work I respected, and who is very practical in his boat designs.  There's no one right solution for everyone, you just need to come to a point that you are sufficiently convinced that doubt doesn't niggle at you during a 3am watch when you are crashing off waves.  Darren  On 2019-02-25 7:12 a.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:     On Feb 24, 2019, at 7:08 PM, williswildest@... [origamiboats] < origamiboats@yahoogroups.com> wrote:  What country do you plan to register your boat?  She is US Coast Guard Registered….   ---In  origamiboats@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :  I realized after I read the response, that I could write much more information…  Boat is now officially a one off hull built in a shipyard in Sweden  Her numbers are  LOD 39’  LWL 34.88’  Beam 13’  Draft 6’  Displacement 37357 (scaled at truck stop) (no masts, sails or rigging, no anchor and chain)  | 35591|35591|2019-02-26 17:07:43|prairiemaidca|Battery Chargers| What brands of shore power battery chargers are people using?  I've been using the Xantrex 20 amp. version and was wondering what others have had any luck with...Martin   (Prairie Maid)| 35592|35591|2019-02-26 22:29:59|Brian Stannard|Re: Battery Chargers|Promariner Pronautic P chargers are the best I have seen up to 60 amps. The same units are available under the Sterling brand. On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 2:11 PM losforsters@... [origamiboats] wrote:    What brands of shore power battery chargers are people using?  I've been using the Xantrex 20 amp. version and was wondering what others have had any luck with...Martin   (Prairie Maid) -- CheersBrian | 35593|35591|2019-02-27 09:26:18|prairiemaidca|Re: Battery Chargers|I've looked at Pro Mariner and they seem to be a very good product but the issue I have with them and a few others is that they come with their wires a set length and hard wired into the charger.  The manual says not to cut them and leave them that length.  My old unit uses terminals and you decide on the the wire sizes and lengths.  It would require a lot of extra work to get the old wire out and route the hard wired cables to the two batteries.  The only two units I see are blue sea and Xantrex that use connection terminals rather than fixed wires from the chargers.  Martin  (Prairie Maid}| 35594|35594|2019-02-27 11:14:36|Zoa Scott|Finally!|Managed to get the boat back in the water a few days ago.Super happy. Still lots to do but I guess there always is. This is my first steel boat and although I have been on some of Brents boats its pretty exciting to have my own. My appreciation for the design just keeps growing. Hope the picture works Cheers Zoa [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]| 35595|35594|2019-02-27 12:52:57|prairiemaidca|Re: Finally!|Good to hear you are in the salt.  Will try meet up and check her out when Betty and I head out to the coast in a few weeks for some spring off season sailing.  Martin   (Prairie Maid)| 35596|35591|2019-02-28 04:37:02|Brian Stannard|Re: Battery Chargers|MartinYou are looking at the wrong Promariner chargers. The Pronautic P has no wires  - you provide your own of whatever gauge is required for the length of run. They also come with a temperature sensor which should be on every charger. On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 7:20 AM losforsters@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I've looked at Pro Mariner and they seem to be a very good product but the issue I have with them and a few others is that they come with their wires a set length and hard wired into the charger.  The manual says not to cut them and leave them that length.  My old unit uses terminals and you decide on the the wire sizes and lengths.  It would require a lot of extra work to get the old wire out and route the hard wired cables to the two batteries.  The only two units I see are blue sea and Xantrex that use connection terminals rather than fixed wires from the chargers.  Martin  (Prairie Maid} -- CheersBrian | 35597|35591|2019-02-28 12:30:14|Matt Malone|BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"| #ygrps-yiv-979247490 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Hello all, A the risk of pissing off someone who might be one of the 42 bidders on this boat, there is a Brent Swain 36 going for a steal in Florida, but, one would have to move fast -- it is on ebay.   The current bid is US$2,889.   This time of year, the oceans around Florida are at their least storm-prone.   It is a 2014 boat.   It is going for a steal.   The boat is "Samba". If you have been lurking on this group and thinking about building a Brent Swain, then here is a complete boat for a tiny fraction of the cost of the steel, lead and the engine, and at the effort of a couple clicks of the mouse.   Warning:  If you are not ready to sail next week, some Florida marina fees are very high -- check that -- you may want it out of there.   If you are not ready to sail, this will become a burden to you.   If you are a dreamer, and will never actually get around to sailing, let someone else have it.   Who cares if it is a wreck -- I do not know that it is a wreck, it may be a gem -- you look at the photos.   You were toying with the idea of welding an entire boat, so now you have to weld far less of a boat, maybe zero welding.   You were toying with the idea of grinding/blasting and painting an entire boat, so now maybe you blast, prime and paint a little.   You can do that right? It also comes loaded with equipment.  So what if it is junk (I have no cause to believe it is) -- you were going to scrounge for junk anyway, so, so what?   Or alternately, you were going to have a boat where all of the equipment was top notch and brand new, so you were going to buy all new equipment anyway, so, so what? It has a running 50 Hp engine in a steel boat !   A running engine the ad says!   Even scrounging, that is not coming together completely installed and spinning a prop for less than $5,000, all in -- and this is an entire boat.    It has what looks like a radar dome on it !   It looks like it has two sails properly wrapped to protect them from UV....   My 1974 has 2 of its 3 original sails still usable.   I had another made, for $1,000.   Florida is full of used boat stuff places.   I believe used sail places too.     So what if it leaks (I do not know that it does) and you leave it plugged into shore power with 3 bilge pumps (for redundancy) and you get a $100 electric bill -- so what.  Your first purchase of welding rods was going to be $100 anyway.   This is a 3 week vacation in the Bahamas, just 200 nm south-southwest -- so what if you bring a belt sander with you and buy a few gallons of paint before pushing off.    Right now the price is less than you would pay to take a family to the Bahamas just once.   Yes, owning a boat is way more expensive than zero, and Florida is an expensive place to own a boat, and if you do not move it out of Florida (see Gone With The Wynns) there are apparently extra taxes to pay etc etc.   Last I looked into it, in St. Marten if you register a boat there, you can moor in the lagoon for free -- check that, it was old information.    One would want to buy extra solar to make sure the bilge pump exceeds any leaks that might develop.   But so what?   If you were serious about it, you had planned to spend that much and more.  I know I did when I bought my non-steel boat.    The current bid is US$2,889.    It would be a shame if a steel boat with a working engine goes that cheap.   There are plenty of costs in buying a boat the right way -- haulling, survey, re-lauching, survey continued etc.   There is a reason it is on ebay.   But I would be willing to bet there are not 200 reasons it is on ebay, and, if you were ready to weld up an entire boat, and find and install all the systems, then how can this be more money or more work ?    Yeah, so, you rewire it.   So what?   Yeah so, some nav lights do not work?  If you are not ready to do a little 12V wiring, you have no business reading this far into my post.    https://www.ebay.com/itm/2014-36-BRENT-SWAIN-SAILBOAT-W-YANMAR-50-HP-DIESEL-ENGINE-FL-MEAD-14/264208274537?hash=item3d840a5469:g:YWkAAOSwLXFcbz6V:rk:5:pf:0&vxp=mtr 2014 36' BRENT SWAIN SAILBOAT W/ YANMAR 50 HP DIESEL ENGINE (FL MEAD 14) | eBay 2014 BRENT SWAIN 36' SAILBOAT. LENGTH 36'. THE REPRESENTATIVE VERIFIED THE ENGINE RUNS. DEPTH 4'.5". THIS VESSEL IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING. THIS VESSEL IS BEING SOLD WITH CLEAR FLORIDA TITLE. WOOD STOVE HEATER. | eBay! www.ebay.com Maybe someone on this list knows of a less-wrecky (I do not know this boat is a wreck at all, it may be a gem) BS in some Mexican marina going for a song -- if so, post about it.   Matt. | 35598|35591|2019-02-28 13:45:00|Matt Malone|Re: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"| #ygrps-yiv-21906535 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Further... I read the terms of the auction.   The terms of this auction would seem likely to scare off private buyers.  It looked at a lot of Florida boats before I bought mine.   The boat brokers are all over boats there -- I got mine by buying where brokers do not look for saltwater cruisers.  The brokers on the coasts buy boats for a song and flip them.     I have a feeling the buyer who gets this boat will be very happy when they compare what they got to the cost of the same boat from a broker.     50 Hp would run a very large weldernator.   If it is bilge-keeled, which 4'5" draft and "fixed double keel" suggests, it seems this is a boat that could be taken up a tidal river and beached at high tide and many ills fixed.   The ad claims the hull is good.  I see rust stains on the outside guiding where it needs to be ground and re-painted. I looked at the history of sales for this seller, there seem to be a lot of happy customers, and several boats sold.   Does anyone know anything about Samba, a 36', built (finished) in 2014 ?   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 12:30 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"     Hello all, A the risk of pissing off someone who might be one of the 42 bidders on this boat, there is a Brent Swain 36 going for a steal in Florida, but, one would have to move fast -- it is on ebay.   The current bid is US$2,889.   This time of year, the oceans around Florida are at their least storm-prone.   It is a 2014 boat.   It is going for a steal.   The boat is "Samba". If you have been lurking on this group and thinking about building a Brent Swain, then here is a complete boat for a tiny fraction of the cost of the steel, lead and the engine, and at the effort of a couple clicks of the mouse.   Warning:  If you are not ready to sail next week, some Florida marina fees are very high -- check that -- you may want it out of there.   If you are not ready to sail, this will become a burden to you.   If you are a dreamer, and will never actually get around to sailing, let someone else have it.   Who cares if it is a wreck -- I do not know that it is a wreck, it may be a gem -- you look at the photos.   You were toying with the idea of welding an entire boat, so now you have to weld far less of a boat, maybe zero welding.   You were toying with the idea of grinding/blasting and painting an entire boat, so now maybe you blast, prime and paint a little.   You can do that right? It also comes loaded with equipment.  So what if it is junk (I have no cause to believe it is) -- you were going to scrounge for junk anyway, so, so what?   Or alternately, you were going to have a boat where all of the equipment was top notch and brand new, so you were going to buy all new equipment anyway, so, so what? It has a running 50 Hp engine in a steel boat !   A running engine the ad says!   Even scrounging, that is not coming together completely installed and spinning a prop for less than $5,000, all in -- and this is an entire boat.    It has what looks like a radar dome on it !   It looks like it has two sails properly wrapped to protect them from UV....   My 1974 has 2 of its 3 original sails still usable.   I had another made, for $1,000.   Florida is full of used boat stuff places.   I believe used sail places too.     So what if it leaks (I do not know that it does) and you leave it plugged into shore power with 3 bilge pumps (for redundancy) and you get a $100 electric bill -- so what.  Your first purchase of welding rods was going to be $100 anyway.   This is a 3 week vacation in the Bahamas, just 200 nm south-southwest -- so what if you bring a belt sander with you and buy a few gallons of paint before pushing off.    Right now the price is less than you would pay to take a family to the Bahamas just once.   Yes, owning a boat is way more expensive than zero, and Florida is an expensive place to own a boat, and if you do not move it out of Florida (see Gone With The Wynns) there are apparently extra taxes to pay etc etc.   Last I looked into it, in St. Marten if you register a boat there, you can moor in the lagoon for free -- check that, it was old information.    One would want to buy extra solar to make sure the bilge pump exceeds any leaks that might develop.   But so what?   If you were serious about it, you had planned to spend that much and more.  I know I did when I bought my non-steel boat.    The current bid is US$2,889.    It would be a shame if a steel boat with a working engine goes that cheap.   There are plenty of costs in buying a boat the right way -- haulling, survey, re-lauching, survey continued etc.   There is a reason it is on ebay.   But I would be willing to bet there are not 200 reasons it is on ebay, and, if you were ready to weld up an entire boat, and find and install all the systems, then how can this be more money or more work ?    Yeah, so, you rewire it.   So what?   Yeah so, some nav lights do not work?  If you are not ready to do a little 12V wiring, you have no business reading this far into my post.    https://www.ebay.com/itm/2014-36-BRENT-SWAIN-SAILBOAT-W-YANMAR-50-HP-DIESEL-ENGINE-FL-MEAD-14/264208274537?hash=item3d840a5469:g:YWkAAOSwLXFcbz6V:rk:5:pf:0&vxp=mtr 2014 36' BRENT SWAIN SAILBOAT W/ YANMAR 50 HP DIESEL ENGINE (FL MEAD 14) | eBay 2014 BRENT SWAIN 36' SAILBOAT. LENGTH 36'. THE REPRESENTATIVE VERIFIED THE ENGINE RUNS. DEPTH 4'.5". THIS VESSEL IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING. THIS VESSEL IS BEING SOLD WITH CLEAR FLORIDA TITLE. WOOD STOVE HEATER. | eBay! www.ebay.com Maybe someone on this list knows of a less-wrecky (I do not know this boat is a wreck at all, it may be a gem) BS in some Mexican marina going for a song -- if so, post about it.   Matt. | 35599|35591|2019-02-28 14:24:56|mountain man|Re: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"| It might be older than 2014, and was reregistered in 2014 De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 28 février 2019 13:44:58 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] Re: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"     Further... I read the terms of the auction.   The terms of this auction would seem likely to scare off private buyers.  It looked at a lot of Florida boats before I bought mine.   The boat brokers are all over boats there -- I got mine by buying where brokers do not look for saltwater cruisers.  The brokers on the coasts buy boats for a song and flip them.     I have a feeling the buyer who gets this boat will be very happy when they compare what they got to the cost of the same boat from a broker.     50 Hp would run a very large weldernator.   If it is bilge-keeled, which 4'5" draft and "fixed double keel" suggests, it seems this is a boat that could be taken up a tidal river and beached at high tide and many ills fixed.   The ad claims the hull is good.  I see rust stains on the outside guiding where it needs to be ground and re-painted. I looked at the history of sales for this seller, there seem to be a lot of happy customers, and several boats sold.   Does anyone know anything about Samba, a 36', built (finished) in 2014 ?   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 12:30 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"     Hello all, A the risk of pissing off someone who might be one of the 42 bidders on this boat, there is a Brent Swain 36 going for a steal in Florida, but, one would have to move fast -- it is on ebay.   The current bid is US$2,889.   This time of year, the oceans around Florida are at their least storm-prone.   It is a 2014 boat.   It is going for a steal.   The boat is "Samba". If you have been lurking on this group and thinking about building a Brent Swain, then here is a complete boat for a tiny fraction of the cost of the steel, lead and the engine, and at the effort of a couple clicks of the mouse.   Warning:  If you are not ready to sail next week, some Florida marina fees are very high -- check that -- you may want it out of there.   If you are not ready to sail, this will become a burden to you.   If you are a dreamer, and will never actually get around to sailing, let someone else have it.   Who cares if it is a wreck -- I do not know that it is a wreck, it may be a gem -- you look at the photos.   You were toying with the idea of welding an entire boat, so now you have to weld far less of a boat, maybe zero welding.   You were toying with the idea of grinding/blasting and painting an entire boat, so now maybe you blast, prime and paint a little.   You can do that right? It also comes loaded with equipment.  So what if it is junk (I have no cause to believe it is) -- you were going to scrounge for junk anyway, so, so what?   Or alternately, you were going to have a boat where all of the equipment was top notch and brand new, so you were going to buy all new equipment anyway, so, so what? It has a running 50 Hp engine in a steel boat !   A running engine the ad says!   Even scrounging, that is not coming together completely installed and spinning a prop for less than $5,000, all in -- and this is an entire boat.    It has what looks like a radar dome on it !   It looks like it has two sails properly wrapped to protect them from UV....   My 1974 has 2 of its 3 original sails still usable.   I had another made, for $1,000.   Florida is full of used boat stuff places.   I believe used sail places too.     So what if it leaks (I do not know that it does) and you leave it plugged into shore power with 3 bilge pumps (for redundancy) and you get a $100 electric bill -- so what.  Your first purchase of welding rods was going to be $100 anyway.   This is a 3 week vacation in the Bahamas, just 200 nm south-southwest -- so what if you bring a belt sander with you and buy a few gallons of paint before pushing off.    Right now the price is less than you would pay to take a family to the Bahamas just once.   Yes, owning a boat is way more expensive than zero, and Florida is an expensive place to own a boat, and if you do not move it out of Florida (see Gone With The Wynns) there are apparently extra taxes to pay etc etc.   Last I looked into it, in St. Marten if you register a boat there, you can moor in the lagoon for free -- check that, it was old information.    One would want to buy extra solar to make sure the bilge pump exceeds any leaks that might develop.   But so what?   If you were serious about it, you had planned to spend that much and more.  I know I did when I bought my non-steel boat.    The current bid is US$2,889.    It would be a shame if a steel boat with a working engine goes that cheap.   There are plenty of costs in buying a boat the right way -- haulling, survey, re-lauching, survey continued etc.   There is a reason it is on ebay.   But I would be willing to bet there are not 200 reasons it is on ebay, and, if you were ready to weld up an entire boat, and find and install all the systems, then how can this be more money or more work ?    Yeah, so, you rewire it.   So what?   Yeah so, some nav lights do not work?  If you are not ready to do a little 12V wiring, you have no business reading this far into my post.    https://www.ebay.com/itm/2014-36-BRENT-SWAIN-SAILBOAT-W-YANMAR-50-HP-DIESEL-ENGINE-FL-MEAD-14/264208274537?hash=item3d840a5469:g:YWkAAOSwLXFcbz6V:rk:5:pf:0&vxp=mtr 2014 36' BRENT SWAIN SAILBOAT W/ YANMAR 50 HP DIESEL ENGINE (FL MEAD 14) | eBay 2014 BRENT SWAIN 36' SAILBOAT. LENGTH 36'. THE REPRESENTATIVE VERIFIED THE ENGINE RUNS. DEPTH 4'.5". THIS VESSEL IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING. THIS VESSEL IS BEING SOLD WITH CLEAR FLORIDA TITLE. WOOD STOVE HEATER. | eBay! www.ebay.com Maybe someone on this list knows of a less-wrecky (I do not know this boat is a wreck at all, it may be a gem) BS in some Mexican marina going for a song -- if so, post about it.   Matt. | 35600|35591|2019-02-28 14:48:52|Matt Malone|Re: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"| #ygrps-yiv-282052830 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Yes, you are right Martin. Further info.... Research suggests it is currently in Halifax Harbour Marina in Dayton Beach Florida.   Yearly dockage there is $10/ft/month = $4,320 / year (ouch) and for 3 months it would be $1,404.  These are just estimates from their website...  electricity is extra, live aboard is extra, I bet parking is extra.... and all plus tax also.  The receptionist said they have no more capacity for live aboards right now.    When asked, the receptionist did not believe it was on the "get it out of here, it is not welcome back" list -- she said one would merely have to walk into the office and sign up for another contract.     The air draft of the bridge between it and the ocean is 65'. https://charts.noaa.gov/BookletChart/11485_BookletChart.pdf If one were looking at holiday property in Florida, this boat is a bargain -- just one would be forced to sail it when there.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of mountain man mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 2:24 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] RE: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"     It might be older than 2014, and was reregistered in 2014 De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 28 février 2019 13:44:58 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] Re: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"     Further... I read the terms of the auction.   The terms of this auction would seem likely to scare off private buyers.  It looked at a lot of Florida boats before I bought mine.   The boat brokers are all over boats there -- I got mine by buying where brokers do not look for saltwater cruisers.  The brokers on the coasts buy boats for a song and flip them.     I have a feeling the buyer who gets this boat will be very happy when they compare what they got to the cost of the same boat from a broker.     50 Hp would run a very large weldernator.   If it is bilge-keeled, which 4'5" draft and "fixed double keel" suggests, it seems this is a boat that could be taken up a tidal river and beached at high tide and many ills fixed.   The ad claims the hull is good..  I see rust stains on the outside guiding where it needs to be ground and re-painted. I looked at the history of sales for this seller, there seem to be a lot of happy customers, and several boats sold.   Does anyone know anything about Samba, a 36', built (finished) in 2014 ?   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 12:30 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"     Hello all, A the risk of pissing off someone who might be one of the 42 bidders on this boat, there is a Brent Swain 36 going for a steal in Florida, but, one would have to move fast -- it is on ebay.   The current bid is US$2,889.   This time of year, the oceans around Florida are at their least storm-prone.   It is a 2014 boat.   It is going for a steal.   The boat is "Samba".. If you have been lurking on this group and thinking about building a Brent Swain, then here is a complete boat for a tiny fraction of the cost of the steel, lead and the engine, and at the effort of a couple clicks of the mouse.   Warning:  If you are not ready to sail next week, some Florida marina fees are very high -- check that -- you may want it out of there.   If you are not ready to sail, this will become a burden to you.   If you are a dreamer, and will never actually get around to sailing, let someone else have it.   Who cares if it is a wreck -- I do not know that it is a wreck, it may be a gem -- you look at the photos.   You were toying with the idea of welding an entire boat, so now you have to weld far less of a boat, maybe zero welding.   You were toying with the idea of grinding/blasting and painting an entire boat, so now maybe you blast, prime and paint a little.   You can do that right? It also comes loaded with equipment.  So what if it is junk (I have no cause to believe it is) -- you were going to scrounge for junk anyway, so, so what?   Or alternately, you were going to have a boat where all of the equipment was top notch and brand new, so you were going to buy all new equipment anyway, so, so what? It has a running 50 Hp engine in a steel boat !   A running engine the ad says!   Even scrounging, that is not coming together completely installed and spinning a prop for less than $5,000, all in -- and this is an entire boat.    It has what looks like a radar dome on it !   It looks like it has two sails properly wrapped to protect them from UV....   My 1974 has 2 of its 3 original sails still usable.   I had another made, for $1,000.   Florida is full of used boat stuff places.   I believe used sail places too.     So what if it leaks (I do not know that it does) and you leave it plugged into shore power with 3 bilge pumps (for redundancy) and you get a $100 electric bill -- so what.  Your first purchase of welding rods was going to be $100 anyway.   This is a 3 week vacation in the Bahamas, just 200 nm south-southwest -- so what if you bring a belt sander with you and buy a few gallons of paint before pushing off.    Right now the price is less than you would pay to take a family to the Bahamas just once.   Yes, owning a boat is way more expensive than zero, and Florida is an expensive place to own a boat, and if you do not move it out of Florida (see Gone With The Wynns) there are apparently extra taxes to pay etc etc.   Last I looked into it, in St. Marten if you register a boat there, you can moor in the lagoon for free -- check that, it was old information.    One would want to buy extra solar to make sure the bilge pump exceeds any leaks that might develop.   But so what?   If you were serious about it, you had planned to spend that much and more.  I know I did when I bought my non-steel boat..    The current bid is US$2,889.    It would be a shame if a steel boat with a working engine goes that cheap.   There are plenty of costs in buying a boat the right way -- haulling, survey, re-lauching, survey continued etc.   There is a reason it is on ebay.   But I would be willing to bet there are not 200 reasons it is on ebay, and, if you were ready to weld up an entire boat, and find and install all the systems, then how can this be more money or more work ?    Yeah, so, you rewire it.   So what?   Yeah so, some nav lights do not work?  If you are not ready to do a little 12V wiring, you have no business reading this far into my post.    https://www.ebay.com/itm/2014-36-BRENT-SWAIN-SAILBOAT-W-YANMAR-50-HP-DIESEL-ENGINE-FL-MEAD-14/264208274537?hash=item3d840a5469:g:YWkAAOSwLXFcbz6V:rk:5:pf:0&vxp=mtr 2014 36' BRENT SWAIN SAILBOAT W/ YANMAR 50 HP DIESEL ENGINE (FL MEAD 14) | eBay 2014 BRENT SWAIN 36' SAILBOAT. LENGTH 36'. THE REPRESENTATIVE VERIFIED THE ENGINE RUNS. DEPTH 4'.5". THIS VESSEL IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING. THIS VESSEL IS BEING SOLD WITH CLEAR FLORIDA TITLE. WOOD STOVE HEATER. | eBay! www.ebay.com Maybe someone on this list knows of a less-wrecky (I do not know this boat is a wreck at all, it may be a gem) BS in some Mexican marina going for a song -- if so, post about it.   Matt. | 35601|35591|2019-02-28 15:11:26|mountain man|Re: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"| Maybe there is a condition to the sale....you have to stay at that marina for 10 years...$4320.00 x 10....lol De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 28 février 2019 14:48:49 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] Re: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"     Yes, you are right Martin. Further info.... Research suggests it is currently in Halifax Harbour Marina in Dayton Beach Florida.   Yearly dockage there is $10/ft/month = $4,320 / year (ouch) and for 3 months it would be $1,404.  These are just estimates from their website...  electricity is extra, live aboard is extra, I bet parking is extra.... and all plus tax also.  The receptionist said they have no more capacity for live aboards right now.    When asked, the receptionist did not believe it was on the "get it out of here, it is not welcome back" list -- she said one would merely have to walk into the office and sign up for another contract.     The air draft of the bridge between it and the ocean is 65'. https://charts.noaa.gov/BookletChart/11485_BookletChart.pdf If one were looking at holiday property in Florida, this boat is a bargain -- just one would be forced to sail it when there.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of mountain man mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 2:24 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] RE: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"     It might be older than 2014, and was reregistered in 2014 De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 28 février 2019 13:44:58 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] Re: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"     Further... I read the terms of the auction.   The terms of this auction would seem likely to scare off private buyers.  It looked at a lot of Florida boats before I bought mine.   The boat brokers are all over boats there -- I got mine by buying where brokers do not look for saltwater cruisers.  The brokers on the coasts buy boats for a song and flip them.     I have a feeling the buyer who gets this boat will be very happy when they compare what they got to the cost of the same boat from a broker.     50 Hp would run a very large weldernator.   If it is bilge-keeled, which 4'5" draft and "fixed double keel" suggests, it seems this is a boat that could be taken up a tidal river and beached at high tide and many ills fixed.   The ad claims the hull is good...  I see rust stains on the outside guiding where it needs to be ground and re-painted. I looked at the history of sales for this seller, there seem to be a lot of happy customers, and several boats sold.   Does anyone know anything about Samba, a 36', built (finished) in 2014 ?   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 12:30 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"     Hello all, A the risk of pissing off someone who might be one of the 42 bidders on this boat, there is a Brent Swain 36 going for a steal in Florida, but, one would have to move fast -- it is on ebay.   The current bid is US$2,889.   This time of year, the oceans around Florida are at their least storm-prone.   It is a 2014 boat.   It is going for a steal.   The boat is "Samba"... If you have been lurking on this group and thinking about building a Brent Swain, then here is a complete boat for a tiny fraction of the cost of the steel, lead and the engine, and at the effort of a couple clicks of the mouse.   Warning:  If you are not ready to sail next week, some Florida marina fees are very high -- check that -- you may want it out of there.   If you are not ready to sail, this will become a burden to you.   If you are a dreamer, and will never actually get around to sailing, let someone else have it.   Who cares if it is a wreck -- I do not know that it is a wreck, it may be a gem -- you look at the photos.   You were toying with the idea of welding an entire boat, so now you have to weld far less of a boat, maybe zero welding.   You were toying with the idea of grinding/blasting and painting an entire boat, so now maybe you blast, prime and paint a little.   You can do that right? It also comes loaded with equipment.  So what if it is junk (I have no cause to believe it is) -- you were going to scrounge for junk anyway, so, so what?   Or alternately, you were going to have a boat where all of the equipment was top notch and brand new, so you were going to buy all new equipment anyway, so, so what? It has a running 50 Hp engine in a steel boat !   A running engine the ad says!   Even scrounging, that is not coming together completely installed and spinning a prop for less than $5,000, all in -- and this is an entire boat.    It has what looks like a radar dome on it !   It looks like it has two sails properly wrapped to protect them from UV....   My 1974 has 2 of its 3 original sails still usable.   I had another made, for $1,000.   Florida is full of used boat stuff places.   I believe used sail places too.     So what if it leaks (I do not know that it does) and you leave it plugged into shore power with 3 bilge pumps (for redundancy) and you get a $100 electric bill -- so what.  Your first purchase of welding rods was going to be $100 anyway.   This is a 3 week vacation in the Bahamas, just 200 nm south-southwest -- so what if you bring a belt sander with you and buy a few gallons of paint before pushing off.    Right now the price is less than you would pay to take a family to the Bahamas just once.   Yes, owning a boat is way more expensive than zero, and Florida is an expensive place to own a boat, and if you do not move it out of Florida (see Gone With The Wynns) there are apparently extra taxes to pay etc etc.   Last I looked into it, in St. Marten if you register a boat there, you can moor in the lagoon for free -- check that, it was old information.    One would want to buy extra solar to make sure the bilge pump exceeds any leaks that might develop.   But so what?   If you were serious about it, you had planned to spend that much and more.  I know I did when I bought my non-steel boat...    The current bid is US$2,889.    It would be a shame if a steel boat with a working engine goes that cheap.   There are plenty of costs in buying a boat the right way -- haulling, survey, re-lauching, survey continued etc.   There is a reason it is on ebay.   But I would be willing to bet there are not 200 reasons it is on ebay, and, if you were ready to weld up an entire boat, and find and install all the systems, then how can this be more money or more work ?    Yeah, so, you rewire it.   So what?   Yeah so, some nav lights do not work?  If you are not ready to do a little 12V wiring, you have no business reading this far into my post.    https://www.ebay.com/itm/2014-36-BRENT-SWAIN-SAILBOAT-W-YANMAR-50-HP-DIESEL-ENGINE-FL-MEAD-14/264208274537?hash=item3d840a5469:g:YWkAAOSwLXFcbz6V:rk:5:pf:0&vxp=mtr 2014 36' BRENT SWAIN SAILBOAT W/ YANMAR 50 HP DIESEL ENGINE (FL MEAD 14) | eBay 2014 BRENT SWAIN 36' SAILBOAT. LENGTH 36'. THE REPRESENTATIVE VERIFIED THE ENGINE RUNS. DEPTH 4'.5". THIS VESSEL IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING. THIS VESSEL IS BEING SOLD WITH CLEAR FLORIDA TITLE. WOOD STOVE HEATER. | eBay! www.ebay.com Maybe someone on this list knows of a less-wrecky (I do not know this boat is a wreck at all, it may be a gem) BS in some Mexican marina going for a song -- if so, post about it.   Matt. | 35602|35602|2019-02-28 17:56:39|aguysailing|Puerto Vallharta Mexico (Nuevo Vallharta)|A bit off topic but just wondering if anyone is down there March 30th for a week or 2 and wants to rent out their docked boat or even something shore based ... let me know.  I am getting dental work because Cdn dentists are outa sight with fees.  Many thanks... Gary| 35603|35591|2019-02-28 19:54:44|Matt Malone|Re: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"| Correcting possible false information.  The charity seller is under the impression it must leave but said "everything works". Matt From: mountain man mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 15:17 Subject: [origamiboats] RE: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba" To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Maybe there is a condition to the sale....you have to stay at that marina for 10 years...$4320.00 x 10....lol De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 28 février 2019 14:48:49 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] Re: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"     Yes, you are right Martin. Further info.... Research suggests it is currently in Halifax Harbour Marina in Dayton Beach Florida.   Yearly dockage there is $10/ft/month = $4,320 / year (ouch) and for 3 months it would be $1,404.  These are just estimates from their website...  electricity is extra, live aboard is extra, I bet parking is extra.... and all plus tax also.  The receptionist said they have no more capacity for live aboards right now.    When asked, the receptionist did not believe it was on the "get it out of here, it is not welcome back" list -- she said one would merely have to walk into the office and sign up for another contract.     The air draft of the bridge between it and the ocean is 65'. https://charts.noaa.gov/BookletChart/11485_BookletChart.pdf If one were looking at holiday property in Florida, this boat is a bargain -- just one would be forced to sail it when there.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of mountain man mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 2:24 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] RE: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"     It might be older than 2014, and was reregistered in 2014 De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 28 février 2019 13:44:58 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] Re: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"     Further... I read the terms of the auction.   The terms of this auction would seem likely to scare off private buyers.  It looked at a lot of Florida boats before I bought mine.   The boat brokers are all over boats there -- I got mine by buying where brokers do not look for saltwater cruisers.  The brokers on the coasts buy boats for a song and flip them.     I have a feeling the buyer who gets this boat will be very happy when they compare what they got to the cost of the same boat from a broker.     50 Hp would run a very large weldernator.   If it is bilge-keeled, which 4'5" draft and "fixed double keel" suggests, it seems this is a boat that could be taken up a tidal river and beached at high tide and many ills fixed.   The ad claims the hull is good....  I see rust stains on the outside guiding where it needs to be ground and re-painted. I looked at the history of sales for this seller, there seem to be a lot of happy customers, and several boats sold.   Does anyone know anything about Samba, a 36', built (finished) in 2014 ?   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 12:30 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"     Hello all, A the risk of pissing off someone who might be one of the 42 bidders on this boat, there is a Brent Swain 36 going for a steal in Florida, but, one would have to move fast -- it is on ebay.   The current bid is US$2,889.   This time of year, the oceans around Florida are at their least storm-prone.   It is a 2014 boat.   It is going for a steal.   The boat is "Samba".... If you have been lurking on this group and thinking about building a Brent Swain, then here is a complete boat for a tiny fraction of the cost of the steel, lead and the engine, and at the effort of a couple clicks of the mouse.   Warning:  If you are not ready to sail next week, some Florida marina fees are very high -- check that -- you may want it out of there.   If you are not ready to sail, this will become a burden to you.   If you are a dreamer, and will never actually get around to sailing, let someone else have it.   Who cares if it is a wreck -- I do not know that it is a wreck, it may be a gem -- you look at the photos.   You were toying with the idea of welding an entire boat, so now you have to weld far less of a boat, maybe zero welding.   You were toying with the idea of grinding/blasting and painting an entire boat, so now maybe you blast, prime and paint a little.   You can do that right? It also comes loaded with equipment.  So what if it is junk (I have no cause to believe it is) -- you were going to scrounge for junk anyway, so, so what?   Or alternately, you were going to have a boat where all of the equipment was top notch and brand new, so you were going to buy all new equipment anyway, so, so what? It has a running 50 Hp engine in a steel boat !   A running engine the ad says!   Even scrounging, that is not coming together completely installed and spinning a prop for less than $5,000, all in -- and this is an entire boat.    It has what looks like a radar dome on it !   It looks like it has two sails properly wrapped to protect them from UV....   My 1974 has 2 of its 3 original sails still usable.   I had another made, for $1,000.   Florida is full of used boat stuff places.   I believe used sail places too.     So what if it leaks (I do not know that it does) and you leave it plugged into shore power with 3 bilge pumps (for redundancy) and you get a $100 electric bill -- so what.  Your first purchase of welding rods was going to be $100 anyway.   This is a 3 week vacation in the Bahamas, just 200 nm south-southwest -- so what if you bring a belt sander with you and buy a few gallons of paint before pushing off.    Right now the price is less than you would pay to take a family to the Bahamas just once.   Yes, owning a boat is way more expensive than zero, and Florida is an expensive place to own a boat, and if you do not move it out of Florida (see Gone With The Wynns) there are apparently extra taxes to pay etc etc.   Last I looked into it, in St. Marten if you register a boat there, you can moor in the lagoon for free -- check that, it was old information.    One would want to buy extra solar to make sure the bilge pump exceeds any leaks that might develop.   But so what?   If you were serious about it, you had planned to spend that much and more.  I know I did when I bought my non-steel boat....    The current bid is US$2,889.    It would be a shame if a steel boat with a working engine goes that cheap.   There are plenty of costs in buying a boat the right way -- haulling, survey, re-lauching, survey continued etc.   There is a reason it is on ebay.   But I would be willing to bet there are not 200 reasons it is on ebay, and, if you were ready to weld up an entire boat, and find and install all the systems, then how can this be more money or more work ?    Yeah, so, you rewire it.   So what?   Yeah so, some nav lights do not work?  If you are not ready to do a little 12V wiring, you have no business reading this far into my post.    https://www.ebay.com/itm/2014-36-BRENT-SWAIN-SAILBOAT-W-YANMAR-50-HP-DIESEL-ENGINE-FL-MEAD-14/264208274537?hash=item3d840a5469:g:YWkAAOSwLXFcbz6V:rk:5:pf:0&vxp=mtr 2014 36' BRENT SWAIN SAILBOAT W/ YANMAR 50 HP DIESEL ENGINE (FL MEAD 14) | eBay 2014 BRENT SWAIN 36' SAILBOAT. LENGTH 36'. THE REPRESENTATIVE VERIFIED THE ENGINE RUNS. DEPTH 4'.5". THIS VESSEL IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING. THIS VESSEL IS BEING SOLD WITH CLEAR FLORIDA TITLE. WOOD STOVE HEATER. | eBay! www.ebay.com Maybe someone on this list knows of a less-wrecky (I do not know this boat is a wreck at all, it may be a gem) BS in some Mexican marina going for a song -- if so, post about it.   Matt. | 35604|35591|2019-03-01 16:52:58|prairiemaidca|Re: Battery Chargers|Thanks for the tip Brian.   Have a pronautic 1230 P 30 amp. charger on hold for me in Victoria at a very good price so I'll pick it up on the 12th when I get out there.  Not sure how they are able to give that price because my regular supplier said it was below his cost.  Found one place in Halifax that does on line and ships for free and one in Victoria.  Both of them were very well priced.  Time will tell as to how it holds up.Martin..   (Prairie Maid)| 35605|35591|2019-03-01 17:29:07|Brian Stannard|Re: Battery Chargers|What store in Victoria? On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 1:53 PM losforsters@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Thanks for the tip Brian.   Have a pronautic 1230 P 30 amp. charger on hold for me in Victoria at a very good price so I'll pick it up on the 12th when I get out there.  Not sure how they are able to give that price because my regular supplier said it was below his cost.  Found one place in Halifax that does on line and ships for free and one in Victoria.  Both of them were very well priced.  Time will tell as to how it holds up.Martin..   (Prairie Maid) -- CheersBrian | 35606|35557|2019-03-01 20:29:06|Rick Jackson|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|The weight is correct.. What I learned from a number of guys who actually weighed their steel boats (and not on a travel lift) were shocked how much more they weighed than estimated.  Ive heard of high end builders who have known weights for everything and calculate to nearest OZ and they are way off.  I think only racing boats where they approach the construction like the space shuttle, where things are accurate.   I looked at the plans which were supposed to have been for our boat.. Very similar in size and profile, but it was listed as a 27k displacement... I found out that did not include a pilothouse, or glass, proper size fuel and water tankage, etc…  I was incorrect in claiming no masts in weight taken, when they both were… No rigging or sails ( we have 9 and they weigh a ton) and the fluids were all removed..  I added in weight for fuel, water, sails, rigging, anchor and chain and we were pushing 42k lbs… Compare to a trawler, that’s normal for a 12M full provisioned and wet.  On our boat, it is asking a lot from the sails… But we have 130hp, and 23 inch screw, so there is that... On Feb 25, 2019, at 4:07 PM, williswildest@... [origamiboats] wrote:Was she waiting ~37,000 Lbs ( ~ 16.8t) on a truck scale?I am wondering why it weight so much with only 8,000 Lbs (~ 3.6t) ballast? The hull's weight (with interior, etc)   will be about 13t in this case??? Looks too much....I am building 40 ft boat with similar dimensions (with 5.24mm plate for the hull). I estimate it to be ~15t (when finished) including 8t ballast.Are you sure she has 6mm plate for the hull?It is nice if you are able to get NA's help. I am just curios how NA going to estimate added strength to the hull due to hull's shape and interior. As I know, most ship software (at leas affordable ones) can only do "regular" type of estimates for ship structures.If I remember correctly, even Bureau Veritas starts asking to meet shipbuilding rules only for boats above 70 meters LOA.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I realized after I read the response, that I could write much more information…Boat is now officially a one off hull built in a shipyard in SwedenHer numbers areLOD 39’LWL 34.88’Beam 13’Draft 6’Displacement 37357 (scaled at truck stop) (no masts, sails or rigging, no anchor and chain)....skept...I was also told that when the boat was completed, it sat 8 inches deeper in the water than the plans called for, requiring the boat to be hauled and the paint line raised…Hull is 6mm plate, which is overkill on a 12M hull, but makes he Ice capable...Apparently once they sea trialed it, they had some “issues” which were never described in detail, that caused them to pull the boat again, and replace the 7500 pounds of steel marbles with 8000 pounds of lead. The lead change apparently made her sail very well,| 35607|35591|2019-03-01 20:33:14|brentswain38|Re: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"|I clicked on it, and the sign said SOLD.| 35608|35591|2019-03-01 20:34:56|prairiemaidca|Re: Battery Chargers|    The best price I could find was at Trotac Marine.  | 35609|35591|2019-03-01 23:53:01|wild_explorer|Re: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"|Yep, boat was sold the same day for $3,151. But you still can see original listing with all photos, if you click "View original item" link. Matt posted information about 8 hours before end of the auction, He gave all Pros and Cons about buying vs building, plus he gave very good information about the sale, seller, marina, etc. If someone wanted to buy it, it was enough time to do so.The main problem, as I see it, was a long waiting list for "live aboard" there + pretty high storage cost per month.In California, state allows only to have about 10% (???) of marina's space to be allocated as "Live aboard". They do not want people to live on boats, instead of paying rent. Other states may have similar restrictions.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I clicked on it, and the sign said SOLD.| 35610|35591|2019-03-02 00:08:00|Matt Malone|Re: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"| Thank you Will, I actually did some research after the sale.   That marina turned out to be a low price when compared with anything from the Keys to Halifax, NS.  Maybe there is a mom&pop somewhere that would be cheaper.  I considered some farmer with a dock on a tidal river, and a tractor -- there are a lot of possibilities with a steel bilge keeler.  A lot of marinas were devastated in the hurricane and are closed for repairs.  I was shocked by the costs.   I saw the auction completely by accident -- I accidentally clicked an old bookmark when I intended to click another one.  If I had seen it earlier I would have posted it earlier.   Matt From: williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, March 1, 23:53 Subject: [origamiboats] Re: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba" To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Yep, boat was sold the same day for $3,151. But you still can see original listing with all photos, if you click "View original item" link. Matt posted information about 8 hours before end of the auction, He gave all Pros and Cons about buying vs building, plus he gave very good information about the sale, seller, marina, etc. If someone wanted to buy it, it was enough time to do so. The main problem, as I see it, was a long waiting list for "live aboard" there + pretty high storage cost per month. In California, state allows only to have about 10% (???) of marina's space to be allocated as "Live aboard". They do not want people to live on boats, instead of paying rent. Other states may have similar restrictions. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : I clicked on it, and the sign said SOLD. | 35611|35591|2019-03-02 13:01:16|aguysailing|Re: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"|Very interesting.  Does anyone know the history of the boat? Where built, sea miles etc.......| 35612|35594|2019-03-02 20:48:05|Zoa Scott|Re: Finally!|Sounds great Martin we should be here till middle of march then heading north for a bit . On Wed, Feb 27, 2019, 9:53 AM losforsters@... [origamiboats], wrote:   Good to hear you are in the salt.  Will try meet up and check her out when Betty and I head out to the coast in a few weeks for some spring off season sailing.  Martin   (Prairie Maid) | 35613|35557|2019-03-02 21:01:41|brentswain38|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Yes, I met a 37 ft steel version of a Bob Perry designed Tayana 37.The owner said she weighed 36,000 lbs, Perry calculated her at 27,000 lbs.  I have seen my 36 footers come up 6 inches in the water, when the owners took all their personal possessions off,  at 1150 lbs per inch. No designer can predict how much stuff any owner will put aboard,some very little ,others are pack rats.If they included everything imaginable, they would sell far  fewer plans than someone who includes very little ,and gives only the weight of an empty boat.Roland gave the highway scale weight of one of my 36 footers, almost all steel work done, and ballasted at 15,000 lbs. One guy stripped the interior out of a 37 footer and weighed the total of it ,at around 450 lbs.That would be typical  for most sailboats that size. Variations would be far less than the variations of the weight of stuff different owners put aboard.| 35614|35557|2019-03-02 21:11:43|brentswain38|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Any polycarbonate I've seen goes cloudy in 3 years. A friend tried the hard surface stuff. The hard surface fell off like old varnish,  before he got to Frisco, the first 700 miles of his trip, and he circumnavigated the Pacific looking thru fogged up windows.Forget the polycarbonate , stick to plexi ,which has the impact resistance 25 times that of standard plate glass.| 35615|35557|2019-03-02 21:13:28|brentswain38|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|If you have any apprehensions,  it would only take a day to put longitudinals in, which could also help fair the hull up.| 35616|35557|2019-03-02 21:20:45|brentswain38|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Ask the frame loving, "Experts" how many transverse frames they put in their fibreglass boats.Would they claim fibreglass is stronger than steel?So much for that arguement!---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :  I guess I just allowed some folks here in the states with many years of experience to put in my head that this type of hull construction was inferior and just some current fad for low tech back yard boat builders.. I feel better about it now, and I think I am going to subscribe to the thought that folks who have been fishing and building boats (albeit wood) longer than America has existed, and might know a little bit more about this subject… er numbers are LOD 39’ LWL 34.88’ Beam 13’ Draft 6’ Displacement 37357 (scaled at truck stop) (no masts, sails or rigging, no anchor and chain) | 35617|35591|2019-03-02 22:50:42|SHANE ROTHWELL|Re: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"|Maybe they are looking for a sucker & it's got a huge lien against the title/rego.& it would also require trusting a SeppoSent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35618|35618|2019-03-03 02:07:34|wild_explorer|US PayPal - you ARE criminal, untill you prove you are not|I am interested if PayPal (PP) does the same in Europe.It looks like PayPal starts treating US customers like criminals. You HAVE TO prove that you are not. Every US citizen is guilty of "money laundering and terrorism". At least what PP trying to explain, when it claims that PP need to "comply" with US "Patriot Act". Most interesting that PP is "transfer agent", NOT a bank, and different rules apply to a PP.1. Starting Apr 1, PP changing Service Agreement for USA customers.- if you have current PP account (even with credit card on file), you have to "verify" your identity by linking your bank account to continue to use PP- OR you need to open separate "Cash" PP account and provide your Social Security Number (SSN), copy of government issued ID (federal or state), phone number, etc, etc.2. Even If you have linked bank account - you CANNOT keep money on regular PP account. You have to transfer it to your bank account immediately after payment (in days - free, in minutes - fees).3. PP "Cash" account - safety of your money is NOT guaranteed. PP never had bank status (not FDIC insured), but now it is CLEARLY stated it in Service Agreement. PP says it can use your money as it wants (invest it, no interest paid, etc, etc). It is your problem that you are PP customer.4. If you DO NOT provide requested information, you will not be able to spend money on your PP account (pay from your PP account). Basically, you WILL LOOSE your money on your PP account,5. If you use PP, READ Service Agreement, not just "click" Agree. You may learn many interesting things and avoid "freezing/loosing" your money later.6. I guess, PP will get a lot of money by freezing "unupdated" accounts.Some comments:- SSN should NOT be used for identification purposes (according to Social Security Administration)- USA Passport is NOT enough to open bank account in USA (banks require secondary ID or SSN)- eBay will change "transfer agent" to European one in 2020 (???).- Even Prepaid VISA/MASTER cards need to be registered before use (providing all personal information)Does anyone know USABLE alternatives to PayPal for use in e-commerce (online payments, receiving payments online)?There are other options for "regular" e-commerce, but it all > $100/mo.P.S. Bitcoin will not work for e-commerce. It takes TOO LONG now to confirm transaction (make it unusable for everyday use).P.S.S. Please, try not go into politics (even if you are tempted) in this thread,| 35619|35557|2019-03-03 02:36:27|wild_explorer|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|I was always amazed why it is so difficult to estimate correct weight of the boat. Especially if it is built by boat yard. Even for "backyard" builder it is not a big deal.It just need to take into an account all steel (sold by Lb/Kg), electrodes, all wood, screws, ballast, mast, sails, equipment, engine, fuel, water, paint, spray foam. interior, etc, etc. Almost all item have known weight - take it from ordered material list. Just sum it up.... It may take few paper pages, bit it is relatively easy to get FULL (equipped for cruising) weight of the boat.Only one unknown weight is "owner's pack-rat weight". But, 5t should be good-enough estimate.P.S. It is mandatory requirement to have CORRECT weight estimate for passenger cruise ship, and it is done very precisely. Small sailboat - easy. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :The weight is correct.. What I learned from a number of guys who actually weighed their steel boats (and not on a travel lift) were shocked how much more they weighed than estimated.  Ive heard of high end builders who have known weights for everything and calculate to nearest OZ and they are way off.  I think only racing boats where they approach the construction like the space shuttle, where things are accurate.   | 35620|35591|2019-03-03 02:44:46|wild_explorer|Re: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"|If I remember correctly, It was stated in eBay action that "boat has clear title" (or not ???). Usually marina sells boats to recover "late storage fees". They give the option to an owner to sell the boat before they put lien on it (and have to auction it by themselves). May be that was the case. May be It was easier to give it to charity, than to deal with the sale.P.S. It is easy to loose your boat if you fail to pay to a contractor who did something on your boat and did not get paid..---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Maybe they are looking for a sucker & it's got a huge lien against the title/rego.& it would also require trusting a SeppoSent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35621|35591|2019-03-03 08:14:26|Matt Malone|Re: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"| "Clear title" is one of the things it listed, which would rule out a formal lien.   Some of these boats have money owing at the marina, and at US$4,300/year this worried me.  When called, the charity seller could not remember.   If I had found it before there was only 8 hours to go, I would have chased that down.  The biggest real problem was, it appeared one would have only days to move it out, and, after the auction, it appeared US$4,300 was a bargain over a wide stretch of coast.   One would have to sail it a long way on short notice, or find a Mom&Pop marina in some bayou that was not devastated by the hurricane and not closed, or some farmer on a tidal river with a tractor to skid it up above the tide line. I find it dispiriting that a steel boat someone no doubt poured tens of thousands into, and according to the seller, everything works -- a chart plotter, radar and 50hp engine were listed -- sold for $3,151.   The reality is, in that part of the world, in just a few years the dockage would cost more than any fair price for a sight-unseen boat.  Free anchorage is something Florida seems determined to eliminate.  It seems clear, anywhere near Florida, find a marina first and bookmark it, and then wait for the right boat. I would be curious to see if Samba pops back up for sale by a broker at  tens of thousands, and the only difference is a survey. Matt From: SHANE ROTHWELL rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, March 2, 22:51 Subject: [origamiboats] Re: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba" To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Maybe they are looking for a sucker & it's got a huge lien against the title/rego. & it would also require trusting a Seppo Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android | 35622|35591|2019-03-03 17:14:12|jpronk1|Re: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"|We saw this with less then an hour and we were very close to bidding on it. At $4000 Canadian that boat was a steal! Even with the extra $5000 to $6000 to truck the boat to south side of Lake Ontario it was still a great deal. I still want to build our own boat and when the time is right we will. Would love to hear who has bought it! James Sent from my iPhone| 35623|35618|2019-03-03 20:52:36|brentswain38|Re: US PayPal - you ARE criminal, untill you prove you are not|Paypal screwed me out of $40.They are a sleazebag scam. Now they are acting in the interest of the US govt imposing themselves, and their so called "Patriot Act " on the rest of the  world. Got along fine without them, will continue to do so.I'm more and more using duckduckgo for a search engine and protonmail for email, beyond the prying eyes of Uncle Sam.brentswain36@...---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I am interested if PayPal (PP) does the same in Europe.It looks like PayPal starts treating US customers like criminals. You HAVE TO prove that you are not. Every US citizen is guilty of "money laundering and terrorism". At least what PP trying to explain, when it claims that PP need to "comply" with US "Patriot Act". Most interesting that PP is "transfer agent", NOT a bank, and different rules apply to a PP.1. Starting Apr 1, PP changing Service Agreement for USA customers.- if you have current PP account (even with credit card on file), you have to "verify" your identity by linking your bank account to continue to use PP- OR you need to open separate "Cash" PP account and provide your Social Security Number (SSN), copy of government issued ID (federal or state), phone number, etc, etc.2. Even If you have linked bank account - you CANNOT keep money on regular PP account. You have to transfer it to your bank account immediately after payment (in days - free, in minutes - fees).3. PP "Cash" account - safety of your money is NOT guaranteed. PP never had bank status (not FDIC insured), but now it is CLEARLY stated it in Service Agreement. PP says it can use your money as it wants (invest it, no interest paid, etc, etc). It is your problem that you are PP customer.4. If you DO NOT provide requested information, you will not be able to spend money on your PP account (pay from your PP account). Basically, you WILL LOOSE your money on your PP account,5. If you use PP, READ Service Agreement, not just "click" Agree. You may learn many interesting things and avoid "freezing/loosing" your money later.6. I guess, PP will get a lot of money by freezing "unupdated" accounts.Some comments:- SSN should NOT be used for identification purposes (according to Social Security Administration)- USA Passport is NOT enough to open bank account in USA (banks require secondary ID or SSN)- eBay will change "transfer agent" to European one in 2020 (???).- Even Prepaid VISA/MASTER cards need to be registered before use (providing all personal information)Does anyone know USABLE alternatives to PayPal for use in e-commerce (online payments, receiving payments online)?There are other options for "regular" e-commerce, but it all > $100/mo.P.S. Bitcoin will not work for e-commerce. It takes TOO LONG now to confirm transaction (make it unusable for everyday use).P.S.S. Please, try not go into politics (even if you are tempted) in this thread,| 35624|35557|2019-03-03 20:54:11|brentswain38|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Tats the nice thing about metal, it is extremely consistent in terms of weight.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I was always amazed why it is so difficult to estimate correct weight of the boat. Especially if it is built by boat yard. Even for "backyard" builder it is not a big deal.It just need to take into an account all steel (sold by Lb/Kg), electrodes, all wood, screws, ballast, mast, sails, equipment, engine, fuel, water, paint, spray foam. interior, etc, etc. Almost all item have known weight - take it from ordered material list. Just sum it up.... It may take few paper pages, bit it is relatively easy to get FULL (equipped for cruising) weight of the boat.Only one unknown weight is "owner's pack-rat weight". But, 5t should be good-enough estimate.P.S. It is mandatory requirement to have CORRECT weight estimate for passenger cruise ship, and it is done very precisely. Small sailboat - easy. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :The weight is correct.. What I learned from a number of guys who actually weighed their steel boats (and not on a travel lift) were shocked how much more they weighed than estimated.  Ive heard of high end builders who have known weights for everything and calculate to nearest OZ and they are way off.  I think only racing boats where they approach the construction like the space shuttle, where things are accurate.   | 35625|35557|2019-03-03 20:55:17|Rick Jackson|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Thank you for the tips… We sold the house last month and just moved to the boat yard yesterday… Siting in the warmth of our little trailer, and looking out the window at our world cruiser… We have some work to do to settle in, then its all hands for a quick and efficient refit.  I will get the take off lines documented for our NA and then start blasting the hull inside and out…I will leave the decision wether  or not to add any more framing to our NA… I was adamant about about no spray foam, but now Im waffling again… I do love the Mascot products, but struggling to believe they are what the claims make… Any info on those ceramic bead insulation options??  I can post that as a new query if it makes more sense… However, I would hate to start a long debate which insulation of steel hulls will invariably do.. On Mar 2, 2019, at 6:01 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:Yes, I met a 37 ft steel version of a Bob Perry designed Tayana 37.The owner said she weighed 36,000 lbs, Perry calculated her at 27,000 lbs.  I have seen my 36 footers come up 6 inches in the water, when the owners took all their personal possessions off,  at 1150 lbs per inch. No designer can predict how much stuff any owner will put aboard,some very little ,others are pack rats.If they included everything imaginable, they would sell far  fewer plans than someone who includes very little ,and gives only the weight of an empty boat.Roland gave the highway scale weight of one of my 36 footers, almost all steel work done, and ballasted at 15,000 lbs. One guy stripped the interior out of a 37 footer and weighed the total of it ,at around 450 lbs.That would be typical  for most sailboats that size. Variations would be far less than the variations of the weight of stuff different owners put aboard.| 35626|35557|2019-03-03 20:55:48|Rick Jackson|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|I was looking at the idea of setting the boat up on 4 adjustable platforms that move up and down using bottle jacks with the hydraulic scale. Could allow me to get the boat level on all axis, and throughout the build, we can apply psi on the lift to check combined weights.  Will also allow es to know how weight is distributed off its center lines.. On Mar 2, 2019, at 11:35 PM, williswildest@... [origamiboats] wrote:I was always amazed why it is so difficult to estimate correct weight of the boat. Especially if it is built by boat yard. Even for "backyard" builder it is not a big deal.It just need to take into an account all steel (sold by Lb/Kg), electrodes, all wood, screws, ballast, mast, sails, equipment, engine, fuel, water, paint, spray foam. interior, etc, etc. Almost all item have known weight - take it from ordered material list. Just sum it up.... It may take few paper pages, bit it is relatively easy to get FULL (equipped for cruising) weight of the boat.Only one unknown weight is "owner's pack-rat weight". But, 5t should be good-enough estimate.P.S. It is mandatory requirement to have CORRECT weight estimate for passenger cruise ship, and it is done very precisely. Small sailboat - easy. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :The weight is correct.. What I learned from a number of guys who actually weighed their steel boats (and not on a travel lift) were shocked how much more they weighed than estimated.  Ive heard of high end builders who have known weights for everything and calculate to nearest OZ and they are way off.  I think only racing boats where they approach the construction like the space shuttle, where things are accurate.   | 35627|35618|2019-03-03 21:04:44|jpronk1|Re: US PayPal - you ARE criminal, untill you prove you are not|Is PayPal not one of Elon Musk’s companies? James Sent from my iPhone| 35628|35618|2019-03-03 21:11:08|Jfisher|Re: US PayPal - you ARE criminal, untill you prove you are not|That’s how he made his $$.  He was bought out.  Sent from my iPad On Mar 3, 2019, at 19:04, jpronk1@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Is PayPal not one of Elon Musk’s companies? James Sent from my iPhone | 35629|35557|2019-03-03 21:22:37|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| #ygrps-yiv-470455869 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Rick, I have given foam some thought on my boat.   I keep coming back to, foam board laminated to the back of interior panels with vapour barrier between the foam and panel.  This means, if the interior panels are removeable, one can inspect, clean and maintain the inside of the hull by removing a panel.   That seems a really powerful ability on a boat.  Yes, this means there is an air gap between the hull and insulation, and the hull will condense water and it will run down into the bilges.   The panels on the underside of the hull would have a drip barrier too, so water would not sit on the back of the insulation but run down into the bilges.    This will make the boat inside the insulation a dry boat with a source of heat.  The alternative, foam stuck to the inside of the hull, especially on a steel boat is an inconvenience.   One cannot weld unless a lot of foam is scraped off.   One would have to be prepared to spray in replacement foam to the extent that foam is removed.   One cannot inspect in any meaningful way except where one sees rust bleed through the foam.    I know Brent says, coat the inside well with good paint and there will be no problems.  Fail to paint the inside of the hull well and the hull will rust from the inside out.   I have a solid glass boat, so rust is not an issue for me, but inspection and cleaning is.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, March 2, 2019 9:25 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...     Thank you for the tips… We sold the house last month and just moved to the boat yard yesterday… Siting in the warmth of our little trailer, and looking out the window at our world cruiser…  We have some work to do to settle in, then its all hands for a quick and efficient refit.  I will get the take off lines documented for our NA and then start blasting the hull inside and out… I will leave the decision wether  or not to add any more framing to our NA…  I was adamant about about no spray foam, but now Im waffling again… I do love the Mascot products, but struggling to believe they are what the claims make… Any info on those ceramic bead insulation options??  I can post that as a new query if it makes more sense… However, I would hate to start a long debate which insulation of steel hulls will invariably do.. On Mar 2, 2019, at 6:01 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote: Yes, I met a 37 ft steel version of a Bob Perry designed Tayana 37.The owner said she weighed 36,000 lbs, Perry calculated her at 27,000 lbs.   I have seen my 36 footers come up 6 inches in the water, when the owners took all their personal possessions off,  at 1150 lbs per inch.  No designer can predict how much stuff any owner will put aboard,some very little ,others are pack rats. If they included everything imaginable, they would sell far  fewer plans than someone who includes very little ,and gives only the weight of an empty boat. Roland gave the highway scale weight of one of my 36 footers, almost all steel work done, and ballasted at 15,000 lbs.  One guy stripped the interior out of a 37 footer and weighed the total of it ,at around 450 lbs.That would be typical  for most sailboats that size. Variations would be far less than the variations of the weight of stuff different owners put aboard. | 35630|35557|2019-03-04 13:21:59|brentswain38|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Friends in plastic boats, who had tried glue in foam for years , couldn't believe how much drier and more comfortable their boats got, once they spray foamed them. Glue in panels on the overhead collected condensation behind them, then suddenly broke free, sending  a deluge of water onto the bunk below.Spray foam made them suddenly ,exponentially dryer and warmer. Condensation behind the foam is still, overall dampness in the boat.A friend, who had been using sheet foam on her plastic boat, while living aboard full time, came cruising with me last winter. She was amazed at how much dryer and warmer my boat was. When we got back, a guy was talking about more sheet foam in his liveaboard plastic boat.She said "Forget that , spray foam it. "With a solid plastic boat, there is no need to ever get behind the foam.If you punch a hole in her, the foam is an already in place gasket ,and you can easily put enough into make it unsinkable.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :#ygrps-yiv-2025162511 #ygrps-yiv-2025162511ygrps-yiv-1930838411 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Rick, I have given foam some thought on my boat.   I keep coming back to, foam board laminated to the back of interior panels with vapour barrier between the foam and panel.  This means, if the interior panels are removeable, one can inspect, clean and maintain the inside of the hull by removing a panel.   That seems a really powerful ability on a boat.  Yes, this means there is an air gap between the hull and insulation, and the hull will condense water and it will run down into the bilges.   The panels on the underside of the hull would have a drip barrier too, so water would not sit on the back of the insulation but run down into the bilges.    This will make the boat inside the insulation a dry boat with a source of heat.  The alternative, foam stuck to the inside of the hull, especially on a steel boat is an inconvenience.   One cannot weld unless a lot of foam is scraped off.   One would have to be prepared to spray in replacement foam to the extent that foam is removed.   One cannot inspect in any meaningful way except where one sees rust bleed through the foam.    I know Brent says, coat the inside well with good paint and there will be no problems.  Fail to paint the inside of the hull well and the hull will rust from the inside out.   I have a solid glass boat, so rust is not an issue for me, but inspection and cleaning is.   Matt | 35631|35557|2019-03-04 13:22:19|Rick Jackson|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| Matt,,,I am in agreement regarding the compromises with spray foam..  Since we plan to live on the boat permanently for several years, we feel like the entire hull needs access for inspection.  Taking the interior out showed me the importance of installing the new in a manner that allows for easy removal of hull panels. Ours was built where the hull panels were installed first, then the floor, and last was the bulkheads.. No inspection was possible with this method…Interestingly, our hull was insulated with glass bats against the steel with a heavy plastic vapor barrier. Ive been told it is a bad idea. What I noticed, was the only moisture was where the swim step welds leaked, and under every window. The other thing I noticed that is worth keeping in mind, was the glue used to secure the batts to the steel, had a chemical reaction that caused the paint to blister and those areas rusted. Mascoat has the ceramic hollow bead infused paint which gets good reviews.  There is also another company that sells just those beads which can be added to the paint of your choice.   I was considering adding those beads inside and out on all metal surfaces.   I do not think that this paint alone would be enough so the addition of the Armaflex sheets should add some benefit as well.Im toying with the idea of keeping an air gap where the condensation can build up, and run off the Armaflex and down into the bilge. If we use something like Cool Shield to back up all the paneling, we would effectively manage the moisture and be able to have removable panels that provide the ability to inspect everything. Another consideration is managing the moisture build up on the interior of the windows.  I am building our window frames, and if I can create a space to allow that moisture to direct the run off down into that air gap, it will run into the bilge as well..  On Mar 3, 2019, at 6:22 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:Rick,I have given foam some thought on my boat.   I keep coming back to, foam board laminated to the back of interior panels with vapour barrier between the foam and panel.  This means, if the interior panels are removeable, one can inspect, clean and maintain the inside of the hull by removing a panel.   That seems a really powerful ability on a boat.  Yes, this means there is an air gap between the hull and insulation, and the hull will condense water and it will run down into the bilges..   The panels on the underside of the hull would have a drip barrier too, so water would not sit on the back of the insulation but run down into the bilges.    This will make the boat inside the insulation a dry boat with a source of heat.  The alternative, foam stuck to the inside of the hull, especially on a steel boat is an inconvenience.   One cannot weld unless a lot of foam is scraped off.   One would have to be prepared to spray in replacement foam to the extent that foam is removed.   One cannot inspect in any meaningful way except where one sees rust bleed through the foam.    I know Brent says, coat the inside well with good paint and there will be no problems.  Fail to paint the inside of the hull well and the hull will rust from the inside out.   I have a solid glass boat, so rust is not an issue for me, but inspection and cleaning is.   MattFrom: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, March 2, 2019 9:25 PMTo: origamiboats@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group....  Thank you for the tips… We sold the house last month and just moved to the boat yard yesterday… Siting in the warmth of our little trailer, and looking out the window at our world cruiser… We have some work to do to settle in, then its all hands for a quick and efficient refit.  I will get the take off lines documented for our NA and then start blasting the hull inside and out…I will leave the decision wether  or not to add any more framing to our NA… I was adamant about about no spray foam, but now Im waffling again… I do love the Mascot products, but struggling to believe they are what the claims make… Any info on those ceramic bead insulation options??  I can post that as a new query if it makes more sense… However, I would hate to start a long debate which insulation of steel hulls will invariably do..On Mar 2, 2019, at 6:01 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:Yes, I met a 37 ft steel version of a Bob Perry designed Tayana 37.The owner said she weighed 36,000 lbs, Perry calculated her at 27,000 lbs.  I have seen my 36 footers come up 6 inches in the water, when the owners took all their personal possessions off,  at 1150 lbs per inch. No designer can predict how much stuff any owner will put aboard,some very little ,others are pack rats.If they included everything imaginable, they would sell far  fewer plans than someone who includes very little ,and gives only the weight of an empty boat.Roland gave the highway scale weight of one of my 36 footers, almost all steel work done, and ballasted at 15,000 lbs. One guy stripped the interior out of a 37 footer and weighed the total of it ,at around 450 lbs.That would be typical  for most sailboats that size. Variations would be far less than the variations of the weight of stuff different owners put aboard.| 35632|35557|2019-03-04 13:38:10|brentswain38|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|I tried the hollow ceramic beads,on the inside of 4 inch stainless vent tubes, which dripped condensation.It stopped the condensation; until I started cooking, when they began to rain condensation again. I found some 1/16th inch close cell foam in a ditch. I put that in, and it stopped condensation permanently, even while cooking and canning. Gives a good measure of how much more effective foam is, than anything else. A friend mentioned a thin walled foam coffee cup .Boiling temp inside, and barely warm on the outside. No paint can come remotely close to that kind of efficiency. Ceramic beads are grossly oversold, and overrated.Tried glass insulation .Sopping wet, regardless of attempts at a vapor barrier, a serious corrosion risk to steel.It quickly made tiny blisters in the paint.I spray foamed it.| 35633|35557|2019-03-04 14:41:37|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| #ygrps-yiv-1160740914 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Well Rick, Brent swears by spray foam and I have never been in a boat with spray foam or foam board, only foam cored glass boats, I have to recognize his experience.   I find Brent's observation about a coffee cup is interesting.   My one boat with some insulation has like urethane foam -- like furniture foam.   It is thin maybe 1/4 inch.   It looked poor from the outset I am sure, it is ratty now.  It seems its only benefit is, it will be easy to remove and I will suffer no regret as I do it.  If I were going to spray foam, I would route all sorts of 1/2" plastic conduits I am certain I will never need everywhere, so that I will never feel the need to cut foam.   I would keep the conduits as straight as possible so fishing and pulling them is as easy as possible, and have them emerge together in junction box areas so cross-routing is possible.    Remember,  the current rating capacity of the electrical wires is related to their ability to reject heat, and the temperature rating of the insulation.  Therefore a wire suitable for 13 Amps nailed to a joist in a barn, will overheat at a far lower current if buried in foam insulation behind panels in a boat, even in a conduit.   With modern LED lighting, this is less of a problem than it used to be.   This however applies to an electrically powered windlass/gypsy likely to be located quite far from the batteries.   I would put in two separate conduits in, one for + and one for -, so I could string wire in the 2/0 or larger range without the problem of trying to get two thick cables into one circular conduit.   Brent also recommends painting the inside surface of spray foam to vapour seal it.  I recall him saying scrap latex paint is suitable for this.   I would take this very seriously, using new gloss bathroom grade or better paint and use multiple coats to make sure it seals.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, March 4, 2019 1:38 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...     I tried the hollow ceramic beads,on the inside of 4 inch stainless vent tubes, which dripped condensation.It stopped the condensation; until I started cooking, when they began to rain condensation again. I found some 1/16th inch close cell foam in a ditch. I put that in, and it stopped condensation permanently, even while cooking and canning. Gives a good measure of how much more effective foam is, than anything else. A friend mentioned a thin walled foam coffee cup .Boiling temp inside, and barely warm on the outside. No paint can come remotely close to that kind of efficiency. Ceramic beads are grossly oversold, and overrated. Tried glass insulation .Sopping wet, regardless of attempts at a vapor barrier, a serious corrosion risk to steel.It quickly made tiny blisters in the paint.I spray foamed it. | 35634|35557|2019-03-04 15:33:09|Darren Bos|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| Our refit boat had 1.5" extruded polystyrene foam cut and fit into place.  It must have taken forever, wasn't particularly warm and when I removed it there were lots of spots where pinky/orange mold had started to grow on the foam or hull.  Fortunately, with an aluminum hull there was no corrosion issues.  We've now spray-foamed and are finishing the build out.  Even unfinished, the boat is warmer and easier to heat with the spray foam in place.  Spray foam also makes it easier to cover every nook and cranny, which is critical.  I used Tiger Foam to spray the inside and would not do it again.  It was one of the most miserable jobs I've ever done, the DIY kits are extremely temperature sensitive, which creates all sorts of headaches if you're not foaming in the middle of the summer.  The uncured foam is really toxic, even a respirator is not good enough, you really should have an external fresh air supply.  If I were to do it again, I'd still use spray urethane foam, but I'd get a professional to come in and do the spraying.  I've forgotten who here recommended it, but I used a Fien-style oscillating tool to cut back the foam with a scraper attachment.  It is very fast, easy to control and leaves a nice finish.  It creates almost no dust while removing the foam.  I spent a bunch of time thinking and comparing insulation options.  I don't think there is anything that compares to urethane spray foam.  Some of the other options might be OK as long as you were sailing in warm places.  The glass beads are better than nothing, but that's about it. I'd run 3/4" conduit for most runs.  I used 1/2" for some of the over head runs, but you don't need much wire in them to make it really difficult to pull some more wire through.  I ran my 2/0 wires for the windlass through 1 1/4" conduit without much difficulty (one person pushed the cable in while the other pulled via the messengers).  Make sure you leave messenger lines of some slippery line or webbing in the conduit.  When you pull wire through include another messenger line.  I've used some 1/2" webbing and paracord for messenger lines.  The webbing works particularly well.  Don't use light gauge string for the messenger lines, it's not up to the task.  Also, any 90 degree bends make pulling subsequent wire much more difficult if you're trying anything larger than 14ga duplex. On 2019-03-04 11:41 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Well Rick, Brent swears by spray foam and I have never been in a boat with spray foam or foam board, only foam cored glass boats, I have to recognize his experience.   I find Brent's observation about a coffee cup is interesting.   My one boat with some insulation has like urethane foam -- like furniture foam.   It is thin maybe 1/4 inch.   It looked poor from the outset I am sure, it is ratty now.  It seems its only benefit is, it will be easy to remove and I will suffer no regret as I do it.  If I were going to spray foam, I would route all sorts of 1/2" plastic conduits I am certain I will never need everywhere, so that I will never feel the need to cut foam.   I would keep the conduits as straight as possible so fishing and pulling them is as easy as possible, and have them emerge together in junction box areas so cross-routing is possible.    Remember,  the current rating capacity of the electrical wires is related to their ability to reject heat, and the temperature rating of the insulation.  Therefore a wire suitable for 13 Amps nailed to a joist in a barn, will overheat at a far lower current if buried in foam insulation behind panels in a boat, even in a conduit.   With modern LED lighting, this is less of a problem than it used to be.   This however applies to an electrically powered windlass/gypsy likely to be located quite far from the batteries.   I would put in two separate conduits in, one for + and one for -, so I could string wire in the 2/0 or larger range without the problem of trying to get two thick cables into one circular conduit.   Brent also recommends painting the inside surface of spray foam to vapour seal it.  I recall him saying scrap latex paint is suitable for this.   I would take this very seriously, using new gloss bathroom grade or better paint and use multiple coats to make sure it seals.   Matt | 35635|35557|2019-03-04 16:03:03|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| 2 runs of 1/2" conduit is much less interruption to the insulation than one 1-1/4" conduit.   If I had S/V Seeker, I would be using larger conduit everywhere, and a thicker layer of spray foam.  I do not.  My cabin is small already, so by going with 1 /2" conduit, I feel I can go with slightly thinner foam and have no funny bulges behind the interior paneling from a proud section of conduit..   Thank you Darren for the tip on getting a pro to install it. A long time ago, someone said they got spray foam installed and got a certificate attesting that it was of a certain grade, it was guaranteed to be closed-cell, and guaranteed to have a certain, very good, fire resistance rating.   Does anyone know anything about such grades of spray foam? Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, March 4, 15:36 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Our refit boat had 1.5" extruded polystyrene foam cut and fit into place.  It must have taken forever, wasn't particularly warm and when I removed it there were lots of spots where pinky/orange mold had started to grow on the foam or hull.  Fortunately, with an aluminum hull there was no corrosion issues.  We've now spray-foamed and are finishing the build out.  Even unfinished, the boat is warmer and easier to heat with the spray foam in place.  Spray foam also makes it easier to cover every nook and cranny, which is critical.  I used Tiger Foam to spray the inside and would not do it again.  It was one of the most miserable jobs I've ever done, the DIY kits are extremely temperature sensitive, which creates all sorts of headaches if you're not foaming in the middle of the summer.  The uncured foam is really toxic, even a respirator is not good enough, you really should have an external fresh air supply.  If I were to do it again, I'd still use spray urethane foam, but I'd get a professional to come in and do the spraying.  I've forgotten who here recommended it, but I used a Fien-style oscillating tool to cut back the foam with a scraper attachment.  It is very fast, easy to control and leaves a nice finish.  It creates almost no dust while removing the foam.  I spent a bunch of time thinking and comparing insulation options.  I don't think there is anything that compares to urethane spray foam.  Some of the other options might be OK as long as you were sailing in warm places.  The glass beads are better than nothing, but that's about it. I'd run 3/4" conduit for most runs.  I used 1/2" for some of the over head runs, but you don't need much wire in them to make it really difficult to pull some more wire through.  I ran my 2/0 wires for the windlass through 1 1/4" conduit without much difficulty (one person pushed the cable in while the other pulled via the messengers).  Make sure you leave messenger lines of some slippery line or webbing in the conduit.  When you pull wire through include another messenger line.  I've used some 1/2" webbing and paracord for messenger lines.  The webbing works particularly well.  Don't use light gauge string for the messenger lines, it's not up to the task.  Also, any 90 degree bends make pulling subsequent wire much more difficult if you're trying anything larger than 14ga duplex. On 2019-03-04 11:41 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Well Rick, Brent swears by spray foam and I have never been in a boat with spray foam or foam board, only foam cored glass boats, I have to recognize his experience.   I find Brent's observation about a coffee cup is interesting.   My one boat with some insulation has like urethane foam -- like furniture foam.   It is thin maybe 1/4 inch.   It looked poor from the outset I am sure, it is ratty now.  It seems its only benefit is, it will be easy to remove and I will suffer no regret as I do it.  If I were going to spray foam, I would route all sorts of 1/2" plastic conduits I am certain I will never need everywhere, so that I will never feel the need to cut foam.   I would keep the conduits as straight as possible so fishing and pulling them is as easy as possible, and have them emerge together in junction box areas so cross-routing is possible.    Remember,  the current rating capacity of the electrical wires is related to their ability to reject heat, and the temperature rating of the insulation.  Therefore a wire suitable for 13 Amps nailed to a joist in a barn, will overheat at a far lower current if buried in foam insulation behind panels in a boat, even in a conduit.   With modern LED lighting, this is less of a problem than it used to be.   This however applies to an electrically powered windlass/gypsy likely to be located quite far from the batteries.   I would put in two separate conduits in, one for + and one for -, so I could string wire in the 2/0 or larger range without the problem of trying to get two thick cables into one circular conduit.   Brent also recommends painting the inside surface of spray foam to vapour seal it.  I recall him saying scrap latex paint is suitable for this.   I would take this very seriously, using new gloss bathroom grade or better paint and use multiple coats to make sure it seals.   Matt | 35636|35618|2019-03-04 17:32:58|Marc de Piolenc|Re: US PayPal - you ARE criminal, untill you prove you are not|Difficult not to go into politics, since Paypal is acting like an oppressive régime rather than a business. I have long considered the Paypal/eBay axis a criminal association, because they collect huge amounts of personal information, but never use it to protect their honest users from frauds. I am $75 in the hole, after using eBay over my own better judgement (the vendor was offering an extremely rare technical book). Various alternatives have been tried and are being tried, but I am not current on their status. I am forced to use Paypal because my clients use it, but I keep my involvement limited. I do not give an SSN (I don't have one, but would not let them have it in any case). I do not link a bank account. Instead, I use the account to do my own shopping for supplies and the like. Obviously, this would not work if all my money were coming in via Paypal. And it sounds like even this will soon no longer work. Marc de Piolenc -- Archivale catalog: http://www.archivale.com/catalog Polymath weblog: http://www.archivale.com/weblog Translations (ProZ profile): http://www.proz.com/profile/639380 Translations (BeWords profile): http://www.bewords.com/Marc-dePiolenc Ducted fans: http://massflow.archivale.com/| 35637|35557|2019-03-04 20:12:08|Darren Bos|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| Matt, I suggested 3/4" conduit, the only exception was for the 2/0 windlass cables (and there is no way you'll get even one lead of 2/0 through half inch conduit).  Each boat is going to be different, but for many metal boats it is going to be easy to run 3/4" conduit along the longitudinals which will be taller, then you just enclose the whole thing in foam.  Even the 1 1/4" fits neatly under the T-stock longitudinals on my boat.  The 1/2" conduit really is too small for running anything more than a bit of 16ga in.  It looks like it could hold more, but trying to pull extra cables through it in the future is going to be a headache.  I've pulled the cables for my Nav lights through 1/2" conduit, it was slow and frustrating compared to pulling the other wires through the 3/4".  1/2" conduit is super cheap to do a mockup with to convince yourself that it is going to be a pain in the butt.  If it is dead straight, you could pull a few wires though it, but bend it to match the hull, and then have bends where you need to come out through the insulation, believe me I'm just trying to save you the pain I've already been through.  I'm sure you can afford the extra 1/4" to go up to 3/4" from 1/2".  Darren On 2019-03-04 1:02 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   2 runs of 1/2" conduit is much less interruption to the insulation than one 1-1/4" conduit.   If I had S/V Seeker, I would be using larger conduit everywhere, and a thicker layer of spray foam.  I do not.  My cabin is small already, so by going with 1 /2" conduit, I feel I can go with slightly thinner foam and have no funny bulges behind the interior paneling from a proud section of conduit..   Thank you Darren for the tip on getting a pro to install it. A long time ago, someone said they got spray foam installed and got a certificate attesting that it was of a certain grade, it was guaranteed to be closed-cell, and guaranteed to have a certain, very good, fire resistance rating.   Does anyone know anything about such grades of spray foam? Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, March 4, 15:36 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Our refit boat had 1.5" extruded polystyrene foam cut and fit into place.  It must have taken forever, wasn't particularly warm and when I removed it there were lots of spots where pinky/orange mold had started to grow on the foam or hull.  Fortunately, with an aluminum hull there was no corrosion issues.  We've now spray-foamed and are finishing the build out.  Even unfinished, the boat is warmer and easier to heat with the spray foam in place.  Spray foam also makes it easier to cover every nook and cranny, which is critical.  I used Tiger Foam to spray the inside and would not do it again.  It was one of the most miserable jobs I've ever done, the DIY kits are extremely temperature sensitive, which creates all sorts of headaches if you're not foaming in the middle of the summer.  The uncured foam is really toxic, even a respirator is not good enough, you really should have an external fresh air supply.  If I were to do it again, I'd still use spray urethane foam, but I'd get a professional to come in and do the spraying.  I've forgotten who here recommended it, but I used a Fien-style oscillating tool to cut back the foam with a scraper attachment.  It is very fast, easy to control and leaves a nice finish.  It creates almost no dust while removing the foam.  I spent a bunch of time thinking and comparing insulation options.  I don't think there is anything that compares to urethane spray foam.  Some of the other options might be OK as long as you were sailing in warm places.  The glass beads are better than nothing, but that's about it. I'd run 3/4" conduit for most runs.  I used 1/2" for some of the over head runs, but you don't need much wire in them to make it really difficult to pull some more wire through.  I ran my 2/0 wires for the windlass through 1 1/4" conduit without much difficulty (one person pushed the cable in while the other pulled via the messengers).  Make sure you leave messenger lines of some slippery line or webbing in the conduit.  When you pull wire through include another messenger line.  I've used some 1/2" webbing and paracord for messenger lines.  The webbing works particularly well.  Don't use light gauge string for the messenger lines, it's not up to the task.  Also, any 90 degree bends make pulling subsequent wire much more difficult if you're trying anything larger than 14ga duplex. On 2019-03-04 11:41 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Well Rick, Brent swears by spray foam and I have never been in a boat with spray foam or foam board, only foam cored glass boats, I have to recognize his experience.   I find Brent's observation about a coffee cup is interesting.   My one boat with some insulation has like urethane foam -- like furniture foam.   It is thin maybe 1/4 inch.   It looked poor from the outset I am sure, it is ratty now.  It seems its only benefit is, it will be easy to remove and I will suffer no regret as I do it.  If I were going to spray foam, I would route all sorts of 1/2" plastic conduits I am certain I will never need everywhere, so that I will never feel the need to cut foam.   I would keep the conduits as straight as possible so fishing and pulling them is as easy as possible, and have them emerge together in junction box areas so cross-routing is possible.    Remember,  the current rating capacity of the electrical wires is related to their ability to reject heat, and the temperature rating of the insulation.  Therefore a wire suitable for 13 Amps nailed to a joist in a barn, will overheat at a far lower current if buried in foam insulation behind panels in a boat, even in a conduit.   With modern LED lighting, this is less of a problem than it used to be.   This however applies to an electrically powered windlass/gypsy likely to be located quite far from the batteries.   I would put in two separate conduits in, one for + and one for -, so I could string wire in the 2/0 or larger range without the problem of trying to get two thick cables into one circular conduit.   Brent also recommends painting the inside surface of spray foam to vapour seal it.  I recall him saying scrap latex paint is suitable for this.   I would take this very seriously, using new gloss bathroom grade or better paint and use multiple coats to make sure it seals.   Matt | 35638|35557|2019-03-04 20:15:44|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| Thank you Darren, I will take your advice and save myself the learning curve and hassle. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, March 4, 2019 8:12:05 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...     Matt, I suggested 3/4" conduit, the only exception was for the 2/0 windlass cables (and there is no way you'll get even one lead of 2/0 through half inch conduit).  Each boat is going to be different, but for many metal boats it is going to be easy to run 3/4" conduit along the longitudinals which will be taller, then you just enclose the whole thing in foam.  Even the 1 1/4" fits neatly under the T-stock longitudinals on my boat.  The 1/2" conduit really is too small for running anything more than a bit of 16ga in.  It looks like it could hold more, but trying to pull extra cables through it in the future is going to be a headache.  I've pulled the cables for my Nav lights through 1/2" conduit, it was slow and frustrating compared to pulling the other wires through the 3/4".  1/2" conduit is super cheap to do a mockup with to convince yourself that it is going to be a pain in the butt.  If it is dead straight, you could pull a few wires though it, but bend it to match the hull, and then have bends where you need to come out through the insulation, believe me I'm just trying to save you the pain I've already been through.  I'm sure you can afford the extra 1/4" to go up to 3/4" from 1/2".  Darren On 2019-03-04 1:02 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   2 runs of 1/2" conduit is much less interruption to the insulation than one 1-1/4" conduit.   If I had S/V Seeker, I would be using larger conduit everywhere, and a thicker layer of spray foam.  I do not.  My cabin is small already, so by going with 1 /2" conduit, I feel I can go with slightly thinner foam and have no funny bulges behind the interior paneling from a proud section of conduit..   Thank you Darren for the tip on getting a pro to install it. A long time ago, someone said they got spray foam installed and got a certificate attesting that it was of a certain grade, it was guaranteed to be closed-cell, and guaranteed to have a certain, very good, fire resistance rating.   Does anyone know anything about such grades of spray foam? Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, March 4, 15:36 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Our refit boat had 1.5" extruded polystyrene foam cut and fit into place.  It must have taken forever, wasn't particularly warm and when I removed it there were lots of spots where pinky/orange mold had started to grow on the foam or hull.  Fortunately, with an aluminum hull there was no corrosion issues.  We've now spray-foamed and are finishing the build out.  Even unfinished, the boat is warmer and easier to heat with the spray foam in place.  Spray foam also makes it easier to cover every nook and cranny, which is critical.  I used Tiger Foam to spray the inside and would not do it again.  It was one of the most miserable jobs I've ever done, the DIY kits are extremely temperature sensitive, which creates all sorts of headaches if you're not foaming in the middle of the summer.  The uncured foam is really toxic, even a respirator is not good enough, you really should have an external fresh air supply.  If I were to do it again, I'd still use spray urethane foam, but I'd get a professional to come in and do the spraying.  I've forgotten who here recommended it, but I used a Fien-style oscillating tool to cut back the foam with a scraper attachment.  It is very fast, easy to control and leaves a nice finish.  It creates almost no dust while removing the foam.  I spent a bunch of time thinking and comparing insulation options.  I don't think there is anything that compares to urethane spray foam.  Some of the other options might be OK as long as you were sailing in warm places.  The glass beads are better than nothing, but that's about it. I'd run 3/4" conduit for most runs.  I used 1/2" for some of the over head runs, but you don't need much wire in them to make it really difficult to pull some more wire through.  I ran my 2/0 wires for the windlass through 1 1/4" conduit without much difficulty (one person pushed the cable in while the other pulled via the messengers).  Make sure you leave messenger lines of some slippery line or webbing in the conduit.  When you pull wire through include another messenger line.  I've used some 1/2" webbing and paracord for messenger lines.  The webbing works particularly well.  Don't use light gauge string for the messenger lines, it's not up to the task.  Also, any 90 degree bends make pulling subsequent wire much more difficult if you're trying anything larger than 14ga duplex. On 2019-03-04 11:41 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Well Rick, Brent swears by spray foam and I have never been in a boat with spray foam or foam board, only foam cored glass boats, I have to recognize his experience.   I find Brent's observation about a coffee cup is interesting.   My one boat with some insulation has like urethane foam -- like furniture foam.   It is thin maybe 1/4 inch.   It looked poor from the outset I am sure, it is ratty now.  It seems its only benefit is, it will be easy to remove and I will suffer no regret as I do it.  If I were going to spray foam, I would route all sorts of 1/2" plastic conduits I am certain I will never need everywhere, so that I will never feel the need to cut foam.   I would keep the conduits as straight as possible so fishing and pulling them is as easy as possible, and have them emerge together in junction box areas so cross-routing is possible.    Remember,  the current rating capacity of the electrical wires is related to their ability to reject heat, and the temperature rating of the insulation.  Therefore a wire suitable for 13 Amps nailed to a joist in a barn, will overheat at a far lower current if buried in foam insulation behind panels in a boat, even in a conduit.   With modern LED lighting, this is less of a problem than it used to be.   This however applies to an electrically powered windlass/gypsy likely to be located quite far from the batteries.   I would put in two separate conduits in, one for + and one for -, so I could string wire in the 2/0 or larger range without the problem of trying to get two thick cables into one circular conduit.   Brent also recommends painting the inside surface of spray foam to vapour seal it.  I recall him saying scrap latex paint is suitable for this.   I would take this very seriously, using new gloss bathroom grade or better paint and use multiple coats to make sure it seals.   Matt | 35639|35618|2019-03-05 01:05:03|wild_explorer|Re: US PayPal - you ARE criminal, untill you prove you are not|Actually, PayPal sells you e-Money (NOT using your money from Credit/Debit card - your money belongs to PP after it, and PP can do whatever PP wants with it)PAYPAL ACCOUNT USER AGREEMENT (For USA, 54 pages, who reads it ALL? You SHOULD!! I am only on p.30 now)Many things are Skept below - just most "interesting" highlights left... Quotes:By continuing to use our services after any changes to this user agreement, you agree to abide and be bound by those changes. If you do not agree with any changes to this user agreement, you may close your account*** This user agreement will be effective for all users as of March 29, 2019 ***You also consent to PayPal obtaining your personal and/or business credit report from a credit reporting agency at account opening and whenever we reasonably believe there may be an increased level of risk associated with your business PayPal accountYou acknowledge that we may make certain reports to tax authorities regarding transactions that weprocess. For example, PayPal is required to report to the Internal Revenue Service the total amount ofpayments for goods and services you receive each calendar year into all of your PayPal accounts associatedwith the same tax identification number if you receive more than $20,000 in payments for good andservices and process more than 200 transactions involving goods or services through those PayPal accountsin the same calendar year.*** Most interesting part is "200  transactions" (even for $1) ***For some uses of your PayPal accounts, PayPal may determine currency conversion is necessary. For any of the following transactions that involve a currency conversion, the currency conversion spread is 3.0%:Restricted Activities....you must not:- Refuse to cooperate in an investigation or provide confirmation of your identity or any information youprovide to us;- Breach this user agreement ....- Provide false, inaccurate or misleading information;- Refuse to cooperate in an investigation or provide confirmation of your identity or any information youprovide to us;- Allow your PayPal account to have a negative balance;- Use an anonymizing proxy;- Access the PayPal services from a country that is not included on PayPal's permitted countries list;*** Above rule can be unintentionally "breached" by boat cruiser ****- Take any action that may cause us to lose any of the services from our Internet service providers, paymentprocessors, or other suppliers or service providers;Actions We May Take if You Engage in Any Restricted Activities:- Terminate this user agreement, limit your PayPal account (and any linked Cash Account), and/or close orsuspend your PayPal account (and any linked Cash Account), immediately and without penalty to us;Refuse to provide the PayPal services to you in the future;- Refuse to provide the PayPal services to you in the future;- Limit your access to our websites, software, systems (including any networks and servers used to provideany of the PayPal services) operated by us or on our behalf, your PayPal account or any of the PayPalservices, including limiting your ability to pay or send money with any of the payment methods linked toyour PayPal account, restricting your ability to send money or make withdrawals;- Hold the balance in your Cash Account, the balance in your business PayPal account, or any money waitingto be claimed through your personal PayPal account if you do not have a Cash Account linked to yourpersonal PayPal account, for up to 180 days if reasonably needed to protect against the risk of liability or ifyou have violated our Acceptable Use Policy- if you are a seller and you violate the Acceptable Use Policy, then in addition to being subject to the aboveactions you will be liable to PayPal for the amount of PayPal's damages caused by your violation of theAcceptable Use Policy. You acknowledge and agree that $2,500.00 U.S. dollars per violation of theAcceptable Use Policy is presently a reasonable minimum estimate of PayPal's actual damages consideringall currently existing circumstances, including the relationship of the sum to the range of harm to PayPalthat reasonably could be anticipated because, due to the nature of the violations of the Acceptable UsePolicy, actual damages would be impractical or extremely difficult to calculate. PayPal may deduct suchdamages directly from any existing balance in any PayPal account you controlYou are responsible for all reversals, chargebacks, claims, fees, fines, penalties and other liability incurred byPayPal, any PayPal customer, or a third party caused by or arising out of your breach of this agreement, and/or your use of the PayPal services.We may place a hold on payments sent to your PayPal account if, in our sole discretion, we believe that theremay be a high level of risk associated with you, your PayPal account, or your transactions or that placing such a hold is necessary to comply with state or federal regulatory requirements. We make decisions about whether to place a payment hold based on a number of factors, including information available to us from both internal sources and third partiesThere are several reasons why your PayPal account could be limited, including:- If we reasonably believe you have breached this agreement or violated the Acceptable Use Policy- Seller performance indicating your PayPal account is high risk. Examples include: indications of poorselling performance because you’ve received an unusually high number of claims and chargebacks, sellingan entirely new or high-cost product type, or if your typical sales volume increases rapidly.We may place a reserve on your business PayPal account at any time if we believe there may be a high level of risk associated with you, your business PayPal account, your business model, or your transactions. When we place a reserve on your business PayPal account, it means that all or some portion of the money in yourbusiness PayPal account is reserved as unavailable for withdrawal in order to protect against the risk oftransactions made by you being reversed or invalidated or any other risk related to your business PayPalaccount or use of the PayPal services. We make decisions about whether to place a reserve based on a number of factors, including information available to us from both internal sources and from third parties*** To be continued (when I have time) ***---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Various alternatives have been tried and are being tried, but I am not current on their status. I am forced to use Paypal because my clients use it, but I keep my involvement limited. I do not give an SSN (I don't have one, but would not let them have it in any case). I do not link a bank account. Instead, I use the account to do my own shopping for supplies and the like. Obviously, this would not work if all my money were coming in via Paypal. And it sounds like even this will soon no longer work. Marc de Piolenc| 35640|35557|2019-03-06 10:45:22|brentswain38|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Good points .Well said.Friends started on a Waterline 33 with sheet foam,spending many days cutting and fitting it. Half way thru decided to call a spray foamer, who finished the job in an hour, for less than it would have cost for sheet foam.As all steel has to be covered with  1/4 inch or more of foam, or it will drip like a leaky faucet, that is hard to accomplish with sheet foam.I'd go for the bigger conduit.An electrician I detailed a 36  for had a frame made up to take the windlass battery  under the forepeak bunk, so the leads would be super short. That battery was strictly for the windlass. Charging wires can be much smaller.A friend who had a fire on his 36 said the fire stopped cold, where the foam was painted with cheap latex.Some foam is open cell, some is closed, at a higher price.Make sure you use closed cell. Kits are cheaper ,but not that much cheaper.The advantage is being able to do it on your own timeline, anywhere, any time.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :#ygrps-yiv-1134451675 #ygrps-yiv-1134451675ygrps-yiv-197505491 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Well Rick, Brent swears by spray foam and I have never been in a boat with spray foam or foam board, only foam cored glass boats, I have to recognize his experience.   I find Brent's observation about a coffee cup is interesting.   My one boat with some insulation has like urethane foam -- like furniture foam.   It is thin maybe 1/4 inch.   It looked poor from the outset I am sure, it is ratty now.  It seems its only benefit is, it will be easy to remove and I will suffer no regret as I do it.  If I were going to spray foam, I would route all sorts of 1/2" plastic conduits I am certain I will never need everywhere, so that I will never feel the need to cut foam.   I would keep the conduits as straight as possible so fishing and pulling them is as easy as possible, and have them emerge together in junction box areas so cross-routing is possible.    Remember,  the current rating capacity of the electrical wires is related to their ability to reject heat, and the temperature rating of the insulation.  Therefore a wire suitable for 13 Amps nailed to a joist in a barn, will overheat at a far lower current if buried in foam insulation behind panels in a boat, even in a conduit.   With modern LED lighting, this is less of a problem than it used to be.   This however applies to an electrically powered windlass/gypsy likely to be located quite far from the batteries.   I would put in two separate conduits in, one for + and one for -, so I could string wire in the 2/0 or larger range without the problem of trying to get two thick cables into one circular conduit.   Brent also recommends painting the inside surface of spray foam to vapour seal it.  I recall him saying scrap latex paint is suitable for this.   I would take this very seriously, using new gloss bathroom grade or better paint and use multiple coats to make sure it seals.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, March 4, 2019 1:38 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...  I tried the hollow ceramic beads,on the inside of 4 inch stainless vent tubes, which dripped condensation.It stopped the condensation; until I started cooking, when they began to rain condensation again. I found some 1/16th inch close cell foam in a ditch. I put that in, and it stopped condensation permanently, even while cooking and canning. Gives a good measure of how much more effective foam is, than anything else. A friend mentioned a thin walled foam coffee cup .Boiling temp inside, and barely warm on the outside. No paint can come remotely close to that kind of efficiency. Ceramic beads are grossly oversold, and overrated.Tried glass insulation .Sopping wet, regardless of attempts at a vapor barrier, a serious corrosion risk to steel.It quickly made tiny blisters in the paint.I spray foamed it.| 35641|35557|2019-03-06 10:59:44|brentswain38|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|An electrician I once detailed a boat for ,put a separate anchor winch battery under his forepeak bunk ,exclusively for the winch, making the leads super short. Charging leads from the alternator can be much lighter. Friends  started insulating a Waterline 33 with sheet foam. After many days of tediously fitting it, they called a spray foamer, who did the other half in about an hour , for about the same price as sheet foam would have cost. Another  problem  with sheet foam is, any tiny piece of bare metal  poking thru it will drip condensation like a leaky faucet, which is hard to completely cover using sheet foam.Friends had a roaring fire  on one of my 36 footers, but where the fire met cheap latex paint covered foam, it  died quickly. | 35642|35557|2019-03-06 11:53:01|brentswain38|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|I'd use the biggest conduit I could fit under the foam.| 35643|35557|2019-03-06 11:54:21|prairiemaidca|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Once you have been in cold wet weather for a week or two aboard a "well" spray foamed (1 1/2 min.) boat you will be a total believer in how dry and warm the interior is and how the great the difference is between an insulated metal boat and a plastic one.  I know some people have said that they had to spend a lot of time in excess foam removal but that is the result of the applicator.  I lucked out and had almost no excess, in fact I think I had probably only two or three large garbage bags of trimmings.  Martin (Prairie Maid)| 35644|35557|2019-03-06 11:54:56|brentswain38|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| When inside blasting, it is well worthwhile  cutting big holes in the low points of the hull, to blow the sandblasting sand out thru. Then, you blast the cut out pieces and weld them back in, then blast the welds.Saves a huge amount of time and money. Digging all that sand out is a huge job. Sand accumulation interferes with getting a good sand blasting job.With 100% weld strength, there is no reason not to.| 35645|35557|2019-03-06 20:56:51|Rick Jackson|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Ok,,, I spent some time running through the pros and cons…Assuming the hull prep is done correctly (sand blasted and cleaned) and the proper application of quality epoxy, one should never need worry about corrosion behind the foam?If this is considered the case, then the cons are not what I hear, regarding condensation and corrosion.. Aside from an impact to the hull, and the interior paint cracking from that impact, how would corrosion occur?So a question,,, how far down do you take the spray foam?  To the waterline, or to the sole? On Mar 6, 2019, at 8:15 AM, losforsters@gmail..com [origamiboats] wrote:Once you have been in cold wet weather for a week or two aboard a "well" spray foamed (1 1/2 min.) boat you will be a total believer in how dry and warm the interior is and how the great the difference is between an insulated metal boat and a plastic one.  I know some people have said that they had to spend a lot of time in excess foam removal but that is the result of the applicator.  I lucked out and had almost no excess, in fact I think I had probably only two or three large garbage bags of trimmings.  Martin (Prairie Maid)| 35646|35557|2019-03-06 20:57:13|Rick Jackson|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Way ahead of ya on that… Already cut holes.. Now looking at opening the whole area above the keel and cutting access at the lead line in keel so we can blast out all the hollow cavities.  We are going to prep all the voids in the keel for access from above so all can be painted and have bolted on covers. Most will become tankage anyway.. Several hundred gallons potential in the keel voids…. On Mar 5, 2019, at 4:46 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote: When inside blasting, it is well worthwhile  cutting big holes in the low points of the hull, to blow the sandblasting sand out thru. Then, you blast the cut out pieces and weld them back in, then blast the welds.Saves a huge amount of time and money. Digging all that sand out is a huge job. Sand accumulation interferes with getting a good sand blasting job.With 100% weld strength, there is no reason not to.| 35647|35557|2019-03-06 21:58:01|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| Tankage contained on 5 of 6 sides by critical structure makes me nervous.  Freezing water is an irresistible force.  Salt water can go below the freezing point of fresh water.   If you plan to make the keel tanks fuel only, ok.  If you are going to have freshwater bladders you might include crushable volume, like some thin foam sheets around the bladders. Matt From: Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 21:07 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Way ahead of ya on that… Already cut holes.. Now looking at opening the whole area above the keel and cutting access at the lead line in keel so we can blast out all the hollow cavities.  We are going to prep all the voids in the keel for access from above so all can be painted and have bolted on covers. Most will become tankage anyway.. Several hundred gallons potential in the keel voids…. On Mar 5, 2019, at 4:46 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:  When inside blasting, it is well worthwhile  cutting big holes in the low points of the hull, to blow the sandblasting sand out thru. Then, you blast the cut out pieces and weld them back in, then blast the welds.Saves a huge amount of time and money. Digging all that sand out is a huge job. Sand accumulation interferes with getting a good sand blasting job. With 100% weld strength, there is no reason not to. | 35648|35557|2019-03-06 22:24:33|brentswain38|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|With the main water tank on the centreline, below the main floor,  between the keels, the bottom of the tank is a V shape. Unless the tank is completely filled, any expansion will simply lift the ice a bit , harming  nothing. The tank top is a fully welded, longitudinal steel bulkhead, structurally, giving tremendous strength to the twin keels attachment.  Recently, with my boat in a drying anchorage, and me in Mexico,  I was worried about my caning jars freezing and breaking at low tide in the night, with minis 8 degree temperatures. Nothing froze or broke.When ocean water freezes here, my depth sounder reads 38 degrees F, the bilge temperature, far from freezing. In deep water here, the ocean  stays around 40 degrees  minimum, no chance of freezing anything below the waterline. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Tankage contained on 5 of 6 sides by critical structure makes me nervous.  Freezing water is an irresistible force.  Salt water can go below the freezing point of fresh water.   If you plan to make the keel tanks fuel only, ok.  If you are going to have freshwater bladders you might include crushable volume, like some thin foam sheets around the bladders. Matt | 35649|35557|2019-03-06 22:46:10|brentswain38|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Take the foam to the cabin sole only. Any lower, and it will wick water out of the bilge, causing corrosion. If you want to insulate the sole, then foam on the underside of the floor boards, or carpet in winter, which will reduce your heat loss by 30%Corrosion only comes thru inadequate epoxy , or epoxy over dirty steel.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Ok,,, I spent some time running through the pros and cons…Assuming the hull prep is done correctly (sand blasted and cleaned) and the proper application of quality epoxy, one should never need worry about corrosion behind the foam?If this is considered the case, then the cons are not what I hear, regarding condensation and corrosion.. Aside from an impact to the hull, and the interior paint cracking from that impact, how would corrosion occur?So a question,,, how far down do you take the spray foam?  To the waterline, or to the sole? On Mar 6, 2019, at 8:15 AM, losforsters@gmail..com [origamiboats] wrote:Once you have been in cold wet weather for a week or two aboard a "well" spray foamed (1 1/2 min.) boat you will be a total believer in how dry and warm the interior is and how the great the difference is between an insulated metal boat and a plastic one.  I know some people have said that they had to spend a lot of time in excess foam removal but that is the result of the applicator.  I lucked out and had almost no excess, in fact I think I had probably only two or three large garbage bags of trimmings.  Martin (Prairie Maid)| 35650|35557|2019-03-07 09:24:01|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| #ygrps-yiv-632007683 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Brent, the water tanks on the your origamis might be better-shaped or better placed.   I was referring to something that does apply to my boat and might apply to Rick's boat -- Rick has to decide.  My experience with my bilge water / in keel water tank water is, it does not freeze until about 3 weeks of continuous below-freezing weather have passed.   Similarly, when I look at the boat in the early spring, when the air is humid and above freezing, frost forms on the sides of the keel in the shape of the contained ballast.   I would not be concerned about overnight or between tide cycles, or preserves in a foamed boat in a week, even at -8C.   My concern would be either for my boat or Ricks, when it is left for a month, either in a cold salt-water marina or on the hard without draining the tanks.   I have seen water as deep as it is wide in a container not crack a plastic container, but I would be inclined to get the depth below 1/4 of the smallest surface dimension.   That is the rule of thumb I use on my bilge water and water tank water to keep there from being freezing damage.   Completely empty would be completely safe, but, I cannot guarantee that on my boat.  I am less concerned about the origami designs I see in the photos because on at least 3 sides of the tank it is the interior of the boat and something non-structural on the other side of the tank wall.  I had always assumed these sides were made with flat sheet in Brent's designs, whereas all the structural parts were curved.    Brent you give contradictory information on water temperature in coastal BC.   I can attest, it never gets warmer than 40F, having surfed it.   But you say the water temperature never goes below 40F -- I am guessing in the Strait of Georgia.   You say your depth sounder reads 38F when ice forms.  Ocean water normally freezes only a few degrees cooler than fresh water, 28.4F by one reference, but the dynamic wave action and currents and winds can keep it stirred for some time.    This stirring would stir surface water that is below 32F to lower depths before ice forms at the surface.   So it seems that your depth sounder is likely reading up to 10 degrees off.   If your depth sounder is calculating water temperature from acoustic properties, is it possible it is calibrated to fresh water?  I wonder what a regular thermometer on a string would read.   This would be the time of year to check. https://www.rona.ca/en/indoor-and-outdoor-wall-thermometer-0321071?viewStore=55070&cm_mmc=shopping_google-_-g_127_87-_-1701297967-_-ON-0321071&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIuZXT35Tw4AIVzYCfCh1Nxw3iEAQYAiABEgLmdvD_BwE Indoor and Outdoor Wall Thermometer Indoor and outdoor wall mount thermometer. Durable resin construction, scale in celsius and fahrenheit, weatherproof. Freezing temperature indicator ... www.rona.ca    In general, for measuring remote temperatures, I like these thermometers: https://www.walmart.com/ip/Accu-Temp-90817-Indoor-Outdoor-Digital-Thermometer/323885464 Accu-Temp 90817 Indoor-Outdoor Digital Thermometer - Walmart.com

Measure temperature and rain with the Springfield Indoor/Outdoor DigitalThermometer with Clock. This dual view thermometer/clock unit measuresindoor temperatures while the discreet 10-foot wired probe measuresoutdoor temperatures through a window or door. www.walmart.com Inexpensive, long lead wire, big display.  It would not be hard to line up a bunch of them, reading refrigerator, freezer, bilge, outside, cooling skeg water temperature.   If one wanted to measure engine temperature and wet exhaust temperature, something like this would be better: https://www.amazon.com/Digital-k-type-Thermocouple-Thermometer-Furnace/dp/B00G0PFS4C Amazon.com: Digital 2 k-type Thermocouple Thermometer DM6802 for HVAC, Furnace, Heater: Industrial & Scientific The thermocouple works well with a variety of mini-K type probes. It seems to have a quick response time. The temperature difference often seems to show rounding effects (T1 measures 79, T2 measures 80, but the difference measures 0), which means it probably has at least one digit not displayed. www.amazon.com Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2019 10:24 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...     With the main water tank on the centreline, below the main floor,  between the keels, the bottom of the tank is a V shape. Unless the tank is completely filled, any expansion will simply lift the ice a bit , harming  nothing. The tank top is a fully welded, longitudinal steel bulkhead, structurally, giving tremendous strength to the twin keels attachment.  Recently, with my boat in a drying anchorage, and me in Mexico,  I was worried about my caning jars freezing and breaking at low tide in the night, with minis 8 degree temperatures. Nothing froze or broke.When ocean water freezes here, my depth sounder reads 38 degrees F, the bilge temperature, far from freezing. In deep water here, the ocean  stays around 40 degrees  minimum, no chance of freezing anything below the waterline. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Tankage contained on 5 of 6 sides by critical structure makes me nervous.  Freezing water is an irresistible force.  Salt water can go below the freezing point of fresh water.   If you plan to make the keel tanks fuel only, ok.  If you are going to have freshwater bladders you might include crushable volume, like some thin foam sheets around the bladders. Matt | 35651|35557|2019-03-07 12:06:55|brentswain38|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Yes, hauled out it would definitely be a worry, in different shaped tanks, as in some much colder climes.Where the sea water freezes around my boat is in a shallow, closed  bay ,where the surface water freezes, but the sea water under it says 38 degrees F , according to my depth sounder,and swimming pool thermometer. Ditto other depth sounders I have used in the past.A boat here keeps much warmer in cold snaps, if it stays afloat, and doesn't dry out.Yes, the west coast ( surf country) doesn't get much warmer than 40 degrees ,but the inner coast in some places hits 79 degrees F or more in summer. I remember coming thru Surge Narrows in summer, watching the depth sounder quickly go from 44 F to 65F in a mile or two. In summer, we have the warmest sea water north of the Gulf of Mexico, in some places---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : #ygrps-yiv-408165654 #ygrps-yiv-408165654ygrps-yiv-1389954987 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Brent, the water tanks on the your origamis might be better-shaped or better placed.   I was referring to something that does apply to my boat and might apply to Rick's boat -- Rick has to decide.  My experience with my bilge water / in keel water tank water is, it does not freeze until about 3 weeks of continuous below-freezing weather have passed.   Similarly, when I look at the boat in the early spring, when the air is humid and above freezing, frost forms on the sides of the keel in the shape of the contained ballast.   I would not be concerned about overnight or between tide cycles, or preserves in a foamed boat in a week, even at -8C.   My concern would be either for my boat or Ricks, when it is left for a month, either in a cold salt-water marina or on the hard without draining the tanks.   I have seen water as deep as it is wide in a container not crack a plastic container, but I would be inclined to get the depth below 1/4 of the smallest surface dimension.   That is the rule of thumb I use on my bilge water and water tank water to keep there from being freezing damage.   Completely empty would be completely safe, but, I cannot guarantee that on my boat.  I am less concerned about the origami designs I see in the photos because on at least 3 sides of the tank it is the interior of the boat and something non-structural on the other side of the tank wall.  I had always assumed these sides were made with flat sheet in Brent's designs, whereas all the structural parts were curved.    Brent you give contradictory information on water temperature in coastal BC.   I can attest, it never gets warmer than 40F, having surfed it.   But you say the water temperature never goes below 40F -- I am guessing in the Strait of Georgia.   You say your depth sounder reads 38F when ice forms.  Ocean water normally freezes only a few degrees cooler than fresh water, 28.4F by one reference, but the dynamic wave action and currents and winds can keep it stirred for some time.    This stirring would stir surface water that is below 32F to lower depths before ice forms at the surface.   So it seems that your depth sounder is likely reading up to 10 degrees off.   If your depth sounder is calculating water temperature from acoustic properties, is it possible it is calibrated to fresh water?  I wonder what a regular thermometer on a string would read.   This would be the time of year to check. https://www.rona.ca/en/indoor-and-outdoor-wall-thermometer-0321071?viewStore=55070&cm_mmc=shopping_google-_-g_127_87-_-1701297967-_-ON-0321071&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIuZXT35Tw4AIVzYCfCh1Nxw3iEAQYAiABEgLmdvD_BwE    | 35652|35557|2019-03-07 14:11:58|Darren Bos|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| Surface water out here is often fresher than the salt water below.  Depending where you are on the BC coast, we tend to get between one and two meters of rain between October and May.  The size of the freshwater lens floating on the saltwater varies on a bunch of different size scales.  The large plume of freshwater coming out of the Fraser River is one example and pretty easy to observe from the air (or even on the water) for much of the year.  On the other end of the size scale, if it is calm, it is also not unusual for a small bay to have a lens of freshwater on the surface.  It may be as little as a few inches or on the scale of several feet.  I've been snorkelling in Desolation Sound in the summer where if you kept moving you could stay in the warm, fresh, surface water, but if you slowed down and sank just four inches you'd be in the colder saltier water below.  So, you may be seeing relatively low salinity water freezing around the boat. If you really need to overwinter somewhere cold and are worried about ice around the boat or freshwater freezing in keel tanks, a bubbler might be enough to prevent the problem.  It's nothing more than a bunch of tubes lowered into the water around the boat.  As the bubbles rise they bring warmer water from below.  On Lake Ontario, they've used this to keep a lane open for the ferry and there is a place where you can get some serious ice.  As long as the water you are in is deep enough, there is almost a limitless thermal reservoir to keep the water from freezing around the boat.  At least down to temperatures I'd be willing to find myself in a boat. So, I think keel tanks for freshwater aren't a huge problem unless your planning on overwintering in the arctic.  If you haul out in freezing conditions, it'd be best to use a wet-dry shop vac to get the water out of the tanks through the inspection ports. On 2019-03-07 9:06 a.m., brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Yes, hauled out it would definitely be a worry, in different shaped tanks, as in some much colder climes. Where the sea water freezes around my boat is in a shallow, closed  bay ,where the surface water freezes, but the sea water under it says 38 degrees F , according to my depth sounder,and swimming pool thermometer. Ditto other depth sounders I have used in the past. A boat here keeps much warmer in cold snaps, if it stays afloat, and doesn't dry out. Yes, the west coast ( surf country) doesn't get much warmer than 40 degrees ,but the inner coast in some places hits 79 degrees F or more in summer. I remember coming thru Surge Narrows in summer, watching the depth sounder quickly go from 44 F to 65F in a mile or two. In summer, we have the warmest sea water north of the Gulf of Mexico, in some places ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Brent, the water tanks on the your origamis might be better-shaped or better placed.   I was referring to something that does apply to my boat and might apply to Rick's boat -- Rick has to decide.  My experience with my bilge water / in keel water tank water is, it does not freeze until about 3 weeks of continuous below-freezing weather have passed.   Similarly, when I look at the boat in the early spring, when the air is humid and above freezing, frost forms on the sides of the keel in the shape of the contained ballast.   I would not be concerned about overnight or between tide cycles, or preserves in a foamed boat in a week, even at -8C.   My concern would be either for my boat or Ricks, when it is left for a month, either in a cold salt-water marina or on the hard without draining the tanks.   I have seen water as deep as it is wide in a container not crack a plastic container, but I would be inclined to get the depth below 1/4 of the smallest surface dimension.   That is the rule of thumb I use on my bilge water and water tank water to keep there from being freezing damage.   Completely empty would be completely safe, but, I cannot guarantee that on my boat.  I am less concerned about the origami designs I see in the photos because on at least 3 sides of the tank it is the interior of the boat and something non-structural on the other side of the tank wall.  I had always assumed these sides were made with flat sheet in Brent's designs, whereas all the structural parts were curved.    Brent you give contradictory information on water temperature in coastal BC.   I can attest, it never gets warmer than 40F, having surfed it.   But you say the water temperature never goes below 40F -- I am guessing in the Strait of Georgia.   You say your depth sounder reads 38F when ice forms.  Ocean water normally freezes only a few degrees cooler than fresh water, 28.4F by one reference, but the dynamic wave action and currents and winds can keep it stirred for some time.    This stirring would stir surface water that is below 32F to lower depths before ice forms at the surface.   So it seems that your depth sounder is likely reading up to 10 degrees off.   If your depth sounder is calculating water temperature from acoustic properties, is it possible it is calibrated to fresh water?  I wonder what a regular thermometer on a string would read.   This would be the time of year to check. https://www.rona.ca/en/indoor-and-outdoor-wall-thermometer-0321071?viewStore=55070&cm_mmc=shopping_google-_-g_127_87-_-1701297967-_-ON-0321071&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIuZXT35Tw4AIVzYCfCh1Nxw3iEAQYAiABEgLmdvD_BwE    | 35653|35557|2019-03-07 15:04:02|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| #ygrps-yiv-133622075 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Ok Darren, I would have guessed that on the east side near the river, but Brent is more often somewhere on the west side.   But looking into it more, you are right.  There is clearly some very interesting stuff going on with the temperature in the Strait of Georgia.  I googled "salinity in the Strait of Georgia" and came up with this: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/science/data-donnees/cotesud-southcoast/index-eng.html I am familiar with thermal gradients, but only in summer and winter, and to a limited degree.   All the places I have been, the wind and changing seasons is enough to stir things up twice a year.   Reading this reminded me of what I have read about the Baltic Sea and the Black Sea with their stable year-round layers.  So OK, Brent's instruments must be reading correctly.   Fresh water at 4C (close to the 38F/40F Brent reports) is the densest fresh water can be.  This water is still less dense than sea water, so, one may have seawater on the bottom, on top of that one has 4C freshwater at the bottom of the freshwater layer, and ice on the top of the freshwater layer.   Brent must be anchored in a relatively freshwater layer.    The reference would suggest the salt water below is actually a lot warmer than 4C where it is deeper. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 2:11 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...     Surface water out here is often fresher than the salt water below.  Depending where you are on the BC coast, we tend to get between one and two meters of rain between October and May.  The size of the freshwater lens floating on the saltwater varies on a bunch of different size scales.  The large plume of freshwater coming out of the Fraser River is one example and pretty easy to observe from the air (or even on the water) for much of the year.  On the other end of the size scale, if it is calm, it is also not unusual for a small bay to have a lens of freshwater on the surface.  It may be as little as a few inches or on the scale of several feet.  I've been snorkelling in Desolation Sound in the summer where if you kept moving you could stay in the warm, fresh, surface water, but if you slowed down and sank just four inches you'd be in the colder saltier water below.  So, you may be seeing relatively low salinity water freezing around the boat. If you really need to overwinter somewhere cold and are worried about ice around the boat or freshwater freezing in keel tanks, a bubbler might be enough to prevent the problem.  It's nothing more than a bunch of tubes lowered into the water around the boat.  As the bubbles rise they bring warmer water from below.  On Lake Ontario, they've used this to keep a lane open for the ferry and there is a place where you can get some serious ice.  As long as the water you are in is deep enough, there is almost a limitless thermal reservoir to keep the water from freezing around the boat.  At least down to temperatures I'd be willing to find myself in a boat. So, I think keel tanks for freshwater aren't a huge problem unless your planning on overwintering in the arctic.  If you haul out in freezing conditions, it'd be best to use a wet-dry shop vac to get the water out of the tanks through the inspection ports. On 2019-03-07 9:06 a.m., brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Yes, hauled out it would definitely be a worry, in different shaped tanks, as in some much colder climes. Where the sea water freezes around my boat is in a shallow, closed  bay ,where the surface water freezes, but the sea water under it says 38 degrees F , according to my depth sounder,and swimming pool thermometer. Ditto other depth sounders I have used in the past. A boat here keeps much warmer in cold snaps, if it stays afloat, and doesn't dry out. Yes, the west coast ( surf country) doesn't get much warmer than 40 degrees ,but the inner coast in some places hits 79 degrees F or more in summer. I remember coming thru Surge Narrows in summer, watching the depth sounder quickly go from 44 F to 65F in a mile or two. In summer, we have the warmest sea water north of the Gulf of Mexico, in some places ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Brent, the water tanks on the your origamis might be better-shaped or better placed.   I was referring to something that does apply to my boat and might apply to Rick's boat -- Rick has to decide.  My experience with my bilge water / in keel water tank water is, it does not freeze until about 3 weeks of continuous below-freezing weather have passed.   Similarly, when I look at the boat in the early spring, when the air is humid and above freezing, frost forms on the sides of the keel in the shape of the contained ballast.   I would not be concerned about overnight or between tide cycles, or preserves in a foamed boat in a week, even at -8C.   My concern would be either for my boat or Ricks, when it is left for a month, either in a cold salt-water marina or on the hard without draining the tanks.   I have seen water as deep as it is wide in a container not crack a plastic container, but I would be inclined to get the depth below 1/4 of the smallest surface dimension.   That is the rule of thumb I use on my bilge water and water tank water to keep there from being freezing damage.   Completely empty would be completely safe, but, I cannot guarantee that on my boat.  I am less concerned about the origami designs I see in the photos because on at least 3 sides of the tank it is the interior of the boat and something non-structural on the other side of the tank wall.  I had always assumed these sides were made with flat sheet in Brent's designs, whereas all the structural parts were curved.    Brent you give contradictory information on water temperature in coastal BC.   I can attest, it never gets warmer than 40F, having surfed it.   But you say the water temperature never goes below 40F -- I am guessing in the Strait of Georgia.   You say your depth sounder reads 38F when ice forms.  Ocean water normally freezes only a few degrees cooler than fresh water, 28.4F by one reference, but the dynamic wave action and currents and winds can keep it stirred for some time.    This stirring would stir surface water that is below 32F to lower depths before ice forms at the surface.   So it seems that your depth sounder is likely reading up to 10 degrees off.   If your depth sounder is calculating water temperature from acoustic properties, is it possible it is calibrated to fresh water?  I wonder what a regular thermometer on a string would read.   This would be the time of year to check. https://www.rona.ca/en/indoor-and-outdoor-wall-thermometer-0321071?viewStore=55070&cm_mmc=shopping_google-_-g_127_87-_-1701297967-_-ON-0321071&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIuZXT35Tw4AIVzYCfCh1Nxw3iEAQYAiABEgLmdvD_BwE    | 35654|35557|2019-03-07 16:29:48|brentswain38|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Mooring where the water moves keeps it from freezing.I moored off the fery dock, and the ferry wash kept it open,and ice free. Closed bays are the worst for ice.| 35655|35557|2019-03-07 16:36:46|Rick Jackson|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Interesting observations. I do not see our boat drying out, and I typically drain water tanks prior to haul out. So if I were on the hard in cold climates, I would not have those concerns..  Our keel is roughly 60 cubic feet and all but 11 cubic feet (lead) is empty space (366 gallons).   We had 300 gallons of fuel tankage flanking the main engine, and we had 300 gallons of water under the galley sole.  The boat did not have a water maker, which it now does, so we can reduce H2o storage. I am aware that we can not actually use all that hollow space, but we can use most of it..   I cut access into each cavity of the keel to inspect and it looks surprisingly well even though it was taking on salt water.   My objective is to sandblast those cavities and apply the appropriate coatings. That means I can not weld them back up, so why not cap each section with a bolted down, sealed lid, each with inspection ports, which creates tankage.  The trick I still am working out, is the space under the main engine. The ballast is under the main but we still have nearly 90 gallons of space there.  If I could utilize that space and maintain access for inspection and maintenance, it could be used.  I would love to figure out how to use that space for a house bank of AGMs. We are also willing to save some of those cavities for water ballast to balance the boat if it became necessary.  Main concern is that those spaces serve a purpose.   On Mar 7, 2019, at 9:06 AM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:Yes, hauled out it would definitely be a worry, in different shaped tanks, as in some much colder climes.Where the sea water freezes around my boat is in a shallow, closed  bay ,where the surface water freezes, but the sea water under it says 38 degrees F , according to my depth sounder,and swimming pool thermometer. Ditto other depth sounders I have used in the past.A boat here keeps much warmer in cold snaps, if it stays afloat, and doesn't dry out.Yes, the west coast ( surf country) doesn't get much warmer than 40 degrees ,but the inner coast in some places hits 79 degrees F or more in summer. I remember coming thru Surge Narrows in summer, watching the depth sounder quickly go from 44 F to 65F in a mile or two. In summer, we have the warmest sea water north of the Gulf of Mexico, in some places---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Brent, the water tanks on the your origamis might be better-shaped or better placed.   I was referring to something that does apply to my boat and might apply to Rick's boat -- Rick has to decide.  My experience with my bilge water / in keel water tank water is, it does not freeze until about 3 weeks of continuous below-freezing weather have passed.   Similarly, when I look at the boat in the early spring, when the air is humid and above freezing, frost forms on the sides of the keel in the shape of the contained ballast.   I would not be concerned about overnight or between tide cycles, or preserves in a foamed boat in a week, even at -8C.   My concern would be either for my boat or Ricks, when it is left for a month, either in a cold salt-water marina or on the hard without draining the tanks.   I have seen water as deep as it is wide in a container not crack a plastic container, but I would be inclined to get the depth below 1/4 of the smallest surface dimension.   That is the rule of thumb I use on my bilge water and water tank water to keep there from being freezing damage.   Completely empty would be completely safe, but, I cannot guarantee that on my boat.  I am less concerned about the origami designs I see in the photos because on at least 3 sides of the tank it is the interior of the boat and something non-structural on the other side of the tank wall.  I had always assumed these sides were made with flat sheet in Brent's designs, whereas all the structural parts were curved.    Brent you give contradictory information on water temperature in coastal BC.   I can attest, it never gets warmer than 40F, having surfed it.   But you say the water temperature never goes below 40F -- I am guessing in the Strait of Georgia.   You say your depth sounder reads 38F when ice forms.  Ocean water normally freezes only a few degrees cooler than fresh water, 28.4F by one reference, but the dynamic wave action and currents and winds can keep it stirred for some time.    This stirring would stir surface water that is below 32F to lower depths before ice forms at the surface.   So it seems that your depth sounder is likely reading up to 10 degrees off.   If your depth sounder is calculating water temperature from acoustic properties, is it possible it is calibrated to fresh water?  I wonder what a regular thermometer on a string would read.   This would be the time of year to check.https://www.rona.ca/en/indoor-and-outdoor-wall-thermometer-0321071?viewStore=55070&cm_mmc=shopping_google-_-g_127_87-_-1701297967-_-ON-0321071&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIuZXT35Tw4AIVzYCfCh1Nxw3iEAQYAiABEgLmdvD_BwE   | 35656|35557|2019-03-07 17:08:43|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| #ygrps-yiv-1611340870 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Hi Rick, Water ballast is like changing the shape of the underwater part of the boat, so that the tanks are like they are outside the boat.  If one built the boat differently so these tanks were outside the boat, the restoring moment of the boat would be unchanged.  Water provides zero ballast beyond that, until the water ballast is lifted above the water line in extreme heeling or something -- that is sufficient for cats and Open 60s.   In a monohull boat, the moment arm for water ballast is only a fraction of half the beam, and this is less than the draft, so adding a lead shoe to the bottom of the keel is always better than water tanks under the port and starboard settees for instance.   There is use in shipping extra fresh water if you do not have a water maker.  If you are filling empty space with water, just buy a smaller boat.   Far better is something more dense than water.  This actually provides a restoring moment that cannot be modelled as a smaller hull shape.    There was a good thread a while ago about making a chain locker out of a large diameter vertical pipe -- sink one of those into the empty space in the keel and move your chain out of the forward locker.    You are going to carry chain anyway, so, just have it lower.   Use the forward locker for light deck stuff like maybe fenders, or emergency line. It sounds like your lead is way down in the keel.   Is this as much lead as the design called for ?  More lead might (will) induce more hull stresses in motion, but, if you are thinking about any ballast, a small amount of lead ballast on top of your current lead ballast is far better than water.   Material Density    Ballast coefficient sample        X                  X-1 Air              0.001226      -0.9987 Water            1                   0 concrete       2.4               1.4 steel              7.85             6.85 lead               11.34           10.34 tungsten        19.3             18.3   Adding a doghouse helps ultimate stability because it is adding anti-ballast (coefficient -0.9987) above the center of flotation. Steel is substantially better than concrete, and lead is substantially better than steel.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 12:47 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...     Interesting observations.  I do not see our boat drying out, and I typically drain water tanks prior to haul out. So if I were on the hard in cold climates, I would not have those concerns..   Our keel is roughly 60 cubic feet and all but 11 cubic feet (lead) is empty space (366 gallons).   We had 300 gallons of fuel tankage flanking the main engine, and we had 300 gallons of water under the galley sole.  The boat did not have a water maker, which it now does, so we can reduce H2o storage.  I am aware that we can not actually use all that hollow space, but we can use most of it..    I cut access into each cavity of the keel to inspect and it looks surprisingly well even though it was taking on salt water.   My objective is to sandblast those cavities and apply the appropriate coatings. That means I can not weld them back up, so why not cap each section with a bolted down, sealed lid, each with inspection ports, which creates tankage.  The trick I still am working out, is the space under the main engine. The ballast is under the main but we still have nearly 90 gallons of space there.  If I could utilize that space and maintain access for inspection and maintenance, it could be used.  I would love to figure out how to use that space for a house bank of AGMs.  We are also willing to save some of those cavities for water ballast to balance the boat if it became necessary.  Main concern is that those spaces serve a purpose.   On Mar 7, 2019, at 9:06 AM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote: Yes, hauled out it would definitely be a worry, in different shaped tanks, as in some much colder climes. Where the sea water freezes around my boat is in a shallow, closed  bay ,where the surface water freezes, but the sea water under it says 38 degrees F , according to my depth sounder,and swimming pool thermometer. Ditto other depth sounders I have used in the past. A boat here keeps much warmer in cold snaps, if it stays afloat, and doesn't dry out. Yes, the west coast ( surf country) doesn't get much warmer than 40 degrees ,but the inner coast in some places hits 79 degrees F or more in summer.  I remember coming thru Surge Narrows in summer, watching the depth sounder quickly go from 44 F to 65F in a mile or two. In summer, we have the warmest sea water north of the Gulf of Mexico, in some places ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Brent, the water tanks on the your origamis might be better-shaped or better placed.   I was referring to something that does apply to my boat and might apply to Rick's boat -- Rick has to decide.   My experience with my bilge water / in keel water tank water is, it does not freeze until about 3 weeks of continuous below-freezing weather have passed.   Similarly, when I look at the boat in the early spring, when the air is humid and above freezing, frost forms on the sides of the keel in the shape of the contained ballast.   I would not be concerned about overnight or between tide cycles, or preserves in a foamed boat in a week, even at -8C.    My concern would be either for my boat or Ricks, when it is left for a month, either in a cold salt-water marina or on the hard without draining the tanks.   I have seen water as deep as it is wide in a container not crack a plastic container, but I would be inclined to get the depth below 1/4 of the smallest surface dimension.   That is the rule of thumb I use on my bilge water and water tank water to keep there from being freezing damage.   Completely empty would be completely safe, but, I cannot guarantee that on my boat.   I am less concerned about the origami designs I see in the photos because on at least 3 sides of the tank it is the interior of the boat and something non-structural on the other side of the tank wall.  I had always assumed these sides were made with flat sheet in Brent's designs, whereas all the structural parts were curved.     Brent you give contradictory information on water temperature in coastal BC.   I can attest, it never gets warmer than 40F, having surfed it.   But you say the water temperature never goes below 40F -- I am guessing in the Strait of Georgia.   You say your depth sounder reads 38F when ice forms.  Ocean water normally freezes only a few degrees cooler than fresh water, 28.4F by one reference, but the dynamic wave action and currents and winds can keep it stirred for some time.    This stirring would stir surface water that is below 32F to lower depths before ice forms at the surface.   So it seems that your depth sounder is likely reading up to 10 degrees off.   If your depth sounder is calculating water temperature from acoustic properties, is it possible it is calibrated to fresh water?  I wonder what a regular thermometer on a string would read.   This would be the time of year to check. https://www.rona.ca/en/indoor-and-outdoor-wall-thermometer-0321071?viewStore=55070&cm_mmc=shopping_google-_-g_127_87-_-1701297967-_-ON-0321071&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIuZXT35Tw4AIVzYCfCh1Nxw3iEAQYAiABEgLmdvD_BwE     | 35657|35557|2019-03-07 19:25:49|aguysailing|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|I went with 150 L plastimo flexible water tank....  15 yrs no problems... take out in seconds for cleaning.   Could put a couple of them or more in several places on my 36 twin.   https://www.plastimo.com/en/water-on-board/fresh-water-tanks/reservoirs-souples-pour-eau-douce-9828.htmlCoastal cruising this capacity is fine for me.  (no shower)   Have water makers rendered large tanks not necessary?| 35658|35557|2019-03-07 19:36:57|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| I say larger tanks are not unnecessary with a watermaker.   RO systems work better, and should use less electrical power if you feed them less-salty water.  They also remove other chemicals.   Extra tanks can be used to gather rain water and deck water that might be slightly brackish.  RO systems can be used after solar and wind have already charged the batteries -- extra power would just be thrown away.   Filling extra tanks with freshwater is like extra batteries good for 10,000 cycles more than the most modern $1,000 lithium storage battery.  It also provides a reserve water capacity to cover maintenance periods. Matt From: aguysailing@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, March 7, 19:26 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I went with 150 L plastimo flexible water tank....  15 yrs no problems... take out in seconds for cleaning.   Could put a couple of them or more in several places on my 36 twin.   https://www.plastimo.com/en/water-on-board/fresh-water-tanks/reservoirs-souples-pour-eau-douce-9828.html Coastal cruising this capacity is fine for me.  (no shower)   Have water makers rendered large tanks not necessary? | 35659|35557|2019-03-08 14:09:21|Darren Bos|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| If you're interested in learning more Matt, the important terms are thermocline and halocline.  The two can also interact.  The really warm surface water I experienced in Desolation Sound was likely an interaction of both.  You get a halocline with freshwater floating on salty, and then that is further enhanced by a thermocline where the surface freshwater is heated to a greater extent by the sun.  Haloclines are far more common than most folks realize.  If you snorkel or dive it isn't unusual after a severe rain event to find places where you have a layer of poor visibility silt rich freshwater floating atop clearer saltwater.  For really heavily laden boats the halocline can have pretty severe consequences, as the boat is no longer as buoyant as you would think.  A typical example is a fishing boat returning completely full and faltering when it hits the freshwater plume from a river. On 2019-03-07 12:03 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Ok Darren, I would have guessed that on the east side near the river, but Brent is more often somewhere on the west side.   But looking into it more, you are right.  There is clearly some very interesting stuff going on with the temperature in the Strait of Georgia.  I googled "salinity in the Strait of Georgia" and came up with this: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/science/data-donnees/cotesud-southcoast/index-eng.html I am familiar with thermal gradients, but only in summer and winter, and to a limited degree.   All the places I have been, the wind and changing seasons is enough to stir things up twice a year.   Reading this reminded me of what I have read about the Baltic Sea and the Black Sea with their stable year-round layers.  So OK, Brent's instruments must be reading correctly.   Fresh water at 4C (close to the 38F/40F Brent reports) is the densest fresh water can be.  This water is still less dense than sea water, so, one may have seawater on the bottom, on top of that one has 4C freshwater at the bottom of the freshwater layer, and ice on the top of the freshwater layer.   Brent must be anchored in a relatively freshwater layer.    The reference would suggest the salt water below is actually a lot warmer than 4C where it is deeper. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 2:11 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...     Surface water out here is often fresher than the salt water below.  Depending where you are on the BC coast, we tend to get between one and two meters of rain between October and May.  The size of the freshwater lens floating on the saltwater varies on a bunch of different size scales.  The large plume of freshwater coming out of the Fraser River is one example and pretty easy to observe from the air (or even on the water) for much of the year.  On the other end of the size scale, if it is calm, it is also not unusual for a small bay to have a lens of freshwater on the surface.  It may be as little as a few inches or on the scale of several feet.  I've been snorkelling in Desolation Sound in the summer where if you kept moving you could stay in the warm, fresh, surface water, but if you slowed down and sank just four inches you'd be in the colder saltier water below.  So, you may be seeing relatively low salinity water freezing around the boat. If you really need to overwinter somewhere cold and are worried about ice around the boat or freshwater freezing in keel tanks, a bubbler might be enough to prevent the problem.  It's nothing more than a bunch of tubes lowered into the water around the boat.  As the bubbles rise they bring warmer water from below.  On Lake Ontario, they've used this to keep a lane open for the ferry and there is a place where you can get some serious ice.  As long as the water you are in is deep enough, there is almost a limitless thermal reservoir to keep the water from freezing around the boat.  At least down to temperatures I'd be willing to find myself in a boat. So, I think keel tanks for freshwater aren't a huge problem unless your planning on overwintering in the arctic.  If you haul out in freezing conditions, it'd be best to use a wet-dry shop vac to get the water out of the tanks through the inspection ports. On 2019-03-07 9:06 a.m., brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Yes, hauled out it would definitely be a worry, in different shaped tanks, as in some much colder climes. Where the sea water freezes around my boat is in a shallow, closed  bay ,where the surface water freezes, but the sea water under it says 38 degrees F , according to my depth sounder,and swimming pool thermometer. Ditto other depth sounders I have used in the past. A boat here keeps much warmer in cold snaps, if it stays afloat, and doesn't dry out. Yes, the west coast ( surf country) doesn't get much warmer than 40 degrees ,but the inner coast in some places hits 79 degrees F or more in summer. I remember coming thru Surge Narrows in summer, watching the depth sounder quickly go from 44 F to 65F in a mile or two. In summer, we have the warmest sea water north of the Gulf of Mexico, in some places ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Brent, the water tanks on the your origamis might be better-shaped or better placed.   I was referring to something that does apply to my boat and might apply to Rick's boat -- Rick has to decide.  My experience with my bilge water / in keel water tank water is, it does not freeze until about 3 weeks of continuous below-freezing weather have passed.   Similarly, when I look at the boat in the early spring, when the air is humid and above freezing, frost forms on the sides of the keel in the shape of the contained ballast.   I would not be concerned about overnight or between tide cycles, or preserves in a foamed boat in a week, even at -8C.   My concern would be either for my boat or Ricks, when it is left for a month, either in a cold salt-water marina or on the hard without draining the tanks.   I have seen water as deep as it is wide in a container not crack a plastic container, but I would be inclined to get the depth below 1/4 of the smallest surface dimension.   That is the rule of thumb I use on my bilge water and water tank water to keep there from being freezing damage.   Completely empty would be completely safe, but, I cannot guarantee that on my boat.  I am less concerned about the origami designs I see in the photos because on at least 3 sides of the tank it is the interior of the boat and something non-structural on the other side of the tank wall.  I had always assumed these sides were made with flat sheet in Brent's designs, whereas all the structural parts were curved.    Brent you give contradictory information on water temperature in coastal BC.   I can attest, it never gets warmer than 40F, having surfed it.   But you say the water temperature never goes below 40F -- I am guessing in the Strait of Georgia.   You say your depth sounder reads 38F when ice forms.  Ocean water normally freezes only a few degrees cooler than fresh water, 28.4F by one reference, but the dynamic wave action and currents and winds can keep it stirred for some time.    This stirring would stir surface water that is below 32F to lower depths before ice forms at the surface.   So it seems that your depth sounder is likely reading up to 10 degrees off.   If your depth sounder is calculating water temperature from acoustic properties, is it possible it is calibrated to fresh water?  I wonder what a regular thermometer on a string would read.   This would be the time of year to check. https://www.rona.ca/en/indoor-and-outdoor-wall-thermometer-0321071?viewStore=55070&cm_mmc=shopping_google-_-g_127_87-_-1701297967-_-ON-0321071&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIuZXT35Tw4AIVzYCfCh1Nxw3iEAQYAiABEgLmdvD_BwE    | 35660|35557|2019-03-08 14:45:05|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| #ygrps-yiv-309519755 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Thank you Darren, I had read about those terms, but had forgotten them.   I read up on halocline in preparation for sailing in a tidal river sound much smaller than the Strait of Georgia.   While it is not very hazardous, it is can be completely hidden and lead to unusual effects, like you mention with the fishing boat example.   Another is the halocline can have lumps in it, like underwater standing waves like those in a rocky rapids, and these can affect the boat.   I was on a ferry once crossing the Hudson from New Jersey to Manhattan, and we hit something.   The water was pretty much flat, just a little stirred looking.  The sensation was not the same as grounding, there was no bump feeling, or grind that vibrates the boat, or the sudden give of letting go of the bottom, but the vessel was so much larger than anything I have ever grounded in that I cannot be certain.   The ferry lurched and heeled badly.  As a reasonably tall, narrow double-decker passenger ferry for use in a river, I know for sure, it was not designed to do that.     Then the captain cut power very abruptly.   The ferry took a long 3 or 4 seconds to right itself.  After that, there was apparently some checking to do -- we floated for a while.  There never was any announcement.   Then a few minutes later we powered up again and proceeded slowly, smoothly to the destination.  I had never seen any of these ferries stop mid-river like that before.   I can only guess it was a halocline underwater wave.   It sure had the feeling of being pushed by an invisible wave -- forceful but of no solid substance.   It was this experience that encouraged me to read up before piloting a sailboat in a tidal river.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, March 8, 2019 2:09 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...     If you're interested in learning more Matt, the important terms are thermocline and halocline.  The two can also interact.  The really warm surface water I experienced in Desolation Sound was likely an interaction of both.  You get a halocline with freshwater floating on salty, and then that is further enhanced by a thermocline where the surface freshwater is heated to a greater extent by the sun.  Haloclines are far more common than most folks realize.  If you snorkel or dive it isn't unusual after a severe rain event to find places where you have a layer of poor visibility silt rich freshwater floating atop clearer saltwater.  For really heavily laden boats the halocline can have pretty severe consequences, as the boat is no longer as buoyant as you would think.  A typical example is a fishing boat returning completely full and faltering when it hits the freshwater plume from a river. On 2019-03-07 12:03 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Ok Darren, I would have guessed that on the east side near the river, but Brent is more often somewhere on the west side.   But looking into it more, you are right.  There is clearly some very interesting stuff going on with the temperature in the Strait of Georgia.  I googled "salinity in the Strait of Georgia" and came up with this: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/science/data-donnees/cotesud-southcoast/index-eng.html I am familiar with thermal gradients, but only in summer and winter, and to a limited degree.   All the places I have been, the wind and changing seasons is enough to stir things up twice a year.   Reading this reminded me of what I have read about the Baltic Sea and the Black Sea with their stable year-round layers.  So OK, Brent's instruments must be reading correctly.   Fresh water at 4C (close to the 38F/40F Brent reports) is the densest fresh water can be.  This water is still less dense than sea water, so, one may have seawater on the bottom, on top of that one has 4C freshwater at the bottom of the freshwater layer, and ice on the top of the freshwater layer.   Brent must be anchored in a relatively freshwater layer.    The reference would suggest the salt water below is actually a lot warmer than 4C where it is deeper. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 2:11 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...     Surface water out here is often fresher than the salt water below.  Depending where you are on the BC coast, we tend to get between one and two meters of rain between October and May.  The size of the freshwater lens floating on the saltwater varies on a bunch of different size scales.  The large plume of freshwater coming out of the Fraser River is one example and pretty easy to observe from the air (or even on the water) for much of the year.  On the other end of the size scale, if it is calm, it is also not unusual for a small bay to have a lens of freshwater on the surface.  It may be as little as a few inches or on the scale of several feet.  I've been snorkelling in Desolation Sound in the summer where if you kept moving you could stay in the warm, fresh, surface water, but if you slowed down and sank just four inches you'd be in the colder saltier water below.  So, you may be seeing relatively low salinity water freezing around the boat. If you really need to overwinter somewhere cold and are worried about ice around the boat or freshwater freezing in keel tanks, a bubbler might be enough to prevent the problem.  It's nothing more than a bunch of tubes lowered into the water around the boat.  As the bubbles rise they bring warmer water from below.  On Lake Ontario, they've used this to keep a lane open for the ferry and there is a place where you can get some serious ice.  As long as the water you are in is deep enough, there is almost a limitless thermal reservoir to keep the water from freezing around the boat.  At least down to temperatures I'd be willing to find myself in a boat. So, I think keel tanks for freshwater aren't a huge problem unless your planning on overwintering in the arctic.  If you haul out in freezing conditions, it'd be best to use a wet-dry shop vac to get the water out of the tanks through the inspection ports. On 2019-03-07 9:06 a.m., brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Yes, hauled out it would definitely be a worry, in different shaped tanks, as in some much colder climes. Where the sea water freezes around my boat is in a shallow, closed  bay ,where the surface water freezes, but the sea water under it says 38 degrees F , according to my depth sounder,and swimming pool thermometer. Ditto other depth sounders I have used in the past. A boat here keeps much warmer in cold snaps, if it stays afloat, and doesn't dry out. Yes, the west coast ( surf country) doesn't get much warmer than 40 degrees ,but the inner coast in some places hits 79 degrees F or more in summer. I remember coming thru Surge Narrows in summer, watching the depth sounder quickly go from 44 F to 65F in a mile or two. In summer, we have the warmest sea water north of the Gulf of Mexico, in some places ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Brent, the water tanks on the your origamis might be better-shaped or better placed.   I was referring to something that does apply to my boat and might apply to Rick's boat -- Rick has to decide.  My experience with my bilge water / in keel water tank water is, it does not freeze until about 3 weeks of continuous below-freezing weather have passed.   Similarly, when I look at the boat in the early spring, when the air is humid and above freezing, frost forms on the sides of the keel in the shape of the contained ballast.   I would not be concerned about overnight or between tide cycles, or preserves in a foamed boat in a week, even at -8C.   My concern would be either for my boat or Ricks, when it is left for a month, either in a cold salt-water marina or on the hard without draining the tanks.   I have seen water as deep as it is wide in a container not crack a plastic container, but I would be inclined to get the depth below 1/4 of the smallest surface dimension.   That is the rule of thumb I use on my bilge water and water tank water to keep there from being freezing damage.   Completely empty would be completely safe, but, I cannot guarantee that on my boat.  I am less concerned about the origami designs I see in the photos because on at least 3 sides of the tank it is the interior of the boat and something non-structural on the other side of the tank wall.  I had always assumed these sides were made with flat sheet in Brent's designs, whereas all the structural parts were curved.    Brent you give contradictory information on water temperature in coastal BC.   I can attest, it never gets warmer than 40F, having surfed it.   But you say the water temperature never goes below 40F -- I am guessing in the Strait of Georgia.   You say your depth sounder reads 38F when ice forms.  Ocean water normally freezes only a few degrees cooler than fresh water, 28.4F by one reference, but the dynamic wave action and currents and winds can keep it stirred for some time.    This stirring would stir surface water that is below 32F to lower depths before ice forms at the surface.   So it seems that your depth sounder is likely reading up to 10 degrees off.   If your depth sounder is calculating water temperature from acoustic properties, is it possible it is calibrated to fresh water?  I wonder what a regular thermometer on a string would read.   This would be the time of year to check. https://www.rona.ca/en/indoor-and-outdoor-wall-thermometer-0321071?viewStore=55070&cm_mmc=shopping_google-_-g_127_87-_-1701297967-_-ON-0321071&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIuZXT35Tw4AIVzYCfCh1Nxw3iEAQYAiABEgLmdvD_BwE    | 35661|35591|2019-03-10 05:53:48|Maxime Camirand|Re: BS 36 with a working 50 Hp engine for Sale in Florida "Samba"|If I had seen this in time, I probably would have bought it. Liens will always worry me, though. I bought a Colvin Gazelle in 2009 with "clear title" (said so on the sale contract) for $3500 if I remember correctly, and found there was a lien when I tried to delete it from the American registry to import it to Canada. The person who had put the lien on the boat (first owner, when selling to second owners, who then sold it to me) had died. I stopped paying the marina and they got rid of it after a while. A year later the seller got back to me saying he had been able to find the heirs and get the lien lifted, but it was too late.Max On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 at 17:14, jpronk1@... [origamiboats] wrote:   We saw this with less then an hour and we were very close to bidding on it. At $4000 Canadian that boat was a steal! Even with the extra $5000 to $6000 to truck the boat to south side of Lake Ontario it was still a great deal. I still want to build our own boat and when the time is right we will. Would love to hear who has bought it! James Sent from my iPhone | 35662|35557|2019-03-11 17:33:08|Rick Jackson|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Matt,  good information… As to the ballast idea… Ive been on boats that pumped water in and out of “ballast tanks” to balance loads in work boats.  I was referring to that as an option if it became necessary… However,,, I love the idea of moving the chain… Id have to work out how to keep the water out though… Our chain locker is typical, high in the bow and with a water tight bulkhead. Water in chain locker drains outside.   I think I weighed the chain at around 450 pounds so would be beneficial to move down lower..Our 8000 pounds of lead is all centered under the engine room with plenty space above it..  The boat is heavy for her size and adding weight is an issue, but one viable option is to recalculate the ballast requirements,  and possibly use what is on the boat to make up for what is needed down low, like the idea of anchor chain… Theoretically couldn’t you remove 450 pounds of lead and replace it with the chain?  It has the affect of removing 450 pounds from the boat… Same with the battery bank… Ideally Id like to add more of a house bank.. Would it be feasible to add a 1000 pounds of lead batteries and remove 1000 pounds of lead?  Again,,, it just lightened our boat 1000 pounds….  Im playing with ideas…. Batteries have to be accessible, and properly vented, and very secure.. Even if I had to hang a winch from the cabin top to raise and lower the bank, it would be worth it… On Mar 7, 2019, at 2:08 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:Hi Rick,Water ballast is like changing the shape of the underwater part of the boat, so that the tanks are like they are outside the boat.  If one built the boat differently so these tanks were outside the boat, the restoring moment of the boat would be unchanged.  Water provides zero ballast beyond that, until the water ballast is lifted above the water line in extreme heeling or something -- that is sufficient for cats and Open 60s.   In a monohull boat, the moment arm for water ballast is only a fraction of half the beam, and this is less than the draft, so adding a lead shoe to the bottom of the keel is always better than water tanks under the port and starboard settees for instance..   There is use in shipping extra fresh water if you do not have a water maker.  If you are filling empty space with water, just buy a smaller boat.   Far better is something more dense than water.  This actually provides a restoring moment that cannot be modelled as a smaller hull shape.    There was a good thread a while ago about making a chain locker out of a large diameter vertical pipe -- sink one of those into the empty space in the keel and move your chain out of the forward locker.    You are going to carry chain anyway, so, just have it lower.   Use the forward locker for light deck stuff like maybe fenders, or emergency line. It sounds like your lead is way down in the keel.   Is this as much lead as the design called for ?  More lead might (will) induce more hull stresses in motion, but, if you are thinking about any ballast, a small amount of lead ballast on top of your current lead ballast is far better than water.   Material Density    Ballast coefficientsample        X                  X-1Air              0.001226      -0.9987Water            1                   0concrete       2.4               1.4steel              7.85             6.85lead               11.34           10.34tungsten        19.3             18.3  Adding a doghouse helps ultimate stability because it is adding anti-ballast (coefficient -0.9987) above the center of flotation.Steel is substantially better than concrete, and lead is substantially better than steel.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 12:47 PMTo: origamiboats@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...  Interesting observations. I do not see our boat drying out, and I typically drain water tanks prior to haul out. So if I were on the hard in cold climates, I would not have those concerns..  Our keel is roughly 60 cubic feet and all but 11 cubic feet (lead) is empty space (366 gallons).   We had 300 gallons of fuel tankage flanking the main engine, and we had 300 gallons of water under the galley sole.  The boat did not have a water maker, which it now does, so we can reduce H2o storage. I am aware that we can not actually use all that hollow space, but we can use most of it..   I cut access into each cavity of the keel to inspect and it looks surprisingly well even though it was taking on salt water.   My objective is to sandblast those cavities and apply the appropriate coatings. That means I can not weld them back up, so why not cap each section with a bolted down, sealed lid, each with inspection ports, which creates tankage.  The trick I still am working out, is the space under the main engine. The ballast is under the main but we still have nearly 90 gallons of space there.  If I could utilize that space and maintain access for inspection and maintenance, it could be used.  I would love to figure out how to use that space for a house bank of AGMs. We are also willing to save some of those cavities for water ballast to balance the boat if it became necessary.  Main concern is that those spaces serve a purpose.  On Mar 7, 2019, at 9:06 AM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:Yes, hauled out it would definitely be a worry, in different shaped tanks, as in some much colder climes.Where the sea water freezes around my boat is in a shallow, closed  bay ,where the surface water freezes, but the sea water under it says 38 degrees F , according to my depth sounder,and swimming pool thermometer. Ditto other depth sounders I have used in the past.A boat here keeps much warmer in cold snaps, if it stays afloat, and doesn't dry out.Yes, the west coast ( surf country) doesn't get much warmer than 40 degrees ,but the inner coast in some places hits 79 degrees F or more in summer. I remember coming thru Surge Narrows in summer, watching the depth sounder quickly go from 44 F to 65F in a mile or two. In summer, we have the warmest sea water north of the Gulf of Mexico, in some places---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Brent, the water tanks on the your origamis might be better-shaped or better placed.   I was referring to something that does apply to my boat and might apply to Rick's boat -- Rick has to decide.  My experience with my bilge water / in keel water tank water is, it does not freeze until about 3 weeks of continuous below-freezing weather have passed.   Similarly, when I look at the boat in the early spring, when the air is humid and above freezing, frost forms on the sides of the keel in the shape of the contained ballast.   I would not be concerned about overnight or between tide cycles, or preserves in a foamed boat in a week, even at -8C.   My concern would be either for my boat or Ricks, when it is left for a month, either in a cold salt-water marina or on the hard without draining the tanks.   I have seen water as deep as it is wide in a container not crack a plastic container, but I would be inclined to get the depth below 1/4 of the smallest surface dimension.   That is the rule of thumb I use on my bilge water and water tank water to keep there from being freezing damage.   Completely empty would be completely safe, but, I cannot guarantee that on my boat.  I am less concerned about the origami designs I see in the photos because on at least 3 sides of the tank it is the interior of the boat and something non-structural on the other side of the tank wall.  I had always assumed these sides were made with flat sheet in Brent's designs, whereas all the structural parts were curved.    Brent you give contradictory information on water temperature in coastal BC.   I can attest, it never gets warmer than 40F, having surfed it.   But you say the water temperature never goes below 40F -- I am guessing in the Strait of Georgia.   You say your depth sounder reads 38F when ice forms.  Ocean water normally freezes only a few degrees cooler than fresh water, 28.4F by one reference, but the dynamic wave action and currents and winds can keep it stirred for some time.    This stirring would stir surface water that is below 32F to lower depths before ice forms at the surface.   So it seems that your depth sounder is likely reading up to 10 degrees off.   If your depth sounder is calculating water temperature from acoustic properties, is it possible it is calibrated to fresh water?  I wonder what a regular thermometer on a string would read.   This would be the time of year to check.https://www.rona.ca/en/indoor-and-outdoor-wall-thermometer-0321071?viewStore=55070&cm_mmc=shopping_google-_-g_127_87-_-1701297967-_-ON-0321071&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIuZXT35Tw4AIVzYCfCh1Nxw3iEAQYAiABEgLmdvD_BwE   | 35663|35557|2019-03-11 17:33:28|Rick Jackson|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|You have to love the internet… I would be living in a library if it did not exist…. Just found this which is interestinghttps://patents.google.com/patent/US20090283024A1/en On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Rick Jackson wrote:Matt,  good information… As to the ballast idea… Ive been on boats that pumped water in and out of “ballast tanks” to balance loads in work boats.  I was referring to that as an option if it became necessary… However,,, I love the idea of moving the chain… Id have to work out how to keep the water out though… Our chain locker is typical, high in the bow and with a water tight bulkhead. Water in chain locker drains outside.   I think I weighed the chain at around 450 pounds so would be beneficial to move down lower..Our 8000 pounds of lead is all centered under the engine room with plenty space above it..  The boat is heavy for her size and adding weight is an issue, but one viable option is to recalculate the ballast requirements,  and possibly use what is on the boat to make up for what is needed down low, like the idea of anchor chain… Theoretically couldn’t you remove 450 pounds of lead and replace it with the chain?  It has the affect of removing 450 pounds from the boat… Same with the battery bank… Ideally Id like to add more of a house bank.. Would it be feasible to add a 1000 pounds of lead batteries and remove 1000 pounds of lead?  Again,,, it just lightened our boat 1000 pounds….  Im playing with ideas…. Batteries have to be accessible, and properly vented, and very secure.. Even if I had to hang a winch from the cabin top to raise and lower the bank, it would be worth it…On Mar 7, 2019, at 2:08 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:Hi Rick,Water ballast is like changing the shape of the underwater part of the boat, so that the tanks are like they are outside the boat.  If one built the boat differently so these tanks were outside the boat, the restoring moment of the boat would be unchanged.  Water provides zero ballast beyond that, until the water ballast is lifted above the water line in extreme heeling or something -- that is sufficient for cats and Open 60s.   In a monohull boat, the moment arm for water ballast is only a fraction of half the beam, and this is less than the draft, so adding a lead shoe to the bottom of the keel is always better than water tanks under the port and starboard settees for instance.   There is use in shipping extra fresh water if you do not have a water maker.  If you are filling empty space with water, just buy a smaller boat.   Far better is something more dense than water..  This actually provides a restoring moment that cannot be modelled as a smaller hull shape.    There was a good thread a while ago about making a chain locker out of a large diameter vertical pipe -- sink one of those into the empty space in the keel and move your chain out of the forward locker.    You are going to carry chain anyway, so, just have it lower.   Use the forward locker for light deck stuff like maybe fenders, or emergency line. It sounds like your lead is way down in the keel.   Is this as much lead as the design called for ?  More lead might (will) induce more hull stresses in motion, but, if you are thinking about any ballast, a small amount of lead ballast on top of your current lead ballast is far better than water.   Material Density    Ballast coefficientsample        X                  X-1Air              0.001226      -0.9987Water            1                   0concrete       2.4               1.4steel              7.85             6.85lead               11.34           10.34tungsten        19.3             18.3  Adding a doghouse helps ultimate stability because it is adding anti-ballast (coefficient -0.9987) above the center of flotation.Steel is substantially better than concrete, and lead is substantially better than steel.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 12:47 PMTo: origamiboats@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...  Interesting observations. I do not see our boat drying out, and I typically drain water tanks prior to haul out. So if I were on the hard in cold climates, I would not have those concerns..  Our keel is roughly 60 cubic feet and all but 11 cubic feet (lead) is empty space (366 gallons).   We had 300 gallons of fuel tankage flanking the main engine, and we had 300 gallons of water under the galley sole.  The boat did not have a water maker, which it now does, so we can reduce H2o storage. I am aware that we can not actually use all that hollow space, but we can use most of it...   I cut access into each cavity of the keel to inspect and it looks surprisingly well even though it was taking on salt water.   My objective is to sandblast those cavities and apply the appropriate coatings. That means I can not weld them back up, so why not cap each section with a bolted down, sealed lid, each with inspection ports, which creates tankage.  The trick I still am working out, is the space under the main engine. The ballast is under the main but we still have nearly 90 gallons of space there.  If I could utilize that space and maintain access for inspection and maintenance, it could be used.  I would love to figure out how to use that space for a house bank of AGMs. We are also willing to save some of those cavities for water ballast to balance the boat if it became necessary.  Main concern is that those spaces serve a purpose.  On Mar 7, 2019, at 9:06 AM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:Yes, hauled out it would definitely be a worry, in different shaped tanks, as in some much colder climes.Where the sea water freezes around my boat is in a shallow, closed  bay ,where the surface water freezes, but the sea water under it says 38 degrees F , according to my depth sounder,and swimming pool thermometer. Ditto other depth sounders I have used in the past.A boat here keeps much warmer in cold snaps, if it stays afloat, and doesn't dry out.Yes, the west coast ( surf country) doesn't get much warmer than 40 degrees ,but the inner coast in some places hits 79 degrees F or more in summer. I remember coming thru Surge Narrows in summer, watching the depth sounder quickly go from 44 F to 65F in a mile or two. In summer, we have the warmest sea water north of the Gulf of Mexico, in some places---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Brent, the water tanks on the your origamis might be better-shaped or better placed.   I was referring to something that does apply to my boat and might apply to Rick's boat -- Rick has to decide.  My experience with my bilge water / in keel water tank water is, it does not freeze until about 3 weeks of continuous below-freezing weather have passed.   Similarly, when I look at the boat in the early spring, when the air is humid and above freezing, frost forms on the sides of the keel in the shape of the contained ballast.   I would not be concerned about overnight or between tide cycles, or preserves in a foamed boat in a week, even at -8C.   My concern would be either for my boat or Ricks, when it is left for a month, either in a cold salt-water marina or on the hard without draining the tanks.   I have seen water as deep as it is wide in a container not crack a plastic container, but I would be inclined to get the depth below 1/4 of the smallest surface dimension.   That is the rule of thumb I use on my bilge water and water tank water to keep there from being freezing damage.   Completely empty would be completely safe, but, I cannot guarantee that on my boat.  I am less concerned about the origami designs I see in the photos because on at least 3 sides of the tank it is the interior of the boat and something non-structural on the other side of the tank wall.  I had always assumed these sides were made with flat sheet in Brent's designs, whereas all the structural parts were curved.    Brent you give contradictory information on water temperature in coastal BC.   I can attest, it never gets warmer than 40F, having surfed it.   But you say the water temperature never goes below 40F -- I am guessing in the Strait of Georgia.   You say your depth sounder reads 38F when ice forms.  Ocean water normally freezes only a few degrees cooler than fresh water, 28.4F by one reference, but the dynamic wave action and currents and winds can keep it stirred for some time.    This stirring would stir surface water that is below 32F to lower depths before ice forms at the surface.   So it seems that your depth sounder is likely reading up to 10 degrees off.   If your depth sounder is calculating water temperature from acoustic properties, is it possible it is calibrated to fresh water?  I wonder what a regular thermometer on a string would read.   This would be the time of year to check.https://www.rona.ca/en/indoor-and-outdoor-wall-thermometer-0321071?viewStore=55070&cm_mmc=shopping_google-_-g_127_87-_-1701297967-_-ON-0321071&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIuZXT35Tw4AIVzYCfCh1Nxw3iEAQYAiABEgLmdvD_BwE   | 35664|35557|2019-03-11 22:26:50|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| Hi Rick, this chain locker was not my idea.  I recall Darren having a lot of input.  I am sure you will find the entire tread somewhere, but briefly, I recall: - the container being something like a watermain pipe section, mounted vertically, sealed with a plug at the bottom, - a port on the side near the bottom for a sump pump, - an openable/sealable observation port on side nearer the top, - 3 ports on the top:   - - the chain port on a hawse pipe,   - - a fan forced ventilation port, to suck in outside air and blow it up the hawse pipe, and   - - finally a sprayer port to wash the chain in the locker.  In the limit, one could dump in an anti-biological, top it with water, soak it for a day, pump it out, and spray it with pine scent if you want. I would not remove any ballast, ever. Completely sealed batteries with comprehensive silicon sealant separating all electricity from all electricity on all connections, and one would not lose power before getting 1/4" of water above the floor-board level.  Otherwise saltwater will drain the batteries in a fraction of an hour and fill the cabin with hydrogen and maybe chlorine. One could seal the batteries in with a 1/2" vent hose for the chamber and build an electrically isolated feed-through, then there would be only two connections to seal. Matt From: Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, March 11, 17:33 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Matt,  good information…  As to the ballast idea… Ive been on boats that pumped water in and out of “ballast tanks” to balance loads in work boats.  I was referring to that as an option if it became necessary…  However,,, I love the idea of moving the chain… Id have to work out how to keep the water out though… Our chain locker is typical, high in the bow and with a water tight bulkhead. Water in chain locker drains outside.   I think I weighed the chain at around 450 pounds so would be beneficial to move down lower.. Our 8000 pounds of lead is all centered under the engine room with plenty space above it...  The boat is heavy for her size and adding weight is an issue, but one viable option is to recalculate the ballast requirements,  and possibly use what is on the boat to make up for what is needed down low, like the idea of anchor chain… Theoretically couldn’t you remove 450 pounds of lead and replace it with the chain?  It has the affect of removing 450 pounds from the boat… Same with the battery bank… Ideally Id like to add more of a house bank.. Would it be feasible to add a 1000 pounds of lead batteries and remove 1000 pounds of lead?  Again,,, it just lightened our boat 1000 pounds….  Im playing with ideas…. Batteries have to be accessible, and properly vented, and very secure.. Even if I had to hang a winch from the cabin top to raise and lower the bank, it would be worth it… On Mar 7, 2019, at 2:08 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote: Hi Rick, Water ballast is like changing the shape of the underwater part of the boat, so that the tanks are like they are outside the boat.  If one built the boat differently so these tanks were outside the boat, the restoring moment of the boat would be unchanged.  Water provides zero ballast beyond that, until the water ballast is lifted above the water line in extreme heeling or something -- that is sufficient for cats and Open 60s.   In a monohull boat, the moment arm for water ballast is only a fraction of half the beam, and this is less than the draft, so adding a lead shoe to the bottom of the keel is always better than water tanks under the port and starboard settees for instance..    There is use in shipping extra fresh water if you do not have a water maker.  If you are filling empty space with water, just buy a smaller boat.   Far better is something more dense than water.  This actually provides a restoring moment that cannot be modelled as a smaller hull shape.     There was a good thread a while ago about making a chain locker out of a large diameter vertical pipe -- sink one of those into the empty space in the keel and move your chain out of the forward locker.    You are going to carry chain anyway, so, just have it lower.   Use the forward locker for light deck stuff like maybe fenders, or emergency line.  It sounds like your lead is way down in the keel.   Is this as much lead as the design called for ?  More lead might (will) induce more hull stresses in motion, but, if you are thinking about any ballast, a small amount of lead ballast on top of your current lead ballast is far better than water.    Material Density    Ballast coefficient sample        X                  X-1 Air              0.001226      -0.9987 Water            1                   0 concrete       2.4               1.4 steel              7.85             6.85 lead               11.34           10.34 tungsten        19.3             18.3    Adding a doghouse helps ultimate stability because it is adding anti-ballast (coefficient -0.9987) above the center of flotation. Steel is substantially better than concrete, and lead is substantially better than steel.    Matt  From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 12:47 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...     Interesting observations.  I do not see our boat drying out, and I typically drain water tanks prior to haul out. So if I were on the hard in cold climates, I would not have those concerns..   Our keel is roughly 60 cubic feet and all but 11 cubic feet (lead) is empty space (366 gallons).   We had 300 gallons of fuel tankage flanking the main engine, and we had 300 gallons of water under the galley sole.  The boat did not have a water maker, which it now does, so we can reduce H2o storage.  I am aware that we can not actually use all that hollow space, but we can use most of it..    I cut access into each cavity of the keel to inspect and it looks surprisingly well even though it was taking on salt water.   My objective is to sandblast those cavities and apply the appropriate coatings. That means I can not weld them back up, so why not cap each section with a bolted down, sealed lid, each with inspection ports, which creates tankage.  The trick I still am working out, is the space under the main engine. The ballast is under the main but we still have nearly 90 gallons of space there.  If I could utilize that space and maintain access for inspection and maintenance, it could be used.  I would love to figure out how to use that space for a house bank of AGMs.  We are also willing to save some of those cavities for water ballast to balance the boat if it became necessary.  Main concern is that those spaces serve a purpose.   On Mar 7, 2019, at 9:06 AM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote: Yes, hauled out it would definitely be a worry, in different shaped tanks, as in some much colder climes. Where the sea water freezes around my boat is in a shallow, closed  bay ,where the surface water freezes, but the sea water under it says 38 degrees F , according to my depth sounder,and swimming pool thermometer. Ditto other depth sounders I have used in the past. A boat here keeps much warmer in cold snaps, if it stays afloat, and doesn't dry out. Yes, the west coast ( surf country) doesn't get much warmer than 40 degrees ,but the inner coast in some places hits 79 degrees F or more in summer.  I remember coming thru Surge Narrows in summer, watching the depth sounder quickly go from 44 F to 65F in a mile or two. In summer, we have the warmest sea water north of the Gulf of Mexico, in some places ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Brent, the water tanks on the your origamis might be better-shaped or better placed.   I was referring to something that does apply to my boat and might apply to Rick's boat -- Rick has to decide.   My experience with my bilge water / in keel water tank water is, it does not freeze until about 3 weeks of continuous below-freezing weather have passed.   Similarly, when I look at the boat in the early spring, when the air is humid and above freezing, frost forms on the sides of the keel in the shape of the contained ballast..   I would not be concerned about overnight or between tide cycles, or preserves in a foamed boat in a week, even at -8C.    My concern would be either for my boat or Ricks, when it is left for a month, either in a cold salt-water marina or on the hard without draining the tanks.   I have seen water as deep as it is wide in a container not crack a plastic container, but I would be inclined to get the depth below 1/4 of the smallest surface dimension.   That is the rule of thumb I use on my bilge water and water tank water to keep there from being freezing damage.   Completely empty would be completely safe, but, I cannot guarantee that on my boat.   I am less concerned about the origami designs I see in the photos because on at least 3 sides of the tank it is the interior of the boat and something non-structural on the other side of the tank wall.  I had always assumed these sides were made with flat sheet in Brent's designs, whereas all the structural parts were curved.     Brent you give contradictory information on water temperature in coastal BC.   I can attest, it never gets warmer than 40F, having surfed it.   But you say the water temperature never goes below 40F -- I am guessing in the Strait of Georgia.   You say your depth sounder reads 38F when ice forms.  Ocean water normally freezes only a few degrees cooler than fresh water, 28.4F by one reference, but the dynamic wave action and currents and winds can keep it stirred for some time.    This stirring would stir surface water that is below 32F to lower depths before ice forms at the surface.   So it seems that your depth sounder is likely reading up to 10 degrees off.   If your depth sounder is calculating water temperature from acoustic properties, is it possible it is calibrated to fresh water?  I wonder what a regular thermometer on a string would read.   This would be the time of year to check. https://www.rona.ca/en/indoor-and-outdoor-wall-thermometer-0321071?viewStore=55070&cm_mmc=shopping_google-_-g_127_87-_-1701297967-_-ON-0321071&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIuZXT35Tw4AIVzYCfCh1Nxw3iEAQYAiABEgLmdvD_BwE     | 35665|35557|2019-03-11 22:57:15|Brian Stannard|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|RickYour idea works but only if the new weight - anchor chain and batteries - are as low as the original ballast. Probably not possible.Some boats are designed that way. Dashew's Sundeers use traction batteries below the cabin sole and they are part of the designed ballast.  On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 2:33 PM Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Matt,  good information… As to the ballast idea… Ive been on boats that pumped water in and out of “ballast tanks” to balance loads in work boats.  I was referring to that as an option if it became necessary… However,,, I love the idea of moving the chain… Id have to work out how to keep the water out though… Our chain locker is typical, high in the bow and with a water tight bulkhead. Water in chain locker drains outside.   I think I weighed the chain at around 450 pounds so would be beneficial to move down lower..Our 8000 pounds of lead is all centered under the engine room with plenty space above it...  The boat is heavy for her size and adding weight is an issue, but one viable option is to recalculate the ballast requirements,  and possibly use what is on the boat to make up for what is needed down low, like the idea of anchor chain… Theoretically couldn’t you remove 450 pounds of lead and replace it with the chain?  It has the affect of removing 450 pounds from the boat… Same with the battery bank… Ideally Id like to add more of a house bank.. Would it be feasible to add a 1000 pounds of lead batteries and remove 1000 pounds of lead?  Again,,, it just lightened our boat 1000 pounds….  Im playing with ideas…. Batteries have to be accessible, and properly vented, and very secure.. Even if I had to hang a winch from the cabin top to raise and lower the bank, it would be worth it…On Mar 7, 2019, at 2:08 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:Hi Rick,Water ballast is like changing the shape of the underwater part of the boat, so that the tanks are like they are outside the boat.  If one built the boat differently so these tanks were outside the boat, the restoring moment of the boat would be unchanged.  Water provides zero ballast beyond that, until the water ballast is lifted above the water line in extreme heeling or something -- that is sufficient for cats and Open 60s.   In a monohull boat, the moment arm for water ballast is only a fraction of half the beam, and this is less than the draft, so adding a lead shoe to the bottom of the keel is always better than water tanks under the port and starboard settees for instance..   There is use in shipping extra fresh water if you do not have a water maker.  If you are filling empty space with water, just buy a smaller boat.   Far better is something more dense than water.  This actually provides a restoring moment that cannot be modelled as a smaller hull shape.    There was a good thread a while ago about making a chain locker out of a large diameter vertical pipe -- sink one of those into the empty space in the keel and move your chain out of the forward locker.    You are going to carry chain anyway, so, just have it lower.   Use the forward locker for light deck stuff like maybe fenders, or emergency line. It sounds like your lead is way down in the keel.   Is this as much lead as the design called for ?  More lead might (will) induce more hull stresses in motion, but, if you are thinking about any ballast, a small amount of lead ballast on top of your current lead ballast is far better than water.   Material Density    Ballast coefficientsample        X                  X-1Air              0.001226      -0.9987Water            1                   0concrete       2.4               1.4steel              7.85             6.85lead               11.34           10.34tungsten        19.3             18.3  Adding a doghouse helps ultimate stability because it is adding anti-ballast (coefficient -0.9987) above the center of flotation.Steel is substantially better than concrete, and lead is substantially better than steel.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 12:47 PMTo: origamiboats@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...  Interesting observations. I do not see our boat drying out, and I typically drain water tanks prior to haul out. So if I were on the hard in cold climates, I would not have those concerns..  Our keel is roughly 60 cubic feet and all but 11 cubic feet (lead) is empty space (366 gallons).   We had 300 gallons of fuel tankage flanking the main engine, and we had 300 gallons of water under the galley sole.  The boat did not have a water maker, which it now does, so we can reduce H2o storage. I am aware that we can not actually use all that hollow space, but we can use most of it..   I cut access into each cavity of the keel to inspect and it looks surprisingly well even though it was taking on salt water.   My objective is to sandblast those cavities and apply the appropriate coatings. That means I can not weld them back up, so why not cap each section with a bolted down, sealed lid, each with inspection ports, which creates tankage.  The trick I still am working out, is the space under the main engine. The ballast is under the main but we still have nearly 90 gallons of space there.  If I could utilize that space and maintain access for inspection and maintenance, it could be used.  I would love to figure out how to use that space for a house bank of AGMs. We are also willing to save some of those cavities for water ballast to balance the boat if it became necessary.  Main concern is that those spaces serve a purpose.  On Mar 7, 2019, at 9:06 AM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:Yes, hauled out it would definitely be a worry, in different shaped tanks, as in some much colder climes.Where the sea water freezes around my boat is in a shallow, closed  bay ,where the surface water freezes, but the sea water under it says 38 degrees F , according to my depth sounder,and swimming pool thermometer. Ditto other depth sounders I have used in the past.A boat here keeps much warmer in cold snaps, if it stays afloat, and doesn't dry out.Yes, the west coast ( surf country) doesn't get much warmer than 40 degrees ,but the inner coast in some places hits 79 degrees F or more in summer. I remember coming thru Surge Narrows in summer, watching the depth sounder quickly go from 44 F to 65F in a mile or two. In summer, we have the warmest sea water north of the Gulf of Mexico, in some places---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Brent, the water tanks on the your origamis might be better-shaped or better placed.   I was referring to something that does apply to my boat and might apply to Rick's boat -- Rick has to decide.  My experience with my bilge water / in keel water tank water is, it does not freeze until about 3 weeks of continuous below-freezing weather have passed.   Similarly, when I look at the boat in the early spring, when the air is humid and above freezing, frost forms on the sides of the keel in the shape of the contained ballast..   I would not be concerned about overnight or between tide cycles, or preserves in a foamed boat in a week, even at -8C.   My concern would be either for my boat or Ricks, when it is left for a month, either in a cold salt-water marina or on the hard without draining the tanks.   I have seen water as deep as it is wide in a container not crack a plastic container, but I would be inclined to get the depth below 1/4 of the smallest surface dimension.   That is the rule of thumb I use on my bilge water and water tank water to keep there from being freezing damage.   Completely empty would be completely safe, but, I cannot guarantee that on my boat.  I am less concerned about the origami designs I see in the photos because on at least 3 sides of the tank it is the interior of the boat and something non-structural on the other side of the tank wall.  I had always assumed these sides were made with flat sheet in Brent's designs, whereas all the structural parts were curved.    Brent you give contradictory information on water temperature in coastal BC.   I can attest, it never gets warmer than 40F, having surfed it.   But you say the water temperature never goes below 40F -- I am guessing in the Strait of Georgia.   You say your depth sounder reads 38F when ice forms.  Ocean water normally freezes only a few degrees cooler than fresh water, 28.4F by one reference, but the dynamic wave action and currents and winds can keep it stirred for some time.    This stirring would stir surface water that is below 32F to lower depths before ice forms at the surface.   So it seems that your depth sounder is likely reading up to 10 degrees off.   If your depth sounder is calculating water temperature from acoustic properties, is it possible it is calibrated to fresh water?  I wonder what a regular thermometer on a string would read.   This would be the time of year to check.https://www.rona.ca/en/indoor-and-outdoor-wall-thermometer-0321071?viewStore=55070&cm_mmc=shopping_google-_-g_127_87-_-1701297967-_-ON-0321071&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIuZXT35Tw4AIVzYCfCh1Nxw3iEAQYAiABEgLmdvD_BwE    -- CheersBrian | 35666|35557|2019-03-11 23:09:39|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| Ditto, that is really cool.  Fitted batteries, as is shown in the diagram in the patent would have a good effective density.   Rectangular production batteries, not so much.  If you do the calculations on the mass of batteries and the odd-shaped empty keel volume you cannot fit one more battery in -- that calculated density is quite low.  They may actually have a density less than water in that volume.  I spoke against adding water as ballast which is different from your most recent point of shifting existing water for trimming.  Even if batteries do not pack efficiently into the odd-shaped keel volume, it is about moving weight you would have somewhere else to a lower location, and this is always good.    I have spoken in the past about electric propulsion - there are entire groups discussing that - and adding lots of batteries for any reason.  I have observed big ship rules require separate and sealed battery rooms for safety.   Remember, you intend to sleep in the same volume as these batteries.  Every one is a risk.  In a steel boat, there is the potential to weld in a bulkhead to separate batteries from the cabin.   Then if you want to add more batteries, then each is less additional risk.  (Brent is against adding bulkheads for other reasons.)  Batteries in the contigupus air volume of the living space is a risk generally accepted in small yachts, but you need not accept it if you have a currently stripped - out boat.   Propane is similarly a risk generally accepted on small yachts.  In a steel boat a separate volume can be created for storage cylinders too.  I saw one open 60 design with the engine in the middle of the saloon.  Panels secured all around it and a beautiful table top went on top.  Complete accessibility, complete separation.   A massive battery bank would fit compactly into such a low, center-saloon enclosure.  Just do not forget a steel duct to outside for a vent, in case of fire. Lastly, nickel-iron batteries, if you were considering them, take a careful look at the specs sheet.  Take the specs sheet mass, and divide by the case size and you will find their case-density is very low, before considering packing them inefficiently into an odd-shaped keel volume. Matt From: Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, March 11, 17:33 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   You have to love the internet… I would be living in a library if it did not exist…. Just found this which is interesting https://patents.google.com/patent/US20090283024A1/en On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Rick Jackson wrote: Matt,  good information…  As to the ballast idea… Ive been on boats that pumped water in and out of “ballast tanks” to balance loads in work boats.  I was referring to that as an option if it became necessary…  However,,, I love the idea of moving the chain… Id have to work out how to keep the water out though… Our chain locker is typical, high in the bow and with a water tight bulkhead. Water in chain locker drains outside.   I think I weighed the chain at around 450 pounds so would be beneficial to move down lower.. Our 8000 pounds of lead is all centered under the engine room with plenty space above it..  The boat is heavy for her size and adding weight is an issue, but one viable option is to recalculate the ballast requirements,  and possibly use what is on the boat to make up for what is needed down low, like the idea of anchor chain… Theoretically couldn’t you remove 450 pounds of lead and replace it with the chain?  It has the affect of removing 450 pounds from the boat… Same with the battery bank… Ideally Id like to add more of a house bank.. Would it be feasible to add a 1000 pounds of lead batteries and remove 1000 pounds of lead?  Again,,, it just lightened our boat 1000 pounds….  Im playing with ideas…. Batteries have to be accessible, and properly vented, and very secure.. Even if I had to hang a winch from the cabin top to raise and lower the bank, it would be worth it… On Mar 7, 2019, at 2:08 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote: Hi Rick, Water ballast is like changing the shape of the underwater part of the boat, so that the tanks are like they are outside the boat.  If one built the boat differently so these tanks were outside the boat, the restoring moment of the boat would be unchanged.  Water provides zero ballast beyond that, until the water ballast is lifted above the water line in extreme heeling or something -- that is sufficient for cats and Open 60s.   In a monohull boat, the moment arm for water ballast is only a fraction of half the beam, and this is less than the draft, so adding a lead shoe to the bottom of the keel is always better than water tanks under the port and starboard settees for instance.    There is use in shipping extra fresh water if you do not have a water maker.  If you are filling empty space with water, just buy a smaller boat.   Far better is something more dense than water..  This actually provides a restoring moment that cannot be modelled as a smaller hull shape.     There was a good thread a while ago about making a chain locker out of a large diameter vertical pipe -- sink one of those into the empty space in the keel and move your chain out of the forward locker.    You are going to carry chain anyway, so, just have it lower.   Use the forward locker for light deck stuff like maybe fenders, or emergency line.  It sounds like your lead is way down in the keel.   Is this as much lead as the design called for ?  More lead might (will) induce more hull stresses in motion, but, if you are thinking about any ballast, a small amount of lead ballast on top of your current lead ballast is far better than water.    Material Density    Ballast coefficient sample        X                  X-1 Air              0.001226      -0.9987 Water            1                   0 concrete       2.4               1.4 steel              7.85             6.85 lead               11.34           10.34 tungsten        19.3             18.3    Adding a doghouse helps ultimate stability because it is adding anti-ballast (coefficient -0.9987) above the center of flotation. Steel is substantially better than concrete, and lead is substantially better than steel.    Matt  From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 12:47 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...     Interesting observations.  I do not see our boat drying out, and I typically drain water tanks prior to haul out. So if I were on the hard in cold climates, I would not have those concerns..   Our keel is roughly 60 cubic feet and all but 11 cubic feet (lead) is empty space (366 gallons).   We had 300 gallons of fuel tankage flanking the main engine, and we had 300 gallons of water under the galley sole.  The boat did not have a water maker, which it now does, so we can reduce H2o storage.  I am aware that we can not actually use all that hollow space, but we can use most of it...    I cut access into each cavity of the keel to inspect and it looks surprisingly well even though it was taking on salt water.   My objective is to sandblast those cavities and apply the appropriate coatings. That means I can not weld them back up, so why not cap each section with a bolted down, sealed lid, each with inspection ports, which creates tankage.  The trick I still am working out, is the space under the main engine. The ballast is under the main but we still have nearly 90 gallons of space there.  If I could utilize that space and maintain access for inspection and maintenance, it could be used.  I would love to figure out how to use that space for a house bank of AGMs.  We are also willing to save some of those cavities for water ballast to balance the boat if it became necessary.  Main concern is that those spaces serve a purpose.   On Mar 7, 2019, at 9:06 AM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote: Yes, hauled out it would definitely be a worry, in different shaped tanks, as in some much colder climes. Where the sea water freezes around my boat is in a shallow, closed  bay ,where the surface water freezes, but the sea water under it says 38 degrees F , according to my depth sounder,and swimming pool thermometer. Ditto other depth sounders I have used in the past. A boat here keeps much warmer in cold snaps, if it stays afloat, and doesn't dry out. Yes, the west coast ( surf country) doesn't get much warmer than 40 degrees ,but the inner coast in some places hits 79 degrees F or more in summer.  I remember coming thru Surge Narrows in summer, watching the depth sounder quickly go from 44 F to 65F in a mile or two. In summer, we have the warmest sea water north of the Gulf of Mexico, in some places ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Brent, the water tanks on the your origamis might be better-shaped or better placed.   I was referring to something that does apply to my boat and might apply to Rick's boat -- Rick has to decide.   My experience with my bilge water / in keel water tank water is, it does not freeze until about 3 weeks of continuous below-freezing weather have passed.   Similarly, when I look at the boat in the early spring, when the air is humid and above freezing, frost forms on the sides of the keel in the shape of the contained ballast.   I would not be concerned about overnight or between tide cycles, or preserves in a foamed boat in a week, even at -8C.    My concern would be either for my boat or Ricks, when it is left for a month, either in a cold salt-water marina or on the hard without draining the tanks.   I have seen water as deep as it is wide in a container not crack a plastic container, but I would be inclined to get the depth below 1/4 of the smallest surface dimension.   That is the rule of thumb I use on my bilge water and water tank water to keep there from being freezing damage.   Completely empty would be completely safe, but, I cannot guarantee that on my boat.   I am less concerned about the origami designs I see in the photos because on at least 3 sides of the tank it is the interior of the boat and something non-structural on the other side of the tank wall.  I had always assumed these sides were made with flat sheet in Brent's designs, whereas all the structural parts were curved.     Brent you give contradictory information on water temperature in coastal BC.   I can attest, it never gets warmer than 40F, having surfed it.   But you say the water temperature never goes below 40F -- I am guessing in the Strait of Georgia.   You say your depth sounder reads 38F when ice forms.  Ocean water normally freezes only a few degrees cooler than fresh water, 28.4F by one reference, but the dynamic wave action and currents and winds can keep it stirred for some time.    This stirring would stir surface water that is below 32F to lower depths before ice forms at the surface.   So it seems that your depth sounder is likely reading up to 10 degrees off.   If your depth sounder is calculating water temperature from acoustic properties, is it possible it is calibrated to fresh water?  I wonder what a regular thermometer on a string would read.   This would be the time of year to check. https://www.rona.ca/en/indoor-and-outdoor-wall-thermometer-0321071?viewStore=55070&cm_mmc=shopping_google-_-g_127_87-_-1701297967-_-ON-0321071&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIuZXT35Tw4AIVzYCfCh1Nxw3iEAQYAiABEgLmdvD_BwE     | 35667|35557|2019-03-12 00:14:02|Darren Bos|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| Yep, that is pretty much how I built my chain locker.  10" PVC pipe, cut extra sections and warm in oven and clamp between 3/4" ply  to make some flat stock, one piece for the bottom and another a bit above that with holes drilled in it to lift the chain a bit above the sump.   Sump is pumped out with manual diaphragm pump.  Cut an access door out the side, glue an extra section of pipe inside to frame the cutout to retain the door again.  Attach the door with four spring loaded over-center latches. I did this mostly to make the chain more manageable.  A tall narrow locker is ideal to avoid chain snarls.  The sealed pipe keeps the mess out of the rest  of the boat.  My windlass motor is outside the pipe so it will live a longer and happier life.  For me this also moved the chain three or four feet aft.  Buying a PVC pipe of this size is expensive, but you can likely find some for free if you keep an eye out for city workers laying new water mains or sewer lines.  Apparently the flange on the end is the valuable bit, but the extra bits of pipe less so.  I used 10" because it was what was on hand.  From the top of the keel to below deck my locker holds 200' of 5/16" chain.  If I were searching for something again, it would be really nice to have 12" pipe.  However, I think that is bigger than you're likely to find commonly. On 2019-03-11 7:26 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Hi Rick, this chain locker was not my idea.  I recall Darren having a lot of input.  I am sure you will find the entire tread somewhere, but briefly, I recall: - the container being something like a watermain pipe section, mounted vertically, sealed with a plug at the bottom, - a port on the side near the bottom for a sump pump, - an openable/sealable observation port on side nearer the top, - 3 ports on the top:   - - the chain port on a hawse pipe,   - - a fan forced ventilation port, to suck in outside air and blow it up the hawse pipe, and   - - finally a sprayer port to wash the chain in the locker.  In the limit, one could dump in an anti-biological, top it with water, soak it for a day, pump it out, and spray it with pine scent if you want. I would not remove any ballast, ever. Completely sealed batteries with comprehensive silicon sealant separating all electricity from all electricity on all connections, and one would not lose power before getting 1/4" of water above the floor-board level.  Otherwise saltwater will drain the batteries in a fraction of an hour and fill the cabin with hydrogen and maybe chlorine. One could seal the batteries in with a 1/2" vent hose for the chamber and build an electrically isolated feed-through, then there would be only two connections to seal. Matt From: Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, March 11, 17:33 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Matt,  good information…  As to the ballast idea… Ive been on boats that pumped water in and out of “ballast tanks” to balance loads in work boats.  I was referring to that as an option if it became necessary…  However,,, I love the idea of moving the chain… Id have to work out how to keep the water out though… Our chain locker is typical, high in the bow and with a water tight bulkhead. Water in chain locker drains outside.   I think I weighed the chain at around 450 pounds so would be beneficial to move down lower.. Our 8000 pounds of lead is all centered under the engine room with plenty space above it...  The boat is heavy for her size and adding weight is an issue, but one viable option is to recalculate the ballast requirements,  and possibly use what is on the boat to make up for what is needed down low, like the idea of anchor chain… Theoretically couldn’t you remove 450 pounds of lead and replace it with the chain?  It has the affect of removing 450 pounds from the boat… Same with the battery bank… Ideally Id like to add more of a house bank.. Would it be feasible to add a 1000 pounds of lead batteries and remove 1000 pounds of lead?  Again,,, it just lightened our boat 1000 pounds….  Im playing with ideas…. Batteries have to be accessible, and properly vented, and very secure.. Even if I had to hang a winch from the cabin top to raise and lower the bank, it would be worth it… On Mar 7, 2019, at 2:08 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote: Hi Rick, Water ballast is like changing the shape of the underwater part of the boat, so that the tanks are like they are outside the boat.  If one built the boat differently so these tanks were outside the boat, the restoring moment of the boat would be unchanged.  Water provides zero ballast beyond that, until the water ballast is lifted above the water line in extreme heeling or something -- that is sufficient for cats and Open 60s.   In a monohull boat, the moment arm for water ballast is only a fraction of half the beam, and this is less than the draft, so adding a lead shoe to the bottom of the keel is always better than water tanks under the port and starboard settees for instance..    There is use in shipping extra fresh water if you do not have a water maker..  If you are filling empty space with water, just buy a smaller boat.   Far better is something more dense than water.  This actually provides a restoring moment that cannot be modelled as a smaller hull shape.     There was a good thread a while ago about making a chain locker out of a large diameter vertical pipe -- sink one of those into the empty space in the keel and move your chain out of the forward locker.    You are going to carry chain anyway, so, just have it lower.   Use the forward locker for light deck stuff like maybe fenders, or emergency line.  It sounds like your lead is way down in the keel.   Is this as much lead as the design called for ?  More lead might (will) induce more hull stresses in motion, but, if you are thinking about any ballast, a small amount of lead ballast on top of your current lead ballast is far better than water.    Material Density    Ballast coefficient sample        X                  X-1 Air              0.001226      -0.9987 Water            1                   0 concrete       2.4               1.4 steel              7.85             6.85 lead               11.34           10.34 tungsten        19.3             18.3    Adding a doghouse helps ultimate stability because it is adding anti-ballast (coefficient -0.9987) above the center of flotation. Steel is substantially better than concrete, and lead is substantially better than steel.    Matt  From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 12:47 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...     Interesting observations.  I do not see our boat drying out, and I typically drain water tanks prior to haul out. So if I were on the hard in cold climates, I would not have those concerns..   Our keel is roughly 60 cubic feet and all but 11 cubic feet (lead) is empty space (366 gallons).   We had 300 gallons of fuel tankage flanking the main engine, and we had 300 gallons of water under the galley sole.  The boat did not have a water maker, which it now does, so we can reduce H2o storage.  I am aware that we can not actually use all that hollow space, but we can use most of it..    I cut access into each cavity of the keel to inspect and it looks surprisingly well even though it was taking on salt water.   My objective is to sandblast those cavities and apply the appropriate coatings. That means I can not weld them back up, so why not cap each section with a bolted down, sealed lid, each with inspection ports, which creates tankage.  The trick I still am working out, is the space under the main engine. The ballast is under the main but we still have nearly 90 gallons of space there.  If I could utilize that space and maintain access for inspection and maintenance, it could be used.  I would love to figure out how to use that space for a house bank of AGMs.  We are also willing to save some of those cavities for water ballast to balance the boat if it became necessary.  Main concern is that those spaces serve a purpose.   On Mar 7, 2019, at 9:06 AM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote: Yes, hauled out it would definitely be a worry, in different shaped tanks, as in some much colder climes. Where the sea water freezes around my boat is in a shallow, closed  bay ,where the surface water freezes, but the sea water under it says 38 degrees F , according to my depth sounder,and swimming pool thermometer. Ditto other depth sounders I have used in the past. A boat here keeps much warmer in cold snaps, if it stays afloat, and doesn't dry out. Yes, the west coast ( surf country) doesn't get much warmer than 40 degrees ,but the inner coast in some places hits 79 degrees F or more in summer.  I remember coming thru Surge Narrows in summer, watching the depth sounder quickly go from 44 F to 65F in a mile or two. In summer, we have the warmest sea water north of the Gulf of Mexico, in some places ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Brent, the water tanks on the your origamis might be better-shaped or better placed.   I was referring to something that does apply to my boat and might apply to Rick's boat -- Rick has to decide.   My experience with my bilge water / in keel water tank water is, it does not freeze until about 3 weeks of continuous below-freezing weather have passed.   Similarly, when I look at the boat in the early spring, when the air is humid and above freezing, frost forms on the sides of the keel in the shape of the contained ballast..   I would not be concerned about overnight or between tide cycles, or preserves in a foamed boat in a week, even at -8C.    My concern would be either for my boat or Ricks, when it is left for a month, either in a cold salt-water marina or on the hard without draining the tanks.   I have seen water as deep as it is wide in a container not crack a plastic container, but I would be inclined to get the depth below 1/4 of the smallest surface dimension.   That is the rule of thumb I use on my bilge water and water tank water to keep there from being freezing damage.   Completely empty would be completely safe, but, I cannot guarantee that on my boat.   I am less concerned about the origami designs I see in the photos because on at least 3 sides of the tank it is the interior of the boat and something non-structural on the other side of the tank wall.  I had always assumed these sides were made with flat sheet in Brent's designs, whereas all the structural parts were curved.     Brent you give contradictory information on water temperature in coastal BC..   I can attest, it never gets warmer than 40F, having surfed it..   But you say the water temperature never goes below 40F -- I am guessing in the Strait of Georgia.   You say your depth sounder reads 38F when ice forms.  Ocean water normally freezes only a few degrees cooler than fresh water, 28.4F by one reference, but the dynamic wave action and currents and winds can keep it stirred for some time.    This stirring would stir surface water that is below 32F to lower depths before ice forms at the surface.   So it seems that your depth sounder is likely reading up to 10 degrees off.   If your depth sounder is calculating water temperature from acoustic properties, is it possible it is calibrated to fresh water?  I wonder what a regular thermometer on a string would read.   This would be the time of year to check. https://www.rona.ca/en/indoor-and-outdoor-wall-thermometer-0321071?viewStore=55070&cm_mmc=shopping_google-_-g_127_87-_-1701297967-_-ON-0321071&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIuZXT35Tw4AIVzYCfCh1Nxw3iEAQYAiABEgLmdvD_BwE     | 35668|35557|2019-03-12 00:27:04|Darren Bos|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| Everyone's got there own ideas of what makes a good boat, here's my $0.02, probably worth about as much. I wouldn't remove any lead.  I spent a great deal of time effort and money replacing the 5000lbs of steel punchings and concrete with 8000lbs of lead.  My boat is also a 12m and not entirely different design.  It's always hard to judge from pics, but your boat is relatively traditional and narrow shape.  She's not going to benefit from much from losing 1000lbs and ballast is the very last place you want to lose weight.  Do whatever else you want to make her lighter, but don't steal from the ballast.  If she is heavy because of thicker steel plate, then she needs the ballast more than ever.  If it makes you feel better, build a lightweight interior, maybe you could save 1000lbs if the original interior had been built very heavily.  Water is heavy, so get a watermaker and sail with smaller tanks.  Also, heavy boats aren't all bad.  Extra mass makes the motion easier and more comfortable.  I'd leave her heavy and just make sure she has enough sail to get around at a reasonable pace. On 2019-03-07 4:44 p.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Matt,  good information…  As to the ballast idea… Ive been on boats that pumped water in and out of “ballast tanks” to balance loads in work boats.  I was referring to that as an option if it became necessary…  However,,, I love the idea of moving the chain… Id have to work out how to keep the water out though… Our chain locker is typical, high in the bow and with a water tight bulkhead. Water in chain locker drains outside.   I think I weighed the chain at around 450 pounds so would be beneficial to move down lower.. Our 8000 pounds of lead is all centered under the engine room with plenty space above it...  The boat is heavy for her size and adding weight is an issue, but one viable option is to recalculate the ballast requirements,  and possibly use what is on the boat to make up for what is needed down low, like the idea of anchor chain… Theoretically couldn’t you remove 450 pounds of lead and replace it with the chain?  It has the affect of removing 450 pounds from the boat… Same with the battery bank… Ideally Id like to add more of a house bank.. Would it be feasible to add a 1000 pounds of lead batteries and remove 1000 pounds of lead?  Again,,, it just lightened our boat 1000 pounds….  Im playing with ideas…. Batteries have to be accessible, and properly vented, and very secure.. Even if I had to hang a winch from the cabin top to raise and lower the bank, it would be worth it… On Mar 7, 2019, at 2:08 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote: Hi Rick, Water ballast is like changing the shape of the underwater part of the boat, so that the tanks are like they are outside the boat.  If one built the boat differently so these tanks were outside the boat, the restoring moment of the boat would be unchanged.  Water provides zero ballast beyond that, until the water ballast is lifted above the water line in extreme heeling or something -- that is sufficient for cats and Open 60s.   In a monohull boat, the moment arm for water ballast is only a fraction of half the beam, and this is less than the draft, so adding a lead shoe to the bottom of the keel is always better than water tanks under the port and starboard settees for instance..    There is use in shipping extra fresh water if you do not have a water maker.  If you are filling empty space with water, just buy a smaller boat.   Far better is something more dense than water.  This actually provides a restoring moment that cannot be modelled as a smaller hull shape.     There was a good thread a while ago about making a chain locker out of a large diameter vertical pipe -- sink one of those into the empty space in the keel and move your chain out of the forward locker.    You are going to carry chain anyway, so, just have it lower.   Use the forward locker for light deck stuff like maybe fenders, or emergency line.  It sounds like your lead is way down in the keel.   Is this as much lead as the design called for ?  More lead might (will) induce more hull stresses in motion, but, if you are thinking about any ballast, a small amount of lead ballast on top of your current lead ballast is far better than water.    Material Density    Ballast coefficient sample        X                  X-1 Air              0.001226      -0.9987 Water            1                   0 concrete       2.4               1.4 steel              7.85             6.85 lead               11.34           10.34 tungsten        19.3             18.3    Adding a doghouse helps ultimate stability because it is adding anti-ballast (coefficient -0.9987) above the center of flotation. Steel is substantially better than concrete, and lead is substantially better than steel.    Matt  From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 12:47 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...     Interesting observations.  I do not see our boat drying out, and I typically drain water tanks prior to haul out. So if I were on the hard in cold climates, I would not have those concerns..   Our keel is roughly 60 cubic feet and all but 11 cubic feet (lead) is empty space (366 gallons).   We had 300 gallons of fuel tankage flanking the main engine, and we had 300 gallons of water under the galley sole.  The boat did not have a water maker, which it now does, so we can reduce H2o storage.  I am aware that we can not actually use all that hollow space, but we can use most of it..    I cut access into each cavity of the keel to inspect and it looks surprisingly well even though it was taking on salt water.   My objective is to sandblast those cavities and apply the appropriate coatings. That means I can not weld them back up, so why not cap each section with a bolted down, sealed lid, each with inspection ports, which creates tankage.  The trick I still am working out, is the space under the main engine. The ballast is under the main but we still have nearly 90 gallons of space there.  If I could utilize that space and maintain access for inspection and maintenance, it could be used.  I would love to figure out how to use that space for a house bank of AGMs.  We are also willing to save some of those cavities for water ballast to balance the boat if it became necessary.  Main concern is that those spaces serve a purpose.   On Mar 7, 2019, at 9:06 AM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote: Yes, hauled out it would definitely be a worry, in different shaped tanks, as in some much colder climes. Where the sea water freezes around my boat is in a shallow, closed  bay ,where the surface water freezes, but the sea water under it says 38 degrees F , according to my depth sounder,and swimming pool thermometer. Ditto other depth sounders I have used in the past. A boat here keeps much warmer in cold snaps, if it stays afloat, and doesn't dry out. Yes, the west coast ( surf country) doesn't get much warmer than 40 degrees ,but the inner coast in some places hits 79 degrees F or more in summer.  I remember coming thru Surge Narrows in summer, watching the depth sounder quickly go from 44 F to 65F in a mile or two. In summer, we have the warmest sea water north of the Gulf of Mexico, in some places ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Brent, the water tanks on the your origamis might be better-shaped or better placed.   I was referring to something that does apply to my boat and might apply to Rick's boat -- Rick has to decide.   My experience with my bilge water / in keel water tank water is, it does not freeze until about 3 weeks of continuous below-freezing weather have passed.   Similarly, when I look at the boat in the early spring, when the air is humid and above freezing, frost forms on the sides of the keel in the shape of the contained ballast..   I would not be concerned about overnight or between tide cycles, or preserves in a foamed boat in a week, even at -8C.    My concern would be either for my boat or Ricks, when it is left for a month, either in a cold salt-water marina or on the hard without draining the tanks.   I have seen water as deep as it is wide in a container not crack a plastic container, but I would be inclined to get the depth below 1/4 of the smallest surface dimension.   That is the rule of thumb I use on my bilge water and water tank water to keep there from being freezing damage.   Completely empty would be completely safe, but, I cannot guarantee that on my boat.   I am less concerned about the origami designs I see in the photos because on at least 3 sides of the tank it is the interior of the boat and something non-structural on the other side of the tank wall.  I had always assumed these sides were made with flat sheet in Brent's designs, whereas all the structural parts were curved.     Brent you give contradictory information on water temperature in coastal BC.   I can attest, it never gets warmer than 40F, having surfed it.   But you say the water temperature never goes below 40F -- I am guessing in the Strait of Georgia.   You say your depth sounder reads 38F when ice forms.  Ocean water normally freezes only a few degrees cooler than fresh water, 28.4F by one reference, but the dynamic wave action and currents and winds can keep it stirred for some time.    This stirring would stir surface water that is below 32F to lower depths before ice forms at the surface.   So it seems that your depth sounder is likely reading up to 10 degrees off.   If your depth sounder is calculating water temperature from acoustic properties, is it possible it is calibrated to fresh water?  I wonder what a regular thermometer on a string would read.   This would be the time of year to check. https://www.rona.ca/en/indoor-and-outdoor-wall-thermometer-0321071?viewStore=55070&cm_mmc=shopping_google-_-g_127_87-_-1701297967-_-ON-0321071&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIuZXT35Tw4AIVzYCfCh1Nxw3iEAQYAiABEgLmdvD_BwE     | 35669|35557|2019-03-12 09:42:24|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| Darren, how far down in the keel does the top of the lead sit in comparison to the top of the steel and concrete?   I am betting it is comparable or lower which means you have bought yourself a substantial bonus in stability.   I bet that was a tremendous amount of work. Rick, removing ballast and replacing it with things of lower effective density would be the opposite.  Good ballast is absolutely irreplaceable, accept perhaps by the pie in the sky concept of a keel-fitted battery cell as shown in that patent.   Nothing else will come close to an average finished density of ballast. Lower density means the top of the ballast replacement is closer to the old center of mass of the boat.   That means the ballast replacement on the bottom of the pile is contributing 100% to weight but only its ratio of distance from the cg to the bottom of the ballast pile to stability, so maybe less than 30% to righting moment.  That means you need to add more than 3 times as much mass at the level of the top of the ballast pile to contribute the same to stability, at the penalty of all the weight.   If one considers less and less dense ballast replacements, there comes a point where the top of the ballast reaches the cg, and there is just no room to add more in the boat.  The previous, circumnavigation-able stability cannot be recovered.  You would be in boat that was less capable than the last time around.  I explained it better in an old post.  A boat with a tungsten bulb is a light, stable boat because one has the least mass placed as low as possible to achieve the target stability.  Tungsten is a vert dense ballast.  Going in the opposite direction, the lower the density the ballast, and the higher it is, the heavier the boat attempting to be as stable, and it may not be possible to have the same stability as the tungsten-bulb boat. Darren took his boat in the more stable direction when he added ballast mass and increased its density.  You would be doing the opposite if you did what you are describing.   If I had your boat, I would be if anything acquiring more lead.  I would be casting bars of lead in a rectangular channel where I could adjust the location and angle of the ends of the channel to make individual form fitting bars.   Then I could cast a bar that would closely fit athwartships on top of the ballast, and the cast another to fit just beside it and so on to cover the top of the current ballast.  Some time would go into making the one adjustable mould.  In this way I could add tight-fitting, dense, low-mounted ballast that I could reach in through a small hole to place it, without exposing an existing boat to molten lead.  I would do everything else, put the boat back in the water, sail it to make sure I am happy.  Before doing any crossing, I would the pour a few cups of epoxy in to flood all the cracks between and under the lead blocks, to keep them in place in a seaway.   I would add another few cups of epoxy to flood the top of the bricks, and then paint the top to seal the lead for the passenger compartment.  Rubbing lead blocks might create dust. Alternately, one could flatten and laminated down sheets of lead roofing - one would have to get them flat down against the ballast with no air gaps to keep the effective density high. I would consider all this work, because if anything it sounds like your boat is ballast-light.   I have around 7,600 pounds in a 13m boat.   Darren has 8,000 in a 12m.   You could add a ton of ballast and barely notice the weight, but really notice a difference in how she sails.   You would be able to add a little more weight at the top of the mast, a bigger masthead piece with more pulley blocks or something.  You have to be really careful, a ton at -2 feet from the cg buys less than 50 pounds at +60 feet from the cg (2x2000/60 = 66.7 pounds but always aim substantially lighter to, if anything, leave the stability better) -- these are example numbers to show that an added ton of ballast can be very little.   A ton of added ballast at -2 ft might instead balance the addition of a light, nice dry pilot cuddy for the cockpit at +8 feet above the cg (maybe 200 pounds -- remember the windage of broad top-side structure additionally reduces stability so 2x2000/8 = 500 lbs as structure would be far too much to add) -- again the numbers are just for-examples not intended to be used.    Since she has already been around the world, if you sail as the skippers before did, you might expect the same outcome, if you do nothing.  You may decide you need no more ballast.  But I sure would never remove any ballast.  You must carry less sail, go slower, knock down easier, reduce your ultimate stability angle where a knock down becomes taking a roll, and risk staying inverted longer, or never recovering from being inverted.  That lead in your keel is gold.   Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 00:28 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Everyone's got there own ideas of what makes a good boat, here's my $0.02, probably worth about as much. I wouldn't remove any lead.  I spent a great deal of time effort and money replacing the 5000lbs of steel punchings and concrete with 8000lbs of lead.  My boat is also a 12m and not entirely different design.  It's always hard to judge from pics, but your boat is relatively traditional and narrow shape.  She's not going to benefit from much from losing 1000lbs and ballast is the very last place you want to lose weight.  Do whatever else you want to make her lighter, but don't steal from the ballast.  If she is heavy because of thicker steel plate, then she needs the ballast more than ever.  If it makes you feel better, build a lightweight interior, maybe you could save 1000lbs if the original interior had been built very heavily.  Water is heavy, so get a watermaker and sail with smaller tanks.  Also, heavy boats aren't all bad.  Extra mass makes the motion easier and more comfortable.  I'd leave her heavy and just make sure she has enough sail to get around at a reasonable pace. On 2019-03-07 4:44 p.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Matt,  good information…  As to the ballast idea… Ive been on boats that pumped water in and out of “ballast tanks” to balance loads in work boats.  I was referring to that as an option if it became necessary…  However,,, I love the idea of moving the chain… Id have to work out how to keep the water out though… Our chain locker is typical, high in the bow and with a water tight bulkhead. Water in chain locker drains outside.   I think I weighed the chain at around 450 pounds so would be beneficial to move down lower.. Our 8000 pounds of lead is all centered under the engine room with plenty space above it...  The boat is heavy for her size and adding weight is an issue, but one viable option is to recalculate the ballast requirements,  and possibly use what is on the boat to make up for what is needed down low, like the idea of anchor chain… Theoretically couldn’t you remove 450 pounds of lead and replace it with the chain?  It has the affect of removing 450 pounds from the boat… Same with the battery bank… Ideally Id like to add more of a house bank.. Would it be feasible to add a 1000 pounds of lead batteries and remove 1000 pounds of lead?  Again,,, it just lightened our boat 1000 pounds….  Im playing with ideas…. Batteries have to be accessible, and properly vented, and very secure.. Even if I had to hang a winch from the cabin top to raise and lower the bank, it would be worth it… On Mar 7, 2019, at 2:08 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote: Hi Rick, Water ballast is like changing the shape of the underwater part of the boat, so that the tanks are like they are outside the boat.  If one built the boat differently so these tanks were outside the boat, the restoring moment of the boat would be unchanged.  Water provides zero ballast beyond that, until the water ballast is lifted above the water line in extreme heeling or something -- that is sufficient for cats and Open 60s.   In a monohull boat, the moment arm for water ballast is only a fraction of half the beam, and this is less than the draft, so adding a lead shoe to the bottom of the keel is always better than water tanks under the port and starboard settees for instance..    There is use in shipping extra fresh water if you do not have a water maker.  If you are filling empty space with water, just buy a smaller boat.   Far better is something more dense than water.  This actually provides a restoring moment that cannot be modelled as a smaller hull shape.     There was a good thread a while ago about making a chain locker out of a large diameter vertical pipe -- sink one of those into the empty space in the keel and move your chain out of the forward locker.    You are going to carry chain anyway, so, just have it lower.   Use the forward locker for light deck stuff like maybe fenders, or emergency line.  It sounds like your lead is way down in the keel.   Is this as much lead as the design called for ?  More lead might (will) induce more hull stresses in motion, but, if you are thinking about any ballast, a small amount of lead ballast on top of your current lead ballast is far better than water.    Material Density    Ballast coefficient sample        X                  X-1 Air              0.001226      -0.9987 Water            1                   0 concrete       2.4               1.4 steel              7.85             6.85 lead               11.34           10.34 tungsten        19.3             18.3    Adding a doghouse helps ultimate stability because it is adding anti-ballast (coefficient -0.9987) above the center of flotation. Steel is substantially better than concrete, and lead is substantially better than steel.    Matt  From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 12:47 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...     Interesting observations.  I do not see our boat drying out, and I typically drain water tanks prior to haul out. So if I were on the hard in cold climates, I would not have those concerns..   Our keel is roughly 60 cubic feet and all but 11 cubic feet (lead) is empty space (366 gallons).   We had 300 gallons of fuel tankage flanking the main engine, and we had 300 gallons of water under the galley sole.  The boat did not have a water maker, which it now does, so we can reduce H2o storage.  I am aware that we can not actually use all that hollow space, but we can use most of it..    I cut access into each cavity of the keel to inspect and it looks surprisingly well even though it was taking on salt water.   My objective is to sandblast those cavities and apply the appropriate coatings. That means I can not weld them back up, so why not cap each section with a bolted down, sealed lid, each with inspection ports, which creates tankage.  The trick I still am working out, is the space under the main engine. The ballast is under the main but we still have nearly 90 gallons of space there.  If I could utilize that space and maintain access for inspection and maintenance, it could be used.  I would love to figure out how to use that space for a house bank of AGMs.  We are also willing to save some of those cavities for water ballast to balance the boat if it became necessary.  Main concern is that those spaces serve a purpose.   On Mar 7, 2019, at 9:06 AM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote: Yes, hauled out it would definitely be a worry, in different shaped tanks, as in some much colder climes. Where the sea water freezes around my boat is in a shallow, closed  bay ,where the surface water freezes, but the sea water under it says 38 degrees F , according to my depth sounder,and swimming pool thermometer. Ditto other depth sounders I have used in the past. A boat here keeps much warmer in cold snaps, if it stays afloat, and doesn't dry out. Yes, the west coast ( surf country) doesn't get much warmer than 40 degrees ,but the inner coast in some places hits 79 degrees F or more in summer.  I remember coming thru Surge Narrows in summer, watching the depth sounder quickly go from 44 F to 65F in a mile or two. In summer, we have the warmest sea water north of the Gulf of Mexico, in some places ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Brent, the water tanks on the your origamis might be better-shaped or better placed.   I was referring to something that does apply to my boat and might apply to Rick's boat -- Rick has to decide.   My experience with my bilge water / in keel water tank water is, it does not freeze until about 3 weeks of continuous below-freezing weather have passed.   Similarly, when I look at the boat in the early spring, when the air is humid and above freezing, frost forms on the sides of the keel in the shape of the contained ballast..   I would not be concerned about overnight or between tide cycles, or preserves in a foamed boat in a week, even at -8C.    My concern would be either for my boat or Ricks, when it is left for a month, either in a cold salt-water marina or on the hard without draining the tanks.   I have seen water as deep as it is wide in a container not crack a plastic container, but I would be inclined to get the depth below 1/4 of the smallest surface dimension.   That is the rule of thumb I use on my bilge water and water tank water to keep there from being freezing damage.   Completely empty would be completely safe, but, I cannot guarantee that on my boat.   I am less concerned about the origami designs I see in the photos because on at least 3 sides of the tank it is the interior of the boat and something non-structural on the other side of the tank wall.  I had always assumed these sides were made with flat sheet in Brent's designs, whereas all the structural parts were curved.     Brent you give contradictory information on water temperature in coastal BC.   I can attest, it never gets warmer than 40F, having surfed it.   But you say the water temperature never goes below 40F -- I am guessing in the Strait of Georgia.   You say your depth sounder reads 38F when ice forms.  Ocean water normally freezes only a few degrees cooler than fresh water, 28.4F by one reference, but the dynamic wave action and currents and winds can keep it stirred for some time.    This stirring would stir surface water that is below 32F to lower depths before ice forms at the surface.   So it seems that your depth sounder is likely reading up to 10 degrees off.   If your depth sounder is calculating water temperature from acoustic properties, is it possible it is calibrated to fresh water?  I wonder what a regular thermometer on a string would read.   This would be the time of year to check. https://www.rona.ca/en/indoor-and-outdoor-wall-thermometer-0321071?viewStore=55070&cm_mmc=shopping_google-_-g_127_87-_-1701297967-_-ON-0321071&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIuZXT35Tw4AIVzYCfCh1Nxw3iEAQYAiABEgLmdvD_BwE     | 35670|35557|2019-03-12 15:56:34|Darren Bos|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| The lead took about half the volume of the steel punchings/concrete.  I had to do the change because water had intruded and the steel punchings where "drilling" their way out through the aluminum hull.  There was some of the most impressive galvanic corrosion I've ever seen.  Somewhere I put aside a piece of the hull plate where there is a perfect punching-shaped depression in the 1/4" aluminum plate where the steel punching had managed to corrode about 1/8" through the 1/4" plate.   The worst corrosion was near the welds. After a bunch of new plate on the keel, and the ballast added, I welded the top of the ballast cavity shut, pressure tested, left a 1/2" void, then welded another plate to form the bottom of a water tank.  The void has a plug where the ballast cavity ends forward.  I can occasionally remove the plug, if oil comes out, there is a failure of the capped ballast compartment, if water comes out there is a leak in the bottom of the water tank.  I doubt either will happen, but obviously you don't want your drinking water anywhere near the lead ballast.  The oil reservoir for the lead ballast is above the waterline and thus provides slight positive pressure.  A drop in volume would mean the ballast compartment has been compromised.  We're in the last year of our refit and I still haven't filled the ballast with oil yet.  Silicone oil would seem ideal (inert, and poses no problems for future welding), but is prohibitively expensive.  I've considered just pressurizing the space with argon and leaving it.  However, given the large spans of hull plate you've got to keep the pressures low.  So low, that weather changes the pressure readings on the gauge.  Also, the pressures are low enough that they are ok when you are on the hard, aren't enough to make the bottom of the keel above the water pressure once the hull is immersed.  If I went with a higher pressure I think I'd need to remember to depressurize the keel each time the boat is hauled......  Right now, I'm leaning to biodegradeable hydraulic oil, but if anyone has other suggestions, I'm keen to hear. It was a big job and one I wouldn't be keen to do again.  However, lots of lead down low should give any sailor a nice warm feeling. On 2019-03-12 6:42 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Darren, how far down in the keel does the top of the lead sit in comparison to the top of the steel and concrete?   I am betting it is comparable or lower which means you have bought yourself a substantial bonus in stability.   I bet that was a tremendous amount of work. | 35671|35557|2019-03-12 16:16:34|brentswain38|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|I once ballasted a keel by melting  lead around cast iron.Roughly 50-50, around 600 lbs per cubic ft ,didn't come much higher than straight lead. Only works on the single  keel 36; not enough room in the twins.One could do it in the wins , if one had some thick pieces which fit in the bottom foot.| 35672|35557|2019-03-12 16:59:58|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| #ygrps-yiv-1567277274 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} >The lead took about half the volume of the steel punchings/concrete. Wow, from 5,000 to 8,000 and that much lower in the keel.  That would likely close to double your ballast's contribution to roll restoring moment.   Absent other changes, you may notice the roll-flick restoration frequency is increased with a reduction in comfort.   This will not be as important while sailing -- the sail acts as a huge damper to roll motions.   In an anchorage it may be more noticable and uncomfortable.   If your boat had a very sluggish roll restoring frequency, then it may be just right after the change.   Adding mass at the top of the mast, or a taller heavier rig will slow that, but I would try it before any changes to the rig....  or calculate and get a pro to compute the appropriate rig changes.   It is not a complex calculation, but, one cannot do it without eyes on all aspects of the situation, and one wants a pro's insurance ... in case.   > I've considered just pressurizing the space with argon and leaving it.  >However, given the large spans of hull plate you've got to keep the >pressures low.  So low, that weather changes the pressure readings >on the gauge.  Also, the pressures are low enough that they are ok >when you are on the hard, aren't enough to make the bottom of the >keel above the water pressure once the hull is immersed.  If I went >with a higher pressure I think I'd need to remember to depressurize >the keel each time the boat is hauled......  Right now, I'm leaning to >biodegradeable hydraulic oil, but if anyone has other suggestions, >I'm keen to hear. One option instead of a contained pressure is a fixed head height.  Lead a pipe and hose into an engine space and fill it with your fluid, and mark the level.   That will keep the pressure above seawater, but never more than what, 30 inches of water, not enough pressure to be a problem.   I like your thoughts on fluids.   Tossing out another idea -- propylene glycol ?   It is used for antifreeze, it is non-toxic, is pink (easy to see the level in a tube), flavoured to taste like peppermint.   I would not be concerned with Argon pressurization, at like 0.5psi.   The keel will not change temperatures fast enough in the water to be a problem.  The problem is, water can leak from the water tank into the void volume and not change the pressure much.   Oil can leak from the led to the void volume, the same, no significant pressure change.  One needs a fluid in the gap volume to reliably detect small leaks.    Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 3:56 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...     The lead took about half the volume of the steel punchings/concrete.  I had to do the change because water had intruded and the steel punchings where "drilling" their way out through the aluminum hull.  There was some of the most impressive galvanic corrosion I've ever seen.  Somewhere I put aside a piece of the hull plate where there is a perfect punching-shaped depression in the 1/4" aluminum plate where the steel punching had managed to corrode about 1/8" through the 1/4" plate.   The worst corrosion was near the welds. After a bunch of new plate on the keel, and the ballast added, I welded the top of the ballast cavity shut, pressure tested, left a 1/2" void, then welded another plate to form the bottom of a water tank.  The void has a plug where the ballast cavity ends forward.  I can occasionally remove the plug, if oil comes out, there is a failure of the capped ballast compartment, if water comes out there is a leak in the bottom of the water tank.  I doubt either will happen, but obviously you don't want your drinking water anywhere near the lead ballast.  The oil reservoir for the lead ballast is above the waterline and thus provides slight positive pressure.  A drop in volume would mean the ballast compartment has been compromised.  We're in the last year of our refit and I still haven't filled the ballast with oil yet.  Silicone oil would seem ideal (inert, and poses no problems for future welding), but is prohibitively expensive.  I've considered just pressurizing the space with argon and leaving it.  However, given the large spans of hull plate you've got to keep the pressures low.  So low, that weather changes the pressure readings on the gauge.  Also, the pressures are low enough that they are ok when you are on the hard, aren't enough to make the bottom of the keel above the water pressure once the hull is immersed.  If I went with a higher pressure I think I'd need to remember to depressurize the keel each time the boat is hauled......  Right now, I'm leaning to biodegradeable hydraulic oil, but if anyone has other suggestions, I'm keen to hear. It was a big job and one I wouldn't be keen to do again.  However, lots of lead down low should give any sailor a nice warm feeling. On 2019-03-12 6:42 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Darren, how far down in the keel does the top of the lead sit in comparison to the top of the steel and concrete?   I am betting it is comparable or lower which means you have bought yourself a substantial bonus in stability.   I bet that was a tremendous amount of work. | 35673|35557|2019-03-12 17:02:50|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| #ygrps-yiv-251142199 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Or bolted lead shoes to the bottom of the twins sacrificing a couple inches of draft for an easier ballast solution of lead and iron ? Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 2:08 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...     I once ballasted a keel by melting  lead around cast iron.Roughly 50-50, around 600 lbs per cubic ft ,didn't come much higher than straight lead. Only works on the single  keel 36; not enough room in the twins.One could do it in the wins , if one had some thick pieces which fit in the bottom foot. | 35674|35557|2019-03-12 19:05:14|Darren Bos|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| We have free standing masts, so they are already a fair bit heavier than standard.  Also, we have a modified full keel which helps provide some roll resistance.  We won't really know for sure until we get it back in the water, but I think it will be OK.  We ran the changes past the naval architect, his words were "add at least 8000lbs of lead".  The only reason one would use steel punchings and concrete for ballast is to try and save some cash.  They had filled the keel to the top with punchings and concrete and still only had 5000lbs, which I think left the boat under ballasted.  Brents idea of using large chunks of solid steel and pouring lead around it would be much better.  Steel punchings are just a lousy ballast choice. If you're interested, our boat is essentially a Benford Brigantine.  Built in steel, the plans call for 12 000lbs ballast!!!  As far as we can figure, John Brandlmayr and Sons converted it from steel into aluminum, during which the forefoot of the keel was cut back somewhat and it got an extra foot of beam.  When we got her she was set up as staysail schooner.  We're converting her to cambered panel junk rig. Propylene glycol still has a fair bit of water in it.  I wonder if that wouldn't lead to trouble with corrosion between the lead and aluminum?  Otherwise, that's a pretty attractive option. On 2019-03-12 1:59 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   >The lead took about half the volume of the steel punchings/concrete. Wow, from 5,000 to 8,000 and that much lower in the keel.  That would likely close to double your ballast's contribution to roll restoring moment.   Absent other changes, you may notice the roll-flick restoration frequency is increased with a reduction in comfort.   This will not be as important while sailing -- the sail acts as a huge damper to roll motions.   In an anchorage it may be more noticable and uncomfortable.   If your boat had a very sluggish roll restoring frequency, then it may be just right after the change.   Adding mass at the top of the mast, or a taller heavier rig will slow that, but I would try it before any changes to the rig....  or calculate and get a pro to compute the appropriate rig changes.   It is not a complex calculation, but, one cannot do it without eyes on all aspects of the situation, and one wants a pro's insurance ... in case.   > I've considered just pressurizing the space with argon and leaving it.  >However, given the large spans of hull plate you've got to keep the >pressures low.  So low, that weather changes the pressure readings >on the gauge.  Also, the pressures are low enough that they are ok >when you are on the hard, aren't enough to make the bottom of the >keel above the water pressure once the hull is immersed.  If I went >with a higher pressure I think I'd need to remember to depressurize >the keel each time the boat is hauled......  Right now, I'm leaning to >biodegradeable hydraulic oil, but if anyone has other suggestions, >I'm keen to hear. One option instead of a contained pressure is a fixed head height.  Lead a pipe and hose into an engine space and fill it with your fluid, and mark the level.   That will keep the pressure above seawater, but never more than what, 30 inches of water, not enough pressure to be a problem.   I like your thoughts on fluids.   Tossing out another idea -- propylene glycol ?   It is used for antifreeze, it is non-toxic, is pink (easy to see the level in a tube), flavoured to taste like peppermint.   I would not be concerned with Argon pressurization, at like 0.5psi.   The keel will not change temperatures fast enough in the water to be a problem.  The problem is, water can leak from the water tank into the void volume and not change the pressure much.   Oil can leak from the led to the void volume, the same, no significant pressure change.  One needs a fluid in the gap volume to reliably detect small leaks.    Matt | 35675|35557|2019-03-12 19:12:10|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| You cold put two little pieces of aluminium welded together in a pint mason jar of PG and see what happens.  Keep the jar in the boat so it accumulates years 6 months head of the boat. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 6:50:12 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...     We have free standing masts, so they are already a fair bit heavier than standard.  Also, we have a modified full keel which helps provide some roll resistance.  We won't really know for sure until we get it back in the water, but I think it will be OK.  We ran the changes past the naval architect, his words were "add at least 8000lbs of lead".  The only reason one would use steel punchings and concrete for ballast is to try and save some cash.  They had filled the keel to the top with punchings and concrete and still only had 5000lbs, which I think left the boat under ballasted.  Brents idea of using large chunks of solid steel and pouring lead around it would be much better.  Steel punchings are just a lousy ballast choice. If you're interested, our boat is essentially a Benford Brigantine.  Built in steel, the plans call for 12 000lbs ballast!!!  As far as we can figure, John Brandlmayr and Sons converted it from steel into aluminum, during which the forefoot of the keel was cut back somewhat and it got an extra foot of beam.  When we got her she was set up as staysail schooner.  We're converting her to cambered panel junk rig. Propylene glycol still has a fair bit of water in it.  I wonder if that wouldn't lead to trouble with corrosion between the lead and aluminum?  Otherwise, that's a pretty attractive option. On 2019-03-12 1:59 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   >The lead took about half the volume of the steel punchings/concrete. Wow, from 5,000 to 8,000 and that much lower in the keel.  That would likely close to double your ballast's contribution to roll restoring moment.   Absent other changes, you may notice the roll-flick restoration frequency is increased with a reduction in comfort.   This will not be as important while sailing -- the sail acts as a huge damper to roll motions.   In an anchorage it may be more noticable and uncomfortable.   If your boat had a very sluggish roll restoring frequency, then it may be just right after the change.   Adding mass at the top of the mast, or a taller heavier rig will slow that, but I would try it before any changes to the rig....  or calculate and get a pro to compute the appropriate rig changes.   It is not a complex calculation, but, one cannot do it without eyes on all aspects of the situation, and one wants a pro's insurance ... in case.   > I've considered just pressurizing the space with argon and leaving it.  >However, given the large spans of hull plate you've got to keep the >pressures low.  So low, that weather changes the pressure readings >on the gauge.  Also, the pressures are low enough that they are ok >when you are on the hard, aren't enough to make the bottom of the >keel above the water pressure once the hull is immersed.  If I went >with a higher pressure I think I'd need to remember to depressurize >the keel each time the boat is hauled......  Right now, I'm leaning to >biodegradeable hydraulic oil, but if anyone has other suggestions, >I'm keen to hear. One option instead of a contained pressure is a fixed head height.  Lead a pipe and hose into an engine space and fill it with your fluid, and mark the level.   That will keep the pressure above seawater, but never more than what, 30 inches of water, not enough pressure to be a problem.   I like your thoughts on fluids.   Tossing out another idea -- propylene glycol ?   It is used for antifreeze, it is non-toxic, is pink (easy to see the level in a tube), flavoured to taste like peppermint.   I would not be concerned with Argon pressurization, at like 0.5psi.   The keel will not change temperatures fast enough in the water to be a problem.  The problem is, water can leak from the water tank into the void volume and not change the pressure much.   Oil can leak from the led to the void volume, the same, no significant pressure change.  One needs a fluid in the gap volume to reliably detect small leaks.    Matt | 35676|35557|2019-03-13 13:11:07|Darren Bos|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| Antifreeze seemed like it could be a great solution.  However, it looks like the anti-corrosion properties are entirely due to additives and that glycol-water mixes are actually more corrosive than water alone.  I wonder how long the additives would last in the keel...... Darren On 2019-03-12 4:12 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   You cold put two little pieces of aluminium welded together in a pint mason jar of PG and see what happens.  Keep the jar in the boat so it accumulates years 6 months head of the boat. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 6:50:12 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...     We have free standing masts, so they are already a fair bit heavier than standard.  Also, we have a modified full keel which helps provide some roll resistance.  We won't really know for sure until we get it back in the water, but I think it will be OK.  We ran the changes past the naval architect, his words were "add at least 8000lbs of lead".  The only reason one would use steel punchings and concrete for ballast is to try and save some cash.  They had filled the keel to the top with punchings and concrete and still only had 5000lbs, which I think left the boat under ballasted.  Brents idea of using large chunks of solid steel and pouring lead around it would be much better.  Steel punchings are just a lousy ballast choice. If you're interested, our boat is essentially a Benford Brigantine.  Built in steel, the plans call for 12 000lbs ballast!!!  As far as we can figure, John Brandlmayr and Sons converted it from steel into aluminum, during which the forefoot of the keel was cut back somewhat and it got an extra foot of beam.  When we got her she was set up as staysail schooner.  We're converting her to cambered panel junk rig. Propylene glycol still has a fair bit of water in it.  I wonder if that wouldn't lead to trouble with corrosion between the lead and aluminum?  Otherwise, that's a pretty attractive option. On 2019-03-12 1:59 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   >The lead took about half the volume of the steel punchings/concrete. Wow, from 5,000 to 8,000 and that much lower in the keel.  That would likely close to double your ballast's contribution to roll restoring moment.   Absent other changes, you may notice the roll-flick restoration frequency is increased with a reduction in comfort.   This will not be as important while sailing -- the sail acts as a huge damper to roll motions.   In an anchorage it may be more noticable and uncomfortable.   If your boat had a very sluggish roll restoring frequency, then it may be just right after the change.   Adding mass at the top of the mast, or a taller heavier rig will slow that, but I would try it before any changes to the rig....  or calculate and get a pro to compute the appropriate rig changes.   It is not a complex calculation, but, one cannot do it without eyes on all aspects of the situation, and one wants a pro's insurance ... in case.   > I've considered just pressurizing the space with argon and leaving it.  >However, given the large spans of hull plate you've got to keep the >pressures low.  So low, that weather changes the pressure readings >on the gauge.  Also, the pressures are low enough that they are ok >when you are on the hard, aren't enough to make the bottom of the >keel above the water pressure once the hull is immersed.  If I went >with a higher pressure I think I'd need to remember to depressurize >the keel each time the boat is hauled......  Right now, I'm leaning to >biodegradeable hydraulic oil, but if anyone has other suggestions, >I'm keen to hear. One option instead of a contained pressure is a fixed head height.  Lead a pipe and hose into an engine space and fill it with your fluid, and mark the level.   That will keep the pressure above seawater, but never more than what, 30 inches of water, not enough pressure to be a problem.   I like your thoughts on fluids.   Tossing out another idea -- propylene glycol ?   It is used for antifreeze, it is non-toxic, is pink (easy to see the level in a tube), flavoured to taste like peppermint.   I would not be concerned with Argon pressurization, at like 0.5psi.   The keel will not change temperatures fast enough in the water to be a problem.  The problem is, water can leak from the water tank into the void volume and not change the pressure much.   Oil can leak from the led to the void volume, the same, no significant pressure change.  One needs a fluid in the gap volume to reliably detect small leaks.    Matt | 35677|35557|2019-03-13 13:19:20|Matt Malone|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...| But regular antifreeze with additives is toxic.   How about baby oil -- light parafin wax?  Problem I see is solidification before water's freezing point, but then it acts like a big toilet gasket.  It would float to the top of the water tank and be visible. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 13:13 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Antifreeze seemed like it could be a great solution.  However, it looks like the anti-corrosion properties are entirely due to additives and that glycol-water mixes are actually more corrosive than water alone.  I wonder how long the additives would last in the keel...... Darren On 2019-03-12 4:12 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   You cold put two little pieces of aluminium welded together in a pint mason jar of PG and see what happens.  Keep the jar in the boat so it accumulates years 6 months head of the boat. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 6:50:12 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group...     We have free standing masts, so they are already a fair bit heavier than standard.  Also, we have a modified full keel which helps provide some roll resistance.  We won't really know for sure until we get it back in the water, but I think it will be OK.  We ran the changes past the naval architect, his words were "add at least 8000lbs of lead".  The only reason one would use steel punchings and concrete for ballast is to try and save some cash.  They had filled the keel to the top with punchings and concrete and still only had 5000lbs, which I think left the boat under ballasted.  Brents idea of using large chunks of solid steel and pouring lead around it would be much better.  Steel punchings are just a lousy ballast choice. If you're interested, our boat is essentially a Benford Brigantine.  Built in steel, the plans call for 12 000lbs ballast!!!  As far as we can figure, John Brandlmayr and Sons converted it from steel into aluminum, during which the forefoot of the keel was cut back somewhat and it got an extra foot of beam.  When we got her she was set up as staysail schooner.  We're converting her to cambered panel junk rig. Propylene glycol still has a fair bit of water in it.  I wonder if that wouldn't lead to trouble with corrosion between the lead and aluminum?  Otherwise, that's a pretty attractive option. On 2019-03-12 1:59 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   >The lead took about half the volume of the steel punchings/concrete. Wow, from 5,000 to 8,000 and that much lower in the keel.  That would likely close to double your ballast's contribution to roll restoring moment.   Absent other changes, you may notice the roll-flick restoration frequency is increased with a reduction in comfort.   This will not be as important while sailing -- the sail acts as a huge damper to roll motions.   In an anchorage it may be more noticable and uncomfortable.   If your boat had a very sluggish roll restoring frequency, then it may be just right after the change.   Adding mass at the top of the mast, or a taller heavier rig will slow that, but I would try it before any changes to the rig....  or calculate and get a pro to compute the appropriate rig changes.   It is not a complex calculation, but, one cannot do it without eyes on all aspects of the situation, and one wants a pro's insurance ... in case.   > I've considered just pressurizing the space with argon and leaving it.  >However, given the large spans of hull plate you've got to keep the >pressures low.  So low, that weather changes the pressure readings >on the gauge.  Also, the pressures are low enough that they are ok >when you are on the hard, aren't enough to make the bottom of the >keel above the water pressure once the hull is immersed.  If I went >with a higher pressure I think I'd need to remember to depressurize >the keel each time the boat is hauled......  Right now, I'm leaning to >biodegradeable hydraulic oil, but if anyone has other suggestions, >I'm keen to hear. One option instead of a contained pressure is a fixed head height.  Lead a pipe and hose into an engine space and fill it with your fluid, and mark the level.   That will keep the pressure above seawater, but never more than what, 30 inches of water, not enough pressure to be a problem.   I like your thoughts on fluids.   Tossing out another idea -- propylene glycol ?   It is used for antifreeze, it is non-toxic, is pink (easy to see the level in a tube), flavoured to taste like peppermint.   I would not be concerned with Argon pressurization, at like 0.5psi.   The keel will not change temperatures fast enough in the water to be a problem.  The problem is, water can leak from the water tank into the void volume and not change the pressure much.   Oil can leak from the led to the void volume, the same, no significant pressure change.  One needs a fluid in the gap volume to reliably detect small leaks.    Matt | 35678|35557|2019-03-14 22:08:21|brentswain38|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|I use water soluable machining  oil in my keel cooler. Eliminates corrosion, and it doesn't take much oil to do that.| 35679|35557|2019-03-15 18:31:01|brentswain38|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Before painting and foaming the inside, is a good time to  replace any mild steel deck fittings and hatch coamings with stainless, and put some stainless weld on wear points, where paint is likely to  chip or wear off.Its also a good time to replace any bad thru hulls with  welded in stainless ones..| 35680|35680|2019-03-17 18:59:37|brentswain38|fatburger in the sink drain|I just found my galley sink drain plugged by a fat burger.Tried the bottle brush, with no luck, Tried a rod , still no luck Tried hot water and paint remover,  still no luck. What worked|? A piece of 1/4inch,  1x19 rigging wire with   a small eye on the end. Sure glad the pipe was relatively straight. I'd hate to think of what I would have to deal with,  with a more complex drainpipe, something to think about when plumbing a boat.| 35681|35557|2019-03-17 18:59:51|Rick Jackson|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Good advice.. I just took delivery of my new Everlast welder and plasma cutter, and those projects will be a snap now.   I have been toying with the idea of welding in threaded plates with no through holes for all our deck hardware so no holes for leaks and one person operation.. Seen it done with weld on nuts and with hex couplers, but I am hoping to seal up that hole, or make it from 5/8 stock and use a bottoming tap an leave an 1/8.. See any problems with that idea? Or have a better one?   I really dislike all these nuts and flat washers, plus if I had to repair or replace tracks or any other hardware, Id have to pull down the ceiling..Rick On Mar 15, 2019, at 3:30 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:Before painting and foaming the inside, is a good time to  replace any mild steel deck fittings and hatch coamings with stainless, and put some stainless weld on wear points, where paint is likely to  chip or wear off.Its also a good time to replace any bad thru hulls with  welded in stainless ones..| 35682|35557|2019-03-17 19:03:47|brentswain38|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|With one tapped plate, the steel under it may rust. Two SS plates, with the taped holes only in the top one could be better. Not much thread tho. I prefer to weld in flush SS acorn nuts, for flush, threaded SS  bolt holes. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Good advice.. I just took delivery of my new Everlast welder and plasma cutter, and those projects will be a snap now.   I have been toying with the idea of welding in threaded plates with no through holes for all our deck hardware so no holes for leaks and one person operation.. Seen it done with weld on nuts and with hex couplers, but I am hoping to seal up that hole, or make it from 5/8 stock and use a bottoming tap an leave an 1/8.. See any problems with that idea? Or have a better one?   I really dislike all these nuts and flat washers, plus if I had to repair or replace tracks or any other hardware, Id have to pull down the ceiling..Rick On Mar 15, 2019, at 3:30 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:Before painting and foaming the inside, is a good time to  replace any mild steel deck fittings and hatch coamings with stainless, and put some stainless weld on wear points, where paint is likely to  chip or wear off.Its also a good time to replace any bad thru hulls with  welded in stainless ones..| 35683|35557|2019-03-17 21:19:22|jpronk1|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|I would weld a 1/8 thick stainless piece of plate as an end cap on 1/2” or 5/8” stainless nuts and then weld them flush to your deck so you can bolt into them. Stainless steel is a right bugger to drill and tap! Make sure you use good quality grease on them and never over tighten into them or they will gall. You could put in extra where you might think you will need them down the road and just fill them with silicone or you could melt beeswax into them and carve it out when you need to use them. The only problem I see would be the nuts shrinking from the heat of welding but you could clean out the threads with a tap them. That would be easier than drilling and tapping stainless steel. Just my $0.02, James Pronk Sent from my iPhone| 35684|35557|2019-03-17 22:48:25|Matt Malone|Everlast Welder & Plasma cutter| Rick (and anyone else with an inexpensive plasma cutter), I would like to hear how your Everlast welder/plasma cutter works out.  I have looked at them as a way to get a plasma cutter.  I have read a lot of product literature for inexpensive plasma cutters where they claim much thicker cuts at a given Amp reading than expensive cutters claim at 50% higher Amp ratings.   I have read a very few reviews purportedly from experienced metal workers accustomed to expensive units who have used the inexpensive units and completely contradicted the product claims on what they are suitable to cut, or the maximum they can cut. So I would like to hear in particular your experience with the plasma cutter function, what model it is and how you find it on various thicknesses.   I am sure it is a lot like a hacksaw. Any input people can offer on choosing a unit that uses a particular type of consumables (for availability, durability or low cost) would be useful too. Matt From: Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, March 17, 18:59 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Good advice.. I just took delivery of my new Everlast welder and plasma cutter, and those projects will be a snap now.   I have been toying with the idea of welding in threaded plates with no through holes for all our deck hardware so no holes for leaks and one person operation.. Seen it done with weld on nuts and with hex couplers, but I am hoping to seal up that hole, or make it from 5/8 stock and use a bottoming tap an leave an 1/8.. See any problems with that idea? Or have a better one?   I really dislike all these nuts and flat washers, plus if I had to repair or replace tracks or any other hardware, Id have to pull down the ceiling.. Rick On Mar 15, 2019, at 3:30 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote: Before painting and foaming the inside, is a good time to  replace any mild steel deck fittings and hatch coamings with stainless, and put some stainless weld on wear points, where paint is likely to  chip or wear off. Its also a good time to replace any bad thru hulls with  welded in stainless ones.. | 35685|35557|2019-03-17 23:42:32|Darren Bos|Re: Everlast Welder & Plasma cutter| I've got a cut50.  It will do up to 1/2" plate with some fiddling of air settings, but really it is happier at 3/8".  Make sure it has a good supply of clean dry air.  I work mostly in aluminum, so mine hasn't seen that much use.  I've never worked with a professional machine.  The cuts I produce in thick stuff require a fair bit of cleaning up with a grinder, but I've always assumed a good part of that is my technique. On 2019-03-17 7:48 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Rick (and anyone else with an inexpensive plasma cutter), I would like to hear how your Everlast welder/plasma cutter works out.  I have looked at them as a way to get a plasma cutter.  I have read a lot of product literature for inexpensive plasma cutters where they claim much thicker cuts at a given Amp reading than expensive cutters claim at 50% higher Amp ratings.   I have read a very few reviews purportedly from experienced metal workers accustomed to expensive units who have used the inexpensive units and completely contradicted the product claims on what they are suitable to cut, or the maximum they can cut. So I would like to hear in particular your experience with the plasma cutter function, what model it is and how you find it on various thicknesses.   I am sure it is a lot like a hacksaw. Any input people can offer on choosing a unit that uses a particular type of consumables (for availability, durability or low cost) would be useful too. Matt From: Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, March 17, 18:59 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group... To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Good advice.. I just took delivery of my new Everlast welder and plasma cutter, and those projects will be a snap now.   I have been toying with the idea of welding in threaded plates with no through holes for all our deck hardware so no holes for leaks and one person operation.. Seen it done with weld on nuts and with hex couplers, but I am hoping to seal up that hole, or make it from 5/8 stock and use a bottoming tap an leave an 1/8.. See any problems with that idea? Or have a better one?   I really dislike all these nuts and flat washers, plus if I had to repair or replace tracks or any other hardware, Id have to pull down the ceiling.. Rick On Mar 15, 2019, at 3:30 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote: Before painting and foaming the inside, is a good time to  replace any mild steel deck fittings and hatch coamings with stainless, and put some stainless weld on wear points, where paint is likely to  chip or wear off. Its also a good time to replace any bad thru hulls with  welded in stainless ones.. | 35686|35557|2019-03-18 01:23:04|Aaron|Re: Everlast Welder & Plasma cutter|I have used a Hypertherm power max 600 for the last 10 years cutting range from .032" to .50" it was a great machine and worked flawlessly.Used on plasma cam CnC table Just upgraded to the hypertherm XP45 . The box is at least half the size and weight. I have used several other name brands for hand or manual cutting They all work pretty darn good these day compared to 20 years ago Realy depends on what a person want one for. One off boats a $3000 would be a waste of money. My old pmax 600 for 2 or 300 would cut out everything on a Brent boat  steel or aluminum Aaron| 35687|35557|2019-03-18 15:08:57|brentswain38|Re: Everlast Welder & Plasma cutter|On the last 36 I built, we had some of the most expensive commercial plasma cutters available.Lots of knobs and dials, and were thus extremely finicky, and we often  couldn't get them to work, so we did most of our cutting with the torch. Just wasn't worth the  time of screwing around with the plasma. A friend has a cheapie, which is far more reliable and easy to use. Just turn it on , and it works every time.Cuts 1/4 inch stainless with no problem. | 35688|35557|2019-03-18 15:09:20|Rick Jackson|Re: Newbie and unsure how to use this group...|Thanks James.. I hadn’t thought about that way… I was thinking about how to weld up the nut end. Not the easiest thing to do.  I had a suggestion that regular steel would be sufficient when properly prepped and painted, with the addition of antisieze on the bolts..  If I remember correctly, the thickness of threads needs to be at a minimum of the bolts thickness. IE. 1/2 inch plate for 1/2 inch bolts as a min.    On Mar 17, 2019, at 6:19 PM, jpronk1@... [origamiboats] wrote:I would weld a 1/8 thick stainless piece of plate as an end cap on 1/2” or 5/8” stainless nuts and then weld them flush to your deck so you can bolt into them. Stainless steel is a right bugger to drill and tap! Make sure you use good quality grease on them and never over tighten into them or they will gall. You could put in extra where you might think you will need them down the road and just fill them with silicone or you could melt beeswax into them and carve it out when you need to use them. The only problem I see would be the nuts shrinking from the heat of welding but you could clean out the threads with a tap them. That would be easier than drilling and tapping stainless steel. Just my $0.02,James Pronk Sent from my iPhone| 35689|35689|2019-03-18 15:09:40|svsalmoneyes@gmail.com|Salmoneyes Steel Ketch Project|First off, I want to thank all you folks for some great feed back..Im learning a lot, and I would prefer to learn from others experiences (read mistakes) and save time and money..  I have used some other forums, but it is more of an apples and oranges comparison. Here, we are, for the most part, all talking about the same types of hulls. My newbie title was a bit of an embarrassment after a while, so I wanted to start something new...I will have a bunch of questions as we move along but I wanted to bring up something I saw last night..Came across a guy building a steel boat on you tube and was surprised by the paint method..  I noticed the steel had the typical factory applied red primer.  When he applied his epoxy primer, he did so over the red primer.  You could see where the welds had burned off the red, and he had done some sanding to clean up those edges and prep the welds for epoxy. I am operating off the idea that steel is a great choice provided you properly seal it which requires a full blasting of the steel, a proper wash down to remove all dust (with an added agent in water to prevent post wash rust) and being aware that oil on your hands and dirt on your shoes will cause a barrier to prevent proper adhesion anywhere you touch or walk.  I have been thinking about this for a while and I have some observations from many sites where boats are being built or rebuilt...It seems common to have the boat coated with primer and sometimes painted, during the fit out.  Having build many homes in my career, I know that I personally am always dropping stuff.  It seems a bit counter productive, to have your hull fully prepped and painted, only to cause dents and digs in your paint from the fit out process.. My plan is first to blast only areas where I need to cut and weld. After all my steelwork is complete, I will fit all my interior. This will be easy for me as the plan is to build everything so it can be quickly and easily removed for proper inspection including cabinets. After all my interior is fitted, I can remove it and then sandblast. Once I get the proper prep completed, I can coat the entire interior with an epoxy system, then the bilge paint system, then install the rough floor.  With everything coated and a rough floor system installed, I can put the interior back in with minus risk to damage to the painted surfaces.  Lots of details in there I hadn't mentioned as I am still working out some things.  Need to make the final decision on insulation which I have some ideas that I need to try, but basically I want the benefits of expanded foam with the ability of removal. We are looking at going all hydraulic for anchor windless, jet drive thrusters, water makers, and jib crane as opposed to an electric motor for each system. | 35690|35557|2019-03-18 15:09:48|svsalmoneyes@gmail.com|Re: Everlast Welder & Plasma cutter|Hi MattI haven't fired them up yet... I plan to start building a rolling gantry tomorrow so I will be able to comment then..I bought the PowerMTS 221 STI Multi Process in MIG/TIG/Stick welder. I wanted the AC/DC version since we are going to build a 14 foot aluminum landing craft for our dink. I wanted the newer 252 version but the company guy asked what all the plan was and he said I would not need that extra power, and that the weight was nearly 90 pounds. The one I got is nearly 70 and Im sad to say, that packing it around is not that much fun..  Our ultimate cruising plans include doing "good works" projects where there is a need, and that could require loading it on and off a pitching boat, so I went with this as opposed the extra 500 for the bigger machine.. ( definitely buy for the company itself, as they are great to work with, and they are very generous with "gifting" or free upgrades..The Plasma cutter is the 50S and again, I answered a bunch of questions it was the model they recommended.  I do not have a lot of experience with one, and the company has resources for tutorials, plus a open forum to share tips and advice ( you won't have to suffer through a bunch of useless table about the machine being no good since its all Everlast owners)Long winded, my apologizes, but that is the down and dirty of it... we will know more tomorrow...| 35691|35618|2019-03-20 00:31:39|wild_explorer|Re: US PayPal - you ARE criminal, untill you prove you are not|I read US, Europe and Swiss PayPal User Agreements + bunch of extra related docs on PayPal website for each region. It took me a long time...USA - is worst.European Union - a little bit better, but still lousy.Swiss - has better agreement among all.I was trying to remove ALL information from PayPal account before closing it... Impossible for average person. Even if you remove your card on file - PayPal still will be able to charge your card "in case of unexpected scheduled payments, etc". You cannot remove your name without jumping through a lot of hoops.| 35692|35557|2019-03-20 01:39:48|wild_explorer|Re: Everlast Welder & Plasma cutter|What professionals say: do NOT buy welder-plasma cutter combo. Reason: Welder and Plasma Cutter use different output voltage. It is very hard to make decent combo. If you try to find professional "Welder/Plasma combo" - it does not exist. You can easily find professional Arc/Mig/Tig combo and professional Plasma Cutter though. There is a reason why it Welder and Plasma cutter are not combined in professional application - unit should work without problems on the field, combo will not.Consumer type Welder-Plasma Cuter is more about convenience.I have 240V IGBT inverter welder up to 200 amp (it was cheap about 5 years ago). It is Light and "good enough" for most welding on a boat. Easy to move around. It died ones, but was replaced during warranty period. If I could find used surplus welder, I would go for it - much better investment. All electronics in professional equipment are sealed and does not collect dust, metal shavings, etc between electronic components and easy to clean.Consumer type -  electronics are NOT sealed (applies for consumer welders and plasma cutters).I have 120/240V consumer-type plasma cutter. I believe it is about 50A. It uses professional type torch, but torch died anyway (was shorted inside due to fried wires). Unit itself survived. Same problem as with consumer type welders - electronics are not sealed. Plasma cutting requires a LOT of air (cubic feet per minute - CFM). My medium size professional compressor was not enough (even CFM was slightly over recommended in Plasma Cutter manual). I had to use Industrial (vertical tank) compressor for more or less usable operation. Main problem - very small air lines inside the unit with "push on" connections. I had to use MAXIMUM allowed input air pressure (about 100-120 psi) and 1/4" air hose from compressor to the unit to keep constant output pressure (about 30-40 psi) without dropping it much in on/off position, And it does not cut advertised thickness of metal anyway - need to give more air pressure and current which reduce DUTY CYCLE (working time before it is need to cool off unit).Finally, those plastic air line started to pop out from air connections inside the unit, Consumables in the torch got fried and was very hard to replace,It takes more time to set it up than to use it. So, give yourself a favor - buy used surplus PROFESSIONAL units. Especially plasma cutter (if you REALLY need one). And look for plasma torch which will actually allow you to SEE where you cutting. If you have gas suppliers nearby, consider using OXY-PROPANE torch set up instead of plasma. It is more versatile and useful than plasma cutter (for a boat built from mild steel).It is more economical to plasma cut small stainless steel parts you need by CNC in professional shop, than to buy GOOD PROFESSIONAL plasma cutter, CORRECT compressor, consumables, etc.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Rick (and anyone else with an inexpensive plasma cutter), I would like to hear how your Everlast welder/plasma cutter works out.  I have looked at them as a way to get a plasma cutter.  I have read a lot of product literature for inexpensive plasma cutters where they claim much thicker cuts at a given Amp reading than expensive cutters claim at 50% higher Amp ratings.   I have read a very few reviews purportedly from experienced metal workers accustomed to expensive units who have used the inexpensive units and completely contradicted the product claims on what they are suitable to cut, or the maximum they can cut. So I would like to hear in particular your experience with the plasma cutter function, what model it is and how you find it on various thicknesses.   I am sure it is a lot like a hacksaw. Any input people can offer on choosing a unit that uses a particular type of consumables (for availability, durability or low cost) would be useful too. Matt| 35693|35557|2019-03-20 17:48:36|brentswain38|Re: Everlast Welder & Plasma cutter|I found a cheap 225 amp 220 volt  buzzbox is all the welder I have ever needed to build a boat.I've used more expensive ones, and found they had no advantage.Ditto more expensive plasmas. We used the torch instead, for mild steel| 35694|35557|2019-03-21 02:05:01|wild_explorer|Re: Everlast Welder & Plasma cutter|Yes, buz-box (AC welder) is enough to build a boat. I still have Lincoln AC 225 amp welder, but I stop using it. The problem in my case was long (more than 100 ft) extension cable for 240V, Buz-box| 35695|35557|2019-03-21 02:16:49|wild_explorer|Re: Everlast Welder & Plasma cutter|Sorry, hit a wrong button... Buzzbox was tripping 50 amp circuit breaker after few minutes of welding. DC welder with  IGBT inverter takes about 20-25 amp for the same welding current (AC welder loose about 50% of power, IGBT DC welder loose about 5-10%).  Switching to IGBT welder solved the problem - no more circuit breaker tripping.So, if you have good 240V very close where you weld, AC welder (buzzbox) is enough. It just doubles your electricity bill.| 35696|35557|2019-03-21 03:29:05|opuspaul|Re: Everlast Welder & Plasma cutter|I found that my cheap Chinese 200 amp inverter welder is much easier to use than an old buzz box or transformer welder when using it on a long extension cord.  I am really glad I bought mine for use as a portable welder in boatyards and areas where two phase or higher voltage power isn't available.   The inverter welders electronic circuitry can compensate and maintain a higher and steadier voltage/current  so it maintains a smoother and more forgiving arc and ends up doing a better job.  Paul| 35697|35557|2019-03-21 17:44:59|Rick Jackson|Re: Everlast Welder & Plasma cutter|Hi Matt… Fired her up today… Two thumbs up!! Way up!!I only got to use it for an hour or so, and used it on an old, rusty mobile home frame, and it cut like butter.  Ive done it before with OXY/ACT and the plasma is many times faster and cleaner, with less sparks and heat. Less noise as well.. Tomorrow I will cut some 1/2 inch and let you know… This is an 800 dollar machine and worth every penny…Rick On Mar 17, 2019, at 7:48 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:Rick (and anyone else with an inexpensive plasma cutter),I would like to hear how your Everlast welder/plasma cutter works out.  I have looked at them as a way to get a plasma cutter.  I have read a lot of product literature for inexpensive plasma cutters where they claim much thicker cuts at a given Amp reading than expensive cutters claim at 50% higher Amp ratings.   I have read a very few reviews purportedly from experienced metal workers accustomed to expensive units who have used the inexpensive units and completely contradicted the product claims on what they are suitable to cut, or the maximum they can cut.So I would like to hear in particular your experience with the plasma cutter function, what model it is and how you find it on various thicknesses.   I am sure it is a lot like a hacksaw.Any input people can offer on choosing a unit that uses a particular type of consumables (for availability, durability or low cost) would be useful too.MattFrom: Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats]Sent: Sunday, March 17, 18:59Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Newbie and unsure how to use this group....To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  Good advice.. I just took delivery of my new Everlast welder and plasma cutter, and those projects will be a snap now.   I have been toying with the idea of welding in threaded plates with no through holes for all our deck hardware so no holes for leaks and one person operation.. Seen it done with weld on nuts and with hex couplers, but I am hoping to seal up that hole, or make it from 5/8 stock and use a bottoming tap an leave an 1/8.. See any problems with that idea? Or have a better one?   I really dislike all these nuts and flat washers, plus if I had to repair or replace tracks or any other hardware, Id have to pull down the ceiling...RickOn Mar 15, 2019, at 3:30 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:Before painting and foaming the inside, is a good time to  replace any mild steel deck fittings and hatch coamings with stainless, and put some stainless weld on wear points, where paint is likely to  chip or wear off.Its also a good time to replace any bad thru hulls with  welded in stainless ones..| 35698|35557|2019-03-21 17:45:45|Rick Jackson|Re: Everlast Welder & Plasma cutter|Yep,, I just bought a 100 feet of AWG 6 SOOW. Believe it or no, I saved over a buck a foot buying a roll at HD….As to a Buzz box being enough,,, Its like saying I can build a house with a chain saw. Your not going to get an art piece when its done….  FWIW,,, there are no used Multi Process welders on the market within a 100 miles of us. I could sell the whole works when Im done and get back 90%.    On Mar 20, 2019, at 11:04 PM, williswildest@... [origamiboats] wrote:Yes, buz-box (AC welder) is enough to build a boat. I still have Lincoln AC 225 amp welder, but I stop using it. The problem in my case was long (more than 100 ft) extension cable for 240V, Buz-box| 35699|35699|2019-03-21 17:45:57|svsalmoneyes@gmail.com|Copper keel coolers|I just came across some 20 foot sticks of 1 inch copper pipe (new) and can get for scrap price..  I already had a fernstrum keel cooler lined up (1500) which is copper and nickel.  Is there a reason NOT to use copper pipe sweated with Lead?   I can build the cooler for under 500...| 35700|35557|2019-03-21 17:46:13|Rick Jackson|Re: Everlast Welder & Plasma cutter|On Mar 19, 2019, at 10:39 PM, williswildest@... [origamiboats] wrote:What professionals say: do NOT buy welder-plasma cutter combo. Reason: Welder and Plasma Cutter use different output voltage. It is very hard to make decent combo. If you try to find professional "Welder/Plasma combo" - it does not exist.  Are Multiprocess Welders Prone to Failure? Kevin Caron - YouTubehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVyjrtJprdkWORLDS FIRST AC/DC TIG MIG STICK WELDER!! EVERLAST ...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7hnR-JHlzAI respectfully challenge the above statement..  I personally bought the Everlast MTS221 MIG/TIG/ Stick unit and a separate Plasma 50S cutter. I had assumed Matt was asking about those, but in the event he was asking about a Multi w/plasma rig, I attached a video that addresses those concerns.   First of all, I grew up welding with a gas rig and AC/DC stick machine. When wire feeds got reasonably priced, I bought one and only used a stick once... I have built full NFPA certified roll cages, fuel tanks, water tanks, cut down and welded up several truck frames and fish plated. The above is only to qualify my next comments. I wanted (and needed to keep on the boat) a small lightweight rig that would not take up a lot of space, and could run on dual voltage.  Having spent plenty of time in ship yards, I also knew, a dual voltage rig could pay for itself in no time doing small jobs for others. I am very cautious about buying tools and try to do as much research as possible prior to spending any money.  In my research of the myriad of offerings in these multi process welders, I did find some note worthy information.LOTS OF CHEAP CRAP ON THE MARKET… These cheap units give the quality Multi Process units a bad reputation.  Those $300.00 unfits at the box stores are emergency repair units at best. The older (2016 and prior) multi with plasma were a huge problem, and Miller, Lincoln, and ESAB were unable to get them to last ( referenced in several professional review videos). Everlast was the first company to solve the issue and as of recently, they have a unit that is trouble free. ( I personally did not buy the unit with plasma, but got a separate plasma cutter..)I should also mention, that I invested over 3 grand on these units so we are not comparing the “cheap” multi to a professional unit.  Everlast was a great company to work with on the phone. They are based right in San Fransisco and they make the welders there.  I wanted to buy the top of the line Multi, but after going over all my needs, the sales person recommended the next size down. Im now glad he did, as the other unit is 82 pounds and much taller, which size and weight over rides functions that will never truly be needed. The sales person also explained that their multi process machines are state of the art technology, and perfectly suited for professional users, but if you are a boat building shop and running the welder  non stop in production mode, you would not be using a multi process for that anyway.  It was also explained that part of the cost savings is due to “inexpensive, hobbyist type” guns and consumables.  We were fortunate in that our TIG torch and Plasma torch were upgraded.Now, all that said. A plasma cutter, is an absolute game changer and I would recommend that to anyone doing steel cutting. I have cut miles and miles of steel with a torch in my life, and this plasma cutter is like comparing a Lamborghini to a VW Beetle.  I cut up a mobile home frame yesterday to build our gantry crane and not only was it fast, but my cuts needed no grinding, and my kerfs were less than an 1/8th of an inch. The speed and accuracy of cuts is unmatched by typical gas rigs. I also have the benefit of not having to carry oxy/act on the boat.  This cutter will cut any steel on our boat using the 120v plug, even though we have 240 available. If Matt is like me;  needs a small welder capable of welding all the various types of material commonly found on a steel boat, with the intention to keep it on the boat for future use, then a multi process welder is a perfect choice. The plasma cutter would be an added benefit in a separate machine especially on a boat when you need to cut off rusty bolts, chain, or whatever.I meant no disrespect in my above comments, and am always open to healthy debates, but since I have done some pretty exhaustive research where numerous contradictive information is prevalent, prior to purchasing my machines, I only thought it fair to make that information available to anyone else considering purchasing. Rick---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Rick (and anyone else with an inexpensive plasma cutter),I would like to hear how your Everlast welder/plasma cutter works out.  I have looked at them as a way to get a plasma cutter.  I have read a lot of product literature for inexpensive plasma cutters where they claim much thicker cuts at a given Amp reading than expensive cutters claim at 50% higher Amp ratings.   I have read a very few reviews purportedly from experienced metal workers accustomed to expensive units who have used the inexpensive units and completely contradicted the product claims on what they are suitable to cut, or the maximum they can cut.So I would like to hear in particular your experience with the plasma cutter function, what model it is and how you find it on various thicknesses.   I am sure it is a lot like a hacksaw.Any input people can offer on choosing a unit that uses a particular type of consumables (for availability, durability or low cost) would be useful too.Matt| 35701|35699|2019-03-21 17:49:08|brentswain38|Re: Copper keel coolers|You would have to make damned sure there was no electrical contact between it and  your steel hull ,or you will have some serious electrolysis problems.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I just came across some 20 foot sticks of 1 inch copper pipe (new) and can get for scrap price..  I already had a fernstrum keel cooler lined up (1500) which is copper and nickel.  Is there a reason NOT to use copper pipe sweated with Lead?   I can build the cooler for under 500...| 35702|35557|2019-03-21 17:55:54|brentswain38|Re: Everlast Welder & Plasma cutter|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :There is  no benefit whatsoever  in  an expensive welder over a buzzbox, for a one off steel hull. In over 40 years, none of my buzzbox mild steel welds has ever failed.Yep,, I just bought a 100 feet of AWG 6 SOOW. Believe it or no, I saved over a buck a foot buying a roll at HD….As to a Buzz box being enough,,, Its like saying I can build a house with a chain saw. Your not going to get an art piece when its done….  FWIW,,, there are no used Multi Process welders on the market within a 100 miles of us. I could sell the whole works when Im done and get back 90%.    On Mar 20, 2019, at 11:04 PM, williswildest@... [origamiboats] wrote:Yes, buz-box (AC welder) is enough to build a boat. I still have Lincoln AC 225 amp welder, but I stop using it. The problem in my case was long (more than 100 ft) extension cable for 240V, Buz-box| 35703|35557|2019-03-21 17:58:00|brentswain38|Re: Everlast Welder & Plasma cutter|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I once put together a 36 with a 225 amp buzzbox on 90 feet of 3 strand #12 extension cord. No problem.Sorry, hit a wrong button... Buzzbox was tripping 50 amp circuit breaker after few minutes of welding. DC welder with  IGBT inverter takes about 20-25 amp for the same welding current (AC welder loose about 50% of power, IGBT DC welder loose about 5-10%).  Switching to IGBT welder solved the problem - no more circuit breaker tripping.So, if you have good 240V very close where you weld, AC welder (buzzbox) is enough. It just doubles your electricity bill.| 35704|35699|2019-03-25 16:20:58|Rick Jackson|Re: Copper keel coolers|So I would need to isolate the copper from the steel? I can do that..  On Mar 21, 2019, at 2:49 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:You would have to make damned sure there was no electrical contact between it and  your steel hull ,or you will have some serious electrolysis problems.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I just came across some 20 foot sticks of 1 inch copper pipe (new) and can get for scrap price..  I already had a fernstrum keel cooler lined up (1500) which is copper and nickel.  Is there a reason NOT to use copper pipe sweated with Lead?   I can build the cooler for under 500...| 35705|35557|2019-03-25 16:21:20|Rick Jackson|Re: Everlast Welder & Plasma cutter|How do you wed up the stainless? On Mar 21, 2019, at 2:52 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :There is  no benefit whatsoever  in  an expensive welder over a buzzbox, for a one off steel hull.. In over 40 years, none of my buzzbox mild steel welds has ever failed.Yep,, I just bought a 100 feet of AWG 6 SOOW. Believe it or no, I saved over a buck a foot buying a roll at HD….As to a Buzz box being enough,,, Its like saying I can build a house with a chain saw. Your not going to get an art piece when its done….  FWIW,,, there are no used Multi Process welders on the market within a 100 miles of us. I could sell the whole works when Im done and get back 90%.   On Mar 20, 2019, at 11:04 PM, williswildest@... [origamiboats] wrote:Yes, buz-box (AC welder) is enough to build a boat. I still have Lincoln AC 225 amp welder, but I stop using it. The problem in my case was long (more than 100 ft) extension cable for 240V, Buz-box| 35706|35699|2019-03-25 16:22:43|brentswain38|Re: Copper keel coolers|Yes definitely! ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :So I would need to isolate the copper from the steel? I can do that..  On Mar 21, 2019, at 2:49 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:You would have to make damned sure there was no electrical contact between it and  your steel hull ,or you will have some serious electrolysis problems.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I just came across some 20 foot sticks of 1 inch copper pipe (new) and can get for scrap price..  I already had a fernstrum keel cooler lined up (1500) which is copper and nickel.  Is there a reason NOT to use copper pipe sweated with Lead?   I can build the cooler for under 500...| 35707|35699|2019-03-25 17:19:36|opuspaul|Re: Copper keel coolers|Is copper robust enough for a keel cooler?  I think I would stick with steel.| 35708|35557|2019-03-25 18:13:36|Aaron|Re: Everlast Welder & Plasma cutter|309 electrodes for SS TO carbon and depending on the quality of SS  you would use 308 or 316 and or 309Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 12:21 PM, Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   How do you wed up the stainless?On Mar 21, 2019, at 2:52 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :There is  no benefit whatsoever  in  an expensive welder over a buzzbox, for a one off steel hull.. In over 40 years, none of my buzzbox mild steel welds has ever failed.Yep,, I just bought a 100 feet of AWG 6 SOOW. Believe it or no, I saved over a buck a foot buying a roll at HD….As to a Buzz box being enough,,, Its like saying I can build a house with a chain saw. Your not going to get an art piece when its done….  FWIW,,, there are no used Multi Process welders on the market within a 100 miles of us. I could sell the whole works when Im done and get back 90%.   On Mar 20, 2019, at 11:04 PM, williswildest@... [origamiboats] wrote:Yes, buz-box (AC welder) is enough to build a boat. I still have Lincoln AC 225 amp welder, but I stop using it. The problem in my case was long (more than 100 ft) extension cable for 240V, Buz-box #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 -- #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-mkp { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-mkp hr { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291hd { color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ads { margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ad { padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ad p { margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ad a { color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-lc { font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291hd { margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ad { margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291actions { font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291activity { background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291activity span { font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291activity span:first-child { text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291activity span a { color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291activity span span { color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291activity span .ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291underline { text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 .ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291attach { clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 .ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291attach div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 .ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291attach img { border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 .ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291attach label { display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 .ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291attach label a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 blockquote { margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 .ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291bold { font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 .ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291bold a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 dd.ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291last p a { font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 dd.ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291last p span { margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 dd.ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291last p span.ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291yshortcuts { margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 div.ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291attach-table div div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 div.ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291attach-table { width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 div.ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 div.ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 div.ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 div.ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291file-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 div.ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 div.ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 div.ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 div.ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291photo-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 div#ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291yshortcuts { font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 .ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291green { color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 .ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291MsoNormal { margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 o { font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291photos div { float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291photos div div { border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291photos div label { color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291reco-category { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291reco-desc { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 .ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291replbq { margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-actbar div a:first-child { margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-mlmsg { font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-mlmsg table { font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 input, #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 textarea { font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-mlmsg pre, #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 code { font:115% monospace;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-mlmsg * { line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291logo { padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-msg p a { font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291attach-count span { color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291reco-head { color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-reco { margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ov li a { font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ov li { font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ov ul { margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-text { font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-text p { margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-text tt { font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291 #ygrps-yiv-535610446yiv0992446291ygrp-vital ul li:last-child { border-right:none !important;} #ygrps-yiv-535610446 | 35709|35699|2019-03-26 10:18:57|Shawn Green|Re: Copper keel coolers|Hands down one of the worst ideas I've heard in ages.| 35710|35699|2019-03-26 10:57:00|Matt Malone|Re: Copper keel coolers| Rick, I just want to be clear, would the copper be in contact with salt water on the outside and engine coolant on the inside?  Or would the copper be on the inside of the hull, conducting heat out through the hull? If the copper is in contact with seawater, it seems impossible to get complete electrical isolation if you consider the coolant as conductive, the engine block, transmission, and prop shaft.  Isolating it from the hull might just lead to your prop shaft zinc  corroding away substantially faster, or something less foreseeable. Not to pass up a deal on quality material, if you were planning being anywhere cold with your boat, I would consider an engine coolant heating system, using this copper pipe as radiators.  The copper would not touch the hull or seawater.  A two valves, one in the heating loop, one in the bypass to the loop would allow heat or no heat from the engine. You could have a loop that heats hanging lockers to promote drying.  Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 9:31:51 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Copper keel coolers     So I would need to isolate the copper from the steel? I can do that..  On Mar 21, 2019, at 2:49 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote: You would have to make damned sure there was no electrical contact between it and  your steel hull ,or you will have some serious electrolysis problems. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : I just came across some 20 foot sticks of 1 inch copper pipe (new) and can get for scrap price..  I already had a fernstrum keel cooler lined up (1500) which is copper and nickel.   Is there a reason NOT to use copper pipe sweated with Lead?   I can build the cooler for under 500... | 35711|35699|2019-03-26 12:32:52|Darren Bos|Re: Copper keel coolers| Rick, The copper keel cooler you have planned sounds like what might be found on a wood or fiberglass boat.  On steel and aluminum boats it makes more sense to use the hull plate as one side of the keel cooler.  This is standard practice on steel canal boats in England (see Beta Marine site for details).  I think Brent uses the Skeg on his design for a keel cooler.  I welded mine just against the hull close to the keel well below the wateline.   External copper keel coolers would be a nightmare on a steel boat.  Using the hull as one surface means no extra drag and a keel cooler that is as tough as the hull.  Darren On 2019-03-21 6:31 p.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   So I would need to isolate the copper from the steel? I can do that..  On Mar 21, 2019, at 2:49 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote: You would have to make damned sure there was no electrical contact between it and  your steel hull ,or you will have some serious electrolysis problems. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : I just came across some 20 foot sticks of 1 inch copper pipe (new) and can get for scrap price..  I already had a fernstrum keel cooler lined up (1500) which is copper and nickel.   Is there a reason NOT to use copper pipe sweated with Lead?   I can build the cooler for under 500... | 35712|35699|2019-03-26 14:32:51|Matt Malone|Re: Copper keel coolers| #ygrps-yiv-1007376244 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} So, an area of the hull becomes warm and loses heat to the water.   I too considered this.  Yes, it has the advantages of no external appendage, no added drag, no cleaning, no snagging.   On the less favourable factors:  At least half of the area of the cooler is facing the inside of the boat.   Convection would tend to heat the inside of the boat, possibly when it is already warm in the boat.   One would want to place some insulation on the inside, so the cooler looses heat only to the water outside and does not heat the boat whether desired or not. I like the idea of a skeg cooler because its area is nearly all in contact with water, only the root cross-section touches the hull.   Also, there would be less thermal gradient on the hull and through the paint, which might do funny things with chemistry over a long period in salt water.   Also, the skeg might be made from stainless, and perhaps left uncoated, so that coatings do not impede thermal flow.  The thick layers of hull coatings would tend to make the cooler itself run hotter and lead to warmer return water to the engine.   Engines might run better with warmer return water -- gasoline car engines sure do.  I think it is better to control that through a skeg cooler bypass valve that can be feathered so some uncooled water mixes with the cooled water for optimal engine efficiency...  It occurs to me, there is probably an all-mechanical industrial part that will do that, sort of like a reverse of an automotive thermostat something that measures the temperature of the mixed return water and opens when cold to add more uncooled water, and closes when hot to make full use of the skeg cooler.   One would size the skeg cooler to assure cooling capacity in tropical waters, and suffer no drop in engine efficiency in cold temperate waters or in winter.    That Beta Marine page Darren linked to is very useful.  Maybe Brent can comment on what calculations he uses for sizing a cooling skeg?   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 12:32 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Copper keel coolers     Rick, The copper keel cooler you have planned sounds like what might be found on a wood or fiberglass boat.  On steel and aluminum boats it makes more sense to use the hull plate as one side of the keel cooler.  This is standard practice on steel canal boats in England (see Beta Marine site for details).  I think Brent uses the Skeg on his design for a keel cooler.  I welded mine just against the hull close to the keel well below the wateline.   External copper keel coolers would be a nightmare on a steel boat.  Using the hull as one surface means no extra drag and a keel cooler that is as tough as the hull.  Darren On 2019-03-21 6:31 p.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   So I would need to isolate the copper from the steel? I can do that..  On Mar 21, 2019, at 2:49 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote: You would have to make damned sure there was no electrical contact between it and  your steel hull ,or you will have some serious electrolysis problems. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : I just came across some 20 foot sticks of 1 inch copper pipe (new) and can get for scrap price..  I already had a fernstrum keel cooler lined up (1500) which is copper and nickel.   Is there a reason NOT to use copper pipe sweated with Lead?   I can build the cooler for under 500... | 35713|35699|2019-03-26 19:23:03|Rick Jackson|Re: Copper keel coolers|That sounds pretty extreme..?    I looked into keel coolers,, there are several copper/ nickel units on the market.. Some of the best units are those combinations.  I see how they are isolated from the hull, and it is straight forward.  There is a model which is using the copper /nickle manifold with thin wall copper tubing….  Our copper is much thicker and much more robust…. I think it would be fair to ask that you expound on your statement “hands down one of the worst ideas Ive ever heard in ages”.   To make a statement like that without qualification helps no body… It could allow one to think the statement is made with bad intention and could promote what (following your logic) could lead too an innocent person loosing their boat, or worse... On Mar 26, 2019, at 7:18 AM, Shawn Green greenseaboats@... [origamiboats] wrote:Hands down one of the worst ideas I've heard in ages.| 35714|35699|2019-03-26 19:28:24|Matt Malone|Re: Copper keel coolers| #ygrps-yiv-849736659 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Yeah, I would like to know why too.  All the things I have mentioned are reasonably slow, and if one knows something odd might happen, and checks for it, like all problems that one does regular inspections for, it is not a problem, it is part of the routine.  One other aspect, 1" copper is often used for drain lines and is thin.   It might be the same thickness as 1/2 copper, but, as you know, larger diameter pipes need to be thicker to carry the same pressure.  That said, I have seen 2" pipes used in an engine coolant system, but I have no idea how thick they were. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 5:25 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Copper keel coolers     That sounds pretty extreme..?     I looked into keel coolers,, there are several copper/ nickel units on the market.. Some of the best units are those combinations.  I see how they are isolated from the hull, and it is straight forward.  There is a model which is using the copper /nickle manifold with thin wall copper tubing….  Our copper is much thicker and much more robust….  I think it would be fair to ask that you expound on your statement “hands down one of the worst ideas Ive ever heard in ages”.    To make a statement like that without qualification helps no body… It could allow one to think the statement is made with bad intention and could promote what (following your logic) could lead too an innocent person loosing their boat, or worse... On Mar 26, 2019, at 7:18 AM, Shawn Green greenseaboats@... [origamiboats] wrote: Hands down one of the worst ideas I've heard in ages. | 35715|35699|2019-03-26 19:38:06|brentswain38|Re: Copper keel coolers|I have no bypass on my skeg cooling. Never needed one. The thermostat takes care of that.| 35716|35699|2019-03-26 19:45:45|brentswain38|Re: Copper keel coolers|Yes , some use built in  tankage in the keel. One boat I put together used a 45 degree plate between the keel and the hull . As the entire underwater surface is potential cooling surface , copper keel coolers make no sense on a metal boat. I remember when the mounties catamaran was in Comox in an open house . I asked them if they use keel coolers ,and they  said "No, we use proper heat exchangers."I asked why they would do that, instead of keel cooling ,using the super conductor aluminium is. They said "Our experts know  how to cool engines properly!"Later, a friend saw two of them hauled out, the bottoms severely corroded. They had bolted bronze keel coolers directly on the aluminiumn hull, no insulation nor isolation  whatsoever!I mentioned that to a retired mountie, who was briefly involved in their building, and he rolled his eyes,and said "When the first two 800 hp Allison diesels arrived for them ,a high  ranking mountie  stole them, sold them and pocketed the money." When he got caught, they would not let my friend charge him. They made him give the money back, then fired him,no charges, as that would have brought the media, and they couldn't cover it up, like they did.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :#ygrps-yiv-1260674824 #ygrps-yiv-1260674824ygrps-yiv-1802607788 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} So, an area of the hull becomes warm and loses heat to the water.   I too considered this.  Yes, it has the advantages of no external appendage, no added drag, no cleaning, no snagging.   On the less favourable factors:  At least half of the area of the cooler is facing the inside of the boat.   Convection would tend to heat the inside of the boat, possibly when it is already warm in the boat.   One would want to place some insulation on the inside, so the cooler looses heat only to the water outside and does not heat the boat whether desired or not. I like the idea of a skeg cooler because its area is nearly all in contact with water, only the root cross-section touches the hull.   Also, there would be less thermal gradient on the hull and through the paint, which might do funny things with chemistry over a long period in salt water.   Also, the skeg might be made from stainless, and perhaps left uncoated, so that coatings do not impede thermal flow.  The thick layers of hull coatings would tend to make the cooler itself run hotter and lead to warmer return water to the engine.   Engines might run better with warmer return water -- gasoline car engines sure do.  I think it is better to control that through a skeg cooler bypass valve that can be feathered so some uncooled water mixes with the cooled water for optimal engine efficiency...  It occurs to me, there is probably an all-mechanical industrial part that will do that, sort of like a reverse of an automotive thermostat something that measures the temperature of the mixed return water and opens when cold to add more uncooled water, and closes when hot to make full use of the skeg cooler.   One would size the skeg cooler to assure cooling capacity in tropical waters, and suffer no drop in engine efficiency in cold temperate waters or in winter.    That Beta Marine page Darren linked to is very useful.  Maybe Brent can comment on what calculations he uses for sizing a cooling skeg?   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 12:32 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Copper keel coolers  Rick, The copper keel cooler you have planned sounds like what might be found on a wood or fiberglass boat.  On steel and aluminum boats it makes more sense to use the hull plate as one side of the keel cooler.  This is standard practice on steel canal boats in England (see Beta Marine site for details).  I think Brent uses the Skeg on his design for a keel cooler.  I welded mine just against the hull close to the keel well below the wateline.   External copper keel coolers would be a nightmare on a steel boat.  Using the hull as one surface means no extra drag and a keel cooler that is as tough as the hull.  Darren On 2019-03-21 6:31 p.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:  So I would need to isolate the copper from the steel? I can do that.. On Mar 21, 2019, at 2:49 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote: You would have to make damned sure there was no electrical contact between it and  your steel hull ,or you will have some serious electrolysis problems. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : I just came across some 20 foot sticks of 1 inch copper pipe (new) and can get for scrap price..  I already had a fernstrum keel cooler lined up (1500) which is copper and nickel.   Is there a reason NOT to use copper pipe sweated with Lead?   I can build the cooler for under 500... | 35717|35699|2019-03-26 21:23:05|Matt Malone|Re: Copper keel coolers| #ygrps-yiv-1514241623 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} In theory, yes Brent, but it would be like Canadians putting a piece of cardboard in front of the rad in their pickup, or big rig trucks having a little zipper-up vinyl windbreaker on the grill.  Part of it is the engine runs more efficiently.   Yes, salt water just cannot get cooler than like -2C or something, but, it is a way better heat sink than air.  A cooler sized for the tropics and +30C water, sized so the engine never overheats no matter how well closed the engine compartment, that cooler will make the engine choke its thermostat almost completely shut at -2C to keep at a good temperature at the thermostat, where water is exiting the engine.  Then some part of the block is getting a trickle of -2C water being fed into it.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 7:38 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Copper keel coolers     I have no bypass on my skeg cooling. Never needed one. The thermostat takes care of that. | 35718|35699|2019-03-27 12:34:59|Darren Bos|Re: Copper keel coolers| I'm sure Shawn will have his own comments.  I interpreted "hands down the worst idea I've ever heard in ages" as shorthand for: 1) an external keel cooler creates more drag, one made of copper pipe will be particularly bad (remember you already have a heavy boat with limited sail area). 2) an external copper keel cooler is vulnerable to damage from an impact.  One log strike could cause loss of engine. 3) copper house pipe isn't particularly strong stuff, this impacts construction, corrosion and impact resistance 4) soldering the copper house pipe with lead solder, as proposed, is a recipe for corrosion of the keel cooler itself 5) copper pipe next to a steel hull is a recipe for corrosion.  It will be much harder to electrically isolate in a reliably watertight way than you think, and if that isolation fails at any point you will have a corrosion nightmare.  Even with perfect physical isolation, you still have the coolant in contact with the copper and the engine block, and more likely than not, your engine block will not be isolated from the hull. 6) an external keel cooler requires you to put more holes in the hull, and those are what cause the vast majority of boat sinkings 7) the external keel cooler is going to be ugly and unusual.  This won't matter to many of use here, but no one keeps a boat forever and if you should ever need to sell it, such a protuberance is going to make the boat difficult to sell. All this compares to the robust simplicity of welding the keel cooler into the skeg or along the hull if you don't have a skeg that can be used.  I think Brent has talked about how he prevents corrosion of the steel inside the keel cooler before, but maybe he could remind us now.  Here is a picture of the keel coolers I welded in, outlined in red to make it them easier to see against the other framing.  Given that you have gutted your boat and don't have longitudinals to work around, something similar should be easy for you to implement. Darren On 2019-03-26 2:25 p.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   That sounds pretty extreme..?     I looked into keel coolers,, there are several copper/ nickel units on the market.. Some of the best units are those combinations.  I see how they are isolated from the hull, and it is straight forward.  There is a model which is using the copper /nickle manifold with thin wall copper tubing….  Our copper is much thicker and much more robust….  I think it would be fair to ask that you expound on your statement “hands down one of the worst ideas Ive ever heard in ages”.    To make a statement like that without qualification helps no body… It could allow one to think the statement is made with bad intention and could promote what (following your logic) could lead too an innocent person loosing their boat, or worse... On Mar 26, 2019, at 7:18 AM, Shawn Green greenseaboats@... [origamiboats] wrote: Hands down one of the worst ideas I've heard in ages. | 35719|35699|2019-03-27 15:04:42|wild_explorer|Re: Copper keel coolers|If you really want to have copper cooler, it would be easy to make heat exchanger inside water-tight keel's compartment filled with transformer oil.Arrangement: - 2 vertical Teflon flat bars (with holes for copper tubes) to fix and stiffen-up assembly and prevent copper touching the keel. - You make heat exchanger by connecting copper pipes going through the holes.- Intake and exhaust heat exchanger's  pipes on the top of the keel go through Teflon compression coupling. This way your copper pipes are electrically insulated from the keel and the hull.- Transformer oil acts as insulator and allows good heat exchange between copper-oil-keel-outside_water.Trucks with diesel engine have copper radiators - not too many problems. Some people recommend to put piece of galvanized pipe between hoses to prevent block corrosion (even with proper engine coolant on a truck)P.S. Possible problems: if transformer oil gets inside heat exchanger and mixes with the coolant, it will be deposited on the inside passages of the block and reduce cooling efficiency.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Yes definitely! ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :So I would need to isolate the copper from the steel? I can do that..  On Mar 21, 2019, at 2:49 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:You would have to make damned sure there was no electrical contact between it and  your steel hull ,or you will have some serious electrolysis problems.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I just came across some 20 foot sticks of 1 inch copper pipe (new) and can get for scrap price..  I already had a fernstrum keel cooler lined up (1500) which is copper and nickel.  Is there a reason NOT to use copper pipe sweated with Lead?   I can build the cooler for under 500...| 35720|35720|2019-03-27 15:39:31|wild_explorer|Perpetua|I have spotted aluminum sailboat in Pacific Northwest which looks like 40 ft BrentBoat. It is registered in Oregon (not CC registered) and has unofficial name Perpetua. It is built a little bit differently: deck is flash to the hull's sides and there is another pipe on the pegs to which side rails are welded. It has pilothouse which looks like traditional low sailboat's pilothouse (not fishermen type). It has small cockpit compare to standard one. Cabin without potholes. Pretty tall aluminum mast.All other looks like BrenBoat design. Does anyone has information about it? P.S. Someone told me that boat is not finished inside, but already put good sea mileage on it.| 35721|35699|2019-03-27 16:03:04|Rick Jackson|Re: Copper keel coolers| Ive read  recently read an article on this, but back in my pops commercial fishing days, the fishing boats we all knew ran keel coolers, and did so because the older diesels needed to run above 180 degree F and preferred to run at 195F.  The sea water cooling will not allow those temps due to “life” in the sea water which causes all sorts of issues when temps exceed 180 or is it less?  ( if I remember right) .   As it was explained back in the day, a cold running diesel, creates carbon when the motor is lugged and or cold running (under 180F) which significantly reduces the life span of the engine… If I can find the article,I will post it, but there is a great write up about the old school diesels compared to the newer common rail versions, and in it, it covered all things key to getting the maximum hours out of your power plant.. It was written for the work boat industry, but it discussed how the new common rail versions allow you to generate more horse power out of a smaller (read lighter as in less iron) power plants. Those newer computer controlled units can accommodate for multiple variables and perform at an optimum. Although,,, at a cost of total $ per hour due to their acquisition cost, and their light construction, causes them to be unable to shed heat efficiently. Add in leaner run computer setting to compensate for lower temps and you can have issues prematurely. Old school N/A diesels with or without direct injection operated off purely a mechanical fuel/air induction and therefore were designed to operate optimally at a set and regulated temperature, which is commonly at 190 and 195.  We had a puller that ran best numbers at 212. (Remember higher psi allows higher temps before boiling).Soooo… The keel cooler and closed loop system,  with our 1960’s vintage Mercedes 130HP OM352 will allow us to “motor Sail” where we can utilize a little bit of our engines power at a reduced fuel consumption, without the risk lugging at temperatures below 190F..As a side note… I have learned in my many years of building things, that there is never only one way to do things. What works well in one arena, may not work at all in others. To say that one thing is a bad idea, when clearly professionals do it all the time,  only limits your possibilities to learn new things.  On Mar 26, 2019, at 4:28 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:Yeah, I would like to know why too.  All the things I have mentioned are reasonably slow, and if one knows something odd might happen, and checks for it, like all problems that one does regular inspections for, it is not a problem, it is part of the routine.  One other aspect, 1" copper is often used for drain lines and is thin.   It might be the same thickness as 1/2 copper, but, as you know, larger diameter pipes need to be thicker to carry the same pressure.  That said, I have seen 2" pipes used in an engine coolant system, but I have no idea how thick they were.Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 5:25 PMTo: origamiboats@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [origamiboats] Copper keel coolers  That sounds pretty extreme..?    I looked into keel coolers,, there are several copper/ nickel units on the market.. Some of the best units are those combinations.  I see how they are isolated from the hull, and it is straight forward.  There is a model which is using the copper /nickle manifold with thin wall copper tubing….  Our copper is much thicker and much more robust…. I think it would be fair to ask that you expound on your statement “hands down one of the worst ideas Ive ever heard in ages”.   To make a statement like that without qualification helps no body… It could allow one to think the statement is made with bad intention and could promote what (following your logic) could lead too an innocent person loosing their boat, or worse...On Mar 26, 2019, at 7:18 AM, Shawn Green greenseaboats@... [origamiboats] wrote:Hands down one of the worst ideas I've heard in ages.| 35722|35699|2019-03-27 16:03:23|Rick Jackson|Re: Copper keel coolers|Thanks for the input DarrenAll good points.. I asked a retired fisherman/ engineer about it… He was saying they used galvanized pipe for years… Those older boats were wood so that nicks that. He agreed the copper would need to be protected from Flotsam… covering would defeat the purpose…. So on to the next option…. I was considering originally the idea of building the cooler into the hull… I saw where SV Seeker did this, but he had some issues…. I have see where with steel, rectangular box channel is welded to the hull exterior and used as the cooler. Does not resolve your concern for through hull, but absolutely does for impact resistance…   I have access to a bunch of good scrap steel here, and Ive been looking at this 20 foot stick of 6 inch ID well pipe.   It keeps talking to me like I need to find a way to use it…  It would not be to difficult to 1/2 or 1/4 it, make contoured bullet nose piece….I plan to use all my hollow keel space for tankage, storage and battery bank. I will have a number of tank bulkheads welded in so I do not see having the interior hull space available for cooling.  As it was, I was looking at a loop which brought the pipe back to the same location.    Our hull had through hulls all random.. I was planing to keep them centrally located so all were easily accessible with bungs and some Belzona close by... On Mar 27, 2019, at 9:34 AM, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote:I'm sure Shawn will have his own comments.  I interpreted "hands down the worst idea I've ever heard in ages" as shorthand for:1) an external keel cooler creates more drag, one made of copper pipe will be particularly bad (remember you already have a heavy boat with limited sail area).2) an external copper keel cooler is vulnerable to damage from an impact.  One log strike could cause loss of engine.3) copper house pipe isn't particularly strong stuff, this impacts construction, corrosion and impact resistance4) soldering the copper house pipe with lead solder, as proposed, is a recipe for corrosion of the keel cooler itself5) copper pipe next to a steel hull is a recipe for corrosion.  It will be much harder to electrically isolate in a reliably watertight way than you think, and if that isolation fails at any point you will have a corrosion nightmare.  Even with perfect physical isolation, you still have the coolant in contact with the copper and the engine block, and more likely than not, your engine block will not be isolated from the hull.6) an external keel cooler requires you to put more holes in the hull, and those are what cause the vast majority of boat sinkings7) the external keel cooler is going to be ugly and unusual.  This won't matter to many of use here, but no one keeps a boat forever and if you should ever need to sell it, such a protuberance is going to make the boat difficult to sell.All this compares to the robust simplicity of welding the keel cooler into the skeg or along the hull if you don't have a skeg that can be used.  I think Brent has talked about how he prevents corrosion of the steel inside the keel cooler before, but maybe he could remind us now.  Here is a picture of the keel coolers I welded in, outlined in red to make it them easier to see against the other framing.  Given that you have gutted your boat and don't have longitudinals to work around, something similar should be easy for you to implement.DarrenOn 2019-03-26 2:25 p.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote: That sounds pretty extreme..?    I looked into keel coolers,, there are several copper/ nickel units on the market.. Some of the best units are those combinations.  I see how they are isolated from the hull, and it is straight forward.  There is a model which is using the copper /nickle manifold with thin wall copper tubing….  Our copper is much thicker and much more robust…. I think it would be fair to ask that you expound on your statement “hands down one of the worst ideas Ive ever heard in ages”.   To make a statement like that without qualification helps no body… It could allow one to think the statement is made with bad intention and could promote what (following your logic) could lead too an innocent person loosing their boat, or worse...On Mar 26, 2019, at 7:18 AM, Shawn Green greenseaboats@... [origamiboats] wrote:Hands down one of the worst ideas I've heard in ages.| 35723|35720|2019-03-27 16:09:33|brentswain38|Re: Perpetua|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :The only brentboat  aluminium 40 I 'm  aware of is Loon in Ganges Harbour, which was quite modified. She cruised to Australia and back , outsailing many of the beats she encountered.I have sold lots of plans, and often see pictures of my designs,which  I was unaware had been builtI have spotted aluminum sailboat in Pacific Northwest which looks like 40 ft BrentBoat. It is registered in Oregon (not CC registered) and has unofficial name Perpetua. It is built a little bit differently: deck is flash to the hull's sides and there is another pipe on the pegs to which side rails are welded. It has pilothouse which looks like traditional low sailboat's pilothouse (not fishermen type). It has small cockpit compare to standard one. Cabin without potholes. Pretty tall aluminum mast.All other looks like BrenBoat design. Does anyone has information about it? P.S. Someone told me that boat is not finished inside, but already put good sea mileage on it.| 35724|35699|2019-03-27 16:21:02|brentswain38|Re: Copper keel coolers|Why bother, when  you can simply use a built in keel tank. I have used water soluable machinists oil for years in coolant, no problems, It doesn't take much in cooling water, to eliminate corrosion.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :If you really want to have copper cooler, it would be easy to make heat exchanger inside water-tight keel's compartment filled with transformer oil.Arrangement: - 2 vertical Teflon flat bars (with holes for copper tubes) to fix and stiffen-up assembly and prevent copper touching the keel. - You make heat exchanger by connecting copper pipes going through the holes.- Intake and exhaust heat exchanger's  pipes on the top of the keel go through Teflon compression coupling. This way your copper pipes are electrically insulated from the keel and the hull.- Transformer oil acts as insulator and allows good heat exchange between copper-oil-keel-outside_water.Trucks with diesel engine have copper radiators - not too many problems. Some people recommend to put piece of galvanized pipe between hoses to prevent block corrosion (even with proper engine coolant on a truck)P.S. Possible problems: if transformer oil gets inside heat exchanger and mixes with the coolant, it will be deposited on the inside passages of the block and reduce cooling efficiency.-| 35725|35699|2019-03-27 16:23:43|brentswain38|Re: Copper keel coolers|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :No problem with mine in 34 years, including a lot of  motoring in the tropics.#ygrps-yiv-2116360160 #ygrps-yiv-2116360160ygrps-yiv-7077502 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} In theory, yes Brent, but it would be like Canadians putting a piece of cardboard in front of the rad in their pickup, or big rig trucks having a little zipper-up vinyl windbreaker on the grill.  Part of it is the engine runs more efficiently.   Yes, salt water just cannot get cooler than like -2C or something, but, it is a way better heat sink than air.  A cooler sized for the tropics and +30C water, sized so the engine never overheats no matter how well closed the engine compartment, that cooler will make the engine choke its thermostat almost completely shut at -2C to keep at a good temperature at the thermostat, where water is exiting the engine.  Then some part of the block is getting a trickle of -2C water being fed into it.   Matt miboats@yahoogroups.com> on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 7:38 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Copper keel coolers  I have no bypass on my skeg cooling. Never needed one. The thermostat takes care of that. From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com wrote: I'm sure Shawn will have his own comments.  I interpreted "hands down the worst idea I've ever heard in ages" as shorthand for: 1) an external keel cooler creates more drag, one made of copper pipe will be particularly bad (remember you already have a heavy boat with limited sail area). 2) an external copper keel cooler is vulnerable to damage from an impact.  One log strike could cause loss of engine. 3) copper house pipe isn't particularly strong stuff, this impacts construction, corrosion and impact resistance 4) soldering the copper house pipe with lead solder, as proposed, is a recipe for corrosion of the keel cooler itself 5) copper pipe next to a steel hull is a recipe for corrosion.  It will be much harder to electrically isolate in a reliably watertight way than you think, and if that isolation fails at any point you will have a corrosion nightmare.  Even with perfect physical isolation, you still have the coolant in contact with the copper and the engine block, and more likely than not, your engine block will not be isolated from the hull. 6) an external keel cooler requires you to put more holes in the hull, and those are what cause the vast majority of boat sinkings 7) the external keel cooler is going to be ugly and unusual.  This won't matter to many of use here, but no one keeps a boat forever and if you should ever need to sell it, such a protuberance is going to make the boat difficult to sell. All this compares to the robust simplicity of welding the keel cooler into the skeg or along the hull if you don't have a skeg that can be used.  I think Brent has talked about how he prevents corrosion of the steel inside the keel cooler before, but maybe he could remind us now.  Here is a picture of the keel coolers I welded in, outlined in red to make it them easier to see against the other framing.  Given that you have gutted your boat and don't have longitudinals to work around, something similar should be easy for you to implement. Darren | 35727|35699|2019-03-27 18:15:32|Matt Malone|Re: Copper keel coolers| Well my tractor has run for 72 years, but that does not prove it has run well, or at its best, or that it has been taken care of well. Rick was talking about sooting at below-optimal temperatures.   Matt From: brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 16:25 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Copper keel coolers To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : No problem with mine in 34 years, including a lot of  motoring in the tropics. In theory, yes Brent, but it would be like Canadians putting a piece of cardboard in front of the rad in their pickup, or big rig trucks having a little zipper-up vinyl windbreaker on the grill.  Part of it is the engine runs more efficiently.   Yes, salt water just cannot get cooler than like -2C or something, but, it is a way better heat sink than air.  A cooler sized for the tropics and +30C water, sized so the engine never overheats no matter how well closed the engine compartment, that cooler will make the engine choke its thermostat almost completely shut at -2C to keep at a good temperature at the thermostat, where water is exiting the engine.  Then some part of the block is getting a trickle of -2C water being fed into it.   Matt miboats@yahoogroups.com> on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 7:38 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Copper keel coolers     I have no bypass on my skeg cooling. Never needed one. The thermostat takes care of that. From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com wrote: > > > I have spotted aluminum sailboat in Pacific Northwest which looks like 40 > ft BrentBoat. > > It is registered in Oregon (not CC registered) and has unofficial name > Perpetua. > > It is built a little bit differently: deck is flash to the hull's sides > and there is another pipe on the pegs to which side rails are welded. It > has pilothouse which looks like traditional low sailboat's pilothouse (not > fishermen type). It has small cockpit compare to standard one. Cabin > without potholes. Pretty tall aluminum mast. > > All other looks like BrenBoat design. > > Does anyone has information about it? > > P.S. Someone told me that boat is not finished inside, but already put > good sea mileage on it. > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]| 35730|35699|2019-03-28 17:16:04|Rick Jackson|Re: Copper keel coolers|Did you use any formulae to size you’re cooler?Fernstrum sent me specs and it stated that it held .91 gallon. No flow rates…. I read on the Seeker site where you have to make sure it flows at just the right pace. Too fast and it won’t cool, to slow and it won’t cool… Difficult to figure that all out?I like the idea that Brent has using the keel itself to house a cooling system. I don’t think I will have any space to spare but the idea is interesting...Rick On Mar 27, 2019, at 3:13 PM, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote:There's always more than one way to do things, but rarely are they all equally good, just be aware of the trade-offs.  I'd steer away from anything on the outside of the hull.  Folks go to great lengths and spend considerable sums of money on things like feathering propellers to get an extra 0.5 or 1 knot of sailing performance.  Adding the drag of an external keel cooler is going in the wrong direction.   With the motor always running the drag from an external keel cooler impacts an old fishboat a lot less than it will a sailboat.  A smooth surface on the oustide of the boat is also easier to keep clean from fouling, which is important with keel cooling.  In the pic I linked to, the keel coolers inside my hull are only 1" taller than the hull itself and perfectly follow the curve of the hull.  Surely you have room for that?  Put them in right now and then treat them like the hull as you finish the rest of the boat around them.  In mine you can see where the transverse frames are welded on top of the keel coolers, inside the keel cooler there is support for those frames.  The supports were connected to the inner face of the keel cooler with plug welds.On 2019-03-27 11:55 a.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote: Thanks for the input DarrenAll good points.. I asked a retired fisherman/ engineer about it… He was saying they used galvanized pipe for years… Those older boats were wood so that nicks that. He agreed the copper would need to be protected from Flotsam… covering would defeat the purpose…. So on to the next option…. I was considering originally the idea of building the cooler into the hull… I saw where SV Seeker did this, but he had some issues…. I have see where with steel, rectangular box channel is welded to the hull exterior and used as the cooler. Does not resolve your concern for through hull, but absolutely does for impact resistance…   I have access to a bunch of good scrap steel here, and Ive been looking at this 20 foot stick of 6 inch ID well pipe.   It keeps talking to me like I need to find a way to use it…  It would not be to difficult to 1/2 or 1/4 it, make contoured bullet nose piece….I plan to use all my hollow keel space for tankage, storage and battery bank.. I will have a number of tank bulkheads welded in so I do not see having the interior hull space available for cooling..  As it was, I was looking at a loop which brought the pipe back to the same location.    Our hull had through hulls all random.. I was planing to keep them centrally located so all were easily accessible with bungs and some Belzona close by...On Mar 27, 2019, at 9:34 AM, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote:I'm sure Shawn will have his own comments.  I interpreted "hands down the worst idea I've ever heard in ages" as shorthand for:1) an external keel cooler creates more drag, one made of copper pipe will be particularly bad (remember you already have a heavy boat with limited sail area).2) an external copper keel cooler is vulnerable to damage from an impact.  One log strike could cause loss of engine.3) copper house pipe isn't particularly strong stuff, this impacts construction, corrosion and impact resistance4) soldering the copper house pipe with lead solder, as proposed, is a recipe for corrosion of the keel cooler itself5) copper pipe next to a steel hull is a recipe for corrosion.  It will be much harder to electrically isolate in a reliably watertight way than you think, and if that isolation fails at any point you will have a corrosion nightmare.  Even with perfect physical isolation, you still have the coolant in contact with the copper and the engine block, and more likely than not, your engine block will not be isolated from the hull.6) an external keel cooler requires you to put more holes in the hull, and those are what cause the vast majority of boat sinkings7) the external keel cooler is going to be ugly and unusual.  This won't matter to many of use here, but no one keeps a boat forever and if you should ever need to sell it, such a protuberance is going to make the boat difficult to sell.All this compares to the robust simplicity of welding the keel cooler into the skeg or along the hull if you don't have a skeg that can be used.  I think Brent has talked about how he prevents corrosion of the steel inside the keel cooler before, but maybe he could remind us now.  Here is a picture of the keel coolers I welded in, outlined in red to make it them easier to see against the other framing.  Given that you have gutted your boat and don't have longitudinals to work around, something similar should be easy for you to implement.Darren| 35731|35699|2019-03-28 17:16:33|Rick Jackson|Re: Copper keel coolers|Thank you Shawn,,, I have been convinced..  Anyone want a good deal on 60 feet of copper pipe?  I like the idea of the of steel channel. I have seen a couple now.  Adds wetted surface area but our boat is a motor sailer…  It appears one could lengthen the box to keep the profile low but surface area is surface area either way.  Putting the box inside the hull is very interesting for the obvious reasons, however, what about the heat transferred inside the hull?   Due to my need to fill the keel with lead/potable water/ fuel/ hydro oil/ and batteries (its a huge keel) I prefer not to have a lot of heat transferred into those fluids.  Directly below the main is the lead which would be my only option for mounting direct to the hull..  For accurate input to our project, it should be stated, I am removing the keel plates. The boat has grounded and there is some damage to the front, midships and the rudder support.   I decided to remove all the lead, re plate the keel, with pre blasted plate to simplify epoxy coating later.   I have seen removable panels on steel keels which is interesting as well (makes painting and utilizing the space easier, but again, there is that drag issue with things like bolt heads….  Yea,,, bad habit of trying to re invent the wheel…. Rick On Mar 28, 2019, at 5:18 AM, Shawn Green greenseaboats@... [origamiboats] wrote:Well, Darren covered most of it. Not strong enough. Corrosion problems. Joinery problems. Especially amplified when you are sorta reinventing the wheel. Keel coolers have been around a long time.The  navy boat I'm welding on today has steel channel run all over the bottom for engine as well as hydraulic fluid cooling. It's quite old but pressured tested fine despite multiple impacts. Galvanized pipe is a good option if you dont have a steel hull to make things easy for you.| 35732|35699|2019-03-28 17:22:44|brentswain38|Re: Copper keel coolers|If spray foamed over, there is not much heat transfer inside the hull.The return pipe from my skeg stays cool to the touch,after days of motoring in he tropics---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Thank you Shawn,,, I have been convinced..  Anyone want a good deal on 60 feet of copper pipe?  I like the idea of the of steel channel. I have seen a couple now.  Adds wetted surface area but our boat is a motor sailer…  It appears one could lengthen the box to keep the profile low but surface area is surface area either way.  Putting the box inside the hull is very interesting for the obvious reasons, however, what about the heat transferred inside the hull?   Due to my need to fill the keel with lead/potable water/ fuel/ hydro oil/ and batteries (its a huge keel) I prefer not to have a lot of heat transferred into those fluids.  Directly below the main is the lead which would be my only option for mounting direct to the hull..  For accurate input to our project, it should be stated, I am removing the keel plates. The boat has grounded and there is some damage to the front, midships and the rudder support.   I decided to remove all the lead, re plate the keel, with pre blasted plate to simplify epoxy coating later.   I have seen removable panels on steel keels which is interesting as well (makes painting and utilizing the space easier, but again, there is that drag issue with things like bolt heads….  Yea,,, bad habit of trying to re invent the wheel…. Rick On Mar 28, 2019, at 5:18 AM, Shawn Green greenseaboats@... [origamiboats] wrote:Well, Darren covered most of it. Not strong enough. Corrosion problems. Joinery problems. Especially amplified when you are sorta reinventing the wheel. Keel coolers have been around a long time.The  navy boat I'm welding on today has steel channel run all over the bottom for engine as well as hydraulic fluid cooling. It's quite old but pressured tested fine despite multiple impacts. Galvanized pipe is a good option if you dont have a steel hull to make things easy for you.| 35733|35699|2019-03-28 17:33:55|brentswain38|Re: Copper keel coolers|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :In 1980,  I replaced keel coolers on a tug which had been working  fine since 1947.They were 2 inch sch 40 mild steel pipes , as were the replacements.They worked out to 1 1/2 sq ft surface area  per ten HP. She spent her  first ten years in a lake, in warm summer temperatures, for months at a time. An overkill on that  will hurt nothing.Did you use any formulae to size you’re cooler?Fernstrum sent me specs and it stated that it held .91 gallon. No flow rates…. I read on the Seeker site where you have to make sure it flows at just the right pace. Too fast and it won’t cool, to slow and it won’t cool… Difficult to figure that all out?I like the idea that Brent has using the keel itself to house a cooling system. I don’t think I will have any space to spare but the idea is interesting...Rick On Mar 27, 2019, at 3:13 PM, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote:There's always more than one way to do things, but rarely are they all equally good, just be aware of the trade-offs.  I'd steer away from anything on the outside of the hull.  Folks go to great lengths and spend considerable sums of money on things like feathering propellers to get an extra 0.5 or 1 knot of sailing performance.  Adding the drag of an external keel cooler is going in the wrong direction.   With the motor always running the drag from an external keel cooler impacts an old fishboat a lot less than it will a sailboat.  A smooth surface on the oustide of the boat is also easier to keep clean from fouling, which is important with keel cooling.  In the pic I linked to, the keel coolers inside my hull are only 1" taller than the hull itself and perfectly follow the curve of the hull.  Surely you have room for that?  Put them in right now and then treat them like the hull as you finish the rest of the boat around them.  In mine you can see where the transverse frames are welded on top of the keel coolers, inside the keel cooler there is support for those frames.  The supports were connected to the inner face of the keel cooler with plug welds.On 2019-03-27 11:55 a.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote: Thanks for the input DarrenAll good points.. I asked a retired fisherman/ engineer about it… He was saying they used galvanized pipe for years… Those older boats were wood so that nicks that. He agreed the copper would need to be protected from Flotsam… covering would defeat the purpose…. So on to the next option…. I was considering originally the idea of building the cooler into the hull… I saw where SV Seeker did this, but he had some issues…. I have see where with steel, rectangular box channel is welded to the hull exterior and used as the cooler. Does not resolve your concern for through hull, but absolutely does for impact resistance…   I have access to a bunch of good scrap steel here, and Ive been looking at this 20 foot stick of 6 inch ID well pipe.   It keeps talking to me like I need to find a way to use it…  It would not be to difficult to 1/2 or 1/4 it, make contoured bullet nose piece….I plan to use all my hollow keel space for tankage, storage and battery bank.. I will have a number of tank bulkheads welded in so I do not see having the interior hull space available for cooling..  As it was, I was looking at a loop which brought the pipe back to the same location.    Our hull had through hulls all random.. I was planing to keep them centrally located so all were easily accessible with bungs and some Belzona close by...On Mar 27, 2019, at 9:34 AM, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote:I'm sure Shawn will have his own comments.  I interpreted "hands down the worst idea I've ever heard in ages" as shorthand for:1) an external keel cooler creates more drag, one made of copper pipe will be particularly bad (remember you already have a heavy boat with limited sail area).2) an external copper keel cooler is vulnerable to damage from an impact.  One log strike could cause loss of engine.3) copper house pipe isn't particularly strong stuff, this impacts construction, corrosion and impact resistance4) soldering the copper house pipe with lead solder, as proposed, is a recipe for corrosion of the keel cooler itself5) copper pipe next to a steel hull is a recipe for corrosion.  It will be much harder to electrically isolate in a reliably watertight way than you think, and if that isolation fails at any point you will have a corrosion nightmare.  Even with perfect physical isolation, you still have the coolant in contact with the copper and the engine block, and more likely than not, your engine block will not be isolated from the hull.6) an external keel cooler requires you to put more holes in the hull, and those are what cause the vast majority of boat sinkings7) the external keel cooler is going to be ugly and unusual.  This won't matter to many of use here, but no one keeps a boat forever and if you should ever need to sell it, such a protuberance is going to make the boat difficult to sell.All this compares to the robust simplicity of welding the keel cooler into the skeg or along the hull if you don't have a skeg that can be used.  I think Brent has talked about how he prevents corrosion of the steel inside the keel cooler before, but maybe he could remind us now.  Here is a picture of the keel coolers I welded in, outlined in red to make it them easier to see against the other framing.  Given that you have gutted your boat and don't have longitudinals to work around, something similar should be easy for you to implement.Darren| 35734|35720|2019-03-28 17:39:10|brentswain38|Re: Perpetua|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :The latest photos posted are definitely not one of my designs. Chines go too far forward and the transom is too big, for my 40 footer.Not the best picture but only one I have . Modified by someone on vancouver island . Perhaps Brent knows more . On Wed, Mar 27, 2019, 12:40 PM williswildest@... [origamiboats], < origamiboats@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > > > I have spotted aluminum sailboat in Pacific Northwest which looks like 40 > ft BrentBoat. > > It is registered in Oregon (not CC registered) and has unofficial name > Perpetua. > > It is built a little bit differently: deck is flash to the hull's sides > and there is another pipe on the pegs to which side rails are welded. It > has pilothouse which looks like traditional low sailboat's pilothouse (not > fishermen type). It has small cockpit compare to standard one. Cabin > without potholes. Pretty tall aluminum mast. > > All other looks like BrenBoat design. > > Does anyone has information about it? > > P.S. Someone told me that boat is not finished inside, but already put > good sea mileage on it. > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]| 35735|35699|2019-03-28 18:15:41|opuspaul|Re: Copper keel coolers|The hull surface or tubing of a keel cooler, when it is in water, will never heat up more than a few degrees.   There is far too much heat transfer to the water.   The surface area or length of the tube is really just there to give the coolant enough time and area to cool before going back into the engine.   Think of it this way...in an inadequately sized keel cooler, you would have hot coolant skipping right by a cool pipe or plate before it got enough of a chance to cool down.I ran my engine while hauled out in Fiji for 15 or 20 minutes at a time in plus 30C temperatures.  The skeg got hot to touch with the engine running and the sun beating down, but due to it's large size,  the engine was never in any danger of overheating.Nigel Warren, in his book Marine Conversions, has a large section on keel coolers.  It is an old and out of print book but worth having if you can find it.  I will try to upload the relevent pages.| 35736|35699|2019-03-28 18:20:14|opuspaul|Re: Copper keel coolers|My internet is too slow on the boat right now.  I will try to upload the files later when I am on a better internet connection.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :The hull surface or tubing of a keel cooler, when it is in water, will never heat up more than a few degrees.   There is far too much heat transfer to the water.   The surface area or length of the tube is really just there to give the coolant enough time and area to cool before going back into the engine.   Think of it this way...in an inadequately sized keel cooler, you would have hot coolant skipping right by a cool pipe or plate before it got enough of a chance to cool down.I ran my engine while hauled out in Fiji for 15 or 20 minutes at a time in plus 30C temperatures.  The skeg got hot to touch with the engine running and the sun beating down, but due to it's large size,  the engine was never in any danger of overheating.Nigel Warren, in his book Marine Conversions, has a large section on keel coolers.  It is an old and out of print book but worth having if you can find it.  I will try to upload the relevent pages.| 35737|35699|2019-03-28 18:30:01|mountain man|Re: Copper keel coolers| NIGEL WARREN BOOK; pdfprintout.cf/publications/kindle-ebooks-marine-conversions-vehicle-engine-conversions-for-boats-pdf-by-nigel-warren-0229117708.html De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de opusnz@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 28 mars 2019 18:15:36 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : Re: [origamiboats] Copper keel coolers     The hull surface or tubing of a keel cooler, when it is in water, will never heat up more than a few degrees.   There is far too much heat transfer to the water.   The surface area or length of the tube is really just there to give the coolant enough time and area to cool before going back into the engine.   Think of it this way...in an inadequately sized keel cooler, you would have hot coolant skipping right by a cool pipe or plate before it got enough of a chance to cool down. I ran my engine while hauled out in Fiji for 15 or 20 minutes at a time in plus 30C temperatures.  The skeg got hot to touch with the engine running and the sun beating down, but due to it's large size,  the engine was never in any danger of overheating. Nigel Warren, in his book Marine Conversions, has a large section on keel coolers.  It is an old and out of print book but worth having if you can find it.  I will try to upload the relevent pages. | 35738|35699|2019-03-28 18:50:10|opuspaul|Re: Copper keel coolers|I can't get that link to work.   ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : NIGEL WARREN BOOK; pdfprintout.cf/publications/kindle-ebooks-marine-conversions-vehicle-engine-conversions-for-boats-pdf-by-nigel-warren-0229117708.htmlDe : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de opusnz@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 28 mars 2019 18:15:36 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : Re: [origamiboats] Copper keel coolers  The hull surface or tubing of a keel cooler, when it is in water, will never heat up more than a few degrees.   There is far too much heat transfer to the water.   The surface area or length of the tube is really just there to give the coolant enough time and area to cool before going back into the engine.   Think of it this way...in an inadequately sized keel cooler, you would have hot coolant skipping right by a cool pipe or plate before it got enough of a chance to cool down.I ran my engine while hauled out in Fiji for 15 or 20 minutes at a time in plus 30C temperatures.  The skeg got hot to touch with the engine running and the sun beating down, but due to it's large size,  the engine was never in any danger of overheating.Nigel Warren, in his book Marine Conversions, has a large section on keel coolers.  It is an old and out of print book but worth having if you can find it.  I will try to upload the relevent pages.#ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ads {margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ad {padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ad p {margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ad a {color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_hd {margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_actions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_activity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_activity span {font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_activity span:first-child {text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_activity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_activity span span {color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_activity span .ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_underline {text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 .ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_attach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 .ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_attach div a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 .ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_attach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 .ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_attach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 .ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_attach label a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 .ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_bold {font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 .ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_bold a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 dd.ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_last p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 dd.ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_last p span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 dd.ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_last p span.ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_yshortcuts {margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 div.ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_attach-table div div a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 div.ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_attach-table {width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 div.ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 div.ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 div.ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 div.ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_file-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 div.ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 div.ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 div.ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 div.ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 div#ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_yshortcuts {font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 .ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_green {color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 .ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_MsoNormal {margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 o {font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_photos div {float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_photos div div {border:1px solid #666666;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_photos div label {color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_reco-category {font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_reco-desc {font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 .ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_replbq {margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-actbar div a:first-child {margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 input, #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 textarea {font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_logo {padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-msg p a {font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_attach-count span {color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_reco-head {color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-reco {margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ov li a {font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ov li {font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ov ul {margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-text {font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-text p {margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-text tt {font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-97833433 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568 #ygrps-yiv-97833433ygrps-yiv-1745683568x_ygrp-vital ul li:last-child {border-right:none!important;}| 35739|35699|2019-03-29 01:22:46|wild_explorer|Re: Copper keel coolers|You can use copper pipe to make Engine OIL cooler. It was proven that cooling the engine oil prolongs engine life dramatically. Plus oil going through copper pipes deposit some copper on internal parts of the engine, which reduce friction and protects moving parts of the engine.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Thank you Shawn,,, I have been convinced..  Anyone want a good deal on 60 feet of copper pipe?  | 35740|35720|2019-03-29 01:33:25|wild_explorer|Re: Perpetua|Where did you put the picture? I could not find it in photos or files sections...---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Not the best picture but only one I have . Modified by someone on vancouver island . Perhaps Brent knows more . On Wed, Mar 27, 2019, 12:40 PM williswildest@... [origamiboats], < origamiboats@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > > > I have spotted aluminum sailboat in Pacific Northwest which looks like 40 > ft BrentBoat. > > It is registered in Oregon (not CC registered) and has unofficial name > Perpetua. > > It is built a little bit differently: deck is flash to the hull's sides > and there is another pipe on the pegs to which side rails are welded. It > has pilothouse which looks like traditional low sailboat's pilothouse (not > fishermen type). It has small cockpit compare to standard one. Cabin > without potholes. Pretty tall aluminum mast. > > All other looks like BrenBoat design. > > Does anyone has information about it? > > P.S. Someone told me that boat is not finished inside, but already put > good sea mileage on it. > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]| 35741|35699|2019-03-29 12:10:08|H|Re: Copper keel coolers|flow rate? the flow is set by the thermostat in the engine. fully open its about the flow rate of a garden hose, so as long you dont restrict the flow more than that your engine will be fine. "Too much" flow doesn't exist, if the cooling water is too cold it opens less and restricts the flow to keep the coolant inside the engine to a proper temp. The external pipe keel coolers for say a 40' troller with a big 6-71detroit are about 6 - 1" pipes about 8 feet long on either side of the hull. Each pipes about 2 cubic feet of surface so a total of 24 seems to work fine in the fishing industry. Also is about the size of my skeg and is way more than I'd need for my 50hp engine.| 35742|35699|2019-03-29 15:12:09|Darren Bos|Re: Copper keel coolers| I used the formulae in Dave Gerr's Boat Mechanical Systems Handbook, as well as the Beta Marine site I linked to earlier in this thread.  Both yielded similar results, Gerr is a bit more conservative.  For a steel hull and a flat plate keel cooler that uses the hull for a side you need about a square foot for every four horsepower.  Remember, while you want a large area, you want to keep the keel cooler volume as low as possible, or you need a larger expansion tank and the coolant warms. On 2019-03-27 5:05 p.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Did you use any formulae to size you’re cooler? Fernstrum sent me specs and it stated that it held .91 gallon. No flow rates…. I read on the Seeker site where you have to make sure it flows at just the right pace. Too fast and it won’t cool, to slow and it won’t cool… Difficult to figure that all out? I like the idea that Brent has using the keel itself to house a cooling system. I don’t think I will have any space to spare but the idea is interesting... Rick On Mar 27, 2019, at 3:13 PM, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote: There's always more than one way to do things, but rarely are they all equally good, just be aware of the trade-offs.  I'd steer away from anything on the outside of the hull.  Folks go to great lengths and spend considerable sums of money on things like feathering propellers to get an extra 0.5 or 1 knot of sailing performance.  Adding the drag of an external keel cooler is going in the wrong direction.   With the motor always running the drag from an external keel cooler impacts an old fishboat a lot less than it will a sailboat.  A smooth surface on the oustide of the boat is also easier to keep clean from fouling, which is important with keel cooling.   In the pic I linked to, the keel coolers inside my hull are only 1" taller than the hull itself and perfectly follow the curve of the hull.  Surely you have room for that?  Put them in right now and then treat them like the hull as you finish the rest of the boat around them.  In mine you can see where the transverse frames are welded on top of the keel coolers, inside the keel cooler there is support for those frames.  The supports were connected to the inner face of the keel cooler with plug welds. On 2019-03-27 11:55 a.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@gmail..com [origamiboats] wrote:   Thanks for the input Darren All good points..  I asked a retired fisherman/ engineer about it… He was saying they used galvanized pipe for years… Those older boats were wood so that nicks that. He agreed the copper would need to be protected from Flotsam… covering would defeat the purpose…. So on to the next option….  I was considering originally the idea of building the cooler into the hull… I saw where SV Seeker did this, but he had some issues…. I have see where with steel, rectangular box channel is welded to the hull exterior and used as the cooler. Does not resolve your concern for through hull, but absolutely does for impact resistance…   I have access to a bunch of good scrap steel here, and Ive been looking at this 20 foot stick of 6 inch ID well pipe.   It keeps talking to me like I need to find a way to use it…  It would not be to difficult to 1/2 or 1/4 it, make contoured bullet nose piece…. I plan to use all my hollow keel space for tankage, storage and battery bank.. I will have a number of tank bulkheads welded in so I do not see having the interior hull space available for cooling..  As it was, I was looking at a loop which brought the pipe back to the same location.    Our hull had through hulls all random.. I was planing to keep them centrally located so all were easily accessible with bungs and some Belzona close by... On Mar 27, 2019, at 9:34 AM, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote: I'm sure Shawn will have his own comments.  I interpreted "hands down the worst idea I've ever heard in ages" as shorthand for: 1) an external keel cooler creates more drag, one made of copper pipe will be particularly bad (remember you already have a heavy boat with limited sail area). 2) an external copper keel cooler is vulnerable to damage from an impact.  One log strike could cause loss of engine. 3) copper house pipe isn't particularly strong stuff, this impacts construction, corrosion and impact resistance 4) soldering the copper house pipe with lead solder, as proposed, is a recipe for corrosion of the keel cooler itself 5) copper pipe next to a steel hull is a recipe for corrosion.  It will be much harder to electrically isolate in a reliably watertight way than you think, and if that isolation fails at any point you will have a corrosion nightmare.  Even with perfect physical isolation, you still have the coolant in contact with the copper and the engine block, and more likely than not, your engine block will not be isolated from the hull. 6) an external keel cooler requires you to put more holes in the hull, and those are what cause the vast majority of boat sinkings 7) the external keel cooler is going to be ugly and unusual.  This won't matter to many of use here, but no one keeps a boat forever and if you should ever need to sell it, such a protuberance is going to make the boat difficult to sell. All this compares to the robust simplicity of welding the keel cooler into the skeg or along the hull if you don't have a skeg that can be used..  I think Brent has talked about how he prevents corrosion of the steel inside the keel cooler before, but maybe he could remind us now.  Here is a picture of the keel coolers I welded in, outlined in red to make it them easier to see against the other framing.  Given that you have gutted your boat and don't have longitudinals to work around, something similar should be easy for you to implement. Darren | 35743|35699|2019-03-29 18:31:09|twgconft|Re: Copper keel coolers|The link I found was (note the j- prefix): https://j-pdfprintout.cf/publications/kindle-ebooks-marine-conversions-vehicle-engine-conversions-for-boats-pdf-by-nigel-warren-0229117708.htmlalthough I did not access the file (being a cautious WEB type). But I do have a copy of the book I got used off Amz, and humorously, on page 38 (Second Edition), he mentions using copper pipes for an external keel cooler. The theme of the book seems directed towards canal boats, which seem to be made of mild steel plate. Note also he seems to recommend overall to use a internal tank cooler arrangement. I have a twin keeled BS 36 with standard skeg cooling, BTW. Bought used and currently in re-fit mode. Still learning the in's and out's. | 35744|35699|2019-03-29 18:33:28|brentswain38|Re: Copper keel coolers|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :You could also turn part of your hull surface into an  engine oil cooler.You can use copper pipe to make Engine OIL cooler. It was proven that cooling the engine oil prolongs engine life dramatically. Plus oil going through copper pipes deposit some copper on internal parts of the engine, which reduce friction and protects moving parts of the engine.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Thank you Shawn,,, I have been convinced..  Anyone want a good deal on 60 feet of copper pipe?  | 35745|35699|2019-03-29 18:36:55|brentswain38|Re: Copper keel coolers|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :The hull surface or tubing of a keel cooler, when it is in water, will never heat up more than a few degrees.   There is far too much heat transfer to the water.   The surface area or length of the tube is really just there to give the coolant enough time and area to cool before going back into the engine.  Not enough to put any significant heat inside the boat, with a built in keel cooler,or pipes and channels on the  inside of the hull plate.| 35746|35699|2019-03-29 18:41:50|Rick Jackson|Re: Copper keel coolers|I would Loe to read those pages,,,, thank you… Rick On Mar 28, 2019, at 3:15 PM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:The hull surface or tubing of a keel cooler, when it is in water, will never heat up more than a few degrees.   There is far too much heat transfer to the water.   The surface area or length of the tube is really just there to give the coolant enough time and area to cool before going back into the engine.   Think of it this way...in an inadequately sized keel cooler, you would have hot coolant skipping right by a cool pipe or plate before it got enough of a chance to cool down.I ran my engine while hauled out in Fiji for 15 or 20 minutes at a time in plus 30C temperatures.  The skeg got hot to touch with the engine running and the sun beating down, but due to it's large size,  the engine was never in any danger of overheating.Nigel Warren, in his book Marine Conversions, has a large section on keel coolers.  It is an old and out of print book but worth having if you can find it.  I will try to upload the relevent pages.| 35747|35699|2019-03-29 18:53:54|a.sobriquet|Re: Copper keel coolers|You can purchase a used copy of Marine Conversions quite reasonably from ABE books:https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/SearchResults?sts=t&cm_sp=SearchF-_-home-_-Results&an=+Nigel+Warren&tn=Marine+Conversions&kn=&isbn=---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Nigel Warren, in his book Marine Conversions, has a large section on keel coolers.  It is an old and out of print book but worth having if you can find it.  I will try to upload the relevent pages.| 35748|35748|2019-03-31 00:08:43|wild_explorer|Dry Ice Blasting (cryogenic blasting)|Blasting with Dry Ice Pellets (instead of sand).Main benefit - able to clean many things without need to remove cleaning media, Pellets evaporate on impact.Does someone know how much it cost (compare to sand blasting)?| 35749|35720|2019-03-31 00:44:31|wild_explorer|Re: Perpetua|Brent and group's members, I posted pictures of PERPETUA in Photo sectionhttps://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/origamiboats/photos/albums/1974544498May be someone can recognize it now....| 35750|35748|2019-03-31 00:47:47|Matt Malone|Re: Dry Ice Blasting (cryogenic blasting)| Blasting with anything will work with enough pressure and patience.   Dry ice is like 1/3rd the density of beach sand or glass so, more pressure/shot speed or time and more dry ice.  Weight for weight, even at cleaned, washed home depot sand prices, dry ice would have to be 10x the cost.  I bought 20 kg of dry ice once, that is my recollection of cost ratio.  Brent likes beach sand.  I do not think the thermal-shock aspect of dry ice will do more that cooling from welding heat to room temperature for slag, where it might be really good on latex paint graffiti. Positive flow ventilation is needed in a boat, because dry ice is CO2, displacing air in confined spaces.  I am not sure if dry ice provides the same grippy surface etch texture as sand.   Sand is harder than mild steel so it will scratch.  I am not sure dry ice is. So one has to sweep out sand.   You only do it once.  Like roofing, the second time you pay someone to do it. Matt From: williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, March 31, 00:08 Subject: [origamiboats] Dry Ice Blasting (cryogenic blasting) To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Blasting with Dry Ice Pellets (instead of sand). Main benefit - able to clean many things without need to remove cleaning media, Pellets evaporate on impact. Does someone know how much it cost (compare to sand blasting)? | 35751|35748|2019-03-31 02:05:13|Aaron|Re: Dry Ice Blasting (cryogenic blasting)|Dry ice is good outside where one is repainting when original blast anchor profile was good Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 8:47 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Blasting with anything will work with enough pressure and patience.   Dry ice is like 1/3rd the density of beach sand or glass so, more pressure/shot speed or time and more dry ice.  Weight for weight, even at cleaned, washed home depot sand prices, dry ice would have to be 10x the cost.  I bought 20 kg of dry ice once, that is my recollection of cost ratio.  Brent likes beach sand.  I do not think the thermal-shock aspect of dry ice will do more that cooling from welding heat to room temperature for slag, where it might be really good on latex paint graffiti. Positive flow ventilation is needed in a boat, because dry ice is CO2, displacing air in confined spaces.  I am not sure if dry ice provides the same grippy surface etch texture as sand.   Sand is harder than mild steel so it will scratch.  I am not sure dry ice is. So one has to sweep out sand.   You only do it once.  Like roofing, the second time you pay someone to do it. Matt From: williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, March 31, 00:08 Subject: [origamiboats] Dry Ice Blasting (cryogenic blasting) To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Blasting with Dry Ice Pellets (instead of sand). Main benefit - able to clean many things without need to remove cleaning media, Pellets evaporate on impact. Does someone know how much it cost (compare to sand blasting)? #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 -- #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-mkp { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-mkp hr { border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812hd { color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ads { margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ad { padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ad p { margin:0;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ad a { color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-lc { font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812hd { margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ad { margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812actions { font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812activity { background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812activity span { font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812activity span:first-child { text-transform:uppercase;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812activity span a { color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812activity span span { color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812activity span .ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812underline { text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 .ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812attach { clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 .ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812attach div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 .ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812attach img { border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 .ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812attach label { display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 .ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812attach label a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 blockquote { margin:0 0 0 4px;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 .ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812bold { font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 .ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812bold a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 dd.ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812last p a { font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 dd.ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812last p span { margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 dd.ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812last p span.ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812yshortcuts { margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 div.ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812attach-table div div a { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 div.ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812attach-table { width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 div.ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 div.ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 div.ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 div.ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812file-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 div.ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 div.ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 div.ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 div.ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812photo-title a:visited { text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 div#ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812yshortcuts { font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 .ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812green { color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 .ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812MsoNormal { margin:0 0 0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 o { font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812photos div { float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812photos div div { border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812photos div label { color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812reco-category { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812reco-desc { font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 .ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812replbq { margin:4px;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-actbar div a:first-child { margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-mlmsg { font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-mlmsg table { font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 input, #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 textarea { font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-mlmsg pre, #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 code { font:115% monospace;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-mlmsg * { line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812logo { padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-msg p a { font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812attach-count span { color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812reco-head { color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-reco { margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ov li a { font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ov li { font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ov ul { margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-text { font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-text p { margin:0 0 1em 0;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-text tt { font-size:120%;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812 #ygrps-yiv-646659475yiv0190840812ygrp-vital ul li:last-child { border-right:none !important;} #ygrps-yiv-646659475 | 35752|35748|2019-03-31 11:14:24|wild_explorer|Re: Dry Ice Blasting (cryogenic blasting)|More likely, Cryo-Blasting is not what is needed for getting good initial rough surface profile on steel for painting.It is not fair to compare Dry Ice with sand just simply by weight cost. It should have different efficiency rate. Dry ice pellet "micro-explode" to gas on contact expanding more than 700 times, releasing good amount of energy and lifting "dirt" from underside. It allow to clean hard to reach places where sand cannot reach."Micro-explosion" principle is used in "soda-blasting" as well. I do not think that you need more air pressure for Cryo-Blasting than original sandblasting. It might need slightly different equipment though.I can see benefit of Dry Ice blasting when you need to do clean small area inside boat without removing anything, Cryo-Blasting is used to clean food processing equipment and equipment is ready to be used without any delay after it.I just could not find what the cost is. Agree on ventilation requirement.I only found that generating Dry Ice pellets on site will cost extra $50/hr... Dry Ice < $1-1.5/Lbs ???---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Blasting with anything will work with enough pressure and patience.   Dry ice is like 1/3rd the density of beach sand or glass so, more pressure/shot speed or time and more dry ice.  Weight for weight, even at cleaned, washed home depot sand prices, dry ice would have to be 10x the cost. | 35753|35748|2019-03-31 15:01:28|Matt Malone|Re: Dry Ice Blasting (cryogenic blasting)| I have heard wild claims about cryoblasting before.  Though trying it for the first time is weird, it is nowhere near as impressive as a knotted cup brush or coarse flap disc on an angle grinder -- Watt for Watt, an angle grinder is the most aggressive attack on a surface.  Yeah, a big diesel-run aircompressor, and a commercial sand blasting unit are better, but, check the kilowatts on the diesel engine -- Is it really more impressive than an army of 60-100 guys with angle grinders?  Watt for Watt, for maximum surface attack satisfaction, its an angle grinder.   Comparing dry ice to an explosive is not correct.  It is like comparing a pit to a hill.  Dry ice is at negative energy.  It needs a lot of energy to turn into gas.   Explosives are at positive energy and just need a little disturbance to release stored energy.   Shooting things with dry ice would have to make them cold to release the gas.  Thermal shock on organics, be it food debris or latex paint, can be effective. In case people are thinking the energy of the pellets in flight (1/2 mv^2) is sufficient to explode the ice into gas ... the energy of sublimation (solid to gas) is 571 kJ/kg   =  1069 m/s = 3,850 km/h.    That is faster than  the speed of most high power rifle bullets (22-250 is faster, everything else I am familiar with is slower).   There is no way a regular compressed air jet can be that fast.  Even if it were possible, it would be loud.  Like rocket-engine loud, many times louder than anything that could be run from a construction compressor. I will not rule out odd chemistry of C02 and surface physics effects, as magical the way soap lifts off grease, or dry ice being driven under paint chips or into cracks. I will not doubt it seems useful, and of application to do a patch inside an otherwise finished boat, with anchor texture already in the steel. Cost, yeah, about $2+/kg in bulk for dry ice, you pickup, which is more than 10x more than home depot's fanciest sand.  Matt From: williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, March 31, 11:14 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Dry Ice Blasting (cryogenic blasting) To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   More likely, Cryo-Blasting is not what is needed for getting good initial rough surface profile on steel for painting. It is not fair to compare Dry Ice with sand just simply by weight cost. It should have different efficiency rate. Dry ice pellet "micro-explode" to gas on contact expanding more than 700 times, releasing good amount of energy and lifting "dirt" from underside. It allow to clean hard to reach places where sand cannot reach. "Micro-explosion" principle is used in "soda-blasting" as well. I do not think that you need more air pressure for Cryo-Blasting than original sandblasting. It might need slightly different equipment though. I can see benefit of Dry Ice blasting when you need to do clean small area inside boat without removing anything, Cryo-Blasting is used to clean food processing equipment and equipment is ready to be used without any delay after it. I just could not find what the cost is. Agree on ventilation requirement. I only found that generating Dry Ice pellets on site will cost extra $50/hr... Dry Ice < $1-1.5/Lbs ??? ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Blasting with anything will work with enough pressure and patience.   Dry ice is like 1/3rd the density of beach sand or glass so, more pressure/shot speed or time and more dry ice.  Weight for weight, even at cleaned, washed home depot sand prices, dry ice would have to be 10x the cost. | 35754|35748|2019-03-31 17:17:14|wild_explorer|Re: Dry Ice Blasting (cryogenic blasting)|You are wrong Matt, I am ASKING about Cryo-Blasting for the fist time ;-)))After more research, I found that pellet of dry ice leaves the blast gun at the speed about 150 km/hr (about 42 m/sec) - pretty low speed. So, some of your calculations are off for some reasons.Agree on 100 men with the grinders. Better to give them hand-held metal brush - no electricity required.I just would love to see how they could clean hard-to-reach areas (complicated shapes) with 8 inch grinder (or even with 4 inch).P.S. May be you have remembered my question about soda blasting. But soda blasting leaves some deposits, which need to be cleaned.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : I have heard wild claims about cryoblasting before.  Though trying it for the first time is weird, it is nowhere near as impressive as a knotted cup brush or coarse flap disc on an angle grinder -- Watt for Watt, an angle grinder is the most aggressive attack on a surface.  Yeah, a big diesel-run aircompressor, and a commercial sand blasting unit are better, but, check the kilowatts on the diesel engine -- Is it really more impressive than an army of 60-100 guys with angle grinders?  Watt for Watt, for maximum surface attack satisfaction, its an angle grinder.   Comparing dry ice to an explosive is not correct.  It is like comparing a pit to a hill.  Dry ice is at negative energy.  It needs a lot of energy to turn into gas.   Explosives are at positive energy and just need a little disturbance to release stored energy.   Shooting things with dry ice would have to make them cold to release the gas.  Thermal shock on organics, be it food debris or latex paint, can be effective. In case people are thinking the energy of the pellets in flight (1/2 mv^2) is sufficient to explode the ice into gas ... the energy of sublimation (solid to gas) is 571 kJ/kg   =  1069 m/s = 3,850 km/h.    That is faster than  the speed of most high power rifle bullets (22-250 is faster, everything else I am familiar with is slower).   There is no way a regular compressed air jet can be that fast.  Even if it were possible, it would be loud.  Like rocket-engine loud, many times louder than anything that could be run from a construction compressor. I will not rule out odd chemistry of C02 and surface physics effects, as magical the way soap lifts off grease, or dry ice being driven under paint chips or into cracks. I will not doubt it seems useful, and of application to do a patch inside an otherwise finished boat, with anchor texture already in the steel. Cost, yeah, about $2+/kg in bulk for dry ice, you pickup, which is more than 10x more than home depot's fanciest sand.  Matt From: williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, March 31, 11:14 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Dry Ice Blasting (cryogenic blasting) To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   More likely, Cryo-Blasting is not what is needed for getting good initial rough surface profile on steel for painting. It is not fair to compare Dry Ice with sand just simply by weight cost. It should have different efficiency rate. Dry ice pellet "micro-explode" to gas on contact expanding more than 700 times, releasing good amount of energy and lifting "dirt" from underside. It allow to clean hard to reach places where sand cannot reach. "Micro-explosion" principle is used in "soda-blasting" as well. I do not think that you need more air pressure for Cryo-Blasting than original sandblasting. It might need slightly different equipment though. I can see benefit of Dry Ice blasting when you need to do clean small area inside boat without removing anything, Cryo-Blasting is used to clean food processing equipment and equipment is ready to be used without any delay after it. I just could not find what the cost is. Agree on ventilation requirement. I only found that generating Dry Ice pellets on site will cost extra $50/hr... Dry Ice < $1-1.5/Lbs ??? ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Blasting with anything will work with enough pressure and patience.   Dry ice is like 1/3rd the density of beach sand or glass so, more pressure/shot speed or time and more dry ice.  Weight for weight, even at cleaned, washed home depot sand prices, dry ice would have to be 10x the cost. | 35755|35748|2019-03-31 17:55:41|brentswain38|Re: Dry Ice Blasting (cryogenic blasting)|  A knotted cup wire brush, or any kind of wire brush often simply polishes the  surface of rust without removing it, A angle grinder is aggressive, but I have never got  quite the  paint stick I get with  blasting,and it doesn't get into tight corners as well.Glass is silica; sand.   A  guy in Kamloops is grinding recycle glass into blasting sand, and making  a lot of money from  glass too contaminated with  labels,  to be recycled in any other way, economically . .| 35756|35748|2019-03-31 17:57:46|Matt Malone|Re: Dry Ice Blasting (cryogenic blasting)| #ygrps-yiv-435198576 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} >>I have heard wild claims about cryoblasting before.  >You are wrong Matt, I am ASKING about Cryo-Blasting for the fist time ;-))) By wild claims I meant, claims by others that I found hard to believe, not claims made by Wild.   The wild claims have included that there is such control over cyroblasting as to be able to direct it at skin without damage -- implying it was suitable for use on delicate articles and delicate surfaces that have been contaminated.  There were other extravagant claims about how effectively or efficiently it cleaned.   When I tried it, I was not especially impressed.   I have no doubt, at some setting it can clean metal, it just did not impress me as being particularly fast or effective.  Maybe the unit I was demoing was a poor example.   A cheap imported angle grinders seem just as impressive as an expensive one, except that the cheap ones do not last as long.   There might be a lot more range in ability between cryo-blasting units that I was not seeing.   >>In case people are thinking the energy of the pellets in flight (1/2 mv^2) is sufficient to explode the ice into gas ... the energy of sublimation (solid to gas) is 571 kJ/kg   =  1069 m/s = 3,850 km/h.    >After more research, I found that pellet of dry ice leaves the blast gun at the speed about 150 km/hr (about 42 m/sec) - pretty low speed. So, some of your calculations are off for some reasons. Actually, you proved the point, the pellets are not leaving the blaster with sufficient energy to evaporate on contact.  Therefore, they are acting as a no-residue cold solid hitting a surface, not so much as blast of CO2....  Over very small areas of each fragment impact, there will be some vaporization.   Like 1/2500th of the pellet might turn to gas. Yes, I have long-struggled and been frustrated with disc grinders inability to get into interior 3-sided corners.   I can only say I use the grinder where I can, and a variety of other tools that will get closer into the corner.   I would finish the very limit of the interior corner with a pneumatic needle scaler.   If I ever had easy access to a sand blaster, I would try it on small test pieces to get the hang of it.   If I had a large project, I might try to observe pros sand blasting before renting gear myself.     I have seen soda blasting, but never operated the gun.  I have no impressions or calculations. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2019 5:17 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Dry Ice Blasting (cryogenic blasting)     You are wrong Matt, I am ASKING about Cryo-Blasting for the fist time ;-))) After more research, I found that pellet of dry ice leaves the blast gun at the speed about 150 km/hr (about 42 m/sec) - pretty low speed. So, some of your calculations are off for some reasons. Agree on 100 men with the grinders. Better to give them hand-held metal brush - no electricity required. I just would love to see how they could clean hard-to-reach areas (complicated shapes) with 8 inch grinder (or even with 4 inch). P.S. May be you have remembered my question about soda blasting. But soda blasting leaves some deposits, which need to be cleaned. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : I have heard wild claims about cryoblasting before.  Though trying it for the first time is weird, it is nowhere near as impressive as a knotted cup brush or coarse flap disc on an angle grinder -- Watt for Watt, an angle grinder is the most aggressive attack on a surface.  Yeah, a big diesel-run aircompressor, and a commercial sand blasting unit are better, but, check the kilowatts on the diesel engine -- Is it really more impressive than an army of 60-100 guys with angle grinders?  Watt for Watt, for maximum surface attack satisfaction, its an angle grinder.   Comparing dry ice to an explosive is not correct.  It is like comparing a pit to a hill.  Dry ice is at negative energy.  It needs a lot of energy to turn into gas.   Explosives are at positive energy and just need a little disturbance to release stored energy.   Shooting things with dry ice would have to make them cold to release the gas.  Thermal shock on organics, be it food debris or latex paint, can be effective. In case people are thinking the energy of the pellets in flight (1/2 mv^2) is sufficient to explode the ice into gas ... the energy of sublimation (solid to gas) is 571 kJ/kg   =  1069 m/s = 3,850 km/h.    That is faster than  the speed of most high power rifle bullets (22-250 is faster, everything else I am familiar with is slower).   There is no way a regular compressed air jet can be that fast.  Even if it were possible, it would be loud.  Like rocket-engine loud, many times louder than anything that could be run from a construction compressor. I will not rule out odd chemistry of C02 and surface physics effects, as magical the way soap lifts off grease, or dry ice being driven under paint chips or into cracks. I will not doubt it seems useful, and of application to do a patch inside an otherwise finished boat, with anchor texture already in the steel. Cost, yeah, about $2+/kg in bulk for dry ice, you pickup, which is more than 10x more than home depot's fanciest sand.  Matt From: williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, March 31, 11:14 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Dry Ice Blasting (cryogenic blasting) To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   More likely, Cryo-Blasting is not what is needed for getting good initial rough surface profile on steel for painting. It is not fair to compare Dry Ice with sand just simply by weight cost. It should have different efficiency rate. Dry ice pellet "micro-explode" to gas on contact expanding more than 700 times, releasing good amount of energy and lifting "dirt" from underside. It allow to clean hard to reach places where sand cannot reach. "Micro-explosion" principle is used in "soda-blasting" as well. I do not think that you need more air pressure for Cryo-Blasting than original sandblasting. It might need slightly different equipment though. I can see benefit of Dry Ice blasting when you need to do clean small area inside boat without removing anything, Cryo-Blasting is used to clean food processing equipment and equipment is ready to be used without any delay after it. I just could not find what the cost is. Agree on ventilation requirement. I only found that generating Dry Ice pellets on site will cost extra $50/hr... Dry Ice < $1-1.5/Lbs ??? ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Blasting with anything will work with enough pressure and patience.   Dry ice is like 1/3rd the density of beach sand or glass so, more pressure/shot speed or time and more dry ice.  Weight for weight, even at cleaned, washed home depot sand prices, dry ice would have to be 10x the cost. | 35757|35748|2019-04-01 11:22:50|wild_explorer|Re: Dry Ice Blasting (cryogenic blasting)|I see... Sorry Matt for misunderstanding....I got information about cryo-blasting from science channel. The head of Cryogenic Laboratory was taking about "recycling" of CO2 and mentioned cryo-blasting. Equipment they show was using 42 m/sec blasting gun, and it was enough velocity to turn pellets into gas on impact. I guess, it depends on the design of the equipment (max velocity for cryo-blasting is 300 m/sec - it is need to have hearing protection at this velocity).After more looking into it, I found that sizes of the Pellets used are 1.7 mm and 3 mm. 3 mm pellets are used more often. 1.7 mm - for light blasting.Kinetic energy to turn Ice and Dry Ice into gas should be different. It might explain some discrepancies in calculations. All sources I see, say that Dry Ice pellet from blasting gun turns into gas on impact with the surface.I was more interested about COST and efficiency of this process. So far, I only found specs for equipment used for Dry Ice cleaning of electrical equipment:Air pressure - 5 - 14 kg/cm2Compressed air flow - 3 - 5 m3/minDry Ice pellets flow  -  1 - 2.5 kg/minSpecs did not say what area can be cleaned per minute. So, it is hard to estimate efficiency and cost of the cleaning using this blasting method.I can see benefit of this cleaning on the boat only if you do blasting without removing interior or in similar situation.| 35758|35748|2019-04-01 12:44:06|Matt Malone|Re: Dry Ice Blasting (cryogenic blasting)| #ygrps-yiv-1542249931 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} No problem Wild, Energy is energy, there is a conservation of energy.  My calculations assume that 100% of the energy of flight speed turns into heat and phase-change of the particles.  My calculations are the minimum energy, minimum speed.  If some of the speed energy goes into making noise, there is less available to sublime the dry ice.    I do not know of any stored energy method that would affect this.   Some crystals will hold energetic structures after being cooled -- diamonds are an example -- one can think of diamonds as crystal partially-converted back to carbon but locked in the clear state, waiting for a trigger.   A little radiation disrupting the crystal structure and they turn black.   Put them in a fire, and they burn, releasing the extra stored energy.  Super-cooling is an energy-absence storage method where liquid water can be below freezing, but not be frozen yet.   It is unstable -- the smallest nucleation and it turns to slush.   One can think of super-cooled water has partially-frozen water.   There is no such thing as partially thawed CO2 as far as I know, but I could be wrong on that.    If there were such a thing, then perhaps the chips are partially-thawed but still solid, in which case changing to gas on impact at lower speed might be possible. There are a few processes out there that just seem to work, but their mechanism is misunderstood, or poorly understood, at least when reduced to the simplest terms.   Cryo-blasting always seemed to be one of them to me.  Sonoluminescence is one example subject to scientific speculation at the highest levels, because someone somewhere once said "cold fusion" and that could not be allowed to stand unchallenged.  The problem is, there is (was?) no good, accepted explanation, even at the highest levels of science.   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonoluminescence There are some examples of common phenomena misunderstood by laymen: why does the chimney effect work, where exactly does the force come from to make hot air balloons fly.  I was once dispelled of all the mistaken beliefs of how airplane wings actually work and left with no satisfactory explanation -- that is what I get for speaking to a professor of computation fluid dynamics.  I have heard explanations of how turbo-molecular vacuum pumps work in rarefied atmosphere, and that diffusion vacuum pumps somehow violate the second law of thermodynamics, which seems the least-breakable of the scientific laws of the universe -- something is not right there.   All of these things have reliable performance curves, can be engineered, designed to fit a purpose, and built, even by laymen, even if the simplified explanation of why they work is mistaken.   Ready for a good one?  Use a pipe T so the flow comes in the stem of the T and leaves by the left and right branches at the top -- there is no good explanation for how that will work.  If one digs into codes, one will find that one is just told not to do it.  And one can buy a pipe T for a few dollars at home depot.   This just proves that there are some things with no good, simple explanation, and even a few things with no acceptable explanation.    Similarly, I have yet to hear a plausible scientific explanation of how cryo-blasting works.  The word sounds cool -- it is its own marketing.   It is cool to watch.   The marketing sets off my BS detector.   When I tried it, it just did not give me the "I have a new favourite thing feeling" like I am ready to toss other methods.    As much as Brent says knotted cup brushes just polish rust, which can be true, I have seen it, I challenge anyone to try one and not go "wow!"   Same with a flap disk.   Same with a needle scaler.  Same with a tracked excavator.  A jack-hammer-sized rock drill...   I am sure I will get that feeling when I finally hold a commercial sandblaster.    We agree, inside a finished boat.     Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 1, 2019 11:21 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Dry Ice Blasting (cryogenic blasting)     I see... Sorry Matt for misunderstanding.... I got information about cryo-blasting from science channel. The head of Cryogenic Laboratory was taking about "recycling" of CO2 and mentioned cryo-blasting. Equipment they show was using 42 m/sec blasting gun, and it was enough velocity to turn pellets into gas on impact. I guess, it depends on the design of the equipment (max velocity for cryo-blasting is 300 m/sec - it is need to have hearing protection at this velocity). After more looking into it, I found that sizes of the Pellets used are 1.7 mm and 3 mm. 3 mm pellets are used more often. 1.7 mm - for light blasting. Kinetic energy to turn Ice and Dry Ice into gas should be different. It might explain some discrepancies in calculations. All sources I see, say that Dry Ice pellet from blasting gun turns into gas on impact with the surface. I was more interested about COST and efficiency of this process. So far, I only found specs for equipment used for Dry Ice cleaning of electrical equipment: Air pressure - 5 - 14 kg/cm2 Compressed air flow - 3 - 5 m3/min Dry Ice pellets flow  -  1 - 2.5 kg/min Specs did not say what area can be cleaned per minute. So, it is hard to estimate efficiency and cost of the cleaning using this blasting method. I can see benefit of this cleaning on the boat only if you do blasting without removing interior or in similar situation. | 35759|35759|2019-04-01 17:06:04|smallboatvoyaguer|Height above keel seam for tank top| I am working on installing and designing my keel tank top, singe keel.  Can the tank top be joined right level with the keel/hull seam? Or is it important for it to above the keel/hull seam by a few inches? Single keel swain 31.Thanks... -Marlin| 35760|35759|2019-04-01 17:35:00|brentswain38|Re: Height above keel seam for tank top|Structurally, it doesn't  matter ,but extra height means extra  tankage.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : I am working on installing and designing my keel tank top, singe keel.  Can the tank top be joined right level with the keel/hull seam? Or is it important for it to above the keel/hull seam by a few inches? Single keel swain 31.Thanks... -Marlin| 35761|35748|2019-04-01 17:42:25|brentswain38|Re: Dry Ice Blasting (cryogenic blasting)|For small areas, the $20 siphon blasters work fine. Friends rented a 5 hp  compressor for $100 a week, and used a small pressure pot the size of a 40 lb propane bottle .I used my $20 siphon blaster with the  same compressor, and it  was said there didn't seem to be much difference. The siphon blaster is good for small corner jobs ,and you can  rent  a 5 HP compressor for that. It also will work well with vacu blast, for inside work.| 35762|35759|2019-04-01 18:19:09|prairiemaidca|Re: Height above keel seam for tank top|Hey Martin, don't know if it will help but I just added three pictures of my tankage in Prairie Maid.  I don't know why it couldn't be done on the 31ft. fin keel just the same as my 36ft fin keel.  I made sure there was adequate material of the keel on the inside of the hull then added a lip around both tops.  The tank lids are 1/4 in with a continuous rubber gasket around for each lid and a good sized inspection port and baffle in each tank.  I also made a 33 litre bilge between the two tanks.  In the one picture you can see the unfinished floor section standing on edge to the right of the tanks.  This system with a completely removable floor is working just fine for us.  I've never had a water or fuel leak from the lids.  Just another idea for you to contemplate.   Martin   (Prairie Maid)   | 35763|35759|2019-04-02 17:21:01|Marlin Ledin|Re: Height above keel seam for tank top|Thanks for the info and photos! On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 5:19 PM losforsters@... [origamiboats] wrote: Hey Martin, don't know if it will help but I just added three pictures of my tankage in Prairie Maid.  I don't know why it couldn't be done on the 31ft. fin keel just the same as my 36ft fin keel.  I made sure there was adequate material of the keel on the inside of the hull then added a lip around both tops.  The tank lids are 1/4 in with a continuous rubber gasket around for each lid and a good sized inspection port and baffle in each tank.  I also made a 33 litre bilge between the two tanks.  In the one picture you can see the unfinished floor section standing on edge to the right of the tanks.  This system with a completely removable floor is working just fine for us.  I've never had a water or fuel leak from the lids.  Just another idea for you to contemplate.   Martin   (Prairie Maid)    | 35764|35764|2019-04-02 18:13:57|a.sobriquet|project BS 31 for sale|A project BS 31 single keel for sale, $30,000, in Wisconsin, USA.https://www.sailboatlistings.com/view/71663(I have no other knowledge or interest in this boat)| 35765|35764|2019-04-03 01:05:20|Maxime Camirand|Re: project BS 31 for sale|Sad to see these things. I don't think it can sell at that price. You can get a boat in sail-away condition for that kind of money. On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 23:07, a.sobriquet@... [origamiboats] wrote:   A project BS 31 single keel for sale, $30,000, in Wisconsin, USA.https://www.sailboatlistings.com/view/71663(I have no other knowledge or interest in this boat) | 35766|35748|2019-04-03 01:53:35|wild_explorer|Re: Dry Ice Blasting (cryogenic blasting)|I checked local prices from welding suppliers:CO2 (in cylinder) - about $0.82/Lb (sold by weight for CO2 in cylinders)Dry Ice - about $1/LbIt is pretty easy to make Dry Snow using CO2 from cylinder and make Dry Ice from Dry Snow, or make Dry Ice pellets directly with some simple device. This how Dry Ice generators on site work - using CO2 from cylinder/s.Quote:"Carbon dioxide, or CO2, behaves in very unusual ways and allows you to see the three states of matter in one material. It freezes directly from a gas into a solid, called dry ice, at normal atmospheric pressures, bypassing the liquid phase entirely. This transformation happens at temperatures below -109.3 degrees Fahrenheit at a pressure of 1 atmosphere".End of quoteCO2 recycling:Quote:If you increase the pressure to 5.1 atmospheres, which is about 75 pounds per square inch, and maintain the temperature below minus 69 degrees Fahrenheit something very interesting happens. Known as the triple point, these conditions allow CO2 to coexist in the solid, liquid and gaseous states. End of quote.Explanation of why Dry Ice turns to gas on impact: when Dry Ice is at sublimation point (or melting point), it would only take a small amount of heat/energy to change dry ice into a gas.P.S. It sounds right, and explains low velocity needed to turn Dry Ice pellet into gas.More interesting, that Dry Ice now is considered to be primary energy source on Mars for future Mars exploration.http://marsforthemany.com/news/technology/dry-ice-engine/I do not want to go into discussion about it - just interesting information.| 35767|35764|2019-04-03 14:13:36|brentswain38|Re: project BS 31 for sale|What kind of boat? New steel boat, with all new materials? Not a chance!  Friends  have been quoted $250,000 dollars for a 36 in that  stage, from commercial builders , who are far more prone to cut corners, than a home builder Plastic ? Not everyone wants  a plastic project, nor to go to sea in one. There is an article in this months Sail magazine , about a couple who went that route,and it took them 3 years to get her seaworthy, almost emptying their bank account, a story I see repeated here, by people now dreaming of switching to steel.For those determined to have a good steel boat ,there are few affordable options.Sad to see these things. I don't think it can sell at that price. You can get a boat in sail-away condition for that kind of money. On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 23:07, a.sobriquet@... [origamiboats] wrote:  A project BS 31 single keel for sale, $30,000, in Wisconsin, USA.https://www.sailboatlistings.com/view/71663(I have no other knowledge or interest in this boat) | 35768|35764|2019-04-03 18:13:05|Matt Malone|Re: project BS 31 for sale| #ygrps-yiv-147210019 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} It is self-evident that supply exceeds demand in most categories of boat.  Second hand sale prices are a tiny fraction of professional build cost, maybe even less than the most ingenious scrounging cost.  One can always point to lost opportunities where one could have had a ready-to-sail equal or better boat for less than the cost of what they have now.   I have been there. Similarly, one can always point to the cost of a turn-key boat freshly made of new materials, where it has yet to feed the family of the workers who built it, and say the second hand values for a solid boat should be better.   People will just not build boats for money unless they can feed their family.  They will go do something else.   A lack of demand does not drive down prices, it drives out the industry. It circles back to the supply exceeds the demand.   Manufacturers have been making crap plastic boats for so long, and hurricanes are just not destroying them fast enough.   For every boat sold new for hundreds of thousands, there is a boat entering the second hand market.   Even if the rich were not buying new boats, there are retired people investing in adventure for retirement who sell the house and easily enter the market with hundreds of thousands.   Even if the retirees were not paying new-boat prices, there are all those charter companies, buying new boats and spitting used boats out onto the second hand market.   Yes, they are all plastic.  Some are crap.  But there is an overlap in buyers.   There are buyers who might by crap or good plastic.  There are also buyers who might by good plastic or steel.  And there are buyers who might buy steel or aluminium etc.   It just takes a few to switch their selection within their preferences, for a glut of second hand plastic to pull away buyers and leave the steel boats for sale in surplus to the remaining steel boat buyers.  In this market:  - people should build a boat if they want to build a boat.    - If they are ready to sail a boat and are ready right now to transition lifestyles to living on the hook, or pay huge marina fees, they should invest a year in scoping out the used market.   No matter how long one waits to buy, there is always the possibility of a better opportunity in the future, but, if one scopes the market for a year, researching particular opportunities from time to time, at least then one will reduce the regret of choosing a particular boat over waiting more.     - If they are not ready to transition lifestyles to living on the hook, or do not have the yearly surplus income to pay a marina, they might consider a trailer-able.    - If they do not want a trailer-able, or have nowhere to park it, then they should not buy a boat.   At $3,000 to $6,000 Canadian per year plus insurance to have a boat in a marina that is $30,000 to $60,000 in ten years -- that could be more than the cost of the boat.   The people on the west coast or in jurisdictions not intent on stamping out the plethora of tramp-looking boats that keep washing up in condo parking lots every hurricane, those west coasters might say, who would ever pay that much for a marina?   For people on the east coast, there are many places where there are no anchorages, by design.   People who own waterfront property do not want to look at a bunch of boats on the hook.   That is why that BS boat on ebay in Florida, reportedly in ready-to-sail-away condition sold for US$3,150 was it?  The marina was kicking it out, and everywhere else was more expensive.  Florida Fish and Wildlife and many municipalities have worked long and hard to end anchoring in Florida.   Anyone who wanted to buy had to be ready to sail away in a week and not stop sailing until they reached an anchor-friendly area.   Either that, or truck it -- $3,000-$8,000 -- and have land to put it on where zoning allows boats -- believe it or not, my municipality does not.   Boats are cheap for the patient, expensive for the picky, and expensive to keep in many places. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 2:07 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] project BS 31 for sale     What kind of boat? New steel boat, with all new materials? Not a chance!  Friends  have been quoted $250,000 dollars for a 36 in that  stage, from commercial builders , who are far more prone to cut corners, than a home builder  Plastic ? Not everyone wants  a plastic project, nor to go to sea in one.  There is an article in this months Sail magazine , about a couple who went that route,and it took them 3 years to get her seaworthy, almost emptying their bank account, a story I see repeated here, by people now dreaming of switching to steel. For those determined to have a good steel boat ,there are few affordable options. Sad to see these things. I don't think it can sell at that price. You can get a boat in sail-away condition for that kind of money. On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 23:07, a.sobriquet@... [origamiboats] wrote:   A project BS 31 single keel for sale, $30,000, in Wisconsin, USA. https://www.sailboatlistings.com/view/71663 (I have no other knowledge or interest in this boat) | 35769|35764|2019-04-03 22:40:43|smallboatvoyaguer|Re: project BS 31 for sale|That boat is not for sale anymore. It’s mine, I listed it at a low point in the project for an amount I was hoping no one would pay. Nobody did, and I’m glad for it. I feel foolish for having ever listed it at all. It’s priceless really. The value of the boat is so far beyond something as small and meaningless as money... Thank you Brent!| 35770|35770|2019-04-04 14:36:19|Matt Malone|Another deal on Solar Panels| #ygrps-yiv-1103597365 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Again ML Solar (408) 583.8101, www.mlsolar.com, out of California is offering another deal on solar panels.  This time it is "245W"* panels manufactured by S-Energy, a spin off of Samsung, manufactured in Korea.   The manufacturing date on the example sticker shows 2011-10 so, I am assuming these are used panels coming back into the market.   They are selling for US$75 each by the pallet, US$80 each in minimum quantities of 4.   These panels have a Vmpp of 30.4V, so they are panels that would best fit into a 24V power system and minimize conversion losses getting the power to the batteries.   * I have said before, the sun is not felt the same everywhere on Earth.  Ratings are what one might see on a cloudless, hazeless, dark-blue sky day in the New Mexico desert with the panel pointed perfectly at the sun ... everyone else will measure less production.  Typical tropical haze on a light-blue sky day? Less. Canada? Less.  Winter? Less.   Clouds? less.   Not oriented to the sun? Less.   On a sunning day in March in southern Canada, oriented to the sun, I measure about 70% of ratings on new Canadian Tire panels and about 67% on my used ML Solar panels.   This leads me to suspect "used" is one of the smallest factors, but your mileage may vary. 4 of these make a nice "almost 1000W" system for US$320.   A good start for a boat or off-grid cabin. Power conversion losses will vary to a 12V system, but can be quite low with more expensive equipment.  And easier approach is to pair 12V loads and run them from 24V -- your port and starboard lights are 12V... Wire them in series instead of parallel.   Interior lights?  Pair them in series.   In general 24V appliances are more efficient than 12V when you can get them -- inverters, refrigerators, etc.  Any 120V or 220V appliances, you were inverting anyway, and, like I said, a 24V bank is generally more efficient.   That leaves only solitary 12V loads -- the engine starter, the radio, etc.   If one had a 4-battery energy system, one might have a 12V starting and 12V house that receives power from the alternator, and potentially a charger from the 24V system, and 24V house made of up two 12V in series that receives power from the panels, feeds the inverter, and perhaps might also receive power from either a supplemental 24V alternator, or a 12V to 24V charger.    In any case, running at 24V reduces the current and therefore the mass and expense of copper needed to run things like the windlass and other higher current loads.   I am tempted by the $250 Chinese 12V 100Ah lithium batteries one can find on Alibaba for house batteries.   Regular truck shipping applies -- make sure you buy insurance.   Importation applies if you are Canadian -- I recommend shipping to a nearby US depot and importing them on the back of your own truck, you will be directed inside to pay tax but skip the brokerage fees of shipping them across by a commercial carrier.   Matt | 35771|35764|2019-04-04 16:41:04|Rick Jackson|Re: project BS 31 for sale|Well said MattEveryone is different.. I just bought a project last summer, and paid the same price.  It is 35 years old and needs to be rebuilt tip to tail… This “project BS 31for sale” represents a great value all things considered. My dad had an auto repair shop I grew up working in. Cant tell you how many times I would get a car in the shop wanting an oil and filter job and a “look over” for a 2000 mile trip, and the car wasn’t worth driving 5 miles to the store. But folks drive those vehicles cross country all the time.  Some folks want a new car for that same trip. Others wouldn’t risk driving anywhere unless they had intimate knowledge of the entire vehicle which typically comes from building it yourself… I think the same is true for boats.. We are of the latter, and would never cross the Pacific in a boat, I hadn’t massaged every inch of personally… Not wanting to to spend 5 to 10 years building from scratch, I choose a “re” buildable boat where everything is there and I only need to freshen it up to be safe. I just happened to choose to make some improvements, which are adding to our time frame, but we wanted to be on the water in under 2 years.. We are doing good…I have 2 couples we know that are interested in doing the same thing. This would be perfect for them both other than its a bit small for them…Now to contradict everything I just said… We almost bought a brand new 47 foot Skookum built by John Schaffer from Shaffer Marine. He spent over a million on this boat and 20 years. ( apparently he built several other boats during this build). He died without ever sailing it.  It started on the market for 499 and is now at 150.  This boat is an amazing deal, but just did not fit our style. It is a high latitude boat with little thought to spending time on deck other than the cock pit. If not for that, I would have bought it in an instant. Rick On Apr 3, 2019, at 3:13 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:It is self-evident that supply exceeds demand in most categories of boat.  Second hand sale prices are a tiny fraction of professional build cost, maybe even less than the most ingenious scrounging cost.  One can always point to lost opportunities where one could have had a ready-to-sail equal or better boat for less than the cost of what they have now.   I have been there. Similarly, one can always point to the cost of a turn-key boat freshly made of new materials, where it has yet to feed the family of the workers who built it, and say the second hand values for a solid boat should be better.   People will just not build boats for money unless they can feed their family.  They will go do something else.   A lack of demand does not drive down prices, it drives out the industry.It circles back to the supply exceeds the demand.   Manufacturers have been making crap plastic boats for so long, and hurricanes are just not destroying them fast enough.   For every boat sold new for hundreds of thousands, there is a boat entering the second hand market.   Even if the rich were not buying new boats, there are retired people investing in adventure for retirement who sell the house and easily enter the market with hundreds of thousands.   Even if the retirees were not paying new-boat prices, there are all those charter companies, buying new boats and spitting used boats out onto the second hand market.   Yes, they are all plastic.  Some are crap.  But there is an overlap in buyers.   There are buyers who might by crap or good plastic.  There are also buyers who might by good plastic or steel.  And there are buyers who might buy steel or aluminium etc.   It just takes a few to switch their selection within their preferences, for a glut of second hand plastic to pull away buyers and leave the steel boats for sale in surplus to the remaining steel boat buyers.  In this market: - people should build a boat if they want to build a boat.    - If they are ready to sail a boat and are ready right now to transition lifestyles to living on the hook, or pay huge marina fees, they should invest a year in scoping out the used market.   No matter how long one waits to buy, there is always the possibility of a better opportunity in the future, but, if one scopes the market for a year, researching particular opportunities from time to time, at least then one will reduce the regret of choosing a particular boat over waiting more.    - If they are not ready to transition lifestyles to living on the hook, or do not have the yearly surplus income to pay a marina, they might consider a trailer-able.    - If they do not want a trailer-able, or have nowhere to park it, then they should not buy a boat.   At $3,000 to $6,000 Canadian per year plus insurance to have a boat in a marina that is $30,000 to $60,000 in ten years -- that could be more than the cost of the boat.   The people on the west coast or in jurisdictions not intent on stamping out the plethora of tramp-looking boats that keep washing up in condo parking lots every hurricane, those west coasters might say, who would ever pay that much for a marina?   For people on the east coast, there are many places where there are no anchorages, by design.   People who own waterfront property do not want to look at a bunch of boats on the hook.   That is why that BS boat on ebay in Florida, reportedly in ready-to-sail-away condition sold for US$3,150 was it?  The marina was kicking it out, and everywhere else was more expensive.  Florida Fish and Wildlife and many municipalities have worked long and hard to end anchoring in Florida.   Anyone who wanted to buy had to be ready to sail away in a week and not stop sailing until they reached an anchor-friendly area.   Either that, or truck it -- $3,000-$8,000 -- and have land to put it on where zoning allows boats -- believe it or not, my municipality does not.   Boats are cheap for the patient, expensive for the picky, and expensive to keep in many places.Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of brentswain38@hotmail..com [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 2:07 PMTo: origamiboats@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [origamiboats] project BS 31 for sale  What kind of boat? New steel boat, with all new materials? Not a chance!  Friends  have been quoted $250,000 dollars for a 36 in that  stage, from commercial builders , who are far more prone to cut corners, than a home builder Plastic ? Not everyone wants  a plastic project, nor to go to sea in one. There is an article in this months Sail magazine , about a couple who went that route,and it took them 3 years to get her seaworthy, almost emptying their bank account, a story I see repeated here, by people now dreaming of switching to steel.For those determined to have a good steel boat ,there are few affordable options.Sad to see these things. I don't think it can sell at that price. You can get a boat in sail-away condition for that kind of money.On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 23:07, a.sobriquet@... [origamiboats] wrote: A project BS 31 single keel for sale, $30,000, in Wisconsin, USA.https://www.sailboatlistings.com/view/71663(I have no other knowledge or interest in this boat)| 35772|35770|2019-04-04 16:41:10|Rick Jackson|Re: Another deal on Solar Panels|Hey MattIm interested… I looked at the web site.. Then re read your post… Are you a dealer?  You sound quite knowledgeable… I am building my own batteries.. Id love to pick your brain….Rick On Apr 4, 2019, at 11:36 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:Again ML Solar (408) 583.8101, www.mlsolar.com, out of California is offering another deal on solar panels.  This time it is "245W"* panels manufactured by S-Energy, a spin off of Samsung, manufactured in Korea.   The manufacturing date on the example sticker shows 2011-10 so, I am assuming these are used panels coming back into the market.   They are selling for US$75 each by the pallet, US$80 each in minimum quantities of 4.   These panels have a Vmpp of 30.4V, so they are panels that would best fit into a 24V power system and minimize conversion losses getting the power to the batteries.   * I have said before, the sun is not felt the same everywhere on Earth.  Ratings are what one might see on a cloudless, hazeless, dark-blue sky day in the New Mexico desert with the panel pointed perfectly at the sun ... everyone else will measure less production.  Typical tropical haze on a light-blue sky day? Less. Canada? Less.  Winter? Less.   Clouds? less.   Not oriented to the sun? Less.   On a sunning day in March in southern Canada, oriented to the sun, I measure about 70% of ratings on new Canadian Tire panels and about 67% on my used ML Solar panels.   This leads me to suspect "used" is one of the smallest factors, but your mileage may vary.4 of these make a nice "almost 1000W" system for US$320.   A good start for a boat or off-grid cabin.Power conversion losses will vary to a 12V system, but can be quite low with more expensive equipment.  And easier approach is to pair 12V loads and run them from 24V -- your port and starboard lights are 12V... Wire them in series instead of parallel.   Interior lights?  Pair them in series.   In general 24V appliances are more efficient than 12V when you can get them -- inverters, refrigerators, etc.  Any 120V or 220V appliances, you were inverting anyway, and, like I said, a 24V bank is generally more efficient.   That leaves only solitary 12V loads -- the engine starter, the radio, etc.   If one had a 4-battery energy system, one might have a 12V starting and 12V house that receives power from the alternator, and potentially a charger from the 24V system, and 24V house made of up two 12V in series that receives power from the panels, feeds the inverter, and perhaps might also receive power from either a supplemental 24V alternator, or a 12V to 24V charger.    In any case, running at 24V reduces the current and therefore the mass and expense of copper needed to run things like the windlass and other higher current loads.   I am tempted by the $250 Chinese 12V 100Ah lithium batteries one can find on Alibaba for house batteries.   Regular truck shipping applies -- make sure you buy insurance.   Importation applies if you are Canadian -- I recommend shipping to a nearby US depot and importing them on the back of your own truck, you will be directed inside to pay tax but skip the brokerage fees of shipping them across by a commercial carrier.   Matt | 35773|35764|2019-04-04 16:58:52|brentswain38|Re: project BS 31 for sale|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :While there is definitely a glut of stock plastic boats on the market,not so true of good boats, especially well built and  maintained steel ones.I meet a lot of people trying hard to find a good one, especially good twin keelers. I met a guy from the US east coast, who bought a classic Rhodes.  By  the time he reached the West Indies, he was totally  exhausted from the high maintenance of the bright work. So he sold her, and made a list of all the requirements for  his next boat, believing there were plenty of boats to choose from. He specified solid glass, no core, and the number of buying options  dropped drastically. A proper skeg on the  rudder, reduced  the number of choices drastically , again. Proper width side decks reduced it even further. No wood on the outside of the boat reduced it even further. By the time he got thru his list of requirements, very few good boats for sale, meeting his  practical  requirements, were available .#ygrps-yiv-1511187571 #ygrps-yiv-1511187571ygrps-yiv-1739848616 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} It is self-evident that supply exceeds demand in most categories of boat.  Second hand sale prices are a tiny fraction of professional build cost, maybe even less than the most ingenious scrounging cost.  One can always point to lost opportunities where one could have had a ready-to-sail equal or better boat for less than the cost of what they have now.   I have been there. Similarly, one can always point to the cost of a turn-key boat freshly made of new materials, where it has yet to feed the family of the workers who built it, and say the second hand values for a solid boat should be better.   People will just not build boats for money unless they can feed their family.  They will go do something else.   A lack of demand does not drive down prices, it drives out the industry. It circles back to the supply exceeds the demand.   Manufacturers have been making crap plastic boats for so long, and hurricanes are just not destroying them fast enough.   For every boat sold new for hundreds of thousands, there is a boat entering the second hand market.   Even if the rich were not buying new boats, there are retired people investing in adventure for retirement who sell the house and easily enter the market with hundreds of thousands.   Even if the retirees were not paying new-boat prices, there are all those charter companies, buying new boats and spitting used boats out onto the second hand market.   Yes, they are all plastic.  Some are crap.  But there is an overlap in buyers.   There are buyers who might by crap or good plastic.  There are also buyers who might by good plastic or steel.  And there are buyers who might buy steel or aluminium etc.   It just takes a few to switch their selection within their preferences, for a glut of second hand plastic to pull away buyers and leave the steel boats for sale in surplus to the remaining steel boat buyers.  In this market:  - people should build a boat if they want to build a boat.    - If they are ready to sail a boat and are ready right now to transition lifestyles to living on the hook, or pay huge marina fees, they should invest a year in scoping out the used market.   No matter how long one waits to buy, there is always the possibility of a better opportunity in the future, but, if one scopes the market for a year, researching particular opportunities from time to time, at least then one will reduce the regret of choosing a particular boat over waiting more.     - If they are not ready to transition lifestyles to living on the hook, or do not have the yearly surplus income to pay a marina, they might consider a trailer-able.    - If they do not want a trailer-able, or have nowhere to park it, then they should not buy a boat.   At $3,000 to $6,000 Canadian per year plus insurance to have a boat in a marina that is $30,000 to $60,000 in ten years -- that could be more than the cost of the boat.   The people on the west coast or in jurisdictions not intent on stamping out the plethora of tramp-looking boats that keep washing up in condo parking lots every hurricane, those west coasters might say, who would ever pay that much for a marina?   For people on the east coast, there are many places where there are no anchorages, by design.   People who own waterfront property do not want to look at a bunch of boats on the hook.   That is why that BS boat on ebay in Florida, reportedly in ready-to-sail-away condition sold for US$3,150 was it?  The marina was kicking it out, and everywhere else was more expensive.  Florida Fish and Wildlife and many municipalities have worked long and hard to end anchoring in Florida.   Anyone who wanted to buy had to be ready to sail away in a week and not stop sailing until they reached an anchor-friendly area.   Either that, or truck it -- $3,000-$8,000 -- and have land to put it on where zoning allows boats -- believe it or not, my municipality does not.   Boats are cheap for the patient, expensive for the picky, and expensive to keep in many places. | 35774|35764|2019-04-04 17:14:41|brentswain38|Re: project BS 31 for sale|Thankfully, here in BC we have tens of thousands of anchorages with no bureaucrats, as long as we stay out of cities. The cost of urban moorage is far more than the entire cost of living and full time cruising ,as long as you stay out  of cities. So what is the point of paying moorage?  I remember in the 80s,  a cop asking me how much it costs me to live. When I told him, he rolled his eyes, thinking 'What a bullshit artist!" Later, when he had moved aboard, and got out of town, he said'"Man, I though you were bullshitting me .I can't believe how cheap living becomes, when you  get out of town!"At the ripe old age of 16, I figured out there are  two ways to deal with money. Either find a way to make lots, easily, or make it less relevant in your life. Thankfully, I chose the latter, which has let me live far freer ,working about a month a year since my mid 20s.Pisses the rich off, as it undermines their religion, and undermines their power over you. Telling others that, has got me kicked off many a forum, at the request of the rich.| 35776|35770|2019-04-05 16:40:10|Rick Jackson|Re: Another deal on Solar Panels|I should have been more lear… Im buying Lithium iron phosphate 3.2V cells to build banks from.. We going over our space, and we have room for 24 which is six 12 volt batteries.   They will fit in a section of the keel nicely. On Apr 4, 2019, at 4:24 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:Hi Rick,No I am not a dealer.  I am just an engineer.  With respect to alternative energy, I am just a technical person who has been paying attention to the low-cost alternative energy market for a decade.  It is a tiny corner of my interests and hobbies.   I also have a farm, with no electricity..  Just getting the poles to my property would be tens of thousands of dollars.   Then tens of thousands more to get them to where I would want electricity..  Ontario Hydro, Hydro One, whatever, then starts charging you a "debt retirement charge" as soon as you are hooked up on top of the costs of the electricity and "delivery"  -- basically every customer is paying for all of their past mis-management and past and current monumental corporate salaries.   Eff them all..  I am going completely off-grid.  For a fraction of the cost of even hooking up, I will be energy independent and not paying $200-$300 / month to a utility..  I have a huge area, I can put up a lot of different generators too, diversify over types of energy, designs for generators, and have multiple generators for redundancy.   I was a ex-professor of engineering, and also a maker and doer in many projects in many technologies.  I have never felt a need for a contractor.  It would be easy to dismiss me as a armchair expert with respect to many sailing topics because, my sum total salt water experience could be exceeded in just the first few days of having a boat of my own in salt water.   I have however paid close attention when doing freshwater, read widely and have a strong background in stability and control of aircraft so appreciate the complexities of some of the nautical stability and control issues.   I made an external control system to control the 3 point hitch of my tractor inspired by some sail-to-turning-block-to-rudder self-steering systems I have read about.   The world just looks different when one actually knows how things work.  I respect these guys on origami boats who have a lot of experience and good ideas and the confidence to just go do it.  There is a bullshit content one must filter.  Wild sometimes exasperates me...  Like most recently with his magically evaporating CO2 flakes..  Latent heat of phase change ... if it did not work reliably in every case exactly like physics says it has to, refrigerators and air conditioners would only work properly some of the time, and not work other times.  The earth's climate would go out of control.  Mars would have turned tropical and gone back to an ice planet several times in recorded history.  Wild just has no idea how unrooted in science a lot of his stuff is.  I have to be careful though, he presses me for specifics to the point where I am essentially doing the design for him, and I can't do that as in real life I am a licensed consulting engineer.  He could actually try to do what I am describing, eff-it up, kill himself, and his family could sue me.Brent has some ideas about structures that sound good ... to Brent .... but are at odds with basic engineering analysis.  Frankly, when his detractors say, anyone who gets into his boats is a fool, I have to say, well, actually, the first person who got into his boat must have had a lot of confidence in Brent, to take the chance and prove out the design as successful.  Fortunately, the first person *was* Brent, and he lacks nothing in self-confidence, and what he does not understand seems to have worked out OK, so I have to give him credit.  I believe in his designs to the point I would have bought one of them, nearly did.  I worry the next guy though who goes off to invent a new way to make boats, and a new design, with a bag full of misunderstood science, his first boat might be his last boat.   I have 3 sailboats:  - a 1974 16' Evans daysailer.  I am practicing fiberglass on it..   I am adding sealed floatation and a proper deep ballast to give it an ultimate stability and otherwise to make it coastal-safe.  I am draying inspiration from Ming Ming and Roger Taylor -- he takes his open ocean at high latitudes, so I am confident of making it coastal safe.   I am going to add electric propulsion -- an electric trawling motor and lithium battery a cheap panel and a charge controller.   I am going to keep and work on this boat because, I could not sell it for $500, and I can tow it with my truck so easily it is like it is not there.  It is below the tow restrictions for all states and provinces, and is a tiny fraction of the tow limit of my truck.   At my age, and amount of spare time, it might be the only way I get to sail extensively in saltwater.  Drive to a good spot and trailer launch it for a weeks-long holiday.   - a 1974 23' Grampian pocket cruiser, trailerable.   It really is a nice boat.  I put solar on it more than a decade ago, had a combination of electric and outboard propulsion for docking and getting in and out of the freshwater marina.   I have already made and used a more complex electric propulsion system than I plan to put on the 16' Evans, so, I am 100% certain of success on the 16' Evans.  The Grampian is where I have done most of my sailing.   Unfortunately, it is heavy, 3,400 pounds, plus cargo, plus trailer, and the trailer is not fitted out to modern codes particularly with respect to brakes.   I would need to put a surge hitch on it, and change the hubs to surge brakes, or electric, and a brake controller, and in either case, I should upgrade to a class 5 reciprocating hitch.   Even then I am not confident I would meet the towing requirements of all states and provinces.  I have towed it 120 miles, I regularly tow it 10 miles, but I would never risk taking it on a long road trip in mountains to get somewhere to sail it in the ocean.   It would be far more costly and time consuming to convert it to coastal-safe, though I have seen the exact same model sailed from Florida to the Bahamas by others without modifications.   I could not sell it for more than $1,000 in this market, and it costs me nothing to keep it on my farm, so, I doubt I will sell it, and will never trailer it far, and will likely never extensively lake sail again when there are better things to do.    - my 1957 41' Rhodes Bounty II, hull #4, thick solid glass everywhere, open ocean cruiser.  It was mainly the hull I valued.  Glass so thick, when you slap it, it sounds like concrete sidewalk, no hallow sound whatsoever.  Really.  I doubt that even boat # 10 was as thick as this one.  They literally just kept putting the glass and resin in until they stopped being scared that they might need a little more.  It is potentially a forever boat.  Extraordinarily low maintenance every 30 years and she the hull will remain as it was the day it was made.   The main problem with this boat is, I need to work on it and it is at my farm that has no power.   It has a very small number of minor blisters for a 62 year old boat, but, no way I am leaving that unresolved before splashing her again.   Then there is the fibreglass mast.  Yes, it is heavier than aluminium, but tougher.  Try breaking a fibreglass fishing rod -- its is hard to do.  Yet the transport that got it to its last owner, they managed to crack it by allowing the mast to slap on the road -- it was more flexible than they anticipated.  Either that, or the previous owner lied and sailed it into a low bridge, and did not manage to break it, only crack it.   Anyway it is glass.  I might fix it, I might replace it, have not decided.  All the rigging is heavy, solid Monel and oversized stainless in pristine condition, like one will never find again for a fortune and could not expect to be in as good a condition in another 62 years, so, I am keeping all that even if I replace the mast.  She has a gasoline engine and 62 year old solid fibreglass gas tank that I am considering doing something about.   The electrical works, but, no way I am going anywhere before replacing it.  It has no instruments, and I just took the radio out before even checking if it works.   The stove is good, the head was used too extensively by someone else, so it is going, and I really want a shower or laundry if I can in addition to either an icemaker to feed the giant ice box or standard refrigeration.   The water tank is a disaster and I am thinking about just cleaning it and putting in a bladder.  I have to upgrade the spill containment around the engine to separate spilled oil from going into the bilge.   And it is 41' so, as soon as it goes into the water it is $4,000 / year, whether I sail it or not.   In 5 years, it would cost me more than every dollar that I have put into it so far.   So procrastination is paying me $4,000/year and I got it for a bargain.   I have come to the conclusion there is a chance I may never get the Rhodes it in the water, if there are health issues in the next 10 years.  I am just not ready to retire yet.  I bought it for US$6,600 out of the mountains of the US -- at the time the same boat on any coast would have been $25-30k.  Now that it is only 0.5, 2, 4 and 6 hours to 4 of the 5 Great Lakes, it should still be worth substantially more than I paid, but I am not optimistic about that.  A couple years ago, I saw a well-equipped Columbia 35 flush-deck go for $3,000 .. Canadian.   The marina and professional storage yard fees are just killing the boat market around me.    Then that steel BS in Florida that went for $3,150 on Ebay last month.  It was a crying shame.  I was the #2 bidder.   I did not really want to win it, not really, but, for $3,100 for a fully-equipped, ready to sail steel boat, of a design I have been paying attention to for a decade, I was ready to go down there and sail it onto a sand bar at high tide (it is a bilge keel and will stand upright on a good beaching) in some tidal river in South Carolina, screw in some moorings and call it moored, paint my cell phone number on it lock it up, and walk away from it, on the off-chance it will still be there in 6 months for my first summer sailing vacation.  So I practice glass on my 16', and plan vacations to use it inter-coastal.   I am making a solar system for my farm.   I have 2,800 Watts of panels earmarked for the farm, a solar building to house gear, 25 automotive batteries already hooked up to panels, enough I no longer need a generator for weekend projects.  I could work on my 41' boat with extension cords right now.   Instead, I am laying a proper permanent cableway from the collectors to the boat now.   I have another 1,000 Watts of cells, that I am thinking of just plastering onto the deck material and top sides of a sailboat -- maybe my 16' -- like those solar race cars, and just have a boat that *is* a collector with not projections to catch a bad wind or a wave.So, no, not a dealer. As far as making batteries:https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Rechargeable-li-ion-18650-cells-12v_62027110350.html?spm=a2700.7735675.normalList.48.M35G6O&s=pNo point.  These are 2,000 cycles at 100% DOD.  Others are typically 5,000 cycles at 80% DOD.  At that price, there is just no point of fooling around.   My only concern is to seal them away from the living area of the cabin.   If I had a steel boat, I would weld a locker for them, put them behind a bulkhead, or weld up a coffin for them with their own vent to outside.  I would make the vent a captive piece of metal that cannot get lost and then just seal it down with soft wax.  If I had a fire, it blows the cap, there follows a few minutes of dragon's breath out the vent, and maybe the coffin is glowing red hot and its paint is not so good.  But my boat would be safe, I would be safe, and my boat re-enters mid-19th century as far as sailing.    I would do the same thing whether my batteries were lead acid, one of the "stable" lithium chemistries, or lithium ion.  If I had free lead sheet, I could make industrial quality farm-emplacement type batteries -- lift each cell one at a time with a tractor -- with a near-infinite life and crappy capacity per pound, they could be even cheaper than those $250 12V/100AH lithium Chinese batteries like at the link.  Otherwise, there is no point in any batteries but these ones.  Even the scrap yard automotive batteries I buy where I can test them myself and pick the best of the litter for $20 Canadian for a virtually-new lead-acid battery, even assuming $20 per car battery, a proper lithium is still more than 12 times better.  The only advantage of scrap yard batteries might be that I can sell the dead lead-acid batteries back to the scrap yard for $10 Canadian when I kill them..  So that makes them $10 plus a $10 deposit -- hard to beat that.  There is no advantage in any direction to making your own batteries ... except the fun of making batteries. As for batteries, my question is, are your sure you need them / that much batteries?  With my 41' boat, I have a huge, really well-insulated 1957 ice-box.  Think of it like an energy battery.   An ice maker would be the equivalent of a "battery charger".  When I have power available, I make ice and charge the "battery".   The same philosophy can be applied more widely.   If you think about using energy when you have it, and storing it in other forms, how many true batteries does one really need ?   On a farm with unlimited space, for things like a water tower and other things ... that number could be really small.   Compressed air?  On a farm, no problem.   If I wanted to, every time I go to the scrap yard, I snag a few more BBQ propane tanks, unthread the valve, leave them in the sun to outgas the last of the propane residues, then chain them together with some black-iron pipe in a shed leaving a valve and fitting to attach another string of bottles..   BBQ propane tanks have to be good to over 200 PSI to not burst in the sun in the summer in Ontario, so, I figure I can use them to 100 PSI in a remote shed, forever.  If one bursts, who cares, I am nowhere near it.  Then I hook a compressor to a windmill.   Compared to batteries, they are 100% DOD, last forever, and come at scrap steel prices.  They cannot short out or cause a fire.   I run a line from the storage shed to my shop.   Hook them to a compressed air engine, like a dry steam engine and one has mechanical power.   Electricity to recharge batteries? -- hook it to a generator.   There are dozens of ways to skin the energy cat.  Yes, limited space and weight on sailboats changes the equation.   Fortunately, China makes some good stuff cheap.   MattFrom: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 3:19 PMTo: origamiboats@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [origamiboats] Another deal on Solar Panels  Hey MattIm interested… I looked at the web site.. Then re read your post… Are you a dealer?  You sound quite knowledgeable… I am building my own batteries... Id love to pick your brain….RickOn Apr 4, 2019, at 11:36 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:Again ML Solar (408) 583.8101, www.mlsolar.com, out of California is offering another deal on solar panels.  This time it is "245W"* panels manufactured by S-Energy, a spin off of Samsung, manufactured in Korea.   The manufacturing date on the example sticker shows 2011-10 so, I am assuming these are used panels coming back into the market.   They are selling for US$75 each by the pallet, US$80 each in minimum quantities of 4.   These panels have a Vmpp of 30.4V, so they are panels that would best fit into a 24V power system and minimize conversion losses getting the power to the batteries.   * I have said before, the sun is not felt the same everywhere on Earth.  Ratings are what one might see on a cloudless, hazeless, dark-blue sky day in the New Mexico desert with the panel pointed perfectly at the sun ... everyone else will measure less production.  Typical tropical haze on a light-blue sky day? Less. Canada? Less.  Winter? Less.   Clouds? less.   Not oriented to the sun? Less.   On a sunning day in March in southern Canada, oriented to the sun, I measure about 70% of ratings on new Canadian Tire panels and about 67% on my used ML Solar panels.   This leads me to suspect "used" is one of the smallest factors, but your mileage may vary.4 of these make a nice "almost 1000W" system for US$320.   A good start for a boat or off-grid cabin.Power conversion losses will vary to a 12V system, but can be quite low with more expensive equipment.  And easier approach is to pair 12V loads and run them from 24V -- your port and starboard lights are 12V... Wire them in series instead of parallel.   Interior lights?  Pair them in series.   In general 24V appliances are more efficient than 12V when you can get them -- inverters, refrigerators, etc.  Any 120V or 220V appliances, you were inverting anyway, and, like I said, a 24V bank is generally more efficient.   That leaves only solitary 12V loads -- the engine starter, the radio, etc.   If one had a 4-battery energy system, one might have a 12V starting and 12V house that receives power from the alternator, and potentially a charger from the 24V system, and 24V house made of up two 12V in series that receives power from the panels, feeds the inverter, and perhaps might also receive power from either a supplemental 24V alternator, or a 12V to 24V charger.    In any case, running at 24V reduces the current and therefore the mass and expense of copper needed to run things like the windlass and other higher current loads.   I am tempted by the $250 Chinese 12V 100Ah lithium batteries one can find on Alibaba for house batteries.   Regular truck shipping applies -- make sure you buy insurance.   Importation applies if you are Canadian -- I recommend shipping to a nearby US depot and importing them on the back of your own truck, you will be directed inside to pay tax but skip the brokerage fees of shipping them across by a commercial carrier.   Matt | 35777|35770|2019-04-05 16:47:34|brentswain38|Re: Another deal on Solar Panels|A guy here on Quadra Island, giving a lecture on sustainability, mentioned carbon foam batteries.  He said they left one stone dead for  a year, charged it up, and it held a charge well. Seems the carbon stops the  sulfates from ever hardening on the plates. They are slightly more expensive , around $350 , but I think they will be my next battery. Given how many I have screwed up, by leaving them too low ,they may actually work out cheaper, in the long run.Does anyone here have any experience with them?| 35779|35770|2019-04-05 20:44:58|Chris Salayka|Re: Another deal on Solar Panels|Hi  First check on carbon foam in Canada, an outfit in Kelowna selling the Firefly Oasis for 600 bucks. 350 is a good deal – where are they selling at that price?  Chris Virus-free. www.avg.com | 35780|35770|2019-04-05 21:04:46|bcboomer1948|Re: Another deal on Solar Panels|At $350 I'll take 10.The're $750 CAD in Vancouver, | 35781|35770|2019-04-05 23:57:00|Chris Salayka|Re: Another deal on Solar Panels|http://azimuthsolar.ca/product-category/batteries/carbonfoambatteries   Virus-free. www.avg.com | 35782|35770|2019-04-06 09:38:00|Matt Malone|Re: Another deal on Solar Panels| I have read some on carbon foam batteries.  They are really good, for lead acid batteries.  Over discharge on a few occasions is less damaging.   When it comes down to it, it is a 50% DOD, 3600 cycle battery. Chinese lithiums are 80%DOD, 5000 cycles. That is 1800 vs 4000... the lithium is still twice the battery.   If you can get mass produced lithiums from Alibaba for US$250, vs US$520 for carbon foam, it appears to be 4 times the value to me. Further, the carbon foam appear to be back ordered.  Production problem?   A quick check of Alibaba finds carbon foam battery components for sale.  It will not be long before some Chinese company is knocking them off.   I would not consider them until they are below US$200 for a 12V100Ah.  At that point, I would start looking more closely at the claims for each option. At 12V, a lithium is a superior product in my opinion because it contains a cell balancing circuit.  (It requires it for safety.)  Lead acid does not need it if one does balancing charges - overcharges the battery to even up the cells.  Overcharging affects life. At $250, how bad would that lithium have to be to be not worth the risk?  Here I return to "4 times the value".  If it gave me only 1/4 the life, then it was a gamble that was no worse than carbon foam.   And it is a gamble with a $250 buy in.   Seems like a no-brainer to buy one Chinese lithium and try it.  Worst case, if it is less than 1/4 of the battery claimed, I will feel I have lost a fraction of $250 on a bad bet.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of 'Chris Salayka' kurlidog@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 11:54:55 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Another deal on Solar Panels     http://azimuthsolar.ca/product-category/batteries/carbonfoambatteries   Virus-free. www.avg.com | 35783|35770|2019-04-06 10:56:05|Matt Malone|Re: Another deal on Solar Panels| That analysis assumes all of the exaggerations of performance might lay only on the Chinese lithium side of weighing options.  If the carbon foam batteries performance numbers are at all overstated relative to what I would see in service, then that would just make me less likely to be disappointed in taking a chance and buying one Chinese lithium and trying it. Matt From: Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, April 6, 09:38 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Another deal on Solar Panels To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I have read some on carbon foam batteries.  They are really good, for lead acid batteries.  Over discharge on a few occasions is less damaging.   When it comes down to it, it is a 50% DOD, 3600 cycle battery. Chinese lithiums are typically 80%DOD, 5000 cycles (multiple manufacturers). That is 1800 vs 4000... the lithium is still twice the battery.   If you can get mass produced lithiums from Alibaba for US$250, vs US$520 for carbon foam, it appears to be 4 times the value to me. Further, the carbon foam appear to be back ordered.  Production problem?   A quick check of Alibaba finds carbon foam battery components for sale.  It will not be long before some Chinese company is knocking them off.   I would not consider them until they are below US$200 for a 12V100Ah.  At that point, I would start looking more closely at the claims for each option. At 12V, a lithium is a superior product in my opinion because it contains a cell balancing circuit.  (It requires it for safety.)  Lead acid does not need it if one does balancing charges - overcharges the battery to even up the cells.  Overcharging affects life. At $250, how bad would that lithium have to be to be not worth the risk?  Here I return to "4 times the value".  If it gave me only 1/4 the life, then it was a gamble that was no worse than carbon foam.   And it is a gamble with a $250 buy in.   Seems like a no-brainer to buy one Chinese lithium and try it.  Worst case, if it is less than 1/4 of the battery claimed, I will feel I have lost a fraction of $250 on a bad bet.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of 'Chris Salayka' kurlidog@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 11:54:55 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Another deal on Solar Panels     http://azimuthsolar.ca/product-category/batteries/carbonfoambatteries   Virus-free. www.avg.com | 35784|35770|2019-04-06 16:51:48|Darren Bos|Re: Another deal on Solar Panels| The Firefly Carbon foam are what they say they are, and guys like Nigel Calder and Rod Collins of Compass Marine have put them through the paces to prove it.  They are still expensive, but certainly one of the nicest battery choices out there.  In comparison, I've ordered enough things on Alibaba and ebay to know that your odds are only around 50/50 to end up with a really quality product vs something that just barely passes mustard.  I'd definitely buy just one cheap Chinese Lithium to start and experiment with it. For the costs, you also need to include a battery management system to go with the lithium.  Really to work properly a lithium system needs to be designed from the ground up, the so-called drop-in lithium create problems and prevent you from some realizing some of the main benefits of lithium. As a drop-in replacement, I think Firefly beats the lithium, for a brand new system completely designed around lithium, it is harder to say.  There are some things I really don't like about lithium.  If you charge them below freezing they will be irreparably damaged.  For us on the BC coast, there are enough times where the water temperatures in a quiet bay are cold enough you'd have to worry about charging lithium batteries without damaging them.  Figuring out a way to warm the batteries before you start charging is another headache.  Also, if your BMS fails you have no battery power.  If you have one main battery bank and the BMS disconnects the battery for a number of different kinds of faults (temperature, voltage, cells out of balance), you lose all power in the boat.  Most folks talk about high charge and discharge rates of lithium, but you'll never realize higher charge rates without some careful system design from the start, and some significant expense.  Most folks don't have anything on their boat that could fully utilize the max amperage of 400 Ah lithium bank. My experience with batteries is that it is one of the places where you still get what you pay for.  Quality materials, proper assembly, matched (or at least consistent) cells, all matter.  As lithium becomes more common on boats there are more stories of lost battery banks due to a single mistake, poor quality cells, etc.  These aren't really reasons not to have a lithium bank if you have the skills to do it really well.  But, I'm not sure everyone is aware that lithium is one of the least forgiving battery technologies.  They'll kill themselves as a result of any number of oversights on the part of the installer/owner.  I think if you include all the lithiums that die premature deaths, the average number of cycles seen amongst the boating community wouldn't be anywhere near as impressive as the sales literature. On 2019-04-06 7:56 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   That analysis assumes all of the exaggerations of performance might lay only on the Chinese lithium side of weighing options.  If the carbon foam batteries performance numbers are at all overstated relative to what I would see in service, then that would just make me less likely to be disappointed in taking a chance and buying one Chinese lithium and trying it. Matt From: Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, April 6, 09:38 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Another deal on Solar Panels To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I have read some on carbon foam batteries.  They are really good, for lead acid batteries.  Over discharge on a few occasions is less damaging.   When it comes down to it, it is a 50% DOD, 3600 cycle battery. Chinese lithiums are typically 80%DOD, 5000 cycles (multiple manufacturers). That is 1800 vs 4000... the lithium is still twice the battery.   If you can get mass produced lithiums from Alibaba for US$250, vs US$520 for carbon foam, it appears to be 4 times the value to me. Further, the carbon foam appear to be back ordered.  Production problem?   A quick check of Alibaba finds carbon foam battery components for sale.  It will not be long before some Chinese company is knocking them off.   I would not consider them until they are below US$200 for a 12V100Ah.  At that point, I would start looking more closely at the claims for each option. At 12V, a lithium is a superior product in my opinion because it contains a cell balancing circuit.  (It requires it for safety.)  Lead acid does not need it if one does balancing charges - overcharges the battery to even up the cells.  Overcharging affects life. At $250, how bad would that lithium have to be to be not worth the risk?  Here I return to "4 times the value".  If it gave me only 1/4 the life, then it was a gamble that was no worse than carbon foam.   And it is a gamble with a $250 buy in.   Seems like a no-brainer to buy one Chinese lithium and try it.  Worst case, if it is less than 1/4 of the battery claimed, I will feel I have lost a fraction of $250 on a bad bet.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of 'Chris Salayka' kurlidog@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 11:54:55 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Another deal on Solar Panels     http://azimuthsolar.ca/product-category/batteries/carbonfoambatteries   Virus-free. www.avg.com | 35785|35770|2019-04-06 17:07:21|Matt Malone|Re: Another deal on Solar Panels| I have yet to actually purchase from Alibaba, but many times from China via ebay.  There were 2 purchases out of approximately 50 where what I got was crap.  For me, a 12V/100Ah from Alibaba would be a first, and a gamble. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, April 6, 16:52 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Another deal on Solar Panels To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   The Firefly Carbon foam are what they say they are, and guys like Nigel Calder and Rod Collins of Compass Marine have put them through the paces to prove it.  They are still expensive, but certainly one of the nicest battery choices out there.  In comparison, I've ordered enough things on Alibaba and ebay to know that your odds are only around 50/50 to end up with a really quality product vs something that just barely passes mustard.  I'd definitely buy just one cheap Chinese Lithium to start and experiment with it. For the costs, you also need to include a battery management system to go with the lithium.  Really to work properly a lithium system needs to be designed from the ground up, the so-called drop-in lithium create problems and prevent you from some realizing some of the main benefits of lithium. As a drop-in replacement, I think Firefly beats the lithium, for a brand new system completely designed around lithium, it is harder to say.  There are some things I really don't like about lithium.  If you charge them below freezing they will be irreparably damaged.  For us on the BC coast, there are enough times where the water temperatures in a quiet bay are cold enough you'd have to worry about charging lithium batteries without damaging them.  Figuring out a way to warm the batteries before you start charging is another headache.  Also, if your BMS fails you have no battery power.  If you have one main battery bank and the BMS disconnects the battery for a number of different kinds of faults (temperature, voltage, cells out of balance), you lose all power in the boat.  Most folks talk about high charge and discharge rates of lithium, but you'll never realize higher charge rates without some careful system design from the start, and some significant expense.  Most folks don't have anything on their boat that could fully utilize the max amperage of 400 Ah lithium bank. My experience with batteries is that it is one of the places where you still get what you pay for.  Quality materials, proper assembly, matched (or at least consistent) cells, all matter.  As lithium becomes more common on boats there are more stories of lost battery banks due to a single mistake, poor quality cells, etc.  These aren't really reasons not to have a lithium bank if you have the skills to do it really well.  But, I'm not sure everyone is aware that lithium is one of the least forgiving battery technologies.  They'll kill themselves as a result of any number of oversights on the part of the installer/owner.  I think if you include all the lithiums that die premature deaths, the average number of cycles seen amongst the boating community wouldn't be anywhere near as impressive as the sales literature. On 2019-04-06 7:56 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   That analysis assumes all of the exaggerations of performance might lay only on the Chinese lithium side of weighing options.  If the carbon foam batteries performance numbers are at all overstated relative to what I would see in service, then that would just make me less likely to be disappointed in taking a chance and buying one Chinese lithium and trying it. Matt From: Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, April 6, 09:38 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Another deal on Solar Panels To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I have read some on carbon foam batteries.  They are really good, for lead acid batteries.  Over discharge on a few occasions is less damaging.   When it comes down to it, it is a 50% DOD, 3600 cycle battery. Chinese lithiums are typically 80%DOD, 5000 cycles (multiple manufacturers). That is 1800 vs 4000... the lithium is still twice the battery.   If you can get mass produced lithiums from Alibaba for US$250, vs US$520 for carbon foam, it appears to be 4 times the value to me. Further, the carbon foam appear to be back ordered.  Production problem?   A quick check of Alibaba finds carbon foam battery components for sale.  It will not be long before some Chinese company is knocking them off.   I would not consider them until they are below US$200 for a 12V100Ah.  At that point, I would start looking more closely at the claims for each option. At 12V, a lithium is a superior product in my opinion because it contains a cell balancing circuit.  (It requires it for safety.)  Lead acid does not need it if one does balancing charges - overcharges the battery to even up the cells.  Overcharging affects life. At $250, how bad would that lithium have to be to be not worth the risk?  Here I return to "4 times the value".  If it gave me only 1/4 the life, then it was a gamble that was no worse than carbon foam.   And it is a gamble with a $250 buy in.   Seems like a no-brainer to buy one Chinese lithium and try it.  Worst case, if it is less than 1/4 of the battery claimed, I will feel I have lost a fraction of $250 on a bad bet.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of 'Chris Salayka' kurlidog@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, April 5, 2019 11:54:55 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Another deal on Solar Panels     http://azimuthsolar.ca/product-category/batteries/carbonfoambatteries   Virus-free. www.avg.com | 35786|35770|2019-04-06 18:40:00|Rick Jackson|Re: Another deal on Solar Panels|Firefly batteries is what sounds like your talking about.  They sound as good as lithium.  I considered them until I found I could build my own lithium Iron phosphate for the same price.  The Firefly battery shines when your boat spends a lot of time in Northern latitude and or are discharged beyond 50%This is only from reading reviews.  Sent from my iPhone On Apr 5, 2019, at 1:47 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   A guy here on Quadra Island, giving a lecture on sustainability, mentioned carbon foam batteries.  He said they left one stone dead for  a year, charged it up, and it held a charge well. Seems the carbon stops the  sulfates from ever hardening on the plates. They are slightly more expensive , around $350 , but I think they will be my next battery. Given how many I have screwed up, by leaving them too low ,they may actually work out cheaper, in the long run.Does anyone here have any experience with them? | 35787|35770|2019-04-06 18:55:55|Matt Malone|Lithium Iron Phosphate Batteries| Rick, How would you make LiFePO4 batteries? Matt From: Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, April 6, 18:40 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Another deal on Solar Panels To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Firefly batteries is what sounds like your talking about.   They sound as good as lithium.  I considered them until I found I could build my own lithium Iron phosphate for the same price.   The Firefly battery shines when your boat spends a lot of time in Northern latitude and or are discharged beyond 50% This is only from reading reviews.   Sent from my iPhone On Apr 5, 2019, at 1:47 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   A guy here on Quadra Island, giving a lecture on sustainability, mentioned carbon foam batteries.  He said they left one stone dead for  a year, charged it up, and it held a charge well. Seems the carbon stops the  sulfates from ever hardening on the plates. They are slightly more expensive , around $350 , but I think they will be my next battery. Given how many I have screwed up, by leaving them too low ,they may actually work out cheaper, in the long run. Does anyone here have any experience with them? | 35788|35788|2019-04-06 21:52:39|smallboatvoyaguer|Pouring lead|Greetings everyone. I’m almost to the stage of putting the lead in the keel. I figured I’d place ingots in place, and then pour around them. I have chunks of lead ranging from 70 pounds up to 250. Any tips on this process? Thoughts? If I melt the lead at a low temperature, will the impurities float to the top? Such as fiberglass, sand, other metals, etc. Are these things even of concern if they end up sealed in the keel? Thanks, Marlin| 35789|35788|2019-04-06 22:24:02|Matt Malone|Re: Pouring lead| I suspected the mass of lead blocks if not preheated would prevent the lead from making it all the way to.the bottom.and displacing all the air.  Here are some important constants... Latent heat of fusion:  23 kJ/kg Specific heat: 0.13 kJ/kg Melting Point of lead: 327.5C So 1 kg of lead at summer temperature will solidify 1.5 kg of liquid lead that is just fully melted.   So either one must superheat the liquid by the 1.5 times the ratio of liquid to solid or one must preheat the blocks.  If one tries superheating and one melts 1/10th of the lead and puts in 9/10 as blocks, one must get it to 327C + (9 - 1/1.5)*1.5*300K = which is way over the boiling point... impossible. Preheating the blocks and keel section is the way to go.  The closer you can get them to the melting point, the better the fill. Matt From: musicasrevolution@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, April 6, 21:53 Subject: [origamiboats] Pouring lead To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Greetings everyone. I’m almost to the stage of putting the lead in the keel. I figured I’d place ingots in place, and then pour around them. I have chunks of lead ranging from 70 pounds up to 250. Any tips on this process? Thoughts? If I melt the lead at a low temperature, will the impurities float to the top? Such as fiberglass, sand, other metals, etc. Are these things even of concern if they end up sealed in the keel? Thanks, Marlin | 35790|35788|2019-04-06 22:27:59|smallboatvoyaguer|Re: Pouring lead|Is it difficult or an extremely lengthy process to melt solid blocks of lead, say 250 pound chunks?| 35791|35788|2019-04-06 23:04:10|Matt Malone|Re: Pouring lead| Holy cow, 250 pounds...  there are significant factors to keep in mind: - the melter needs to hold up 250 pounds - the melter has to be above the keels. - you have to lift 250 pounds up into the melter. - it has to be set in gently or everything has to be stronger.  - if you melt more than one block, the second block has to be put in gently or there will be a medieval splash of liquid lead. - good thick insulation and an insulated lid, and heating from below is best. - the valve and flow pipe and preheating the flow pipe require thought. Melting 1kg of lead takes 62 kJ.  Fuels are 40MJ / kg.   A 100% efficient melter should melt 640kg of lead for 1kg of fuel, but I would not bet on getting anywhere near 100%, like 20% maybe.   Matt From: musicasrevolution@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, April 6, 22:28 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Is it difficult or an extremely lengthy process to melt solid blocks of lead, say 250 pound chunks? | 35792|35788|2019-04-07 10:12:15|mountain man|Re: Pouring lead| Be carefull with lead, I have cut a few lead  keels in the last 2 years and I now have lead in my blood... De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de musicasrevolution@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 6 avril 2019 22:27:53 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead     Is it difficult or an extremely lengthy process to melt solid blocks of lead, say 250 pound chunks? | 35793|35788|2019-04-07 11:59:14|wild_explorer|Re: Pouring lead|You can try to use weed-killer_type propane torch, I think that how it was done on SV M.O.M.Put one layers of lead blocks in the keel and try to melt it. Keep doing it layer by layer (blocks gaps filled with smaller lead) . Matt already has some numbers in place and will be able to tell you if it is possible to do it with BTU of propane torch (or what BTU needs to be for that).P.S. I second - SAFETY FIRST, be very careful. To split the mass of lead to be melt at one time, you may consider some kind of insulation between layers.| 35794|35788|2019-04-07 12:08:33|wild_explorer|Re: Pouring lead|Clarification: You apply the heat from the TOP of the keel. Torch goes inside the keel and flame heats the lead directly (not through the keel). Move the torch as necessary to melt the layer fully.| 35795|35788|2019-04-07 12:27:51|prairiemaidca|Re: Pouring lead|When melting lead in your keel be very careful not to get to much heat going as you will run the risk of distortion in your keel sides.  I managed to catch that when I was doing my ballast.  Almost caused a major problem.  Martin  (Prairie Maid)| 35796|35788|2019-04-07 12:39:51|Matt Malone|Re: Pouring lead| #ygrps-yiv-1091677345 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Absolutely.   When cutting lead (keels), a dust mask is better than nothing, but not much.   A proper respirator is better.   A full-head respirator, like Alex Steele wears is even better: https://twitter.com/alecsteelesteel/status/905173755231694848 A tyvek suit to keep the dust off your skin is even better.   https://www.amazon.ca/DuPont-TY122S-XL-EACH-Disposable-Elastic-Coverall/dp/B01JOWAOEG/ref=asc_df_B01JOWAOEG/?tag=googleshopc0c-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=293000956767&hvpos=1o5&hvnetw=g&hvrand=11858209445841852816&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9000792&hvtargid=pla-373698560847&psc=1 Buy a box if you are working on a boat.  Lots of paints are no good for you.  Removing bottom coating is no good for you.   Generally it will keep the dust off of you.   Even with all of these measures, you may still end up with detectable lead levels in your blood.   Lead is actually very easy to detect.  Just because it is detectable, that alone is not evidence of a problem.   Archaeological evidence shows pre-colonization North American first nations individuals had detectable levels of lead in them, and one can be certain they never worked with lead.   Lead is in ground water, well water, municipal water (at monitored and controlled levels) and in home water because of old lead piping and less-old lead solder in copper piping systems.   Now, melting lead brings up another problem -- lead vapours.   https://www.powerstream.com/vapor-pressure.htm The second graph shows lead (Pb).   The melting point of lead is 273K + 327C = 600 K   At this temperature, Pb has a vapour pressure of around 10^-8 where one atmosphere is 760 -- so the lead in the air is not even one part in 1 billion (0.013ppb).   BUT... overheat the lead by 100K, up to 427C, to make it flow well, and the vapours are now 10^-6 -- 100 times as much, and around 1.3ppb.   Accidentally overheat some of the lead by 200K up to 527C (which is not even the melting point of aluminium, and we have all melted aluminium with a propane torch so, overheating lead with a propane torch is easy) and the lead in the air is about 65 ppb.   Make sure your respirator protects you from all the forms of lead, and keep the dust from getting on your skin. Here is some safety information on lead.   http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/114574O/lead-technical-bulletin.pdf I solder all the time -- tiny quantities of electronics solder which melts at  183C -- at this temperature, far below the melting point of pure lead at 327C, there are only tiny concentrations of lead vapour.   When using my forges to melt metal I do it outdoors, in a breeze and I stand up wind.   There is no upwind when one is casting into a boat keel.   Instead of filtering air, I would sooner have a blower outside and hose bringing fresh air to a hood.  I used something like one of these at 911: https://www.acklandsgrainger.com/en/product/p/MMMS655?gclid=CjwKCAjwv6blBRBzEiwAihbM-YDlDj8tG-GAba_i0DfEnl3DcmFEALZ-qFrmMftuBY-R6q3QbJwSpBoCa70QAvD_BwE&cm_mmc=PPC:+Google+PLA&ef_id=CjwKCAjwv6blBRBzEiwAihbM-YDlDj8tG-GAba_i0DfEnl3DcmFEALZ-qFrmMftuBY-R6q3QbJwSpBoCa70QAvD_BwE:G:s&s_kwcid=AL!3645!3!303439924316!!!g!543433734430! Like the Alec Steele respirator, it is totally different from a normal respirator because one does not have to work to suck air in through a filter.   There is no respirator fatigue.  One finds they have far greater endurance when bagged up in tyvel if breathing is no effort.  I went 4 hours at a time, no problem.   It felt like work clothes.  I forgot it was there after a while.  I like this style hood for its economy, but check the ratings to make sure it is suitable for your use, including making sure it is sufficiently flame proof, or, that your work plan has you staying away from flames.   I found hoods like this reusable, but keep it clean and dry and store it in a clean place so the inside does not get contaminated.   Have the air arrive at double or quadruple the rate needed, it leaks around the neck and keeps the thing really cool and comfortable and keeps it from fogging up.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of mountain man mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 10:12 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [origamiboats] Pouring lead     Be carefull with lead, I have cut a few lead  keels in the last 2 years and I now have lead in my blood... De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de musicasrevolution@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 6 avril 2019 22:27:53 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead     Is it difficult or an extremely lengthy process to melt solid blocks of lead, say 250 pound chunks? | 35797|35788|2019-04-07 12:47:54|Matt Malone|Re: Pouring lead| #ygrps-yiv-1473431156 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Wild wrote: >P.S. I second - SAFETY FIRST, be very careful. To split the mass of lead to >be melt at one time, you may consider some kind of insulation between layers. Yes, to Wild's suggestion of doing a layer of blocks at a time, and melting a little lead at a time.  I though about this.  I do not know how gravitationally level the bottom of your keels are.  If I were to do it, I might think about melting enough lead to fill to 80-90% up the current layer of blocks.  Enough to be sure to get under and between them, but do not attempt to make it level on the top.   Then place the next layer.   Repeat.   If you want a slope to the top surface of your lead, say deeper toward the bow, one can place thicker and thinner blocks and jack the boat a little between layers to get to the final angle.   I recommend against insulation between layers.   To my mind, I want to melt a little of the lower layer, to get a good bond, so my lead is a monolythic piece when it is done, even though I poured in layers.   The Acorn to Arabella pour: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1cpJBtWnQg Was done in one shot, but, it is an exposed keel bolted to the bottom of a wood boat, not lead inside a steel keel.  Still seeing what they do, and what works and does not, is good information. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 11:59 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead     You can try to use weed-killer_type propane torch, I think that how it was done on SV M.O.M. Put one layers of lead blocks in the keel and try to melt it. Keep doing it layer by layer (blocks gaps filled with smaller lead) . Matt already has some numbers in place and will be able to tell you if it is possible to do it with BTU of propane torch (or what BTU needs to be for that). P.S. I second - SAFETY FIRST, be very careful. To split the mass of lead to be melt at one time, you may consider some kind of insulation between layers. | 35798|35788|2019-04-07 13:14:37|Matt Malone|Re: Pouring lead| #ygrps-yiv-835574590 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} I agree, heating from the top is the way to go instead of heating your keel from below, if you are doing the melting in the keel.   Flames follow a flow pattern.   If I were doing it that way (in addition to really good safety gear) I would have the torch at one end of the keel, and a loose stack of blocks at the other.  The over-blow of the torch would curl up the far end of the keel and pass through the blocks loosely stacked at the other end.   The overblow from the torch would preheat, and maybe even melt the loose stack of blocks at the other end.  Melting lead would seek a level and flow toward the torch.  Lift the torch, and add more blocks...   But I think using the keel as the melter is not the most control.  The boat could get really hot.   I really think the stainless steel beer keg melter that someone described building and using is a much better plan.   It can be insulated, and have a plug lift valve to let some lead out: http://www.schuf.com/pictures/copy_of_Page5DimXd1Discgraphicwithxandd1.jpg/image_mini That looks like a sink stopper, or piston valve actuated from the opposite side to the wall of the melter.  Something more of the shape of a needle valve, like a round tapered punch dropped into a hole on the tank and on the end of a long rod from the top might be better.  Remember steel floats in lead so put a big weight at the top to hold it down.  With a long lever, one is well above and to the side when they let some lead come out the out nozzle.   If it is tapered, then one might be able to lift it a tiny bit, and let lead out slowly.  Remember, liquid lead is very dense so it will flow very fast given a little opening.   Never pull the rod all the way from the hole's opening, it may float up the side and drain the entire tank.   I would keep some lead in the tank so the slag floating on the top does not get into the keel, and also to make it easier to melt the next block.   I would also have a really long pair of tongs to put blocks down into the keel.   Something between this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKFZPx6Arqk and these: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R76AlP6wp3o which are used to lift blocks of metal that will be made into the head of a hammer.  I am assuming your lead blocks are between hand-hammer and sledgehammer head size.    If they are larger... ug, that would be hard.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 12:08 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead     Clarification: You apply the heat from the TOP of the keel. Torch goes inside the keel and flame heats the lead directly (not through the keel). Move the torch as necessary to melt the layer fully. | 35799|35788|2019-04-07 14:04:23|Matt Malone|Re: Pouring lead| #ygrps-yiv-1751693335 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} I just watched the SV. Seeker pour: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Y7T7Rxb8rM I really do not like the cement-mixer style melter they use.  Pouring from the top, all the dross floating on the top of the melt is certain to end up in the keel.   Then there are the forces required to tilt it, and will it overbalance, or get harder to tilt as the melter gets more empty.  Then there is the medieval splashing lead all over the place.   Acron Arabella used a 90-close nipple-90 as a hinge for their pipe.   I think a short pipe point down into the keel would make a much neater job than SV Seeker's pouring melter that drops lead from the top to the longest distance.   Maybe Doug can comment on lessons he learned, and what he might do differently if he were to do it again.  I much prefer something that maintains orientation, is sealed but for a vent to outside.   New blocks can fall down the vent.  Two rods might stick out the top -- one to the axial-needle-valve style plug I described, the other is just a thin rod welded to a block of steel -- the steel floats on the lead, so you can see the level of the lead without looking in.   Then one drains lead out of a pipe in the bottom, using an actuator from the top.  One could even stay outside mainly.    If one has a port on the top where one might fish out floating debris and scoop dross, it might be possible to go straight from wheel weights and sinkers and spent bullets to keel lead in one melt.    It would take a long time, but if it is one process, one might deal better with fumes, and make only one melter one never has to lift with liquid lead in it.   This is in contrast to the people I see using a cast iron fry pan as a melter to change wheel weights and bullets into liquid to pour blocks.   It seems like less work to do things in one process.   This video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTRwfyvIbkc from about minute 28:30 to 36:00 in that video (and the entire rest of the video), it looks to me like ordinary oxide is forming on the surface, and he is repeatedly scraping it off calling it dross.   To my eye and experience melting lead, you can scrape that constantly-forming oxide off forever until there is no lead left at all.   You can turn all your lead into oxide.  To me that is a waste of lead, and creates more toxic dross.   A closed melter, with one liquid surface that does not need to be interrupted to extract molten lead, one will get more lead out of it, and produce less dross.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 12:47 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead     Wild wrote: >P.S. I second - SAFETY FIRST, be very careful. To split the mass of lead to >be melt at one time, you may consider some kind of insulation between layers. Yes, to Wild's suggestion of doing a layer of blocks at a time, and melting a little lead at a time.  I though about this.  I do not know how gravitationally level the bottom of your keels are.  If I were to do it, I might think about melting enough lead to fill to 80-90% up the current layer of blocks.  Enough to be sure to get under and between them, but do not attempt to make it level on the top.   Then place the next layer.   Repeat.   If you want a slope to the top surface of your lead, say deeper toward the bow, one can place thicker and thinner blocks and jack the boat a little between layers to get to the final angle.   I recommend against insulation between layers.   To my mind, I want to melt a little of the lower layer, to get a good bond, so my lead is a monolythic piece when it is done, even though I poured in layers.   The Acorn to Arabella pour: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1cpJBtWnQg Was done in one shot, but, it is an exposed keel bolted to the bottom of a wood boat, not lead inside a steel keel.  Still seeing what they do, and what works and does not, is good information. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 11:59 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead     You can try to use weed-killer_type propane torch, I think that how it was done on SV M.O.M. Put one layers of lead blocks in the keel and try to melt it. Keep doing it layer by layer (blocks gaps filled with smaller lead) . Matt already has some numbers in place and will be able to tell you if it is possible to do it with BTU of propane torch (or what BTU needs to be for that). P.S. I second - SAFETY FIRST, be very careful. To split the mass of lead to be melt at one time, you may consider some kind of insulation between layers. | 35800|35770|2019-04-07 18:16:56|Rick Jackson|Re: Lithium Iron Phosphate Batteries|They make 3.2 volt cells. You can buy and configure your own battery.   4 cells create a 12 volt battery. I can build individual 12v units.  They come in a variety of amperages and I’m looking at 200 amp cells.  You buy from Ali baba for cheap but I never have.  I can local for $.37 a watt.   Sent from my iPhone On Apr 6, 2019, at 3:55 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Rick, How would you make LiFePO4 batteries? Matt From: Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, April 6, 18:40 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Another deal on Solar Panels To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Firefly batteries is what sounds like your talking about.   They sound as good as lithium.  I considered them until I found I could build my own lithium Iron phosphate for the same price.   The Firefly battery shines when your boat spends a lot of time in Northern latitude and or are discharged beyond 50% This is only from reading reviews.   Sent from my iPhone On Apr 5, 2019, at 1:47 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:   A guy here on Quadra Island, giving a lecture on sustainability, mentioned carbon foam batteries.  He said they left one stone dead for  a year, charged it up, and it held a charge well. Seems the carbon stops the  sulfates from ever hardening on the plates. They are slightly more expensive , around $350 , but I think they will be my next battery. Given how many I have screwed up, by leaving them too low ,they may actually work out cheaper, in the long run. Does anyone here have any experience with them? | 35801|35788|2019-04-07 18:17:58|Rick Jackson|Re: Pouring lead|To my understanding the lead is not “fused” to the hull.   I’ve only seen 2 steel keels filled with lead and the were “loosely” fitted..   Any steel protection would be rendered inadequate after coming into contact with melted lead.  If an air gap exists you will have corrosion.   I will photograph ours when we pull the lead.  I’m eagerly waiting for ideas to prevent keel coating damage.   I think the combined brain power here would be enough to come up with something RickSent from my iPhone On Apr 7, 2019, at 9:47 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Wild wrote: >P.S. I second - SAFETY FIRST, be very careful. To split the mass of lead to >be melt at one time, you may consider some kind of insulation between layers. Yes, to Wild's suggestion of doing a layer of blocks at a time, and melting a little lead at a time.  I though about this.  I do not know how gravitationally level the bottom of your keels are.  If I were to do it, I might think about melting enough lead to fill to 80-90% up the current layer of blocks.  Enough to be sure to get under and between them, but do not attempt to make it level on the top.   Then place the next layer.   Repeat.   If you want a slope to the top surface of your lead, say deeper toward the bow, one can place thicker and thinner blocks and jack the boat a little between layers to get to the final angle.   I recommend against insulation between layers.   To my mind, I want to melt a little of the lower layer, to get a good bond, so my lead is a monolythic piece when it is done, even though I poured in layers.   The Acorn to Arabella pour: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1cpJBtWnQg Was done in one shot, but, it is an exposed keel bolted to the bottom of a wood boat, not lead inside a steel keel.  Still seeing what they do, and what works and does not, is good information. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 11:59 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead     You can try to use weed-killer_type propane torch, I think that how it was done on SV M.O.M. Put one layers of lead blocks in the keel and try to melt it. Keep doing it layer by layer (blocks gaps filled with smaller lead) . Matt already has some numbers in place and will be able to tell you if it is possible to do it with BTU of propane torch (or what BTU needs to be for that). P.S. I second - SAFETY FIRST, be very careful. To split the mass of lead to be melt at one time, you may consider some kind of insulation between layers. | 35802|35788|2019-04-07 18:22:12|brentswain38|Re: Pouring lead|That works, I have melted lead around cast iron pulp mill grinder plates that way heating it from the top with  a tiger torch .Do it one layer at a time, to avoid voids.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Greetings everyone. I’m almost to the stage of putting the lead in the keel. I figured I’d place ingots in place, and then pour around them. I have chunks of lead ranging from 70 pounds up to 250. Any tips on this process? Thoughts? If I melt the lead at a low temperature, will the impurities float to the top? Such as fiberglass, sand, other metals, etc. Are these things even of concern if they end up sealed in the keel? Thanks, Marlin| 35803|35788|2019-04-07 18:25:02|brentswain38|Re: Pouring lead| In any temperature which melts lead ,lighter stuff will always float on  top.That works, I have melted lead around cast iron pulp mill grinder plates that way heating it from the top with  a tiger torch .Do it one layer at a time, to avoid voids.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Greetings everyone. I’m almost to the stage of putting the lead in the keel. I figured I’d place ingots in place, and then pour around them. I have chunks of lead ranging from 70 pounds up to 250. Any tips on this process? Thoughts? If I melt the lead at a low temperature, will the impurities float to the top? Such as fiberglass, sand, other metals, etc. Are these things even of concern if they end up sealed in the keel? Thanks, Marlin| 35804|35788|2019-04-07 18:26:52|brentswain38|Re: Pouring lead|An old 40 lb propane tank makes a good cauldron for melting lead in.| 35805|35788|2019-04-07 18:31:17|Rick Jackson|Re: Pouring lead|I too need some lead replaced.   Ours is solid.  There are patches welded in where they poured.  I was hoping to cut the lead into small, manageable pieces that will make the most use of the keel voids.  I was planing on using a chainsaw.  All the shavings will get mixed into the epoxy poured in sections to insure no air pockets.  Aside from drag and waterproofing, is there a reason not to have a bolt on keel inspection plate?We have 4 keel sections that hold lead and it would be best not to weld up those voids so I have a proper coat if epoxy not compromised by weld burnsRickSent from my iPhone On Apr 7, 2019, at 7:12 AM, mountain man mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Be carefull with lead, I have cut a few lead  keels in the last 2 years and I now have lead in my blood... De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de musicasrevolution@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 6 avril 2019 22:27:53 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead     Is it difficult or an extremely lengthy process to melt solid blocks of lead, say 250 pound chunks? | 35806|35788|2019-04-07 18:31:39|brentswain38|Re: Pouring lead|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :All oxidation( corrosion) needs oxygen.Weld the keel airtight, and you have no oxygen, and thus no oxidation. A half inch nut, over a hole in the cap plate , lets you put  oil in, and  seal it, by welding a bolt  in it.To my understanding the lead is not “fused” to the hull.   I’ve only seen 2 steel keels filled with lead and the were “loosely” fitted..   Any steel protection would be rendered inadequate after coming into contact with melted lead.  If an air gap exists you will have corrosion.   I will photograph ours when we pull the lead.  I’m eagerly waiting for ideas to prevent keel coating damage.   I think the combined brain power here would be enough to come up with something RickSent from my iPhone | 35807|35788|2019-04-07 18:33:10|mountain man|Re: Pouring lead| When you sell lead to the metal scraper they give you almost nothing if there are a few little pieces of steel trapped inside your lead piece, When they melt the lead they will remove those pieces when they float and put the money they did not give you in their pockets... De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 7 avril 2019 18:25:00 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : [origamiboats] Re: Pouring lead      In any temperature which melts lead ,lighter stuff will always float on  top. That works, I have melted lead around cast iron pulp mill grinder plates that way heating it from the top with  a tiger torch .Do it one layer at a time, to avoid voids. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Greetings everyone. I’m almost to the stage of putting the lead in the keel. I figured I’d place ingots in place, and then pour around them. I have chunks of lead ranging from 70 pounds up to 250. Any tips on this process? Thoughts? If I melt the lead at a low temperature, will the impurities float to the top? Such as fiberglass, sand, other metals, etc. Are these things even of concern if they end up sealed in the keel? Thanks, Marlin | 35808|35788|2019-04-07 18:34:24|brentswain38|Re: Pouring lead|The best way to reduce a big block of lead into more manageable sizes , is put it on the  ground , and tiger torch it into smaller pieces.| 35809|35788|2019-04-07 18:38:47|mountain man|Re: Pouring lead| Rick, I cut a big keel 2 years ago with a chain saw, use a good mask!!!! At first I thought it only made some chips that you collect when you are finish but it also makes dust that  you dont see... And now I have some lead in my blood... De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 7 avril 2019 12:38:54 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead     I too need some lead replaced.   Ours is solid.  There are patches welded in where they poured.  I was hoping to cut the lead into small, manageable pieces that will make the most use of the keel voids..   I was planing on using a chainsaw.  All the shavings will get mixed into the epoxy poured in sections to insure no air pockets.   Aside from drag and waterproofing, is there a reason not to have a bolt on keel inspection plate? We have 4 keel sections that hold lead and it would be best not to weld up those voids so I have a proper coat if epoxy not compromised by weld burns Rick Sent from my iPhone On Apr 7, 2019, at 7:12 AM, mountain man mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Be carefull with lead, I have cut a few lead  keels in the last 2 years and I now have lead in my blood... De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de musicasrevolution@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 6 avril 2019 22:27:53 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead     Is it difficult or an extremely lengthy process to melt solid blocks of lead, say 250 pound chunks? | 35810|35788|2019-04-07 18:45:53|Matt Malone|Re: Pouring lead| #ygrps-yiv-1090527471 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Rick, Acid etch and flux the hull like they do with steel before it is going to be dip-galvanized? (zinc ammonium chloride I think is one flux, or some other awful stuff)   To cause the lead to fuse to the steel?   Flame-spray the inside of the keels with zinc first ?   https://acblastingservices.com/zinc-hot-flame-spray/ Hot Zinc Flame Spray – AC Blasting Services Hot zinc flame spray bonds a zinc layer over metalwork offering corrosion protecting comparable with galvanising without the need for drain or vent holes. Metal spraying is the process of spraying molten non-ferrous metals on to the required object. On contact the molten spray solidifies onto the surface to form a dense, strong, adherent coating. acblastingservices.com I have no certain idea, but those would be where I would start researching.  Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 4:11 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead     To my understanding the lead is not “fused” to the hull.    I’ve only seen 2 steel keels filled with lead and the were “loosely” fitted..   Any steel protection would be rendered inadequate after coming into contact with melted lead..   If an air gap exists you will have corrosion.   I will photograph ours when we pull the lead.   I’m eagerly waiting for ideas to prevent keel coating damage.   I think the combined brain power here would be enough to come up with something  Rick Sent from my iPhone On Apr 7, 2019, at 9:47 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Wild wrote: >P.S. I second - SAFETY FIRST, be very careful. To split the mass of lead to >be melt at one time, you may consider some kind of insulation between layers. Yes, to Wild's suggestion of doing a layer of blocks at a time, and melting a little lead at a time.  I though about this.  I do not know how gravitationally level the bottom of your keels are.  If I were to do it, I might think about melting enough lead to fill to 80-90% up the current layer of blocks.  Enough to be sure to get under and between them, but do not attempt to make it level on the top.   Then place the next layer.   Repeat.   If you want a slope to the top surface of your lead, say deeper toward the bow, one can place thicker and thinner blocks and jack the boat a little between layers to get to the final angle.   I recommend against insulation between layers.   To my mind, I want to melt a little of the lower layer, to get a good bond, so my lead is a monolythic piece when it is done, even though I poured in layers.   The Acorn to Arabella pour: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1cpJBtWnQg Was done in one shot, but, it is an exposed keel bolted to the bottom of a wood boat, not lead inside a steel keel.  Still seeing what they do, and what works and does not, is good information. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 11:59 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead     You can try to use weed-killer_type propane torch, I think that how it was done on SV M.O.M. Put one layers of lead blocks in the keel and try to melt it. Keep doing it layer by layer (blocks gaps filled with smaller lead) . Matt already has some numbers in place and will be able to tell you if it is possible to do it with BTU of propane torch (or what BTU needs to be for that). P.S. I second - SAFETY FIRST, be very careful. To split the mass of lead to be melt at one time, you may consider some kind of insulation between layers. | 35811|35788|2019-04-07 18:51:40|Matt Malone|Re: Pouring lead| #ygrps-yiv-162862722 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} If you point the torch at the unmelted block and not the puddle, it will not go far above the melting point and will not produce as much vapours.   I would use a shovel or axe to cut the puddle into small piece while it is still hot.   I would also do it on a big sheet of rusty steel so the lead it does not get much dirt in it.  Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 6:34 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead     The best way to reduce a big block of lead into more manageable sizes , is put it on the  ground , and tiger torch it into smaller pieces. | 35812|35788|2019-04-08 10:59:55|Darren Bos|Re: Pouring lead| It's possible to give yourself long lasting health problems or even kill yourself (spilling hot lead on you ) doing this, so this is only to describe what I did and not to endorse or advise you doing the same.  I mean this sincerely, this is not a job to undertake lightly, I wouldn't want anyone to suffer long-lasting consequences as a result of a boat-building project and this is not a job to be undertaken casually. The lead needs to be in smaller workable pieces.  Mine were already 70lb ingots and I think that is a workable size.  I worked in a tarped area to capture all the lead swarf when I had to cut ingots to make even layers.  Stack a single layer of lead in the keel, leaving at least an inch on all sides to allow the lead to flow around the existing pieces.  Get two 20lb propane tanks, remove valves, wash and clean thoroughly (remember, these could explode when you cut them if you do not clean them sufficiently).  Cut the bottom of one with a plasma torch to make a lid.  Install an pipe elbow where the valve would have been, install a gate valve on some black pipe just outboard of the propane cylinder.  Build a very, very sturdy stand and mount the propane tank upside down with the valve on the bottom.  Cut second propane bottle into orange segments and use it to build a double wall around first propane bottle (this keeps the heat of the torch from below where it does the most good to melt the lead).  Insulate the sides with fiberglass insulation and wrap with some aluminum foil.  Get two tiger torches.  One torch goes under the propane bottles, one is used to preheat the black pipe and the valve just prior to the pour.  Make sure you get the black pipe and the valve good and hot or the lead will solidify in it and cause great headaches.  Burn the packing out of the valve before your first run.  It seals fine with solid lead until you melt it with the tiger torch at pour time. The lead very quickly flows around the solid lead in the keel.  I did one or two layers of ingots at a time, depending on how wide the keel was at that point.  Doing a single layer at a time helps reduce the chance of warping the keel.  I had to cut out the side of my existing keel to remove the faulty ballast, so I already had a hole in which to layer the lead, and then pour through.  If I was doing a new build I'd be tempted to cut holes in the side of the keel above the finished ballast level that were large enough to put the black pipe spigot through.  You'd still have to carry the lead you were stacking into the boat, but the lead for the melting pot wouldn't need to be carried up into the boat.  Also, having the melting pot outside the boat makes it easier to keep the local air quality reasonable. Cautions: -Do Not superheat the lead.  Heated just to melting the lead does not release a lot of lead vapor.  As you go above that you get increasing release of toxic vapors. -Work in a really well ventilated are AND have an external air source.  Brents low cost respirator and bilge hose option would work as long as you have the hose upwind and well away from the work site. -Be very careful of contaminants or water in the lead.  If you add solid lead with contaminants or water to molten lead in the pot they could cause the lead in your pot to spew or boil out.  Imagine being sprayed with molten lead.  -wear cotton underlayers and protective outer layers (leather welding clothes might be suitable), full face shield, hair covered etc. Again, I'm not advocating anyone do this, I'm just describing what I did.  I've probably forgotten some of the points that are necessary.  Anyone considering this would need to do some more research themselves to convince themselves that they could do it safely for themselves and those around them. On 2019-04-06 6:52 p.m., musicasrevolution@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Greetings everyone. I’m almost to the stage of putting the lead in the keel. I figured I’d place ingots in place, and then pour around them. I have chunks of lead ranging from 70 pounds up to 250. Any tips on this process? Thoughts? If I melt the lead at a low temperature, will the impurities float to the top? Such as fiberglass, sand, other metals, etc. Are these things even of concern if they end up sealed in the keel? Thanks, Marlin | 35813|35788|2019-04-08 11:06:03|Darren Bos|Re: Pouring lead| Rick, I had to replace the  ballast on our boat because water got in and cause galvanicly driven corrosion.  I wouldn't settle for anything less than a pressure-tested welded enclosure for the ballast box.  Everything else is a temporary seal, and an inspection plate on the outside of the boat seams like asking for trouble to me.  Recoating with epoxy isn't as much work as dealing with a ballast problem in the future. On 2019-04-07 9:38 a.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I too need some lead replaced.   Ours is solid.  There are patches welded in where they poured.  I was hoping to cut the lead into small, manageable pieces that will make the most use of the keel voids..   I was planing on using a chainsaw.  All the shavings will get mixed into the epoxy poured in sections to insure no air pockets.   Aside from drag and waterproofing, is there a reason not to have a bolt on keel inspection plate? We have 4 keel sections that hold lead and it would be best not to weld up those voids so I have a proper coat if epoxy not compromised by weld burns Rick Sent from my iPhone On Apr 7, 2019, at 7:12 AM, mountain man mdemers2005@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Be carefull with lead, I have cut a few lead  keels in the last 2 years and I now have lead in my blood... De : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com de la part de musicasrevolution@... [origamiboats] Envoyé : 6 avril 2019 22:27:53 À : origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Objet : Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead     Is it difficult or an extremely lengthy process to melt solid blocks of lead, say 250 pound chunks? | 35814|35788|2019-04-08 11:14:38|Matt Malone|Re: Pouring lead| #ygrps-yiv-589796042 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Detailed post Darren, with lots of warnings. A few photos would make it more clear, if you have any.   Did you drain the melter each time or stop the flow before it drained to keep the dross out, and make the next melt easier? I had considered the pour-pipe and how to heat it efficiently.   I came up with a T just below the gate, with the stem of the T coming off to the side to a 90, and up outside the melter to an open end above the level of the lead, like a plumbing vent in a house.   Then one need only heat the vent section to make sure it does not have a plug in it, then direct the tiger torch into the bottom of the pour-pipe, and it would heat the entire length of discharge pipe as the combustion gases come out the vent.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 10:59 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead     It's possible to give yourself long lasting health problems or even kill yourself (spilling hot lead on you ) doing this, so this is only to describe what I did and not to endorse or advise you doing the same.  I mean this sincerely, this is not a job to undertake lightly, I wouldn't want anyone to suffer long-lasting consequences as a result of a boat-building project and this is not a job to be undertaken casually. The lead needs to be in smaller workable pieces.  Mine were already 70lb ingots and I think that is a workable size.  I worked in a tarped area to capture all the lead swarf when I had to cut ingots to make even layers.  Stack a single layer of lead in the keel, leaving at least an inch on all sides to allow the lead to flow around the existing pieces.  Get two 20lb propane tanks, remove valves, wash and clean thoroughly (remember, these could explode when you cut them if you do not clean them sufficiently).  Cut the bottom of one with a plasma torch to make a lid.  Install an pipe elbow where the valve would have been, install a gate valve on some black pipe just outboard of the propane cylinder.  Build a very, very sturdy stand and mount the propane tank upside down with the valve on the bottom.  Cut second propane bottle into orange segments and use it to build a double wall around first propane bottle (this keeps the heat of the torch from below where it does the most good to melt the lead).  Insulate the sides with fiberglass insulation and wrap with some aluminum foil.  Get two tiger torches.  One torch goes under the propane bottles, one is used to preheat the black pipe and the valve just prior to the pour.  Make sure you get the black pipe and the valve good and hot or the lead will solidify in it and cause great headaches.  Burn the packing out of the valve before your first run.  It seals fine with solid lead until you melt it with the tiger torch at pour time. The lead very quickly flows around the solid lead in the keel.  I did one or two layers of ingots at a time, depending on how wide the keel was at that point.  Doing a single layer at a time helps reduce the chance of warping the keel.  I had to cut out the side of my existing keel to remove the faulty ballast, so I already had a hole in which to layer the lead, and then pour through.  If I was doing a new build I'd be tempted to cut holes in the side of the keel above the finished ballast level that were large enough to put the black pipe spigot through.  You'd still have to carry the lead you were stacking into the boat, but the lead for the melting pot wouldn't need to be carried up into the boat.  Also, having the melting pot outside the boat makes it easier to keep the local air quality reasonable. Cautions: -Do Not superheat the lead.  Heated just to melting the lead does not release a lot of lead vapor.  As you go above that you get increasing release of toxic vapors. -Work in a really well ventilated are AND have an external air source.  Brents low cost respirator and bilge hose option would work as long as you have the hose upwind and well away from the work site. -Be very careful of contaminants or water in the lead.  If you add solid lead with contaminants or water to molten lead in the pot they could cause the lead in your pot to spew or boil out.  Imagine being sprayed with molten lead.  -wear cotton underlayers and protective outer layers (leather welding clothes might be suitable), full face shield, hair covered etc. Again, I'm not advocating anyone do this, I'm just describing what I did.  I've probably forgotten some of the points that are necessary.  Anyone considering this would need to do some more research themselves to convince themselves that they could do it safely for themselves and those around them. On 2019-04-06 6:52 p.m., musicasrevolution@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Greetings everyone. I’m almost to the stage of putting the lead in the keel. I figured I’d place ingots in place, and then pour around them. I have chunks of lead ranging from 70 pounds up to 250. Any tips on this process? Thoughts? If I melt the lead at a low temperature, will the impurities float to the top? Such as fiberglass, sand, other metals, etc. Are these things even of concern if they end up sealed in the keel? Thanks, Marlin | 35815|35788|2019-04-08 11:37:44|Darren Bos|Re: Pouring lead| I let the melting pot drain fully each time, 20lb propane tanks made a reasonable pour volume.  I closed the gate valve after each pour when things were still hot and any last bits of lead were still molten.  Not sure I understand your piping description.  The gate valve is easy and works well (it's actually Brent's idea, not mine).  Given the slope of the hull and the height you need the melting pot at, you will need a fairly long length of pipe from the pot to the keel (3-4ft).  So, since you already need to heat that with a tiger torch, you might as well use a gate valve.  I started heating the pipe nearest the boat and worked my way back to the gate valve.  You do need a well-insulated fire resistant glove to open the gate valve. I took a bunch of photos.  I'm off to build right now, but I could take a look tonight if there's something particular folks would like to see. On 2019-04-08 8:14 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Detailed post Darren, with lots of warnings. A few photos would make it more clear, if you have any.   Did you drain the melter each time or stop the flow before it drained to keep the dross out, and make the next melt easier? I had considered the pour-pipe and how to heat it efficiently.   I came up with a T just below the gate, with the stem of the T coming off to the side to a 90, and up outside the melter to an open end above the level of the lead, like a plumbing vent in a house.   Then one need only heat the vent section to make sure it does not have a plug in it, then direct the tiger torch into the bottom of the pour-pipe, and it would heat the entire length of discharge pipe as the combustion gases come out the vent.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 10:59 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead     It's possible to give yourself long lasting health problems or even kill yourself (spilling hot lead on you ) doing this, so this is only to describe what I did and not to endorse or advise you doing the same.  I mean this sincerely, this is not a job to undertake lightly, I wouldn't want anyone to suffer long-lasting consequences as a result of a boat-building project and this is not a job to be undertaken casually. The lead needs to be in smaller workable pieces.  Mine were already 70lb ingots and I think that is a workable size.  I worked in a tarped area to capture all the lead swarf when I had to cut ingots to make even layers.  Stack a single layer of lead in the keel, leaving at least an inch on all sides to allow the lead to flow around the existing pieces.  Get two 20lb propane tanks, remove valves, wash and clean thoroughly (remember, these could explode when you cut them if you do not clean them sufficiently).  Cut the bottom of one with a plasma torch to make a lid.  Install an pipe elbow where the valve would have been, install a gate valve on some black pipe just outboard of the propane cylinder.  Build a very, very sturdy stand and mount the propane tank upside down with the valve on the bottom.  Cut second propane bottle into orange segments and use it to build a double wall around first propane bottle (this keeps the heat of the torch from below where it does the most good to melt the lead).  Insulate the sides with fiberglass insulation and wrap with some aluminum foil.  Get two tiger torches.  One torch goes under the propane bottles, one is used to preheat the black pipe and the valve just prior to the pour.  Make sure you get the black pipe and the valve good and hot or the lead will solidify in it and cause great headaches.  Burn the packing out of the valve before your first run.  It seals fine with solid lead until you melt it with the tiger torch at pour time. The lead very quickly flows around the solid lead in the keel.  I did one or two layers of ingots at a time, depending on how wide the keel was at that point.  Doing a single layer at a time helps reduce the chance of warping the keel.  I had to cut out the side of my existing keel to remove the faulty ballast, so I already had a hole in which to layer the lead, and then pour through.  If I was doing a new build I'd be tempted to cut holes in the side of the keel above the finished ballast level that were large enough to put the black pipe spigot through.  You'd still have to carry the lead you were stacking into the boat, but the lead for the melting pot wouldn't need to be carried up into the boat.  Also, having the melting pot outside the boat makes it easier to keep the local air quality reasonable. Cautions: -Do Not superheat the lead.  Heated just to melting the lead does not release a lot of lead vapor.  As you go above that you get increasing release of toxic vapors. -Work in a really well ventilated are AND have an external air source.  Brents low cost respirator and bilge hose option would work as long as you have the hose upwind and well away from the work site. -Be very careful of contaminants or water in the lead.  If you add solid lead with contaminants or water to molten lead in the pot they could cause the lead in your pot to spew or boil out.  Imagine being sprayed with molten lead.  -wear cotton underlayers and protective outer layers (leather welding clothes might be suitable), full face shield, hair covered etc. Again, I'm not advocating anyone do this, I'm just describing what I did.  I've probably forgotten some of the points that are necessary.  Anyone considering this would need to do some more research themselves to convince themselves that they could do it safely for themselves and those around them. On 2019-04-06 6:52 p.m., musicasrevolution@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Greetings everyone. I’m almost to the stage of putting the lead in the keel. I figured I’d place ingots in place, and then pour around them. I have chunks of lead ranging from 70 pounds up to 250. Any tips on this process? Thoughts? If I melt the lead at a low temperature, will the impurities float to the top? Such as fiberglass, sand, other metals, etc. Are these things even of concern if they end up sealed in the keel? Thanks, Marlin | 35816|35788|2019-04-08 17:28:00|Rick Jackson|Re: Pouring lead|I was thinking about that. I could look it up, but what is the minimum temp that lead melts?  I am using all Belzona epoxy paint on the hull, and I remember seeing a very high heat version… The paint was off the charts expensive so I shudder to think what the high heat version would run if it could handle it….RickRick,Acid etch and flux the hull like they do with steel before it is going to be dip-galvanized? (zinc ammonium chloride I think is one flux, or some other awful stuff)   To cause the lead to fuse to the steel?   Flame-spray the inside of the keels with zinc first ?   https://acblastingservices..com/zinc-hot-flame-spray/Hot Zinc Flame Spray – AC Blasting ServicesHot zinc flame spray bonds a zinc layer over metalwork offering corrosion protecting comparable with galvanising without the need for drain or vent holes. Metal spraying is the process of spraying molten non-ferrous metals on to the required object. On contact the molten spray solidifies onto the surface to form a dense, strong, adherent coating.acblastingservices.comI have no certain idea, but those would be where I would start researching.  Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 4:11 PMTo: origamiboats@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead  To my understanding the lead is not “fused” to the hull.   I’ve only seen 2 steel keels filled with lead and the were “loosely” fitted..   Any steel protection would be rendered inadequate after coming into contact with melted lead..  If an air gap exists you will have corrosion.   I will photograph ours when we pull the lead.  I’m eagerly waiting for ideas to prevent keel coating damage.   I think the combined brain power here would be enough to come up with something RickSent from my iPhoneOn Apr 7, 2019, at 9:47 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote: Wild wrote:>P.S. I second - SAFETY FIRST, be very careful. To split the mass of lead to >be melt at one time, you may consider some kind of insulation between layers.Yes, to Wild's suggestion of doing a layer of blocks at a time, and melting a little lead at a time.  I though about this..  I do not know how gravitationally level the bottom of your keels are.  If I were to do it, I might think about melting enough lead to fill to 80-90% up the current layer of blocks.  Enough to be sure to get under and between them, but do not attempt to make it level on the top.   Then place the next layer.   Repeat.   If you want a slope to the top surface of your lead, say deeper toward the bow, one can place thicker and thinner blocks and jack the boat a little between layers to get to the final angle.   I recommend against insulation between layers.   To my mind, I want to melt a little of the lower layer, to get a good bond, so my lead is a monolythic piece when it is done, even though I poured in layers.   The Acorn to Arabella pour:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1cpJBtWnQgWas done in one shot, but, it is an exposed keel bolted to the bottom of a wood boat, not lead inside a steel keel.  Still seeing what they do, and what works and does not, is good information.MattFrom: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 11:59 AMTo: origamiboats@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead  You can try to use weed-killer_type propane torch, I think that how it was done on SV M.O.M.Put one layers of lead blocks in the keel and try to melt it. Keep doing it layer by layer (blocks gaps filled with smaller lead) .Matt already has some numbers in place and will be able to tell you if it is possible to do it with BTU of propane torch (or what BTU needs to be for that).P.S. I second - SAFETY FIRST, be very careful. To split the mass of lead to be melt at one time, you may consider some kind of insulation between layers.| 35817|35788|2019-04-08 17:39:31|Rick Jackson|Re: Pouring lead|I've considered all these ideas presented and there are pro’s and con’s to all.  My 2 biggest concerns are1. Warping from excessive heat (a manageable problem with proper technique)2. Heat rendering corrosion protection ineffective. Difficult to manageAs a thought,,,, Since I want to use the keel void above the lead for fuel, what would the harm be to allow the fuel and lead to touch?  Originally I was going to isolate, but the fuel would act as a rust preventer. Lead was always a lubricant in gasoline, but not in diesel if I recall. Would the lead impart some of its “essence” into the fuel and if so, would that be good or bad?Rick On Apr 8, 2019, at 8:37 AM, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote:I let the melting pot drain fully each time, 20lb propane tanks made a reasonable pour volume.  I closed the gate valve after each pour when things were still hot and any last bits of lead were still molten.  Not sure I understand your piping description.  The gate valve is easy and works well (it's actually Brent's idea, not mine).  Given the slope of the hull and the height you need the melting pot at, you will need a fairly long length of pipe from the pot to the keel (3-4ft).  So, since you already need to heat that with a tiger torch, you might as well use a gate valve.  I started heating the pipe nearest the boat and worked my way back to the gate valve..  You do need a well-insulated fire resistant glove to open the gate valve.I took a bunch of photos.  I'm off to build right now, but I could take a look tonight if there's something particular folks would like to see.On 2019-04-08 8:14 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote: Detailed post Darren, with lots of warnings.A few photos would make it more clear, if you have any.   Did you drain the melter each time or stop the flow before it drained to keep the dross out, and make the next melt easier?I had considered the pour-pipe and how to heat it efficiently.   I came up with a T just below the gate, with the stem of the T coming off to the side to a 90, and up outside the melter to an open end above the level of the lead, like a plumbing vent in a house.   Then one need only heat the vent section to make sure it does not have a plug in it, then direct the tiger torch into the bottom of the pour-pipe, and it would heat the entire length of discharge pipe as the combustion gases come out the vent.   MattFrom: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats]Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 10:59 AMTo: origamiboats@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead  It's possible to give yourself long lasting health problems or even kill yourself (spilling hot lead on you ) doing this, so this is only to describe what I did and not to endorse or advise you doing the same.  I mean this sincerely, this is not a job to undertake lightly, I wouldn't want anyone to suffer long-lasting consequences as a result of a boat-building project and this is not a job to be undertaken casually.The lead needs to be in smaller workable pieces.  Mine were already 70lb ingots and I think that is a workable size.  I worked in a tarped area to capture all the lead swarf when I had to cut ingots to make even layers.  Stack a single layer of lead in the keel, leaving at least an inch on all sides to allow the lead to flow around the existing pieces.  Get two 20lb propane tanks, remove valves, wash and clean thoroughly (remember, these could explode when you cut them if you do not clean them sufficiently).  Cut the bottom of one with a plasma torch to make a lid.  Install an pipe elbow where the valve would have been, install a gate valve on some black pipe just outboard of the propane cylinder.  Build a very, very sturdy stand and mount the propane tank upside down with the valve on the bottom.  Cut second propane bottle into orange segments and use it to build a double wall around first propane bottle (this keeps the heat of the torch from below where it does the most good to melt the lead).  Insulate the sides with fiberglass insulation and wrap with some aluminum foil.  Get two tiger torches.  One torch goes under the propane bottles, one is used to preheat the black pipe and the valve just prior to the pour.  Make sure you get the black pipe and the valve good and hot or the lead will solidify in it and cause great headaches.  Burn the packing out of the valve before your first run.  It seals fine with solid lead until you melt it with the tiger torch at pour time.The lead very quickly flows around the solid lead in the keel.  I did one or two layers of ingots at a time, depending on how wide the keel was at that point.  Doing a single layer at a time helps reduce the chance of warping the keel.  I had to cut out the side of my existing keel to remove the faulty ballast, so I already had a hole in which to layer the lead, and then pour through.  If I was doing a new build I'd be tempted to cut holes in the side of the keel above the finished ballast level that were large enough to put the black pipe spigot through.  You'd still have to carry the lead you were stacking into the boat, but the lead for the melting pot wouldn't need to be carried up into the boat.  Also, having the melting pot outside the boat makes it easier to keep the local air quality reasonable.Cautions:-Do Not superheat the lead.  Heated just to melting the lead does not release a lot of lead vapor.  As you go above that you get increasing release of toxic vapors.-Work in a really well ventilated are AND have an external air source.  Brents low cost respirator and bilge hose option would work as long as you have the hose upwind and well away from the work site.-Be very careful of contaminants or water in the lead.  If you add solid lead with contaminants or water to molten lead in the pot they could cause the lead in your pot to spew or boil out.  Imagine being sprayed with molten lead.  -wear cotton underlayers and protective outer layers (leather welding clothes might be suitable), full face shield, hair covered etc.Again, I'm not advocating anyone do this, I'm just describing what I did.  I've probably forgotten some of the points that are necessary.  Anyone considering this would need to do some more research themselves to convince themselves that they could do it safely for themselves and those around them.On 2019-04-06 6:52 p.m., musicasrevolution@... [origamiboats] wrote: Greetings everyone.I’m almost to the stage of putting the lead in the keel. I figured I’d place ingots in place, and then pour around them. I have chunks of lead ranging from 70 pounds up to 250. Any tips on this process? Thoughts? If I melt the lead at a low temperature, will the impurities float to the top? Such as fiberglass, sand, other metals, etc. Are these things even of concern if they end up sealed in the keel?Thanks,Marlin | 35818|35788|2019-04-08 17:41:24|brentswain38|Re: Pouring lead|I have never had a problem with hot lead warping a keel, altho my keels are mostly 1/4 inch plate.I have seen severe warping  on aluminium keels. | 35819|35788|2019-04-08 17:41:32|brentswain38|Re: Pouring lead|Don't worry about dirt in the lead. Anything lighter than lead will float on top and is easily skimmed off.| 35820|35788|2019-04-09 00:19:46|Darren Bos|Re: Pouring lead| I don't think this is a good idea.  Water in diesel settles to the bottom of the tank.  Lead and mild steel are about 0.4V apart on the galvanic scale, which is enough to potentially cause trouble.  On 2019-04-08 9:43 a.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I've considered all these ideas presented and there are pro’s and con’s to all.  My 2 biggest concerns are 1. Warping from excessive heat (a manageable problem with proper technique) 2. Heat rendering corrosion protection ineffective. Difficult to manage As a thought,,,, Since I want to use the keel void above the lead for fuel, what would the harm be to allow the fuel and lead to touch?  Originally I was going to isolate, but the fuel would act as a rust preventer. Lead was always a lubricant in gasoline, but not in diesel if I recall. Would the lead impart some of its “essence” into the fuel and if so, would that be good or bad? Rick On Apr 8, 2019, at 8:37 AM, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote: I let the melting pot drain fully each time, 20lb propane tanks made a reasonable pour volume.  I closed the gate valve after each pour when things were still hot and any last bits of lead were still molten.  Not sure I understand your piping description.  The gate valve is easy and works well (it's actually Brent's idea, not mine).  Given the slope of the hull and the height you need the melting pot at, you will need a fairly long length of pipe from the pot to the keel (3-4ft).  So, since you already need to heat that with a tiger torch, you might as well use a gate valve.  I started heating the pipe nearest the boat and worked my way back to the gate valve..  You do need a well-insulated fire resistant glove to open the gate valve. I took a bunch of photos.  I'm off to build right now, but I could take a look tonight if there's something particular folks would like to see. On 2019-04-08 8:14 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Detailed post Darren, with lots of warnings. A few photos would make it more clear, if you have any.   Did you drain the melter each time or stop the flow before it drained to keep the dross out, and make the next melt easier? I had considered the pour-pipe and how to heat it efficiently.   I came up with a T just below the gate, with the stem of the T coming off to the side to a 90, and up outside the melter to an open end above the level of the lead, like a plumbing vent in a house.   Then one need only heat the vent section to make sure it does not have a plug in it, then direct the tiger torch into the bottom of the pour-pipe, and it would heat the entire length of discharge pipe as the combustion gases come out the vent.    Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 10:59 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead     It's possible to give yourself long lasting health problems or even kill yourself (spilling hot lead on you ) doing this, so this is only to describe what I did and not to endorse or advise you doing the same.  I mean this sincerely, this is not a job to undertake lightly, I wouldn't want anyone to suffer long-lasting consequences as a result of a boat-building project and this is not a job to be undertaken casually. The lead needs to be in smaller workable pieces.  Mine were already 70lb ingots and I think that is a workable size.  I worked in a tarped area to capture all the lead swarf when I had to cut ingots to make even layers.  Stack a single layer of lead in the keel, leaving at least an inch on all sides to allow the lead to flow around the existing pieces.  Get two 20lb propane tanks, remove valves, wash and clean thoroughly (remember, these could explode when you cut them if you do not clean them sufficiently).  Cut the bottom of one with a plasma torch to make a lid.  Install an pipe elbow where the valve would have been, install a gate valve on some black pipe just outboard of the propane cylinder.  Build a very, very sturdy stand and mount the propane tank upside down with the valve on the bottom.  Cut second propane bottle into orange segments and use it to build a double wall around first propane bottle (this keeps the heat of the torch from below where it does the most good to melt the lead).  Insulate the sides with fiberglass insulation and wrap with some aluminum foil.  Get two tiger torches.  One torch goes under the propane bottles, one is used to preheat the black pipe and the valve just prior to the pour.  Make sure you get the black pipe and the valve good and hot or the lead will solidify in it and cause great headaches.  Burn the packing out of the valve before your first run.  It seals fine with solid lead until you melt it with the tiger torch at pour time. The lead very quickly flows around the solid lead in the keel.  I did one or two layers of ingots at a time, depending on how wide the keel was at that point.  Doing a single layer at a time helps reduce the chance of warping the keel.  I had to cut out the side of my existing keel to remove the faulty ballast, so I already had a hole in which to layer the lead, and then pour through.  If I was doing a new build I'd be tempted to cut holes in the side of the keel above the finished ballast level that were large enough to put the black pipe spigot through.  You'd still have to carry the lead you were stacking into the boat, but the lead for the melting pot wouldn't need to be carried up into the boat.  Also, having the melting pot outside the boat makes it easier to keep the local air quality reasonable. Cautions: -Do Not superheat the lead.  Heated just to melting the lead does not release a lot of lead vapor.  As you go above that you get increasing release of toxic vapors. -Work in a really well ventilated are AND have an external air source.  Brents low cost respirator and bilge hose option would work as long as you have the hose upwind and well away from the work site. -Be very careful of contaminants or water in the lead.  If you add solid lead with contaminants or water to molten lead in the pot they could cause the lead in your pot to spew or boil out.  Imagine being sprayed with molten lead.   -wear cotton underlayers and protective outer layers (leather welding clothes might be suitable), full face shield, hair covered etc. Again, I'm not advocating anyone do this, I'm just describing what I did.  I've probably forgotten some of the points that are necessary.  Anyone considering this would need to do some more research themselves to convince themselves that they could do it safely for themselves and those around them. On 2019-04-06 6:52 p.m., musicasrevolution@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Greetings everyone. I’m almost to the stage of putting the lead in the keel. I figured I’d place ingots in place, and then pour around them. I have chunks of lead ranging from 70 pounds up to 250.  Any tips on this process? Thoughts?  If I melt the lead at a low temperature, will the impurities float to the top? Such as fiberglass, sand, other metals, etc. Are these things even of concern if they end up sealed in the keel? Thanks, Marlin  | 35821|35788|2019-04-09 06:12:28|jpronk1|Re: Pouring lead|Darren, I found your post very informative. Matt, I have no idea what your talking about, could you post some photos? Thank you, James Sent from my iPhone| 35822|35788|2019-04-09 06:52:28|Matt Malone|Re: Pouring lead| It is an especially bad idea because of bacteria mediated corrosion in water/diesel/steel - it forms pits. Iron is the more active metal so if there is any corrosion, lead could only accelerate it.   Tetra-ethyl-lead was a cast iron valve seat life extender and octane boosting anti knock agent for some gas engines.  Do not confuse it with lead metal.  I would seal the lead in any case. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 00:19 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I don't think this is a good idea.  Water in diesel settles to the bottom of the tank.  Lead and mild steel are about 0.4V apart on the galvanic scale, which is enough to potentially cause trouble.  On 2019-04-08 9:43 a.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I've considered all these ideas presented and there are pro’s and con’s to all.  My 2 biggest concerns are 1. Warping from excessive heat (a manageable problem with proper technique) 2. Heat rendering corrosion protection ineffective. Difficult to manage As a thought,,,, Since I want to use the keel void above the lead for fuel, what would the harm be to allow the fuel and lead to touch?  Originally I was going to isolate, but the fuel would act as a rust preventer. Lead was always a lubricant in gasoline, but not in diesel if I recall. Would the lead impart some of its “essence” into the fuel and if so, would that be good or bad? Rick On Apr 8, 2019, at 8:37 AM, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] < origamiboats@yahoogroups.com> wrote: I let the melting pot drain fully each time, 20lb propane tanks made a reasonable pour volume.  I closed the gate valve after each pour when things were still hot and any last bits of lead were still molten.  Not sure I understand your piping description.  The gate valve is easy and works well (it's actually Brent's idea, not mine).  Given the slope of the hull and the height you need the melting pot at, you will need a fairly long length of pipe from the pot to the keel (3-4ft).  So, since you already need to heat that with a tiger torch, you might as well use a gate valve.  I started heating the pipe nearest the boat and worked my way back to the gate valve..  You do need a well-insulated fire resistant glove to open the gate valve. I took a bunch of photos.  I'm off to build right now, but I could take a look tonight if there's something particular folks would like to see. On 2019-04-08 8:14 a.m., Matt Malone  m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Detailed post Darren, with lots of warnings. A few photos would make it more clear, if you have any.   Did you drain the melter each time or stop the flow before it drained to keep the dross out, and make the next melt easier? I had considered the pour-pipe and how to heat it efficiently.   I came up with a T just below the gate, with the stem of the T coming off to the side to a 90, and up outside the melter to an open end above the level of the lead, like a plumbing vent in a house.   Then one need only heat the vent section to make sure it does not have a plug in it, then direct the tiger torch into the bottom of the pour-pipe, and it would heat the entire length of discharge pipe as the combustion gases come out the vent.    Matt From:  origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   on behalf of Darren Bos  bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 10:59 AM To:  origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead     It's possible to give yourself long lasting health problems or even kill yourself (spilling hot lead on you ) doing this, so this is only to describe what I did and not to endorse or advise you doing the same.  I mean this sincerely, this is not a job to undertake lightly, I wouldn't want anyone to suffer long-lasting consequences as a result of a boat-building project and this is not a job to be undertaken casually. The lead needs to be in smaller workable pieces.  Mine were already 70lb ingots and I think that is a workable size.  I worked in a tarped area to capture all the lead swarf when I had to cut ingots to make even layers.  Stack a single layer of lead in the keel, leaving at least an inch on all sides to allow the lead to flow around the existing pieces.  Get two 20lb propane tanks, remove valves, wash and clean thoroughly (remember, these could explode when you cut them if you do not clean them sufficiently).  Cut the bottom of one with a plasma torch to make a lid.  Install an pipe elbow where the valve would have been, install a gate valve on some black pipe just outboard of the propane cylinder.  Build a very, very sturdy stand and mount the propane tank upside down with the valve on the bottom.  Cut second propane bottle into orange segments and use it to build a double wall around first propane bottle (this keeps the heat of the torch from below where it does the most good to melt the lead).  Insulate the sides with fiberglass insulation and wrap with some aluminum foil.  Get two tiger torches.  One torch goes under the propane bottles, one is used to preheat the black pipe and the valve just prior to the pour.  Make sure you get the black pipe and the valve good and hot or the lead will solidify in it and cause great headaches.  Burn the packing out of the valve before your first run.  It seals fine with solid lead until you melt it with the tiger torch at pour time. The lead very quickly flows around the solid lead in the keel.  I did one or two layers of ingots at a time, depending on how wide the keel was at that point.  Doing a single layer at a time helps reduce the chance of warping the keel.  I had to cut out the side of my existing keel to remove the faulty ballast, so I already had a hole in which to layer the lead, and then pour through.  If I was doing a new build I'd be tempted to cut holes in the side of the keel above the finished ballast level that were large enough to put the black pipe spigot through.  You'd still have to carry the lead you were stacking into the boat, but the lead for the melting pot wouldn't need to be carried up into the boat.  Also, having the melting pot outside the boat makes it easier to keep the local air quality reasonable. Cautions: -Do Not superheat the lead.  Heated just to melting the lead does not release a lot of lead vapor.  As you go above that you get increasing release of toxic vapors. -Work in a really well ventilated are AND have an external air source.  Brents low cost respirator and bilge hose option would work as long as you have the hose upwind and well away from the work site. -Be very careful of contaminants or water in the lead.  If you add solid lead with contaminants or water to molten lead in the pot they could cause the lead in your pot to spew or boil out.  Imagine being sprayed with molten lead.   -wear cotton underlayers and protective outer layers (leather welding clothes might be suitable), full face shield, hair covered etc. Again, I'm not advocating anyone do this, I'm just describing what I did.  I've probably forgotten some of the points that are necessary.  Anyone considering this would need to do some more research themselves to convince themselves that they could do it safely for themselves and those around them. On 2019-04-06 6:52 p.m.,  musicasrevolution@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Greetings everyone. I’m almost to the stage of putting the lead in the keel. I figured I’d place ingots in place, and then pour around them. I have chunks of lead ranging from 70 pounds up to 250.  Any tips on this process? Thoughts?  If I melt the lead at a low temperature, will the impurities float to the top? Such as fiberglass, sand, other metals, etc. Are these things even of concern if they end up sealed in the keel? Thanks, Marlin  | 35823|35788|2019-04-09 07:18:24|smallboatvoyaguer|Re: Pouring lead|You’d still need to secure the lead, and welding a cap over it’s entirety seems like the best option, which puts you back at where you started anyway. Might as well just keep them separated.| 35824|35788|2019-04-09 17:26:32|brentswain38|Re: Pouring lead|Water in the lead still  needs a steady supply of oxygen, for oxidation of steel to happen. Welding a steel cap over it lets you seal all oxygen out.| 35825|35788|2019-04-09 21:54:11|H|Re: Pouring lead|I melted down all the narly looking lead scraps i got from the scrapyard into ingots, anything not lead floats to the top with a vengeance. Anything that looked clean which ended up being mostly smallbits i measured and divided into two then put the ingots in as tightly as possible into the keel, put the small bits over top and melted it all down with a tiger torch. It worked beautifully on the first keel but on the second the bottle froze up until benkownst to me and the lower temperature caused me to heat it for too long and distorted the keel plate. I had to weld a bolt to the outside and draw it out with a puller. So quick intense heat works best, before it can spread everywhere else, much like soldering.  | 35826|35788|2019-04-10 18:18:55|Rick Jackson|Re: Pouring lead|That is interesting… If I seal it up with oil or some viscous fluid, with some way to check,, mmm dipstick maybe, then I can feel assured that the steel (where exposed from super heated lead) will have slowed or stopped corrosion.. Just a thought… Rick On Apr 9, 2019, at 1:59 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:Water in the lead still  needs a steady supply of oxygen, for oxidation of steel to happen. Welding a steel cap over it lets you seal all oxygen out.| 35827|35788|2019-04-10 18:22:32|brentswain38|Re: Pouring lead|A  propane tank will freeze, if it empties too quickly. Let it warm up a bit from time to time , between keels,  and put it under a black  tarp in the hot sun. Switching to another tank also helps. | 35828|35788|2019-04-10 18:23:14|brentswain38|Re: Pouring lead|Yes ,definitely .| 35829|22|2019-04-10 23:22:01|origamiboats@yahoogroups.com|New file uploaded to origamiboats|Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the origamiboats group. File : /Keel Coolers.xps Uploaded by : opuspaul Description : Keel Coolers from the book Marine Conversions by Nigel Warren You can access this file at the URL: https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/origamiboats/files/Keel%20Coolers.xps To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit: https://help.yahoo.com/kb/index?page=content&y=PROD_GRPS&locale=en_US&id=SLN15398 Regards, opuspaul | 35830|22|2019-04-10 23:23:16|origamiboats@yahoogroups.com|New file uploaded to origamiboats|Hello, This email message is a notification to let you know that a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the origamiboats group. File : /Keel Coolers.pdf Uploaded by : opuspaul Description : Keel Coolers from the book Marine Conversions by Nigel Warren You can access this file at the URL: https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/origamiboats/files/Keel%20Coolers.pdf To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit: https://help.yahoo.com/kb/index?page=content&y=PROD_GRPS&locale=en_US&id=SLN15398 Regards, opuspaul | 35831|35699|2019-04-10 23:26:14|opuspaul|Re: Copper keel coolers|It has taken me awhile but I just uploaded the Keel Cooler pages from Nigel Warren's book Marine Conversions to the file section.  Cheers.| 35832|35788|2019-04-10 23:27:20|opuspaul|Re: Pouring lead|I just put the propane bottle in a water bath or run a garden hose over it to stop it icing up.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :A  propane tank will freeze, if it empties too quickly. Let it warm up a bit from time to time , between keels,  and put it under a black  tarp in the hot sun. Switching to another tank also helps. | 35833|35788|2019-04-10 23:55:32|Darren Bos|Re: Pouring lead| You need oxygen for the steel to rust, but even without oxygen the galvanic reactions will still take place if water is present.  Before repair, the water in the anoxic keel of our boat was enough to allow the steel punchings to essentially drill their way through the aluminum plate.  Because steel is less noble than lead, it will be the one to lose material.  With lead and steel in the same space, the welds are the most likely to see severe corrosion if water is present.  Flooding the space with oil is one solution.  A header tank above water level can ensure that there is always a positive pressure of oil in the space.  If the oil level drops in the header tank, you know you have a problem. On 2019-04-09 6:33 p.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   That is interesting… If I seal it up with oil or some viscous fluid, with some way to check,, mmm dipstick maybe, then I can feel assured that the steel (where exposed from super heated lead) will have slowed or stopped corrosion.. Just a thought…  Rick On Apr 9, 2019, at 1:59 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote: Water in the lead still  needs a steady supply of oxygen, for oxidation of steel to happen. Welding a steel cap over it lets you seal all oxygen out. | 35834|35788|2019-04-10 23:59:24|opuspaul|Re: Pouring lead|My two cents....If I remember correctly there was about a 1mm gap between the lead and the steel after the lead cooled.  Just for the hell of it, I poured in some resin to fill the gap and then welded on a steel cap.   I never had any problems with warpage but was worried about it with my larger single keel so I placed about a ton of triangular ingots on end  into the bottom of the keel and then poured the lead around it.  There was about a 2 inch gap between the ingots and the lead easily flowed around them.   I don't know if it is really necessary but I previously painted the inside of the keel with a zinc weldable primer.   The first time I melted the lead, I made triangular ingots by melting the lead in a split barrel over a fire and ladling the lead into a mold made from an old BBQ lid.  This saved me a lot of money in propane.   The ingots I made were about 30 kg each.  The fire was great for melting the lead.  A blower on it really burned up the wood quickly and pumped the heat out.  Most of my lead came from tire weights.   There was a lot of clips, garbage and dirt that came off and floated to the top.   If you don't get rid of it, you are taking up a lot of volume and getting a poor job. On my second and final pour day, I melted the lead outside in a tub on a stand using two tiger torches.   I think I went through about 8 or 9 bottles of propane that day.    I used a 1 inch pipe and gate valve through the side of the keel to the inside and welded up the hole later.    You will need a torch to melt the solid lead in the pipe but once it gets flowing it will go out very quick.   I think this method is much safer and easier than running lead up and down a ladder or melting inside a closed space inside.  I like the idea of using an old 9 kg or 20 lb propane tank.  It is about the right size.    Make sure the stand is very sturdy.  I was quite happy with how things worked out.  I would probably do it the same way again.   Cheers, Paul| 35835|35788|2019-04-11 00:03:48|opuspaul|Re: Pouring lead|I agree.  The lead should be capped and completely sealed off.  ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : You need oxygen for the steel to rust, but even without oxygen the galvanic reactions will still take place if water is present.  Before repair, the water in the anoxic keel of our boat was enough to allow the steel punchings to essentially drill their way through the aluminum plate.  Because steel is less noble than lead, it will be the one to lose material.  With lead and steel in the same space, the welds are the most likely to see severe corrosion if water is present.  Flooding the space with oil is one solution.  A header tank above water level can ensure that there is always a positive pressure of oil in the space.  If the oil level drops in the header tank, you know you have a problem. | 35836|35788|2019-04-11 10:18:29|Matt Malone|Re: Pouring lead| #ygrps-yiv-1584448840 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} I like the idea of totally sealed with a steel plug for inspection.  I like resin backfill to provide no void space.  I like the weldable zinc primer before the lead pour. I like the idea of setting up the melter outside and filling the keels through a hole.   I like the idea of a wood fire for its economy, but, one should be careful, any fire could overheat the lead, and one generally has less positive control over the heat of a wood fire.   I would favour a continuous process, where one is adding lead to the melter frequently, and tapping frequently.   Tapping off some lead before all that has most recently been added has completely melted greatly reduces the chance of overheating the lead.   Also, not draining all of the lead out of the melter until the very last tapping keeps the dross to a minimum in the keels.  Less dross, less porosity, less funny chemistry.   I also like the oil head tank for its ability to alert you to problems.  One drawback is, with air over the oil in the head tank, one is creating a small passage by which oxygen can diffuse down into the keel that might be better than diffusing through large areas of thick metal.    I considered a closed fluid system and pressure gauge (less than 3 psi = 6 feet underwater) to do the same thing.  Problem is, a dent from running aground could blow the gauge completely off.   I considered a seal head tank pre-charged with nitrogen or argon, with a pressure gauge -- either level or pressure will tell me there is a problem. Alternately, I considered a material that chemically scavenges oxygen from the keel at the same time as being prone to protect metal.  One possibility I considered was linseed oil.  By pouring that in a sealed keel, one turns the keel into a giant paint can.  When the linseed oil goes curdy, one knows the oxygen protection is decreasing.   Pinholes, like undetected weld porosity, can potentially seal themselves by the linseed oil forming a solid plug in the pinhole from air infiltrating the hole.  Linseed oil might work better if one has a bolt-down inspection plate to fish out curds, like clear lexan.  One could put little coloured plastic balls, like BB to pea sized, maybe airsoft pellets, something, that floats on the linseed oil.  They would move around from the heeling of the boat when the oil is more liquid.   Fluorescent or phosphorescent would be cool to make them easier to see.  When they hold position, one knows the oil is getting curdy and the oxygen protection is decreasing.  What do people think of that ? I appreciate that lead is a awful job, and a job with time pressure, so at some point in the operation it becomes a git-it-done type job.  I do not think I have ever melted more than 10lbs at a time, but recalling those projects was enough to encourage me to plan.  I have a 200 pound dagger board to pour for my little day-sailer.   In my mind I am already digging the hole down into the ground to put the steel dagger board shell into so my melter can be at a comfortable working height.  I am imagining a 4-step-up stage if I were doing a pour into an origami.   I am seeing all my lead set up on a stack of skids so it is easier to get it into the melter.   I am seeing a stack of firewood prepared under a tarp to one side of the platform also up on a stack of skids.     A little fore-thought, learning from others can lead to fewer compromises when the lead hits the keel.     There are lots of options I think to make the keel the longest-lived and least-maintenance part of the boat.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 12:03 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead     I agree.  The lead should be capped and completely sealed off.  ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : You need oxygen for the steel to rust, but even without oxygen the galvanic reactions will still take place if water is present.  Before repair, the water in the anoxic keel of our boat was enough to allow the steel punchings to essentially drill their way through the aluminum plate.  Because steel is less noble than lead, it will be the one to lose material.  With lead and steel in the same space, the welds are the most likely to see severe corrosion if water is present.  Flooding the space with oil is one solution.  A header tank above water level can ensure that there is always a positive pressure of oil in the space.  If the oil level drops in the header tank, you know you have a problem. | 35837|35788|2019-04-11 12:21:13|Darren Bos|Re: Pouring lead| Making ingots out of bulk lead makes a ton of sense, both for ease of handling and to get rid of the contaminants.  I'm sure the stacked lead did a lot to prevent warpage.  I have a small "bump" on one keel section where I had less stacked lead and did two large pours back to back. The insulated, double-walled, melting pot I made out of two twenty pound propane tanks, was pretty efficient in propane use.  Stacking a layer of lead and then pouring lead to fill the spaces used less than three 20lb tanks of propane to do 8000lb of lead. On 2019-04-10 8:59 p.m., opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:   My two cents.... If I remember correctly there was about a 1mm gap between the lead and the steel after the lead cooled.  Just for the hell of it, I poured in some resin to fill the gap and then welded on a steel cap.   I never had any problems with warpage but was worried about it with my larger single keel so I placed about a ton of triangular ingots on end  into the bottom of the keel and then poured the lead around it.  There was about a 2 inch gap between the ingots and the lead easily flowed around them.   I don't know if it is really necessary but I previously painted the inside of the keel with a zinc weldable primer.   The first time I melted the lead, I made triangular ingots by melting the lead in a split barrel over a fire and ladling the lead into a mold made from an old BBQ lid.  This saved me a lot of money in propane.   The ingots I made were about 30 kg each.  The fire was great for melting the lead.  A blower on it really burned up the wood quickly and pumped the heat out.  Most of my lead came from tire weights.   There was a lot of clips, garbage and dirt that came off and floated to the top.   If you don't get rid of it, you are taking up a lot of volume and getting a poor job. On my second and final pour day, I melted the lead outside in a tub on a stand using two tiger torches.   I think I went through about 8 or 9 bottles of propane that day.    I used a 1 inch pipe and gate valve through the side of the keel to the inside and welded up the hole later.    You will need a torch to melt the solid lead in the pipe but once it gets flowing it will go out very quick.   I think this method is much safer and easier than running lead up and down a ladder or melting inside a closed space inside.  I like the idea of using an old 9 kg or 20 lb propane tank.  It is about the right size.    Make sure the stand is very sturdy.  I was quite happy with how things worked out.  I would probably do it the same way again.   Cheers, Paul | 35838|35788|2019-04-11 12:47:35|Darren Bos|Re: Pouring lead| I experimented with pressurizing the keel ballast compartment and even tried it for a while while the boat was on the hard.  The problem is that the surface are is large, so the pressure must be kept low to avoid distorting the keel.  3 psi is just barely over water pressure if the bottom of the keel is 6' below water.  Ideally, you'd like at least a couple psi above that to make sure the keel always has positive pressure relative to the surrounding water (keep in mind flowing water is going to increase the pressure).  However, if you pressurize the keel to what you think is a safe level in the water and then haul the boat without depressurizing the keel, there is the potential for trouble.  Also, the keel ends up working like a barometer.  I could watch the pressure gauge change as the weather changed.  Finding a gauge that read accurately at low pressure also took a bit of searching. I worked with a welder who built aluminum dinghies that looked like zodiacs but with aluminum tubes.  He purged the insides of them with argon before pressurizing.  Worked well for preventing corrosion and detecting leaks. I also like the oil head tank for its ability to alert you to problems.  One drawback is, with air over the oil in the head tank, one is creating a small passage by which oxygen can diffuse down into the keel that might be better than diffusing through large areas of thick metal.    I considered a closed fluid system and pressure gauge (less than 3 psi = 6 feet underwater) to do the same thing.  Problem is, a dent from running aground could blow the gauge completely off.   I considered a seal head tank pre-charged with nitrogen or argon, with a pressure gauge -- either level or pressure will tell me there is a problem. | 35839|35788|2019-04-11 18:17:38|Rick Jackson|Re: Pouring lead|I think I can incorporate all these ideas.  I currently have 8000 pounds of lead to pull and then replace. There is definitely an air gap around all of the lead which is solid and clean. It appears it was poured in from above. Our keel has 18 inches above each lead pour in each of the keel sections where sea water had entered from keel damage. I think I will go with a weldable primer, pour in lead and a “small” tank space for oil above as the remaining area is integral to the new fuel tanks…The weather here just keeps kicking our but so our progress is very slow currently.  GrrrrRick On Apr 10, 2019, at 8:27 PM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:I just put the propane bottle in a water bath or run a garden hose over it to stop it icing up.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :A  propane tank will freeze, if it empties too quickly. Let it warm up a bit from time to time , between keels,  and put it under a black  tarp in the hot sun. Switching to another tank also helps. | 35840|35699|2019-04-11 18:17:50|Rick Jackson|Re: Copper keel coolers|Disregard,,, I wasn’t signed in …  On Apr 10, 2019, at 9:49 PM, Rick Jackson wrote:Could be me, but not Abe to open. The first said invalid.. Second is nothing…. Please advice if Im doing something wrong… Looking forward to reading it.RickOn Apr 10, 2019, at 8:26 PM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:It has taken me awhile but I just uploaded the Keel Cooler pages from Nigel Warren's book Marine Conversions to the file section.  Cheers.| 35841|35788|2019-04-11 18:18:19|Rick Jackson|Re: Pouring lead|I like the way your brain works Matt… Planning and prep will allow most “reasonable” methods to be successful.  I absolutely feel like Im always reinventing the wheel, but I never have been a “if it aint broke don’t fix it” kinda guy…I was a volunteer firefighter and paid wild land firefighter for over 30 years, and I learned to ignore that mentality. Mainly because everything we did had lives in the balance. I see the boat as the same. A steel boat sitting in salt water for 35 years is hiding all sorts of issues that may never show a warning sign before a catastrophic failure.  A small pin hole in the keel void over time allows salt water to become trapped and then a major problem is brewing. This is the case with our boat.  When a fellow sailor tells me not to worry, I make a mental note to be wary of any future advice.  Shifting gears,  there is certainly a wealth of documented stories of break downs and problems with boats. Hence the adage “break out another thousand” which I personally believe those cases are mostly due to improper use, installations or maintenance.  I was explaining my philosophy to a friend the other day.. When your young and have more time and energy than money, you make due often with used, and good enough. Those choices may cause you to replace or repair in a shorter period of time than new and proper.  In my mid 50s I have less time and energy than a much younger person.  I can afford to find long lasting solutions and when our boat is complete, I do not want to baby sit a sketchy part that could cause extensive down time or funds to repair or replace in some foreign country.  I also think that building (and documenting) for 30 year or more life span, will allow us to see some of our investment returned to us in 10 to 20 years when we decide to move back to shore.  Back to the keel. Ours lasted 35 years even with a few groundings and water intrusion, but it will not last much longer. So we are fixing it. It is a perfect time to find and implement some improvements. I am preparing for when and not if I ground her myself….Rick On Apr 11, 2019, at 7:18 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:I like the idea of totally sealed with a steel plug for inspection.  I like resin backfill to provide no void space.  I like the weldable zinc primer before the lead pour.I like the idea of setting up the melter outside and filling the keels through a hole.   I like the idea of a wood fire for its economy, but, one should be careful, any fire could overheat the lead, and one generally has less positive control over the heat of a wood fire.   I would favour a continuous process, where one is adding lead to the melter frequently, and tapping frequently.   Tapping off some lead before all that has most recently been added has completely melted greatly reduces the chance of overheating the lead.   Also, not draining all of the lead out of the melter until the very last tapping keeps the dross to a minimum in the keels.  Less dross, less porosity, less funny chemistry.   I also like the oil head tank for its ability to alert you to problems.  One drawback is, with air over the oil in the head tank, one is creating a small passage by which oxygen can diffuse down into the keel that might be better than diffusing through large areas of thick metal.    I considered a closed fluid system and pressure gauge (less than 3 psi = 6 feet underwater) to do the same thing.  Problem is, a dent from running aground could blow the gauge completely off.   I considered a seal head tank pre-charged with nitrogen or argon, with a pressure gauge -- either level or pressure will tell me there is a problem.Alternately, I considered a material that chemically scavenges oxygen from the keel at the same time as being prone to protect metal.  One possibility I considered was linseed oil.  By pouring that in a sealed keel, one turns the keel into a giant paint can.  When the linseed oil goes curdy, one knows the oxygen protection is decreasing.   Pinholes, like undetected weld porosity, can potentially seal themselves by the linseed oil forming a solid plug in the pinhole from air infiltrating the hole.  Linseed oil might work better if one has a bolt-down inspection plate to fish out curds, like clear lexan.  One could put little coloured plastic balls, like BB to pea sized, maybe airsoft pellets, something, that floats on the linseed oil.  They would move around from the heeling of the boat when the oil is more liquid.   Fluorescent or phosphorescent would be cool to make them easier to see.  When they hold position, one knows the oil is getting curdy and the oxygen protection is decreasing.  What do people think of that ?I appreciate that lead is a awful job, and a job with time pressure, so at some point in the operation it becomes a git-it-done type job.  I do not think I have ever melted more than 10lbs at a time, but recalling those projects was enough to encourage me to plan.  I have a 200 pound dagger board to pour for my little day-sailer.   In my mind I am already digging the hole down into the ground to put the steel dagger board shell into so my melter can be at a comfortable working height.  I am imagining a 4-step-up stage if I were doing a pour into an origami.   I am seeing all my lead set up on a stack of skids so it is easier to get it into the melter.   I am seeing a stack of firewood prepared under a tarp to one side of the platform also up on a stack of skids.     A little fore-thought, learning from others can lead to fewer compromises when the lead hits the keel.     There are lots of options I think to make the keel the longest-lived and least-maintenance part of the boat.   MattFrom: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 12:03 AMTo: origamiboats@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [origamiboats] Pouring lead  I agree.  The lead should be capped and completely sealed off.  ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :You need oxygen for the steel to rust, but even without oxygen the galvanic reactions will still take place if water is present.  Before repair, the water in the anoxic keel of our boat was enough to allow the steel punchings to essentially drill their way through the aluminum plate.  Because steel is less noble than lead, it will be the one to lose material.  With lead and steel in the same space, the welds are the most likely to see severe corrosion if water is present.  Flooding the space with oil is one solution.  A header tank above water level can ensure that there is always a positive pressure of oil in the space.  If the oil level drops in the header tank, you know you have a problem.| 35842|35788|2019-04-11 18:19:00|Rick Jackson|Re: Pouring lead|With the smelting pot insulated, did you put the heat directly on the lead? Ive done a crude version of that with a Oxytocin’s/Acet torch with wheel weights, and had some blow back. Scared me…Rick On Apr 11, 2019, at 9:21 AM, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote:Making ingots out of bulk lead makes a ton of sense, both for ease of handling and to get rid of the contaminants.  I'm sure the stacked lead did a lot to prevent warpage.  I have a small "bump" on one keel section where I had less stacked lead and did two large pours back to back.The insulated, double-walled, melting pot I made out of two twenty pound propane tanks, was pretty efficient in propane use.  Stacking a layer of lead and then pouring lead to fill the spaces used less than three 20lb tanks of propane to do 8000lb of lead.On 2019-04-10 8:59 p.m., opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote: My two cents....If I remember correctly there was about a 1mm gap between the lead and the steel after the lead cooled.  Just for the hell of it, I poured in some resin to fill the gap and then welded on a steel cap.   I never had any problems with warpage but was worried about it with my larger single keel so I placed about a ton of triangular ingots on end  into the bottom of the keel and then poured the lead around it.  There was about a 2 inch gap between the ingots and the lead easily flowed around them.   I don't know if it is really necessary but I previously painted the inside of the keel with a zinc weldable primer.   The first time I melted the lead, I made triangular ingots by melting the lead in a split barrel over a fire and ladling the lead into a mold made from an old BBQ lid.  This saved me a lot of money in propane.   The ingots I made were about 30 kg each.  The fire was great for melting the lead.  A blower on it really burned up the wood quickly and pumped the heat out.  Most of my lead came from tire weights.   There was a lot of clips, garbage and dirt that came off and floated to the top.   If you don't get rid of it, you are taking up a lot of volume and getting a poor job. On my second and final pour day, I melted the lead outside in a tub on a stand using two tiger torches.   I think I went through about 8 or 9 bottles of propane that day.    I used a 1 inch pipe and gate valve through the side of the keel to the inside and welded up the hole later.    You will need a torch to melt the solid lead in the pipe but once it gets flowing it will go out very quick.   I think this method is much safer and easier than running lead up and down a ladder or melting inside a closed space inside.  I like the idea of using an old 9 kg or 20 lb propane tank.  It is about the right size.    Make sure the stand is very sturdy.  I was quite happy with how things worked out.  I would probably do it the same way again.   Cheers, Paul| 35843|35788|2019-04-11 18:26:14|brentswain38|Re: Pouring lead|One could cut a  hole in a steel hull, to pas the ingots inside, then weld the hole shut again, saving a lot of lifting. On the 31,  I leave the little triangular pieces behind the engine off, until blasted , for  just that reason.| 35844|35788|2019-04-11 20:45:04|opuspaul|Re: Pouring lead|Just to be clear, when I poured my lead over the ingots, the triangular ingots were propped up vertically with a big space between them.  The gap was about and inch or two and the lead was free to flow around them so there was no chance of any freezing of flow and air gaps.  The only gap I had was the slight gap left between the lead and the steel after it cooled.| 35845|35788|2019-04-11 21:37:13|opuspaul|Re: Pouring lead|It took a bit of planning but I actually enjoyed doing the lead pour.   Sandblasting, on the other hand,  particularly in the interior,  is opening the gates of hell. >>>I appreciate that lead is a awful job, and a job with time pressure, so at some point in the operation it becomes a git-it-done type job.  I do not think I have ever melted more than 10lbs at a time, but recalling those projects was enough to encourage me to plan.| 35846|35788|2019-04-12 00:33:54|Darren Bos|Re: Pouring lead| I'll send you some pics tomorrow Rick that will make it clear.  The melting pot is only double-walled and insulated on the sides.  Torch is applied to bottom of tank that holds the lead, the second tank just creates an air gap which keeps all the heat from the torch right next to the main tank.  Insulation is just around the second tank, it makes things heat up even faster and also make it more comfortable to work around as it isn't radiating heat at you. On 2019-04-11 10:15 a.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   With the smelting pot insulated, did you put the heat directly on the lead? Ive done a crude version of that with a Oxytocin’s/Acet torch with wheel weights, and had some blow back. Scared me… Rick On Apr 11, 2019, at 9:21 AM, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote: Making ingots out of bulk lead makes a ton of sense, both for ease of handling and to get rid of the contaminants.  I'm sure the stacked lead did a lot to prevent warpage.  I have a small "bump" on one keel section where I had less stacked lead and did two large pours back to back. The insulated, double-walled, melting pot I made out of two twenty pound propane tanks, was pretty efficient in propane use.  Stacking a layer of lead and then pouring lead to fill the spaces used less than three 20lb tanks of propane to do 8000lb of lead. On 2019-04-10 8:59 p.m., opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:   My two cents.... If I remember correctly there was about a 1mm gap between the lead and the steel after the lead cooled.  Just for the hell of it, I poured in some resin to fill the gap and then welded on a steel cap.    I never had any problems with warpage but was worried about it with my larger single keel so I placed about a ton of triangular ingots on end  into the bottom of the keel and then poured the lead around it.  There was about a 2 inch gap between the ingots and the lead easily flowed around them.   I don't know if it is really necessary but I previously painted the inside of the keel with a zinc weldable primer.    The first time I melted the lead, I made triangular ingots by melting the lead in a split barrel over a fire and ladling the lead into a mold made from an old BBQ lid..  This saved me a lot of money in propane.   The ingots I made were about 30 kg each.  The fire was great for melting the lead.  A blower on it really burned up the wood quickly and pumped the heat out.  Most of my lead came from tire weights.   There was a lot of clips, garbage and dirt that came off and floated to the top.   If you don't get rid of it, you are taking up a lot of volume and getting a poor job.  On my second and final pour day, I melted the lead outside in a tub on a stand using two tiger torches.   I think I went through about 8 or 9 bottles of propane that day.    I used a 1 inch pipe and gate valve through the side of the keel to the inside and welded up the hole later.    You will need a torch to melt the solid lead in the pipe but once it gets flowing it will go out very quick.   I think this method is much safer and easier than running lead up and down a ladder or melting inside a closed space inside.  I like the idea of using an old 9 kg or 20 lb propane tank.  It is about the right size.    Make sure the stand is very sturdy.   I was quite happy with how things worked out.  I would probably do it the same way again.   Cheers, Paul | 35847|35699|2019-04-12 16:31:10|Rick Jackson|Re: Copper keel coolers|Could be me, but not Abe to open. The first said invalid.. Second is nothing…. Please advice if Im doing something wrong… Looking forward to reading it.Rick On Apr 10, 2019, at 8:26 PM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:It has taken me awhile but I just uploaded the Keel Cooler pages from Nigel Warren's book Marine Conversions to the file section.  Cheers.| 35848|35788|2019-04-12 16:31:31|Rick Jackson|Re: Pouring lead|Interesting idea DarrenArgon would do it.. But again,, any leaks will be an issue… I was thinking with oil, or at min inspection window or?? You could see if you had water intrusion..   I have seen many articles touting the value of steel when you ground but you certainly need to check those keel voids after. Mine were sealed up. When we pulled the boat the, she dribbled for 24 hours out of a small weld at the bottom of the keel shoe at its leading edge.   On Apr 11, 2019, at 9:47 AM, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote:I experimented with pressurizing the keel ballast compartment and even tried it for a while while the boat was on the hard.  The problem is that the surface are is large, so the pressure must be kept low to avoid distorting the keel.  3 psi is just barely over water pressure if the bottom of the keel is 6' below water.  Ideally, you'd like at least a couple psi above that to make sure the keel always has positive pressure relative to the surrounding water (keep in mind flowing water is going to increase the pressure).  However, if you pressurize the keel to what you think is a safe level in the water and then haul the boat without depressurizing the keel, there is the potential for trouble.  Also, the keel ends up working like a barometer.  I could watch the pressure gauge change as the weather changed.  Finding a gauge that read accurately at low pressure also took a bit of searching.I worked with a welder who built aluminum dinghies that looked like zodiacs but with aluminum tubes.  He purged the insides of them with argon before pressurizing.  Worked well for preventing corrosion and detecting leaks.I also like the oil head tank for its ability to alert you to problems.  One drawback is, with air over the oil in the head tank, one is creating a small passage by which oxygen can diffuse down into the keel that might be better than diffusing through large areas of thick metal.    I considered a closed fluid system and pressure gauge (less than 3 psi = 6 feet underwater) to do the same thing.  Problem is, a dent from running aground could blow the gauge completely off..   I considered a seal head tank pre-charged with nitrogen or argon, with a pressure gauge -- either level or pressure will tell me there is a problem.| 35849|35788|2019-04-12 16:31:48|Rick Jackson|Re: Pouring lead|Got it… Some where I have a  home made crab cooker that runs off propane.  It will suck down a 5 gal tank fairly quick… I wonder if I could use that with an insulated pot for smelting… I re watched the SV Seeker pour. It looked a bit sketchy. They made it look easy but it was lucky no one got hurt.  The technique looked good though.. Heat then pour with no moving of the pot... I like the recommendation of a valve to allow it to run rather than pour though…Rick On Apr 11, 2019, at 9:33 PM, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote:I'll send you some pics tomorrow Rick that will make it clear.  The melting pot is only double-walled and insulated on the sides.  Torch is applied to bottom of tank that holds the lead, the second tank just creates an air gap which keeps all the heat from the torch right next to the main tank.  Insulation is just around the second tank, it makes things heat up even faster and also make it more comfortable to work around as it isn't radiating heat at you.On 2019-04-11 10:15 a.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote: With the smelting pot insulated, did you put the heat directly on the lead? Ive done a crude version of that with a Oxytocin’s/Acet torch with wheel weights, and had some blow back. Scared me…RickOn Apr 11, 2019, at 9:21 AM, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote:Making ingots out of bulk lead makes a ton of sense, both for ease of handling and to get rid of the contaminants.  I'm sure the stacked lead did a lot to prevent warpage.  I have a small "bump" on one keel section where I had less stacked lead and did two large pours back to back.The insulated, double-walled, melting pot I made out of two twenty pound propane tanks, was pretty efficient in propane use.  Stacking a layer of lead and then pouring lead to fill the spaces used less than three 20lb tanks of propane to do 8000lb of lead.On 2019-04-10 8:59 p.m., opusnz@yahoo..ca [origamiboats] wrote: My two cents....If I remember correctly there was about a 1mm gap between the lead and the steel after the lead cooled.  Just for the hell of it, I poured in some resin to fill the gap and then welded on a steel cap.   I never had any problems with warpage but was worried about it with my larger single keel so I placed about a ton of triangular ingots on end  into the bottom of the keel and then poured the lead around it.  There was about a 2 inch gap between the ingots and the lead easily flowed around them.   I don't know if it is really necessary but I previously painted the inside of the keel with a zinc weldable primer.   The first time I melted the lead, I made triangular ingots by melting the lead in a split barrel over a fire and ladling the lead into a mold made from an old BBQ lid..  This saved me a lot of money in propane.   The ingots I made were about 30 kg each.  The fire was great for melting the lead.  A blower on it really burned up the wood quickly and pumped the heat out.  Most of my lead came from tire weights.   There was a lot of clips, garbage and dirt that came off and floated to the top.   If you don't get rid of it, you are taking up a lot of volume and getting a poor job. On my second and final pour day, I melted the lead outside in a tub on a stand using two tiger torches.   I think I went through about 8 or 9 bottles of propane that day.    I used a 1 inch pipe and gate valve through the side of the keel to the inside and welded up the hole later.    You will need a torch to melt the solid lead in the pipe but once it gets flowing it will go out very quick.   I think this method is much safer and easier than running lead up and down a ladder or melting inside a closed space inside.  I like the idea of using an old 9 kg or 20 lb propane tank.  It is about the right size.    Make sure the stand is very sturdy.  I was quite happy with how things worked out.  I would probably do it the same way again.   Cheers, Paul| 35850|35850|2019-04-15 23:31:55|Thomas D Popp|CL ad for Swain boat in Mexico| Brent Swain 31 "Nomadic" from Eagle River, AK for sale (Seattle CL) in Guaymas Mexico https://seattle.craigslist.org/see/boa/d/seward-steel-sail-boat-brent-swain-31/6865121138.html just passing along... | 35851|35788|2019-04-16 06:39:47|smallboatvoyaguer|Re: Pouring lead|Could you send me some pics? I started this thread and am trying to see what people have been doing for the keel pouring. -thx Marlin| 35852|35852|2019-04-16 11:08:52|smallboatvoyaguer|Bilge placement and size|Trying to decide where to put the bilge. My feeling is at the afte end of the keel, but I’m seeing how the low point on my floor will actually be forward of that. Thoughts?| 35853|35852|2019-04-16 12:12:18|Matt Malone|Re: Bilge placement and size| #ygrps-yiv-1607597649 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} I am not sure how much separation exists in the BS designs between the oil bilge (the separate area under the engine where oil might drip) and the water bilge.   The concern is environmental regulations, inspections, etc, that will make this a constant headache if it is not down well.   My water bilge is right beside my engine, and by design there is a limber hole allowing oil drippings to drip into the water bilge.  Further, there is no path for water from the aft of the boat to reach the water bilge without flowing through the oil bilge.    It is an old design, one that I have to modify to separate the oil and water bilges.   It may be the only semi-structural work I do on my boat.   If I do not do it, I will be constantly hassled on every inspection. As you are placing your water bilge now, I would recommend making it easy to keep them separate, if it does not already exist in the BS design.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of musicasrevolution@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 9:24 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Bilge placement and size     Trying to decide where to put the bilge. My feeling is at the afte end of the keel, but I’m seeing how the low point on my floor will actually be forward of that. Thoughts? | 35854|35854|2019-04-16 17:54:49|svsalmoneyes@gmail.com|LiFePo4|Just ordered our batteries. Went with 16 of the LiFePo4 3.2v/271amp cells with BMS and shipping for $.27 a watt. We spent months researching all options and this option was an 11th hour finding. After looking deeper, we found that all the LiFePo4 drop ins are built with 3.2v cells. Now I need to decide on the rest. The company is recommending we wire the whole thing in series for 48 volts at 271amps. The prices for panels, turbines and inverter seem roughly comparable in 48v so looking for reasons NOT to go 48v. Your thoughts? Rick| 35855|35852|2019-04-16 18:08:24|brentswain38|Re: Bilge placement and size|Yes the aft end of the keel is best.Slope your tank top down to that point.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Trying to decide where to put the bilge. My feeling is at the afte end of the keel, but I’m seeing how the low point on my floor will actually be forward of that. Thoughts?| 35856|35854|2019-04-16 21:23:01|Matt Malone|Re: LiFePo4| #ygrps-yiv-1706085839 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Rick, I would choose "24V", hands down. "48V", in reality 52-56V is a potentially lethal voltage.  Mixed with salt and sweat, even 24V or 12V could be a problem, but 48V will be a problem first.   Mounted on the wall of a shed or cottage that is stationary, with 3 feet of clear standing space in front of said shed or cottage wall, where one would have space to jump back or intentionally fall to break a connection, no problem I would go 48V.   Pitching around like a boat in an anchorage, in a little locker, no way.  I personally have a 120VDC system in a land based system -- I am very careful with it.  It would be suicide to have that system on any of my boats.   I would never have 48V in a machinery space under the cockpit, when at the best of times it is boat yoga to get in there.  DC voltages can cause your muscles to freeze in position perhaps freezing the one yoga muscle needed to get unstuck from the accidental connection.     48V is more expensive for inverters.   24V inverters are cheap and reasonably efficient. The overwhelming majority of commercial vehicles in North America have been 24V for decades.  There is a rich aftermarket to tap into for 24V things, and scrap yards full of experienced 24V things.  Some vehicles even have 24V heaters to preheat air and water for large engines -- the possibilities.  Things as simple as light bulbs, fan motors etc, windshield wiper motors, will be easy.   For electric propulsion, 48V may be a voltage some DC propulsion motors you can find might be more suited to run on -- so for a few choices of motor, 48V might be convenient.   Alternatively, a boost voltage converter (from 24V to whatever voltage the motor runs at) combined in one unit with a variable speed controller to make a serendipitously-found motor of some other voltage work would probably be a cheaper total system.  If that step-up controller were mounted right by the motor, so that the potentially high voltage cables are less than a foot long and very localized, it could be a safer system than running 48V through the entire boat.  You are going to want a controller for any high hp propulsion motor anyway. Two banks of 24V can be charged through a 4-terminal battery isolator -- in, out, out, alternator sense wire -- and a "24V" commercial vehicle alternator.   Battery disconnects or bank transfer switches at 24V are cheap. Switches over "24V" are expensive.   The max voltage in a "24V" system is close to 30V, the threshold for practical parting arc stability.  Voltages over about 30-36V can sustain a stable parting arc -- that means one sees sizzling inside the switch that does not stop and a huge hole melts in the side of the switch and it starts shooting out a tuft of flame like a 6011 welding rod.  30-36V is the voltage range that most 100-200 Amp arc welders put out.  I fried one drill at 120VDC -- the drill did not stop when I released the trigger, the case lit up from the inside, the magic smoke escaped, and I pulled the plug as fast as I could.  That is the risk in a 48V system if one does not have proper gear.   Parting arcs are much less stable on 24V systems, even though the theoretical minimum for welding is around 14V.  Yes, 12V will make a hot bright arc, but a very unstable arc -- there is a short flash and the parts either stick together or part reasonably quickly.  The fact that parting arcs at 48V are perhaps stable makes DC current switches very much more expensive above "24V" --   In fact, a 120VDC / 15Amp wall switch that would be a drop-in-replacement for a 120VAC 15Amp wall switch ($3) is practically unattainable -- I have looked.  If anyone can find a 120VDC / 15Amp wall-type switch, let me know.  Where would one have to go to find 48VDC-compatible switches?  Higher DC voltages are seen in industrial machinery control cabinets.    Such cabinets use industrial contactors to switch DC voltages.   DC voltages over "24V" are going to be far more expensive for switches, if you can find any.   Fuses are not as much trouble as switches.  There are DC fuses that go up to higher voltages, maybe at only 4 times the price of commercial vehicle 24V fuses and breakers.  Higher voltage DC fuses are found in industrial machinery control cabinets.  I purchased an industrial control cabinet rail, fuse modules: https://kudammcorp.com/images/principles/bussmann/modular_fuse_holders.png and power distribution modules: https://www.c3controls.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/TB-intro-845x477.jpg to use as terminal blocks.   These are the modules one sees screwed in ranks into the back of a motion control cabinet for a CNC machine or a robot.   For higher voltage DC nothing is cheap.    I have also worked in telephony central office equipment that runs 48V.   Very expensive.   Try finding anything like that in a small-market developing world port.   24V -- if they have shipping containers and cargo trucks to move them, then there will probably be some generic commercial truck repair parts to be found locally. Splitting 48V of batteries into two 24V banks provides redundancy.   Having two banks isolates problems.  At any given time, one can be used as a spare.  For my 23' cruiser, I have a very simple 2-bank system accomplished with a total of $14 in parts.   I have a simple box with two double-throw, double-pole switches to control bank charging and bank usage. One switch sends charge to either the A or B bank.  The other switch connects either the A or B bank to the boat power distribution.   At 24V, these are easily sourced inexpensive switches ($4?), that are easy to replace if needed.  I have a third on-off-on double pole double throw switch (30A, $6) that I use to run my DC bow thruster.   At 48V, try $100 or more for a DC contactor that is industrial-grade to replace just that one switch.   https://www.arc-components.com/sw182b-7-albright-double-acting-motor-reversing-solenoid-contactor-48v-intermittent-5243.html SW182B-7 | Albright 48V Motor Reversing Solenoid - Intermittent - Arc Components Ltd Albright's SW182B-7 150A double acting strapped pair solenoid, 48V intermittent. Paired 48 volt dc single pole, double throw contactors for hydraulic motor reversing. www.arc-components.com Lastly, the cheapest solar panels are all in the 30-36V maximum power point range -- and these panels are best suited to charge 24V batteries with less-expensive MPPT charge controllers.   For me, unless one can find a compelling reason to go 48V, and more than just the slightly better average efficiency of 48VDC to 120VAC inverters, I would never consider 48V on a private cruising sailboat.    Matt From: svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 19:13 Subject: [origamiboats] LiFePo4 To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Just ordered our batteries. Went with 16 of the LiFePo4 3.2v/271amp cells with BMS and shipping for $.27 a watt. We spent months researching all options and this option was an 11th hour finding. After looking deeper, we found that all the LiFePo4 drop ins are built with 3.2v cells. Now I need to decide on the rest. The company is recommending we wire the whole thing in series for 48 volts at 271amps. The prices for panels, turbines and inverter seem roughly comparable in 48v so looking for reasons NOT to go 48v. Your thoughts? Rick | 35857|35852|2019-04-16 22:57:08|brentswain38|Re: Bilge placement and size|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :The oil sump is  well aft of the bilge. I make the front transverse engine web, water and oil proof, and a second sump pump for the engine sump lets you pump it  separately from the bilge water.#ygrps-yiv-1200725304 #ygrps-yiv-1200725304ygrps-yiv-1736850435 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} I am not sure how much separation exists in the BS designs between the oil bilge (the separate area under the engine where oil might drip) and the water bilge.   The concern is environmental regulations, inspections, etc, that will make this a constant headache if it is not down well.   My water bilge is right beside my engine, and by design there is a limber hole allowing oil drippings to drip into the water bilge.  Further, there is no path for water from the aft of the boat to reach the water bilge without flowing through the oil bilge.    It is an old design, one that I have to modify to separate the oil and water bilges.   It may be the only semi-structural work I do on my boat.   If I do not do it, I will be constantly hassled on every inspection. As you are placing your water bilge now, I would recommend making it easy to keep them separate, if it does not already exist in the BS design.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of musicasrevolution@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 9:24 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Bilge placement and size  Trying to decide where to put the bilge. My feeling is at the afte end of the keel, but I’m seeing how the low point on my floor will actually be forward of that. Thoughts?| 35858|35854|2019-04-18 16:37:49|Rick Jackson|Re: LiFePo4|That’s a lot of reasons for not going 48 volt.   Battery manufacturer has recommended it.  You made many good points.  Here is another question.   I spoke with AIMS about their 6000 watt inverter.  They asked about my generator which is 7500 watts and they claim I can not go over 4000 watt inverter with a 7500 watt gen set.   Why would that matter with 13000 watts of battery ?Sent from my iPhone On Apr 16, 2019, at 6:22 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Rick, I would choose "24V", hands down. "48V", in reality 52-56V is a potentially lethal voltage.  Mixed with salt and sweat, even 24V or 12V could be a problem, but 48V will be a problem first.   Mounted on the wall of a shed or cottage that is stationary, with 3 feet of clear standing space in front of said shed or cottage wall, where one would have space to jump back or intentionally fall to break a connection, no problem I would go 48V.   Pitching around like a boat in an anchorage, in a little locker, no way.  I personally have a 120VDC system in a land based system -- I am very careful with it.  It would be suicide to have that system on any of my boats.   I would never have 48V in a machinery space under the cockpit, when at the best of times it is boat yoga to get in there.  DC voltages can cause your muscles to freeze in position perhaps freezing the one yoga muscle needed to get unstuck from the accidental connection.     48V is more expensive for inverters.   24V inverters are cheap and reasonably efficient. The overwhelming majority of commercial vehicles in North America have been 24V for decades.  There is a rich aftermarket to tap into for 24V things, and scrap yards full of experienced 24V things.  Some vehicles even have 24V heaters to preheat air and water for large engines -- the possibilities.  Things as simple as light bulbs, fan motors etc, windshield wiper motors, will be easy.   For electric propulsion, 48V may be a voltage some DC propulsion motors you can find might be more suited to run on -- so for a few choices of motor, 48V might be convenient.   Alternatively, a boost voltage converter (from 24V to whatever voltage the motor runs at) combined in one unit with a variable speed controller to make a serendipitously-found motor of some other voltage work would probably be a cheaper total system.  If that step-up controller were mounted right by the motor, so that the potentially high voltage cables are less than a foot long and very localized, it could be a safer system than running 48V through the entire boat.  You are going to want a controller for any high hp propulsion motor anyway. Two banks of 24V can be charged through a 4-terminal battery isolator -- in, out, out, alternator sense wire -- and a "24V" commercial vehicle alternator.   Battery disconnects or bank transfer switches at 24V are cheap. Switches over "24V" are expensive.   The max voltage in a "24V" system is close to 30V, the threshold for practical parting arc stability.  Voltages over about 30-36V can sustain a stable parting arc -- that means one sees sizzling inside the switch that does not stop and a huge hole melts in the side of the switch and it starts shooting out a tuft of flame like a 6011 welding rod.  30-36V is the voltage range that most 100-200 Amp arc welders put out.  I fried one drill at 120VDC -- the drill did not stop when I released the trigger, the case lit up from the inside, the magic smoke escaped, and I pulled the plug as fast as I could.  That is the risk in a 48V system if one does not have proper gear.   Parting arcs are much less stable on 24V systems, even though the theoretical minimum for welding is around 14V.  Yes, 12V will make a hot bright arc, but a very unstable arc -- there is a short flash and the parts either stick together or part reasonably quickly.  The fact that parting arcs at 48V are perhaps stable makes DC current switches very much more expensive above "24V" --   In fact, a 120VDC / 15Amp wall switch that would be a drop-in-replacement for a 120VAC 15Amp wall switch ($3) is practically unattainable -- I have looked.  If anyone can find a 120VDC / 15Amp wall-type switch, let me know.  Where would one have to go to find 48VDC-compatible switches?  Higher DC voltages are seen in industrial machinery control cabinets.    Such cabinets use industrial contactors to switch DC voltages.   DC voltages over "24V" are going to be far more expensive for switches, if you can find any.   Fuses are not as much trouble as switches.  There are DC fuses that go up to higher voltages, maybe at only 4 times the price of commercial vehicle 24V fuses and breakers.  Higher voltage DC fuses are found in industrial machinery control cabinets.  I purchased an industrial control cabinet rail, fuse modules: https://kudammcorp.com/images/principles/bussmann/modular_fuse_holders.png and power distribution modules: https://www.c3controls.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/TB-intro-845x477..jpg to use as terminal blocks.   These are the modules one sees screwed in ranks into the back of a motion control cabinet for a CNC machine or a robot.   For higher voltage DC nothing is cheap.    I have also worked in telephony central office equipment that runs 48V.   Very expensive.   Try finding anything like that in a small-market developing world port.   24V -- if they have shipping containers and cargo trucks to move them, then there will probably be some generic commercial truck repair parts to be found locally. Splitting 48V of batteries into two 24V banks provides redundancy.   Having two banks isolates problems.  At any given time, one can be used as a spare.  For my 23' cruiser, I have a very simple 2-bank system accomplished with a total of $14 in parts.   I have a simple box with two double-throw, double-pole switches to control bank charging and bank usage. One switch sends charge to either the A or B bank.  The other switch connects either the A or B bank to the boat power distribution.   At 24V, these are easily sourced inexpensive switches ($4?), that are easy to replace if needed.  I have a third on-off-on double pole double throw switch (30A, $6) that I use to run my DC bow thruster.   At 48V, try $100 or more for a DC contactor that is industrial-grade to replace just that one switch.   https://www.arc-components.com/sw182b-7-albright-double-acting-motor-reversing-solenoid-contactor-48v-intermittent-5243.html SW182B-7 | Albright 48V Motor Reversing Solenoid - Intermittent - Arc Components Ltd Albright's SW182B-7 150A double acting strapped pair solenoid, 48V intermittent. Paired 48 volt dc single pole, double throw contactors for hydraulic motor reversing. www.arc-components.com Lastly, the cheapest solar panels are all in the 30-36V maximum power point range -- and these panels are best suited to charge 24V batteries with less-expensive MPPT charge controllers.   For me, unless one can find a compelling reason to go 48V, and more than just the slightly better average efficiency of 48VDC to 120VAC inverters, I would never consider 48V on a private cruising sailboat.    Matt From: svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 19:13 Subject: [origamiboats] LiFePo4 To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Just ordered our batteries. Went with 16 of the LiFePo4 3.2v/271amp cells with BMS and shipping for $.27 a watt. We spent months researching all options and this option was an 11th hour finding. After looking deeper, we found that all the LiFePo4 drop ins are built with 3.2v cells. Now I need to decide on the rest. The company is recommending we wire the whole thing in series for 48 volts at 271amps. The prices for panels, turbines and inverter seem roughly comparable in 48v so looking for reasons NOT to go 48v. Your thoughts? Rick | 35859|35854|2019-04-18 17:03:29|Matt Malone|Re: LiFePo4| #ygrps-yiv-1514646193 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} I cannot be sure what they are thinking, but a guess is a 4,000W inverter is 4,000W continuous, surge maybe to 5,000W whereas a 7,500W gen set may be 8,500W surge, but at 4,000W it lasts many times longer.   Perhaps they are hoping you get further way before the gen set wears out.  Remember, fuel engines, their max hp is not their continuous hp, they last a lot longer at 50% hp.  They may also be thinking, in the discharged state, your batteries might draw 4,000W, and your inverter 4,000W , overloading your gen set.   Rick, your boat is going to be floating power station. Pay close attention to your heavy cables leading between these major electrical appliances.   Pay close attention to how you route them and how you 100% prevent and exclude any chance of chaffing.   http://www.improvedracing.com/hose-clamps/adel-high-temp-cushioned-mounting-clamps-for-an-hose-and-tubing-p-322.html P-clips are the way to go, dozens of them per run of cable, where the cable is held in clear air, not against a surface.  Where two or more cables run parallel or cross near each other, use a P-clip around each and then one bolt... it is like handcuffs holding the two cables a fixed distance apart.   Do not allow the cables to touch anything but P-clips and the end terminals.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 10:41 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     That’s a lot of reasons for not going 48 volt.   Battery manufacturer has recommended it.  You made many good points.   Here is another question.   I spoke with AIMS about their 6000 watt inverter.  They asked about my generator which is 7500 watts and they claim I can not go over 4000 watt inverter with a 7500 watt gen set.   Why would that matter with 13000 watts of battery ? Sent from my iPhone On Apr 16, 2019, at 6:22 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Rick, I would choose "24V", hands down. "48V", in reality 52-56V is a potentially lethal voltage.  Mixed with salt and sweat, even 24V or 12V could be a problem, but 48V will be a problem first.   Mounted on the wall of a shed or cottage that is stationary, with 3 feet of clear standing space in front of said shed or cottage wall, where one would have space to jump back or intentionally fall to break a connection, no problem I would go 48V.   Pitching around like a boat in an anchorage, in a little locker, no way.  I personally have a 120VDC system in a land based system -- I am very careful with it.  It would be suicide to have that system on any of my boats.   I would never have 48V in a machinery space under the cockpit, when at the best of times it is boat yoga to get in there.  DC voltages can cause your muscles to freeze in position perhaps freezing the one yoga muscle needed to get unstuck from the accidental connection.     48V is more expensive for inverters.   24V inverters are cheap and reasonably efficient. The overwhelming majority of commercial vehicles in North America have been 24V for decades.  There is a rich aftermarket to tap into for 24V things, and scrap yards full of experienced 24V things.  Some vehicles even have 24V heaters to preheat air and water for large engines -- the possibilities.  Things as simple as light bulbs, fan motors etc, windshield wiper motors, will be easy.   For electric propulsion, 48V may be a voltage some DC propulsion motors you can find might be more suited to run on -- so for a few choices of motor, 48V might be convenient.   Alternatively, a boost voltage converter (from 24V to whatever voltage the motor runs at) combined in one unit with a variable speed controller to make a serendipitously-found motor of some other voltage work would probably be a cheaper total system.  If that step-up controller were mounted right by the motor, so that the potentially high voltage cables are less than a foot long and very localized, it could be a safer system than running 48V through the entire boat.  You are going to want a controller for any high hp propulsion motor anyway. Two banks of 24V can be charged through a 4-terminal battery isolator -- in, out, out, alternator sense wire -- and a "24V" commercial vehicle alternator.   Battery disconnects or bank transfer switches at 24V are cheap. Switches over "24V" are expensive.   The max voltage in a "24V" system is close to 30V, the threshold for practical parting arc stability.  Voltages over about 30-36V can sustain a stable parting arc -- that means one sees sizzling inside the switch that does not stop and a huge hole melts in the side of the switch and it starts shooting out a tuft of flame like a 6011 welding rod.  30-36V is the voltage range that most 100-200 Amp arc welders put out.  I fried one drill at 120VDC -- the drill did not stop when I released the trigger, the case lit up from the inside, the magic smoke escaped, and I pulled the plug as fast as I could.  That is the risk in a 48V system if one does not have proper gear.   Parting arcs are much less stable on 24V systems, even though the theoretical minimum for welding is around 14V.  Yes, 12V will make a hot bright arc, but a very unstable arc -- there is a short flash and the parts either stick together or part reasonably quickly.  The fact that parting arcs at 48V are perhaps stable makes DC current switches very much more expensive above "24V" --   In fact, a 120VDC / 15Amp wall switch that would be a drop-in-replacement for a 120VAC 15Amp wall switch ($3) is practically unattainable -- I have looked.  If anyone can find a 120VDC / 15Amp wall-type switch, let me know.  Where would one have to go to find 48VDC-compatible switches?  Higher DC voltages are seen in industrial machinery control cabinets.    Such cabinets use industrial contactors to switch DC voltages.   DC voltages over "24V" are going to be far more expensive for switches, if you can find any.   Fuses are not as much trouble as switches.  There are DC fuses that go up to higher voltages, maybe at only 4 times the price of commercial vehicle 24V fuses and breakers.  Higher voltage DC fuses are found in industrial machinery control cabinets.  I purchased an industrial control cabinet rail, fuse modules: https://kudammcorp.com/images/principles/bussmann/modular_fuse_holders.png and power distribution modules: https://www.c3controls.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/TB-intro-845x477..jpg to use as terminal blocks.   These are the modules one sees screwed in ranks into the back of a motion control cabinet for a CNC machine or a robot.   For higher voltage DC nothing is cheap.    I have also worked in telephony central office equipment that runs 48V.   Very expensive.   Try finding anything like that in a small-market developing world port.   24V -- if they have shipping containers and cargo trucks to move them, then there will probably be some generic commercial truck repair parts to be found locally. Splitting 48V of batteries into two 24V banks provides redundancy.   Having two banks isolates problems.  At any given time, one can be used as a spare.  For my 23' cruiser, I have a very simple 2-bank system accomplished with a total of $14 in parts.   I have a simple box with two double-throw, double-pole switches to control bank charging and bank usage. One switch sends charge to either the A or B bank.  The other switch connects either the A or B bank to the boat power distribution.   At 24V, these are easily sourced inexpensive switches ($4?), that are easy to replace if needed.  I have a third on-off-on double pole double throw switch (30A, $6) that I use to run my DC bow thruster.   At 48V, try $100 or more for a DC contactor that is industrial-grade to replace just that one switch.   https://www.arc-components.com/sw182b-7-albright-double-acting-motor-reversing-solenoid-contactor-48v-intermittent-5243.html SW182B-7 | Albright 48V Motor Reversing Solenoid - Intermittent - Arc Components Ltd Albright's SW182B-7 150A double acting strapped pair solenoid, 48V intermittent. Paired 48 volt dc single pole, double throw contactors for hydraulic motor reversing. www.arc-components.com Lastly, the cheapest solar panels are all in the 30-36V maximum power point range -- and these panels are best suited to charge 24V batteries with less-expensive MPPT charge controllers.   For me, unless one can find a compelling reason to go 48V, and more than just the slightly better average efficiency of 48VDC to 120VAC inverters, I would never consider 48V on a private cruising sailboat.    Matt From: svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 19:13 Subject: [origamiboats] LiFePo4 To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Just ordered our batteries. Went with 16 of the LiFePo4 3.2v/271amp cells with BMS and shipping for $.27 a watt. We spent months researching all options and this option was an 11th hour finding. After looking deeper, we found that all the LiFePo4 drop ins are built with 3.2v cells. Now I need to decide on the rest. The company is recommending we wire the whole thing in series for 48 volts at 271amps. The prices for panels, turbines and inverter seem roughly comparable in 48v so looking for reasons NOT to go 48v. Your thoughts? Rick | 35860|35854|2019-04-18 17:22:45|Brian Stannard|Re: LiFePo4|The inverter relates to the battery bank, not the generator. What you were told doesn't make sense.I also wouldn't go with 48 volts. Not 24 volts either unless a larger boat. On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 1:37 PM Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   That’s a lot of reasons for not going 48 volt.   Battery manufacturer has recommended it.  You made many good points.  Here is another question.   I spoke with AIMS about their 6000 watt inverter.  They asked about my generator which is 7500 watts and they claim I can not go over 4000 watt inverter with a 7500 watt gen set.   Why would that matter with 13000 watts of battery ?Sent from my iPhoneOn Apr 16, 2019, at 6:22 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Rick, I would choose "24V", hands down. "48V", in reality 52-56V is a potentially lethal voltage.  Mixed with salt and sweat, even 24V or 12V could be a problem, but 48V will be a problem first.   Mounted on the wall of a shed or cottage that is stationary, with 3 feet of clear standing space in front of said shed or cottage wall, where one would have space to jump back or intentionally fall to break a connection, no problem I would go 48V.   Pitching around like a boat in an anchorage, in a little locker, no way.  I personally have a 120VDC system in a land based system -- I am very careful with it.  It would be suicide to have that system on any of my boats.   I would never have 48V in a machinery space under the cockpit, when at the best of times it is boat yoga to get in there.  DC voltages can cause your muscles to freeze in position perhaps freezing the one yoga muscle needed to get unstuck from the accidental connection.     48V is more expensive for inverters.   24V inverters are cheap and reasonably efficient. The overwhelming majority of commercial vehicles in North America have been 24V for decades.  There is a rich aftermarket to tap into for 24V things, and scrap yards full of experienced 24V things.  Some vehicles even have 24V heaters to preheat air and water for large engines -- the possibilities.  Things as simple as light bulbs, fan motors etc, windshield wiper motors, will be easy.   For electric propulsion, 48V may be a voltage some DC propulsion motors you can find might be more suited to run on -- so for a few choices of motor, 48V might be convenient.   Alternatively, a boost voltage converter (from 24V to whatever voltage the motor runs at) combined in one unit with a variable speed controller to make a serendipitously-found motor of some other voltage work would probably be a cheaper total system.  If that step-up controller were mounted right by the motor, so that the potentially high voltage cables are less than a foot long and very localized, it could be a safer system than running 48V through the entire boat.  You are going to want a controller for any high hp propulsion motor anyway. Two banks of 24V can be charged through a 4-terminal battery isolator -- in, out, out, alternator sense wire -- and a "24V" commercial vehicle alternator.   Battery disconnects or bank transfer switches at 24V are cheap. Switches over "24V" are expensive.   The max voltage in a "24V" system is close to 30V, the threshold for practical parting arc stability.  Voltages over about 30-36V can sustain a stable parting arc -- that means one sees sizzling inside the switch that does not stop and a huge hole melts in the side of the switch and it starts shooting out a tuft of flame like a 6011 welding rod.  30-36V is the voltage range that most 100-200 Amp arc welders put out.  I fried one drill at 120VDC -- the drill did not stop when I released the trigger, the case lit up from the inside, the magic smoke escaped, and I pulled the plug as fast as I could.  That is the risk in a 48V system if one does not have proper gear.   Parting arcs are much less stable on 24V systems, even though the theoretical minimum for welding is around 14V.  Yes, 12V will make a hot bright arc, but a very unstable arc -- there is a short flash and the parts either stick together or part reasonably quickly.  The fact that parting arcs at 48V are perhaps stable makes DC current switches very much more expensive above "24V" --   In fact, a 120VDC / 15Amp wall switch that would be a drop-in-replacement for a 120VAC 15Amp wall switch ($3) is practically unattainable -- I have looked.  If anyone can find a 120VDC / 15Amp wall-type switch, let me know.  Where would one have to go to find 48VDC-compatible switches?  Higher DC voltages are seen in industrial machinery control cabinets.    Such cabinets use industrial contactors to switch DC voltages.   DC voltages over "24V" are going to be far more expensive for switches, if you can find any.   Fuses are not as much trouble as switches.  There are DC fuses that go up to higher voltages, maybe at only 4 times the price of commercial vehicle 24V fuses and breakers.  Higher voltage DC fuses are found in industrial machinery control cabinets.  I purchased an industrial control cabinet rail, fuse modules: https://kudammcorp.com/images/principles/bussmann/modular_fuse_holders.png and power distribution modules: https://www.c3controls.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/TB-intro-845x477..jpg to use as terminal blocks.   These are the modules one sees screwed in ranks into the back of a motion control cabinet for a CNC machine or a robot.   For higher voltage DC nothing is cheap.    I have also worked in telephony central office equipment that runs 48V.   Very expensive.   Try finding anything like that in a small-market developing world port.   24V -- if they have shipping containers and cargo trucks to move them, then there will probably be some generic commercial truck repair parts to be found locally. Splitting 48V of batteries into two 24V banks provides redundancy.   Having two banks isolates problems.  At any given time, one can be used as a spare.  For my 23' cruiser, I have a very simple 2-bank system accomplished with a total of $14 in parts.   I have a simple box with two double-throw, double-pole switches to control bank charging and bank usage. One switch sends charge to either the A or B bank.  The other switch connects either the A or B bank to the boat power distribution.   At 24V, these are easily sourced inexpensive switches ($4?), that are easy to replace if needed.  I have a third on-off-on double pole double throw switch (30A, $6) that I use to run my DC bow thruster.   At 48V, try $100 or more for a DC contactor that is industrial-grade to replace just that one switch.   https://www.arc-components.com/sw182b-7-albright-double-acting-motor-reversing-solenoid-contactor-48v-intermittent-5243.html SW182B-7 | Albright 48V Motor Reversing Solenoid - Intermittent - Arc Components Ltd Albright's SW182B-7 150A double acting strapped pair solenoid, 48V intermittent. Paired 48 volt dc single pole, double throw contactors for hydraulic motor reversing. www.arc-components.com Lastly, the cheapest solar panels are all in the 30-36V maximum power point range -- and these panels are best suited to charge 24V batteries with less-expensive MPPT charge controllers.   For me, unless one can find a compelling reason to go 48V, and more than just the slightly better average efficiency of 48VDC to 120VAC inverters, I would never consider 48V on a private cruising sailboat.    Matt From: svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 19:13 Subject: [origamiboats] LiFePo4 To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Just ordered our batteries. Went with 16 of the LiFePo4 3.2v/271amp cells with BMS and shipping for $.27 a watt. We spent months researching all options and this option was an 11th hour finding. After looking deeper, we found that all the LiFePo4 drop ins are built with 3.2v cells. Now I need to decide on the rest. The company is recommending we wire the whole thing in series for 48 volts at 271amps. The prices for panels, turbines and inverter seem roughly comparable in 48v so looking for reasons NOT to go 48v. Your thoughts? Rick -- CheersBrian | 35861|35854|2019-04-18 19:29:29|Matt Malone|Re: LiFePo4| #ygrps-yiv-1499771394 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} I took the generator to be one that outputs DC -- that is the only way it makes any sense.  But you are right, if the generator puts out AC then it would be the battery charger that is the load, along with unnamed AC loads.  The size of the inverter would be unconnected to the size of the generator.  Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Brian Stannard brianstannard@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2019 5:22 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     The inverter relates to the battery bank, not the generator. What you were told doesn't make sense. I also wouldn't go with 48 volts. Not 24 volts either unless a larger boat. On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 1:37 PM Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   That’s a lot of reasons for not going 48 volt.   Battery manufacturer has recommended it.  You made many good points.   Here is another question.   I spoke with AIMS about their 6000 watt inverter.  They asked about my generator which is 7500 watts and they claim I can not go over 4000 watt inverter with a 7500 watt gen set.   Why would that matter with 13000 watts of battery ? Sent from my iPhone On Apr 16, 2019, at 6:22 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Rick, I would choose "24V", hands down. "48V", in reality 52-56V is a potentially lethal voltage.  Mixed with salt and sweat, even 24V or 12V could be a problem, but 48V will be a problem first.   Mounted on the wall of a shed or cottage that is stationary, with 3 feet of clear standing space in front of said shed or cottage wall, where one would have space to jump back or intentionally fall to break a connection, no problem I would go 48V.   Pitching around like a boat in an anchorage, in a little locker, no way.  I personally have a 120VDC system in a land based system -- I am very careful with it.  It would be suicide to have that system on any of my boats.   I would never have 48V in a machinery space under the cockpit, when at the best of times it is boat yoga to get in there.  DC voltages can cause your muscles to freeze in position perhaps freezing the one yoga muscle needed to get unstuck from the accidental connection.     48V is more expensive for inverters.   24V inverters are cheap and reasonably efficient. The overwhelming majority of commercial vehicles in North America have been 24V for decades.  There is a rich aftermarket to tap into for 24V things, and scrap yards full of experienced 24V things.  Some vehicles even have 24V heaters to preheat air and water for large engines -- the possibilities.  Things as simple as light bulbs, fan motors etc, windshield wiper motors, will be easy.   For electric propulsion, 48V may be a voltage some DC propulsion motors you can find might be more suited to run on -- so for a few choices of motor, 48V might be convenient.   Alternatively, a boost voltage converter (from 24V to whatever voltage the motor runs at) combined in one unit with a variable speed controller to make a serendipitously-found motor of some other voltage work would probably be a cheaper total system.  If that step-up controller were mounted right by the motor, so that the potentially high voltage cables are less than a foot long and very localized, it could be a safer system than running 48V through the entire boat.  You are going to want a controller for any high hp propulsion motor anyway. Two banks of 24V can be charged through a 4-terminal battery isolator -- in, out, out, alternator sense wire -- and a "24V" commercial vehicle alternator.   Battery disconnects or bank transfer switches at 24V are cheap. Switches over "24V" are expensive.   The max voltage in a "24V" system is close to 30V, the threshold for practical parting arc stability.  Voltages over about 30-36V can sustain a stable parting arc -- that means one sees sizzling inside the switch that does not stop and a huge hole melts in the side of the switch and it starts shooting out a tuft of flame like a 6011 welding rod.  30-36V is the voltage range that most 100-200 Amp arc welders put out.  I fried one drill at 120VDC -- the drill did not stop when I released the trigger, the case lit up from the inside, the magic smoke escaped, and I pulled the plug as fast as I could.  That is the risk in a 48V system if one does not have proper gear.   Parting arcs are much less stable on 24V systems, even though the theoretical minimum for welding is around 14V.  Yes, 12V will make a hot bright arc, but a very unstable arc -- there is a short flash and the parts either stick together or part reasonably quickly.  The fact that parting arcs at 48V are perhaps stable makes DC current switches very much more expensive above "24V" --   In fact, a 120VDC / 15Amp wall switch that would be a drop-in-replacement for a 120VAC 15Amp wall switch ($3) is practically unattainable -- I have looked.  If anyone can find a 120VDC / 15Amp wall-type switch, let me know.  Where would one have to go to find 48VDC-compatible switches?  Higher DC voltages are seen in industrial machinery control cabinets.    Such cabinets use industrial contactors to switch DC voltages.   DC voltages over "24V" are going to be far more expensive for switches, if you can find any.   Fuses are not as much trouble as switches.  There are DC fuses that go up to higher voltages, maybe at only 4 times the price of commercial vehicle 24V fuses and breakers.  Higher voltage DC fuses are found in industrial machinery control cabinets.  I purchased an industrial control cabinet rail, fuse modules: https://kudammcorp.com/images/principles/bussmann/modular_fuse_holders.png and power distribution modules: https://www.c3controls.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/TB-intro-845x477..jpg to use as terminal blocks.   These are the modules one sees screwed in ranks into the back of a motion control cabinet for a CNC machine or a robot.   For higher voltage DC nothing is cheap.    I have also worked in telephony central office equipment that runs 48V.   Very expensive.   Try finding anything like that in a small-market developing world port.   24V -- if they have shipping containers and cargo trucks to move them, then there will probably be some generic commercial truck repair parts to be found locally. Splitting 48V of batteries into two 24V banks provides redundancy.   Having two banks isolates problems.  At any given time, one can be used as a spare.  For my 23' cruiser, I have a very simple 2-bank system accomplished with a total of $14 in parts.   I have a simple box with two double-throw, double-pole switches to control bank charging and bank usage. One switch sends charge to either the A or B bank.  The other switch connects either the A or B bank to the boat power distribution.   At 24V, these are easily sourced inexpensive switches ($4?), that are easy to replace if needed.  I have a third on-off-on double pole double throw switch (30A, $6) that I use to run my DC bow thruster.   At 48V, try $100 or more for a DC contactor that is industrial-grade to replace just that one switch.   https://www.arc-components.com/sw182b-7-albright-double-acting-motor-reversing-solenoid-contactor-48v-intermittent-5243.html SW182B-7 | Albright 48V Motor Reversing Solenoid - Intermittent - Arc Components Ltd Albright's SW182B-7 150A double acting strapped pair solenoid, 48V intermittent. Paired 48 volt dc single pole, double throw contactors for hydraulic motor reversing. www.arc-components.com Lastly, the cheapest solar panels are all in the 30-36V maximum power point range -- and these panels are best suited to charge 24V batteries with less-expensive MPPT charge controllers.   For me, unless one can find a compelling reason to go 48V, and more than just the slightly better average efficiency of 48VDC to 120VAC inverters, I would never consider 48V on a private cruising sailboat.    Matt From: svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 19:13 Subject: [origamiboats] LiFePo4 To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Just ordered our batteries. Went with 16 of the LiFePo4 3.2v/271amp cells with BMS and shipping for $.27 a watt. We spent months researching all options and this option was an 11th hour finding. After looking deeper, we found that all the LiFePo4 drop ins are built with 3.2v cells. Now I need to decide on the rest. The company is recommending we wire the whole thing in series for 48 volts at 271amps. The prices for panels, turbines and inverter seem roughly comparable in 48v so looking for reasons NOT to go 48v. Your thoughts? Rick -- Cheers Brian | 35862|35854|2019-04-19 18:01:48|Rick Jackson|Re: LiFePo4|My thoughts as well.   I think I might need to be more clear when asking questions.  I try to keep it short and simple but often the answers are to questions I’m not asking.   Victron was horrible with response and AIMS did not do much better.    Sent from my iPhone On Apr 18, 2019, at 4:29 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I took the generator to be one that outputs DC -- that is the only way it makes any sense.  But you are right, if the generator puts out AC then it would be the battery charger that is the load, along with unnamed AC loads.  The size of the inverter would be unconnected to the size of the generator.  Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Brian Stannard brianstannard@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2019 5:22 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     The inverter relates to the battery bank, not the generator. What you were told doesn't make sense. I also wouldn't go with 48 volts. Not 24 volts either unless a larger boat. On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 1:37 PM Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   That’s a lot of reasons for not going 48 volt.   Battery manufacturer has recommended it.  You made many good points.   Here is another question.   I spoke with AIMS about their 6000 watt inverter.  They asked about my generator which is 7500 watts and they claim I can not go over 4000 watt inverter with a 7500 watt gen set.   Why would that matter with 13000 watts of battery ? Sent from my iPhone On Apr 16, 2019, at 6:22 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Rick, I would choose "24V", hands down. "48V", in reality 52-56V is a potentially lethal voltage.  Mixed with salt and sweat, even 24V or 12V could be a problem, but 48V will be a problem first.   Mounted on the wall of a shed or cottage that is stationary, with 3 feet of clear standing space in front of said shed or cottage wall, where one would have space to jump back or intentionally fall to break a connection, no problem I would go 48V.   Pitching around like a boat in an anchorage, in a little locker, no way.  I personally have a 120VDC system in a land based system -- I am very careful with it.  It would be suicide to have that system on any of my boats.   I would never have 48V in a machinery space under the cockpit, when at the best of times it is boat yoga to get in there.  DC voltages can cause your muscles to freeze in position perhaps freezing the one yoga muscle needed to get unstuck from the accidental connection.     48V is more expensive for inverters.   24V inverters are cheap and reasonably efficient. The overwhelming majority of commercial vehicles in North America have been 24V for decades.  There is a rich aftermarket to tap into for 24V things, and scrap yards full of experienced 24V things.  Some vehicles even have 24V heaters to preheat air and water for large engines -- the possibilities.  Things as simple as light bulbs, fan motors etc, windshield wiper motors, will be easy.   For electric propulsion, 48V may be a voltage some DC propulsion motors you can find might be more suited to run on -- so for a few choices of motor, 48V might be convenient.   Alternatively, a boost voltage converter (from 24V to whatever voltage the motor runs at) combined in one unit with a variable speed controller to make a serendipitously-found motor of some other voltage work would probably be a cheaper total system.  If that step-up controller were mounted right by the motor, so that the potentially high voltage cables are less than a foot long and very localized, it could be a safer system than running 48V through the entire boat.  You are going to want a controller for any high hp propulsion motor anyway.. Two banks of 24V can be charged through a 4-terminal battery isolator -- in, out, out, alternator sense wire -- and a "24V" commercial vehicle alternator.   Battery disconnects or bank transfer switches at 24V are cheap. Switches over "24V" are expensive.   The max voltage in a "24V" system is close to 30V, the threshold for practical parting arc stability.  Voltages over about 30-36V can sustain a stable parting arc -- that means one sees sizzling inside the switch that does not stop and a huge hole melts in the side of the switch and it starts shooting out a tuft of flame like a 6011 welding rod.  30-36V is the voltage range that most 100-200 Amp arc welders put out.  I fried one drill at 120VDC -- the drill did not stop when I released the trigger, the case lit up from the inside, the magic smoke escaped, and I pulled the plug as fast as I could.  That is the risk in a 48V system if one does not have proper gear.   Parting arcs are much less stable on 24V systems, even though the theoretical minimum for welding is around 14V.  Yes, 12V will make a hot bright arc, but a very unstable arc -- there is a short flash and the parts either stick together or part reasonably quickly.  The fact that parting arcs at 48V are perhaps stable makes DC current switches very much more expensive above "24V" --   In fact, a 120VDC / 15Amp wall switch that would be a drop-in-replacement for a 120VAC 15Amp wall switch ($3) is practically unattainable -- I have looked.  If anyone can find a 120VDC / 15Amp wall-type switch, let me know.  Where would one have to go to find 48VDC-compatible switches?  Higher DC voltages are seen in industrial machinery control cabinets.    Such cabinets use industrial contactors to switch DC voltages.   DC voltages over "24V" are going to be far more expensive for switches, if you can find any.   Fuses are not as much trouble as switches.  There are DC fuses that go up to higher voltages, maybe at only 4 times the price of commercial vehicle 24V fuses and breakers.  Higher voltage DC fuses are found in industrial machinery control cabinets.  I purchased an industrial control cabinet rail, fuse modules: https://kudammcorp.com/images/principles/bussmann/modular_fuse_holders.png and power distribution modules: https://www.c3controls.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/TB-intro-845x477..jpg to use as terminal blocks.   These are the modules one sees screwed in ranks into the back of a motion control cabinet for a CNC machine or a robot.   For higher voltage DC nothing is cheap.    I have also worked in telephony central office equipment that runs 48V.   Very expensive.   Try finding anything like that in a small-market developing world port.   24V -- if they have shipping containers and cargo trucks to move them, then there will probably be some generic commercial truck repair parts to be found locally. Splitting 48V of batteries into two 24V banks provides redundancy.   Having two banks isolates problems.  At any given time, one can be used as a spare.  For my 23' cruiser, I have a very simple 2-bank system accomplished with a total of $14 in parts.   I have a simple box with two double-throw, double-pole switches to control bank charging and bank usage. One switch sends charge to either the A or B bank.  The other switch connects either the A or B bank to the boat power distribution.   At 24V, these are easily sourced inexpensive switches ($4?), that are easy to replace if needed.  I have a third on-off-on double pole double throw switch (30A, $6) that I use to run my DC bow thruster.   At 48V, try $100 or more for a DC contactor that is industrial-grade to replace just that one switch.   https://www.arc-components.com/sw182b-7-albright-double-acting-motor-reversing-solenoid-contactor-48v-intermittent-5243.html SW182B-7 | Albright 48V Motor Reversing Solenoid - Intermittent - Arc Components Ltd Albright's SW182B-7 150A double acting strapped pair solenoid, 48V intermittent. Paired 48 volt dc single pole, double throw contactors for hydraulic motor reversing. www.arc-components.com Lastly, the cheapest solar panels are all in the 30-36V maximum power point range -- and these panels are best suited to charge 24V batteries with less-expensive MPPT charge controllers.   For me, unless one can find a compelling reason to go 48V, and more than just the slightly better average efficiency of 48VDC to 120VAC inverters, I would never consider 48V on a private cruising sailboat.    Matt From: svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 19:13 Subject: [origamiboats] LiFePo4 To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Just ordered our batteries. Went with 16 of the LiFePo4 3.2v/271amp cells with BMS and shipping for $.27 a watt. We spent months researching all options and this option was an 11th hour finding. After looking deeper, we found that all the LiFePo4 drop ins are built with 3.2v cells. Now I need to decide on the rest. The company is recommending we wire the whole thing in series for 48 volts at 271amps. The prices for panels, turbines and inverter seem roughly comparable in 48v so looking for reasons NOT to go 48v. Your thoughts? Rick -- Cheers Brian | 35863|35854|2019-04-26 00:27:23|opuspaul|Re: LiFePo4|I recently upgraded to a 1500 watt pure sine wave inverter to be able to run a small 3/4 hp 220 volt ac air compressor for a hooka and I thought that might be overkill.  I can't think of any senario where I would want to run a 6000 watt inverter.   That would be enough to run an 8 hp electric motor or a very large welder.  The wires and connections to your batteries would need to be massive to run that kind of current.  In theory, I like the idea of running a 24 volt system but you really restrict yourself by not being able to run typical consumer 12 volt items without using a 24 to 12 volt converter.   This can add a lot more expense.| 35864|35864|2019-04-26 00:38:34|opuspaul|Perkins M80T|This isn't for an origami boat but I know there are some experienced people here.   Does anyone have an opinion or experience with Perkins M80T engines?   Are they any good?| 35865|35854|2019-04-26 11:07:11|Matt Malone|Re: LiFePo4| #ygrps-yiv-1735474071 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} 24V to 12V step down equipment seems cheap and plentiful.   https://www.ebay.com/itm/322660237342 https://www.ebay.com/itm/DC-24V-To-DC12V-10A-120W-Step-Down-Power-Supply-Converter-Regulator-Waterproof/192007838039 DC 24V To DC12V 10A 120W Step Down Power Supply Converter Regulator Waterproof 696233035287 | eBay (1) For defected items, We will do our best to service you! (2) Return shipping cost and subsequent replacement shipping cost would be borne by seller. (3) please contact us with the item number, ebay ID and defect description within 7 days after the date of package arriving. (4) We will provide positive feedback for the buyer as soon as the buyer pays for the item. www.ebay.com https://www.amazon.com/Cllena-Converter-Regulator-Transformer-Waterproof/dp/B07B4HLLWJ/ref=sr_1_3?keywords=24V+to+12V+converter&qid=1556288825&s=gateway&sr=8-3 Amazon.com: Cllena DC/DC Voltage Converter Regulator DC 24V Step-Down to 12V 40A 480W Buck Transformer Waterproof: Automotive Buy Cllena DC/DC Voltage Converter Regulator DC 24V Step-Down to 12V 40A 480W Buck Transformer Waterproof: Power Converters - Amazon.com FREE DELIVERY possible on eligible purchases www.amazon.com After looking at a number of items posted, the price seems to be about US$1/Amp of output current.  (The first is $18.80 for 20 Amps, the second is $36 for 40Amps, I checked, 100A units are $105.)   One would want to check for the actual voltage your "12V" appliances like, maybe a 13.6V output is actually better -- roughly the same price.   I would not consider anything that has a power conversion efficiency less than 95%, or that does not state a power conversion efficiency.   Just how much current does one think their total 12V system will draw?   I have written before about pairing 12V loads, like two identical 12V light bulbs in series to make a 24V load.  Even if you have to check both loads serially if the lights do not work, with only two items, it is not like the pain that serial Christmas lights were.   By checking the voltage on the serial connection between the pair of loads, it will be either: 24V if the ground-connected member of the pair is blown, or 0V if the 24V-connected member of the pair is blown.   If there is a bad connection, the voltage in the middle will point to the problem in the same way.  If the voltage in the middle is not all-the-way bad (24V/0V), but middling, like 18V or 6V, it still points in the direction of the problem.   If one of the pair runs crazy bright, or fast, burns out, then check the other side for shorts.   Always use negative isolated fixtures with two wires that are equally-well weather sealed for reasons of corrosion of connections, corrosion of the boat, and pairability.   After pairing all pairable loads, what is left, the radio ?    That does not seem to be much of a problem. At these prices, I would buy 3 -- one to use, and two to sit sealed in plastic until they are needed.   When one can afford double redundancy, and they are so easy to get, even mass produced stuff seems boat-worthy to me.   I would put any electrical module without a name-brand in an easily accessible area, with a cut off switch near it, in addition to appropriate fusing -- fire precautions.      In the meantime, one enjoys all the benefits of a 24V system -- cheaper, higher power solar panels, more efficient operation of the charge controller at lower cost, more efficient operation of the inverter, half the weight of copper in wires, less wire losses to heavy loads.   95% chance the starter and alternator and starting battery are all 12V, so, even if the converts all fail, there is always a backup system one can use for things that have to be 12V.  I do not see the problem with 24V as the main energy storage on the boat.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 12:27 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     I recently upgraded to a 1500 watt pure sine wave inverter to be able to run a small 3/4 hp 220 volt ac air compressor for a hooka and I thought that might be overkill.  I can't think of any senario where I would want to run a 6000 watt inverter.   That would be enough to run an 8 hp electric motor or a very large welder.  The wires and connections to your batteries would need to be massive to run that kind of current.  In theory, I like the idea of running a 24 volt system but you really restrict yourself by not being able to run typical consumer 12 volt items without using a 24 to 12 volt converter.   This can add a lot more expense. | 35866|35854|2019-04-26 17:02:10|opuspaul|Re: LiFePo4|When I worked on fishing boats eons ago the 24 to 12 volt converters were notorious for making radio noise.  I would think a cheap inverter from Asia would have the bare minimum of parts for filtering to keep the cost down.   You would have to experiment.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : #ygrps-yiv-2071247192 #ygrps-yiv-2071247192ygrps-yiv-347223764 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} 24V to 12V step down equipment seems cheap and plentiful.   onverter.   This can add a lot more expense. | 35867|35854|2019-04-26 18:37:11|Matt Malone|Re: LiFePo4| An experiment would be a good idea. It would be an inexpensive experiment. There are ways to reduce radio noise.  First would be, look for a converter with RF approvals like you see on stickers on a lot of things.  Second would be to determine if the noise is being broadcast and picked up by the antenna or coupled through the power to the cabin radio - compare to a handheld.  If it is poor power quality, that can be fixed external to an inexpensive converter. Electronics have improved.  A new cheap unit might be much higher frequency than the ones ages ago, with lower ripple.  Capacitors have improved, the efficiency of power conversion inductors has improved.   All of these improvements have been pushed by decades of very competitive computer power supply production.  I would not hesitate to give it a try in an experiment anticipating a completely different outcome from early power converters contemporaneous to the first PCs. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 5:02:09 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     When I worked on fishing boats eons ago the 24 to 12 volt converters were notorious for making radio noise.  I would think a cheap inverter from Asia would have the bare minimum of parts for filtering to keep the cost down.   You would have to experiment. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : 24V to 12V step down equipment seems cheap and plentiful.   onverter.   This can add a lot more expense. | 35868|35854|2019-04-28 15:06:37|Rick Jackson|Re: LiFePo4|UPDATE:  Batteries have shipped from China with 2 BMS units.  We were told they do a balance on our batteries before shipping to avoid any possible defects or warranty issues… So far we have been pleased with the service, and the patience they have with us and our 10,000 questions… All in all we are very satisfied,,, Now we wait…Since we are not experts in solar systems we are open to suggestions and advice.. Please feel free to correct me if my thinking is wrong here… But we are of the impression that once the bank is built and hooked to the inverter, all our power needs are maintained through a service panel.The inverter we are interested in (regardless of voltage) will output to a main 50 amp breaker in the panel much like a home is wired.   The boat only has 120v for lights and the kitchen appliances.  There will only be a few DC lights for back up, and all the electronics will be DC.  The 6000 watt inverter allows us to run multiple appliances at the same time in the kitchen so our lifestyle change will not be as drastic as it could be. Since we plan to live aboard full time for the next few years, we want to keep life as functional as possible in the galley.   For example:We are living in a new, fancy RV at the boat yar, but only have a 30 amp service. We are constantly dealing with power issues..  We had to turn off electric heat to run microwave, and now that its warmer, we are doing the same with the AC.  It is a small thing, but having talked to folks who live aboard full time, we hear where the galley is a place where inconvenience over time makes life unnecessarily complicated.  I think when people think “sailboat” they automatically think of some lightweight, camping situation with some time limitation.  Ours is heavy, with all the comforts of home. We are clearly in the comfort over speed group…Rick On Apr 26, 2019, at 3:37 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:An experiment would be a good idea. It would be an inexpensive experiment.There are ways to reduce radio noise.  First would be, look for a converter with RF approvals like you see on stickers on a lot of things.  Second would be to determine if the noise is being broadcast and picked up by the antenna or coupled through the power to the cabin radio - compare to a handheld.  If it is poor power quality, that can be fixed external to an inexpensive converter.Electronics have improved.  A new cheap unit might be much higher frequency than the ones ages ago, with lower ripple.  Capacitors have improved, the efficiency of power conversion inductors has improved.   All of these improvements have been pushed by decades of very competitive computer power supply production.  I would not hesitate to give it a try in an experiment anticipating a completely different outcome from early power converters contemporaneous to the first PCs.MattFrom: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 5:02:09 PMTo: origamiboats@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4  When I worked on fishing boats eons ago the 24 to 12 volt converters were notorious for making radio noise.  I would think a cheap inverter from Asia would have the bare minimum of parts for filtering to keep the cost down.   You would have to experiment.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :24V to 12V step down equipment seems cheap and plentiful.   onverter.   This can add a lot more expense.| 35869|35854|2019-04-28 19:56:42|Matt Malone|Re: LiFePo4| #ygrps-yiv-1243578448 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} I would be interested to hear what the final costs of the batteries are including shipping, taxes, duties etc.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 8:19 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     UPDATE:   Batteries have shipped from China with 2 BMS units.  We were told they do a balance on our batteries before shipping to avoid any possible defects or warranty issues… So far we have been pleased with the service, and the patience they have with us and our 10,000 questions… All in all we are very satisfied,,, Now we wait… Since we are not experts in solar systems we are open to suggestions and advice.. Please feel free to correct me if my thinking is wrong here… But we are of the impression that once the bank is built and hooked to the inverter, all our power needs are maintained through a service panel.. The inverter we are interested in (regardless of voltage) will output to a main 50 amp breaker in the panel much like a home is wired.   The boat only has 120v for lights and the kitchen appliances.  There will only be a few DC lights for back up, and all the electronics will be DC.  The 6000 watt inverter allows us to run multiple appliances at the same time in the kitchen so our lifestyle change will not be as drastic as it could be. Since we plan to live aboard full time for the next few years, we want to keep life as functional as possible in the galley.    For example: We are living in a new, fancy RV at the boat yar, but only have a 30 amp service. We are constantly dealing with power issues..  We had to turn off electric heat to run microwave, and now that its warmer, we are doing the same with the AC.   It is a small thing, but having talked to folks who live aboard full time, we hear where the galley is a place where inconvenience over time makes life unnecessarily complicated.   I think when people think “sailboat” they automatically think of some lightweight, camping situation with some time limitation.  Ours is heavy, with all the comforts of home. We are clearly in the comfort over speed group… Rick On Apr 26, 2019, at 3:37 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@hotmail..com [origamiboats] wrote: An experiment would be a good idea. It would be an inexpensive experiment. There are ways to reduce radio noise.  First would be, look for a converter with RF approvals like you see on stickers on a lot of things.  Second would be to determine if the noise is being broadcast and picked up by the antenna or coupled through the power to the cabin radio - compare to a handheld.  If it is poor power quality, that can be fixed external to an inexpensive converter. Electronics have improved.  A new cheap unit might be much higher frequency than the ones ages ago, with lower ripple.  Capacitors have improved, the efficiency of power conversion inductors has improved.   All of these improvements have been pushed by decades of very competitive computer power supply production.  I would not hesitate to give it a try in an experiment anticipating a completely different outcome from early power converters contemporaneous to the first PCs. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 5:02:09 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     When I worked on fishing boats eons ago the 24 to 12 volt converters were notorious for making radio noise.  I would think a cheap inverter from Asia would have the bare minimum of parts for filtering to keep the cost down.   You would have to experiment. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : 24V to 12V step down equipment seems cheap and plentiful.    onverter.   This can add a lot more expense. | 35870|35854|2019-04-29 12:12:53|Darren Bos|Re: LiFePo4| I may have missed something earlier in the thread Rick, but it seems your focus is on consuming power, where I'd suggest you need to think about producing it.  The footprint you'll have available for solar is fairly small, so you're likely to be producing something on the scale of 500 to 600 watts.  Running all loads through the inverter requires the inverter to be on all the time and thus wasting power.  Even in use you have the losses of the inverter.   A boat that is careful with its electrical design can run completely on solar now, but it does require careful forethought about efficiency.  It looks like you're heading down the road of running a generator on a daily basis, which is a drag for you and those anchored around you.  On 2019-04-26 5:19 p.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   UPDATE:   Batteries have shipped from China with 2 BMS units.  We were told they do a balance on our batteries before shipping to avoid any possible defects or warranty issues… So far we have been pleased with the service, and the patience they have with us and our 10,000 questions… All in all we are very satisfied,,, Now we wait… Since we are not experts in solar systems we are open to suggestions and advice.. Please feel free to correct me if my thinking is wrong here… But we are of the impression that once the bank is built and hooked to the inverter, all our power needs are maintained through a service panel.. The inverter we are interested in (regardless of voltage) will output to a main 50 amp breaker in the panel much like a home is wired.   The boat only has 120v for lights and the kitchen appliances.  There will only be a few DC lights for back up, and all the electronics will be DC.  The 6000 watt inverter allows us to run multiple appliances at the same time in the kitchen so our lifestyle change will not be as drastic as it could be. Since we plan to live aboard full time for the next few years, we want to keep life as functional as possible in the galley.    For example: We are living in a new, fancy RV at the boat yar, but only have a 30 amp service. We are constantly dealing with power issues..  We had to turn off electric heat to run microwave, and now that its warmer, we are doing the same with the AC.   It is a small thing, but having talked to folks who live aboard full time, we hear where the galley is a place where inconvenience over time makes life unnecessarily complicated.   I think when people think “sailboat” they automatically think of some lightweight, camping situation with some time limitation.  Ours is heavy, with all the comforts of home. We are clearly in the comfort over speed group… Rick On Apr 26, 2019, at 3:37 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@hotmail..com [origamiboats] wrote: An experiment would be a good idea. It would be an inexpensive experiment. There are ways to reduce radio noise.  First would be, look for a converter with RF approvals like you see on stickers on a lot of things.  Second would be to determine if the noise is being broadcast and picked up by the antenna or coupled through the power to the cabin radio - compare to a handheld.  If it is poor power quality, that can be fixed external to an inexpensive converter. Electronics have improved.  A new cheap unit might be much higher frequency than the ones ages ago, with lower ripple.  Capacitors have improved, the efficiency of power conversion inductors has improved.   All of these improvements have been pushed by decades of very competitive computer power supply production.  I would not hesitate to give it a try in an experiment anticipating a completely different outcome from early power converters contemporaneous to the first PCs. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 5:02:09 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     When I worked on fishing boats eons ago the 24 to 12 volt converters were notorious for making radio noise.  I would think a cheap inverter from Asia would have the bare minimum of parts for filtering to keep the cost down.   You would have to experiment. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : 24V to 12V step down equipment seems cheap and plentiful.    onverter.   This can add a lot more expense. | 35871|35854|2019-04-29 14:21:32|Matt Malone|Re: LiFePo4| #ygrps-yiv-636541691 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Yes Darren, you are right, but, Rick is clear, he wants a seamless transition from house-style living to boat style living.   I have seen 10,000 Watt generators installed in cottages so that an ordinary residential electric range could be used.   It is a different philosophy, not mine.    I went down this road with my own solar system, in calculations only.   I calculated to have a battery system that will run a kitchen at peak loading for a holiday-get-together style meal, I would need about 26 kWh of storage.   I did the computation for 12V/100Ah battery units (1.2 kWh each) and figured I would need 25 batteries of 100% DOD, or 50 batteries of 50% DOD to achieve this.   I do indeed have 35 batteries currently in my solar system, but there is no way I could power a kitchen -- the system is targeted at power tools for a weekend-type use -- lower current, intermittently through the day, for a longer time, followed by a much longer period for recharge -- this better suits my batteries and installed panel capacity.   The solutions I am considering to expand the system would not be suitable for a boat, but they still can be informed by Rick's experience. Compared to the batteries Rick is getting, mine are crap.   That is why I am so eager to learn from Rick.   Darren is right about the drawbacks of Rick's system.  It is possible that the diesel budget and noise to maintain the ideal of a full power experience on Rick's boat will gradually shift -- more power-efficient appliances that accomplish the same thing:     - For instance, computer-controlled, insulated pressure cookers (such as the Instant Pot) seem in practice to use much less power to cook a large meal.     - The power draw of sous vide cooking is just a question of insulation -- more insulation less power consumed to maintain temperatures of 130-150F.   Think DIY around a suitable pot.   The resulting geometry might be similar to that of a tandoori stove, but much lower temperature.    - I have read good things about the efficiency of modern clam-shell-style counter top ovens (Gone with the Wynns, who were first RVers, and then cruisers, and maintain a very civilized level of cruising, use a Cuisinart counter top oven).   These are not the jazzed up toaster ovens with big glass doors that would lose a lot of heat, but something that looks sort of like panini grill that closes completely, and has a baking cavity inside.   I am sure if one looked, there are many more power-saving kitchen appliances to stretch battery life.  Their main features are less mass to heat up, and a lot more insulation. I would not hesitate to run my sous vide or an Instant Pot from an inverter and my current solar system.   A wide range of dishes could be made with my current system.    Then there is the potential to run efficient cooking appliances straight from DC.  In developing my solar system, I have used older-style electric range burner coils and dryer heater cores as test loads.   Even in the range of 24V to 35V, dissipating 30 - 100W, these coils put out a significant heat.  Sealed in an insulated box, they would rise to cooking temperatures eventually.  In combination with: https://www.amazon.com/Powered-Universal-Temperature-Controller-Thermocouple/dp/B01EK73OVA/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_1?keywords=Thermocouple+Temperature+controller+DC+load+20A&qid=1556561060&s=gateway&sr=8-1-fkmr0 and a high current DC relay that might look like these: https://www.littelfuse.com/products/dc-solenoids-and-relays/standard-high-current-relays.aspx one might make a cooking appliance that runs straight from DC.    No inverter losses.   DIY, so, the user decides the trade-off between insulation and power consumption. If Rick aims heavy, and then experience leads him to more efficient loads and less generator running, then that is an evolutionary approach that maintains lifestyle.    Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 12:12 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     I may have missed something earlier in the thread Rick, but it seems your focus is on consuming power, where I'd suggest you need to think about producing it.  The footprint you'll have available for solar is fairly small, so you're likely to be producing something on the scale of 500 to 600 watts.  Running all loads through the inverter requires the inverter to be on all the time and thus wasting power.  Even in use you have the losses of the inverter.   A boat that is careful with its electrical design can run completely on solar now, but it does require careful forethought about efficiency.  It looks like you're heading down the road of running a generator on a daily basis, which is a drag for you and those anchored around you.  On 2019-04-26 5:19 p.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   UPDATE:   Batteries have shipped from China with 2 BMS units.  We were told they do a balance on our batteries before shipping to avoid any possible defects or warranty issues… So far we have been pleased with the service, and the patience they have with us and our 10,000 questions… All in all we are very satisfied,,, Now we wait… Since we are not experts in solar systems we are open to suggestions and advice.. Please feel free to correct me if my thinking is wrong here… But we are of the impression that once the bank is built and hooked to the inverter, all our power needs are maintained through a service panel.. The inverter we are interested in (regardless of voltage) will output to a main 50 amp breaker in the panel much like a home is wired.   The boat only has 120v for lights and the kitchen appliances.  There will only be a few DC lights for back up, and all the electronics will be DC.  The 6000 watt inverter allows us to run multiple appliances at the same time in the kitchen so our lifestyle change will not be as drastic as it could be. Since we plan to live aboard full time for the next few years, we want to keep life as functional as possible in the galley.    For example: We are living in a new, fancy RV at the boat yar, but only have a 30 amp service. We are constantly dealing with power issues..  We had to turn off electric heat to run microwave, and now that its warmer, we are doing the same with the AC.   It is a small thing, but having talked to folks who live aboard full time, we hear where the galley is a place where inconvenience over time makes life unnecessarily complicated.   I think when people think “sailboat” they automatically think of some lightweight, camping situation with some time limitation.  Ours is heavy, with all the comforts of home. We are clearly in the comfort over speed group… Rick On Apr 26, 2019, at 3:37 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@hotmail..com [origamiboats] wrote: An experiment would be a good idea. It would be an inexpensive experiment. There are ways to reduce radio noise.  First would be, look for a converter with RF approvals like you see on stickers on a lot of things.  Second would be to determine if the noise is being broadcast and picked up by the antenna or coupled through the power to the cabin radio - compare to a handheld.  If it is poor power quality, that can be fixed external to an inexpensive converter. Electronics have improved.  A new cheap unit might be much higher frequency than the ones ages ago, with lower ripple.  Capacitors have improved, the efficiency of power conversion inductors has improved.   All of these improvements have been pushed by decades of very competitive computer power supply production.  I would not hesitate to give it a try in an experiment anticipating a completely different outcome from early power converters contemporaneous to the first PCs. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 5:02:09 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     When I worked on fishing boats eons ago the 24 to 12 volt converters were notorious for making radio noise.  I would think a cheap inverter from Asia would have the bare minimum of parts for filtering to keep the cost down.   You would have to experiment. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : 24V to 12V step down equipment seems cheap and plentiful.    onverter.   This can add a lot more expense. | 35872|35854|2019-04-29 16:31:29|opuspaul|Re: LiFePo4|I don't think you will ever have seamless transition from a house to a boat.   There is a huge difference between having endless power through a 30 amp power cord and being independant and generating your own power.  I think Darren is right.   It is naive to think you can generate such power through solar (or wind) on a boat.  You will need to run a generator all the time.   Even in short bursts, anything over 1000 watts is a tremendous drain on batteries.    I would regularly run my engine and alternator any time I started up my 750 watt vacuum.   If I didn't, the voltage would drop from the currrent surge and cause other problems.   5000 or 6000 watts is unrealistic and would need a massive battery bank and cables, especially if you are putting on a big load for a long time like when you are cooking a meal.   Rather than let the batteries recover slowly through your charge system, I think you would end up running your generator for every meal.Solar puts out surprisingly little when it is cloudy or rainy so you need a lot of panels to be really independent in all conditions.   For example,  I recently hauled out and stayed at a boatyard that was totally off grid.  They had more than a dozen very large panels and a battery bank that filled a shed.Besides all that, don't you want peace and quiet?  I used to curse the boats that come in to quiet anchorages and spoil everything by running generators all the time.Just my opinion, Paul | 35873|35854|2019-04-29 16:35:48|Darren Bos|Re: LiFePo4| Although some of the ideas are interesting Matt, I don't think they materially change things.  At the power levels being discussed, there is no way you can fit enough solar onto a monohull to generate anywhere near the power required.  The Wynns, who have a Cat and therefore double the solar I used in the example, still end up running their generator often to support their electric needs.  Battery storage doesn't matter a whole lot here other than it allows you to run the generator a bit less often.  I went through a bunch of iterations when designing the electric system for our boat.  I decided that the simplest, most robust and most convenient system was 12V powered entirely from solar (with a large alternator as a backup).  With careful choices around a fridge and freezer, and avoiding high-draw AC appliances, you can have system that runs entirely on solar.  With four 120 watt panels, each with its own controller, you have a bunch of redundancy that requires virtually no maintenance, attention or ongoing running costs for most of its life.   The only downside of 12V is that it requires larger diameter wires to carry the current.  However, the costs of larger wire are offset by not needing things like voltage converters, and thick wire is a lot more reliable than an inverter or a DC-DC converter. However, one of the nice things about boats is that it is still one area where we get to make our own choices.  I wouldn't openly criticize anyone who pursues a high power consumption lifestyle, as long as they remember not to be the moron who anchors right next to someone in a quiet anchorage and then proceeds to run your generator incessantly.  On 2019-04-29 11:21 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Yes Darren, you are right, but, Rick is clear, he wants a seamless transition from house-style living to boat style living.   I have seen 10,000 Watt generators installed in cottages so that an ordinary residential electric range could be used.   It is a different philosophy, not mine.    I went down this road with my own solar system, in calculations only.   I calculated to have a battery system that will run a kitchen at peak loading for a holiday-get-together style meal, I would need about 26 kWh of storage.   I did the computation for 12V/100Ah battery units (1.2 kWh each) and figured I would need 25 batteries of 100% DOD, or 50 batteries of 50% DOD to achieve this.   I do indeed have 35 batteries currently in my solar system, but there is no way I could power a kitchen -- the system is targeted at power tools for a weekend-type use -- lower current, intermittently through the day, for a longer time, followed by a much longer period for recharge -- this better suits my batteries and installed panel capacity.   The solutions I am considering to expand the system would not be suitable for a boat, but they still can be informed by Rick's experience. Compared to the batteries Rick is getting, mine are crap.   That is why I am so eager to learn from Rick.   Darren is right about the drawbacks of Rick's system.  It is possible that the diesel budget and noise to maintain the ideal of a full power experience on Rick's boat will gradually shift -- more power-efficient appliances that accomplish the same thing:     - For instance, computer-controlled, insulated pressure cookers (such as the Instant Pot) seem in practice to use much less power to cook a large meal.     - The power draw of sous vide cooking is just a question of insulation -- more insulation less power consumed to maintain temperatures of 130-150F.   Think DIY around a suitable pot.   The resulting geometry might be similar to that of a tandoori stove, but much lower temperature.    - I have read good things about the efficiency of modern clam-shell-style counter top ovens (Gone with the Wynns, who were first RVers, and then cruisers, and maintain a very civilized level of cruising, use a Cuisinart counter top oven).   These are not the jazzed up toaster ovens with big glass doors that would lose a lot of heat, but something that looks sort of like panini grill that closes completely, and has a baking cavity inside.   I am sure if one looked, there are many more power-saving kitchen appliances to stretch battery life.  Their main features are less mass to heat up, and a lot more insulation. I would not hesitate to run my sous vide or an Instant Pot from an inverter and my current solar system.   A wide range of dishes could be made with my current system.    Then there is the potential to run efficient cooking appliances straight from DC.  In developing my solar system, I have used older-style electric range burner coils and dryer heater cores as test loads.   Even in the range of 24V to 35V, dissipating 30 - 100W, these coils put out a significant heat.  Sealed in an insulated box, they would rise to cooking temperatures eventually.  In combination with: https://www.amazon.com/Powered-Universal-Temperature-Controller-Thermocouple/dp/B01EK73OVA/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_1?keywords=Thermocouple+Temperature+controller+DC+load+20A&qid=1556561060&s=gateway&sr=8-1-fkmr0 and a high current DC relay that might look like these: https://www.littelfuse.com/products/dc-solenoids-and-relays/standard-high-current-relays.aspx one might make a cooking appliance that runs straight from DC.    No inverter losses.   DIY, so, the user decides the trade-off between insulation and power consumption. If Rick aims heavy, and then experience leads him to more efficient loads and less generator running, then that is an evolutionary approach that maintains lifestyle.    Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 12:12 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     I may have missed something earlier in the thread Rick, but it seems your focus is on consuming power, where I'd suggest you need to think about producing it.  The footprint you'll have available for solar is fairly small, so you're likely to be producing something on the scale of 500 to 600 watts.  Running all loads through the inverter requires the inverter to be on all the time and thus wasting power.  Even in use you have the losses of the inverter.   A boat that is careful with its electrical design can run completely on solar now, but it does require careful forethought about efficiency.  It looks like you're heading down the road of running a generator on a daily basis, which is a drag for you and those anchored around you.  On 2019-04-26 5:19 p.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   UPDATE:   Batteries have shipped from China with 2 BMS units.  We were told they do a balance on our batteries before shipping to avoid any possible defects or warranty issues… So far we have been pleased with the service, and the patience they have with us and our 10,000 questions… All in all we are very satisfied,,, Now we wait… Since we are not experts in solar systems we are open to suggestions and advice.. Please feel free to correct me if my thinking is wrong here… But we are of the impression that once the bank is built and hooked to the inverter, all our power needs are maintained through a service panel.. The inverter we are interested in (regardless of voltage) will output to a main 50 amp breaker in the panel much like a home is wired.   The boat only has 120v for lights and the kitchen appliances.  There will only be a few DC lights for back up, and all the electronics will be DC.  The 6000 watt inverter allows us to run multiple appliances at the same time in the kitchen so our lifestyle change will not be as drastic as it could be. Since we plan to live aboard full time for the next few years, we want to keep life as functional as possible in the galley.    For example: We are living in a new, fancy RV at the boat yar, but only have a 30 amp service. We are constantly dealing with power issues..  We had to turn off electric heat to run microwave, and now that its warmer, we are doing the same with the AC.   It is a small thing, but having talked to folks who live aboard full time, we hear where the galley is a place where inconvenience over time makes life unnecessarily complicated.   I think when people think “sailboat” they automatically think of some lightweight, camping situation with some time limitation.  Ours is heavy, with all the comforts of home. We are clearly in the comfort over speed group… Rick On Apr 26, 2019, at 3:37 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@hotmail..com [origamiboats] wrote: An experiment would be a good idea. It would be an inexpensive experiment. There are ways to reduce radio noise.  First would be, look for a converter with RF approvals like you see on stickers on a lot of things.  Second would be to determine if the noise is being broadcast and picked up by the antenna or coupled through the power to the cabin radio - compare to a handheld.  If it is poor power quality, that can be fixed external to an inexpensive converter. Electronics have improved.  A new cheap unit might be much higher frequency than the ones ages ago, with lower ripple.  Capacitors have improved, the efficiency of power conversion inductors has improved.   All of these improvements have been pushed by decades of very competitive computer power supply production.  I would not hesitate to give it a try in an experiment anticipating a completely different outcome from early power converters contemporaneous to the first PCs. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 5:02:09 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     When I worked on fishing boats eons ago the 24 to 12 volt converters were notorious for making radio noise.  I would think a cheap inverter from Asia would have the bare minimum of parts for filtering to keep the cost down.   You would have to experiment. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : 24V to 12V step down equipment seems cheap and plentiful.    onverter.   This can add a lot more expense. | 35874|35854|2019-04-29 17:01:46|Matt Malone|Re: LiFePo4| #ygrps-yiv-735714258 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} You are right Darren.  The only point I would change is, I am leaning to 24V for the house, but that may change if I run into problems getting major equipment in 24V.   Yes, I entirely agree, generators are annoying. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 4:35 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     Although some of the ideas are interesting Matt, I don't think they materially change things.  At the power levels being discussed, there is no way you can fit enough solar onto a monohull to generate anywhere near the power required.  The Wynns, who have a Cat and therefore double the solar I used in the example, still end up running their generator often to support their electric needs.  Battery storage doesn't matter a whole lot here other than it allows you to run the generator a bit less often.  I went through a bunch of iterations when designing the electric system for our boat.  I decided that the simplest, most robust and most convenient system was 12V powered entirely from solar (with a large alternator as a backup).  With careful choices around a fridge and freezer, and avoiding high-draw AC appliances, you can have system that runs entirely on solar.  With four 120 watt panels, each with its own controller, you have a bunch of redundancy that requires virtually no maintenance, attention or ongoing running costs for most of its life.   The only downside of 12V is that it requires larger diameter wires to carry the current.  However, the costs of larger wire are offset by not needing things like voltage converters, and thick wire is a lot more reliable than an inverter or a DC-DC converter. However, one of the nice things about boats is that it is still one area where we get to make our own choices.  I wouldn't openly criticize anyone who pursues a high power consumption lifestyle, as long as they remember not to be the moron who anchors right next to someone in a quiet anchorage and then proceeds to run your generator incessantly.  On 2019-04-29 11:21 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Yes Darren, you are right, but, Rick is clear, he wants a seamless transition from house-style living to boat style living.   I have seen 10,000 Watt generators installed in cottages so that an ordinary residential electric range could be used.   It is a different philosophy, not mine.    I went down this road with my own solar system, in calculations only.   I calculated to have a battery system that will run a kitchen at peak loading for a holiday-get-together style meal, I would need about 26 kWh of storage.   I did the computation for 12V/100Ah battery units (1.2 kWh each) and figured I would need 25 batteries of 100% DOD, or 50 batteries of 50% DOD to achieve this.   I do indeed have 35 batteries currently in my solar system, but there is no way I could power a kitchen -- the system is targeted at power tools for a weekend-type use -- lower current, intermittently through the day, for a longer time, followed by a much longer period for recharge -- this better suits my batteries and installed panel capacity.   The solutions I am considering to expand the system would not be suitable for a boat, but they still can be informed by Rick's experience. Compared to the batteries Rick is getting, mine are crap.   That is why I am so eager to learn from Rick.   Darren is right about the drawbacks of Rick's system.  It is possible that the diesel budget and noise to maintain the ideal of a full power experience on Rick's boat will gradually shift -- more power-efficient appliances that accomplish the same thing:     - For instance, computer-controlled, insulated pressure cookers (such as the Instant Pot) seem in practice to use much less power to cook a large meal.     - The power draw of sous vide cooking is just a question of insulation -- more insulation less power consumed to maintain temperatures of 130-150F.   Think DIY around a suitable pot.   The resulting geometry might be similar to that of a tandoori stove, but much lower temperature.    - I have read good things about the efficiency of modern clam-shell-style counter top ovens (Gone with the Wynns, who were first RVers, and then cruisers, and maintain a very civilized level of cruising, use a Cuisinart counter top oven).   These are not the jazzed up toaster ovens with big glass doors that would lose a lot of heat, but something that looks sort of like panini grill that closes completely, and has a baking cavity inside.   I am sure if one looked, there are many more power-saving kitchen appliances to stretch battery life.  Their main features are less mass to heat up, and a lot more insulation. I would not hesitate to run my sous vide or an Instant Pot from an inverter and my current solar system.   A wide range of dishes could be made with my current system.    Then there is the potential to run efficient cooking appliances straight from DC.  In developing my solar system, I have used older-style electric range burner coils and dryer heater cores as test loads.   Even in the range of 24V to 35V, dissipating 30 - 100W, these coils put out a significant heat.  Sealed in an insulated box, they would rise to cooking temperatures eventually.  In combination with: https://www.amazon.com/Powered-Universal-Temperature-Controller-Thermocouple/dp/B01EK73OVA/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_1?keywords=Thermocouple+Temperature+controller+DC+load+20A&qid=1556561060&s=gateway&sr=8-1-fkmr0 and a high current DC relay that might look like these: https://www.littelfuse.com/products/dc-solenoids-and-relays/standard-high-current-relays.aspx one might make a cooking appliance that runs straight from DC.    No inverter losses.   DIY, so, the user decides the trade-off between insulation and power consumption. If Rick aims heavy, and then experience leads him to more efficient loads and less generator running, then that is an evolutionary approach that maintains lifestyle.    Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 12:12 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     I may have missed something earlier in the thread Rick, but it seems your focus is on consuming power, where I'd suggest you need to think about producing it.  The footprint you'll have available for solar is fairly small, so you're likely to be producing something on the scale of 500 to 600 watts.  Running all loads through the inverter requires the inverter to be on all the time and thus wasting power.  Even in use you have the losses of the inverter.   A boat that is careful with its electrical design can run completely on solar now, but it does require careful forethought about efficiency.  It looks like you're heading down the road of running a generator on a daily basis, which is a drag for you and those anchored around you.  On 2019-04-26 5:19 p.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   UPDATE:   Batteries have shipped from China with 2 BMS units.  We were told they do a balance on our batteries before shipping to avoid any possible defects or warranty issues… So far we have been pleased with the service, and the patience they have with us and our 10,000 questions… All in all we are very satisfied,,, Now we wait… Since we are not experts in solar systems we are open to suggestions and advice.. Please feel free to correct me if my thinking is wrong here… But we are of the impression that once the bank is built and hooked to the inverter, all our power needs are maintained through a service panel.. The inverter we are interested in (regardless of voltage) will output to a main 50 amp breaker in the panel much like a home is wired.   The boat only has 120v for lights and the kitchen appliances.  There will only be a few DC lights for back up, and all the electronics will be DC.  The 6000 watt inverter allows us to run multiple appliances at the same time in the kitchen so our lifestyle change will not be as drastic as it could be. Since we plan to live aboard full time for the next few years, we want to keep life as functional as possible in the galley.    For example: We are living in a new, fancy RV at the boat yar, but only have a 30 amp service. We are constantly dealing with power issues..  We had to turn off electric heat to run microwave, and now that its warmer, we are doing the same with the AC.   It is a small thing, but having talked to folks who live aboard full time, we hear where the galley is a place where inconvenience over time makes life unnecessarily complicated.   I think when people think “sailboat” they automatically think of some lightweight, camping situation with some time limitation.  Ours is heavy, with all the comforts of home. We are clearly in the comfort over speed group… Rick On Apr 26, 2019, at 3:37 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@hotmail..com [origamiboats] wrote: An experiment would be a good idea. It would be an inexpensive experiment. There are ways to reduce radio noise.  First would be, look for a converter with RF approvals like you see on stickers on a lot of things.  Second would be to determine if the noise is being broadcast and picked up by the antenna or coupled through the power to the cabin radio - compare to a handheld.  If it is poor power quality, that can be fixed external to an inexpensive converter. Electronics have improved.  A new cheap unit might be much higher frequency than the ones ages ago, with lower ripple.  Capacitors have improved, the efficiency of power conversion inductors has improved.   All of these improvements have been pushed by decades of very competitive computer power supply production.  I would not hesitate to give it a try in an experiment anticipating a completely different outcome from early power converters contemporaneous to the first PCs. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 5:02:09 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     When I worked on fishing boats eons ago the 24 to 12 volt converters were notorious for making radio noise.  I would think a cheap inverter from Asia would have the bare minimum of parts for filtering to keep the cost down.   You would have to experiment. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : 24V to 12V step down equipment seems cheap and plentiful.    onverter.   This can add a lot more expense. | 35875|35854|2019-04-29 17:49:18|opuspaul|Re: LiFePo4|I agree 100% with Darren.   Any system that will rely on running a generator is the wrong system.  I remember one boat that would fire up a Honda generator on their foredeck and then go ashore for the day while it letting it run....no problem for them, but a real annoyance for everybody else.  Superyachts are the worst.   They may have sound proofed generators but the sound of their exhaust gurgling and splashing from their hull can be a real pain....it never ends. >>>>>>  I wouldn't openly criticize anyone who pursues a high power consumption lifestyle, as long as they remember not to be the moron who anchors right next to someone in a quiet anchorage and then proceeds to run your generator incessantly.  | 35876|35854|2019-04-30 01:34:09|SHANE ROTHWELL|Re: LiFePo4|I thought the whole point of going sailing and espcially this group was to simplify things not complicate them.Seemlessly from ashore to aboard? Your kidding, right?Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android| 35877|35854|2019-04-30 08:00:21|Matt Malone|Re: LiFePo4| #ygrps-yiv-1165767401 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Sorry Shane, and Rick, I used the term "seamless", not Rick.  Perhaps I should have said "with less of an adjustment".   Going from ashore to aboard with less of an adjustment. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of SHANE ROTHWELL rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 1:34 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: LiFePo4     I thought the whole point of going sailing and espcially this group was to simplify things not complicate them. Seemlessly from ashore to aboard? Your kidding, right? Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android | 35878|35878|2019-04-30 08:39:08|smallboatvoyaguer|Engine vent|Hey y’all I’d like to keep my engine area separate from the living quarters of my boat, and so would like to add an air intake vent to my cockpit area, to feed the needs of the engines air requirements. Any ideas of what size bent this should be? -Marlin| 35879|35854|2019-04-30 12:03:40|Matt Malone|Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?| #ygrps-yiv-1565881509 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} What really is the electrical capacity on a boat from solar, how far will that take you, and realistically, will one be running a generator and how much? Solar Power Generation: Based on some tests by the Wynns in Florida (latitude N26), two used "160W" panels (they have 6 of these), produced 15 Amps at "12V", at 14.4V from the panels, but we will say 12.8V from the batteries later because though the charge voltage is higher, the voltage at which the power comes out is lower.    That is 216 Watts in, 192 Watts of useful power out of the batteries later.   They also tested two new "140W" panels and produced 20 Amps at "12V", or about 288 Watts in, 256 Watts out later.   256/"280" = 91% useful power.   192/"320" = 60% useful power.   Same solar controller in both tests.  At latitude N44, I was seeing about 67% of ratings from the panels, before considering charging losses which for a perfect charge controller might be 60% useful power.    On my off-grid solar installation, I have huge reserve capacity, currently not that much generating capacity, and the vampire load is very low.   I would add panels if I were to increase expected daily loads.   The Wynns also did a lot of shading tests, simulating halyards (no appreciable difference) and the boom (much larger difference).   Lets assume this is a boat on the hook and one has put a preventer on the boom to make it not shade panels, and oriented the boat to get uninterrupted sun on the panels.   If I were designing a solar system for a boat today, for a monohull, I would go with the most power dense panels I could get -- lets say "320W" panels.   Lets say I have an arch over my davits and I am able to put three 40-inch wide panels flat above this arch -- that is a beam of 10 feet.   Lets assume 60% useful power.   That is 960 Watts * 60% = 576 Watts which is not much. One only gets that during the day.   So one might get 3kWh of power per day from the panels -- based on not angling panels.   For someone who thinks they can run without a generator, that is the limit of power.   "Average use for a typical RVer is around 20 kWh a day.   ....  RVers parked in areas where they do not need air conditioning will use much less electricity than RVers who do need it.  In fact, the average amount of electricity used by people who are not running air conditioning is about 10 kWh a day."  (1) There is one total power budget estimate.   Lets look at it from the components up: Loads: Required Unoccupied, trekking the country nearby while the boat is on anchor:  - Refrigeration: 300 kWh / year (modern, high efficiency, extra insulation for the tropics)   lets say 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Anchoring light (LED, 2 nm visibility, on a timer, 12 hour burn):  0.025 kWh/day   (3)    - Bilge Pump (500 gallons/day, 1 hour/day): 0.060 kWh/day (4)  - Most basic of computers offering Wifi and sensor monitoring to report alerts & email: 0.080 kWh/day (5 + estimate for dry contact and sensor system)   Minimum Occupied:  - Radio (hand held, listening):  0.020 kWh/day  (2)   - Interior Lights (LED):  0.050 kWh/day   - Recharging (Cell, shaver, shortwave receiver, flashlights, head lamps, miscellaneous): 0.050 kWh/day Voluntary Electronics:  - Netbook (4 hours):  0.100 kWh/day    - Full Laptop (4 hours): 0.300 kWh/day   - Display Screen (tv/monitor) (4 hours): 0.400 kWh//day  - DVD player (2 hours): 0.050 kWh/day Other:  - Pressurized water (per 100 liters -- usage for 1 day):  0.020 kWh/day (7)  - Freezer: 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Washing machine, 2 people:  0.400 kWh/day (one load every second day)  - Water maker (most efficient, per 100 liters/day): 0.400 kWh/day (6) Working on Boat:  - hand saw and driver drill for cabinetry work (1 hour run time/8 hour day): 1 kWh/day (experience)  - belt sander for finishing (6 hours run time/8 hour day): 7.2 kWh/day (experience) This is before using any electricity for cooking.   Looking at these conveniences ... pressurized water is a power bargain.   So, basic anchoring budget is 1.17 kWh / day -- solar will cover it with more than 100% to spare -- one 12V/100Ah battery unit at 50% DOD will carry it through the night.   On light overcast days, when one is getting 50% power, the system is still OK.   So one uses two 12V/100Ah units to keep the average DOD to 25%, to make sure it does not go much below 50% DOD in a stretch of moderately cloudy weather.      To go one week (hurricane overcast on a boat, a week of heavy overcast in winter in Canada) without significant sun, the battery bank must be 8.2 kWh -- which is 14 units of 12V/100Ah at 50% DOD -- that is a lot of batteries.   Rick's batteries, four times 12V/200Ah, 9.6 kWh, could handle this, just.   This is why I am interested in Rick's batteries -- they are about the minimum I would consider to have constant refrigeration, be it in a cottage or boat.   Speaking of refrigeration.  When one is not opening the fridge and adding things or taking things out, the power consumption of a fridge is inversely related to thickness of insulation.   As the largest power draw in an unoccupied space, I would consider a hyper-insulated fridge (I do not believe it is available, I was thinking DIY) to cut the power in half.   That allows Rick's batteries to run the system for close to 2 weeks without sun.   That I think would be a far better design for an off-grid cottage.   Ricks batteries would recharge in about 4 days after 2 weeks with heavy overcast.    If one had reliable sun every day, and particularly if the panels netted a little better than 60% useful power from their rating, then: 3.93 kWh/day -- based on 200 liters/day of water desalinated, and pressurized, laundry, freezer, and no voluntary electronics.  The solar panels could not reliably keep up.  In full sun, Rick's batteries would need a generator run of 10 hours once every 8 or 9 days.   From fully charged, after 2 days without sun, without a generator run, Rick's batteries would be exhausted.    Therefore, a pretty spartan existence, with a short shower daily, would be a strain without a daily generator run of about an hour on sunny days, and 4 hours a day on heavy overcast days.   (Assuming a Honda 1200W quiet generator outputting 1000W average.) Get rid of the freezer and one is just below what one would expect of the panels per day.   After just one day without sun, one would have to wait 2 weeks for the batteries to get back up to normal.   It is not reasonable to expect only 1 day of heavy clouds in each 2 weeks.   Therefore, even without the freezer, the solar panels would likely fall behind and regular generator running would be needed.  One could laminate flexible panels to the deck, but they are on average half the efficiency per unit area and, one really could not expect more than another 320 W of power to be conveniently placed. For those thinking that wind power will save them...  one would need an anchorage protected from waves, by say a submerged reef, and open to the wind -- so not like a closed bay.   Most small wind generators are rated for 40km/h, that is, they give their rated power at 40km/h wind speed.   They do not cut in until about 8 or 9 km/h.   Wind energy goes by the cube of the wind speed.   To generate half the rated output, one needs about 32 km/h of wind.   Half the rated output on a 400 Watt generator is 200 Watts.   Even if it is a tiringly windy anchorage, and the wind blows 24/7, that is only 4.8 kWh of power maximum theoretical, 4.2 kWh useful delivered to loads is more likely with charging inefficiency.  That is more than solar, but only if one assumes a tiringly windy anchorage.   If one wants the wind generator to total the same output as solar in 24 hours, one must have 27 kmph winds, 24/7.    Based on the theory that when it is not sunny the wind is blowing, to cover minimal loads (1.17kWh/day), one needs 20 km/h winds, 24/7 on cloudy days.     That is actually a reasonable expectation, on average, but not reliably.   Generator Inevitable Therefore, one should expect to use a generator on a cruising boat at least from time to time.   Now the question is how big and how long.  (I like the little 1200W Hondas .... they are very quiet.)   Taking a 1200W at 80% load, that is one hour of daily generator running for each kWh of extra consumption one has.  A freezer -- average an hour a day extra.  If one has AC, the RV example would have one run the generator for the entire daylight hours.     This is assuming all cooking appliances run from fuel.   If one assumes a sum total of 2 hours running 1800W (kettle, toaster oven, or single element hot plate), that is 3-4 kWh/day, 3-4 more hours of running the generator. Cat vs. Monohull.... Now, the Wynns have 11 solar panels on their cat.   If they upgraded them all to 320W panels (physically a bit larger, but also more efficient), and assuming 60% useful power, that is about 12.5 kWh / day ... I cannot say anything about their power usage, or their total average power received on their panels, but, it would seem a cat has a much better chance of being able to reliably handle reasonable hotel loads on solar alone.   Looking to the RV example, with no A, a Cat is the minimum unit of cruising boat to have an average RV experience without the need to run a generator every day -- certainly one will have a generator, certainly it will be run frequently in the average 2-week period to account for shortages of sun, but, it will not be run with certainty every single day just to meet average needs.      I did this calculation long ago, and that is why, some time ago, I encouraged Brent to come out of retirement and design an orgami cat, say based on a pair of 31 hulls, maybe with less beam (or maybe not), to each hull.    The hulls could each be a long, shallow draft single keel for even more shallow boat draft than the monohull twin keeler.   An origami Cat could compete with RVs as a lifestyle cruising boat where the entire world is available.    There are about 350,000-500,000 RVs sold each year worldwide(?) (9).  There are about 2,500 cruising boats sold in the US each year and about 2,000 sailboats of all sizes, including daysailers sold (8).   Monohulls are small on the inside compared to a modest RV.   Small = reduced comfort.   While there are many factors keeping the boat market about 200 times smaller, comfort is something that can be addressed.  Flip the Other Way -- Why Have Solar at All? If solar is so pathetic and doomed to be insufficient, why have solar at all?    Even if one is only netting 2kWh of electricity total from solar panels on sunny days, that is still 2 hours not running a generator, per day, or about 2.2 litres of fuel per day (for a Honda 1200W), or one 20 litre jerry can every 9 days.    Economically that does not make sense, solar panels are expensive.   But over a year, that is over 800 litres.   Really good solar panels are still only about $0.7-0.8/Rated Watt.   960 Rated Watts is what, $770?  Does anyone think one can find 800 litres of fuel reliably while cruising for less than $770 ?    Want to explain what a pain it is to mount and wire up panels -- I will tell you about hauling 40 jerry cans of fuel a year, every year probably most of the time in a dingy.  Yes, the charge controller will be a good chunk of change too.   We are not looking at a one-year payback, but, one year is informative.       One can outfit solar panels before leaving, at continental industrial-source prices for all components to protect against fuel costs in small markets later.   Other Budgets There are many other people who have done power budgets for homes, and RVs and boats, and I am certainly not saying this power budget is better, or closer to what you will experience, I was just trying to solve the question -- generator or not, and if so how long must it run.   I was also trying to highlight the benefits of a cat when it comes to power.   Matt References: (1) https://www.godownsize.com/electricity-consumption-rv/ (2) https://www.westmarine.com/buy/west-marine--vhf95db-dual-band-floating-handheld-vhf-radio--16230526 and https://www.westmarine.com/WestAdvisor/Selecting-a-VHF-Handheld-Radio (3) https://www.yachtingmonthly.com/gear/anchor-lights-test-33105 (4) https://www.amazon.ca/Electric-Automatic-Caravan-Five-Oceans/dp/B00N44FG5I (5) https://www.pidramble.com/wiki/benchmarks/power-consumption (6) https://www.cruisingworld.com/desalination-decisions-watermakers (7) https://www.rvpartscanada.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=37&products_id=2335#.XMhVLEN7nq4 (8) https://www.tradeonlytoday.com/industry-news/boat-sales-topped-250000-in-2016 (9) https://www.rvia.org/historical-rv-data From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 5:13 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     I agree 100% with Darren.   Any system that will rely on running a generator is the wrong system.  I remember one boat that would fire up a Honda generator on their foredeck and then go ashore for the day while it letting it run....no problem for them, but a real annoyance for everybody else.  Superyachts are the worst.   They may have sound proofed generators but the sound of their exhaust gurgling and splashing from their hull can be a real pain....it never ends. >>>>>>  I wouldn't openly criticize anyone who pursues a high power consumption lifestyle, as long as they remember not to be the moron who anchors right next to someone in a quiet anchorage and then proceeds to run your generator incessantly.  | 35880|35854|2019-04-30 13:58:45|Matt Malone|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?| #ygrps-yiv-658972719 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} This is an example of low power refrigeration -- a small unit of 9 cubic feet, with about 1/3rd of the energy figures used in the previous calculation: 102kWh/year, or 0.28 kWh/day.    $2,000.     But it proves there are commercial products that focus on insulation for reduced power consumption. http://www.sunfrost.com/R10_efficient_ac_dc_refrigerator.html Their freezer unit numbers are not as impressive - 321 kWh/year for 9 cubic feet, $2,000.    Here is a small Walmart chest freezer 5 cubic feet, 218 kWh/year, $169 https://www.walmart.com/ip/Arctic-King-5-cu-ft-Chest-Freezer/45723096 Here is a Walmart 7 cubic foot model - 250 kWh/year, $198 https://www.walmart.com/ip/Arctic-King-7-cu-ft-Chest-Freezer-Black/345429525 Arctic King 7 cu ft Chest Freezer, Black - Walmart.com Free Shipping. Buy Arctic King 7 cu ft Chest Freezer, Black at Walmart.com www.walmart.com While 102 kWh/year is impressive for an upright model, for $2,000, I am pretty sure one could tamper with the set point of a Walmart chest freezer and make it a chest refrigerator and get well below 200 kWh/year or 0.55 kWh/day.   That was what I was thinking about for my boat, if I ever convert away from the hyper-insulated ice chest it has built in now.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 12:03 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     What really is the electrical capacity on a boat from solar, how far will that take you, and realistically, will one be running a generator and how much? Solar Power Generation: Based on some tests by the Wynns in Florida (latitude N26), two used "160W" panels (they have 6 of these), produced 15 Amps at "12V", at 14.4V from the panels, but we will say 12.8V from the batteries later because though the charge voltage is higher, the voltage at which the power comes out is lower.    That is 216 Watts in, 192 Watts of useful power out of the batteries later.   They also tested two new "140W" panels and produced 20 Amps at "12V", or about 288 Watts in, 256 Watts out later.   256/"280" = 91% useful power.   192/"320" = 60% useful power.   Same solar controller in both tests.  At latitude N44, I was seeing about 67% of ratings from the panels, before considering charging losses which for a perfect charge controller might be 60% useful power.    On my off-grid solar installation, I have huge reserve capacity, currently not that much generating capacity, and the vampire load is very low.   I would add panels if I were to increase expected daily loads.   The Wynns also did a lot of shading tests, simulating halyards (no appreciable difference) and the boom (much larger difference).   Lets assume this is a boat on the hook and one has put a preventer on the boom to make it not shade panels, and oriented the boat to get uninterrupted sun on the panels.   If I were designing a solar system for a boat today, for a monohull, I would go with the most power dense panels I could get -- lets say "320W" panels.   Lets say I have an arch over my davits and I am able to put three 40-inch wide panels flat above this arch -- that is a beam of 10 feet.   Lets assume 60% useful power.   That is 960 Watts * 60% = 576 Watts which is not much. One only gets that during the day.   So one might get 3kWh of power per day from the panels -- based on not angling panels.   For someone who thinks they can run without a generator, that is the limit of power.   "Average use for a typical RVer is around 20 kWh a day.   ....  RVers parked in areas where they do not need air conditioning will use much less electricity than RVers who do need it.  In fact, the average amount of electricity used by people who are not running air conditioning is about 10 kWh a day."  (1) There is one total power budget estimate.   Lets look at it from the components up: Loads: Required Unoccupied, trekking the country nearby while the boat is on anchor:  - Refrigeration: 300 kWh / year (modern, high efficiency, extra insulation for the tropics)   lets say 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Anchoring light (LED, 2 nm visibility, on a timer, 12 hour burn):  0.025 kWh/day   (3)    - Bilge Pump (500 gallons/day, 1 hour/day): 0.060 kWh/day (4)  - Most basic of computers offering Wifi and sensor monitoring to report alerts & email: 0.080 kWh/day (5 + estimate for dry contact and sensor system)   Minimum Occupied:  - Radio (hand held, listening):  0.020 kWh/day  (2)   - Interior Lights (LED):  0.050 kWh/day   - Recharging (Cell, shaver, shortwave receiver, flashlights, head lamps, miscellaneous): 0.050 kWh/day Voluntary Electronics:  - Netbook (4 hours):  0.100 kWh/day    - Full Laptop (4 hours): 0.300 kWh/day   - Display Screen (tv/monitor) (4 hours): 0.400 kWh//day  - DVD player (2 hours): 0.050 kWh/day Other:  - Pressurized water (per 100 liters -- usage for 1 day):  0.020 kWh/day (7)  - Freezer: 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Washing machine, 2 people:  0.400 kWh/day (one load every second day)  - Water maker (most efficient, per 100 liters/day): 0.400 kWh/day (6) Working on Boat:  - hand saw and driver drill for cabinetry work (1 hour run time/8 hour day): 1 kWh/day (experience)  - belt sander for finishing (6 hours run time/8 hour day): 7.2 kWh/day (experience) This is before using any electricity for cooking.   Looking at these conveniences ... pressurized water is a power bargain.   So, basic anchoring budget is 1.17 kWh / day -- solar will cover it with more than 100% to spare -- one 12V/100Ah battery unit at 50% DOD will carry it through the night.   On light overcast days, when one is getting 50% power, the system is still OK.   So one uses two 12V/100Ah units to keep the average DOD to 25%, to make sure it does not go much below 50% DOD in a stretch of moderately cloudy weather.      To go one week (hurricane overcast on a boat, a week of heavy overcast in winter in Canada) without significant sun, the battery bank must be 8.2 kWh -- which is 14 units of 12V/100Ah at 50% DOD -- that is a lot of batteries.   Rick's batteries, four times 12V/200Ah, 9.6 kWh, could handle this, just.   This is why I am interested in Rick's batteries -- they are about the minimum I would consider to have constant refrigeration, be it in a cottage or boat.   Speaking of refrigeration.  When one is not opening the fridge and adding things or taking things out, the power consumption of a fridge is inversely related to thickness of insulation.   As the largest power draw in an unoccupied space, I would consider a hyper-insulated fridge (I do not believe it is available, I was thinking DIY) to cut the power in half.   That allows Rick's batteries to run the system for close to 2 weeks without sun.   That I think would be a far better design for an off-grid cottage.   Ricks batteries would recharge in about 4 days after 2 weeks with heavy overcast.    If one had reliable sun every day, and particularly if the panels netted a little better than 60% useful power from their rating, then: 3.93 kWh/day -- based on 200 liters/day of water desalinated, and pressurized, laundry, freezer, and no voluntary electronics.  The solar panels could not reliably keep up.  In full sun, Rick's batteries would need a generator run of 10 hours once every 8 or 9 days.   From fully charged, after 2 days without sun, without a generator run, Rick's batteries would be exhausted.    Therefore, a pretty spartan existence, with a short shower daily, would be a strain without a daily generator run of about an hour on sunny days, and 4 hours a day on heavy overcast days.   (Assuming a Honda 1200W quiet generator outputting 1000W average.) Get rid of the freezer and one is just below what one would expect of the panels per day.   After just one day without sun, one would have to wait 2 weeks for the batteries to get back up to normal.   It is not reasonable to expect only 1 day of heavy clouds in each 2 weeks.   Therefore, even without the freezer, the solar panels would likely fall behind and regular generator running would be needed.  One could laminate flexible panels to the deck, but they are on average half the efficiency per unit area and, one really could not expect more than another 320 W of power to be conveniently placed. For those thinking that wind power will save them...  one would need an anchorage protected from waves, by say a submerged reef, and open to the wind -- so not like a closed bay.   Most small wind generators are rated for 40km/h, that is, they give their rated power at 40km/h wind speed.   They do not cut in until about 8 or 9 km/h.   Wind energy goes by the cube of the wind speed.   To generate half the rated output, one needs about 32 km/h of wind.   Half the rated output on a 400 Watt generator is 200 Watts.   Even if it is a tiringly windy anchorage, and the wind blows 24/7, that is only 4.8 kWh of power maximum theoretical, 4.2 kWh useful delivered to loads is more likely with charging inefficiency.  That is more than solar, but only if one assumes a tiringly windy anchorage.   If one wants the wind generator to total the same output as solar in 24 hours, one must have 27 kmph winds, 24/7.    Based on the theory that when it is not sunny the wind is blowing, to cover minimal loads (1.17kWh/day), one needs 20 km/h winds, 24/7 on cloudy days.     That is actually a reasonable expectation, on average, but not reliably.   Generator Inevitable Therefore, one should expect to use a generator on a cruising boat at least from time to time.   Now the question is how big and how long.  (I like the little 1200W Hondas .... they are very quiet.)   Taking a 1200W at 80% load, that is one hour of daily generator running for each kWh of extra consumption one has.  A freezer -- average an hour a day extra.  If one has AC, the RV example would have one run the generator for the entire daylight hours.     This is assuming all cooking appliances run from fuel.   If one assumes a sum total of 2 hours running 1800W (kettle, toaster oven, or single element hot plate), that is 3-4 kWh/day, 3-4 more hours of running the generator. Cat vs. Monohull.... Now, the Wynns have 11 solar panels on their cat.   If they upgraded them all to 320W panels (physically a bit larger, but also more efficient), and assuming 60% useful power, that is about 12.5 kWh / day ... I cannot say anything about their power usage, or their total average power received on their panels, but, it would seem a cat has a much better chance of being able to reliably handle reasonable hotel loads on solar alone.   Looking to the RV example, with no A, a Cat is the minimum unit of cruising boat to have an average RV experience without the need to run a generator every day -- certainly one will have a generator, certainly it will be run frequently in the average 2-week period to account for shortages of sun, but, it will not be run with certainty every single day just to meet average needs.      I did this calculation long ago, and that is why, some time ago, I encouraged Brent to come out of retirement and design an orgami cat, say based on a pair of 31 hulls, maybe with less beam (or maybe not), to each hull.    The hulls could each be a long, shallow draft single keel for even more shallow boat draft than the monohull twin keeler.   An origami Cat could compete with RVs as a lifestyle cruising boat where the entire world is available.    There are about 350,000-500,000 RVs sold each year worldwide(?) (9).  There are about 2,500 cruising boats sold in the US each year and about 2,000 sailboats of all sizes, including daysailers sold (8).   Monohulls are small on the inside compared to a modest RV.   Small = reduced comfort.   While there are many factors keeping the boat market about 200 times smaller, comfort is something that can be addressed.  Flip the Other Way -- Why Have Solar at All? If solar is so pathetic and doomed to be insufficient, why have solar at all?    Even if one is only netting 2kWh of electricity total from solar panels on sunny days, that is still 2 hours not running a generator, per day, or about 2.2 litres of fuel per day (for a Honda 1200W), or one 20 litre jerry can every 9 days.    Economically that does not make sense, solar panels are expensive.   But over a year, that is over 800 litres.   Really good solar panels are still only about $0.7-0.8/Rated Watt.   960 Rated Watts is what, $770?  Does anyone think one can find 800 litres of fuel reliably while cruising for less than $770 ?    Want to explain what a pain it is to mount and wire up panels -- I will tell you about hauling 40 jerry cans of fuel a year, every year probably most of the time in a dingy.  Yes, the charge controller will be a good chunk of change too.   We are not looking at a one-year payback, but, one year is informative.       One can outfit solar panels before leaving, at continental industrial-source prices for all components to protect against fuel costs in small markets later.   Other Budgets There are many other people who have done power budgets for homes, and RVs and boats, and I am certainly not saying this power budget is better, or closer to what you will experience, I was just trying to solve the question -- generator or not, and if so how long must it run.   I was also trying to highlight the benefits of a cat when it comes to power.   Matt References: (1) https://www.godownsize.com/electricity-consumption-rv/ (2) https://www.westmarine.com/buy/west-marine--vhf95db-dual-band-floating-handheld-vhf-radio--16230526 and https://www.westmarine.com/WestAdvisor/Selecting-a-VHF-Handheld-Radio (3) https://www.yachtingmonthly.com/gear/anchor-lights-test-33105 (4) https://www.amazon.ca/Electric-Automatic-Caravan-Five-Oceans/dp/B00N44FG5I (5) https://www.pidramble.com/wiki/benchmarks/power-consumption (6) https://www.cruisingworld.com/desalination-decisions-watermakers (7) https://www.rvpartscanada.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=37&products_id=2335#.XMhVLEN7nq4 (8) https://www.tradeonlytoday.com/industry-news/boat-sales-topped-250000-in-2016 (9) https://www.rvia.org/historical-rv-data From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 5:13 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     I agree 100% with Darren.   Any system that will rely on running a generator is the wrong system.  I remember one boat that would fire up a Honda generator on their foredeck and then go ashore for the day while it letting it run....no problem for them, but a real annoyance for everybody else.  Superyachts are the worst.   They may have sound proofed generators but the sound of their exhaust gurgling and splashing from their hull can be a real pain....it never ends. >>>>>>  I wouldn't openly criticize anyone who pursues a high power consumption lifestyle, as long as they remember not to be the moron who anchors right next to someone in a quiet anchorage and then proceeds to run your generator incessantly.  | 35881|35854|2019-04-30 15:00:01|Darren Bos|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?| For everyone who has a simple boat without refrigeration/freezer, you probably wonder why everyone is so concerned about how to generate enough power from solar.  Your life is simple and there is no reason to read the rest of this. Matt, that's a pretty reasonable analysis, and would fit some boats.  There are certainly boats that manage these comforts on lower watts.  The obvious area for improvement is refrigeration, any efficiencies gained here is money better spent than money spent on power generation (solar and generators).  I came to the conclusion that 4" of styrofoam insulation for the fridge and 6" for the freezer was the minimum to make DC refrigeration work on a reasonable energy budget.  50 to 125 Ah per day is what 12v DC refrigeration generally uses per day.  The differences are almost entirely due to insulation, next due to the size of the fridge/freezer.  If you can get closer to 50Ah per day your energy budget changes drastically.  I decided a spillover design fridge freezer, custom built to maximize insulation was the best way to go in my build.  Aspen Aerogel is an interesting material here.  However, polystyrene foam is easy to work, cheap, readily available, and absorbs water less than the other foam insulation choices. Your energy budget doesn't consider engine run time and power from the alternator at all.  A boat that moves even just once or twice a week can reduce/eliminate its need for generator run time by super-sizing its alternator.  I've ordered a Leece-Neville 210A school bus alternator.  It should run happily at 170A continuous, perhaps a bit more with careful attention to cooling.  This is a win-win situation, getting power from the alternator is more efficient than from a generator.  With a fixed pitch prop you're running at an inefficient part of the power curve of the diesel at cruising rpm.  The extra load the alternator moves the engine into a more efficient part of the fuel map, that improvement in efficiency means that part of the fuel consumed by the alternator comes for free as your making the engine more efficient at the same time you make carbon buildup problems less likely.  Even if you have a smaller diesel you could fit an alternator this size.  If you need maximum propulsion power at some point, an external regulator like a Balmar Mc-614 used with a switch for small engine mode (field output reduced to 50%) allows you to get most of the power from the engine for propulsion when necessary.  You could also just put a plain switch in the field wire to the alt for a inexpensive solution, although charging at these high currents you probably want an external regulator anyway.  It should be noted that this solution relies on batteries that can accept pretty high charge rates.  This would be LiPO4, Firefly >AGM>very large flooded lead acid bank.  A small flooded-lead-acid bank probably won't be able to accept the high charge rate for long enough for a large alternator to do a lot of good.  The LiPO4 and the Firefly also have the advantage that they are totally happy in a partial state of charge and can stay there without damage until you are ready to move to the next anchorage (within reasonable time limits and state of charge limits).  You should switch to a serpentine belt to run a large alternator like a Delco Remy 28SI or a Leece Neville Idle Pro. There are two ways of looking at comfort while cruising.  Your comfort could come from plugging in whatever you want whenever you want.  However, this comes with the discomfort of noise from the generator, discomfort getting/storing fuel for the generator (especially bad for gasoline generators),  discomfort from getting/storing oil for the generator, the discomfort from generator oil changes, discomfort from trying to source generator parts in some distant port, discomfort from getting shunned by the cruisers who can't stand the noise of your generator.  On the flip side, if you design a boat with conservation in mind, it is possible to run almost entirely on solar.  I've met more than one boat (with refrigeration and watermaker) that runs successfully with just solar/wind/alternator.  You boil water in a kettle on the stove (is that a discomfort?), you wash laundry ashore or in a bucket (Ok, the bucket counts as a discomfort), is lighting a propane stove a discomfort compared to electric (around here tons of folks spend tons of money on their house for the luxury of a natural gas stove).  I have a nice antique coffee grinder, it takes zero watts to run, is beautiful and a pleasure to use, there are tons of equivalents to this on the boat, where doing things different is part of the pleasure for me.  A generator is definitely not necessary.   On 2019-04-30 9:03 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   What really is the electrical capacity on a boat from solar, how far will that take you, and realistically, will one be running a generator and how much? Solar Power Generation: Based on some tests by the Wynns in Florida (latitude N26), two used "160W" panels (they have 6 of these), produced 15 Amps at "12V", at 14.4V from the panels, but we will say 12.8V from the batteries later because though the charge voltage is higher, the voltage at which the power comes out is lower.    That is 216 Watts in, 192 Watts of useful power out of the batteries later.   They also tested two new "140W" panels and produced 20 Amps at "12V", or about 288 Watts in, 256 Watts out later.   256/"280" = 91% useful power.   192/"320" = 60% useful power.   Same solar controller in both tests.  At latitude N44, I was seeing about 67% of ratings from the panels, before considering charging losses which for a perfect charge controller might be 60% useful power.    On my off-grid solar installation, I have huge reserve capacity, currently not that much generating capacity, and the vampire load is very low.   I would add panels if I were to increase expected daily loads.   The Wynns also did a lot of shading tests, simulating halyards (no appreciable difference) and the boom (much larger difference).   Lets assume this is a boat on the hook and one has put a preventer on the boom to make it not shade panels, and oriented the boat to get uninterrupted sun on the panels.   If I were designing a solar system for a boat today, for a monohull, I would go with the most power dense panels I could get -- lets say "320W" panels.   Lets say I have an arch over my davits and I am able to put three 40-inch wide panels flat above this arch -- that is a beam of 10 feet.   Lets assume 60% useful power.   That is 960 Watts * 60% = 576 Watts which is not much. One only gets that during the day.   So one might get 3kWh of power per day from the panels -- based on not angling panels.   For someone who thinks they can run without a generator, that is the limit of power.   "Average use for a typical RVer is around 20 kWh a day.   ....  RVers parked in areas where they do not need air conditioning will use much less electricity than RVers who do need it.  In fact, the average amount of electricity used by people who are not running air conditioning is about 10 kWh a day."  (1) There is one total power budget estimate.   Lets look at it from the components up: Loads: Required Unoccupied, trekking the country nearby while the boat is on anchor:  - Refrigeration: 300 kWh / year (modern, high efficiency, extra insulation for the tropics)   lets say 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Anchoring light (LED, 2 nm visibility, on a timer, 12 hour burn):  0.025 kWh/day   (3)    - Bilge Pump (500 gallons/day, 1 hour/day): 0.060 kWh/day (4)  - Most basic of computers offering Wifi and sensor monitoring to report alerts & email: 0.080 kWh/day (5 + estimate for dry contact and sensor system)   Minimum Occupied:  - Radio (hand held, listening):  0.020 kWh/day  (2)   - Interior Lights (LED):  0.050 kWh/day   - Recharging (Cell, shaver, shortwave receiver, flashlights, head lamps, miscellaneous): 0.050 kWh/day Voluntary Electronics:  - Netbook (4 hours):  0.100 kWh/day    - Full Laptop (4 hours): 0.300 kWh/day   - Display Screen (tv/monitor) (4 hours): 0.400 kWh//day  - DVD player (2 hours): 0.050 kWh/day Other:  - Pressurized water (per 100 liters -- usage for 1 day):  0.020 kWh/day (7)  - Freezer: 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Washing machine, 2 people:  0.400 kWh/day (one load every second day)  - Water maker (most efficient, per 100 liters/day): 0.400 kWh/day (6) Working on Boat:  - hand saw and driver drill for cabinetry work (1 hour run time/8 hour day): 1 kWh/day (experience)  - belt sander for finishing (6 hours run time/8 hour day): 7.2 kWh/day (experience) This is before using any electricity for cooking.   Looking at these conveniences ... pressurized water is a power bargain.   So, basic anchoring budget is 1.17 kWh / day -- solar will cover it with more than 100% to spare -- one 12V/100Ah battery unit at 50% DOD will carry it through the night.   On light overcast days, when one is getting 50% power, the system is still OK.   So one uses two 12V/100Ah units to keep the average DOD to 25%, to make sure it does not go much below 50% DOD in a stretch of moderately cloudy weather.      To go one week (hurricane overcast on a boat, a week of heavy overcast in winter in Canada) without significant sun, the battery bank must be 8.2 kWh -- which is 14 units of 12V/100Ah at 50% DOD -- that is a lot of batteries.   Rick's batteries, four times 12V/200Ah, 9.6 kWh, could handle this, just.   This is why I am interested in Rick's batteries -- they are about the minimum I would consider to have constant refrigeration, be it in a cottage or boat.   Speaking of refrigeration.  When one is not opening the fridge and adding things or taking things out, the power consumption of a fridge is inversely related to thickness of insulation.   As the largest power draw in an unoccupied space, I would consider a hyper-insulated fridge (I do not believe it is available, I was thinking DIY) to cut the power in half.   That allows Rick's batteries to run the system for close to 2 weeks without sun.   That I think would be a far better design for an off-grid cottage.   Ricks batteries would recharge in about 4 days after 2 weeks with heavy overcast.    If one had reliable sun every day, and particularly if the panels netted a little better than 60% useful power from their rating, then: 3.93 kWh/day -- based on 200 liters/day of water desalinated, and pressurized, laundry, freezer, and no voluntary electronics.  The solar panels could not reliably keep up.  In full sun, Rick's batteries would need a generator run of 10 hours once every 8 or 9 days.   From fully charged, after 2 days without sun, without a generator run, Rick's batteries would be exhausted.    Therefore, a pretty spartan existence, with a short shower daily, would be a strain without a daily generator run of about an hour on sunny days, and 4 hours a day on heavy overcast days.   (Assuming a Honda 1200W quiet generator outputting 1000W average.) Get rid of the freezer and one is just below what one would expect of the panels per day.   After just one day without sun, one would have to wait 2 weeks for the batteries to get back up to normal.   It is not reasonable to expect only 1 day of heavy clouds in each 2 weeks.   Therefore, even without the freezer, the solar panels would likely fall behind and regular generator running would be needed.  One could laminate flexible panels to the deck, but they are on average half the efficiency per unit area and, one really could not expect more than another 320 W of power to be conveniently placed. For those thinking that wind power will save them...  one would need an anchorage protected from waves, by say a submerged reef, and open to the wind -- so not like a closed bay.   Most small wind generators are rated for 40km/h, that is, they give their rated power at 40km/h wind speed.   They do not cut in until about 8 or 9 km/h.   Wind energy goes by the cube of the wind speed.   To generate half the rated output, one needs about 32 km/h of wind.   Half the rated output on a 400 Watt generator is 200 Watts.   Even if it is a tiringly windy anchorage, and the wind blows 24/7, that is only 4.8 kWh of power maximum theoretical, 4.2 kWh useful delivered to loads is more likely with charging inefficiency.  That is more than solar, but only if one assumes a tiringly windy anchorage.   If one wants the wind generator to total the same output as solar in 24 hours, one must have 27 kmph winds, 24/7.    Based on the theory that when it is not sunny the wind is blowing, to cover minimal loads (1.17kWh/day), one needs 20 km/h winds, 24/7 on cloudy days.     That is actually a reasonable expectation, on average, but not reliably.   Generator Inevitable Therefore, one should expect to use a generator on a cruising boat at least from time to time.   Now the question is how big and how long.  (I like the little 1200W Hondas .... they are very quiet.)   Taking a 1200W at 80% load, that is one hour of daily generator running for each kWh of extra consumption one has.  A freezer -- average an hour a day extra.  If one has AC, the RV example would have one run the generator for the entire daylight hours.     This is assuming all cooking appliances run from fuel.   If one assumes a sum total of 2 hours running 1800W (kettle, toaster oven, or single element hot plate), that is 3-4 kWh/day, 3-4 more hours of running the generator. Cat vs. Monohull.... Now, the Wynns have 11 solar panels on their cat.   If they upgraded them all to 320W panels (physically a bit larger, but also more efficient), and assuming 60% useful power, that is about 12.5 kWh / day ... I cannot say anything about their power usage, or their total average power received on their panels, but, it would seem a cat has a much better chance of being able to reliably handle reasonable hotel loads on solar alone.   Looking to the RV example, with no A, a Cat is the minimum unit of cruising boat to have an average RV experience without the need to run a generator every day -- certainly one will have a generator, certainly it will be run frequently in the average 2-week period to account for shortages of sun, but, it will not be run with certainty every single day just to meet average needs.      I did this calculation long ago, and that is why, some time ago, I encouraged Brent to come out of retirement and design an orgami cat, say based on a pair of 31 hulls, maybe with less beam (or maybe not), to each hull.    The hulls could each be a long, shallow draft single keel for even more shallow boat draft than the monohull twin keeler.   An origami Cat could compete with RVs as a lifestyle cruising boat where the entire world is available.    There are about 350,000-500,000 RVs sold each year worldwide(?) (9).  There are about 2,500 cruising boats sold in the US each year and about 2,000 sailboats of all sizes, including daysailers sold (8).   Monohulls are small on the inside compared to a modest RV.   Small = reduced comfort.   While there are many factors keeping the boat market about 200 times smaller, comfort is something that can be addressed.  Flip the Other Way -- Why Have Solar at All? If solar is so pathetic and doomed to be insufficient, why have solar at all?    Even if one is only netting 2kWh of electricity total from solar panels on sunny days, that is still 2 hours not running a generator, per day, or about 2.2 litres of fuel per day (for a Honda 1200W), or one 20 litre jerry can every 9 days.    Economically that does not make sense, solar panels are expensive.   But over a year, that is over 800 litres.   Really good solar panels are still only about $0.7-0.8/Rated Watt.   960 Rated Watts is what, $770?  Does anyone think one can find 800 litres of fuel reliably while cruising for less than $770 ?    Want to explain what a pain it is to mount and wire up panels -- I will tell you about hauling 40 jerry cans of fuel a year, every year probably most of the time in a dingy.  Yes, the charge controller will be a good chunk of change too.   We are not looking at a one-year payback, but, one year is informative.       One can outfit solar panels before leaving, at continental industrial-source prices for all components to protect against fuel costs in small markets later.   Other Budgets There are many other people who have done power budgets for homes, and RVs and boats, and I am certainly not saying this power budget is better, or closer to what you will experience, I was just trying to solve the question -- generator or not, and if so how long must it run.   I was also trying to highlight the benefits of a cat when it comes to power.   Matt References: (1) https://www.godownsize.com/electricity-consumption-rv/ (2) https://www.westmarine.com/buy/west-marine--vhf95db-dual-band-floating-handheld-vhf-radio--16230526 and https://www.westmarine.com/WestAdvisor/Selecting-a-VHF-Handheld-Radio (3) https://www.yachtingmonthly.com/gear/anchor-lights-test-33105 (4) https://www.amazon.ca/Electric-Automatic-Caravan-Five-Oceans/dp/B00N44FG5I (5) https://www.pidramble.com/wiki/benchmarks/power-consumption (6) https://www.cruisingworld.com/desalination-decisions-watermakers (7) https://www.rvpartscanada.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=37&products_id=2335#.XMhVLEN7nq4 (8) https://www.tradeonlytoday.com/industry-news/boat-sales-topped-250000-in-2016 (9) https://www.rvia.org/historical-rv-data From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 5:13 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     I agree 100% with Darren.   Any system that will rely on running a generator is the wrong system.  I remember one boat that would fire up a Honda generator on their foredeck and then go ashore for the day while it letting it run....no problem for them, but a real annoyance for everybody else.  Superyachts are the worst.   They may have sound proofed generators but the sound of their exhaust gurgling and splashing from their hull can be a real pain....it never ends. >>>>>>  I wouldn't openly criticize anyone who pursues a high power consumption lifestyle, as long as they remember not to be the moron who anchors right next to someone in a quiet anchorage and then proceeds to run your generator incessantly.  | 35882|35854|2019-04-30 16:47:50|Matt Malone|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?| #ygrps-yiv-1179492986 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Absolutely agreed Darren, if people do not have refrigeration, they should remain in that blissful place.   Absolutely agreed Darren, if you include running the propulsion engine as different from running a dedicated engine to generate electricity.   Perhaps I should change the title to "Run a fuel engine to make electricity sometimes, or Not".   Engine or Generator -- seems the same thing to me.  It was easier to do the calculations with a 1200W Honda. What you said about running the propulsion engine for two purposes is absolutely of advantage.   Thank you for telling me about the "small engine" regulators ... I want one.   Absolutely true, propulsion engines are usually diesel, more efficient, marine-ized so they last longer in a boat environment, whereas generators are, well, inexpensive if they are gasoline and not marine-ized.   But chances are, the outboard on the tender is gasoline so, one probably has gasoline on board in any case.   It is absolutely true for some boats and some owners that running the engine will come at about the same frequency as one would normally need to top up the batteries.   But then this tempo will get ingrained.  When one gets somewhere they really like and want to stay for a while, the tempo will make one feel itchy to go somewhere on a certain schedule or face the prospect of just running the engine just to make electricity, which more than a few cruisers complain is inefficient and irritating to them.   Where sails are a redundancy to the propulsion engine, there is no redundancy to an alternator if any one of a dozen things goes wrong with the propulsion engine.   The propulsion engine has a limited service lifetime and a chance of other failures, every hour it runs.   If something goes wrong with the engine, you are talking about boat yoga in tight spaces if you are a DIY type, on-site diesel mechanics ($$), and worst case a $10,000-$15,000 bill and a crane to replace it.   Yikes, I am not running that sucker just to make electricity.  As for incidental electricity... I sail differently.   My sails are my propulsion.  I have used as little as 12 litres of fuel in year, and there is no such thing as a wind where my boat is slower than a cottage.   My engine is my backup to my sails.   Naturally, good seamanship dictates caution and to some that points only to the engine.  If that is the way it has to be, OK.   But waiting to go in until the wind and tide are favourable is also seamanship, and then the engine and its full tank of fuel is still there in reserve.    Many times I start the engine and just let it idle for the decisive couple of minutes as I sail nearly all the way in -- it is there in an instant for oh-crap moments.      At least with a 1200 Watt generator, there is no issue of charge rate, they are really quiet out of the box, and can be made quieter with a little DIY.   If something goes wrong with the generator, I had always assumed that in a pinch I would have the 20,000 Watt propulsion engine was the backup to the generator, even though it is inefficient and straining to the electrical system unless it is used for something else at the same time.   If something goes wrong with the generator, it never be a big bill.  I carry it ashore to a small engine repair place, or buy another one.  In the meantime, so long as the generator works, one runs their engine only when necessary, keeping its hours down.   So it is down to wear and tear on the engine, or a disposable substitute to change fuel into electricity.  I would never NOT have a portable generator.    I am really not disputing anything you are saying Darren, some people will find what you describe to be the simplest course of action.   I am just giving the other side of what some other boats might do.   But lets run with your idea, a very good one, to have a 210A bus alternator running directly off the propulsion engine to take advantage of the huge surplus of mechanical power available that one might borrow from when moving the boat.   But, if you are going to do that....  - if you have an external regulator, is it not possible with the flip of an appropriately-wired switch to turn this into an unbelievable weldernator ?   One is never doing that with a 1200W Honda.   Even Rick's batteries, and a little inverter welder, that is a joke compared to this T-rex of weldernators.   You could do half inch plate with 5/32" rod and really feel like you are accomplishing something.   If you have never tried 5/32 rod, you really have to, just for fun, on 3/16" or thicker steel.   Have 100 feet of cables, and industrial fenders and raft up to commercial boats and do a little commercial welding.   I want one.  Really, I do.    - why stop at a 210A alternator -- connect up a high pressure pump with a couple of one-way valves so your water maker runs electric off one pump or directly from the engine from the other pump -- for just the cost of a second pump, you are creating redundancy.   Drawing the same torque as the alternator, the engine-powered watermaker could put out 200 gallons per hour, assuming one has suitable osmosis media.   The efficiency would be awesome, diesel directly driving the pump skips the following filters of efficiency: claw-style armature alternator 75-80%, battery charging 90%, electric motor 80-90% -- combined total 54%-65% efficiency.  One avoids all that by going straight off the engine.   Then one also has the alternative to make water with the engine if the electric pump ever fails.   I sure am thinking about doing this.  - why stop there ... If the water tanks fill before one is finished motoring, start filling the bathtub and have a good celebratory soak in the tub to prepare for going out on the town at the new destination.  Your 20,000 Watt motor is easily producing 25,000 Watts of heat so, that tub can be nice and toasty warm with just a few valves and a little hose.   This is just a given, I am definitely having an engine-heat option to my hot water tank.   - Heck why stop there ... turn down the flow rate so the fresh water comes out at full exhaust temperature and fill your teapot.   There is a lot of comfort possible here.    I don't like tea that much so, no.    - If there is still a surplus of fresh water, start filling all those water jerry cans most boats have -- over stock and then turn off the electric water maker -- run the engine today, save Amps tomorrow.   I sure would do this.      - why stop there ... put a semi-hermetic compressor on the engine and hook it up to a big-ass ice maker -- freeze a fraction that 200 GPH pouring out of the water maker and get rid of the need for both refrigeration and freezer (save the brine waste from water making ... ice+brine = -17C in a cold plate).    Says that man with a great big ice chest ... pull it out, or add a compressor to the engine ... open question.    - why stop there ... Just keep making ice, and put hundreds of pounds of ice in a stainless cabinet inside an adjustable-vent wood cabinet, with a drip pan under the stainless cabinet -- a DIY dehumidifier.   This is probably beyond the electrical power budget for most boats, so, what a luxury.   Dry gallons an hour.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Have the melt-water drain for the stainless cabinet run through a cooling coil along the cabinet ceiling and back down into the fresh water tanks -- step one air conditioning, for the price of pumping water a few feet -- we have already established, that is bargain compared to AC.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Not cool enough? Open vents in the side of the wood cabinet and blow air in there to both get more cool air and accelerate melting.   Glorious air conditioning -- not even a cat could manage that on solar.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... they have these cooking appliances, called muff pots, better than instant pots, and they are *ZERO* Watts:  http://cs.amsnow.com/sno/b/news/archive/2015/04/09/snacker-packer-meals-made-easy.aspx Cooking on a snowmobile made easy - American Snowmobiler Magazine - Snowmobile forums, news, Polaris, Ski-Doo, Arctic Cat & Yamaha reviews - AmSnow.com American Snowmobiler Magazine presents news, reviews, forums, videos, photos and the latest stats and prices for Arctic Cat, Ski-Doo, Yamaha and Polaris snowmobiles. cs.amsnow.com If one has never cooked on the exhaust of an engine ...   Heck with all that, one solar panel would run the radio and the nav lights, nav, etc.   If co-generating electricity by depending on running a 20,000 Watt engine with any frequency is how some boaters will do it, then co-generating everything else that would otherwise require electricity, or would generate comfort is worth mentioning too.   So when it comes down to it, same answer:  On a monohull, one is running an engine sometimes, but there is a lot of room for innovation, taste, preferences and different ways to meet the power budget.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:59 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     For everyone who has a simple boat without refrigeration/freezer, you probably wonder why everyone is so concerned about how to generate enough power from solar.  Your life is simple and there is no reason to read the rest of this. Matt, that's a pretty reasonable analysis, and would fit some boats.  There are certainly boats that manage these comforts on lower watts.  The obvious area for improvement is refrigeration, any efficiencies gained here is money better spent than money spent on power generation (solar and generators).  I came to the conclusion that 4" of styrofoam insulation for the fridge and 6" for the freezer was the minimum to make DC refrigeration work on a reasonable energy budget.  50 to 125 Ah per day is what 12v DC refrigeration generally uses per day.  The differences are almost entirely due to insulation, next due to the size of the fridge/freezer.  If you can get closer to 50Ah per day your energy budget changes drastically.  I decided a spillover design fridge freezer, custom built to maximize insulation was the best way to go in my build.  Aspen Aerogel is an interesting material here.  However, polystyrene foam is easy to work, cheap, readily available, and absorbs water less than the other foam insulation choices. Your energy budget doesn't consider engine run time and power from the alternator at all.  A boat that moves even just once or twice a week can reduce/eliminate its need for generator run time by super-sizing its alternator.  I've ordered a Leece-Neville 210A school bus alternator.  It should run happily at 170A continuous, perhaps a bit more with careful attention to cooling.  This is a win-win situation, getting power from the alternator is more efficient than from a generator.  With a fixed pitch prop you're running at an inefficient part of the power curve of the diesel at cruising rpm.  The extra load the alternator moves the engine into a more efficient part of the fuel map, that improvement in efficiency means that part of the fuel consumed by the alternator comes for free as your making the engine more efficient at the same time you make carbon buildup problems less likely.  Even if you have a smaller diesel you could fit an alternator this size.  If you need maximum propulsion power at some point, an external regulator like a Balmar Mc-614 used with a switch for small engine mode (field output reduced to 50%) allows you to get most of the power from the engine for propulsion when necessary.  You could also just put a plain switch in the field wire to the alt for a inexpensive solution, although charging at these high currents you probably want an external regulator anyway.  It should be noted that this solution relies on batteries that can accept pretty high charge rates.  This would be LiPO4, Firefly >AGM>very large flooded lead acid bank.  A small flooded-lead-acid bank probably won't be able to accept the high charge rate for long enough for a large alternator to do a lot of good.  The LiPO4 and the Firefly also have the advantage that they are totally happy in a partial state of charge and can stay there without damage until you are ready to move to the next anchorage (within reasonable time limits and state of charge limits).  You should switch to a serpentine belt to run a large alternator like a Delco Remy 28SI or a Leece Neville Idle Pro. There are two ways of looking at comfort while cruising.  Your comfort could come from plugging in whatever you want whenever you want.  However, this comes with the discomfort of noise from the generator, discomfort getting/storing fuel for the generator (especially bad for gasoline generators),  discomfort from getting/storing oil for the generator, the discomfort from generator oil changes, discomfort from trying to source generator parts in some distant port, discomfort from getting shunned by the cruisers who can't stand the noise of your generator.  On the flip side, if you design a boat with conservation in mind, it is possible to run almost entirely on solar.  I've met more than one boat (with refrigeration and watermaker) that runs successfully with just solar/wind/alternator.  You boil water in a kettle on the stove (is that a discomfort?), you wash laundry ashore or in a bucket (Ok, the bucket counts as a discomfort), is lighting a propane stove a discomfort compared to electric (around here tons of folks spend tons of money on their house for the luxury of a natural gas stove).  I have a nice antique coffee grinder, it takes zero watts to run, is beautiful and a pleasure to use, there are tons of equivalents to this on the boat, where doing things different is part of the pleasure for me.  A generator is definitely not necessary.   On 2019-04-30 9:03 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   What really is the electrical capacity on a boat from solar, how far will that take you, and realistically, will one be running a generator and how much? Solar Power Generation: Based on some tests by the Wynns in Florida (latitude N26), two used "160W" panels (they have 6 of these), produced 15 Amps at "12V", at 14.4V from the panels, but we will say 12.8V from the batteries later because though the charge voltage is higher, the voltage at which the power comes out is lower.    That is 216 Watts in, 192 Watts of useful power out of the batteries later.   They also tested two new "140W" panels and produced 20 Amps at "12V", or about 288 Watts in, 256 Watts out later.   256/"280" = 91% useful power.   192/"320" = 60% useful power.   Same solar controller in both tests.  At latitude N44, I was seeing about 67% of ratings from the panels, before considering charging losses which for a perfect charge controller might be 60% useful power.    On my off-grid solar installation, I have huge reserve capacity, currently not that much generating capacity, and the vampire load is very low.   I would add panels if I were to increase expected daily loads.   The Wynns also did a lot of shading tests, simulating halyards (no appreciable difference) and the boom (much larger difference).   Lets assume this is a boat on the hook and one has put a preventer on the boom to make it not shade panels, and oriented the boat to get uninterrupted sun on the panels.   If I were designing a solar system for a boat today, for a monohull, I would go with the most power dense panels I could get -- lets say "320W" panels.   Lets say I have an arch over my davits and I am able to put three 40-inch wide panels flat above this arch -- that is a beam of 10 feet.   Lets assume 60% useful power.   That is 960 Watts * 60% = 576 Watts which is not much. One only gets that during the day.   So one might get 3kWh of power per day from the panels -- based on not angling panels.   For someone who thinks they can run without a generator, that is the limit of power.   "Average use for a typical RVer is around 20 kWh a day.   ....  RVers parked in areas where they do not need air conditioning will use much less electricity than RVers who do need it.  In fact, the average amount of electricity used by people who are not running air conditioning is about 10 kWh a day."  (1) There is one total power budget estimate.   Lets look at it from the components up: Loads: Required Unoccupied, trekking the country nearby while the boat is on anchor:  - Refrigeration: 300 kWh / year (modern, high efficiency, extra insulation for the tropics)   lets say 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Anchoring light (LED, 2 nm visibility, on a timer, 12 hour burn):  0.025 kWh/day   (3)    - Bilge Pump (500 gallons/day, 1 hour/day): 0.060 kWh/day (4)  - Most basic of computers offering Wifi and sensor monitoring to report alerts & email: 0.080 kWh/day (5 + estimate for dry contact and sensor system)   Minimum Occupied:  - Radio (hand held, listening):  0.020 kWh/day  (2)   - Interior Lights (LED):  0.050 kWh/day   - Recharging (Cell, shaver, shortwave receiver, flashlights, head lamps, miscellaneous): 0.050 kWh/day Voluntary Electronics:  - Netbook (4 hours):  0.100 kWh/day    - Full Laptop (4 hours): 0.300 kWh/day   - Display Screen (tv/monitor) (4 hours): 0.400 kWh//day  - DVD player (2 hours): 0.050 kWh/day Other:  - Pressurized water (per 100 liters -- usage for 1 day):  0.020 kWh/day (7)  - Freezer: 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Washing machine, 2 people:  0.400 kWh/day (one load every second day)  - Water maker (most efficient, per 100 liters/day): 0.400 kWh/day (6) Working on Boat:  - hand saw and driver drill for cabinetry work (1 hour run time/8 hour day): 1 kWh/day (experience)  - belt sander for finishing (6 hours run time/8 hour day): 7.2 kWh/day (experience) This is before using any electricity for cooking.   Looking at these conveniences ... pressurized water is a power bargain.   So, basic anchoring budget is 1.17 kWh / day -- solar will cover it with more than 100% to spare -- one 12V/100Ah battery unit at 50% DOD will carry it through the night.   On light overcast days, when one is getting 50% power, the system is still OK.   So one uses two 12V/100Ah units to keep the average DOD to 25%, to make sure it does not go much below 50% DOD in a stretch of moderately cloudy weather.      To go one week (hurricane overcast on a boat, a week of heavy overcast in winter in Canada) without significant sun, the battery bank must be 8.2 kWh -- which is 14 units of 12V/100Ah at 50% DOD -- that is a lot of batteries.   Rick's batteries, four times 12V/200Ah, 9.6 kWh, could handle this, just.   This is why I am interested in Rick's batteries -- they are about the minimum I would consider to have constant refrigeration, be it in a cottage or boat.   Speaking of refrigeration.  When one is not opening the fridge and adding things or taking things out, the power consumption of a fridge is inversely related to thickness of insulation.   As the largest power draw in an unoccupied space, I would consider a hyper-insulated fridge (I do not believe it is available, I was thinking DIY) to cut the power in half.   That allows Rick's batteries to run the system for close to 2 weeks without sun.   That I think would be a far better design for an off-grid cottage.   Ricks batteries would recharge in about 4 days after 2 weeks with heavy overcast.    If one had reliable sun every day, and particularly if the panels netted a little better than 60% useful power from their rating, then: 3.93 kWh/day -- based on 200 liters/day of water desalinated, and pressurized, laundry, freezer, and no voluntary electronics.  The solar panels could not reliably keep up.  In full sun, Rick's batteries would need a generator run of 10 hours once every 8 or 9 days.   From fully charged, after 2 days without sun, without a generator run, Rick's batteries would be exhausted.    Therefore, a pretty spartan existence, with a short shower daily, would be a strain without a daily generator run of about an hour on sunny days, and 4 hours a day on heavy overcast days.   (Assuming a Honda 1200W quiet generator outputting 1000W average.) Get rid of the freezer and one is just below what one would expect of the panels per day.   After just one day without sun, one would have to wait 2 weeks for the batteries to get back up to normal.   It is not reasonable to expect only 1 day of heavy clouds in each 2 weeks.   Therefore, even without the freezer, the solar panels would likely fall behind and regular generator running would be needed.  One could laminate flexible panels to the deck, but they are on average half the efficiency per unit area and, one really could not expect more than another 320 W of power to be conveniently placed. For those thinking that wind power will save them...  one would need an anchorage protected from waves, by say a submerged reef, and open to the wind -- so not like a closed bay.   Most small wind generators are rated for 40km/h, that is, they give their rated power at 40km/h wind speed.   They do not cut in until about 8 or 9 km/h.   Wind energy goes by the cube of the wind speed.   To generate half the rated output, one needs about 32 km/h of wind.   Half the rated output on a 400 Watt generator is 200 Watts.   Even if it is a tiringly windy anchorage, and the wind blows 24/7, that is only 4.8 kWh of power maximum theoretical, 4.2 kWh useful delivered to loads is more likely with charging inefficiency.  That is more than solar, but only if one assumes a tiringly windy anchorage.   If one wants the wind generator to total the same output as solar in 24 hours, one must have 27 kmph winds, 24/7.    Based on the theory that when it is not sunny the wind is blowing, to cover minimal loads (1.17kWh/day), one needs 20 km/h winds, 24/7 on cloudy days.     That is actually a reasonable expectation, on average, but not reliably.   Generator Inevitable Therefore, one should expect to use a generator on a cruising boat at least from time to time.   Now the question is how big and how long.  (I like the little 1200W Hondas .... they are very quiet.)   Taking a 1200W at 80% load, that is one hour of daily generator running for each kWh of extra consumption one has.  A freezer -- average an hour a day extra.  If one has AC, the RV example would have one run the generator for the entire daylight hours.     This is assuming all cooking appliances run from fuel.   If one assumes a sum total of 2 hours running 1800W (kettle, toaster oven, or single element hot plate), that is 3-4 kWh/day, 3-4 more hours of running the generator. Cat vs. Monohull.... Now, the Wynns have 11 solar panels on their cat.   If they upgraded them all to 320W panels (physically a bit larger, but also more efficient), and assuming 60% useful power, that is about 12.5 kWh / day ... I cannot say anything about their power usage, or their total average power received on their panels, but, it would seem a cat has a much better chance of being able to reliably handle reasonable hotel loads on solar alone.   Looking to the RV example, with no A, a Cat is the minimum unit of cruising boat to have an average RV experience without the need to run a generator every day -- certainly one will have a generator, certainly it will be run frequently in the average 2-week period to account for shortages of sun, but, it will not be run with certainty every single day just to meet average needs.      I did this calculation long ago, and that is why, some time ago, I encouraged Brent to come out of retirement and design an orgami cat, say based on a pair of 31 hulls, maybe with less beam (or maybe not), to each hull.    The hulls could each be a long, shallow draft single keel for even more shallow boat draft than the monohull twin keeler.   An origami Cat could compete with RVs as a lifestyle cruising boat where the entire world is available.    There are about 350,000-500,000 RVs sold each year worldwide(?) (9).  There are about 2,500 cruising boats sold in the US each year and about 2,000 sailboats of all sizes, including daysailers sold (8).   Monohulls are small on the inside compared to a modest RV.   Small = reduced comfort.   While there are many factors keeping the boat market about 200 times smaller, comfort is something that can be addressed.  Flip the Other Way -- Why Have Solar at All? If solar is so pathetic and doomed to be insufficient, why have solar at all?    Even if one is only netting 2kWh of electricity total from solar panels on sunny days, that is still 2 hours not running a generator, per day, or about 2.2 litres of fuel per day (for a Honda 1200W), or one 20 litre jerry can every 9 days.    Economically that does not make sense, solar panels are expensive.   But over a year, that is over 800 litres.   Really good solar panels are still only about $0.7-0.8/Rated Watt.   960 Rated Watts is what, $770?  Does anyone think one can find 800 litres of fuel reliably while cruising for less than $770 ?    Want to explain what a pain it is to mount and wire up panels -- I will tell you about hauling 40 jerry cans of fuel a year, every year probably most of the time in a dingy.  Yes, the charge controller will be a good chunk of change too.   We are not looking at a one-year payback, but, one year is informative.       One can outfit solar panels before leaving, at continental industrial-source prices for all components to protect against fuel costs in small markets later.   Other Budgets There are many other people who have done power budgets for homes, and RVs and boats, and I am certainly not saying this power budget is better, or closer to what you will experience, I was just trying to solve the question -- generator or not, and if so how long must it run.   I was also trying to highlight the benefits of a cat when it comes to power.   Matt References: (1) https://www.godownsize.com/electricity-consumption-rv/ (2) https://www.westmarine.com/buy/west-marine--vhf95db-dual-band-floating-handheld-vhf-radio--16230526 and https://www.westmarine.com/WestAdvisor/Selecting-a-VHF-Handheld-Radio (3) https://www.yachtingmonthly.com/gear/anchor-lights-test-33105 (4) https://www.amazon.ca/Electric-Automatic-Caravan-Five-Oceans/dp/B00N44FG5I (5) https://www.pidramble.com/wiki/benchmarks/power-consumption (6) https://www.cruisingworld.com/desalination-decisions-watermakers (7) https://www.rvpartscanada.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=37&products_id=2335#.XMhVLEN7nq4 (8) https://www.tradeonlytoday.com/industry-news/boat-sales-topped-250000-in-2016 (9) https://www.rvia.org/historical-rv-data From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 5:13 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     I agree 100% with Darren.   Any system that will rely on running a generator is the wrong system.  I remember one boat that would fire up a Honda generator on their foredeck and then go ashore for the day while it letting it run....no problem for them, but a real annoyance for everybody else.  Superyachts are the worst.   They may have sound proofed generators but the sound of their exhaust gurgling and splashing from their hull can be a real pain....it never ends. >>>>>>  I wouldn't openly criticize anyone who pursues a high power consumption lifestyle, as long as they remember not to be the moron who anchors right next to someone in a quiet anchorage and then proceeds to run your generator incessantly.  | 35883|35854|2019-04-30 16:49:23|opuspaul|Re: LiFePo4|I know I am very opinionated but I also don't want to be too judgemental.     Sometimes the decisions we make may not be the best idea but they may be necessary to get a reluctant partner to go along our plans.    I am not saying it is the case with all of them, but there are a lot of old (and unhappy) singlehanders running around who weren't willing to compromise or were too cheap to splurge on a few luxuries once in awhile.    If I am not careful, it could be me one day.| 35884|35854|2019-04-30 16:53:04|Matt Malone|Re: LiFePo4| #ygrps-yiv-1491317204 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Insightful.   Sometimes the decisions we make not the cheapest option, or the easiest to equip for, but may be necessary. From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 4:49 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: LiFePo4     I know I am very opinionated but I also don't want to be too judgemental.     Sometimes the decisions we make may not be the best idea but they may be necessary to get a reluctant partner to go along our plans.    I am not saying it is the case with all of them, but there are a lot of old (and unhappy) singlehanders running around who weren't willing to compromise or were too cheap to splurge on a few luxuries once in awhile.    If I am not careful, it could be me one day. | 35885|35854|2019-04-30 17:27:17|Rick Jackson|Re: LiFePo4|Sure… Total to our door is $3700.00 including the BMS units, taxes and air freight. We also were able to use Pay Pal..that fee was not included..We are getting 13875.2 watts so that works out to $.26 per watt for LiFePo4 cells to the door… I still need to build a box to put them in, but at least I can configure them to my space..Rick On Apr 28, 2019, at 4:56 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@hotmail..com [origamiboats] wrote:I would be interested to hear what the final costs of the batteries are including shipping, taxes, duties etc.   MattFrom: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 8:19 PMTo: origamiboats@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4  UPDATE:  Batteries have shipped from China with 2 BMS units.  We were told they do a balance on our batteries before shipping to avoid any possible defects or warranty issues… So far we have been pleased with the service, and the patience they have with us and our 10,000 questions… All in all we are very satisfied,,, Now we wait…Since we are not experts in solar systems we are open to suggestions and advice.. Please feel free to correct me if my thinking is wrong here… But we are of the impression that once the bank is built and hooked to the inverter, all our power needs are maintained through a service panel..The inverter we are interested in (regardless of voltage) will output to a main 50 amp breaker in the panel much like a home is wired.   The boat only has 120v for lights and the kitchen appliances.  There will only be a few DC lights for back up, and all the electronics will be DC.  The 6000 watt inverter allows us to run multiple appliances at the same time in the kitchen so our lifestyle change will not be as drastic as it could be. Since we plan to live aboard full time for the next few years, we want to keep life as functional as possible in the galley.   For example:We are living in a new, fancy RV at the boat yar, but only have a 30 amp service. We are constantly dealing with power issues..  We had to turn off electric heat to run microwave, and now that its warmer, we are doing the same with the AC.  It is a small thing, but having talked to folks who live aboard full time, we hear where the galley is a place where inconvenience over time makes life unnecessarily complicated.  I think when people think “sailboat” they automatically think of some lightweight, camping situation with some time limitation.  Ours is heavy, with all the comforts of home. We are clearly in the comfort over speed group…RickOn Apr 26, 2019, at 3:37 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@hotmail..com [origamiboats] wrote:An experiment would be a good idea. It would be an inexpensive experiment.There are ways to reduce radio noise.  First would be, look for a converter with RF approvals like you see on stickers on a lot of things.  Second would be to determine if the noise is being broadcast and picked up by the antenna or coupled through the power to the cabin radio - compare to a handheld.  If it is poor power quality, that can be fixed external to an inexpensive converter.Electronics have improved.  A new cheap unit might be much higher frequency than the ones ages ago, with lower ripple.  Capacitors have improved, the efficiency of power conversion inductors has improved.   All of these improvements have been pushed by decades of very competitive computer power supply production.  I would not hesitate to give it a try in an experiment anticipating a completely different outcome from early power converters contemporaneous to the first PCs.MattFrom: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 5:02:09 PMTo: origamiboats@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4  When I worked on fishing boats eons ago the 24 to 12 volt converters were notorious for making radio noise.  I would think a cheap inverter from Asia would have the bare minimum of parts for filtering to keep the cost down.   You would have to experiment.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :24V to 12V step down equipment seems cheap and plentiful.   onverter.   This can add a lot more expense.| 35886|35854|2019-04-30 17:27:41|Rick Jackson|Re: LiFePo4|When you guys  put it that way, I sound kinda lame… Again, not enough background information… Matt… you are correct in our desire for a smooth transition.. We moved from a 4000’ home to a 28 foot RV… There is a method in that madness… We got rid of everything that did not fit in the RV.    Other than our huge walk in shower, we do not miss the big house which we never went upstairs in anyway….BTW, we were given free rent space as the space is 50 feet from a pig pen. A real pig pen. With pigs. So its all part of the plan…Our thoughts were to go super rough and compact living while we build the boat, so once we move aboard, we will be moving into a nicer and larger space…. At 12m the boat will be perfect for a couple, but tight for 2. We are creating a space for my buddy who is a captain which will eventually be a crew space once he turns us loose.. But all share one bathroom. We are making the bathroom bigger than typical as it also functions as laundry space. The whole room is stain and mold proof HDPE panels and can be easily kept clean and bright (important to women).We are learning as we go, and one thing we learned from the RV, is that propane goes much much further than we thought it would. We were going to nix our 2 burner swinger, but have decided to keep it. Original plan was for an Induction stove, which now will be a smaller 2 burner countertop model that can stow easily instead.  We have been using an InstaPot now for over a year, and that is our go to cooking option most of the time anyway.  My DIY cooking project is a stainless steel solar cooker that will live on deck in its folded up profile most of the time.  We are experimenting with solar water heaters and looking for options there.  Heat will be provided by radiant oil heaters and the AC if we choose it, will be limited to the Pilot house only.  I have done a few radiant systems for residences that function as both heat and cooling. Typical pex systems with the concrete functioning as the heat sink, but I use well water and landscaped water features to circulate cold water throughout the system in the summertime. We cooled a 4000’ home in triple digits for under a $70.00 a month.  I think the same can be done with the boat using seawater…I have worked on yachts that literally had more conveniences  than a typical home, and that is not what we are going for.  Ultimately we are hoping to have a boat where you won’t burn in the shower if someone opens the tap in the kitchen. Able to cook a proper meal with lights and stereo on. Wash your feet in the shower without sticking your head in the toilet and get in and out of bed without crawling over or under someone or something.RickPost Script… Just got back from Seattle with our new 4BT cummins. Life is good…. On Apr 29, 2019, at 11:21 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:Yes Darren, you are right, but, Rick is clear, he wants a seamless transition from house-style living to boat style living.   I have seen 10,000 Watt generators installed in cottages so that an ordinary residential electric range could be used.   It is a different philosophy, not mine.    I went down this road with my own solar system, in calculations only.   I calculated to have a battery system that will run a kitchen at peak loading for a holiday-get-together style meal, I would need about 26 kWh of storage.   I did the computation for 12V/100Ah battery units (1.2 kWh each) and figured I would need 25 batteries of 100% DOD, or 50 batteries of 50% DOD to achieve this.   I do indeed have 35 batteries currently in my solar system, but there is no way I could power a kitchen -- the system is targeted at power tools for a weekend-type use -- lower current, intermittently through the day, for a longer time, followed by a much longer period for recharge -- this better suits my batteries and installed panel capacity.   The solutions I am considering to expand the system would not be suitable for a boat, but they still can be informed by Rick's experience.Compared to the batteries Rick is getting, mine are crap.   That is why I am so eager to learn from Rick.   Darren is right about the drawbacks of Rick's system.  It is possible that the diesel budget and noise to maintain the ideal of a full power experience on Rick's boat will gradually shift -- more power-efficient appliances that accomplish the same thing:     - For instance, computer-controlled, insulated pressure cookers (such as the Instant Pot) seem in practice to use much less power to cook a large meal.     - The power draw of sous vide cooking is just a question of insulation -- more insulation less power consumed to maintain temperatures of 130-150F.   Think DIY around a suitable pot.   The resulting geometry might be similar to that of a tandoori stove, but much lower temperature.    - I have read good things about the efficiency of modern clam-shell-style counter top ovens (Gone with the Wynns, who were first RVers, and then cruisers, and maintain a very civilized level of cruising, use a Cuisinart counter top oven).   These are not the jazzed up toaster ovens with big glass doors that would lose a lot of heat, but something that looks sort of like panini grill that closes completely, and has a baking cavity inside.   I am sure if one looked, there are many more power-saving kitchen appliances to stretch battery life.  Their main features are less mass to heat up, and a lot more insulation.I would not hesitate to run my sous vide or an Instant Pot from an inverter and my current solar system.   A wide range of dishes could be made with my current system.    Then there is the potential to run efficient cooking appliances straight from DC.  In developing my solar system, I have used older-style electric range burner coils and dryer heater cores as test loads.   Even in the range of 24V to 35V, dissipating 30 - 100W, these coils put out a significant heat.  Sealed in an insulated box, they would rise to cooking temperatures eventually.  In combination with:https://www.amazon.com/Powered-Universal-Temperature-Controller-Thermocouple/dp/B01EK73OVA/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_1?keywords=Thermocouple+Temperature+controller+DC+load+20A&qid=1556561060&s=gateway&sr=8-1-fkmr0and a high current DC relay that might look like these: https://www.littelfuse.com/products/dc-solenoids-and-relays/standard-high-current-relays.aspxone might make a cooking appliance that runs straight from DC.    No inverter losses.   DIY, so, the user decides the trade-off between insulation and power consumption. If Rick aims heavy, and then experience leads him to more efficient loads and less generator running, then that is an evolutionary approach that maintains lifestyle.    Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 12:12 PMTo: origamiboats@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4  I may have missed something earlier in the thread Rick, but it seems your focus is on consuming power, where I'd suggest you need to think about producing it.  The footprint you'll have available for solar is fairly small, so you're likely to be producing something on the scale of 500 to 600 watts.  Running all loads through the inverter requires the inverter to be on all the time and thus wasting power.  Even in use you have the losses of the inverter.   A boat that is careful with its electrical design can run completely on solar now, but it does require careful forethought about efficiency.  It looks like you're heading down the road of running a generator on a daily basis, which is a drag for you and those anchored around you.  On 2019-04-26 5:19 p.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote: UPDATE:  Batteries have shipped from China with 2 BMS units.  We were told they do a balance on our batteries before shipping to avoid any possible defects or warranty issues… So far we have been pleased with the service, and the patience they have with us and our 10,000 questions… All in all we are very satisfied,,, Now we wait…Since we are not experts in solar systems we are open to suggestions and advice.. Please feel free to correct me if my thinking is wrong here… But we are of the impression that once the bank is built and hooked to the inverter, all our power needs are maintained through a service panel..The inverter we are interested in (regardless of voltage) will output to a main 50 amp breaker in the panel much like a home is wired.   The boat only has 120v for lights and the kitchen appliances.  There will only be a few DC lights for back up, and all the electronics will be DC.  The 6000 watt inverter allows us to run multiple appliances at the same time in the kitchen so our lifestyle change will not be as drastic as it could be. Since we plan to live aboard full time for the next few years, we want to keep life as functional as possible in the galley.   For example:We are living in a new, fancy RV at the boat yar, but only have a 30 amp service. We are constantly dealing with power issues..  We had to turn off electric heat to run microwave, and now that its warmer, we are doing the same with the AC.  It is a small thing, but having talked to folks who live aboard full time, we hear where the galley is a place where inconvenience over time makes life unnecessarily complicated.  I think when people think “sailboat” they automatically think of some lightweight, camping situation with some time limitation.  Ours is heavy, with all the comforts of home. We are clearly in the comfort over speed group…RickOn Apr 26, 2019, at 3:37 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@hotmail..com [origamiboats] wrote:An experiment would be a good idea. It would be an inexpensive experiment.There are ways to reduce radio noise.  First would be, look for a converter with RF approvals like you see on stickers on a lot of things.  Second would be to determine if the noise is being broadcast and picked up by the antenna or coupled through the power to the cabin radio - compare to a handheld.  If it is poor power quality, that can be fixed external to an inexpensive converter.Electronics have improved.  A new cheap unit might be much higher frequency than the ones ages ago, with lower ripple.  Capacitors have improved, the efficiency of power conversion inductors has improved.   All of these improvements have been pushed by decades of very competitive computer power supply production.  I would not hesitate to give it a try in an experiment anticipating a completely different outcome from early power converters contemporaneous to the first PCs.MattFrom: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 5:02:09 PMTo: origamiboats@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4  When I worked on fishing boats eons ago the 24 to 12 volt converters were notorious for making radio noise.  I would think a cheap inverter from Asia would have the bare minimum of parts for filtering to keep the cost down.   You would have to experiment.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :24V to 12V step down equipment seems cheap and plentiful.   onverter.   This can add a lot more expense.| 35887|35854|2019-04-30 17:28:07|Rick Jackson|Re: LiFePo4|I agree Darren.. I too have been in beautiful places when someone rolls in with stereos blasting, dogs barking, drunken yelling after everyone else is trying to sleep. I never want to be that guy.. Im working on a way to build a system that would last a minimum of 72 hours. I just pulled our gen apart to inspect and its shot… So the plan is in flux anyway.  We are going to have at least one D 400w wind turbine, and now, maybe 2?  I choose the D400 as its one of the quietest on the market. Im aware it is not enough to supply the power requirements, but it is a valuable part of the greater whole.    We discussed that siting on a anchor for days and days is not what we are interested in either. It just may be that when power is needed, we fire up and head out for the day.  I can honestly say that being “that guy” in the anchorage, is the last thing we want..We are certainly open to all the ideas from others (hence my posts) and I believe that with enough thought, and some hard work or currency of some sort, one can solve all sorts of problems. On Apr 29, 2019, at 1:35 PM, Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] wrote:Although some of the ideas are interesting Matt, I don't think they materially change things.  At the power levels being discussed, there is no way you can fit enough solar onto a monohull to generate anywhere near the power required.  The Wynns, who have a Cat and therefore double the solar I used in the example, still end up running their generator often to support their electric needs.  Battery storage doesn't matter a whole lot here other than it allows you to run the generator a bit less often.  I went through a bunch of iterations when designing the electric system for our boat.  I decided that the simplest, most robust and most convenient system was 12V powered entirely from solar (with a large alternator as a backup).  With careful choices around a fridge and freezer, and avoiding high-draw AC appliances, you can have system that runs entirely on solar.  With four 120 watt panels, each with its own controller, you have a bunch of redundancy that requires virtually no maintenance, attention or ongoing running costs for most of its life.   The only downside of 12V is that it requires larger diameter wires to carry the current.  However, the costs of larger wire are offset by not needing things like voltage converters, and thick wire is a lot more reliable than an inverter or a DC-DC converter.However, one of the nice things about boats is that it is still one area where we get to make our own choices.  I wouldn't openly criticize anyone who pursues a high power consumption lifestyle, as long as they remember not to be the moron who anchors right next to someone in a quiet anchorage and then proceeds to run your generator incessantly.  On 2019-04-29 11:21 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote: Yes Darren, you are right, but, Rick is clear, he wants a seamless transition from house-style living to boat style living.   I have seen 10,000 Watt generators installed in cottages so that an ordinary residential electric range could be used.   It is a different philosophy, not mine.    I went down this road with my own solar system, in calculations only.   I calculated to have a battery system that will run a kitchen at peak loading for a holiday-get-together style meal, I would need about 26 kWh of storage.   I did the computation for 12V/100Ah battery units (1.2 kWh each) and figured I would need 25 batteries of 100% DOD, or 50 batteries of 50% DOD to achieve this..   I do indeed have 35 batteries currently in my solar system, but there is no way I could power a kitchen -- the system is targeted at power tools for a weekend-type use -- lower current, intermittently through the day, for a longer time, followed by a much longer period for recharge -- this better suits my batteries and installed panel capacity.   The solutions I am considering to expand the system would not be suitable for a boat, but they still can be informed by Rick's experience.Compared to the batteries Rick is getting, mine are crap.   That is why I am so eager to learn from Rick.   Darren is right about the drawbacks of Rick's system.  It is possible that the diesel budget and noise to maintain the ideal of a full power experience on Rick's boat will gradually shift -- more power-efficient appliances that accomplish the same thing:     - For instance, computer-controlled, insulated pressure cookers (such as the Instant Pot) seem in practice to use much less power to cook a large meal.     - The power draw of sous vide cooking is just a question of insulation -- more insulation less power consumed to maintain temperatures of 130-150F.   Think DIY around a suitable pot.   The resulting geometry might be similar to that of a tandoori stove, but much lower temperature.    - I have read good things about the efficiency of modern clam-shell-style counter top ovens (Gone with the Wynns, who were first RVers, and then cruisers, and maintain a very civilized level of cruising, use a Cuisinart counter top oven).   These are not the jazzed up toaster ovens with big glass doors that would lose a lot of heat, but something that looks sort of like panini grill that closes completely, and has a baking cavity inside.   I am sure if one looked, there are many more power-saving kitchen appliances to stretch battery life.  Their main features are less mass to heat up, and a lot more insulation.I would not hesitate to run my sous vide or an Instant Pot from an inverter and my current solar system.   A wide range of dishes could be made with my current system.    Then there is the potential to run efficient cooking appliances straight from DC.  In developing my solar system, I have used older-style electric range burner coils and dryer heater cores as test loads.   Even in the range of 24V to 35V, dissipating 30 - 100W, these coils put out a significant heat.  Sealed in an insulated box, they would rise to cooking temperatures eventually.  In combination with:https://www.amazon.com/Powered-Universal-Temperature-Controller-Thermocouple/dp/B01EK73OVA/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_1?keywords=Thermocouple+Temperature+controller+DC+load+20A&qid=1556561060&s=gateway&sr=8-1-fkmr0and a high current DC relay that might look like these: https://www.littelfuse.com/products/dc-solenoids-and-relays/standard-high-current-relays.aspxone might make a cooking appliance that runs straight from DC.    No inverter losses.   DIY, so, the user decides the trade-off between insulation and power consumption. If Rick aims heavy, and then experience leads him to more efficient loads and less generator running, then that is an evolutionary approach that maintains lifestyle.    Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats]Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 12:12 PMTo: origamiboats@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4  I may have missed something earlier in the thread Rick, but it seems your focus is on consuming power, where I'd suggest you need to think about producing it.  The footprint you'll have available for solar is fairly small, so you're likely to be producing something on the scale of 500 to 600 watts.  Running all loads through the inverter requires the inverter to be on all the time and thus wasting power.  Even in use you have the losses of the inverter.   A boat that is careful with its electrical design can run completely on solar now, but it does require careful forethought about efficiency.  It looks like you're heading down the road of running a generator on a daily basis, which is a drag for you and those anchored around you.  On 2019-04-26 5:19 p.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote: UPDATE:  Batteries have shipped from China with 2 BMS units.  We were told they do a balance on our batteries before shipping to avoid any possible defects or warranty issues… So far we have been pleased with the service, and the patience they have with us and our 10,000 questions… All in all we are very satisfied,,, Now we wait…Since we are not experts in solar systems we are open to suggestions and advice.. Please feel free to correct me if my thinking is wrong here… But we are of the impression that once the bank is built and hooked to the inverter, all our power needs are maintained through a service panel..The inverter we are interested in (regardless of voltage) will output to a main 50 amp breaker in the panel much like a home is wired.   The boat only has 120v for lights and the kitchen appliances.  There will only be a few DC lights for back up, and all the electronics will be DC.  The 6000 watt inverter allows us to run multiple appliances at the same time in the kitchen so our lifestyle change will not be as drastic as it could be. Since we plan to live aboard full time for the next few years, we want to keep life as functional as possible in the galley.   For example:We are living in a new, fancy RV at the boat yar, but only have a 30 amp service. We are constantly dealing with power issues..  We had to turn off electric heat to run microwave, and now that its warmer, we are doing the same with the AC.  It is a small thing, but having talked to folks who live aboard full time, we hear where the galley is a place where inconvenience over time makes life unnecessarily complicated.  I think when people think “sailboat” they automatically think of some lightweight, camping situation with some time limitation.  Ours is heavy, with all the comforts of home. We are clearly in the comfort over speed group…RickOn Apr 26, 2019, at 3:37 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@hotmail..com [origamiboats] wrote:An experiment would be a good idea. It would be an inexpensive experiment.There are ways to reduce radio noise.  First would be, look for a converter with RF approvals like you see on stickers on a lot of things.  Second would be to determine if the noise is being broadcast and picked up by the antenna or coupled through the power to the cabin radio - compare to a handheld.  If it is poor power quality, that can be fixed external to an inexpensive converter.Electronics have improved.  A new cheap unit might be much higher frequency than the ones ages ago, with lower ripple.  Capacitors have improved, the efficiency of power conversion inductors has improved.   All of these improvements have been pushed by decades of very competitive computer power supply production.  I would not hesitate to give it a try in an experiment anticipating a completely different outcome from early power converters contemporaneous to the first PCs.MattFrom: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 5:02:09 PMTo: origamiboats@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4  When I worked on fishing boats eons ago the 24 to 12 volt converters were notorious for making radio noise.  I would think a cheap inverter from Asia would have the bare minimum of parts for filtering to keep the cost down.   You would have to experiment.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :24V to 12V step down equipment seems cheap and plentiful.   onverter.   This can add a lot more expense.| 35888|35854|2019-04-30 17:28:31|Rick Jackson|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?|13000 watt storage and 50 amp service.   We will learn how to make that 13k last as long as possible with what we have to charge with.  I do not expect to max out 50 ampsSent from my iPhone On Apr 30, 2019, at 9:03 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   What really is the electrical capacity on a boat from solar, how far will that take you, and realistically, will one be running a generator and how much? Solar Power Generation: Based on some tests by the Wynns in Florida (latitude N26), two used "160W" panels (they have 6 of these), produced 15 Amps at "12V", at 14.4V from the panels, but we will say 12.8V from the batteries later because though the charge voltage is higher, the voltage at which the power comes out is lower.    That is 216 Watts in, 192 Watts of useful power out of the batteries later.   They also tested two new "140W" panels and produced 20 Amps at "12V", or about 288 Watts in, 256 Watts out later.   256/"280" = 91% useful power.   192/"320" = 60% useful power.   Same solar controller in both tests.  At latitude N44, I was seeing about 67% of ratings from the panels, before considering charging losses which for a perfect charge controller might be 60% useful power.    On my off-grid solar installation, I have huge reserve capacity, currently not that much generating capacity, and the vampire load is very low.   I would add panels if I were to increase expected daily loads.   The Wynns also did a lot of shading tests, simulating halyards (no appreciable difference) and the boom (much larger difference).   Lets assume this is a boat on the hook and one has put a preventer on the boom to make it not shade panels, and oriented the boat to get uninterrupted sun on the panels.   If I were designing a solar system for a boat today, for a monohull, I would go with the most power dense panels I could get -- lets say "320W" panels.   Lets say I have an arch over my davits and I am able to put three 40-inch wide panels flat above this arch -- that is a beam of 10 feet.   Lets assume 60% useful power.   That is 960 Watts * 60% = 576 Watts which is not much. One only gets that during the day.   So one might get 3kWh of power per day from the panels -- based on not angling panels.   For someone who thinks they can run without a generator, that is the limit of power.   "Average use for a typical RVer is around 20 kWh a day.   .....  RVers parked in areas where they do not need air conditioning will use much less electricity than RVers who do need it.  In fact, the average amount of electricity used by people who are not running air conditioning is about 10 kWh a day."  (1) There is one total power budget estimate.   Lets look at it from the components up: Loads: Required Unoccupied, trekking the country nearby while the boat is on anchor:  - Refrigeration: 300 kWh / year (modern, high efficiency, extra insulation for the tropics)   lets say 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Anchoring light (LED, 2 nm visibility, on a timer, 12 hour burn):  0.025 kWh/day   (3)    - Bilge Pump (500 gallons/day, 1 hour/day): 0.060 kWh/day (4)  - Most basic of computers offering Wifi and sensor monitoring to report alerts & email: 0.080 kWh/day (5 + estimate for dry contact and sensor system)   Minimum Occupied:  - Radio (hand held, listening):  0.020 kWh/day  (2)   - Interior Lights (LED):  0.050 kWh/day   - Recharging (Cell, shaver, shortwave receiver, flashlights, head lamps, miscellaneous): 0.050 kWh/day Voluntary Electronics:  - Netbook (4 hours):  0.100 kWh/day    - Full Laptop (4 hours): 0.300 kWh/day   - Display Screen (tv/monitor) (4 hours): 0.400 kWh//day  - DVD player (2 hours): 0.050 kWh/day Other:  - Pressurized water (per 100 liters -- usage for 1 day):  0.020 kWh/day (7)  - Freezer: 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Washing machine, 2 people:  0.400 kWh/day (one load every second day)  - Water maker (most efficient, per 100 liters/day): 0.400 kWh/day (6) Working on Boat:  - hand saw and driver drill for cabinetry work (1 hour run time/8 hour day): 1 kWh/day (experience)  - belt sander for finishing (6 hours run time/8 hour day): 7.2 kWh/day (experience) This is before using any electricity for cooking.   Looking at these conveniences ... pressurized water is a power bargain.   So, basic anchoring budget is 1.17 kWh / day -- solar will cover it with more than 100% to spare -- one 12V/100Ah battery unit at 50% DOD will carry it through the night.   On light overcast days, when one is getting 50% power, the system is still OK.   So one uses two 12V/100Ah units to keep the average DOD to 25%, to make sure it does not go much below 50% DOD in a stretch of moderately cloudy weather.      To go one week (hurricane overcast on a boat, a week of heavy overcast in winter in Canada) without significant sun, the battery bank must be 8.2 kWh -- which is 14 units of 12V/100Ah at 50% DOD -- that is a lot of batteries.   Rick's batteries, four times 12V/200Ah, 9.6 kWh, could handle this, just..   This is why I am interested in Rick's batteries -- they are about the minimum I would consider to have constant refrigeration, be it in a cottage or boat.   Speaking of refrigeration.  When one is not opening the fridge and adding things or taking things out, the power consumption of a fridge is inversely related to thickness of insulation.   As the largest power draw in an unoccupied space, I would consider a hyper-insulated fridge (I do not believe it is available, I was thinking DIY) to cut the power in half.   That allows Rick's batteries to run the system for close to 2 weeks without sun.   That I think would be a far better design for an off-grid cottage.   Ricks batteries would recharge in about 4 days after 2 weeks with heavy overcast.    If one had reliable sun every day, and particularly if the panels netted a little better than 60% useful power from their rating, then: 3.93 kWh/day -- based on 200 liters/day of water desalinated, and pressurized, laundry, freezer, and no voluntary electronics.  The solar panels could not reliably keep up.  In full sun, Rick's batteries would need a generator run of 10 hours once every 8 or 9 days.   From fully charged, after 2 days without sun, without a generator run, Rick's batteries would be exhausted.    Therefore, a pretty spartan existence, with a short shower daily, would be a strain without a daily generator run of about an hour on sunny days, and 4 hours a day on heavy overcast days.   (Assuming a Honda 1200W quiet generator outputting 1000W average.) Get rid of the freezer and one is just below what one would expect of the panels per day.   After just one day without sun, one would have to wait 2 weeks for the batteries to get back up to normal.   It is not reasonable to expect only 1 day of heavy clouds in each 2 weeks.   Therefore, even without the freezer, the solar panels would likely fall behind and regular generator running would be needed.  One could laminate flexible panels to the deck, but they are on average half the efficiency per unit area and, one really could not expect more than another 320 W of power to be conveniently placed. For those thinking that wind power will save them....  one would need an anchorage protected from waves, by say a submerged reef, and open to the wind -- so not like a closed bay.   Most small wind generators are rated for 40km/h, that is, they give their rated power at 40km/h wind speed.   They do not cut in until about 8 or 9 km/h.   Wind energy goes by the cube of the wind speed.   To generate half the rated output, one needs about 32 km/h of wind.   Half the rated output on a 400 Watt generator is 200 Watts.   Even if it is a tiringly windy anchorage, and the wind blows 24/7, that is only 4.8 kWh of power maximum theoretical, 4.2 kWh useful delivered to loads is more likely with charging inefficiency.  That is more than solar, but only if one assumes a tiringly windy anchorage.   If one wants the wind generator to total the same output as solar in 24 hours, one must have 27 kmph winds, 24/7.    Based on the theory that when it is not sunny the wind is blowing, to cover minimal loads (1.17kWh/day), one needs 20 km/h winds, 24/7 on cloudy days.     That is actually a reasonable expectation, on average, but not reliably.   Generator Inevitable Therefore, one should expect to use a generator on a cruising boat at least from time to time.   Now the question is how big and how long.  (I like the little 1200W Hondas .... they are very quiet.)   Taking a 1200W at 80% load, that is one hour of daily generator running for each kWh of extra consumption one has.  A freezer -- average an hour a day extra.  If one has AC, the RV example would have one run the generator for the entire daylight hours.     This is assuming all cooking appliances run from fuel.   If one assumes a sum total of 2 hours running 1800W (kettle, toaster oven, or single element hot plate), that is 3-4 kWh/day, 3-4 more hours of running the generator. Cat vs. Monohull.... Now, the Wynns have 11 solar panels on their cat.   If they upgraded them all to 320W panels (physically a bit larger, but also more efficient), and assuming 60% useful power, that is about 12.5 kWh / day ... I cannot say anything about their power usage, or their total average power received on their panels, but, it would seem a cat has a much better chance of being able to reliably handle reasonable hotel loads on solar alone.   Looking to the RV example, with no A, a Cat is the minimum unit of cruising boat to have an average RV experience without the need to run a generator every day -- certainly one will have a generator, certainly it will be run frequently in the average 2-week period to account for shortages of sun, but, it will not be run with certainty every single day just to meet average needs.      I did this calculation long ago, and that is why, some time ago, I encouraged Brent to come out of retirement and design an orgami cat, say based on a pair of 31 hulls, maybe with less beam (or maybe not), to each hull.    The hulls could each be a long, shallow draft single keel for even more shallow boat draft than the monohull twin keeler.   An origami Cat could compete with RVs as a lifestyle cruising boat where the entire world is available.    There are about 350,000-500,000 RVs sold each year worldwide(?) (9).  There are about 2,500 cruising boats sold in the US each year and about 2,000 sailboats of all sizes, including daysailers sold (8).   Monohulls are small on the inside compared to a modest RV.   Small = reduced comfort.   While there are many factors keeping the boat market about 200 times smaller, comfort is something that can be addressed.  Flip the Other Way -- Why Have Solar at All? If solar is so pathetic and doomed to be insufficient, why have solar at all?    Even if one is only netting 2kWh of electricity total from solar panels on sunny days, that is still 2 hours not running a generator, per day, or about 2.2 litres of fuel per day (for a Honda 1200W), or one 20 litre jerry can every 9 days.    Economically that does not make sense, solar panels are expensive.   But over a year, that is over 800 litres.   Really good solar panels are still only about $0.7-0.8/Rated Watt.   960 Rated Watts is what, $770?  Does anyone think one can find 800 litres of fuel reliably while cruising for less than $770 ?    Want to explain what a pain it is to mount and wire up panels -- I will tell you about hauling 40 jerry cans of fuel a year, every year probably most of the time in a dingy.  Yes, the charge controller will be a good chunk of change too.   We are not looking at a one-year payback, but, one year is informative.       One can outfit solar panels before leaving, at continental industrial-source prices for all components to protect against fuel costs in small markets later.   Other Budgets There are many other people who have done power budgets for homes, and RVs and boats, and I am certainly not saying this power budget is better, or closer to what you will experience, I was just trying to solve the question -- generator or not, and if so how long must it run.   I was also trying to highlight the benefits of a cat when it comes to power.   Matt References: (1) https://www.godownsize.com/electricity-consumption-rv/ (2) https://www.westmarine.com/buy/west-marine--vhf95db-dual-band-floating-handheld-vhf-radio--16230526 and https://www.westmarine.com/WestAdvisor/Selecting-a-VHF-Handheld-Radio (3) https://www.yachtingmonthly.com/gear/anchor-lights-test-33105 (4) https://www.amazon.ca/Electric-Automatic-Caravan-Five-Oceans/dp/B00N44FG5I (5) https://www.pidramble.com/wiki/benchmarks/power-consumption (6) https://www.cruisingworld.com/desalination-decisions-watermakers (7) https://www.rvpartscanada.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=37&products_id=2335#.XMhVLEN7nq4 (8) https://www.tradeonlytoday.com/industry-news/boat-sales-topped-250000-in-2016 (9) https://www.rvia.org/historical-rv-data From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 5:13 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     I agree 100% with Darren.   Any system that will rely on running a generator is the wrong system.  I remember one boat that would fire up a Honda generator on their foredeck and then go ashore for the day while it letting it run....no problem for them, but a real annoyance for everybody else.  Superyachts are the worst.   They may have sound proofed generators but the sound of their exhaust gurgling and splashing from their hull can be a real pain....it never ends. >>>>>>  I wouldn't openly criticize anyone who pursues a high power consumption lifestyle, as long as they remember not to be the moron who anchors right next to someone in a quiet anchorage and then proceeds to run your generator incessantly.  | 35889|35854|2019-04-30 17:28:45|Rick Jackson|Re: LiFePo4|There is a difference between “vacation sailing” and full time live aboard.  Remember that we have a motor sailer.   Sent from my iPhone On Apr 29, 2019, at 10:34 PM, SHANE ROTHWELL rockrothwell@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I thought the whole point of going sailing and espcially this group was to simplify things not complicate them.Seemlessly from ashore to aboard? Your kidding, right?Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android | 35890|35854|2019-04-30 17:29:00|Rick Jackson|Re: LiFePo4|You get it.  I can do candles and a bucket.  I hate ice and can eat food from a can.  I’ve gone weeks without showers and beer is mostly water.   I do however have the most amazing wife who take a bullet for me.   Sent from my iPhone On Apr 30, 2019, at 1:49 PM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I know I am very opinionated but I also don't want to be too judgemental.     Sometimes the decisions we make may not be the best idea but they may be necessary to get a reluctant partner to go along our plans.    I am not saying it is the case with all of them, but there are a lot of old (and unhappy) singlehanders running around who weren't willing to compromise or were too cheap to splurge on a few luxuries once in awhile.    If I am not careful, it could be me one day. | 35891|35854|2019-04-30 17:37:16|opuspaul|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?|I have 12 volt fridge/freezer.  It is built in, well insulated, and very efficient since it is water cooled via copper condensor plate epoxied to the hull.  My biggest power draw other than the fridge is my computer.   I use a large 17 inch screen laptop a lot.   I have converted all lighting to LEDs which makes a big difference.  I don't use SSB or other radios much at all.   Some people seem to talk on Ham radio or SSB all day and for them, this can be a significant power draw.My charge system is a single 12 volt 250 watt panel with very good MPPT regulator.   The panel is placed on an arch over the cockpit where it gets little to no shadows.  The single 250 watt panel provides almost all my needs if it is sunny.  On good days, I often see over 15 amps.  If it is cloudy and rainy, forget it.  You could have triple the panels and still not keep up.  On the bad weather days, I probably need to run the engine for an hour with my 100A alternator.  This my experience in NZ with a moderate climate.    In Fiji, the water is warmer and the air is hotter so the fridge is much harder on the batteries.  I once had a wind generator.   It put the amps out but since it often cast a shadow on the solar panels it made them much less efficient.   It was also noisy, required maintenance and was sometimes scary.  It killed a few birds over the years.   Believe me, sitting in the cockpit late at night while on watch and having a large bird  go splat beside you is not fun ;).  I was very happy to get rid of it.If I could fit another 250 watt panel somewhere, I would do it in a heartbeat but I can't figure out where to do it.  The only place away from shadows or walking areas is on the rail which I think is a little too vulnerable to damage for my liking.  I need a bigger boat ;).   I could probably benefit from better batteries but I don't see spending the money for a new set of expensive batteries when the limit seems to be my solar panel.   If I could get another panel and get up to 30 amps out of them, I would probably upgrade to something better.  Paul| 35892|35854|2019-04-30 17:50:39|brentswain38|Re: LiFePo4|I cruised 17 years and 3 Pacific crossings before I installed any electrical system ,a very simple, minimalist one. A guy in Haida Gwai told me of a guy there who spent 3 years and $25K on electrics before launching and going sailing. If I were building another boat , I would go without electrics to get  cruising quickly, and slowly develop electrics while cruising. That lets you get the bugs our of each wire , before  doing the next one.Canning eliminates the vulnerability of freezing, a nd its dependence on constant  power, and complex systems. It also can drastically reduce your cruising costs.We were amazed at an electrical meeting at Cabo San Lucas, when they told us how much power the " average cruising boat "uses, a tiny fraction of what we used.I use 3 -80 milliamp lights ,sometimes a 4th, and an AM radio, my total  electrical  consumption, most of the time.  I live very comfortably. A comfort greatly  increased, by not having to  go to work, to pay for electrical contraptions, and their maintenancee| 35893|35854|2019-04-30 17:54:23|opuspaul|Re: LiFePo4|I have been based in the South Pacific for the last 20 years on the coconut run so have met more long term cruisers than most...it is probably in the many hundreds now, from all over the world on all different budgets.  I have met many couples doing it rough (ie. no refridgeration or other luxuries) but most of them only made trips for about a year or one trip across the Pacific.   After that, they were either done or upgraded to a different boat.   I have seen water temperatures in the lagoons of over 30C.  Sooner or later you get tired of having warm drinks and salt water showers.   I can't recall one long term cruising couple (say 5 years or more) that doesn't have refridgeration.  Most have watermakers now.| 35894|35854|2019-04-30 17:55:08|brentswain38|Re: LiFePo4|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I have know several  elders who rammed a potato up the exhausts,  when such people were ashore, wrecking one  generator. I just went aboard and turned them off , while  thinking about the potato trick. I agree 100% with Darren.   Any system that will rely on running a generator is the wrong system.  I remember one boat that would fire up a Honda generator on their foredeck and then go ashore for the day while it letting it run....no problem for them, but a real annoyance for everybody else.  Superyachts are the worst.   They may have sound proofed generators but the sound of their exhaust gurgling and splashing from their hull can be a real pain....it never ends. >>>>>>  I wouldn't openly criticize anyone who pursues a high power consumption lifestyle, as long as they remember not to be the moron who anchors right next to someone in a quiet anchorage and then proceeds to run your generator incessantly.  | 35895|35854|2019-04-30 18:02:15|brentswain38|Re: LiFePo4|I've been cruising around 47 years and 9 Pacific crossings and have no interest  in refrigeration, but I have built  a watermaker, 540 gallons per day, for under $900. Engine driven watermakers are really ,quite simple gizmos.| 35896|35854|2019-05-01 01:20:47|Darren Bos|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?| Agreed, and I enjoyed your embellishment of the idea Matt  :-)  The one thing you have to look out for is how heavily you load the crankshaft bearing.  The manufacturers tend to be a bit cagey about what is tolerable.  If I had a water pump for a watermaker and a big alternator, I'd try and mount them opposed by 180 degrees.  Most marine engines die from corrosion and lack of use.  While you wouldn't want to idle one to charge the batteries, just about any other use is likely to make it last longer. On 2019-04-30 1:47 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Absolutely agreed Darren, if people do not have refrigeration, they should remain in that blissful place.   Absolutely agreed Darren, if you include running the propulsion engine as different from running a dedicated engine to generate electricity.   Perhaps I should change the title to "Run a fuel engine to make electricity sometimes, or Not".   Engine or Generator -- seems the same thing to me.  It was easier to do the calculations with a 1200W Honda. What you said about running the propulsion engine for two purposes is absolutely of advantage.   Thank you for telling me about the "small engine" regulators ... I want one.   Absolutely true, propulsion engines are usually diesel, more efficient, marine-ized so they last longer in a boat environment, whereas generators are, well, inexpensive if they are gasoline and not marine-ized.   But chances are, the outboard on the tender is gasoline so, one probably has gasoline on board in any case.   It is absolutely true for some boats and some owners that running the engine will come at about the same frequency as one would normally need to top up the batteries.   But then this tempo will get ingrained.  When one gets somewhere they really like and want to stay for a while, the tempo will make one feel itchy to go somewhere on a certain schedule or face the prospect of just running the engine just to make electricity, which more than a few cruisers complain is inefficient and irritating to them.   Where sails are a redundancy to the propulsion engine, there is no redundancy to an alternator if any one of a dozen things goes wrong with the propulsion engine.   The propulsion engine has a limited service lifetime and a chance of other failures, every hour it runs.   If something goes wrong with the engine, you are talking about boat yoga in tight spaces if you are a DIY type, on-site diesel mechanics ($$), and worst case a $10,000-$15,000 bill and a crane to replace it.   Yikes, I am not running that sucker just to make electricity.  As for incidental electricity... I sail differently.   My sails are my propulsion.  I have used as little as 12 litres of fuel in year, and there is no such thing as a wind where my boat is slower than a cottage.   My engine is my backup to my sails.   Naturally, good seamanship dictates caution and to some that points only to the engine.  If that is the way it has to be, OK.   But waiting to go in until the wind and tide are favourable is also seamanship, and then the engine and its full tank of fuel is still there in reserve.    Many times I start the engine and just let it idle for the decisive couple of minutes as I sail nearly all the way in -- it is there in an instant for oh-crap moments.      At least with a 1200 Watt generator, there is no issue of charge rate, they are really quiet out of the box, and can be made quieter with a little DIY.   If something goes wrong with the generator, I had always assumed that in a pinch I would have the 20,000 Watt propulsion engine was the backup to the generator, even though it is inefficient and straining to the electrical system unless it is used for something else at the same time.   If something goes wrong with the generator, it never be a big bill.  I carry it ashore to a small engine repair place, or buy another one.  In the meantime, so long as the generator works, one runs their engine only when necessary, keeping its hours down.   So it is down to wear and tear on the engine, or a disposable substitute to change fuel into electricity.  I would never NOT have a portable generator.    I am really not disputing anything you are saying Darren, some people will find what you describe to be the simplest course of action.   I am just giving the other side of what some other boats might do.   But lets run with your idea, a very good one, to have a 210A bus alternator running directly off the propulsion engine to take advantage of the huge surplus of mechanical power available that one might borrow from when moving the boat.   But, if you are going to do that....  - if you have an external regulator, is it not possible with the flip of an appropriately-wired switch to turn this into an unbelievable weldernator ?   One is never doing that with a 1200W Honda.   Even Rick's batteries, and a little inverter welder, that is a joke compared to this T-rex of weldernators.   You could do half inch plate with 5/32" rod and really feel like you are accomplishing something.   If you have never tried 5/32 rod, you really have to, just for fun, on 3/16" or thicker steel.   Have 100 feet of cables, and industrial fenders and raft up to commercial boats and do a little commercial welding.   I want one.  Really, I do.    - why stop at a 210A alternator -- connect up a high pressure pump with a couple of one-way valves so your water maker runs electric off one pump or directly from the engine from the other pump -- for just the cost of a second pump, you are creating redundancy.   Drawing the same torque as the alternator, the engine-powered watermaker could put out 200 gallons per hour, assuming one has suitable osmosis media.   The efficiency would be awesome, diesel directly driving the pump skips the following filters of efficiency: claw-style armature alternator 75-80%, battery charging 90%, electric motor 80-90% -- combined total 54%-65% efficiency.  One avoids all that by going straight off the engine.   Then one also has the alternative to make water with the engine if the electric pump ever fails.   I sure am thinking about doing this.  - why stop there ... If the water tanks fill before one is finished motoring, start filling the bathtub and have a good celebratory soak in the tub to prepare for going out on the town at the new destination.  Your 20,000 Watt motor is easily producing 25,000 Watts of heat so, that tub can be nice and toasty warm with just a few valves and a little hose.   This is just a given, I am definitely having an engine-heat option to my hot water tank.   - Heck why stop there ... turn down the flow rate so the fresh water comes out at full exhaust temperature and fill your teapot.   There is a lot of comfort possible here.    I don't like tea that much so, no.    - If there is still a surplus of fresh water, start filling all those water jerry cans most boats have -- over stock and then turn off the electric water maker -- run the engine today, save Amps tomorrow.   I sure would do this.      - why stop there ... put a semi-hermetic compressor on the engine and hook it up to a big-ass ice maker -- freeze a fraction that 200 GPH pouring out of the water maker and get rid of the need for both refrigeration and freezer (save the brine waste from water making ... ice+brine = -17C in a cold plate).    Says that man with a great big ice chest ... pull it out, or add a compressor to the engine ... open question.    - why stop there ... Just keep making ice, and put hundreds of pounds of ice in a stainless cabinet inside an adjustable-vent wood cabinet, with a drip pan under the stainless cabinet -- a DIY dehumidifier.   This is probably beyond the electrical power budget for most boats, so, what a luxury.   Dry gallons an hour.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Have the melt-water drain for the stainless cabinet run through a cooling coil along the cabinet ceiling and back down into the fresh water tanks -- step one air conditioning, for the price of pumping water a few feet -- we have already established, that is bargain compared to AC.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Not cool enough? Open vents in the side of the wood cabinet and blow air in there to both get more cool air and accelerate melting.   Glorious air conditioning -- not even a cat could manage that on solar.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... they have these cooking appliances, called muff pots, better than instant pots, and they are *ZERO* Watts:  http://cs.amsnow.com/sno/b/news/archive/2015/04/09/snacker-packer-meals-made-easy.aspx Cooking on a snowmobile made easy - American Snowmobiler Magazine - Snowmobile forums, news, Polaris, Ski-Doo, Arctic Cat & Yamaha reviews - AmSnow.com American Snowmobiler Magazine presents news, reviews, forums, videos, photos and the latest stats and prices for Arctic Cat, Ski-Doo, Yamaha and Polaris snowmobiles. cs.amsnow.com If one has never cooked on the exhaust of an engine ...   Heck with all that, one solar panel would run the radio and the nav lights, nav, etc.   If co-generating electricity by depending on running a 20,000 Watt engine with any frequency is how some boaters will do it, then co-generating everything else that would otherwise require electricity, or would generate comfort is worth mentioning too.   So when it comes down to it, same answer:  On a monohull, one is running an engine sometimes, but there is a lot of room for innovation, taste, preferences and different ways to meet the power budget.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:59 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     For everyone who has a simple boat without refrigeration/freezer, you probably wonder why everyone is so concerned about how to generate enough power from solar.  Your life is simple and there is no reason to read the rest of this. Matt, that's a pretty reasonable analysis, and would fit some boats.  There are certainly boats that manage these comforts on lower watts.  The obvious area for improvement is refrigeration, any efficiencies gained here is money better spent than money spent on power generation (solar and generators).  I came to the conclusion that 4" of styrofoam insulation for the fridge and 6" for the freezer was the minimum to make DC refrigeration work on a reasonable energy budget.  50 to 125 Ah per day is what 12v DC refrigeration generally uses per day.  The differences are almost entirely due to insulation, next due to the size of the fridge/freezer.  If you can get closer to 50Ah per day your energy budget changes drastically.  I decided a spillover design fridge freezer, custom built to maximize insulation was the best way to go in my build.  Aspen Aerogel is an interesting material here.  However, polystyrene foam is easy to work, cheap, readily available, and absorbs water less than the other foam insulation choices. Your energy budget doesn't consider engine run time and power from the alternator at all.  A boat that moves even just once or twice a week can reduce/eliminate its need for generator run time by super-sizing its alternator.  I've ordered a Leece-Neville 210A school bus alternator.  It should run happily at 170A continuous, perhaps a bit more with careful attention to cooling.  This is a win-win situation, getting power from the alternator is more efficient than from a generator.  With a fixed pitch prop you're running at an inefficient part of the power curve of the diesel at cruising rpm.  The extra load the alternator moves the engine into a more efficient part of the fuel map, that improvement in efficiency means that part of the fuel consumed by the alternator comes for free as your making the engine more efficient at the same time you make carbon buildup problems less likely.  Even if you have a smaller diesel you could fit an alternator this size.  If you need maximum propulsion power at some point, an external regulator like a Balmar Mc-614 used with a switch for small engine mode (field output reduced to 50%) allows you to get most of the power from the engine for propulsion when necessary.  You could also just put a plain switch in the field wire to the alt for a inexpensive solution, although charging at these high currents you probably want an external regulator anyway.  It should be noted that this solution relies on batteries that can accept pretty high charge rates.  This would be LiPO4, Firefly >AGM>very large flooded lead acid bank.  A small flooded-lead-acid bank probably won't be able to accept the high charge rate for long enough for a large alternator to do a lot of good.  The LiPO4 and the Firefly also have the advantage that they are totally happy in a partial state of charge and can stay there without damage until you are ready to move to the next anchorage (within reasonable time limits and state of charge limits).  You should switch to a serpentine belt to run a large alternator like a Delco Remy 28SI or a Leece Neville Idle Pro. There are two ways of looking at comfort while cruising.  Your comfort could come from plugging in whatever you want whenever you want.  However, this comes with the discomfort of noise from the generator, discomfort getting/storing fuel for the generator (especially bad for gasoline generators),  discomfort from getting/storing oil for the generator, the discomfort from generator oil changes, discomfort from trying to source generator parts in some distant port, discomfort from getting shunned by the cruisers who can't stand the noise of your generator.  On the flip side, if you design a boat with conservation in mind, it is possible to run almost entirely on solar.  I've met more than one boat (with refrigeration and watermaker) that runs successfully with just solar/wind/alternator.  You boil water in a kettle on the stove (is that a discomfort?), you wash laundry ashore or in a bucket (Ok, the bucket counts as a discomfort), is lighting a propane stove a discomfort compared to electric (around here tons of folks spend tons of money on their house for the luxury of a natural gas stove).  I have a nice antique coffee grinder, it takes zero watts to run, is beautiful and a pleasure to use, there are tons of equivalents to this on the boat, where doing things different is part of the pleasure for me.  A generator is definitely not necessary.   On 2019-04-30 9:03 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   What really is the electrical capacity on a boat from solar, how far will that take you, and realistically, will one be running a generator and how much? Solar Power Generation: Based on some tests by the Wynns in Florida (latitude N26), two used "160W" panels (they have 6 of these), produced 15 Amps at "12V", at 14.4V from the panels, but we will say 12.8V from the batteries later because though the charge voltage is higher, the voltage at which the power comes out is lower.    That is 216 Watts in, 192 Watts of useful power out of the batteries later.   They also tested two new "140W" panels and produced 20 Amps at "12V", or about 288 Watts in, 256 Watts out later.   256/"280" = 91% useful power.   192/"320" = 60% useful power.   Same solar controller in both tests.  At latitude N44, I was seeing about 67% of ratings from the panels, before considering charging losses which for a perfect charge controller might be 60% useful power.    On my off-grid solar installation, I have huge reserve capacity, currently not that much generating capacity, and the vampire load is very low.   I would add panels if I were to increase expected daily loads.   The Wynns also did a lot of shading tests, simulating halyards (no appreciable difference) and the boom (much larger difference).   Lets assume this is a boat on the hook and one has put a preventer on the boom to make it not shade panels, and oriented the boat to get uninterrupted sun on the panels.   If I were designing a solar system for a boat today, for a monohull, I would go with the most power dense panels I could get -- lets say "320W" panels.   Lets say I have an arch over my davits and I am able to put three 40-inch wide panels flat above this arch -- that is a beam of 10 feet.   Lets assume 60% useful power.   That is 960 Watts * 60% = 576 Watts which is not much. One only gets that during the day.   So one might get 3kWh of power per day from the panels -- based on not angling panels.   For someone who thinks they can run without a generator, that is the limit of power.   "Average use for a typical RVer is around 20 kWh a day.   ....  RVers parked in areas where they do not need air conditioning will use much less electricity than RVers who do need it.  In fact, the average amount of electricity used by people who are not running air conditioning is about 10 kWh a day."  (1) There is one total power budget estimate.   Lets look at it from the components up: Loads: Required Unoccupied, trekking the country nearby while the boat is on anchor:  - Refrigeration: 300 kWh / year (modern, high efficiency, extra insulation for the tropics)   lets say 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Anchoring light (LED, 2 nm visibility, on a timer, 12 hour burn):  0.025 kWh/day   (3)    - Bilge Pump (500 gallons/day, 1 hour/day): 0.060 kWh/day (4)  - Most basic of computers offering Wifi and sensor monitoring to report alerts & email: 0.080 kWh/day (5 + estimate for dry contact and sensor system)   Minimum Occupied:  - Radio (hand held, listening):  0.020 kWh/day  (2)   - Interior Lights (LED):  0.050 kWh/day   - Recharging (Cell, shaver, shortwave receiver, flashlights, head lamps, miscellaneous): 0.050 kWh/day Voluntary Electronics:  - Netbook (4 hours):  0.100 kWh/day    - Full Laptop (4 hours): 0.300 kWh/day   - Display Screen (tv/monitor) (4 hours): 0.400 kWh//day  - DVD player (2 hours): 0.050 kWh/day Other:  - Pressurized water (per 100 liters -- usage for 1 day):  0.020 kWh/day (7)  - Freezer: 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Washing machine, 2 people:  0.400 kWh/day (one load every second day)  - Water maker (most efficient, per 100 liters/day): 0.400 kWh/day (6) Working on Boat:  - hand saw and driver drill for cabinetry work (1 hour run time/8 hour day): 1 kWh/day (experience)  - belt sander for finishing (6 hours run time/8 hour day): 7.2 kWh/day (experience) This is before using any electricity for cooking.   Looking at these conveniences ... pressurized water is a power bargain.   So, basic anchoring budget is 1.17 kWh / day -- solar will cover it with more than 100% to spare -- one 12V/100Ah battery unit at 50% DOD will carry it through the night.   On light overcast days, when one is getting 50% power, the system is still OK.   So one uses two 12V/100Ah units to keep the average DOD to 25%, to make sure it does not go much below 50% DOD in a stretch of moderately cloudy weather.      To go one week (hurricane overcast on a boat, a week of heavy overcast in winter in Canada) without significant sun, the battery bank must be 8.2 kWh -- which is 14 units of 12V/100Ah at 50% DOD -- that is a lot of batteries.   Rick's batteries, four times 12V/200Ah, 9.6 kWh, could handle this, just.   This is why I am interested in Rick's batteries -- they are about the minimum I would consider to have constant refrigeration, be it in a cottage or boat.   Speaking of refrigeration.  When one is not opening the fridge and adding things or taking things out, the power consumption of a fridge is inversely related to thickness of insulation.   As the largest power draw in an unoccupied space, I would consider a hyper-insulated fridge (I do not believe it is available, I was thinking DIY) to cut the power in half.   That allows Rick's batteries to run the system for close to 2 weeks without sun.   That I think would be a far better design for an off-grid cottage.   Ricks batteries would recharge in about 4 days after 2 weeks with heavy overcast.    If one had reliable sun every day, and particularly if the panels netted a little better than 60% useful power from their rating, then: 3.93 kWh/day -- based on 200 liters/day of water desalinated, and pressurized, laundry, freezer, and no voluntary electronics.  The solar panels could not reliably keep up.  In full sun, Rick's batteries would need a generator run of 10 hours once every 8 or 9 days.   From fully charged, after 2 days without sun, without a generator run, Rick's batteries would be exhausted.    Therefore, a pretty spartan existence, with a short shower daily, would be a strain without a daily generator run of about an hour on sunny days, and 4 hours a day on heavy overcast days.   (Assuming a Honda 1200W quiet generator outputting 1000W average.) Get rid of the freezer and one is just below what one would expect of the panels per day.   After just one day without sun, one would have to wait 2 weeks for the batteries to get back up to normal.   It is not reasonable to expect only 1 day of heavy clouds in each 2 weeks.   Therefore, even without the freezer, the solar panels would likely fall behind and regular generator running would be needed.  One could laminate flexible panels to the deck, but they are on average half the efficiency per unit area and, one really could not expect more than another 320 W of power to be conveniently placed. For those thinking that wind power will save them...  one would need an anchorage protected from waves, by say a submerged reef, and open to the wind -- so not like a closed bay.   Most small wind generators are rated for 40km/h, that is, they give their rated power at 40km/h wind speed.   They do not cut in until about 8 or 9 km/h.   Wind energy goes by the cube of the wind speed.   To generate half the rated output, one needs about 32 km/h of wind.   Half the rated output on a 400 Watt generator is 200 Watts.   Even if it is a tiringly windy anchorage, and the wind blows 24/7, that is only 4.8 kWh of power maximum theoretical, 4.2 kWh useful delivered to loads is more likely with charging inefficiency.  That is more than solar, but only if one assumes a tiringly windy anchorage.   If one wants the wind generator to total the same output as solar in 24 hours, one must have 27 kmph winds, 24/7.    Based on the theory that when it is not sunny the wind is blowing, to cover minimal loads (1.17kWh/day), one needs 20 km/h winds, 24/7 on cloudy days.     That is actually a reasonable expectation, on average, but not reliably.   Generator Inevitable Therefore, one should expect to use a generator on a cruising boat at least from time to time.   Now the question is how big and how long.  (I like the little 1200W Hondas .... they are very quiet.)   Taking a 1200W at 80% load, that is one hour of daily generator running for each kWh of extra consumption one has.  A freezer -- average an hour a day extra.  If one has AC, the RV example would have one run the generator for the entire daylight hours.     This is assuming all cooking appliances run from fuel.   If one assumes a sum total of 2 hours running 1800W (kettle, toaster oven, or single element hot plate), that is 3-4 kWh/day, 3-4 more hours of running the generator. Cat vs. Monohull.... Now, the Wynns have 11 solar panels on their cat.   If they upgraded them all to 320W panels (physically a bit larger, but also more efficient), and assuming 60% useful power, that is about 12.5 kWh / day ... I cannot say anything about their power usage, or their total average power received on their panels, but, it would seem a cat has a much better chance of being able to reliably handle reasonable hotel loads on solar alone.   Looking to the RV example, with no A, a Cat is the minimum unit of cruising boat to have an average RV experience without the need to run a generator every day -- certainly one will have a generator, certainly it will be run frequently in the average 2-week period to account for shortages of sun, but, it will not be run with certainty every single day just to meet average needs.      I (Message over 64 KB, truncated) | 35897|35854|2019-05-01 01:27:49|Darren Bos|Re: LiFePo4| I agree completely, comfort and livability are a big part of our refit.  Lots of guys tend to think focusing on the boat is the most important part of cruising.  I'd say the boat is second, maybe a distant second. On 2019-04-30 1:49 p.m., opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I know I am very opinionated but I also don't want to be too judgemental.     Sometimes the decisions we make may not be the best idea but they may be necessary to get a reluctant partner to go along our plans.    I am not saying it is the case with all of them, but there are a lot of old (and unhappy) singlehanders running around who weren't willing to compromise or were too cheap to splurge on a few luxuries once in awhile.    If I am not careful, it could be me one day. | 35898|35854|2019-05-01 08:20:25|Matt Malone|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?| Excellent point Darren, I had not considered drive belt load on the crankshaft bearing from all these extras.  My engine is not well set up for extra driven components so I had been toying with the idea of a pony shaft just to run components from.   But even then, if one is pulling 10,000W off the pony shaft (3,000W for each of the alternator, semihermetic compressor and watermaker pump plus surge margin) then a lot of design calculation and checking for what is easily available has go into the power transmission link between the engine and pony shaft.  Is a motorcycle drive cogged belt that custom bikes use between the engine and transmission ... is that the easiest?   I don't know.  Is it better to put one extra to the right, another to the left so they balance bearing loads, except for the little torque caused by the separation between the plane of the two belts?    Is there room to put one extra below the crankshaft to balance a triad... there might be on my boat. Really good point.  Last thing one wants to do is reduce the life of the primary engine. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 01:21 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Agreed, and I enjoyed your embellishment of the idea Matt  :-)  The one thing you have to look out for is how heavily you load the crankshaft bearing.  The manufacturers tend to be a bit cagey about what is tolerable.  If I had a water pump for a watermaker and a big alternator, I'd try and mount them opposed by 180 degrees.  Most marine engines die from corrosion and lack of use.  While you wouldn't want to idle one to charge the batteries, just about any other use is likely to make it last longer. On 2019-04-30 1:47 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Absolutely agreed Darren, if people do not have refrigeration, they should remain in that blissful place.   Absolutely agreed Darren, if you include running the propulsion engine as different from running a dedicated engine to generate electricity.   Perhaps I should change the title to "Run a fuel engine to make electricity sometimes, or Not".   Engine or Generator -- seems the same thing to me.  It was easier to do the calculations with a 1200W Honda. What you said about running the propulsion engine for two purposes is absolutely of advantage.   Thank you for telling me about the "small engine" regulators ... I want one.   Absolutely true, propulsion engines are usually diesel, more efficient, marine-ized so they last longer in a boat environment, whereas generators are, well, inexpensive if they are gasoline and not marine-ized.   But chances are, the outboard on the tender is gasoline so, one probably has gasoline on board in any case.   It is absolutely true for some boats and some owners that running the engine will come at about the same frequency as one would normally need to top up the batteries.   But then this tempo will get ingrained.  When one gets somewhere they really like and want to stay for a while, the tempo will make one feel itchy to go somewhere on a certain schedule or face the prospect of just running the engine just to make electricity, which more than a few cruisers complain is inefficient and irritating to them.   Where sails are a redundancy to the propulsion engine, there is no redundancy to an alternator if any one of a dozen things goes wrong with the propulsion engine.   The propulsion engine has a limited service lifetime and a chance of other failures, every hour it runs.   If something goes wrong with the engine, you are talking about boat yoga in tight spaces if you are a DIY type, on-site diesel mechanics ($$), and worst case a $10,000-$15,000 bill and a crane to replace it.   Yikes, I am not running that sucker just to make electricity.  As for incidental electricity... I sail differently.   My sails are my propulsion.  I have used as little as 12 litres of fuel in year, and there is no such thing as a wind where my boat is slower than a cottage.   My engine is my backup to my sails.   Naturally, good seamanship dictates caution and to some that points only to the engine.  If that is the way it has to be, OK.   But waiting to go in until the wind and tide are favourable is also seamanship, and then the engine and its full tank of fuel is still there in reserve.    Many times I start the engine and just let it idle for the decisive couple of minutes as I sail nearly all the way in -- it is there in an instant for oh-crap moments.      At least with a 1200 Watt generator, there is no issue of charge rate, they are really quiet out of the box, and can be made quieter with a little DIY.   If something goes wrong with the generator, I had always assumed that in a pinch I would have the 20,000 Watt propulsion engine was the backup to the generator, even though it is inefficient and straining to the electrical system unless it is used for something else at the same time.   If something goes wrong with the generator, it never be a big bill.  I carry it ashore to a small engine repair place, or buy another one.  In the meantime, so long as the generator works, one runs their engine only when necessary, keeping its hours down.   So it is down to wear and tear on the engine, or a disposable substitute to change fuel into electricity.  I would never NOT have a portable generator.    I am really not disputing anything you are saying Darren, some people will find what you describe to be the simplest course of action.   I am just giving the other side of what some other boats might do.   But lets run with your idea, a very good one, to have a 210A bus alternator running directly off the propulsion engine to take advantage of the huge surplus of mechanical power available that one might borrow from when moving the boat.   But, if you are going to do that....  - if you have an external regulator, is it not possible with the flip of an appropriately-wired switch to turn this into an unbelievable weldernator ?   One is never doing that with a 1200W Honda.   Even Rick's batteries, and a little inverter welder, that is a joke compared to this T-rex of weldernators.   You could do half inch plate with 5/32" rod and really feel like you are accomplishing something.   If you have never tried 5/32 rod, you really have to, just for fun, on 3/16" or thicker steel.   Have 100 feet of cables, and industrial fenders and raft up to commercial boats and do a little commercial welding.   I want one.  Really, I do.    - why stop at a 210A alternator -- connect up a high pressure pump with a couple of one-way valves so your water maker runs electric off one pump or directly from the engine from the other pump -- for just the cost of a second pump, you are creating redundancy.   Drawing the same torque as the alternator, the engine-powered watermaker could put out 200 gallons per hour, assuming one has suitable osmosis media.   The efficiency would be awesome, diesel directly driving the pump skips the following filters of efficiency: claw-style armature alternator 75-80%, battery charging 90%, electric motor 80-90% -- combined total 54%-65% efficiency.  One avoids all that by going straight off the engine.   Then one also has the alternative to make water with the engine if the electric pump ever fails.   I sure am thinking about doing this.  - why stop there ... If the water tanks fill before one is finished motoring, start filling the bathtub and have a good celebratory soak in the tub to prepare for going out on the town at the new destination.  Your 20,000 Watt motor is easily producing 25,000 Watts of heat so, that tub can be nice and toasty warm with just a few valves and a little hose.   This is just a given, I am definitely having an engine-heat option to my hot water tank.   - Heck why stop there ... turn down the flow rate so the fresh water comes out at full exhaust temperature and fill your teapot.   There is a lot of comfort possible here.    I don't like tea that much so, no.    - If there is still a surplus of fresh water, start filling all those water jerry cans most boats have -- over stock and then turn off the electric water maker -- run the engine today, save Amps tomorrow.   I sure would do this.      - why stop there ... put a semi-hermetic compressor on the engine and hook it up to a big-ass ice maker -- freeze a fraction that 200 GPH pouring out of the water maker and get rid of the need for both refrigeration and freezer (save the brine waste from water making ... ice+brine = -17C in a cold plate).    Says that man with a great big ice chest ... pull it out, or add a compressor to the engine ... open question.    - why stop there ... Just keep making ice, and put hundreds of pounds of ice in a stainless cabinet inside an adjustable-vent wood cabinet, with a drip pan under the stainless cabinet -- a DIY dehumidifier.   This is probably beyond the electrical power budget for most boats, so, what a luxury.   Dry gallons an hour.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Have the melt-water drain for the stainless cabinet run through a cooling coil along the cabinet ceiling and back down into the fresh water tanks -- step one air conditioning, for the price of pumping water a few feet -- we have already established, that is bargain compared to AC.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Not cool enough? Open vents in the side of the wood cabinet and blow air in there to both get more cool air and accelerate melting.   Glorious air conditioning -- not even a cat could manage that on solar.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... they have these cooking appliances, called muff pots, better than instant pots, and they are *ZERO* Watts:  http://cs.amsnow.com/sno/b/news/archive/2015/04/09/snacker-packer-meals-made-easy.aspx Cooking on a snowmobile made easy - American Snowmobiler Magazine - Snowmobile forums, news, Polaris, Ski-Doo, Arctic Cat & Yamaha reviews - AmSnow.com American Snowmobiler Magazine presents news, reviews, forums, videos, photos and the latest stats and prices for Arctic Cat, Ski-Doo, Yamaha and Polaris snowmobiles. cs.amsnow.com If one has never cooked on the exhaust of an engine ...   Heck with all that, one solar panel would run the radio and the nav lights, nav, etc.   If co-generating electricity by depending on running a 20,000 Watt engine with any frequency is how some boaters will do it, then co-generating everything else that would otherwise require electricity, or would generate comfort is worth mentioning too.   So when it comes down to it, same answer:  On a monohull, one is running an engine sometimes, but there is a lot of room for innovation, taste, preferences and different ways to meet the power budget.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:59 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     For everyone who has a simple boat without refrigeration/freezer, you probably wonder why everyone is so concerned about how to generate enough power from solar.  Your life is simple and there is no reason to read the rest of this. Matt, that's a pretty reasonable analysis, and would fit some boats.  There are certainly boats that manage these comforts on lower watts.  The obvious area for improvement is refrigeration, any efficiencies gained here is money better spent than money spent on power generation (solar and generators).  I came to the conclusion that 4" of styrofoam insulation for the fridge and 6" for the freezer was the minimum to make DC refrigeration work on a reasonable energy budget.  50 to 125 Ah per day is what 12v DC refrigeration generally uses per day.  The differences are almost entirely due to insulation, next due to the size of the fridge/freezer.  If you can get closer to 50Ah per day your energy budget changes drastically.  I decided a spillover design fridge freezer, custom built to maximize insulation was the best way to go in my build.  Aspen Aerogel is an interesting material here.  However, polystyrene foam is easy to work, cheap, readily available, and absorbs water less than the other foam insulation choices. Your energy budget doesn't consider engine run time and power from the alternator at all.  A boat that moves even just once or twice a week can reduce/eliminate its need for generator run time by super-sizing its alternator.  I've ordered a Leece-Neville 210A school bus alternator.  It should run happily at 170A continuous, perhaps a bit more with careful attention to cooling.  This is a win-win situation, getting power from the alternator is more efficient than from a generator.  With a fixed pitch prop you're running at an inefficient part of the power curve of the diesel at cruising rpm.  The extra load the alternator moves the engine into a more efficient part of the fuel map, that improvement in efficiency means that part of the fuel consumed by the alternator comes for free as your making the engine more efficient at the same time you make carbon buildup problems less likely.  Even if you have a smaller diesel you could fit an alternator this size.  If you need maximum propulsion power at some point, an external regulator like a Balmar Mc-614 used with a switch for small engine mode (field output reduced to 50%) allows you to get most of the power from the engine for propulsion when necessary.  You could also just put a plain switch in the field wire to the alt for a inexpensive solution, although charging at these high currents you probably want an external regulator anyway.  It should be noted that this solution relies on batteries that can accept pretty high charge rates.  This would be LiPO4, Firefly >AGM>very large flooded lead acid bank.  A small flooded-lead-acid bank probably won't be able to accept the high charge rate for long enough for a large alternator to do a lot of good.  The LiPO4 and the Firefly also have the advantage that they are totally happy in a partial state of charge and can stay there without damage until you are ready to move to the next anchorage (within reasonable time limits and state of charge limits).  You should switch to a serpentine belt to run a large alternator like a Delco Remy 28SI or a Leece Neville Idle Pro. There are two ways of looking at comfort while cruising.  Your comfort could come from plugging in whatever you want whenever you want.  However, this comes with the discomfort of noise from the generator, discomfort getting/storing fuel for the generator (especially bad for gasoline generators),  discomfort from getting/storing oil for the generator, the discomfort from generator oil changes, discomfort from trying to source generator parts in some distant port, discomfort from getting shunned by the cruisers who can't stand the noise of your generator.  On the flip side, if you design a boat with conservation in mind, it is possible to run almost entirely on solar.  I've met more than one boat (with refrigeration and watermaker) that runs successfully with just solar/wind/alternator.  You boil water in a kettle on the stove (is that a discomfort?), you wash laundry ashore or in a bucket (Ok, the bucket counts as a discomfort), is lighting a propane stove a discomfort compared to electric (around here tons of folks spend tons of money on their house for the luxury of a natural gas stove).  I have a nice antique coffee grinder, it takes zero watts to run, is beautiful and a pleasure to use, there are tons of equivalents to this on the boat, where doing things different is part of the pleasure for me.  A generator is definitely not necessary.   On 2019-04-30 9:03 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   What really is the electrical capacity on a boat from solar, how far will that take you, and realistically, will one be running a generator and how much? Solar Power Generation: Based on some tests by the Wynns in Florida (latitude N26), two used "160W" panels (they have 6 of these), produced 15 Amps at "12V", at 14.4V from the panels, but we will say 12.8V from the batteries later because though the charge voltage is higher, the voltage at which the power comes out is lower.    That is 216 Watts in, 192 Watts of useful power out of the batteries later.   They also tested two new "140W" panels and produced 20 Amps at "12V", or about 288 Watts in, 256 Watts out later.   256/"280" = 91% useful power.   192/"320" = 60% useful power.   Same solar controller in both tests.  At latitude N44, I was seeing about 67% of ratings from the panels, before considering charging losses which for a perfect charge controller might be 60% useful power.    On my off-grid solar installation, I have huge reserve capacity, currently not that much generating capacity, and the vampire load is very low.   I would add panels if I were to increase expected daily loads.   The Wynns also did a lot of shading tests, simulating halyards (no appreciable difference) and the boom (much larger difference).   Lets assume this is a boat on the hook and one has put a preventer on the boom to make it not shade panels, and oriented the boat to get uninterrupted sun on the panels.   If I were designing a solar system for a boat today, for a monohull, I would go with the most power dense panels I could get -- lets say "320W" panels.   Lets say I have an arch over my davits and I am able to put three 40-inch wide panels flat above this arch -- that is a beam of 10 feet.   Lets assume 60% useful power.   That is 960 Watts * 60% = 576 Watts which is not much. One only gets that during the day.   So one might get 3kWh of power per day from the panels -- based on not angling panels.   For someone who thinks they can run without a generator, that is the limit of power.   "Average use for a typical RVer is around 20 kWh a day.   ....  RVers parked in areas where they do not need air conditioning will use much less electricity than RVers who do need it.  In fact, the average amount of electricity used by people who are not running air conditioning is about 10 kWh a day."  (1) There is one total power budget estimate.   Lets look at it from the components up: Loads: Required Unoccupied, trekking the country nearby while the boat is on anchor:  - Refrigeration: 300 kWh / year (modern, high efficiency, extra insulation for the tropics)   lets say 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Anchoring light (LED, 2 nm visibility, on a timer, 12 hour burn):  0.025 kWh/day   (3)    - Bilge Pump (500 gallons/day, 1 hour/day): 0.060 kWh/day (4)  - Most basic of computers offering Wifi and sensor monitoring to report alerts & email: 0.080 kWh/day (5 + estimate for dry contact and sensor system)   Minimum Occupied:  - Radio (hand held, listening):  0.020 kWh/day  (2)   - Interior Lights (LED):  0.050 kWh/day   - Recharging (Cell, shaver, shortwave receiver, flashlights, head lamps, miscellaneous): 0.050 kWh/day Voluntary Electronics:  - Netbook (4 hours):  0.100 kWh/day    - Full Laptop (4 hours): 0.300 kWh/day   - Display Screen (tv/monitor) (4 hours): 0.400 kWh//day  - DVD player (2 hours): 0.050 kWh/day Other:  - Pressurized water (per 100 liters -- usage for 1 day):  0.020 kWh/day (7)  - Freezer: 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Washing machine, 2 people:  0.400 kWh/day (one load every second day)  - Water maker (most efficient, per 100 liters/day): 0.400 kWh/day (6) Working on Boat:  - hand saw and driver drill for cabinetry work (1 hour run time/8 hour day): 1 kWh/day (experience)  - belt sander for finishing (6 hours run time/8 hour day): 7.2 kWh/day (experience) This is before using any electricity for cooking.   Looking at these conveniences ... pressurized water is a power bargain.   So, basic anchoring budget is 1.17 kWh / day -- solar will cover it with more than 100% to spare -- one 12V/100Ah battery unit at 50% DOD will carry it through the night.   On light overcast days, when one is getting 50% power, the system is still OK.   So one uses two 12V/100Ah units to keep the average DOD to 25%, to make sure it does not go much below 50% DOD in a stretch of moderately cloudy weather.      To go one week (hurricane overcast on a boat, a week of heavy overcast in winter in Canada) without significant sun, the battery bank must be 8.2 kWh -- which is 14 units of 12V/100Ah at 50% DOD -- that is a lot of batteries.   Rick's batteries, four times 12V/200Ah, 9.6 kWh, could handle this, just.   This is why I am interested in Rick's batteries -- they are about the minimum I would consider to have constant refrigeration, be it in a cottage or boat.   Speaking of refrigeration.  When one is not opening the fridge and adding things or taking things out, the power consumption of a fridge is inversely related to thickness of insulation.   As the largest power draw in an unoccupied space, I would consider a hyper-insulated fridge (I do not believe it is available, I was thinking DIY) to cut the power in half.   That allows Rick's batteries to run the system for close to 2 weeks without sun.   That I think would be a far better design for an off-grid cottage.   Ricks batteries would recharge in about 4 days after 2 weeks with heavy overcast.    If one had reliable sun every day, and particularly if the panels netted a little better than 60% useful power from their rating, then: 3.93 kWh/day -- based on 200 liters/day of water desalinated, and pressurized, laundry, freezer, and no voluntary electronics.  The solar panels could not reliably keep up.  In full sun, Rick's batteries would need a generator run of 10 hours once every 8 or 9 days.   From fully charged, after 2 days without sun, without a generator run, Rick's batteries would be exhausted.    Therefore, a pretty spartan existence, with a short shower daily, would be a strain without a daily generator run of about an hour on sunny days, and 4 hours a day on heavy overcast days.   (Assuming a Honda 1200W quiet generator outputting 1000W average.) Get rid of the freezer and one is just below what one would expect of the panels per day.   After just one day without sun, one would have to wait 2 weeks for the batteries to get back up to normal.   It is not reasonable to expect only 1 day of heavy clouds in each 2 weeks.   Therefore, even without the freezer, the solar panels would likely fall behind and regular generator running would be needed.  One could laminate flexible panels to the deck, but they are on average half the efficiency per unit area and, one really could not expect more than another 320 W of power to be conveniently placed. For those thinking that wind power will save them...  one would need an anchorage protected from waves, by say a submerged reef, and open to the wind -- so not like a closed bay.   Most small wind generators are rated for 40km/h, that is, they give their rated power at 40km/h wind speed.   They do not cut in until about 8 or 9 km/h.   Wind energy goes by the cube of the wind speed.   To generate half the rated output, one needs about 32 km/h of wind.   Half the rated output on a 400 Watt generator is 200 Watts.   Even if it is a tiringly windy anchorage, and the wind blows 24/7, that is only 4.8 kWh of power maximum theoretical, 4.2 kWh useful delivered to loads is more likely with charging inefficiency.  That is more than solar, but only if one assumes a tiringly windy anchorage.   If one wants the wind generator to total the same output as solar in 24 hours, one must have 27 kmph winds, 24/7.    Based on the theory that when it is not sunny the wind is blowing, to cover minimal loads (1.17kWh/day), one needs 20 km/h winds, 24/7 on cloudy days.     That is actually a reasonable expectation, on average, but not reliably.   Generator Inevitable Therefore, one should expect to use a generator on a cruising boat at least from time to time.   Now the question is how big and how long.  (I like the little 1200W Hondas .... they are very quiet.)   Taking a 1200W at 80% load, that is one hour of daily generator running for each kWh of extra consumption one has.  A freezer -- average an hour a day extra.  If one has AC, the RV example would have one run the generator for the entire daylight hours.     This is assuming all cooking appliances run from fuel.   If one assumes a sum total of 2 hours running 1800W (kettle, toaster oven, or single element hot plate), that is 3-4 kWh/day, 3-4 more hours of running the generator. Cat vs. Monohull.... Now, the Wynns have 11 solar panels on their cat.   If they upgraded them all to 320W panels (physically a bit larger, but also more efficient), and assuming 60% useful power, that is about 12.5 kWh / day ... I cannot say anything about their power usage, or their total average power received on their panels, but, it would seem a cat has a much better chance of being able to reliably handle reasonable hotel loads on solar alone.   Looking to the RV example, with no A, a Cat is the minimum unit of cruising boat to have an average RV experience without the need to run a generator every day -- certainly one will have a generator, certainly it will be run frequently in the average 2-week period to account for shortages of sun, but, it will not be run with certainty every single day just to meet average needs.      I did this calculation long ago, and that is why, some time ago, I encouraged Brent to come out of retirement and design an orgami cat, say based on a pair of 31 hulls, maybe with less beam (or maybe not), to each hull.    The hulls could each be a long, shallow draft single keel for even more shallow boat draft than the monohull twin keeler.   An origami Cat could compete with RVs as a lifestyle cruising boat where the entire world is available.    There are about 350,000-500,000 RVs sold each year worldwide(?) (9).  There are about 2,500 cruising boats sold in the US each year and about 2,000 sailboats of all sizes, including daysailers sold (8).   Monohulls are small on the inside compared to a modest RV.   Small = reduced comfort.   While there are many factors keeping the boat market about 200 times smaller, comfort is something that can be addressed.  Flip the Other Way -- Why Have Solar at All? If solar is so pathetic and doomed to be insufficient, why have solar at all?    Even if one is only netting 2kWh of electricity total from solar panels on sunny days, that is still 2 hours not running a generator, per day, or about 2.2 litres of fuel per day (for a Honda 1200W), or one 20 litre jerry can every 9 days.    Economically that does not make sense, solar panels are expensive.   But over a year, that is over 800 litres.   Really good solar panels are still only about $0.7-0.8/Rated Watt.   960 Rated Watts is what, $770?  Does anyone think one can find 800 litres of fuel reliably while cruising for less than $770 ?    Want to explain what a pain it is to mount and wire up panels -- I will tell you about hauling 40 jerry cans of fuel a year, every year probably most of the time in a dingy.  Yes, the charge controller will be a good chunk of change too.   We are not looking at a one-year payback, but, one year is informative.       One can outfit solar panels before leaving, at continental industrial-source prices for all components to protect against fuel costs in small markets later.   Other Budgets There are many other people who have done power budgets for homes, and RVs and boats, and I am certainly not saying this power budget is better, or closer to what you will experience, I was just trying to solve the question -- generator or not, and if so how long must it run.   I was also trying to highlight the benefits of a cat when it comes to power.   Matt References: (1) https://www.godownsize.com/electricity-consumption-rv/ (2) https://www.westmarine.com/buy/west-marine--vhf95db-dual-band-floating-handheld-vhf-radio--16230526 and https://www.westmarine.com/WestAdvisor/Selecting-a-VHF-Handheld-Radio (3) https://www.yachtingmonthly.com/gear/anchor-lights-test-33105 (4) https://www.amazon.ca/Electric-Automatic-Caravan-Five-Oceans/dp/B00N44FG5I (5) https://www.pidramble.com/wiki/benchmarks/power-consumption (6) https://www.cruisingworld.com/desalination-decisions-watermakers (7) https://www.rvpartscanada.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=37&products_id=2335#.XMhVLEN7nq4 (8) https://www.tradeonlytoday.com/industry-news/boat-sales-topped-250000-in-2016 (9) https://www.rvia.org/historical-rv-data From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 5:13 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     I agree 100% with Darren.   Any system that will rely on running a generator is the wrong system.  I remember one boat that would fire up a Honda generator on their foredeck and then go ashore for the day while it letting it run....no problem for them, but a real annoyance for everybody else.  Superyachts are the worst.   They may have sound proofed generators but the sound of their exhaust gurgling and splashing from their hull can be a real pain....it never ends. >>>>>>  I wouldn't openly criticize anyone who pursues a high power consumption lifestyle, as long as they remember not to be the moron who anchors right next to someone in a quiet anchorage and then proceeds to run your generator incessantly.  | 35899|35854|2019-05-01 19:01:46|Rick Jackson|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?|I like the way you think.  However..  Where do all these numbers you cite come from?   How accurate are your claims?    Put blue prints in front of me and I’ll build it.  Ask me to engineer and I’m milk toast.   I rely on engineers often and I just trust the information I’m given.  I’m just not sure how to digest all your calculations.    If your being realistic than I want to use those for my project.  I’d hate to find out later that your shooting from the hip.   Sent from my iPhone On Apr 30, 2019, at 1:47 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Absolutely agreed Darren, if people do not have refrigeration, they should remain in that blissful place.   Absolutely agreed Darren, if you include running the propulsion engine as different from running a dedicated engine to generate electricity.   Perhaps I should change the title to "Run a fuel engine to make electricity sometimes, or Not".   Engine or Generator -- seems the same thing to me.  It was easier to do the calculations with a 1200W Honda. What you said about running the propulsion engine for two purposes is absolutely of advantage.   Thank you for telling me about the "small engine" regulators ... I want one.   Absolutely true, propulsion engines are usually diesel, more efficient, marine-ized so they last longer in a boat environment, whereas generators are, well, inexpensive if they are gasoline and not marine-ized.   But chances are, the outboard on the tender is gasoline so, one probably has gasoline on board in any case.   It is absolutely true for some boats and some owners that running the engine will come at about the same frequency as one would normally need to top up the batteries.   But then this tempo will get ingrained.  When one gets somewhere they really like and want to stay for a while, the tempo will make one feel itchy to go somewhere on a certain schedule or face the prospect of just running the engine just to make electricity, which more than a few cruisers complain is inefficient and irritating to them.   Where sails are a redundancy to the propulsion engine, there is no redundancy to an alternator if any one of a dozen things goes wrong with the propulsion engine.   The propulsion engine has a limited service lifetime and a chance of other failures, every hour it runs.   If something goes wrong with the engine, you are talking about boat yoga in tight spaces if you are a DIY type, on-site diesel mechanics ($$), and worst case a $10,000-$15,000 bill and a crane to replace it.   Yikes, I am not running that sucker just to make electricity.  As for incidental electricity... I sail differently.   My sails are my propulsion.  I have used as little as 12 litres of fuel in year, and there is no such thing as a wind where my boat is slower than a cottage.   My engine is my backup to my sails.   Naturally, good seamanship dictates caution and to some that points only to the engine.  If that is the way it has to be, OK.   But waiting to go in until the wind and tide are favourable is also seamanship, and then the engine and its full tank of fuel is still there in reserve.    Many times I start the engine and just let it idle for the decisive couple of minutes as I sail nearly all the way in -- it is there in an instant for oh-crap moments.      At least with a 1200 Watt generator, there is no issue of charge rate, they are really quiet out of the box, and can be made quieter with a little DIY.   If something goes wrong with the generator, I had always assumed that in a pinch I would have the 20,000 Watt propulsion engine was the backup to the generator, even though it is inefficient and straining to the electrical system unless it is used for something else at the same time.   If something goes wrong with the generator, it never be a big bill.  I carry it ashore to a small engine repair place, or buy another one.  In the meantime, so long as the generator works, one runs their engine only when necessary, keeping its hours down.   So it is down to wear and tear on the engine, or a disposable substitute to change fuel into electricity.  I would never NOT have a portable generator.    I am really not disputing anything you are saying Darren, some people will find what you describe to be the simplest course of action.   I am just giving the other side of what some other boats might do.   But lets run with your idea, a very good one, to have a 210A bus alternator running directly off the propulsion engine to take advantage of the huge surplus of mechanical power available that one might borrow from when moving the boat.   But, if you are going to do that....  - if you have an external regulator, is it not possible with the flip of an appropriately-wired switch to turn this into an unbelievable weldernator ?   One is never doing that with a 1200W Honda.   Even Rick's batteries, and a little inverter welder, that is a joke compared to this T-rex of weldernators.   You could do half inch plate with 5/32" rod and really feel like you are accomplishing something.   If you have never tried 5/32 rod, you really have to, just for fun, on 3/16" or thicker steel.   Have 100 feet of cables, and industrial fenders and raft up to commercial boats and do a little commercial welding.   I want one.  Really, I do.    - why stop at a 210A alternator -- connect up a high pressure pump with a couple of one-way valves so your water maker runs electric off one pump or directly from the engine from the other pump -- for just the cost of a second pump, you are creating redundancy.   Drawing the same torque as the alternator, the engine-powered watermaker could put out 200 gallons per hour, assuming one has suitable osmosis media.   The efficiency would be awesome, diesel directly driving the pump skips the following filters of efficiency: claw-style armature alternator 75-80%, battery charging 90%, electric motor 80-90% -- combined total 54%-65% efficiency.  One avoids all that by going straight off the engine.   Then one also has the alternative to make water with the engine if the electric pump ever fails.   I sure am thinking about doing this.  - why stop there ... If the water tanks fill before one is finished motoring, start filling the bathtub and have a good celebratory soak in the tub to prepare for going out on the town at the new destination.  Your 20,000 Watt motor is easily producing 25,000 Watts of heat so, that tub can be nice and toasty warm with just a few valves and a little hose.   This is just a given, I am definitely having an engine-heat option to my hot water tank.   - Heck why stop there ... turn down the flow rate so the fresh water comes out at full exhaust temperature and fill your teapot.   There is a lot of comfort possible here.    I don't like tea that much so, no.    - If there is still a surplus of fresh water, start filling all those water jerry cans most boats have -- over stock and then turn off the electric water maker -- run the engine today, save Amps tomorrow.   I sure would do this.      - why stop there ... put a semi-hermetic compressor on the engine and hook it up to a big-ass ice maker -- freeze a fraction that 200 GPH pouring out of the water maker and get rid of the need for both refrigeration and freezer (save the brine waste from water making ... ice+brine = -17C in a cold plate).    Says that man with a great big ice chest ... pull it out, or add a compressor to the engine .... open question.    - why stop there ... Just keep making ice, and put hundreds of pounds of ice in a stainless cabinet inside an adjustable-vent wood cabinet, with a drip pan under the stainless cabinet -- a DIY dehumidifier.   This is probably beyond the electrical power budget for most boats, so, what a luxury.   Dry gallons an hour.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Have the melt-water drain for the stainless cabinet run through a cooling coil along the cabinet ceiling and back down into the fresh water tanks -- step one air conditioning, for the price of pumping water a few feet -- we have already established, that is bargain compared to AC.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Not cool enough? Open vents in the side of the wood cabinet and blow air in there to both get more cool air and accelerate melting.   Glorious air conditioning -- not even a cat could manage that on solar.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... they have these cooking appliances, called muff pots, better than instant pots, and they are *ZERO* Watts:  http://cs.amsnow.com/sno/b/news/archive/2015/04/09/snacker-packer-meals-made-easy.aspx Cooking on a snowmobile made easy - American Snowmobiler Magazine - Snowmobile forums, news, Polaris, Ski-Doo, Arctic Cat & Yamaha reviews - AmSnow.com American Snowmobiler Magazine presents news, reviews, forums, videos, photos and the latest stats and prices for Arctic Cat, Ski-Doo, Yamaha and Polaris snowmobiles. cs.amsnow.com If one has never cooked on the exhaust of an engine ...   Heck with all that, one solar panel would run the radio and the nav lights, nav, etc.   If co-generating electricity by depending on running a 20,000 Watt engine with any frequency is how some boaters will do it, then co-generating everything else that would otherwise require electricity, or would generate comfort is worth mentioning too.   So when it comes down to it, same answer:  On a monohull, one is running an engine sometimes, but there is a lot of room for innovation, taste, preferences and different ways to meet the power budget.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:59 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     For everyone who has a simple boat without refrigeration/freezer, you probably wonder why everyone is so concerned about how to generate enough power from solar.  Your life is simple and there is no reason to read the rest of this. Matt, that's a pretty reasonable analysis, and would fit some boats.  There are certainly boats that manage these comforts on lower watts.  The obvious area for improvement is refrigeration, any efficiencies gained here is money better spent than money spent on power generation (solar and generators).  I came to the conclusion that 4" of styrofoam insulation for the fridge and 6" for the freezer was the minimum to make DC refrigeration work on a reasonable energy budget.  50 to 125 Ah per day is what 12v DC refrigeration generally uses per day.  The differences are almost entirely due to insulation, next due to the size of the fridge/freezer.  If you can get closer to 50Ah per day your energy budget changes drastically.  I decided a spillover design fridge freezer, custom built to maximize insulation was the best way to go in my build.  Aspen Aerogel is an interesting material here.  However, polystyrene foam is easy to work, cheap, readily available, and absorbs water less than the other foam insulation choices. Your energy budget doesn't consider engine run time and power from the alternator at all.  A boat that moves even just once or twice a week can reduce/eliminate its need for generator run time by super-sizing its alternator.  I've ordered a Leece-Neville 210A school bus alternator.  It should run happily at 170A continuous, perhaps a bit more with careful attention to cooling.  This is a win-win situation, getting power from the alternator is more efficient than from a generator.  With a fixed pitch prop you're running at an inefficient part of the power curve of the diesel at cruising rpm.  The extra load the alternator moves the engine into a more efficient part of the fuel map, that improvement in efficiency means that part of the fuel consumed by the alternator comes for free as your making the engine more efficient at the same time you make carbon buildup problems less likely.  Even if you have a smaller diesel you could fit an alternator this size.  If you need maximum propulsion power at some point, an external regulator like a Balmar Mc-614 used with a switch for small engine mode (field output reduced to 50%) allows you to get most of the power from the engine for propulsion when necessary.  You could also just put a plain switch in the field wire to the alt for a inexpensive solution, although charging at these high currents you probably want an external regulator anyway.  It should be noted that this solution relies on batteries that can accept pretty high charge rates.  This would be LiPO4, Firefly >AGM>very large flooded lead acid bank.  A small flooded-lead-acid bank probably won't be able to accept the high charge rate for long enough for a large alternator to do a lot of good.  The LiPO4 and the Firefly also have the advantage that they are totally happy in a partial state of charge and can stay there without damage until you are ready to move to the next anchorage (within reasonable time limits and state of charge limits).  You should switch to a serpentine belt to run a large alternator like a Delco Remy 28SI or a Leece Neville Idle Pro. There are two ways of looking at comfort while cruising.  Your comfort could come from plugging in whatever you want whenever you want.  However, this comes with the discomfort of noise from the generator, discomfort getting/storing fuel for the generator (especially bad for gasoline generators),  discomfort from getting/storing oil for the generator, the discomfort from generator oil changes, discomfort from trying to source generator parts in some distant port, discomfort from getting shunned by the cruisers who can't stand the noise of your generator.  On the flip side, if you design a boat with conservation in mind, it is possible to run almost entirely on solar.  I've met more than one boat (with refrigeration and watermaker) that runs successfully with just solar/wind/alternator.  You boil water in a kettle on the stove (is that a discomfort?), you wash laundry ashore or in a bucket (Ok, the bucket counts as a discomfort), is lighting a propane stove a discomfort compared to electric (around here tons of folks spend tons of money on their house for the luxury of a natural gas stove).  I have a nice antique coffee grinder, it takes zero watts to run, is beautiful and a pleasure to use, there are tons of equivalents to this on the boat, where doing things different is part of the pleasure for me.  A generator is definitely not necessary.   On 2019-04-30 9:03 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   What really is the electrical capacity on a boat from solar, how far will that take you, and realistically, will one be running a generator and how much? Solar Power Generation: Based on some tests by the Wynns in Florida (latitude N26), two used "160W" panels (they have 6 of these), produced 15 Amps at "12V", at 14.4V from the panels, but we will say 12.8V from the batteries later because though the charge voltage is higher, the voltage at which the power comes out is lower.    That is 216 Watts in, 192 Watts of useful power out of the batteries later.   They also tested two new "140W" panels and produced 20 Amps at "12V", or about 288 Watts in, 256 Watts out later.   256/"280" = 91% useful power.   192/"320" = 60% useful power.   Same solar controller in both tests.  At latitude N44, I was seeing about 67% of ratings from the panels, before considering charging losses which for a perfect charge controller might be 60% useful power.    On my off-grid solar installation, I have huge reserve capacity, currently not that much generating capacity, and the vampire load is very low.   I would add panels if I were to increase expected daily loads.   The Wynns also did a lot of shading tests, simulating halyards (no appreciable difference) and the boom (much larger difference).   Lets assume this is a boat on the hook and one has put a preventer on the boom to make it not shade panels, and oriented the boat to get uninterrupted sun on the panels.   If I were designing a solar system for a boat today, for a monohull, I would go with the most power dense panels I could get -- lets say "320W" panels.   Lets say I have an arch over my davits and I am able to put three 40-inch wide panels flat above this arch -- that is a beam of 10 feet.   Lets assume 60% useful power.   That is 960 Watts * 60% = 576 Watts which is not much. One only gets that during the day.   So one might get 3kWh of power per day from the panels -- based on not angling panels.   For someone who thinks they can run without a generator, that is the limit of power.   "Average use for a typical RVer is around 20 kWh a day.   ....  RVers parked in areas where they do not need air conditioning will use much less electricity than RVers who do need it.  In fact, the average amount of electricity used by people who are not running air conditioning is about 10 kWh a day."  (1) There is one total power budget estimate.   Lets look at it from the components up: Loads: Required Unoccupied, trekking the country nearby while the boat is on anchor:  - Refrigeration: 300 kWh / year (modern, high efficiency, extra insulation for the tropics)   lets say 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Anchoring light (LED, 2 nm visibility, on a timer, 12 hour burn):  0.025 kWh/day   (3)    - Bilge Pump (500 gallons/day, 1 hour/day): 0.060 kWh/day (4)  - Most basic of computers offering Wifi and sensor monitoring to report alerts & email: 0.080 kWh/day (5 + estimate for dry contact and sensor system)   Minimum Occupied:  - Radio (hand held, listening):  0.020 kWh/day  (2)   - Interior Lights (LED):  0.050 kWh/day   - Recharging (Cell, shaver, shortwave receiver, flashlights, head lamps, miscellaneous): 0.050 kWh/day Voluntary Electronics:  - Netbook (4 hours):  0.100 kWh/day    - Full Laptop (4 hours): 0.300 kWh/day   - Display Screen (tv/monitor) (4 hours): 0.400 kWh//day  - DVD player (2 hours): 0.050 kWh/day Other:  - Pressurized water (per 100 liters -- usage for 1 day):  0.020 kWh/day (7)  - Freezer: 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Washing machine, 2 people:  0.400 kWh/day (one load every second day)  - Water maker (most efficient, per 100 liters/day): 0.400 kWh/day (6) Working on Boat:  - hand saw and driver drill for cabinetry work (1 hour run time/8 hour day): 1 kWh/day (experience)  - belt sander for finishing (6 hours run time/8 hour day): 7.2 kWh/day (experience) This is before using any electricity for cooking.   Looking at these conveniences ... pressurized water is a power bargain.   So, basic anchoring budget is 1.17 kWh / day -- solar will cover it with more than 100% to spare -- one 12V/100Ah battery unit at 50% DOD will carry it through the night.   On light overcast days, when one is getting 50% power, the system is still OK.   So one uses two 12V/100Ah units to keep the average DOD to 25%, to make sure it does not go much below 50% DOD in a stretch of moderately cloudy weather.      To go one week (hurricane overcast on a boat, a week of heavy overcast in winter in Canada) without significant sun, the battery bank must be 8.2 kWh -- which is 14 units of 12V/100Ah at 50% DOD -- that is a lot of batteries.   Rick's batteries, four times 12V/200Ah, 9.6 kWh, could handle this, just.   This is why I am interested in Rick's batteries -- they are about the minimum I would consider to have constant refrigeration, be it in a cottage or boat.   Speaking of refrigeration.  When one is not opening the fridge and adding things or taking things out, the power consumption of a fridge is inversely related to thickness of insulation.   As the largest power draw in an unoccupied space, I would consider a hyper-insulated fridge (I do not believe it is available, I was thinking DIY) to cut the power in half.   That allows Rick's batteries to run the system for close to 2 weeks without sun.   That I think would be a far better design for an off-grid cottage.   Ricks batteries would recharge in about 4 days after 2 weeks with heavy overcast.    If one had reliable sun every day, and particularly if the panels netted a little better than 60% useful power from their rating, then: 3.93 kWh/day -- based on 200 liters/day of water desalinated, and pressurized, laundry, freezer, and no voluntary electronics.  The solar panels could not reliably keep up.  In full sun, Rick's batteries would need a generator run of 10 hours once every 8 or 9 days.   From fully charged, after 2 days without sun, without a generator run, Rick's batteries would be exhausted.    Therefore, a pretty spartan existence, with a short shower daily, would be a strain without a daily generator run of about an hour on sunny days, and 4 hours a day on heavy overcast days.   (Assuming a Honda 1200W quiet generator outputting 1000W average.) Get rid of the freezer and one is just below what one would expect of the panels per day.   After just one day without sun, one would have to wait 2 weeks for the batteries to get back up to normal.   It is not reasonable to expect only 1 day of heavy clouds in each 2 weeks.   Therefore, even without the freezer, the solar panels would likely fall behind and regular generator running would be needed.  One could laminate flexible panels to the deck, but they are on average half the efficiency per unit area and, one really could not expect more than another 320 W of power to be conveniently placed. For those thinking that wind power will save them...  one would need an anchorage protected from waves, by say a submerged reef, and open to the wind -- so not like a closed bay.   Most small wind generators are rated for 40km/h, that is, they give their rated power at 40km/h wind speed.   They do not cut in until about 8 or 9 km/h.   Wind energy goes by the cube of the wind speed.   To generate half the rated output, one needs about 32 km/h of wind.   Half the rated output on a 400 Watt generator is 200 Watts.   Even if it is a tiringly windy anchorage, and the wind blows 24/7, that is only 4.8 kWh of power maximum theoretical, 4.2 kWh useful delivered to loads is more likely with charging inefficiency.  That is more than solar, but only if one assumes a tiringly windy anchorage.   If one wants the wind generator to total the same output as solar in 24 hours, one must have 27 kmph winds, 24/7.    Based on the theory that when it is not sunny the wind is blowing, to cover minimal loads (1.17kWh/day), one needs 20 km/h winds, 24/7 on cloudy days.     That is actually a reasonable expectation, on average, but not reliably.   Generator Inevitable Therefore, one should expect to use a generator on a cruising boat at least from time to time.   Now the question is how big and how long.  (I like the little 1200W Hondas .... they are very quiet.)   Taking a 1200W at 80% load, that is one hour of daily generator running for each kWh of extra consumption one has.  A freezer -- average an hour a day extra.  If one has AC, the RV example would have one run the generator for the entire daylight hours.     This is assuming all cooking appliances run from fuel.   If one assumes a sum total of 2 hours running 1800W (kettle, toaster oven, or single element hot plate), that is 3-4 kWh/day, 3-4 more hours of running the generator. Cat vs. Monohull.... Now, the Wynns have 11 solar panels on their cat.   If they upgraded them all to 320W panels (physically a bit larger, but also more efficient), and assuming 60% useful power, that is about 12.5 kWh / day .... I cannot say anything about their power usage, or their total average power received on their panels, but, it would seem a cat has a much better chance of being able to reliably handle reasonable hotel loads on solar alone.   Looking to the RV example, with no A, a Cat is the minimum unit of cruising boat to have an average RV experience without the need to run a generator every day -- certainly one will have a generator, certainly it will be run frequently in the average 2-week period to account for shortages of sun, but, it will not be run with certainty every single day just to meet average needs.      I did this calculation long ago, and that is why, some time ago, I encouraged Brent to come out of retirement and design an orgami cat, say based on a pair of 31 hulls, maybe with less beam (or maybe not), to each hull.    The hulls could each be a long, shallow draft single keel for even more shallow boat draft than the monohull twin keeler.   An origami Cat could compete with RVs as a lifestyle cruising boat where the entire world is available.    There are about 350,000-500,000 RVs sold each year worldwide(?) (9).  There are about 2,500 cruising boats sold in the US each year and about 2,000 sailboats of all sizes, including daysailers sold (8).   Monohulls are small on the inside compared to a modest RV.   Small = reduced comfort.   While there are many factors keeping the boat market about 200 times smaller, comfort is something that can be addressed.  Flip the Other Way -- Why Have Solar at All? If solar is so pathetic and doomed to be insufficient, why have solar at all?    Even if one is only netting 2kWh of electricity total from solar panels on sunny days, that is still 2 hours not running a generator, per day, or about 2.2 litres of fuel per day (for a Honda 1200W), or one 20 litre jerry can every 9 days.    Economically that does not make sense, solar panels are expensive.   But over a year, that is over 800 litres.   Really good solar panels are still only about $0.7-0.8/Rated Watt.   960 Rated Watts is what, $770?  Does anyone think one can find 800 litres of fuel reliably while cruising for less than $770 ?    Want to explain what a pain it is to mount and wire up panels -- I will tell you about hauling 40 jerry cans of fuel a year, every year probably most of the time in a dingy.  Yes, the charge controller will be a good chunk of change too.   We are not looking at a one-year payback, but, one year is informative.       One can outfit solar panels before leaving, at continental industrial-source prices for all components to protect against fuel costs in small markets later.   Other Budgets There are many other people who have done power budgets for homes, and RVs and boats, and I am certainly not saying this power budget is better, or closer to what you will experience, I was just trying to solve the question -- generator or not, and if so how long must it run.   I was also trying to highlight the benefits of a cat when it comes to power.   Matt References: (1) https://www.godownsize.com/electricity-consumption-rv/ (2) https://www.westmarine.com/buy/west-marine--vhf95db-dual-band-floating-handheld-vhf-radio--16230526 and https://www.westmarine.com/WestAdvisor/Selecting-a-VHF-Handheld-Radio (3) https://www.yachtingmonthly.com/gear/anchor-lights-test-33105 (4) https://www.amazon.ca/Electric-Automatic-Caravan-Five-Oceans/dp/B00N44FG5I (5) https://www.pidramble.com/wiki/benchmarks/power-consumption (6) https://www.cruisingworld.com/desalination-decisions-watermakers (7) https://www.rvpartscanada.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=37&products_id=2335#.XMhVLEN7nq4 (8) https://www.tradeonlytoday.com/industry-news/boat-sales-topped-250000-in-2016 (9) https://www.rvia.org/historical-rv-data From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 5:13 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     I agree 100% with Darren.   Any system that will rely on running a generator is the wrong system.  I remember one boat that would fire up a Honda generator on their foredeck and then go ashore for the day while it letting it run....no problem for them, but a real annoyance for everybody else.  Superyachts are the worst.   They may have sound proofed generators but the sound of their exhaust gurgling and splashing from their hull can be a real pain....it never ends. >>>>>>  I wouldn't openly criticize anyone who pursues a high power consumption lifestyle, as long as they remember not to be the moron who anchors right next to someone in a quiet anchorage and then proceeds to run your generator incessantly.  | 35900|35854|2019-05-01 19:02:02|Zoa Scott|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?|Just a note incase its not widely known.All diesel engine manufacturers will let you know max allowable parasitic hp loads to be taken off crankshaft .Im a diesel mechanic by trade.If your running mutiple gizmos they are usually installed opposing each other if belt driven.Zoa  On Wed, May 1, 2019, 5:20 AM Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats], wrote:   Excellent point Darren, I had not considered drive belt load on the crankshaft bearing from all these extras.  My engine is not well set up for extra driven components so I had been toying with the idea of a pony shaft just to run components from.   But even then, if one is pulling 10,000W off the pony shaft (3,000W for each of the alternator, semihermetic compressor and watermaker pump plus surge margin) then a lot of design calculation and checking for what is easily available has go into the power transmission link between the engine and pony shaft..  Is a motorcycle drive cogged belt that custom bikes use between the engine and transmission ... is that the easiest?   I don't know.  Is it better to put one extra to the right, another to the left so they balance bearing loads, except for the little torque caused by the separation between the plane of the two belts?    Is there room to put one extra below the crankshaft to balance a triad... there might be on my boat. Really good point.  Last thing one wants to do is reduce the life of the primary engine. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 01:21 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Agreed, and I enjoyed your embellishment of the idea Matt  :-)  The one thing you have to look out for is how heavily you load the crankshaft bearing.  The manufacturers tend to be a bit cagey about what is tolerable.  If I had a water pump for a watermaker and a big alternator, I'd try and mount them opposed by 180 degrees.  Most marine engines die from corrosion and lack of use.  While you wouldn't want to idle one to charge the batteries, just about any other use is likely to make it last longer. On 2019-04-30 1:47 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Absolutely agreed Darren, if people do not have refrigeration, they should remain in that blissful place.   Absolutely agreed Darren, if you include running the propulsion engine as different from running a dedicated engine to generate electricity.   Perhaps I should change the title to "Run a fuel engine to make electricity sometimes, or Not".   Engine or Generator -- seems the same thing to me.  It was easier to do the calculations with a 1200W Honda. What you said about running the propulsion engine for two purposes is absolutely of advantage.   Thank you for telling me about the "small engine" regulators ... I want one.   Absolutely true, propulsion engines are usually diesel, more efficient, marine-ized so they last longer in a boat environment, whereas generators are, well, inexpensive if they are gasoline and not marine-ized.   But chances are, the outboard on the tender is gasoline so, one probably has gasoline on board in any case.   It is absolutely true for some boats and some owners that running the engine will come at about the same frequency as one would normally need to top up the batteries.   But then this tempo will get ingrained.  When one gets somewhere they really like and want to stay for a while, the tempo will make one feel itchy to go somewhere on a certain schedule or face the prospect of just running the engine just to make electricity, which more than a few cruisers complain is inefficient and irritating to them..   Where sails are a redundancy to the propulsion engine, there is no redundancy to an alternator if any one of a dozen things goes wrong with the propulsion engine.   The propulsion engine has a limited service lifetime and a chance of other failures, every hour it runs.   If something goes wrong with the engine, you are talking about boat yoga in tight spaces if you are a DIY type, on-site diesel mechanics ($$), and worst case a $10,000-$15,000 bill and a crane to replace it.   Yikes, I am not running that sucker just to make electricity.  As for incidental electricity... I sail differently.   My sails are my propulsion.  I have used as little as 12 litres of fuel in year, and there is no such thing as a wind where my boat is slower than a cottage.   My engine is my backup to my sails.   Naturally, good seamanship dictates caution and to some that points only to the engine.  If that is the way it has to be, OK.   But waiting to go in until the wind and tide are favourable is also seamanship, and then the engine and its full tank of fuel is still there in reserve.    Many times I start the engine and just let it idle for the decisive couple of minutes as I sail nearly all the way in -- it is there in an instant for oh-crap moments.      At least with a 1200 Watt generator, there is no issue of charge rate, they are really quiet out of the box, and can be made quieter with a little DIY.   If something goes wrong with the generator, I had always assumed that in a pinch I would have the 20,000 Watt propulsion engine was the backup to the generator, even though it is inefficient and straining to the electrical system unless it is used for something else at the same time.   If something goes wrong with the generator, it never be a big bill.  I carry it ashore to a small engine repair place, or buy another one.  In the meantime, so long as the generator works, one runs their engine only when necessary, keeping its hours down.   So it is down to wear and tear on the engine, or a disposable substitute to change fuel into electricity.  I would never NOT have a portable generator.    I am really not disputing anything you are saying Darren, some people will find what you describe to be the simplest course of action.   I am just giving the other side of what some other boats might do.   But lets run with your idea, a very good one, to have a 210A bus alternator running directly off the propulsion engine to take advantage of the huge surplus of mechanical power available that one might borrow from when moving the boat.   But, if you are going to do that....  - if you have an external regulator, is it not possible with the flip of an appropriately-wired switch to turn this into an unbelievable weldernator ?   One is never doing that with a 1200W Honda.   Even Rick's batteries, and a little inverter welder, that is a joke compared to this T-rex of weldernators.   You could do half inch plate with 5/32" rod and really feel like you are accomplishing something.   If you have never tried 5/32 rod, you really have to, just for fun, on 3/16" or thicker steel.   Have 100 feet of cables, and industrial fenders and raft up to commercial boats and do a little commercial welding.   I want one.  Really, I do.    - why stop at a 210A alternator -- connect up a high pressure pump with a couple of one-way valves so your water maker runs electric off one pump or directly from the engine from the other pump -- for just the cost of a second pump, you are creating redundancy.   Drawing the same torque as the alternator, the engine-powered watermaker could put out 200 gallons per hour, assuming one has suitable osmosis media.   The efficiency would be awesome, diesel directly driving the pump skips the following filters of efficiency: claw-style armature alternator 75-80%, battery charging 90%, electric motor 80-90% -- combined total 54%-65% efficiency.  One avoids all that by going straight off the engine.   Then one also has the alternative to make water with the engine if the electric pump ever fails.   I sure am thinking about doing this..  - why stop there ... If the water tanks fill before one is finished motoring, start filling the bathtub and have a good celebratory soak in the tub to prepare for going out on the town at the new destination.  Your 20,000 Watt motor is easily producing 25,000 Watts of heat so, that tub can be nice and toasty warm with just a few valves and a little hose.   This is just a given, I am definitely having an engine-heat option to my hot water tank.   - Heck why stop there ... turn down the flow rate so the fresh water comes out at full exhaust temperature and fill your teapot.   There is a lot of comfort possible here.    I don't like tea that much so, no.    - If there is still a surplus of fresh water, start filling all those water jerry cans most boats have -- over stock and then turn off the electric water maker -- run the engine today, save Amps tomorrow.   I sure would do this.      - why stop there ... put a semi-hermetic compressor on the engine and hook it up to a big-ass ice maker -- freeze a fraction that 200 GPH pouring out of the water maker and get rid of the need for both refrigeration and freezer (save the brine waste from water making ... ice+brine = -17C in a cold plate).    Says that man with a great big ice chest ... pull it out, or add a compressor to the engine ... open question.    - why stop there ... Just keep making ice, and put hundreds of pounds of ice in a stainless cabinet inside an adjustable-vent wood cabinet, with a drip pan under the stainless cabinet -- a DIY dehumidifier.   This is probably beyond the electrical power budget for most boats, so, what a luxury.   Dry gallons an hour.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Have the melt-water drain for the stainless cabinet run through a cooling coil along the cabinet ceiling and back down into the fresh water tanks -- step one air conditioning, for the price of pumping water a few feet -- we have already established, that is bargain compared to AC.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Not cool enough? Open vents in the side of the wood cabinet and blow air in there to both get more cool air and accelerate melting.   Glorious air conditioning -- not even a cat could manage that on solar.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... they have these cooking appliances, called muff pots, better than instant pots, and they are *ZERO* Watts:  http://cs.amsnow.com/sno/b/news/archive/2015/04/09/snacker-packer-meals-made-easy.aspx Cooking on a snowmobile made easy - American Snowmobiler Magazine - Snowmobile forums, news, Polaris, Ski-Doo, Arctic Cat & Yamaha reviews - AmSnow.com American Snowmobiler Magazine presents news, reviews, forums, videos, photos and the latest stats and prices for Arctic Cat, Ski-Doo, Yamaha and Polaris snowmobiles. cs.amsnow.com If one has never cooked on the exhaust of an engine ...   Heck with all that, one solar panel would run the radio and the nav lights, nav, etc.   If co-generating electricity by depending on running a 20,000 Watt engine with any frequency is how some boaters will do it, then co-generating everything else that would otherwise require electricity, or would generate comfort is worth mentioning too.   So when it comes down to it, same answer:  On a monohull, one is running an engine sometimes, but there is a lot of room for innovation, taste, preferences and different ways to meet the power budget.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:59 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     For everyone who has a simple boat without refrigeration/freezer, you probably wonder why everyone is so concerned about how to generate enough power from solar.  Your life is simple and there is no reason to read the rest of this. Matt, that's a pretty reasonable analysis, and would fit some boats.  There are certainly boats that manage these comforts on lower watts.  The obvious area for improvement is refrigeration, any efficiencies gained here is money better spent than money spent on power generation (solar and generators).  I came to the conclusion that 4" of styrofoam insulation for the fridge and 6" for the freezer was the minimum to make DC refrigeration work on a reasonable energy budget.  50 to 125 Ah per day is what 12v DC refrigeration generally uses per day.  The differences are almost entirely due to insulation, next due to the size of the fridge/freezer.  If you can get closer to 50Ah per day your energy budget changes drastically.  I decided a spillover design fridge freezer, custom built to maximize insulation was the best way to go in my build.  Aspen Aerogel is an interesting material here.  However, polystyrene foam is easy to work, cheap, readily available, and absorbs water less than the other foam insulation choices. Your energy budget doesn't consider engine run time and power from the alternator at all.  A boat that moves even just once or twice a week can reduce/eliminate its need for generator run time by super-sizing its alternator.  I've ordered a Leece-Neville 210A school bus alternator.  It should run happily at 170A continuous, perhaps a bit more with careful attention to cooling.  This is a win-win situation, getting power from the alternator is more efficient than from a generator.  With a fixed pitch prop you're running at an inefficient part of the power curve of the diesel at cruising rpm.  The extra load the alternator moves the engine into a more efficient part of the fuel map, that improvement in efficiency means that part of the fuel consumed by the alternator comes for free as your making the engine more efficient at the same time you make carbon buildup problems less likely.  Even if you have a smaller diesel you could fit an alternator this size.  If you need maximum propulsion power at some point, an external regulator like a Balmar Mc-614 used with a switch for small engine mode (field output reduced to 50%) allows you to get most of the power from the engine for propulsion when necessary.  You could also just put a plain switch in the field wire to the alt for a inexpensive solution, although charging at these high currents you probably want an external regulator anyway.  It should be noted that this solution relies on batteries that can accept pretty high charge rates.  This would be LiPO4, Firefly >AGM>very large flooded lead acid bank.  A small flooded-lead-acid bank probably won't be able to accept the high charge rate for long enough for a large alternator to do a lot of good.  The LiPO4 and the Firefly also have the advantage that they are totally happy in a partial state of charge and can stay there without damage until you are ready to move to the next anchorage (within reasonable time limits and state of charge limits).  You should switch to a serpentine belt to run a large alternator like a Delco Remy 28SI or a Leece Neville Idle Pro. There are two ways of looking at comfort while cruising.  Your comfort could come from plugging in whatever you want whenever you want.  However, this comes with the discomfort of noise from the generator, discomfort getting/storing fuel for the generator (especially bad for gasoline generators),  discomfort from getting/storing oil for the generator, the discomfort from generator oil changes, discomfort from trying to source generator parts in some distant port, discomfort from getting shunned by the cruisers who can't stand the noise of your generator.  On the flip side, if you design a boat with conservation in mind, it is possible to run almost entirely on solar.  I've met more than one boat (with refrigeration and watermaker) that runs successfully with just solar/wind/alternator.  You boil water in a kettle on the stove (is that a discomfort?), you wash laundry ashore or in a bucket (Ok, the bucket counts as a discomfort), is lighting a propane stove a discomfort compared to electric (around here tons of folks spend tons of money on their house for the luxury of a natural gas stove).  I have a nice antique coffee grinder, it takes zero watts to run, is beautiful and a pleasure to use, there are tons of equivalents to this on the boat, where doing things different is part of the pleasure for me.  A generator is definitely not necessary.   On 2019-04-30 9:03 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   What really is the electrical capacity on a boat from solar, how far will that take you, and realistically, will one be running a generator and how much? Solar Power Generation: Based on some tests by the Wynns in Florida (latitude N26), two used "160W" panels (they have 6 of these), produced 15 Amps at "12V", at 14.4V from the panels, but we will say 12.8V from the batteries later because though the charge voltage is higher, the voltage at which the power comes out is lower.    That is 216 Watts in, 192 Watts of useful power out of the batteries later.   They also tested two new "140W" panels and produced 20 Amps at "12V", or about 288 Watts in, 256 Watts out later.   256/"280" = 91% useful power.   192/"320" = 60% useful power.   Same solar controller in both tests.  At latitude N44, I was seeing about 67% of ratings from the panels, before considering charging losses which for a perfect charge controller might be 60% useful power.    On my off-grid solar installation, I have huge reserve capacity, currently not that much generating capacity, and the vampire load is very low.   I would add panels if I were to increase expected daily loads.   The Wynns also did a lot of shading tests, simulating halyards (no appreciable difference) and the boom (much larger difference).   Lets assume this is a boat on the hook and one has put a preventer on the boom to make it not shade panels, and oriented the boat to get uninterrupted sun on the panels.   If I were designing a solar system for a boat today, for a monohull, I would go with the most power dense panels I could get -- lets say "320W" panels.   Lets say I have an arch over my davits and I am able to put three 40-inch wide panels flat above this arch -- that is a beam of 10 feet.   Lets assume 60% useful power.   That is 960 Watts * 60% = 576 Watts which is not much.. One only gets that during the day.   So one might get 3kWh of power per day from the panels -- based on not angling panels.   For someone who thinks they can run without a generator, that is the limit of power.   "Average use for a typical RVer is around 20 kWh a day.   ....  RVers parked in areas where they do not need air conditioning will use much less electricity than RVers who do need it.  In fact, the average amount of electricity used by people who are not running air conditioning is about 10 kWh a day.."  (1) There is one total power budget estimate.   Lets look at it from the components up: Loads: Required Unoccupied, trekking the country nearby while the boat is on anchor:  - Refrigeration: 300 kWh / year (modern, high efficiency, extra insulation for the tropics)   lets say 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Anchoring light (LED, 2 nm visibility, on a timer, 12 hour burn):  0.025 kWh/day   (3)    - Bilge Pump (500 gallons/day, 1 hour/day): 0.060 kWh/day (4)  - Most basic of computers offering Wifi and sensor monitoring to report alerts & email: 0.080 kWh/day (5 + estimate for dry contact and sensor system)   Minimum Occupied:  - Radio (hand held, listening):  0.020 kWh/day  (2)   - Interior Lights (LED):  0.050 kWh/day   - Recharging (Cell, shaver, shortwave receiver, flashlights, head lamps, miscellaneous): 0.050 kWh/day Voluntary Electronics:  - Netbook (4 hours):  0.100 kWh/day    - Full Laptop (4 hours): 0.300 kWh/day   - Display Screen (tv/monitor) (4 hours): 0.400 kWh//day  - DVD player (2 hours): 0.050 kWh/day Other:  - Pressurized water (per 100 liters -- usage for 1 day):  0.020 kWh/day (7)  - Freezer: 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Washing machine, 2 people:  0.400 kWh/day (one load every second day)  - Water maker (most efficient, per 100 liters/day): 0.400 kWh/day (6) Working on Boat:  - hand saw and driver drill for cabinetry work (1 hour run time/8 hour day): 1 kWh/day (experience)  - belt sander for finishing (6 hours run time/8 hour day): 7.2 kWh/day (experience) This is before using any electricity for cooking.   Looking at these conveniences ... pressurized water is a power bargain.   So, basic anchoring budget is 1.17 kWh / day -- solar will cover it with more than 100% to spare -- one 12V/100Ah battery unit at 50% DOD will carry it through the night.   On light overcast days, when one is getting 50% power, the system is still OK.   So one uses two 12V/100Ah units to keep the average DOD to 25%, to make sure it does not go much below 50% DOD in a stretch of moderately cloudy weather.      To go one week (hurricane overcast on a boat, a week of heavy overcast in winter in Canada) without significant sun, the battery bank must be 8.2 kWh -- which is 14 units of 12V/100Ah at 50% DOD -- that is a lot of batteries.   Rick's batteries, four times 12V/200Ah, 9.6 kWh, could handle this, just.   This is why I am interested in Rick's batteries -- they are about the minimum I would consider to have constant refrigeration, be it in a cottage or boat.   Speaking of refrigeration.  When one is not opening the fridge and adding things or taking things out, the power consumption of a fridge is inversely related to thickness of insulation.   As the largest power draw in an unoccupied space, I would consider a hyper-insulated fridge (I do not believe it is available, I was thinking DIY) to cut the power in half.   That allows Rick's batteries to run the system for close to 2 weeks without sun.   That I think would be a far better design for an off-grid cottage.   Ricks batteries would recharge in about 4 days after 2 weeks with heavy overcast.    If one had reliable sun every day, and particularly if the panels netted a little better than 60% useful power from their rating, then: 3.93 kWh/day -- based on 200 liters/day of water desalinated, and pressurized, laundry, freezer, and no voluntary electronics.  The solar panels could not reliably keep up.  In full sun, Rick's batteries would need a generator run of 10 hours once every 8 or 9 days.   From fully charged, after 2 days without sun, without a generator run, Rick's batteries would be exhausted.    Therefore, a pretty spartan existence, with a short shower daily, would be a strain without a daily generator run of about an hour on sunny days, and 4 hours a day on heavy overcast days.   (Assuming a Honda 1200W quiet generator outputting 1000W average.) Get rid of the freezer and one is just below what one would expect of the panels per day.   After just one day without sun, one would have to wait 2 weeks for the batteries to get back up to normal.   It is not reasonable to expect only 1 day of heavy clouds in each 2 weeks.   Therefore, even without the freezer, the solar panels would likely fall behind and regular generator running would be needed.  One could laminate flexible panels to the deck, but they are on average half the efficiency per unit area and, one really could not expect more than another 320 W of power to be conveniently placed. For those thinking that wind power will save them...  one would need an anchorage protected from waves, by say a submerged reef, and open to the wind -- so not like a closed bay.   Most small wind generators are rated for 40km/h, that is, they give their rated power at 40km/h wind speed.   They do not cut in until about 8 or 9 km/h.   Wind energy goes by the cube of the wind speed.   To generate half the rated output, one needs about 32 km/h of wind.   Half the rated output on a 400 Watt generator is 200 Watts.   Even if it is a tiringly windy anchorage, and the wind blows 24/7, that is only 4.8 kWh of power maximum theoretical, 4.2 kWh useful delivered to loads is more likely with charging inefficiency.  That is more than solar, but only if one assumes a tiringly windy anchorage.   If one wants the wind generator to total the same output as solar in 24 hours, one must have 27 kmph winds, 24/7.    Based on the theory that when it is not sunny the wind is blowing, to cover minimal loads (1.17kWh/day), one needs 20 km/h winds, 24/7 on cloudy days.     That is actually a reasonable expectation, on average, but not reliably.   Generator Inevitable Therefore, one should expect to use a generator on a cruising boat at least from time to time.   Now the question is how big and how long.  (I like the little 1200W Hondas .... they are very quiet.)   Taking a 1200W at 80% load, that is one hour of daily generator running for each kWh of extra consumption one has.  A freezer -- average an hour a day extra.  If one has AC, the RV example would have one run the generator for the entire daylight hours.     This is assuming all cooking appliances run from fuel.   If one assumes a sum total of 2 hours running 1800W (kettle, toaster oven, or single element hot plate), that is 3-4 kWh/day, 3-4 more hours of running the generator. Cat vs. Monohull.... Now, the Wynns have 11 solar panels on their cat.   If they upgraded them all to 320W panels (physically a bit larger, but also more efficient), and assuming 60% useful power, that is about 12.5 kWh / day ... I cannot say anything about their power usage, or their total average power received on their panels, but, it would seem a cat has a much better chance of being able to reliably handle reasonable hotel loads on solar alone.   Looking to the RV example, with no A, a Cat is the minimum unit of cruising boat to have an average RV experience without the need to run a generator every day -- certainly one will have a generator, certainly it will be run frequently in the average 2-week period to account for shortages of sun, but, it will not be run with certainty every single day just to meet average needs.      I did this calculation long ago, and that is why, some time ago, I encouraged Brent to come out of retirement and design an orgami cat, say based on a pair of 31 hulls, maybe with less beam (or maybe not), to each hull.    The hulls could each be a long, shallow draft single keel for even more shallow boat draft than the monohull twin keeler.   An origami Cat could compete with RVs as a lifestyle cruising boat where the entire world is available.    There are about 350,000-500,000 RVs sold each year worldwide(?) (9).  There are about 2,500 cruising boats sold in the US each year and about 2,000 sailboats of all sizes, including daysailers sold (8).   Monohulls are small on the inside compared to a modest RV.   Small = reduced comfort.   While there are many factors keeping the boat market about 200 times smaller, comfort is something that can be addressed.  Flip the Other Way -- Why Have Solar at All? If solar is so pathetic and doomed to be insufficient, why have solar at all?    Even if one is only netting 2kWh of electricity total from solar panels on sunny days, that is still 2 hours not running a generator, per day, or about 2.2 litres of fuel per day (for a Honda 1200W), or one 20 litre jerry can every 9 days.    Economically that does not make sense, solar panels are expensive.   But over a year, that is over 800 litres.   Really good solar panels are still only about $0.7-0.8/Rated Watt.   960 Rated Watts is what, $770?  Does anyone think one can find 800 litres of fuel reliably while cruising for less than $770 ?    Want to explain what a pain it is to mount and wire up panels -- I will tell you about hauling 40 jerry cans of fuel a year, every year probably most of the time in a dingy.  Yes, the charge controller will be a good chunk of change too.   We are not looking at a one-year payback, but, one year is informative.       One can outfit solar panels before leaving, at continental industrial-source prices for all components to protect against fuel costs in small markets later.   Other Budgets There are many other people who have done power budgets for homes, and RVs and boats, and I am certainly not saying this power budget is better, or closer to what you will experience, I was just trying to solve the question -- generator or not, and if so how long must it run.   I was also trying to highlight the benefits of a cat when it comes to power.   Matt References: (1) https://www.godownsize.com/electricity-consumption-rv/ (2) https://www.westmarine.com/buy/west-marine--vhf95db-dual-band-floating-handheld-vhf-radio--16230526 and https://www.westmarine.com/WestAdvisor/Selecting-a-VHF-Handheld-Radio (3) https://www.yachtingmonthly.com/gear/anchor-lights-test-33105 (4) https://www.amazon.ca/Electric-Automatic-Caravan-Five-Oceans/dp/B00N44FG5I (5) https://www.pidramble.com/wiki/benchmarks/power-consumption (6) https://www.cruisingworld.com/desalination-decisions-watermakers (7) https://www.rvpartscanada.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=37&products_id=2335#.XMhVLEN7nq4 (8) https://www.tradeonlytoday.com/industry-news/boat-sales-topped-250000-in-2016 (9) https://www.rvia.org/historical-rv-data From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 5:13 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     I agree 100% with Darren.   Any system that will rely on running a generator is the wrong system.  I remember one boat that would fire up a Honda generator on their foredeck and then go ashore for the day while it letting it run....no problem for them, but a real annoyance for everybody else.  Superyachts are the worst.   They may have sound proofed generators but the sound of their exhaust gurgling and splashing from their hull can be a real pain....it never ends. >>>>>>  I wouldn't openly criticize anyone who pursues a high power consumption lifestyle, as long as they remember not to be the moron who anchors right next to someone in a quiet anchorage and then proceeds to run your generator incessantly.  | 35901|35854|2019-05-01 19:02:15|Rick Jackson|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?|I looked at several boats before I bought ours and a Maple Leaf I saw had what looked like a medium sized generator power head with a manual engage lever.  I didn’t spend time looking at how it worked but it definitely was a manual engage.   Sent from my iPhone On May 1, 2019, at 5:20 AM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Excellent point Darren, I had not considered drive belt load on the crankshaft bearing from all these extras.  My engine is not well set up for extra driven components so I had been toying with the idea of a pony shaft just to run components from.   But even then, if one is pulling 10,000W off the pony shaft (3,000W for each of the alternator, semihermetic compressor and watermaker pump plus surge margin) then a lot of design calculation and checking for what is easily available has go into the power transmission link between the engine and pony shaft.  Is a motorcycle drive cogged belt that custom bikes use between the engine and transmission ... is that the easiest?   I don't know.  Is it better to put one extra to the right, another to the left so they balance bearing loads, except for the little torque caused by the separation between the plane of the two belts?    Is there room to put one extra below the crankshaft to balance a triad... there might be on my boat. Really good point..  Last thing one wants to do is reduce the life of the primary engine.. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 01:21 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Agreed, and I enjoyed your embellishment of the idea Matt  :-)  The one thing you have to look out for is how heavily you load the crankshaft bearing.  The manufacturers tend to be a bit cagey about what is tolerable.  If I had a water pump for a watermaker and a big alternator, I'd try and mount them opposed by 180 degrees.  Most marine engines die from corrosion and lack of use.  While you wouldn't want to idle one to charge the batteries, just about any other use is likely to make it last longer. On 2019-04-30 1:47 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Absolutely agreed Darren, if people do not have refrigeration, they should remain in that blissful place.   Absolutely agreed Darren, if you include running the propulsion engine as different from running a dedicated engine to generate electricity.   Perhaps I should change the title to "Run a fuel engine to make electricity sometimes, or Not".   Engine or Generator -- seems the same thing to me.  It was easier to do the calculations with a 1200W Honda. What you said about running the propulsion engine for two purposes is absolutely of advantage.   Thank you for telling me about the "small engine" regulators ... I want one.   Absolutely true, propulsion engines are usually diesel, more efficient, marine-ized so they last longer in a boat environment, whereas generators are, well, inexpensive if they are gasoline and not marine-ized.   But chances are, the outboard on the tender is gasoline so, one probably has gasoline on board in any case.   It is absolutely true for some boats and some owners that running the engine will come at about the same frequency as one would normally need to top up the batteries.   But then this tempo will get ingrained.  When one gets somewhere they really like and want to stay for a while, the tempo will make one feel itchy to go somewhere on a certain schedule or face the prospect of just running the engine just to make electricity, which more than a few cruisers complain is inefficient and irritating to them.   Where sails are a redundancy to the propulsion engine, there is no redundancy to an alternator if any one of a dozen things goes wrong with the propulsion engine.   The propulsion engine has a limited service lifetime and a chance of other failures, every hour it runs.   If something goes wrong with the engine, you are talking about boat yoga in tight spaces if you are a DIY type, on-site diesel mechanics ($$), and worst case a $10,000-$15,000 bill and a crane to replace it.   Yikes, I am not running that sucker just to make electricity.  As for incidental electricity... I sail differently.   My sails are my propulsion.  I have used as little as 12 litres of fuel in year, and there is no such thing as a wind where my boat is slower than a cottage.   My engine is my backup to my sails.   Naturally, good seamanship dictates caution and to some that points only to the engine.  If that is the way it has to be, OK.   But waiting to go in until the wind and tide are favourable is also seamanship, and then the engine and its full tank of fuel is still there in reserve.    Many times I start the engine and just let it idle for the decisive couple of minutes as I sail nearly all the way in -- it is there in an instant for oh-crap moments.      At least with a 1200 Watt generator, there is no issue of charge rate, they are really quiet out of the box, and can be made quieter with a little DIY.   If something goes wrong with the generator, I had always assumed that in a pinch I would have the 20,000 Watt propulsion engine was the backup to the generator, even though it is inefficient and straining to the electrical system unless it is used for something else at the same time.   If something goes wrong with the generator, it never be a big bill.  I carry it ashore to a small engine repair place, or buy another one.  In the meantime, so long as the generator works, one runs their engine only when necessary, keeping its hours down.   So it is down to wear and tear on the engine, or a disposable substitute to change fuel into electricity.  I would never NOT have a portable generator.    I am really not disputing anything you are saying Darren, some people will find what you describe to be the simplest course of action.   I am just giving the other side of what some other boats might do.   But lets run with your idea, a very good one, to have a 210A bus alternator running directly off the propulsion engine to take advantage of the huge surplus of mechanical power available that one might borrow from when moving the boat.   But, if you are going to do that....  - if you have an external regulator, is it not possible with the flip of an appropriately-wired switch to turn this into an unbelievable weldernator ?   One is never doing that with a 1200W Honda.   Even Rick's batteries, and a little inverter welder, that is a joke compared to this T-rex of weldernators.   You could do half inch plate with 5/32" rod and really feel like you are accomplishing something.   If you have never tried 5/32 rod, you really have to, just for fun, on 3/16" or thicker steel.   Have 100 feet of cables, and industrial fenders and raft up to commercial boats and do a little commercial welding.   I want one.  Really, I do.    - why stop at a 210A alternator -- connect up a high pressure pump with a couple of one-way valves so your water maker runs electric off one pump or directly from the engine from the other pump -- for just the cost of a second pump, you are creating redundancy.   Drawing the same torque as the alternator, the engine-powered watermaker could put out 200 gallons per hour, assuming one has suitable osmosis media..   The efficiency would be awesome, diesel directly driving the pump skips the following filters of efficiency: claw-style armature alternator 75-80%, battery charging 90%, electric motor 80-90% -- combined total 54%-65% efficiency.  One avoids all that by going straight off the engine.   Then one also has the alternative to make water with the engine if the electric pump ever fails.   I sure am thinking about doing this.  - why stop there ... If the water tanks fill before one is finished motoring, start filling the bathtub and have a good celebratory soak in the tub to prepare for going out on the town at the new destination.  Your 20,000 Watt motor is easily producing 25,000 Watts of heat so, that tub can be nice and toasty warm with just a few valves and a little hose.   This is just a given, I am definitely having an engine-heat option to my hot water tank.   - Heck why stop there ... turn down the flow rate so the fresh water comes out at full exhaust temperature and fill your teapot.   There is a lot of comfort possible here.    I don't like tea that much so, no.    - If there is still a surplus of fresh water, start filling all those water jerry cans most boats have -- over stock and then turn off the electric water maker -- run the engine today, save Amps tomorrow.   I sure would do this.      - why stop there ... put a semi-hermetic compressor on the engine and hook it up to a big-ass ice maker -- freeze a fraction that 200 GPH pouring out of the water maker and get rid of the need for both refrigeration and freezer (save the brine waste from water making ... ice+brine = -17C in a cold plate).    Says that man with a great big ice chest ... pull it out, or add a compressor to the engine ... open question.    - why stop there ... Just keep making ice, and put hundreds of pounds of ice in a stainless cabinet inside an adjustable-vent wood cabinet, with a drip pan under the stainless cabinet -- a DIY dehumidifier.   This is probably beyond the electrical power budget for most boats, so, what a luxury.   Dry gallons an hour.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Have the melt-water drain for the stainless cabinet run through a cooling coil along the cabinet ceiling and back down into the fresh water tanks -- step one air conditioning, for the price of pumping water a few feet -- we have already established, that is bargain compared to AC.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Not cool enough? Open vents in the side of the wood cabinet and blow air in there to both get more cool air and accelerate melting.   Glorious air conditioning -- not even a cat could manage that on solar.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... they have these cooking appliances, called muff pots, better than instant pots, and they are *ZERO* Watts:  http://cs.amsnow.com/sno/b/news/archive/2015/04/09/snacker-packer-meals-made-easy.aspx Cooking on a snowmobile made easy - American Snowmobiler Magazine - Snowmobile forums, news, Polaris, Ski-Doo, Arctic Cat & Yamaha reviews - AmSnow.com American Snowmobiler Magazine presents news, reviews, forums, videos, photos and the latest stats and prices for Arctic Cat, Ski-Doo, Yamaha and Polaris snowmobiles. cs.amsnow.com If one has never cooked on the exhaust of an engine ...   Heck with all that, one solar panel would run the radio and the nav lights, nav, etc.   If co-generating electricity by depending on running a 20,000 Watt engine with any frequency is how some boaters will do it, then co-generating everything else that would otherwise require electricity, or would generate comfort is worth mentioning too.   So when it comes down to it, same answer:  On a monohull, one is running an engine sometimes, but there is a lot of room for innovation, taste, preferences and different ways to meet the power budget.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:59 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     For everyone who has a simple boat without refrigeration/freezer, you probably wonder why everyone is so concerned about how to generate enough power from solar.  Your life is simple and there is no reason to read the rest of this. Matt, that's a pretty reasonable analysis, and would fit some boats.  There are certainly boats that manage these comforts on lower watts.  The obvious area for improvement is refrigeration, any efficiencies gained here is money better spent than money spent on power generation (solar and generators).  I came to the conclusion that 4" of styrofoam insulation for the fridge and 6" for the freezer was the minimum to make DC refrigeration work on a reasonable energy budget.  50 to 125 Ah per day is what 12v DC refrigeration generally uses per day.  The differences are almost entirely due to insulation, next due to the size of the fridge/freezer.  If you can get closer to 50Ah per day your energy budget changes drastically.  I decided a spillover design fridge freezer, custom built to maximize insulation was the best way to go in my build.  Aspen Aerogel is an interesting material here.  However, polystyrene foam is easy to work, cheap, readily available, and absorbs water less than the other foam insulation choices. Your energy budget doesn't consider engine run time and power from the alternator at all.  A boat that moves even just once or twice a week can reduce/eliminate its need for generator run time by super-sizing its alternator.  I've ordered a Leece-Neville 210A school bus alternator.  It should run happily at 170A continuous, perhaps a bit more with careful attention to cooling.  This is a win-win situation, getting power from the alternator is more efficient than from a generator.  With a fixed pitch prop you're running at an inefficient part of the power curve of the diesel at cruising rpm.  The extra load the alternator moves the engine into a more efficient part of the fuel map, that improvement in efficiency means that part of the fuel consumed by the alternator comes for free as your making the engine more efficient at the same time you make carbon buildup problems less likely.  Even if you have a smaller diesel you could fit an alternator this size.  If you need maximum propulsion power at some point, an external regulator like a Balmar Mc-614 used with a switch for small engine mode (field output reduced to 50%) allows you to get most of the power from the engine for propulsion when necessary.  You could also just put a plain switch in the field wire to the alt for a inexpensive solution, although charging at these high currents you probably want an external regulator anyway.  It should be noted that this solution relies on batteries that can accept pretty high charge rates.  This would be LiPO4, Firefly >AGM>very large flooded lead acid bank.  A small flooded-lead-acid bank probably won't be able to accept the high charge rate for long enough for a large alternator to do a lot of good.  The LiPO4 and the Firefly also have the advantage that they are totally happy in a partial state of charge and can stay there without damage until you are ready to move to the next anchorage (within reasonable time limits and state of charge limits).  You should switch to a serpentine belt to run a large alternator like a Delco Remy 28SI or a Leece Neville Idle Pro. There are two ways of looking at comfort while cruising.  Your comfort could come from plugging in whatever you want whenever you want.  However, this comes with the discomfort of noise from the generator, discomfort getting/storing fuel for the generator (especially bad for gasoline generators),  discomfort from getting/storing oil for the generator, the discomfort from generator oil changes, discomfort from trying to source generator parts in some distant port, discomfort from getting shunned by the cruisers who can't stand the noise of your generator.  On the flip side, if you design a boat with conservation in mind, it is possible to run almost entirely on solar.  I've met more than one boat (with refrigeration and watermaker) that runs successfully with just solar/wind/alternator.  You boil water in a kettle on the stove (is that a discomfort?), you wash laundry ashore or in a bucket (Ok, the bucket counts as a discomfort), is lighting a propane stove a discomfort compared to electric (around here tons of folks spend tons of money on their house for the luxury of a natural gas stove).  I have a nice antique coffee grinder, it takes zero watts to run, is beautiful and a pleasure to use, there are tons of equivalents to this on the boat, where doing things different is part of the pleasure for me.  A generator is definitely not necessary.   On 2019-04-30 9:03 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   What really is the electrical capacity on a boat from solar, how far will that take you, and realistically, will one be running a generator and how much? Solar Power Generation: Based on some tests by the Wynns in Florida (latitude N26), two used "160W" panels (they have 6 of these), produced 15 Amps at "12V", at 14.4V from the panels, but we will say 12.8V from the batteries later because though the charge voltage is higher, the voltage at which the power comes out is lower.    That is 216 Watts in, 192 Watts of useful power out of the batteries later.   They also tested two new "140W" panels and produced 20 Amps at "12V", or about 288 Watts in, 256 Watts out later.   256/"280" = 91% useful power.   192/"320" = 60% useful power.   Same solar controller in both tests.  At latitude N44, I was seeing about 67% of ratings from the panels, before considering charging losses which for a perfect charge controller might be 60% useful power.    On my off-grid solar installation, I have huge reserve capacity, currently not that much generating capacity, and the vampire load is very low.   I would add panels if I were to increase expected daily loads.   The Wynns also did a lot of shading tests, simulating halyards (no appreciable difference) and the boom (much larger difference).   Lets assume this is a boat on the hook and one has put a preventer on the boom to make it not shade panels, and oriented the boat to get uninterrupted sun on the panels.   If I were designing a solar system for a boat today, for a monohull, I would go with the most power dense panels I could get -- lets say "320W" panels.   Lets say I have an arch over my davits and I am able to put three 40-inch wide panels flat above this arch -- that is a beam of 10 feet.   Lets assume 60% useful power.   That is 960 Watts * 60% = 576 Watts which is not much. One only gets that during the day.   So one might get 3kWh of power per day from the panels -- based on not angling panels.   For someone who thinks they can run without a generator, that is the limit of power.   "Average use for a typical RVer is around 20 kWh a day.   ....  RVers parked in areas where they do not need air conditioning will use much less electricity than RVers who do need it.  In fact, the average amount of electricity used by people who are not running air conditioning is about 10 kWh a day."  (1) There is one total power budget estimate.   Lets look at it from the components up: Loads: Required Unoccupied, trekking the country nearby while the boat is on anchor:  - Refrigeration: 300 kWh / year (modern, high efficiency, extra insulation for the tropics)   lets say 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Anchoring light (LED, 2 nm visibility, on a timer, 12 hour burn):  0.025 kWh/day   (3)    - Bilge Pump (500 gallons/day, 1 hour/day): 0.060 kWh/day (4)  - Most basic of computers offering Wifi and sensor monitoring to report alerts & email: 0.080 kWh/day (5 + estimate for dry contact and sensor system)   Minimum Occupied:  - Radio (hand held, listening):  0.020 kWh/day  (2)   - Interior Lights (LED):  0.050 kWh/day   - Recharging (Cell, shaver, shortwave receiver, flashlights, head lamps, miscellaneous): 0.050 kWh/day Voluntary Electronics:  - Netbook (4 hours):  0.100 kWh/day    - Full Laptop (4 hours): 0.300 kWh/day   - Display Screen (tv/monitor) (4 hours): 0.400 kWh//day  - DVD player (2 hours): 0.050 kWh/day Other:  - Pressurized water (per 100 liters -- usage for 1 day):  0.020 kWh/day (7)  - Freezer: 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Washing machine, 2 people:  0.400 kWh/day (one load every second day)  - Water maker (most efficient, per 100 liters/day): 0.400 kWh/day (6) Working on Boat:  - hand saw and driver drill for cabinetry work (1 hour run time/8 hour day): 1 kWh/day (experience)  - belt sander for finishing (6 hours run time/8 hour day): 7.2 kWh/day (experience) This is before using any electricity for cooking.   Looking at these conveniences ... pressurized water is a power bargain.   So, basic anchoring budget is 1.17 kWh / day -- solar will cover it with more than 100% to spare -- one 12V/100Ah battery unit at 50% DOD will carry it through the night.   On light overcast days, when one is getting 50% power, the system is still OK.   So one uses two 12V/100Ah units to keep the average DOD to 25%, to make sure it does not go much below 50% DOD in a stretch of moderately cloudy weather.      To go one week (hurricane overcast on a boat, a week of heavy overcast in winter in Canada) without significant sun, the battery bank must be 8.2 kWh -- which is 14 units of 12V/100Ah at 50% DOD -- that is a lot of batteries.   Rick's batteries, four times 12V/200Ah, 9.6 kWh, could handle this, just.   This is why I am interested in Rick's batteries -- they are about the minimum I would consider to have constant refrigeration, be it in a cottage or boat.   Speaking of refrigeration.  When one is not opening the fridge and adding things or taking things out, the power consumption of a fridge is inversely related to thickness of insulation.   As the largest power draw in an unoccupied space, I would consider a hyper-insulated fridge (I do not believe it is available, I was thinking DIY) to cut the power in half.   That allows Rick's batteries to run the system for close to 2 weeks without sun.   That I think would be a far better design for an off-grid cottage.   Ricks batteries would recharge in about 4 days after 2 weeks with heavy overcast.    If one had reliable sun every day, and particularly if the panels netted a little better than 60% useful power from their rating, then: 3.93 kWh/day -- based on 200 liters/day of water desalinated, and pressurized, laundry, freezer, and no voluntary electronics.  The solar panels could not reliably keep up.  In full sun, Rick's batteries would need a generator run of 10 hours once every 8 or 9 days.   From fully charged, after 2 days without sun, without a generator run, Rick's batteries would be exhausted.    Therefore, a pretty spartan existence, with a short shower daily, would be a strain without a daily generator run of about an hour on sunny days, and 4 hours a day on heavy overcast days.   (Assuming a Honda 1200W quiet generator outputting 1000W average.) Get rid of the freezer and one is just below what one would expect of the panels per day.   After just one day without sun, one would have to wait 2 weeks for the batteries to get back up to normal.   It is not reasonable to expect only 1 day of heavy clouds in each 2 weeks.   Therefore, even without the freezer, the solar panels would likely fall behind and regular generator running would be needed.  One could laminate flexible panels to the deck, but they are on average half the efficiency per unit area and, one really could not expect more than another 320 W of power to be conveniently placed. For those thinking that wind power will save them...  one would need an anchorage protected from waves, by say a submerged reef, and open to the wind -- so not like a closed bay.   Most small wind generators are rated for 40km/h, that is, they give their rated power at 40km/h wind speed.   They do not cut in until about 8 or 9 km/h.   Wind energy goes by the cube of the wind speed.   To generate half the rated output, one needs about 32 km/h of wind.   Half the rated output on a 400 Watt generator is 200 Watts.   Even if it is a tiringly windy anchorage, and the wind blows 24/7, that is only 4.8 kWh of power maximum theoretical, 4.2 kWh useful delivered to loads is more likely with charging inefficiency.  That is more than solar, but only if one assumes a tiringly windy anchorage.   If one wants the wind generator to total the same output as solar in 24 hours, one must have 27 kmph winds, 24/7.    Based on the theory that when it is not sunny the wind is blowing, to cover minimal loads (1.17kWh/day), one needs 20 km/h winds, 24/7 on cloudy days.     That is actually a reasonable expectation, on average, but not reliably.   Generator Inevitable Therefore, one should expect to use a generator on a cruising boat at least from time to time.   Now the question is how big and how long.  (I like the little 1200W Hondas .... they are very quiet.)   Taking a 1200W at 80% load, that is one hour of daily generator running for each kWh of extra consumption one has.  A freezer -- average an hour a day extra.  If one has AC, the RV example would have one run the generator for the entire daylight hours.     This is assuming all cooking appliances run from fuel.   If one assumes a sum total of 2 hours running 1800W (kettle, toaster oven, or single element hot plate), that is 3-4 kWh/day, 3-4 more hours of running the generator. Cat vs. Monohull.... Now, the Wynns have 11 solar panels on their cat.   If they upgraded them all to 320W panels (physically a bit larger, but also more efficient), and assuming 60% useful power, that is about 12.5 kWh / day ... I cannot say anything about their power usage, or their total average power received on their panels, but, it would seem a cat has a much better chance of being able to reliably handle reasonable hotel loads on solar alone.   Looking to the RV example, with no A, a Cat is the minimum unit of cruising boat to have an average RV experience without the need to run a generator every day -- certainly one will have a generator, certainly it will be run frequently in the average 2-week period to account for shortages of sun, but, it will not be run with certainty every single day just to meet average needs.      I did this calculation long ago, and that is why, some time ago, I encouraged Brent to come out of retirement and design an orgami cat, say based on a pair of 31 hulls, maybe with less beam (or maybe not), to each hull.    The hulls could each be a long, shallow draft single keel for even more shallow boat draft than the monohull twin keeler..   An origami Cat could compete with RVs as a lifestyle cruising boat where the entire world is available.    There are about 350,000-500,000 RVs sold each year worldwide(?) (9).  There are about 2,500 cruising boats sold in the US each year and about 2,000 sailboats of all sizes, including daysailers sold (8).   Monohulls are small on the inside compared to a modest RV.   Small = reduced comfort.   While there are many factors keeping the boat market about 200 times smaller, comfort is something that can be addressed.  Flip the Other Way -- Why Have Solar at All? If solar is so pathetic and doomed to be insufficient, why have solar at all?    Even if one is only netting 2kWh of electricity total from solar panels on sunny days, that is still 2 hours not running a generator, per day, or about 2.2 litres of fuel per day (for a Honda 1200W), or one 20 litre jerry can every 9 days.    Economically that does not make sense, solar panels are expensive.   But over a year, that is over 800 litres.   Really good solar panels are still only about $0.7-0.8/Rated Watt.   960 Rated Watts is what, $770?  Does anyone think one can find 800 litres of fuel reliably while cruising for less than $770 ?    Want to explain what a pain it is to mount and wire up panels -- I will tell you about hauling 40 jerry cans of fuel a year, every year probably most of the time in a dingy.  Yes, the charge controller will be a good chunk of change too.   We are not looking at a one-year payback, but, one year is informative.       One can outfit solar panels before leaving, at continental industrial-source prices for all components to protect against fuel costs in small markets later.   Other Budgets There are many other people who have done power budgets for homes, and RVs and boats, and I am certainly not saying this power budget is better, or closer to what you will experience, I was just trying to solve the question -- generator or not, and if so how long must it run.   I was also trying to highlight the benefits of a cat when it comes to power.   Matt References: (1) https://www.godownsize.com/electricity-consumption-rv/ (2) https://www.westmarine.com/buy/west-marine--vhf95db-dual-band-floating-handheld-vhf-radio--16230526 and https://www.westmarine.com/WestAdvisor/Selecting-a-VHF-Handheld-Radio (3) https://www.yachtingmonthly.com/gear/anchor-lights-test-33105 (4) https://www.amazon.ca/Electric-Automatic-Caravan-Five-Oceans/dp/B00N44FG5I (5) https://www.pidramble.com/wiki/benchmarks/power-consumption (6) https://www.cruisingworld.com/desalination-decisions-watermakers (7) https://www.rvpartscanada.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=37&products_id=2335#.XMhVLEN7nq4 (8) https://www.tradeonlytoday.com/industry-news/boat-sales-topped-250000-in-2016 (9) https://www..rvia.org/historical-rv-data From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 5:13 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     I agree 100% with Darren.   Any system that will rely on running a generator is the wrong system.  I remember one boat that would fire up a Honda generator on their foredeck and then go ashore for the day while it letting it run....no problem for them, but a real annoyance for everybody else.  Superyachts are the worst..   They may have sound proofed generators but the sound of their exhaust gurgling and splashing from their hull can be a real pain....it never ends. >>>>>>  I wouldn't openly criticize anyone who pursues a high power consumption lifestyle, as long as they remember not to be the moron who anchors right next to someone in a quiet anchorage and then proceeds to run your generator incessantly.  | 35902|35854|2019-05-01 19:26:09|Matt Malone|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?| Hi Rick, Every number I gave was on the more costly side of typical, but your mileage may vary.   You can find half or double in another product if you look hard enough.  Research, computation and experience is where the numbers come from.   You should research the numbers for your system. One thing I know I forget to include ... the latent heat of vapourization of water is 2265 kJ/kg, latent heat of fusion is 334 kJ/kg.  Therefore condensing water from the air using ice will cost just less than 7kg of ice for every kg of water vapour removed from the air.  But if one has a big enough ice maker, who cares, make more ice. Also ice + brine is less than freezing, always.  But if the brine is dillute, or becomes dillute, the temperature rises.  Ice and seawater goes to only -2C, because it is quite dillute brine.  It is -17C for salt-saturated brine, or solid salt.  Solid salt is better because the brine around it does not dillute as ice melts until the last of the salt dissolves.  This makes a freezer that can be charged and then checked -- as long as it has salt and ice, it is good to go.  If the osmosis waste brine is put in an evaporation pond, like a kiddy pool on the foredeck, and you make salt, that is better.  Yes, a solar powered freezer.   Generally, one would have to work hard to keep a salt-ice freezer at the lowest temperature. Matt From: Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 19:01 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I like the way you think.  However..  Where do all these numbers you cite come from?   How accurate are your claims?     Put blue prints in front of me and I’ll build it.  Ask me to engineer and I’m milk toast.    I rely on engineers often and I just trust the information I’m given.  I’m just not sure how to digest all your calculations.    If your being realistic than I want to use those for my project.  I’d hate to find out later that your shooting from the hip.    Sent from my iPhone On Apr 30, 2019, at 1:47 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] < origamiboats@yahoogroups.com> wrote:   Absolutely agreed Darren, if people do not have refrigeration, they should remain in that blissful place.   Absolutely agreed Darren, if you include running the propulsion engine as different from running a dedicated engine to generate electricity.   Perhaps I should change the title to "Run a fuel engine to make electricity sometimes, or Not".   Engine or Generator -- seems the same thing to me.  It was easier to do the calculations with a 1200W Honda. What you said about running the propulsion engine for two purposes is absolutely of advantage.   Thank you for telling me about the "small engine" regulators ... I want one.   Absolutely true, propulsion engines are usually diesel, more efficient, marine-ized so they last longer in a boat environment, whereas generators are, well, inexpensive if they are gasoline and not marine-ized.   But chances are, the outboard on the tender is gasoline so, one probably has gasoline on board in any case.   It is absolutely true for some boats and some owners that running the engine will come at about the same frequency as one would normally need to top up the batteries.   But then this tempo will get ingrained.  When one gets somewhere they really like and want to stay for a while, the tempo will make one feel itchy to go somewhere on a certain schedule or face the prospect of just running the engine just to make electricity, which more than a few cruisers complain is inefficient and irritating to them.   Where sails are a redundancy to the propulsion engine, there is no redundancy to an alternator if any one of a dozen things goes wrong with the propulsion engine.   The propulsion engine has a limited service lifetime and a chance of other failures, every hour it runs.   If something goes wrong with the engine, you are talking about boat yoga in tight spaces if you are a DIY type, on-site diesel mechanics ($$), and worst case a $10,000-$15,000 bill and a crane to replace it.   Yikes, I am not running that sucker just to make electricity.  As for incidental electricity... I sail differently.   My sails are my propulsion.  I have used as little as 12 litres of fuel in year, and there is no such thing as a wind where my boat is slower than a cottage.   My engine is my backup to my sails.   Naturally, good seamanship dictates caution and to some that points only to the engine.  If that is the way it has to be, OK.   But waiting to go in until the wind and tide are favourable is also seamanship, and then the engine and its full tank of fuel is still there in reserve.    Many times I start the engine and just let it idle for the decisive couple of minutes as I sail nearly all the way in -- it is there in an instant for oh-crap moments..      At least with a 1200 Watt generator, there is no issue of charge rate, they are really quiet out of the box, and can be made quieter with a little DIY..   If something goes wrong with the generator, I had always assumed that in a pinch I would have the 20,000 Watt propulsion engine was the backup to the generator, even though it is inefficient and straining to the electrical system unless it is used for something else at the same time.   If something goes wrong with the generator, it never be a big bill.  I carry it ashore to a small engine repair place, or buy another one.  In the meantime, so long as the generator works, one runs their engine only when necessary, keeping its hours down.   So it is down to wear and tear on the engine, or a disposable substitute to change fuel into electricity.  I would never NOT have a portable generator.    I am really not disputing anything you are saying Darren, some people will find what you describe to be the simplest course of action.   I am just giving the other side of what some other boats might do.   But lets run with your idea, a very good one, to have a 210A bus alternator running directly off the propulsion engine to take advantage of the huge surplus of mechanical power available that one might borrow from when moving the boat.   But, if you are going to do that....  - if you have an external regulator, is it not possible with the flip of an appropriately-wired switch to turn this into an unbelievable weldernator ?   One is never doing that with a 1200W Honda.   Even Rick's batteries, and a little inverter welder, that is a joke compared to this T-rex of weldernators.   You could do half inch plate with 5/32" rod and really feel like you are accomplishing something.   If you have never tried 5/32 rod, you really have to, just for fun, on 3/16" or thicker steel.   Have 100 feet of cables, and industrial fenders and raft up to commercial boats and do a little commercial welding.   I want one.  Really, I do..    - why stop at a 210A alternator -- connect up a high pressure pump with a couple of one-way valves so your water maker runs electric off one pump or directly from the engine from the other pump -- for just the cost of a second pump, you are creating redundancy.   Drawing the same torque as the alternator, the engine-powered watermaker could put out 200 gallons per hour, assuming one has suitable osmosis media.   The efficiency would be awesome, diesel directly driving the pump skips the following filters of efficiency: claw-style armature alternator 75-80%, battery charging 90%, electric motor 80-90% -- combined total 54%-65% efficiency.  One avoids all that by going straight off the engine.   Then one also has the alternative to make water with the engine if the electric pump ever fails.   I sure am thinking about doing this.  - why stop there ... If the water tanks fill before one is finished motoring, start filling the bathtub and have a good celebratory soak in the tub to prepare for going out on the town at the new destination.  Your 20,000 Watt motor is easily producing 25,000 Watts of heat so, that tub can be nice and toasty warm with just a few valves and a little hose.   This is just a given, I am definitely having an engine-heat option to my hot water tank.   - Heck why stop there ... turn down the flow rate so the fresh water comes out at full exhaust temperature and fill your teapot.   There is a lot of comfort possible here.    I don't like tea that much so, no.    - If there is still a surplus of fresh water, start filling all those water jerry cans most boats have -- over stock and then turn off the electric water maker -- run the engine today, save Amps tomorrow.   I sure would do this.      - why stop there ... put a semi-hermetic compressor on the engine and hook it up to a big-ass ice maker -- freeze a fraction that 200 GPH pouring out of the water maker and get rid of the need for both refrigeration and freezer (save the brine waste from water making ... ice+brine = -17C in a cold plate).    Says that man with a great big ice chest ... pull it out, or add a compressor to the engine .... open question.    - why stop there ... Just keep making ice, and put hundreds of pounds of ice in a stainless cabinet inside an adjustable-vent wood cabinet, with a drip pan under the stainless cabinet -- a DIY dehumidifier.   This is probably beyond the electrical power budget for most boats, so, what a luxury.   Dry gallons an hour.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Have the melt-water drain for the stainless cabinet run through a cooling coil along the cabinet ceiling and back down into the fresh water tanks -- step one air conditioning, for the price of pumping water a few feet -- we have already established, that is bargain compared to AC.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Not cool enough? Open vents in the side of the wood cabinet and blow air in there to both get more cool air and accelerate melting.   Glorious air conditioning -- not even a cat could manage that on solar.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... they have these cooking appliances, called muff pots, better than instant pots, and they are *ZERO* Watts:  http://cs.amsnow.com/sno/b/news/archive/2015/04/09/snacker-packer-meals-made-easy.aspx Cooking on a snowmobile made easy - American Snowmobiler Magazine - Snowmobile forums, news, Polaris, Ski-Doo, Arctic Cat & Yamaha reviews - AmSnow.com American Snowmobiler Magazine presents news, reviews, forums, videos, photos and the latest stats and prices for Arctic Cat, Ski-Doo, Yamaha and Polaris snowmobiles. cs.amsnow.com If one has never cooked on the exhaust of an engine ...   Heck with all that, one solar panel would run the radio and the nav lights, nav, etc.   If co-generating electricity by depending on running a 20,000 Watt engine with any frequency is how some boaters will do it, then co-generating everything else that would otherwise require electricity, or would generate comfort is worth mentioning too.   So when it comes down to it, same answer:  On a monohull, one is running an engine sometimes, but there is a lot of room for innovation, taste, preferences and different ways to meet the power budget.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com < origamiboats@yahoogroups.com > on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] < origamiboats@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:59 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     For everyone who has a simple boat without refrigeration/freezer, you probably wonder why everyone is so concerned about how to generate enough power from solar.  Your life is simple and there is no reason to read the rest of this. Matt, that's a pretty reasonable analysis, and would fit some boats.  There are certainly boats that manage these comforts on lower watts.  The obvious area for improvement is refrigeration, any efficiencies gained here is money better spent than money spent on power generation (solar and generators).  I came to the conclusion that 4" of styrofoam insulation for the fridge and 6" for the freezer was the minimum to make DC refrigeration work on a reasonable energy budget.  50 to 125 Ah per day is what 12v DC refrigeration generally uses per day.  The differences are almost entirely due to insulation, next due to the size of the fridge/freezer.  If you can get closer to 50Ah per day your energy budget changes drastically.  I decided a spillover design fridge freezer, custom built to maximize insulation was the best way to go in my build.  Aspen Aerogel is an interesting material here.  However, polystyrene foam is easy to work, cheap, readily available, and absorbs water less than the other foam insulation choices. Your energy budget doesn't consider engine run time and power from the alternator at all.  A boat that moves even just once or twice a week can reduce/eliminate its need for generator run time by super-sizing its alternator.  I've ordered a Leece-Neville 210A school bus alternator.  It should run happily at 170A continuous, perhaps a bit more with careful attention to cooling.  This is a win-win situation, getting power from the alternator is more efficient than from a generator.  With a fixed pitch prop you're running at an inefficient part of the power curve of the diesel at cruising rpm.  The extra load the alternator moves the engine into a more efficient part of the fuel map, that improvement in efficiency means that part of the fuel consumed by the alternator comes for free as your making the engine more efficient at the same time you make carbon buildup problems less likely.  Even if you have a smaller diesel you could fit an alternator this size.  If you need maximum propulsion power at some point, an external regulator like a Balmar Mc-614 used with a switch for small engine mode (field output reduced to 50%) allows you to get most of the power from the engine for propulsion when necessary.  You could also just put a plain switch in the field wire to the alt for a inexpensive solution, although charging at these high currents you probably want an external regulator anyway.  It should be noted that this solution relies on batteries that can accept pretty high charge rates.  This would be LiPO4, Firefly >AGM>very large flooded lead acid bank.  A small flooded-lead-acid bank probably won't be able to accept the high charge rate for long enough for a large alternator to do a lot of good.  The LiPO4 and the Firefly also have the advantage that they are totally happy in a partial state of charge and can stay there without damage until you are ready to move to the next anchorage (within reasonable time limits and state of charge limits).  You should switch to a serpentine belt to run a large alternator like a Delco Remy 28SI or a Leece Neville Idle Pro. There are two ways of looking at comfort while cruising.  Your comfort could come from plugging in whatever you want whenever you want.  However, this comes with the discomfort of noise from the generator, discomfort getting/storing fuel for the generator (especially bad for gasoline generators),  discomfort from getting/storing oil for the generator, the discomfort from generator oil changes, discomfort from trying to source generator parts in some distant port, discomfort from getting shunned by the cruisers who can't stand the noise of your generator.  On the flip side, if you design a boat with conservation in mind, it is possible to run almost entirely on solar.  I've met more than one boat (with refrigeration and watermaker) that runs successfully with just solar/wind/alternator.  You boil water in a kettle on the stove (is that a discomfort?), you wash laundry ashore or in a bucket (Ok, the bucket counts as a discomfort), is lighting a propane stove a discomfort compared to electric (around here tons of folks spend tons of money on their house for the luxury of a natural gas stove).  I have a nice antique coffee grinder, it takes zero watts to run, is beautiful and a pleasure to use, there are tons of equivalents to this on the boat, where doing things different is part of the pleasure for me.  A generator is definitely not necessary.   On 2019-04-30 9:03 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   What really is the electrical capacity on a boat from solar, how far will that take you, and realistically, will one be running a generator and how much? Solar Power Generation: Based on some tests by the Wynns in Florida (latitude N26), two used "160W" panels (they have 6 of these), produced 15 Amps at "12V", at 14.4V from the panels, but we will say 12.8V from the batteries later because though the charge voltage is higher, the voltage at which the power comes out is lower.    That is 216 Watts in, 192 Watts of useful power out of the batteries later.   They also tested two new "140W" panels and produced 20 Amps at "12V", or about 288 Watts in, 256 Watts out later.   256/"280" = 91% useful power.   192/"320" = 60% useful power.   Same solar controller in both tests.  At latitude N44, I was seeing about 67% of ratings from the panels, before considering charging losses which for a perfect charge controller might be 60% useful power.    On my off-grid solar installation, I have huge reserve capacity, currently not that much generating capacity, and the vampire load is very low.   I would add panels if I were to increase expected daily loads.   The Wynns also did a lot of shading tests, simulating halyards (no appreciable difference) and the boom (much larger difference).   Lets assume this is a boat on the hook and one has put a preventer on the boom to make it not shade panels, and oriented the boat to get uninterrupted sun on the panels.   If I were designing a solar system for a boat today, for a monohull, I would go with the most power dense panels I could get -- lets say "320W" panels..   Lets say I have an arch over my davits and I am able to put three 40-inch wide panels flat above this arch -- that is a beam of 10 feet.   Lets assume 60% useful power.   That is 960 Watts * 60% = 576 Watts which is not much. One only gets that during the day.   So one might get 3kWh of power per day from the panels -- based on not angling panels.   For someone who thinks they can run without a generator, that is the limit of power.   "Average use for a typical RVer is around 20 kWh a day.   .....  RVers parked in areas where they do not need air conditioning will use much less electricity than RVers who do need it.  In fact, the average amount of electricity used by people who are not running air conditioning is about 10 kWh a day."  (1) There is one total power budget estimate.   Lets look at it from the components up: Loads: Required Unoccupied, trekking the country nearby while the boat is on anchor:  - Refrigeration: 300 kWh / year (modern, high efficiency, extra insulation for the tropics)   lets say 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Anchoring light (LED, 2 nm visibility, on a timer, 12 hour burn):  0.025 kWh/day   (3)    - Bilge Pump (500 gallons/day, 1 hour/day): 0.060 kWh/day (4)  - Most basic of computers offering Wifi and sensor monitoring to report alerts & email: 0.080 kWh/day (5 + estimate for dry contact and sensor system)   Minimum Occupied:  - Radio (hand held, listening):  0.020 kWh/day  (2)   - Interior Lights (LED):  0.050 kWh/day   - Recharging (Cell, shaver, shortwave receiver, flashlights, head lamps, miscellaneous): 0.050 kWh/day Voluntary Electronics:  - Netbook (4 hours):  0.100 kWh/day    - Full Laptop (4 hours): 0.300 kWh/day   - Display Screen (tv/monitor) (4 hours): 0.400 kWh//day  - DVD player (2 hours): 0.050 kWh/day Other:  - Pressurized water (per 100 liters -- usage for 1 day):  0.020 kWh/day (7)  - Freezer: 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Washing machine, 2 people:  0.400 kWh/day (one load every second day)  - Water maker (most efficient, per 100 liters/day): 0.400 kWh/day (6) Working on Boat:  - hand saw and driver drill for cabinetry work (1 hour run time/8 hour day): 1 kWh/day (experience)  - belt sander for finishing (6 hours run time/8 hour day): 7.2 kWh/day (experience) This is before using any electricity for cooking.   Looking at these conveniences ... pressurized water is a power bargain.   So, basic anchoring budget is 1.17 kWh / day -- solar will cover it with more than 100% to spare -- one 12V/100Ah battery unit at 50% DOD will carry it through the night.   On light overcast days, when one is getting 50% power, the system is still OK.   So one uses two 12V/100Ah units to keep the average DOD to 25%, to make sure it does not go much below 50% DOD in a stretch of moderately cloudy weather..      To go one week (hurricane overcast on a boat, a week of heavy overcast in winter in Canada) without significant sun, the battery bank must be 8.2 kWh -- which is 14 units of 12V/100Ah at 50% DOD -- that is a lot of batteries.   Rick's batteries, four times 12V/200Ah, 9.6 kWh, could handle this, just.   This is why I am interested in Rick's batteries -- they are about the minimum I would consider to have constant refrigeration, be it in a cottage or boat.   Speaking of refrigeration.  When one is not opening the fridge and adding things or taking things out, the power consumption of a fridge is inversely related to thickness of insulation.   As the largest power draw in an unoccupied space, I would consider a hyper-insulated fridge (I do not believe it is available, I was thinking DIY) to cut the power in half.   That allows Rick's batteries to run the system for close to 2 weeks without sun.   That I think would be a far better design for an off-grid cottage.   Ricks batteries would recharge in about 4 days after 2 weeks with heavy overcast.    If one had reliable sun every day, and particularly if the panels netted a little better than 60% useful power from their rating, then: 3.93 kWh/day -- based on 200 liters/day of water desalinated, and pressurized, laundry, freezer, and no voluntary electronics.  The solar panels could not reliably keep up.  In full sun, Rick's batteries would need a generator run of 10 hours once every 8 or 9 days.   From fully charged, after 2 days without sun, without a generator run, Rick's batteries would be exhausted.    Therefore, a pretty spartan existence, with a short shower daily, would be a strain without a daily generator run of about an hour on sunny days, and 4 hours a day on heavy overcast days.   (Assuming a Honda 1200W quiet generator outputting 1000W average.) Get rid of the freezer and one is just below what one would expect of the panels per day.   After just one day without sun, one would have to wait 2 weeks for the batteries to get back up to normal.   It is not reasonable to expect only 1 day of heavy clouds in each 2 weeks.   Therefore, even without the freezer, the solar panels would likely fall behind and regular generator running would be needed.  One could laminate flexible panels to the deck, but they are on average half the efficiency per unit area and, one really could not expect more than another 320 W of power to be conveniently placed. For those thinking that wind power will save them...  one would need an anchorage protected from waves, by say a submerged reef, and open to the wind -- so not like a closed bay.   Most small wind generators are rated for 40km/h, that is, they give their rated power at 40km/h wind speed.   They do not cut in until about 8 or 9 km/h.   Wind energy goes by the cube of the wind speed.   To generate half the rated output, one needs about 32 km/h of wind.   Half the rated output on a 400 Watt generator is 200 Watts.   Even if it is a tiringly windy anchorage, and the wind blows 24/7, that is only 4.8 kWh of power maximum theoretical, 4.2 kWh useful delivered to loads is more likely with charging inefficiency.  That is more than solar, but only if one assumes a tiringly windy anchorage.   If one wants the wind generator to total the same output as solar in 24 hours, one must have 27 kmph winds, 24/7.    Based on the theory that when it is not sunny the wind is blowing, to cover minimal loads (1.17kWh/day), one needs 20 km/h winds, 24/7 on cloudy days.     That is actually a reasonable expectation, on average, but not reliably.   Generator Inevitable Therefore, one should expect to use a generator on a cruising boat at least from time to time.   Now the question is how big and how long.  (I like the little 1200W Hondas .... they are very quiet.)   Taking a 1200W at 80% load, that is one hour of daily generator running for each kWh of extra consumption one has.  A freezer -- average an hour a day extra.  If one has AC, the RV example would have one run the generator for the entire daylight hours.     This is assuming all cooking appliances run from fuel.   If one assumes a sum total of 2 hours running 1800W (kettle, toaster oven, or single element hot plate), that is 3-4 kWh/day, 3-4 more hours of running the generator. Cat vs. Monohull.... Now, the Wynns have 11 solar panels on their cat.   If they upgraded them all to 320W panels (physically a bit larger, but also more efficient), and assuming 60% useful power, that is about 12.5 kWh / day .... I cannot say anything about their power usage, or their total average power received on their panels, but, it would seem a cat has a much better chance of being able to reliably handle reasonable hotel loads on solar alone.   Looking to the RV example, with no A, a Cat is the minimum unit of cruising boat to have an average RV experience without the need to run a generator every day -- certainly one will have a generator, certainly it will be run frequently in the average 2-week period to account for shortages of sun, but, it will not be run with certainty every single day just to meet average needs.      I did this calculation long ago, and that is why, some time ago, I encouraged Brent to come out of retirement and design an orgami cat, say based on a pair of 31 hulls, maybe with less beam (or maybe not), to each hull.    The hulls could each be a long, shallow draft single keel for even more shallow boat draft than the monohull twin keeler.   An origami Cat could compete with RVs as a lifestyle cruising boat where the entire world is available.    There are about 350,000-500,000 RVs sold each year worldwide(?) (9).  There are about 2,500 cruising boats sold in the US each year and about 2,000 sailboats of all sizes, including daysailers sold (8).   Monohulls are small on the inside compared to a modest RV.   Small = reduced comfort.   While there are many factors keeping the boat market about 200 times smaller, comfort is something that can be addressed.  Flip the Other Way -- Why Have Solar at All? If solar is so pathetic and doomed to be insufficient, why have solar at all?    Even if one is only netting 2kWh of electricity total from solar panels on sunny days, that is still 2 hours not running a generator, per day, or about 2.2 litres of fuel per day (for a Honda 1200W), or one 20 litre jerry can every 9 days.    Economically that does not make sense, solar panels are expensive.   But over a year, that is over 800 litres.   Really good solar panels are still only about $0.7-0.8/Rated Watt.   960 Rated Watts is what, $770?  Does anyone think one can find 800 litres of fuel reliably while cruising for less than $770 ?    Want to explain what a pain it is to mount and wire up panels -- I will tell you about hauling 40 jerry cans of fuel a year, every year probably most of the time in a dingy.  Yes, the charge controller will be a good chunk of change too.   We are not looking at a one-year payback, but, one year is informative.       One can outfit solar panels before leaving, at continental industrial-source prices for all components to protect against fuel costs in small markets later.   Other Budgets There are many other people who have done power budgets for homes, and RVs and boats, and I am certainly not saying this power budget is better, or closer to what you will experience, I was just trying to solve the question -- generator or not, and if so how long must it run.   I was also trying to highlight the benefits of a cat when it comes to power.   Matt References: (1) https://www.godownsize.com/electricity-consumption-rv/ (2) https://www.westmarine.com/buy/west-marine--vhf95db-dual-band-floating-handheld-vhf-radio--16230526 and https://www.westmarine.com/WestAdvisor/Selecting-a-VHF-Handheld-Radio (3) https://www.yachtingmonthly.com/gear/anchor-lights-test-33105 (4) https://www.amazon.ca/Electric-Automatic-Caravan-Five-Oceans/dp/B00N44FG5I (5) https://www.pidramble.com/wiki/benchmarks/power-consumption (6) https://www.cruisingworld.com/desalination-decisions-watermakers (7) https://www.rvpartscanada.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=37&products_id=2335#.XMhVLEN7nq4 (8) https://www.tradeonlytoday.com/industry-news/boat-sales-topped-250000-in-2016 (9) https://www.rvia.org/historical-rv-data From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 5:13 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     I agree 100% with Darren.   Any system that will rely on running a generator is the wrong system.  I remember one boat that would fire up a Honda generator on their foredeck and then go ashore for the day while it letting it run....no problem for them, but a real annoyance for everybody else.  Superyachts are the worst.   They may have sound proofed generators but the sound of their exhaust gurgling and splashing from their hull can be a real pain....it never ends. >>>>>>  I wouldn't openly criticize anyone who pursues a high power consumption lifestyle, as long as they remember not to be the moron who anchors right next to someone in a quiet anchorage and then proceeds to run your generator incessantly.  | 35903|35854|2019-05-01 19:30:01|Matt Malone|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?| Thank you Zoa.  Also ignored, with parasitic loads, your (residual) torque-rpm characteristic cannot match the prop anymore if it match without parasitic loads. Matt From: Zoa Scott zoascott74@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 19:02 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Just a note incase its not widely known. All diesel engine manufacturers will let you know max allowable parasitic hp loads to be taken off crankshaft . Im a diesel mechanic by trade. If your running mutiple gizmos they are usually installed opposing each other if belt driven. Zoa  On Wed, May 1, 2019, 5:20 AM Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats], wrote:   Excellent point Darren, I had not considered drive belt load on the crankshaft bearing from all these extras.  My engine is not well set up for extra driven components so I had been toying with the idea of a pony shaft just to run components from.   But even then, if one is pulling 10,000W off the pony shaft (3,000W for each of the alternator, semihermetic compressor and watermaker pump plus surge margin) then a lot of design calculation and checking for what is easily available has go into the power transmission link between the engine and pony shaft..  Is a motorcycle drive cogged belt that custom bikes use between the engine and transmission ... is that the easiest?   I don't know.  Is it better to put one extra to the right, another to the left so they balance bearing loads, except for the little torque caused by the separation between the plane of the two belts?    Is there room to put one extra below the crankshaft to balance a triad... there might be on my boat. Really good point.  Last thing one wants to do is reduce the life of the primary engine. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 01:21 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Agreed, and I enjoyed your embellishment of the idea Matt  :-)  The one thing you have to look out for is how heavily you load the crankshaft bearing.  The manufacturers tend to be a bit cagey about what is tolerable.  If I had a water pump for a watermaker and a big alternator, I'd try and mount them opposed by 180 degrees.  Most marine engines die from corrosion and lack of use.  While you wouldn't want to idle one to charge the batteries, just about any other use is likely to make it last longer. On 2019-04-30 1:47 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Absolutely agreed Darren, if people do not have refrigeration, they should remain in that blissful place.   Absolutely agreed Darren, if you include running the propulsion engine as different from running a dedicated engine to generate electricity.   Perhaps I should change the title to "Run a fuel engine to make electricity sometimes, or Not".   Engine or Generator -- seems the same thing to me.  It was easier to do the calculations with a 1200W Honda.. What you said about running the propulsion engine for two purposes is absolutely of advantage.   Thank you for telling me about the "small engine" regulators ... I want one.   Absolutely true, propulsion engines are usually diesel, more efficient, marine-ized so they last longer in a boat environment, whereas generators are, well, inexpensive if they are gasoline and not marine-ized.   But chances are, the outboard on the tender is gasoline so, one probably has gasoline on board in any case.   It is absolutely true for some boats and some owners that running the engine will come at about the same frequency as one would normally need to top up the batteries.   But then this tempo will get ingrained.  When one gets somewhere they really like and want to stay for a while, the tempo will make one feel itchy to go somewhere on a certain schedule or face the prospect of just running the engine just to make electricity, which more than a few cruisers complain is inefficient and irritating to them..   Where sails are a redundancy to the propulsion engine, there is no redundancy to an alternator if any one of a dozen things goes wrong with the propulsion engine.   The propulsion engine has a limited service lifetime and a chance of other failures, every hour it runs.   If something goes wrong with the engine, you are talking about boat yoga in tight spaces if you are a DIY type, on-site diesel mechanics ($$), and worst case a $10,000-$15,000 bill and a crane to replace it.   Yikes, I am not running that sucker just to make electricity.  As for incidental electricity... I sail differently.   My sails are my propulsion.  I have used as little as 12 litres of fuel in year, and there is no such thing as a wind where my boat is slower than a cottage.   My engine is my backup to my sails.   Naturally, good seamanship dictates caution and to some that points only to the engine.  If that is the way it has to be, OK.   But waiting to go in until the wind and tide are favourable is also seamanship, and then the engine and its full tank of fuel is still there in reserve.    Many times I start the engine and just let it idle for the decisive couple of minutes as I sail nearly all the way in -- it is there in an instant for oh-crap moments..      At least with a 1200 Watt generator, there is no issue of charge rate, they are really quiet out of the box, and can be made quieter with a little DIY..   If something goes wrong with the generator, I had always assumed that in a pinch I would have the 20,000 Watt propulsion engine was the backup to the generator, even though it is inefficient and straining to the electrical system unless it is used for something else at the same time.   If something goes wrong with the generator, it never be a big bill.  I carry it ashore to a small engine repair place, or buy another one.  In the meantime, so long as the generator works, one runs their engine only when necessary, keeping its hours down.   So it is down to wear and tear on the engine, or a disposable substitute to change fuel into electricity.  I would never NOT have a portable generator.    I am really not disputing anything you are saying Darren, some people will find what you describe to be the simplest course of action.   I am just giving the other side of what some other boats might do.   But lets run with your idea, a very good one, to have a 210A bus alternator running directly off the propulsion engine to take advantage of the huge surplus of mechanical power available that one might borrow from when moving the boat.   But, if you are going to do that....  - if you have an external regulator, is it not possible with the flip of an appropriately-wired switch to turn this into an unbelievable weldernator ?   One is never doing that with a 1200W Honda.   Even Rick's batteries, and a little inverter welder, that is a joke compared to this T-rex of weldernators.   You could do half inch plate with 5/32" rod and really feel like you are accomplishing something.   If you have never tried 5/32 rod, you really have to, just for fun, on 3/16" or thicker steel.   Have 100 feet of cables, and industrial fenders and raft up to commercial boats and do a little commercial welding.   I want one.  Really, I do..    - why stop at a 210A alternator -- connect up a high pressure pump with a couple of one-way valves so your water maker runs electric off one pump or directly from the engine from the other pump -- for just the cost of a second pump, you are creating redundancy.   Drawing the same torque as the alternator, the engine-powered watermaker could put out 200 gallons per hour, assuming one has suitable osmosis media.   The efficiency would be awesome, diesel directly driving the pump skips the following filters of efficiency: claw-style armature alternator 75-80%, battery charging 90%, electric motor 80-90% -- combined total 54%-65% efficiency.  One avoids all that by going straight off the engine.   Then one also has the alternative to make water with the engine if the electric pump ever fails.   I sure am thinking about doing this..  - why stop there ... If the water tanks fill before one is finished motoring, start filling the bathtub and have a good celebratory soak in the tub to prepare for going out on the town at the new destination.  Your 20,000 Watt motor is easily producing 25,000 Watts of heat so, that tub can be nice and toasty warm with just a few valves and a little hose.   This is just a given, I am definitely having an engine-heat option to my hot water tank.   - Heck why stop there ... turn down the flow rate so the fresh water comes out at full exhaust temperature and fill your teapot.   There is a lot of comfort possible here.    I don't like tea that much so, no.    - If there is still a surplus of fresh water, start filling all those water jerry cans most boats have -- over stock and then turn off the electric water maker -- run the engine today, save Amps tomorrow.   I sure would do this.      - why stop there ... put a semi-hermetic compressor on the engine and hook it up to a big-ass ice maker -- freeze a fraction that 200 GPH pouring out of the water maker and get rid of the need for both refrigeration and freezer (save the brine waste from water making ... ice+brine = -17C in a cold plate).    Says that man with a great big ice chest ... pull it out, or add a compressor to the engine ... open question.    - why stop there ... Just keep making ice, and put hundreds of pounds of ice in a stainless cabinet inside an adjustable-vent wood cabinet, with a drip pan under the stainless cabinet -- a DIY dehumidifier.   This is probably beyond the electrical power budget for most boats, so, what a luxury.   Dry gallons an hour.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Have the melt-water drain for the stainless cabinet run through a cooling coil along the cabinet ceiling and back down into the fresh water tanks -- step one air conditioning, for the price of pumping water a few feet -- we have already established, that is bargain compared to AC.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Not cool enough? Open vents in the side of the wood cabinet and blow air in there to both get more cool air and accelerate melting.   Glorious air conditioning -- not even a cat could manage that on solar.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... they have these cooking appliances, called muff pots, better than instant pots, and they are *ZERO* Watts:  http://cs.amsnow.com/sno/b/news/archive/2015/04/09/snacker-packer-meals-made-easy.aspx Cooking on a snowmobile made easy - American Snowmobiler Magazine - Snowmobile forums, news, Polaris, Ski-Doo, Arctic Cat & Yamaha reviews - AmSnow.com American Snowmobiler Magazine presents news, reviews, forums, videos, photos and the latest stats and prices for Arctic Cat, Ski-Doo, Yamaha and Polaris snowmobiles. cs.amsnow.com If one has never cooked on the exhaust of an engine ...   Heck with all that, one solar panel would run the radio and the nav lights, nav, etc.   If co-generating electricity by depending on running a 20,000 Watt engine with any frequency is how some boaters will do it, then co-generating everything else that would otherwise require electricity, or would generate comfort is worth mentioning too.   So when it comes down to it, same answer:  On a monohull, one is running an engine sometimes, but there is a lot of room for innovation, taste, preferences and different ways to meet the power budget.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:59 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     For everyone who has a simple boat without refrigeration/freezer, you probably wonder why everyone is so concerned about how to generate enough power from solar.  Your life is simple and there is no reason to read the rest of this. Matt, that's a pretty reasonable analysis, and would fit some boats.  There are certainly boats that manage these comforts on lower watts.  The obvious area for improvement is refrigeration, any efficiencies gained here is money better spent than money spent on power generation (solar and generators).  I came to the conclusion that 4" of styrofoam insulation for the fridge and 6" for the freezer was the minimum to make DC refrigeration work on a reasonable energy budget.  50 to 125 Ah per day is what 12v DC refrigeration generally uses per day.  The differences are almost entirely due to insulation, next due to the size of the fridge/freezer.  If you can get closer to 50Ah per day your energy budget changes drastically.  I decided a spillover design fridge freezer, custom built to maximize insulation was the best way to go in my build.  Aspen Aerogel is an interesting material here.  However, polystyrene foam is easy to work, cheap, readily available, and absorbs water less than the other foam insulation choices. Your energy budget doesn't consider engine run time and power from the alternator at all.  A boat that moves even just once or twice a week can reduce/eliminate its need for generator run time by super-sizing its alternator.  I've ordered a Leece-Neville 210A school bus alternator.  It should run happily at 170A continuous, perhaps a bit more with careful attention to cooling.  This is a win-win situation, getting power from the alternator is more efficient than from a generator.  With a fixed pitch prop you're running at an inefficient part of the power curve of the diesel at cruising rpm.  The extra load the alternator moves the engine into a more efficient part of the fuel map, that improvement in efficiency means that part of the fuel consumed by the alternator comes for free as your making the engine more efficient at the same time you make carbon buildup problems less likely.  Even if you have a smaller diesel you could fit an alternator this size.  If you need maximum propulsion power at some point, an external regulator like a Balmar Mc-614 used with a switch for small engine mode (field output reduced to 50%) allows you to get most of the power from the engine for propulsion when necessary.  You could also just put a plain switch in the field wire to the alt for a inexpensive solution, although charging at these high currents you probably want an external regulator anyway.  It should be noted that this solution relies on batteries that can accept pretty high charge rates.  This would be LiPO4, Firefly >AGM>very large flooded lead acid bank.  A small flooded-lead-acid bank probably won't be able to accept the high charge rate for long enough for a large alternator to do a lot of good.  The LiPO4 and the Firefly also have the advantage that they are totally happy in a partial state of charge and can stay there without damage until you are ready to move to the next anchorage (within reasonable time limits and state of charge limits).  You should switch to a serpentine belt to run a large alternator like a Delco Remy 28SI or a Leece Neville Idle Pro. There are two ways of looking at comfort while cruising.  Your comfort could come from plugging in whatever you want whenever you want.  However, this comes with the discomfort of noise from the generator, discomfort getting/storing fuel for the generator (especially bad for gasoline generators),  discomfort from getting/storing oil for the generator, the discomfort from generator oil changes, discomfort from trying to source generator parts in some distant port, discomfort from getting shunned by the cruisers who can't stand the noise of your generator.  On the flip side, if you design a boat with conservation in mind, it is possible to run almost entirely on solar.  I've met more than one boat (with refrigeration and watermaker) that runs successfully with just solar/wind/alternator.  You boil water in a kettle on the stove (is that a discomfort?), you wash laundry ashore or in a bucket (Ok, the bucket counts as a discomfort), is lighting a propane stove a discomfort compared to electric (around here tons of folks spend tons of money on their house for the luxury of a natural gas stove).  I have a nice antique coffee grinder, it takes zero watts to run, is beautiful and a pleasure to use, there are tons of equivalents to this on the boat, where doing things different is part of the pleasure for me.  A generator is definitely not necessary.   On 2019-04-30 9:03 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   What really is the electrical capacity on a boat from solar, how far will that take you, and realistically, will one be running a generator and how much? Solar Power Generation: Based on some tests by the Wynns in Florida (latitude N26), two used "160W" panels (they have 6 of these), produced 15 Amps at "12V", at 14.4V from the panels, but we will say 12.8V from the batteries later because though the charge voltage is higher, the voltage at which the power comes out is lower.    That is 216 Watts in, 192 Watts of useful power out of the batteries later.   They also tested two new "140W" panels and produced 20 Amps at "12V", or about 288 Watts in, 256 Watts out later.   256/"280" = 91% useful power.   192/"320" = 60% useful power.   Same solar controller in both tests.  At latitude N44, I was seeing about 67% of ratings from the panels, before considering charging losses which for a perfect charge controller might be 60% useful power.    On my off-grid solar installation, I have huge reserve capacity, currently not that much generating capacity, and the vampire load is very low.   I would add panels if I were to increase expected daily loads.   The Wynns also did a lot of shading tests, simulating halyards (no appreciable difference) and the boom (much larger difference).   Lets assume this is a boat on the hook and one has put a preventer on the boom to make it not shade panels, and oriented the boat to get uninterrupted sun on the panels.   If I were designing a solar system for a boat today, for a monohull, I would go with the most power dense panels I could get -- lets say "320W" panels.   Lets say I have an arch over my davits and I am able to put three 40-inch wide panels flat above this arch -- that is a beam of 10 feet.   Lets assume 60% useful power.   That is 960 Watts * 60% = 576 Watts which is not much.. One only gets that during the day.   So one might get 3kWh of power per day from the panels -- based on not angling panels.   For someone who thinks they can run without a generator, that is the limit of power.   "Average use for a typical RVer is around 20 kWh a day.   .....  RVers parked in areas where they do not need air conditioning will use much less electricity than RVers who do need it.  In fact, the average amount of electricity used by people who are not running air conditioning is about 10 kWh a day.."  (1) There is one total power budget estimate.   Lets look at it from the components up: Loads: Required Unoccupied, trekking the country nearby while the boat is on anchor:  - Refrigeration: 300 kWh / year (modern, high efficiency, extra insulation for the tropics)   lets say 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Anchoring light (LED, 2 nm visibility, on a timer, 12 hour burn):  0.025 kWh/day   (3)    - Bilge Pump (500 gallons/day, 1 hour/day): 0.060 kWh/day (4)  - Most basic of computers offering Wifi and sensor monitoring to report alerts & email: 0.080 kWh/day (5 + estimate for dry contact and sensor system)   Minimum Occupied:  - Radio (hand held, listening):  0.020 kWh/day  (2)   - Interior Lights (LED):  0.050 kWh/day   - Recharging (Cell, shaver, shortwave receiver, flashlights, head lamps, miscellaneous): 0.050 kWh/day Voluntary Electronics:  - Netbook (4 hours):  0.100 kWh/day    - Full Laptop (4 hours): 0.300 kWh/day   - Display Screen (tv/monitor) (4 hours): 0.400 kWh//day  - DVD player (2 hours): 0.050 kWh/day Other:  - Pressurized water (per 100 liters -- usage for 1 day):  0.020 kWh/day (7)  - Freezer: 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Washing machine, 2 people:  0.400 kWh/day (one load every second day)  - Water maker (most efficient, per 100 liters/day): 0.400 kWh/day (6) Working on Boat:  - hand saw and driver drill for cabinetry work (1 hour run time/8 hour day): 1 kWh/day (experience)  - belt sander for finishing (6 hours run time/8 hour day): 7.2 kWh/day (experience) This is before using any electricity for cooking.   Looking at these conveniences ... pressurized water is a power bargain.   So, basic anchoring budget is 1.17 kWh / day -- solar will cover it with more than 100% to spare -- one 12V/100Ah battery unit at 50% DOD will carry it through the night.   On light overcast days, when one is getting 50% power, the system is still OK.   So one uses two 12V/100Ah units to keep the average DOD to 25%, to make sure it does not go much below 50% DOD in a stretch of moderately cloudy weather..      To go one week (hurricane overcast on a boat, a week of heavy overcast in winter in Canada) without significant sun, the battery bank must be 8.2 kWh -- which is 14 units of 12V/100Ah at 50% DOD -- that is a lot of batteries.   Rick's batteries, four times 12V/200Ah, 9.6 kWh, could handle this, just.   This is why I am interested in Rick's batteries -- they are about the minimum I would consider to have constant refrigeration, be it in a cottage or boat.   Speaking of refrigeration.  When one is not opening the fridge and adding things or taking things out, the power consumption of a fridge is inversely related to thickness of insulation.   As the largest power draw in an unoccupied space, I would consider a hyper-insulated fridge (I do not believe it is available, I was thinking DIY) to cut the power in half.   That allows Rick's batteries to run the system for close to 2 weeks without sun.   That I think would be a far better design for an off-grid cottage.   Ricks batteries would recharge in about 4 days after 2 weeks with heavy overcast.    If one had reliable sun every day, and particularly if the panels netted a little better than 60% useful power from their rating, then: 3.93 kWh/day -- based on 200 liters/day of water desalinated, and pressurized, laundry, freezer, and no voluntary electronics.  The solar panels could not reliably keep up.  In full sun, Rick's batteries would need a generator run of 10 hours once every 8 or 9 days.   From fully charged, after 2 days without sun, without a generator run, Rick's batteries would be exhausted.    Therefore, a pretty spartan existence, with a short shower daily, would be a strain without a daily generator run of about an hour on sunny days, and 4 hours a day on heavy overcast days.   (Assuming a Honda 1200W quiet generator outputting 1000W average.) Get rid of the freezer and one is just below what one would expect of the panels per day.   After just one day without sun, one would have to wait 2 weeks for the batteries to get back up to normal.   It is not reasonable to expect only 1 day of heavy clouds in each 2 weeks.   Therefore, even without the freezer, the solar panels would likely fall behind and regular generator running would be needed.  One could laminate flexible panels to the deck, but they are on average half the efficiency per unit area and, one really could not expect more than another 320 W of power to be conveniently placed. For those thinking that wind power will save them...  one would need an anchorage protected from waves, by say a submerged reef, and open to the wind -- so not like a closed bay.   Most small wind generators are rated for 40km/h, that is, they give their rated power at 40km/h wind speed.   They do not cut in until about 8 or 9 km/h.   Wind energy goes by the cube of the wind speed.   To generate half the rated output, one needs about 32 km/h of wind.   Half the rated output on a 400 Watt generator is 200 Watts.   Even if it is a tiringly windy anchorage, and the wind blows 24/7, that is only 4.8 kWh of power maximum theoretical, 4.2 kWh useful delivered to loads is more likely with charging inefficiency.  That is more than solar, but only if one assumes a tiringly windy anchorage.   If one wants the wind generator to total the same output as solar in 24 hours, one must have 27 kmph winds, 24/7.    Based on the theory that when it is not sunny the wind is blowing, to cover minimal loads (1.17kWh/day), one needs 20 km/h winds, 24/7 on cloudy days.     That is actually a reasonable expectation, on average, but not reliably.   Generator Inevitable Therefore, one should expect to use a generator on a cruising boat at least from time to time.   Now the question is how big and how long.  (I like the little 1200W Hondas .... they are very quiet.)   Taking a 1200W at 80% load, that is one hour of daily generator running for each kWh of extra consumption one has.  A freezer -- average an hour a day extra.  If one has AC, the RV example would have one run the generator for the entire daylight hours.     This is assuming all cooking appliances run from fuel.   If one assumes a sum total of 2 hours running 1800W (kettle, toaster oven, or single element hot plate), that is 3-4 kWh/day, 3-4 more hours of running the generator. Cat vs. Monohull.... Now, the Wynns have 11 solar panels on their cat.   If they upgraded them all to 320W panels (physically a bit larger, but also more efficient), and assuming 60% useful power, that is about 12.5 kWh / day ... I cannot say anything about their power usage, or their total average power received on their panels, but, it would seem a cat has a much better chance of being able to reliably handle reasonable hotel loads on solar alone.   Looking to the RV example, with no A, a Cat is the minimum unit of cruising boat to have an average RV experience without the need to run a generator every day -- certainly one will have a generator, certainly it will be run frequently in the average 2-week period to account for shortages of sun, but, it will not be run with certainty every single day just to meet average needs.      I did this calculation long ago, and that is why, some time ago, I encouraged Brent to come out of retirement and design an orgami cat, say based on a pair of 31 hulls, maybe with less beam (or maybe not), to each hull.    The hulls could each be a long, shallow draft single keel for even more shallow boat draft than the monohull twin keeler.   An origami Cat could compete with RVs as a lifestyle cruising boat where the entire world is available.    There are about 350,000-500,000 RVs sold each year worldwide(?) (9).  There are about 2,500 cruising boats sold in the US each year and about 2,000 sailboats of all sizes, including daysailers sold (8).   Monohulls are small on the inside compared to a modest RV.   Small = reduced comfort.   While there are many factors keeping the boat market about 200 times smaller, comfort is something that can be addressed.  Flip the Other Way -- Why Have Solar at All? If solar is so pathetic and doomed to be insufficient, why have solar at all?    Even if one is only netting 2kWh of electricity total from solar panels on sunny days, that is still 2 hours not running a generator, per day, or about 2.2 litres of fuel per day (for a Honda 1200W), or one 20 litre jerry can every 9 days.    Economically that does not make sense, solar panels are expensive.   But over a year, that is over 800 litres.   Really good solar panels are still only about $0.7-0.8/Rated Watt.   960 Rated Watts is what, $770?  Does anyone think one can find 800 litres of fuel reliably while cruising for less than $770 ?    Want to explain what a pain it is to mount and wire up panels -- I will tell you about hauling 40 jerry cans of fuel a year, every year probably most of the time in a dingy.  Yes, the charge controller will be a good chunk of change too.   We are not looking at a one-year payback, but, one year is informative.       One can outfit solar panels before leaving, at continental industrial-source prices for all components to protect against fuel costs in small markets later.   Other Budgets There are many other people who have done power budgets for homes, and RVs and boats, and I am certainly not saying this power budget is better, or closer to what you will experience, I was just trying to solve the question -- generator or not, and if so how long must it run.   I was also trying to highlight the benefits of a cat when it comes to power.   Matt References: (1) https://www.godownsize.com/electricity-consumption-rv/ (2) https://www.westmarine.com/buy/west-marine--vhf95db-dual-band-floating-handheld-vhf-radio--16230526 and https://www.westmarine.com/WestAdvisor/Selecting-a-VHF-Handheld-Radio (3) https://www.yachtingmonthly.com/gear/anchor-lights-test-33105 (4) https://www.amazon.ca/Electric-Automatic-Caravan-Five-Oceans/dp/B00N44FG5I (5) https://www.pidramble.com/wiki/benchmarks/power-consumption (6) https://www.cruisingworld.com/desalination-decisions-watermakers (7) https://www.rvpartscanada.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=37&products_id=2335#.XMhVLEN7nq4 (8) https://www.tradeonlytoday.com/industry-news/boat-sales-topped-250000-in-2016 (9) https://www.rvia.org/historical-rv-data From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 5:13 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     I agree 100% with Darren.   Any system that will rely on running a generator is the wrong system.  I remember one boat that would fire up a Honda generator on their foredeck and then go ashore for the day while it letting it run....no problem for them, but a real annoyance for everybody else.  Superyachts are the worst.   They may have sound proofed generators but the sound of their exhaust gurgling and splashing from their hull can be a real pain....it never ends. >>>>>>  I wouldn't openly criticize anyone who pursues a high power consumption lifestyle, as long as they remember not to be the moron who anchors right next to someone in a quiet anchorage and then proceeds to run your generator incessantly.  | 35904|35854|2019-05-02 12:03:19|Darren Bos|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?| Because the power curve of the engine does not match that for the power absorption of a fixed pitch propeller, you only have one point where engine power and propeller absorption match (where the curves cross).  In order to prevent damage to the engine, this point is set at the maximum produced power.  When you install a new prop and check to make sure that the engine can still reach its maximum rpm, this is what you are doing.  So, at any engine speed below the max rpm, the propeller is absorbing less power than the engine would like to be producing for that rpm.  If all you are doing is adding a larger alternator, then you are unlikely to run into problems overloading the engine and are likely moving it to a more efficient part of the fuel consumption map.  Should you need max power out of then engine, install an ordinary switch in the field wire of your alternator or use an external regulator like a Balmar that has a small engine mode that allows you to reduce the alternator output. If you want to add more accessories, then you might want to be a bit more careful that you are not overloading the engine.  Check the power curves that are published for your engine.  Also, an exhaust temperature gauge is good insurance that you are not overloading the engine.  In reality, most of the accessories you would strap to the engine won't be on all the time.  A watermaker either has an electric clutch, or a simple manual engagement system like Brent has talked about.  The alternator load can be turned on and off easily.  Even a fridge compressor would have an electric clutch.  So, as long as you stay within the limits of allowable accessory loads on the crankshaft, you can add whatever you can find space to fit and still have a propeller matched to the maximum hp that the engine can produce. I'm not a diesel mechanic.  Just a guy that likes messing about with the technical side of boats and I try to share what I know here with the hope of helping someone out as others here have done for me.  Also, discussions here are a good way to find the limits of what I know and the cases where I'm just plain wrong. Cheers, Darren On 2019-05-01 4:29 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Thank you Zoa.  Also ignored, with parasitic loads, your (residual) torque-rpm characteristic cannot match the prop anymore if it match without parasitic loads. Matt From: Zoa Scott zoascott74@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 19:02 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Just a note incase its not widely known. All diesel engine manufacturers will let you know max allowable parasitic hp loads to be taken off crankshaft . Im a diesel mechanic by trade. If your running mutiple gizmos they are usually installed opposing each other if belt driven. Zoa  On Wed, May 1, 2019, 5:20 AM Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats], wrote:   Excellent point Darren, I had not considered drive belt load on the crankshaft bearing from all these extras.  My engine is not well set up for extra driven components so I had been toying with the idea of a pony shaft just to run components from.   But even then, if one is pulling 10,000W off the pony shaft (3,000W for each of the alternator, semihermetic compressor and watermaker pump plus surge margin) then a lot of design calculation and checking for what is easily available has go into the power transmission link between the engine and pony shaft..  Is a motorcycle drive cogged belt that custom bikes use between the engine and transmission ... is that the easiest?   I don't know.  Is it better to put one extra to the right, another to the left so they balance bearing loads, except for the little torque caused by the separation between the plane of the two belts?    Is there room to put one extra below the crankshaft to balance a triad... there might be on my boat. Really good point.  Last thing one wants to do is reduce the life of the primary engine. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 01:21 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Agreed, and I enjoyed your embellishment of the idea Matt  :-)  The one thing you have to look out for is how heavily you load the crankshaft bearing.  The manufacturers tend to be a bit cagey about what is tolerable.  If I had a water pump for a watermaker and a big alternator, I'd try and mount them opposed by 180 degrees.  Most marine engines die from corrosion and lack of use.  While you wouldn't want to idle one to charge the batteries, just about any other use is likely to make it last longer. On 2019-04-30 1:47 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Absolutely agreed Darren, if people do not have refrigeration, they should remain in that blissful place.   Absolutely agreed Darren, if you include running the propulsion engine as different from running a dedicated engine to generate electricity.   Perhaps I should change the title to "Run a fuel engine to make electricity sometimes, or Not".   Engine or Generator -- seems the same thing to me.  It was easier to do the calculations with a 1200W Honda.. What you said about running the propulsion engine for two purposes is absolutely of advantage.   Thank you for telling me about the "small engine" regulators ... I want one.   Absolutely true, propulsion engines are usually diesel, more efficient, marine-ized so they last longer in a boat environment, whereas generators are, well, inexpensive if they are gasoline and not marine-ized.   But chances are, the outboard on the tender is gasoline so, one probably has gasoline on board in any case.   It is absolutely true for some boats and some owners that running the engine will come at about the same frequency as one would normally need to top up the batteries.   But then this tempo will get ingrained.  When one gets somewhere they really like and want to stay for a while, the tempo will make one feel itchy to go somewhere on a certain schedule or face the prospect of just running the engine just to make electricity, which more than a few cruisers complain is inefficient and irritating to them..   Where sails are a redundancy to the propulsion engine, there is no redundancy to an alternator if any one of a dozen things goes wrong with the propulsion engine.   The propulsion engine has a limited service lifetime and a chance of other failures, every hour it runs.   If something goes wrong with the engine, you are talking about boat yoga in tight spaces if you are a DIY type, on-site diesel mechanics ($$), and worst case a $10,000-$15,000 bill and a crane to replace it.   Yikes, I am not running that sucker just to make electricity.  As for incidental electricity... I sail differently.   My sails are my propulsion.  I have used as little as 12 litres of fuel in year, and there is no such thing as a wind where my boat is slower than a cottage.   My engine is my backup to my sails.   Naturally, good seamanship dictates caution and to some that points only to the engine.  If that is the way it has to be, OK.   But waiting to go in until the wind and tide are favourable is also seamanship, and then the engine and its full tank of fuel is still there in reserve.    Many times I start the engine and just let it idle for the decisive couple of minutes as I sail nearly all the way in -- it is there in an instant for oh-crap moments..      At least with a 1200 Watt generator, there is no issue of charge rate, they are really quiet out of the box, and can be made quieter with a little DIY..   If something goes wrong with the generator, I had always assumed that in a pinch I would have the 20,000 Watt propulsion engine was the backup to the generator, even though it is inefficient and straining to the electrical system unless it is used for something else at the same time.   If something goes wrong with the generator, it never be a big bill.  I carry it ashore to a small engine repair place, or buy another one.  In the meantime, so long as the generator works, one runs their engine only when necessary, keeping its hours down.   So it is down to wear and tear on the engine, or a disposable substitute to change fuel into electricity.  I would never NOT have a portable generator.    I am really not disputing anything you are saying Darren, some people will find what you describe to be the simplest course of action.   I am just giving the other side of what some other boats might do.   But lets run with your idea, a very good one, to have a 210A bus alternator running directly off the propulsion engine to take advantage of the huge surplus of mechanical power available that one might borrow from when moving the boat.   But, if you are going to do that....  - if you have an external regulator, is it not possible with the flip of an appropriately-wired switch to turn this into an unbelievable weldernator ?   One is never doing that with a 1200W Honda.   Even Rick's batteries, and a little inverter welder, that is a joke compared to this T-rex of weldernators.   You could do half inch plate with 5/32" rod and really feel like you are accomplishing something.   If you have never tried 5/32 rod, you really have to, just for fun, on 3/16" or thicker steel.   Have 100 feet of cables, and industrial fenders and raft up to commercial boats and do a little commercial welding.   I want one.  Really, I do..    - why stop at a 210A alternator -- connect up a high pressure pump with a couple of one-way valves so your water maker runs electric off one pump or directly from the engine from the other pump -- for just the cost of a second pump, you are creating redundancy.   Drawing the same torque as the alternator, the engine-powered watermaker could put out 200 gallons per hour, assuming one has suitable osmosis media.   The efficiency would be awesome, diesel directly driving the pump skips the following filters of efficiency: claw-style armature alternator 75-80%, battery charging 90%, electric motor 80-90% -- combined total 54%-65% efficiency.  One avoids all that by going straight off the engine.   Then one also has the alternative to make water with the engine if the electric pump ever fails.   I sure am thinking about doing this..  - why stop there ... If the water tanks fill before one is finished motoring, start filling the bathtub and have a good celebratory soak in the tub to prepare for going out on the town at the new destination.  Your 20,000 Watt motor is easily producing 25,000 Watts of heat so, that tub can be nice and toasty warm with just a few valves and a little hose.   This is just a given, I am definitely having an engine-heat option to my hot water tank.   - Heck why stop there ... turn down the flow rate so the fresh water comes out at full exhaust temperature and fill your teapot.   There is a lot of comfort possible here.    I don't like tea that much so, no.    - If there is still a surplus of fresh water, start filling all those water jerry cans most boats have -- over stock and then turn off the electric water maker -- run the engine today, save Amps tomorrow.   I sure would do this.      - why stop there ... put a semi-hermetic compressor on the engine and hook it up to a big-ass ice maker -- freeze a fraction that 200 GPH pouring out of the water maker and get rid of the need for both refrigeration and freezer (save the brine waste from water making ... ice+brine = -17C in a cold plate).    Says that man with a great big ice chest ... pull it out, or add a compressor to the engine ... open question.    - why stop there ... Just keep making ice, and put hundreds of pounds of ice in a stainless cabinet inside an adjustable-vent wood cabinet, with a drip pan under the stainless cabinet -- a DIY dehumidifier.   This is probably beyond the electrical power budget for most boats, so, what a luxury.   Dry gallons an hour.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Have the melt-water drain for the stainless cabinet run through a cooling coil along the cabinet ceiling and back down into the fresh water tanks -- step one air conditioning, for the price of pumping water a few feet -- we have already established, that is bargain compared to AC.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Not cool enough? Open vents in the side of the wood cabinet and blow air in there to both get more cool air and accelerate melting.   Glorious air conditioning -- not even a cat could manage that on solar.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... they have these cooking appliances, called muff pots, better than instant pots, and they are *ZERO* Watts:  http://cs.amsnow.com/sno/b/news/archive/2015/04/09/snacker-packer-meals-made-easy.aspx Cooking on a snowmobile made easy - American Snowmobiler Magazine - Snowmobile forums, news, Polaris, Ski-Doo, Arctic Cat & Yamaha reviews - AmSnow.com American Snowmobiler Magazine presents news, reviews, forums, videos, photos and the latest stats and prices for Arctic Cat, Ski-Doo, Yamaha and Polaris snowmobiles. cs.amsnow.com If one has never cooked on the exhaust of an engine ...   Heck with all that, one solar panel would run the radio and the nav lights, nav, etc.   If co-generating electricity by depending on running a 20,000 Watt engine with any frequency is how some boaters will do it, then co-generating everything else that would otherwise require electricity, or would generate comfort is worth mentioning too.   So when it comes down to it, same answer:  On a monohull, one is running an engine sometimes, but there is a lot of room for innovation, taste, preferences and different ways to meet the power budget.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:59 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     For everyone who has a simple boat without refrigeration/freezer, you probably wonder why everyone is so concerned about how to generate enough power from solar.  Your life is simple and there is no reason to read the rest of this. Matt, that's a pretty reasonable analysis, and would fit some boats.  There are certainly boats that manage these comforts on lower watts.  The obvious area for improvement is refrigeration, any efficiencies gained here is money better spent than money spent on power generation (solar and generators).  I came to the conclusion that 4" of styrofoam insulation for the fridge and 6" for the freezer was the minimum to make DC refrigeration work on a reasonable energy budget.  50 to 125 Ah per day is what 12v DC refrigeration generally uses per day.  The differences are almost entirely due to insulation, next due to the size of the fridge/freezer.  If you can get closer to 50Ah per day your energy budget changes drastically.  I decided a spillover design fridge freezer, custom built to maximize insulation was the best way to go in my build.  Aspen Aerogel is an interesting material here.  However, polystyrene foam is easy to work, cheap, readily available, and absorbs water less than the other foam insulation choices. Your energy budget doesn't consider engine run time and power from the alternator at all.  A boat that moves even just once or twice a week can reduce/eliminate its need for generator run time by super-sizing its alternator.  I've ordered a Leece-Neville 210A school bus alternator.  It should run happily at 170A continuous, perhaps a bit more with careful attention to cooling.  This is a win-win situation, getting power from the alternator is more efficient than from a generator.  With a fixed pitch prop you're running at an inefficient part of the power curve of the diesel at cruising rpm.  The extra load the alternator moves the engine into a more efficient part of the fuel map, that improvement in efficiency means that part of the fuel consumed by the alternator comes for free as your making the engine more efficient at the same time you make carbon buildup problems less likely.  Even if you have a smaller diesel you could fit an alternator this size.  If you need maximum propulsion power at some point, an external regulator like a Balmar Mc-614 used with a switch for small engine mode (field output reduced to 50%) allows you to get most of the power from the engine for propulsion when necessary.  You could also just put a plain switch in the field wire to the alt for a inexpensive solution, although charging at these high currents you probably want an external regulator anyway.  It should be noted that this solution relies on batteries that can accept pretty high charge rates.  This would be LiPO4, Firefly >AGM>very large flooded lead acid bank.  A small flooded-lead-acid bank probably won't be able to accept the high charge rate for long enough for a large alternator to do a lot of good.  The LiPO4 and the Firefly also have the advantage that they are totally happy in a partial state of charge and can stay there without damage until you are ready to move to the next anchorage (within reasonable time limits and state of charge limits).  You should switch to a serpentine belt to run a large alternator like a Delco Remy 28SI or a Leece Neville Idle Pro. There are two ways of looking at comfort while cruising.  Your comfort could come from plugging in whatever you want whenever you want.  However, this comes with the discomfort of noise from the generator, discomfort getting/storing fuel for the generator (especially bad for gasoline generators),  discomfort from getting/storing oil for the generator, the discomfort from generator oil changes, discomfort from trying to source generator parts in some distant port, discomfort from getting shunned by the cruisers who can't stand the noise of your generator.  On the flip side, if you design a boat with conservation in mind, it is possible to run almost entirely on solar.  I've met more than one boat (with refrigeration and watermaker) that runs successfully with just solar/wind/alternator.  You boil water in a kettle on the stove (is that a discomfort?), you wash laundry ashore or in a bucket (Ok, the bucket counts as a discomfort), is lighting a propane stove a discomfort compared to electric (around here tons of folks spend tons of money on their house for the luxury of a natural gas stove).  I have a nice antique coffee grinder, it takes zero watts to run, is beautiful and a pleasure to use, there are tons of equivalents to this on the boat, where doing things different is part of the pleasure for me.  A generator is definitely not necessary.   On 2019-04-30 9:03 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   What really is the electrical capacity on a boat from solar, how far will that take you, and realistically, will one be running a generator and how much? Solar Power Generation: Based on some tests by the Wynns in Florida (latitude N26), two used "160W" panels (they have 6 of these), produced 15 Amps at "12V", at 14.4V from the panels, but we will say 12.8V from the batteries later because though the charge voltage is higher, the voltage at which the power comes out is lower.    That is 216 Watts in, 192 Watts of useful power out of the batteries later.   They also tested two new "140W" panels and produced 20 Amps at "12V", or about 288 Watts in, 256 Watts out later.   256/"280" = 91% useful power.   192/"320" = 60% useful power.   Same solar controller in both tests.  At latitude N44, I was seeing about 67% of ratings from the panels, before considering charging losses which for a perfect charge controller might be 60% useful power.    On my off-grid solar installation, I have huge reserve capacity, currently not that much generating capacity, and the vampire load is very low.   I would add panels if I were to increase expected daily loads.   The Wynns also did a lot of shading tests, simulating halyards (no appreciable difference) and the boom (much larger difference).   Lets assume this is a boat on the hook and one has put a preventer on the boom to make it not shade panels, and oriented the boat to get uninterrupted sun on the panels.   If I were designing a solar system for a boat today, for a monohull, I would go with the most power dense panels I could get -- lets say "320W" panels.   Lets say I have an arch over my davits and I am able to put three 40-inch wide panels flat above this arch -- that is a beam of 10 feet.   Lets assume 60% useful power.   That is 960 Watts * 60% = 576 Watts which is not much.. One only gets that during the day.   So one might get 3kWh of power per day from the panels -- based on not angling panels.   For someone who thinks they can run without a generator, that is the limit of power.   "Average use for a typical RVer is around 20 kWh a day.   .....  RVers parked in areas where they do not need air conditioning will use much less electricity than RVers who do need it.  In fact, the average amount of electricity used by people who are not running air conditioning is about 10 kWh a day.."  (1) There is one total power budget estimate.   Lets look at it from the components up: Loads: Required Unoccupied, trekking the country nearby while the boat is on anchor:  - Refrigeration: 300 kWh / year (modern, high efficiency, extra insulation for the tropics)   lets say 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Anchoring light (LED, 2 nm visibility, on a timer, 12 hour burn):  0.025 kWh/day   (3)    - Bilge Pump (500 gallons/day, 1 hour/day): 0.060 kWh/day (4)  - Most basic of computers offering Wifi and sensor monitoring to report alerts & email: 0.080 kWh/day (5 + estimate for dry contact and sensor system)   Minimum Occupied:  - Radio (hand held, listening):  0.020 kWh/day  (2)   - Interior Lights (LED):  0.050 kWh/day   - Recharging (Cell, shaver, shortwave receiver, flashlights, head lamps, miscellaneous): 0.050 kWh/day Voluntary Electronics:  - Netbook (4 hours):  0.100 kWh/day    - Full Laptop (4 hours): 0.300 kWh/day   - Display Screen (tv/monitor) (4 hours): 0.400 kWh//day  - DVD player (2 hours): 0.050 kWh/day Other:  - Pressurized water (per 100 liters -- usage for 1 day):  0.020 kWh/day (7)  - Freezer: 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Washing machine, 2 people:  0.400 kWh/day (one load every second day)  - Water maker (most efficient, per 100 liters/day): 0.400 kWh/day (6) Working on Boat:  - hand saw and driver drill for cabinetry work (1 hour run time/8 hour day): 1 kWh/day (experience)  - belt sander for finishing (6 hours run time/8 hour day): 7.2 kWh/day (experience) This is before using any electricity for cooking.   Looking at these conveniences ... pressurized water is a power bargain.   So, basic anchoring budget is 1.17 kWh / day -- solar will cover it with more than 100% to spare -- one 12V/100Ah battery unit at 50% DOD will carry it through the night.   On light overcast days, when one is getting 50% power, the system is still OK.   So one uses two 12V/100Ah units to keep the average DOD to 25%, to make sure it does not go much below 50% DOD in a stretch of moderately cloudy weather..      To go one week (hurricane overcast on a boat, a week of heavy overcast in winter in Canada) without significant sun, the battery bank must be 8.2 kWh -- which is 14 units of 12V/100Ah at 50% DOD -- that is a lot of batteries.   Rick's batteries, four times 12V/200Ah, 9.6 kWh, could handle this, just.   This is why I am interested in Rick's batteries -- they are about the minimum I would consider to have constant refrigeration, be it in a cottage or boat.   Speaking of refrigeration.  When one is not opening the fridge and adding things or taking things out, the power consumption of a fridge is inversely related to thickness of insulation.   As the largest power draw in an unoccupied space, I would consider a hyper-insulated fridge (I do not believe it is available, I was thinking DIY) to cut the power in half.   That allows Rick's batteries to run the system for close to 2 weeks without sun.   That I think would be a far better design for an off-grid cottage.   Ricks batteries would recharge in about 4 days after 2 weeks with heavy overcast.    If one had reliable sun every day, and particularly if the panels netted a little better than 60% useful power from their rating, then: 3.93 kWh/day -- based on 200 liters/day of water desalinated, and pressurized, laundry, freezer, and no voluntary electronics.  The solar panels could not reliably keep up.  In full sun, Rick's batteries would need a generator run of 10 hours once every 8 or 9 days.   From fully charged, after 2 days without sun, without a generator run, Rick's batteries would be exhausted.    Therefore, a pretty spartan existence, with a short shower daily, would be a strain without a daily generator run of about an hour on sunny days, and 4 hours a day on heavy overcast days.   (Assuming a Honda 1200W quiet generator outputting 1000W average.) Get rid of the freezer and one is just below what one would expect of the panels per day.   After just one day without sun, one would have to wait 2 weeks for the batteries to get back up to normal.   It is not reasonable to expect only 1 day of heavy clouds in each 2 weeks.   Therefore, even without the freezer, the solar panels would likely fall behind and regular generator running would be needed.  One could laminate flexible panels to the deck, but they are on average half the efficiency per unit area and, one really could not expect more than another 320 W of power to be conveniently placed. For those thinking that wind power will save them...  one would need an anchorage protected from waves, by say a submerged reef, and open to the wind -- so not like a closed bay.   Most small wind generators are rated for 40km/h, that is, they give their rated power at 40km/h wind speed.   They do not cut in until about 8 or 9 km/h.   Wind energy goes by the cube of the wind speed.   To generate half the rated output, one needs about 32 km/h of wind.   Half the rated output on a 400 Watt generator is 200 Watts.   Even if it is a tiringly windy anchorage, and the wind blows 24/7, that is only 4.8 kWh of power maximum theoretical, 4.2 kWh useful delivered to loads is more likely with charging inefficiency.  That is more than solar, but only if one assumes a tiringly windy anchorage.   If one wants the wind generator to total the same output as solar in 24 hours, one must have 27 kmph winds, 24/7.    Based on the theory that when it is not sunny the wind is blowing, to cover minimal loads (1.17kWh/day), one needs 20 km/h winds, 24/7 on cloudy days.     That is actually a reasonable expectation, on average, but not reliably.   | 35905|35854|2019-05-02 12:29:18|Matt Malone|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?| #ygrps-yiv-1215971156 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Trying to piece this together to learn something.... OK then, as one reduces RPM, the hp gap between the prop curve and engine curve increases -- the engine is capable of more than the prop.  Engine curves and prop curves both fall to zero at zero RPM, so, there is an RPM for the maximum difference between the curves, where the engine is producing the maximum spare horsepower beyond what the prop is using.  There is a range near that RPM where there is plenty of spare hp.   One might not be certain at a given moment what hp is being drawn by electric-clutch-driven-automatic accessories, or the alternator that is regulated by the regulator.  So I am guessing (so long as the prop is engaged) one should always operate the engine between the maximum hp gap RPM, and the prop-engine match RPM ? So as a procedure, in the case of automatically regulated load accessories: I am guessing one sets the engine for the maximum hp gap RPM, as a starting point, and then monitors the engine exhaust temperature (or sound by ear) for overload ? If one is well below temperature indicating underload (and sound by ear also indicates underload), then one increases RPM slightly toward the prop-engine match RPM ? If one is over-temperature at a given RPM indicating overload (or the sound by ear indicates overload), then one decreases the RPM toward the maximum hp gap RPM ? Would this be a practical way to operate a propulsion diesel with heavy, automatically-controlled accessories on it ? The maximum hp gap between the engine and prop curves gives another limit on the maximum hp that can be used by accessories.   Zoa Scott indicated the engine itself has a limit in the specs.   So one would have to keep below both these limits ... it seems ?   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 12:03 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     Because the power curve of the engine does not match that for the power absorption of a fixed pitch propeller, you only have one point where engine power and propeller absorption match (where the curves cross).  In order to prevent damage to the engine, this point is set at the maximum produced power.  When you install a new prop and check to make sure that the engine can still reach its maximum rpm, this is what you are doing.  So, at any engine speed below the max rpm, the propeller is absorbing less power than the engine would like to be producing for that rpm.  If all you are doing is adding a larger alternator, then you are unlikely to run into problems overloading the engine and are likely moving it to a more efficient part of the fuel consumption map.  Should you need max power out of then engine, install an ordinary switch in the field wire of your alternator or use an external regulator like a Balmar that has a small engine mode that allows you to reduce the alternator output. If you want to add more accessories, then you might want to be a bit more careful that you are not overloading the engine.  Check the power curves that are published for your engine.  Also, an exhaust temperature gauge is good insurance that you are not overloading the engine.  In reality, most of the accessories you would strap to the engine won't be on all the time.  A watermaker either has an electric clutch, or a simple manual engagement system like Brent has talked about.  The alternator load can be turned on and off easily.  Even a fridge compressor would have an electric clutch.  So, as long as you stay within the limits of allowable accessory loads on the crankshaft, you can add whatever you can find space to fit and still have a propeller matched to the maximum hp that the engine can produce. I'm not a diesel mechanic.  Just a guy that likes messing about with the technical side of boats and I try to share what I know here with the hope of helping someone out as others here have done for me.  Also, discussions here are a good way to find the limits of what I know and the cases where I'm just plain wrong. Cheers, Darren On 2019-05-01 4:29 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Thank you Zoa.  Also ignored, with parasitic loads, your (residual) torque-rpm characteristic cannot match the prop anymore if it match without parasitic loads. Matt From: Zoa Scott zoascott74@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 19:02 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Just a note incase its not widely known. All diesel engine manufacturers will let you know max allowable parasitic hp loads to be taken off crankshaft . Im a diesel mechanic by trade. If your running mutiple gizmos they are usually installed opposing each other if belt driven. Zoa  On Wed, May 1, 2019, 5:20 AM Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats], wrote:   Excellent point Darren, I had not considered drive belt load on the crankshaft bearing from all these extras.  My engine is not well set up for extra driven components so I had been toying with the idea of a pony shaft just to run components from.   But even then, if one is pulling 10,000W off the pony shaft (3,000W for each of the alternator, semihermetic compressor and watermaker pump plus surge margin) then a lot of design calculation and checking for what is easily available has go into the power transmission link between the engine and pony shaft..  Is a motorcycle drive cogged belt that custom bikes use between the engine and transmission ... is that the easiest?   I don't know.  Is it better to put one extra to the right, another to the left so they balance bearing loads, except for the little torque caused by the separation between the plane of the two belts?    Is there room to put one extra below the crankshaft to balance a triad... there might be on my boat. Really good point.  Last thing one wants to do is reduce the life of the primary engine. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 01:21 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Agreed, and I enjoyed your embellishment of the idea Matt  :-)  The one thing you have to look out for is how heavily you load the crankshaft bearing.  The manufacturers tend to be a bit cagey about what is tolerable.  If I had a water pump for a watermaker and a big alternator, I'd try and mount them opposed by 180 degrees.  Most marine engines die from corrosion and lack of use.  While you wouldn't want to idle one to charge the batteries, just about any other use is likely to make it last longer. On 2019-04-30 1:47 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Absolutely agreed Darren, if people do not have refrigeration, they should remain in that blissful place.   Absolutely agreed Darren, if you include running the propulsion engine as different from running a dedicated engine to generate electricity.   Perhaps I should change the title to "Run a fuel engine to make electricity sometimes, or Not".   Engine or Generator -- seems the same thing to me.  It was easier to do the calculations with a 1200W Honda.. What you said about running the propulsion engine for two purposes is absolutely of advantage.   Thank you for telling me about the "small engine" regulators ... I want one.   Absolutely true, propulsion engines are usually diesel, more efficient, marine-ized so they last longer in a boat environment, whereas generators are, well, inexpensive if they are gasoline and not marine-ized.   But chances are, the outboard on the tender is gasoline so, one probably has gasoline on board in any case.   It is absolutely true for some boats and some owners that running the engine will come at about the same frequency as one would normally need to top up the batteries.   But then this tempo will get ingrained.  When one gets somewhere they really like and want to stay for a while, the tempo will make one feel itchy to go somewhere on a certain schedule or face the prospect of just running the engine just to make electricity, which more than a few cruisers complain is inefficient and irritating to them..   Where sails are a redundancy to the propulsion engine, there is no redundancy to an alternator if any one of a dozen things goes wrong with the propulsion engine.   The propulsion engine has a limited service lifetime and a chance of other failures, every hour it runs.   If something goes wrong with the engine, you are talking about boat yoga in tight spaces if you are a DIY type, on-site diesel mechanics ($$), and worst case a $10,000-$15,000 bill and a crane to replace it.   Yikes, I am not running that sucker just to make electricity.  As for incidental electricity... I sail differently.   My sails are my propulsion.  I have used as little as 12 litres of fuel in year, and there is no such thing as a wind where my boat is slower than a cottage.   My engine is my backup to my sails.   Naturally, good seamanship dictates caution and to some that points only to the engine.  If that is the way it has to be, OK.   But waiting to go in until the wind and tide are favourable is also seamanship, and then the engine and its full tank of fuel is still there in reserve.    Many times I start the engine and just let it idle for the decisive couple of minutes as I sail nearly all the way in -- it is there in an instant for oh-crap moments..      At least with a 1200 Watt generator, there is no issue of charge rate, they are really quiet out of the box, and can be made quieter with a little DIY..   If something goes wrong with the generator, I had always assumed that in a pinch I would have the 20,000 Watt propulsion engine was the backup to the generator, even though it is inefficient and straining to the electrical system unless it is used for something else at the same time.   If something goes wrong with the generator, it never be a big bill.  I carry it ashore to a small engine repair place, or buy another one.  In the meantime, so long as the generator works, one runs their engine only when necessary, keeping its hours down.   So it is down to wear and tear on the engine, or a disposable substitute to change fuel into electricity.  I would never NOT have a portable generator.    I am really not disputing anything you are saying Darren, some people will find what you describe to be the simplest course of action.   I am just giving the other side of what some other boats might do.   But lets run with your idea, a very good one, to have a 210A bus alternator running directly off the propulsion engine to take advantage of the huge surplus of mechanical power available that one might borrow from when moving the boat.   But, if you are going to do that....  - if you have an external regulator, is it not possible with the flip of an appropriately-wired switch to turn this into an unbelievable weldernator ?   One is never doing that with a 1200W Honda.   Even Rick's batteries, and a little inverter welder, that is a joke compared to this T-rex of weldernators.   You could do half inch plate with 5/32" rod and really feel like you are accomplishing something.   If you have never tried 5/32 rod, you really have to, just for fun, on 3/16" or thicker steel.   Have 100 feet of cables, and industrial fenders and raft up to commercial boats and do a little commercial welding.   I want one.  Really, I do..    - why stop at a 210A alternator -- connect up a high pressure pump with a couple of one-way valves so your water maker runs electric off one pump or directly from the engine from the other pump -- for just the cost of a second pump, you are creating redundancy.   Drawing the same torque as the alternator, the engine-powered watermaker could put out 200 gallons per hour, assuming one has suitable osmosis media.   The efficiency would be awesome, diesel directly driving the pump skips the following filters of efficiency: claw-style armature alternator 75-80%, battery charging 90%, electric motor 80-90% -- combined total 54%-65% efficiency.  One avoids all that by going straight off the engine.   Then one also has the alternative to make water with the engine if the electric pump ever fails.   I sure am thinking about doing this..  - why stop there ... If the water tanks fill before one is finished motoring, start filling the bathtub and have a good celebratory soak in the tub to prepare for going out on the town at the new destination.  Your 20,000 Watt motor is easily producing 25,000 Watts of heat so, that tub can be nice and toasty warm with just a few valves and a little hose.   This is just a given, I am definitely having an engine-heat option to my hot water tank.   - Heck why stop there ... turn down the flow rate so the fresh water comes out at full exhaust temperature and fill your teapot.   There is a lot of comfort possible here.    I don't like tea that much so, no.    - If there is still a surplus of fresh water, start filling all those water jerry cans most boats have -- over stock and then turn off the electric water maker -- run the engine today, save Amps tomorrow.   I sure would do this.      - why stop there ... put a semi-hermetic compressor on the engine and hook it up to a big-ass ice maker -- freeze a fraction that 200 GPH pouring out of the water maker and get rid of the need for both refrigeration and freezer (save the brine waste from water making ... ice+brine = -17C in a cold plate).    Says that man with a great big ice chest ... pull it out, or add a compressor to the engine ... open question.    - why stop there ... Just keep making ice, and put hundreds of pounds of ice in a stainless cabinet inside an adjustable-vent wood cabinet, with a drip pan under the stainless cabinet -- a DIY dehumidifier.   This is probably beyond the electrical power budget for most boats, so, what a luxury.   Dry gallons an hour.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Have the melt-water drain for the stainless cabinet run through a cooling coil along the cabinet ceiling and back down into the fresh water tanks -- step one air conditioning, for the price of pumping water a few feet -- we have already established, that is bargain compared to AC.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Not cool enough? Open vents in the side of the wood cabinet and blow air in there to both get more cool air and accelerate melting.   Glorious air conditioning -- not even a cat could manage that on solar.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... they have these cooking appliances, called muff pots, better than instant pots, and they are *ZERO* Watts:  http://cs.amsnow.com/sno/b/news/archive/2015/04/09/snacker-packer-meals-made-easy.aspx Cooking on a snowmobile made easy - American Snowmobiler Magazine - Snowmobile forums, news, Polaris, Ski-Doo, Arctic Cat & Yamaha reviews - AmSnow.com American Snowmobiler Magazine presents news, reviews, forums, videos, photos and the latest stats and prices for Arctic Cat, Ski-Doo, Yamaha and Polaris snowmobiles. cs.amsnow.com If one has never cooked on the exhaust of an engine ...   Heck with all that, one solar panel would run the radio and the nav lights, nav, etc.   If co-generating electricity by depending on running a 20,000 Watt engine with any frequency is how some boaters will do it, then co-generating everything else that would otherwise require electricity, or would generate comfort is worth mentioning too.   So when it comes down to it, same answer:  On a monohull, one is running an engine sometimes, but there is a lot of room for innovation, taste, preferences and different ways to meet the power budget.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:59 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     For everyone who has a simple boat without refrigeration/freezer, you probably wonder why everyone is so concerned about how to generate enough power from solar.  Your life is simple and there is no reason to read the rest of this. Matt, that's a pretty reasonable analysis, and would fit some boats.  There are certainly boats that manage these comforts on lower watts.  The obvious area for improvement is refrigeration, any efficiencies gained here is money better spent than money spent on power generation (solar and generators).  I came to the conclusion that 4" of styrofoam insulation for the fridge and 6" for the freezer was the minimum to make DC refrigeration work on a reasonable energy budget.  50 to 125 Ah per day is what 12v DC refrigeration generally uses per day.  The differences are almost entirely due to insulation, next due to the size of the fridge/freezer.  If you can get closer to 50Ah per day your energy budget changes drastically.  I decided a spillover design fridge freezer, custom built to maximize insulation was the best way to go in my build.  Aspen Aerogel is an interesting material here.  However, polystyrene foam is easy to work, cheap, readily available, and absorbs water less than the other foam insulation choices. Your energy budget doesn't consider engine run time and power from the alternator at all.  A boat that moves even just once or twice a week can reduce/eliminate its need for generator run time by super-sizing its alternator.  I've ordered a Leece-Neville 210A school bus alternator.  It should run happily at 170A continuous, perhaps a bit more with careful attention to cooling.  This is a win-win situation, getting power from the alternator is more efficient than from a generator.  With a fixed pitch prop you're running at an inefficient part of the power curve of the diesel at cruising rpm.  The extra load the alternator moves the engine into a more efficient part of the fuel map, that improvement in efficiency means that part of the fuel consumed by the alternator comes for free as your making the engine more efficient at the same time you make carbon buildup problems less likely.  Even if you have a smaller diesel you could fit an alternator this size.  If you need maximum propulsion power at some point, an external regulator like a Balmar Mc-614 used with a switch for small engine mode (field output reduced to 50%) allows you to get most of the power from the engine for propulsion when necessary.  You could also just put a plain switch in the field wire to the alt for a inexpensive solution, although charging at these high currents you probably want an external regulator anyway.  It should be noted that this solution relies on batteries that can accept pretty high charge rates.  This would be LiPO4, Firefly >AGM>very large flooded lead acid bank.  A small flooded-lead-acid bank probably won't be able to accept the high charge rate for long enough for a large alternator to do a lot of good.  The LiPO4 and the Firefly also have the advantage that they are totally happy in a partial state of charge and can stay there without damage until you are ready to move to the next anchorage (within reasonable time limits and state of charge limits).  You should switch to a serpentine belt to run a large alternator like a Delco Remy 28SI or a Leece Neville Idle Pro. There are two ways of looking at comfort while cruising.  Your comfort could come from plugging in whatever you want whenever you want.  However, this comes with the discomfort of noise from the generator, discomfort getting/storing fuel for the generator (especially bad for gasoline generators),  discomfort from getting/storing oil for the generator, the discomfort from generator oil changes, discomfort from trying to source generator parts in some distant port, discomfort from getting shunned by the cruisers who can't stand the noise of your generator.  On the flip side, if you design a boat with conservation in mind, it is possible to run almost entirely on solar.  I've met more than one boat (with refrigeration and watermaker) that runs successfully with just solar/wind/alternator.  You boil water in a kettle on the stove (is that a discomfort?), you wash laundry ashore or in a bucket (Ok, the bucket counts as a discomfort), is lighting a propane stove a discomfort compared to electric (around here tons of folks spend tons of money on their house for the luxury of a natural gas stove).  I have a nice antique coffee grinder, it takes zero watts to run, is beautiful and a pleasure to use, there are tons of equivalents to this on the boat, where doing things different is part of the pleasure for me.  A generator is definitely not necessary.   On 2019-04-30 9:03 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   What really is the electrical capacity on a boat from solar, how far will that take you, and realistically, will one be running a generator and how much? Solar Power Generation: Based on some tests by the Wynns in Florida (latitude N26), two used "160W" panels (they have 6 of these), produced 15 Amps at "12V", at 14.4V from the panels, but we will say 12.8V from the batteries later because though the charge voltage is higher, the voltage at which the power comes out is lower.    That is 216 Watts in, 192 Watts of useful power out of the batteries later.   They also tested two new "140W" panels and produced 20 Amps at "12V", or about 288 Watts in, 256 Watts out later.   256/"280" = 91% useful power.   192/"320" = 60% useful power.   Same solar controller in both tests.  At latitude N44, I was seeing about 67% of ratings from the panels, before considering charging losses which for a perfect charge controller might be 60% useful power.    On my off-grid solar installation, I have huge reserve capacity, currently not that much generating capacity, and the vampire load is very low.   I would add panels if I were to increase expected daily loads.   The Wynns also did a lot of shading tests, simulating halyards (no appreciable difference) and the boom (much larger difference).   Lets assume this is a boat on the hook and one has put a preventer on the boom to make it not shade panels, and oriented the boat to get uninterrupted sun on the panels.   If I were designing a solar system for a boat today, for a monohull, I would go with the most power dense panels I could get -- lets say "320W" panels.   Lets say I have an arch over my davits and I am able to put three 40-inch wide panels flat above this arch -- that is a beam of 10 feet.   Lets assume 60% useful power.   That is 960 Watts * 60% = 576 Watts which is not much.. One only gets that during the day.   So one might get 3kWh of power per day from the panels -- based on not angling panels.   For someone who thinks they can run without a generator, that is the limit of power.   "Average use for a typical RVer is around 20 kWh a day.   .....  RVers parked in areas where they do not need air conditioning will use much less electricity than RVers who do need it.  In fact, the average amount of electricity used by people who are not running air conditioning is about 10 kWh a day.."  (1) There is one total power budget estimate.   Lets look at it from the components up: Loads: Required Unoccupied, trekking the country nearby while the boat is on anchor:  - Refrigeration: 300 kWh / year (modern, high efficiency, extra insulation for the tropics)   lets say 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Anchoring light (LED, 2 nm visibility, on a timer, 12 hour burn):  0.025 kWh/day   (3)    - Bilge Pump (500 gallons/day, 1 hour/day): 0.060 kWh/day (4)  - Most basic of computers offering Wifi and sensor monitoring to report alerts & email: 0.080 kWh/day (5 + estimate for dry contact and sensor system)   Minimum Occupied:  - Radio (hand held, listening):  0.020 kWh/day  (2)   - Interior Lights (LED):  0.050 kWh/day   - Recharging (Cell, shaver, shortwave receiver, flashlights, head lamps, miscellaneous): 0.050 kWh/day Voluntary Electronics:  - Netbook (4 hours):  0.100 kWh/day    - Full Laptop (4 hours): 0.300 kWh/day   - Display Screen (tv/monitor) (4 hours): 0.400 kWh//day  - DVD player (2 hours): 0.050 kWh/day Other:  - Pressurized water (per 100 liters -- usage for 1 day):  0.020 kWh/day (7)  - Freezer: 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Washing machine, 2 people:  0.400 kWh/day (one load every second day)  - Water maker (most efficient, per 100 liters/day): 0.400 kWh/day (6) Working on Boat:  - hand saw and driver drill for cabinetry work (1 hour run time/8 hour day): 1 kWh/day (experience)  - belt sander for finishing (6 hours run time/8 hour day): 7.2 kWh/day (experience) This is before using any electricity for cooking.   Looking at these conveniences ... pressurized water is a power bargain.   So, basic anchoring budget is 1.17 kWh / day -- solar will cover it with more than 100% to spare -- one 12V/100Ah battery unit at 50% DOD will carry it through the night.   On light overcast days, when one is getting 50% power, the system is still OK.   So one uses two 12V/100Ah units to keep the average DOD to 25%, to make sure it does not go much below 50% DOD in a stretch of moderately cloudy weather..      To go one week (hurricane overcast on a boat, a week of heavy overcast in winter in Canada) without significant sun, the battery bank must be 8.2 kWh -- which is 14 units of 12V/100Ah at 50% DOD -- that is a lot of batteries.   Rick's batteries, four times 12V/200Ah, 9.6 kWh, could handle this, just.   This is why I am interested in Rick's batteries -- they are about the minimum I would consider to have constant refrigeration, be it in a cottage or boat.   Speaking of refrigeration.  When one is not opening the fridge and adding things or taking things out, the power consumption of a fridge is inversely related to thickness of insulation.   As the largest power draw in an unoccupied space, I would consider a hyper-insulated fridge (I do not believe it is available, I was thinking DIY) to cut the power in half.   That allows Rick's batteries to run the system for close to 2 weeks without sun.   That I think would be a far better design for an off-grid cottage.   Ricks batteries would recharge in about 4 days after 2 weeks with heavy overcast.    If one had reliable sun every day, and particularly if the panels netted a little better than 60% useful power from their rating, then: 3.93 kWh/day -- based on 200 liters/day of water desalinated, and pressurized, laundry, freezer, and no voluntary electronics.  The solar panels could not reliably keep up.  In full sun, Rick's batteries would need a generator run of 10 hours once every 8 or 9 days.   From fully charged, after 2 days without sun, without a generator run, Rick's batteries would be exhausted.    Therefore, a pretty spartan existence, with a short shower daily, would be a strain without a daily generator run of about an hour on sunny days, and 4 hours a day on heavy overcast days.   (Assuming a Honda 1200W quiet generator outputting 1000W average.) Get rid of the freezer and one is just below what one would expect of the panels per day.   After just one day without sun, one would have to wait 2 weeks for the batteries to get back up to normal.   It is not reasonable to expect only 1 day of heavy clouds in each 2 weeks.   Therefore, even without the freezer, the solar panels would likely fall behind and regular generator running would be needed.  One could laminate flexible panels to the deck, but they are on average half the efficiency per unit area and, one really could not expect more than another 320 W of power to be conveniently placed. For those thinking that wind power will save them...  one would need an anchorage protected from waves, by say a submerged reef, and open to the wind -- so not like a closed bay.   Most small wind generators are rated for 40km/h, that is, they give their rated power at 40km/h wind speed.   They do not cut in until about 8 or 9 km/h.   Wind energy goes by the cube of the wind speed.   To generate half the rated output, one needs about 32 km/h of wind.   Half the rated output on a 400 Watt generator is 200 Watts.   Even if it is a tiringly windy anchorage, and the wind blows 24/7, that is only 4.8 kWh of power maximum theoretical, 4.2 kWh useful delivered to loads is more likely with charging inefficiency.  That is more than solar, but only if one assumes a tiringly windy anchorage.   If one wants the wind generator to total the same output as solar in 24 hours, one must have 27 kmph winds, 24/7.    Based on the theory that when it is not sunny the wind is blowing, to cover minimal loads (1.17kWh/day), one needs 20 km/h winds, 24/7 on cloudy days.     That is actually a reasonable expectation, on average, but not reliably.   Generator Inevitable Therefore, one should expect to use a generator on a cruising boat at least from time to time.   Now the question is how big and how long.  (I like the little 1200W Hondas .... they are very quiet.)   Taking a 1200W at 80% load, that is one hour of daily generator running for each kWh of extra consumption one has.  A freezer -- average an hour a day extra.  If one has AC, the RV example would have one run the generator for the entire daylight hours.     This is assuming all cooking appliances run from fuel.   If one assumes a sum total of 2 hours running 1800W (kettle, toaster oven, or single element hot plate), that is 3-4 kWh/day, 3-4 more hours of running the generator. Cat vs. Monohull.... Now, the Wynns have 11 solar panels on their cat.   If they upgraded them all to 320W panels (physically a bit larger, but also more efficient), and assuming 60% useful power, that is about 12.5 kWh / day ... I cannot say anything about their power usage, or their total average power received on their panels, but, it would seem a cat has a much better chance of being able to reliably handle reasonable hotel loads on solar alone.   Looking to the RV example, with no A, a Cat is the minimum unit of cruising boat to have an average RV experience without the need to run a generator every day -- certainly one will have a generator, certainly it will be run frequently in the average 2-week period to account for shortages of sun, but, it will not be run with certainty every single day just to meet average needs.      I did this calculation long ago, and that is why, some time ago, I encouraged Brent to come out of retirement and design an orgami cat, say based on a pair of 31 hulls, maybe with less beam (or maybe not), to each hull.    The hulls could each be a long, shallow draft single keel for even more shallow boat draft than the monohull twin keeler.   An origami Cat could compete with RVs as a lifestyle cruising boat where the entire world is available.    There are about 350,000-500,000 RVs sold each year worldwide(?) (9).  There are about 2,500 cruising boats sold in the US each year and about 2,000 sailboats of all sizes, including daysailers sold (8).   Monohulls are small on the inside compared to a modest RV.   Small = reduced comfort.   While there are many factors keeping the boat market about 200 times smaller, comfort is something that can be addressed.  Flip the Other Way -- Why Have Solar at All? (Message over 64 KB, truncated) | 35906|35854|2019-05-02 12:46:13|wild_explorer|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?|Darren, you are very good for a "guy who just messing with the engines". Many mechanics do not know what you know and how to match engine and prop to get maximum fuel efficiency and run diesel at maximum load to prolong its life. Not enough load is the main killer of a diesel engine  ;-) Another one is shutting down the engine after high RPM operation without giving proper time for idling to cool engine off.I second:- Learn your engine Power and Fuel Consumption curves.- Matching prop and engine is tricky, You need to account for extra load when weather is bad, which puts extra load on the engine (that where you need to go into full RPM). Cruising RPMs should be at the point of most economical fuel consumption on the curve.- sometimes this means that you may need bigger engine that you may expect OR another engine which have different Power and Fuel Consumption curve.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Because the power curve of the engine does not match that for the power absorption of a fixed pitch propeller, you only have one point where engine power and propeller absorption match (where the curves cross).  In order to prevent damage to the engine, this point is set at the maximum produced power.  When you install a new prop and check to make sure that the engine can still reach its maximum rpm, this is what you are doing.  So, at any engine speed below the max rpm, the propeller is absorbing less power than the engine would like to be producing for that rpm.  If all you are doing is adding a larger alternator, then you are unlikely to run into problems overloading the engine and are likely moving it to a more efficient part of the fuel consumption map.  Should you need max power out of then engine, install an ordinary switch in the field wire of your alternator or use an external regulator like a Balmar that has a small engine mode that allows you to reduce the alternator output. If you want to add more accessories, then you might want to be a bit more careful that you are not overloading the engine.  Check the power curves that are published for your engine.  Also, an exhaust temperature gauge is good insurance that you are not overloading the engine.  In reality, most of the accessories you would strap to the engine won't be on all the time.  A watermaker either has an electric clutch, or a simple manual engagement system like Brent has talked about.  The alternator load can be turned on and off easily.  Even a fridge compressor would have an electric clutch.  So, as long as you stay within the limits of allowable accessory loads on the crankshaft, you can add whatever you can find space to fit and still have a propeller matched to the maximum hp that the engine can produce. I'm not a diesel mechanic.  Just a guy that likes messing about with the technical side of boats and I try to share what I know here with the hope of helping someone out as others here have done for me.  Also, discussions here are a good way to find the limits of what I know and the cases where I'm just plain wrong. Cheers, Darren On 2019-05-01 4:29 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Thank you Zoa.  Also ignored, with parasitic loads, your (residual) torque-rpm characteristic cannot match the prop anymore if it match without parasitic loads. Matt From: Zoa Scott zoascott74@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 19:02 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Just a note incase its not widely known. All diesel engine manufacturers will let you know max allowable parasitic hp loads to be taken off crankshaft . Im a diesel mechanic by trade. If your running mutiple gizmos they are usually installed opposing each other if belt driven. Zoa  On Wed, May 1, 2019, 5:20 AM Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats], wrote:   Excellent point Darren, I had not considered drive belt load on the crankshaft bearing from all these extras.  My engine is not well set up for extra driven components so I had been toying with the idea of a pony shaft just to run components from.   But even then, if one is pulling 10,000W off the pony shaft (3,000W for each of the alternator, semihermetic compressor and watermaker pump plus surge margin) then a lot of design calculation and checking for what is easily available has go into the power transmission link between the engine and pony shaft..  Is a motorcycle drive cogged belt that custom bikes use between the engine and transmission ... is that the easiest?   I don't know.  Is it better to put one extra to the right, another to the left so they balance bearing loads, except for the little torque caused by the separation between the plane of the two belts?    Is there room to put one extra below the crankshaft to balance a triad... there might be on my boat. Really good point.  Last thing one wants to do is reduce the life of the primary engine. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 01:21 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Agreed, and I enjoyed your embellishment of the idea Matt  :-)  The one thing you have to look out for is how heavily you load the crankshaft bearing.  The manufacturers tend to be a bit cagey about what is tolerable.  If I had a water pump for a watermaker and a big alternator, I'd try and mount them opposed by 180 degrees.  Most marine engines die from corrosion and lack of use.  While you wouldn't want to idle one to charge the batteries, just about any other use is likely to make it last longer. On 2019-04-30 1:47 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Absolutely agreed Darren, if people do not have refrigeration, they should remain in that blissful place.   Absolutely agreed Darren, if you include running the propulsion engine as different from running a dedicated engine to generate electricity.   Perhaps I should change the title to "Run a fuel engine to make electricity sometimes, or Not".   Engine or Generator -- seems the same thing to me.  It was easier to do the calculations with a 1200W Honda.. What you said about running the propulsion engine for two purposes is absolutely of advantage.   Thank you for telling me about the "small engine" regulators ... I want one.   Absolutely true, propulsion engines are usually diesel, more efficient, marine-ized so they last longer in a boat environment, whereas generators are, well, inexpensive if they are gasoline and not marine-ized.   But chances are, the outboard on the tender is gasoline so, one probably has gasoline on board in any case.   It is absolutely true for some boats and some owners that running the engine will come at about the same frequency as one would normally need to top up the batteries.   But then this tempo will get ingrained.  When one gets somewhere they really like and want to stay for a while, the tempo will make one feel itchy to go somewhere on a certain schedule or face the prospect of just running the engine just to make electricity, which more than a few cruisers complain is inefficient and irritating to them..   Where sails are a redundancy to the propulsion engine, there is no redundancy to an alternator if any one of a dozen things goes wrong with the propulsion engine.   The propulsion engine has a limited service lifetime and a chance of other failures, every hour it runs.   If something goes wrong with the engine, you are talking about boat yoga in tight spaces if you are a DIY type, on-site diesel mechanics ($$), and worst case a $10,000-$15,000 bill and a crane to replace it.   Yikes, I am not running that sucker just to make electricity.  As for incidental electricity... I sail differently.   My sails are my propulsion.  I have used as little as 12 litres of fuel in year, and there is no such thing as a wind where my boat is slower than a cottage.   My engine is my backup to my sails.   Naturally, good seamanship dictates caution and to some that points only to the engine.  If that is the way it has to be, OK.   But waiting to go in until the wind and tide are favourable is also seamanship, and then the engine and its full tank of fuel is still there in reserve.    Many times I start the engine and just let it idle for the decisive couple of minutes as I sail nearly all the way in -- it is there in an instant for oh-crap moments..      At least with a 1200 Watt generator, there is no issue of charge rate, they are really quiet out of the box, and can be made quieter with a little DIY..   If something goes wrong with the generator, I had always assumed that in a pinch I would have the 20,000 Watt propulsion engine was the backup to the generator, even though it is inefficient and straining to the electrical system unless it is used for something else at the same time.   If something goes wrong with the generator, it never be a big bill.  I carry it ashore to a small engine repair place, or buy another one.  In the meantime, so long as the generator works, one runs their engine only when necessary, keeping its hours down.   So it is down to wear and tear on the engine, or a disposable substitute to change fuel into electricity.  I would never NOT have a portable generator.    I am really not disputing anything you are saying Darren, some people will find what you describe to be the simplest course of action.   I am just giving the other side of what some other boats might do.   But lets run with your idea, a very good one, to have a 210A bus alternator running directly off the propulsion engine to take advantage of the huge surplus of mechanical power available that one might borrow from when moving the boat.   But, if you are going to do that....  - if you have an external regulator, is it not possible with the flip of an appropriately-wired switch to turn this into an unbelievable weldernator ?   One is never doing that with a 1200W Honda.   Even Rick's batteries, and a little inverter welder, that is a joke compared to this T-rex of weldernators.   You could do half inch plate with 5/32" rod and really feel like you are accomplishing something.   If you have never tried 5/32 rod, you really have to, just for fun, on 3/16" or thicker steel.   Have 100 feet of cables, and industrial fenders and raft up to commercial boats and do a little commercial welding.   I want one.  Really, I do..    - why stop at a 210A alternator -- connect up a high pressure pump with a couple of one-way valves so your water maker runs electric off one pump or directly from the engine from the other pump -- for just the cost of a second pump, you are creating redundancy.   Drawing the same torque as the alternator, the engine-powered watermaker could put out 200 gallons per hour, assuming one has suitable osmosis media.   The efficiency would be awesome, diesel directly driving the pump skips the following filters of efficiency: claw-style armature alternator 75-80%, battery charging 90%, electric motor 80-90% -- combined total 54%-65% efficiency.  One avoids all that by going straight off the engine.   Then one also has the alternative to make water with the engine if the electric pump ever fails.   I sure am thinking about doing this..  - why stop there ... If the water tanks fill before one is finished motoring, start filling the bathtub and have a good celebratory soak in the tub to prepare for going out on the town at the new destination.  Your 20,000 Watt motor is easily producing 25,000 Watts of heat so, that tub can be nice and toasty warm with just a few valves and a little hose.   This is just a given, I am definitely having an engine-heat option to my hot water tank.   - Heck why stop there ... turn down the flow rate so the fresh water comes out at full exhaust temperature and fill your teapot.   There is a lot of comfort possible here.    I don't like tea that much so, no.    - If there is still a surplus of fresh water, start filling all those water jerry cans most boats have -- over stock and then turn off the electric water maker -- run the engine today, save Amps tomorrow.   I sure would do this.      - why stop there ... put a semi-hermetic compressor on the engine and hook it up to a big-ass ice maker -- freeze a fraction that 200 GPH pouring out of the water maker and get rid of the need for both refrigeration and freezer (save the brine waste from water making ... ice+brine = -17C in a cold plate).    Says that man with a great big ice chest ... pull it out, or add a compressor to the engine ... open question.    - why stop there ... Just keep making ice, and put hundreds of pounds of ice in a stainless cabinet inside an adjustable-vent wood cabinet, with a drip pan under the stainless cabinet -- a DIY dehumidifier.   This is probably beyond the electrical power budget for most boats, so, what a luxury.   Dry gallons an hour.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Have the melt-water drain for the stainless cabinet run through a cooling coil along the cabinet ceiling and back down into the fresh water tanks -- step one air conditioning, for the price of pumping water a few feet -- we have already established, that is bargain compared to AC.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Not cool enough? Open vents in the side of the wood cabinet and blow air in there to both get more cool air and accelerate melting.   Glorious air conditioning -- not even a cat could manage that on solar.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... they have these cooking appliances, called muff pots, better than instant pots, and they are *ZERO* Watts:  http://cs.amsnow.com/sno/b/news/archive/2015/04/09/snacker-packer-meals-made-easy.aspx Cooking on a snowmobile made easy - American Snowmobiler Magazine - Snowmobile forums, news, Polaris, Ski-Doo, Arctic Cat & Yamaha reviews - AmSnow.com American Snowmobiler Magazine presents news, reviews, forums, videos, photos and the latest stats and prices for Arctic Cat, Ski-Doo, Yamaha and Polaris snowmobiles. cs.amsnow.com If one has never cooked on the exhaust of an engine ...   Heck with all that, one solar panel would run the radio and the nav lights, nav, etc.   If co-generating electricity by depending on running a 20,000 Watt engine with any frequency is how some boaters will do it, then co-generating everything else that would otherwise require electricity, or would generate comfort is worth mentioning too.   So when it comes down to it, same answer:  On a monohull, one is running an engine sometimes, but there is a lot of room for innovation, taste, preferences and different ways to meet the power budget.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:59 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     For everyone who has a simple boat without refrigeration/freezer, you probably wonder why everyone is so concerned about how to generate enough power from solar.  Your life is simple and there is no reason to read the rest of this. Matt, that's a pretty reasonable analysis, and would fit some boats.  There are certainly boats that manage these comforts on lower watts.  The obvious area for improvement is refrigeration, any efficiencies gained here is money better spent than money spent on power generation (solar and generators).  I came to the conclusion that 4" of styrofoam insulation for the fridge and 6" for the freezer was the minimum to make DC refrigeration work on a reasonable energy budget.  50 to 125 Ah per day is what 12v DC refrigeration generally uses per day.  The differences are almost entirely due to insulation, next due to the size of the fridge/freezer.  If you can get closer to 50Ah per day your energy budget changes drastically.  I decided a spillover design fridge freezer, custom built to maximize insulation was the best way to go in my build.  Aspen Aerogel is an interesting material here.  However, polystyrene foam is easy to work, cheap, readily available, and absorbs water less than the other foam insulation choices. Your energy budget doesn't consider engine run time and power from the alternator at all.  A boat that moves even just once or twice a week can reduce/eliminate its need for generator run time by super-sizing its alternator.  I've ordered a Leece-Neville 210A school bus alternator.  It should run happily at 170A continuous, perhaps a bit more with careful attention to cooling.  This is a win-win situation, getting power from the alternator is more efficient than from a generator.  With a fixed pitch prop you're running at an inefficient part of the power curve of the diesel at cruising rpm.  The extra load the alternator moves the engine into a more efficient part of the fuel map, that improvement in efficiency means that part of the fuel consumed by the alternator comes for free as your making the engine more efficient at the same time you make carbon buildup problems less likely.  Even if you have a smaller diesel you could fit an alternator this size.  If you need maximum propulsion power at some point, an external regulator like a Balmar Mc-614 used with a switch for small engine mode (field output reduced to 50%) allows you to get most of the power from the engine for propulsion when necessary.  You could also just put a plain switch in the field wire to the alt for a inexpensive solution, although charging at these high currents you probably want an external regulator anyway.  It should be noted that this solution relies on batteries that can accept pretty high charge rates.  This would be LiPO4, Firefly >AGM>very large flooded lead acid bank.  A small flooded-lead-acid bank probably won't be able to accept the high charge rate for long enough for a large alternator to do a lot of good.  The LiPO4 and the Firefly also have the advantage that they are totally happy in a partial state of charge and can stay there without damage until you are ready to move to the next anchorage (within reasonable time limits and state of charge limits).  You should switch to a serpentine belt to run a large alternator like a Delco Remy 28SI or a Leece Neville Idle Pro. There are two ways of looking at comfort while cruising.  Your comfort could come from plugging in whatever you want whenever you want.  However, this comes with the discomfort of noise from the generator, discomfort getting/storing fuel for the generator (especially bad for gasoline generators),  discomfort from getting/storing oil for the generator, the discomfort from generator oil changes, discomfort from trying to source generator parts in some distant port, discomfort from getting shunned by the cruisers who can't stand the noise of your generator.  On the flip side, if you design a boat with conservation in mind, it is possible to run almost entirely on solar.  I've met more than one boat (with refrigeration and watermaker) that runs successfully with just solar/wind/alternator.  You boil water in a kettle on the stove (is that a discomfort?), you wash laundry ashore or in a bucket (Ok, the bucket counts as a discomfort), is lighting a propane stove a discomfort compared to electric (around here tons of folks spend tons of money on their house for the luxury of a natural gas stove).  I have a nice antique coffee grinder, it takes zero watts to run, is beautiful and a pleasure to use, there are tons of equivalents to this on the boat, where doing things different is part of the pleasure for me.  A generator is definitely not necessary.   On 2019-04-30 9:03 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   What really is the electrical capacity on a boat from solar, how far will that take you, and realistically, will one be running a generator and how much? Solar Power Generation: Based on some tests by the Wynns in Florida (latitude N26), two used "160W" panels (they have 6 of these), produced 15 Amps at "12V", at 14.4V from the panels, but we will say 12.8V from the batteries later because though the charge voltage is higher, the voltage at which the power comes out is lower.    That is 216 Watts in, 192 Watts of useful power out of the batteries later.   They also tested two new "140W" panels and produced 20 Amps at "12V", or about 288 Watts in, 256 Watts out later.   256/"280" = 91% useful power.   192/"320" = 60% useful power.   Same solar controller in both tests.  At latitude N44, I was seeing about 67% of ratings from the panels, before considering charging losses which for a perfect charge controller might be 60% useful power.    On my off-grid solar installation, I have huge reserve capacity, currently not that much generating capacity, and the vampire load is very low.   I would add panels if I were to increase expected daily loads.   The Wynns also did a lot of shading tests, simulating halyards (no appreciable difference) and the boom (much larger difference).   Lets assume this is a boat on the hook and one has put a preventer on the boom to make it not shade panels, and oriented the boat to get uninterrupted sun on the panels.   If I were designing a solar system for a boat today, for a monohull, I would go with the most power dense panels I could get -- lets say "320W" panels.   Lets say I have an arch over my davits and I am able to put three 40-inch wide panels flat above this arch -- that is a beam of 10 feet.   Lets assume 60% useful power.   That is 960 Watts * 60% = 576 Watts which is not much.. One only gets that during the day.   So one might get 3kWh of power per day from the panels -- based on not angling panels.   For someone who thinks they can run without a generator, that is the limit of power.   "Average use for a typical RVer is around 20 kWh a day.   .....  RVers parked in areas where they do not need air conditioning will use much less electricity than RVers who do need it.  In fact, the average amount of electricity used by people who are not running air conditioning is about 10 kWh a day.."  (1) There is one total power budget estimate.   Lets look at it from the components up: Loads: Required Unoccupied, trekking the country nearby while the boat is on anchor:  - Refrigeration: 300 kWh / year (modern, high efficiency, extra insulation for the tropics)   lets say 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Anchoring light (LED, 2 nm visibility, on a timer, 12 hour burn):  0.025 kWh/day   (3)    - Bilge Pump (500 gallons/day, 1 hour/day): 0.060 kWh/day (4)  - Most basic of computers offering Wifi and sensor monitoring to report alerts & email: 0.080 kWh/day (5 + estimate for dry contact and sensor system)   Minimum Occupied:  - Radio (hand held, listening):  0.020 kWh/day  (2)   - Interior Lights (LED):  0.050 kWh/day   - Recharging (Cell, shaver, shortwave receiver, flashlights, head lamps, miscellaneous): 0.050 kWh/day Voluntary Electronics:  - Netbook (4 hours):  0.100 kWh/day    - Full Laptop (4 hours): 0.300 kWh/day   - Display Screen (tv/monitor) (4 hours): 0.400 kWh//day  - DVD player (2 hours): 0.050 kWh/day Other:  - Pressurized water (per 100 liters -- usage for 1 day):  0.020 kWh/day (7)  - Freezer: 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Washing machine, 2 people:  0.400 kWh/day (one load every second day)  - Water maker (most efficient, per 100 liters/day): 0.400 kWh/day (6) Working on Boat:  - hand saw and driver drill for cabinetry work (1 hour run time/8 hour day): 1 kWh/day (experience)  - belt sander for finishing (6 hours run time/8 hour day): 7.2 kWh/day (experience) This is before using any electricity for cooking.   Looking at these conveniences ... pressurized water is a power bargain.   So, basic anchoring budget is 1.17 kWh / day -- solar will cover it with more than 100% to spare -- one 12V/100Ah battery unit at 50% DOD will carry it through the night.   On light overcast days, when one is getting 50% power, the system is still OK.   So one uses two 12V/100Ah units to keep the average DOD to 25%, to make sure it does not go much below 50% DOD in a stretch of moderately cloudy weather..      To go one week (hurricane overcast on a boat, a week of heavy overcast in winter in Canada) without significant sun, the battery bank must be 8.2 kWh -- which is 14 units of 12V/100Ah at 50% DOD -- that is a lot of batteries.   Rick's batteries, four times 12V/200Ah, 9.6 kWh, could handle this, just.   This is why I am interested in Rick's batteries -- they are about the minimum I would consider to have constant refrigeration, be it in a cottage or boat.   Speaking of refrigeration.  When one is not opening the fridge and adding things or taking things out, the power consumption of a fridge is inversely related to thickness of insulation.   As the largest power draw in an unoccupied space, I would consider a hyper-insulated fridge (I do not believe it is available, I was thinking DIY) to cut the power in half.   That allows Rick's batteries to run the system for close to 2 weeks without sun.   That I think would be a far better design for an off-grid cottage.   Ricks batteries would recharge in about 4 days after 2 weeks with heavy overcast.    If one had reliable sun every day, and particularly if the panels netted a little better than 60% useful power from their rating, then: 3.93 kWh/day -- based on 200 liters/day of water desalinated, and pressurized, laundry, freezer, and no voluntary electronics.  The solar panels could not reliably keep up.  In full sun, Rick's batteries would need a generator run of 10 hours once every 8 or 9 days.   From fully charged, after 2 days without sun, without a generator run, Rick's batteries would be exhausted.    Therefore, a pretty spartan existence, with a short shower daily, would be a strain without a daily generator run of about an hour on sunny days, and 4 hours a day on heavy overcast days.   (Assuming a Honda 1200W quiet generator outputting 1000W average.) Get rid of the freezer and one is just below what one would expect of the panels per day.   After just one day without sun, one would have to wait 2 weeks for the batteries to get back up to normal.   It is not reasonable to expect only 1 day of heavy clouds in each 2 weeks.   Therefore, even without the freezer, the solar panels would likely fall behind and regular generator running would be needed.  One could laminate flexible panels to the deck, but they are on average half the efficiency per unit area and, one really could not expect more than another 320 W of power to be conveniently placed. For those thinking that wind power will save them...  one would need an anchorage protected from waves, by say a submerged reef, and open to the wind -- so not like a closed bay.   Most small wind generators are rated for 40km/h, that is, they give their rated power at 40km/h wind speed.   They do not cut in until about 8 or 9 km/h.   Wind energy goes by the cube of the wind speed.   To generate half the rated output, one needs about 32 km/h of wind.   Half the rated output on a 400 Watt generator is 200 Watts.   Even if it is a tiringly windy anchorage, and the wind blows 24/7, that is only 4.8 kWh of power maximum theoretical, 4.2 kWh useful delivered to loads is more likely with charging inefficiency.  That is more than solar, but only if one assumes a tiringly windy anchorage.   If one wants the wind generator to total the same output as solar in 24 hours, one must have 27 kmph winds, 24/7.    Based on the theory that when it is not sunny the wind is blowing, to cover minimal loads (1.17kWh/day), one needs 20 km/h winds, 24/7 on cloudy days.     That is actually a reasonable expectation, on average, but not reliably.   | 35907|35854|2019-05-02 12:56:28|wild_explorer|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?|Matt,It is a little bit more complex. Take for example Kubota diesel engines. Same model, but one revision for Tractor and onother for Generator. Compare Power and Fuel Consumption curves. They should be different.There is software which allow to match Hull, Engine and Prop. It gives you necessary RPM/KW curves for chosen size/pitch of the prop. It shows as well if chosen prop is OK or Not (cavitation, engine overload) When you have all this information, you can set up an automatic load balancer,---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :#ygrps-yiv-2030437378 #ygrps-yiv-2030437378ygrps-yiv-2063773243 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Trying to piece this together to learn something.... OK then, as one reduces RPM, the hp gap between the prop curve and engine curve increases -- the engine is capable of more than the prop.  Engine curves and prop curves both fall to zero at zero RPM, so, there is an RPM for the maximum difference between the curves, where the engine is producing the maximum spare horsepower beyond what the prop is using.  There is a range near that RPM where there is plenty of spare hp.   One might not be certain at a given moment what hp is being drawn by electric-clutch-driven-automatic accessories, or the alternator that is regulated by the regulator.  So I am guessing (so long as the prop is engaged) one should always operate the engine between the maximum hp gap RPM, and the prop-engine match RPM ? So as a procedure, in the case of automatically regulated load accessories: I am guessing one sets the engine for the maximum hp gap RPM, as a starting point, and then monitors the engine exhaust temperature (or sound by ear) for overload ? If one is well below temperature indicating underload (and sound by ear also indicates underload), then one increases RPM slightly toward the prop-engine match RPM ? If one is over-temperature at a given RPM indicating overload (or the sound by ear indicates overload), then one decreases the RPM toward the maximum hp gap RPM ? Would this be a practical way to operate a propulsion diesel with heavy, automatically-controlled accessories on it ? The maximum hp gap between the engine and prop curves gives another limit on the maximum hp that can be used by accessories.   Zoa Scott indicated the engine itself has a limit in the specs.   So one would have to keep below both these limits ... it seems ?   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 12:03 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?  Because the power curve of the engine does not match that for the power absorption of a fixed pitch propeller, you only have one point where engine power and propeller absorption match (where the curves cross).  In order to prevent damage to the engine, this point is set at the maximum produced power.  When you install a new prop and check to make sure that the engine can still reach its maximum rpm, this is what you are doing.  So, at any engine speed below the max rpm, the propeller is absorbing less power than the engine would like to be producing for that rpm.  If all you are doing is adding a larger alternator, then you are unlikely to run into problems overloading the engine and are likely moving it to a more efficient part of the fuel consumption map.  Should you need max power out of then engine, install an ordinary switch in the field wire of your alternator or use an external regulator like a Balmar that has a small engine mode that allows you to reduce the alternator output. If you want to add more accessories, then you might want to be a bit more careful that you are not overloading the engine.  Check the power curves that are published for your engine.  Also, an exhaust temperature gauge is good insurance that you are not overloading the engine.  In reality, most of the accessories you would strap to the engine won't be on all the time.  A watermaker either has an electric clutch, or a simple manual engagement system like Brent has talked about.  The alternator load can be turned on and off easily.  Even a fridge compressor would have an electric clutch.  So, as long as you stay within the limits of allowable accessory loads on the crankshaft, you can add whatever you can find space to fit and still have a propeller matched to the maximum hp that the engine can produce. I'm not a diesel mechanic.  Just a guy that likes messing about with the technical side of boats and I try to share what I know here with the hope of helping someone out as others here have done for me.  Also, discussions here are a good way to find the limits of what I know and the cases where I'm just plain wrong. Cheers, Darren On 2019-05-01 4:29 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Thank you Zoa.  Also ignored, with parasitic loads, your (residual) torque-rpm characteristic cannot match the prop anymore if it match without parasitic loads. Matt From: Zoa Scott zoascott74@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 19:02 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Just a note incase its not widely known. All diesel engine manufacturers will let you know max allowable parasitic hp loads to be taken off crankshaft . Im a diesel mechanic by trade. If your running mutiple gizmos they are usually installed opposing each other if belt driven. Zoa  On Wed, May 1, 2019, 5:20 AM Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats], wrote:   Excellent point Darren, I had not considered drive belt load on the crankshaft bearing from all these extras.  My engine is not well set up for extra driven components so I had been toying with the idea of a pony shaft just to run components from.   But even then, if one is pulling 10,000W off the pony shaft (3,000W for each of the alternator, semihermetic compressor and watermaker pump plus surge margin) then a lot of design calculation and checking for what is easily available has go into the power transmission link between the engine and pony shaft..  Is a motorcycle drive cogged belt that custom bikes use between the engine and transmission ... is that the easiest?   I don't know.  Is it better to put one extra to the right, another to the left so they balance bearing loads, except for the little torque caused by the separation between the plane of the two belts?    Is there room to put one extra below the crankshaft to balance a triad... there might be on my boat. Really good point.  Last thing one wants to do is reduce the life of the primary engine. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 01:21 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Agreed, and I enjoyed your embellishment of the idea Matt  :-)  The one thing you have to look out for is how heavily you load the crankshaft bearing.  The manufacturers tend to be a bit cagey about what is tolerable.  If I had a water pump for a watermaker and a big alternator, I'd try and mount them opposed by 180 degrees.  Most marine engines die from corrosion and lack of use.  While you wouldn't want to idle one to charge the batteries, just about any other use is likely to make it last longer. On 2019-04-30 1:47 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Absolutely agreed Darren, if people do not have refrigeration, they should remain in that blissful place.   Absolutely agreed Darren, if you include running the propulsion engine as different from running a dedicated engine to generate electricity.   Perhaps I should change the title to "Run a fuel engine to make electricity sometimes, or Not".   Engine or Generator -- seems the same thing to me.  It was easier to do the calculations with a 1200W Honda.. What you said about running the propulsion engine for two purposes is absolutely of advantage.   Thank you for telling me about the "small engine" regulators ... I want one.   Absolutely true, propulsion engines are usually diesel, more efficient, marine-ized so they last longer in a boat environment, whereas generators are, well, inexpensive if they are gasoline and not marine-ized.   But chances are, the outboard on the tender is gasoline so, one probably has gasoline on board in any case.   It is absolutely true for some boats and some owners that running the engine will come at about the same frequency as one would normally need to top up the batteries.   But then this tempo will get ingrained.  When one gets somewhere they really like and want to stay for a while, the tempo will make one feel itchy to go somewhere on a certain schedule or face the prospect of just running the engine just to make electricity, which more than a few cruisers complain is inefficient and irritating to them..   Where sails are a redundancy to the propulsion engine, there is no redundancy to an alternator if any one of a dozen things goes wrong with the propulsion engine.   The propulsion engine has a limited service lifetime and a chance of other failures, every hour it runs.   If something goes wrong with the engine, you are talking about boat yoga in tight spaces if you are a DIY type, on-site diesel mechanics ($$), and worst case a $10,000-$15,000 bill and a crane to replace it.   Yikes, I am not running that sucker just to make electricity.  As for incidental electricity... I sail differently.   My sails are my propulsion.  I have used as little as 12 litres of fuel in year, and there is no such thing as a wind where my boat is slower than a cottage.   My engine is my backup to my sails.   Naturally, good seamanship dictates caution and to some that points only to the engine.  If that is the way it has to be, OK.   But waiting to go in until the wind and tide are favourable is also seamanship, and then the engine and its full tank of fuel is still there in reserve.    Many times I start the engine and just let it idle for the decisive couple of minutes as I sail nearly all the way in -- it is there in an instant for oh-crap moments..      At least with a 1200 Watt generator, there is no issue of charge rate, they are really quiet out of the box, and can be made quieter with a little DIY..   If something goes wrong with the generator, I had always assumed that in a pinch I would have the 20,000 Watt propulsion engine was the backup to the generator, even though it is inefficient and straining to the electrical system unless it is used for something else at the same time.   If something goes wrong with the generator, it never be a big bill.  I carry it ashore to a small engine repair place, or buy another one.  In the meantime, so long as the generator works, one runs their engine only when necessary, keeping its hours down.   So it is down to wear and tear on the engine, or a disposable substitute to change fuel into electricity.  I would never NOT have a portable generator.    I am really not disputing anything you are saying Darren, some people will find what you describe to be the simplest course of action.   I am just giving the other side of what some other boats might do.   But lets run with your idea, a very good one, to have a 210A bus alternator running directly off the propulsion engine to take advantage of the huge surplus of mechanical power available that one might borrow from when moving the boat.   But, if you are going to do that....  - if you have an external regulator, is it not possible with the flip of an appropriately-wired switch to turn this into an unbelievable weldernator ?   One is never doing that with a 1200W Honda.   Even Rick's batteries, and a little inverter welder, that is a joke compared to this T-rex of weldernators.   You could do half inch plate with 5/32" rod and really feel like you are accomplishing something.   If you have never tried 5/32 rod, you really have to, just for fun, on 3/16" or thicker steel.   Have 100 feet of cables, and industrial fenders and raft up to commercial boats and do a little commercial welding.   I want one.  Really, I do..    - why stop at a 210A alternator -- connect up a high pressure pump with a couple of one-way valves so your water maker runs electric off one pump or directly from the engine from the other pump -- for just the cost of a second pump, you are creating redundancy.   Drawing the same torque as the alternator, the engine-powered watermaker could put out 200 gallons per hour, assuming one has suitable osmosis media.   The efficiency would be awesome, diesel directly driving the pump skips the following filters of efficiency: claw-style armature alternator 75-80%, battery charging 90%, electric motor 80-90% -- combined total 54%-65% efficiency.  One avoids all that by going straight off the engine.   Then one also has the alternative to make water with the engine if the electric pump ever fails.   I sure am thinking about doing this..  - why stop there ... If the water tanks fill before one is finished motoring, start filling the bathtub and have a good celebratory soak in the tub to prepare for going out on the town at the new destination.  Your 20,000 Watt motor is easily producing 25,000 Watts of heat so, that tub can be nice and toasty warm with just a few valves and a little hose.   This is just a given, I am definitely having an engine-heat option to my hot water tank.   - Heck why stop there ... turn down the flow rate so the fresh water comes out at full exhaust temperature and fill your teapot.   There is a lot of comfort possible here.    I don't like tea that much so, no.    - If there is still a surplus of fresh water, start filling all those water jerry cans most boats have -- over stock and then turn off the electric water maker -- run the engine today, save Amps tomorrow.   I sure would do this.      - why stop there ... put a semi-hermetic compressor on the engine and hook it up to a big-ass ice maker -- freeze a fraction that 200 GPH pouring out of the water maker and get rid of the need for both refrigeration and freezer (save the brine waste from water making ... ice+brine = -17C in a cold plate).    Says that man with a great big ice chest ... pull it out, or add a compressor to the engine ... open question.    - why stop there ... Just keep making ice, and put hundreds of pounds of ice in a stainless cabinet inside an adjustable-vent wood cabinet, with a drip pan under the stainless cabinet -- a DIY dehumidifier.   This is probably beyond the electrical power budget for most boats, so, what a luxury.   Dry gallons an hour.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Have the melt-water drain for the stainless cabinet run through a cooling coil along the cabinet ceiling and back down into the fresh water tanks -- step one air conditioning, for the price of pumping water a few feet -- we have already established, that is bargain compared to AC.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Not cool enough? Open vents in the side of the wood cabinet and blow air in there to both get more cool air and accelerate melting.   Glorious air conditioning -- not even a cat could manage that on solar.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... they have these cooking appliances, called muff pots, better than instant pots, and they are *ZERO* Watts:  http://cs.amsnow.com/sno/b/news/archive/2015/04/09/snacker-packer-meals-made-easy.aspx Cooking on a snowmobile made easy - American Snowmobiler Magazine - Snowmobile forums, news, Polaris, Ski-Doo, Arctic Cat & Yamaha reviews - AmSnow.com American Snowmobiler Magazine presents news, reviews, forums, videos, photos and the latest stats and prices for Arctic Cat, Ski-Doo, Yamaha and Polaris snowmobiles. cs.amsnow.com If one has never cooked on the exhaust of an engine ...   Heck with all that, one solar panel would run the radio and the nav lights, nav, etc.   If co-generating electricity by depending on running a 20,000 Watt engine with any frequency is how some boaters will do it, then co-generating everything else that would otherwise require electricity, or would generate comfort is worth mentioning too.   So when it comes down to it, same answer:  On a monohull, one is running an engine sometimes, but there is a lot of room for innovation, taste, preferences and different ways to meet the power budget.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:59 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     For everyone who has a simple boat without refrigeration/freezer, you probably wonder why everyone is so concerned about how to generate enough power from solar.  Your life is simple and there is no reason to read the rest of this. Matt, that's a pretty reasonable analysis, and would fit some boats.  There are certainly boats that manage these comforts on lower watts.  The obvious area for improvement is refrigeration, any efficiencies gained here is money better spent than money spent on power generation (solar and generators).  I came to the conclusion that 4" of styrofoam insulation for the fridge and 6" for the freezer was the minimum to make DC refrigeration work on a reasonable energy budget.  50 to 125 Ah per day is what 12v DC refrigeration generally uses per day.  The differences are almost entirely due to insulation, next due to the size of the fridge/freezer.  If you can get closer to 50Ah per day your energy budget changes drastically.  I decided a spillover design fridge freezer, custom built to maximize insulation was the best way to go in my build.  Aspen Aerogel is an interesting material here.  However, polystyrene foam is easy to work, cheap, readily available, and absorbs water less than the other foam insulation choices. Your energy budget doesn't consider engine run time and power from the alternator at all.  A boat that moves even just once or twice a week can reduce/eliminate its need for generator run time by super-sizing its alternator.  I've ordered a Leece-Neville 210A school bus alternator.  It should run happily at 170A continuous, perhaps a bit more with careful attention to cooling.  This is a win-win situation, getting power from the alternator is more efficient than from a generator.  With a fixed pitch prop you're running at an inefficient part of the power curve of the diesel at cruising rpm.  The extra load the alternator moves the engine into a more efficient part of the fuel map, that improvement in efficiency means that part of the fuel consumed by the alternator comes for free as your making the engine more efficient at the same time you make carbon buildup problems less likely.  Even if you have a smaller diesel you could fit an alternator this size.  If you need maximum propulsion power at some point, an external regulator like a Balmar Mc-614 used with a switch for small engine mode (field output reduced to 50%) allows you to get most of the power from the engine for propulsion when necessary.  You could also just put a plain switch in the field wire to the alt for a inexpensive solution, although charging at these high currents you probably want an external regulator anyway.  It should be noted that this solution relies on batteries that can accept pretty high charge rates.  This would be LiPO4, Firefly >AGM>very large flooded lead acid bank.  A small flooded-lead-acid bank probably won't be able to accept the high charge rate for long enough for a large alternator to do a lot of good.  The LiPO4 and the Firefly also have the advantage that they are totally happy in a partial state of charge and can stay there without damage until you are ready to move to the next anchorage (within reasonable time limits and state of charge limits).  You should switch to a serpentine belt to run a large alternator like a Delco Remy 28SI or a Leece Neville Idle Pro. There are two ways of looking at comfort while cruising.  Your comfort could come from plugging in whatever you want whenever you want.  However, this comes with the discomfort of noise from the generator, discomfort getting/storing fuel for the generator (especially bad for gasoline generators),  discomfort from getting/storing oil for the generator, the discomfort from generator oil changes, discomfort from trying to source generator parts in some distant port, discomfort from getting shunned by the cruisers who can't stand the noise of your generator.  On the flip side, if you design a boat with conservation in mind, it is possible to run almost entirely on solar.  I've met more than one boat (with refrigeration and watermaker) that runs successfully with just solar/wind/alternator.  You boil water in a kettle on the stove (is that a discomfort?), you wash laundry ashore or in a bucket (Ok, the bucket counts as a discomfort), is lighting a propane stove a discomfort compared to electric (around here tons of folks spend tons of money on their house for the luxury of a natural gas stove).  I have a nice antique coffee grinder, it takes zero watts to run, is beautiful and a pleasure to use, there are tons of equivalents to this on the boat, where doing things different is part of the pleasure for me.  A generator is definitely not necessary.   On 2019-04-30 9:03 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   What really is the electrical capacity on a boat from solar, how far will that take you, and realistically, will one be running a generator and how much? Solar Power Generation: Based on some tests by the Wynns in Florida (latitude N26), two used "160W" panels (they have 6 of these), produced 15 Amps at "12V", at 14.4V from the panels, but we will say 12.8V from the batteries later because though the charge voltage is higher, the voltage at which the power comes out is lower.    That is 216 Watts in, 192 Watts of useful power out of the batteries later.   They also tested two new "140W" panels and produced 20 Amps at "12V", or about 288 Watts in, 256 Watts out later.   256/"280" = 91% useful power.   192/"320" = 60% useful power.   Same solar controller in both tests.  At latitude N44, I was seeing about 67% of ratings from the panels, before considering charging losses which for a perfect charge controller might be 60% useful power.    On my off-grid solar installation, I have huge reserve capacity, currently not that much generating capacity, and the vampire load is very low.   I would add panels if I were to increase expected daily loads.   The Wynns also did a lot of shading tests, simulating halyards (no appreciable difference) and the boom (much larger difference).   Lets assume this is a boat on the hook and one has put a preventer on the boom to make it not shade panels, and oriented the boat to get uninterrupted sun on the panels.   If I were designing a solar system for a boat today, for a monohull, I would go with the most power dense panels I could get -- lets say "320W" panels.   Lets say I have an arch over my davits and I am able to put three 40-inch wide panels flat above this arch -- that is a beam of 10 feet.   Lets assume 60% useful power.   That is 960 Watts * 60% = 576 Watts which is not much.. One only gets that during the day.   So one might get 3kWh of power per day from the panels -- based on not angling panels.   For someone who thinks they can run without a generator, that is the limit of power.   "Average use for a typical RVer is around 20 kWh a day.   .....  RVers parked in areas where they do not need air conditioning will use much less electricity than RVers who do need it.  In fact, the average amount of electricity used by people who are not running air conditioning is about 10 kWh a day.."  (1) There is one total power budget estimate.   Lets look at it from the components up: Loads: Required Unoccupied, trekking the country nearby while the boat is on anchor:  - Refrigeration: 300 kWh / year (modern, high efficiency, extra insulation for the tropics)   lets say 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Anchoring light (LED, 2 nm visibility, on a timer, 12 hour burn):  0.025 kWh/day   (3)    - Bilge Pump (500 gallons/day, 1 hour/day): 0.060 kWh/day (4)  - Most basic of computers offering Wifi and sensor monitoring to report alerts & email: 0.080 kWh/day (5 + estimate for dry contact and sensor system)   Minimum Occupied:  - Radio (hand held, listening):  0.020 kWh/day  (2)   - Interior Lights (LED):  0.050 kWh/day   - Recharging (Cell, shaver, shortwave receiver, flashlights, head lamps, miscellaneous): 0.050 kWh/day Voluntary Electronics:  - Netbook (4 hours):  0.100 kWh/day    - Full Laptop (4 hours): 0.300 kWh/day   - Display Screen (tv/monitor) (4 hours): 0.400 kWh//day  - DVD player (2 hours): 0.050 kWh/day Other:  - Pressurized water (per 100 liters -- usage for 1 day):  0.020 kWh/day (7)  - Freezer: 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Washing machine, 2 people:  0.400 kWh/day (one load every second day)  - Water maker (most efficient, per 100 liters/day): 0.400 kWh/day (6) Working on Boat:  - hand saw and driver drill for cabinetry work (1 hour run time/8 hour day): 1 kWh/day (experience)  - belt sander for finishing (6 hours run time/8 hour day): 7.2 kWh/day (experience) This is before using any electricity for cooking.   Looking at these conveniences ... pressurized water is a power bargain.   So, basic anchoring budget is 1.17 kWh / day -- solar will cover it with more than 100% to spare -- one 12V/100Ah battery unit at 50% DOD will carry it through the night.   On light overcast days, when one is getting 50% power, the system is still OK.   So one uses two 12V/100Ah units to keep the average DOD to 25%, to make sure it does not go much below 50% DOD in a stretch of moderately cloudy weather..      To go one week (hurricane overcast on a boat, a week of heavy overcast in winter in Canada) without significant sun, the battery bank must be 8.2 kWh -- which is 14 units of 12V/100Ah at 50% DOD -- that is a lot of batteries.   Rick's batteries, four times 12V/200Ah, 9.6 kWh, could handle this, just.   This is why I am interested in Rick's batteries -- they are about the minimum I would consider to have constant refrigeration, be it in a cottage or boat.   Speaking of refrigeration.  When one is not opening the fridge and adding things or taking things out, the power consumption of a fridge is inversely related to thickness of insulation.   As the largest power draw in an unoccupied space, I would consider a hyper-insulated fridge (I do not believe it is available, I was thinking DIY) to cut the power in half.   That allows Rick's batteries to run the system for close to 2 weeks without sun.   That I think would be a far better design for an off-grid cottage.   Ricks batteries would recharge in about 4 days after 2 weeks with heavy overcast.    If one had reliable sun every day, and particularly if the panels netted a little better than 60% useful power from their rating, then: 3.93 kWh/day -- based on 200 liters/day of water desalinated, and pressurized, laundry, freezer, and no voluntary electronics.  The solar panels could not reliably keep up.  In full sun, Rick's batteries would need a generator run of 10 hours once every 8 or 9 days.   From fully charged, after 2 days without sun, without a generator run, Rick's batteries would be exhausted.    Therefore, a pretty spartan existence, with a short shower daily, would be a strain without a daily generator run of about an hour on sunny days, and 4 hours a day on heavy overcast days.   (Assuming a Honda 1200W quiet generator outputting 1000W average.) Get rid of the freezer and one is just below what one would expect of the panels per day.   After just one day without sun, one would have to wait 2 weeks for the batteries to get back up to normal.   It is not reasonable to expect only 1 day of heavy clouds in each 2 weeks.   Therefore, even without the freezer, the solar panels would likely fall behind and regular generator running would be needed.  One could laminate flexible panels to the deck, but they are on average half the efficiency per unit area and, one really could not expect more than another 320 W of power to be conveniently placed. For those thinking that wind power will save them...  one would need an anchorage protected from waves, by say a submerged reef, and open to the wind -- so not like a closed bay.   Most small wind generators are rated for 40km/h, that is, they give their rated power at 40km/h wind speed.   They do not cut in until about 8 or 9 km/h.   Wind energy goes by the cube of the wind speed.   To generate half the rated output, one needs about 32 km/h of wind.   Half the rated output on a 400 Watt generator is 200 Watts.   Even if it is a tiringly windy anchorage, and the wind blows 24/7, that is only 4.8 kWh of power maximum theoretical, 4.2 kWh useful delivered to loads is more likely with charging inefficiency.  That is more than solar, but only if one assumes a tiringly windy anchorage.   If one wants the wind generator to total the same output as solar in 24 hours, one must have 27 kmph winds, 24/7.    Based on the theory that when it is not sunny the wind is blowing, to cover minimal loads (1.17kWh/day), one needs 20 km/h winds, 24/7 on cloudy days.     That is actually a reasonable expectation, on average, but not reliably.   Generator Inevitable Therefore, one should expect to use a generator on a cruising boat at least from time to time.   Now the question is how big and how long.  (I like the little 1200W Hondas .... they are very quiet.)   Taking a 1200W at 80% load, that is one hour of daily generator running for each kWh of extra consumption one has.  A freezer -- average an hour a day extra.  If one has AC, the RV example would have one run the generator for the entire daylight hours.     This is assuming all cooking appliances run from fuel.   If one assumes a sum total of 2 hours running 1800W (kettle, toaster oven, or single element hot plate), that is 3-4 kWh/day, 3-4 more hours of running the generator. Cat vs. Monohull.... Now, the Wynns have 11 solar panels on their cat.   If they upgraded them all to 320W panels (physically a bit larger, but also more efficient), and assuming 60% useful power, that is about 12.5 kWh / day ... I cannot say anything about their power usage, or their total average power received on their panels, but, it would seem a cat has a much better chance of being able to reliably handle reasonable hotel loads on solar alone.   Looking to the RV example, with no A, a Cat is the minimum unit of cruising boat to have an average RV experience without the need to run a generator every day -- certainly one will have a generator, certainly it will be run frequently in the average 2-week period to account for shortages of sun, but, it will not be run with certainty every single day just to meet average needs.      I did this calculation long ago, and that is why, some time ago, I encouraged Brent to come out of retirement and design an orgami cat, say based on a pair of 31 hulls, maybe with less beam (or maybe not), to each hull.    The hulls could each be a long, shallow draft single keel for even more shallow boat draft than the monohull twin keeler.   An origami Cat could compete with RVs as a lifestyle cruising boat where the entire world is available.    There are about 350,000-500,000 RVs sold each year worldwide(?) (9).  There are about 2,500 cruising boats sold in the US each year and about 2,000 sailboats of all sizes, including daysailers sold (8).   Monohulls are small on the inside compared to a modest RV.   Small = reduced comfort.   While there are many factors keeping the boat market about 200 times smaller, comfort is something that can be addressed.  Flip the Other Way -- Why Have Solar at All? (Message over 64 KB, truncated)| 35908|35854|2019-05-02 14:22:07|brentswain38|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?|I give her full throttle, get up to speed, then back her off a bit.If backing  off slightly slows the engine down, she is not overloaded .If I have to back her off  a long way before she slows down, then she is definitely overloaded.Something worth checking when  motoring into a head wind, or steep chop.| 35909|35854|2019-05-02 14:28:04|Matt Malone|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?| #ygrps-yiv-762143086 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Wild, >you can set up an automatic load balancer Is that a sort of engine governor that does more than just hold an RPM, something that takes into account loading on the engine ?    If it does not take into account variable load at a given RPM, how is it helping control the engine as the alternator regulator throttles up for more electrical output, or the water maker pump engages, or the compressor kicks in ? Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 12:56 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     Matt, It is a little bit more complex. Take for example Kubota diesel engines. Same model, but one revision for Tractor and onother for Generator. Compare Power and Fuel Consumption curves. They should be different. There is software which allow to match Hull, Engine and Prop. It gives you necessary RPM/KW curves for chosen size/pitch of the prop. It shows as well if chosen prop is OK or Not (cavitation, engine overload) When you have all this information, you can set up an automatic load balancer, ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Trying to piece this together to learn something.... OK then, as one reduces RPM, the hp gap between the prop curve and engine curve increases -- the engine is capable of more than the prop.  Engine curves and prop curves both fall to zero at zero RPM, so, there is an RPM for the maximum difference between the curves, where the engine is producing the maximum spare horsepower beyond what the prop is using.  There is a range near that RPM where there is plenty of spare hp.   One might not be certain at a given moment what hp is being drawn by electric-clutch-driven-automatic accessories, or the alternator that is regulated by the regulator.  So I am guessing (so long as the prop is engaged) one should always operate the engine between the maximum hp gap RPM, and the prop-engine match RPM ? So as a procedure, in the case of automatically regulated load accessories: I am guessing one sets the engine for the maximum hp gap RPM, as a starting point, and then monitors the engine exhaust temperature (or sound by ear) for overload ? If one is well below temperature indicating underload (and sound by ear also indicates underload), then one increases RPM slightly toward the prop-engine match RPM ? If one is over-temperature at a given RPM indicating overload (or the sound by ear indicates overload), then one decreases the RPM toward the maximum hp gap RPM ? Would this be a practical way to operate a propulsion diesel with heavy, automatically-controlled accessories on it ? The maximum hp gap between the engine and prop curves gives another limit on the maximum hp that can be used by accessories.   Zoa Scott indicated the engine itself has a limit in the specs.   So one would have to keep below both these limits ... it seems ?   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 12:03 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     Because the power curve of the engine does not match that for the power absorption of a fixed pitch propeller, you only have one point where engine power and propeller absorption match (where the curves cross).  In order to prevent damage to the engine, this point is set at the maximum produced power.  When you install a new prop and check to make sure that the engine can still reach its maximum rpm, this is what you are doing.  So, at any engine speed below the max rpm, the propeller is absorbing less power than the engine would like to be producing for that rpm.  If all you are doing is adding a larger alternator, then you are unlikely to run into problems overloading the engine and are likely moving it to a more efficient part of the fuel consumption map.  Should you need max power out of then engine, install an ordinary switch in the field wire of your alternator or use an external regulator like a Balmar that has a small engine mode that allows you to reduce the alternator output. If you want to add more accessories, then you might want to be a bit more careful that you are not overloading the engine.  Check the power curves that are published for your engine.  Also, an exhaust temperature gauge is good insurance that you are not overloading the engine.  In reality, most of the accessories you would strap to the engine won't be on all the time.  A watermaker either has an electric clutch, or a simple manual engagement system like Brent has talked about.  The alternator load can be turned on and off easily.  Even a fridge compressor would have an electric clutch.  So, as long as you stay within the limits of allowable accessory loads on the crankshaft, you can add whatever you can find space to fit and still have a propeller matched to the maximum hp that the engine can produce. I'm not a diesel mechanic.  Just a guy that likes messing about with the technical side of boats and I try to share what I know here with the hope of helping someone out as others here have done for me.  Also, discussions here are a good way to find the limits of what I know and the cases where I'm just plain wrong. Cheers, Darren On 2019-05-01 4:29 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Thank you Zoa.  Also ignored, with parasitic loads, your (residual) torque-rpm characteristic cannot match the prop anymore if it match without parasitic loads. Matt From: Zoa Scott zoascott74@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 19:02 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Just a note incase its not widely known. All diesel engine manufacturers will let you know max allowable parasitic hp loads to be taken off crankshaft . Im a diesel mechanic by trade. If your running mutiple gizmos they are usually installed opposing each other if belt driven. Zoa  On Wed, May 1, 2019, 5:20 AM Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats], wrote:   Excellent point Darren, I had not considered drive belt load on the crankshaft bearing from all these extras.  My engine is not well set up for extra driven components so I had been toying with the idea of a pony shaft just to run components from.   But even then, if one is pulling 10,000W off the pony shaft (3,000W for each of the alternator, semihermetic compressor and watermaker pump plus surge margin) then a lot of design calculation and checking for what is easily available has go into the power transmission link between the engine and pony shaft..  Is a motorcycle drive cogged belt that custom bikes use between the engine and transmission ... is that the easiest?   I don't know.  Is it better to put one extra to the right, another to the left so they balance bearing loads, except for the little torque caused by the separation between the plane of the two belts?    Is there room to put one extra below the crankshaft to balance a triad... there might be on my boat. Really good point.  Last thing one wants to do is reduce the life of the primary engine. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 01:21 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Agreed, and I enjoyed your embellishment of the idea Matt  :-)  The one thing you have to look out for is how heavily you load the crankshaft bearing.  The manufacturers tend to be a bit cagey about what is tolerable.  If I had a water pump for a watermaker and a big alternator, I'd try and mount them opposed by 180 degrees.  Most marine engines die from corrosion and lack of use.  While you wouldn't want to idle one to charge the batteries, just about any other use is likely to make it last longer. On 2019-04-30 1:47 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Absolutely agreed Darren, if people do not have refrigeration, they should remain in that blissful place.   Absolutely agreed Darren, if you include running the propulsion engine as different from running a dedicated engine to generate electricity.   Perhaps I should change the title to "Run a fuel engine to make electricity sometimes, or Not".   Engine or Generator -- seems the same thing to me.  It was easier to do the calculations with a 1200W Honda.. What you said about running the propulsion engine for two purposes is absolutely of advantage.   Thank you for telling me about the "small engine" regulators ... I want one.   Absolutely true, propulsion engines are usually diesel, more efficient, marine-ized so they last longer in a boat environment, whereas generators are, well, inexpensive if they are gasoline and not marine-ized.   But chances are, the outboard on the tender is gasoline so, one probably has gasoline on board in any case.   It is absolutely true for some boats and some owners that running the engine will come at about the same frequency as one would normally need to top up the batteries.   But then this tempo will get ingrained.  When one gets somewhere they really like and want to stay for a while, the tempo will make one feel itchy to go somewhere on a certain schedule or face the prospect of just running the engine just to make electricity, which more than a few cruisers complain is inefficient and irritating to them..   Where sails are a redundancy to the propulsion engine, there is no redundancy to an alternator if any one of a dozen things goes wrong with the propulsion engine.   The propulsion engine has a limited service lifetime and a chance of other failures, every hour it runs.   If something goes wrong with the engine, you are talking about boat yoga in tight spaces if you are a DIY type, on-site diesel mechanics ($$), and worst case a $10,000-$15,000 bill and a crane to replace it.   Yikes, I am not running that sucker just to make electricity.  As for incidental electricity... I sail differently.   My sails are my propulsion.  I have used as little as 12 litres of fuel in year, and there is no such thing as a wind where my boat is slower than a cottage.   My engine is my backup to my sails.   Naturally, good seamanship dictates caution and to some that points only to the engine.  If that is the way it has to be, OK.   But waiting to go in until the wind and tide are favourable is also seamanship, and then the engine and its full tank of fuel is still there in reserve.    Many times I start the engine and just let it idle for the decisive couple of minutes as I sail nearly all the way in -- it is there in an instant for oh-crap moments..      At least with a 1200 Watt generator, there is no issue of charge rate, they are really quiet out of the box, and can be made quieter with a little DIY..   If something goes wrong with the generator, I had always assumed that in a pinch I would have the 20,000 Watt propulsion engine was the backup to the generator, even though it is inefficient and straining to the electrical system unless it is used for something else at the same time.   If something goes wrong with the generator, it never be a big bill.  I carry it ashore to a small engine repair place, or buy another one.  In the meantime, so long as the generator works, one runs their engine only when necessary, keeping its hours down.   So it is down to wear and tear on the engine, or a disposable substitute to change fuel into electricity.  I would never NOT have a portable generator.    I am really not disputing anything you are saying Darren, some people will find what you describe to be the simplest course of action.   I am just giving the other side of what some other boats might do.   But lets run with your idea, a very good one, to have a 210A bus alternator running directly off the propulsion engine to take advantage of the huge surplus of mechanical power available that one might borrow from when moving the boat.   But, if you are going to do that....  - if you have an external regulator, is it not possible with the flip of an appropriately-wired switch to turn this into an unbelievable weldernator ?   One is never doing that with a 1200W Honda.   Even Rick's batteries, and a little inverter welder, that is a joke compared to this T-rex of weldernators.   You could do half inch plate with 5/32" rod and really feel like you are accomplishing something.   If you have never tried 5/32 rod, you really have to, just for fun, on 3/16" or thicker steel.   Have 100 feet of cables, and industrial fenders and raft up to commercial boats and do a little commercial welding.   I want one.  Really, I do..    - why stop at a 210A alternator -- connect up a high pressure pump with a couple of one-way valves so your water maker runs electric off one pump or directly from the engine from the other pump -- for just the cost of a second pump, you are creating redundancy.   Drawing the same torque as the alternator, the engine-powered watermaker could put out 200 gallons per hour, assuming one has suitable osmosis media.   The efficiency would be awesome, diesel directly driving the pump skips the following filters of efficiency: claw-style armature alternator 75-80%, battery charging 90%, electric motor 80-90% -- combined total 54%-65% efficiency.  One avoids all that by going straight off the engine.   Then one also has the alternative to make water with the engine if the electric pump ever fails.   I sure am thinking about doing this..  - why stop there ... If the water tanks fill before one is finished motoring, start filling the bathtub and have a good celebratory soak in the tub to prepare for going out on the town at the new destination.  Your 20,000 Watt motor is easily producing 25,000 Watts of heat so, that tub can be nice and toasty warm with just a few valves and a little hose.   This is just a given, I am definitely having an engine-heat option to my hot water tank.   - Heck why stop there ... turn down the flow rate so the fresh water comes out at full exhaust temperature and fill your teapot.   There is a lot of comfort possible here.    I don't like tea that much so, no.    - If there is still a surplus of fresh water, start filling all those water jerry cans most boats have -- over stock and then turn off the electric water maker -- run the engine today, save Amps tomorrow.   I sure would do this.      - why stop there ... put a semi-hermetic compressor on the engine and hook it up to a big-ass ice maker -- freeze a fraction that 200 GPH pouring out of the water maker and get rid of the need for both refrigeration and freezer (save the brine waste from water making ... ice+brine = -17C in a cold plate).    Says that man with a great big ice chest ... pull it out, or add a compressor to the engine ... open question.    - why stop there ... Just keep making ice, and put hundreds of pounds of ice in a stainless cabinet inside an adjustable-vent wood cabinet, with a drip pan under the stainless cabinet -- a DIY dehumidifier.   This is probably beyond the electrical power budget for most boats, so, what a luxury.   Dry gallons an hour.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Have the melt-water drain for the stainless cabinet run through a cooling coil along the cabinet ceiling and back down into the fresh water tanks -- step one air conditioning, for the price of pumping water a few feet -- we have already established, that is bargain compared to AC.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Not cool enough? Open vents in the side of the wood cabinet and blow air in there to both get more cool air and accelerate melting.   Glorious air conditioning -- not even a cat could manage that on solar.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... they have these cooking appliances, called muff pots, better than instant pots, and they are *ZERO* Watts:  http://cs.amsnow.com/sno/b/news/archive/2015/04/09/snacker-packer-meals-made-easy.aspx Cooking on a snowmobile made easy - American Snowmobiler Magazine - Snowmobile forums, news, Polaris, Ski-Doo, Arctic Cat & Yamaha reviews - AmSnow.com American Snowmobiler Magazine presents news, reviews, forums, videos, photos and the latest stats and prices for Arctic Cat, Ski-Doo, Yamaha and Polaris snowmobiles. cs.amsnow.com If one has never cooked on the exhaust of an engine ...   Heck with all that, one solar panel would run the radio and the nav lights, nav, etc.   If co-generating electricity by depending on running a 20,000 Watt engine with any frequency is how some boaters will do it, then co-generating everything else that would otherwise require electricity, or would generate comfort is worth mentioning too.   So when it comes down to it, same answer:  On a monohull, one is running an engine sometimes, but there is a lot of room for innovation, taste, preferences and different ways to meet the power budget.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:59 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     For everyone who has a simple boat without refrigeration/freezer, you probably wonder why everyone is so concerned about how to generate enough power from solar.  Your life is simple and there is no reason to read the rest of this. Matt, that's a pretty reasonable analysis, and would fit some boats.  There are certainly boats that manage these comforts on lower watts.  The obvious area for improvement is refrigeration, any efficiencies gained here is money better spent than money spent on power generation (solar and generators).  I came to the conclusion that 4" of styrofoam insulation for the fridge and 6" for the freezer was the minimum to make DC refrigeration work on a reasonable energy budget.  50 to 125 Ah per day is what 12v DC refrigeration generally uses per day.  The differences are almost entirely due to insulation, next due to the size of the fridge/freezer.  If you can get closer to 50Ah per day your energy budget changes drastically.  I decided a spillover design fridge freezer, custom built to maximize insulation was the best way to go in my build.  Aspen Aerogel is an interesting material here.  However, polystyrene foam is easy to work, cheap, readily available, and absorbs water less than the other foam insulation choices. Your energy budget doesn't consider engine run time and power from the alternator at all.  A boat that moves even just once or twice a week can reduce/eliminate its need for generator run time by super-sizing its alternator.  I've ordered a Leece-Neville 210A school bus alternator.  It should run happily at 170A continuous, perhaps a bit more with careful attention to cooling.  This is a win-win situation, getting power from the alternator is more efficient than from a generator.  With a fixed pitch prop you're running at an inefficient part of the power curve of the diesel at cruising rpm.  The extra load the alternator moves the engine into a more efficient part of the fuel map, that improvement in efficiency means that part of the fuel consumed by the alternator comes for free as your making the engine more efficient at the same time you make carbon buildup problems less likely.  Even if you have a smaller diesel you could fit an alternator this size.  If you need maximum propulsion power at some point, an external regulator like a Balmar Mc-614 used with a switch for small engine mode (field output reduced to 50%) allows you to get most of the power from the engine for propulsion when necessary.  You could also just put a plain switch in the field wire to the alt for a inexpensive solution, although charging at these high currents you probably want an external regulator anyway.  It should be noted that this solution relies on batteries that can accept pretty high charge rates.  This would be LiPO4, Firefly >AGM>very large flooded lead acid bank.  A small flooded-lead-acid bank probably won't be able to accept the high charge rate for long enough for a large alternator to do a lot of good.  The LiPO4 and the Firefly also have the advantage that they are totally happy in a partial state of charge and can stay there without damage until you are ready to move to the next anchorage (within reasonable time limits and state of charge limits).  You should switch to a serpentine belt to run a large alternator like a Delco Remy 28SI or a Leece Neville Idle Pro. There are two ways of looking at comfort while cruising.  Your comfort could come from plugging in whatever you want whenever you want.  However, this comes with the discomfort of noise from the generator, discomfort getting/storing fuel for the generator (especially bad for gasoline generators),  discomfort from getting/storing oil for the generator, the discomfort from generator oil changes, discomfort from trying to source generator parts in some distant port, discomfort from getting shunned by the cruisers who can't stand the noise of your generator.  On the flip side, if you design a boat with conservation in mind, it is possible to run almost entirely on solar.  I've met more than one boat (with refrigeration and watermaker) that runs successfully with just solar/wind/alternator.  You boil water in a kettle on the stove (is that a discomfort?), you wash laundry ashore or in a bucket (Ok, the bucket counts as a discomfort), is lighting a propane stove a discomfort compared to electric (around here tons of folks spend tons of money on their house for the luxury of a natural gas stove).  I have a nice antique coffee grinder, it takes zero watts to run, is beautiful and a pleasure to use, there are tons of equivalents to this on the boat, where doing things different is part of the pleasure for me.  A generator is definitely not necessary.   On 2019-04-30 9:03 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   What really is the electrical capacity on a boat from solar, how far will that take you, and realistically, will one be running a generator and how much? Solar Power Generation: Based on some tests by the Wynns in Florida (latitude N26), two used "160W" panels (they have 6 of these), produced 15 Amps at "12V", at 14.4V from the panels, but we will say 12.8V from the batteries later because though the charge voltage is higher, the voltage at which the power comes out is lower.    That is 216 Watts in, 192 Watts of useful power out of the batteries later.   They also tested two new "140W" panels and produced 20 Amps at "12V", or about 288 Watts in, 256 Watts out later.   256/"280" = 91% useful power.   192/"320" = 60% useful power.   Same solar controller in both tests.  At latitude N44, I was seeing about 67% of ratings from the panels, before considering charging losses which for a perfect charge controller might be 60% useful power.    On my off-grid solar installation, I have huge reserve capacity, currently not that much generating capacity, and the vampire load is very low.   I would add panels if I were to increase expected daily loads.   The Wynns also did a lot of shading tests, simulating halyards (no appreciable difference) and the boom (much larger difference).   Lets assume this is a boat on the hook and one has put a preventer on the boom to make it not shade panels, and oriented the boat to get uninterrupted sun on the panels.   If I were designing a solar system for a boat today, for a monohull, I would go with the most power dense panels I could get -- lets say "320W" panels.   Lets say I have an arch over my davits and I am able to put three 40-inch wide panels flat above this arch -- that is a beam of 10 feet.   Lets assume 60% useful power.   That is 960 Watts * 60% = 576 Watts which is not much.. One only gets that during the day.   So one might get 3kWh of power per day from the panels -- based on not angling panels.   For someone who thinks they can run without a generator, that is the limit of power.   "Average use for a typical RVer is around 20 kWh a day.   .....  RVers parked in areas where they do not need air conditioning will use much less electricity than RVers who do need it.  In fact, the average amount of electricity used by people who are not running air conditioning is about 10 kWh a day.."  (1) There is one total power budget estimate.   Lets look at it from the components up: Loads: Required Unoccupied, trekking the country nearby while the boat is on anchor:  - Refrigeration: 300 kWh / year (modern, high efficiency, extra insulation for the tropics)   lets say 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Anchoring light (LED, 2 nm visibility, on a timer, 12 hour burn):  0.025 kWh/day   (3)    - Bilge Pump (500 gallons/day, 1 hour/day): 0.060 kWh/day (4)  - Most basic of computers offering Wifi and sensor monitoring to report alerts & email: 0.080 kWh/day (5 + estimate for dry contact and sensor system)   Minimum Occupied:  - Radio (hand held, listening):  0.020 kWh/day  (2)   - Interior Lights (LED):  0.050 kWh/day   - Recharging (Cell, shaver, shortwave receiver, flashlights, head lamps, miscellaneous): 0.050 kWh/day Voluntary Electronics:  - Netbook (4 hours):  0.100 kWh/day    - Full Laptop (4 hours): 0.300 kWh/day   - Display Screen (tv/monitor) (4 hours): 0.400 kWh//day  - DVD player (2 hours): 0.050 kWh/day Other:  - Pressurized water (per 100 liters -- usage for 1 day):  0.020 kWh/day (7)  - Freezer: 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Washing machine, 2 people:  0.400 kWh/day (one load every second day)  - Water maker (most efficient, per 100 liters/day): 0.400 kWh/day (6) Working on Boat:  - hand saw and driver drill for cabinetry work (1 hour run time/8 hour day): 1 kWh/day (experience)  - belt sander for finishing (6 hours run time/8 hour day): 7.2 kWh/day (experience) This is before using any electricity for cooking.   Looking at these conveniences ... pressurized water is a power bargain.   So, basic anchoring budget is 1.17 kWh / day -- solar will cover it with more than 100% to spare -- one 12V/100Ah battery unit at 50% DOD will carry it through the night.   On light overcast days, when one is getting 50% power, the system is still OK.   So one uses two 12V/100Ah units to keep the average DOD to 25%, to make sure it does not go much below 50% DOD in a stretch of moderately cloudy weather..      To go one week (hurricane overcast on a boat, a week of heavy overcast in winter in Canada) without significant sun, the battery bank must be 8.2 kWh -- which is 14 units of 12V/100Ah at 50% DOD -- that is a lot of batteries.   Rick's batteries, four times 12V/200Ah, 9.6 kWh, could handle this, just.   This is why I am interested in Rick's batteries -- they are about the minimum I would consider to have constant refrigeration, be it in a cottage or boat.   Speaking of refrigeration.  When one is not opening the fridge and adding things or taking things out, the power consumption of a fridge is inversely related to thickness of insulation.   As the largest power draw in an unoccupied space, I would consider a hyper-insulated fridge (I do not believe it is available, I was thinking DIY) to cut the power in half.   That allows Rick's batteries to run the system for close to 2 weeks without sun.   That I think would be a far better design for an off-grid cottage.   Ricks batteries would recharge in about 4 days after 2 weeks with heavy overcast.    If one had reliable sun every day, and particularly if the panels netted a little better than 60% useful power from their rating, then: 3.93 kWh/day -- based on 200 liters/day of water desalinated, and pressurized, laundry, freezer, and no voluntary electronics.  The solar panels could not reliably keep up.  In full sun, Rick's batteries would need a generator run of 10 hours once every 8 or 9 days.   From fully charged, after 2 days without sun, without a generator run, Rick's batteries would be exhausted.    Therefore, a pretty spartan existence, with a short shower daily, would be a strain without a daily generator run of about an hour on sunny days, and 4 hours a day on heavy overcast days.   (Assuming a Honda 1200W quiet generator outputting 1000W average.) Get rid of the freezer and one is just below what one would expect of the panels per day.   After just one day without sun, one would have to wait 2 weeks for the batteries to get back up to normal.   It is not reasonable to expect only 1 day of heavy clouds in each 2 weeks.   Therefore, even without the freezer, the solar panels would likely fall behind and regular generator running would be needed.  One could laminate flexible panels to the deck, but they are on average half the efficiency per unit area and, one really could not expect more than another 320 W of power to be conveniently placed. For those thinking that wind power will save them...  one would need an anchorage protected from waves, by say a submerged reef, and open to the wind -- so not like a closed bay.   Most small wind generators are rated for 40km/h, that is, they give their rated power at 40km/h wind speed.   They do not cut in until about 8 or 9 km/h.   Wind energy goes by the cube of the wind speed.   To generate half the rated output, one needs about 32 km/h of wind.   Half the rated output on a 400 Watt generator is 200 Watts.   Even if it is a tiringly windy anchorage, and the wind blows 24/7, that is only 4.8 kWh of power maximum theoretical, 4.2 kWh useful delivered to loads is more likely with charging inefficiency.  That is more than solar, but only if one assumes a tiringly windy anchorage.   If one wants the wind generator to total the same output as solar in 24 hours, one must have 27 kmph winds, 24/7.    Based on the theory that (Message over 64 KB, truncated) | 35910|35854|2019-05-02 15:28:32|Darren Bos|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?| Matt, I'm in full blown boating building mode right now, so here's the quick answer while I eat my lunch.  The best introduction I know is Dave Gerr's Propeller Handbook.  If you look at this link on amazon and go to the preview you can read the relevant pages for free.  Pages 4 and 5 have examples of the kind of graph I was talking about.  As you can see, over most of the operating range there is a significant difference between the power the prop will absorb and the horsepower curve of the engine.  For the 80hp engine in Fig 4. you can see that at 1800rpm there is a 35 hp gap between what a properly matched prop is absorbing and what the engine can produce.  Later in the book Gerr mentions pyrometers and oil pressure to gauge if the engine is being overworked.  Really, this isn't much different from what folks with controllable pitch props do, they have to be careful not to overpitch and overload the engine.  If you're engine is from a marine manufacturer, there is a chance you could get such a graph from them.  Otherwise, you can get the engine part of the graph from the engine manufacturer and you'll probably have to calculate the prop bit yourself. Keep in mind the many thousands of sailboats that are running around right now, and that main engine failures are the exception rather than the rule.  This is despite the fact that lots of boats are overpitched, but rarely use full rpm, so they get away with it.  Lots of boats are properly pitched, but almost always run at moderate rpm and are thus running underloaded.  Properly pitching your prop, adding a pyrometer, a reasonable number of accessories, and actually monitoring your engine would put you well ahead of the pack.  When I set up the dry exhaust for my engine I added a threaded fitting which makes it easy to install and replace the pyrometer (egt sensor).  A display with an setable alarm can be found cheaply. For context, remember I was talking about adding a 210A alternator to a 50hp engine as an attractive alternative to having a generator.  So, 210A x 14V = 3kW.  3kW = 4hp   However, there are losses.  Balmar's rule of thumb is 1hp per 25A alternator output, which is 8hp.  Downrating the alternator to 180A (2.5 kW, 3.4hp), and using an external regulator which allows the alternator load to slowly increase makes things easier on the engine.  So, the real loads are likely around 6 hp when the alternator is running at full load.  This number also jives well with an alternator efficiency of 55%  So much for a quick reply.... On 2019-05-02 9:29 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Trying to piece this together to learn something.... OK then, as one reduces RPM, the hp gap between the prop curve and engine curve increases -- the engine is capable of more than the prop.  Engine curves and prop curves both fall to zero at zero RPM, so, there is an RPM for the maximum difference between the curves, where the engine is producing the maximum spare horsepower beyond what the prop is using.  There is a range near that RPM where there is plenty of spare hp.   One might not be certain at a given moment what hp is being drawn by electric-clutch-driven-automatic accessories, or the alternator that is regulated by the regulator.  So I am guessing (so long as the prop is engaged) one should always operate the engine between the maximum hp gap RPM, and the prop-engine match RPM ? So as a procedure, in the case of automatically regulated load accessories: I am guessing one sets the engine for the maximum hp gap RPM, as a starting point, and then monitors the engine exhaust temperature (or sound by ear) for overload ? If one is well below temperature indicating underload (and sound by ear also indicates underload), then one increases RPM slightly toward the prop-engine match RPM ? If one is over-temperature at a given RPM indicating overload (or the sound by ear indicates overload), then one decreases the RPM toward the maximum hp gap RPM ? Would this be a practical way to operate a propulsion diesel with heavy, automatically-controlled accessories on it ? The maximum hp gap between the engine and prop curves gives another limit on the maximum hp that can be used by accessories.   Zoa Scott indicated the engine itself has a limit in the specs.   So one would have to keep below both these limits ... it seems ?   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 12:03 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     Because the power curve of the engine does not match that for the power absorption of a fixed pitch propeller, you only have one point where engine power and propeller absorption match (where the curves cross).  In order to prevent damage to the engine, this point is set at the maximum produced power.  When you install a new prop and check to make sure that the engine can still reach its maximum rpm, this is what you are doing.  So, at any engine speed below the max rpm, the propeller is absorbing less power than the engine would like to be producing for that rpm.  If all you are doing is adding a larger alternator, then you are unlikely to run into problems overloading the engine and are likely moving it to a more efficient part of the fuel consumption map.  Should you need max power out of then engine, install an ordinary switch in the field wire of your alternator or use an external regulator like a Balmar that has a small engine mode that allows you to reduce the alternator output. If you want to add more accessories, then you might want to be a bit more careful that you are not overloading the engine.  Check the power curves that are published for your engine.  Also, an exhaust temperature gauge is good insurance that you are not overloading the engine.  In reality, most of the accessories you would strap to the engine won't be on all the time.  A watermaker either has an electric clutch, or a simple manual engagement system like Brent has talked about.  The alternator load can be turned on and off easily.  Even a fridge compressor would have an electric clutch.  So, as long as you stay within the limits of allowable accessory loads on the crankshaft, you can add whatever you can find space to fit and still have a propeller matched to the maximum hp that the engine can produce. I'm not a diesel mechanic.  Just a guy that likes messing about with the technical side of boats and I try to share what I know here with the hope of helping someone out as others here have done for me.  Also, discussions here are a good way to find the limits of what I know and the cases where I'm just plain wrong. Cheers, Darren On 2019-05-01 4:29 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Thank you Zoa.  Also ignored, with parasitic loads, your (residual) torque-rpm characteristic cannot match the prop anymore if it match without parasitic loads. Matt From: Zoa Scott zoascott74@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 19:02 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Just a note incase its not widely known. All diesel engine manufacturers will let you know max allowable parasitic hp loads to be taken off crankshaft . Im a diesel mechanic by trade. If your running mutiple gizmos they are usually installed opposing each other if belt driven. Zoa  On Wed, May 1, 2019, 5:20 AM Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats], wrote:   Excellent point Darren, I had not considered drive belt load on the crankshaft bearing from all these extras.  My engine is not well set up for extra driven components so I had been toying with the idea of a pony shaft just to run components from.   But even then, if one is pulling 10,000W off the pony shaft (3,000W for each of the alternator, semihermetic compressor and watermaker pump plus surge margin) then a lot of design calculation and checking for what is easily available has go into the power transmission link between the engine and pony shaft..  Is a motorcycle drive cogged belt that custom bikes use between the engine and transmission ... is that the easiest?   I don't know.  Is it better to put one extra to the right, another to the left so they balance bearing loads, except for the little torque caused by the separation between the plane of the two belts?    Is there room to put one extra below the crankshaft to balance a triad... there might be on my boat. Really good point.  Last thing one wants to do is reduce the life of the primary engine. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 01:21 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Agreed, and I enjoyed your embellishment of the idea Matt  :-)  The one thing you have to look out for is how heavily you load the crankshaft bearing.  The manufacturers tend to be a bit cagey about what is tolerable.  If I had a water pump for a watermaker and a big alternator, I'd try and mount them opposed by 180 degrees.  Most marine engines die from corrosion and lack of use.  While you wouldn't want to idle one to charge the batteries, just about any other use is likely to make it last longer. On 2019-04-30 1:47 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Absolutely agreed Darren, if people do not have refrigeration, they should remain in that blissful place.   Absolutely agreed Darren, if you include running the propulsion engine as different from running a dedicated engine to generate electricity.   Perhaps I should change the title to "Run a fuel engine to make electricity sometimes, or Not".   Engine or Generator -- seems the same thing to me.  It was easier to do the calculations with a 1200W Honda.. What you said about running the propulsion engine for two purposes is absolutely of advantage.   Thank you for telling me about the "small engine" regulators ... I want one.   Absolutely true, propulsion engines are usually diesel, more efficient, marine-ized so they last longer in a boat environment, whereas generators are, well, inexpensive if they are gasoline and not marine-ized.   But chances are, the outboard on the tender is gasoline so, one probably has gasoline on board in any case.   It is absolutely true for some boats and some owners that running the engine will come at about the same frequency as one would normally need to top up the batteries.   But then this tempo will get ingrained.  When one gets somewhere they really like and want to stay for a while, the tempo will make one feel itchy to go somewhere on a certain schedule or face the prospect of just running the engine just to make electricity, which more than a few cruisers complain is inefficient and irritating to them..   Where sails are a redundancy to the propulsion engine, there is no redundancy to an alternator if any one of a dozen things goes wrong with the propulsion engine.   The propulsion engine has a limited service lifetime and a chance of other failures, every hour it runs.   If something goes wrong with the engine, you are talking about boat yoga in tight spaces if you are a DIY type, on-site diesel mechanics ($$), and worst case a $10,000-$15,000 bill and a crane to replace it.   Yikes, I am not running that sucker just to make electricity.  As for incidental electricity... I sail differently.   My sails are my propulsion.  I have used as little as 12 litres of fuel in year, and there is no such thing as a wind where my boat is slower than a cottage.   My engine is my backup to my sails.   Naturally, good seamanship dictates caution and to some that points only to the engine.  If that is the way it has to be, OK.   But waiting to go in until the wind and tide are favourable is also seamanship, and then the engine and its full tank of fuel is still there in reserve.    Many times I start the engine and just let it idle for the decisive couple of minutes as I sail nearly all the way in -- it is there in an instant for oh-crap moments..      At least with a 1200 Watt generator, there is no issue of charge rate, they are really quiet out of the box, and can be made quieter with a little DIY..   If something goes wrong with the generator, I had always assumed that in a pinch I would have the 20,000 Watt propulsion engine was the backup to the generator, even though it is inefficient and straining to the electrical system unless it is used for something else at the same time.   If something goes wrong with the generator, it never be a big bill.  I carry it ashore to a small engine repair place, or buy another one.  In the meantime, so long as the generator works, one runs their engine only when necessary, keeping its hours down.   So it is down to wear and tear on the engine, or a disposable substitute to change fuel into electricity.  I would never NOT have a portable generator.    I am really not disputing anything you are saying Darren, some people will find what you describe to be the simplest course of action.   I am just giving the other side of what some other boats might do.   But lets run with your idea, a very good one, to have a 210A bus alternator running directly off the propulsion engine to take advantage of the huge surplus of mechanical power available that one might borrow from when moving the boat.   But, if you are going to do that....  - if you have an external regulator, is it not possible with the flip of an appropriately-wired switch to turn this into an unbelievable weldernator ?   One is never doing that with a 1200W Honda.   Even Rick's batteries, and a little inverter welder, that is a joke compared to this T-rex of weldernators.   You could do half inch plate with 5/32" rod and really feel like you are accomplishing something.   If you have never tried 5/32 rod, you really have to, just for fun, on 3/16" or thicker steel.   Have 100 feet of cables, and industrial fenders and raft up to commercial boats and do a little commercial welding.   I want one.  Really, I do..    - why stop at a 210A alternator -- connect up a high pressure pump with a couple of one-way valves so your water maker runs electric off one pump or directly from the engine from the other pump -- for just the cost of a second pump, you are creating redundancy.   Drawing the same torque as the alternator, the engine-powered watermaker could put out 200 gallons per hour, assuming one has suitable osmosis media.   The efficiency would be awesome, diesel directly driving the pump skips the following filters of efficiency: claw-style armature alternator 75-80%, battery charging 90%, electric motor 80-90% -- combined total 54%-65% efficiency.  One avoids all that by going straight off the engine.   Then one also has the alternative to make water with the engine if the electric pump ever fails.   I sure am thinking about doing this..  - why stop there ... If the water tanks fill before one is finished motoring, start filling the bathtub and have a good celebratory soak in the tub to prepare for going out on the town at the new destination.  Your 20,000 Watt motor is easily producing 25,000 Watts of heat so, that tub can be nice and toasty warm with just a few valves and a little hose.   This is just a given, I am definitely having an engine-heat option to my hot water tank.   - Heck why stop there ... turn down the flow rate so the fresh water comes out at full exhaust temperature and fill your teapot.   There is a lot of comfort possible here.    I don't like tea that much so, no.    - If there is still a surplus of fresh water, start filling all those water jerry cans most boats have -- over stock and then turn off the electric water maker -- run the engine today, save Amps tomorrow.   I sure would do this.      - why stop there ... put a semi-hermetic compressor on the engine and hook it up to a big-ass ice maker -- freeze a fraction that 200 GPH pouring out of the water maker and get rid of the need for both refrigeration and freezer (save the brine waste from water making ... ice+brine = -17C in a cold plate).    Says that man with a great big ice chest ... pull it out, or add a compressor to the engine ... open question.    - why stop there ... Just keep making ice, and put hundreds of pounds of ice in a stainless cabinet inside an adjustable-vent wood cabinet, with a drip pan under the stainless cabinet -- a DIY dehumidifier.   This is probably beyond the electrical power budget for most boats, so, what a luxury.   Dry gallons an hour.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Have the melt-water drain for the stainless cabinet run through a cooling coil along the cabinet ceiling and back down into the fresh water tanks -- step one air conditioning, for the price of pumping water a few feet -- we have already established, that is bargain compared to AC.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Not cool enough? Open vents in the side of the wood cabinet and blow air in there to both get more cool air and accelerate melting.   Glorious air conditioning -- not even a cat could manage that on solar.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... they have these cooking appliances, called muff pots, better than instant pots, and they are *ZERO* Watts:  http://cs.amsnow.com/sno/b/news/archive/2015/04/09/snacker-packer-meals-made-easy.aspx Cooking on a snowmobile made easy - American Snowmobiler Magazine - Snowmobile forums, news, Polaris, Ski-Doo, Arctic Cat & Yamaha reviews - AmSnow.com American Snowmobiler Magazine presents news, reviews, forums, videos, photos and the latest stats and prices for Arctic Cat, Ski-Doo, Yamaha and Polaris snowmobiles. cs.amsnow.com If one has never cooked on the exhaust of an engine ...   Heck with all that, one solar panel would run the radio and the nav lights, nav, etc.   If co-generating electricity by depending on running a 20,000 Watt engine with any frequency is how some boaters will do it, then co-generating everything else that would otherwise require electricity, or would generate comfort is worth mentioning too.   So when it comes down to it, same answer:  On a monohull, one is running an engine sometimes, but there is a lot of room for innovation, taste, preferences and different ways to meet the power budget.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:59 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     For everyone who has a simple boat without refrigeration/freezer, you probably wonder why everyone is so concerned about how to generate enough power from solar.  Your life is simple and there is no reason to read the rest of this. Matt, that's a pretty reasonable analysis, and would fit some boats.  There are certainly boats that manage these comforts on lower watts.  The obvious area for improvement is refrigeration, any efficiencies gained here is money better spent than money spent on power generation (solar and generators).  I came to the conclusion that 4" of styrofoam insulation for the fridge and 6" for the freezer was the minimum to make DC refrigeration work on a reasonable energy budget.  50 to 125 Ah per day is what 12v DC refrigeration generally uses per day.  The differences are almost entirely due to insulation, next due to the size of the fridge/freezer.  If you can get closer to 50Ah per day your energy budget changes drastically.  I decided a spillover design fridge freezer, custom built to maximize insulation was the best way to go in my build.  Aspen Aerogel is an interesting material here.  However, polystyrene foam is easy to work, cheap, readily available, and absorbs water less than the other foam insulation choices. Your energy budget doesn't consider engine run time and power from the alternator at all.  A boat that moves even just once or twice a week can reduce/eliminate its need for generator run time by super-sizing its alternator.  I've ordered a Leece-Neville 210A school bus alternator.  It should run happily at 170A continuous, perhaps a bit more with careful attention to cooling.  This is a win-win situation, getting power from the alternator is more efficient than from a generator.  With a fixed pitch prop you're running at an inefficient part of the power curve of the diesel at cruising rpm.  The extra load the alternator moves the engine into a more efficient part of the fuel map, that improvement in efficiency means that part of the fuel consumed by the alternator comes for free as your making the engine more efficient at the same time you make carbon buildup problems less likely.  Even if you have a smaller diesel you could fit an alternator this size.  If you need maximum propulsion power at some point, an external regulator like a Balmar Mc-614 used with a switch for small engine mode (field output reduced to 50%) allows you to get most of the power from the engine for propulsion when necessary.  You could also just put a plain switch in the field wire to the alt for a inexpensive solution, although charging at these high currents you probably want an external regulator anyway.  It should be noted that this solution relies on batteries that can accept pretty high charge rates.  This would be LiPO4, Firefly >AGM>very large flooded lead acid bank.  A small flooded-lead-acid bank probably won't be able to accept the high charge rate for long enough for a large alternator to do a lot of good.  The LiPO4 and the Firefly also have the advantage that they are totally happy in a partial state of charge and can stay there without damage until you are ready to move to the next anchorage (within reasonable time limits and state of charge limits).  You should switch to a serpentine belt to run a large alternator like a Delco Remy 28SI or a Leece Neville Idle Pro. There are two ways of looking at comfort while cruising.  Your comfort could come from plugging in whatever you want whenever you want.  However, this comes with the discomfort of noise from the generator, discomfort getting/storing fuel for the generator (especially bad for gasoline generators),  discomfort from getting/storing oil for the generator, (Message over 64 KB, truncated) | 35911|35854|2019-05-02 16:22:42|Matt Malone|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?| #ygrps-yiv-835941046 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Thanks Darren, You are right, 55% is a typical alternator efficiency, not the 75-80% I gave before.   And you are right about engine curves and propellers.  After you reminded me, I remembered those curve shapes, and of course...   Just one thing... >main engine failures are the exception rather than the rule Except for me  (I am considering an engine upgrade) everyone I have talked to with an older boat has replaced the engine owing to not a catastrophic failure, but increasing signs of problems, general deterioration-type problems, or a single repair that was expensive enough ($1,000) to cause them to take the replacement path instead ($10,000+).   There are people telling me where I can get second hand engines and parts.   Engine problems seem inevitable from my perspective.     Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 3:28 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     Matt, I'm in full blown boating building mode right now, so here's the quick answer while I eat my lunch.  The best introduction I know is Dave Gerr's Propeller Handbook.  If you look at this link on amazon and go to the preview you can read the relevant pages for free.  Pages 4 and 5 have examples of the kind of graph I was talking about.  As you can see, over most of the operating range there is a significant difference between the power the prop will absorb and the horsepower curve of the engine.  For the 80hp engine in Fig 4. you can see that at 1800rpm there is a 35 hp gap between what a properly matched prop is absorbing and what the engine can produce.  Later in the book Gerr mentions pyrometers and oil pressure to gauge if the engine is being overworked.  Really, this isn't much different from what folks with controllable pitch props do, they have to be careful not to overpitch and overload the engine.  If you're engine is from a marine manufacturer, there is a chance you could get such a graph from them.  Otherwise, you can get the engine part of the graph from the engine manufacturer and you'll probably have to calculate the prop bit yourself. Keep in mind the many thousands of sailboats that are running around right now, and that main engine failures are the exception rather than the rule.  This is despite the fact that lots of boats are overpitched, but rarely use full rpm, so they get away with it.  Lots of boats are properly pitched, but almost always run at moderate rpm and are thus running underloaded.  Properly pitching your prop, adding a pyrometer, a reasonable number of accessories, and actually monitoring your engine would put you well ahead of the pack.  When I set up the dry exhaust for my engine I added a threaded fitting which makes it easy to install and replace the pyrometer (egt sensor).  A display with an setable alarm can be found cheaply. For context, remember I was talking about adding a 210A alternator to a 50hp engine as an attractive alternative to having a generator.  So, 210A x 14V = 3kW.  3kW = 4hp   However, there are losses.  Balmar's rule of thumb is 1hp per 25A alternator output, which is 8hp.  Downrating the alternator to 180A (2.5 kW, 3.4hp), and using an external regulator which allows the alternator load to slowly increase makes things easier on the engine.  So, the real loads are likely around 6 hp when the alternator is running at full load.  This number also jives well with an alternator efficiency of 55%  So much for a quick reply.... On 2019-05-02 9:29 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Trying to piece this together to learn something.... OK then, as one reduces RPM, the hp gap between the prop curve and engine curve increases -- the engine is capable of more than the prop.  Engine curves and prop curves both fall to zero at zero RPM, so, there is an RPM for the maximum difference between the curves, where the engine is producing the maximum spare horsepower beyond what the prop is using.  There is a range near that RPM where there is plenty of spare hp.   One might not be certain at a given moment what hp is being drawn by electric-clutch-driven-automatic accessories, or the alternator that is regulated by the regulator.  So I am guessing (so long as the prop is engaged) one should always operate the engine between the maximum hp gap RPM, and the prop-engine match RPM ? So as a procedure, in the case of automatically regulated load accessories: I am guessing one sets the engine for the maximum hp gap RPM, as a starting point, and then monitors the engine exhaust temperature (or sound by ear) for overload ? If one is well below temperature indicating underload (and sound by ear also indicates underload), then one increases RPM slightly toward the prop-engine match RPM ? If one is over-temperature at a given RPM indicating overload (or the sound by ear indicates overload), then one decreases the RPM toward the maximum hp gap RPM ? Would this be a practical way to operate a propulsion diesel with heavy, automatically-controlled accessories on it ? The maximum hp gap between the engine and prop curves gives another limit on the maximum hp that can be used by accessories.   Zoa Scott indicated the engine itself has a limit in the specs.   So one would have to keep below both these limits ... it seems ?   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 12:03 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     Because the power curve of the engine does not match that for the power absorption of a fixed pitch propeller, you only have one point where engine power and propeller absorption match (where the curves cross).  In order to prevent damage to the engine, this point is set at the maximum produced power.  When you install a new prop and check to make sure that the engine can still reach its maximum rpm, this is what you are doing.  So, at any engine speed below the max rpm, the propeller is absorbing less power than the engine would like to be producing for that rpm.  If all you are doing is adding a larger alternator, then you are unlikely to run into problems overloading the engine and are likely moving it to a more efficient part of the fuel consumption map.  Should you need max power out of then engine, install an ordinary switch in the field wire of your alternator or use an external regulator like a Balmar that has a small engine mode that allows you to reduce the alternator output. If you want to add more accessories, then you might want to be a bit more careful that you are not overloading the engine.  Check the power curves that are published for your engine.  Also, an exhaust temperature gauge is good insurance that you are not overloading the engine.  In reality, most of the accessories you would strap to the engine won't be on all the time.  A watermaker either has an electric clutch, or a simple manual engagement system like Brent has talked about.  The alternator load can be turned on and off easily.  Even a fridge compressor would have an electric clutch.  So, as long as you stay within the limits of allowable accessory loads on the crankshaft, you can add whatever you can find space to fit and still have a propeller matched to the maximum hp that the engine can produce. I'm not a diesel mechanic.  Just a guy that likes messing about with the technical side of boats and I try to share what I know here with the hope of helping someone out as others here have done for me.  Also, discussions here are a good way to find the limits of what I know and the cases where I'm just plain wrong. Cheers, Darren On 2019-05-01 4:29 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Thank you Zoa.  Also ignored, with parasitic loads, your (residual) torque-rpm characteristic cannot match the prop anymore if it match without parasitic loads. Matt From: Zoa Scott zoascott74@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 19:02 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Just a note incase its not widely known. All diesel engine manufacturers will let you know max allowable parasitic hp loads to be taken off crankshaft . Im a diesel mechanic by trade. If your running mutiple gizmos they are usually installed opposing each other if belt driven. Zoa  On Wed, May 1, 2019, 5:20 AM Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats], wrote:   Excellent point Darren, I had not considered drive belt load on the crankshaft bearing from all these extras.  My engine is not well set up for extra driven components so I had been toying with the idea of a pony shaft just to run components from.   But even then, if one is pulling 10,000W off the pony shaft (3,000W for each of the alternator, semihermetic compressor and watermaker pump plus surge margin) then a lot of design calculation and checking for what is easily available has go into the power transmission link between the engine and pony shaft..  Is a motorcycle drive cogged belt that custom bikes use between the engine and transmission ... is that the easiest?   I don't know.  Is it better to put one extra to the right, another to the left so they balance bearing loads, except for the little torque caused by the separation between the plane of the two belts?    Is there room to put one extra below the crankshaft to balance a triad... there might be on my boat. Really good point.  Last thing one wants to do is reduce the life of the primary engine. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 01:21 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Agreed, and I enjoyed your embellishment of the idea Matt  :-)  The one thing you have to look out for is how heavily you load the crankshaft bearing.  The manufacturers tend to be a bit cagey about what is tolerable.  If I had a water pump for a watermaker and a big alternator, I'd try and mount them opposed by 180 degrees.  Most marine engines die from corrosion and lack of use.  While you wouldn't want to idle one to charge the batteries, just about any other use is likely to make it last longer. On 2019-04-30 1:47 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Absolutely agreed Darren, if people do not have refrigeration, they should remain in that blissful place.   Absolutely agreed Darren, if you include running the propulsion engine as different from running a dedicated engine to generate electricity.   Perhaps I should change the title to "Run a fuel engine to make electricity sometimes, or Not".   Engine or Generator -- seems the same thing to me.  It was easier to do the calculations with a 1200W Honda.. What you said about running the propulsion engine for two purposes is absolutely of advantage.   Thank you for telling me about the "small engine" regulators ... I want one.   Absolutely true, propulsion engines are usually diesel, more efficient, marine-ized so they last longer in a boat environment, whereas generators are, well, inexpensive if they are gasoline and not marine-ized.   But chances are, the outboard on the tender is gasoline so, one probably has gasoline on board in any case.   It is absolutely true for some boats and some owners that running the engine will come at about the same frequency as one would normally need to top up the batteries.   But then this tempo will get ingrained.  When one gets somewhere they really like and want to stay for a while, the tempo will make one feel itchy to go somewhere on a certain schedule or face the prospect of just running the engine just to make electricity, which more than a few cruisers complain is inefficient and irritating to them..   Where sails are a redundancy to the propulsion engine, there is no redundancy to an alternator if any one of a dozen things goes wrong with the propulsion engine.   The propulsion engine has a limited service lifetime and a chance of other failures, every hour it runs.   If something goes wrong with the engine, you are talking about boat yoga in tight spaces if you are a DIY type, on-site diesel mechanics ($$), and worst case a $10,000-$15,000 bill and a crane to replace it.   Yikes, I am not running that sucker just to make electricity.  As for incidental electricity... I sail differently.   My sails are my propulsion.  I have used as little as 12 litres of fuel in year, and there is no such thing as a wind where my boat is slower than a cottage.   My engine is my backup to my sails.   Naturally, good seamanship dictates caution and to some that points only to the engine.  If that is the way it has to be, OK.   But waiting to go in until the wind and tide are favourable is also seamanship, and then the engine and its full tank of fuel is still there in reserve.    Many times I start the engine and just let it idle for the decisive couple of minutes as I sail nearly all the way in -- it is there in an instant for oh-crap moments..      At least with a 1200 Watt generator, there is no issue of charge rate, they are really quiet out of the box, and can be made quieter with a little DIY..   If something goes wrong with the generator, I had always assumed that in a pinch I would have the 20,000 Watt propulsion engine was the backup to the generator, even though it is inefficient and straining to the electrical system unless it is used for something else at the same time.   If something goes wrong with the generator, it never be a big bill.  I carry it ashore to a small engine repair place, or buy another one.  In the meantime, so long as the generator works, one runs their engine only when necessary, keeping its hours down.   So it is down to wear and tear on the engine, or a disposable substitute to change fuel into electricity.  I would never NOT have a portable generator.    I am really not disputing anything you are saying Darren, some people will find what you describe to be the simplest course of action.   I am just giving the other side of what some other boats might do.   But lets run with your idea, a very good one, to have a 210A bus alternator running directly off the propulsion engine to take advantage of the huge surplus of mechanical power available that one might borrow from when moving the boat.   But, if you are going to do that....  - if you have an external regulator, is it not possible with the flip of an appropriately-wired switch to turn this into an unbelievable weldernator ?   One is never doing that with a 1200W Honda.   Even Rick's batteries, and a little inverter welder, that is a joke compared to this T-rex of weldernators.   You could do half inch plate with 5/32" rod and really feel like you are accomplishing something.   If you have never tried 5/32 rod, you really have to, just for fun, on 3/16" or thicker steel.   Have 100 feet of cables, and industrial fenders and raft up to commercial boats and do a little commercial welding.   I want one.  Really, I do..    - why stop at a 210A alternator -- connect up a high pressure pump with a couple of one-way valves so your water maker runs electric off one pump or directly from the engine from the other pump -- for just the cost of a second pump, you are creating redundancy.   Drawing the same torque as the alternator, the engine-powered watermaker could put out 200 gallons per hour, assuming one has suitable osmosis media.   The efficiency would be awesome, diesel directly driving the pump skips the following filters of efficiency: claw-style armature alternator 75-80%, battery charging 90%, electric motor 80-90% -- combined total 54%-65% efficiency.  One avoids all that by going straight off the engine.   Then one also has the alternative to make water with the engine if the electric pump ever fails.   I sure am thinking about doing this..  - why stop there ... If the water tanks fill before one is finished motoring, start filling the bathtub and have a good celebratory soak in the tub to prepare for going out on the town at the new destination.  Your 20,000 Watt motor is easily producing 25,000 Watts of heat so, that tub can be nice and toasty warm with just a few valves and a little hose.   This is just a given, I am definitely having an engine-heat option to my hot water tank.   - Heck why stop there ... turn down the flow rate so the fresh water comes out at full exhaust temperature and fill your teapot.   There is a lot of comfort possible here.    I don't like tea that much so, no.    - If there is still a surplus of fresh water, start filling all those water jerry cans most boats have -- over stock and then turn off the electric water maker -- run the engine today, save Amps tomorrow.   I sure would do this.      - why stop there ... put a semi-hermetic compressor on the engine and hook it up to a big-ass ice maker -- freeze a fraction that 200 GPH pouring out of the water maker and get rid of the need for both refrigeration and freezer (save the brine waste from water making ... ice+brine = -17C in a cold plate).    Says that man with a great big ice chest ... pull it out, or add a compressor to the engine ... open question.    - why stop there ... Just keep making ice, and put hundreds of pounds of ice in a stainless cabinet inside an adjustable-vent wood cabinet, with a drip pan under the stainless cabinet -- a DIY dehumidifier.   This is probably beyond the electrical power budget for most boats, so, what a luxury.   Dry gallons an hour.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Have the melt-water drain for the stainless cabinet run through a cooling coil along the cabinet ceiling and back down into the fresh water tanks -- step one air conditioning, for the price of pumping water a few feet -- we have already established, that is bargain compared to AC.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Not cool enough? Open vents in the side of the wood cabinet and blow air in there to both get more cool air and accelerate melting.   Glorious air conditioning -- not even a cat could manage that on solar.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... they have these cooking appliances, called muff pots, better than instant pots, and they are *ZERO* Watts:  http://cs.amsnow.com/sno/b/news/archive/2015/04/09/snacker-packer-meals-made-easy.aspx Cooking on a snowmobile made easy - American Snowmobiler Magazine - Snowmobile forums, news, Polaris, Ski-Doo, Arctic Cat & Yamaha reviews - AmSnow.com American Snowmobiler Magazine presents news, reviews, forums, videos, photos and the latest stats and prices for Arctic Cat, Ski-Doo, Yamaha and Polaris snowmobiles. cs.amsnow.com If one has never cooked on the exhaust of an engine ...   Heck with all that, one solar panel would run the radio and the nav lights, nav, etc.   If co-generating electricity by depending on running a 20,000 Watt engine with any frequency is how some boaters will do it, then co-generating everything else that would otherwise require electricity, or would generate comfort is worth mentioning too.   So when it comes down to it, same answer:  On a monohull, one is running an engine sometimes, but there is a lot of room for innovation, taste, preferences and different ways to meet the power budget.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:59 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     For everyone who has a simple boat without refrigeration/freezer, you probably wonder why everyone is so concerned about how to generate enough power from solar.  Your life is simple and there is no reason to read the rest of this. Matt, that's a pretty reasonable analysis, and would fit some boats.  There are certainly boats that manage these comforts on lower watts.  The obvious area for improvement is refrigeration, any efficiencies gained here is money better spent than money spent on power generation (solar and generators).  I came to the conclusion that 4" of styrofoam insulation for the fridge and 6" for the freezer was the minimum to make DC refrigeration work on a reasonable energy budget.  50 to 125 Ah per day is what 12v DC refrigeration generally uses per day.  The differences are almost entirely due to insulation, next due to the size of the fridge/freezer.  If you can get closer to 50Ah per day your energy budget changes drastically.  I decided a spillover design fridge freezer, custom built to maximize insulation was the best way to go in my build.  Aspen Aerogel is an interesting material here.  However, polystyrene foam is easy to work, cheap, readily available, and absorbs water less than the other foam insulation choices. Your energy budget doesn't consider engine run time and power from the alternator at all.  A boat that moves even just once or twice a week can reduce/eliminate its need for generator run time by super-sizing its alternator.  I've ordered a Leece-Neville 210A school bus alternator.  It should run happily at 170A continuous, perhaps a bit more with careful attention to cooling.  This is a win-win situation, getting power from the alternator is more efficient than from a generator.  With a fixed pitch prop you're running at an inefficient part of the power curve of the diesel at cruising rpm.  The extra load the alternator moves the engine into a more efficient part of the fuel map, that improvement in efficiency means that part of the fuel consumed by the alternator comes for free as your making the engine more efficient at the same time you make carbon buildup problems less likely.  Even if you have a smaller diesel you could fit an alternator this size.  If you need maximum propulsion power at some point, an external regulator like a Balmar Mc-614 used with a switch for small engine mode (field output reduced to 50%) allows you to get most of the power from the engine for propulsion when necessary.  You could also just put a plain switch in the field wire to the alt for a inexpensive solution, although charging at these high currents you probably want an external regulator anyway.  It should be noted that this solution relies on batteries that can accept pretty high charge rates.  This would be LiPO4, Firefly >AGM>very large flooded lead acid bank.  A small flooded-lead-acid bank probably won't be able to accept the high charge rate for long enough for a large alternator to do a lot of good.  The LiPO4 and the Firefly also have the advantage that they are totally happy in a partial state of charge and can stay there without damage until you are ready to move to the next anchorage (within reasonable time limits and state of charge limits).  You should switch to a serpentine belt to run a large alternator like a Delco Remy 28SI or a Leece Neville Idle Pro. There are two ways of looking at comfort while cruising.  Your comfort could come from plugging in whatever you want whenever you want.  However, this comes with the discomfort of noise from the generator, discomfort getting/storing fuel for the generator (especially bad for gasoline generators),  discomfort from getting/storing oil for the generator, the discomfort from generator oil changes, discomfort from trying to source generator parts in some distant port, discomfort from getting shunned by the cruisers who can't stand the noise of your generator.  On the flip side, if you design a boat with conservation in mind, it is possible to run almost entirely on solar.  I've met more than one boat (with refrigeration and watermaker) that runs successfully with just solar/wind/alternator.  You boil water in a kettle on the stove (is that a discomfort?), you wash laundry ashore or in a bucket (Ok, the bucket counts as a discomfort), is lighting a propane stove a discomfort compared to electric (around here tons of folks spend tons of money on their house for the luxury of a natural gas stove).  I have a nice antique coffee grinder, it takes zero watts to run, is beautiful and a pleasure to use, there are tons of equivalents to this on the boat, where doing things different is part of the pleasure for me.  A generator is definitely not necessary.   On 2019-04-30 9:03 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   What really is the electrical capacity on a boat from solar, how far will that take you, and realistically, will one be running a generator and how much? Solar Power Generation: Based on some tests by the Wynns in Florida (latitude N26), two used "160W" panels (they have 6 of these), produced 15 Amps at "12V", at 14.4V from the panels, but we will say 12.8V from the batteries later because though the charge voltage is higher, the voltage at which the power comes out is lower.    That is 216 Watts in, 192 Watts of useful power out of the batteries later.   They also tested two new "140W" panels and produced 20 Amps at "12V", or about 288 Watts in, 256 Watts out later.   256/"280" = 91% useful power.   192/"320" = 60% useful power.   Same solar controller in both tests.  At latitude N44, I was seeing about 67% of ratings from the panels, before considering charging losses which for a perfect charge controller might be 60% useful power.    On my off-grid solar installation, I have huge reserve capacity, currently not that much generating capacity, and the vampire load is very low.   I would add panels if I were to increase expected daily loads.   The Wynns also did a lot of shading tests, simulating halyards (no appreciable difference) and the boom (much larger difference).   Lets assume this is a boat on the hook and one has put a preventer on the boom to make it not shade panels, and oriented the boat to get uninterrupted sun on the panels.   If I were designing a solar system for a boat today, for a monohull, I would go with the most power dense panels I could get -- lets say "320W" panels.   Lets say I have an arch over my davits and I am able to put three 40-inch wide panels flat above this arch -- that is a beam of 10 feet.   Lets assume 60% useful power.   That is 960 Watts * 60% = 576 Watts which is not much.. One only gets that during the day.   So one might get 3kWh of power per day from the panels -- based on not angling panels.   For someone who thinks they can run without a generator, that is the limit of power.   "Average use for a typical RVer is around 20 kWh a day.   .....  RVers parked in areas where they do not need air conditioning will use much less electricity than RVers who do need it.  In fact, the average amount of electricity used by people who are not running air conditioning is about 10 kWh a day.."  (1) There is one total power budget estimate.   Lets look at it from the components up: Loads: Required Unoccupied, trekking the country nearby while the boat is on anchor:  - Refrigeration: 300 kWh / year (modern, high efficiency, extra insulation for the tropics)   lets say 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Anchoring light (LED, 2 nm visibility, on a timer, 12 hour burn):  0.025 kWh/day   (3)    - Bilge Pump (500 gallons/day, 1 hour/day): 0.060 kWh/day (4)  - Most basic of computers offering Wifi and sensor monitoring to report alerts & email: 0.080 kWh/day (5 + estimate for dry contact and sensor system)   Minimum Occupied:  - Radio (hand held, listening):  0.020 kWh/day  (2)   - Interior Lights (LED):  0.050 kWh/day   - Recharging (Cell, shaver, shortwave receiver, flashlights, head lamps, miscellaneous): 0.050 kWh/day Voluntary Electronics:  - Netbook (4 hours):  0.100 kWh/day    - Full Laptop (4 hours): 0.300 kWh/day   - Display Screen (tv/monitor) (4 hours): 0.400 kWh//day  - DVD player (2 hours): 0.050 kWh/day Other:  - Pressurized water (per 100 liters -- usage for 1 day):  0.020 kWh/day (7)  - Freezer: 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Washing machine, 2 people:  0.400 kWh/day (one load every second day)  - Water maker (most efficient, per 100 liters/day): 0.400 kWh/day (6) Working on Boat:  - hand saw and driver drill for cabinetry work (1 hour run time/8 hour day): 1 kWh/day (experience)  - belt sander for finishing (6 hours run time/8 hour day): 7.2 kWh/day (experience) This is before using any electricity for cooking.   Looking at these conveniences ... pressurized water is a power bargain.   So, basic anchoring budget is 1.17 kWh / day -- solar will cover it with more than 100% to spare -- one 12V/100Ah battery unit at 50% DOD will carry it through the night.   On light overcast days, when one is getting 50% power, the system is still OK.   So one uses two 12V/100Ah units to keep the average DOD to 25%, to make sure it does not go much below 50% DOD in a stretch of moderately cloudy weather..      To go one week (hurricane overcast on a boat, a week of heavy overcast in winter in Canada) without significant sun, the battery bank must be 8.2 kWh -- which is 14 units of 12V/100Ah at 50% DOD -- that is a lot of batteries.   Rick's batteries, four times 12V/200Ah, 9.6 kWh, could handle this, just.   This is why I am interested in Rick's batteries -- they are about the minimum I would consider to have constant refrigeration, be it in a cottage or boat.   | 35912|35854|2019-05-02 17:25:48|Darren Bos|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?| I think this is a bit like the stats that say riding a motorcycle is dangerous.  If you just look at the fatalities, it looks a lot more dangerous than driving a car.  However, if you parse out the young guys doing stupid stuff it turns out riding a motorcycle is just a bit more dangerous than driving a car.  There is no shortage of folks who have stories about failed diesels and like plane crashes, it is a pretty traumatic event that sticks in your mind.  However, it is truly remarkable how many diesel auxiliaries keep thumping away given the neglect and poor conditions they face. There's a fair number of members here who know how to take care of diesel, so maybe they could give some examples of long time service.  Compared to most industrial diesels, sailboat auxlillaries put in a trivial number of hours.  What often leads to poor lifespan is the fact that most installations insist in mixing seawater with the engine, we often get poor quality fuel (water and microbe contaminated) compared to land or industrial sources, we stick them in engine rooms without enough air or cooling, we put undersized transmissions on them, we overprop them, we underprop them, we abuse them by charging batteries at idle, we don't change filters, we let them sit unused for months on end, we don't understand that the mixing elbow on the exhaust is a disposable item that gets clogged rusts and fails, we don't change impellers often enough, we inherit poorly installed exhaust systems that let water back to the cylinders, we leave old oil in while the motor sits for winter.......  I'm sure there are things that others can add to the list.   I think we're roughly close in age Matt.  If so, a new engine that is well cared for is likely to outlast your use of the boat and it won't be use, even hard use, that ultimately brings about its failure. Coffee breaks over, back to making big pieces of wood into too small pieces of wood. On 2019-05-02 1:22 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Thanks Darren, You are right, 55% is a typical alternator efficiency, not the 75-80% I gave before.   And you are right about engine curves and propellers.  After you reminded me, I remembered those curve shapes, and of course...   Just one thing... >main engine failures are the exception rather than the rule Except for me  (I am considering an engine upgrade) everyone I have talked to with an older boat has replaced the engine owing to not a catastrophic failure, but increasing signs of problems, general deterioration-type problems, or a single repair that was expensive enough ($1,000) to cause them to take the replacement path instead ($10,000+).   There are people telling me where I can get second hand engines and parts.   Engine problems seem inevitable from my perspective.     Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 3:28 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     Matt, I'm in full blown boating building mode right now, so here's the quick answer while I eat my lunch.  The best introduction I know is Dave Gerr's Propeller Handbook.  If you look at this link on amazon and go to the preview you can read the relevant pages for free.  Pages 4 and 5 have examples of the kind of graph I was talking about.  As you can see, over most of the operating range there is a significant difference between the power the prop will absorb and the horsepower curve of the engine.  For the 80hp engine in Fig 4. you can see that at 1800rpm there is a 35 hp gap between what a properly matched prop is absorbing and what the engine can produce.  Later in the book Gerr mentions pyrometers and oil pressure to gauge if the engine is being overworked.  Really, this isn't much different from what folks with controllable pitch props do, they have to be careful not to overpitch and overload the engine.  If you're engine is from a marine manufacturer, there is a chance you could get such a graph from them.  Otherwise, you can get the engine part of the graph from the engine manufacturer and you'll probably have to calculate the prop bit yourself. Keep in mind the many thousands of sailboats that are running around right now, and that main engine failures are the exception rather than the rule.  This is despite the fact that lots of boats are overpitched, but rarely use full rpm, so they get away with it.  Lots of boats are properly pitched, but almost always run at moderate rpm and are thus running underloaded.  Properly pitching your prop, adding a pyrometer, a reasonable number of accessories, and actually monitoring your engine would put you well ahead of the pack.  When I set up the dry exhaust for my engine I added a threaded fitting which makes it easy to install and replace the pyrometer (egt sensor).  A display with an setable alarm can be found cheaply. For context, remember I was talking about adding a 210A alternator to a 50hp engine as an attractive alternative to having a generator.  So, 210A x 14V = 3kW.  3kW = 4hp   However, there are losses.  Balmar's rule of thumb is 1hp per 25A alternator output, which is 8hp.  Downrating the alternator to 180A (2.5 kW, 3.4hp), and using an external regulator which allows the alternator load to slowly increase makes things easier on the engine.  So, the real loads are likely around 6 hp when the alternator is running at full load.  This number also jives well with an alternator efficiency of 55%  So much for a quick reply.... On 2019-05-02 9:29 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Trying to piece this together to learn something.... OK then, as one reduces RPM, the hp gap between the prop curve and engine curve increases -- the engine is capable of more than the prop.  Engine curves and prop curves both fall to zero at zero RPM, so, there is an RPM for the maximum difference between the curves, where the engine is producing the maximum spare horsepower beyond what the prop is using.  There is a range near that RPM where there is plenty of spare hp.   One might not be certain at a given moment what hp is being drawn by electric-clutch-driven-automatic accessories, or the alternator that is regulated by the regulator.  So I am guessing (so long as the prop is engaged) one should always operate the engine between the maximum hp gap RPM, and the prop-engine match RPM ? So as a procedure, in the case of automatically regulated load accessories: I am guessing one sets the engine for the maximum hp gap RPM, as a starting point, and then monitors the engine exhaust temperature (or sound by ear) for overload ? If one is well below temperature indicating underload (and sound by ear also indicates underload), then one increases RPM slightly toward the prop-engine match RPM ? If one is over-temperature at a given RPM indicating overload (or the sound by ear indicates overload), then one decreases the RPM toward the maximum hp gap RPM ? Would this be a practical way to operate a propulsion diesel with heavy, automatically-controlled accessories on it ? The maximum hp gap between the engine and prop curves gives another limit on the maximum hp that can be used by accessories.   Zoa Scott indicated the engine itself has a limit in the specs.   So one would have to keep below both these limits ... it seems ?   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 12:03 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     Because the power curve of the engine does not match that for the power absorption of a fixed pitch propeller, you only have one point where engine power and propeller absorption match (where the curves cross).  In order to prevent damage to the engine, this point is set at the maximum produced power.  When you install a new prop and check to make sure that the engine can still reach its maximum rpm, this is what you are doing.  So, at any engine speed below the max rpm, the propeller is absorbing less power than the engine would like to be producing for that rpm.  If all you are doing is adding a larger alternator, then you are unlikely to run into problems overloading the engine and are likely moving it to a more efficient part of the fuel consumption map.  Should you need max power out of then engine, install an ordinary switch in the field wire of your alternator or use an external regulator like a Balmar that has a small engine mode that allows you to reduce the alternator output. If you want to add more accessories, then you might want to be a bit more careful that you are not overloading the engine.  Check the power curves that are published for your engine.  Also, an exhaust temperature gauge is good insurance that you are not overloading the engine.  In reality, most of the accessories you would strap to the engine won't be on all the time.  A watermaker either has an electric clutch, or a simple manual engagement system like Brent has talked about.  The alternator load can be turned on and off easily.  Even a fridge compressor would have an electric clutch.  So, as long as you stay within the limits of allowable accessory loads on the crankshaft, you can add whatever you can find space to fit and still have a propeller matched to the maximum hp that the engine can produce. I'm not a diesel mechanic.  Just a guy that likes messing about with the technical side of boats and I try to share what I know here with the hope of helping someone out as others here have done for me.  Also, discussions here are a good way to find the limits of what I know and the cases where I'm just plain wrong. Cheers, Darren On 2019-05-01 4:29 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Thank you Zoa.  Also ignored, with parasitic loads, your (residual) torque-rpm characteristic cannot match the prop anymore if it match without parasitic loads. Matt From: Zoa Scott zoascott74@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 19:02 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Just a note incase its not widely known. All diesel engine manufacturers will let you know max allowable parasitic hp loads to be taken off crankshaft . Im a diesel mechanic by trade. If your running mutiple gizmos they are usually installed opposing each other if belt driven. Zoa  On Wed, May 1, 2019, 5:20 AM Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats], wrote:   Excellent point Darren, I had not considered drive belt load on the crankshaft bearing from all these extras.  My engine is not well set up for extra driven components so I had been toying with the idea of a pony shaft just to run components from.   But even then, if one is pulling 10,000W off the pony shaft (3,000W for each of the alternator, semihermetic compressor and watermaker pump plus surge margin) then a lot of design calculation and checking for what is easily available has go into the power transmission link between the engine and pony shaft..  Is a motorcycle drive cogged belt that custom bikes use between the engine and transmission ... is that the easiest?   I don't know.  Is it better to put one extra to the right, another to the left so they balance bearing loads, except for the little torque caused by the separation between the plane of the two belts?    Is there room to put one extra below the crankshaft to balance a triad... there might be on my boat. Really good point.  Last thing one wants to do is reduce the life of the primary engine. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 01:21 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Agreed, and I enjoyed your embellishment of the idea Matt  :-)  The one thing you have to look out for is how heavily you load the crankshaft bearing.  The manufacturers tend to be a bit cagey about what is tolerable.  If I had a water pump for a watermaker and a big alternator, I'd try and mount them opposed by 180 degrees.  Most marine engines die from corrosion and lack of use.  While you wouldn't want to idle one to charge the batteries, just about any other use is likely to make it last longer. On 2019-04-30 1:47 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Absolutely agreed Darren, if people do not have refrigeration, they should remain in that blissful place.   Absolutely agreed Darren, if you include running the propulsion engine as different from running a dedicated engine to generate electricity.   Perhaps I should change the title to "Run a fuel engine to make electricity sometimes, or Not".   Engine or Generator -- seems the same thing to me.  It was easier to do the calculations with a 1200W Honda.. What you said about running the propulsion engine for two purposes is absolutely of advantage.   Thank you for telling me about the "small engine" regulators ... I want one.   Absolutely true, propulsion engines are usually diesel, more efficient, marine-ized so they last longer in a boat environment, whereas generators are, well, inexpensive if they are gasoline and not marine-ized.   But chances are, the outboard on the tender is gasoline so, one probably has gasoline on board in any case.   It is absolutely true for some boats and some owners that running the engine will come at about the same frequency as one would normally need to top up the batteries.   But then this tempo will get ingrained.  When one gets somewhere they really like and want to stay for a while, the tempo will make one feel itchy to go somewhere on a certain schedule or face the prospect of just running the engine just to make electricity, which more than a few cruisers complain is inefficient and irritating to them..   Where sails are a redundancy to the propulsion engine, there is no redundancy to an alternator if any one of a dozen things goes wrong with the propulsion engine.   The propulsion engine has a limited service lifetime and a chance of other failures, every hour it runs.   If something goes wrong with the engine, you are talking about boat yoga in tight spaces if you are a DIY type, on-site diesel mechanics ($$), and worst case a $10,000-$15,000 bill and a crane to replace it.   Yikes, I am not running that sucker just to make electricity.  As for incidental electricity... I sail differently.   My sails are my propulsion.  I have used as little as 12 litres of fuel in year, and there is no such thing as a wind where my boat is slower than a cottage.   My engine is my backup to my sails.   Naturally, good seamanship dictates caution and to some that points only to the engine.  If that is the way it has to be, OK.   But waiting to go in until the wind and tide are favourable is also seamanship, and then the engine and its full tank of fuel is still there in reserve.    Many times I start the engine and just let it idle for the decisive couple of minutes as I sail nearly all the way in -- it is there in an instant for oh-crap moments..      At least with a 1200 Watt generator, there is no issue of charge rate, they are really quiet out of the box, and can be made quieter with a little DIY..   If something goes wrong with the generator, I had always assumed that in a pinch I would have the 20,000 Watt propulsion engine was the backup to the generator, even though it is inefficient and straining to the electrical system unless it is used for something else at the same time.   If something goes wrong with the generator, it never be a big bill.  I carry it ashore to a small engine repair place, or buy another one.  In the meantime, so long as the generator works, one runs their engine only when necessary, keeping its hours down.   So it is down to wear and tear on the engine, or a disposable substitute to change fuel into electricity.  I would never NOT have a portable generator.    I am really not disputing anything you are saying Darren, some people will find what you describe to be the simplest course of action.   I am just giving the other side of what some other boats might do.   But lets run with your idea, a very good one, to have a 210A bus alternator running directly off the propulsion engine to take advantage of the huge surplus of mechanical power available that one might borrow from when moving the boat.   But, if you are going to do that....  - if you have an external regulator, is it not possible with the flip of an appropriately-wired switch to turn this into an unbelievable weldernator ?   One is never doing that with a 1200W Honda.   Even Rick's batteries, and a little inverter welder, that is a joke compared to this T-rex of weldernators.   You could do half inch plate with 5/32" rod and really feel like you are accomplishing something.   If you have never tried 5/32 rod, you really have to, just for fun, on 3/16" or thicker steel.   Have 100 feet of cables, and industrial fenders and raft up to commercial boats and do a little commercial welding.   I want one.  Really, I do..   (Message over 64 KB, truncated) | 35913|35854|2019-05-03 02:38:51|wild_explorer|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?|I probably used incorrect name for such device. As I understand, you want to use "spare" engine power to run accessories. Let call it "Accessories Load Indicator" or similar. More likely, it will be some kind of controller which is programmed with engine Max Power at certain RPM (Power Curve), Prop load curve, speed of the hull, speed of the current, speed and direction of the wind. All that will give you what "spare" power is available from the engine at a given time. Using this indicator you can engage different accessories to use all available "spare" engine power.Or you can use Brent's suggestion, You simply graduate throttle lever position in 100 RPM steps (at full engine load at that RPM). It might be tricky to fully load engine at all RPMs needed to be graduated. After graduation, use engine tachometer to compare the results when accessories are engaged.  It will be much easier to compare - just need to evaluate tachometer readings with throttle lever position. Equal - proper load, Tach RPM > Lever RPM - underload, Tach RPM < Lever RPM - overload,  No extra electronics/controller.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :#ygrps-yiv-1421246365 #ygrps-yiv-1421246365ygrps-yiv-76080926 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Wild, >you can set up an automatic load balancer Is that a sort of engine governor that does more than just hold an RPM, something that takes into account loading on the engine ?    If it does not take into account variable load at a given RPM, how is it helping control the engine as the alternator regulator throttles up for more electrical output, or the water maker pump engages, or the compressor kicks in ? Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 12:56 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?  Matt,It is a little bit more complex. Take for example Kubota diesel engines. Same model, but one revision for Tractor and onother for Generator. Compare Power and Fuel Consumption curves. They should be different.There is software which allow to match Hull, Engine and Prop. It gives you necessary RPM/KW curves for chosen size/pitch of the prop. It shows as well if chosen prop is OK or Not (cavitation, engine overload) When you have all this information, you can set up an automatic load balancer, ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Trying to piece this together to learn something.... OK then, as one reduces RPM, the hp gap between the prop curve and engine curve increases -- the engine is capable of more than the prop.  Engine curves and prop curves both fall to zero at zero RPM, so, there is an RPM for the maximum difference between the curves, where the engine is producing the maximum spare horsepower beyond what the prop is using.  There is a range near that RPM where there is plenty of spare hp.   One might not be certain at a given moment what hp is being drawn by electric-clutch-driven-automatic accessories, or the alternator that is regulated by the regulator.  So I am guessing (so long as the prop is engaged) one should always operate the engine between the maximum hp gap RPM, and the prop-engine match RPM ? So as a procedure, in the case of automatically regulated load accessories: I am guessing one sets the engine for the maximum hp gap RPM, as a starting point, and then monitors the engine exhaust temperature (or sound by ear) for overload ? If one is well below temperature indicating underload (and sound by ear also indicates underload), then one increases RPM slightly toward the prop-engine match RPM ? If one is over-temperature at a given RPM indicating overload (or the sound by ear indicates overload), then one decreases the RPM toward the maximum hp gap RPM ? Would this be a practical way to operate a propulsion diesel with heavy, automatically-controlled accessories on it ? The maximum hp gap between the engine and prop curves gives another limit on the maximum hp that can be used by accessories.   Zoa Scott indicated the engine itself has a limit in the specs.   So one would have to keep below both these limits ... it seems ?   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 12:03 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?  Because the power curve of the engine does not match that for the power absorption of a fixed pitch propeller, you only have one point where engine power and propeller absorption match (where the curves cross).  In order to prevent damage to the engine, this point is set at the maximum produced power.  When you install a new prop and check to make sure that the engine can still reach its maximum rpm, this is what you are doing.  So, at any engine speed below the max rpm, the propeller is absorbing less power than the engine would like to be producing for that rpm.  If all you are doing is adding a larger alternator, then you are unlikely to run into problems overloading the engine and are likely moving it to a more efficient part of the fuel consumption map.  Should you need max power out of then engine, install an ordinary switch in the field wire of your alternator or use an external regulator like a Balmar that has a small engine mode that allows you to reduce the alternator output. If you want to add more accessories, then you might want to be a bit more careful that you are not overloading the engine.  Check the power curves that are published for your engine.  Also, an exhaust temperature gauge is good insurance that you are not overloading the engine.  In reality, most of the accessories you would strap to the engine won't be on all the time.  A watermaker either has an electric clutch, or a simple manual engagement system like Brent has talked about.  The alternator load can be turned on and off easily.  Even a fridge compressor would have an electric clutch.  So, as long as you stay within the limits of allowable accessory loads on the crankshaft, you can add whatever you can find space to fit and still have a propeller matched to the maximum hp that the engine can produce. I'm not a diesel mechanic.  Just a guy that likes messing about with the technical side of boats and I try to share what I know here with the hope of helping someone out as others here have done for me.  Also, discussions here are a good way to find the limits of what I know and the cases where I'm just plain wrong. Cheers, Darren On 2019-05-01 4:29 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Thank you Zoa.  Also ignored, with parasitic loads, your (residual) torque-rpm characteristic cannot match the prop anymore if it match without parasitic loads. Matt From: Zoa Scott zoascott74@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 19:02 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Just a note incase its not widely known. All diesel engine manufacturers will let you know max allowable parasitic hp loads to be taken off crankshaft . Im a diesel mechanic by trade. If your running mutiple gizmos they are usually installed opposing each other if belt driven. Zoa  On Wed, May 1, 2019, 5:20 AM Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats], wrote:   Excellent point Darren, I had not considered drive belt load on the crankshaft bearing from all these extras.  My engine is not well set up for extra driven components so I had been toying with the idea of a pony shaft just to run components from.   But even then, if one is pulling 10,000W off the pony shaft (3,000W for each of the alternator, semihermetic compressor and watermaker pump plus surge margin) then a lot of design calculation and checking for what is easily available has go into the power transmission link between the engine and pony shaft..  Is a motorcycle drive cogged belt that custom bikes use between the engine and transmission ... is that the easiest?   I don't know.  Is it better to put one extra to the right, another to the left so they balance bearing loads, except for the little torque caused by the separation between the plane of the two belts?    Is there room to put one extra below the crankshaft to balance a triad... there might be on my boat. Really good point.  Last thing one wants to do is reduce the life of the primary engine. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 01:21 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Agreed, and I enjoyed your embellishment of the idea Matt  :-)  The one thing you have to look out for is how heavily you load the crankshaft bearing.  The manufacturers tend to be a bit cagey about what is tolerable.  If I had a water pump for a watermaker and a big alternator, I'd try and mount them opposed by 180 degrees.  Most marine engines die from corrosion and lack of use.  While you wouldn't want to idle one to charge the batteries, just about any other use is likely to make it last longer. On 2019-04-30 1:47 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Absolutely agreed Darren, if people do not have refrigeration, they should remain in that blissful place.   Absolutely agreed Darren, if you include running the propulsion engine as different from running a dedicated engine to generate electricity.   Perhaps I should change the title to "Run a fuel engine to make electricity sometimes, or Not".   Engine or Generator -- seems the same thing to me.  It was easier to do the calculations with a 1200W Honda.. What you said about running the propulsion engine for two purposes is absolutely of advantage.   Thank you for telling me about the "small engine" regulators ... I want one.   Absolutely true, propulsion engines are usually diesel, more efficient, marine-ized so they last longer in a boat environment, whereas generators are, well, inexpensive if they are gasoline and not marine-ized.   But chances are, the outboard on the tender is gasoline so, one probably has gasoline on board in any case.   It is absolutely true for some boats and some owners that running the engine will come at about the same frequency as one would normally need to top up the batteries.   But then this tempo will get ingrained.  When one gets somewhere they really like and want to stay for a while, the tempo will make one feel itchy to go somewhere on a certain schedule or face the prospect of just running the engine just to make electricity, which more than a few cruisers complain is inefficient and irritating to them..   Where sails are a redundancy to the propulsion engine, there is no redundancy to an alternator if any one of a dozen things goes wrong with the propulsion engine.   The propulsion engine has a limited service lifetime and a chance of other failures, every hour it runs.   If something goes wrong with the engine, you are talking about boat yoga in tight spaces if you are a DIY type, on-site diesel mechanics ($$), and worst case a $10,000-$15,000 bill and a crane to replace it.   Yikes, I am not running that sucker just to make electricity.  As for incidental electricity... I sail differently.   My sails are my propulsion.  I have used as little as 12 litres of fuel in year, and there is no such thing as a wind where my boat is slower than a cottage.   My engine is my backup to my sails.   Naturally, good seamanship dictates caution and to some that points only to the engine.  If that is the way it has to be, OK.   But waiting to go in until the wind and tide are favourable is also seamanship, and then the engine and its full tank of fuel is still there in reserve.    Many times I start the engine and just let it idle for the decisive couple of minutes as I sail nearly all the way in -- it is there in an instant for oh-crap moments..      At least with a 1200 Watt generator, there is no issue of charge rate, they are really quiet out of the box, and can be made quieter with a little DIY..   If something goes wrong with the generator, I had always assumed that in a pinch I would have the 20,000 Watt propulsion engine was the backup to the generator, even though it is inefficient and straining to the electrical system unless it is used for something else at the same time.   If something goes wrong with the generator, it never be a big bill.  I carry it ashore to a small engine repair place, or buy another one.  In the meantime, so long as the generator works, one runs their engine only when necessary, keeping its hours down.   So it is down to wear and tear on the engine, or a disposable substitute to change fuel into electricity.  I would never NOT have a portable generator.    I am really not disputing anything you are saying Darren, some people will find what you describe to be the simplest course of action.   I am just giving the other side of what some other boats might do.   But lets run with your idea, a very good one, to have a 210A bus alternator running directly off the propulsion engine to take advantage of the huge surplus of mechanical power available that one might borrow from when moving the boat.   But, if you are going to do that....  - if you have an external regulator, is it not possible with the flip of an appropriately-wired switch to turn this into an unbelievable weldernator ?   One is never doing that with a 1200W Honda.   Even Rick's batteries, and a little inverter welder, that is a joke compared to this T-rex of weldernators.   You could do half inch plate with 5/32" rod and really feel like you are accomplishing something.   If you have never tried 5/32 rod, you really have to, just for fun, on 3/16" or thicker steel.   Have 100 feet of cables, and industrial fenders and raft up to commercial boats and do a little commercial welding.   I want one.  Really, I do..    - why stop at a 210A alternator -- connect up a high pressure pump with a couple of one-way valves so your water maker runs electric off one pump or directly from the engine from the other pump -- for just the cost of a second pump, you are creating redundancy.   Drawing the same torque as the alternator, the engine-powered watermaker could put out 200 gallons per hour, assuming one has suitable osmosis media.   The efficiency would be awesome, diesel directly driving the pump skips the following filters of efficiency: claw-style armature alternator 75-80%, battery charging 90%, electric motor 80-90% -- combined total 54%-65% efficiency.  One avoids all that by going straight off the engine.   Then one also has the alternative to make water with the engine if the electric pump ever fails.   I sure am thinking about doing this..  - why stop there ... If the water tanks fill before one is finished motoring, start filling the bathtub and have a good celebratory soak in the tub to prepare for going out on the town at the new destination.  Your 20,000 Watt motor is easily producing 25,000 Watts of heat so, that tub can be nice and toasty warm with just a few valves and a little hose.   This is just a given, I am definitely having an engine-heat option to my hot water tank.   - Heck why stop there ... turn down the flow rate so the fresh water comes out at full exhaust temperature and fill your teapot.   There is a lot of comfort possible here.    I don't like tea that much so, no.    - If there is still a surplus of fresh water, start filling all those water jerry cans most boats have -- over stock and then turn off the electric water maker -- run the engine today, save Amps tomorrow.   I sure would do this.      - why stop there ... put a semi-hermetic compressor on the engine and hook it up to a big-ass ice maker -- freeze a fraction that 200 GPH pouring out of the water maker and get rid of the need for both refrigeration and freezer (save the brine waste from water making ... ice+brine = -17C in a cold plate).    Says that man with a great big ice chest ... pull it out, or add a compressor to the engine ... open question.    - why stop there ... Just keep making ice, and put hundreds of pounds of ice in a stainless cabinet inside an adjustable-vent wood cabinet, with a drip pan under the stainless cabinet -- a DIY dehumidifier.   This is probably beyond the electrical power budget for most boats, so, what a luxury.   Dry gallons an hour.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Have the melt-water drain for the stainless cabinet run through a cooling coil along the cabinet ceiling and back down into the fresh water tanks -- step one air conditioning, for the price of pumping water a few feet -- we have already established, that is bargain compared to AC.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Not cool enough? Open vents in the side of the wood cabinet and blow air in there to both get more cool air and accelerate melting.   Glorious air conditioning -- not even a cat could manage that on solar.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... they have these cooking appliances, called muff pots, better than instant pots, and they are *ZERO* Watts:  http://cs.amsnow.com/sno/b/news/archive/2015/04/09/snacker-packer-meals-made-easy.aspx Cooking on a snowmobile made easy - American Snowmobiler Magazine - Snowmobile forums, news, Polaris, Ski-Doo, Arctic Cat & Yamaha reviews - AmSnow.com American Snowmobiler Magazine presents news, reviews, forums, videos, photos and the latest stats and prices for Arctic Cat, Ski-Doo, Yamaha and Polaris snowmobiles. cs.amsnow.com If one has never cooked on the exhaust of an engine ...   Heck with all that, one solar panel would run the radio and the nav lights, nav, etc.   If co-generating electricity by depending on running a 20,000 Watt engine with any frequency is how some boaters will do it, then co-generating everything else that would otherwise require electricity, or would generate comfort is worth mentioning too.   So when it comes down to it, same answer:  On a monohull, one is running an engine sometimes, but there is a lot of room for innovation, taste, preferences and different ways to meet the power budget.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:59 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     For everyone who has a simple boat without refrigeration/freezer, you probably wonder why everyone is so concerned about how to generate enough power from solar.  Your life is simple and there is no reason to read the rest of this. Matt, that's a pretty reasonable analysis, and would fit some boats.  There are certainly boats that manage these comforts on lower watts.  The obvious area for improvement is refrigeration, any efficiencies gained here is money better spent than money spent on power generation (solar and generators).  I came to the conclusion that 4" of styrofoam insulation for the fridge and 6" for the freezer was the minimum to make DC refrigeration work on a reasonable energy budget.  50 to 125 Ah per day is what 12v DC refrigeration generally uses per day.  The differences are almost entirely due to insulation, next due to the size of the fridge/freezer.  If you can get closer to 50Ah per day your energy budget changes drastically.  I decided a spillover design fridge freezer, custom built to maximize insulation was the best way to go in my build.  Aspen Aerogel is an interesting material here.  However, polystyrene foam is easy to work, cheap, readily available, and absorbs water less than the other foam insulation choices. Your energy budget doesn't consider engine run time and power from the alternator at all.  A boat that moves even just once or twice a week can reduce/eliminate its need for generator run time by super-sizing its alternator.  I've ordered a Leece-Neville 210A school bus alternator.  It should run happily at 170A continuous, perhaps a bit more with careful attention to cooling.  This is a win-win situation, getting power from the alternator is more efficient than from a generator.  With a fixed pitch prop you're running at an inefficient part of the power curve of the diesel at cruising rpm.  The extra load the alternator moves the engine into a more efficient part of the fuel map, that improvement in efficiency means that part of the fuel consumed by the alternator comes for free as your making the engine more efficient at the same time you make carbon buildup problems less likely.  Even if you have a smaller diesel you could fit an alternator this size.  If you need maximum propulsion power at some point, an external regulator like a Balmar Mc-614 used with a switch for small engine mode (field output reduced to 50%) allows you to get most of the power from the engine for propulsion when necessary.  You could also just put a plain switch in the field wire to the alt for a inexpensive solution, although charging at these high currents you probably want an external regulator anyway.  It should be noted that this solution relies on batteries that can accept pretty high charge rates.  This would be LiPO4, Firefly >AGM>very large flooded lead acid bank.  A small flooded-lead-acid bank probably won't be able to accept the high charge rate for long enough for a large alternator to do a lot of good.  The LiPO4 and the Firefly also have the advantage that they are totally happy in a partial state of charge and can stay there without damage until you are ready to move to the next anchorage (within reasonable time limits and state of charge limits).  You should switch to a serpentine belt to run a large alternator like a Delco Remy 28SI or a Leece Neville Idle Pro. There are two ways of looking at comfort while cruising.  Your comfort could come from plugging in whatever you want whenever you want.  However, this comes with the discomfort of noise from the generator, discomfort getting/storing fuel for the generator (especially bad for gasoline generators),  discomfort from getting/storing oil for the generator, the discomfort from generator oil changes, discomfort from trying to source generator parts in some distant port, discomfort from getting shunned by the cruisers who can't stand the noise of your generator.  On the flip side, if you design a boat with conservation in mind, it is possible to run almost entirely on solar.  I've met more than one boat (with refrigeration and watermaker) that runs successfully with just solar/wind/alternator.  You boil water in a kettle on the stove (is that a discomfort?), you wash laundry ashore or in a bucket (Ok, the bucket counts as a discomfort), is lighting a propane stove a discomfort compared to electric (around here tons of folks spend tons of money on their house for the luxury of a natural gas stove).  I have a nice antique coffee grinder, it takes zero watts to run, is beautiful and a pleasure to use, there are tons of equivalents to this on the boat, where doing things different is part of the pleasure for me.  A generator is definitely not necessary.   On 2019-04-30 9:03 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   What really is the electrical capacity on a boat from solar, how far will that take you, and realistically, will one be running a generator and how much? Solar Power Generation: Based on some tests by the Wynns in Florida (latitude N26), two used "160W" panels (they have 6 of these), produced 15 Amps at "12V", at 14.4V from the panels, but we will say 12.8V from the batteries later because though the charge voltage is higher, the voltage at which the power comes out is lower.    That is 216 Watts in, 192 Watts of useful power out of the batteries later.   They also tested two new "140W" panels and produced 20 Amps at "12V", or about 288 Watts in, 256 Watts out later.   256/"280" = 91% useful power.   192/"320" = 60% useful power.   Same solar controller in both tests.  At latitude N44, I was seeing about 67% of ratings from the panels, before considering charging losses which for a perfect charge controller might be 60% useful power.    On my off-grid solar installation, I have huge reserve capacity, currently not that much generating capacity, and the vampire load is very low.   I would add panels if I were to increase expected daily loads.   The Wynns also did a lot of shading tests, simulating halyards (no appreciable difference) and the boom (much larger difference).   Lets assume this is a boat on the hook and one has put a preventer on the boom to make it not shade panels, and oriented the boat to get uninterrupted sun on the panels.   If I were designing a solar system for a boat today, for a monohull, I would go with the most power dense panels I could get -- lets say "320W" panels.   Lets say I have an arch over my davits and I am able to put three 40-inch wide panels flat above this arch -- that is a beam of 10 feet.   Lets assume 60% useful power.   That is 960 Watts * 60% = 576 Watts which is not much.. One only gets that during the day.   So one might get 3kWh of power per day from the panels -- based on not angling panels.   For someone who thinks they can run without a generator, that is the limit of power.   "Average use for a typical RVer is around 20 kWh a day.   .....  RVers parked in areas where they do not need air conditioning will use much less electricity than RVers who do need it.  In fact, the average amount of electricity used by people who are not running air conditioning is about 10 kWh a day.."  (1) There is one total power budget estimate.   Lets look at it from the components up: Loads: Required Unoccupied, trekking the country nearby while the boat is on anchor:  - Refrigeration: 300 kWh / year (modern, high efficiency, extra insulation for the tropics)   lets say 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Anchoring light (LED, 2 nm visibility, on a timer, 12 hour burn):  0.025 kWh/day   (3)    - Bilge Pump (500 gallons/day, 1 hour/day): 0.060 kWh/day (4)  - Most basic of computers offering Wifi and sensor monitoring to report alerts & email: 0.080 kWh/day (5 + estimate for dry contact and sensor system)   Minimum Occupied:  - Radio (hand held, listening):  0.020 kWh/day  (2)   - Interior Lights (LED):  0.050 kWh/day   - Recharging (Cell, shaver, shortwave receiver, flashlights, head lamps, miscellaneous): 0.050 kWh/day Voluntary Electronics:  - Netbook (4 hours):  0.100 kWh/day    - Full Laptop (4 hours): 0.300 kWh/day   - Display Screen (tv/monitor) (4 hours): 0.400 kWh//day  - DVD player (2 hours): 0.050 kWh/day Other:  - Pressurized water (per 100 liters -- usage for 1 day):  0.020 kWh/day (7)  - Freezer: 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Washing machine, 2 people:  0.400 kWh/day (one load every second day)  - Water maker (most efficient, per 100 liters/day): 0.400 kWh/day (6) Working on Boat:  - hand saw and driver drill for cabinetry work (1 hour run time/8 hour day): 1 kWh/day (experience)  - belt sander for finishing (6 hours run time/8 hour day): 7.2 kWh/day (experience) This is before using any electricity for cooking.   Looking at these conveniences ... pressurized water is a power bargain.   So, basic anchoring budget is 1.17 kWh / day -- solar will cover it with more than 100% to spare -- one 12V/100Ah battery unit at 50% DOD will carry it through the night.   On light overcast days, when one is getting 50% power, the system is still OK.   So one uses two 12V/100Ah units to keep the average DOD to 25%, to make sure it does not go much below 50% DOD in a stretch of moderately cloudy weather..      To go one week (hurricane overcast on a boat, a week of heavy overcast in winter in Canada) without significant sun, the battery bank must be 8.2 kWh -- which is 14 units of 12V/100Ah at 50% DOD -- that is a lot of batteries.   Rick's batteries, four times 12V/200Ah, 9.6 kWh, could handle this, just.   This is why I am interested in Rick's batteries -- they are about the minimum I would consider to have constant refrigeration, be it in a cottage or boat.   Speaking of refrigeration.  When one is not opening the fridge and adding things or taking things out, the power consumption of a fridge is inversely related to thickness of insulation.   As the largest power draw in an unoccupied space, I would consider a hyper-insulated fridge (I do not believe it is available, I was thinking DIY) to cut the power in half.   That allows Rick's batteries to run the system for close to 2 weeks without sun.   That I think would be a far better design for an off-grid cottage.   Ricks batteries would recharge in about 4 days after 2 weeks with heavy overcast.    If one had reliable sun every day, and particularly if the panels netted a little better than 60% useful power from their rating, then: 3.93 kWh/day -- based on 200 liters/day of water desalinated, and pressurized, laundry, freezer, and no voluntary electronics.  The solar panels could not reliably keep up.  In full sun, Rick's batteries would need a generator run of 10 hours once every 8 or 9 days.   From fully charged, after 2 days without sun, without a generator run, Rick's batteries would be exhausted.    Therefore, a pretty spartan existence, with a short shower daily, would be a strain without a daily generator run of about an hour on sunny days, and 4 hours a day on heavy overcast days.   (Assuming a Honda 1200W quiet generator outputting 1000W average.) Get rid of the freezer and one is just below what one would expect of the panels per day.   After just one day without sun, one would have to wait 2 weeks for the batteries to get back up to normal.   It is not reasonable to expect only 1 day of heavy clouds in each 2 weeks.   Therefore, even without the freezer, the solar panels would likely fall behind and regular generator running would be needed.  One could laminate flexible panels to the deck, but they are on average half the efficiency per unit area and, one really could not expect more than another 320 W of power to be conveniently placed. For those thinking that wind power will save them...  one would need an anchorage protected from waves, by say a submerged reef, and open to the wind -- so not like a closed bay.   Most small wind generators are rated for 40km/h, that is, they give their rated power at 40km/h wind speed.   They do not cut in until about 8 or 9 km/h.   Wind energy goes by the cube of the wind speed.   To generate half the rated output, one needs about 32 km/h of wind.   Half the rated output on a 400 Watt generator is 200 Watts.   Even if it is a tiringly windy anchorage, and the wind blows 24/7, that is only 4.8 kWh of power maximum theoretical, 4.2 kWh useful delivered to loads is more like(Message over 64 KB, truncated) | 35914|35854|2019-05-03 12:17:49|Matt Malone|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?| #ygrps-yiv-1090881943 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Wild, so this is a new hypothetical invention, which is fine.   Just want to be clear that google was not failing me.   Seems doable and might be useful, even if one had a good sense of one's own engine by sound or response to tweaks.   Despite taking into account so many things, the output would have to be simple -- red for throttle down.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, May 3, 2019 2:21 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     I probably used incorrect name for such device. As I understand, you want to use "spare" engine power to run accessories. Let call it "Accessories Load Indicator" or similar. More likely, it will be some kind of controller which is programmed with engine Max Power at certain RPM (Power Curve), Prop load curve, speed of the hull, speed of the current, speed and direction of the wind. All that will give you what "spare" power is available from the engine at a given time. Using this indicator you can engage different accessories to use all available "spare" engine power. Or you can use Brent's suggestion, You simply graduate throttle lever position in 100 RPM steps (at full engine load at that RPM). It might be tricky to fully load engine at all RPMs needed to be graduated. After graduation, use engine tachometer to compare the results when accessories are engaged.  It will be much easier to compare - just need to evaluate tachometer readings with throttle lever position. Equal - proper load, Tach RPM > Lever RPM - underload, Tach RPM < Lever RPM - overload,  No extra electronics/controller. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Wild, >you can set up an automatic load balancer Is that a sort of engine governor that does more than just hold an RPM, something that takes into account loading on the engine ?    If it does not take into account variable load at a given RPM, how is it helping control the engine as the alternator regulator throttles up for more electrical output, or the water maker pump engages, or the compressor kicks in ? Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 12:56 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     Matt, It is a little bit more complex. Take for example Kubota diesel engines. Same model, but one revision for Tractor and onother for Generator. Compare Power and Fuel Consumption curves. They should be different. There is software which allow to match Hull, Engine and Prop. It gives you necessary RPM/KW curves for chosen size/pitch of the prop. It shows as well if chosen prop is OK or Not (cavitation, engine overload) When you have all this information, you can set up an automatic load balancer, ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Trying to piece this together to learn something.... OK then, as one reduces RPM, the hp gap between the prop curve and engine curve increases -- the engine is capable of more than the prop.  Engine curves and prop curves both fall to zero at zero RPM, so, there is an RPM for the maximum difference between the curves, where the engine is producing the maximum spare horsepower beyond what the prop is using.  There is a range near that RPM where there is plenty of spare hp.   One might not be certain at a given moment what hp is being drawn by electric-clutch-driven-automatic accessories, or the alternator that is regulated by the regulator.  So I am guessing (so long as the prop is engaged) one should always operate the engine between the maximum hp gap RPM, and the prop-engine match RPM ? So as a procedure, in the case of automatically regulated load accessories: I am guessing one sets the engine for the maximum hp gap RPM, as a starting point, and then monitors the engine exhaust temperature (or sound by ear) for overload ? If one is well below temperature indicating underload (and sound by ear also indicates underload), then one increases RPM slightly toward the prop-engine match RPM ? If one is over-temperature at a given RPM indicating overload (or the sound by ear indicates overload), then one decreases the RPM toward the maximum hp gap RPM ? Would this be a practical way to operate a propulsion diesel with heavy, automatically-controlled accessories on it ? The maximum hp gap between the engine and prop curves gives another limit on the maximum hp that can be used by accessories.   Zoa Scott indicated the engine itself has a limit in the specs.   So one would have to keep below both these limits ... it seems ?   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 12:03 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     Because the power curve of the engine does not match that for the power absorption of a fixed pitch propeller, you only have one point where engine power and propeller absorption match (where the curves cross).  In order to prevent damage to the engine, this point is set at the maximum produced power.  When you install a new prop and check to make sure that the engine can still reach its maximum rpm, this is what you are doing.  So, at any engine speed below the max rpm, the propeller is absorbing less power than the engine would like to be producing for that rpm.  If all you are doing is adding a larger alternator, then you are unlikely to run into problems overloading the engine and are likely moving it to a more efficient part of the fuel consumption map.  Should you need max power out of then engine, install an ordinary switch in the field wire of your alternator or use an external regulator like a Balmar that has a small engine mode that allows you to reduce the alternator output. If you want to add more accessories, then you might want to be a bit more careful that you are not overloading the engine.  Check the power curves that are published for your engine.  Also, an exhaust temperature gauge is good insurance that you are not overloading the engine.  In reality, most of the accessories you would strap to the engine won't be on all the time.  A watermaker either has an electric clutch, or a simple manual engagement system like Brent has talked about.  The alternator load can be turned on and off easily.  Even a fridge compressor would have an electric clutch.  So, as long as you stay within the limits of allowable accessory loads on the crankshaft, you can add whatever you can find space to fit and still have a propeller matched to the maximum hp that the engine can produce. I'm not a diesel mechanic.  Just a guy that likes messing about with the technical side of boats and I try to share what I know here with the hope of helping someone out as others here have done for me.  Also, discussions here are a good way to find the limits of what I know and the cases where I'm just plain wrong. Cheers, Darren On 2019-05-01 4:29 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Thank you Zoa.  Also ignored, with parasitic loads, your (residual) torque-rpm characteristic cannot match the prop anymore if it match without parasitic loads. Matt From: Zoa Scott zoascott74@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 19:02 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Just a note incase its not widely known. All diesel engine manufacturers will let you know max allowable parasitic hp loads to be taken off crankshaft . Im a diesel mechanic by trade. If your running mutiple gizmos they are usually installed opposing each other if belt driven. Zoa  On Wed, May 1, 2019, 5:20 AM Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats], wrote:   Excellent point Darren, I had not considered drive belt load on the crankshaft bearing from all these extras.  My engine is not well set up for extra driven components so I had been toying with the idea of a pony shaft just to run components from.   But even then, if one is pulling 10,000W off the pony shaft (3,000W for each of the alternator, semihermetic compressor and watermaker pump plus surge margin) then a lot of design calculation and checking for what is easily available has go into the power transmission link between the engine and pony shaft..  Is a motorcycle drive cogged belt that custom bikes use between the engine and transmission ... is that the easiest?   I don't know.  Is it better to put one extra to the right, another to the left so they balance bearing loads, except for the little torque caused by the separation between the plane of the two belts?    Is there room to put one extra below the crankshaft to balance a triad... there might be on my boat. Really good point.  Last thing one wants to do is reduce the life of the primary engine. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 01:21 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Agreed, and I enjoyed your embellishment of the idea Matt  :-)  The one thing you have to look out for is how heavily you load the crankshaft bearing.  The manufacturers tend to be a bit cagey about what is tolerable.  If I had a water pump for a watermaker and a big alternator, I'd try and mount them opposed by 180 degrees.  Most marine engines die from corrosion and lack of use.  While you wouldn't want to idle one to charge the batteries, just about any other use is likely to make it last longer. On 2019-04-30 1:47 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Absolutely agreed Darren, if people do not have refrigeration, they should remain in that blissful place.   Absolutely agreed Darren, if you include running the propulsion engine as different from running a dedicated engine to generate electricity.   Perhaps I should change the title to "Run a fuel engine to make electricity sometimes, or Not".   Engine or Generator -- seems the same thing to me.  It was easier to do the calculations with a 1200W Honda.. What you said about running the propulsion engine for two purposes is absolutely of advantage.   Thank you for telling me about the "small engine" regulators ... I want one.   Absolutely true, propulsion engines are usually diesel, more efficient, marine-ized so they last longer in a boat environment, whereas generators are, well, inexpensive if they are gasoline and not marine-ized.   But chances are, the outboard on the tender is gasoline so, one probably has gasoline on board in any case.   It is absolutely true for some boats and some owners that running the engine will come at about the same frequency as one would normally need to top up the batteries.   But then this tempo will get ingrained.  When one gets somewhere they really like and want to stay for a while, the tempo will make one feel itchy to go somewhere on a certain schedule or face the prospect of just running the engine just to make electricity, which more than a few cruisers complain is inefficient and irritating to them..   Where sails are a redundancy to the propulsion engine, there is no redundancy to an alternator if any one of a dozen things goes wrong with the propulsion engine.   The propulsion engine has a limited service lifetime and a chance of other failures, every hour it runs.   If something goes wrong with the engine, you are talking about boat yoga in tight spaces if you are a DIY type, on-site diesel mechanics ($$), and worst case a $10,000-$15,000 bill and a crane to replace it.   Yikes, I am not running that sucker just to make electricity.  As for incidental electricity... I sail differently.   My sails are my propulsion.  I have used as little as 12 litres of fuel in year, and there is no such thing as a wind where my boat is slower than a cottage.   My engine is my backup to my sails.   Naturally, good seamanship dictates caution and to some that points only to the engine.  If that is the way it has to be, OK.   But waiting to go in until the wind and tide are favourable is also seamanship, and then the engine and its full tank of fuel is still there in reserve.    Many times I start the engine and just let it idle for the decisive couple of minutes as I sail nearly all the way in -- it is there in an instant for oh-crap moments..      At least with a 1200 Watt generator, there is no issue of charge rate, they are really quiet out of the box, and can be made quieter with a little DIY..   If something goes wrong with the generator, I had always assumed that in a pinch I would have the 20,000 Watt propulsion engine was the backup to the generator, even though it is inefficient and straining to the electrical system unless it is used for something else at the same time.   If something goes wrong with the generator, it never be a big bill.  I carry it ashore to a small engine repair place, or buy another one.  In the meantime, so long as the generator works, one runs their engine only when necessary, keeping its hours down.   So it is down to wear and tear on the engine, or a disposable substitute to change fuel into electricity.  I would never NOT have a portable generator.    I am really not disputing anything you are saying Darren, some people will find what you describe to be the simplest course of action.   I am just giving the other side of what some other boats might do.   But lets run with your idea, a very good one, to have a 210A bus alternator running directly off the propulsion engine to take advantage of the huge surplus of mechanical power available that one might borrow from when moving the boat.   But, if you are going to do that....  - if you have an external regulator, is it not possible with the flip of an appropriately-wired switch to turn this into an unbelievable weldernator ?   One is never doing that with a 1200W Honda.   Even Rick's batteries, and a little inverter welder, that is a joke compared to this T-rex of weldernators.   You could do half inch plate with 5/32" rod and really feel like you are accomplishing something.   If you have never tried 5/32 rod, you really have to, just for fun, on 3/16" or thicker steel.   Have 100 feet of cables, and industrial fenders and raft up to commercial boats and do a little commercial welding.   I want one.  Really, I do..    - why stop at a 210A alternator -- connect up a high pressure pump with a couple of one-way valves so your water maker runs electric off one pump or directly from the engine from the other pump -- for just the cost of a second pump, you are creating redundancy.   Drawing the same torque as the alternator, the engine-powered watermaker could put out 200 gallons per hour, assuming one has suitable osmosis media.   The efficiency would be awesome, diesel directly driving the pump skips the following filters of efficiency: claw-style armature alternator 75-80%, battery charging 90%, electric motor 80-90% -- combined total 54%-65% efficiency.  One avoids all that by going straight off the engine.   Then one also has the alternative to make water with the engine if the electric pump ever fails.   I sure am thinking about doing this..  - why stop there ... If the water tanks fill before one is finished motoring, start filling the bathtub and have a good celebratory soak in the tub to prepare for going out on the town at the new destination.  Your 20,000 Watt motor is easily producing 25,000 Watts of heat so, that tub can be nice and toasty warm with just a few valves and a little hose.   This is just a given, I am definitely having an engine-heat option to my hot water tank.   - Heck why stop there ... turn down the flow rate so the fresh water comes out at full exhaust temperature and fill your teapot.   There is a lot of comfort possible here.    I don't like tea that much so, no.    - If there is still a surplus of fresh water, start filling all those water jerry cans most boats have -- over stock and then turn off the electric water maker -- run the engine today, save Amps tomorrow.   I sure would do this.      - why stop there ... put a semi-hermetic compressor on the engine and hook it up to a big-ass ice maker -- freeze a fraction that 200 GPH pouring out of the water maker and get rid of the need for both refrigeration and freezer (save the brine waste from water making ... ice+brine = -17C in a cold plate).    Says that man with a great big ice chest ... pull it out, or add a compressor to the engine ... open question.    - why stop there ... Just keep making ice, and put hundreds of pounds of ice in a stainless cabinet inside an adjustable-vent wood cabinet, with a drip pan under the stainless cabinet -- a DIY dehumidifier.   This is probably beyond the electrical power budget for most boats, so, what a luxury.   Dry gallons an hour.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Have the melt-water drain for the stainless cabinet run through a cooling coil along the cabinet ceiling and back down into the fresh water tanks -- step one air conditioning, for the price of pumping water a few feet -- we have already established, that is bargain compared to AC.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Not cool enough? Open vents in the side of the wood cabinet and blow air in there to both get more cool air and accelerate melting.   Glorious air conditioning -- not even a cat could manage that on solar.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... they have these cooking appliances, called muff pots, better than instant pots, and they are *ZERO* Watts:  http://cs.amsnow.com/sno/b/news/archive/2015/04/09/snacker-packer-meals-made-easy.aspx Cooking on a snowmobile made easy - American Snowmobiler Magazine - Snowmobile forums, news, Polaris, Ski-Doo, Arctic Cat & Yamaha reviews - AmSnow.com American Snowmobiler Magazine presents news, reviews, forums, videos, photos and the latest stats and prices for Arctic Cat, Ski-Doo, Yamaha and Polaris snowmobiles. cs.amsnow.com If one has never cooked on the exhaust of an engine ...   Heck with all that, one solar panel would run the radio and the nav lights, nav, etc.   If co-generating electricity by depending on running a 20,000 Watt engine with any frequency is how some boaters will do it, then co-generating everything else that would otherwise require electricity, or would generate comfort is worth mentioning too.   So when it comes down to it, same answer:  On a monohull, one is running an engine sometimes, but there is a lot of room for innovation, taste, preferences and different ways to meet the power budget.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:59 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     For everyone who has a simple boat without refrigeration/freezer, you probably wonder why everyone is so concerned about how to generate enough power from solar.  Your life is simple and there is no reason to read the rest of this. Matt, that's a pretty reasonable analysis, and would fit some boats.  There are certainly boats that manage these comforts on lower watts.  The obvious area for improvement is refrigeration, any efficiencies gained here is money better spent than money spent on power generation (solar and generators).  I came to the conclusion that 4" of styrofoam insulation for the fridge and 6" for the freezer was the minimum to make DC refrigeration work on a reasonable energy budget.  50 to 125 Ah per day is what 12v DC refrigeration generally uses per day.  The differences are almost entirely due to insulation, next due to the size of the fridge/freezer.  If you can get closer to 50Ah per day your energy budget changes drastically.  I decided a spillover design fridge freezer, custom built to maximize insulation was the best way to go in my build.  Aspen Aerogel is an interesting material here.  However, polystyrene foam is easy to work, cheap, readily available, and absorbs water less than the other foam insulation choices. Your energy budget doesn't consider engine run time and power from the alternator at all.  A boat that moves even just once or twice a week can reduce/eliminate its need for generator run time by super-sizing its alternator.  I've ordered a Leece-Neville 210A school bus alternator.  It should run happily at 170A continuous, perhaps a bit more with careful attention to cooling.  This is a win-win situation, getting power from the alternator is more efficient than from a generator.  With a fixed pitch prop you're running at an inefficient part of the power curve of the diesel at cruising rpm.  The extra load the alternator moves the engine into a more efficient part of the fuel map, that improvement in efficiency means that part of the fuel consumed by the alternator comes for free as your making the engine more efficient at the same time you make carbon buildup problems less likely.  Even if you have a smaller diesel you could fit an alternator this size.  If you need maximum propulsion power at some point, an external regulator like a Balmar Mc-614 used with a switch for small engine mode (field output reduced to 50%) allows you to get most of the power from the engine for propulsion when necessary.  You could also just put a plain switch in the field wire to the alt for a inexpensive solution, although charging at these high currents you probably want an external regulator anyway.  It should be noted that this solution relies on batteries that can accept pretty high charge rates.  This would be LiPO4, Firefly >AGM>very large flooded lead acid bank.  A small flooded-lead-acid bank probably won't be able to accept the high charge rate for long enough for a large alternator to do a lot of good.  The LiPO4 and the Firefly also have the advantage that they are totally happy in a partial state of charge and can stay there without damage until you are ready to move to the next anchorage (within reasonable time limits and state of charge limits).  You should switch to a serpentine belt to run a large alternator like a Delco Remy 28SI or a Leece Neville Idle Pro. There are two ways of looking at comfort while cruising.  Your comfort could come from plugging in whatever you want whenever you want.  However, this comes with the discomfort of noise from the generator, discomfort getting/storing fuel for the generator (especially bad for gasoline generators),  discomfort from getting/storing oil for the generator, the discomfort from generator oil changes, discomfort from trying to source generator parts in some distant port, discomfort from getting shunned by the cruisers who can't stand the noise of your generator.  On the flip side, if you design a boat with conservation in mind, it is possible to run almost entirely on solar.  I've met more than one boat (with refrigeration and watermaker) that runs successfully with just solar/wind/alternator.  You boil water in a kettle on the stove (is that a discomfort?), you wash laundry ashore or in a bucket (Ok, the bucket counts as a discomfort), is lighting a propane stove a discomfort compared to electric (around here tons of folks spend tons of money on their house for the luxury of a natural gas stove).  I have a nice antique coffee grinder, it takes zero watts to run, is beautiful and a pleasure to use, there are tons of equivalents to this on the boat, where doing things different is part of the pleasure for me.  A generator is definitely not necessary.   On 2019-04-30 9:03 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   What really is the electrical capacity on a boat from solar, how far will that take you, and realistically, will one be running a generator and how much? Solar Power Generation: Based on some tests by the Wynns in Florida (latitude N26), two used "160W" panels (they have 6 of these), produced 15 Amps at "12V", at 14.4V from the panels, but we will say 12.8V from the batteries later because though the charge voltage is higher, the voltage at which the power comes out is lower.    That is 216 Watts in, 192 Watts of useful power out of the batteries later.   They also tested two new "140W" panels and produced 20 Amps at "12V", or about 288 Watts in, 256 Watts out later.   256/"280" = 91% useful power.   192/"320" = 60% useful power.   Same solar controller in both tests.  At latitude N44, I was seeing about 67% of ratings from the panels, before considering charging losses which for a perfect charge controller might be 60% useful power.    On my off-grid solar installation, I have huge reserve capacity, currently not that much generating capacity, and the vampire load is very low.   I would add panels if I were to increase expected daily loads.   The Wynns also did a lot of shading tests, simulating halyards (no appreciable difference) and the boom (much larger difference).   Lets assume this is a boat on the hook and one has put a preventer on the boom to make it not shade panels, and oriented the boat to get uninterrupted sun on the panels.   If I were designing a solar system for a boat today, for a monohull, I would go with the most power dense panels I could get -- lets say "320W" panels.   Lets say I have an arch over my davits and I am able to put three 40-inch wide panels flat above this arch -- that is a beam of 10 feet.   Lets assume 60% useful power.   That is 960 Watts * 60% = 576 Watts which is not much.. One only gets that during the day.   So one might get 3kWh of power per day from the panels -- based on not angling panels.   For someone who thinks they can run without a generator, that is the limit of power.   "Average use for a typical RVer is around 20 kWh a day.   .....  RVers parked in areas where they do not need air conditioning will use much less electricity than RVers who do need it.  In fact, the average amount of electricity used by people who are not running air conditioning is about 10 kWh a day.."  (1) There is one total power budget estimate.   Lets look at it from the components up: Loads: Required Unoccupied, trekking the country nearby while the boat is on anchor:  - Refrigeration: 300 kWh / year (modern, high efficiency, extra insulation for the tropics)   lets say 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Anchoring light (LED, 2 nm visibility, on a timer, 12 hour burn):  0.025 kWh/day   (3)    - Bilge Pump (500 gallons/day, 1 hour/day): 0.060 kWh/day (4)  - Most basic of computers offering Wifi and sensor monitoring to report alerts & email: 0.080 kWh/day (5 + estimate for dry contact and sensor system)   Minimum Occupied:  - Radio (hand held, listening):  0.020 kWh/day  (2)   - Interior Lights (LED):  0.050 kWh/day   - Recharging (Cell, shaver, shortwave receiver, flashlights, head lamps, miscellaneous): 0.050 kWh/day Voluntary Electronics:  - Netbook (4 hours):  0.100 kWh/day    - Full Laptop (4 hours): 0.300 kWh/day   - Display Screen (tv/monitor) (4 hours): 0.400 kWh//day  - DVD player (2 hours): 0.050 kWh/day Other:  - Pressurized water (per 100 liters -- usage for 1 day):  0.020 kWh/day (7)  - Freezer: 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Washing machine, 2 people:  0.400 kWh/day (one load every second day)  - Water maker (most efficient, per 100 liters/day): 0.400 kWh/day (6) Working on Boat:  - hand saw and driver drill for cabinetry work (1 hour run time/8 hour day): 1 kWh/day (experience)  - belt sander for finishing (6 hours run time/8 hour day): 7.2 kWh/day (experience) This is before using any electricity for cooking.   Looking at these conveniences ... pressurized water is a power bargain.   So, basic anchoring budget is 1.17 kWh / day -- solar will cover it with more than 100% to spare --(Message over 64 KB, truncated) | 35915|35854|2019-05-03 14:17:16|wild_explorer|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?|Matt,There is nothing new about using a controller (instead of simple diesel governor). That how ALL new electronically controlled injector engines work - using programmable controllers. Even on motorcycles now.Do I like it? No.... More electronics - less reliability.Simple "Red Line" output will not be enough, It is need to keep diesel engine in 85-100% load range for best results.I was surprised, that Kubota diesel engines (same model) for generators and tractors have noticeable difference in its design. It is NOT just a governor which is different. Generator revision has extra piston ring to prevent cylinder wall from glazing when diesel runs underload. There are some other design differences as well.Similar problem is for Marine and Truck engines (same model), You can put old truck engine into a boat, but you will have a problem if you put old marine engine into a truck. The problem is that marine engine runs at constant (usually lower) RPMs than truck engine. It creates steep ridge on the top of a cylinder wall. When you run marine engine  at higher RPM then intended, piston goes slightly higher and the ridge will damage top piston ring.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :#ygrps-yiv-257546557 #ygrps-yiv-257546557ygrps-yiv-2128748088 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Wild, so this is a new hypothetical invention, which is fine.   Just want to be clear that google was not failing me.   Seems doable and might be useful, even if one had a good sense of one's own engine by sound or response to tweaks.   Despite taking into account so many things, the output would have to be simple -- red for throttle down.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, May 3, 2019 2:21 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?  I probably used incorrect name for such device.As I understand, you want to use "spare" engine power to run accessories. Let call it "Accessories Load Indicator" or similar. More likely, it will be some kind of controller which is programmed with engine Max Power at certain RPM (Power Curve), Prop load curve, speed of the hull, speed of the current, speed and direction of the wind. All that will give you what "spare" power is available from the engine at a given time. Using this indicator you can engage different accessories to use all available "spare" engine power.Or you can use Brent's suggestion, You simply graduate throttle lever position in 100 RPM steps (at full engine load at that RPM). It might be tricky to fully load engine at all RPMs needed to be graduated. After graduation, use engine tachometer to compare the results when accessories are engaged.  It will be much easier to compare - just need to evaluate tachometer readings with throttle lever position. Equal - proper load, Tach RPM > Lever RPM - underload, Tach RPM < Lever RPM - overload,  No extra electronics/controller. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Wild, >you can set up an automatic load balancer Is that a sort of engine governor that does more than just hold an RPM, something that takes into account loading on the engine ?    If it does not take into account variable load at a given RPM, how is it helping control the engine as the alternator regulator throttles up for more electrical output, or the water maker pump engages, or the compressor kicks in ? Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of williswildest@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 12:56 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?  Matt,It is a little bit more complex. Take for example Kubota diesel engines. Same model, but one revision for Tractor and onother for Generator. Compare Power and Fuel Consumption curves. They should be different.There is software which allow to match Hull, Engine and Prop. It gives you necessary RPM/KW curves for chosen size/pitch of the prop. It shows as well if chosen prop is OK or Not (cavitation, engine overload) When you have all this information, you can set up an automatic load balancer, ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Trying to piece this together to learn something.... OK then, as one reduces RPM, the hp gap between the prop curve and engine curve increases -- the engine is capable of more than the prop.  Engine curves and prop curves both fall to zero at zero RPM, so, there is an RPM for the maximum difference between the curves, where the engine is producing the maximum spare horsepower beyond what the prop is using.  There is a range near that RPM where there is plenty of spare hp.   One might not be certain at a given moment what hp is being drawn by electric-clutch-driven-automatic accessories, or the alternator that is regulated by the regulator.  So I am guessing (so long as the prop is engaged) one should always operate the engine between the maximum hp gap RPM, and the prop-engine match RPM ? So as a procedure, in the case of automatically regulated load accessories: I am guessing one sets the engine for the maximum hp gap RPM, as a starting point, and then monitors the engine exhaust temperature (or sound by ear) for overload ? If one is well below temperature indicating underload (and sound by ear also indicates underload), then one increases RPM slightly toward the prop-engine match RPM ? If one is over-temperature at a given RPM indicating overload (or the sound by ear indicates overload), then one decreases the RPM toward the maximum hp gap RPM ? Would this be a practical way to operate a propulsion diesel with heavy, automatically-controlled accessories on it ? The maximum hp gap between the engine and prop curves gives another limit on the maximum hp that can be used by accessories.   Zoa Scott indicated the engine itself has a limit in the specs.   So one would have to keep below both these limits ... it seems ?   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 12:03 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?   Because the power curve of the engine does not match that for the power absorption of a fixed pitch propeller, you only have one point where engine power and propeller absorption match (where the curves cross).  In order to prevent damage to the engine, this point is set at the maximum produced power.  When you install a new prop and check to make sure that the engine can still reach its maximum rpm, this is what you are doing.  So, at any engine speed below the max rpm, the propeller is absorbing less power than the engine would like to be producing for that rpm.  If all you are doing is adding a larger alternator, then you are unlikely to run into problems overloading the engine and are likely moving it to a more efficient part of the fuel consumption map.  Should you need max power out of then engine, install an ordinary switch in the field wire of your alternator or use an external regulator like a Balmar that has a small engine mode that allows you to reduce the alternator output. If you want to add more accessories, then you might want to be a bit more careful that you are not overloading the engine.  Check the power curves that are published for your engine.  Also, an exhaust temperature gauge is good insurance that you are not overloading the engine.  In reality, most of the accessories you would strap to the engine won't be on all the time.  A watermaker either has an electric clutch, or a simple manual engagement system like Brent has talked about.  The alternator load can be turned on and off easily.  Even a fridge compressor would have an electric clutch.  So, as long as you stay within the limits of allowable accessory loads on the crankshaft, you can add whatever you can find space to fit and still have a propeller matched to the maximum hp that the engine can produce. I'm not a diesel mechanic.  Just a guy that likes messing about with the technical side of boats and I try to share what I know here with the hope of helping someone out as others here have done for me.  Also, discussions here are a good way to find the limits of what I know and the cases where I'm just plain wrong. Cheers, Darren On 2019-05-01 4:29 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Thank you Zoa.  Also ignored, with parasitic loads, your (residual) torque-rpm characteristic cannot match the prop anymore if it match without parasitic loads. Matt From: Zoa Scott zoascott74@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 19:02 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Just a note incase its not widely known. All diesel engine manufacturers will let you know max allowable parasitic hp loads to be taken off crankshaft . Im a diesel mechanic by trade. If your running mutiple gizmos they are usually installed opposing each other if belt driven. Zoa  On Wed, May 1, 2019, 5:20 AM Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats], wrote:   Excellent point Darren, I had not considered drive belt load on the crankshaft bearing from all these extras.  My engine is not well set up for extra driven components so I had been toying with the idea of a pony shaft just to run components from.   But even then, if one is pulling 10,000W off the pony shaft (3,000W for each of the alternator, semihermetic compressor and watermaker pump plus surge margin) then a lot of design calculation and checking for what is easily available has go into the power transmission link between the engine and pony shaft..  Is a motorcycle drive cogged belt that custom bikes use between the engine and transmission ... is that the easiest?   I don't know.  Is it better to put one extra to the right, another to the left so they balance bearing loads, except for the little torque caused by the separation between the plane of the two belts?    Is there room to put one extra below the crankshaft to balance a triad... there might be on my boat. Really good point.  Last thing one wants to do is reduce the life of the primary engine. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 01:21 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Agreed, and I enjoyed your embellishment of the idea Matt  :-)  The one thing you have to look out for is how heavily you load the crankshaft bearing.  The manufacturers tend to be a bit cagey about what is tolerable.  If I had a water pump for a watermaker and a big alternator, I'd try and mount them opposed by 180 degrees.  Most marine engines die from corrosion and lack of use.  While you wouldn't want to idle one to charge the batteries, just about any other use is likely to make it last longer. On 2019-04-30 1:47 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Absolutely agreed Darren, if people do not have refrigeration, they should remain in that blissful place.   Absolutely agreed Darren, if you include running the propulsion engine as different from running a dedicated engine to generate electricity.   Perhaps I should change the title to "Run a fuel engine to make electricity sometimes, or Not".   Engine or Generator -- seems the same thing to me.  It was easier to do the calculations with a 1200W Honda.. What you said about running the propulsion engine for two purposes is absolutely of advantage.   Thank you for telling me about the "small engine" regulators ... I want one.   Absolutely true, propulsion engines are usually diesel, more efficient, marine-ized so they last longer in a boat environment, whereas generators are, well, inexpensive if they are gasoline and not marine-ized.   But chances are, the outboard on the tender is gasoline so, one probably has gasoline on board in any case.   It is absolutely true for some boats and some owners that running the engine will come at about the same frequency as one would normally need to top up the batteries.   But then this tempo will get ingrained.  When one gets somewhere they really like and want to stay for a while, the tempo will make one feel itchy to go somewhere on a certain schedule or face the prospect of just running the engine just to make electricity, which more than a few cruisers complain is inefficient and irritating to them..   Where sails are a redundancy to the propulsion engine, there is no redundancy to an alternator if any one of a dozen things goes wrong with the propulsion engine.   The propulsion engine has a limited service lifetime and a chance of other failures, every hour it runs.   If something goes wrong with the engine, you are talking about boat yoga in tight spaces if you are a DIY type, on-site diesel mechanics ($$), and worst case a $10,000-$15,000 bill and a crane to replace it.   Yikes, I am not running that sucker just to make electricity.  As for incidental electricity... I sail differently.   My sails are my propulsion.  I have used as little as 12 litres of fuel in year, and there is no such thing as a wind where my boat is slower than a cottage.   My engine is my backup to my sails.   Naturally, good seamanship dictates caution and to some that points only to the engine.  If that is the way it has to be, OK.   But waiting to go in until the wind and tide are favourable is also seamanship, and then the engine and its full tank of fuel is still there in reserve.    Many times I start the engine and just let it idle for the decisive couple of minutes as I sail nearly all the way in -- it is there in an instant for oh-crap moments..      At least with a 1200 Watt generator, there is no issue of charge rate, they are really quiet out of the box, and can be made quieter with a little DIY..   If something goes wrong with the generator, I had always assumed that in a pinch I would have the 20,000 Watt propulsion engine was the backup to the generator, even though it is inefficient and straining to the electrical system unless it is used for something else at the same time.   If something goes wrong with the generator, it never be a big bill.  I carry it ashore to a small engine repair place, or buy another one.  In the meantime, so long as the generator works, one runs their engine only when necessary, keeping its hours down.   So it is down to wear and tear on the engine, or a disposable substitute to change fuel into electricity.  I would never NOT have a portable generator.    I am really not disputing anything you are saying Darren, some people will find what you describe to be the simplest course of action.   I am just giving the other side of what some other boats might do.   But lets run with your idea, a very good one, to have a 210A bus alternator running directly off the propulsion engine to take advantage of the huge surplus of mechanical power available that one might borrow from when moving the boat.   But, if you are going to do that....  - if you have an external regulator, is it not possible with the flip of an appropriately-wired switch to turn this into an unbelievable weldernator ?   One is never doing that with a 1200W Honda.   Even Rick's batteries, and a little inverter welder, that is a joke compared to this T-rex of weldernators.   You could do half inch plate with 5/32" rod and really feel like you are accomplishing something.   If you have never tried 5/32 rod, you really have to, just for fun, on 3/16" or thicker steel.   Have 100 feet of cables, and industrial fenders and raft up to commercial boats and do a little commercial welding.   I want one.  Really, I do..    - why stop at a 210A alternator -- connect up a high pressure pump with a couple of one-way valves so your water maker runs electric off one pump or directly from the engine from the other pump -- for just the cost of a second pump, you are creating redundancy.   Drawing the same torque as the alternator, the engine-powered watermaker could put out 200 gallons per hour, assuming one has suitable osmosis media.   The efficiency would be awesome, diesel directly driving the pump skips the following filters of efficiency: claw-style armature alternator 75-80%, battery charging 90%, electric motor 80-90% -- combined total 54%-65% efficiency.  One avoids all that by going straight off the engine.   Then one also has the alternative to make water with the engine if the electric pump ever fails.   I sure am thinking about doing this..  - why stop there ... If the water tanks fill before one is finished motoring, start filling the bathtub and have a good celebratory soak in the tub to prepare for going out on the town at the new destination.  Your 20,000 Watt motor is easily producing 25,000 Watts of heat so, that tub can be nice and toasty warm with just a few valves and a little hose.   This is just a given, I am definitely having an engine-heat option to my hot water tank.   - Heck why stop there ... turn down the flow rate so the fresh water comes out at full exhaust temperature and fill your teapot.   There is a lot of comfort possible here.    I don't like tea that much so, no.    - If there is still a surplus of fresh water, start filling all those water jerry cans most boats have -- over stock and then turn off the electric water maker -- run the engine today, save Amps tomorrow.   I sure would do this.      - why stop there ... put a semi-hermetic compressor on the engine and hook it up to a big-ass ice maker -- freeze a fraction that 200 GPH pouring out of the water maker and get rid of the need for both refrigeration and freezer (save the brine waste from water making ... ice+brine = -17C in a cold plate).    Says that man with a great big ice chest ... pull it out, or add a compressor to the engine ... open question.    - why stop there ... Just keep making ice, and put hundreds of pounds of ice in a stainless cabinet inside an adjustable-vent wood cabinet, with a drip pan under the stainless cabinet -- a DIY dehumidifier.   This is probably beyond the electrical power budget for most boats, so, what a luxury.   Dry gallons an hour.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Have the melt-water drain for the stainless cabinet run through a cooling coil along the cabinet ceiling and back down into the fresh water tanks -- step one air conditioning, for the price of pumping water a few feet -- we have already established, that is bargain compared to AC.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Not cool enough? Open vents in the side of the wood cabinet and blow air in there to both get more cool air and accelerate melting.   Glorious air conditioning -- not even a cat could manage that on solar.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... they have these cooking appliances, called muff pots, better than instant pots, and they are *ZERO* Watts:  http://cs.amsnow.com/sno/b/news/archive/2015/04/09/snacker-packer-meals-made-easy.aspx Cooking on a snowmobile made easy - American Snowmobiler Magazine - Snowmobile forums, news, Polaris, Ski-Doo, Arctic Cat & Yamaha reviews - AmSnow.com American Snowmobiler Magazine presents news, reviews, forums, videos, photos and the latest stats and prices for Arctic Cat, Ski-Doo, Yamaha and Polaris snowmobiles. cs.amsnow.com If one has never cooked on the exhaust of an engine ...   Heck with all that, one solar panel would run the radio and the nav lights, nav, etc.   If co-generating electricity by depending on running a 20,000 Watt engine with any frequency is how some boaters will do it, then co-generating everything else that would otherwise require electricity, or would generate comfort is worth mentioning too.   So when it comes down to it, same answer:  On a monohull, one is running an engine sometimes, but there is a lot of room for innovation, taste, preferences and different ways to meet the power budget.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:59 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     For everyone who has a simple boat without refrigeration/freezer, you probably wonder why everyone is so concerned about how to generate enough power from solar.  Your life is simple and there is no reason to read the rest of this. Matt, that's a pretty reasonable analysis, and would fit some boats.  There are certainly boats that manage these comforts on lower watts.  The obvious area for improvement is refrigeration, any efficiencies gained here is money better spent than money spent on power generation (solar and generators).  I came to the conclusion that 4" of styrofoam insulation for the fridge and 6" for the freezer was the minimum to make DC refrigeration work on a reasonable energy budget.  50 to 125 Ah per day is what 12v DC refrigeration generally uses per day.  The differences are almost entirely due to insulation, next due to the size of the fridge/freezer.  If you can get closer to 50Ah per day your energy budget changes drastically.  I decided a spillover design fridge freezer, custom built to maximize insulation was the best way to go in my build.  Aspen Aerogel is an interesting material here.  However, polystyrene foam is easy to work, cheap, readily available, and absorbs water less than the other foam insulation choices. Your energy budget doesn't consider engine run time and power from the alternator at all.  A boat that moves even just once or twice a week can reduce/eliminate its need for generator run time by super-sizing its alternator.  I've ordered a Leece-Neville 210A school bus alternator.  It should run happily at 170A continuous, perhaps a bit more with careful attention to cooling.  This is a win-win situation, getting power from the alternator is more efficient than from a generator.  With a fixed pitch prop you're running at an inefficient part of the power curve of the diesel at cruising rpm.  The extra load the alternator moves the engine into a more efficient part of the fuel map, that improvement in efficiency means that part of the fuel consumed by the alternator comes for free as your making the engine more efficient at the same time you make carbon buildup problems less likely.  Even if you have a smaller diesel you could fit an alternator this size.  If you need maximum propulsion power at some point, an external regulator like a Balmar Mc-614 used with a switch for small engine mode (field output reduced to 50%) allows you to get most of the power from the engine for propulsion when necessary.  You could also just put a plain switch in the field wire to the alt for a inexpensive solution, although charging at these high currents you probably want an external regulator anyway.  It should be noted that this solution relies on batteries that can accept pretty high charge rates.  This would be LiPO4, Firefly >AGM>very large flooded lead acid bank.  A small flooded-lead-acid bank probably won't be able to accept the high charge rate for long enough for a large alternator to do a lot of good.  The LiPO4 and the Firefly also have the advantage that they are totally happy in a partial state of charge and can stay there without damage until you are ready to move to the next anchorage (within reasonable time limits and state of charge limits).  You should switch to a serpentine belt to run a large alternator like a Delco Remy 28SI or a Leece Neville Idle Pro. There are two ways of looking at comfort while cruising.  Your comfort could come from plugging in whatever you want whenever you want.  However, this comes with the discomfort of noise from the generator, discomfort getting/storing fuel for the generator (especially bad for gasoline generators),  discomfort from getting/storing oil for the generator, the discomfort from generator oil changes, discomfort from trying to source generator parts in some distant port, discomfort from getting shunned by the cruisers who can't stand the noise of your generator.  On the flip side, if you design a boat with conservation in mind, it is possible to run almost entirely on solar.  I've met more than one boat (with refrigeration and watermaker) that runs successfully with just solar/wind/alternator.  You boil water in a kettle on the stove (is that a discomfort?), you wash laundry ashore or in a bucket (Ok, the bucket counts as a discomfort), is lighting a propane stove a discomfort compared to electric (around here tons of folks spend tons of money on their house for the luxury of a natural gas stove).  I have a nice antique coffee grinder, it takes zero watts to run, is beautiful and a pleasure to use, there are tons of equivalents to this on the boat, where doing things different is part of the pleasure for me.  A generator is definitely not necessary.   On 2019-04-30 9:03 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   What really is the electrical capacity on a boat from solar, how far will that take you, and realistically, will one be running a generator and how much? Solar Power Generation: Based on some tests by the Wynns in Florida (latitude N26), two used "160W" panels (they have 6 of these), produced 15 Amps at "12V", at 14.4V from the panels, but we will say 12.8V from the batteries later because though the charge voltage is higher, the voltage at which the power comes out is lower.    That is 216 Watts in, 192 Watts of useful power out of the batteries later.   They also tested two new "140W" panels and produced 20 Amps at "12V", or about 288 Watts in, 256 Watts out later.   256/"280" = 91% useful power.   192/"320" = 60% useful power.   Same solar controller in both tests.  At latitude N44, I was seeing about 67% of ratings from the panels, before considering charging losses which for a perfect charge controller might be 60% useful power.    On my off-grid solar installation, I have huge reserve capacity, currently not that much generating capacity, and the vampire load is very low.   I would add panels if I were to increase expected daily loads.   The Wynns also did a lot of shading tests, simulating halyards (no appreciable difference) and the boom (much larger difference).   Lets assume this is a boat on the hook and one has put a preventer on the boom to make it not shade panels, and oriented the boat to get uninterrupted sun on the panels.   If I were designing a solar system for a boat today, for a monohull, I would go with the most power dense panels I could get -- lets say "320W" panels.   Lets say I have an arch over my davits and I am able to put three 40-inch wide panels flat above this arch -- that is a beam of 10 feet.   Lets assume 60% useful power.   That is 960 Watts * 60% = 576 Watts which is not much.. One only gets that during the day.   So one might get 3kWh of power per day from the panels -- based on not angling panels.   For someone who thinks they can run without a generator, that is the limit of power.   "Average use for a typical RVer is around 20 kWh a day.   .....  RVers parked in areas where they do not need air conditioning will use much less electricity than RVers who do need it.  In fact, the average amount of electricity used by people who are not running air conditioning is about 10 kWh a day.."  (1) There is one total power budget estimate.   Lets look at it from the components up: Loads: Required Unoccupied, trekking the country nearby while the boat is on anchor:  - Refrigeration: 300 kWh / year (modern, high efficiency, extra insulation for the tropics)   lets say 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Anchoring light (LED, 2 nm visibility, on a timer, 12 hour burn):  0.025 kWh/day   (3)    - Bilge Pump (500 gallons/day, 1 hour/day): 0.060 kWh/day (4)  - Most basic of computers offering Wifi and sensor monitoring to report alerts & email: 0.080 kWh/day (5 + estimate for dry contact and sensor system)   Minimum Occupied:  - Radio (hand held, listening):  0.020 kWh/day  (2)   - Interior Lights (LED):  0.050 kWh/day   - Recharging (Cell, shaver, shortwave receiver, flashlights, head lamps, miscellaneous): 0.050 kWh/day Voluntary Electronics:  - Netbook (4 hours):  0.100 kWh/day    - Full Laptop (4 hours): 0.300 kWh/day   - Display Screen (tv/monitor) (4 hours): 0.400 kWh//day  - DVD player (2 hours): 0.050 kWh/day Other:  - Pressurized water (per 100 liters -- usage for 1 day):  0.020 kWh/day (7)  - Freezer: 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Washing machine, 2 people:  0.400 kWh/day (one load every second day)  - Water maker (most efficient, per 100 liters/day): 0.400 kWh/day (6) Working on Boat:  - hand saw and driver drill for cabinetry work (1 hour run time/8 hour day): 1 kWh/day (experience)  - belt sander for finishing (6 hours run time/8 hour day)(Message over 64 KB, truncated) | 35916|35854|2019-05-03 16:33:46|Matt Malone|Re: LiFePo4| #ygrps-yiv-2059952049 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Rick, what was the total weight of the 16 cells ? Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2019 8:06 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     Sure… Total to our door is $3700.00 including the BMS units, taxes and air freight. We also were able to use Pay Pal..that fee was not included.. We are getting 13875.2 watts so that works out to $.26 per watt for LiFePo4 cells to the door… I still need to build a box to put them in, but at least I can configure them to my space.. Rick On Apr 28, 2019, at 4:56 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@hotmail..com [origamiboats] wrote: I would be interested to hear what the final costs of the batteries are including shipping, taxes, duties etc.    Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 8:19 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     UPDATE:   Batteries have shipped from China with 2 BMS units.  We were told they do a balance on our batteries before shipping to avoid any possible defects or warranty issues… So far we have been pleased with the service, and the patience they have with us and our 10,000 questions… All in all we are very satisfied,,, Now we wait… Since we are not experts in solar systems we are open to suggestions and advice.. Please feel free to correct me if my thinking is wrong here… But we are of the impression that once the bank is built and hooked to the inverter, all our power needs are maintained through a service panel.. The inverter we are interested in (regardless of voltage) will output to a main 50 amp breaker in the panel much like a home is wired.   The boat only has 120v for lights and the kitchen appliances.  There will only be a few DC lights for back up, and all the electronics will be DC.  The 6000 watt inverter allows us to run multiple appliances at the same time in the kitchen so our lifestyle change will not be as drastic as it could be. Since we plan to live aboard full time for the next few years, we want to keep life as functional as possible in the galley.    For example: We are living in a new, fancy RV at the boat yar, but only have a 30 amp service. We are constantly dealing with power issues..  We had to turn off electric heat to run microwave, and now that its warmer, we are doing the same with the AC.   It is a small thing, but having talked to folks who live aboard full time, we hear where the galley is a place where inconvenience over time makes life unnecessarily complicated.   I think when people think “sailboat” they automatically think of some lightweight, camping situation with some time limitation.  Ours is heavy, with all the comforts of home. We are clearly in the comfort over speed group… Rick On Apr 26, 2019, at 3:37 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@hotmail..com [origamiboats] wrote: An experiment would be a good idea. It would be an inexpensive experiment. There are ways to reduce radio noise.  First would be, look for a converter with RF approvals like you see on stickers on a lot of things.  Second would be to determine if the noise is being broadcast and picked up by the antenna or coupled through the power to the cabin radio - compare to a handheld.  If it is poor power quality, that can be fixed external to an inexpensive converter. Electronics have improved.  A new cheap unit might be much higher frequency than the ones ages ago, with lower ripple.  Capacitors have improved, the efficiency of power conversion inductors has improved.   All of these improvements have been pushed by decades of very competitive computer power supply production.  I would not hesitate to give it a try in an experiment anticipating a completely different outcome from early power converters contemporaneous to the first PCs. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com  on behalf of opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 5:02:09 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] LiFePo4     When I worked on fishing boats eons ago the 24 to 12 volt converters were notorious for making radio noise.  I would think a cheap inverter from Asia would have the bare minimum of parts for filtering to keep the cost down.   You would have to experiment. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : 24V to 12V step down equipment seems cheap and plentiful.    onverter.   This can add a lot more expense. | 35917|35854|2019-05-03 17:47:30|Rick Jackson|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?|I had a Ram 5500 with ambulance package that had 2 / 200amp alts.   I never needed them but when ever I sat idling with everything on the idle would jump up to 1100 sometimes.  But again it was sub zero tempsSent from my iPhone On May 2, 2019, at 9:38 AM, williswildest@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Darren, you are very good for a "guy who just messing with the engines". Many mechanics do not know what you know and how to match engine and prop to get maximum fuel efficiency and run diesel at maximum load to prolong its life. Not enough load is the main killer of a diesel engine  ;-) Another one is shutting down the engine after high RPM operation without giving proper time for idling to cool engine off.I second:- Learn your engine Power and Fuel Consumption curves.- Matching prop and engine is tricky, You need to account for extra load when weather is bad, which puts extra load on the engine (that where you need to go into full RPM). Cruising RPMs should be at the point of most economical fuel consumption on the curve.- sometimes this means that you may need bigger engine that you may expect OR another engine which have different Power and Fuel Consumption curve.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Because the power curve of the engine does not match that for the power absorption of a fixed pitch propeller, you only have one point where engine power and propeller absorption match (where the curves cross).  In order to prevent damage to the engine, this point is set at the maximum produced power.  When you install a new prop and check to make sure that the engine can still reach its maximum rpm, this is what you are doing.  So, at any engine speed below the max rpm, the propeller is absorbing less power than the engine would like to be producing for that rpm.  If all you are doing is adding a larger alternator, then you are unlikely to run into problems overloading the engine and are likely moving it to a more efficient part of the fuel consumption map.  Should you need max power out of then engine, install an ordinary switch in the field wire of your alternator or use an external regulator like a Balmar that has a small engine mode that allows you to reduce the alternator output. If you want to add more accessories, then you might want to be a bit more careful that you are not overloading the engine.  Check the power curves that are published for your engine.  Also, an exhaust temperature gauge is good insurance that you are not overloading the engine.  In reality, most of the accessories you would strap to the engine won't be on all the time.  A watermaker either has an electric clutch, or a simple manual engagement system like Brent has talked about.  The alternator load can be turned on and off easily.  Even a fridge compressor would have an electric clutch.  So, as long as you stay within the limits of allowable accessory loads on the crankshaft, you can add whatever you can find space to fit and still have a propeller matched to the maximum hp that the engine can produce. I'm not a diesel mechanic.  Just a guy that likes messing about with the technical side of boats and I try to share what I know here with the hope of helping someone out as others here have done for me.  Also, discussions here are a good way to find the limits of what I know and the cases where I'm just plain wrong. Cheers, Darren On 2019-05-01 4:29 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Thank you Zoa.  Also ignored, with parasitic loads, your (residual) torque-rpm characteristic cannot match the prop anymore if it match without parasitic loads. Matt From: Zoa Scott zoascott74@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 19:02 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Just a note incase its not widely known. All diesel engine manufacturers will let you know max allowable parasitic hp loads to be taken off crankshaft . Im a diesel mechanic by trade. If your running mutiple gizmos they are usually installed opposing each other if belt driven. Zoa  On Wed, May 1, 2019, 5:20 AM Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats], wrote:   Excellent point Darren, I had not considered drive belt load on the crankshaft bearing from all these extras.  My engine is not well set up for extra driven components so I had been toying with the idea of a pony shaft just to run components from.   But even then, if one is pulling 10,000W off the pony shaft (3,000W for each of the alternator, semihermetic compressor and watermaker pump plus surge margin) then a lot of design calculation and checking for what is easily available has go into the power transmission link between the engine and pony shaft..  Is a motorcycle drive cogged belt that custom bikes use between the engine and transmission ... is that the easiest?   I don't know.  Is it better to put one extra to the right, another to the left so they balance bearing loads, except for the little torque caused by the separation between the plane of the two belts?    Is there room to put one extra below the crankshaft to balance a triad... there might be on my boat. Really good point.  Last thing one wants to do is reduce the life of the primary engine. Matt From: Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 01:21 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Agreed, and I enjoyed your embellishment of the idea Matt  :-)  The one thing you have to look out for is how heavily you load the crankshaft bearing.  The manufacturers tend to be a bit cagey about what is tolerable.  If I had a water pump for a watermaker and a big alternator, I'd try and mount them opposed by 180 degrees.  Most marine engines die from corrosion and lack of use.  While you wouldn't want to idle one to charge the batteries, just about any other use is likely to make it last longer. On 2019-04-30 1:47 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Absolutely agreed Darren, if people do not have refrigeration, they should remain in that blissful place.   Absolutely agreed Darren, if you include running the propulsion engine as different from running a dedicated engine to generate electricity.   Perhaps I should change the title to "Run a fuel engine to make electricity sometimes, or Not".   Engine or Generator -- seems the same thing to me.  It was easier to do the calculations with a 1200W Honda.. What you said about running the propulsion engine for two purposes is absolutely of advantage.   Thank you for telling me about the "small engine" regulators ... I want one.   Absolutely true, propulsion engines are usually diesel, more efficient, marine-ized so they last longer in a boat environment, whereas generators are, well, inexpensive if they are gasoline and not marine-ized.   But chances are, the outboard on the tender is gasoline so, one probably has gasoline on board in any case.   It is absolutely true for some boats and some owners that running the engine will come at about the same frequency as one would normally need to top up the batteries.   But then this tempo will get ingrained.  When one gets somewhere they really like and want to stay for a while, the tempo will make one feel itchy to go somewhere on a certain schedule or face the prospect of just running the engine just to make electricity, which more than a few cruisers complain is inefficient and irritating to them..   Where sails are a redundancy to the propulsion engine, there is no redundancy to an alternator if any one of a dozen things goes wrong with the propulsion engine.   The propulsion engine has a limited service lifetime and a chance of other failures, every hour it runs.   If something goes wrong with the engine, you are talking about boat yoga in tight spaces if you are a DIY type, on-site diesel mechanics ($$), and worst case a $10,000-$15,000 bill and a crane to replace it.   Yikes, I am not running that sucker just to make electricity.  As for incidental electricity... I sail differently.   My sails are my propulsion.  I have used as little as 12 litres of fuel in year, and there is no such thing as a wind where my boat is slower than a cottage.   My engine is my backup to my sails.   Naturally, good seamanship dictates caution and to some that points only to the engine.  If that is the way it has to be, OK.   But waiting to go in until the wind and tide are favourable is also seamanship, and then the engine and its full tank of fuel is still there in reserve.    Many times I start the engine and just let it idle for the decisive couple of minutes as I sail nearly all the way in -- it is there in an instant for oh-crap moments..      At least with a 1200 Watt generator, there is no issue of charge rate, they are really quiet out of the box, and can be made quieter with a little DIY..   If something goes wrong with the generator, I had always assumed that in a pinch I would have the 20,000 Watt propulsion engine was the backup to the generator, even though it is inefficient and straining to the electrical system unless it is used for something else at the same time.   If something goes wrong with the generator, it never be a big bill.  I carry it ashore to a small engine repair place, or buy another one.  In the meantime, so long as the generator works, one runs their engine only when necessary, keeping its hours down.   So it is down to wear and tear on the engine, or a disposable substitute to change fuel into electricity.  I would never NOT have a portable generator.    I am really not disputing anything you are saying Darren, some people will find what you describe to be the simplest course of action.   I am just giving the other side of what some other boats might do.   But lets run with your idea, a very good one, to have a 210A bus alternator running directly off the propulsion engine to take advantage of the huge surplus of mechanical power available that one might borrow from when moving the boat.   But, if you are going to do that....  - if you have an external regulator, is it not possible with the flip of an appropriately-wired switch to turn this into an unbelievable weldernator ?   One is never doing that with a 1200W Honda.   Even Rick's batteries, and a little inverter welder, that is a joke compared to this T-rex of weldernators.   You could do half inch plate with 5/32" rod and really feel like you are accomplishing something.   If you have never tried 5/32 rod, you really have to, just for fun, on 3/16" or thicker steel.   Have 100 feet of cables, and industrial fenders and raft up to commercial boats and do a little commercial welding.   I want one.  Really, I do..    - why stop at a 210A alternator -- connect up a high pressure pump with a couple of one-way valves so your water maker runs electric off one pump or directly from the engine from the other pump -- for just the cost of a second pump, you are creating redundancy.   Drawing the same torque as the alternator, the engine-powered watermaker could put out 200 gallons per hour, assuming one has suitable osmosis media.   The efficiency would be awesome, diesel directly driving the pump skips the following filters of efficiency: claw-style armature alternator 75-80%, battery charging 90%, electric motor 80-90% -- combined total 54%-65% efficiency.  One avoids all that by going straight off the engine.   Then one also has the alternative to make water with the engine if the electric pump ever fails.   I sure am thinking about doing this..  - why stop there ... If the water tanks fill before one is finished motoring, start filling the bathtub and have a good celebratory soak in the tub to prepare for going out on the town at the new destination.  Your 20,000 Watt motor is easily producing 25,000 Watts of heat so, that tub can be nice and toasty warm with just a few valves and a little hose.   This is just a given, I am definitely having an engine-heat option to my hot water tank.   - Heck why stop there ... turn down the flow rate so the fresh water comes out at full exhaust temperature and fill your teapot.   There is a lot of comfort possible here.    I don't like tea that much so, no.    - If there is still a surplus of fresh water, start filling all those water jerry cans most boats have -- over stock and then turn off the electric water maker -- run the engine today, save Amps tomorrow.   I sure would do this.      - why stop there ... put a semi-hermetic compressor on the engine and hook it up to a big-ass ice maker -- freeze a fraction that 200 GPH pouring out of the water maker and get rid of the need for both refrigeration and freezer (save the brine waste from water making ... ice+brine = -17C in a cold plate).    Says that man with a great big ice chest ... pull it out, or add a compressor to the engine ... open question.    - why stop there ... Just keep making ice, and put hundreds of pounds of ice in a stainless cabinet inside an adjustable-vent wood cabinet, with a drip pan under the stainless cabinet -- a DIY dehumidifier.   This is probably beyond the electrical power budget for most boats, so, what a luxury.   Dry gallons an hour.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Have the melt-water drain for the stainless cabinet run through a cooling coil along the cabinet ceiling and back down into the fresh water tanks -- step one air conditioning, for the price of pumping water a few feet -- we have already established, that is bargain compared to AC.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... Not cool enough? Open vents in the side of the wood cabinet and blow air in there to both get more cool air and accelerate melting.   Glorious air conditioning -- not even a cat could manage that on solar.   (Now I am just being silly for a boat, but, this is actually done as a form of electricity rate arbitrage in large office buildings.)  - why stop there ... they have these cooking appliances, called muff pots, better than instant pots, and they are *ZERO* Watts:  http://cs.amsnow.com/sno/b/news/archive/2015/04/09/snacker-packer-meals-made-easy.aspx Cooking on a snowmobile made easy - American Snowmobiler Magazine - Snowmobile forums, news, Polaris, Ski-Doo, Arctic Cat & Yamaha reviews - AmSnow.com American Snowmobiler Magazine presents news, reviews, forums, videos, photos and the latest stats and prices for Arctic Cat, Ski-Doo, Yamaha and Polaris snowmobiles. cs.amsnow.com If one has never cooked on the exhaust of an engine ......   Heck with all that, one solar panel would run the radio and the nav lights, nav, etc.   If co-generating electricity by depending on running a 20,000 Watt engine with any frequency is how some boaters will do it, then co-generating everything else that would otherwise require electricity, or would generate comfort is worth mentioning too.   So when it comes down to it, same answer:  On a monohull, one is running an engine sometimes, but there is a lot of room for innovation, taste, preferences and different ways to meet the power budget.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:59 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?     For everyone who has a simple boat without refrigeration/freezer, you probably wonder why everyone is so concerned about how to generate enough power from solar.  Your life is simple and there is no reason to read the rest of this. Matt, that's a pretty reasonable analysis, and would fit some boats.  There are certainly boats that manage these comforts on lower watts.  The obvious area for improvement is refrigeration, any efficiencies gained here is money better spent than money spent on power generation (solar and generators).  I came to the conclusion that 4" of styrofoam insulation for the fridge and 6" for the freezer was the minimum to make DC refrigeration work on a reasonable energy budget.  50 to 125 Ah per day is what 12v DC refrigeration generally uses per day.  The differences are almost entirely due to insulation, next due to the size of the fridge/freezer.  If you can get closer to 50Ah per day your energy budget changes drastically.  I decided a spillover design fridge freezer, custom built to maximize insulation was the best way to go in my build..  Aspen Aerogel is an interesting material here.  However, polystyrene foam is easy to work, cheap, readily available, and absorbs water less than the other foam insulation choices. Your energy budget doesn't consider engine run time and power from the alternator at all.  A boat that moves even just once or twice a week can reduce/eliminate its need for generator run time by super-sizing its alternator.  I've ordered a Leece-Neville 210A school bus alternator.  It should run happily at 170A continuous, perhaps a bit more with careful attention to cooling.  This is a win-win situation, getting power from the alternator is more efficient than from a generator.  With a fixed pitch prop you're running at an inefficient part of the power curve of the diesel at cruising rpm.  The extra load the alternator moves the engine into a more efficient part of the fuel map, that improvement in efficiency means that part of the fuel consumed by the alternator comes for free as your making the engine more efficient at the same time you make carbon buildup problems less likely.  Even if you have a smaller diesel you could fit an alternator this size.  If you need maximum propulsion power at some point, an external regulator like a Balmar Mc-614 used with a switch for small engine mode (field output reduced to 50%) allows you to get most of the power from the engine for propulsion when necessary.  You could also just put a plain switch in the field wire to the alt for a inexpensive solution, although charging at these high currents you probably want an external regulator anyway.  It should be noted that this solution relies on batteries that can accept pretty high charge rates.  This would be LiPO4, Firefly >AGM>very large flooded lead acid bank.  A small flooded-lead-acid bank probably won't be able to accept the high charge rate for long enough for a large alternator to do a lot of good.  The LiPO4 and the Firefly also have the advantage that they are totally happy in a partial state of charge and can stay there without damage until you are ready to move to the next anchorage (within reasonable time limits and state of charge limits).  You should switch to a serpentine belt to run a large alternator like a Delco Remy 28SI or a Leece Neville Idle Pro. There are two ways of looking at comfort while cruising.  Your comfort could come from plugging in whatever you want whenever you want.  However, this comes with the discomfort of noise from the generator, discomfort getting/storing fuel for the generator (especially bad for gasoline generators),  discomfort from getting/storing oil for the generator, the discomfort from generator oil changes, discomfort from trying to source generator parts in some distant port, discomfort from getting shunned by the cruisers who can't stand the noise of your generator.  On the flip side, if you design a boat with conservation in mind, it is possible to run almost entirely on solar.  I've met more than one boat (with refrigeration and watermaker) that runs successfully with just solar/wind/alternator.  You boil water in a kettle on the stove (is that a discomfort?), you wash laundry ashore or in a bucket (Ok, the bucket counts as a discomfort), is lighting a propane stove a discomfort compared to electric (around here tons of folks spend tons of money on their house for the luxury of a natural gas stove).  I have a nice antique coffee grinder, it takes zero watts to run, is beautiful and a pleasure to use, there are tons of equivalents to this on the boat, where doing things different is part of the pleasure for me.  A generator is definitely not necessary.   On 2019-04-30 9:03 a.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   What really is the electrical capacity on a boat from solar, how far will that take you, and realistically, will one be running a generator and how much? Solar Power Generation: Based on some tests by the Wynns in Florida (latitude N26), two used "160W" panels (they have 6 of these), produced 15 Amps at "12V", at 14.4V from the panels, but we will say 12.8V from the batteries later because though the charge voltage is higher, the voltage at which the power comes out is lower.    That is 216 Watts in, 192 Watts of useful power out of the batteries later.   They also tested two new "140W" panels and produced 20 Amps at "12V", or about 288 Watts in, 256 Watts out later.   256/"280" = 91% useful power.   192/"320" = 60% useful power.   Same solar controller in both tests.  At latitude N44, I was seeing about 67% of ratings from the panels, before considering charging losses which for a perfect charge controller might be 60% useful power.    On my off-grid solar installation, I have huge reserve capacity, currently not that much generating capacity, and the vampire load is very low.   I would add panels if I were to increase expected daily loads.   The Wynns also did a lot of shading tests, simulating halyards (no appreciable difference) and the boom (much larger difference).   Lets assume this is a boat on the hook and one has put a preventer on the boom to make it not shade panels, and oriented the boat to get uninterrupted sun on the panels.   If I were designing a solar system for a boat today, for a monohull, I would go with the most power dense panels I could get -- lets say "320W" panels.   Lets say I have an arch over my davits and I am able to put three 40-inch wide panels flat above this arch -- that is a beam of 10 feet.   Lets assume 60% useful power.   That is 960 Watts * 60% = 576 Watts which is not much... One only gets that during the day.   So one might get 3kWh of power per day from the panels -- based on not angling panels.   For someone who thinks they can run without a generator, that is the limit of power.   "Average use for a typical RVer is around 20 kWh a day..   .....  RVers parked in areas where they do not need air conditioning will use much less electricity than RVers who do need it.  In fact, the average amount of electricity used by people who are not running air conditioning is about 10 kWh a day.."  (1) There is one total power budget estimate.   Lets look at it from the components up: Loads: Required Unoccupied, trekking the country nearby while the boat is on anchor:  - Refrigeration: 300 kWh / year (modern, high efficiency, extra insulation for the tropics)   lets say 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Anchoring light (LED, 2 nm visibility, on a timer, 12 hour burn):  0.025 kWh/day   (3)    - Bilge Pump (500 gallons/day, 1 hour/day): 0.060 kWh/day (4)  - Most basic of computers offering Wifi and sensor monitoring to report alerts & email: 0.080 kWh/day (5 + estimate for dry contact and sensor system)   Minimum Occupied:  - Radio (hand held, listening):  0.020 kWh/day  (2)   - Interior Lights (LED):  0.050 kWh/day   - Recharging (Cell, shaver, shortwave receiver, flashlights, head lamps, miscellaneous): 0.050 kWh/day Voluntary Electronics:  - Netbook (4 hours):  0.100 kWh/day    - Full Laptop (4 hours): 0.300 kWh/day   - Display Screen (tv/monitor) (4 hours): 0.400 kWh//day  - DVD player (2 hours): 0.050 kWh/day Other:  - Pressurized water (per 100 liters -- usage for 1 day):  0.020 kWh/day (7)  - Freezer: 1 kWh/day (Various)  - Washing machine, 2 people:  0.400 kWh/day (one load every second day)  - Water maker (most efficient, per 100 liters/day): 0.400 kWh/day (6) Working on Boat:  - hand saw and driver drill for cabinetry work (1 hour run time/8 hour day): 1 kWh/day (experience)  - belt sander for finishing (6 hours run time/8 hour day): 7.2 kWh/day (experience) This is before using any electricity for cooking.   Looking at these conveniences ... pressurized water is a power bargain.   So, basic anchoring budget is 1.17 kWh / day -- solar will cover it with more than 100% to spare -- one 12V/100Ah battery unit at 50% DOD will carry it through the night.   On light overcast days, when one is getting 50% power, the system is still OK.   So one uses two 12V/100Ah units to keep the average DOD to 25%, to make sure it does not go much below 50% DOD in a stretch of moderately cloudy weather..      To go one week (hurricane overcast on a boat, a week of heavy overcast in winter in Canada) without significant sun, the battery bank must be 8.2 kWh -- which is 14 units of 12V/100Ah at 50% DOD -- that is a lot of batteries.   Rick's batteries, four times 12V/200Ah, 9.6 kWh, could handle this, just.   This is why I am interested in Rick's batteries -- they are about the minimum I would consider to have constant refrigeration, be it in a cottage or boat.   Speaking of refrigeration.  When one is not opening the fridge and adding things or taking things out, the power consumption of a fridge is inversely related to thickness of insulation.   As the largest power draw in an unoccupied space, I would consider a hyper-insulated fridge (I do not believe it is available, I was thinking DIY) to cut the power in half.   That allows Rick's batteries to run the system for close to 2 weeks without sun.   That I think would be a far better design for an off-grid cottage.   Ricks batteries would recharge in about 4 days after 2 weeks with heavy overcast.    If one had reliable sun every day, and particularly if the panels netted a little better than 60% useful power from their rating, then: 3.93 kWh/day -- based on 200 liters/day of water desalinated, and pressurized, laundry, freezer, and no voluntary electronics.  The solar panels could not reliably keep up.  In full sun, Rick's batteries would need a generator run of 10 hours once every 8 or 9 days.   From fully charged, after 2 days without sun, without a generator run, Rick's batteries would be exhausted.    Therefore, a pretty spartan existence, with a short shower daily, would be a strain without a daily generator run of about an hour on sunny days, and 4 hours a day on heavy overcast days.   (Assuming a Honda 1200W quiet generator outputting 1000W average.) Get rid of the freezer and one is just below what one would expect of the panels per day.   After just one day without sun, one would have to wait 2 weeks for the batteries to get back up to normal.   It is not reasonable to expect only 1 day of heavy clouds in each 2 weeks.   Therefore, even without the freezer, the solar panels would likely fall behind and regular generator running would be needed.  One could laminate flexible panels to the deck, but they are on average half the efficiency per unit area and, one really could not expect more than another 320 W of power to be conveniently placed. For those thinking that wind power will save them...  one would need an anchorage protected from waves, by say a submerged reef, and open to the wind -- so not like a closed bay.   Most small wind generators are rated for 40km/h, that is, they give their rated power at 40km/h wind speed.   They do not cut in until about 8 or 9 km/h.   Wind energy goes by the cube of the wind speed.   To generate half the rated output, one needs about 32 km/h of wind.   Half the rated output on a 400 Watt generator is 200 Watts.   Even if it is a tiringly windy anchorage, and the wind blows 24/7, that is only 4.8 kWh of power maximum theoretical, 4.2 kWh useful delivered to loads is more likely with charging inefficiency.  That is more than solar, but only if one assumes a tiringly windy anchorage.   If one wants the wind generator to total the same output as solar in 24 hours, one must have 27 kmph winds, 24/7.    Based on the theory that when it is not sunny the wind is blowing, to cover minimal loads (1.17kWh/day), one needs 20 km/h winds, 24/7 on cloudy days.     That is actually a reasonable expectation, on average, but not reliably.   | 35918|35854|2019-05-03 17:48:01|Rick Jackson|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?|I have seen an article with a photo of a generator powerhead running inline off the crank of the main. It had a clutch pulley to engage it. That kind of room is rare on a sailboat, but it is possible.. In my research Im finding I can buy alternator, synchronous alternator, brushless alternator, and generator. All seem to have pros and cons. I have to ask myself why do two equal output units come in these various types and vastly different weight and sizes? Why are some rated only at a fixed RPM where others are not? Matt? Going back to the comment made by the Inverter folks, I can not use an alternator or generator at 12v to charge my LiFePo4 bank. I need to use them to power a separate charger which Im still unclear about. Rick > On May 2, 2019, at 11:21 PM, williswildest@... [origamiboats] wrote: > > | 35919|35854|2019-05-03 18:47:24|opuspaul|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?|I can't tell you how many people I have met who think that because their engine runs at a lower rpm with a big prop that they use less fuel.  All it does is overload the engine and make it blow smoke.   If you add on a large alternator that can take another 3 hp out of the engine at the low rpm, you make it even worse.   This was a big mistake I made when I launched my boat but it took me several years to figure out.   Going hull speed at 1600 rmp was stupid.....with a better matched prop, I now run at about 2100 rpm to get full hull speed (2800 max) and my transom stays clean rather than always being covered in soot.   The engine has more torque and I use no more fuel.  Paul---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Darren, you are very good for a "guy who just messing with the engines". Many mechanics do not know what you know and how to match engine and prop to get maximum fuel efficiency and run diesel at maximum load to prolong its life. Not enough load is the main killer of a diesel engine  ;-) Another one is shutting down the engine after high RPM operation without giving proper time for idling to cool engine off.I second:- Learn your engine Power and Fuel Consumption curves.- Matching prop and engine is tricky, You need to account for extra load when weather is bad, which puts extra load on the engine (that where you need to go into full RPM). Cruising RPMs should be at the point of most economical fuel consumption on the curve.- sometimes this means that you may need bigger engine that you may expect OR another engine which have different Power and Fuel Consumption curve.| 35920|35854|2019-05-03 18:49:02|opuspaul|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?|Good ideas......---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I give her full throttle, get up to speed, then back her off a bit.If backing  off slightly slows the engine down, she is not overloaded .If I have to back her off  a long way before she slows down, then she is definitely overloaded.Something worth checking when  motoring into a head wind, or steep chop.| 35921|35854|2019-05-03 19:14:52|opuspaul|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?|Try not to over-complicate what is already complicated enough.   I know of a guy who put in a jack shaft system on his boat and not only did it take up a lot of room (and cost a lot) he spent more time maintaining it than he did his main engine.  Keep in mind an engine moves around a lot and the jackshaft is normally rigidly mounted.   This can cause all kind of problems.You can remove the hp load off an engine by turning an alternator or clutch on and off electrically but the side load from the belts remain.   A 100 amp alternator is a big load and is about the limit for a single belt.  It should really use double belts which need to be a matched set to get them evenly tensioned.   If there is any wear on the pulleys, the belts will slip and wear prematurely.   I don't know what it would cost but I think I would consider toothed belts if I was doing it all again.FWIW, my house alternator pulls one way on the engine, the water pump and small engine alternator the other.  It isn't perfect but this helps balance the loads on the crank.  Avoid electric clutches if possible.   They fail and keep side load on the engine crank even when the item isn't engaged.  I have a hydraulic motor on a swing arm tensioned by a rope pulley system.  It only takes a bout a minute to flip the belt on or off and eliminates the side load.  I only use it when running the anchor winch or water maker so it is not a big deal.  Paul---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :#ygrps-yiv-1380028217 #ygrps-yiv-1380028217ygrps-yiv-1221967826 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Wild, >you can set up an automatic load balancer Is that a sort of engine governor that does more than just hold an RPM, something that takes into account loading on the engine ?    If it does not take into account variable load at a given RPM, how is it helping control the engine as the alternator regulator throttles up for more electrical output, or the water maker pump engages, or the compressor kicks in ? Matt ated)| 35922|35854|2019-05-03 22:52:45|Matt Malone|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?| I know that generating electricity is complicated.   I have to believe one of those options is far more efficient than a common claw-armature alternator.   There are different equations for different types of motors and I know some are two-way and apply to generators.  Then there is a difference between what is potentially generated in the unit and what is delivered by the unit.  For AC consuming loads, that is called power factor.  In other words how one draws the power out of a power-producing device matters. This is all very complex in general.  If you could post links to specific product specification sheets, then we might compare specifics. Matt From: Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, May 3, 17:48 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ? To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   I have seen an article with a photo of a generator powerhead running inline off the crank of the main. It had a clutch pulley to engage it. That kind of room is rare on a sailboat, but it is possible.. In my research Im finding I can buy alternator, synchronous alternator, brushless alternator, and generator. All seem to have pros and cons. I have to ask myself why do two equal output units come in these various types and vastly different weight and sizes? Why are some rated only at a fixed RPM where others are not? Matt? Going back to the comment made by the Inverter folks, I can not use an alternator or generator at 12v to charge my LiFePo4 bank. I need to use them to power a separate charger which Im still unclear about. Rick > On May 2, 2019, at 11:21 PM, williswildest@... [origamiboats] wrote: > > | 35923|35854|2019-05-04 13:46:28|Darren Bos|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?| V-belts are one of those crazy things that persist in boats where you almost never find them in new autos.  If you want to power substantial loads off the crankshaft with a belt, then a serpentine or multi-groove belt is the way to go.  You need to stock a few, because there slightly harder to find than v-belts, but the reward is no more constantly fiddling with belt adjustment (especially compared to double v-belts), much longer belt life, lower side loads on the bearings, and no more filling the engine compartment with belt dust (admittedly well adjusted and lightly loaded v-belts don't produce a lot of dust). On 2019-05-03 4:14 p.m., opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Try not to over-complicate what is already complicated enough.   I know of a guy who put in a jack shaft system on his boat and not only did it take up a lot of room (and cost a lot) he spent more time maintaining it than he did his main engine.  Keep in mind an engine moves around a lot and the jackshaft is normally rigidly mounted.   This can cause all kind of problems. You can remove the hp load off an engine by turning an alternator or clutch on and off electrically but the side load from the belts remain.   A 100 amp alternator is a big load and is about the limit for a single belt.  It should really use double belts which need to be a matched set to get them evenly tensioned.   If there is any wear on the pulleys, the belts will slip and wear prematurely.   I don't know what it would cost but I think I would consider toothed belts if I was doing it all again. FWIW, my house alternator pulls one way on the engine, the water pump and small engine alternator the other.  It isn't perfect but this helps balance the loads on the crank.  Avoid electric clutches if possible.   They fail and keep side load on the engine crank even when the item isn't engaged.  I have a hydraulic motor on a swing arm tensioned by a rope pulley system.  It only takes a bout a minute to flip the belt on or off and eliminates the side load.  I only use it when running the anchor winch or water maker so it is not a big deal.  Paul ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Wild, >you can set up an automatic load balancer Is that a sort of engine governor that does more than just hold an RPM, something that takes into account loading on the engine ?    If it does not take into account variable load at a given RPM, how is it helping control the engine as the alternator regulator throttles up for more electrical output, or the water maker pump engages, or the compressor kicks in ? Matt ated) | 35924|35854|2019-05-04 16:59:20|Rick Jackson|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?|Hi PaulWhat are you referring to in “Jackshaft”?  I am familiar with that as a 2 jointed shaft, drive line like on a car… I had that on my boat and it seems like the hot set up. Allowed for weird angles and reduced vibration….Id like to see photos of your swing arm tensioner… Im looking at those options….Rick On May 3, 2019, at 4:14 PM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:Try not to over-complicate what is already complicated enough.   I know of a guy who put in a jack shaft system on his boat and not only did it take up a lot of room (and cost a lot) he spent more time maintaining it than he did his main engine.  Keep in mind an engine moves around a lot and the jackshaft is normally rigidly mounted.   This can cause all kind of problems.You can remove the hp load off an engine by turning an alternator or clutch on and off electrically but the side load from the belts remain.   A 100 amp alternator is a big load and is about the limit for a single belt.  It should really use double belts which need to be a matched set to get them evenly tensioned.   If there is any wear on the pulleys, the belts will slip and wear prematurely.   I don't know what it would cost but I think I would consider toothed belts if I was doing it all again.FWIW, my house alternator pulls one way on the engine, the water pump and small engine alternator the other.  It isn't perfect but this helps balance the loads on the crank.  Avoid electric clutches if possible.   They fail and keep side load on the engine crank even when the item isn't engaged.  I have a hydraulic motor on a swing arm tensioned by a rope pulley system.  It only takes a bout a minute to flip the belt on or off and eliminates the side load.  I only use it when running the anchor winch or water maker so it is not a big deal.  Paul---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Wild,>you can set up an automatic load balancerIs that a sort of engine governor that does more than just hold an RPM, something that takes into account loading on the engine ?    If it does not take into account variable load at a given RPM, how is it helping control the engine as the alternator regulator throttles up for more electrical output, or the water maker pump engages, or the compressor kicks in ?Mattated)| 35925|35854|2019-05-04 16:59:54|Rick Jackson|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?|Ok,,, Im getting that if you want to run a generator off your main,, it is important to size it in conjunction with the other loads, or possibly include that in the calculations when having a prop sized?  That makes sense….Im understanding that in our case, our hull was rated for a max of 85hp per the numbers… It had a 130hp unit with a 23x15 3 blade.  Im working with Auto Prop and they sized it at 25 (apples and oranges) but they claim it ranges in power consumption based on how fast the “prop” spins.  Apparently the best option for motor sailing when you are not running full power to assist in pointing.. If we are over powered, which we are, I can have the prop built to address the extra load while under way when the gen is at full power and taking into consideration it is a feathering type prop, I assume it has some wider range of acceptable load and power application.Should we choose go this route, we would more likely than not, motor sail when needed for a full recharge so as not to disturb others tranquility.. That said,,, if its crap weather, most folks are in side and not subjected to much noise above the weather anyway… I guess circumstances will dictate when to run the gen, and how…With our bank, Im counting on 72 hours min before a start up, but it could be more like 7.  Time will teach us how to get the longest run from the bank, and weather, location, etc will all affect that I’m sure…I must say, Im learning a lot here, and everyone has something to offer… Im afraid of what my decisions would have been had I not found this site…...Rick On May 3, 2019, at 4:14 PM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:Try not to over-complicate what is already complicated enough.   I know of a guy who put in a jack shaft system on his boat and not only did it take up a lot of room (and cost a lot) he spent more time maintaining it than he did his main engine.  Keep in mind an engine moves around a lot and the jackshaft is normally rigidly mounted.   This can cause all kind of problems.You can remove the hp load off an engine by turning an alternator or clutch on and off electrically but the side load from the belts remain.   A 100 amp alternator is a big load and is about the limit for a single belt.  It should really use double belts which need to be a matched set to get them evenly tensioned.   If there is any wear on the pulleys, the belts will slip and wear prematurely.   I don't know what it would cost but I think I would consider toothed belts if I was doing it all again.FWIW, my house alternator pulls one way on the engine, the water pump and small engine alternator the other.  It isn't perfect but this helps balance the loads on the crank.  Avoid electric clutches if possible.   They fail and keep side load on the engine crank even when the item isn't engaged.  I have a hydraulic motor on a swing arm tensioned by a rope pulley system.  It only takes a bout a minute to flip the belt on or off and eliminates the side load.  I only use it when running the anchor winch or water maker so it is not a big deal.  Paul---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Wild,>you can set up an automatic load balancerIs that a sort of engine governor that does more than just hold an RPM, something that takes into account loading on the engine ?    If it does not take into account variable load at a given RPM, how is it helping control the engine as the alternator regulator throttles up for more electrical output, or the water maker pump engages, or the compressor kicks in ?Mattated)| 35926|35854|2019-05-04 17:32:06|opuspaul|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?|Agreed but the problem is that old junk yard alternators often come with V-belts.     My 100 Amp alternator was only $25.  I got a spare for about the same money.  Changing the brushes and bearings is not a big deal.   All you need is wrench and a bearing puller.If you don't want to rebuild one yourself, you can buy remanufactured car 100 amp alternators for about $150.  PIck one you like that will fit your boat.   Price out a Balmar 100 amp alternator...it is just ridiculous... over $800 US! https://www.westmarine.com/buy/balmar--100-amp-12-volt-model-621-alternator--7807720Others they have are over $1500.  Nuts! I now have access to a metal lathe....I might try adapting/changing things around with the pulleys and convert to toothed belts.  In the meantime, by not buying the overpriced bullshit from the gougers at the marine stores,  I can buy a lot of belts.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : V-belts are one of those crazy things that persist in boats where you almost never find them in new autos.  If you want to power substantial loads off the crankshaft with a belt, then a serpentine or multi-groove belt is the way to go.  You need to stock a few, because there slightly harder to find than v-belts, but the reward is no more constantly fiddling with belt adjustment (especially compared to double v-belts), much longer belt life, lower side loads on the bearings, and no more filling the engine compartment with belt dust (admittedly well adjusted and lightly loaded v-belts don't produce a lot of dust). | 35927|35854|2019-05-04 17:51:12|opuspaul|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?|Maybe my terminology is wrong but I consider a jackshaft as an alternate shaft  run off the main engine.  Rather than have 4 items directly running off the engine, you would have 1 belt on the engine driving the jack shaft and then the 4 items would run off that.  You could just belt it or run it through a direct drive system like a Univeral joint  driveline on a car.  It can take up a lot of space.I am not on the boat now so can't show you a picture but the swing arm is simply just that.  My hydraulic pump is on a pivoting arm.  I just swing the arm towards the engine, slip on the belt and then pull it back with a rope pulley arrangement until it is tight.  ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Hi PaulWhat are you referring to in “Jackshaft”?  I am familiar with that as a 2 jointed shaft, drive line like on a car… I had that on my boat and it seems like the hot set up. Allowed for weird angles and reduced vibration….Id like to see photos of your swing arm tensioner… Im looking at those options….Rick| 35928|35854|2019-05-05 00:35:02|Darren Bos|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?| A brand new 200A school bus alternator can be had for less than $300CAN (Delco Remy 28SI).  Because my engine engine has an isolated ground I went with a Leece Neville equivalent that was about $400CAN.  The Leece Neville unit is also slightly shorter for those working with space constraints from other engine components.  I'm sure you could find these in the junk yard for cheap as well.  The school bus units are attractive because they're wound to produce greater output at lower rpm, just like the more expensive marine units.  The Balmar alternators are overpriced, although their external regulators look to be unmatched.  If you really want to charge at over 100A, it does make sense to have an external regulator that gives you more control and can do things like temperature compensation. Folks here have done just about every engine contrivance that could be imagined.  Adapting an engine for a serpentine belt isn't a big task compared to some of the other machinations we've discussed.  It's all part of a continuum.  If a 100A alternator meets your needs then there is no reason to go to the expense/trouble to generate twice the power.  The 80/20 rule also applies.  You can get 80% of the way to the ideal solution for 20% of the cost/effort.  The last 20% costs you 80% more.  All you have to do is find your happy place. On 2019-05-04 2:32 p.m., opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Agreed but the problem is that old junk yard alternators often come with V-belts.     My 100 Amp alternator was only $25.  I got a spare for about the same money.  Changing the brushes and bearings is not a big deal.   All you need is wrench and a bearing puller. If you don't want to rebuild one yourself, you can buy remanufactured car 100 amp alternators for about $150.  PIck one you like that will fit your boat.   Price out a Balmar 100 amp alternator...it is just ridiculous... over $800 US! https://www.westmarine.com/buy/balmar--100-amp-12-volt-model-621-alternator--7807720 Others they have are over $1500.  Nuts!   I now have access to a metal lathe....I might try adapting/changing things around with the pulleys and convert to toothed belts.  In the meantime, by not buying the overpriced bullshit from the gougers at the marine stores,  I can buy a lot of belts. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : V-belts are one of those crazy things that persist in boats where you almost never find them in new autos.  If you want to power substantial loads off the crankshaft with a belt, then a serpentine or multi-groove belt is the way to go.  You need to stock a few, because there slightly harder to find than v-belts, but the reward is no more constantly fiddling with belt adjustment (especially compared to double v-belts), much longer belt life, lower side loads on the bearings, and no more filling the engine compartment with belt dust (admittedly well adjusted and lightly loaded v-belts don't produce a lot of dust). | 35929|35854|2019-05-05 00:39:48|Darren Bos|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?| Rick, I don't know the particulars of your setup, but even with LiFePO4 batteries you should be able to use the alternator to charge the batteries directly.  Something like this should give you all the control you need. On 2019-05-03 5:35 a.m., Rick Jackson svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Going back to the comment made by the Inverter folks, I can not use an alternator or generator at 12v to charge my LiFePo4 bank. I need to use them to power a separate charger which Im still unclear about. Rick > On May 2, 2019, at 11:21 PM, williswildest@... [origamiboats] wrote: > > | 35930|35854|2019-05-05 03:03:07|wild_explorer|Re: Generator or Not: What is the Electrical Capacity on a Boat ?|Matt, I was looking at the pickup truck with an old 7.3 diesel (with mechanical high pressure injector pump - HPIP) and was thinking "What idiot decided to pair electronically controlled automatic transmission with diesel engine?" I understand - fuel economy, blah, blah, blah....And suddenly, I realized that this is EXACTLY what you are looking for. Electronic transmission is operated by a transmission controller. Controller takes an input from variable resistor mounted on a throttle lever of injector pump. I do not remember exact set up now, but transmission controller shifts the gears depending on the load of the engine based on readings from that variable resistor. Of cause, all mechanical parameters are programmed into a controller and need to be reprogrammed if any mechanical part (wheels diameter, rear axle reduction ratio, etc) changes.The problem with this setup (for the truck), is when that resistor deteriorate or become loose, you are loosing correct shifting or all the gears at all. It is common problem for such setup.If you want to dig deeper, take a look at 7.3 diesel with E4OD transmission setup and its operation.P.S. The bad part about 7.3 diesel with mechanical HPIP, that it still requires 12V electrical power. There are 2 solenoids 1 Outside and 1 INSIDE mechanical HPIP (cold IDLE and Fuel-Shut-Off). If there is no power to INTERNAL fuel-shut-off solenoid (or solenoid goes bad), you will not be able to start the diesel. It is possible to disassemble HPIP and remove solenoid to make engine start, but it is a big pain and not safe (there is no way to turn off the fuel if needed).---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :#ygrps-yiv-456090089 #ygrps-yiv-456090089ygrps-yiv-1795738758 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Wild, so this is a new hypothetical invention, which is fine.   Just want to be clear that google was not failing me.   Seems doable and might be useful, even if one had a good sense of one's own engine by sound or response to tweaks.   Despite taking into account so many things, the output would have to be simple -- red for throttle down.   Matt | 35931|35931|2019-05-05 08:33:06|smallboatvoyaguer|Engine install|Hey y’all, About to start installing my engine, fabricating beds, etc. Any pointers or anyone willing to give me a walk through of the process? I have a pretty good idea but so much info comes from actually having done an install, which I have not. 31 footer. -Marlin| 35932|35931|2019-05-05 15:21:37|Rick Jackson|Re: Engine install|Hey Marlin,, I will be doing the same (re-power with different main) so I will follow this closely.  Posting photos here is not user friendly so I may ask you to send some as you work it out….My beds were offset and had a 24 inch jack shaft to the prop shaft.. It just bugs me to be off set so Im tempted to cut them out and redo. Rick On May 5, 2019, at 5:33 AM, musicasrevolution@... [origamiboats] wrote:Hey y’all, About to start installing my engine, fabricating beds, etc.Any pointers or anyone willing to give me a walk through of the process? I have a pretty good idea but so much info comes from actually having done an install, which I have not.31 footer.-Marlin| 35933|35933|2019-05-05 15:21:54|svsalmoneyes@gmail.com|welding on keel with Lead touching steel behind|Thats the question.. Can I?  My gut says no..  I have a Tig, Mig and stick option for this theoretical weld.Rick| 35934|35931|2019-05-05 15:34:15|brentswain38|Re: Engine install|A chalk line or a laser, centred  thru the stern tube, can be measured off , for the positions of your engine beds. Their width and height,  from your prop shaft centre to the engine beds, is given in the paper work on your engine.  Best go low, in case you have to  change your mounts at some point in time. As wide as possible  gives you more options, if you ever change engines .A fully welded web across the front, keeps oil drippings in the sump, and out of your bilge.A separate engine sump hand pump deals  with that, and stuffing box drips .---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Hey y’all, About to start installing my engine, fabricating beds, etc. Any pointers or anyone willing to give me a walk through of the process? I have a pretty good idea but so much info comes from actually having done an install, which I have not. 31 footer. -Marlin| 35935|35933|2019-05-05 16:12:54|Matt Malone|Re: welding on keel with Lead touching steel behind| #ygrps-yiv-72912672 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Depends, what is the coating on the inside of the steel keel?   You are welding to the outside surface of the keel right, no penetration through the steel right ? Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2019 12:12 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] welding on keel with Lead touching steel behind     Thats the question.. Can I?  My gut says no..  I have a Tig, Mig and stick option for this theoretical weld. Rick | 35936|35933|2019-05-06 11:27:00|Darren Bos|Re: welding on keel with Lead touching steel behind| I think the problem that Rick is pondering is that he has corrosion of the keel plating and is considering replacing it.  The options would be to remove all the lead and replate, or cut out the plate and replace it and leave the lead in place.  So, full penetration welds are necessary.  I think the concern is can you get weld contamination from the lead into the weld.  I suspect the answer is that if the lead is in contact with the plate then there is the potential for trouble.  Since lead poured in place contracts a bit, the plate might actually stand off the lead by a little bit, but I have no idea how far away it would have to be to avoid contamination.  Maybe someone here with more experience could comment? On 2019-05-05 1:12 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Depends, what is the coating on the inside of the steel keel?   You are welding to the outside surface of the keel right, no penetration through the steel right ? Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2019 12:12 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] welding on keel with Lead touching steel behind     Thats the question.. Can I?  My gut says no..  I have a Tig, Mig and stick option for this theoretical weld. Rick | 35937|35933|2019-05-06 11:51:19|Matt Malone|Re: welding on keel with Lead touching steel behind| #ygrps-yiv-1923279730 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Ok, this is re-plating.   Should one trust anyone who has not looked at the actual project ? Radical idea... re-plate the entire keel ?   Grind down the surface on the current keel so it was smooth, clamp steel sheet to it, weld the new steel on the outside as a second layer.  Leave the old steel where it is as a heat shield for the lead, and as existing structural strength.   Fill the gap between the two with anti-microbial dosed oil to prevent corrosion between.   If I recall correctly, Rick was concerned about wanting to add ballast to his boat.   Seems like an option to talk about. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Darren Bos bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, May 6, 2019 11:26 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] welding on keel with Lead touching steel behind     I think the problem that Rick is pondering is that he has corrosion of the keel plating and is considering replacing it.  The options would be to remove all the lead and replate, or cut out the plate and replace it and leave the lead in place.  So, full penetration welds are necessary.  I think the concern is can you get weld contamination from the lead into the weld.  I suspect the answer is that if the lead is in contact with the plate then there is the potential for trouble.  Since lead poured in place contracts a bit, the plate might actually stand off the lead by a little bit, but I have no idea how far away it would have to be to avoid contamination.  Maybe someone here with more experience could comment? On 2019-05-05 1:12 p.m., Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Depends, what is the coating on the inside of the steel keel?   You are welding to the outside surface of the keel right, no penetration through the steel right ? Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2019 12:12 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] welding on keel with Lead touching steel behind     Thats the question.. Can I?  My gut says no..  I have a Tig, Mig and stick option for this theoretical weld. Rick | 35938|35933|2019-05-06 19:26:04|Rick Jackson|Re: welding on keel with Lead touching steel behind|Correct.Currently its primered .    On May 5, 2019, at 1:12 PM, Matt Malone m_j_malone@... [origamiboats] wrote:Depends, what is the coating on the inside of the steel keel?   You are welding to the outside surface of the keel right, no penetration through the steel right ?Matt| 35939|35933|2019-05-06 19:33:33|brentswain38|Re: welding on keel with Lead touching steel behind|Give her some good whacks with a hammer and centrepunch, to make sure there  is plenty of thickness where you plant to weld.If there is, you can make short tacks, too brief to melt the lead while making them, with  a stick welder. To much weld at any time, will definitely melt the lead and cause problems, but putting it together one short tack at a time, could work.| 35940|35940|2019-05-09 18:59:09|svsalmoneyes@gmail.com|Rudder Ports|Ive been trying to find steel weld in rudder ports... Mine leaked so bad it needs replaced.  I find bronze all over the place but not steel... Not sure but mine does not look home made. It is the typical bolted flange style with packing and a plastic bushing. | 35941|35940|2019-05-09 19:01:58|brentswain38|Re: Rudder Ports|Its not hard to fabricate one out of stainless, and weld it in.No one sees it,so function is all that matters, not cosmetics.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Ive been trying to find steel weld in rudder ports... Mine leaked so bad it needs replaced.  I find bronze all over the place but not steel... Not sure but mine does not look home made. It is the typical bolted flange style with packing and a plastic bushing. | 35942|35940|2019-05-09 21:03:20|Matt Malone|Re: Ruddlpllp0p0o| Pppllp0pp Pp Matt Malone Root Cause Forensic Science and Engineering Inc. 416-371-22 From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of svsalmoneyes@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 11:15:17 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Rudder Ports     Ive been trying to find steel weld in rudder ports...  Mine leaked so bad it needs replaced.  I find bronze all over the place but not steel...  Not sure but mine does not look home made. It is the typical bolted flange style with packing and a plastic bushing.  | 35943|35943|2019-05-15 18:07:55|aguysailing|Korean rope|Anyone come across review of Korean rope?  Redden Net & Supplies, Campbell River BC says good stuff but then again..they are selling it.  Price is $80 CDN per 100' for 5/8" 3 strand nylon rope.  US made rope cost $200 Cdn for 100' here..... thanksI just had my anchor rope get chafed up in some old iron machinery in an anchorage.  The strands aren't cut through but chafed.     | 35944|35943|2019-05-18 17:30:12|brentswain38|Re: Korean rope|Sounds like  great deal,  Thanks for the heads up. .Not as good as braid ,but I used some for anchor rode  for over  30 years with no problem.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Anyone come across review of Korean rope?  Redden Net & Supplies, Campbell River BC says good stuff but then again..they are selling it.  Price is $80 CDN per 100' for 5/8" 3 strand nylon rope.  US made rope cost $200 Cdn for 100' here..... thanksI just had my anchor rope get chafed up in some old iron machinery in an anchorage.  The strands aren't cut through but chafed.     | 35945|35943|2019-05-18 21:46:09|Matt Malone|Re: Korean rope| Yes, braid is better, but 3 strand, one can splice it with no tools, or put an eye in it with no tools.  With practice, one can do it in the dark. Matt From: brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, May 18, 17:30 Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Korean rope To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Sounds like  great deal,  Thanks for the heads up. .Not as good as braid ,but I used some for anchor rode  for over  30 years with no problem. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Anyone come across review of Korean rope?  Redden Net & Supplies, Campbell River BC says good stuff but then again..they are selling it.  Price is $80 CDN per 100' for 5/8" 3 strand nylon rope.  US made rope cost $200 Cdn for 100' here. .... thanks I just had my anchor rope get chafed up in some old iron machinery in an anchorage.  The strands aren't cut through but chafed.     | 35946|35946|2019-05-19 17:28:50|Zoa Scott|Drogues and sea anchors|Maybe this has been covered here if it has i apologize.I have a 36 ft single keel and am planning on going to mexico this fall.I dont have a any device to slow the boat down if required .Any one here who has a swain boat single or twin keeled that has actually deployed a drogue and has info on what was used and how the boat behaved.Thanks Zoa | 35947|35943|2019-05-19 17:31:36|brentswain38|Re: Korean rope|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Yes 3 strand is much easier to splice especially  when it gets old. Yes, braid is better, but 3 strand, one can splice it with no tools, or put an eye in it with no tools.  With practice, one can do it in the dark. Matt From: brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Saturday, May 18, 17:30 Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Korean rope To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Sounds like  great deal,  Thanks for the heads up. .Not as good as braid ,but I used some for anchor rode  for over  30 years with no problem. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Anyone come across review of Korean rope?  Redden Net & Supplies, Campbell River BC says good stuff but then again..they are selling it.  Price is $80 CDN per 100' for 5/8" 3 strand nylon rope.  US made rope cost $200 Cdn for 100' here. .... thanks I just had my anchor rope get chafed up in some old iron machinery in an anchorage.  The strands aren't cut through but chafed.     | 35948|35946|2019-05-19 17:58:06|brentswain38|Re: Drogues and sea anchors|Steve used a series drogue on Silas Crosby(search Silas Crosby), with good success cruising around  Cape Horn area. It eliminated all apprehension  about storms, after a Southern Ocean storm approaching Valdiva, which blew down 200 year  old trees.I made up   a galerider out of old car seat belts ,using a big mooring ball as a mold. I just stapled it over the ball, and sewed it up while taking  the staples  out, later.Mike Ferguson had no problem handling the Queens Birthday Storm  off New Zealand, with  a gale rider. The manufacturers encouraged him to  write about it, in a book on storm management ,offering to pay him for it.He did, it was  published, and they never gave him a cent.He said it worked best about 80 feet behind the boat , eliminating the need to carry the huge amounts of line they recommend.I have built drogues out of half tires, in minutes, which I hope to t post in the photos section. Using chain for the first couple of feet leaving the boat, eliminates chafe there.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Maybe this has been covered here if it has i apologize.I have a 36 ft single keel and am planning on going to mexico this fall.I dont have a any device to slow the boat down if required .Any one here who has a swain boat single or twin keeled that has actually deployed a drogue and has info on what was used and how the boat behaved.Thanks Zoa | 35949|35946|2019-05-20 14:37:57|zoascott74@gmail.com|Re: Drogues and sea anchors|Thanks Brent . What did you use to support the opening of your version of a gale rider? Good idea.| 35950|35946|2019-05-20 14:39:52|brentswain38|Re: Drogues and sea anchors|I used 3/8th inch 1x19 stainless rigging wire , to hold her open.Folds up nicely into  a smaller coil.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Thanks Brent . What did you use to support the opening of your version of a gale rider? Good idea.| 35951|35951|2019-05-21 18:47:30|aguysailing|aluminum anodes|Replaced zincs with aluminum. Do I have a problem. I posted pics showing results after a month. My zincs also seemed to deteriorate faster than Brents boat for example. The pics were posted unless screwed up. Thanks| 35952|35951|2019-05-22 16:07:24|brentswain38|Re: aluminum anodes|Give it more time.Lots of material left .---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Replaced zincs with aluminum. Do I have a problem. I posted pics showing results after a month. My zincs also seemed to deteriorate faster than Brents boat for example. The pics were posted unless screwed up. Thanks| 35953|35951|2019-05-22 17:04:21|aguysailing|Re: aluminum anodes|..... just wondering about the bubbles.  Never seen that before... seen decay but not actual boils...seems weird.  ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Give it more time.Lots of material left .---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Replaced zincs with aluminum. Do I have a problem. I posted pics showing results after a month. My zincs also seemed to deteriorate faster than Brents boat for example. The pics were posted unless screwed up. Thanks| 35954|35951|2019-05-22 18:11:54|darren_bos|Re: aluminum anodes|I tried replying by e-mail twice, but Yahoo has eaten both messages.  I'm trying through the website this time, see second message below:I tried replying this morning, but Yahoo apparently ate my message. Anyway, I'm interested in aluminum anodes as they seem better than zinc in every way, so I did a bit of googling while I ate my lunch and found this image.  I couldn't find the original image on the Martyr site, and the google search for this image just leads to nefarious third party sites.  Anyway, it looks like a white foamy appearance is normal for an aluminum anode and means it's working.  Given that a crusty white appearance means zinc anodes aren't working, you think they would make this information easy to find.  You could always call the folks at Canadian Metals (who make Martyr Anodes) and ask them as well.| 35955|35951|2019-05-22 23:39:33|aguysailing|Re: aluminum anodes|I guess my next question as I am concerned with seemingly a history of rapid decay of my zincs and now these aluminums (relative to other Brents) I am wondering if there is a way to test if there is some electric current from my stuff going into the hull or if that is at all possible.. .I heard that here at some point about "electrical leak into the hull"....  thanks| 35956|35951|2019-05-23 09:49:41|darren_bos|Re: aluminum anodes|Yahoo, appears to be broken again.  Anything I send by e-mail doesn't show up in the group.  Here is a re-post of what I sent last night: There could be lots of reasons for the faster anode decay.  Do you have more exposed underwater metal?  Do you have any zinc anodes left mixed with the aluminum?  What weight of anodes do you have relative to the boats you're comparing to?  However, the most likely cause would be if you are at a dock, while Brent is not.  If you're at a dock, plugged in and don't have an isolation transformer or a galvanic isolator, then your zincs are probably serving the entire marina. If you're at anchor, there are situations where your dc system could cause the zincs to go faster, however, this is a less likely scenario.  Depending on your wiring scheme there should be no DC ground to the hull or it should be grounded at only one point.  If you have your hull grounded to neg 12v, you should read 12-14v if you probe between the positive battery terminal and the hull.  If you remove your one ground point to the hull and test again it should read 0V between the pos terminal and the hull if everything is isolated.  If not, you have more than one ground. If you have an isolated ground and double throw breakers (break both pos and neg when thrown), then finding the problem is as easy as switching breakers on and off (testing between the neg DC bus and the hull for continuity).  Otherwise, you have to check systems one by disconnecting your one ground to the hull and then one by manually disconnecting the grounds for the other circuits to see which ones have grounds to the hull other than the main ground.    The problem with more than one ground, is that the hull and the anodes and the water can then become part of the circuit.I'm sure there are other reasons I've failed to think of, it has been a long day arguing with a bilge pump.| 35957|35951|2019-05-23 11:19:15|Matt Malone|Re: aluminum anodes| #ygrps-yiv-1217714464 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} I appreciated the photograph of what an aluminium "zinc" should look like when it is working.   This got me questioning how to practically isolate a metal boat from the electrical system, and I came across this: http://www.cruisersforum.com/forums/f14/alternator-and-starter-isolation-2043.html Alternator and Starter Isolation - Cruisers & Sailing Forums Hi our starter motor died today and am replacing and upgrading the alternator at the same time. The boat is steel and therefore to my knowlege these should not be grounded as the boat should be running a floating ground system - ie. everything should be isolated from the hull.Does anyone have any brillient ideas of how to achieve this? It was previously not isolated. www.cruisersforum.com Gord May makes a distinction between a negative return line that is intended to routinely carry currents, and a connection from the negative battery terminal to the engine block which is not intended to routinely carry current.  By having the alternator and the starter, and all appliances and sensors on the engine as 2-wire or isolated systems -- each one has its own red and black wire -- that means current is ordinarily carried by the negative return lines (black wires) of each item, and not by the strap that connects the negative battery terminal to the engine block. If current routinely flows through the strap from the negative battery terminal to the engine block, then there will be a small voltage difference between the negative battery terminal and the engine block -- current does not flow in a wire unless there is a voltage difference.   If the connection to all other metal parts touching the water (in a fibreglass boat) is made from the engine block to the other metal components, and there is ordinarily no current flowing in these connections, then all other metal parts of the boat will be at the same potential as the engine block.   This is desireable. If however, one runs a strap from the negative terminal to the engine block and it does ordinarily have current flowing through it, and one separately runs a strap from the negative battery terminal to say an electric windlass on the foredeck, then there will be a small voltage difference between the electric windlass on the foredeck and the engine block when currents are flowing in the straps.   Even if the strap is instead run from the engine block to the windlass, if the windlass itself causes come current to flow (possibly due to corrosion, moisture, salt build up) through this strap back to the engine block and from there back to the negative battery terminal, then again, the engine block and windlass case are not at the same voltage.   In a metal boat, the conductivity of the bulk of the boat will generally prevent bulk problems, but locally, where a strap attaches near on appliance, or where the appliance is bolted to the hull, there may be problems.   The voltage differences between some areas and others may be small, and intermittent -- a voltage difference may be generated only when the alternator is charging the batteries, or when the windlass is run, or when a particular light is on.   These voltage differences may be enough to steer corrosion to one area over another, but defy measurements because of practical considerations of when and how they might be measured to detect the differences.       These considerations might help one understand otherwise puzzling results with the lifetime of anodes in various locations.  Does a wire routinely carry a current, or, is it meant to guarantee that two things remain at the same potential -- CHOOSE ONE ONLY.  If one is on the hard, one can observe this by using a multimeter to measure the voltage between the neutral return connection and the ground pin on a 3-prong outlet, remote from the panel.  Theoretically, they are the same potential.  Practically, if the circuit is in use, one might measure a Volt or two.   That is because the neutral return line IS carrying current, so it cannot be the same voltage everywhere as the ground pin is. This is all before considering AC power on boats, and leakage from AC to other things brought on by corrosion and moisture, or other effects.  Remember, the highest electrochemical potentials are around 4 Volts, therefore a little electricity can drive any chemistry.  Separately, a Coulomb, the number of electrons per second when 1 Amp is flowing, there are 96,485 Coulombs in a Mole -- a Mole of steel weighs about 55 grams.  So to be clear, a little electricity will drive any chemistry, but, it will do so very slowly for small currents.   The problem is, losing a gram of steel, if it is all in one very small location that can be a big problem -- for instance a 1/4" hole in a 3/16" thick hull.   BTW, a mole of aluminium weighs about 27 grams, and a mole of zinc weighs about 65 grams.  At 4Volts,  even soaking wet, I am not certain people will detect a tingle from a leakage that would slowly dissolve the boat.  So those equipment cases that are isolated to protect people from electrical shock, they may never have been isolated enough to prevent any effect on corrosion, and over time, they may cause corrosion before there is a detectable tingle.   Could any of these factors help explain your anodes ?   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 9:40 AM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: [origamiboats] Re: aluminum anodes     Yahoo, appears to be broken again.  Anything I send by e-mail doesn't show up in the group.  Here is a re-post of what I sent last night:  There could be lots of reasons for the faster anode decay.  Do you have more exposed underwater metal?  Do you have any zinc anodes left mixed with the aluminum?  What weight of anodes do you have relative to the boats you're comparing to?  However, the most likely cause would be if you are at a dock, while Brent is not.  If you're at a dock, plugged in and don't have an isolation transformer or a galvanic isolator, then your zincs are probably serving the entire marina.  If you're at anchor, there are situations where your dc system could cause the zincs to go faster, however, this is a less likely scenario.  Depending on your wiring scheme there should be no DC ground to the hull or it should be grounded at only one point.  If you have your hull grounded to neg 12v, you should read 12-14v if you probe between the positive battery terminal and the hull.  If you remove your one ground point to the hull and test again it should read 0V between the pos terminal and the hull if everything is isolated.  If not, you have more than one ground. If you have an isolated ground and double throw breakers (break both pos and neg when thrown), then finding the problem is as easy as switching breakers on and off (testing between the neg DC bus and the hull for continuity).  Otherwise, you have to check systems one by disconnecting your one ground to the hull and then one by manually disconnecting the grounds for the other circuits to see which ones have grounds to the hull other than the main ground.    The problem with more than one ground, is that the hull and the anodes and the water can then become part of the circuit. I'm sure there are other reasons I've failed to think of, it has been a long day arguing with a bilge pump. | 35958|35951|2019-05-23 14:33:58|darren_bos|Re: aluminum anodes|Isolating all wiring in a metal boat is the best way to go, but it not the easiest.  A device such as these is meant for this.  Practically, it is difficult to isolate the engine as there are so many sensors that are single wire and grounded to the engine block, not to mention engine mounts and connections to the prop shaft.  I've talked to a few boats that have had good results installing isolation switches in both the positive AND negative wires to the engine.  Thus the boats DC negative is not  isolated from the hull when the engine is running, but so little time is spent doing so that it doesn't seem to cause problems.| 35959|35951|2019-05-23 14:59:12|Matt Malone|Re: aluminum anodes| #ygrps-yiv-544287866 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} That is an interesting product.  An isolation switch on both positive and negative would also cut off completely solve any current caused by leakage from moisture and corrosion even in 2-wire things.   Also, if one catches an inappropriate amount of water in the cabin, one can isolate the engine, which may be down in the slosh zone, preventing the batteries from discharging, and allow other appliances to run.   On my boat, the water need not even be above the floor boards to wet the starter, though my solenoid is mounted higher.   Cutting off the engine will prevent battery-electricity-driven chemistry from attacking an engine in seawater.   But then one has to have two switches capable of taking full starter current to isolate the engine, and if either fails, the engine does not start without work.   Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 2:30 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: aluminum anodes     Isolating all wiring in a metal boat is the best way to go, but it not the easiest.  A device such as these is meant for this.  Practically, it is difficult to isolate the engine as there are so many sensors that are single wire and grounded to the engine block, not to mention engine mounts and connections to the prop shaft.  I've talked to a few boats that have had good results installing isolation switches in both the positive AND negative wires to the engine.  Thus the boats DC negative is not  isolated from the hull when the engine is running, but so little time is spent doing so that it doesn't seem to cause problems. | 35960|35951|2019-05-23 16:55:26|darren_bos|Re: aluminum anodes|I was thinking about these 500A  dual throw master disconnect switches from Littlefuse/Cole Hersee, so you only need one switch to simplify engine starting/engine isolation. I'm not sure if water up to the floorboards is a time when I'd want to have my engine isolated.   Even in saltwater, a 12V system should be ok submerged (excluding batteries, alternators, electronics).  Although we have manual pumps, Plan A involves having the engine running to power all the bilge pumps (2 x 7A diaphragm, 2 x 17A centrifigal, 1 x 60A sump pump (110V through inverter), means a total of 108A coming out of the batteries.  If the alternator is not running, the main battery bank isn't going to last long at those levels.  Although this is getting off topic, this kind of thing makes it clear that a couple of cheap water sensor alarms part way up the blige are good insurance.| 35961|35951|2019-05-23 17:05:15|Matt Malone|Re: aluminum anodes| #ygrps-yiv-2040774118 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} Cool item.  I had been thinking knife switch made of 1/4" copper, but this is much better.   I was not thinking a leak below the water line requiring on-going pumping, but maybe a wave down the companionway, or even just rain gets in somewhere when moored for a couple months while one is away.   Mine had that much water in it from rain and a bad deck drain hose, and a little vegetation litter plugging the exit end of the hose.  Without the litter, it did not leak as the crack in the hose was on the top pointed into the corner in the hull-deck joint.    Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of bosdg@... [origamiboats] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 4:55 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: aluminum anodes     I was thinking about these 500A  dual throw master disconnect switches from Littlefuse/Cole Hersee, so you only need one switch to simplify engine starting/engine isolation.  I'm not sure if water up to the floorboards is a time when I'd want to have my engine isolated.   Even in saltwater, a 12V system should be ok submerged (excluding batteries, alternators, electronics).  Although we have manual pumps, Plan A involves having the engine running to power all the bilge pumps (2 x 7A diaphragm, 2 x 17A centrifigal, 1 x 60A sump pump (110V through inverter), means a total of 108A coming out of the batteries.  If the alternator is not running, the main battery bank isn't going to last long at those levels.  Although this is getting off topic, this kind of thing makes it clear that a couple of cheap water sensor alarms part way up the blige are good insurance. | 35962|35931|2019-06-06 19:14:39|svsalmoneyes@gmail.com|Re: Engine install|i am interested in an update.. Specifically what you used for soft mounts?| 35963|35931|2019-06-06 19:23:18|brentswain38|Re: Engine install|One should avoid   the super soft Yanmar mounts,  or any mounts which rely on rubber alone to keep  your engine contained . Boats have had them all break simultaneously, leaving the engine rolling in the bilge, and have even allowed the engine to punch a hole in the boat, causing it to sink rapidly . Perkos contain the engine, leaving metal to hold them together , if  the rubber gives out. I prefer solid mounting on poly sheet. I prefer the noise, over the risk. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :i am interested in an update.. Specifically what you used for soft mounts?| 35964|35931|2019-06-08 16:49:13|Rick Jackson|Re: Engine install|I just bought (for a pretty penny) 4 of the Seaboard Marine rebuildable mounts… They are a 60 durometer and are what they recommend for the 4BT Cummins (shaker). We have a thrust bearing in the prop shaft so hopefully it will not cause that problem… I must admit however, that we had those safety style mounts and all the rubber was broke and only the steel was holding it in. When I talked to a few folks, they explained the cause is mostly  due to oil getting on the rubber and poor maintenance. On Jun 6, 2019, at 4:23 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:One should avoid   the super soft Yanmar mounts,  or any mounts which rely on rubber alone to keep  your engine contained . Boats have had them all break simultaneously, leaving the engine rolling in the bilge, and have even allowed the engine to punch a hole in the boat, causing it to sink rapidly . Perkos contain the engine, leaving metal to hold them together , if  the rubber gives out.I prefer solid mounting on poly sheet. I prefer the noise, over the risk.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :i am interested in an update.. Specifically what you used for soft mounts?| 35965|35931|2019-06-10 16:39:30|brentswain38|Re: Engine install|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Engine mounts which wont survive oil?BRILLIANT!I bet the guys who came up with that idea, have walls covered with paper qualifications. I guess that is what my critics on other sites call "Engineering" and  claim that is what I should be doing more of !LOL!I just bought (for a pretty penny) 4 of the Seaboard Marine rebuildable mounts… They are a 60 durometer and are what they recommend for the 4BT Cummins (shaker). We have a thrust bearing in the prop shaft so hopefully it will not cause that problem… I must admit however, that we had those safety style mounts and all the rubber was broke and only the steel was holding it in. When I talked to a few folks, they explained the cause is mostly  due to oil getting on the rubber and poor maintenance. On Jun 6, 2019, at 4:23 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:One should avoid   the super soft Yanmar mounts,  or any mounts which rely on rubber alone to keep  your engine contained . Boats have had them all break simultaneously, leaving the engine rolling in the bilge, and have even allowed the engine to punch a hole in the boat, causing it to sink rapidly . Perkos contain the engine, leaving metal to hold them together , if  the rubber gives out.I prefer solid mounting on poly sheet. I prefer the noise, over the risk.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :i am interested in an update.. Specifically what you used for soft mounts?| 35966|35931|2019-06-11 18:00:02|Rick Jackson|Re: Engine install|I was concerned that with the size of the old Mercedes, we needed more than just the 4, 2 at front and 2 back on the gear. I don’t see them running 4 on the engine and wonder why. Other than cost, but 2 extra at 160 a pop seems reasonable insurance.  On Jun 10, 2019, at 1:15 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Engine mounts which wont survive oil?BRILLIANT!I bet the guys who came up with that idea, have walls covered with paper qualifications. I guess that is what my critics on other sites call "Engineering" and  claim that is what I should be doing more of !LOL!I just bought (for a pretty penny) 4 of the Seaboard Marine rebuildable mounts… They are a 60 durometer and are what they recommend for the 4BT Cummins (shaker). We have a thrust bearing in the prop shaft so hopefully it will not cause that problem… I must admit however, that we had those safety style mounts and all the rubber was broke and only the steel was holding it in. When I talked to a few folks, they explained the cause is mostly  due to oil getting on the rubber and poor maintenance.On Jun 6, 2019, at 4:23 PM, brentswain38@... [origamiboats] wrote:One should avoid   the super soft Yanmar mounts,  or any mounts which rely on rubber alone to keep  your engine contained . Boats have had them all break simultaneously, leaving the engine rolling in the bilge, and have even allowed the engine to punch a hole in the boat, causing it to sink rapidly . Perkos contain the engine, leaving metal to hold them together , if  the rubber gives out.I prefer solid mounting on poly sheet. I prefer the noise, over the risk.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :i am interested in an update.. Specifically what you used for soft mounts?| 35967|35931|2019-06-12 10:50:16|opuspaul|Re: Engine install|I was on a yacht delivery of a catamaran that had Yanmar mounts.  Out of 8 mounts, 7 of them were separating.  The engines shook so much at low rpm that it was tearing apart the shaft couplings.  It cost a fortune for the owner to fix everything.  Yanmar loves this.....it wouldn't surprise me if they made more money over the years on their mounts than on their engines.I use the Bushings DF-100 mounts.   They are very cheap, fully adjustable and a little soft but not too soft.   They don't have and of the problems like on the Yanmars.  They have been no problem in over 25 years.| 35968|35931|2019-06-13 15:20:25|Rick Jackson|Re: Engine install|When you refer to “Yanmar mounts” is it the brand or the style?   I just bought the SBAR adjustable mounts from Seaboard Marine in Ventura. They make these and they are rebuildable. Our cummins is a “shaker” and these are the recommended mounts but Im still a bit apprehensive.  Ive been thinking about mounting a torsional stabilizer bar as extra sense of security. Rick On Jun 12, 2019, at 7:47 AM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:Bushings DF-100 mounts| 35969|35931|2019-06-13 15:32:47|brentswain38|Re: Engine install|One of my 31s had a new Yanmar installed in Aussie. At certain low RPMs it shook like hell. He asked Yanmar if he could switch to harder mounts, and they said that would void the warantee. So I posted the story on every cruising chatline I could, and when he got to Singapore, a speed boat came along side, several Yanmar reps jumped out, and replaced the works, no charge. Bad publicity on the internet can motivate.Yanmar are the only mounts I know of, which rely completely on rubber to stop your engine from breaking free . ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I was on a yacht delivery of a catamaran that had Yanmar mounts.  Out of 8 mounts, 7 of them were separating.  The engines shook so much at low rpm that it was tearing apart the shaft couplings.  It cost a fortune for the owner to fix everything.  Yanmar loves this.....it wouldn't surprise me if they made more money over the years on their mounts than on their engines.I use the Bushings DF-100 mounts.   They are very cheap, fully adjustable and a little soft but not too soft.   They don't have and of the problems like on the Yanmars.  They have been no problem in over 25 years.| 35970|35931|2019-06-13 18:20:19|opuspaul|Re: Engine install|These are the ones I had problems with looked like this....the rubber separated from the metal.https://www.parts4engines.com/yanmar-3gm30-engine-mount/---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :When you refer to “Yanmar mounts” is it the brand or the style?   I just bought the SBAR adjustable mounts from Seaboard Marine in Ventura. They make these and they are rebuildable. Our cummins is a “shaker” and these are the recommended mounts but Im still a bit apprehensive.  Ive been thinking about mounting a torsional stabilizer bar as extra sense of security. Rick On Jun 12, 2019, at 7:47 AM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:Bushings DF-100 mounts| 35971|35931|2019-06-13 18:37:26|opuspaul|Re: Engine install|This kind of motion will just shake shaft couplings to bits.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gdOGWk-GV8---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :These are the ones I had problems with looked like this....the rubber separated from the metal.https://www.parts4engines.com/yanmar-3gm30-engine-mount/---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :When you refer to “Yanmar mounts” is it the brand or the style?   I just bought the SBAR adjustable mounts from Seaboard Marine in Ventura. They make these and they are rebuildable. Our cummins is a “shaker” and these are the recommended mounts but Im still a bit apprehensive.  Ive been thinking about mounting a torsional stabilizer bar as extra sense of security. Rick On Jun 12, 2019, at 7:47 AM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:Bushings DF-100 mounts| 35972|35931|2019-06-14 15:39:06|brentswain38|Re: Engine install|---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Wholey dependent on  rubber sticking to steel.BRILLIANT!I bet those guys have paper qualifications up the yin yang!These are the ones I had problems with looked like this....the rubber separated from the metal.https://www.parts4engines.com/yanmar-3gm30-engine-mount/---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :When you refer to “Yanmar mounts” is it the brand or the style?   I just bought the SBAR adjustable mounts from Seaboard Marine in Ventura. They make these and they are rebuildable. Our cummins is a “shaker” and these are the recommended mounts but Im still a bit apprehensive.  Ive been thinking about mounting a torsional stabilizer bar as extra sense of security. Rick On Jun 12, 2019, at 7:47 AM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:Bushings DF-100 mounts| 35973|35931|2019-06-14 15:39:53|Rick Jackson|Re: Engine install|Yep… those look like what we had… The rubber was gone... On Jun 13, 2019, at 3:20 PM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:These are the ones I had problems with looked like this....the rubber separated from the metal.https://www.parts4engines.com/yanmar-3gm30-engine-mount/---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :When you refer to “Yanmar mounts” is it the brand or the style?   I just bought the SBAR adjustable mounts from Seaboard Marine in Ventura. They make these and they are rebuildable. Our cummins is a “shaker” and these are the recommended mounts but Im still a bit apprehensive.  Ive been thinking about mounting a torsional stabilizer bar as extra sense of security. RickOn Jun 12, 2019, at 7:47 AM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:Bushings DF-100 mounts| 35974|35931|2019-06-14 15:40:09|Rick Jackson|Re: Engine install|We will have a thrust bearing and jack shaft to reduce our cummins “shaker” behavior…We can run super soft mounts we are being told.. On Jun 13, 2019, at 3:37 PM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:This kind of motion will just shake shaft couplings to bits.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gdOGWk-GV8---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :These are the ones I had problems with looked like this....the rubber separated from the metal.https://www.parts4engines.com/yanmar-3gm30-engine-mount/---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :When you refer to “Yanmar mounts” is it the brand or the style?   I just bought the SBAR adjustable mounts from Seaboard Marine in Ventura. They make these and they are rebuildable. Our cummins is a “shaker” and these are the recommended mounts but Im still a bit apprehensive.  Ive been thinking about mounting a torsional stabilizer bar as extra sense of security. RickOn Jun 12, 2019, at 7:47 AM, opusnz@.... [origamiboats] wrote:Bushings DF-100 mounts| 35975|35931|2019-06-14 15:43:17|brentswain38|Re: Engine install|I'm sure Paul and svsalmoneyes were also "Being told' the same!Don't buy it.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :We will have a thrust bearing and jack shaft to reduce our cummins “shaker” behavior…We can run super soft mounts we are being told.. On Jun 13, 2019, at 3:37 PM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:This kind of motion will just shake shaft couplings to bits.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gdOGWk-GV8---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :These are the ones I had problems with looked like this....the rubber separated from the metal.https://www.parts4engines.com/yanmar-3gm30-engine-mount/---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :When you refer to “Yanmar mounts” is it the brand or the style?   I just bought the SBAR adjustable mounts from Seaboard Marine in Ventura. They make these and they are rebuildable. Our cummins is a “shaker” and these are the recommended mounts but Im still a bit apprehensive.  Ive been thinking about mounting a torsional stabilizer bar as extra sense of security. RickOn Jun 12, 2019, at 7:47 AM, opusnz@.... [origamiboats] wrote:Bushings DF-100 mounts| 35976|35931|2019-06-14 21:39:24|Matt Malone|Re: Engine install| I know you have a thing about engineers Brent, but lots of engineers have made more robust engine mounts, including what are no doubt your favourites.   Gravity keeps locomotives on rails, no rubber sticking required, but roller coasters hold more robustly by wrapping around the rails allowing greater angles and even inversion.   I can see why the pictured mounts are not preferred and it is not hard to imagine what more robust ones would look like.  I would not choose the pictured mounts. Matt From: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com on behalf of brentswain38@... [origamiboats] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 3:39:02 PM To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Engine install     ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Wholey dependent on  rubber sticking to steel. BRILLIANT! I bet those guys have paper qualifications up the yin yang! These are the ones I had problems with looked like this....the rubber separated from the metal. https://www.parts4engines.com/yanmar-3gm30-engine-mount/ ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : When you refer to “Yanmar mounts” is it the brand or the style?    I just bought the SBAR adjustable mounts from Seaboard Marine in Ventura. They make these and they are rebuildable. Our cummins is a “shaker” and these are the recommended mounts but Im still a bit apprehensive.  Ive been thinking about mounting a torsional stabilizer bar as extra sense of security.  Rick On Jun 12, 2019, at 7:47 AM, opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote: Bushings DF-100 mounts | 35977|35931|2019-06-15 16:25:43|brentswain38|Re: Engine install|Better engineers carefully consider the lessons of past history, and include a lot of practicality, hands on experience , and logic, in their decisions.Others dismiss past experience  and logic,   dismiss them as  "merely  Anecdote" ,ignoring he lessons of history , believing their calculations are more reliable and accurate than experienced and lived reality.  That is like believing tomorrow's weather forecast can be more accurate than yesterday's weather record , dismissing he latter as" merely  anecdote." and thus of no significance, and thus, not worth  considering. I define  good engineering as "judicious  application of logic", the opposite of what some of my critics   claim.When someone  dismisses experience as ""merely anecdote ,his advice instantly becomes not worth  a pinch of coon shit!| 35978|35931|2019-06-16 16:30:04|opuspaul|Re: Engine install|Yanmar has making and selling those same shitty engine mounts for many decades.  Either their engineers have learned nothing over the years or the company loves to make the money from their parts sales and doesn't give a damn about reliability for their customers.   My vote is the latter.As someone who worked in aviation for many years, I know it would never be allowed on airplanes.| 35979|35931|2019-06-17 17:49:14|brentswain38|Re: Engine install|The kind of "Engineers" my  critics say we should all put blind faith in, rather than trust more practical, logical people, without the "knows it all" paper hanging on their wall. May they all buy Yanmar mounts, may they all fail, and leave their ":engineered" engines rolling in their bilges!Oh ya!And may the fleas of a thousand  camels nest in their armpits, and may a buffalo in heat find them in his hour of need!---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Yanmar has making and selling those same shitty engine mounts for many decades.  Either their engineers have learned nothing over the years or the company loves to make the money from their parts sales and doesn't give a damn about reliability for their customers.   My vote is the latter.As someone who worked in aviation for many years, I know it would never be allowed on airplanes.| 35980|35931|2019-06-17 19:29:59|opuspaul|Re: Engine install|For what it is worth, the same goes for Autohelm/ Raymarine wheel pilots.   The ones that use a ram below are just passable but the kind that have a round hoop gear mechanism that bolts to a wheel are incredibly unreliable.  Their plastic parts, crappy connectors and crappy belts wear out in no time and they have caused no end or trouble and heartache for people that choose to rely on them in real world, offshore conditions.  These things have been absolute pieces of shit for many years yet you will never get a saleman or "qualified" repairman to admit it....they will always blame the boat or the installation and then happily sell you a bill for their parts so you can just burn it up or break it again.  Raymarine should be ashamed of themselves.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :The kind of "Engineers" my  critics say we should all put blind faith in, rather than trust more practical, logical people, without the "knows it all" paper hanging on their wall. May they all buy Yanmar mounts, may they all fail, and leave their ":engineered" engines rolling in their bilges!Oh ya!And may the fleas of a thousand  camels nest in their armpits, and may a buffalo in heat find them in his hour of need!---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Yanmar has making and selling those same shitty engine mounts for many decades.  Either their engineers have learned nothing over the years or the company loves to make the money from their parts sales and doesn't give a damn about reliability for their customers.   My vote is the latter.As someone who worked in aviation for many years, I know it would never be allowed on airplanes.| 35981|35931|2019-06-17 20:46:24|Matt Malone|Re: Engine install| Not all engineers are idiots.   Lets just get that out of the way.   Where do you think all the good coatings, and good engines and good sail materials come from?  It is self evident even looking at a very narrow view of the world that is sailing in a Brent boat that at least some people with a piece of paper on the wall learned good science and how to apply it and make reliable things. Even these maligned motor mounts, might actually have been a design from a naturally balanced inline 6 engine on a highway vehicle.   Subsequently some bean counter decided there was more profit in reusing the design in a nautical application with heel angle, negatives Gs from time to time and poorly balanced little diesels that shake like hell.   Maybe no engineer ever approved it for this use.   If an engineer steps forward and claims this as their baby, I will explain how to start a professional complaint of incompetence, if that is your opinion.   You can have your day in their professional review hearing.  But you are barking up the wrong tree.  Not everything sold was approved by an engineer.  Any idiot can start up a company making boats, make ludicrous claims, and sell them to the public.  They are not required to employ a single engineer, they are only required to carry insurance.   Brent is not an engineer and no one has prevented him from pursuing his designs.  The very real problem is, for every one Brent, there are a dozen young welders with no analytical abilities, a surplus of confidence, who will build a boat, and kill the first person to sail it -- probably themselves.   And for every one of these young welders, there are 10,000 bean counters constantly chiseling away at every product to make money.  In their view companies do not make reliable things, they make money.  They buy insurance to cover bad products.  Brent is railing at the wrong people. Instead of telling us only what does not work, please tell us what does work, in your opinion. Matt From: opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Monday, June 17, 19:30 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Engine install To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   For what it is worth, the same goes for Autohelm/ Raymarine wheel pilots.   The ones that use a ram below are just passable but the kind that have a round hoop gear mechanism that bolts to a wheel are incredibly unreliable.  Their plastic parts, crappy connectors and crappy belts wear out in no time and they have caused no end or trouble and heartache for people that choose to rely on them in real world, offshore conditions.  These things have been absolute pieces of shit for many years yet you will never get a saleman or "qualified" repairman to admit it....they will always blame the boat or the installation and then happily sell you a bill for their parts so you can just burn it up or break it again.  Raymarine should be ashamed of themselves. ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : The kind of "Engineers" my  critics say we should all put blind faith in, rather than trust more practical, logical people, without the "knows it all" paper hanging on their wall. May they all buy Yanmar mounts, may they all fail, and leave their ":engineered" engines rolling in their bilges! Oh ya! And may the fleas of a thousand  camels nest in their armpits, and may a buffalo in heat find them in his hour of need! ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : Yanmar has making and selling those same shitty engine mounts for many decades.  Either their engineers have learned nothing over the years or the company loves to make the money from their parts sales and doesn't give a damn about reliability for their customers.   My vote is the latter. As someone who worked in aviation for many years, I know it would never be allowed on airplanes. | 35982|35931|2019-06-17 23:41:11|opuspaul|Re: Engine install|Sorry, but I don't buy it.   I certainly don't blame engineers for everything that goes wrong but when a company has been doing something wrong for over 30+ years, everybody is to blame.  Management is certainly to blame for their business decisions but the engineers who both failed to do a good design in the first place or failed to communicate to management that things needed to be improved and changed are at fault too.It is only because they are selling to retail customers who are ignorant (being swayed by glossy advertisements) or powerless (due to no organization) that companies like Yanmar or Raymarine get away with such shitty designs.  If their customers were commercial operators who depend on reliability to make a living or were in aviation, they would have been held to account long ago.  Instead the same crap comes out year after year and the only thing that changes is the color of the ribbon tied around the pile of shit.I blame the yachtie magazines too....they will never say something is bad if it is comes from a key advertiser.    They are full of bad advice and what they typically say is suitable for offshore sailing is an absolute joke.  All they are interested in doing is selling gear.| 35983|35983|2019-06-17 23:58:41|akenai|Water and Fuel|I am looking for ideas about the best place to put the diesel fuel fill nozzle and the water. BS36 twin keel with internal tank.Aaron in Alaska| 35984|35931|2019-06-18 00:33:55|Darren Bos|Re: Engine install| With 8 billion people in the world, there is no shortage of great engineers, scientists, creators and inventors, trying to paint an entire group as flawed is ridiculous.  Even though there are lousy engineers, I doubt the blame for most lousy products should fall on any of them, usually they are so far removed from a commercial product that only the shadows of their ingenuity remain.  I'd be willing to bet that most lousy designs had really great prototypes, it is when they get "commercialized" that things fall apart.  You could blame the MBA's, CEO's and the advertisers, for many of whom there should be a special place in hell, but even they are more of a symptom.  Really, it's us, the consuming masses that are to blame.  We want more and we want it cheaper, and all too often we choose a cheaper version over the more expensive quality version.  There are folks here who will say that it doesn't apply to them, but it almost certainly does, some of us are worse than others, but just about everyone has bought the cheaper version without really thinking about what had to be done to make it cheaper.   If you built an origami boat using steel made in your country, recycled lots of materials doing it, and made things to the highest standard, or did without, then you're doing better than many.  If you installed untinned wire with insulation that's not up to marine environment, then you took a cost-saving measure that reduced quality, just like many of the production engineers/companies.  If you have a really dry boat your probably OK with that compromise, for a company the number of failed products just needs to remain low enough to maximize profitability.  Not many of us could look at our foot-ware and say we've bought something that is quality, long-lived, socially and environmentally responsible.  We buy it and the companies keep producing it.  The marine industry has some egregious examples of profiteering and poor quality, but they couldn't do it except for the consumers that demand more for less and put quality second (at best) to price.  On 2019-06-17 8:39 p.m., opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:   Sorry, but I don't buy it.   I certainly don't blame engineers for everything that goes wrong but when a company has been doing something wrong for over 30+ years, everybody is to blame.  Management is certainly to blame for their business decisions but the engineers who both failed to do a good design in the first place or failed to communicate to management that things needed to be improved and changed are at fault too. It is only because they are selling to retail customers who are ignorant (being swayed by glossy advertisements) or powerless (due to no organization) that companies like Yanmar or Raymarine get away with such shitty designs.  If their customers were commercial operators who depend on reliability to make a living or were in aviation, they would have been held to account long ago.  Instead the same crap comes out year after year and the only thing that changes is the color of the ribbon tied around the pile of shit. I blame the yachtie magazines too....they will never say something is bad if it is comes from a key advertiser.    They are full of bad advice and what they typically say is suitable for offshore sailing is an absolute joke.  All they are interested in doing is selling gear. | 35985|35983|2019-06-18 00:51:34|Darren Bos|Re: Water and Fuel| I'll leave the specific location recommendation to someone with a 36, but for the actual fill I would skip the regular marine fill where only a tiny o-ring flush mounted to the deck stops water from getting into your fuel.  A few years back I was on a search and rescue boat and noticed they had a cam-lock fitting mounted on the aft of the pilot-house for their fuel fill.  Now there is something that will keep water out.  I couldn't make that location work, so I welded a male camlock with a hose nipple to the deck in a non-toe-stubbing location.  You can even get camlock caps that easily accept a padlock. Darren On 2019-06-17 8:58 p.m., akenai@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I am looking for ideas about the best place to put the diesel fuel fill nozzle and the water. BS36 twin keel with internal tank. Aaron in Alaska | 35986|35983|2019-06-18 01:29:47|opuspaul|Re: Water and Fuel|I have my fuel fill in the cockpit and my water fill on deck near the mast.  I wouldn't put either of them on the side decks since I have had water over the deck for days at a time.  If there isn't a perfect seal, you would eventually end up with water in the tanks.  The same goes  for the vents.| 35987|35983|2019-06-18 02:01:47|Darren Bos|Re: Water and Fuel| Agreed. My fill is on deck, but near the stern where the cockpit would be if I had one.   That said, I suspect you could use a camlock in an exposed location and get away with it, where a regular deck fill in such a location is just asking for trouble.   If you put the two side by side, the traditional flush-deck marine fills really look pretty meager.  The O-ring on a standard deck fill only has less than a 1/16" contact across its face to make a seal and is located and designed in a way that just asks for sand and debris to collect on the sealing surfaces.  Meanwhile, the camlock has a much thicker seal that is about 1/4" across the sealing surface.  It is much less likely to get debris in it and if it were to, the wide thick seal is far more likely to actually still seal.  On 2019-06-17 10:29 p.m., opusnz@... [origamiboats] wrote:   I have my fuel fill in the cockpit and my water fill on deck near the mast.  I wouldn't put either of them on the side decks since I have had water over the deck for days at a time.  If there isn't a perfect seal, you would eventually end up with water in the tanks.  The same goes  for the vents. Posted by: opusnz@... | 35988|35988|2019-06-18 05:11:17|Alex Bar|Modern origami design|Does anybody know about modern origami yacht design?Alex| 35989|35931|2019-06-18 14:53:26|brentswain38|Re: Engine install|My autohelm 800 ran my trim tab well for decades. When it crapped out, I found Raymarine had bough them out,  and were my only option.So I bought a Raymarine 1000. The engineers had redesigned it , fixed what was not broke, making it far more complex to use, and nowhere near as reliable. If it aint broke ,don't fix it  is beyond their "make work for themselves" ethic.Its a piece of crap, compared to my old autohelm.For the wheel pilots, some have improved them by cutting up an old drive belt, into 6 inch pieces,  and gluing the drum. That makes it a syncro mesh arrangement ,the teeth on the drive belt going into  the teeth on the drum, eliminating slippage, and reducing wear drastically .One would think their "highly qualified engineers" would have figured that out long ago.No, it takes a cruiser to figure that out.Then ,there are always those who pay someone with no boat building ,cruising, living aboard, and long term boat maintenance experience ,$175 an hour, to give them advice on the above subjects ,only due to their self promotion ability.For what it is worth, the same goes for Autohelm/ Raymarine wheel pilots.   The ones that use a ram below are just passable but the kind that have a round hoop gear mechanism that bolts to a wheel are incredibly unreliable.  Their plastic parts, crappy connectors and crappy belts wear out in no time and they have caused no end or trouble and heartache for people that choose to rely on them in real world, offshore conditions.  These things have been absolute pieces of shit for many years yet you will never get a saleman or "qualified" repairman to admit it....they will always blame the boat or the installation and then happily sell you a bill for their parts so you can just burn it up or break it again.  Raymarine should be ashamed of themselves.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :The kind of "Engineers" my  critics say we should all put blind faith in, rather than trust more practical, logical people, without the "knows it all" paper hanging on their wall. May they all buy Yanmar mounts, may they all fail, and leave their ":engineered" engines rolling in their bilges!Oh ya!And may the fleas of a thousand  camels nest in their armpits, and may a buffalo in heat find them in his hour of need!---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Yanmar has making and selling those same shitty engine mounts for many decades.  Either their engineers have learned nothing over the years or the company loves to make the money from their parts sales and doesn't give a damn about reliability for their customers.   My vote is the latter.As someone who worked in aviation for many years, I know it would never be allowed on airplanes.| 35990|35983|2019-06-18 15:01:46|brentswain38|Re: Water and Fuel| I have been putting them at the back of the cockpit, 1 1/2 inch sch 40 SS pipes , tall enough to clear  the top of the cockpit locker .Then I run the hoses either  side of the engine into the tanks.I have put them thru the wheelhouse top ,along the  corner the aft quarter berth cabin.I once read of a couple off a lee shore in Central  America. They were motoring off,  low on fuel, and worried about running out, but there was so much water on deck, that they dared not try filing their tanks from jerry cans, as they only had flush fittings on their fuel fills, an insane way to do fuel fills. I prefer SS stand pipes near the centreline, with no chance of going under in a knock down.( The kind of thing  armchair designers with  no cruising experience  cant be expected to  understand.) ---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :I am looking for ideas about the best place to put the diesel fuel fill nozzle and the water. BS36 twin keel with internal tank.Aaron in Alaska| 35991|35931|2019-06-18 15:24:56|brentswain38|Re: Engine install|Great post Paul. You nailed it. I see many examples.On other sites I see a steady stream of problems listed for  roller furlers costing thousands of dollars, due to extreme and useless complexity "Engineered" into them , which  my $80 furler simply cant have, and never have had,  in over 37 years of use, due to its simplicity. No bearings to bind. Hard to get a 5/8th ID pipe to bind on a 5/16th stay. No halyard swivels to bind , Cant happen if you don't have or  need a swivel .No separation of sections on a one piece.Hard to  justify charging thousand of dollars for something simple,so they "engineer" greater complexity into them , both to up the price, and to discourage people from simplifying them, and making their  own.Ditto blocks, anchor winches, etc, etc.I see Lewmar rates their $40  sheet blocks at 900 lbs . I just  broke a piece of new line rated at 2700 lbs, with  one of my $2 blocks. Plan to try it with one rated at 3700 lbs then 6500 lbs. I think the $2 block will have no problem with them. Ditto anchor winches, self steering, etc,  etc, the list goes on. Giving this kind of info gets me banned on other sites, as  their sponsors don't want consumers to have this kind of info  competing  with their bullshit.Sorry, but I don't buy it.   I certainly don't blame engineers for everything that goes wrong but when a company has been doing something wrong for over 30+ years, everybody is to blame.  Management is certainly to blame for their business decisions but the engineers who both failed to do a good design in the first place or failed to communicate to management that things needed to be improved and changed are at fault too.It is only because they are selling to retail customers who are ignorant (being swayed by glossy advertisements) or powerless (due to no organization) that companies like Yanmar or Raymarine get away with such shitty designs.  If their customers were commercial operators who depend on reliability to make a living or were in aviation, they would have been held to account long ago.  Instead the same crap comes out year after year and the only thing that changes is the color of the ribbon tied around the pile of shit.I blame the yachtie magazines too....they will never say something is bad if it is comes from a key advertiser.    They are full of bad advice and what they typically say is suitable for offshore sailing is an absolute joke.  All they are interested in doing is selling gear.| 35992|35988|2019-06-19 17:11:02|Alex Bar|Re: Modern origami design|So,it seems that there are no other origami yachts except Brent Swain one's. Is that possible? Nobody else tried to take advantage of the origami quick method?!? Unbelievable! Why?Il giorno mar 18 giu 2019 alle ore 11:11 Alex Bar ha scritto: Does anybody know about modern origami yacht design?Alex | 35993|35988|2019-06-19 18:13:26|Yves-Marie R. de Tanton|Re: Modern origami design|Hello. You might want to check the following. www.tantonyachtdesign.blogspot.com Under search. Type: Inquiring mind wants to know. Sincerely, Y-M T -----Original Message----- From: Alex Bar alebarale33@... [origamiboats] To: origamiboats Sent: Wed, Jun 19, 2019 5:11 pm Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Modern origami design   So,it seems that there are no other origami yachts except Brent Swain one's. Is that possible? Nobody else tried to take advantage of the origami quick method?!? Unbelievable! Why? Il giorno mar 18 giu 2019 alle ore 11:11 Alex Bar ha scritto: Does anybody know about modern origami yacht design? Alex #ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 -- #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194hd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 0;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ads {margin-bottom:10px;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ad {padding:0 0;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ad p {margin:0;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ad a {color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194hd {margin:10px 0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194actions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194activity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194activity span {font-weight:700;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194activity span:first-child {text-transform:uppercase;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194activity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194activity span span {color:#ff7900;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194activity span .ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194underline {text-decoration:underline;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 .ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194attach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 .ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194attach div a {text-decoration:none;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 .ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194attach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 .ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194attach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 .ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194attach label a {text-decoration:none;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 4px;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 .ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194bold {font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 .ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194bold a {text-decoration:none;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 dd.ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194last p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 dd.ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194last p span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 dd.ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194last p span.ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194yshortcuts {margin-right:0;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 div.ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194attach-table div div a {text-decoration:none;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 div.ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194attach-table {width:400px;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 div.ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194file-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 div.ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194file-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 div.ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194file-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 div.ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194file-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 div.ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194photo-title a, #ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 div.ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194photo-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 div.ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194photo-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 div.ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 div#ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194yshortcuts {font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 .ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194green {color:#628c2a;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 .ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194MsoNormal {margin:0 0 0 0;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 o {font-size:0;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194photos div div {border:1px solid #666666;min-height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194photos div label {color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194reco-category {font-size:77%;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 .ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194replbq {margin:4px;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-actbar div a:first-child {margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 input, #ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 textarea {font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-mlmsg pre, #ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 code {font:115% monospace;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-mlmsg * {line-height:1.22em;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194logo {padding-bottom:10px;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-msg p a {font-family:Verdana;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-msg p#ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194attach-count span {color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194reco-head {color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-reco {margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ov li a {font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ov li {font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ov ul {margin:0;padding:0 0 0 8px;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-text {font-family:Georgia;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-text p {margin:0 0 1em 0;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-text tt {font-size:120%;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194 #ygrps-yiv-1632600455yiv3984183194ygrp-vital ul li:last-child {border-right:none !important;}#ygrps-yiv-1632600455 | 35994|35988|2019-06-19 19:02:20|Matt Malone|Re: Modern origami design| Thank you Yves-Marie Matt From: 'Yves-Marie R. de Tanton' Tantonyachts@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 18:13 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Modern origami design To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   Hello. You might want to check the following. www.tantonyachtdesign.blogspot.com Under search. Type: Inquiring mind wants to know. Sincerely, Y-M T -----Original Message----- From: Alex Bar alebarale33@... [origamiboats] To: origamiboats Sent: Wed, Jun 19, 2019 5:11 pm Subject: [origamiboats] Re: Modern origami design   So,it seems that there are no other origami yachts except Brent Swain one's. Is that possible? Nobody else tried to take advantage of the origami quick method?!? Unbelievable! Why? Il giorno mar 18 giu 2019 alle ore 11:11 Alex Bar ha scritto: Does anybody know about modern origami yacht design? Alex | 35995|35988|2019-06-19 20:17:26|opuspaul|Re: Modern origami design|There was this one, but I never heard what happened to it since the website hasn't been updated for years.   http://www.origamimagic.com/Click the link to designs.   I think a couple of the 50 footers were built.| 35996|35988|2019-06-19 20:27:15|opuspaul|Re: Modern origami design|Modern shapes are possible.   It is not that hard to come up with a long and lean canoe shaped hull.  I was playing around myself when with some ideas and came up with a 48 foot hull.  A few sketches here:https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/origamiboats/files/Paul%20Wilson%27s%20File/---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :There was this one, but I never heard what happened to it since the website hasn't been updated for years.   http://www.origamimagic.com/Click the link to designs.   I think a couple of the 50 footers were built.| 35997|35988|2019-06-19 20:33:21|opuspaul|Re: Modern origami design|Besides all that, is the 36 fin and skeg arrangement really that old school?  If you want a good, fast offshore design that can also carry a load, what would you want to change?---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :Modern shapes are possible.   It is not that hard to come up with a long and lean canoe shaped hull.  I was playing around myself when with some ideas and came up with a 48 foot hull.  A few sketches here:https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/origamiboats/files/Paul%20Wilson%27s%20File/---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote :There was this one, but I never heard what happened to it since the website hasn't been updated for years.   http://www.origamimagic.com/Click the link to designs.   I think a couple of the 50 footers were built.| 35998|35988|2019-06-19 20:34:56|Matt Malone|Re: Modern origami design| That appears to be a hard chine, many-plate without-frame design.   I was tempted to assemble a small boat in this way.  Note the alignment tabs the hold the abutting plates edge to edge.  That is way more welding than a Brent boat, but, the shape can be anything.  The photo shows only tension cables and chains holding the shape.   One is certain to install something inside... it would be so.much easier to build that and tack plates to it. It is a frame-less build.  It does not appear to be an origami in the same sense as Brent's or the designs shown on the Tanton website. Matt From: opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 20:17 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Modern origami design To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   There was this one, but I never heard what happened to it since the website hasn't been updated for years.   http://www.origamimagic.com/ Click the link to designs.   I think a couple of the 50 footers were built. | 35999|35988|2019-06-19 22:54:20|opuspaul|Re: Modern origami design|It definitely borrows from Brent's ideas since each hull side comes from a large flat sheet.   For practical reasons, the large flat sheet is pieced together from smaller sheets on the flat.    The double chine makes for a lot more welding and complication but it still beats building a conventionally framed boat by a mile.  There are a series of construction photos if you click "site map" on the left hand side of the page.  Unfortunately, they aren't in order but you get the idea.Maybe Brent knows what happened to the boat.....I am curious.---In origamiboats@yahoogroups.com, wrote : That appears to be a hard chine, many-plate without-frame design.   I was tempted to assemble a small boat in this way.  Note the alignment tabs the hold the abutting plates edge to edge.  That is way more welding than a Brent boat, but, the shape can be anything.  The photo shows only tension cables and chains holding the shape.   One is certain to install something inside... it would be so.much easier to build that and tack plates to it. It is a frame-less build.  It does not appear to be an origami in the same sense as Brent's or the designs shown on the Tanton website. Matt From: opusnz@... [origamiboats] Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 20:17 Subject: Re: [origamiboats] Re: Modern origami design To: origamiboats@yahoogroups.com   There was this one, but I never heard what happened to it since the website hasn't been updated for years.   http://www.origamimagic.com/ Click the link to designs.   I think a couple of the 50 footers were built. | 36000|35988|2019-06-19 23:08:17|opuspaul|Re: Modern origami design|It is amazing what you can do with a flat sheet.   Google "tortured ply boat" and you come up with some interesting designs using thin plywood.   I think quite a few Tornado catamarans were built this way.  If you saw these hulls with their rounded shape, you would have no idea.https://smalltridesign.com/Trimaran-Articles/Construction-Methods/Tortured-Plywood-Hulls.htmlI built an outrigger for a proa using similar methods.  It was a very quick and easy build.   |